US690960A - Tunnel. - Google Patents

Tunnel. Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US690960A
US690960A US8620701A US1901086207A US690960A US 690960 A US690960 A US 690960A US 8620701 A US8620701 A US 8620701A US 1901086207 A US1901086207 A US 1901086207A US 690960 A US690960 A US 690960A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
tunnel
shell
span
bridge
roadway
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US8620701A
Inventor
Charles M Jacobs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US8620701A priority Critical patent/US690960A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US690960A publication Critical patent/US690960A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21FSAFETY DEVICES, TRANSPORT, FILLING-UP, RESCUE, VENTILATION, OR DRAINING IN OR OF MINES OR TUNNELS
    • E21F17/00Methods or devices for use in mines or tunnels, not covered elsewhere
    • E21F17/103Dams, e.g. for ventilation

Definitions

  • My invention relates to tunnels.
  • Figurel is in the main a longitudinal sectional view of my invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a section on the line 2 2 of Fig. l.
  • Fig. 3 is a section on the line 3 3 of Fig. l.
  • Fig. 4 is a similar View showing an additional feature of construction.
  • Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic view of twin tunnels.
  • Fig. l of the drawings the tunnel is shown as passing through loose or soft earthy material-s uch as gravel, silt, or the like-such as often found underneath a river.
  • loose or soft earthy material-s uch as gravel, silt, or the like-such as often found underneath a river.
  • rock or hardpan or other firm foundation In the lower part of Fig. 1 is illustrated rock or hardpan or other firm foundation.
  • great difficulty is experienced in passing a tunnel through material such a silt, running sand, and thelike, and under the present con ditions of heavy loads it is generally supposed to be practically impossible and unsafe to construct a very long tunnel through such ma ⁇ terials.
  • a tunnel construction maybe passed through such material and be entirely safe and practicable and will have the capacity of carrying great loads, such as heavy main-line railway traffic, although it is obvious the tunnel maybe used for any purpose, such as a pathway or roadway, the purpose of the invention being to make it available for all uses.
  • A is a solid foundation material.
  • B is the silt or other loose unstable material.
  • C is water above the bed formed by the silt or the like.
  • D is a protecting-shell, formed of any suit able material-for example, cast-iron.
  • the shell is of cylindrical form and built up of sectional rings added one to the other.
  • the form of the protecting-shell may be lnodie'd.
  • the piers are piers extending downwardly from the lower side of the tunnel until they secure a solid foundation. As shown in the drawings, the piers are extended through the silt B and down to the foundation A. It is preferred that the shell D should be of such strength that in the process of erection it will support itself and afford working space to protect a passage-Way from one pier to another; but it is not essential that the strength of the shell I) should be such as to carry the loads intended to pass through the tunnel. In the preferred form of construction the loads are carried b y means of a bridge of any effective construction, as indicated in the drawings.
  • F illu-strates a roadway, and G any approved form of truss constitu ting the span supporting said roadway.
  • the load is taken by the spans and transmitted to the piers in the usual way.
  • the tunnel-shell D maybe of only sufficient strength to carry its own weight, yet it will not be deiiected by reason of any loads passing through it.
  • the shell may be tied to the bridgefor example, by connecting-plates II H, as shown in Fig. Lt. This construction will be found of advantage where long spans are made from pier to pier, although it is a matter of option With the engineer whether the same are availed of or not.
  • E is the pier, D the shell, and F the roadway.
  • pier E supports the casting I, which in turn supports the bridge girders or trusses and also the shell.
  • the weight of the load is transmitted from the bridge through the casting to the pier.
  • the construction might be modified so that the shell performs the dual function of shell and bridge-span.
  • K represents transverse supporting-beams carried at suitable intervals by the spans and upon IOO which the roadway maybe placed. This suggests one convenient form for constructing the roadway. Obviously it maybe modiiied in a variety of ways.
  • a plurality of tunnel-bridges may be arranged side by side and connected to each other by a girder J or other suitable means.
  • the piers may be of any desired cross-sectional shape and may be formed of any suitable material, such as steel, concrete, stone, screw-piles, or other material.
  • Hitherto tunnels designed to carry great weights or heavy loads must be depressed or carried down to such a great depth as to render the approach to the entrances practically prohibitive.
  • the level ofthe tunnel may be raised much higher, thereby reducing the cost of approaches and making it possible to reach a surface terminal only a short distance from the deepest point of the tunnel.
  • a subterranean tunnel comprising a bridge-span, a pier underneath and supporting said span, and a surrounding shell forming a tunnel cavity or passage.
  • a subterranean tunnel comprising a bridge-span, a pier underneath and supporting said span, a roadway carried by vsaid span, and a surrounding shell forming a tunnel cavity or passage.
  • a subterranean t'unnel comprising a bridge-span, a pier underneath and supporting said span, and a surrounding shell forining a tunnel cavity or passage, said shell being secured to said bridge-span.
  • a subterranean tunnel composed of piers carrying; a truss-like structure bearing a roadway and a shell forming the tunnel cavity or passage and holding back the earth through which the tunnel passes.
  • a tunnel for projecting a passage-way through unstable earthy' material comprising a shell for protecting a passage-way therethrough, a bridge-span within said shell and a roadway carried by said bridge-span and piers underneath and supporting said bridge and roadway, said piers extending downwardly through said unstable earthy material to solid foundation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Lining And Supports For Tunnels (AREA)

Description

N0. 690,960. Pat'ented lan. |04, |902. C. M. JACOBS.
TUNNEL.
(Application med Dec. 1*'7, 1901.) (No Nudel.) 3 Sheets-Sheet l.
77/1/57 'Q "um l lim/@mmf W M MQW @M366 ./JCLOU 5J we Nonms crans ce, vHoYoLITHo., WASHINGTON. nA c.
l Patented lan. I4, H902. C. M. JACUBS.
T U N N E L.
(Application filed Dec. 17, 1901.)
3 Sheets-Sheet 2.
(No Model.)
TN; mams PETERS ou, PHOTQUTHQ., wAsmNcroN, n. c.
Patned an. I4, |902. C. M. JACOBS.
T U N N E L.
(Application led Dec. 17, 1901. y
3 Sheets-Shoal 3.
No Model.)
iooo
mi "cams frans co. PHoraLnHo.. wAsmNmoN, D. c.
llniTTnn dTaTns PaTnNT Trish.
CHARLES M. JACOBS, OF NE'W YORK, N. Y.
TUNNEL.
SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 690,960, dated January 14, 1902. Application filed December 17,1901. Serial No. 86,207. (No model.)
To all whom, t may concern:
Beit known that I, CHARLES M. JACOBS, a subject of the King of Great Britain, residing at New York, New York county, New York State, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Tunnels, of which the following is a full, clear, and exact description.
My invention relates to tunnels.
Among the main objects of my invention is to provide a simple, highly efficient, economical, and durable construction for tu nnels and the like.
In the drawings, Figurel is in the main a longitudinal sectional view of my invention. Fig. 2 is a section on the line 2 2 of Fig. l. Fig. 3 is a section on the line 3 3 of Fig. l. Fig. 4 is a similar View showing an additional feature of construction. Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic view of twin tunnels.
In Fig. l of the drawings the tunnel is shown as passing through loose or soft earthy material-s uch as gravel, silt, or the like-such as often found underneath a river. In the lower part of Fig. 1 is illustrated rock or hardpan or other firm foundation. As is well known, great difficulty is experienced in passing a tunnel through material such a silt, running sand, and thelike, and under the present con ditions of heavy loads it is generally supposed to be practically impossible and unsafe to construct a very long tunnel through such ma` terials. By myinvention a tunnel construction maybe passed through such material and be entirely safe and practicable and will have the capacity of carrying great loads, such as heavy main-line railway traffic, although it is obvious the tunnel maybe used for any purpose, such as a pathway or roadway, the purpose of the invention being to make it available for all uses.
In the drawings, A is a solid foundation material.
B is the silt or other loose unstable material.
C is water above the bed formed by the silt or the like.
D is a protecting-shell, formed of any suit able material-for example, cast-iron. In the particular construction shown the shell is of cylindrical form and built up of sectional rings added one to the other. Obviously the form of the protecting-shell may be lnodie'd.
E E are piers extending downwardly from the lower side of the tunnel until they secure a solid foundation. As shown in the drawings, the piers are extended through the silt B and down to the foundation A. It is preferred that the shell D should be of such strength that in the process of erection it will support itself and afford working space to protect a passage-Way from one pier to another; but it is not essential that the strength of the shell I) should be such as to carry the loads intended to pass through the tunnel. In the preferred form of construction the loads are carried b y means of a bridge of any effective construction, as indicated in the drawings.
In the drawings, F illu-strates a roadway, and G any approved form of truss constitu ting the span supporting said roadway. In use the load is taken by the spans and transmitted to the piers in the usual way. By this construction the tunnel-shell D maybe of only sufficient strength to carry its own weight, yet it will not be deiiected by reason of any loads passing through it.
From the foregoing it will loe seen that the in vention m ay properly be entitled and clearly defined hy the term subterranean tunnelbridge.
'lhe piers may be placed at such intervals as the necessity requires and the load de mands, the determination of that question being largely decided by the conditions that prevail in different localites. lf desired, the shell may be tied to the bridgefor example, by connecting-plates II H, as shown in Fig. Lt. This construction will be found of advantage where long spans are made from pier to pier, although it is a matter of option With the engineer whether the same are availed of or not.
-In Fig. 2 it will be seen that E is the pier, D the shell, and F the roadway. 'Ihe pier E supports the casting I, which in turn supports the bridge girders or trusses and also the shell. In the particular construction shown the weight of the load is transmitted from the bridge through the casting to the pier. Manifestly the construction might be modified so that the shell performs the dual function of shell and bridge-span. K represents transverse supporting-beams carried at suitable intervals by the spans and upon IOO which the roadway maybe placed. This suggests one convenient form for constructing the roadway. Obviously it maybe modiiied in a variety of ways.
As shown in Fig. 5, if desirable a plurality of tunnel-bridges may be arranged side by side and connected to each other by a girder J or other suitable means.
The piers may be of any desired cross-sectional shape and may be formed of any suitable material, such as steel, concrete, stone, screw-piles, or other material.
Hitherto tunnels designed to carry great weights or heavy loads must be depressed or carried down to such a great depth as to render the approach to the entrances practically prohibitive. By this invention, however, the level ofthe tunnel may be raised much higher, thereby reducing the cost of approaches and making it possible to reach a surface terminal only a short distance from the deepest point of the tunnel.
What I claim is- 1. A subterranean tunnel, comprising a bridge-span, a pier underneath and supporting said span, and a surrounding shell forming a tunnel cavity or passage.
2. A subterranean tunnel, comprising a bridge-span, a pier underneath and supporting said span, a roadway carried by vsaid span, and a surrounding shell forming a tunnel cavity or passage.
3. A subterranean t'unnel, comprising a bridge-span, a pier underneath and supporting said span, and a surrounding shell forining a tunnel cavity or passage, said shell being secured to said bridge-span.
4. A subterranean tunnel composed of piers carrying; a truss-like structure bearing a roadway and a shell forming the tunnel cavity or passage and holding back the earth through which the tunnel passes.
5. A tunnel for projecting a passage-way through unstable earthy' material, said tunnel comprising a shell for protecting a passage-way therethrough, a bridge-span within said shell and a roadway carried by said bridge-span and piers underneath and supporting said bridge and roadway, said piers extending downwardly through said unstable earthy material to solid foundation.
CHARLES M. JACOBS.
Witnesses:
L. VREELAND, R. S. ALLYN.
US8620701A 1901-12-17 1901-12-17 Tunnel. Expired - Lifetime US690960A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8620701A US690960A (en) 1901-12-17 1901-12-17 Tunnel.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8620701A US690960A (en) 1901-12-17 1901-12-17 Tunnel.

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US690960A true US690960A (en) 1902-01-14

Family

ID=2759501

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US8620701A Expired - Lifetime US690960A (en) 1901-12-17 1901-12-17 Tunnel.

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US690960A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US690960A (en) Tunnel.
US513389A (en) Suspension-bridge
WO1990006401A1 (en) Enclosed prestressed concrete suspension bridge and method for constructing said bridge
US731595A (en) Concrete-steel sidewalk.
US637935A (en) Block for building moles, dams, piers, & c.
US1019458A (en) Suspension-bridge.
US3605153A (en) Single tower suspension bridges
US445994A (en) William dale harris
US1007299A (en) Bridge.
US715406A (en) Tunnel-roof.
US715497A (en) Tunnel.
Thakur Technologies of transportation: road, bridge and boat construction in colonial Punjab
Davis et al. THE KING EDWARD VII BRIDGE, NEWCASTLE-ON-TYNE.(INCLUDING APPENDIXES AND PLATES AT BACK OF VOLUME).
US968552A (en) Suspension-bridge.
ELLIOTT COOPER et al. DISCUSSION. QUEEN ALEXANDRIA BRIDGE, OVER THE RIVER WEAR, SUNDERLAND AND THE NEW CLYDE BRIDGE OF THE CALEDONIAN RAILWAY AT GLASGOW.
Kelley et al. Discussion on Johnsonville Bridge
BARLOW et al. CORRESPONDENCE. THE HUDSON RIVER TUNNELS OF THE HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD.
Edwards The evolution of early American bridges
Kulbach Conceptual design of Estonian longest strait crossing
US714204A (en) Tunnel construction.
Zhang Research on the Developing Process and the Types of Bridges
GRIERSON et al. DISCUSSION ON RECONSTRUCTION OF VIADUCTS.
Dudra Design and Construction of Hudson Hope Bridge
Steele On Skew Bridges, and on the Construction of Falls Skew Bridge Over the Schuylkill, near Philadelphia
US380934A (en) John b