US7473184B2 - Golf club - Google Patents

Golf club Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7473184B2
US7473184B2 US11/319,583 US31958305A US7473184B2 US 7473184 B2 US7473184 B2 US 7473184B2 US 31958305 A US31958305 A US 31958305A US 7473184 B2 US7473184 B2 US 7473184B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
golf club
shaft
moment
grip
mass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US11/319,583
Other versions
US20070105641A1 (en
Inventor
Wataru Ban
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd filed Critical Bridgestone Sports Co Ltd
Assigned to BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD. reassignment BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BAN, WATARU
Publication of US20070105641A1 publication Critical patent/US20070105641A1/en
Priority to US12/124,461 priority Critical patent/US7568981B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7473184B2 publication Critical patent/US7473184B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00—Golf clubs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B60/00—Details or accessories of golf clubs, bats, rackets or the like
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00—Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04—Heads
    • A63B53/0466—Heads wood-type

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a golf club and, more particularly, to a wood type golf club such as a driver or fairway wood.
  • Factors that influence the performance of a golf club include the primary moment and secondary moment (moment of inertia) of the golf club.
  • the primary and secondary moments are respectively expressed as m ⁇ L and m ⁇ L 2 where m is the mass of the golf club and L is the length from the grip side end of the golf club to the barycentric position of the golf club.
  • Japanese Patent Laid-Open Nos. 8-173577 and 2005-198816 disclose a golf club improved based on its primary moment. These references point out that when the primary moment is decreased, the golfer can easily increase the head speed and can expect that the traveling distance of a ball will increase. On the other hand, the golf club becomes lighter and the swing orbit of the golf club becomes unstable thus degrading the direction of the ball.
  • Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-46563 discloses a golf club improved by considering the secondary moment.
  • the secondary moment of a golf club influences the feel at impact.
  • the feel at impact is enhanced, and the golfer can easily swing the golf club fully. Also, the direction of the ball improves.
  • the present invention has been made in order to overcome the deficits of prior art.
  • a wood type golf club comprising a shaft, a grip at one end of the shaft, and a head at the other end of the shaft, wherein a mass m (g) of the golf club and a length L (cm) from a grip side end of the golf club to a barycentric position of the golf club satisfy m ⁇ L 2 >2.280 ⁇ 10 6 (g ⁇ cm 2 ) and m ⁇ L 2 >140 ⁇ m ⁇ L ⁇ (5.95 ⁇ m ⁇ 417) ⁇ 10 3 .
  • the golf club has a comparatively small primary moment (m ⁇ L) and a comparatively large secondary moment (m ⁇ L 2 ) within ranges where the practical limitations on the lengths and masses of the golf club and its constituent components are satisfied. As a result, both an increase in traveling distance of the ball and enhanced feel at impact are achieved.
  • FIG. 1A is a view for explaining a golf club A according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1B is a view for explaining a shaft 1 ;
  • FIG. 2A is a table showing the specifications of examples of the present invention and comparative examples
  • FIG. 2B is a table showing the evaluation results of the examples of the present invention and the comparative examples.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the ranges of a primary moment M and secondary moment I, respectively, expressed by equations (1) and (2).
  • FIG. 1A is a view for explaining a wood type golf club A according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the golf club A has a shaft 1 , a grip 2 attached to one end of the shaft 1 , and a head 3 attached to the other end of the shaft 1 .
  • the head 3 has a face portion 3 a which serves as a golf ball hitting surface and a sole portion 3 b which forms the bottom surface of the head 3 .
  • reference symbol Lw denotes the total length of the golf club A, which indicates the length between the grip 2 side end of the golf club A and the intersection of an axis La of the shaft 1 and the sole portion 3 b .
  • a point P 1 indicates the barycentric position of the golf club A, where the golf club A balances with its shaft 1 being in a substantially horizontal state.
  • a point P 2 indicates a position 14 inches from the grip 2 side end of the golf club A in the direction of the axis La.
  • the secondary moment I is a value obtained by multiplying the primary moment M by the barycentric length L. Accordingly, the primary moment M and secondary moment I tend to change basically in the same manner.
  • a certain practical limitation is imposed on the lengths and masses of the golf club and its constituent components. In the case of a wood type golf club, for example, the mass of the grip is about 40 g to 55 g, the mass of the shaft is about 40 g to 65 g, and the mass of the head is about 180 g to 200 g. The total mass of the golf club is about 260 g to 340 g.
  • the mass m and barycentric length L are set to satisfy: m ⁇ L 2 >2.280 ⁇ 10 6 ( g ⁇ cm 2 ) (1) m ⁇ L 2 >140 ⁇ m ⁇ L ⁇ (5.95 ⁇ m ⁇ 417) ⁇ 10 3 (2)
  • equations (1) and (2) are respectively rewritten as: I> 2.280 ⁇ 10 6 ( g ⁇ cm 2 ) I> 140 ⁇ M ⁇ (5.95 ⁇ m ⁇ 417) ⁇ 10 3
  • the secondary moment I is set in the following range: 2.280 ⁇ 10 6 ( g ⁇ cm 2 ) ⁇ I ⁇ 2.500 ⁇ 10 6 ( g ⁇ cm 2 )
  • Equations (1) and (2) are formulated by adjusting the masses and barycentric positions of the shaft 1 , grip 2 , and head 3 which are constituent components of the golf club A.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the ranges of the primary moment M and secondary moment I, respectively, expressed by equations (1) and (2). If equations (1) and (2) are satisfied, the primary moment M and secondary moment I are set within the range, of the ranges divided by lines in FIG. 3 , indicated by an arrow. In the range indicated by the arrow, the primary moment M and second moment I are comparatively small and large, respectively. This range is dependant on the mass m of the golf club A (m 1 , m 2 , and m 3 in FIG. 3 )
  • the golf club A provides a golf club which has a comparatively small primary moment M and a comparatively large secondary moment I within ranges where the practical limitations on the lengths and masses of the golf club A and its constituent components are satisfied. As a result, both an increase in traveling distance of the ball and enhanced feel at impact are achieved.
  • the mass m of the golf club A is preferably within the range of 260 (g) to 300 (g) (both inclusive). If the golf club A is excessively lightweight, the golfer may feel it difficult to swing the golf club A. If the mass m falls within this range, the above effect can be obtained while solving the swing difficulty of the golf club A.
  • the total length Lw of the golf club A can be set within a range of 41 inches to 50 inches (both inclusive), and the loft angle of the face portion 3 a of the head 3 can be set to 25° or less.
  • a wood type golf club such as a driver or fairway wood for which an increase in traveling distance of the ball is regarded significant.
  • the total length Lw is preferably set within a range of 44 inches to 48 inches (both inclusive) and the loft angle is set within a range of 5 degrees to 15 degrees (both inclusive).
  • the golf club A according to this embodiment preferably has a club balance of C7 to D5 according to the 14-inch method.
  • the 14-inch method is a known method of evaluating the club balance of a golf club. This method will be described with reference to FIG. 1A .
  • the load of the grip 2 side end of the golf club A when the shaft 1 is maintained substantially horizontal with the point P 2 being as the fulcrum is converted to be used as an evaluation index. If the club balance of the golf club A is within the above range, the above effect can be obtained within the range of the club balance of a general golf club. With this golf club, address and swing can be performed naturally when compared to a general golf club. It is further preferable if the club balance of the golf club A is C8 to D2 according to the 14-inch method.
  • the barycentric length L is significant. More specifically, if the barycentric length L is increased, the secondary moment I can be increased more. Even when the barycentric length L is large, if the mass m is decreased, the primary moment M decreases.
  • the mass of the grip 2 it is preferable to set the mass of the grip 2 to 40 (g) or less.
  • the mass of the grip 2 is set within a range of 25 (g) to 40 (g) (both inclusive). Within this range, the above effect can be obtained without largely impairing the grip feel of the grip 2 .
  • FIG. 1B is a view for explaining the shaft 1 .
  • reference symbol Ls denotes the total length of the shaft 1 .
  • a point P 3 indicates the barycentric position of the shaft 1 alone.
  • Reference symbol L′ denotes the length from the head 3 side (tip side) end of the shaft 1 to the barycentric position P 3 .
  • the mass of the shaft 1 is 50 (g) or less, and the barycentric position P 3 of the shaft 1 falls within the range of 50%.
  • the total length Ls of the shaft 1 from the head 3 side (tip side) end of the shaft 1 that is, satisfies L′ ⁇ 0.5 ⁇ Ls.
  • the mass m of the golf club A can be decreased more to decrease the primary moment M. If the weight of the shaft 1 is excessively decreased, however, the strength of the shaft 1 may decrease. Therefore, the mass of the shaft 1 is preferably within the range of 30 (g) to 50 (g) (both inclusive). If the barycentric position P 3 of the shaft 1 is extremely closer to the head 3 side, the strength of the shaft 1 may decrease. Therefore, preferably, the barycentric position P 3 of the shaft 1 falls within the range of 45% to 49% the total length Ls of the shaft 1 from the head 3 side end of the shaft 1 , that is, satisfies 0.45 ⁇ Ls ⁇ L′ ⁇ 0.49 ⁇ Ls.
  • FIG. 2A is a table showing the specifications of the examples (Examples 1 and 2) of the present invention and comparative examples (commercially available products A to C), each of which is a driver.
  • the symbols (e.g., m, M, I) of the respective parameters correspond to the reference symbols described above.
  • “X” is the right-hand side of equation (2), which is (140 ⁇ M ⁇ (5.95 ⁇ m ⁇ 417) ⁇ 10 3 ).
  • I ⁇ X is a value obtained by subtracting “X” from a secondary moment I. The requirement of equation (2) is not satisfied if “I ⁇ X” is a negative value. Equation (2) is satisfied if “I ⁇ X” is a positive value.
  • the commercially available product A satisfies neither equation (1) nor (2).
  • the commercially available products B and C satisfy equation (1) but do not satisfy equation (2).
  • Both Examples 1 and 2 satisfy equations (1) and (2).
  • Examples 1 and 2 and the commercially available products A to C no substantial difference exists concerning the total length Lw and the loft angle that mainly influence the traveling distance of the ball. However, Example 2 has the largest total length Lw.
  • FIG. 2B is a table showing the evaluation results of Examples 1 and 2 and commercially available products A to C.
  • the performance evaluation was conducted in the following manner. Five testers hit the golf ball as test hitting using the golf clubs of Examples 1 and 2 and commercially available products A to C. Of the trial hits, three hits with good traveling distances and directions were selected as the evaluation targets. The respective parameters shown in FIG. 2B of the evaluation targets were averaged. Of the parameters shown in FIG. 2B , “deviation amount” indicates the leftward or rightward distance from the target traveling direction of the ball to the actual falling point of the ball, which serves as the index of the directivity of the ball.
  • the organoleptic evaluation is the comment formed by the five testers through exchanging opinions on the relative swing easiness and the like of each club after the test hitting.
  • Examples 1 and 2 are superior to the commercially available products A to C in head speed.
  • Each of Examples 1 and 2 has a smaller deviation amount than that of either one of the commercially available products A to C, and has a comparatively better enhanced feel at impact as the organoleptic evaluation. This may be because Examples 1 and 2 satisfy equations (1) and (2), therefore the secondary moments I are comparatively large while the primary moments M are comparatively small.
  • the commercially available products B and C satisfy equation (1), and the secondary moments I are comparatively large.
  • the commercially available products B and C are inferior to either of Examples 1 and 2 in terms of the organoleptic evaluation. This may be due to the following reason.
  • the primary moments M of the commercially available products B and C are large and inferior to that of either one of Examples 1 and 2.
  • Example 2 has the largest total length Lw, it was evaluated as easiest to swing. Generally, it is more difficult to swing a golf club as its length increases. The reasons why Example 2 was evaluated as easy to swing may be because the secondary moment I of Example 2 is comparatively large while the primary moment M is comparatively small.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Golf Clubs (AREA)

Abstract

This invention provides a wood type golf club including a shaft, a grip at one end of the shaft, and a head at the other end of the shaft, wherein a mass m (g) of the golf club and a length L (cm) from a grip side end of the golf club to a barycentric position of the golf club satisfy m×L2>2.280×106 (g·cm2) and m×L2>140×m×L−(5.95×m−417)×103.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a golf club and, more particularly, to a wood type golf club such as a driver or fairway wood.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Factors that influence the performance of a golf club include the primary moment and secondary moment (moment of inertia) of the golf club. The primary and secondary moments are respectively expressed as m×L and m×L2 where m is the mass of the golf club and L is the length from the grip side end of the golf club to the barycentric position of the golf club.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open Nos. 8-173577 and 2005-198816 disclose a golf club improved based on its primary moment. These references point out that when the primary moment is decreased, the golfer can easily increase the head speed and can expect that the traveling distance of a ball will increase. On the other hand, the golf club becomes lighter and the swing orbit of the golf club becomes unstable thus degrading the direction of the ball.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-46563 discloses a golf club improved by considering the secondary moment. Generally, it is known that the secondary moment of a golf club influences the feel at impact. When the secondary moment is large, the feel at impact is enhanced, and the golfer can easily swing the golf club fully. Also, the direction of the ball improves.
When the secondary moment is increased, however, the primary moment also increases accordingly. Consequently, the head speed decreases and reduces the traveling distance of the ball. Conventional golf clubs have been improved based on only either the primary or secondary moment and is difficult to increase the traveling distance of the ball and at the same time enhance the feel at impact.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention has been made in order to overcome the deficits of prior art.
According to the aspects of the present invention, it is provided a wood type golf club comprising a shaft, a grip at one end of the shaft, and a head at the other end of the shaft, wherein a mass m (g) of the golf club and a length L (cm) from a grip side end of the golf club to a barycentric position of the golf club satisfy m×L2>2.280×106 (g·cm2) and m×L2>140×m×L−(5.95×m−417)×103.
The golf club has a comparatively small primary moment (m×L) and a comparatively large secondary moment (m×L2) within ranges where the practical limitations on the lengths and masses of the golf club and its constituent components are satisfied. As a result, both an increase in traveling distance of the ball and enhanced feel at impact are achieved.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1A is a view for explaining a golf club A according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 1B is a view for explaining a shaft 1;
FIG. 2A is a table showing the specifications of examples of the present invention and comparative examples;
FIG. 2B is a table showing the evaluation results of the examples of the present invention and the comparative examples; and
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the ranges of a primary moment M and secondary moment I, respectively, expressed by equations (1) and (2).
 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described in detail in accordance with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1A is a view for explaining a wood type golf club A according to an embodiment of the present invention. The golf club A has a shaft 1, a grip 2 attached to one end of the shaft 1, and a head 3 attached to the other end of the shaft 1. The head 3 has a face portion 3 a which serves as a golf ball hitting surface and a sole portion 3 b which forms the bottom surface of the head 3.
In FIG. 1A, reference symbol Lw denotes the total length of the golf club A, which indicates the length between the grip 2 side end of the golf club A and the intersection of an axis La of the shaft 1 and the sole portion 3 b. A point P1 indicates the barycentric position of the golf club A, where the golf club A balances with its shaft 1 being in a substantially horizontal state. A point P2 indicates a position 14 inches from the grip 2 side end of the golf club A in the direction of the axis La.
A primary moment M (g·cm) and secondary moment I (g·cm2) of the golf club A are respectively expressed as:
M=m×L
I=m×L 2
where m (g) is the mass (total mass) of the golf club A and L (cm) is the length (to be referred to as the barycentric length hereinafter) from the grip 2 side end to the barycentric position P1 of the golf club A.
This embodiment is aimed at maximizing the secondary moment while minimizing the primary moment to achieve both an increase in traveling distance of the ball and enhanced feel at impact. The secondary moment I is a value obtained by multiplying the primary moment M by the barycentric length L. Accordingly, the primary moment M and secondary moment I tend to change basically in the same manner. Generally, a certain practical limitation is imposed on the lengths and masses of the golf club and its constituent components. In the case of a wood type golf club, for example, the mass of the grip is about 40 g to 55 g, the mass of the shaft is about 40 g to 65 g, and the mass of the head is about 180 g to 200 g. The total mass of the golf club is about 260 g to 340 g.
In this embodiment, the mass m and barycentric length L are set to satisfy:
m×L 2>2.280×106 (g·cm2)  (1)
m×L 2>140×m×L−(5.95×m−417)×103  (2)
By using the primary moment M and secondary moment I, equations (1) and (2) are respectively rewritten as:
I>2.280×106 (g·cm2)
I>140×M−(5.95×m−417)×103
Preferably, the secondary moment I is set in the following range:
2.280×106 (g·cm2)<I≦2.500×106 (g·cm2)
Equations (1) and (2) are formulated by adjusting the masses and barycentric positions of the shaft 1, grip 2, and head 3 which are constituent components of the golf club A. FIG. 3 is a graph showing the ranges of the primary moment M and secondary moment I, respectively, expressed by equations (1) and (2). If equations (1) and (2) are satisfied, the primary moment M and secondary moment I are set within the range, of the ranges divided by lines in FIG. 3, indicated by an arrow. In the range indicated by the arrow, the primary moment M and second moment I are comparatively small and large, respectively. This range is dependant on the mass m of the golf club A (m1, m2, and m3 in FIG. 3)
The golf club A according to this embodiment provides a golf club which has a comparatively small primary moment M and a comparatively large secondary moment I within ranges where the practical limitations on the lengths and masses of the golf club A and its constituent components are satisfied. As a result, both an increase in traveling distance of the ball and enhanced feel at impact are achieved.
The mass m of the golf club A is preferably within the range of 260 (g) to 300 (g) (both inclusive). If the golf club A is excessively lightweight, the golfer may feel it difficult to swing the golf club A. If the mass m falls within this range, the above effect can be obtained while solving the swing difficulty of the golf club A.
The total length Lw of the golf club A can be set within a range of 41 inches to 50 inches (both inclusive), and the loft angle of the face portion 3 a of the head 3 can be set to 25° or less. To set the total length and loft angle of the golf club within these ranges is preferable for a wood type golf club such as a driver or fairway wood for which an increase in traveling distance of the ball is regarded significant. Furthermore, when the golf club A according to this embodiment is a driver, the total length Lw is preferably set within a range of 44 inches to 48 inches (both inclusive) and the loft angle is set within a range of 5 degrees to 15 degrees (both inclusive).
The golf club A according to this embodiment preferably has a club balance of C7 to D5 according to the 14-inch method. The 14-inch method is a known method of evaluating the club balance of a golf club. This method will be described with reference to FIG. 1A. According to the 14-inch method, the load of the grip 2 side end of the golf club A when the shaft 1 is maintained substantially horizontal with the point P2 being as the fulcrum is converted to be used as an evaluation index. If the club balance of the golf club A is within the above range, the above effect can be obtained within the range of the club balance of a general golf club. With this golf club, address and swing can be performed naturally when compared to a general golf club. It is further preferable if the club balance of the golf club A is C8 to D2 according to the 14-inch method.
To further decrease and increase the primary moment M and secondary moment I, respectively, of the golf club A, the barycentric length L is significant. More specifically, if the barycentric length L is increased, the secondary moment I can be increased more. Even when the barycentric length L is large, if the mass m is decreased, the primary moment M decreases.
For this reason, for example, it is preferable to set the mass of the grip 2 to 40 (g) or less. When the weight of the grip 2 side of the golf club A is decreased, a larger barycentric length L can be more easily ensured, and the primary moment M and secondary moment I of the golf club A can easily be set within the above numerical ranges. If the weight of the grip 2 is excessively decreased, the wall thickness of the grip 2 may be decreased to impair the grip feel of the golfer. Therefore, more preferably, the mass of the grip 2 is set within a range of 25 (g) to 40 (g) (both inclusive). Within this range, the above effect can be obtained without largely impairing the grip feel of the grip 2.
To further increase the barycentric length L, specifications of the shaft 1 may be contrived. FIG. 1B is a view for explaining the shaft 1. In FIG. 1B, reference symbol Ls denotes the total length of the shaft 1. A point P3 indicates the barycentric position of the shaft 1 alone. When the shaft 1 is substantially horizontal, the shaft 1 balances at the point P3. Reference symbol L′ denotes the length from the head 3 side (tip side) end of the shaft 1 to the barycentric position P3.
For example, preferably, the mass of the shaft 1 is 50 (g) or less, and the barycentric position P3 of the shaft 1 falls within the range of 50%. the total length Ls of the shaft 1 from the head 3 side (tip side) end of the shaft 1, that is, satisfies L′≦0.5×Ls. When the weight of the head 3 side of the golf club A is increased, a larger barycentric length L can be ensured more easily, and equations (1) and (2) can be satisfied more easily.
When the weight of the shaft 1 is decreased, the mass m of the golf club A can be decreased more to decrease the primary moment M. If the weight of the shaft 1 is excessively decreased, however, the strength of the shaft 1 may decrease. Therefore, the mass of the shaft 1 is preferably within the range of 30 (g) to 50 (g) (both inclusive). If the barycentric position P3 of the shaft 1 is extremely closer to the head 3 side, the strength of the shaft 1 may decrease. Therefore, preferably, the barycentric position P3 of the shaft 1 falls within the range of 45% to 49% the total length Ls of the shaft 1 from the head 3 side end of the shaft 1, that is, satisfies 0.45×Ls≦L′≦0.49×Ls.
EXAMPLE
Performance evaluation was performed using the examples of the present invention and commercially available golf clubs as comparative examples. FIG. 2A is a table showing the specifications of the examples (Examples 1 and 2) of the present invention and comparative examples (commercially available products A to C), each of which is a driver. The symbols (e.g., m, M, I) of the respective parameters correspond to the reference symbols described above. “X” is the right-hand side of equation (2), which is (140×M−(5.95×m−417)×103). “I−X” is a value obtained by subtracting “X” from a secondary moment I. The requirement of equation (2) is not satisfied if “I−X” is a negative value. Equation (2) is satisfied if “I−X” is a positive value.
The commercially available product A satisfies neither equation (1) nor (2). The commercially available products B and C satisfy equation (1) but do not satisfy equation (2). Both Examples 1 and 2 satisfy equations (1) and (2). Among Examples 1 and 2 and the commercially available products A to C, no substantial difference exists concerning the total length Lw and the loft angle that mainly influence the traveling distance of the ball. However, Example 2 has the largest total length Lw.
FIG. 2B is a table showing the evaluation results of Examples 1 and 2 and commercially available products A to C. The performance evaluation was conducted in the following manner. Five testers hit the golf ball as test hitting using the golf clubs of Examples 1 and 2 and commercially available products A to C. Of the trial hits, three hits with good traveling distances and directions were selected as the evaluation targets. The respective parameters shown in FIG. 2B of the evaluation targets were averaged. Of the parameters shown in FIG. 2B, “deviation amount” indicates the leftward or rightward distance from the target traveling direction of the ball to the actual falling point of the ball, which serves as the index of the directivity of the ball. The organoleptic evaluation is the comment formed by the five testers through exchanging opinions on the relative swing easiness and the like of each club after the test hitting.
From the results of the performance evaluation of FIG. 2B, Examples 1 and 2 are superior to the commercially available products A to C in head speed. Each of Examples 1 and 2 has a smaller deviation amount than that of either one of the commercially available products A to C, and has a comparatively better enhanced feel at impact as the organoleptic evaluation. This may be because Examples 1 and 2 satisfy equations (1) and (2), therefore the secondary moments I are comparatively large while the primary moments M are comparatively small.
As described above, the commercially available products B and C satisfy equation (1), and the secondary moments I are comparatively large. However, the commercially available products B and C are inferior to either of Examples 1 and 2 in terms of the organoleptic evaluation. This may be due to the following reason. The primary moments M of the commercially available products B and C are large and inferior to that of either one of Examples 1 and 2. Thus, in spite that the tester swung the golf club of each of the commercially available products B and C strongly, the head speed was not high enough and the tester could not swing the golf club easily.
In spite that Example 2 has the largest total length Lw, it was evaluated as easiest to swing. Generally, it is more difficult to swing a golf club as its length increases. The reasons why Example 2 was evaluated as easy to swing may be because the secondary moment I of Example 2 is comparatively large while the primary moment M is comparatively small.
As many apparently widely different embodiments of the present invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments thereof except as defined in the appended claims.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY
This application claims priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-324017 filed on Nov. 8, 2005, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.

Claims (1)

1. A wood type golf club comprising a shaft, a grip at one end of said shaft, and a head at the other end of said shaft,
wherein a mass m (g) of the golf club and a length L (cm) from a grip side end of the golf club to a barycentric position of the golf club satisfy

m×L=2.53×104(g·cm) and

m×L 2=2.329×106(g·cm2), and
a barycentric position of said shaft is at 48.0% a total length of said shaft from a head side end of said shaft, wherein
the mass m is 275.7 (g),
the length L (cm) is 91.9 (cm)
a loft angle of a face of said head is 10.5 degrees,
a mass of said grip is 40.0 (g), and
a mass of said shaft is 48.0 (g).
US11/319,583 2005-11-08 2005-12-29 Golf club Expired - Fee Related US7473184B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/124,461 US7568981B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2008-05-21 Golf club

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005324017A JP2007130088A (en) 2005-11-08 2005-11-08 Golf club
JP2005-324017 2005-11-08

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/124,461 Division US7568981B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2008-05-21 Golf club

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070105641A1 US20070105641A1 (en) 2007-05-10
US7473184B2 true US7473184B2 (en) 2009-01-06

Family

ID=37866358

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/319,583 Expired - Fee Related US7473184B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2005-12-29 Golf club
US12/124,461 Expired - Fee Related US7568981B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2008-05-21 Golf club

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/124,461 Expired - Fee Related US7568981B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2008-05-21 Golf club

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US7473184B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1782863A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2007130088A (en)
KR (1) KR20070049536A (en)
CN (1) CN1962004A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100273567A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2010-10-28 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8951142B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2015-02-10 Sri Sports Limited Golf club

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5367492B2 (en) * 2009-07-31 2013-12-11 ダンロップスポーツ株式会社 Golf club evaluation method
JP5848521B2 (en) * 2011-05-18 2016-01-27 ダンロップスポーツ株式会社 Golf club
US8608586B2 (en) * 2011-09-01 2013-12-17 Richard E. Parente Golf putter
JP5890995B2 (en) * 2011-10-12 2016-03-22 ダンロップスポーツ株式会社 Golf club
US11358035B2 (en) * 2020-03-04 2022-06-14 Andrew T. Barber Balance point alignment for golf shafts and golf clubs
JP7694040B2 (en) * 2021-01-21 2025-06-18 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Golf Clubs

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3703824A (en) 1970-05-11 1972-11-28 Dunlop Co Ltd Apparatus for comparing moments of inertia of golf clubs
US4058312A (en) 1974-09-05 1977-11-15 The Square Two Golf Corporation Golf club
US4887815A (en) * 1987-10-09 1989-12-19 Hughes James W Low swing weight golf club set
JPH08173577A (en) 1994-12-22 1996-07-09 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Golf club
JPH10155952A (en) * 1996-11-29 1998-06-16 Daiwa Seiko Inc Golf club shaft
US5879241A (en) * 1997-03-04 1999-03-09 Cook; Eric H. Matched set of golf clubs and method of producing the same
JP2001046563A (en) 1999-08-09 2001-02-20 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Golf club
US20020016214A1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2002-02-07 David B. Hueber Golf clubs
JP2005198816A (en) 2004-01-15 2005-07-28 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Golf club
US20050181887A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2005-08-18 Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. Golf club
JP2005304679A (en) * 2004-04-20 2005-11-04 Hirobumi Inoue Clubs and club sets and grips

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001276289A (en) * 2000-04-03 2001-10-09 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Long golf clubs
JP2002263222A (en) * 2001-03-09 2002-09-17 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Golf club

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3703824A (en) 1970-05-11 1972-11-28 Dunlop Co Ltd Apparatus for comparing moments of inertia of golf clubs
US4058312A (en) 1974-09-05 1977-11-15 The Square Two Golf Corporation Golf club
US4887815A (en) * 1987-10-09 1989-12-19 Hughes James W Low swing weight golf club set
JPH08173577A (en) 1994-12-22 1996-07-09 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Golf club
JPH10155952A (en) * 1996-11-29 1998-06-16 Daiwa Seiko Inc Golf club shaft
US5879241A (en) * 1997-03-04 1999-03-09 Cook; Eric H. Matched set of golf clubs and method of producing the same
JP2001046563A (en) 1999-08-09 2001-02-20 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Golf club
US20020016214A1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2002-02-07 David B. Hueber Golf clubs
JP2005198816A (en) 2004-01-15 2005-07-28 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Golf club
US20050181887A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2005-08-18 Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. Golf club
JP2005304679A (en) * 2004-04-20 2005-11-04 Hirobumi Inoue Clubs and club sets and grips

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100273567A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2010-10-28 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8241139B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2012-08-14 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8784231B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2014-07-22 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8951142B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2015-02-10 Sri Sports Limited Golf club

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1962004A (en) 2007-05-16
KR20070049536A (en) 2007-05-11
US20070105641A1 (en) 2007-05-10
JP2007130088A (en) 2007-05-31
US7568981B2 (en) 2009-08-04
US20080234065A1 (en) 2008-09-25
EP1782863A1 (en) 2007-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7568981B2 (en) Golf club
US7507165B2 (en) Golf club
JP5823122B2 (en) Golf club
JP5185992B2 (en) Golf club
US7416495B2 (en) Golf club
JP6093853B2 (en) Golf club head or other ball striking device having face deformation limiting member
US8574095B2 (en) Golf club head
US7993214B2 (en) Golf club head
JP5792944B2 (en) Golf club
JP2010154875A (en) Shaft set for golf club and club set with it
JP2013039194A (en) Golf club set
JP4528241B2 (en) Golf club
US7077761B2 (en) Golf club and method of making golf club
US20060258481A1 (en) Wood-type golf club head
JP4924961B1 (en) Golf club
JP4563192B2 (en) Golf clubs
JP2002000772A (en) Golf club head
JP2002052103A (en) Golf club shaft
JP2001095955A (en) Golf club head
JPH08173577A (en) Golf club
JP6843601B2 (en) Golf club set
JP2009022337A (en) Golf club set
KR20160108151A (en) Golf club shaft
JP2002291948A (en) Golf club head and golf club

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BAN, WATARU;REEL/FRAME:017424/0908

Effective date: 20051215

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20170106