US6850525B2 - Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network performance monitor - Google Patents

Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network performance monitor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6850525B2
US6850525B2 US10/038,837 US3883702A US6850525B2 US 6850525 B2 US6850525 B2 US 6850525B2 US 3883702 A US3883702 A US 3883702A US 6850525 B2 US6850525 B2 US 6850525B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
voip
method
network
udp
pre
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US10/038,837
Other versions
US20030128692A1 (en
Inventor
Derek Hisami Mitsumori
Sujin Catherine Chang
Kwang-Shan Pan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Level 3 Communications LLC
Original Assignee
Level 3 Communications LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Level 3 Communications LLC filed Critical Level 3 Communications LLC
Priority to US10/038,837 priority Critical patent/US6850525B2/en
Assigned to GENUITY INC. reassignment GENUITY INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHANG, SUJIN CATHERINE, MITSUMORI, DEREK HISAMI, PAN, KWANG-SHAN
Publication of US20030128692A1 publication Critical patent/US20030128692A1/en
Assigned to LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC reassignment LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GENUITY, INC.
Assigned to LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. reassignment LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Publication of US6850525B2 publication Critical patent/US6850525B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ICG COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Assigned to LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC reassignment LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Application status is Active legal-status Critical
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/30Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
    • H04L69/32High level architectural aspects of 7-layer open systems interconnection [OSI] type protocol stacks
    • H04L69/322Aspects of intra-layer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
    • H04L69/329Aspects of intra-layer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer, i.e. layer seven
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/22Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks using GUI [Graphical User Interface]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, i.e. ensuring proper service fulfillment according to an agreement or contract between two parties, e.g. between an IT-provider and a customer
    • H04L41/508Network service management, i.e. ensuring proper service fulfillment according to an agreement or contract between two parties, e.g. between an IT-provider and a customer based on type of value added network service under agreement
    • H04L41/5087Network service management, i.e. ensuring proper service fulfillment according to an agreement or contract between two parties, e.g. between an IT-provider and a customer based on type of value added network service under agreement wherein the managed service relates to voice services
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/32Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions involving the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
    • H04L67/325Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions involving the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources whereby a time schedule is established for servicing the requests
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/04Processing of captured monitoring data
    • H04L43/045Processing of captured monitoring data for graphical visualization of monitoring data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring based on specific metrics
    • H04L43/0823Errors
    • H04L43/0829Packet loss
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring based on specific metrics
    • H04L43/0852Delays
    • H04L43/0864Round trip delays
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring based on specific metrics
    • H04L43/0852Delays
    • H04L43/087Jitter
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/10Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks using active monitoring, e.g. heartbeat protocols, polling, ping, trace-route
    • H04L43/106Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks using active monitoring, e.g. heartbeat protocols, polling, ping, trace-route by adding timestamps to packets
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/16Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks using threshold monitoring

Abstract

Packet delivery statistics are derived from a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) stream simulating a service level provided by a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network and transmitted across the VoIP network at a first pre-defined interval. The derived packet delivery statistics are processed at a second pre-defined interval to generate network performance statistics for the VoIP network, where the second pre-defined interval is substantially larger than the first pre-defined interval.

Description

BACKGROUND

The invention relates to a Voice over IP (VoIP) network performance monitor.

Packet-based networks, in particular, VoIP networks, are rapidly emerging as a viable alternative to traditional telephony (that is, circuit switched networks). VoIP is viewed as an attractive option for voice transport in that it allows live voice conversations to be integrated with existing IP data and image applications. To be a truly competitive alternative, VoIP must emulate the performance of traditional telephony and do so using a protocol that was optimized for data traffic. The characteristics of data traffic are quite different from those of voice traffic.

Unlike data traffic, voice traffic is extremely intolerant of delay and delay variation (or “jitter”), as well as, packet loss. Much work has been done in the area of packet delivery to provide end-to-end Quality of Service (QoS). Service level agreements (SLAs) for VoIP, like those for conventional data IP networks, tend to be based on conventional data network metrics—that is, guaranteed service levels are expressed solely in terms of packet level performance, for example, packet loss, jitter, and round-trip delay.

Traditional network performance measurement tools use Packet InterNet Gropers (PINGs) to measure packet loss, jitter and round-trip delay. However, VoIP networks are packet-based networks that transmit data in one-way steady streams of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packets, which PINGing tools cannot simulate. In addition, traditional network monitoring systems accept performance data that has been averaged over an extended period of time, such as a day or a month. While such measurements are acceptable for data transmissions, which are typically TCP in nature, the real-time nature of VoIP service makes daily and/or monthly averaging of performance results inaccurate in representing a VoIP network user's experience of the service.

SUMMARY

In general, according to one aspect of the invention, a method includes deriving packet delivery statistics from a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) stream simulating a service level provided by a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network and transmitted across the VoIP network at a first pre-defined interval, and processing the derived packet delivery statistics at a second pre-defined interval to generate network performance statistics for the VoIP network, where the second pre-defined interval is substantially larger than the first pre-defined interval.

One or more of the following features may also be included.

A first client terminal connected to the VoIP network generates the UDP stream. In certain embodiments, generating a UDP stream includes selecting a service level and adjusting payload sizes and bit rates of the UDP packets according to the selected service level.

As yet another feature, the method also includes setting an IP precedence bit to specify a class of service for each UDP packet. The UDP stream is transmitted by a first client terminal connected to the VoIP network to a second client terminal connected to the VoIP network.

As another feature, the packet delivery statistics are derived from the UDP stream by a first client terminal connected to the VoIP network. Deriving packet delivery statistics includes measuring packet loss of the UDP stream at each first pre-defined interval. In certain embodiments, deriving packet delivery statistics further includes measuring jitter of the UDP stream at each first pre-defined interval.

As yet another feature, deriving packet delivery statistics includes measuring round-trip delay of the UDP stream at each first pre-defined interval. The network performance statistics are generated by a monitoring device connected the VoIP network.

The method also includes generating a graphical report showing a distribution of the derived packet delivery statistics over the second pre-defined interval. In certain embodiments, a first client terminal is connected to a first VoIP Point of Presence (VoIP PoP) on the VoIP network and a second client terminal is connected to a second VoIP PoP on the VoIP network and the method also includes triggering a traceroute that traces a route between the first VoIP PoP and the second VoIP PoP if any one of the network performance statistics exceeds a pre-configured threshold.

According to another aspect of the invention, a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network performance testing system includes a VoIP network, a first client terminal connected to the VoIP network, the first client terminal configured to generate a stream of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packets simulating a service level provided by a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network, transmit the UDP stream across the VoIP network to a second client terminal connected to the VoIP network, derive packet delivery statistics from the UDP stream at a first pre-defined interval, and a monitoring device connected to the VoIP network, the monitoring device configured to process the derived packet delivery statistics at a second pre-defined interval, and generate network performance statistics for the VoIP network, where the second pre-defined interval is substantially larger than the first pre-defined interval.

One or more of the following features may also be included.

In certain embodiments, the UDP stream is generated by a first client terminal connected to the VoIP network.

As another feature, generating includes controlling the first client terminal to select a service level and generate a UDP stream having payload sizes and bit rates corresponding to the selected service level.

As yet another feature, system also includes controlling the first client terminal to set an IP precedence bit to specify a class of service for each UDP packet.

As another feature, the system includes controlling the monitoring device to trigger an alarm if any one of the network performance statistics exceeds a pre-configured threshold.

In certain embodiments, the first client terminal is connected to a first VoIP Point of Presence (VoIP PoP) on the VoIP network and the second client terminal is connected to a second VoIP PoP on the VoIP network, the system also including controlling the monitoring device to trigger a traceroute that traces a route between the first VoIP PoP and the second VoIP PoP if any one of the network performance statistics exceeds a pre-configured threshold.

The system may also include controlling the first client terminal to store results of the traceroute in a traceroute file, wherein the results comprise Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of each router in the route, and send the traceroute file to the monitoring device.

Embodiments may have one or more of the following advantages. The invention enables a VoIP-simulated UDP stream to be generated between every possible pair of VoIP Points of Presence (VoIP PoPs) for use in testing the performance of a VoIP network. The invention generates and reports performance results in a manner that reflects the real-time nature of the VoIP services offered by the VoIP network. With these performance results, a network operator can assess the quality of the VoIP network's services on a daily basis for use with Service Level Agreements, as well as, identify possible problem areas in the VoIP network that may affect performance.

The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network performance test topology.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a process for testing the performance of a VoIP network.

FIG. 3 shows a sample graphical user interface in accordance with the present invention.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one exemplary commercial setting, as shown in FIG. 1, a network infrastructure 100 of a VoIP network 102 is maintained by a VoIP network operator (not shown), such as Genuity Inc. of Woburn, Mass., and made available to that VoIP network operator's customers (not shown), for example, retail service providers who use the infrastructure and related services of the VoIP network operator to provide VoIP services to end users. In a large-scale operation, the network operator supports a large number of VoIP Points of Presence (VoIP PoPs) 104, in different geographic regions for coverage of a larger territory, for example, national level coverage. Each VoIP PoP 104 provides a point of entry to and termination from the VoIP network 102.

The network operator monitors the performance of the VoIP network 102 through the use of a VoIP-performance monitor server (or performance monitor server) 106 and VoIP-performance monitor clients (performance monitor clients) 108 deployed at VoIP PoPs 104 throughout the network 102. Each of the performance monitor clients 108 is configured to generate VoIP-simulated UDP streams to others of the performance monitor clients 108 over the VoIP network 102, and perform network parameter and performance measurements (collectively called “performance data”). Preferably, a VoIP-simulated UDP stream is produced by the performance monitor client 108 for each level of service as determined by the type of codec (i.e., coder/decoder) used by a VoIP communications device that is performing the voice encoding and decoding operations at the VoIP PoP 104. In the VoIP PoP 104 a shown in FIG. 1, a gateway 110 is used to implement one or more coding schemes to support voice encoding/decoding between protocols of the VoIP network 102 and a conventional telephony network, such as a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) 112.

Types of codecs include, but need not be limited to, the following: waveform codecs, source codecs, and hybrid codecs. With waveform codecs, an incoming voice signal is sampled, coded and the coded samples converted to quantized values, which are used to reconstruct the original voice signal. Waveform codecs (e.g., G. 711 and G. 726) produce high quality sound but consume a significant amount of bandwidth. Source codecs try to match an incoming voice signal to a mathematical model of speech generation. That model is used to reconstruct the original voice signal. The source codec operates at low bit rates but tends to produce poor quality sound. Hybrid codecs (e.g., G. 729 and G. 723) use some amount of waveform matching as well as knowledge of how the original sound was generated. They tend to provide fairly good quality sound at lower bit rates than waveform codecs. Due to its lower bandwidth requirements, G.729 is the codec of choice for VoIP network performance testing.

FIG. 2 shows a process 200 implemented by the performance monitor server 106 and the performance monitor clients 108. The performance monitor client 108 a is configured to generate and transmit (202) a VoIP-simulated UDP stream to every VoIP PoP 104 in the VoIP network 102, including the VoIP PoP 104 b having a performance monitor client 108 b. In one implementation, the performance monitor client 108 a in VoIP PoP 104 a is configured to automatically start a new 24-hour testing session, say, for example, every morning after midnight, by generating and transmitting a UDP stream to the performance monitor client 108 b in VoIP PoP 104 b. The performance monitor client 108 a collects (204) samples of raw performance data (e.g., packet loss measurements, jitter measurements, and round-trip delay measurements) on the incoming UDP stream at pre-defined intervals, for example, 10-second intervals. Thus, each sample contains 10-seconds worth of data.

The performance monitor server 106 polls (206) the performance monitor client 108 a at pre-defined intervals, for example, at 15-minute intervals to gather the samples of raw data. The length of the collection interval and the polling interval may be set at any number that provides a sufficiently large sample size. The performance monitor server 106 can be designed to process (208) each sample's raw data to calculate the average, maximum, and minimum packet loss over the 15-minute period. Similar calculations can be made based on the jitter measurements and the round-trip delay measurements. Once processed, the performance monitor server 106 generates a time stamped 15-minute summary report that includes these calculations, as well as, histograms that show the distribution of the packet loss, jitter, and round-trip delay measurements during that particular 15-minute testing window. It should be noted that the data points used for the calculations and the histograms correspond to the 10-second samples. The timestamp indicates both the time and date associated with the “start” and “end” of a 15-minute testing window.

In one implementation, the performance monitor server 106 examines (210) the average and maximum values in the 15-minute summary report and triggers (212) an alarm, such as an e-mail to an employee of the network operator, if an average value or a maximum value exceeds a configurable threshold. In another implementation, the performance monitor server 106 examines (214) the average and maximum values in the 15-minute summary report and triggers a traceroute between the appropriate VoIP PoP pair (in this case, VoIP PoPs 104 a and 104 b) if an average value or maximum value exceeds a configurable threshold, or if the percentage of failure events (defined as high packet loss, high jitter, or high round-trip time in the 10-second sample) during the 15-minute interval exceeds configurable thresholds, such as packet loss which is greater than one percent. These thresholds may be expressed in the format of a Service Level Agreement (SLA) for VoIP services on the VoIP network 102. For example, if the average packet loss value for a UDP stream transmitted by the performance monitor client 108 a and received by the performance monitor client 108 b exceeds a configurable threshold, the performance monitor server 106 sends a signal to the performance monitor client 108 a to trigger a traceroute that traces a route between the VoIP PoP 104 a and the VoIP PoP 104 b. Since UDP provides no connections but simply delivers packets, it is possible that traffic between the VoIP PoPs 104 a and 104 b may be sent over more than one route. Over time it is likely that the route between the VoIP PoPs 104 a and 104 b will vary due to changes in internet connections, modifications of routers, and changes in service. However, over the short term these changes will usually not be present, and a traceroute is a useful tool to test connectivity between the two VoIP PoPs 104 a and 104 b. At the conclusion of the traceroute, the performance monitor client 108 a stores (216) the results of the traceroute—that is, the IP addresses of all the routers along the route between the VoIP PoPs 104 a and 104 b—in a time stamped traceroute file and sends the traceroute file to the performance monitor server 106. The timestamp indicates what time the traceroute was executed.

In one implementation, the network operator monitors the performance (e.g., discard rate, error rate) of the routers in the VoIP network 102 through the use of a router performance monitor server 114. The router performance monitor server 114 may be implemented using commercially available hardware and software. At the conclusion of a traceroute triggered by the performance monitor server 106, the performance monitor server 106 may be configured to establish a link to the router performance monitor server 114 to obtain the performance statistics (e.g., discard rate, error rate) associated with each traceroute hop's router, and store the results of the query in the traceroute file.

The performance monitor server 106 repeats the polling (206) of the performance monitor client 108 b at 15-minute intervals until the date associated with the “end” time of the most-recent 15-minute testing window is different from the date associated with the “start” time of the first 15-minute testing window in the 24-hour testing session. When this occurs, the performance monitor server 106 does the following:

    • (1) The performance monitor server 106 processes the raw data collected during the most-recent 15-minute testing window, generates a 15-minute summary report, and triggers a traceroute or alarm, if necessary.
    • (2) The performance monitor server 106 processes all of the raw data collected during the 24-hour testing session to calculate the average, maximum, and minimum packet loss over the 24-hour period. Similar calculations can be made based on the jitter measurements and the round-trip delay measurements. Once processed, the performance monitor server 106 generates a 24-hour summary report that includes these calculations, as well as, histograms that show the distribution of the packet loss, jitter, and round-trip delay measurements per 10 seconds during that 24-hour testing session. By taking the performance measurements at different times of the day over the 24-hour period, the effect of different system loads on the measured quantity can be seen.

In one implementation, each performance monitor client 108 connected to the VoIP network 102 is configured to generate and transmit a VoIP-simulated UDP stream tagged with an IP precedence bit. Setting the IP precedence bit allows the performance monitor server 106 to check the performance of VoIP services when, for example, Quality of Service (QoS) options are configured on the VoIP network 102. In another implementation, each performance monitor client 108 is configured to generate and transmit two VoIP-simulated UDP streams simultaneously—one tagged with an IP precedence bit and one without. The generation and transmission of side-by-side streams permits the performance monitor server 106 to fully compare the relative performance of the VoIP service across different network configurations. In another implementation, each performance monitor client 108 is configured to generate and transmit multiple VoIP-simulated UDP streams, each UDP stream simulating a different voice codec used by the VoIP service.

A web server 116 connected to the performance monitor server 106 may be configured to display the average, maximum, and minimum values (called “avg/max/min”) for packet loss, jitter, and round-trip delay over a 24-hour testing session on a graphical user interface (GUI), a sample of which is shown in FIG. 3. The web server 116 may be configured to generate web-based graphical reports that indicate daily packet loss avg/max/min, daily results of the 15-minute histogram reports (e.g., reporting the percent of time in each 15-minute testing window where packet loss was less than or equal to 1%), daily jitter avg/max/min, and daily round-trip delay avg/max/min. The graphs can be generated for any pair of VoIP PoPs 104 in the VoIP network 102 using the buttons on the left side of the GUI, indicated in dashed lines 302. The buttons on the right side of the GUI, indicated in dashed lines 304, correspond with the 15-minute summary reports that are the basis of the graphed results. If a user wants to examine a particular 15-minute summary report in detail after viewing the graphical results, the user may select a 15-minute Summary Report button by using, for example, a keyboard or a mouse. The web server 116 can display the selected 15-minute Summary Report in the same browser window, or alternatively, generate a new browser window. When a user selects one of the buttons, indicated in dashed lines 306, say, for example, “Max Chicago=>Dallas”, the web server 116 highlights the line in the corresponding graph for the UDP stream transmitted from Chicago to Dallas during that particular 24-hour testing session.

Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (44)

1. A method for testing Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network performance, comprising:
transmitting a User Datagarm Protocol (UDP) stream from a first client terminal connected to a VoIP network to a second client terminal connected to the VoIP network, wherein the UDP stream simulates a service level provided by the VoIP network;
deriving packet delivery statistics from the UDP stream;
processing the derived packet delivery statistics to generate network performance statistics for the VoIP network;
triggering a traceroute that traces a network route between the first client terminal and the second client terminal if any one of the network performance statistic exceeds a predefined threshold; and
retrieving router performance statistics of each router in the route between the first client terminal and the second client terminal.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein generating a UDP stream comprises:
selecting a service level; and
adjusting payload sizes and bit rates of the UDP packets according to the selected service level.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
setting an IP precedence bit to specify a class of service for UDP packet.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the packet delivery statistics are derived from the UDP stream by the first client terminal connected to the VoIP network.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the network performance statistics are generated by a monitoring device connected to the VoIP network.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a histogram that shows distribution of measurements for packet loss.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a histogram that shows distribution of measurements for jitter.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a histogram that shows distribution of measurements for delay.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
triggering an alarm if any one of the network performance statistics exceeds a pre-configured threshold.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first client terminal is connected to a first VoIP Point of Presence (VoIP PoP) on the VoIP network and the second client terminal is connected to a second VoIP PoP on the VoIP network.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
storing results of the traceroute in a traceroute file, wherein the results comprise Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of each router in the route.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the router performance statistics are retrieved from a router performance monitor connected to the VoIP network.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the router performance statistics comprises discard rates for each router.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the router performance statistics comprises error rates for each router.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the service level is associated with a type of voice codec.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the type of voice codec comprises a waveform codec.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the type of voice codec comprises a source codec.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the type of voice codec comprises a hybrid codec.
19. A Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network performance testing system comprising:
a first client terminal connected to a VoIP network, the first client terminal being configured to:
generate a stream of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packets simulating a service level provided by a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network;
transmit the UDP stream across the VoIP network to a second client terminal connected to the VoIP network;
derive packet delivery statistics from the UDP stream; and
a monitoring device connected to the VoIP network, the monitoring device being configured to:
collect the derived packet delivery statistics;
process the derived packet delivery statistics; and
generate network performance statistics for the VoIP network;
wherein the first client terminal is configured to trigger a traceroute that traces a network route between the first client terminal and the second client terminal if any one of the network performance statistics exceeds a predefined threshold, and wherein the monitor device is configured to retrieve router performance statistics of each router in the route between the first client terminal and the second client terminal.
20. The system of claim 19, wherein the first client terminal generates the stream of UDP rackets by determining the service level and generating a UDP stream having payload sizes and bit rates corresponding to the service level.
21. The system of claim 19, wherein the first client terminal is further configured to set an IP precedence bit to specify a class of service for each UDP packet.
22. The system of claim 19, wherein the monitoring device is further configured to trigger an alarm if any one of the network performance statistics exceeds a predefined threshold.
23. The system of claim 19, wherein the first client terminal is connected to a first VoIP Point of Presence (VoIP PoP) on the VoIP network and the second client terminal is connected to a second VoIP PoP on the VoIP network.
24. The system of claim 19, wherein the first client terminal stores results of the traceroute in a traceroute file, and sends the traceroute file to the monitoring device; wherein the results of the traceroute comprise Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of each router in the route.
25. The system of claim 19, wherein the router performance statistics comprises discard rates for each router.
26. The system of claim 19, wherein the router performance statistics comprises error rates for each router.
27. A method comprising:
transmitting a first User Datagram Protocol (UDP) stream over a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network, the first UDP stream having an IP precedence bit specifying a class of service for each packet in the first UDP stream;
transmitting a second UDP stream over the VoIP network, the second UDP stream either having no IP precedence bit or having an IP precedence bit specifying a class of service for each packet in the second UDP stream different from the class of service for the first UDP stream;
deriving packet delivery statistics from the first and second UDP streams; and
comparing the derived packet delivery statistics from the first and second UDP streams to determine a relative performance of transmission of UDP streams when different classes of services are used.
28. The method of claim 27 in which the packet delivery statistics are derived from the first and second UDP streams at a first pre-defined interval.
29. The method of claim 27, further comprising processing the derived packet delivery statistics at a second pre-defined interval to generate network performance statistics for the VoIP network, where the second pre-defined interval is substantially larger than the first pre-defined interval.
30. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of deriving packet delivery statistics is performed at a first pre-defined interval, and the step of processing the derived packet delivery statistics to generate network performance statistics is performed at a second pre-fined interval, and wherein the second pre-defined interval is larger than the first pre-defined interval.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein deriving packet delivery statistics comprises:
measuring packet loss of the UDP stream at each first pre-defined interval.
32. The method of claim 30, wherein deriving packet delivery statistics comprises:
measuring jitter of the UDP stream at each first pre-defined in interval.
33. The method of claim 30, wherein deriving packet delivery statistics comprises:
measuring round-trip delay of the UDP stream at each first predefined interval.
34. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving an average packet loss value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
35. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving a maximum packet loss value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
36. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving a minimum packet loss value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
37. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving an average jitter value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
38. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving a maximum jitter value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
39. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving a minimum jitter value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
40. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving an average round-trip delay value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
41. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving a maximum round-trip delay value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
42. The method of claim 30, wherein generating network performance statistics comprises:
deriving a minimum round-trip delay value of the UDP stream over the second pre-defined interval.
43. The method of claim 30, further comprising:
generating a graphical report showing a distribution of the derived packet delivery statistics over the second pre-defined interval.
44. The system as recited in claim 19, wherein the first client terminal derives packet delivery statistics at a first predefined interval, and wherein the monitor device generates network performance statistics at a second predefined interval that is larger than the firs predefined interval.
US10/038,837 2002-01-04 2002-01-04 Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network performance monitor Active 2022-02-28 US6850525B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/038,837 US6850525B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2002-01-04 Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network performance monitor

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/038,837 US6850525B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2002-01-04 Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network performance monitor
PCT/US2002/041262 WO2003060643A2 (en) 2002-01-04 2002-12-26 Voice over internet protocol (voip) network performance monitor
CA2472497A CA2472497C (en) 2002-01-04 2002-12-26 Voice over internet protocol (voip) network performance monitor
EP02792520A EP1573435B1 (en) 2002-01-04 2002-12-26 Voice over internet protocol (voip) network performance monitor
AT02792520T AT542343T (en) 2002-01-04 2002-12-26 Network performance monitor for the language-over- Internet Protocol (VoIP)
AU2002358282A AU2002358282A1 (en) 2002-01-04 2002-12-26 Voice over internet protocol (voip) network performance monitor

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030128692A1 US20030128692A1 (en) 2003-07-10
US6850525B2 true US6850525B2 (en) 2005-02-01

Family

ID=21902184

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/038,837 Active 2022-02-28 US6850525B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2002-01-04 Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network performance monitor

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6850525B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1573435B1 (en)
AT (1) AT542343T (en)
AU (1) AU2002358282A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2472497C (en)
WO (1) WO2003060643A2 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040062231A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2004-04-01 Hcs Systems Method and system for determining network capacity to implement voice over IP communications
US20040062204A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Bearden Mark J. Communication system endpoint device with integrated call synthesis capability
US20040114515A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-06-17 Jung-Gi Kim VoIP call control apparatus in private branch exchange and method thereof
US20060015570A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-19 Netscaler, Inc. Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network
US20060153174A1 (en) * 2003-06-28 2006-07-13 Towns-Von Stauber Leon Quality determination for packetized information
US20060245369A1 (en) * 2005-04-19 2006-11-02 Joern Schimmelpfeng Quality of service in IT infrastructures
US20060280184A1 (en) * 2005-06-09 2006-12-14 Sean Chen System to enforce service level agreements for voice-over internet protocol
US20070019544A1 (en) * 2005-07-21 2007-01-25 Nortel Networks Limited Tandem call admission control by proxy for use with non-hop-by-hop VolP signaling protocols
US20070223387A1 (en) * 2006-03-10 2007-09-27 Acterna, Llc Device and method for determining a voice transmission delay over a packet switched network
US20070291745A1 (en) * 2006-06-19 2007-12-20 Avaya Technology Llc Waveform Quality Feedback for the Selection of Gateways
US20080062887A1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-03-13 Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. Method and apparatus for presenting quality information in a communication system
US20080181211A1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-07-31 Satish Parolkar Methods and apparatus to display service quality to a user of a multiple mode communication device
WO2009051372A1 (en) * 2007-10-17 2009-04-23 Haechang Systems Co., Ltd. A statistical data managing system of mirrored packets on the voip network for realtime monitoring and performance trend analysis and the method thereof
US20090141877A1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2009-06-04 Mckenna Luke Rowan SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR PREDICTIVE VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) INFRASTRUCTURE MONITORING UTILIZING ENHANCED CUSTOMER END-POINT VoIP PHONES
US20090290491A1 (en) * 2008-05-22 2009-11-26 Microsoft Corporation End-Host Based Network Management System
US20100008233A1 (en) * 2008-07-10 2010-01-14 Cheng Tien Ee Methods and apparatus to deploy and monitor network layer functionalities
US20100135180A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-03 Fujitsu Limited Method of measuring packet loss rate, packet loss rate measuring device and storage medium
US7778165B2 (en) * 2007-11-08 2010-08-17 University Of Washington Information plane for determining performance metrics of paths between arbitrary end-hosts on the internet
US20100218188A1 (en) * 2009-02-26 2010-08-26 International Business Machines Corporation Policy driven autonomic performance data collection
US20110255541A1 (en) * 2008-12-22 2011-10-20 Jens Poscher Ip multiplexing from many ip hosts
US20120013702A1 (en) * 2004-08-24 2012-01-19 Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc Method and system for locating a voice over internet protocol (voip) device connected to a network
US8699484B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2014-04-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to route packets in a network
US9491085B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2016-11-08 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to route control packets based on address partitioning

Families Citing this family (101)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7948875B2 (en) * 1997-08-29 2011-05-24 AIP Acquisition, LLC IP exchange quality testing system and method
US7072959B2 (en) * 2002-01-15 2006-07-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically assigning a network endpoint to a network region for selecting a proper codec
US7418494B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2008-08-26 Intellectual Ventures Holding 40 Llc Method and system for background replication of data objects
US6975963B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-12-13 Mcdata Corporation Method and system for storing and reporting network performance metrics using histograms
EP1414187A1 (en) * 2002-10-22 2004-04-28 Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite Method for evaluating the quality of service of a telecommunication link via a network
US7469282B2 (en) 2003-01-21 2008-12-23 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for provisioning and maintaining a circuit in a data network
US7391734B2 (en) * 2003-01-21 2008-06-24 At&T Delaware Intellectual Property Corporation, Inc. Method and system for obtaining logical performance data for a circuit in a data network
US7680050B1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2010-03-16 Juniper Networks, Inc. Distributed admission control
US8213323B1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2012-07-03 Sprint Communications Company L.P. System and method for network performance monitoring
US7639606B2 (en) 2003-12-23 2009-12-29 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically rerouting logical circuit data in a virtual private network
US8199638B2 (en) 2003-12-23 2012-06-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically rerouting logical circuit data in a data network
US7630302B2 (en) * 2003-12-23 2009-12-08 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for providing a failover circuit for rerouting logical circuit data in a data network
US8203933B2 (en) * 2003-12-23 2012-06-19 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically identifying a logical circuit failure in a data network
US7639623B2 (en) 2003-12-23 2009-12-29 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for real time simultaneous monitoring of logical circuits in a data network
US7609623B2 (en) * 2003-12-23 2009-10-27 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically rerouting data from an overbalanced logical circuit in a data network
US8223632B2 (en) * 2003-12-23 2012-07-17 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for prioritized rerouting of logical circuit data in a data network
US7646707B2 (en) * 2003-12-23 2010-01-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically renaming logical circuit identifiers for rerouted logical circuits in a data network
US7609637B2 (en) * 2004-03-03 2009-10-27 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Network quality of service management
US7760663B2 (en) * 2004-04-19 2010-07-20 Jds Uniphase Corporation Packet tracing using dynamic packet filters
US7768904B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2010-08-03 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for fail-safe renaming of logical circuit identifiers for rerouted logical circuits in a data network
US8339988B2 (en) 2004-04-22 2012-12-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for provisioning logical circuits for intermittent use in a data network
US7466646B2 (en) 2004-04-22 2008-12-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically rerouting logical circuit data from a logical circuit failure to dedicated backup circuit in a data network
US7460468B2 (en) 2004-04-22 2008-12-02 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and system for automatically tracking the rerouting of logical circuit data in a data network
KR100617303B1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-08-30 한국전자통신연구원 System and method for measuring performance of internet phone protocol
US7532579B1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2009-05-12 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for assessing the installation of a component in a packet-switched network
US7519074B2 (en) 2005-02-22 2009-04-14 Level 3 Communications, Llc Voice call coordinator
US7436936B2 (en) * 2005-02-22 2008-10-14 Level 3 Communications, Llc VoIP call through tester
US7269406B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2007-09-11 Intel Corporation Methods and apparatus for providing information indicative of traffic delay of a wireless link
US20060274664A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Harshang Pandya Characterization of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network
JP4815917B2 (en) * 2005-07-21 2011-11-16 日本電気株式会社 Traffic detection apparatus, the communication quality monitoring apparatus, method, and program
DE102005039192A1 (en) * 2005-08-18 2007-03-01 Siemens Ag A method for fault analysis of a data stream, particularly a real-time data stream in a data network, communication system and monitoring computer
US20070226627A1 (en) * 2006-03-24 2007-09-27 Per Kangru Methods and systems for signal analysis
US7936694B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2011-05-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Sniffing-based network monitoring
US8051163B2 (en) * 2006-05-11 2011-11-01 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Synthetic transactions based on system history and load
US8295162B2 (en) * 2006-05-16 2012-10-23 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method to achieve sub-second routing performance
JP4899633B2 (en) * 2006-05-22 2012-03-21 富士通株式会社 Communication performance analyzing program, communication performance analysis apparatus and communication performance analyzing method
US20070286351A1 (en) * 2006-05-23 2007-12-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and System for Adaptive Media Quality Monitoring
US8717911B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2014-05-06 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for collecting network performance information
US8488447B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2013-07-16 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for adjusting code speed in a transmission path during call set-up due to reduced transmission performance
US7948909B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-05-24 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for resetting counters counting network performance information at network communications devices on a packet network
US8000318B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-08-16 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for call routing based on transmission performance of a packet network
US7765294B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2010-07-27 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for managing subscriber usage of a communications network
US9094257B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2015-07-28 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for selecting a content delivery network
US8194555B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-06-05 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for using distributed network performance information tables to manage network communications
US8223655B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-07-17 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for provisioning resources of a packet network based on collected network performance information
US8098579B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-01-17 Embarq Holdings Company, LP System and method for adjusting the window size of a TCP packet through remote network elements
US8224255B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-07-17 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for managing radio frequency windows
US8307065B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-11-06 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for remotely controlling network operators
WO2008024387A2 (en) 2006-08-22 2008-02-28 Embarq Holdings Company Llc System and method for synchronizing counters on an asynchronous packet communications network
US8274905B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-09-25 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for displaying a graph representative of network performance over a time period
US8576722B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-11-05 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for modifying connectivity fault management packets
US8238253B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-08-07 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for monitoring interlayer devices and optimizing network performance
US8107366B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-01-31 Embarq Holdings Company, LP System and method for using centralized network performance tables to manage network communications
US8531954B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-09-10 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for handling reservation requests with a connection admission control engine
US8743703B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2014-06-03 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for tracking application resource usage
US8064391B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2011-11-22 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for monitoring and optimizing network performance to a wireless device
US8015294B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2011-09-06 Embarq Holdings Company, LP Pin-hole firewall for communicating data packets on a packet network
US8199653B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-06-12 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for communicating network performance information over a packet network
US8228791B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-07-24 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for routing communications between packet networks based on intercarrier agreements
US8144586B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-03-27 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for controlling network bandwidth with a connection admission control engine
US8549405B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-10-01 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for displaying a graphical representation of a network to identify nodes and node segments on the network that are not operating normally
US8144587B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-03-27 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for load balancing network resources using a connection admission control engine
US8407765B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-03-26 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for restricting access to network performance information tables
US9479341B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2016-10-25 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for initiating diagnostics on a packet network node
US8125897B2 (en) * 2006-08-22 2012-02-28 Embarq Holdings Company Lp System and method for monitoring and optimizing network performance with user datagram protocol network performance information packets
US8750158B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2014-06-10 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for differentiated billing
US8619600B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-12-31 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for establishing calls over a call path having best path metrics
US8130793B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-03-06 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for enabling reciprocal billing for different types of communications over a packet network
US7684332B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2010-03-23 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for adjusting the window size of a TCP packet through network elements
US7940735B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2011-05-10 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for selecting an access point
US8537695B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-09-17 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for establishing a call being received by a trunk on a packet network
US7808918B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2010-10-05 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for dynamically shaping network traffic
US8040811B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2011-10-18 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for collecting and managing network performance information
US8111692B2 (en) 2007-05-31 2012-02-07 Embarq Holdings Company Llc System and method for modifying network traffic
US8102770B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2012-01-24 Embarq Holdings Company, LP System and method for monitoring and optimizing network performance with vector performance tables and engines
US7843831B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2010-11-30 Embarq Holdings Company Llc System and method for routing data on a packet network
US20080062175A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Agilent Technologies, Inc. System for Acquiring Signals and for Displaying and Comparing Data from the Signals
US7978617B2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2011-07-12 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods for providing performance improvement recommendations
US8194643B2 (en) 2006-10-19 2012-06-05 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for monitoring the connection of an end-user to a remote network
US8289965B2 (en) 2006-10-19 2012-10-16 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for establishing a communications session with an end-user based on the state of a network connection
US8189468B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2012-05-29 Embarq Holdings, Company, LLC System and method for regulating messages between networks
US8009687B2 (en) * 2007-03-28 2011-08-30 Ixia Measurement of network performance in transporting packet streams
US20090028055A1 (en) * 2007-07-25 2009-01-29 Olaf Carl Zaencker Correlation-based localization of problems in a voip system
US8248953B2 (en) 2007-07-25 2012-08-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. Detecting and isolating domain specific faults
US8665732B2 (en) * 2007-07-25 2014-03-04 VoIPFuture, GmbH VoIP diagnosis
US20090060149A1 (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-05 Pavelko Matthew J AUTOMATED TELEPHONE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM USING VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP)
US8024523B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2011-09-20 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US7948910B2 (en) * 2008-03-06 2011-05-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Monitoring quality of a packet flow in packet-based communication networks
US8559320B2 (en) * 2008-03-19 2013-10-15 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring voice quality on a VoIP network
US8068425B2 (en) 2008-04-09 2011-11-29 Embarq Holdings Company, Llc System and method for using network performance information to determine improved measures of path states
US9769237B2 (en) * 2008-04-23 2017-09-19 Vonage America Inc. Method and apparatus for testing in a communication network
US20100185714A1 (en) * 2009-01-15 2010-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Distributed communications between database instances
KR101652828B1 (en) * 2010-05-20 2016-08-31 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for adaptive digital filtering in a touch sensing system
US8356096B2 (en) * 2010-05-28 2013-01-15 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Apparatuses, method and system for network performance metric statistics from traffic link data, identifying, violating network elements associated with threshold violation using visual cue
US20120066165A1 (en) * 2010-09-14 2012-03-15 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Traceroute diagnosis
WO2014126513A1 (en) * 2013-02-14 2014-08-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and network entity for evaluating a link between a first network node and a second network node
US20150012389A1 (en) * 2013-07-03 2015-01-08 Alexander PERMAN Apparatus, method and software products for timely provision of a product or service
US9300679B1 (en) 2013-12-16 2016-03-29 8X8, Inc. System and method for monitoring computing servers for possible unauthorized access
US9397947B2 (en) 2014-03-11 2016-07-19 International Business Machines Corporation Quality of experience for communication sessions
US9325838B2 (en) 2014-07-22 2016-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation Monitoring voice over internet protocol (VoIP) quality during an ongoing call
US10142860B2 (en) * 2016-06-14 2018-11-27 Hughes Network Systems, Llc Automated network diagnostic techniques

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020015387A1 (en) * 2000-08-02 2002-02-07 Henry Houh Voice traffic packet capture and analysis tool for a data network
US20020051464A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-05-02 Sin Tam Wee Quality of transmission across packet-based networks
US20020141389A1 (en) 2001-04-03 2002-10-03 Fangman Richard E. System and method for routing IP packets
US20020141392A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2002-10-03 Yasuo Tezuka Gateway apparatus and voice data transmission method

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE60044500D1 (en) * 1999-11-08 2010-07-15 British Telecomm communication network
CA2307911A1 (en) 1999-11-18 2001-05-18 Loran Network Management Ltd. Method for determining the delay and jitter in communication between objects in a connected network
EP1146687A3 (en) * 2000-04-12 2004-08-25 Hewlett-Packard Company, A Delaware Corporation Internet usage analysis system and method
US6741569B1 (en) * 2000-04-18 2004-05-25 Telchemy, Incorporated Quality of service monitor for multimedia communications system

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020015387A1 (en) * 2000-08-02 2002-02-07 Henry Houh Voice traffic packet capture and analysis tool for a data network
US20020051464A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-05-02 Sin Tam Wee Quality of transmission across packet-based networks
US20020141392A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2002-10-03 Yasuo Tezuka Gateway apparatus and voice data transmission method
US20020141389A1 (en) 2001-04-03 2002-10-03 Fangman Richard E. System and method for routing IP packets

Cited By (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7313098B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2007-12-25 Avaya Technology Corp. Communication system endpoint device with integrated call synthesis capability
US20040062204A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Bearden Mark J. Communication system endpoint device with integrated call synthesis capability
US7266113B2 (en) * 2002-10-01 2007-09-04 Hcs Systems, Inc. Method and system for determining network capacity to implement voice over IP communications
US20040062231A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2004-04-01 Hcs Systems Method and system for determining network capacity to implement voice over IP communications
US20040114515A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-06-17 Jung-Gi Kim VoIP call control apparatus in private branch exchange and method thereof
US20060153174A1 (en) * 2003-06-28 2006-07-13 Towns-Von Stauber Leon Quality determination for packetized information
US7430179B2 (en) * 2003-06-28 2008-09-30 Geopacket Corporation Quality determination for packetized information
US20060015570A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-19 Netscaler, Inc. Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network
US20120013702A1 (en) * 2004-08-24 2012-01-19 Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc Method and system for locating a voice over internet protocol (voip) device connected to a network
US10070466B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2018-09-04 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Determining a location of a device for calling via an access point
US9648644B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2017-05-09 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Determining a location of a device for calling via an access point
US7924732B2 (en) * 2005-04-19 2011-04-12 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Quality of service in IT infrastructures
US20060245369A1 (en) * 2005-04-19 2006-11-02 Joern Schimmelpfeng Quality of service in IT infrastructures
US7551624B2 (en) * 2005-06-09 2009-06-23 Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. System to enforce service level agreements for voice-over internet protocol
US20060280184A1 (en) * 2005-06-09 2006-12-14 Sean Chen System to enforce service level agreements for voice-over internet protocol
US8369322B2 (en) 2005-07-21 2013-02-05 Rockstar Consortium Us Lp Tandem call admission control by proxy for use with non-hop-by-hop VoIP signaling protocols
US20070019544A1 (en) * 2005-07-21 2007-01-25 Nortel Networks Limited Tandem call admission control by proxy for use with non-hop-by-hop VolP signaling protocols
US20070223387A1 (en) * 2006-03-10 2007-09-27 Acterna, Llc Device and method for determining a voice transmission delay over a packet switched network
US7796650B2 (en) * 2006-03-10 2010-09-14 Acterna Llc Device and method for determining a voice transmission delay over a packet switched network
US8542669B2 (en) * 2006-06-19 2013-09-24 Avaya, Inc. Waveform quality feedback for the selection of gateways
US20070291745A1 (en) * 2006-06-19 2007-12-20 Avaya Technology Llc Waveform Quality Feedback for the Selection of Gateways
US20080181211A1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-07-31 Satish Parolkar Methods and apparatus to display service quality to a user of a multiple mode communication device
US7929453B2 (en) * 2006-09-13 2011-04-19 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp Method and apparatus for presenting quality information in a communication system
US20080062887A1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-03-13 Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. Method and apparatus for presenting quality information in a communication system
US8521232B2 (en) 2006-09-13 2013-08-27 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to display service quality to a user of a multiple mode communication device
WO2009051372A1 (en) * 2007-10-17 2009-04-23 Haechang Systems Co., Ltd. A statistical data managing system of mirrored packets on the voip network for realtime monitoring and performance trend analysis and the method thereof
US7778165B2 (en) * 2007-11-08 2010-08-17 University Of Washington Information plane for determining performance metrics of paths between arbitrary end-hosts on the internet
US20090141877A1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2009-06-04 Mckenna Luke Rowan SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR PREDICTIVE VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) INFRASTRUCTURE MONITORING UTILIZING ENHANCED CUSTOMER END-POINT VoIP PHONES
US20090290491A1 (en) * 2008-05-22 2009-11-26 Microsoft Corporation End-Host Based Network Management System
US8059541B2 (en) * 2008-05-22 2011-11-15 Microsoft Corporation End-host based network management system
US8031627B2 (en) 2008-07-10 2011-10-04 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to deploy and monitor network layer functionalities
US7944844B2 (en) 2008-07-10 2011-05-17 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to monitor network layer functionalities
US20100008363A1 (en) * 2008-07-10 2010-01-14 Cheng Tien Ee Methods and apparatus to distribute network ip traffic
US8331369B2 (en) 2008-07-10 2012-12-11 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to distribute network IP traffic
US20100008233A1 (en) * 2008-07-10 2010-01-14 Cheng Tien Ee Methods and apparatus to deploy and monitor network layer functionalities
US20100008240A1 (en) * 2008-07-10 2010-01-14 Cheng Tien Ee Methods and apparatus to monitor network layer functionalities
US8687638B2 (en) 2008-07-10 2014-04-01 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to distribute network IP traffic
US20100135180A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-03 Fujitsu Limited Method of measuring packet loss rate, packet loss rate measuring device and storage medium
US8817632B2 (en) * 2008-12-01 2014-08-26 Fujitsu Limited Method of measuring packet loss rate, packet loss rate measuring device and storage medium
US9319488B2 (en) * 2008-12-22 2016-04-19 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) IP multiplexing from many IP hosts
US20110255541A1 (en) * 2008-12-22 2011-10-20 Jens Poscher Ip multiplexing from many ip hosts
US8793694B2 (en) * 2009-02-26 2014-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Policy driven autonomic performance data collection
US20100218188A1 (en) * 2009-02-26 2010-08-26 International Business Machines Corporation Policy driven autonomic performance data collection
US8699484B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2014-04-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to route packets in a network
US9491085B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2016-11-08 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to route control packets based on address partitioning
US9893994B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2018-02-13 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to route control packets based on address partitioning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2002358282A1 (en) 2003-07-30
WO2003060643A3 (en) 2009-06-11
CA2472497A1 (en) 2003-07-24
EP1573435A4 (en) 2009-10-28
AU2002358282A8 (en) 2009-07-30
WO2003060643A2 (en) 2003-07-24
EP1573435B1 (en) 2012-01-18
CA2472497C (en) 2012-07-17
EP1573435A2 (en) 2005-09-14
US20030128692A1 (en) 2003-07-10
AT542343T (en) 2012-02-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lakshminarayanan et al. Bandwidth estimation in broadband access networks
US7489641B2 (en) Data connection quality analysis apparatus and methods
JP4593895B2 (en) System and method for calculating the round trip delay of the real-time protocol packet stream
EP1876758B1 (en) Method for probing the peer-to-peer quality of service (QOS)
Padhye et al. A model based TCP-friendly rate control protocol
US7756032B2 (en) Method and apparatus for communicating data within measurement traffic
US8335232B2 (en) Method and system of renegotiating end-to-end voice over internet protocol CODECs
US20030185210A1 (en) Monitoring quality of service in a packet-based network
CN1225102C (en) Method for dynamically sending data packet using RTP and RTCP protocol
Teixeira et al. Traffic matrix reloaded: Impact of routing changes
CN100558044C (en) Method, device and system for monitoring network performance between net elements
US8804575B2 (en) Central entity to adjust redundancy and error correction on RTP sessions
US7519006B1 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring one-way delay at arbitrary points in network
US7894488B2 (en) Apparatus and method for monitoring quality metrics associated with a wireless network
US7746797B2 (en) Non-intrusive monitoring of quality levels for voice communications over a packet-based network
US7720959B2 (en) Method and apparatus for characterizing the quality of a network path
US8867385B2 (en) Tunneling reports for real-time Internet Protocol media streams
US20030039216A1 (en) System and method for identifying errors in a video conference conducted on a packet-based network
US8165109B2 (en) Method for managing the quality of encrypted voice over IP to teleagents
US7948886B2 (en) System and method for the control of the transmission rate in packet-based digital communications
US6741569B1 (en) Quality of service monitor for multimedia communications system
US8451835B2 (en) Voice optimization in a network having voice over internet protocol communication devices
US20020051464A1 (en) Quality of transmission across packet-based networks
EP1332584B1 (en) Method for monitoring quality of service
US7894354B2 (en) System and method to monitor RTP streams using RTCP SR/RR packet information

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENUITY INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MITSUMORI, DEREK HISAMI;CHANG, SUJIN CATHERINE;PAN, KWANG-SHAN;REEL/FRAME:013068/0080

Effective date: 20020702

AS Assignment

Owner name: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COLORADO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENUITY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014324/0285

Effective date: 20030204

AS Assignment

Owner name: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COLORADO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:014653/0859

Effective date: 20040520

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
AS Assignment

Owner name: MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL A

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;ICG COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018207/0120

Effective date: 20060627

AS Assignment

Owner name: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COLORADO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018989/0678

Effective date: 20070312

Owner name: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,COLORADO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018989/0678

Effective date: 20070312

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12