US6783640B2 - Sputtering method and sputtering apparatus - Google Patents

Sputtering method and sputtering apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6783640B2
US6783640B2 US10/050,787 US5078702A US6783640B2 US 6783640 B2 US6783640 B2 US 6783640B2 US 5078702 A US5078702 A US 5078702A US 6783640 B2 US6783640 B2 US 6783640B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
film
target
sputtering
emission intensity
substrate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US10/050,787
Other versions
US20020134670A1 (en
Inventor
Toshihiro Yamashita
Hiroshi Echizen
Yasuyoshi Takai
Hidetoshi Tsuzuki
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Canon Inc
Original Assignee
Canon Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Canon Inc filed Critical Canon Inc
Assigned to CANNON KABUSHIKI KAISHA reassignment CANNON KABUSHIKI KAISHA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: YAMASHITA, TOSHIHIRO, ECHIZEN, HIROSHI, TAKAI, YASUYOSHI, TSUZUKI, HIDETOSHI
Publication of US20020134670A1 publication Critical patent/US20020134670A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6783640B2 publication Critical patent/US6783640B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/0021Reactive sputtering or evaporation
    • C23C14/0036Reactive sputtering
    • C23C14/0042Controlling partial pressure or flow rate of reactive or inert gases with feedback of measurements
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/22Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the process of coating
    • C23C14/54Controlling or regulating the coating process
    • C23C14/542Controlling the film thickness or evaporation rate
    • C23C14/544Controlling the film thickness or evaporation rate using measurement in the gas phase

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Physical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
  • Physical Deposition Of Substances That Are Components Of Semiconductor Devices (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)

Abstract

In a sputtering method for forming a film on a substrate in a film forming space while monitoring emission intensity of plasma, the method comprises the steps of detecting a thickness of the film formed on the substrate; comparing a detected value with a preset value of the film thickness; and deciding a target value of the emission intensity in accordance with a compared result. With the method, a transparent conductive film is formed which has high uniformity in film thickness, sheet resistance and transmittance and hence has superior characteristics.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a sputtering method and a sputtering apparatus, which are implemented while monitoring the emission intensity of plasma. The present invention develops a superior effect particularly when forming a deposit film, such as a transparent conductive film, by a reactive sputtering process.
2. Description of the Related Art
In general, two methods are proposed for producing a transparent conductive film made of a metal oxide on a substrate by a sputtering process, i.e., one in which an oxide, such as In2O3—SnO2, is employed as a target and is subjected to sputtering in an Ar gas, and the other (reactive sputtering process) in which an alloy, such as In—Sn, is subjected to sputtering in a gas mixture of an inert gas, such as Ar, and O2.
The former method is able to produce a film having low electrical resistance and high transmittance by sputtering, but has difficulty in increasing a film forming rate.
On the other hand, the latter reactive sputtering process is able to increase a film forming rate. It is reported that, particularly in a DC magnetron sputtering apparatus using a cylindrical rotating target disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,356,073 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,422,916, the efficiency in utilization of a target material is about 2.5 to 3 times as large as that obtainable with a conventional planar type apparatus (“Functional Materials”, Mar., 1991, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 35-41).
The reactive sputtering process using the rotating target has advantages in that a target material can be saved and a production down time due to target replacement can be greatly reduced.
The DC magnetron sputtering apparatus using the rotating target is therefore suitable for mass-production.
In the reactive sputtering process, however, a film forming condition, in particular, a gas flow rate, has a very narrow suitable range, and hence a difficulty occurs in control of film forming parameters, e.g., uniformity in sheet resistance and transmittance, discharge stability and so on, when a transparent conductive film is formed on, e.g., a sheet-like substrate having a large area.
As an improvement for overcoming the problem mentioned above, there is known a reactive sputtering process employing a plasma emission monitor (abbreviated as “PEM” hereinafter) (S. Schiller, U. Heisig, Chr. Komdorfer, J. Strumpfel, and V. Kirchhoff, “Progress in the Application of the Plasma Emission Monitor in Web Coating”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., USA October 1988).
The PEM is a device for collecting plasma emissions by a collimator, introducing the emissions to a photomultiplier through a spectroscope, and monitoring a plasma state with an electrical signal obtained through photoelectric conversion of the emissions by the photomultiplier. In a sputtering apparatus employing a PEM, the function of adjusting the flow rate of an introduced reactive gas and holding the emission intensity of plasma constant can be developed with the sensitivity of the photomultiplier of the PEM set to a certain value.
Also, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-29863 discloses a technique for forming an ITO (Indium Tin Oxide) film on a substrate. A gist of the disclosed technique is as follows. A substrate is set in a film forming chamber, and a discharge is generated in the film forming chamber under a condition in which a sputtering gas is introduced, but a reactive gas is not introduced to the chamber. The sensitivity of a device for monitoring the emission intensity of discharge plasma is adjusted and the amount of the introduced reactive gas is controlled so that the plasma emission intensity is adjusted at a predetermined value. Then, a target is subjected to sputtering while a set value of the emission intensity is varied so as to hold the actual emission intensity of plasma constant at all times. As a result, a deposition rate is held constant.
In other words, according to the disclosed technique, when forming an ITO film, a deposition rate in the formation of the film is held constant by adjusting the flow rate of an introduced reactive gas (O2) so that the actual-emission intensity of In plasma (wavelength=451.1 nm) is held constant.
With the techniques described above, it has become possible to produce a fairly satisfactory deposit film at a certain level of stability using the reactive sputtering process.
However, when continuously forming a deposition film of superior characteristics at a high film forming rate for a long time, the following problems still remain not yet overcome.
With recent progress of the technology, levels of characteristics and uniformity required for a deposit film have increased year by year. Correspondingly, severer criteria than those ones, which have been employed so far, are applied for determination of characteristics and uniformity. Also, from the viewpoint of cost effectiveness, a deposit film forming method and apparatus with higher productivity is demanded.
Under such a situation, when the above-described conventional reactive sputtering process combined with the PEM is employed to form a transparent conductive film on a substrate for a long time using an In—Sn alloy target, the film forming rate changes over time, whereupon uniformity in sheet resistance and transmittance deteriorates despite of the PEM control. This may result in that the formed film does not satisfy the criteria required as a product (or the yield reduces).
In particular, when sputtering is performed for a long time using a metal having a low melting point, such as In, the surface shape (e.g., asperities) and the surface condition (e.g., partial melting of an outermost surface) of a target change over time. Eventually, even though the emission intensity is controlled by the PEM so as to fall within a certain range, it is often inevitable that the film thickness, the sheet resistance and the transmittance become not uniform.
Those problems are more critical particularly when forming a deposit film for a long time using a long-strip substrate as practiced by the so-called roll-to-roll method, or when increasing, e.g., the applied power and/or the flow rate of an introduced gas during sputtering to increase a deposit film forming rate, because the surface shape and the surface condition of a target are changed to a larger extent in a short time.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is one object of the present invention to provide a sputtering method and a sputtering apparatus, which can hold constant the sheet resistance and the transmittance of a deposit film (particularly a transparent conductive film), and which can easily control a film forming rate to be kept constant. The sputtering method and apparatus of the present invention is particularly suitable for use in the case of performing reactive sputtering with a target using a metal having a low melting point, such as an In—Sn alloy.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a sputtering method and a sputtering apparatus, which can form a deposit film having high uniformity in film thickness, sheet resistance and transmittance and having superior characteristics, particularly even in the case of forming a deposit film (especially a transparent conductive film) for a long time using an long-strip substrate or increasing a deposit film forming rate.
As a result of conducting intensive studies on a reactive sputtering process with a DC magnetron sputtering apparatus using a cylindrical rotating target while attention is especially focused on the surface condition, the sputtering rate and the surface reaction of the target, the inventors have accomplished the present invention having features as follows.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a sputtering method for forming a film on a substrate in a film forming space while monitoring emission intensity of plasma, the method comprising the steps of detecting a thickness of the film formed on the substrate; comparing a detected value with a preset value of the film thickness; and deciding a target value of the emission intensity in accordance with a compared result.
In the sputtering method of the present invention, preferably, a flow rate of at least one of gases introduced to the film forming space is controlled such that actual emission intensity is adjusted at the target value of the emission intensity.
The target value of the emission intensity is preferably set to fall in a predetermined range defined beforehand. Furthermore, preferably, if the target value deviates from the predetermined range, sputtering is stopped.
In the sputtering method of the present invention, a target containing In may be employed as a sputtering target. Also, a cylindrical rotating target is preferably employed as a sputtering target.
In the sputtering method of the present invention, preferably, an oxygen gas is selected as one of the gases, of which flow rate is controlled.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a sputtering apparatus comprising a film forming container, a substrate feeding mechanism, and an emission intensity monitor, the apparatus further comprising a film thickness measuring device for measuring a thickness of a film formed on a substrate and outputting a measured result; and a comparator for comparing an output of the film thickness measuring device with a preset value of the film thickness and outputting a target value of the emission intensity monitor in accordance with a compared result.
Preferably, the sputtering apparatus of the present invention further comprises a gas flow rate control mechanism for receiving the target value of the emission intensity monitor and controlling a flow rate of at least one of gases introduced to the film forming container in accordance with the target value.
Further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view showing one example of an apparatus for forming a transparent conductive film by sputtering according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a graph showing a gas flow rate change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 140 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing a film thickness change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 140 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a graph showing a sheet resistance change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 140 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a graph showing a change in transmittance Q at 400 nm resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 140 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a graph showing a change in conversion efficiency of an amorphous silicon solar cell resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 140 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a graph showing a gas flow rate change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a graph showing a film thickness change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing a sheet resistance change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a graph showing a change in transmittance Q at 400 nm resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 11 is a graph showing a change in conversion efficiency of an amorphous silicon solar cell resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes according to the method of the present invention.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing correlation between a set point and conversion efficiency resulting from an experiment for confirming a predetermined range of the set point in which a stable value of the conversion efficiency is obtained.
FIG. 13 is a graph showing correlation between a set point and Rs (series resistance) resulting from an experiment for confirming a predetermined range of the set point in which a stable value of the Rs is obtained.
FIG. 14 is a graph showing correlation between a set point and transmittance resulting from an experiment for confirming a predetermined range of the set point in which a stable value of the transmittance is obtained.
FIG. 15 is a graph showing correlation between a set point and sheet resistance resulting from an experiment for confirming a predetermined range of the set point in which a stable value of the sheet resistance is obtained.
FIG. 16 is a graph showing correlation between a set point and a film thickness resulting from an experiment for confirming a predetermined range of the set point in which a stable value of the film thickness is obtained.
FIG. 17 is a graph showing a gas flow rate change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes under control only by a thickness gauge as a comparative example 1.
FIG. 18 is a graph showing a film thickness change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes under control only by a thickness gauge as a comparative example 1.
FIG. 19 is a graph showing a sheet resistance change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes under control only by a thickness gauge as a comparative example 1.
FIG. 20 is a graph showing a change in transmittance Q at 400 nm resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes under control only by a thickness gauge as a comparative example 1.
FIG. 21 is a graph showing a change in conversion efficiency of an amorphous silicon solar cell resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed for 700 minutes under control only by a thickness gauge as a comparative example 1.
FIG. 22 is a graph showing a film thickness change resulting when a transparent conductive film is formed by a reactive sputtering process under control of an O2 flow rate only by a PEM as a comparative example 2.
FIG. 23 is a graph showing variations in sheet resistance per unit area of transparent conductive films formed by the method of the present invention and a conventional method.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention will be described below in detail, by way of example, in connection with a preferred embodiment. In the preferred embodiment, a long stainless steel plate is employed as a substrate, and a photoelectric conversion layer (semiconductor layer of the NIP structure) is formed on the substrate. On the photoelectric conversion layer, an ITO film is formed, as a transparent conductive film defining an outermost layer of a photovoltatic device, by the so-called roll-to-roll method using, as a target, a rotating target made of an In—Sn alloy that is a metal having a low melting point. Note that the following description should not be construed as limiting the material and shape of the substrate, the kind of a device, etc., to which the present invention is applicable.
It has been found that, in reactive sputtering using an In—Sn alloy target, a film forming rate is reduced as the flow rate of a reactive gas (O2) increases, and film quality is improved correspondingly (Haruhiro Kobayashi, “Sputtered Thin Film (Fundamentals and Applications)”, The Japan Industrial Journal, 1993).
With a simple increase in the flow rate of the reactive gas, however, the sheet resistance is not stable and is relatively high, as shown in FIG. 19 (described later). The reason is that a portion (so-called nodule) of a rotating target surface, in which oxidation has progressed, and an alloy layer, in which oxidation has not yet occurred, appear in a plasma area by turns periodically.
To be adapted for a periodical change in surface condition of the rotating target, therefore, a PEM is essential which is able to momentarily control the flow rate of the reactive gas depending on the surface condition.
However, even though a target value of the plasma emission intensity is held constant using the PEM, the film thickness formed per unit time is significantly increased m, over time, as shown in FIG. 22, particularly when the target material is a metal having a low melting point (In—Sn in this embodiment).
Such an increase of the film thickness leads to a disadvantage that, in spite of performing the PEM control, in uniformity in sheet resistance and transmittance of a formed deposit film is deteriorated.
That phenomenon is presumably based on the fact that the state of a target under sputtering (typically a sputtering rate) and a manner of reaction thereof with oxygen are varied due to changes in the surface shape (e.g., asperities) and the surface condition (e.g., partial melting of an outermost surface) of the target.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, therefore, the following two kinds of control are carried out during the film formation. First one is short-time control (momentary control of oxygen amount) in which the flow rate of the reactive gas is adjusted moment to moment by a piezo-type valve, for example, so that the plasma emission intensity detected by the PEM is held to be matched with a target value. The sheet resistance and the transmittance of a formed film are thereby controlled. In second kind of control, the sputtering condition, which gradually changes over time due to a change in, e.g., surface condition of the target, is determined based on a change in film thickness, and the target value of the plasma emission intensity under the PEM control is adjusted in accordance with a determined result. More specifically, a detected value of the film thickness is compared with a preset value of the film thickness, and the target value of the plasma emission intensity under the PEM control is varied or maintained in accordance with a compared result. In this respect, an essential point is that while it has been conventional to hold the actual emission intensity constant by varying the target value of the plasma emission intensity, the actual emission intensity is changed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Furthermore, preferably, the target value of the plasma emission intensity is controlled so as to fall within a predetermined width that has been determined based on an experiment beforehand, and the flow rate of the reactive gas (O2)is momentarily adjusted under the PEM control. This enables the piezo-type valve to function under the PEM control such that the sputtering condition is sufficiently adapted for the above-described periodic change in surface condition of the rotating target. As a result, uniformity in the film thickness, sheet resistance and transmittance can be held within respective target ranges. If the decided target value of the plasma emission intensity deviates from the predetermined width upon a change in the film thickness, this means that any anomaly has occurred in the apparatus. In such an event, therefore, it is preferable to stop the film forming operation and check the apparatus.
The sputtering method and apparatus of the present invention will now be described in more detail.
The apparatus configuration is featured in adding a (film) thickness gauge and a plasma emission monitor (PEM) to a sputtering apparatus.
The thickness gauge may be of the type optically. detecting a film thickness, detecting a film thickness by applying a vibration, or physically detecting a film thickness. Among them, an optical detector for illuminating light to a substrate and computing a film thickness from the light reflected by the substrate is suitably employed.
A comparator is connected to the thickness gauge. Inputted to the comparator are an output (detected result) of the thickness gauge and a target value of the film thickness set beforehand. The comparator compares the output value of the thickness gauge with the target value of the film thickness, and outputs a compared result to an emission intensity target-value setting unit.
The emission intensity target-value setting unit sets a target value of the emission intensity in accordance with the compared result. For example, when the output value of the thickness gauge is greater than the target value of the film thickness, the target value of the emission intensity is set to a value smaller than that having been set so far. Conversely, when the output value of the thickness gauge is smaller than the target value of the film thickness, the target value of the emission intensity is set to a value greater than that having been set so far.
Also, the PEM includes a comparator for comparing the plasma emission intensity detected by a photomultiplier with the target value of the emission intensity, and then outputting a compared result.
In this embodiment, since the roll-to-roll method is employed and the substrate is always fed during the film formation, a position of the substrate, at which the film thickness is measured, is also always moved even with the thickness gauge maintained at a fixed position. Accordingly, if the feed speed is constant, the detected film thickness represents an amount by which the film is formed per unit time (i.e., film forming rate). In that case, the film thickness measured by the thickness gauge is proportional to the film forming rate. When a position of the substrate, at which the film thickness is measured, is fixed (i.e., when a film is formed without feeding the substrate), it is preferable to compute a film forming rate from the amount of change in the measured film thickness, to compare the computed film forming rate with a preset value of the film forming rate, and to adjust the target value of the emission intensity in accordance with a compared result.
More preferably, the apparatus is designed to be able to automatically carry out setting and control, which are required in a series of processing steps described above, by using a computer.
Furthermore, the target value of the emission intensity is preferably decided using the PEM by previously confirming an actual amount by which the target value of the emission intensity should be increased or decreased corresponding to a difference between the detected value and the target value.
In the method of the present invention described above, it is important that a proper range of the target value of the emission intensity be confirmed beforehand, by way of example, as follows.
(Example for Confirming Proper Set Range of Target Value of Emission Intensity)
To obtain the film thickness, the sheet resistance and the transmittance at constant values by varying the flow rate of the reactive gas (O2) depending on a change in the film forming rate, the target value for all parameters must be set to fall within the predetermined range as mentioned above. One example of the practical setting method is described below.
The following description is made by taking an amorphous silicon solar cell as an example, but the present invention is in no way limited by the following description. The method and apparatus of the present invention are also applicable to methods and apparatuses for manufacturing any other types of devices having transparent conductive films.
Correlation between each parameter and the target value was confirmed by employing an apparatus that is the same as a roll-to-roll sputtering apparatus used in Example 1 described later, and forming a transparent electrode on the light incident side of the amorphous silicon solar cell at each discrete target value while varying the target value of the emission intensity over a particular range (80 to 320 in this example).
Confirmed results are plotted in FIGS. 12 to 16. FIG. 12 shows correlation between the target value (set point) and conversion efficiency; FIG. 13 shows correlation between the target value and Rs (series resistance); FIG. 14 shows correlation between the target value and transmittance (Q value at 400 nm); FIG. 15 shows correlation between the target value and sheet resistance; and FIG. 16 shows correlation between the target value and a film thickness.
As seen from the correlation between the target value and each of the parameters shown in FIGS. 12 to 16, a proper range of the target value, in which all parameters have stable values, is from 120 to 300. However, that proper range should not be regarded as being absolute one, but differs depending on the type of the PEM employed in practice. In other words, an optimum set range of the target value (i.e., range in which the target value is variably set) must be set depending on a desired system of a deposit film forming apparatus and desired control values of respective parameters.
By determining the set range of the target value in such a manner, stable characteristics of the solar cells can be obtained.
EXAMPLE 1
Although this Example 1 is described below in connection with a roll-to-roll sputtering apparatus in which a reactive sputtering process is performed using a rotating target, the concept of this Example can be similarly applied to any sputtering apparatus provided with a PEM regardless of the kind of process and the type of apparatus.
(Roll-to-Roll Sputtering Apparatus)
FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a DC magnetron reactive sputtering apparatus using a cylindrical rotating target according to this Example.
Referring to FIG. 1, a vacuum chamber 104 is constituted by a substrate letting-out chamber 113, a film forming chamber 114, and a substrate winding-up chamber 115. These chambers can be individually evacuated by respective vacuum pumps (not shown). A long-strip substrate 101 is wound around a substrate letting-out roll 102, and is fed in a direction from the left toward the right, as viewed in FIG. 1, by a feed means (not shown) through a substrate feeding roller 116. Then, the substrate 101 is reeled up around a substrate winding-up roll 103 through a steering roller 117 while windup unevenness in the width direction of the substrate 101 is remedied by a mechanism of the steering roller 117.
A cathode 106 has a cylindrical shape, and a target 105 is attached to a circumferential surface of the cathode 106 by bonding. A magnet 107 and a cooling means (not shown) are provided inside the cathode 106. A DC power supply 108 is connected to the vacuum chamber 104 such that the vacuum chamber 104 serves as an anode. Thus, electric power is applied between the cathode 106 and the vacuum chamber 104. The long-strip substrate 101 is held in a floating state (i.e., state insulated from the vacuum chamber 104).
Heaters 110 and 111 in the form of sheath-heaters are provided in the film forming chamber 114. The heater 110 is arranged slightly offset to the left (in a direction toward the substrate letting-out roll 102) with respect to the cathode 106, and the heater 111 is arranged just above the cathode 106. The heater 110 has an electrical capacity greater than the heater 111. In a region just under the heater 111, particularly, the long-strip substrate 101 is subjected to heat of the heater introduced from above and heat of plasma introduced from below. A temperature at the rear side (upper surface in FIG. 1) of the long-strip substrate 101 is measured by a thermocouple disposed in contact with the substrate rear side. Then, electric power supplied to the heaters 110, 111 is controlled so that the temperature at the substrate rear side is kept constant. Further, a collimator 112 is provided in the film forming chamber 114 and connected to a PEM 118, which is provided outside the film forming chamber 114. The substrate winding-up chamber 115 is provided with a thickness gauge 109 constituted as an optical interference thickness gauge.
The apparatus thus constructed may be operated in an automatic or manual manner. In any case, an interlock mechanism is preferably attached for the sake of safety.
The above-described apparatus is operated in accordance with the following steps.
First, the substrate letting-out roll 102, around which the long-strip substrate 101 is wound, is set in the substrate letting-out chamber 113. Then, the long-strip substrate 101 is routed so as to pass the substrate letting-out chamber 113, the film forming chamber 114 and the substrate winding-up chamber 115 in that order. After fixing a leading end of the long-strip substrate 101 to the substrate winding-up roll 103, the substrate winding-up roll 103 is rotated several times. Subsequently, a tension is applied to the long-strip substrate 101 by a tension generating mechanism (not shown).
When the long-strip substrate 101 is a conductive substrate and must be kept in an electrically insulated state like this Example, the insulated state of the long-strip substrate 101 is confirmed on that occasion (i.e., at the timing immediately after applying a tension).
Next, the film forming chamber 114 is evacuated by a vacuum pump (not shown) to a vacuum degree on the order of 10−3 Pa. Then, an Ar gas is introduced and the vacuum level is adjusted to 0.3 Pa. Outputs of the heaters 110 and 111 are controlled. More specifically, electric power is supplied to the heaters 110 and 111, and outputs of the heaters 110 and 111 are controlled such that the temperature at the rear side of the long-strip substrate 101 is 215° C. in an area opposing to the heater 110 and 200° C. in an area opposing to the heater 111. After the lapse of one hour from the energization of the heaters 110 and 111, electric power of 1.8 kW is applied to the cathode 106 from the DC power supply 108. After confirming the occurrence of an Ar discharge, an O2 gas is introduced to the film forming chamber 114, and the long-strip substrate 101 starts to be fed at a feed speed of 1.5 m/min. Further, sensitivity of the photomultiplier in the PEM 118 is adjusted in accordance with the method disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-29863. The PEM 118 may be, e.g., a plasma emission monitor PEM04 made by ARDENNE ANLAGEN TECHNIK Co.
The sensitivity of the photomultiplier is adjusted by a method of generating a discharge only with an Ar gas and adjusting a gain of the photomultiplier such that the plasma emission intensity is 600. After the adjustment, an O2 gas is introduced to start formation of a film. When an area of the substrate, in which the film has been formed, is fed to a position just above the thickness gauge 109, the target value of the plasma emission intensity is adjusted such that a reading of thickness gauge 109 is held at 60 nm. A transparent conductive film is produced by adjusting the target value of the plasma emission intensity as required.
When the film formation on a predetermined length of the substrate 101 is completed, the O2 gas, the Ar gas, the DC power supply 108, the heater 110, and the heater 111 are all stopped. The feed of the long-strip substrate 101 is also stopped. After cooling the substrate for one hour, the interior of the film forming chamber 114 is restored to the atmospheric pressure, and a product is taken out of the vacuum chamber 104.
(Behavior of Each Parameter in Short Time by Control Process in this Example)
Changes in values of respective parameters measured by carrying out the film formation for a short time will be described with reference to FIGS. 2 to 6. An apparatus used for the measurement was the same as the roll-to-roll sputtering apparatus shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 2 shows a change in the flow rate of the O2 gas, and FIG. 3 shows a change in the film thickness measured by the thickness gauge 109. FIG. 4 shows a sheet resistance change, and FIG. 5 shows a transmittance change. FIG. 6 shows a change in the conversion efficiency of an amorphous silicon solar cell having the transparent conductive film formed according to this Example.
AS shown in FIG. 3, after the lapse of about 20 minutes from the start of the film formation, the film thickness has a greatly increased value. When the film thickness increases by 1 nm from a predetermined value of 60 nm (i.e., at a point a in FIG. 3), the flow-rate of the O2 gas is increased by 0.5 ml/min from a point a1 to b1 as shown in FIG. 2. With such an adjustment, the film thickness is returned to a point b shown in FIG. 3.
FIGS. 2 to 6 show results obtained by performing that adjustment periodically.
More specifically, by carrying out the control process described above, the film thickness can be held substantially constant as seen from FIG. 3.
Also, as seen from FIG. 4, the sheet resistance has a tendency to gradually increase as a whole. Looking at a change in more detail, the sheet resistance is slightly reduced contrary to an increase of the film thickness, and is increased in proportion to an increase of the flow rate of the O2 gas.
As seen from FIG. 5, the transmittance also has a tendency to gradually increase as a whole. Looking at a change in more detail, the transmittance is slightly reduced contrary to an increase of the film thickness, and is increased in proportion to an increase of the flow rate of the O2 gas.
Further, as seen from FIG. 6, the conversion efficiency of the solar cell has characteristics held substantially constant. The reason why the substantially constant conversion efficiency of the solar cell is obtained is that, by increasing the flow rate of the O2 gas to suppress an increase of the film forming rate, the sheet resistance is increased as shown in FIG. 4, thus tending to reduce the conversion efficiency, but at the same time the transmittance is increased as shown in FIG. 5 to compensate for a reduction of the conversion efficiency.
(Behavior of Each Parameter in Long Time by Control Process in this Example)
Changes in values of respective parameters measured by carrying out the film formation for a long time will be described with reference to FIGS. 7 to 11. An apparatus used for the measurement was the same as the roll-to-roll sputtering apparatus shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 shows a change in the flow rate of the O2, gas, and FIG. 8 shows a change in the film thickness measured by the thickness gauge 109. FIG. 9 shows a sheet resistance change, and FIG. 10 shows a transmittance change. FIG. 11 shows a change in the conversion efficiency of an amorphous silicon solar cell having the transparent conductive film formed according to this Example.
As with the short-time experiment described above, the flow rate of the O2 gas is increased (FIG. 7) to hold the film thickness constant as shown in FIG. 8. The sheet resistance is also increased correspondingly (FIG. 9). However, because the transmittance is gradually increased (FIG. 10), the conversion efficiency after the film formation for a long time can be held in a satisfactory range of 10.4 to 10.8% (FIG. 11).
EXAMPLE 2
In this Example 2, experiments were conducted to confirm sheet resistance per unit area resulting by changing electric power applied to a target in each of a conventional method only using the PEM control and the sputtering method of the present invention. Obtained results are plotted in FIG. 23.
As seen from FIG. 23, the sheet resistance per unit area varies in a range of about 40% to 53% with the conventional control method in which the O2 flow rate is changed while monitoring plasma by the PEM.
With the method of the present invention, however, the sheet resistance per unit area varies in a smaller range of 10% to 15% and is held substantially uniform.
In other words, by carrying out the method of the present invention, a film can be formed with substantially uniform sheet resistance per unit area. Further, since that effect is obtained even at higher film forming rates, the production capability can be increased.
The following is a description on results of long-time film formation by the reactive sputtering process using an In—Sn alloy target according to (1) a production method in which the O2 flow rate was changed while monitoring the film thickness by a thickness gauge (Comparative Example 1) and (2) a production method in which the 2 flow rate was changed while monitoring a PEM (Comparative Example 2).
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
FIGS. 17 to 21 show experimental results obtained by employing only the thickness gauge without performing the PEM control and introducing a reactive gas directly by a mass flow controller for adjustment of the film thickness. An apparatus used for the experiments was the same as the roll-to-roll sputtering apparatus shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 17 shows a change in the flow rate of the O2 gas, and FIG. 18 shows a change in the film thickness measured by the thickness gauge 109. FIG. 19 shows a sheet resistance change, and FIG. 20 shows a transmittance change. FIG. 21 shows a change in the conversion efficiency of an amorphous silicon solar cell having the transparent conductive film formed according to this Comparative Example.
As shown in FIG. 17, the flow rate of the Qi gas is gradually increased from the start of the film formation. This is because, corresponding to a gradual increase of the film forming rate, the flow rate of the O2 gas was increased to hold the film forming rate constant. Also, the film thickness shown in FIG. 18 was held constant as a result of adjusting the flow rate of the O2 gas.
As seen from the sheet resistance change shown FIG. 19 and the transmittance change shown in FIG. 20, noticeable variations occur in characteristics values of those two parameters. Such a phenomenon is attributable to the fact that, since the PEM control is not performed, the adjustment is not sufficiently adapted for a momentary (short-time) surface change of the target and hence the film forming rate is varied.
Eventually, as shown in FIG. 21, the conversion efficiency of the solar cell changes at relatively low values in a range of 7.3% to 8.0%.
Stated otherwise, it is understood that, in the case of not performing the PEM control, a difficulty is encountered in proper control of the sheet resistance and the transmittance because a minute surface change of the target cannot be adaptively dealt with.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
FIG. 22 shows an experimental result obtained by employing only the PEM and changing the flow rate of the O2 gas without monitoring the film thickness by the thickness gauge. The vertical axis of FIG. 22 represents the film thickness indicated on the thickness gauge 109 when a transparent conductive film was formed on the long-strip substrate 101 using the roll-to-roll sputtering apparatus shown in FIG. 1. The long-strip substrate 101 was fed at a feed speed of 1.5 m/min.
As seen from FIG. 22, the film thickness is steeply increased over time. This means a rapid increase of the film forming-rate.
In other words, FIG. 22 indicates the fact that, a transparent conductive film is formed on a substrate for a long time by the reactive sputtering process under the PEM control using an In—Sn alloy target, i.e., a target having a relatively low melting point, the film forming rate is monotonously increased over time. Such a-phenomenon is presumably attributable to changes in both reflectance and surface shape which occur upon generation of nodules (oxides) on the target surface during the film formation for a long time.
It is thus understood that the PEM control enables a momentary (short-time) change in the target surface condition to be properly controlled by monitoring the plasma emission intensity, but it is not adaptable for a change in the film forming rate during the film formation for a long time.
The main differences among Comparative Examples 1, 2 and Example 1 of the present invention are summarized in Table 1 given below.
TABLE 1
Controllable
Production Method Parameter
Example 1 O2 flow rate is changed film thickness,
under control using both sheet resistance,
thickness gauge and PEM and transmittance
(control of the invention)
Comparative O2 flow rate is changed film thickness
Example 1 under control only using
thickness gauge (mass flow
controller control)
Comparative O2 flow rate is changed sheet resistance
Example 2 under control only using and transmittance
PEM (piezo-type control)
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, as described above, when a transparent conductive film is formed by the sputtering process, uniformity in film thickness, sheet resistance and transmittance can be greatly increased. In particular, for example, even when the film formation is performed for a long time over 10 hours by the roll-to-roll method using, as a target, a metal having a low melting point such as In, it is possible to hold values of those parameters uniform at all times, and to improve the yield.
Also, even when the deposit film forming rate is increased for an improvement in productivity and the target surface condition is changed to a large extent in a short time, it is similarly possible to hold values of those parameters uniform according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
When the present invention is applied to a method of producing a transparent conductive film of a solar cell, the conversion efficiency can be maintained at a high and uniform level over a large area.
Further, in the reactive sputtering process using a rotating target, for which it is generally said very difficult to realize proper control in formation of a film, the film formation can be properly controlled by relatively simple operation.
Consequently, the reactive sputtering method and apparatus according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention can be relatively easily implemented, and uniformity of various characteristics can be maintained while realizing high film forming rates. As secondary effects, the productivity can be improved in such points as saving of the target material and a reduction of production down time necessary for target replacement.
While the present invention has been described with reference to what are presently considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.

Claims (7)

What is claimed is:
1. A sputtering method for forming a film on a substrate in a film forming space while monitoring emission intensity of plasma, the method comprising the steps of:
detecting a thickness of the film formed on said substrate;
comparing a detected value with a preset value of the film thickness;
deciding a target value of the emission intensity that will provide the preset value of the film thickness in accordance with a compared result; and
adjusting the emission intensity to the target value to increase a transmittance of the film formed on the substrate to compensate for an increase in resistance of the film.
2. The sputtering method according to claim 1, further comprising controlling a flow rate of at least one gas introduced into said film forming space, thereby adjusting the intensity to the target value of the emission intensity.
3. The sputtering method according to claim 2, wherein oxygen gas is selected as the gas for which the flow rate is controlled.
4. The sputtering method according to claim 1, wherein a target containing In is employed as a sputtering target.
5. The sputtering method according to claim 1, wherein a cylindrical rotating target is employed as a sputtering target.
6. The sputtering method according to claim 1, wherein the target value of the emission intensity is set to fall in a predetermined range defined beforehand.
7. The sputtering method according to claim 6, wherein if the target value deviates from said predetermined range, sputtering is stopped.
US10/050,787 2001-01-23 2002-01-18 Sputtering method and sputtering apparatus Expired - Fee Related US6783640B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001-013974 2001-01-23
JP2001013974A JP2002212720A (en) 2001-01-23 2001-01-23 Method and device for sputtering

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020134670A1 US20020134670A1 (en) 2002-09-26
US6783640B2 true US6783640B2 (en) 2004-08-31

Family

ID=18880725

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/050,787 Expired - Fee Related US6783640B2 (en) 2001-01-23 2002-01-18 Sputtering method and sputtering apparatus

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US6783640B2 (en)
JP (1) JP2002212720A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080096305A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-04-24 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for forming deposited film and photovoltaic element
US20090020149A1 (en) * 2007-07-16 2009-01-22 Woods Lawrence M Hybrid Multi-Junction Photovoltaic Cells And Associated Methods
TWI485277B (en) * 2013-12-13 2015-05-21 Univ Minghsin Sci & Tech Multi-sputtering cathodes stabilized process control method for reactive-sputtering deposition
US9951415B2 (en) 2015-04-22 2018-04-24 Canon Tokki Corporation Film deposition apparatus and film deposition method
US20190153582A1 (en) * 2017-11-21 2019-05-23 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Sputtering apparatus and method for manufacturing film

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003013218A (en) 2001-06-29 2003-01-15 Canon Inc Long-term sputtering method
US20100200395A1 (en) * 2009-02-06 2010-08-12 Anton Dietrich Techniques for depositing transparent conductive oxide coatings using dual C-MAG sputter apparatuses
KR20110011297A (en) * 2009-07-28 2011-02-08 지 . 텍 (주) Apparatus for realtime detecting sheet resistance
JP6670546B2 (en) 2015-02-17 2020-03-25 日東電工株式会社 Thin film deposition method
JP7256653B2 (en) * 2019-02-14 2023-04-12 キヤノン株式会社 Paper feeder and information processing method
CN114277348B (en) * 2021-12-27 2023-06-30 晋能清洁能源科技股份公司 Method for controlling magnetron sputtering equipment in HJT battery production

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4356073A (en) 1981-02-12 1982-10-26 Shatterproof Glass Corporation Magnetron cathode sputtering apparatus
US4422916A (en) 1981-02-12 1983-12-27 Shatterproof Glass Corporation Magnetron cathode sputtering apparatus
US5232507A (en) 1991-05-01 1993-08-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for forming deposited films with microwave plasma CVD method
US5360484A (en) 1991-07-26 1994-11-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Microwave plasma CVD apparatus provided with a microwave transmissive window made of specific ceramics for the formation of a functional deposited film
US6051851A (en) 1994-04-28 2000-04-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Semiconductor devices utilizing silicide reaction
US6103442A (en) 1997-12-26 2000-08-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for producing electrophotographic photosensitive member
US6113732A (en) 1996-03-18 2000-09-05 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Deposited film forming apparatus
US6158382A (en) 1996-12-12 2000-12-12 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for forming a deposited film by plasma chemical vapor deposition and apparatus for forming a deposited film by plasma chemical vapor deposition
US6223684B1 (en) 1997-07-07 2001-05-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Film deposition apparatus
US6273955B1 (en) 1995-08-28 2001-08-14 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Film forming apparatus
US6335281B1 (en) 1998-06-18 2002-01-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Deposited film forming process

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0774444B2 (en) * 1986-03-11 1995-08-09 松下電器産業株式会社 Spatter device
JPH116064A (en) * 1997-06-18 1999-01-12 Olympus Optical Co Ltd Method and equipment for production of thin optical film
JPH1129863A (en) * 1997-07-10 1999-02-02 Canon Inc Production of deposited film

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4422916A (en) 1981-02-12 1983-12-27 Shatterproof Glass Corporation Magnetron cathode sputtering apparatus
US4356073A (en) 1981-02-12 1982-10-26 Shatterproof Glass Corporation Magnetron cathode sputtering apparatus
US5232507A (en) 1991-05-01 1993-08-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for forming deposited films with microwave plasma CVD method
US5360484A (en) 1991-07-26 1994-11-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Microwave plasma CVD apparatus provided with a microwave transmissive window made of specific ceramics for the formation of a functional deposited film
US5597623A (en) 1991-07-26 1997-01-28 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Process for using microwave plasma CVD
US6051851A (en) 1994-04-28 2000-04-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Semiconductor devices utilizing silicide reaction
US6273955B1 (en) 1995-08-28 2001-08-14 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Film forming apparatus
US6338872B1 (en) 1995-08-28 2002-01-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Film forming method
US6113732A (en) 1996-03-18 2000-09-05 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Deposited film forming apparatus
US6158382A (en) 1996-12-12 2000-12-12 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for forming a deposited film by plasma chemical vapor deposition and apparatus for forming a deposited film by plasma chemical vapor deposition
US6223684B1 (en) 1997-07-07 2001-05-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Film deposition apparatus
US6103442A (en) 1997-12-26 2000-08-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for producing electrophotographic photosensitive member
US6335281B1 (en) 1998-06-18 2002-01-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Deposited film forming process

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
English Translation of JP 11-29863.* *
JP 11-029863 Abstract.
S. Schiller, et al. "Progress in the Application of the Plasma Emission Monitor in W b Coating" pp. 124-139.

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080096305A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-04-24 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for forming deposited film and photovoltaic element
US7501305B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2009-03-10 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for forming deposited film and photovoltaic element
US20090020149A1 (en) * 2007-07-16 2009-01-22 Woods Lawrence M Hybrid Multi-Junction Photovoltaic Cells And Associated Methods
US9349905B2 (en) 2007-07-16 2016-05-24 Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Hybrid multi-junction photovoltaic cells and associated methods
US9640706B2 (en) * 2007-07-16 2017-05-02 Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc Hybrid multi-junction photovoltaic cells and associated methods
TWI485277B (en) * 2013-12-13 2015-05-21 Univ Minghsin Sci & Tech Multi-sputtering cathodes stabilized process control method for reactive-sputtering deposition
US9951415B2 (en) 2015-04-22 2018-04-24 Canon Tokki Corporation Film deposition apparatus and film deposition method
US20190153582A1 (en) * 2017-11-21 2019-05-23 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Sputtering apparatus and method for manufacturing film

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2002212720A (en) 2002-07-31
US20020134670A1 (en) 2002-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6783640B2 (en) Sputtering method and sputtering apparatus
US6383359B2 (en) Method for forming a zinc oxide layer and method for producing a photovoltaic device
US8198797B2 (en) Method of controlling electron beam focusing of pierce-type electron gun and control apparatus therefor
US5977477A (en) Photovoltaic device
US7501305B2 (en) Method for forming deposited film and photovoltaic element
JPH1129863A (en) Production of deposited film
US6602347B1 (en) Apparatus and method for processing a substrate
US20100200395A1 (en) Techniques for depositing transparent conductive oxide coatings using dual C-MAG sputter apparatuses
US20090183771A1 (en) Plasma processing apparatus, plasma processing method and photoelectric conversion element
JP2004289034A (en) Treatment method for zinc oxide film and method for manufacturing photovoltaic element using same
KR20060127081A (en) Transparent and conductive oxide layer, production and use thereof in a thin film solar cell
JP2016514197A (en) Gas separation with adjustable separation wall
JP2016514198A (en) Deposition source with adjustable electrode
EP0112132B1 (en) Method of depositing a highly conductive, highly transmissive film
US6054024A (en) Apparatus for forming transparent conductive film by sputtering and method therefor
JP2009235488A (en) Vacuum film deposition apparatus, vacuum film deposition method, and electroconductive film
JP2016514196A (en) Common deposition platform, processing station, and method of operation thereof
KR20180132975A (en) Closed loop control
US6740210B2 (en) Sputtering method for forming film and apparatus therefor
US20090266704A1 (en) Sputtering Method and Sputtering Apparatus, and Electronic Device Manufacturing Method
JPH11302843A (en) Method for depositing zinc oxide film, apparatus therefor and photovoltaic element
JP2002180247A (en) Method and apparatus for manufacturing transparent electrically conductive laminate
US6860974B2 (en) Long-Term sputtering method
JP4830288B2 (en) Plasma control method and plasma control apparatus
EP1229595A2 (en) Method of forming transparent, conductive film, method of compensating defective region of semiconductor layer, photovoltaic element, and method of producing photovoltaic element

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CANNON KABUSHIKI KAISHA, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YAMASHITA, TOSHIHIRO;ECHIZEN, HIROSHI;TAKAI, YASUYOSHI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012521/0417;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020108 TO 20020110

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20160831