US8010511B2 - Content monitoring and compliance enforcement - Google Patents

Content monitoring and compliance enforcement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8010511B2
US8010511B2 US11512073 US51207306A US8010511B2 US 8010511 B2 US8010511 B2 US 8010511B2 US 11512073 US11512073 US 11512073 US 51207306 A US51207306 A US 51207306A US 8010511 B2 US8010511 B2 US 8010511B2
Authority
US
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
content
controlled
embodiments
user
example
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US11512073
Other versions
US20080059426A1 (en )
Inventor
James L. Brock
James E. Pitkow
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Attributor Corp
Original Assignee
Attributor Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/10Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material

Abstract

Responding to a use of controlled content is disclosed. Responding includes receiving an indication of the use of the controlled content including a context of the use of the controlled content, automatically determining using the context an engagement action for responding to the use, and automatically initiating the engagement action.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Content, such as text, images, and video, may be stored and displayed on the Internet. For example, an online service provider (OSP), such as Google or YouTube, may display images as a result of a text based image search or video posted by users. There are many cases in which content on the Internet is being used in a non-compliant way. Non-compliant content may include material that violates third party copyrights or trademarks, is illegal (e.g., child pornography), or otherwise does not comply with a content owner's terms of use or with an OSP policy. Examples of potentially non-compliant use of content include bloggers copying text from news reports, eBay sellers copying other seller's listing content, aggregators republishing listing from other sites, spammers using copyrighted text to create web pages to influence search results and generate advertising revenue, or even innocent/accidental use of non-compliant content by a conscientious consumer.

Content on the Internet is difficult to monitor for compliance. Typically, a content owner manually monitors the Internet for copies of the owner's content through repetitive queries in search engines like Google. In some cases, the use of the owner's content is permissible under their own license terms or under legal principles such as the copyright concept of “fair use,” which considers such factors as whether attribution has been provided, what portion of the content that has been used without permission, and whether the content has been used for commercial purposes (such as generating advertising or subscription revenue). Content owners have no automated methods to evaluate the context in which their content is used by others.

Even when non-compliant use of content is detected, typically it is difficult to remedy. In the case of copyright non-compliance, the content owner's objective usually is to cause the content to be removed from third-party services that host the content or search engines which refer users to it through their indices. This typically is a manual process which involves submitting a notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The DMCA provides OSPs and search engines with a safe harbor from copyright infringement liability if they promptly remove content from their service upon request by the content owner. Therefore, when a content owner finds a copy of his content, he can choose to send a take down notice under DMCA by writing a letter or an email to the OSP or search engine. In response, the OSP or search engine typically must manually remove the content from their service to avoid liability.

From an OSP's perspective, monitoring for content that does not comply with the OSP's host policy is also typically a manual process. When OSPs monitor content as it is uploaded, typically a human views and approves content before (or after) it is displayed and non-compliant content is rejected (or removed). OSPs also must manually review and compare content when they receive DMCA notices, and often have little information to determine if content is out of compliance and no automated way to determine the identity or reputation of the complaining party. As the amount of content on the Internet grows, manual content monitoring and enforcement processes are becoming increasingly impractical. Therefore, improved methods for monitoring content and managing enforcement of non-compliant content are needed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a content monitoring system.

FIG. 2A is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for monitoring content.

FIG. 2B is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for monitoring for use of controlled content.

FIG. 2C is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for evaluating context of a content object.

FIG. 2D is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for monitoring for use of controlled content.

FIG. 2E is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for engaging with a user of non-compliant content.

FIG. 2F is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for displaying compliance information.

FIG. 3 is an example of a graphical user interface (GUI) for providing controlled content.

FIG. 4A is an example of a GUI for providing controlled content.

FIG. 4B is an example of a GUI for providing usage rules.

FIG. 5 is an example of a GUI for displaying search results.

FIG. 6 is an example of a GUI for displaying use of a content object.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a composition of matter, a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or communication links. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. A component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task includes both a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.

A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a content monitoring system. In some embodiments, content monitoring system 100 is used by a content owner to monitor for non-compliant use of the content owner's content based on usage rules specified by the content owner. Examples of content owners include: a photographer (e.g., Ansel Adams), a film studio (e.g., Disney), or a columnist (e.g., Walter Mossberg). The content owner is not necessarily the same as the content creator. Usage rules (including usage policies, terms of use, usage terms, etc.) are a set of rules regarding conditions under which content may be used, as specified by the content owner. Usage rules may vary depending on the content and/or the content owner and applicable law (such as “fair use”). Usage rules are more fully described below.

In some embodiments, content monitoring system 100 is used by a content host to monitor for non-compliant use of content based on a host policy specified by the content host. A content host refers to an entity that hosts, serves, stores, provides, and/or displays content. Examples of content hosts include OSPs, such as search engines (e.g., Google), photo or video sharing websites (e.g., YouTube, Yahoo), and blogging sites (e.g., TypePad). As used herein, an OSP is an entity that hosts and/or serves or provides content on behalf of itself or other entities. For example, an OSP includes an OSP as defined under DMCA. An OSP includes an electronic content management system (ECM). A host policy is a set of rules regarding conditions under which content may be hosted, as specified by a content host. A host policy may vary depending on the content host. As an example of a host policy, OSPs may have policies that apply to the posting of content by their users, in which they reserve the right to remove content or users in the event of non-compliance (determined at their discretion). In some embodiments, a configurable host policy governs the automatic handling of DMCA notices, as more fully described below.

A content user is an entity that uses content that is not owned by the content user. A content user includes an entity that owns or posts content. Examples of content users include writers, photographers, bloggers, or any user who posts content on content hosts.

Controlled content refers to content associated with one or more compliance rules, where compliance rules include usage rules specified by a content owner and/or host policy rules specified by a content host. In the case where a content owner is monitoring for use of his content, controlled content is the content owner's content. In the case where a content host is monitoring for non-compliant content, controlled content is content that is non-compliant with the host policy. Monitored content refers to the set of content being searched (i.e., potential matches). In other words, content monitoring system 100 searches monitored content for use of controlled content. As used herein, a match, copy, or use of controlled content does not necessarily refer to an identical match, an identical copy, or use of identical content. A match, copy, or use of controlled content is identified based on criteria such as similarity scores and non-compliance scores, as more fully described below.

Compliant content refers to content that satisfies usage rules associated with the content. In the case where a content host such as an OSP is monitoring for non-compliant content, compliant content refers to content that not only satisfies the usage rules, but also satisfies the host policy of the content host (e.g., the OSP).

As used herein, a unit of content may be referred to as a content object. Content objects can include any object type. Examples of content objects include a text document, an image, video, audio, flash, animation, game, lyrics, code, or portions thereof (e.g., a phrase/sentence/paragraph, a subimage, or a video clip). Other examples include a single file (e.g., an image), all of the text on a web page (e.g., a news article), a chapter in a book, and a blog entry. The content object may be in various audio, image, or video formats, such as MP3, JPEG, MPEG, etc.

Content monitoring system 100 can be used to find copies of a set of content at a given point in time or regularly monitor for matches. Content monitoring system 100 may be used to monitor data associated with the Internet or any other appropriate environment in which there is a need to monitor content for compliance. Examples of appropriate environments include the Internet, an Intranet, a firewalled network, a private network, an Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) network, an ad hoc network, etc.

As shown, user 102 provides input to ingestor 104. Ingestor 104 provides input to subscriber database 105, content database 108, and crawler 112. Reporter 110 receives input from subscriber database 105 and content database 108. Crawler 112 provides input to digester 114. Digester 114 provides input to content database 108, controlled content store 116, and monitored content store 118. Matching engine 120 provides input to controlled content store 116 and monitored content store 118. Content database 108 interacts with matching engine 120.

Content ingestor 104 accepts controlled content from user 102. User 102 includes content owners or administrators of content monitoring system 100. The content may be specified in various ways. A user interface (UI) may be provided for user 102 to specify content. In some embodiments, the UI provides an interface for uploading content or specifying a link/set of links to the content, where the links may be local (e.g., on a local hard drive) or remote (e.g., on a remote server or on the Internet). An example of a remote link is a user's eBay account. User 102 may display, in his eBay store, images to be monitored. For example, user 102 is a photographer selling his photography. Using the UI, user 102 specifies a URL to the eBay store or particular auction. In some embodiments, instead of providing a URL to a particular auction, the content owner provides their username (such as an eBay seller ID), which allows the system to retrieve all of the user-posted content associated with that username, which could be associated with one or more auctions. In some embodiments, the content owner also provides a password if necessary or expedient to locate user-posted content. In some embodiments, a schedule for fetching content may be specified. For example, crawler 112 may be configured to fetch images from the user's eBay store every 24 hours. The raw content is passed to digester 114 for processing and storage.

In some embodiments, the ingesting of content is automatically triggered by content creation. For example, when a blogger posts a new entry, it is automatically ingested. When a writer updates a Word document, the content is automatically ingested.

In some embodiments, if the URL or username provided by the content owner contains some content of third parties, the user is presented with a means to exclude or include specific content objects (such as a single image) from monitoring and from the content owner's usage rules.

The controlled content may be from the Internet or from another source. A manual or automated API may be used to ingest content or perform any of the other processes described herein. A URL or any other appropriate identifier may be used to specify content. Credentials associated with accessing the content, such as a password, may be provided.

Besides controlled content, other data may be provided as input to content monitoring system 100, such as links (e.g., URLs or websites) identified by an administrator, content host, or content owner. These sites may have been identified because the user is aware of a specific instance of non-compliance at that location, they have historically posted non-compliant content or are of particular concern to the user. Other examples of additional data that may be input to content monitoring system 100 are more fully described below.

Crawler 112 fetches content from the network. The content to be fetched may include the Internet, a subset of the Internet, a complete domain, or a single piece of content from the web. Identifiers may be used to identify the content to be fetched. Some examples of identifiers include: a URL, a directory, a password protected website(s), all items for a seller on eBay, and all content of a given type or format (e.g., images only or JPEGs only). In some embodiments, crawler 112 is used with modules that provide different rules for crawling. In some embodiments, crawler 112 fetches content according to a specified schedule.

Controlled content store 116 includes controlled content. In some embodiments, controlled content store 116 includes the following information: a copy of the content, an index of fingerprints associated with the content, and metadata about the content (e.g., filename, URL, fetch date, etc.). In some embodiments, the copy of the content is stored in a separate cache. A fingerprint includes a signature of an object that can be used to detect a copy of an object as a whole or in part. A content object may have more than one fingerprint. A fingerprint may be associated with more than one content object. A fingerprint may be associated with a whole or part of a content object. A fingerprint may be multidimensional. For example, there may be multiple features associated with a fingerprint. A fingerprint may contain multiple fingerprints or sub fingerprints.

Monitored content store 118 is a repository for crawled data. Monitored content store 118 may include any digital object collection or environment. In some embodiments, monitored content store 118 is a web store. In some embodiments, there are multiple content stores, e.g., one for each kind of data—text, images, audio, video, etc. In some embodiments, monitored content store 118 includes data from sites that copy the most often, and is updated most frequently. This data may be indicated as such (i.e., tagged or flagged as common copier) or stored separately. In some embodiments, a real-time store (not shown) is used to store various feeds coming in (e.g., from a content owner's blog each time the blog is updated, or from a content owner's eBay store every 24 hours). In some embodiments, a ping server or similar server is used to update feeds coming in. If the feeds contain links, the content is fetched by crawler 112. Over time, data moves from the real-time store to monitored content store 118 as it becomes older. Monitored content store 118 changes periodically, whereas the real-time store keeps changing as content comes in. In some embodiments, external stores (not shown), such as search engines, are accessed using application programming interfaces (APIs). Once data is fetched, they are stored in monitored content store 118. Some embodiments of this are more fully described below. In some embodiments, fingerprints of content are stored in monitored content store 118. In some embodiments, Gigablast is used to fetch and store content data.

Digester 114 receives content fetched by crawler 112, including controlled content or monitored content, analyzes, and processes it. Analysis of content is more fully described below. The content and associated metadata is stored in controlled content store 116 or monitored content store 118, as described above.

In some embodiments, matching engine 120 finds matches to controlled content by comparing controlled content from controlled content store 116 with monitored content from monitored content store 118 based on matching techniques including technical factors, compliance factors, and other factors, as more fully detailed below.

Reporter 110 reports match results to user 102 or an administrator of content monitoring system 100. Various user interfaces may be used. Examples of reporting and UIs for reporting results are more fully described below.

Subscriber database 106 contains information about customers. Content database 108 contains references to controlled content and to matched content corresponding to the controlled content. In some embodiments, a separate database is used for matched content.

In some embodiments, content monitoring system 100 is used as a content clearinghouse by content users wishing to use content. Before using a particular content object (i.e., unit of content), the content user checks with content monitoring system 100 to determine whether the conditions under which the content user wishes to the use the content complies with the usage policy set by the content owner.

Content monitoring system 100 may be implemented in various ways in various embodiments. For example, controlled content, web data, subscriber data, and/or content data may be organized and stored in one or more databases. Ingesting, crawling, digesting, matching, and/or reporting may be performed using one or more processing engines.

In some embodiments, any of the functions provided by content monitoring system 100, such as ingesting, crawling, digesting, matching, and reporting, may be provided as a web service. For example, content monitoring system 100 or an element of content monitoring system 100 is queried and provides information via XML.

FIG. 2A is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for monitoring content. In some embodiments, this process is performed when a content owner is searching or monitoring for non-compliant use of the his controlled content. In some embodiments, this process is performed by content monitoring system 100.

In the example shown, the process begins at 202, and controlled content is specified. Controlled content may include text, images, video, or any other type of data. Controlled content may be specified in various ways, such as content located in a particular directory and/or all content contributed by a particular user (e.g., on eBay). A user (e.g., a content owner or an administrator) may specify controlled content using any appropriate interface. Examples of graphical user interfaces are described more fully below. The user may also request a one time search or regular monitoring for the controlled content. In the case of the latter, the user may specify options related to regular monitoring, such as frequency of monitoring, how often reports should be received, etc.

At 203, usage rules are specified. Usage rules include conditions under which a content owner permits the use of owned content. Usage rules may include terms under which a content owner permits the republication and/or modification of content. Usage rules may include different conditions depending on whether the use is for commercial or non-commercial uses, business or education uses, with or without attribution, in a limited amount, in a limited context, etc. The usage rules may be based on any appropriate compliance structure, such as “fair use,” “copy left,” “share alike,” Creative Commons specified structures, user specific compliance rules, rules against associating the controlled content with objectionable content (e.g., obscenity, adult content, child pornography), rules requiring attribution, moral rights, rights of personality, or any legal or personal compliance structure. A usage rule may take into account editorial context. In other words, certain uses may be permitted that are not permitted in another context. For example, if the controlled content object is a book, portions from the book may be permitted to be used in a book review but not in another context (where other rules may apply).

A variety of user interfaces may be used to specify usage rules. For example, a list of terms, checkboxes (to apply a rule), and settings (specific to a rule) may be provided. The list may include, for example: whether attribution is required, amount of duplication allowed, whether commercial use is allowed, whether changes are allowed, whether permission is required, whether derivative content is allowed, geographical requirements, whether the owner requires advertisement revenue sharing (e.g., using Google AdSense) and associated terms and information, etc. The usage rules may be hierarchical. For example, a list of higher level rules or compliance structures may be displayed for selection, each of which may be expanded to display lower level rules that each of the high level rules comprises. Usage rules may have any number of levels. Checkboxes (or another appropriate object) may be located next to the higher level or lower level rules and may be selected (e.g., checked off) at any level of granularity. For example, selecting checkboxes next to a higher level rule automatically selectes all corresponding lower level rules. Alternatively, lower level rules may be individually selected. An example of a higher level rule is a particular type of license. Lower level rules under the license include the specific usage rules associated with the license.

Usage rules may be customized for each content owner (and for each content object). In some embodiments, a unique URL is provided to the content owner for his use (e.g., to include as a link associated with an icon placed in proximity to his content on his website, in his eBay store, etc.) When a content user wishes to use content on the content owner's website, the content user can then select the link, which leads to a page describing the content owner's usage rules (for that content object).

In some embodiments, rather than providing a unique URL to the content owner, the content owner could use a particular URL on his website or web page. For example, the particular URL could be “rules.attributor.com.” When a content user wishes to use content on the content owner's website, the content user can select the link, which leads to a page describing the content owner's usage rules (for the website or content on the website). In this case, the content monitoring system determines from which website the link was selected and can determine which usage rules to display. In some embodiments, the same URL is common to multiple content owner's websites. Further examples are discussed below.

Usage rules may be stored in the content monitoring system. For example, the usage rules for content owners may be stored in controlled content store 116 (e.g., as metadata associated with the content object) or in subscriber database 106.

At 204, controlled content is acquired. In some embodiments, 204 is performed by ingestor 104 in system 100. In various embodiments, controlled content is obtained from a source specified at 202. For example, controlled content is obtained from a particular directory or from one or more servers containing content contributed by a particular user. Controlled content acquisition may be automated or non-automated. For example, an automated process could poll for updates and acquire controlled content when an update is detected. In some embodiments, a ping server is used to detect updates. In some embodiments, controlled content is continuously acquired or ingested. For example, if the controlled content is specified as all content contributed by a particular user on eBay, then when the user contributes new content to eBay, that content is automatically acquired or acquired at configured times or time intervals. A variety of APIs may be used to acquire controlled content. In some embodiments, after controlled content is acquired, the user is given an opportunity to confirm that it is the correct controlled content or the controlled content the user intended. The acquisition of controlled content may involve any network, protocol (e.g., UDP, TCP/IP), firewall, etc.

At 206, controlled content is analyzed. In some embodiments, 206 is performed by digester 114 in system 100. In some embodiments, the acquired content is analyzed for unique identifying features. Any appropriate technique may be used to extract features from the content. For example, a fingerprint associated with the content may be determined. The technique may depend on the media type (e.g., spectral analysis for audio/video, histogram or wavelets for images/video, etc.) For example, in the case of text content, various techniques may be used, such as unique phrase extraction, word histograms, text fingerprinting, etc. An example is described in T. Hoad and J. Zobel, “Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents,” in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Volume 54, Issue 3, 2003. In the case of image content, various techniques may be used, including key point identification, color histograms, texture extraction, image signatures, or extraction of any other feature. An example is described in Y. Ke, R. Sukthankar, and L. Houston, “Efficient near-duplicate detection and sub-image retrieval,” in ACM Multimedia. ACM, October 2004, pp. 1150-1157. In the case of video content, a video fingerprinting technique may be used. In another example, a signature is formed for each clip by selecting a small number of its frames that are most similar to a set of random seed images, as further described in S.-C. Cheung, A. Zakhor, “Efficient Video Similarity Measurement with Video Signature,” Submitted to IEEE Trans. on CSVT, January, 2002. In the case of audio content, an audio fingerprinting technology may be used. For example, a spectral signature is obtained and used as input to a hash function. In various embodiments, other techniques may be used. Analyzing may include determining spectral data, wavelet, key point identification, or feature extraction associated with the controlled content. In some embodiments, results from the analysis are stored in controlled content store 116 in system 100.

At 208, monitored content is searched for use of controlled content. In some embodiments, monitored content is specified by a user, such as a content owner or administrator. The entire web may be searched, or a subset of the web (e.g., websites that have been identified as sites that copy the most often or data in a content store such as monitored content store 118). A database of sites that have been crawled and resulting data may be maintained that is updated at various times. Rather than searching the entire web, the database may be used instead. Searching may comprise a combination of searching the web and consulting a database of previously crawled websites. In some embodiments, monitored content store 118 in system 100 stores previously crawled websites. In some embodiments, 208 is performed by crawler 112 in system 100.

Searching may be performed in one or more stages, each stage refining the search further. For example, a first search may yield a first set of candidate content objects. A second search searches the first set of candidate content objects to yield a second set of content objects, and so forth. Eventually, the final set of content object(s) includes the content object(s) that match or most closely match the controlled content object. In some embodiments, less expensive and/or less complex techniques may be used to obtain candidate sets followed by one or more tighter, smaller granularity techniques to progressively enhance the resolution of the analysis. Which techniques may be used and in which order may be determined based on cost and/or complexity. In some embodiments, the second search comprises a manual search. For example, the second set of content objects may be a smaller set and may be searched by a human.

In some embodiments, a hash structure is used to obtain a candidate set of content objects. For example, a hash table is maintained such that similar content objects are hashed to the same or a nearby location in a hash table. This way, to search for content object A, a hash function associated with A is computed and looked up in a hash table, and a set of objects that are similar to A is obtained. A hash function associated with a content object may be computed in various ways. The hash function may be computed differently depending on the type of content object or one or more characteristics of the content object. For example, if the content object is a text document, a fingerprinting technique specific to text may be used to obtain a fingerprint of the document. The fingerprint may be input to the hash function to obtain a hash value that corresponds to a group of other content objects that have a similar fingerprint. Hash values that are nearby in the hash table correspond to content objects that have similar (though less similar than those in the same hash bin) fingerprints, to create a clustering effect. In this way, a candidate set of content objects may be obtained.

Other techniques such as cosine similarity, latent semantic indexing, keyword based methods, etc., may also be used.

In some embodiments, existing search engines or search facilities on websites, such as eBay, are used to obtain a candidate set of documents. This approach may be useful in an initial implementation of the system. For example, APIs provided by Google or other search engines may be used to perform this search. For example, to search for a document, a unique phrase within the document is selected. The unique phrase is input to a Google search using a Google API and the results are a candidate set of documents. Multimedia search engines (e.g., video, image) may be used to obtain a candidate set of documents. In the case of images, an image search engine may be used to obtain a candidate set of images. For example, Riya (www.Riya.com) includes an image search engine that may be used to obtain a candidate set.

In some embodiments, besides the Internet, databases may be searched using these techniques. Some examples of databases include Factiva, Corbis, and Hoover's. Although these databases do not allow indexing of their documents, they do have a search interface. This search interface may be used to perform searches for content using unique phrase extraction. For example, articles in the Factiva database containing a unique phrase from a controlled content object are more likely to be a match. A subsequent search may be performed by obtaining the full text of the articles and searching them using more refined techniques. Searching this way limits having to crawl the entire Internet. Also the more computationally intensive search techniques are limited to a smaller search space.

In some embodiments, once a candidate set of content objects is obtained, one or more refining searches are performed. For example, the candidate set of documents are crawled and advanced matching techniques can be applied to the candidate set of documents. A variety of content or document similarity techniques may be used. For example, the techniques described at 206 may be used on the candidate set of content objects.

In the case of text documents, a refining search may comprise computing a signature for each paragraph or other data set. A Levinstein distance could be used to determine the similarity between a document and the controlled content object. A byte by byte comparison could be used. Other techniques, such as anchoring or cosine similarity may be used, as described more fully in T. Hoad and J. Zobel, “Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents,” in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Volume 54, Issue 3, 2003. Techniques such as PCA-sift or feature extraction of color, texture and signature generation may be used. For example, A. C. Popescu and H. Farid, “Exposing Digital Forgeries by Detecting Duplicated Image Regions, Technical Report, TR2004-515, Dartmouth College, Computer Science describes examples of such techniques.

In the case of images, images may be subsampled to be robust against cropping and subimage reuse using techniques such as key pointing (or key point extraction), which looks for unique signatures within a portion of an image, such as edges or extreme color gradations, and samples these portions to obtain a signature. Another way is to subsample distinctive portions of a color histogram of the image.

In some embodiments, different techniques are used depending on characteristics of the content object. For example, if a document has fewer than 20 paragraphs, a byte by byte comparison may be used. If a document has 20 or more paragraphs, a different technique may be used. Sampling and anchoring points may depend on the format of the document.

At 210, use of controlled content is detected. In some embodiments, 210-213 are performed by matching engine 110 in system 100. In some embodiments, detection is based on various criteria associated with technical factors that may result from searching at 208. An example of a technical factor is a similarity score. A similarity score is a measure of the similarity between two content objects and may be computed in a variety of ways. For example, the Levinstein distance is a similarity score. In some embodiments, if similarity scores meet one or more criteria, use of controlled content is detected. The criteria may be configurable by the user or administrator. One or more similarity scores may be computed for a controlled object and candidate object to represent various characteristics of the content. In some embodiments, one or more similarity scores may be weighted and combined into a single similarity score.

A similarity score may account for various degrees of copying. For example, the first and last paragraph of a document may be copied, a portion of a document may be copied, or the whole document may be copied. Different samples of music may be copied into a single audio file. Videos may be mixed from copied videos. One controlled document may have 15 samples, one or more of which may be copied. A similarity score may account for these factors. For example, a copying extent score may be used to indicate the percentage of a controlled content object that has been copied. A copying density score may be used to indicate the percentage of a match that is comprised of a controlled content object.

At 212, a context associated with the use of the controlled content is evaluated. The context refers to any attribute associated with the use of the content object. For example, the context includes compliance factors, technical factors, and reputation information. Context may be automatically and/or manually determined.

Compliance factors are based on usage rules specified by content owners. For example, compliance factors include information related to attribution and commercial context. Examples of compliance factors include whether the site is government, education, commercial, revenue producing, subscription based, advertising supported, or produces revenue in some other way (e.g., using a reputation bartering scheme associated with a compensation mechanism). This can be determined manually or automatically. For example, a human could review the website, or based on the top level domain (e.g., .edu, .com, .org), or the presence of advertising related HTML code, it can be determined whether the website is commercial.

In some embodiments, a non-compliance score is computed to represent the likelihood that a content object is non-compliant based on the compliance factors. In some embodiments, multiple compliance factors are used to determine a non-compliance score. For example, the non-compliance score takes multiple compliance factors, normalizes and weighs each one as appropriate, and takes the sum. In some embodiments, the weighting is based on usage rules and/or host policy rules. In addition an overall weight may be used to scale the non-compliance score. For example, content found on educational sites may be weighted differently. One or more non-compliance scores may be computed.

Besides technical factors and compliance factors, examples of other factors include reputation information. For example, a reputation database is maintained that includes reputation ratings of content users by other content owners. For example, Bob's blog may have a low reputation because it has posted numerous copyrighted content objects owned by others who have given Bob's blog a low reputation rating.

At 213, matching content (i.e., match content object(s)) is identified based on detection at 210 and/or evaluation at 212. As previously described, a match, copy, or use of controlled content does not necessarily refer to an identical match, an identical copy, or use of identical content.

In some embodiments, a match is a technical match and is selected based only on technical factors, such as similarity scores. In this case, technical matches are identified at 210, and at 212, the technical matches are evaluated based on context to determine whether they are compliant.

In other embodiments, a match is selected based on configurable criteria associated with technical factors (e.g., similarity scores), compliance factors (e.g., non-compliance scores), and/or other factors (e.g., reputation information). In some embodiments, it is determined that content objects with one or more similarity scores that exceed a similarity score threshold and one or more non-compliance scores that exceed a non-compliance score threshold are matches. In other words, a content object that is technically similar, but is compliant with applicable usage rules, would not be considered a match. In some embodiments, it is determined that any content object with one or more similarity scores that exceed a similarity score threshold is a match.

In some embodiments, a binary flagging is used. For example, it is determined that content objects with one or more similarity scores that exceed a similarity score threshold and/or one or more non-compliance scores that exceed a non-compliance score threshold are “interesting” and other content objects are “non-interesting.” In some embodiments, “interesting” content objects are reported to the user at 214.

At 214, content is reported to the user (e.g., content owner). In some embodiments, which content to report is configurable and may depend on criteria based on technical factors (e.g., similarity scores), compliance factors (e.g., non-compliance scores), and/or other factors (e.g., reputation information). In some embodiments, matching content as identified at 213 is reported to the user. In some embodiments, a user views and manually confirms whether each matching content object is non-compliant. The results may be stored in a common database.

In some embodiments, 214 is performed by reporter 110 in system 100. Various interfaces could be used. Screenshots, links, buttons, tabs, etc. may be organized in any appropriate fashion. In some embodiments, a user interface is presented to the user that shows the matching content, one or more similarity scores, and one or more non-compliance scores. Example interfaces for reporting results are more fully described below.

In some embodiments, the interface provides a way for the user to confirm that content is the user's content or reject the content (i.e., indicate a false positive). This data may be fed back into the monitoring process. For example, this information may be stored in a database or with the content metadata. In some embodiments, the interface provides choices of actions for the user to select from (e.g., ask that the reusing party attributes it, offer license/licensing terms, remove under DMCA, etc.).

In some embodiments, 214 is not performed and the process continues at 216.

At 216, the user of the content is engaged. In some embodiments, user contact information is obtained from the IP address, the U.S. Copyright Office (e.g., a designated agent registered with the U.S. Copyright Office), or a known email address (e.g., of an OSP or a user of an OSP). A database or lookup table of contact information associated with various sites may be maintained and used to determine user contact information.

Depending on configuration settings, various types of communication may be sent to the content user. For example, a DMCA notice, information concerning usage rules, licensing information, etc. may be sent. For example, the content owner may have specified one or more usage rules associated with his content, such as “do not license any content,” “replace content with an advertisement,” “add watermark to content,” “add Unicode overlay,” “share advertisement revenue,” or “ask permission prior to use.” Based on the usage rules, an appropriate communication may be sent to the content user. In some embodiments, the content user is also configured to use the content monitoring system. The content user may have specified a set of compliance rules, such as “automatically debit my account up to $100 per year when licensed content is used,” “offer to share advertising revenue when contacted by content owner,” “remove content when contacted by content owner,” etc. Based on the compliance rules, an appropriate response may be sent back to the content owner. In some embodiments, an engagement communication may be configured to be sent in a way that preserves the anonymity of the sender of the engagement communication (e.g., the content owner, or a content host, as more fully described below).

An example of an engagement communication includes an email that is automatically sent to a content user notifying the user that the content is owned and offering to license it for $9.99 per year, and including a link to the content owner's usage rules hosted by the content monitoring system. The content owner may configure his settings so that the email is not sent to content users whose sites are educational or non-profit or those settings may be default settings if the content owner's usage rules indicate free use by educational or non-profit sites. In response, the content user sends a response agreeing to the terms. The response may be created and/or sent automatically because the content user's compliance rules indicate the following rule: “automatically debit my account up to $100 per year when licensed content is used.” The response may be sent manually, or the user may approve an automatically created response before it is sent.

In some embodiments, a series of communications may occur between the content user and content owner. On the content user and/or the content owner's side, the responses may be automatic. In this way, licensing terms can be negotiated and/or steps can be taken towards resolution.

In some embodiments, compensation is not necessarily monetary. For example, the content owner may just want to receive attribution, license revenue or advertising revenue sharing may be donated to charitable or other causes as directed by the content owner or may be treated as a credit towards a trade (e.g., if you use my content, I can use your content), or the content owner may require that the content and derivative works be presented in a manner that enables tracking of the number of uses or views of the content, or that derivative works must be available for use by others under specified usage rules.

In some embodiments, whenever new controlled content is provided, processes 202-206 are performed. In some embodiments, every prespecified search interval, processes 208-213 are performed. In some embodiments, every prespecified report interval, 214 is performed. For example, an email may be sent to the user indicating that new matches have been found, and a link to the web interface provided in the email message. In some embodiments, 214 is performed each time a user logs into the content monitoring system. In some embodiments, 208-213 are performed when a user logs into the content monitoring system, either automatically, or after a user selects an “update results” or “search” button upon logging in.

In some embodiments, the number of accesses to a controlled content object is tracked. For example, the content is associated with a web beacon or other element of code that enables the tracking of accesses of the content for purposes such as calculation of license fees or revenue sharing.

FIG. 2B is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for monitoring for use of controlled content. In some embodiments, this process is performed when a content host, such as an OSP, is searching or monitoring for non-compliant use of content based on a host policy of the content host. Thus, the controlled content in this case is non-compliant content based on a host policy. In some embodiments, this process is performed by content monitoring system 100.

At 230, a host policy is specified. For example, an OSP may have a policy regarding what comprises non-compliant content. Non-compliant content may include material that violates third party copyrights or trademarks, is illegal (e.g., child pornography) or does not comply with an OSP's terms of service (e.g., adult content, pornography, obscenity). A host policy may include host rules that may be associated with any compliance structure, such as host specific compliance rules, rules against objectionable content (e.g., obscenity, adult content, child pornography), or any legal or personal compliance structure. A host policy may specify that content must comply with usage rules specified by the content owner, such as “copy left,” “share alike,” Creative Commons specified structures, etc.

A variety of user interfaces may be used to specify a host policy. For example, any of the user interfaces described at 203 for specifying usage rules may be used to specify a host policy. For example, a list of terms, checkboxes (to apply a rule), and settings (specific to a rule) may be provided. The list may include, for example: whether pornography is allowed, whether profanity is allowed, whether to comply with one or more usage rules, whether to comply with copyright or other legal structures, etc. The rules may be hierarchical. For example, a list of higher level rules or compliance structures may be displayed for selection, each of which may be expanded to display lower level rules that each of the high level rules comprises. Rules may have any number of levels. Checkboxes (or another appropriate object) may be located next to the higher level or lower level rules and may be selected (e.g., checked off) at any level of granularity.

At 232, content is monitored for use of controlled content. In this case, the monitored content comprises the content hosted by the content host (e.g., the content served by the OSP). In some embodiments, monitoring comprises checking each content object before it is hosted (or served) by the OSP. For example, an OSP such as youtube.com may check each video before it is made available for viewing on youtube.com. In some embodiments, monitoring comprises periodically checking content objects served by the OSP. For example, a new video is made available for viewing immediately after being posted, but the video may later be removed by a monitoring process that checks new content objects. If the video is determined to be non-compliant, it is removed and the video owner is optionally notified. The results of the check are stored in a database so that the video does not need to be checked again unless it is modified.

In some embodiments, if information obtained from the database is not enough to determine whether the content is compliant, an evaluation is performed, where the evaluation can include techniques described at 212. The evaluation may also include techniques used to detect objects or characteristics of objects in an image, such as faces, body parts, the age of a person being depicted, etc. Such techniques may be useful to detect pornography or child pornography, for example. The evaluation results may then be stored in the database.

Examples of monitoring are more fully described below with respect to FIG. 2D.

In some embodiments, a common pool of objectionable content is maintained based on input from multiple content hosts. For example, the common pool may include content that has been identified by various content hosts as containing pornography, child pornography, profanity, or racial content. Depending on the compliance rules specified in their host policies, an OSP may have an interest in contributing to, sharing, and using the common pool to identify objectionable content and remove or reject it.

For example, an OSP such as eBay may desire to monitor content posted by its users. An eBay employee manually performs simple filtering for adult content. Each time the eBay employee flags an object as “adult content,” that object is acquired by the content monitoring system and becomes part of a common pool of objectionable controlled content.

Content in the objectionable database may also be stored with a certainty rating. For example, the greater number of times the content object has been identified as violating a rule, the greater the certainty rating. In some embodiments, for each content object in the objectionable database, data is maintained regarding each usage/compliance rule that it violates. For example, content object 10034 may be non-compliant with rules 4, 7, and 112, but not other rules. This information may be stored in a table, metadata associated with content object 10034, or in any other appropriate way.

In some embodiments, if the content is being monitored for by a user at 202-213, data from that process may be re-used at 232. For example, similarity, compliance, and other factors may be determined based on data already obtained at 202-213. Additional compliance factors that take into account the host policy may also be determined and used.

At 234, content is reported. In some embodiments, which content to report is configurable and may depend on criteria based on technical factors (e.g., similarity scores), compliance factors (e.g., non-compliance scores), and/or other factors (e.g., reputation information) as described at 214. Content reported may include content determined to be non-compliant based on the host policy. Content reported may also include notices received from content owners who believe the content host is using their content in a non-compliant way.

For example, a web interface may be provided for viewing and managing reported content. In some embodiments, the web interface allows the host to track and manage past and/or pending engagement notices. The web interface includes information about matching content, reputation information, similarity scores, non-compliance scores, link(s) to usage rules associated with the content object, and any other appropriate information. Reputation information could be related to the content owner, e.g., how reputable the content owner is. For example, the content owner may not actually be the content owner, but a scam artist or spammer who has sent thousands of notices. On the other hand, a reputable content owner may have only sent 3 notices in the past year. In some embodiments, reputation is based on ratings by other content users, content hosts, and/or other users of the content monitoring system. For example, content users who have dealt with a particular content owner and felt that he was legitimate may have given him good reputation ratings. In some embodiments, APIs to the content monitoring system are provided to the OSP for managing notices and responding.

At 236, the report is responded to. In some embodiments, an automatic response is sent according to rules set by the OSP. For example, whenever the OSP receives a DMCA notice from a content owner with a reputation rating above a specified value, it automatically takes down the image. In another example, whenever a child pornography match is made with a similarity score above 90 and a non-compliance score above 80, an email is sent to the user and if no response is received within a set period of time, the content is removed. In some embodiments, an OSP administrator manually reviews each content match and selects a response for each content match.

Besides a common pool of objectionable content, various common/collaborative pools of data may be maintained. Other examples of common pools of data include reputation of content owners, reputation of content users, reputation of content hosts, content known to be in the public domain, sites known to copy the most often, etc. These common pools may be contributed to by content owners (e.g., end users), content hosts (e.g., an employee on an OSP's content review team), legal experts, experts in “fair use,” other reputable entities, results from previous detection results (e.g., false positives), etc. APIs or other interfaces may be provided to assist with flagging content for inclusion in these pools. These common pools of data may then be accessed and used during the monitoring process (e.g., during 202-216 or 231-232).

For example, a negation database be maintained that includes content that is known to be in the public domain, content that has expired or lapsed in copyright, and/or content that is difficult to claim ownership of, e.g., because it is common, such as disclaimers and copyright notices. Any content in the negation database is designated as compliant.

FIG. 2C is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for evaluating context of a content object. In some embodiments, this process is used to perform 212 when the context includes compliance information (e.g., compliance factors). Examples of compliance factors include the presence or absence of advertising on a page containing the content object, whether the page contains paid content, etc. In some embodiments, this process is performed by content monitoring system 100. In some embodiments, this process is performed when a content owner is monitoring for use of his content.

At 240, a detected content object associated with use of controlled content is obtained. In some embodiments, the detected content object is detected based on technical factors, as described at 210.

At 242, usage rules associated with the controlled content are obtained. In some embodiments, the usage rules specified by the content owner at 203 are obtained.

At 246, a usage rule is evaluated against the detected content object. The usage rule may be specified at a high level (e.g., do not permit use on for profit sites, permit use on nonprofit sites) or at lower level (e.g., do not permit use on pages containing advertising, offer to license on pages containing paid content, permit use on sites ending with .edu). For example, it is determined whether the page associated with the content object contains advertising, requires a subscription, contains affiliate links, or contains paid content.

At 248, it is determined whether the usage rule is satisfied. If not, one or more scores are adjusted. For example, a non-compliance score may be increased or decreased as appropriate. At 252, it is determined whether there are additional rules to check. If there are additional rules to check, the process returns to 246. If there are no additional rules to check, one or more scores are provided.

FIG. 2D is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for monitoring for use of controlled content. In some embodiments, this process is performed by content monitoring system 100. In some embodiments, this process is performed when a content host, such as an OSP, is checking for non-compliant use of controlled content. For example, this process may be used to perform 232.

At 260, a content object is received. For example, a user is posting a new content object to an OSP site, and the OSP is receiving the content object for the first time. At 262, a fingerprint of the content object is generated. A fingerprint may be generated, feature(s) may be extracted, or other analysis performed, as described at 206. At 264, the fingerprint (or another analysis result) is checked against a database of known non-compliant (or known compliant) content objects. In some embodiments, the database includes a common pool of content that has previously been identified either manually or automatically as non-compliant or compliant. The content can be looked up by fingerprint or any other appropriate index. At 266, it is determined whether the content object is non-compliant according to the database. If it is non-compliant according to the database, the content object is removed at 272. If it is not non-compliant according to the database, then the content object is evaluated at 268. (In some embodiments, if the content is compliant according to the database, then the content object is approved for posting.) Evaluating may include any of the processes described at 212-213 and/or at 240-256. In some embodiments, evaluating includes notifying the content host (e.g., the OSP) and receiving an evaluation of the content object from the content host. For example, the content host may perform a manual or automatic evaluation. The results of or data from the evaluation is stored in the database with the fingerprint. At 270, it is determined whether the content object is non-compliant according to the evaluation. For example, the determination can be made based on technical factors, compliance factors, or other factors, as previously described. If the content object is non-compliant, the content object is removed at 272. If not, the process ends. In some embodiments, if the content object is not non-compliant, then the content object is approved for posting.

FIG. 2E is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for engaging with a user of non-compliant content. In this example, rather than automatically removing a non-compliant content object, the user may be contacted first. In some embodiments, this process is performed by content monitoring system 100. In some embodiments, this process is used to perform 236 when non-compliant content is found. For example, this process may be performed in place of 272. At 280, a content object is determined to be non-compliant. For example, the determination can be made based on technical factors, compliance factors, or other factors, as previously described. At 282, it is determined whether user contact is requested, which may be a configurable setting. In this example, the user refers to the entity that posted the content on the OSP. If user contact is not requested, then the content object is removed. If user contact is requested, then the user is contacted at 284. For example, the user is notified that the user's content has been identified as non-compliant content and to either take down the content, explain why the content is compliant, or cause the content to be compliant (e.g., based on usage rules for the content). At 286, it is determined whether the content object is in compliance. For example, the user is given a set amount of time to respond, and after that time, an evaluation of whether the content object is in compliance is performed. If it is still not in compliance, the content object is removed. In some embodiments, if it is still not in compliance, the user is notified again, or another appropriate action is taken. If the content object is in compliance, the process ends. In some embodiments, if the content object is now in compliance a database is updated to include this information.

FIG. 2F is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a process for displaying compliance information (e.g., rules) to a content user wishing to use content on a content owner's website (as described at 203). In this example, a content owner has created a web page of his content (e.g., www.example.com) and included on the web page a link that is associated with a server that stores compliance information associated with his content. In some embodiments, the link is a common URL, where the common URL is not unique to the content owner or his web page (e.g., “rules.attributor.com”). At 290, the web page is viewed, e.g., by a potential content user. At 292, the “rules.attributor.com” link is selected. For example, the content user is interested in using the content, and would like to know if there are any usage rules associated with it.

A receiving system (e.g., a server that stores or has access to the compliance information) receives the request for “rules.attributor.com” at 296 and determines the appropriate compliance information at 298. In some embodiments, the compliance information is determined by looking up the web page from which the link was selected (e.g., the content owner's web page) in a table (or other appropriate structure) of compliance information. For example, next to “www.example.com” in the table are usage rules associated with content on www.example.com. In some embodiments, the table includes information about content objects on the web page and associated usage rules. In some embodiments, the server retrieves the content on web page “www.example.com” and looks up associated compliance information based on the retrieved content information. For example, each content object may have a content object ID or fingerprint that may be used to identify it and look up usage rules associated with it. In some embodiments, both the URL “www.example.com” and information associated with the content object (such as a content object ID) are used to obtain the compliance information.

At 299, a web page with the compliance information is returned. At 294, the web page with the compliance information is viewed. For example, the potential content user views the compliance information and can decide whether to use the content.

FIG. 3 is an example of a graphical user interface (GUI) for providing controlled content. In some embodiments, a user uses GUI 300 to specify content to be monitored at 202. As shown, a user can enter a URL or a link to controlled content or upload a file. Any number of content objects can be specified. A username and password to access content can be provided. In some embodiments, a user uses GUI 300 to specify input to ingestor 104 in FIG. 1.

GUI 300 and the other GUIs described herein may vary depending on the embodiment. Which functionality to include and how to present the functionality may vary. For example, which objects (e.g., text, links, input boxes, buttons, etc.) to include and where to place the objects may vary depending on the implementation.

FIG. 4A is an example of a GUI for providing controlled content. In some embodiments, GUI 400 opens in response to selecting a link in GUI 300, such as the “Add Content” button. In some embodiments, a user uses GUI 400 to specify content to be monitored at 202. In some embodiments, a user uses GUI 400 to specify input to ingestor 104 in FIG. 1.

As shown, one or more files may be provided in the “My content” input box. A user can indicate whether the content is a single web page or file or a URL or feed. In the case of the URL or feed, the content includes all existing content plus any new content added in the future. In the “Nickname” input box, the user can specify a nickname for the controlled content. In this way, a user can manage or maintain multiple sets of controlled content using different nicknames.

In some embodiments, a “Sites to watch” input box is provided, in which the user may enter URLs where the user expects the content to appear. For example, the user may currently be aware that a particular site is using the user's content. In some embodiments, the content monitoring system searches the web, but searches the specified sites first or more frequently.

In some embodiments, a “Related Keywords” input box is shown, in which, the user may enter keywords associated with the specified controlled content. For example, if the user expects the content to be found primarily in children's websites, the keywords “kids” and “children” might be included. In some embodiments, the content monitoring system automatically determines keywords (such as unique phrases) to search in addition to the related keywords specified by the user.

In some embodiment, a “Search Scope” input box, is shown, in which the user may specify whether the entire Internet should be searched or only domains specified by the user. In some embodiments, the user may specify to only search sites that copy the most often.

In some embodiments, a “Text” input box is provided, in which text may be entered. The text may be text in the content itself or text associated with the content, such as keywords, tags, depictions of the text (e.g., a photo of a street sign with text), etc. In addition, other search criteria may be specified, including a minimum similarity score, a minimum non-compliance score, a minimum percent of controlled content copied, a minimum percent of text copied, a minimum number of images copied, a minimum percent of match, whether the content is attributed (e.g., to the content owner), whether there is advertising on the page and what type, the minimum number of unique visitors per month, and what types of matches to find (e.g., images only, text only, video only, or combinations, etc.)

FIG. 4B is an example of a GUI for providing usage rules. In some embodiments, GUI 402 is included as part of GUI 400. In some embodiments, GUI 402 opens in response to selecting a link in GUI 400, such as a “Specify Rules of Use” link (not shown in GUI 400). In some embodiments, a user uses GUI 402 to specify usage rules associated with the content specified in GUI 400. In some embodiments, a user uses GUI 402 to specify usage rules at 203.

As shown, a list of usage rules may be selected by selecting bullets and checkboxes. The rules listed in this example include: attribution required/not required; commercial use OK, OK if user shares a specified percentage of the revenue, or no commercial use; limit text copies to a specified percentage of the source (controlled) content; no changes may be made to controlled content; contact content owner first for permission; share alike; a specified Creative Commons license; all rights reserved; or public domain.

Graphical icons are displayed next to each usage rule. For example, “$%” indicates that commercial use is okay if the user shares a specified percentage of the revenue. “By” with a slash through it indicates that attribution is not required. “%” indicates that text copied must be limited to a specified percentage of the controlled content.

A similar GUI may be used to specify host rules for a host policy.

FIG. 5 is an example of a GUI for displaying search results. In some embodiments, GUI 500 is used to report search results at 214, e.g., to a content owner. In some embodiments, reporter 110 in FIG. 1 reports results using GUI 500.

In the example shown, a content owner owns a collection of photography related content, including images of cameras and text descriptions of cameras. The search results are shown in a grid based layout. In each grid cell, a controlled content object and a match content object are shown, where it has been determined that the match content object is similar to the controlled content object based on a similarity score and a non-compliance score. As shown, in grid cell 502, the controlled image (camera1) and the match image (camera2) have a similarity score of 98 and a non-compliance score of 88. In some embodiments, data displayed includes one or more of the following: similarity score, non-compliance score, URL of the match content object, percent of the controlled object copied, percent of the controlled text copied, the number of controlled images copied, the date found, whether there is advertising on the page, etc. In the case of text, a portion of the copied text is displayed along with the controlled text in grid cell 504.

In some embodiments, rather than or in addition to reporting a score, a binary flagging (e.g., “interesting” or not) is reported. For example, a score that aggregates similarity, non-compliance, and/or other factors into a combined/summary score may be displayed.

In some embodiments, if there is more than one matched content object, then the additional matched content objects are displayed using a 3D graphical effect indicating there are multiple pairs. Using forward and back arrows, the user can cycle through the various pairs. In some embodiments, the pairs are displayed in descending similarity score order.

Various other functionality may be provided in GUI 500. For example, the search results may be filtered and sorted in various ways using the “Showing” and “Sort by” pull down menus. Additional controlled content may be added in the “Controlled Content” input box, an email address may be entered for automatic notification (e.g., when more matches are found) in the “Email Address” input box, etc. Rather than use a grid based layout, other layouts may be used in other embodiments.

In the case of a content host monitoring for use of non-compliant content based on the host policy, an interface similar to interface 500 may be used to display resulting matches. For example, cell 502 may display a match with copyrighted content. Cell 504 may display a match with content associated with child pornography. For example, in place of text1 may be a known image that has been positively identified (either manually or automatically) as child pornography, and in place of text2 may be a new image that is being posted by a user to the content host. In this case, the known image in place of text1 may have been in a database of known non-compliant content, and the match determined as described at 264. In some cases, the new image is determined to be a match with child pornography based on an evaluation (e.g., 268) rather than a match with a content object in a database of known pornography. In this case, in place of text1, there may be no image displayed, or data related to the evaluation may be displayed instead.

FIG. 6 is an example of a GUI for displaying use of a content object. In some embodiments, GUI 600 is displayed in response to selecting a “Match” link or the image or text corresponding to a match object in GUI 500.

In the example shown, the portions of the web page that include use of the controlled content are marked, i.e., boxed (e.g., a graphical box around the image or text that is being used). In this example, text1, text3, and photo2 are controlled content objects that are being used on this web page. In various embodiments, various indicators (e.g., visual cues) may be used to indicate the copied portions. Examples of indicators include: highlighting text, changing font appearance (e.g., using bold, underline, different fonts or font sizes, etc.), using different colors, displaying icons or other graphics in the vicinity of the copied portions, using time dependent indicators, such as causing the copied portions to flash, etc.

Various options or functionality may be provided for displaying information related to the use of the controlled content. For example, an archive date (May 31, 2006) may be displayed. Applicable usage rule(s) specified by the content owner may be displayed. In this case, the usage rules are displayed using the icons described with respect to FIG. 4B. When selecting an icon, details regarding the associated usage rule may be displayed.

In some embodiments, the web page shown is the current version of the web page. In some embodiments, the web page shown is an archived version. For example, the archived version may be stored in monitored content store 118. Whether the web page is the current version or an archived version may be indicated in the GUI. In addition, the user may be able to toggle between the two versions.

In some embodiments, a management GUI may be provided for managing content that provides links to one or more of the GUIs described above. In some embodiments, a user uses the management GUI to manage content, including add new controlled content, modify search parameters, report search results, etc. For example, various tabs may be provided, such as a “My Content” tab used to add/modify controlled content and search parameters and a “Matches” tab used to display search results. In some embodiments, selecting the “Matches” tab opens GUI 500.

A user can group content into categories, such as categories associated with the user's blog, camera reviews, the user's eBay account, and all files. In various embodiments, content may be grouped in folders, by tags, or in any other appropriate way. A list of controlled content (e.g., URLs, paths) associated with the category may be displayed, including the number of content objects associated with the controlled content, when the content objects were last archived (e.g., placed in controlled content store 116), rules associated with each content object, and the number of matches found for the content object(s).

Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims (15)

1. A method of responding to a use by a user of controlled copyright content of another, including:
detecting, in response to the use by the user of the controlled copyright content owned by a content owner, the use of the controlled copyright content including a context of the use of the controlled copyright content, wherein the context comprises one or more of the following: compliance information associated with the use of the controlled copyright content, technical information associated with the use of the controlled copyright content, and reputation information;
automatically determining using a processor whether the detected use is a non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content based in part on the context of the use and one or more usage rules specified by the content owner;
automatically determining using a processor, in response to a non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content, an engagement action for engaging the user of the controlled copyright content in the detected use based at least in part on a prespecified rule indicating how to respond to a use of the controlled copyright content; and
automatically initiating the engagement action, including sending an appropriate communication to the user of the controlled content in the detect use where the content of the communication is based on the content owner specified usage rules;
wherein the engagement action includes automatically notifying the user of the controlled copyright content of the user's non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content and requesting for modification of matching content that uses the controlled copyright content; and
wherein the communication to the user is performed anonymously.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the context includes information associated with a user of the controlled copyright content.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the context includes information associated with usage rules associated with the controlled copyright content.
4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the context includes negation information.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the context includes information associated with a common pool of data.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the context includes information associated with a host policy.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein an entity associated with an owner of the controlled copyright content receives the indication of the use of the controlled copyright content.
8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein an entity associated with a host receives the indication of the use of the controlled copyright content.
9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein initiating the engagement action includes sending a communication to a user of the controlled copyright content.
10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the engagement action includes a request or demand for removal of matching content that uses the controlled copyright content.
11. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the engagement action includes a request or demand for modification of matching content that uses the controlled copyright content, wherein the modification includes adding attribution.
12. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the engagement action includes automatically removing matching content that uses the controlled copyright content.
13. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the engagement action includes sending reputation information.
14. A system for responding to a use by a user of controlled copyright content of another, including:
a processor configured to:
detect, in response to the use by the user of the controlled copyright content owned by a content owner, the use of the controlled copyright content including a context of the use of the controlled copyright content, wherein the context comprises one or more of the following: compliance information associated with the use of the controlled copyright content, technical information associated with the use of the controlled copyright content, and reputation information;
automatically determining using a processor whether the detected use is a non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content based in part on the context of the use and one or more usage rules specified by the content owner;
automatically determine using a processor, in response to a non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content, an engagement action for engaging the user of the controlled copyright content in the detected use based at least in part on a prespecified rule indicating how to respond to a use of the controlled copyright content; and
automatically initiate the engagement action, including sending an appropriate communication to the user of the controlled content in the detect use where the content of the communication is based on the content owner specified usage rules;
wherein the engagement action includes automatically notifying the user of the controlled copyright content of the user's non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content and requesting for modification of matching content that uses the controlled copyright content;
wherein the communication to the user is performed anonymously
a memory coupled with the processor, wherein the memory provides the processor with instructions.
15. A computer program product for responding to a use by a user of controlled copyright content of another, the computer program product being embodied in a computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:
detecting, in response to the use by the user of the controlled copyright content owned by a content owner, the use of the controlled copyright content including a context of the use of the controlled copyright content, wherein the context comprises one or more of the following: compliance information associated with the use of the controlled copyright content, technical information associated with the use of the controlled copyright content, and reputation information;
automatically determining using a processor whether the detected use is a non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content based in part on the context of the use and one or more usage rules specified by the content owner;
automatically determining using a processor, in response to a non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content, an engagement action for engaging the user of the controlled copyright content in the detected use based at least in part on a prespecified rule indicating how to respond to a use of the controlled copyright content; and
automatically initiating the engagement action including sending an appropriate communication to the user of the controlled content in the detect use where the content of the communication is based on the content owner specified usage rules;
wherein the engagement action includes automatically notifying the user of the controlled copyright content of the user's non-compliant use of the controlled copyright content and requesting for modification of matching content that uses the controlled copyright content;
wherein the communication to the user is performed anonymously.
US11512073 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement Active 2027-02-27 US8010511B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11512073 US8010511B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11512073 US8010511B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement
PCT/US2007/018893 WO2008027365A3 (en) 2006-08-29 2007-08-28 Content monitoring and compliance
US13187769 US9031919B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2011-07-21 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13187769 Continuation US9031919B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2011-07-21 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080059426A1 true US20080059426A1 (en) 2008-03-06
US8010511B2 true US8010511B2 (en) 2011-08-30

Family

ID=39153196

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11512073 Active 2027-02-27 US8010511B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement
US13187769 Active 2026-10-15 US9031919B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2011-07-21 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13187769 Active 2026-10-15 US9031919B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2011-07-21 Content monitoring and compliance enforcement

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8010511B2 (en)

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080059536A1 (en) * 2006-08-29 2008-03-06 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and host compliance evaluation
US20080178302A1 (en) * 2007-01-19 2008-07-24 Attributor Corporation Determination of originality of content
US20100017391A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2010-01-21 Nec Corporation Polarity estimation system, information delivery system, polarity estimation method, polarity estimation program and evaluation polarity estimatiom program
US20100280984A1 (en) * 2007-12-24 2010-11-04 France Telecom Method for analyzing a multimedia content, corresponding computer program product and analysis device
US20110004693A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Microsoft Corporation Reputation Mashup
US20110173340A1 (en) * 2007-05-15 2011-07-14 Adams Phillip M Computerized, copy detection and discrimination apparatus and method
US20120042391A1 (en) * 2010-08-11 2012-02-16 Hank Risan Method and system for protecting children from accessing inappropriate media available to a computer-based media access system
US8229219B1 (en) * 2009-08-06 2012-07-24 Google Inc. Full-length video fingerprinting
US8290918B1 (en) 2009-09-29 2012-10-16 Google Inc. Robust hashing of digital media data
US8458482B2 (en) 2005-12-23 2013-06-04 Digimarc Corporation Methods for identifying audio or video content
US8498982B1 (en) * 2010-07-07 2013-07-30 Openlogic, Inc. Noise reduction for content matching analysis results for protectable content
US8726400B1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2014-05-13 Google Inc. Ex post facto review of claims made against proprietary content in a live data stream
US9031919B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2015-05-12 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and compliance enforcement
US20150170086A1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 International Business Machines Corporation Augmenting business process execution using natural language processing
US9164687B1 (en) * 2011-01-14 2015-10-20 Symantec Corporation Deduplicating messages for improving message sampling quality
US9369488B2 (en) 2013-05-28 2016-06-14 Globalfoundries Inc. Policy enforcement using natural language processing
US9396237B1 (en) * 2013-02-12 2016-07-19 Focus IP Inc. Monitoring applications for infringement
US20170102831A1 (en) * 2015-10-12 2017-04-13 Xpire, LLC System and method for displaying content objects
US9654447B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2017-05-16 Digimarc Corporation Customized handling of copied content based on owner-specified similarity thresholds

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8364720B2 (en) 2005-12-21 2013-01-29 Digimarc Corporation Content metadata directory services
US20080027931A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2008-01-31 Vobile, Inc. Systems and methods for publishing, searching, retrieving and binding metadata for a digital object
WO2008058093A3 (en) * 2006-11-03 2008-07-24 Franck Chastagnol Content management system
US7707224B2 (en) * 2006-11-03 2010-04-27 Google Inc. Blocking of unlicensed audio content in video files on a video hosting website
US7711684B2 (en) * 2006-12-28 2010-05-04 Ebay Inc. Collaborative content evaluation
US8924270B2 (en) * 2007-05-03 2014-12-30 Google Inc. Monetization of digital content contributions
US8094872B1 (en) 2007-05-09 2012-01-10 Google Inc. Three-dimensional wavelet based video fingerprinting
US8611422B1 (en) 2007-06-19 2013-12-17 Google Inc. Endpoint based video fingerprinting
US8745101B2 (en) * 2008-02-11 2014-06-03 Lg Electronics Inc. Terminal and method for identifying contents
US20100064377A1 (en) * 2008-03-20 2010-03-11 Stephen Farrell Access rights for digital objects
US8793498B2 (en) 2008-08-11 2014-07-29 Nbcuniversal Media, Llc System and method for forensic analysis of media works
US9633014B2 (en) * 2009-04-08 2017-04-25 Google Inc. Policy based video content syndication
US9141768B2 (en) * 2009-06-10 2015-09-22 Lg Electronics Inc. Terminal and control method thereof
CN101938364A (en) * 2009-07-01 2011-01-05 华为技术有限公司 Method, device and system for releasing original content of user to telecommunication system
US20110213720A1 (en) * 2009-08-13 2011-09-01 Google Inc. Content Rights Management
US20120173441A1 (en) * 2011-01-05 2012-07-05 Google Inc. Ownership Resolution System
US20120246719A1 (en) * 2011-03-21 2012-09-27 International Business Machines Corporation Systems and methods for automatic detection of non-compliant content in user actions
US9361624B2 (en) * 2011-03-23 2016-06-07 Ipar, Llc Method and system for predicting association item affinities using second order user item associations
US20120259709A1 (en) * 2011-04-05 2012-10-11 Gimme Bar, Inc. Systems and Methods for Associating Attribution Data with Digital Content
GB201107116D0 (en) * 2011-04-28 2011-06-08 Nds Ltd Computer-implemented method and apparatus for encoding natural-language text content and/or detecting plagiarism
WO2012163735A1 (en) * 2011-05-31 2012-12-06 Restorm Ag System and method for online, interactive licensing and sales of art works
US9129420B2 (en) * 2012-03-07 2015-09-08 3D Printlife Llc Detection of protected subject matter in three dimensional print media
US20130236070A1 (en) * 2012-03-12 2013-09-12 Diy, Co. Automatic face detection and parental approval in images and video and applications thereof
US9847948B2 (en) 2012-07-09 2017-12-19 Eturi Corp. Schedule and location responsive agreement compliance controlled device throttle
US9887887B2 (en) * 2012-07-09 2018-02-06 Eturi Corp. Information throttle based on compliance with electronic communication rules
US9854393B2 (en) 2012-07-09 2017-12-26 Eturi Corp. Partial information throttle based on compliance with an agreement
US9092445B2 (en) * 2012-09-06 2015-07-28 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Predictive information topology modeling and visualization
US20140089661A1 (en) * 2012-09-25 2014-03-27 Securly, Inc. System and method for securing network traffic
US9418050B1 (en) * 2013-01-09 2016-08-16 Pinterest, Inc. Obtaining attribution information for representations
US20170279757A1 (en) * 2016-03-22 2017-09-28 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for identifying matching content
EP3319333A1 (en) * 2016-11-04 2018-05-09 Nagravision SA A method of and a device for rendering content data of a content data stream based on a level of toxicity of the content data stream

Citations (51)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5715403A (en) 1994-11-23 1998-02-03 Xerox Corporation System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works having attached usage rights where the usage rights are defined by a usage rights grammar
US5765152A (en) * 1995-10-13 1998-06-09 Trustees Of Dartmouth College System and method for managing copyrighted electronic media
US5983351A (en) 1996-10-16 1999-11-09 Intellectual Protocols, L.L.C. Web site copyright registration system and method
US6251016B1 (en) 1997-01-07 2001-06-26 Fujitsu Limited Information offering system for providing a lottery on a network
US20020048369A1 (en) * 1995-02-13 2002-04-25 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US6401118B1 (en) 1998-06-30 2002-06-04 Online Monitoring Services Method and computer program product for an online monitoring search engine
US20020078441A1 (en) 2000-08-31 2002-06-20 Eddie Drake Real-time audience monitoring, content rating, and content enhancing
US20020174132A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2002-11-21 Allresearch, Inc. Method and system for detecting unauthorized trademark use on the internet
US6493744B1 (en) 1999-08-16 2002-12-10 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic rating and filtering of data files for objectionable content
US6546135B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2003-04-08 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc Method for representing and comparing multimedia content
US6603921B1 (en) 1998-07-01 2003-08-05 International Business Machines Corporation Audio/video archive system and method for automatic indexing and searching
US6684254B1 (en) 2000-05-31 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Hyperlink filter for “pirated” and “disputed” copyright material on the internet in a method, system and program
US20040054661A1 (en) 2002-09-13 2004-03-18 Dominic Cheung Automated processing of appropriateness determination of content for search listings in wide area network searches
US20040078292A1 (en) 1996-09-03 2004-04-22 Trevor Blumenau Content Display Monitoring by a Processing System
US20040225645A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2004-11-11 Rowney Kevin T. Personal computing device -based mechanism to detect preselected data
US20040230529A1 (en) 2001-11-20 2004-11-18 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. System and method for granting access to an item or permission to use an item based on configurable conditions
US20040236828A1 (en) 2003-05-20 2004-11-25 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing system, information processing apparatus, information processing method, storage medium for information processing apparatus-readably storing program for practicing that method, and program therefor
US20050125358A1 (en) 2003-12-04 2005-06-09 Black Duck Software, Inc. Authenticating licenses for legally-protectable content based on license profiles and content identifiers
US6948657B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2005-09-27 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Document verification system
US20050216417A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-29 Hank Risan Method for providing curriculum enhancement using a computer-based media access system
US6952769B1 (en) 2000-04-17 2005-10-04 International Business Machines Corporation Protocols for anonymous electronic communication and double-blind transactions
US20050222900A1 (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-06 Prashant Fuloria Selectively delivering advertisements based at least in part on trademark issues
US20050273617A1 (en) 2001-04-24 2005-12-08 Microsoft Corporation Robust recognizer of perceptually similar content
US20050276570A1 (en) 2004-06-15 2005-12-15 Reed Ogden C Jr Systems, processes and apparatus for creating, processing and interacting with audiobooks and other media
US20060029251A1 (en) 2004-08-06 2006-02-09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system and image tampering assesment method and control program of the same
US20060059561A1 (en) * 2004-04-14 2006-03-16 Digital River, Inc. Electronic storefront that limits download of software wrappers based on geographic location
US20060059116A1 (en) 2004-08-20 2006-03-16 Levi Ronald M Image processing and identification system, method and apparatus
US20060080200A1 (en) 2000-04-07 2006-04-13 Ashton David M System and method for benefit plan administration
US20060080703A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2006-04-13 Compton Charles L Content storage method and system
US20060101069A1 (en) 2004-11-05 2006-05-11 James Bell Generating a fingerprint for a document
US20060115108A1 (en) * 2004-06-22 2006-06-01 Rodriguez Tony F Metadata management and generation using digital watermarks
US7120273B2 (en) 2002-05-31 2006-10-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Lp. Apparatus and method for image group integrity protection
US20060271512A1 (en) 2002-06-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation System and method providing automated margin tree analysis and processing of sampled data
US20060272028A1 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Oracle International Corporation Platform and service for management and multi-channel delivery of multi-types of contents
US20060287996A1 (en) 2005-06-16 2006-12-21 International Business Machines Corporation Computer-implemented method, system, and program product for tracking content
US7159116B2 (en) 1999-12-07 2007-01-02 Blue Spike, Inc. Systems, methods and devices for trusted transactions
US20070005979A1 (en) 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Hiroshi Ishii Image forming apparatus
US20070118737A1 (en) 2005-11-07 2007-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for distributed management of files
US20070162349A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2007-07-12 Markmonitor Inc. Client Side Brand Protection
US20070192352A1 (en) 2005-12-21 2007-08-16 Levy Kenneth L Content Metadata Directory Services
US20070198426A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2007-08-23 Yates James M Method and apparatus for digital copyright exchange
US20070203891A1 (en) 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Providing and using search index enabling searching based on a targeted content of documents
US20070208715A1 (en) 2006-03-02 2007-09-06 Thomas Muehlbauer Assigning Unique Content Identifiers to Digital Media Content
US20080004116A1 (en) 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Andrew Stephen Van Luchene Video Game Environment
US20080010373A1 (en) 2004-07-26 2008-01-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Transmission History Dependency Processor
US20080008348A1 (en) 2006-02-01 2008-01-10 Markmonitor Inc. Detecting online abuse in images
US7346605B1 (en) 1999-07-22 2008-03-18 Markmonitor, Inc. Method and system for searching and monitoring internet trademark usage
US7363278B2 (en) 2001-04-05 2008-04-22 Audible Magic Corporation Copyright detection and protection system and method
US7379214B2 (en) 2005-12-07 2008-05-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus capable of processing image embedded with digital watermark, method for controlling the image processing apparatus, and storage medium storing program to execute the method
US20080155701A1 (en) 2006-12-22 2008-06-26 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for unauthorized content detection and reporting
US7702591B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2010-04-20 Macrovision Corporation System and methods providing secure delivery of licenses and content

Family Cites Families (181)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7711564B2 (en) 1995-07-27 2010-05-04 Digimarc Corporation Connected audio and other media objects
US8505108B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-08-06 Digimarc Corporation Authentication using a digital watermark
US6505160B1 (en) 1995-07-27 2003-01-07 Digimarc Corporation Connected audio and other media objects
US7113615B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2006-09-26 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedder and reader
US6513018B1 (en) 1994-05-05 2003-01-28 Fair, Isaac And Company, Inc. Method and apparatus for scoring the likelihood of a desired performance result
US7302574B2 (en) 1999-05-19 2007-11-27 Digimarc Corporation Content identifiers triggering corresponding responses through collaborative processing
US7185201B2 (en) 1999-05-19 2007-02-27 Digimarc Corporation Content identifiers triggering corresponding responses
JPH08263438A (en) 1994-11-23 1996-10-11 Xerox Corp Distribution and use control system for digital work, and method for controlling access to digital work
JPH11502344A (en) 1995-03-20 1999-02-23 ロー テクノロジーズ Apparatus and method for identifying the image
US6947571B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2005-09-20 Digimarc Corporation Cell phones with optical capabilities, and related applications
US7756892B2 (en) 2000-05-02 2010-07-13 Digimarc Corporation Using embedded data with file sharing
US6829368B2 (en) 2000-01-26 2004-12-07 Digimarc Corporation Establishing and interacting with on-line media collections using identifiers in media signals
US7047241B1 (en) 1995-10-13 2006-05-16 Digimarc Corporation System and methods for managing digital creative works
US5913205A (en) 1996-03-29 1999-06-15 Virage, Inc. Query optimization for visual information retrieval system
US6222939B1 (en) 1996-06-25 2001-04-24 Eyematic Interfaces, Inc. Labeled bunch graphs for image analysis
US5918223A (en) 1996-07-22 1999-06-29 Muscle Fish Method and article of manufacture for content-based analysis, storage, retrieval, and segmentation of audio information
US6647548B1 (en) 1996-09-06 2003-11-11 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Coded/non-coded program audience measurement system
US20030093790A1 (en) 2000-03-28 2003-05-15 Logan James D. Audio and video program recording, editing and playback systems using metadata
JP3901268B2 (en) 1997-01-23 2007-04-04 ソニー株式会社 Information signal output control device, the information signal output control method, information signal duplication prevention device, and information signal duplication prevention method
EP0974098A4 (en) 1997-02-07 2000-10-25 About Com Inc Collaborative internet data mining system
US6035055A (en) 1997-11-03 2000-03-07 Hewlett-Packard Company Digital image management system in a distributed data access network system
US6055538A (en) 1997-12-22 2000-04-25 Hewlett Packard Company Methods and system for using web browser to search large collections of documents
US6121530A (en) 1998-03-19 2000-09-19 Sonoda; Tomonari World Wide Web-based melody retrieval system with thresholds determined by using distribution of pitch and span of notes
US6301370B1 (en) 1998-04-13 2001-10-09 Eyematic Interfaces, Inc. Face recognition from video images
US6292575B1 (en) 1998-07-20 2001-09-18 Lau Technologies Real-time facial recognition and verification system
US6983371B1 (en) 1998-10-22 2006-01-03 International Business Machines Corporation Super-distribution of protected digital content
US6226618B1 (en) 1998-08-13 2001-05-01 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic content delivery system
US7421723B2 (en) 1999-01-07 2008-09-02 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Detection of media links in broadcast signals
US6868497B1 (en) 1999-03-10 2005-03-15 Digimarc Corporation Method and apparatus for automatic ID management
US7562392B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2009-07-14 Digimarc Corporation Methods of interacting with audio and ambient music
WO2001010127A1 (en) 1999-08-03 2001-02-08 Videoshare, Inc. Method and system for sharing video over a network
US6466695B1 (en) 1999-08-04 2002-10-15 Eyematic Interfaces, Inc. Procedure for automatic analysis of images and image sequences based on two-dimensional shape primitives
US6976165B1 (en) 1999-09-07 2005-12-13 Emc Corporation System and method for secure storage, transfer and retrieval of content addressable information
EP1228461A4 (en) 1999-09-22 2005-07-27 Oleg Kharisovich Zommers Interactive personal information system and method
US6693236B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2004-02-17 Monkeymedia, Inc. User interface for simultaneous management of owned and unowned inventory
US20020002586A1 (en) 2000-02-08 2002-01-03 Howard Rafal Methods and apparatus for creating and hosting customized virtual parties via the internet
US6834308B1 (en) 2000-02-17 2004-12-21 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying media content presented on a media playing device
US7412462B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2008-08-12 Burnside Acquisition, Llc Data repository and method for promoting network storage of data
US7298864B2 (en) 2000-02-19 2007-11-20 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks as a gateway and control mechanism
WO2001086592A3 (en) 2000-05-09 2003-03-20 Hnc Software Inc Approach for generating rules
US6772196B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2004-08-03 Propel Software Corp. Electronic mail filtering system and methods
WO2002011033A1 (en) 2000-07-28 2002-02-07 Copyright.Net Inc. Apparatus and method for transmitting and keeping track of legal notices
US20020069370A1 (en) 2000-08-31 2002-06-06 Infoseer, Inc. System and method for tracking and preventing illegal distribution of proprietary material over computer networks
US7346472B1 (en) 2000-09-07 2008-03-18 Blue Spike, Inc. Method and device for monitoring and analyzing signals
US6597775B2 (en) 2000-09-29 2003-07-22 Fair Isaac Corporation Self-learning real-time prioritization of telecommunication fraud control actions
WO2002033505A3 (en) 2000-10-16 2003-01-30 Ariel Peled A method and apparatus for supporting electronic content distribution
KR20020030610A (en) 2000-10-19 2002-04-25 스톰 씨엔씨 인코포레이티드 A method for preventing reduction of sales amount of phonograph records by way of digital music file unlawfully circulated through communication network
US20060031870A1 (en) 2000-10-23 2006-02-09 Jarman Matthew T Apparatus, system, and method for filtering objectionable portions of a multimedia presentation
US8117282B2 (en) 2004-10-20 2012-02-14 Clearplay, Inc. Media player configured to receive playback filters from alternative storage mediums
US6704733B2 (en) 2000-10-25 2004-03-09 Lightning Source, Inc. Distributing electronic books over a computer network
US7085613B2 (en) 2000-11-03 2006-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation System for monitoring audio content in a video broadcast
US7660902B2 (en) 2000-11-20 2010-02-09 Rsa Security, Inc. Dynamic file access control and management
US7043473B1 (en) 2000-11-22 2006-05-09 Widevine Technologies, Inc. Media tracking system and method
US7266704B2 (en) 2000-12-18 2007-09-04 Digimarc Corporation User-friendly rights management systems and methods
US6968328B1 (en) 2000-12-29 2005-11-22 Fair Isaac Corporation Method and system for implementing rules and ruleflows
US7627897B2 (en) 2001-01-03 2009-12-01 Portauthority Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for a reactive defense against illegal distribution of multimedia content in file sharing networks
US7028009B2 (en) 2001-01-17 2006-04-11 Contentguardiholdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for distributing enforceable property rights
US7085741B2 (en) 2001-01-17 2006-08-01 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing digital content usage rights
DE60228202D1 (en) 2001-02-12 2008-09-25 Gracenote Inc A method for generating an identification hash of the contents of a multimedia file
US20020168082A1 (en) 2001-03-07 2002-11-14 Ravi Razdan Real-time, distributed, transactional, hybrid watermarking method to provide trace-ability and copyright protection of digital content in peer-to-peer networks
US7681032B2 (en) 2001-03-12 2010-03-16 Portauthority Technologies Inc. System and method for monitoring unauthorized transport of digital content
US7197459B1 (en) 2001-03-19 2007-03-27 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Hybrid machine/human computing arrangement
US7653552B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2010-01-26 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Digital file marketplace
US7111169B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2006-09-19 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for content protection across a source-to-destination interface
US20020165819A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2002-11-07 Gateway, Inc. System and method for providing distributed computing services
US7194490B2 (en) 2001-05-22 2007-03-20 Christopher Zee Method for the assured and enduring archival of intellectual property
US6983479B1 (en) 2001-06-08 2006-01-03 Tarantella, Inc. Dynamic content activation by locating, coordinating and presenting content publishing resources such that content publisher can create or change content
WO2002103968A1 (en) 2001-06-15 2002-12-27 Beep Science As An arrangement and a method for content policy control in a mobile multimedia messaging system
US6944604B1 (en) 2001-07-03 2005-09-13 Fair Isaac Corporation Mechanism and method for specified temporal deployment of rules within a rule server
JP2004536348A (en) 2001-07-20 2004-12-02 グレースノート インコーポレイテッド Automatic identification of recording
US6885757B2 (en) 2002-04-18 2005-04-26 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for providing an asymmetric watermark carrier
US20030052768A1 (en) 2001-09-17 2003-03-20 Maune James J. Security method and system
US20030061490A1 (en) 2001-09-26 2003-03-27 Abajian Aram Christian Method for identifying copyright infringement violations by fingerprint detection
US20030101104A1 (en) 2001-11-28 2003-05-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. System and method for retrieving information related to targeted subjects
US7003669B2 (en) 2001-12-17 2006-02-21 Monk Bruce C Document and bearer verification system
US7117200B2 (en) 2002-01-11 2006-10-03 International Business Machines Corporation Synthesizing information-bearing content from multiple channels
EP1474761A2 (en) 2002-02-05 2004-11-10 Philips Electronics N.V. Efficient storage of fingerprints
US20030216988A1 (en) 2002-05-17 2003-11-20 Cassandra Mollett Systems and methods for using phone number validation in a risk assessment
US20050259819A1 (en) 2002-06-24 2005-11-24 Koninklijke Philips Electronics Method for generating hashes from a compressed multimedia content
US7003131B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2006-02-21 Kaleidescape, Inc. Watermarking and fingerprinting digital content using alternative blocks to embed information
US7996503B2 (en) 2002-07-10 2011-08-09 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for managing access to digital content via digital rights policies
US6871200B2 (en) 2002-07-11 2005-03-22 Forensic Eye Ltd. Registration and monitoring system
CA2491662C (en) 2002-07-12 2015-11-24 Privaris, Inc. Personal authentication software and systems for travel privilege assignation and verification
US20050273612A1 (en) 2002-07-26 2005-12-08 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Identification of digital data sequences
US8090717B1 (en) 2002-09-20 2012-01-03 Google Inc. Methods and apparatus for ranking documents
US20040059953A1 (en) 2002-09-24 2004-03-25 Arinc Methods and systems for identity management
US9055239B2 (en) 2003-10-08 2015-06-09 Verance Corporation Signal continuity assessment using embedded watermarks
CN1711531A (en) 2002-11-12 2005-12-21 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 Fingerprinting multimedia contents
WO2004049242A3 (en) 2002-11-26 2004-07-15 Digimarc Id Systems Systems and methods for managing and detecting fraud in image databases used with identification documents
US7370017B1 (en) 2002-12-20 2008-05-06 Microsoft Corporation Redistribution of rights-managed content and technique for encouraging same
JP4226889B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2009-02-18 株式会社東芝 Content management system and program and methods
GB2397904B (en) 2003-01-29 2005-08-24 Hewlett Packard Co Control of access to data content for read and/or write operations
US8332326B2 (en) 2003-02-01 2012-12-11 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus to identify a work received by a processing system
US20050102515A1 (en) 2003-02-03 2005-05-12 Dave Jaworski Controlling read and write operations for digital media
US7606790B2 (en) 2003-03-03 2009-10-20 Digimarc Corporation Integrating and enhancing searching of media content and biometric databases
EP1457889A1 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-09-15 Philips Electronics N.V. Improved fingerprint matching method and system
US20040189441A1 (en) 2003-03-24 2004-09-30 Kosmas Stergiou Apparatus and methods for verification and authentication employing voluntary attributes, knowledge management and databases
US7246740B2 (en) 2003-04-03 2007-07-24 First Data Corporation Suspicious persons database
US8082210B2 (en) 2003-04-29 2011-12-20 The Western Union Company Authentication for online money transfers
DE10319771B4 (en) 2003-05-02 2005-03-17 Koenig & Bauer Ag System for inspecting a printed image
US7669225B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2010-02-23 Portauthority Technologies Inc. Apparatus and method for assuring compliance with distribution and usage policy
US7685642B2 (en) 2003-06-26 2010-03-23 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. System and method for controlling rights expressions by stakeholders of an item
US7454061B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2008-11-18 Ricoh Company, Ltd. System, apparatus, and method for providing illegal use research service for image data, and system, apparatus, and method for providing proper use research service for image data
US20050039057A1 (en) 2003-07-24 2005-02-17 Amit Bagga Method and apparatus for authenticating a user using query directed passwords
US20050043960A1 (en) 2003-08-19 2005-02-24 David Blankley System and automate the licensing, re-use and royalties of authored content in derivative works
US20050043548A1 (en) 2003-08-22 2005-02-24 Joseph Cates Automated monitoring and control system for networked communications
US20050080846A1 (en) 2003-09-27 2005-04-14 Webhound, Inc. Method and system for updating digital content over a network
US7314162B2 (en) 2003-10-17 2008-01-01 Digimore Corporation Method and system for reporting identity document usage
EP1680068A4 (en) 2003-10-22 2009-05-13 Clearplay Inc Apparatus and method for blocking audio/visual programming and for muting audio
CN1883198A (en) 2003-11-17 2006-12-20 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 Commercial insertion into video streams based on surrounding program content
US7444403B1 (en) 2003-11-25 2008-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Detecting sexually predatory content in an electronic communication
US7636855B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2009-12-22 Panasonic Corporation Multiple choice challenge-response user authorization system and method
US20050193016A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2005-09-01 Nicholas Seet Generation of a media content database by correlating repeating media content in media streams
US7751805B2 (en) 2004-02-20 2010-07-06 Google Inc. Mobile image-based information retrieval system
US20050273627A1 (en) 2004-05-18 2005-12-08 Davis Bruce L Biometrics in issuance of government documents
US7975062B2 (en) 2004-06-07 2011-07-05 Sling Media, Inc. Capturing and sharing media content
US7769756B2 (en) 2004-06-07 2010-08-03 Sling Media, Inc. Selection and presentation of context-relevant supplemental content and advertising
US8130746B2 (en) 2004-07-28 2012-03-06 Audible Magic Corporation System for distributing decoy content in a peer to peer network
US20060080356A1 (en) 2004-10-13 2006-04-13 Microsoft Corporation System and method for inferring similarities between media objects
US20060085816A1 (en) 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Funk James M Method and apparatus to control playback in a download-and-view video on demand system
US7124743B2 (en) 2004-10-22 2006-10-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for starting sequential fuel injection internal combustion engine
US8117339B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2012-02-14 Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC Tracking domain name related reputation
US7574409B2 (en) 2004-11-04 2009-08-11 Vericept Corporation Method, apparatus, and system for clustering and classification
US20060106725A1 (en) 2004-11-12 2006-05-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program product for visual display of a license status for a software program
US20060106774A1 (en) 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Cohen Peter D Using qualifications of users to facilitate user performance of tasks
US7945469B2 (en) 2004-11-16 2011-05-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Providing an electronic marketplace to facilitate human performance of programmatically submitted tasks
US20060110137A1 (en) 2004-11-25 2006-05-25 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Video and audio data transmitting apparatus, and video and audio data transmitting method
KR100973516B1 (en) 2004-12-03 2010-08-03 닛본 덴끼 가부시끼가이샤 Video content reproduction supporting method, video content reproduction supporting system, and information delivery program
US8107010B2 (en) 2005-01-05 2012-01-31 Rovi Solutions Corporation Windows management in a television environment
US7814564B2 (en) 2005-01-07 2010-10-12 University Of Maryland Method for fingerprinting multimedia content
US7978859B2 (en) 2005-01-24 2011-07-12 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Private and controlled ownership sharing
US8200775B2 (en) 2005-02-01 2012-06-12 Newsilike Media Group, Inc Enhanced syndication
US7369677B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2008-05-06 Verance Corporation System reactions to the detection of embedded watermarks in a digital host content
US20070242880A1 (en) 2005-05-18 2007-10-18 Stebbings David W System and method for the identification of motional media of widely varying picture content
US20080109306A1 (en) 2005-06-15 2008-05-08 Maigret Robert J Media marketplaces
US20070130015A1 (en) 2005-06-15 2007-06-07 Steven Starr Advertisement revenue sharing for distributed video
US20070028308A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2007-02-01 Kosuke Nishio Decoding apparatus
GB0805932D0 (en) 2005-09-01 2008-05-07 Lev Zvi H System and method for reliable content access using a cellular/wireless device with imaging capabilities
US20070056042A1 (en) * 2005-09-08 2007-03-08 Bahman Qawami Mobile memory system for secure storage and delivery of media content
US20070058925A1 (en) 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Fu-Sheng Chiu Interactive multimedia production
WO2007035965A3 (en) 2005-09-23 2008-10-09 David Hoogstrate Media management system
US7529659B2 (en) 2005-09-28 2009-05-05 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying an unknown work
US7720767B2 (en) 2005-10-24 2010-05-18 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. Method and system to support dynamic rights and resources sharing
WO2007106185A3 (en) 2005-11-22 2008-08-28 Mashlogic Inc Personalized content control
US8442125B2 (en) 2005-11-29 2013-05-14 Google Inc. Determining popularity ratings using social and interactive applications for mass media
US20070162761A1 (en) 2005-12-23 2007-07-12 Davis Bruce L Methods and Systems to Help Detect Identity Fraud
US20130085825A1 (en) 2006-12-20 2013-04-04 Digimarc Corp. Method and system for determining content treatment
US20070156594A1 (en) 2006-01-03 2007-07-05 Mcgucken Elliot System and method for allowing creators, artsists, and owners to protect and profit from content
WO2007091243A3 (en) 2006-02-07 2009-04-16 Mobixell Networks Ltd Matching of modified visual and audio media
US20070203911A1 (en) 2006-02-07 2007-08-30 Fu-Sheng Chiu Video weblog
US20080027931A1 (en) 2006-02-27 2008-01-31 Vobile, Inc. Systems and methods for publishing, searching, retrieving and binding metadata for a digital object
US8037506B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2011-10-11 Verimatrix, Inc. Movie studio-based network distribution system and method
US8103947B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2012-01-24 Timecove Corporation Collaborative system and method for generating biographical accounts
US20080034396A1 (en) 2006-05-30 2008-02-07 Lev Zvi H System and method for video distribution and billing
US20070282472A1 (en) 2006-06-01 2007-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for customizing soundtracks
US7831531B1 (en) 2006-06-22 2010-11-09 Google Inc. Approximate hashing functions for finding similar content
US20080005241A1 (en) 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Usage parameters for communication content
US7899694B1 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-03-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Generating solutions to problems via interactions with human responders
US20080051029A1 (en) 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Bradley James Witteman Phone-based broadcast audio identification
US8010511B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2011-08-30 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and compliance enforcement
US20080059461A1 (en) 2006-08-29 2008-03-06 Attributor Corporation Content search using a provided interface
US8738749B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2014-05-27 Digimarc Corporation Content monitoring and host compliance evaluation
US7730316B1 (en) 2006-09-22 2010-06-01 Fatlens, Inc. Method for document fingerprinting
US8781892B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2014-07-15 Yahoo! Inc. Digital media benefit attachment mechanism
US7945470B1 (en) 2006-09-29 2011-05-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Facilitating performance of submitted tasks by mobile task performers
US7707224B2 (en) 2006-11-03 2010-04-27 Google Inc. Blocking of unlicensed audio content in video files on a video hosting website
WO2008058093A3 (en) 2006-11-03 2008-07-24 Franck Chastagnol Content management system
US20080162228A1 (en) 2006-12-19 2008-07-03 Friedrich Mechbach Method and system for the integrating advertising in user generated contributions
US8055552B2 (en) 2006-12-22 2011-11-08 Yahoo! Inc. Social network commerce model
US8707459B2 (en) 2007-01-19 2014-04-22 Digimarc Corporation Determination of originality of content
US7979464B2 (en) 2007-02-27 2011-07-12 Motion Picture Laboratories, Inc. Associating rights to multimedia content
US20080240490A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Source authentication and usage tracking of video
US8117094B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2012-02-14 Microsoft Corporation Distribution channels and monetizing
JP4938580B2 (en) 2007-07-27 2012-05-23 アイシン精機株式会社 Door handle device
US8238669B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2012-08-07 Google Inc. Detection and classification of matches between time-based media
US20090119169A1 (en) 2007-10-02 2009-05-07 Blinkx Uk Ltd Various methods and apparatuses for an engine that pairs advertisements with video files
US8170392B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2012-05-01 Shlomo Selim Rakib Method and apparatus for generation, distribution and display of interactive video content
US8209223B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2012-06-26 Google Inc. Video object tag creation and processing
CN102084358A (en) 2008-02-05 2011-06-01 杜比实验室特许公司 Associating information with media content
GB0810737D0 (en) 2008-06-12 2008-07-16 Cross Geoffrey M T Hybrid human/computer image processing method
US8200766B2 (en) 2009-01-26 2012-06-12 Nokia Corporation Social networking runtime

Patent Citations (51)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5715403A (en) 1994-11-23 1998-02-03 Xerox Corporation System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works having attached usage rights where the usage rights are defined by a usage rights grammar
US20020048369A1 (en) * 1995-02-13 2002-04-25 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US5765152A (en) * 1995-10-13 1998-06-09 Trustees Of Dartmouth College System and method for managing copyrighted electronic media
US20040078292A1 (en) 1996-09-03 2004-04-22 Trevor Blumenau Content Display Monitoring by a Processing System
US5983351A (en) 1996-10-16 1999-11-09 Intellectual Protocols, L.L.C. Web site copyright registration system and method
US6251016B1 (en) 1997-01-07 2001-06-26 Fujitsu Limited Information offering system for providing a lottery on a network
US7702591B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2010-04-20 Macrovision Corporation System and methods providing secure delivery of licenses and content
US6401118B1 (en) 1998-06-30 2002-06-04 Online Monitoring Services Method and computer program product for an online monitoring search engine
US6603921B1 (en) 1998-07-01 2003-08-05 International Business Machines Corporation Audio/video archive system and method for automatic indexing and searching
US7346605B1 (en) 1999-07-22 2008-03-18 Markmonitor, Inc. Method and system for searching and monitoring internet trademark usage
US6493744B1 (en) 1999-08-16 2002-12-10 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic rating and filtering of data files for objectionable content
US6546135B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2003-04-08 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc Method for representing and comparing multimedia content
US7159116B2 (en) 1999-12-07 2007-01-02 Blue Spike, Inc. Systems, methods and devices for trusted transactions
US20060080200A1 (en) 2000-04-07 2006-04-13 Ashton David M System and method for benefit plan administration
US6952769B1 (en) 2000-04-17 2005-10-04 International Business Machines Corporation Protocols for anonymous electronic communication and double-blind transactions
US6684254B1 (en) 2000-05-31 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Hyperlink filter for “pirated” and “disputed” copyright material on the internet in a method, system and program
US20020078441A1 (en) 2000-08-31 2002-06-20 Eddie Drake Real-time audience monitoring, content rating, and content enhancing
US7363278B2 (en) 2001-04-05 2008-04-22 Audible Magic Corporation Copyright detection and protection system and method
US20050273617A1 (en) 2001-04-24 2005-12-08 Microsoft Corporation Robust recognizer of perceptually similar content
US20020174132A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2002-11-21 Allresearch, Inc. Method and system for detecting unauthorized trademark use on the internet
US20040230529A1 (en) 2001-11-20 2004-11-18 Contentguard Holdings, Inc. System and method for granting access to an item or permission to use an item based on configurable conditions
US7120273B2 (en) 2002-05-31 2006-10-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Lp. Apparatus and method for image group integrity protection
US20060271512A1 (en) 2002-06-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation System and method providing automated margin tree analysis and processing of sampled data
US20040054661A1 (en) 2002-09-13 2004-03-18 Dominic Cheung Automated processing of appropriateness determination of content for search listings in wide area network searches
US6948657B2 (en) 2002-10-29 2005-09-27 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Document verification system
US20040225645A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2004-11-11 Rowney Kevin T. Personal computing device -based mechanism to detect preselected data
US20040236828A1 (en) 2003-05-20 2004-11-25 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing system, information processing apparatus, information processing method, storage medium for information processing apparatus-readably storing program for practicing that method, and program therefor
US20050125358A1 (en) 2003-12-04 2005-06-09 Black Duck Software, Inc. Authenticating licenses for legally-protectable content based on license profiles and content identifiers
US20070198426A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2007-08-23 Yates James M Method and apparatus for digital copyright exchange
US20050216417A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-29 Hank Risan Method for providing curriculum enhancement using a computer-based media access system
US20060080703A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2006-04-13 Compton Charles L Content storage method and system
US20050222900A1 (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-06 Prashant Fuloria Selectively delivering advertisements based at least in part on trademark issues
US20060059561A1 (en) * 2004-04-14 2006-03-16 Digital River, Inc. Electronic storefront that limits download of software wrappers based on geographic location
US20050276570A1 (en) 2004-06-15 2005-12-15 Reed Ogden C Jr Systems, processes and apparatus for creating, processing and interacting with audiobooks and other media
US20060115108A1 (en) * 2004-06-22 2006-06-01 Rodriguez Tony F Metadata management and generation using digital watermarks
US20080010373A1 (en) 2004-07-26 2008-01-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Transmission History Dependency Processor
US20060029251A1 (en) 2004-08-06 2006-02-09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system and image tampering assesment method and control program of the same
US20060059116A1 (en) 2004-08-20 2006-03-16 Levi Ronald M Image processing and identification system, method and apparatus
US20060101069A1 (en) 2004-11-05 2006-05-11 James Bell Generating a fingerprint for a document
US20060272028A1 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Oracle International Corporation Platform and service for management and multi-channel delivery of multi-types of contents
US20060287996A1 (en) 2005-06-16 2006-12-21 International Business Machines Corporation Computer-implemented method, system, and program product for tracking content
US20070005979A1 (en) 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Hiroshi Ishii Image forming apparatus
US20070162349A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2007-07-12 Markmonitor Inc. Client Side Brand Protection
US20070118737A1 (en) 2005-11-07 2007-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for distributed management of files
US7379214B2 (en) 2005-12-07 2008-05-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus capable of processing image embedded with digital watermark, method for controlling the image processing apparatus, and storage medium storing program to execute the method
US20070192352A1 (en) 2005-12-21 2007-08-16 Levy Kenneth L Content Metadata Directory Services
US20080008348A1 (en) 2006-02-01 2008-01-10 Markmonitor Inc. Detecting online abuse in images
US20070203891A1 (en) 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Providing and using search index enabling searching based on a targeted content of documents
US20070208715A1 (en) 2006-03-02 2007-09-06 Thomas Muehlbauer Assigning Unique Content Identifiers to Digital Media Content
US20080004116A1 (en) 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Andrew Stephen Van Luchene Video Game Environment
US20080155701A1 (en) 2006-12-22 2008-06-26 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for unauthorized content detection and reporting

Non-Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BayTSP, Digital Tracking + Security + Protection, www.baytsp.com/solutions-faq.html.
BayTSP, Digital Tracking + Security + Protection, www.baytsp.com/solutions—faq.html.
Cheung et al., Efficient Video Similarity Measurement and Search, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.
Cowboyneal, Slashdot, Microsoft Seeking to Patent Automatic Censorship, May 4, 2006.
DRM Watch, Guba Introduces Video Fingerprint Filtering, Jul. 27, 2006, http://www.drmwatch.com/article.php/3623091.
Email about the product "Sentinel", Nov. 14, 2006.
Fetterly et al., Detecting Phrase-Level Duplication on the World Wide Web.
Fetterly et al., On the Evolution of Clusters of Near-Duplicate Web Pages.
Global File Registry, Global File Registry : The economic, scalable, solution for removing infringing content on the intemet, www.globalfileregistry.com.
Global File Registry, Technical White Paper, Draft 1-26, May 2006.
Hoad et al., Methods for Identifying Versioned and Plagiarised Documents, 2003.
iCopyright on copyright, www.datadepth.com/.
Indyk et al., Locality-Preserving Hashing in Multidimensional Spaces, 1997.
Ke et al., Efficient Near-duplicate Detection and Sub-image Retrieval.
MARC, P2P File Sharing: Altnet Registry is About Money, Not Protection, Aug. 3, 2006, http://www.p2p-weblog.com/50226711/altnet-registry-is-about-money-not-protection.php.
MARC, P2P File Sharing: Altnet Registry is About Money, Not Protection, Aug. 3, 2006, http://www.p2p-weblog.com/50226711/altnet—registry—is—about—money—not—protection.php.
Nevin Heintze, Scalable Document Fingerprinting, Extended Abstract, 1995.
Numly Numbers, Web2.0+ Copyright=Copyright 2.0, www.numly.com/numly/default.asp.
Popescu et al., Exposing Digital Forgeries by Detecting Duplicated Image Regions, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College.
Riya, Visual Search, Riya Personal Search, http://riya.com/index?btnSearch=30e6728ad8c4846e.
Riya, Visual Search, www.riya.com.
Snocap, Services, Sell Your Music, http://www.snocap.com/sell/.
UDI Manber, Finding Similar Files in a Large File System, Department of Computer Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona, Oct. 1993.

Cited By (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8458482B2 (en) 2005-12-23 2013-06-04 Digimarc Corporation Methods for identifying audio or video content
US8688999B2 (en) 2005-12-23 2014-04-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods for identifying audio or video content
US9292513B2 (en) 2005-12-23 2016-03-22 Digimarc Corporation Methods for identifying audio or video content
US8868917B2 (en) 2005-12-23 2014-10-21 Digimarc Corporation Methods for identifying audio or video content
US9654447B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2017-05-16 Digimarc Corporation Customized handling of copied content based on owner-specified similarity thresholds
US9342670B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2016-05-17 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and host compliance evaluation
US9031919B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2015-05-12 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and compliance enforcement
US8738749B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2014-05-27 Digimarc Corporation Content monitoring and host compliance evaluation
US9436810B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2016-09-06 Attributor Corporation Determination of copied content, including attribution
US20080059536A1 (en) * 2006-08-29 2008-03-06 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and host compliance evaluation
US9842200B1 (en) 2006-08-29 2017-12-12 Attributor Corporation Content monitoring and host compliance evaluation
US20100017391A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2010-01-21 Nec Corporation Polarity estimation system, information delivery system, polarity estimation method, polarity estimation program and evaluation polarity estimatiom program
US20080178302A1 (en) * 2007-01-19 2008-07-24 Attributor Corporation Determination of originality of content
US8707459B2 (en) * 2007-01-19 2014-04-22 Digimarc Corporation Determination of originality of content
US8909733B2 (en) * 2007-05-15 2014-12-09 Phillip M. Adams Computerized, copy detection and discrimination apparatus and method
US20110173340A1 (en) * 2007-05-15 2011-07-14 Adams Phillip M Computerized, copy detection and discrimination apparatus and method
US20100280984A1 (en) * 2007-12-24 2010-11-04 France Telecom Method for analyzing a multimedia content, corresponding computer program product and analysis device
US8463725B2 (en) * 2007-12-24 2013-06-11 France Telecom Method for analyzing a multimedia content, corresponding computer program product and analysis device
US20110004693A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Microsoft Corporation Reputation Mashup
US8943211B2 (en) * 2009-07-02 2015-01-27 Microsoft Corporation Reputation mashup
US8229219B1 (en) * 2009-08-06 2012-07-24 Google Inc. Full-length video fingerprinting
US8532382B1 (en) * 2009-08-06 2013-09-10 Google Inc. Full-length video fingerprinting
US8290918B1 (en) 2009-09-29 2012-10-16 Google Inc. Robust hashing of digital media data
US8498982B1 (en) * 2010-07-07 2013-07-30 Openlogic, Inc. Noise reduction for content matching analysis results for protectable content
US9092487B1 (en) 2010-07-07 2015-07-28 Openlogic, Inc. Analyzing content using abstractable interchangeable elements
US20120042391A1 (en) * 2010-08-11 2012-02-16 Hank Risan Method and system for protecting children from accessing inappropriate media available to a computer-based media access system
US9164687B1 (en) * 2011-01-14 2015-10-20 Symantec Corporation Deduplicating messages for improving message sampling quality
US8726400B1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2014-05-13 Google Inc. Ex post facto review of claims made against proprietary content in a live data stream
US9396237B1 (en) * 2013-02-12 2016-07-19 Focus IP Inc. Monitoring applications for infringement
US9369488B2 (en) 2013-05-28 2016-06-14 Globalfoundries Inc. Policy enforcement using natural language processing
US20150170086A1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 International Business Machines Corporation Augmenting business process execution using natural language processing
US20170102831A1 (en) * 2015-10-12 2017-04-13 Xpire, LLC System and method for displaying content objects

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20080059426A1 (en) 2008-03-06 application
US9031919B2 (en) 2015-05-12 grant
US20120011105A1 (en) 2012-01-12 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ratkiewicz et al. Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams
US7450734B2 (en) Digital asset management, targeted searching and desktop searching using digital watermarks
US7610382B1 (en) System and method for marking content
US8099660B1 (en) Tool for managing online content
US20070198506A1 (en) System and method for context-based knowledge search, tagging, collaboration, management, and advertisement
US20080109369A1 (en) Content Management System
US20050063612A1 (en) Method and system for access to electronic images of text based on user ownership of corresponding physical text
US20090094189A1 (en) Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing tags added by users engaged in social tagging of content
US20120095976A1 (en) Following online social behavior to enhance search experience
US20070050467A1 (en) Digital asset management system, including customizable metadata model for asset cataloging and permissioning of digital assets, such as for use with digital images and songs
Grimmelmann The structure of search engine law
US20060115108A1 (en) Metadata management and generation using digital watermarks
US7747537B2 (en) System and method for providing a secure intellectual property marketplace
US20050033747A1 (en) Apparatus and method for the server-sided linking of information
US20080243842A1 (en) Optimizing the performance of duplicate identification by content
US7149353B2 (en) Method and system for suppression of features in digital images of content
US20090012944A1 (en) Internet and Database Searching with Handheld Devices
US20070250496A1 (en) System and Method For Organizing Recorded Events Using Character Tags
US20110320441A1 (en) Adjusting search results based on user social profiles
US7797274B2 (en) Online content collaboration model
US20100223261A1 (en) System for Communication and Collaboration
US20110161174A1 (en) Method and apparatus for managing multimedia files
US20100299326A1 (en) Apparatuses, Methods and Systems For A Forum Ferreting System
US20080306959A1 (en) Semantic web portal and platform
Urban et al. Efficient process or chilling effects-Takedown notices under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ATTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BROCK, JAMES L.;PITKOW, JAMES E.;REEL/FRAME:018503/0505

Effective date: 20060928

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4