US6687696B2 - System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models - Google Patents

System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6687696B2
US6687696B2 US09915755 US91575501A US6687696B2 US 6687696 B2 US6687696 B2 US 6687696B2 US 09915755 US09915755 US 09915755 US 91575501 A US91575501 A US 91575501A US 6687696 B2 US6687696 B2 US 6687696B2
Authority
US
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
data
model
latent
information
user
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US09915755
Other versions
US20020107853A1 (en )
Inventor
Thomas Hofmann
Jan Christian Puzicha
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Recommind Inc
Original Assignee
Recommind Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/3061Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F17/30699Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99934Query formulation, input preparation, or translation
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • Y10S707/99936Pattern matching access
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99942Manipulating data structure, e.g. compression, compaction, compilation

Abstract

The disclosed system implements a novel method for personalized filtering of information and automated generation of user-specific recommendations. The system uses a statistical latent class model, also known as Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis, to integrate data including textual and other content descriptions of items to be searched, user profiles, demographic information, query logs of previous searches, and explicit user ratings of items. The disclosed system learns one or more statistical models based on available data. The learning may be reiterated once additional data is available. The statistical model, once learned, is utilized in various ways: to make predictions about item relevance and user preferences on un-rated items, to generate recommendation lists of items, to generate personalized search result lists, to disambiguate a users query, to refine a search, to compute similarities between items or users, and for data mining purposes such as identifying user communities.

Description

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application No. 60/220,926, filed Jul. 26, 2000. Application Serial No. 60/220,926 is hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to data processing systems and more specifically to a personalized search engine that utilizes latent class models called aspect models or Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis or Indexing.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The rapid growth of digital data storage and the overwhelming supply of on-line information provided by today's communication networks creates a risk of constant information overload. One of the key problems of modern information society is the increasing difficulty in accessing relevant information while suppressing the overwhelming mass of irrelevant data. Most importantly, the notion of relevance is highly individual and thus difficult to formalize in general terms. Information Filtering refers to the general problem of separating useful and important information from nuisance data. Individual users have different preferences, opinions, judgments, tastes, and cultural backgrounds. In order to support different individuals in their quest for information, an automated filtering system has to take into account the diversity of preferences and the inherent relativity of information value.

One commonly distinguishes between (at least) two major approaches to information filtering. The first approach is content-based filtering in which information organization is based on properties of the object or the carrier of information. The second approach is collaborative filtering (or social filtering), in which the preference-behavior and qualities of other persons are exploited in speculating about the preferences of a particular individual. Information Filtering technology had a huge impact on the development of the Internet and the e-commerce boom.

Search engines are classical content-based systems based on pattern matching technology to quickly retrieve information based on query keywords. Search engines are fast and have proven to be scalable to data sets of the size of the Internet, but they have inherent limitations. Due to the simple nature of direct pattern matching they provide no understanding of the sense of a word and the context of its use, often resulting in an unexpected variety of search results. These results are typically explained by word matching, but are meaningless on the intentional level. Search engines typically are unable to effectively process over-specific queries where keywords are closely related to actual document content, yet do not appear in the actual text. Search engines are also frequently non-personalized, i.e., they provide the same results, independent of the user history, and they have no effective mechanism to learn from user satisfaction.

At the other end of the spectrum, E-commerce sites use recommender systems to suggest products to their customers. The products can be recommended based on the top overall sellers on a site, or on the demographics of the customer, or an analysis of the past buying behavior of the customer as a prediction for future buying behavior. Recommender systems aim at personalization on the Web, enabling individual treatment of each customer. However, recommender systems and their underlying collaborative filtering techniques have several shortcomings. Poor predictions at best can be made for new objects and new users (“Early rater problem”). In many domains, only a small percentage of possible items receive ratings for a given user (“Scarcity problem”). There are often users with different interests and tastes than any other users in the database (“Grey sheep problem”). More fundamentally, while many users may share some common interest, it may be extremely difficult to find a sufficient number of users that share all interests.

Therefore, in light of the foregoing deficiencies in the prior art, the applicant's invention is herein presented.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The disclosed system provides a method for the personalized filtering of information and the automated generation of user-specific recommendations. The system goes through 3 phases: 1) Information Gathering, 2) System Learning, and 3) Information Retrieval. The disclosed system is concerned primarily with the final two phases (System Learning and Information Retrieval). In the Information Gathering phase, information about the data to be retrieved (DOCUMENT DATA) and about the individual users (USER DATA) is collected. The USER DATA can be gathered explicitly through questionnaires, etc. or can be implied though observing user behavior such as Internet history logs, demographic information, or any other relevant sources of information. The DOCUMENT DATA can be gathered though a variety of methods including Internet crawling, topic taxonomies or any other relevant source of information. Once the Information Gathering phase is completed, the System Learning phase is initiated. The system employs a statistical algorithm that uses available USER DATA and DOCUMENT DATA to create a statistical latent class model (MODEL), also known as Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (PLSA). The system learns one or more MODELS based on the USER DATA, DOCUMENT DATA, and the available database containing data obtained from other users. Within the MODEL, probabilities for words extracted from training data are calculated and stored in at least one matrix. An extended inverted index may also be generated and stored along with the MODEL in order to facilitate more efficient information gathering. The MODEL may be used in other applications such as the unsupervised learning of topic hierarchies and for other data mining functions such as identifying user communities. Various parts of the Information Gathering phase and the System Learning phase are repeated from time to time in order to further refine or update the MODEL. This refined or updated model will result in even higher levels of accuracy in processing the user's query. The final phase is the Information Retrieval phase. The user may enter a query. Once the query is entered into the system, the MODEL is utilized in calculating probabilities for every word in a document based upon at least 1) the user query, or 2) words associated with the users query in the MODEL, or 3) document information. All of the probabilities for a given document are added together yielding a total relevance “score” after which related documents are compared using this relevance score. The results are returned in descending order of relevance organized into at least one result list. Through the use of the MODEL, the system provides two benefits to the user: 1) the search results are personalized as each MODEL may be created in part using USER DATA, and 2) results for new users are somewhat personalized from the initial use through collaborative filtering based upon USER DATA for other system users.

SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a table showing possible queries in a combined content/collaborative system.

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the cluster-abstraction structure.

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation showing the assignment of occurrences to abstraction levels in terms of latent class variables.

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the aspect model in the asymmetric parameterization.

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the aspect model in the symmetric parameterization.

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the probability sub-simplex spanned by the aspect model.

FIG. 7 is a table showing eight selected factors from a 128-factor decomposition along with their respective most probable words in the class-conditional distribution P(w|z), from top to bottom in descending order.

FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of abstracts of 2 exemplary documents from a cluster collection along with latent class posterior probabilities and word probabilities.

FIG. 9 is a schematic representation showing the information aggregation and integration of the present invention;

FIG. 10 is a schematic representation illustrating the various modules of one implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 11 is a second schematic representation illustrating the various modules of one implementation of the present invention;

FIG. 12 is a schematic representation illustrating a retrieval engine for the present invention; and

FIG. 13 is a schematic representation illustrating the overall implementation of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating the overall method for generating recommendation lists.

FIG. 15 is a flow chart illustrating the process of training a latent class model.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following detailed description sets forth preferred embodiments for a search engine. This description should not be interpreted as limiting the use of the invention to this particular application. Rather, the present invention may be utilized for various functions including information retrieval, data mining, as a recommender system, and to identify user communities. Further, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, figures and equations, which, in conjunction with this detailed description, illustrate and describe the search engine. The invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited only to the disclosed embodiments and equations.

Generally

The information available in typical information filtering applications is highly diverse. Thus, we are first concerned with abstracting away from this diversity in order to identify a few fundamental types of observation data. Co-occurrence data refers to a domain with two or more finite sets of objects in which observations are made for joint occurrences of objects, i.e., typically consist of tuples with one element from either set. This includes event dyadic data, histogram data, and single stimulus preference data as special cases. Co-occurrence data arises naturally in many applications ranging from computational linguistics and information retrieval to preference analysis and computer vision.

In online information filtering applications, we find three fundamental variables, namely objects (documents or products) oεO, users or customers uεU, and a vocabulary wεW of terms and descriptors. Here O, U and W are discrete spaces (i.e. the set of all objects, the set of all users and the underlying vocabulary) so observations can be modeled as co-occurrences of these basic variables, e.g. user queries as (u;w1, . . . , wn), object description (o;w1, . . . , wn), buying events (u, o) etc.

More formally, our starting point is an observation sequence S=(xI n n), 1≦n≦N, which is a realization of an underlying sequence of random variables (XI n n) 1≦n≦N. Superscript indices are used to number observations. Capital letters without superscripts X are used to refer to generic instances of random variables with values in O, U or W, and XI refer to a generic co-occurrence where I is a multi-index for addressing the different co-occurring variables involved. In the modeling approach, it is assumed that the choice of a specific type of co-occurrence In for the n-th observation is predetermined and is not part of the statistical model.

In this fashion, information filtering can be viewed in a statistical setting as completion of co-occurrences based on partial information, in essence the prediction of a response variable given a set of predictors. For example, a search engine functionality is modeled as predicting o given w1, . . . , wn or, in a statistical setting as computing the probability P(o|w1, . . . , wn) of observing o given the query terms. A recommender system is implemented by computing P(o|u) while P(o|u;w1, . . . , wn) implements a personalized search engine. Several other possible applications seem reasonable. FIG. 1 is a table showing possible queries in a combined content/collaborative system (taken in part from Patrick Baudisch, Joining collaborative and content-based filtering. CHI'99 Workshop: Interacting with Recommender Systems, 1999.) FIG. 1 provides an overview of possible modalities in a combined content/collaborative system where the rows relate to a query and the columns relate to a target. The middle row 2 of FIG. 1 represents actual recommender functionality, where users are interested in retrieving objects. The last row 4 is of special interest for marketing applications, where users are to be identified.

The key problem in the statistical analysis of co-occurrence data is data sparseness. While counts n(xI)=|xI n n:xI n n=xI| of the empirical frequency of an event xI capture all that can be possibly measured from the data, these sufficient statistics are subject to statistical fluctuations that for large underlying spaces and higher order co-occurrences become overwhelming, and therefore a direct estimation of joint occurrence probabilities becomes prohibitive.

In describing the invention, we follow three stages of describing Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis as the invented fundamental new principle for data analysis, prediction, and other applications.

First, we start with Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing which is the PROBABILISTIC LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS realization for the case of only two types of observations, namely documents and words. It is thus used for classical information retrieval applications and indexing of document collections, hence the name. Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing has somewhat related to classical Latent Semantic Indexing, so the relationship is discussed in detail. We also discuss the relationship with distributional clustering, its most closely related statistical model that we are aware of.

Second, we then introduce the full, flat Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis model for generic multiway co-occurrence data that can be used, e.g. for joint collaborative and content filtering. While for the special case Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing several relationships to known proposals can be drawn, no competing approach is known for the full Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis method.

Finally, we address on how to extend the invention to hierarchical probabilistic models, which we call cluster-abstraction models. These are especially useful when data is inherently hierarchical and can be employed in many data mining tasks.

Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing

The starting point for Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing is a statistical model, which is also called (dyadic) aspect model. The aspect model is a latent variable model for co-occurrence data which associates an unobserved class variable aεA={a1, . . . , aK} with each observation. The modeling principle of latent variable models is the specification of a joint probability distribution for latent and observable variables. This unifies statistical modeling and structure detection: a probabilistic model of the observables is obtained by marginalization, while Bayes' rule induces posterior probabilities on the latent space of structures with respect to given observations. The latter provides a natural solution for topic extraction, word sense disambiguation and cataloging which correspond to different values of the hidden variables. As a key advantage, mixture models provide both, a parsimonious yet flexible parameterization of probability distributions with good generalization performance on sparse data, as well as structural information about data-inherent grouping structure, which is discussed in detail below in the section entitled ‘The Cluster-Abstraction Model’. In the plain Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing model a joint probability model over OxW is defined by the mixture: P ( o , w ) = P ( o ) P ( w | o ) , P ( w | o ) = a A P ( w | a ) P ( a | o ) . ( 1 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00001

The aspect model introduces a conditional independence assumption, namely that o and w are independent conditioned on the state of the associated latent variable. FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the aspect model in the asymmetric parameterization. Since the cardinality of a is smaller than the number of documents/words in the collection, a acts as a bottleneck variable in predicting words. It is worth noticing that the model can be equivalently parameterized by: P ( o , w ) = a A P ( a ) P ( o | a ) P ( w | a ) ( 2 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00002

which is perfectly symmetric in both entities, documents and words. FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the aspect model in the symmetric parameterization.

The standard procedure for maximum likelihood estimation in latent variable models is the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm. Expectation Maximization alternates two coupled steps: (i) an expectation (E) step where posterior probabilities are computed for the latent variables, (ii) an maximization (M) step, where parameters are updated. Expectation Maximization is discussed in more detail in the section on multivariate aspect models. Standard calculations yield the E-step equation: P ( a | o , w ) = P ( a ) P ( o | a ) P ( w | a ) a A P ( a ) P ( o | a ) P ( w | a ) ( 3 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00003

as well as the following M-step formulae: P ( w | a ) o O n ( o , w ) P ( a | o , w ) , ( 4 ) P ( o | a ) w W n ( o , w ) P ( a | o , w ) , ( 5 ) P ( a ) o O w W n ( o , w ) P ( a | o , w ) . ( 6 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00004

Before discussing algorithmic refinements, we will study the relationship between the proposed model and the classical Latent Semantic Indexing in more detail. Consider the class-conditional multinomial distributions P(·|a) over the vocabulary which we call factors. They can be represented as points on the M−1 dimensional simplex of all possible multinomials. Via its convex hull, this set of K points defines a L≦K−1 dimensional sub-simplex. The modeling assumption expressed by equation (1) is that conditional distributions P(w|o) for all documents are approximated by a multinomial representable as a convex combination of factors P(w|a), where the mixing weights P(a|o) uniquely define a point on the spanned sub-simplex. FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the probability sub-simplex spanned by the aspect model. Despite the discreteness of the introduced latent variables, a continuous latent space is obtained within the space of all multinomial distributions. Since the dimensionality of the sub-simplex is ≦K−1 as opposed to a maximum of M−1 for the complete probability simplex, this performs a dimensionality reduction in the space of multinomial distributions and the spanned sub-simplex can be identified with a probabilistic latent semantic space.

To stress this point and to clarify the relation to Latent Semantic Analysis, let us rewrite the aspect model as parameterized by equation (2) in matrix notation. Hence define matrices by Û=(P(oi|ak))i,k, {circumflex over (V)}=(P(wj|ak))j,k and ^ = ( diag ( P ( z k ) ) ) k .

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00005

The joint probability model P can then be written as a matrix product P = U ^ ^ V ^ .

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00006

Comparing this with the Singular Value Decomposition UΣV′ of the matrix n(oi,wj), as computed in Latent Semantic Indexing, one can make the following observations: (i) outer products between rows of Û and {circumflex over (V)} reflect conditional independence in Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing, (ii) the K factors correspond to the mixture components in the aspect model, and (iii) the mixing proportions in Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing substitute the singular values. The crucial difference between Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing and Latent Semantic Indexing, however, is the objective function utilized to determine the optimal decomposition/approximation.

In Latent Semantic Indexing, this is the L2- or Frobenius norm, which corresponds to an implicit additive Gaussian noise assumption on (possibly transformed) counts. In contrast, Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing relies on the likelihood function of multinomial sampling and aims at an explicit maximization of the predictive power of the model. As is well known, this corresponds to a minimization of the cross entropy or Kullback-Leibler divergence between the empirical distribution and the model, which is very different from any type of squared deviation. On the modeling side this offers important advantages, for example, the mixture approximation P of the co-occurrence table is a well-defined probability distribution and factors have a clear probabilistic meaning. In contrast, Latent Semantic Indexing does not define a properly normalized probability distribution and may even contain negative entries. In addition, there is no obvious interpretation of the directions in the Latent Semantic Indexing latent space, while the directions in the Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing space are interpretable as multinomial word distributions.

Let us briefly discuss some elucidating examples at this point which will also reveal a further advantage of Probabilistic Latent Semantic Indexing over Latent Semantic Indexing in the context of polsemous words. We have generated a dataset (CLUSTER) with abstracts of 1568 documents on clustering and trained an aspect model with 128 latent classes. FIG. 7 is a table showing eight selected factors 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 from a 128 factor decomposition along with their respective most probable words 60 in the class-conditional distribution P(w|z), from top to bottom in descending order. These pairs have been selected as the two factors 50 & 51, 52 & 53, 54 & 55, 56 & 57 that have the highest probability to generate the words “segment”, “matrix”, “line”, and “power”, respectively.

The sketchy characterization of the factors by their ten most probable words 60 already reveals interesting topics. In particular, notice that the term used to select a particular pair has a different meaning in either topic factor: (i) ‘Segment’ 50, 51 refers to an image region in the first and to a phonetic segment in the second factor; (ii) ‘Matrix’ 52, 53 denotes a rectangular table of numbers and to a material in which something is embedded or enclosed; (iii) ‘Line’ 54, 55 can refer to a line in an image, but also to a line in a spectrum; and (iv) ‘Power’ 56, 57 is used in the context of radiating objects in astronomy, but also in electrical engineering. FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of abstracts of two exemplary documents from the cluster collection along with latent class posterior probabilities. The posterior probabilities for the classes given the different occurrences of ‘segment’ 50, 51 indicate how likely it is for each of the factors in the first pair of FIG. 7 to have generated this observation. We have also displayed the estimates of the conditional word probabilities P{w=‘segment’|o1,2}. One can see that the correct meaning of the word ‘segment’ 50, 51 is identified in both cases. This implies that although ‘segment’ 50, 51 occurs frequently in both documents, the overlap in the factored representation is low, since ‘segment’ 50, 51 is identified as a polysemous word (relative to the chosen resolution level) which—dependent on the context—is explained by different factors.

Next, the aspect model is compared with statistical clustering models. In clustering models for documents, one typically associates a latent class variable with each document in the collection. Most closely related to our invention is the distributional clustering model, which can be thought of as an unsupervised version of a naive Bayes' classifier. It can be shown that the conditional word probability of a probabilistic clustering model is given by: P ( w | o ) = a A P { c ( o ) = a } P ( w | a ) , ( 7 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00007

where P{c(o)=a} is the posterior probability of document o having latent class a. It is a simple implication of Bayes' rule that these posterior probabilities will concentrate their probability mass on a certain value a with an increasing number of observations (i.e., with the length of the document). This means that although equations (1) and (7) appear algebraically similar, they are conceptually very different and yield in fact very different results. The aspect model assumes that document-specific distributions are a convex combination of aspects, while the clustering model assumes there is just one cluster-specific distribution, which is inherited by all documents in the cluster. In the distributional clustering model it is only the posterior uncertainty of the cluster assignments that induces some averaging over the class-conditional word distributions P(w|a).

Thus in clustering models the class-conditionals P(w|a) have to capture the complete vocabulary of a subset (cluster) of documents, while factors can focus on certain aspects of the vocabulary of a subset of documents. For example, a factor can be very well used to explain some fraction of the words occurring in a document, although it might not explain other words at all (e.g., even assign zero probability), because these other words can be taken care of by other factors. The difference between aspect and clustering models has to be emphasized. While the latent class structure of an aspect model partitions the observations, clustering models provide a group structure on object spaces. As a consequence, identical observations may have different latent classes in aspect models, whereas latent variables are shared by sets of observations in clustering models.

Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis

The aspect model for multivariate co-occurrence data is built on the assumption that all co-occurrences in the sample S=(xI n n) 1≦n≦N are independent and identically distributed and that random variables Xi n and Xj n i≠j are conditionally independent given the respective latent class. The randomized data generation process can be described as follows:

(i) Choose an aspect a with probability P(A=a) (or, in short notation, P(a)), and

(ii) Select xε{O,U,W} for all iεI with probability P(x1|a).

The corresponding complete data probability, i.e., the joint probability of the data and a hypothetical instantiation for the latent variables, is given by: P ( S , a ) = n = 1 N P ( x I n , a n ) = n = 1 N P ( a n ) i I P ( x i | a n ) ( 8 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00008

By summing over all possible realizations of the latent variables and grouping identical co-occurrences together, one obtains the usual mixture probability distribution on the observables, P ( S ) = x I P ( x I ) n ( x I ) with ( 9 ) P ( x I ) = a A P ( a ) i I P ( x i | a ) . ( 10 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00009

Two fundamental problems arise in the context of statistical modeling, prediction or inference on one hand and model estimation or model learning on the other hand. In prediction, we have to compute probabilities P(XJ|xI, θ) for given model parameters θ=(P(a), P(xi|a)) where we summarize all continuous parameters in a vector θ. Remember that all spaces are discrete, thus e.g., P(a) corresponds to a vector of dimension K. The problem of efficient prediction is addressed below. Estimation or learning on the other hand refers to determining the model parameters θ given a set of observations or training data S. It should, however, be emphasized that model estimation and prediction are computationally well-separated problems. Model learning can be performed offline, while online requirements often lead to high efficiency demands on prediction algorithms.

In the context of statistical models, learning can be identified with the problem of parameter estimation. Since the latent structure by definition consists of unobserved variables, the learning problem is essentially an unsupervised one. The present invention utilizes a novel Tempered Expectation Maximization (tempered EM, TEM) estimation procedure. Tempered Expectation Maximization is an effective learning procedure aspect models. In addition, it allows us to gradually control and reduce the effective degrees of freedoms used in the estimation process (as opposed to the maximal degree of freedoms allowed by the model itself). Tempered Expectation Maximization is a generalization of the standard Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm used to compute maximum likelihood estimators for a probabilistic model. For better understanding, this standard algorithm is now described first. Maximum likelihood is implemented by maximizing the log-likelihood log P(S;θ) with respect to the model parameters, which have been concatenated in a vector θ for notational convenience. The difficulties in maximizing a logarithm of a sum in the log-likelihood of the aspect model is overcome by Expectation Maximization. The Expectation Maximization algorithm and its extensions can be developed generically for the complete class of models covered by this invention and are easily adapted to the specific instances.

Expectation Maximization results in an alternating procedure with two re-estimation steps. The first is an Expectation (E)-step for estimating the posterior probabilities of latent variables for a given parameter estimate θ′. The second is a Maximization (M)-step, which involves maximization of the expected complete data log-likelihood with respect to θ, where the average is performed based on the posterior probabilities computed in the E-step. The Expectation Maximization algorithm is known to increase the observed likelihood with each completed iteration, and converges to a (local) maximum under mild assumptions. The E-step equations for the class posterior probabilities in the aspect model can be derived from Bayes' rule and are given by: P ( a | x I ; θ ) = P ( a ) i I P ( x i | a ) a P ( a ) i I P ( x i | a ) . ( 11 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00010

It is straightforward to derive the M-step re-estimation formulae by differentiating the expected complete data log-likelihood with respect to θ. The latter is given by: Q ( θ , θ ) = x I n ( x I ) a P ( a | x I ; θ ) log P ( x I , a | θ ) , ( 12 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00011

where n (xI) again denotes the sufficient statistics (counts). The probabilities P(a) are easily estimated by: P ( a ) = x I P ( a | x I ; θ ) n ( x I ) / N .

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00012

After introducing appropriate Lagrange multipliers to ensure the correct normalization one obtains for the M-step formulae P ( x i | a ) ~ x I n ( x I ) P ( a | x I ; θ ) . ( 13 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00013

Tempered Expectation Maximization is a novel generalization of Expectation Maximization-based model fitting that incorporates ideas from deterministic annealing based combinatorial optimization. Tempered Expectation Maximization pursues two main goals; (i) avoiding over-fitting by controlling the effective model complexity, and (ii), reducing the sensitivity of Expectation Maximization to local maxima.

Consider, therefore, the general case of maximum likelihood estimation by the Expectation Maximization algorithm. The E-step by definition computes a posterior average of the complete data log-likelihood, which is maximized in the M-step. The tempered E-step at temperature T performs this average with respect to a distribution which is obtained by generalizing Bayes' formula such that the likelihood contribution is taken to the power of 1/T, i.e., in mnemonic notation: tempered−posterior˜prior×likelihood1/T. For T>1 this amounts to increasing the influence of the prior which in turn results in a larger entropy of the tempered posteriors. For mathematical precision, consider the following objective function: F T ( θ , Q ( a ) ) = a Q ( a ) [ log P ( S | a ; θ ) - T log Q ( a ) P ( a | θ ) ] ( 14 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00014

where Q({right arrow over (a)}) are variational parameters. Minimizing FT with respect to Q({right arrow over (a)}) then yields:

Q({right arrow over (a)})∝P(S|{right arrow over (a)};θ)1/T P({right arrow over (a)}|θ).  (15)

For T=1 the usual posterior Q({right arrow over (a)})=P ({right arrow over (a)}|S;θ) is obtained, which is equivalent to computing the standard E-step. In addition, for T=1 the derivative of the averaged complete data log-likelihood with respect to θ equals the derivative of F1 in equation (14). Thus F1 provides a Lyapunov function for the Expectation Maximization-algorithm, which is minimized with respect to Q({right arrow over (a)}) in the E-step and with respect to θ in the M-step. In the aspect model, the tempered E-step generalizing equation (11) is given by:

P(a|x I;θ)∝P(a)[P(x I |a)]1/T.  (16)

For fixed T>1 the tempered E-step performs a regularization based on entropy. This is the reason why tempered Expectation Maximization not only reduces the sensitivity to local minima but also controls the effective model complexity.

The Tempered Expectation Maximization algorithm is implemented in the following way:

(i) Set T=1 and perform Expectation Maximization with early stopping.

(ii) Increase T←n T(n>1) and perform one Tempered Expectation Maximization iteration.

(iii) While performance on hold-out data improves: continue Tempered Expectation Maximization iterations,

(iv) Return when increasing T does not yield further improvements

(v) Return to step ii.

While aspect models already provide substantial modeling flexibility, the number of aspects chosen introduces a notion of granularity and scale. It basically determines how many topics or user tastes can be modeled at the same time. However, these entities are naturally described on different resolutions. The present invention employs two different methods. In the sequel, a simple solution is described which trains independent models on multiple scales and then combines them additively. More specifically, denoted by P (xI; Ml) the prediction of an observation with signature I based on the l-th model Ml. Then the combined estimate: P ( x I ) = l λ I P ( x I ; M l ) ( 17 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00015

is used to compute a probability estimate over different scales. The combination is convex, i.e., we require λl≧0 and Σlλl=1. The model combination parameters λl are determined by running the Expectation Maximization algorithm on hold-out data, a method referred to as deleted interpolation. More precisely, for each observation in a hold-out data set, we compute in the E-step the probability that the observation xl is best “explained” by Ml, P ( M l | x I ) = λ l P ( x I ; M l ) l λ l P ( x I ; M l ) ( 18 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00016

In the M-step one simply sums up those posterior probabilities: λ l x I P ( M l | x I ) . ( 19 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00017

Re-iterating results in an estimate for the combination weights.

For large data sets, the Expectation Maximization algorithm may not be very efficient, since it requires cycling through all observations before actually performing a parameter update step. For highly redundant data sets, an additional intermediate update step based only on some fraction of the data can greatly accelerate the learning procedure. The extreme case would be to perform a parameter update step after each observation, which is usually called on-line learning. In an intermediate case, one would partition the data into blocks of observations and perform an incremental update step with a learning rate n after the E-step for a single block is completed:

θnew=(1−η)θold+ηθblock,  (20)

where θblock is the M-step estimate computed for a particular block of observations. n<1 is decreased according to a learning rate schedule, asymptotically as θα+1/(t+c), where t is the step number and c is a constant.

For prediction, we are interested in calculating probabilities P(xI|xJ). Assuming we are interested in computing the probability of an object given a query and a user, P(o|w1, . . . , wn;u). The first difficulty arises from the fact that we basically train models for co-occurrences with single w, so we assume conditional independence of keywords given object and user, P ( w 1 , , w n | o , u ) = i P ( w i | o , u ) ( 21 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00018

to simplify things. This ensures that different keywords can be generated from different hidden states. More formally, using Bayes' rule we obtain:

P(o|w 1 , . . . , w n ; uP(o|u)P(w i , . . . , w n |o,u)  (22)

=P(o|uP(w i |o,u)  (23)

by equation (14) where: P ( w i | o , u ) = a P ( w i | a ) P ( a | o , u ) ( 24 ) = a P ( w i | a ) P ( a | u ) a P ( a | u ) P ( o | a ) P ( o | a ) , ( 25 ) P ( o | u ) = a P ( o | a ) P ( a | u ) , ( 26 ) P ( a | u ) = P ( u | a ) P ( a ) a P ( u | a ) P ( a ) . ( 27 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00019

The grouping of terms in equation (25) already indicates that for efficient computation we first evaluate the terms independent of o. Equation (27) can be computed offline with identical storage requirements. Other predictions can be carried out similarly by applying the rules of the calculus of probability theory starting from the trained model or combination of models.

In order to achieve an efficient implementation in a preferred embodiment, one should sparsen the representation of probability distributions by discarding probabilities that are below a certain threshold t. Basically, all parameter vectors are stored as sparse vectors, e.g. we set P(x|a)=0 iff P(x|a)<t. To achieve good approximation properties, t is made proportional on the number of entries in the vector P(x|a). In addition to this sparse model representation, we also sparsen the final result vectors as well as most intermediate entities like: P ( w i | a ) P ( a | u ) / a P ( a | u ) P ( o | a ) ( 28 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00020

to achieve maximal computational efficiency.

The Cluster-abstraction Model

We next describe the cluster abstraction model. As previously noted, mixture models provide structural information about data-inherent grouping structure and are thus well suited to perform data mining functions. The cluster abstraction model combines a (horizontal) clustering of documents with a (vertical) aspect model that explains shared factors on different levels of resolutions. The clustering part is demonstrated by the simplified, non-hierarchical version of the Cluster Abstraction Model, which performs ‘flat’ probabilistic clustering, described earlier as the distributional clustering model, see derivation above. Most hierarchical document clustering techniques utilize agglomerative algorithms, which generate a cluster hierarchy or dendogram as a by-product of successive cluster merging. In the Cluster Abstraction Model we will use an explicit abstraction model instead to represent hierarchical relations between document groups. This is achieved by extending the ‘horizontal’ mixture model of the distributional clustering with a ‘vertical’ component that captures the specificity of a particular word wt in the context of a document o. It is assumed that each word occurrence (wt,o)=wot of a word wt in document o has an associated abstraction node a, the latter being identified with inner or terminal nodes of the cluster hierarchy. FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the cluster abstraction structure. To formalize the sketched ideas, additional latent variable vectors ao with components aot are introduced which assign the words in o to exactly one of the nodes in the hierarchy. Based on the topology of the nodes in the hierarchy the following constraints between the cluster variables co and the abstraction variables aot are imposed:

a ot ε{a|a is above co in the hierarchy}  (28)

The notation a ↑ c will be used as a shortcut to refer to nodes a above the terminal node c in the hierarchy. Equation (28) states that the admissible values of the latent abstraction variables aot for a particular document with latent class co are restricted to those nodes in the hierarchy that are predecessors of co. This breaks the permutation-symmetry of the abstraction nodes as well as of the document clusters. An abstraction node a at a particular place in the hierarchy can only be utilized to “explain” words of documents associated with terminal nodes in the subtree of a. FIG. 3 is a schematic representation showing the assigning occurrences to abstraction levels in terms of latent class variables. If o is assigned to c the choices for abstraction nodes for word occurrences wot are restricted to the ‘active’ (highlighted) vertical path 10. One may think of the Cluster Abstraction Model as a mixture model with a horizontal mixture of clusters and a vertical mixture of abstraction levels. Each horizontal component is a mixture of vertical components on the path to the root, vertical components being shared by different horizontal components according to the tree topology. Generalizing the non-hierarchical model, a probability distribution P(w|a) over words is attached to each node (inner or terminal) of the hierarchy.

After application of the chain rule, the complete data model (i.e., the joint probability of all observed and latent variables) can be specified in three steps P(co=c;θ)=P(c), P(aot=a|co=c;=θ)=P(a|c,o), and P ( w o | a o ; θ ) = i = 1 n ( o ) P ( w ot | a ot ) . ( 29 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00021

Note that additional document-specific vertical mixing proportions P (a|c,o) over abstraction nodes above cluster c have been introduced, with the understanding that P(a|c,o)=0 whenever it is not the case that a ↑ c. If one makes the simplifying assumption that the same mixing proportions are shared by all documents assigned to a particular cluster (i.e., P(a|c,o)=P(a|c)), the solution degenerates to the distributional clustering model since one may always choose P(a|c)=δac. However, we propose to use this more parsimonious model and fit P(a|c) from hold-out data (a fraction of words held out from each document), which is in the spirit of model interpolation techniques.

As for the distributional clustering model before, we will derive an Expectation Maximization algorithm for model fitting. The E-step requires to compute (joint) posterior probabilities of the form P(Cd=c, aot=a|wo;θ). After applying the chain rule one obtains: P ( c o = c | w o ; θ ) P ( c ) w [ a P ( w | a ) P ( a | c ) ] n ( o , w ) , ( 30 ) P ( a ot = a | w o , c o = c ; θ ) = P ( w ot | a ) P ( a | c ) a P ( w ot | a ) P ( a | c ) . ( 31 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00022

The M-step re-estimation equations for the conditional word distributions are given by: P ( w | a ) = o t : w ot = w P ( a ot = a | w o ; θ ) o t P ( a ot = a | w o ; θ ) ( 32 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00023

where P ( a ot = a | w o ; θ ) = c P ( c o = c | w o ; θ ) P ( a ot = a | w o , c o = c ; θ ) .

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00024

Moreover, we have the update equation ( P ( c ) = 1 I d P ( c d = c | w d ; θ ) )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00025

for the class priors P(c) and the formula: P ( a | c ) o P ( c o = c | w o ; θ ) × t P ( a ot = a | w o , c o = c ; θ ) ( 33 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00026

which is evaluated on the held-out data. Finally, it may be worth taking a closer look at the predictive word probability distribution P (w|o) in the Cluster Abstraction Model, which is given by: P ( w | o ) = c P ( c o = c | w o ; θ ) a P ( a | c ) P ( w | a ) . ( 34 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00027

If we assume for simplicity that P(co=c|wo;θ)=1 for some c (hard clustering case), then the word probability of o is modeled as a mixture of occurrences from different abstraction levels a. This reflects the reasonable assumption that each document contains a certain mixture of words ranging from general terms of ordinary language to highly specific technical terms and specialty words.

There are three important problems, which also need to be addressed in a successful application of the Cluster Abstraction Model: First and most importantly, one has to avoid the problem of over-fitting. Second, it is necessary to specify a method to determine a meaningful tree topology including the maximum number of terminal nodes. And third, one may also want to find ways to reduce the sensitivity of the Expectation Maximization procedure to local maxima. The present invention finds the answer to all three questions through the optimization algorithm introduced above as tempered Expectation Maximization.

Applying the temperature principle to the clustering variables, the posterior calculation in equation (30) is generalized by replacing n(o, w) in the exponent by n(o, w)/T. In annealed Expectation Maximization (as opposed to “heated” Expectation Maximization discussed above), T is utilized as a control parameter, which is initialized at a high value and successively lowered until the performance on the held-out data starts to decrease. Annealing offers a way to generate tree topologies, since annealing leads through a sequence of so-called phase transitions, where clusters split. In our experiments, T has been lowered until the perplexity (i.e., the log-averaged inverse word probability) on holdout data starts to increase, which automatically defines the number of terminal nodes in the hierarchy.

Extension to Preference Values.

When observing user behavior and preferences one may have richer observations than plain co-occurrences. Many use cases may also provide some additional preference value v with an observation. In this invention, we will treat the simplest case, where vε{−1,+1} corresponds to either a negative or a positive example of preference, modeling events like “person u likes/dislikes object o”.

Let us now focus on extending the aspect model to capture additional binary preferences vε{−1,+1}. The probabilistic latent semantic analysis models can be generalized to handle arbitrary preference values, which requires specifying an appropriate likelihood function based on assumptions on the preference scale. We distinguish two different cases: (i.) situations where the person performs the selection of an object, and then announces her or his preference in retrospect, (ii.) problems where the selection of o is not part of the behavior to be modeled, for instance because it is controlled or triggered by some other external process.

In the first case, there are three different ways to integrate the additional random variable v into the model. v can be conditionally independent of o and u given a, which is a very strong assumption. One implication is that aspects are typically employed to either model positive or negative preferences. In addition, v also depends on either u or o, which offers considerably more flexibility, but also requires estimating more parameters. It is straightforward to modify the Expectation Maximization equations appropriately. We show the equations for the model, where v is assumed to be directly dependent on o, and only indirectly dependent on u through a. The other variants require only minor changes.

For the E-step one obtains: P ( a | o , u , v ) = P ( a ) P ( u | z ) P ( o , v | a ) z P ( a ) P ( u | a ) P ( o , v | a ) ( 35 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00028

while the M-step equations can be summarized into: P ( o , v | a ) = u n ( o , u , v ) P ( a | o , u , v ) o , u , v n ( o , u , v ) P ( a | o , u , v ) , ( 36 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00029

where n(o,u,v) denotes the number of times a particular preference has been observed (typically n(o, u, v)ε{0, 1}). From P(o,v|a) one may also derive P(o|a) and P(v|o,a), if necessary. The M-step equation for P(u|a) does not change. Effectively the state space of O has been enlarged to O′=O×{−1,+1}.

In the second case, the multinomial sampling model of selecting o or a (o, v) pair conditioned on a is no longer adequate. We thus invented a modification of the aspect model and replace multinomials P(o|a) with Bernoulli probabilities P(v|o,a), assuming that o is always conditioned on. This modification results in the E-step: P ( a | o , u , v ) = P ( a ) P ( u | a ) P ( v | o , a ) a P ( a ) P ( u | a ) P ( v | o , a ) . ( 37 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00030

and a M-step re-estimation formula: P ( v | o , a ) = u P ( a | o , u , v ) v = ± 1 u P ( a | o , u , v ) . ( 38 )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00031

Comparing equation(37) with equation (35) one observes that P(v|o,a) now replaces P(v,o|a) since o is treated as a fixed (observation-dependent) conditioning variable. Note that by conditioning on both, o and u, one gets P ( v | o , u ) = a P ( v | o , a ) P ( a | u )

Figure US06687696-20040203-M00032

which reveals the asymmetry introduced into the aspect model by replacing one of the class-conditional multinomials with a vector of Bernoulli probabilities.

Implementation

FIGS. 9 through 13 illustrate an implementation of latent class models for personalized information filtering and recommendations. FIG. 9 shows the primary input streams into server platform 100. User profiles 111 are processed through a profiler module 110 to provide the user related information, such as transaction data, click stream data, download, demographic information, etc. Document information, such as text documents, web pages, emails, etc. comes from a content repository 121 and is processed by a preprocessor and crawler module 120. Content repository 121 can be single proprietary database owned by the user. It can be any collection of data sources including any and all of the information available on the World Wide Web. The final primary input stream is expert annotations 131, including taxonomies, web catalogues, XML ontology, etc. and is processed by XML-parsing module 130. Here we assume that expert annotations of documents are stored as XML tags with the documents. Although this is common nowadays, other interfaces are of course possible.

FIG. 10 illustrates the main data processing modules for latent class models for personalized information filtering and recommendations. The concept extraction module 140 automatically extracts domain-specific concepts and topics for the documents provided by the preprocessor and crawler module 120. Preferably, this extraction includes statistically analyzing the data to learn the semantic associations between words within specific items in the acquired data. Also, preferably, probabilities for each learned semantic association are computed. The collaborative filtering module 142 analyzes the user profiles 111 provided by profiler 110 to learn about user interests long-term information needs. The collaborative filtering module performs 142 two functions: 1) it analyzes the current user's historical profile; and 2) it analyzes other users' historical profiles. Preferably both profile analyses are used in combination with the learned semantic associations and computed probabilities to provide improved predictions or recommendations lists. The categorization module 144 automatically annotates documents with appropriate categories. The data mining module 145 extracts taxonomies, topic maps and user communities. Depending upon the needs of the user one or more of these modules 140, 142, 144, 145 are used to implement latent class modeling for personalized information filtering and recommendations. All four modules are not necessarily used for each implementation.

FIG. 11 illustrates some of the preferred applications of the present invention. Functions included in the software provided by the server platform 100 are intelligent retrieval, categorization, filtering and recommendation. The intelligent retrieval of information incorporates user information from a user profile and from collaborative filtering into the search. From these functions, the present invention can provided personalized search results, automatic categorization of documents, email and text sorting and recommendations. The automatic categorization of documents categorizes the data into existing taxonomies and subject heading classification schemas. The email/text sorting can be used for intelligent information routing for customer relationship management (CRM) supply chain, distributed networking, storage, eMarketplaces, and web application server environments.

FIG. 12 illustrates one implementation of the present invention. A query 151 is input into server 100. The server 100 identifies matching documents 153 based on pure content analysis, it then connects the personalization engine 152 to access the user profile 111. Using the query 151 and the user profile 111, the server 100 uses the full probabilistic latent semantic analysis of user (community) data and content, 156 to produces an unstructured result list 155 with associated relevance scores. The taxonomy 154 is accessed to apply relevant concepts and categories to refine the unstructured result 155 into a structured search result 157. The structured search result can be further refined by including similar documents, refinement of the query by the user, etc.

FIG. 13 is an overall representation of an implementation of latent class modeling for personalized information filtering and recommendations. Server 100 initially acquires a set of data or documents by such means as web crawlers or spiders. Alternatively, the documents could be directly provided by the client in the form of a database or a proprietary database. This set of data is analyzed by server 100 using probabilistic latent semantic analysis to provide a set of statistical latent class models with appropriate model combination weights along with a probability of occurrence for each possible combination of items, content descriptors, users, object or user attributes. The set of models along with the relevant document information is stored on document server 103. A user or client 101 access server through a web server 102 and inputs a query to server 100. Server 100 then produces a recommendation list for user 101 using the set of models and a user profile.

Before processing the user's request, the server 100 analyzes the data collection and automatically extracts concepts, topics, and word contexts that are fully adapted to the specific data and the specific domain. The server 100 extracts concepts from the documents automatically, thus removing the need to manually tag documents. Most document collections are based on a very specific vocabulary, terminology or jargon. Contrary to standard information retrieval engines based on general dictionaries or thesauri, server 100 automatically creates indices and adapts and optimizes with respect to a specific document base. The server 100 architecture is divided into three main components: the learning module, the prediction module, and the data store. The learning module takes content (emails, documents, web-pages, data), adds it to the data store or document server 103 and makes this content accessible for searching, categorizing, filtering, and delivery. The prediction module is used to perform searches against indexed documents. A search is entered using a web search page. The prediction module reduces the search to a set of documents that most clearly match the criteria of the search, and formats this set into a series of document lists, segmented by category. Because the system knows the different meanings of words, it can accommodate ambiguities by returning multiple result lists along with characterizing keywords. For example, the system can distinguish between Apple, the computer company; apple, the fruit; and Apple, the Beatles record company, and group the search results into three distinct lists. Users can then refine or rephrase queries.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating the overall method for generating recommendation lists. A statistical latent class model is generated using data, items, and other relevant sources of data. The system receives data including the statistical latent class models, content descriptors, user data, object or user attributes, preferences, and other relevant data. The system then receives at least one of: (1) a user profile; (2) user query; and (3) a request to generate a recommendation. Next the probability of relevance of each item in the set of data is computed. If the user query received is ambiguous, then the system will return multiple recommendation lists. Otherwise, the system will return a single recommendation list.

FIG. 15 is a flow chart illustrating the process of training a latent class model. Data in the form of a list of tuples of entities is received into the system. Parameters are then received into the system including; (1) a number of dimensions to be used in model training; (2) predetermined fraction of hold out data; and (3) a termination condition. The system then partitions the received data into training data and hold out data. Tempered posterior probabilities are then computed for each tupel and each possible state of a corresponding latent class variable. Next, using the posterior probabilities, the system updates the class conditional probabilities for items, descriptors and attributes, and users. The system continues to iterate the steps of computing tempered posterior probabilities and updating class conditional probabilities until the predictive performance on the hold out data degrades. Then the temperature parameter is adjusted and tempered posterior probabilities continue to be computed until the termination condition is met. Finally, the system combines the trained models.

Claims (13)

What is claimed is:
1. A method in a computer system for training a latent class model comprising the steps:
receiving data in the form of a list of tupels of entities;
receiving a list of parameters, including a number of dimensions to be used in the model training, a predetermined termination condition, and a predetermined fraction of hold out data;
splitting the dataset into training data and hold out data according to the predetermined fraction of hold out data;
applying Tempered Expectation Maximization to the data to train a plurality of latent class models according to the following steps:
computing tempered posterior probabilities for each tupel and each possible state of a corresponding latent class variable;
using these posterior probabilities, updating class conditional probabilities for items, descriptors and attributes, and users;
iterating the steps of computing tempered posterior probabilities and updating class conditional probabilities until the predictive performance on the hold-out data degrades; and
adjusting the temperature parameter and continuing at the step of computing tempered posterior probabilities until the predetermined termination condition is met; and
combining the trained models of different dimensionality into a single model by linearly combining their estimated probabilities.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the entities include at least one of: items; users; content descriptors; attributes; and preferences.
3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising combining the updated class conditional probabilities with a preference value.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of combining the trained models includes computing the weights for the trained models being combined to maximize the predictive model performance on the hold-out data.
5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: iteratively retraining all models based on both the training data and the holdout data.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of adjusting the temperature parameter is omitted.
7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
splitting the training data into a plurality of blocks and updating the tempered posterior probabilities after the posterior probabilities have been computed for all observations in one block.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the received data consists only of items characterized by text.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the received data consists only of pairs of users and items.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the received data consists only of triplets of users, items, and ratings.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the received data consists only of: pairs of users and items; and triplets of users; items and ratings.
12. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
extracting hierarchical relationships between groups of data.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of receiving data includes receiving similarity matrices for the similarity of at least one of: items; and users;
integrating the similarity matrices into the step of updating the tempered posterior probabilities by transforming similarities into probabilities; and
smoothing the estimates of the class conditional probabilities using the transformed similarities.
US09915755 2000-07-26 2001-07-26 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models Active US6687696B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US22092600 true 2000-07-26 2000-07-26
US09915755 US6687696B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2001-07-26 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09915755 US6687696B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2001-07-26 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US10639024 US7328216B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2003-08-11 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10639024 Continuation US7328216B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2003-08-11 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020107853A1 true US20020107853A1 (en) 2002-08-08
US6687696B2 true US6687696B2 (en) 2004-02-03

Family

ID=26915324

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09915755 Active US6687696B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2001-07-26 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US10639024 Active 2022-08-26 US7328216B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2003-08-11 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10639024 Active 2022-08-26 US7328216B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2003-08-11 System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6687696B2 (en)

Cited By (236)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010049688A1 (en) * 2000-03-06 2001-12-06 Raya Fratkina System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US20020160350A1 (en) * 2001-04-26 2002-10-31 Tadashi Tanaka System and method for controlling cooperation learning state
US20020161747A1 (en) * 2001-03-13 2002-10-31 Mingjing Li Media content search engine incorporating text content and user log mining
US20030014399A1 (en) * 2001-03-12 2003-01-16 Hansen Mark H. Method for organizing records of database search activity by topical relevance
US20030018626A1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-01-23 Kay David B. System and method for measuring the quality of information retrieval
US20030050959A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-03-13 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for distributed real-time search
US20030050924A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-03-13 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for resolving distributed network search queries to information providers
US20030055818A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-03-20 Yaroslav Faybishenko Method and system of routing messages in a distributed search network
US20030061239A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-03-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Multimedia searching and browsing system based on user profile
US20030084066A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-01 Waterman Scott A. Device and method for assisting knowledge engineer in associating intelligence with content
US20030088544A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-05-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Distributed information discovery
US20030101024A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2003-05-29 Eytan Adar User profile classification by web usage analysis
US20030105589A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Wen-Yin Liu Media agent
US20030115191A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-06-19 Max Copperman Efficient and cost-effective content provider for customer relationship management (CRM) or other applications
US20030126120A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-07-03 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for multiple data sources to plug into a standardized interface for distributed deep search
US20030154181A1 (en) * 2002-01-25 2003-08-14 Nec Usa, Inc. Document clustering with cluster refinement and model selection capabilities
US20030158839A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-08-21 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for determining relevancy of query responses in a distributed network search mechanism
US20030187614A1 (en) * 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 Erik Wallin Method for adjustment of information
US20040024739A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-05 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US20040064438A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Kostoff Ronald N. Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US20040088308A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-05-06 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information analysing apparatus
US20040243541A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2004-12-02 Hong-Jiang Zhang Relevance maximizing, iteration minimizing, relevance-feedback, content-based image retrieval (CBIR)
US20040249713A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-09 Gross John N. Method for implementing online advertising
US20040249700A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-09 Gross John N. System & method of identifying trendsetters
US20040249615A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2004-12-09 Radek Grzeszczuk Surface light field decomposition using non-negative factorization
US20040254920A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-16 Brill Eric D. Systems and methods that employ a distributional analysis on a query log to improve search results
US20040254957A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2004-12-16 Nokia Corporation Method and a system for modeling user preferences
US20040260600A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-23 Gross John N. System & method for predicting demand for items
US20040260688A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-23 Gross John N. Method for implementing search engine
US20040267604A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-30 Gross John N. System & method for influencing recommender system
US20050086215A1 (en) * 2002-06-14 2005-04-21 Igor Perisic System and method for harmonizing content relevancy across structured and unstructured data
US20050091245A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2005-04-28 Microsoft Corporation System and process for automatically explaining probabilistic predictions
US20050102303A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation Computer-implemented method, system and program product for mapping a user data schema to a mining model schema
US20050114360A1 (en) * 2003-11-24 2005-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Computerized data mining system, method and program product
US20050125440A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2005-06-09 Roy Hirst Systems and methods for improving information discovery
US20050159204A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2005-07-21 Martin Moshal Menu selection system and method of operation thereof
US20050202845A1 (en) * 2004-03-01 2005-09-15 Mikio Sasaki Interface device, inferring system, and visual expression method
US20050234688A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model generation
US20050234763A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model augmentation by variable transformation
US20050234753A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model validation
US20050234762A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Dimension reduction in predictive model development
US20050234761A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model development
US20050246319A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Zybic, Inc. Method and system for decomposing and categorizing organizational information
US6981040B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2005-12-27 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20060010095A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-12 Wolff Gregory J Synchronizing distributed work through document logs
WO2005036368A3 (en) * 2003-10-10 2006-02-02 Humanizing Technologies Inc Clustering based personalized web experience
US20060026147A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Cone Julian M Adaptive search engine
WO2006014467A2 (en) * 2004-07-06 2006-02-09 Content Analyst Company, Llc Taxonomy discovery
US20060053175A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating, editing, and utilizing one or more rules for multi-relational ontology creation and maintenance
US20060053173A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for support of chemical data within multi-relational ontologies
US20060053151A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Bio Wisdom Limited Multi-relational ontology structure
US20060053172A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating, editing, and using multi-relational ontologies
US20060053174A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Bio Wisdom Limited System and method for data extraction and management in multi-relational ontology creation
US20060053382A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for facilitating user interaction with multi-relational ontologies
US20060053171A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for curating one or more multi-relational ontologies
US20060074902A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Forming intent-based clusters and employing same by search
US20060074836A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-04-06 Biowisdom Limited System and method for graphically displaying ontology data
US20060074833A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-04-06 Biowisdom Limited System and method for notifying users of changes in multi-relational ontologies
US20060112128A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-25 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Methods, apparatus, and program products for performing incremental probabilitstic latent semantic analysis
US7082429B2 (en) * 2003-12-10 2006-07-25 National Chiao Tung University Method for web content filtering
US20060167918A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-07-27 Takashi Tsuzuki Information retrieval apparatus
US20060167930A1 (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-07-27 George Witwer Self-organized concept search and data storage method
US20060173910A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-03 Mclaughlin Matthew R Dynamic identification of a new set of media items responsive to an input mediaset
US20060179051A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-08-10 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods and apparatus for steering the analyses of collections of documents
US20060179414A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-10 Musicstrands, Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US7092936B1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2006-08-15 Oracle International Corporation System and method for search and recommendation based on usage mining
US20060190225A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Brand Matthew E Collaborative filtering using random walks of Markov chains
US20060200556A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-09-07 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20060218140A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-09-28 Battelle Memorial Institute Method and apparatus for labeling in steered visual analysis of collections of documents
US20060230033A1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-12 Halevy Alon Y Searching through content which is accessible through web-based forms
US20060230036A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-12 Kei Tateno Information processing apparatus, information processing method and program
US20060242190A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Content Analyst Comapny, Llc Latent semantic taxonomy generation
US20060242140A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Content Analyst Company, Llc Latent semantic clustering
US20060242098A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Content Analyst Company, Llc Generating representative exemplars for indexing, clustering, categorization and taxonomy
US20060248059A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-11-02 Palo Alto Research Center Inc. Systems and methods for personalized search
US20060246932A1 (en) * 2001-01-16 2006-11-02 Texas Instruments Incorporated Collaborative Mechanism of Enhanced Coexistence of Collocated Wireless Networks
US20060259494A1 (en) * 2005-05-13 2006-11-16 Microsoft Corporation System and method for simultaneous search service and email search
US20060277290A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Sam Shank Compiling and filtering user ratings of products
US20070011188A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting a data mining modeling algorithm for data mining applications
US20070011187A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications
US20070011135A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting parameters for data mining modeling algorithms in data mining applications
US20070016576A1 (en) * 2005-07-13 2007-01-18 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for blocking objectionable multimedia information
US20070078836A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Rick Hangartner Systems and methods for promotional media item selection and promotional program unit generation
US20070083506A1 (en) * 2005-09-28 2007-04-12 Liddell Craig M Search engine determining results based on probabilistic scoring of relevance
EP1791114A1 (en) 2005-11-25 2007-05-30 Swisscom Mobile Ag A method for personalization of a service
US20070127692A1 (en) * 2005-12-02 2007-06-07 Satyam Computer Services Ltd. System and method for tracking customer satisfaction index based on intentional context
US7231419B1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2007-06-12 Outlooksoft Corporation System and method for adaptively selecting and delivering recommendations to a requester
US20070136225A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-06-14 Microsoft Corporation Contingency table estimation via sketches
US20070150464A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for predicting destinations in a navigation context based upon observed usage patterns
US20070156632A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Coordination and tracking of workflows
US20070156777A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Log integrity verification
US20070156672A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Refining based on log content
US20070156683A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Always on and updated operation for document logs
US7243085B2 (en) 2003-04-16 2007-07-10 Sony Corporation Hybrid personalization architecture
US20070162546A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-07-12 Musicstrands, Inc. Sharing tags among individual user media libraries
US20070174267A1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2007-07-26 David Patterson Computer aided document retrieval
US20070179924A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20070203790A1 (en) * 2005-12-19 2007-08-30 Musicstrands, Inc. User to user recommender
US20070214131A1 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-13 Microsoft Corporation Re-ranking search results based on query log
US20070233726A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-10-04 Musicstrands, Inc. Methods and apparatus for visualizing a music library
US20070239741A1 (en) * 2002-06-12 2007-10-11 Jordahl Jena J Data storage, retrieval, manipulation and display tools enabling multiple hierarchical points of view
US20070239431A1 (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Scalable probabilistic latent semantic analysis
US20070244880A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2007-10-18 Francisco Martin Mediaset generation system
US20070244768A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-10-18 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US20070265979A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-11-15 Musicstrands, Inc. User programmed media delivery service
US20070276831A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-29 Nhn Corporation Method for retrieving keyword showing difference between two groups and system for executing the method
US20080010258A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-01-10 Infosys Technologies Ltd. Collaborative filtering-based recommendations
US20080082393A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Personal data mining
US20080104047A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2008-05-01 Transaxtions Llc Intelligent search with guiding info
US20080133601A1 (en) * 2005-01-05 2008-06-05 Musicstrands, S.A.U. System And Method For Recommending Multimedia Elements
US20080183685A1 (en) * 2007-01-26 2008-07-31 Yahoo! Inc. System for classifying a search query
US7409335B1 (en) 2001-06-29 2008-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of answers based on application being employed by the user
US20080222105A1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Joseph Matheny Entity recommendation system using restricted information tagged to selected entities
US20080228723A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition Prediction Using Attribute Combinations
US20080229187A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2008-09-18 Mahoney John J Methods and systems for categorizing and indexing human-readable data
US20080243751A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Michael Gormish Method and Apparatus for Recording Associations with Logs
US20080243688A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Hart Peter E Method and Apparatus for Recording Transactions with a Portable Logging Device
US20080250323A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-10-09 Huff Gerald B Method and apparatus for recommending an application-feature to a user
US20080250064A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-10-09 Aptima, Inc. Method and system to compare data entities
US20080270250A1 (en) * 2007-04-26 2008-10-30 Ebay Inc. Flexible asset and search recommendation engines
US20080270242A1 (en) * 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Cvon Innovations Ltd. Method and arrangement for providing content to multimedia devices
US20080275834A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2008-11-06 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20080275859A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Thomson Corporation Method and system for disambiguating informational objects
US20080281909A1 (en) * 2005-12-31 2008-11-13 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Information issuing system, public media information issuing system and issuing method
US20080319973A1 (en) * 2007-06-20 2008-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Recommending content using discriminatively trained document similarity
US20090019356A1 (en) * 2007-07-10 2009-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent Text Annotation
US20090019027A1 (en) * 2007-07-09 2009-01-15 Microsoft Corporation Disambiguating residential listing search results
US20090037355A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2009-02-05 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Context-Based Content Recommendation
US7493333B2 (en) 2004-09-03 2009-02-17 Biowisdom Limited System and method for parsing and/or exporting data from one or more multi-relational ontologies
US7499897B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2009-03-03 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model variable management
US7505989B2 (en) 2004-09-03 2009-03-17 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating customized ontologies
US20090083307A1 (en) * 2005-04-22 2009-03-26 Musicstrands, S.A.U. System and method for acquiring and adding data on the playing of elements or multimedia files
US20090094020A1 (en) * 2007-10-05 2009-04-09 Fujitsu Limited Recommending Terms To Specify Ontology Space
US7519529B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2009-04-14 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of results in response to questions posed to an automated information-retrieval or question-answering service
US20090106195A1 (en) * 2005-12-05 2009-04-23 Sony Corporation Information Processing Apparatus, Information Processing Method and Program
US20090125934A1 (en) * 2007-11-11 2009-05-14 Microsoft Corporation User rating mechanism for media content
US20090132453A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2009-05-21 Musicstrands, Inc. Systems and methods for prioritizing mobile media player files
US20090150519A1 (en) * 2007-12-06 2009-06-11 Eastman Kodak Company Pseudo real time indexing of digital media files
US7562058B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2009-07-14 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model management using a re-entrant process
US20090187551A1 (en) * 2008-01-17 2009-07-23 Oracle International Corporation Search results when searching for records of a business object
US20090193099A1 (en) * 2008-01-29 2009-07-30 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Method and apparatus for automatically incorporating hypothetical context information into recommendation queries
US20090222392A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2009-09-03 Strands, Inc. Dymanic interactive entertainment
US20090234825A1 (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-17 Fujitsu Limited Information distribution system and information distribution method
US20090240682A1 (en) * 2008-03-22 2009-09-24 International Business Machines Corporation Graph search system and method for querying loosely integrated data
US20090254838A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-08 Icurrent, Inc. Information display system based on user profile data with assisted and explicit profile modification
US20090271148A1 (en) * 2008-04-25 2009-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Cold-start in situation-aware systems
US20090271433A1 (en) * 2008-04-25 2009-10-29 Xerox Corporation Clustering using non-negative matrix factorization on sparse graphs
US20090276722A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Jonathan Segel Method and apparatus for dual mode content searching, selection, delivery, and playout
US20090276351A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Strands, Inc. Scaleable system and method for distributed prediction markets
US20090276368A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2009-11-05 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for providing personalized recommendations of products and services based on explicit and implicit user data and feedback
US7627613B1 (en) * 2003-07-03 2009-12-01 Google Inc. Duplicate document detection in a web crawler system
US20090299945A1 (en) * 2008-06-03 2009-12-03 Strands, Inc. Profile modeling for sharing individual user preferences
US20090300008A1 (en) * 2008-05-31 2009-12-03 Strands, Inc. Adaptive recommender technology
US20090327270A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2009-12-31 Microsoft Corporation Using Variation in User Interest to Enhance the Search Experience
US20090327228A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2009-12-31 Microsoft Corporation Balancing the costs of sharing private data with the utility of enhanced personalization of online services
US20100030762A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Oracle International Corporation Reducing lag time when searching a repository using a keyword search
US20100063843A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked Data Record Access
US20100063830A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked Data Provider Selection
US20100076950A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-25 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked Data Service Selection
US7689432B2 (en) 2003-06-06 2010-03-30 Hayley Logistics Llc System and method for influencing recommender system & advertising based on programmed policies
US20100088512A1 (en) * 2008-10-02 2010-04-08 Schwartz Edward L Method and Apparatus for Automatically Publishing Content Based Identifiers
US20100100516A1 (en) * 2008-10-20 2010-04-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Predicting User-Item Ratings
US20100100517A1 (en) * 2008-10-21 2010-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Future data event prediction using a generative model
US7725300B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-05-25 Fortelligent, Inc. Target profiling in predictive modeling
US7734627B1 (en) * 2003-06-17 2010-06-08 Google Inc. Document similarity detection
US7734569B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2010-06-08 Strands, Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US7739253B1 (en) * 2005-04-21 2010-06-15 Sonicwall, Inc. Link-based content ratings of pages
US20100169328A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-01 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for making recommendations using model-based collaborative filtering with user communities and items collections
US20100169262A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Mobile Device for Pangenetic Web
US20100169342A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic Web Satisfaction Prediction System
US20100169340A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic Web Item Recommendation System
US20100169313A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic Web Item Feedback System
US20100185689A1 (en) * 2009-01-20 2010-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Enhancing Keyword Advertising Using Wikipedia Semantics
US20100211533A1 (en) * 2009-02-18 2010-08-19 Microsoft Corporation Extracting structured data from web forums
US7809685B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2010-10-05 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Secure and efficient methods for logging and synchronizing data exchanges
US20100280906A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2010-11-04 Lim Stanley T Economic Filtering System for Delivery of Permission Based, Targeted, Incentivized Advertising
US20100306235A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Yahoo! Inc. Real-Time Detection of Emerging Web Search Queries
US7853618B2 (en) 2005-07-21 2010-12-14 The Boeing Company Methods and apparatus for generic semantic access to information systems
US20100328312A1 (en) * 2006-10-20 2010-12-30 Justin Donaldson Personal music recommendation mapping
US20110029928A1 (en) * 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Apple Inc. System and method for displaying interactive cluster-based media playlists
US20110060738A1 (en) * 2009-09-08 2011-03-10 Apple Inc. Media item clustering based on similarity data
US7933859B1 (en) * 2010-05-25 2011-04-26 Recommind, Inc. Systems and methods for predictive coding
US20110153356A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2011-06-23 Expanse Networks, Inc. System, Method and Software for Healthcare Selection Based on Pangenetic Data
US20110202400A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2011-08-18 Cbs Interactive, Inc. System and Method for an Electronic Product Advisor
US8006094B2 (en) 2007-02-21 2011-08-23 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Trustworthy timestamps and certifiable clocks using logs linked by cryptographic hashes
US20110213761A1 (en) * 2010-03-01 2011-09-01 Microsoft Corporation Searchable web site discovery and recommendation
US20110225192A1 (en) * 2010-03-11 2011-09-15 Imig Scott K Auto-detection of historical search context
US8060816B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2011-11-15 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for intelligent crawling on the world wide web
US8065254B1 (en) 2007-02-19 2011-11-22 Google Inc. Presenting a diversity of recommendations
US8090794B1 (en) * 2008-08-25 2012-01-03 Intuit Inc. Technique for customizing displayed content
US20120030711A1 (en) * 2010-07-28 2012-02-02 Yahoo! Inc. Method or system to predict media content preferences
US8136025B1 (en) 2003-07-03 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Assigning document identification tags
US8135718B1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Collaborative filtering
US20120191630A1 (en) * 2011-01-26 2012-07-26 Google Inc. Updateable Predictive Analytical Modeling
US20120215765A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2012-08-23 Olcan Sercinoglu Systems and Methods for Generating Statistics from Search Engine Query Logs
US8332406B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2012-12-11 Apple Inc. Real-time visualization of user consumption of media items
US8346685B1 (en) 2009-04-22 2013-01-01 Equivio Ltd. Computerized system for enhancing expert-based processes and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8396871B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2013-03-12 DiscoverReady LLC Document classification and characterization
US8407226B1 (en) 2007-02-16 2013-03-26 Google Inc. Collaborative filtering
US8438122B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-05-07 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8473431B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-06-25 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8477786B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2013-07-02 Apple Inc. Messaging system and service
US8479004B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2013-07-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd Paper-based document logging
US8489632B1 (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-07-16 Google Inc. Predictive model training management
US8527523B1 (en) 2009-04-22 2013-09-03 Equivio Ltd. System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8533195B2 (en) 2011-06-27 2013-09-10 Microsoft Corporation Regularized latent semantic indexing for topic modeling
US8533224B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2013-09-10 Google Inc. Assessing accuracy of trained predictive models
US8533194B1 (en) 2009-04-22 2013-09-10 Equivio Ltd. System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8539024B2 (en) 2001-08-20 2013-09-17 Masterobjects, Inc. System and method for asynchronous client server session communication
US8595154B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2013-11-26 Google Inc. Dynamic predictive modeling platform
US8620842B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2013-12-31 Gordon Villy Cormack Systems and methods for classifying electronic information using advanced active learning techniques
US8666915B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2014-03-04 Sony Corporation Method and device for information retrieval
US8788286B2 (en) 2007-08-08 2014-07-22 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Side effects prediction using co-associating bioattributes
US8892495B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2014-11-18 Blanding Hovenweep, Llc Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-interface therefore
US8924395B2 (en) 2010-10-06 2014-12-30 Planet Data Solutions System and method for indexing electronic discovery data
US8965874B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2015-02-24 Google Inc. Dynamic aggregation of users
US8983905B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2015-03-17 Apple Inc. Merging playlists from multiple sources
US9002842B2 (en) 2012-08-08 2015-04-07 Equivio Ltd. System and method for computerized batching of huge populations of electronic documents
US9031870B2 (en) 2008-12-30 2015-05-12 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Pangenetic web user behavior prediction system
US20150170038A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-18 Industrial Technology Research Institute Method And System For Generating Item Recommendation
US9141622B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-09-22 Google Inc. Feature weight training techniques
US9160808B2 (en) 2010-11-17 2015-10-13 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Transmitting product information
US9183290B2 (en) 2007-05-02 2015-11-10 Thomas Reuters Global Resources Method and system for disambiguating informational objects
US9189965B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2015-11-17 International Business Machines Corporation Enhancing posted content in discussion forums
US9245033B2 (en) 2009-04-02 2016-01-26 Graham Holdings Company Channel sharing
US9317588B1 (en) * 2012-03-22 2016-04-19 Google Inc. Resource identification from organic and structured content
US9471581B1 (en) 2013-02-23 2016-10-18 Bryant Christopher Lee Autocompletion of filename based on text in a file to be saved
US9477757B1 (en) 2012-06-14 2016-10-25 Google Inc. Latent user models for personalized ranking
US9529822B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2016-12-27 Yahoo! Inc. Media or content tagging determined by user credibility signals
US9535563B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2017-01-03 Blanding Hovenweep, Llc Internet appliance system and method
US20170052861A1 (en) * 2015-08-21 2017-02-23 Synopsys, Inc. Identifying failure mechanisms based on a population of scan diagnostic reports
US9667514B1 (en) 2012-01-30 2017-05-30 DiscoverReady LLC Electronic discovery system with statistical sampling
US9678623B2 (en) 2009-06-11 2017-06-13 Apple Inc. User interface for media playback
US9785634B2 (en) 2011-06-04 2017-10-10 Recommind, Inc. Integration and combination of random sampling and document batching
US9792269B2 (en) 2002-07-19 2017-10-17 Open Invention Network, Llc Registry driven interoperability and exchange of documents
US9836765B2 (en) 2014-05-19 2017-12-05 Kibo Software, Inc. System and method for context-aware recommendation through user activity change detection

Families Citing this family (262)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8108245B1 (en) 1999-09-17 2012-01-31 Cox Communications, Inc. Method and system for web user profiling and selective content delivery
US7979880B2 (en) * 2000-04-21 2011-07-12 Cox Communications, Inc. Method and system for profiling iTV users and for providing selective content delivery
US7461058B1 (en) 1999-09-24 2008-12-02 Thalveg Data Flow Llc Optimized rule based constraints for collaborative filtering systems
US6728695B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2004-04-27 Burning Glass Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for making predictions about entities represented in documents
US20040073617A1 (en) 2000-06-19 2004-04-15 Milliken Walter Clark Hash-based systems and methods for detecting and preventing transmission of unwanted e-mail
US7788123B1 (en) 2000-06-23 2010-08-31 Ekhaus Michael A Method and system for high performance model-based personalization
WO2002010984A2 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-02-07 Triplehop Technologies, Inc. System and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US6655963B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2003-12-02 Microsoft Corporation Methods and apparatus for predicting and selectively collecting preferences based on personality diagnosis
GB0026353D0 (en) * 2000-10-27 2000-12-13 Canon Kk Apparatus and a method for facilitating searching
US7113943B2 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-09-26 Content Analyst Company, Llc Method for document comparison and selection
US20100057622A1 (en) * 2001-02-27 2010-03-04 Faith Patrick L Distributed Quantum Encrypted Pattern Generation And Scoring
US7269546B2 (en) * 2001-05-09 2007-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method of finding documents related to other documents and of finding related words in response to a query to refine a search
US7194477B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2007-03-20 Revenue Science, Inc. Optimized a priori techniques
US20030225763A1 (en) * 2002-04-15 2003-12-04 Microsoft Corporation Self-improving system and method for classifying pages on the world wide web
US7194527B2 (en) * 2002-06-18 2007-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Media variations browser
US8838622B2 (en) 2002-07-13 2014-09-16 Cricket Media, Inc. Method and system for monitoring and filtering data transmission
US20040122692A1 (en) 2002-07-13 2004-06-24 John Irving Method and system for interactive, multi-user electronic data transmission in a multi-level monitored and filtered system
US7133811B2 (en) * 2002-10-15 2006-11-07 Microsoft Corporation Staged mixture modeling
US20050125240A9 (en) * 2002-10-21 2005-06-09 Speiser Leonard R. Product recommendation in a network-based commerce system
US7831476B2 (en) * 2002-10-21 2010-11-09 Ebay Inc. Listing recommendation in a network-based commerce system
FI114582B (en) * 2002-11-29 2004-11-15 Nokia Corp The predictive probability arrangement for downloading files over an interface
US6732157B1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-05-04 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Comprehensive anti-spam system, method, and computer program product for filtering unwanted e-mail messages
JP2004220215A (en) * 2003-01-14 2004-08-05 Hitachi Ltd Operation guide and support system and operation guide and support method using computer
US7475027B2 (en) * 2003-02-06 2009-01-06 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. On-line recommender system
FR2852712A1 (en) * 2003-03-17 2004-09-24 Gilles Philippe Rocher Computer processing system for use in secured payment system, has platform connected to computer equipments, and one computer processing unit assembling formulation and technical information to generate functional document
EP1606754A4 (en) * 2003-03-25 2006-04-19 Sedna Patent Services Llc Generating audience analytics
US7350187B1 (en) 2003-04-30 2008-03-25 Google Inc. System and methods for automatically creating lists
US7516146B2 (en) * 2003-05-15 2009-04-07 Microsoft Corporation Fast adaptive document filtering
US20040260680A1 (en) * 2003-06-19 2004-12-23 International Business Machines Corporation Personalized indexing and searching for information in a distributed data processing system
US7289983B2 (en) 2003-06-19 2007-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Personalized indexing and searching for information in a distributed data processing system
US7599938B1 (en) 2003-07-11 2009-10-06 Harrison Jr Shelton E Social news gathering, prioritizing, tagging, searching, and syndication method
US7249128B2 (en) * 2003-08-05 2007-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Performance prediction system with query mining
US8458033B2 (en) * 2003-08-11 2013-06-04 Dropbox, Inc. Determining the relevance of offers
GB0320583D0 (en) * 2003-09-03 2003-10-01 Teleit Ltd Automatic target market user profiles
US20050060289A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2005-03-17 Mark Keenan A method for relaxing multiple constraints in search and calculation and then displaying results
WO2005029362A1 (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-03-31 Eurekster, Inc. Enhanced search engine
US7685296B2 (en) * 2003-09-25 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for client-based web crawling
US7836051B1 (en) * 2003-10-13 2010-11-16 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Predictive analysis of browse activity data of users of a database access system in which items are arranged in a hierarchy
CA2447434A1 (en) * 2003-10-29 2005-04-29 Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee Content filtering, ordering by relevant, and caching
US20050102282A1 (en) * 2003-11-07 2005-05-12 Greg Linden Method for personalized search
US20050108024A1 (en) * 2003-11-13 2005-05-19 Fawcett John Jr. Systems and methods for retrieving data
US7444403B1 (en) 2003-11-25 2008-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Detecting sexually predatory content in an electronic communication
US7424469B2 (en) * 2004-01-07 2008-09-09 Microsoft Corporation System and method for blending the results of a classifier and a search engine
US7761569B2 (en) 2004-01-23 2010-07-20 Tiversa, Inc. Method for monitoring and providing information over a peer to peer network
US20050177599A1 (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-11 Microsoft Corporation System and method for complying with anti-spam rules, laws, and regulations
US7987099B2 (en) * 2004-02-27 2011-07-26 Align Technology, Inc. Dental data mining
US9492245B2 (en) * 2004-02-27 2016-11-15 Align Technology, Inc. Method and system for providing dynamic orthodontic assessment and treatment profiles
WO2005086060A1 (en) * 2004-03-02 2005-09-15 Cloudmark, Inc. Method and apparatus to use a genetic algorithm to generate an improved statistical model
JP2007526726A (en) * 2004-03-02 2007-09-13 クラウドマーク インコーポレイテッド Method and apparatus for classifying an electronic communication using a statistical model
US8005835B2 (en) * 2004-03-15 2011-08-23 Yahoo! Inc. Search systems and methods with integration of aggregate user annotations
US20060031386A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2006-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation System for sharing ontology information in a peer-to-peer network
US20050283470A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-22 Or Kuntzman Content categorization
WO2006007194B1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2006-03-02 Personasearch Inc Dynamic search processor
US7428530B2 (en) * 2004-07-01 2008-09-23 Microsoft Corporation Dispersing search engine results by using page category information
US7716219B2 (en) * 2004-07-08 2010-05-11 Yahoo ! Inc. Database search system and method of determining a value of a keyword in a search
US7490082B2 (en) * 2004-09-16 2009-02-10 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for searching internet domains
US7593924B2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2009-09-22 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for receiving and responding to knowledge interchange queries
US20060064411A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 William Gross Search engine using user intent
US20070011155A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2007-01-11 Sarkar Pte. Ltd. System for communication and collaboration
US8688673B2 (en) * 2005-09-27 2014-04-01 Sarkar Pte Ltd System for communication and collaboration
US20060074980A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-04-06 Sarkar Pte. Ltd. System for semantically disambiguating text information
US20080077570A1 (en) * 2004-10-25 2008-03-27 Infovell, Inc. Full Text Query and Search Systems and Method of Use
EP1825395A4 (en) * 2004-10-25 2010-07-07 Yuanhua Tang Full text query and search systems and methods of use
US8335753B2 (en) * 2004-11-03 2012-12-18 Microsoft Corporation Domain knowledge-assisted information processing
US20060111960A1 (en) * 2004-11-22 2006-05-25 International Business Machines Corporation Performance prediction service using business-process information
EP1666074B1 (en) 2004-11-26 2008-05-28 BÄ*RO GmbH &amp; Co. KG Disinfection lamp
US8874570B1 (en) 2004-11-30 2014-10-28 Google Inc. Search boost vector based on co-visitation information
US7533399B2 (en) * 2004-12-02 2009-05-12 Panasonic Corporation Programming guide content collection and recommendation system for viewing on a portable device
US20060161520A1 (en) * 2005-01-14 2006-07-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for generating alternative search terms
US20060161553A1 (en) * 2005-01-19 2006-07-20 Tiny Engine, Inc. Systems and methods for providing user interaction based profiles
US9424563B2 (en) * 2005-03-11 2016-08-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Accessing medial context information using contextual links
US7567946B2 (en) * 2005-03-14 2009-07-28 Xerox Corporation Method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for estimating parameters of a probability model on shared device usage probabilistic semantic analysis
WO2006104534A3 (en) * 2005-03-25 2007-11-22 Jr Robert Glenn Etter Scoring items based on user sentiment and determining the proficiency of predictors
US20060217994A1 (en) * 2005-03-25 2006-09-28 The Motley Fool, Inc. Method and system for harnessing collective knowledge
US20060224579A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Microsoft Corporation Data mining techniques for improving search engine relevance
US8412698B1 (en) * 2005-04-07 2013-04-02 Yahoo! Inc. Customizable filters for personalized search
US7631007B2 (en) * 2005-04-12 2009-12-08 Scenera Technologies, Llc System and method for tracking user activity related to network resources using a browser
US8631006B1 (en) * 2005-04-14 2014-01-14 Google Inc. System and method for personalized snippet generation
US8200687B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2012-06-12 Ebay Inc. System to generate related search queries
US7937264B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2011-05-03 Microsoft Corporation Leveraging unlabeled data with a probabilistic graphical model
JP4878131B2 (en) * 2005-08-04 2012-02-15 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ User behavior estimation system, user behavior estimation method
US7788266B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2010-08-31 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries
JP4107315B2 (en) * 2005-08-30 2008-06-25 コニカミノルタビジネステクノロジーズ株式会社 Information equipment, a control method, and control program
US7539653B2 (en) * 2005-10-07 2009-05-26 Xerox Corporation Document clustering
US7328199B2 (en) * 2005-10-07 2008-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Componentized slot-filling architecture
US7840451B2 (en) * 2005-11-07 2010-11-23 Sap Ag Identifying the most relevant computer system state information
US20070106496A1 (en) * 2005-11-09 2007-05-10 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive task framework
US7606700B2 (en) * 2005-11-09 2009-10-20 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive task framework
US7664746B2 (en) * 2005-11-15 2010-02-16 Microsoft Corporation Personalized search and headlines
US7668821B1 (en) 2005-11-17 2010-02-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recommendations based on item tagging activities of users
US7822699B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2010-10-26 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive semantic reasoning engine
US8903810B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2014-12-02 Collarity, Inc. Techniques for ranking search results
US7831585B2 (en) * 2005-12-05 2010-11-09 Microsoft Corporation Employment of task framework for advertising
US7933914B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2011-04-26 Microsoft Corporation Automatic task creation and execution using browser helper objects
US8429184B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2013-04-23 Collarity Inc. Generation of refinement terms for search queries
US7529761B2 (en) * 2005-12-14 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation Two-dimensional conditional random fields for web extraction
US20070143547A1 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-21 Microsoft Corporation Predictive caching and lookup
US20090094137A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2009-04-09 Toppenberg Larry W Web Page Optimization Systems
US7657522B1 (en) 2006-01-12 2010-02-02 Recommind, Inc. System and method for providing information navigation and filtration
US7747631B1 (en) * 2006-01-12 2010-06-29 Recommind, Inc. System and method for establishing relevance of objects in an enterprise system
WO2007084974A3 (en) * 2006-01-19 2009-04-09 Charles D Hartwig Systems and methods for acquiring analyzing mining data and information
CN100543741C (en) * 2006-02-10 2009-09-23 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司;鸿海精密工业股份有限公司 System and method for automatically downloading and filtering web page
US20070203869A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive semantic platform architecture
US7996783B2 (en) * 2006-03-02 2011-08-09 Microsoft Corporation Widget searching utilizing task framework
US7774294B2 (en) * 2006-03-06 2010-08-10 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on learned periodicity of user content selection
US8019777B2 (en) * 2006-03-16 2011-09-13 Nexify, Inc. Digital content personalization method and system
US8316394B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2012-11-20 United Video Properties, Inc. Interactive media guidance application with intelligent navigation and display features
US8078607B2 (en) * 2006-03-30 2011-12-13 Google Inc. Generating website profiles based on queries from webistes and user activities on the search results
US20070233679A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2007-10-04 Microsoft Corporation Learning a document ranking function using query-level error measurements
US7461061B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2008-12-02 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US8326890B2 (en) * 2006-04-28 2012-12-04 Choicebot, Inc. System and method for assisting computer users to search for and evaluate products and services, typically in a database
US20070255755A1 (en) * 2006-05-01 2007-11-01 Yahoo! Inc. Video search engine using joint categorization of video clips and queries based on multiple modalities
US7822745B2 (en) * 2006-05-31 2010-10-26 Yahoo! Inc. Keyword set and target audience profile generalization techniques
US7814112B2 (en) 2006-06-09 2010-10-12 Ebay Inc. Determining relevancy and desirability of terms
CN100596135C (en) * 2006-06-09 2010-03-24 华为技术有限公司 System and method for determining content supplier priority level
US7958444B2 (en) * 2006-06-15 2011-06-07 Xerox Corporation Visualizing document annotations in the context of the source document
US7761464B2 (en) * 2006-06-19 2010-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Diversifying search results for improved search and personalization
US8001130B2 (en) * 2006-07-25 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Web object retrieval based on a language model
US7593934B2 (en) * 2006-07-28 2009-09-22 Microsoft Corporation Learning a document ranking using a loss function with a rank pair or a query parameter
US7720830B2 (en) * 2006-07-31 2010-05-18 Microsoft Corporation Hierarchical conditional random fields for web extraction
US7921106B2 (en) * 2006-08-03 2011-04-05 Microsoft Corporation Group-by attribute value in search results
US7783636B2 (en) * 2006-09-28 2010-08-24 Microsoft Corporation Personalized information retrieval search with backoff
US8442972B2 (en) 2006-10-11 2013-05-14 Collarity, Inc. Negative associations for search results ranking and refinement
US20080097821A1 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-04-24 Microsoft Corporation Recommendations utilizing meta-data based pair-wise lift predictions
US8126898B2 (en) * 2006-11-06 2012-02-28 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Method and system for generating scored recommendations based on scored references
WO2008057509A9 (en) * 2006-11-07 2008-09-04 Tiversa Inc System and method for enhanced experience with a peer to peer network
US20080176194A1 (en) 2006-11-08 2008-07-24 Nina Zolt System for developing literacy skills using loosely coupled tools in a self-directed learning process within a collaborative social network
WO2008063987A3 (en) 2006-11-13 2008-08-28 Veveo Inc Method of and system for selecting and presenting content based on user identification
US7996409B2 (en) * 2006-12-28 2011-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for content-based object ranking to facilitate information lifecycle management
US7844616B2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2010-11-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program product for discovering relevant information in a dynamic information system
US7685140B2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2010-03-23 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic information systems
US20080183733A1 (en) * 2007-01-30 2008-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program product for the creation and use of a unified dynamic information system
US8484083B2 (en) * 2007-02-01 2013-07-09 Sri International Method and apparatus for targeting messages to users in a social network
US8280877B2 (en) * 2007-02-22 2012-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Diverse topic phrase extraction
US20100094863A1 (en) * 2007-03-12 2010-04-15 Branton Kenton-Dau Intentionality matching
US8620915B1 (en) 2007-03-13 2013-12-31 Google Inc. Systems and methods for promoting personalized search results based on personal information
US9729843B1 (en) 2007-03-16 2017-08-08 The Mathworks, Inc. Enriched video for a technical computing environment
US8005812B1 (en) 2007-03-16 2011-08-23 The Mathworks, Inc. Collaborative modeling environment
CN105321108A (en) * 2007-04-12 2016-02-10 蒂弗萨公司 System and method for creating a list of shared information on a peer-to-peer network
US7899666B2 (en) 2007-05-04 2011-03-01 Expert System S.P.A. Method and system for automatically extracting relations between concepts included in text
US8301623B2 (en) * 2007-05-22 2012-10-30 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Probabilistic recommendation system
US8051040B2 (en) 2007-06-08 2011-11-01 Ebay Inc. Electronic publication system
EP2171666A4 (en) * 2007-06-11 2012-05-09 Tiversa Inc System and method for advertising on a peer-to-peer network
US8751507B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2014-06-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recommendation system with multiple integrated recommenders
US7949659B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2011-05-24 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recommendation system with multiple integrated recommenders
US8260787B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2012-09-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recommendation system with multiple integrated recommenders
EP2019361A1 (en) * 2007-07-26 2009-01-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method and apparatus for extraction of textual content from hypertext web documents
US8027943B2 (en) 2007-08-16 2011-09-27 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for observing responses to invitations by users in a web-based social network
US20090089381A1 (en) * 2007-09-28 2009-04-02 Microsoft Corporation Pending and exclusive electronic mail inbox
US8543380B2 (en) * 2007-10-05 2013-09-24 Fujitsu Limited Determining a document specificity
US20090100094A1 (en) * 2007-10-15 2009-04-16 Xavier Verdaguer Recommendation system and method for multimedia content
EP2068276A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2009-06-10 Sony Corporation Information processing device and method, program, and recording medium
US8572071B2 (en) * 2008-12-19 2013-10-29 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Systems and methods for data transformation using higher order learning
US8234310B2 (en) * 2007-12-20 2012-07-31 Pottenger William M Social networking on a website with topic-based data sharing
US8239492B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2012-08-07 Pottenger William M System for content-based peer-to-peer indexing of data on a networked storage device
US8301768B2 (en) * 2007-12-20 2012-10-30 Pottenger William M Peer-to-peer indexing-based marketplace
US8364685B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2013-01-29 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for annotation and ranking of reviews personalized to prior user experience
US20090177668A1 (en) * 2008-01-08 2009-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Term-Driven Records File Plan and Thesaurus Design
US20090187540A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2009-07-23 Microsoft Corporation Prediction of informational interests
US8326795B2 (en) * 2008-02-26 2012-12-04 Sap Ag Enhanced process query framework
US20090228296A1 (en) * 2008-03-04 2009-09-10 Collarity, Inc. Optimization of social distribution networks
EP2300926A4 (en) 2008-05-08 2013-07-31 Epals Inc Object-based system and language for dynamic data or network interaction including learning management
US8407286B2 (en) * 2008-05-15 2013-03-26 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for utilizing social network information for showing reviews
EP2120179A1 (en) 2008-05-16 2009-11-18 Swisscom AG Method for modelling a user
WO2010008685A3 (en) * 2008-05-28 2010-04-01 Aptima, Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing entity profiles
US20100010895A1 (en) * 2008-07-08 2010-01-14 Yahoo! Inc. Prediction of a degree of relevance between query rewrites and a search query
US7991757B2 (en) * 2008-08-12 2011-08-02 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System for obtaining recommendations from multiple recommenders
US7991650B2 (en) * 2008-08-12 2011-08-02 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System for obtaining recommendations from multiple recommenders
EP2164227A1 (en) * 2008-09-15 2010-03-17 Alcatel, Lucent Providing digital assets and a network therefor
EP2377011A4 (en) * 2008-12-12 2017-12-13 Atigeo Corp Providing recommendations using information determined for domains of interest
US8086631B2 (en) * 2008-12-12 2011-12-27 Microsoft Corporation Search result diversification
US8738618B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2014-05-27 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and systems to estimate query responses based on data set sketches
US8977645B2 (en) * 2009-01-16 2015-03-10 Google Inc. Accessing a search interface in a structured presentation
US20100185651A1 (en) * 2009-01-16 2010-07-22 Google Inc. Retrieving and displaying information from an unstructured electronic document collection
US8412749B2 (en) 2009-01-16 2013-04-02 Google Inc. Populating a structured presentation with new values
US8452791B2 (en) * 2009-01-16 2013-05-28 Google Inc. Adding new instances to a structured presentation
US8615707B2 (en) * 2009-01-16 2013-12-24 Google Inc. Adding new attributes to a structured presentation
US9600581B2 (en) * 2009-02-19 2017-03-21 Yahoo! Inc. Personalized recommendations on dynamic content
CN102460440B (en) * 2009-06-01 2014-10-08 谷歌公司 Search method and apparatus
US20100306223A1 (en) * 2009-06-01 2010-12-02 Google Inc. Rankings in Search Results with User Corrections
US8661050B2 (en) * 2009-07-10 2014-02-25 Microsoft Corporation Hybrid recommendation system
JP5464412B2 (en) * 2009-08-12 2014-04-09 ソニー株式会社 The information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
EP2287751A1 (en) 2009-08-17 2011-02-23 Deutsche Telekom AG Electronic research system
US20130238419A1 (en) * 2010-08-18 2013-09-12 Jinni Media Ltd. System Apparatus Circuit Method and Associated Computer Executable Code for Assessing the Relevance and Impact of Secondary Content
US9792640B2 (en) 2010-08-18 2017-10-17 Jinni Media Ltd. Generating and providing content recommendations to a group of users
US20110047213A1 (en) * 2009-08-20 2011-02-24 Alan David Manuel Method and process for identifying trusted information of interest
US20120185481A1 (en) * 2009-09-21 2012-07-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and Apparatus for Executing a Recommendation
US20110087679A1 (en) * 2009-10-13 2011-04-14 Albert Rosato System and method for cohort based content filtering and display
US20110106819A1 (en) * 2009-10-29 2011-05-05 Google Inc. Identifying a group of related instances
US9251524B2 (en) * 2009-11-25 2016-02-02 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) System and methods for updating user profiles and providing selected documents to users
US20110137705A1 (en) * 2009-12-09 2011-06-09 Rage Frameworks, Inc., Method and system for automated content analysis for a business organization
US8356045B2 (en) * 2009-12-09 2013-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method to identify common structures in formatted text documents
US9336315B2 (en) 2010-01-19 2016-05-10 Ebay Inc. Personalized recommendation of a volatile item
US8875038B2 (en) * 2010-01-19 2014-10-28 Collarity, Inc. Anchoring for content synchronization
US9703779B2 (en) * 2010-02-04 2017-07-11 Veveo, Inc. Method of and system for enhanced local-device content discovery
US9805101B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2017-10-31 Ebay Inc. Parallel data stream processing system
US20110238608A1 (en) * 2010-03-25 2011-09-29 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus for providing personalized information resource recommendation based on group behaviors
US20110246378A1 (en) * 2010-03-30 2011-10-06 Prussack E Fredrick Identifying high value content and determining responses to high value content
US9785987B2 (en) 2010-04-22 2017-10-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc User interface for information presentation system
US20110264678A1 (en) * 2010-04-26 2011-10-27 Microsoft Corporation User modification of a model applied to search results
US8799280B2 (en) * 2010-05-21 2014-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Personalized navigation using a search engine
US8612432B2 (en) * 2010-06-16 2013-12-17 Microsoft Corporation Determining query intent
US20110314011A1 (en) * 2010-06-18 2011-12-22 Microsoft Corporation Automatically generating training data
US8583674B2 (en) * 2010-06-18 2013-11-12 Microsoft Corporation Media item recommendation
US8954422B2 (en) 2010-07-30 2015-02-10 Ebay Inc. Query suggestion for E-commerce sites
US8762217B2 (en) 2010-11-22 2014-06-24 Etsy, Inc. Systems and methods for searching in an electronic commerce environment
US9443028B2 (en) * 2010-12-11 2016-09-13 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Relevance estimation using a search satisfaction metric
US8751433B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2014-06-10 Microsoft Corporation Efficient probabilistic reasoning over semantic data
US9736524B2 (en) 2011-01-06 2017-08-15 Veveo, Inc. Methods of and systems for content search based on environment sampling
US8612419B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2013-12-17 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent content discovery for content consumers
US8484098B2 (en) 2011-03-03 2013-07-09 Michael Bilotta System for information delivery facilitating partner rating of users and user ratings of partners
US9081760B2 (en) * 2011-03-08 2015-07-14 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method for building diverse language models
CN102682045B (en) * 2011-03-18 2015-02-04 财团法人工业技术研究院 Recommendation method and recommender computer system using dynamic language model
US9298287B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2016-03-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Combined activation for natural user interface systems
US9760566B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2017-09-12 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Augmented conversational understanding agent to identify conversation context between two humans and taking an agent action thereof
US9244984B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2016-01-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Location based conversational understanding
US9842168B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2017-12-12 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Task driven user intents
US9858343B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2018-01-02 Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc Personalization of queries, conversations, and searches
US9454962B2 (en) 2011-05-12 2016-09-27 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Sentence simplification for spoken language understanding
JP5845630B2 (en) * 2011-05-24 2016-01-20 ソニー株式会社 Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
US9058612B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2015-06-16 AVG Netherlands B.V. Systems and methods for recommending software applications
US9336493B2 (en) * 2011-06-06 2016-05-10 Sas Institute Inc. Systems and methods for clustering time series data based on forecast distributions
CN102968418A (en) 2011-09-01 2013-03-13 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Website information search method and system
US9311505B2 (en) * 2011-09-22 2016-04-12 Noka Technologies Oy Method and apparatus for providing abstracted user models
US8170971B1 (en) 2011-09-28 2012-05-01 Ava, Inc. Systems and methods for providing recommendations based on collaborative and/or content-based nodal interrelationships
WO2013052555A1 (en) * 2011-10-03 2013-04-11 Kyaw Thu Systems and methods for performing contextual classification using supervised and unsupervised training
US8812416B2 (en) 2011-11-08 2014-08-19 Nokia Corporation Predictive service for third party application developers
US8484099B1 (en) 2012-02-06 2013-07-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Method, medium, and system for behavior-based recommendations of product upgrades
US9171068B2 (en) 2012-03-07 2015-10-27 Ut-Battelle, Llc Recommending personally interested contents by text mining, filtering, and interfaces
US20130238608A1 (en) * 2012-03-07 2013-09-12 Microsoft Corporation Search results by mapping associated with disparate taxonomies
US9123004B2 (en) * 2012-03-29 2015-09-01 International Business Machines Corporation Predicting an effect of events on assets
US9535978B2 (en) * 2012-03-29 2017-01-03 International Business Machines Corporation Semantic mapping of topic map meta-models identifying assets and events to include weights
CN104412261A (en) * 2012-04-11 2015-03-11 英特尔公司 User interface content personalization system
US9460197B2 (en) * 2012-05-03 2016-10-04 Xerox Corporation Measuring informative content of words in documents in a document collection relative to a probability function including a concavity control parameter
US9430468B2 (en) * 2012-06-28 2016-08-30 Elsevier Bv Online peer review system and method
US9660947B1 (en) * 2012-07-27 2017-05-23 Intuit Inc. Method and apparatus for filtering undesirable content based on anti-tags
US9064006B2 (en) 2012-08-23 2015-06-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Translating natural language utterances to keyword search queries
US20140149513A1 (en) * 2012-11-23 2014-05-29 The Extraordinaries, Inc. System and method for matching a profile to a sparsely defined request
WO2014082209A1 (en) * 2012-11-27 2014-06-05 Nokia Corporation Method for web information discovery and user interface
US9123335B2 (en) 2013-02-20 2015-09-01 Jinni Media Limited System apparatus circuit method and associated computer executable code for natural language understanding and semantic content discovery
US20140236575A1 (en) * 2013-02-21 2014-08-21 Microsoft Corporation Exploiting the semantic web for unsupervised natural language semantic parsing
US20140244631A1 (en) * 2013-02-27 2014-08-28 Digitalsmiths Corporation Identifying Multimedia Asset Similarity Using Blended Semantic and Latent Feature Analysis
US9235626B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-01-12 Google Inc. Automatic generation of snippets based on context and user interest
US8732101B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-05-20 Nara Logics, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing harmonized recommendations based on an integrated user profile
US9613112B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-04-04 Miosoft Corporation Structuring data
US9665403B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-05-30 Miosoft Corporation Executing algorithms in parallel
US9547698B2 (en) 2013-04-23 2017-01-17 Google Inc. Determining media consumption preferences
JP5408380B1 (en) * 2013-06-17 2014-02-05 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Information processing program and an information processing apparatus
US8886671B1 (en) 2013-08-14 2014-11-11 Advent Software, Inc. Multi-tenant in-memory database (MUTED) system and method
US9588955B2 (en) * 2013-09-16 2017-03-07 Jason Rollins Systems, methods, and software for manuscript recommendations and submissions
US9898772B1 (en) * 2013-10-23 2018-02-20 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Item recommendation
US8818910B1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2014-08-26 Comrise, Inc. Systems and methods for prioritizing job candidates using a decision-tree forest algorithm
US9959563B1 (en) 2013-12-19 2018-05-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Recommendation generation for infrequently accessed items
US9870356B2 (en) 2014-02-13 2018-01-16 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Techniques for inferring the unknown intents of linguistic items
US8935263B1 (en) * 2014-03-17 2015-01-13 Linkedin Corporation Generating rankings of reputation scores in reputation systems
US9348898B2 (en) * 2014-03-27 2016-05-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Recommendation system with dual collaborative filter usage matrix
CN105095302A (en) * 2014-05-15 2015-11-25 财团法人工业技术研究院 System, device and method for public praise analysis and inspection
US9600743B2 (en) 2014-06-27 2017-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation Directing field of vision based on personal interests
US9471837B2 (en) 2014-08-19 2016-10-18 International Business Machines Corporation Real-time analytics to identify visual objects of interest
US9720978B1 (en) * 2014-09-30 2017-08-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Fingerprint-based literary works recommendation system
US9734207B2 (en) * 2015-12-28 2017-08-15 Entelo, Inc. Entity resolution techniques and systems
US9734219B1 (en) * 2016-01-23 2017-08-15 Digerati, Inc. System and method for modification, personalization and customizable filtering of search results and search result ranking in an internet-based search engine

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5278980A (en) * 1991-08-16 1994-01-11 Xerox Corporation Iterative technique for phrase query formation and an information retrieval system employing same
US5704017A (en) 1996-02-16 1997-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative filtering utilizing a belief network
US5724567A (en) 1994-04-25 1998-03-03 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
US5790935A (en) 1996-01-30 1998-08-04 Hughes Aircraft Company Virtual on-demand digital information delivery system and method
US5790426A (en) 1996-04-30 1998-08-04 Athenium L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering system
US5867799A (en) 1996-04-04 1999-02-02 Lang; Andrew K. Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs
US5918014A (en) 1995-12-27 1999-06-29 Athenium, L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising
US6006218A (en) 1997-02-28 1999-12-21 Microsoft Methods and apparatus for retrieving and/or processing retrieved information as a function of a user's estimated knowledge
US6029141A (en) 1997-06-27 2000-02-22 Amazon.Com, Inc. Internet-based customer referral system
US6029195A (en) 1994-11-29 2000-02-22 Herz; Frederick S. M. System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US6041311A (en) 1995-06-30 2000-03-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US6049777A (en) 1995-06-30 2000-04-11 Microsoft Corporation Computer-implemented collaborative filtering based method for recommending an item to a user
US6064980A (en) 1998-03-17 2000-05-16 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and methods for collaborative recommendations
US6072942A (en) 1996-09-18 2000-06-06 Secure Computing Corporation System and method of electronic mail filtering using interconnected nodes
US6078740A (en) 1996-11-04 2000-06-20 Digital Equipment Corporation Item selection by prediction and refinement
US6138116A (en) 1996-08-01 2000-10-24 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for retrieving data
US6493702B1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2002-12-10 Xerox Corporation System and method for searching and recommending documents in a collection using share bookmarks
US6510406B1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-01-21 Mathsoft, Inc. Inverse inference engine for high performance web search

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4348740A (en) * 1978-04-04 1982-09-07 White Edward A Method and portable apparatus for comparison of stored sets of data
US4870579A (en) * 1987-10-01 1989-09-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method of predicting subjective reactions
US4839853A (en) * 1988-09-15 1989-06-13 Bell Communications Research, Inc. Computer information retrieval using latent semantic structure
US5301109A (en) * 1990-06-11 1994-04-05 Bell Communications Research, Inc. Computerized cross-language document retrieval using latent semantic indexing
US5675819A (en) * 1994-06-16 1997-10-07 Xerox Corporation Document information retrieval using global word co-occurrence patterns
US5758257A (en) * 1994-11-29 1998-05-26 Herz; Frederick System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US5987446A (en) * 1996-11-12 1999-11-16 U.S. West, Inc. Searching large collections of text using multiple search engines concurrently
JPH10188320A (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-07-21 Sony Corp Optical disk recording and reproducing device and its method
US6233575B1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2001-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation Multilevel taxonomy based on features derived from training documents classification using fisher values as discrimination values
US6356864B1 (en) * 1997-07-25 2002-03-12 University Technology Corporation Methods for analysis and evaluation of the semantic content of a writing based on vector length
WO2000046701A1 (en) * 1999-02-08 2000-08-10 Huntsman Ici Chemicals Llc Method for retrieving semantically distant analogies
US6349309B1 (en) * 1999-05-24 2002-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for detecting clusters of information with application to e-commerce
US20020169730A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2002-11-14 Emmanuel Lazaridis Methods for classifying objects and identifying latent classes

Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5278980A (en) * 1991-08-16 1994-01-11 Xerox Corporation Iterative technique for phrase query formation and an information retrieval system employing same
US5724567A (en) 1994-04-25 1998-03-03 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
US6029195A (en) 1994-11-29 2000-02-22 Herz; Frederick S. M. System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US6049777A (en) 1995-06-30 2000-04-11 Microsoft Corporation Computer-implemented collaborative filtering based method for recommending an item to a user
US6041311A (en) 1995-06-30 2000-03-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US5918014A (en) 1995-12-27 1999-06-29 Athenium, L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising
US5790935A (en) 1996-01-30 1998-08-04 Hughes Aircraft Company Virtual on-demand digital information delivery system and method
US5704017A (en) 1996-02-16 1997-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative filtering utilizing a belief network
US5983214A (en) 1996-04-04 1999-11-09 Lycos, Inc. System and method employing individual user content-based data and user collaborative feedback data to evaluate the content of an information entity in a large information communication network
US5867799A (en) 1996-04-04 1999-02-02 Lang; Andrew K. Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs
US5790426A (en) 1996-04-30 1998-08-04 Athenium L.L.C. Automated collaborative filtering system
US5884282A (en) 1996-04-30 1999-03-16 Robinson; Gary B. Automated collaborative filtering system
US6138116A (en) 1996-08-01 2000-10-24 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for retrieving data
US6072942A (en) 1996-09-18 2000-06-06 Secure Computing Corporation System and method of electronic mail filtering using interconnected nodes
US6078740A (en) 1996-11-04 2000-06-20 Digital Equipment Corporation Item selection by prediction and refinement
US6006218A (en) 1997-02-28 1999-12-21 Microsoft Methods and apparatus for retrieving and/or processing retrieved information as a function of a user's estimated knowledge
US6029141A (en) 1997-06-27 2000-02-22 Amazon.Com, Inc. Internet-based customer referral system
US6064980A (en) 1998-03-17 2000-05-16 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and methods for collaborative recommendations
US6510406B1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-01-21 Mathsoft, Inc. Inverse inference engine for high performance web search
US6493702B1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2002-12-10 Xerox Corporation System and method for searching and recommending documents in a collection using share bookmarks

Non-Patent Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A. P. Dempster; N. M. Laird; and D. B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, Journal Royal Statistical Society, V. 39, pp. 1-38, 1977.
A. Rao, D. Miller, K. Rose, and A. Gersho, Deterministically annealed mixture of experts models for statistical regression, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 3201-3204, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1997.
D. Gildea and T. Hofmann, Topic-Based Language Models Using EM, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH), 1999.
D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry, Using Collaborative Filtering To Weave An Information Tapestry, Communications of the ACMV. 35, No. 12, pp. 61-70, 1992.
D. Lee and S. Seung Learning The Parts Of Objects By Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Nature, vol. 401, pp. 788-791 1999.
F. Pereira, N. Tishby and L. Lee, Distributional Clustering of English Words, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 183-190, 1993.
J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie, Empirical Analysis Of Predictive Algorithms For Collaborative Filtering, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1998.
K. Rose, E. Gurewitz, and G. Fox, A Deterministic Annealing Approaches Clustering, Pattern Recognition Letters 11, pp. 589-594, 1990.
L. D. Baker and A. K. McCallum, Distributional Clustering Of Words For Text Classification, SIGIR, 1998.
L. H. Ungar and D. P. Foster, A Formal Statistical Approach To Collaborative Filtering, Proceedings of Conference on Automated Leading and Discovery (CONALD), 1998.
L. H. Ungar and D. P. Foster, Clustering Methods For Collaborative Filtering, AAAI Workshop on Recommendation Systems, 1998.
L. Saul and F. Pereira, Aggregate And Mixed-Order Markov Models For Statistical Language Processing, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1997.
M. Evans, Z. Gilula and I. Guttman, Latent Class Analysis of Two-Way Contingency Tables by Bayesian Methods, Biometrika, V. 76, No. 3, pp. 557-563, 1989.
Patrick Baudisch, Joining Collaborative And Content-Based Filtering, CHI '99 Workshop: Interacting with Recommender Systems, 1999.
S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer and R. Harshman, Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1990.
S.T. Dumais, Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), Proceedings of the Text Retrieval conference (TREC-3)), pp. 219-230, 1995.
T. Hofmann and J. Puzicha, Statistical Models for Co-occurrence DataTechnical Report 1625, MIT, 1998.
T. Hofmann, J. Puzicha and M. I. Jordan, Learning from Dyadic Data, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 11, MIT Press. 1999.
T. Hofmann, Learning the Similarity of Documents: An Information-Geometric Approach to Document Retrieval and Categorization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, pp. 914-920, MIT Press, Jun. 2000.
T. K. Landauer and S. T. Dumais, A Solution To Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory Of Acquisition, Induction, And Representation Of Knowledge, Psychological Review, V. 104, No. 2, pp. 211-240, 1997.
Z. Gilula, S. Haberman, Canonical Analysis of Contingency Tables of Maximum Likelihood, Journal of the American Statistical Association, V. 81, No. 395, pp. 780-788, 1986.

Cited By (474)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8892495B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2014-11-18 Blanding Hovenweep, Llc Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-interface therefore
US9535563B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2017-01-03 Blanding Hovenweep, Llc Internet appliance system and method
US20070033221A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2007-02-08 Knova Software Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US20040024739A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-05 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US7401087B2 (en) 1999-06-15 2008-07-15 Consona Crm, Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US8825853B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2014-09-02 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US8626911B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2014-01-07 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US9098813B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2015-08-04 Personalized User Model Methods and systems for conducting a personalized web browser search by probability estimation that is unseen document is of interest to the user
US20060136589A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2006-06-22 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20100122178A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2010-05-13 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US7685276B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2010-03-23 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US7320031B2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2008-01-15 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20080114756A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2008-05-15 Levino Authomatic, personalized online information and product services
US8301764B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2012-10-30 Personalized User Model Method and system for personalized searching of information and product services by estimating an interest to a user
US6981040B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2005-12-27 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US7337158B2 (en) 2000-03-06 2008-02-26 Consona Crm Inc. System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US7539656B2 (en) 2000-03-06 2009-05-26 Consona Crm Inc. System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US20010049688A1 (en) * 2000-03-06 2001-12-06 Raya Fratkina System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US20100280906A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2010-11-04 Lim Stanley T Economic Filtering System for Delivery of Permission Based, Targeted, Incentivized Advertising
US8712834B2 (en) 2000-07-18 2014-04-29 Google Inc. Economic filtering system for delivery of permission based, targeted, incentivized advertising
US8060816B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2011-11-15 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for intelligent crawling on the world wide web
US20060246932A1 (en) * 2001-01-16 2006-11-02 Texas Instruments Incorporated Collaborative Mechanism of Enhanced Coexistence of Collocated Wireless Networks
US20030014399A1 (en) * 2001-03-12 2003-01-16 Hansen Mark H. Method for organizing records of database search activity by topical relevance
US7194454B2 (en) * 2001-03-12 2007-03-20 Lucent Technologies Method for organizing records of database search activity by topical relevance
US20020161747A1 (en) * 2001-03-13 2002-10-31 Mingjing Li Media content search engine incorporating text content and user log mining
US7231381B2 (en) 2001-03-13 2007-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Media content search engine incorporating text content and user log mining
US20040243541A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2004-12-02 Hong-Jiang Zhang Relevance maximizing, iteration minimizing, relevance-feedback, content-based image retrieval (CBIR)
US7113944B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2006-09-26 Microsoft Corporation Relevance maximizing, iteration minimizing, relevance-feedback, content-based image retrieval (CBIR).
US20050131951A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2005-06-16 Microsoft Corporation Relevance maximizing, iteration minimizing, relevance-feedback, content-based image retrieval (CBIR)
US7111002B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2006-09-19 Microsoft Corporation Relevance maximizing, iteration minimizing, relevance-feedback, content-based image retrieval (CBIR)
US20060248044A1 (en) * 2001-03-30 2006-11-02 Microsoft Corporation Relevance Maximizing, Iteration Minimizing, Relevance-Feedback, Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR)
US7546293B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation Relevance maximizing, iteration minimizing, relevance-feedback, content-based image retrieval (CBIR)
US20020160350A1 (en) * 2001-04-26 2002-10-31 Tadashi Tanaka System and method for controlling cooperation learning state
US20030126120A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-07-03 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for multiple data sources to plug into a standardized interface for distributed deep search
US20030158839A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-08-21 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for determining relevancy of query responses in a distributed network search mechanism
US6961723B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2005-11-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for determining relevancy of query responses in a distributed network search mechanism
US7013303B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2006-03-14 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for multiple data sources to plug into a standardized interface for distributed deep search
US20030088544A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-05-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Distributed information discovery
US6934702B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2005-08-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system of routing messages in a distributed search network
US7171415B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2007-01-30 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Distributed information discovery through searching selected registered information providers
US20030050959A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-03-13 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for distributed real-time search
US7099871B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2006-08-29 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for distributed real-time search
US6950821B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2005-09-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for resolving distributed network search queries to information providers
US20030055818A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-03-20 Yaroslav Faybishenko Method and system of routing messages in a distributed search network
US20030050924A1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2003-03-13 Yaroslav Faybishenko System and method for resolving distributed network search queries to information providers
US7389288B2 (en) * 2001-05-24 2008-06-17 Microsoft Corporation System and process for automatically explaining probabilistic predictions
US20050091245A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2005-04-28 Microsoft Corporation System and process for automatically explaining probabilistic predictions
US7409335B1 (en) 2001-06-29 2008-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of answers based on application being employed by the user
US7519529B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2009-04-14 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of results in response to questions posed to an automated information-retrieval or question-answering service
US7430505B1 (en) 2001-06-29 2008-09-30 Microsoft Corporation Inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of answers based at least on device used for searching
US20090037398A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2009-02-05 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of answers
US7778820B2 (en) 2001-06-29 2010-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of answers based on application employed by the user based at least on informational content being displayed to the user at the query is received
US20030018626A1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-01-23 Kay David B. System and method for measuring the quality of information retrieval
US7376620B2 (en) 2001-07-23 2008-05-20 Consona Crm Inc. System and method for measuring the quality of information retrieval
US9760628B2 (en) 2001-08-20 2017-09-12 Masterobjects, Inc. System and method for asynchronous client server session communication
US8539024B2 (en) 2001-08-20 2013-09-17 Masterobjects, Inc. System and method for asynchronous client server session communication
US7092936B1 (en) * 2001-08-22 2006-08-15 Oracle International Corporation System and method for search and recommendation based on usage mining
US20030061239A1 (en) * 2001-09-26 2003-03-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Multimedia searching and browsing system based on user profile
US7860925B1 (en) 2001-10-19 2010-12-28 Outlooksoft Corporation System and method for adaptively selecting and delivering recommendations to a requester
US7231419B1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2007-06-12 Outlooksoft Corporation System and method for adaptively selecting and delivering recommendations to a requester
US20030084066A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-01 Waterman Scott A. Device and method for assisting knowledge engineer in associating intelligence with content
US20030101024A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2003-05-29 Eytan Adar User profile classification by web usage analysis
US7162522B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2007-01-09 Xerox Corporation User profile classification by web usage analysis
US7962471B2 (en) 2001-11-02 2011-06-14 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated User profile classification by web usage analysis
US8005833B2 (en) 2001-11-02 2011-08-23 Xerox Corporation User profile classification by web usage analysis
US20070073681A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2007-03-29 Xerox Corporation. User Profile Classification By Web Usage Analysis
US20070073682A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2007-03-29 Xerox Corporation User Profile Classification By Web Usage Analysis
US20040215663A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2004-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Media agent
US20040220925A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2004-11-04 Microsoft Corporation Media agent
US7283992B2 (en) * 2001-11-30 2007-10-16 Microsoft Corporation Media agent to suggest contextually related media content
US20030105589A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Wen-Yin Liu Media agent
US7493312B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2009-02-17 Microsoft Corporation Media agent
US20070156665A1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2007-07-05 Janusz Wnek Taxonomy discovery
US20030115191A1 (en) * 2001-12-17 2003-06-19 Max Copperman Efficient and cost-effective content provider for customer relationship management (CRM) or other applications
US20040249615A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2004-12-09 Radek Grzeszczuk Surface light field decomposition using non-negative factorization
US7062419B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2006-06-13 Intel Corporation Surface light field decomposition using non-negative factorization
US20030154181A1 (en) * 2002-01-25 2003-08-14 Nec Usa, Inc. Document clustering with cluster refinement and model selection capabilities
US20060009273A2 (en) * 2002-02-14 2006-01-12 Waterleaf Limited Menu Selection System and Method of Operation Thereof
US20050159204A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2005-07-21 Martin Moshal Menu selection system and method of operation thereof
US20030187614A1 (en) * 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 Erik Wallin Method for adjustment of information
US20070239741A1 (en) * 2002-06-12 2007-10-11 Jordahl Jena J Data storage, retrieval, manipulation and display tools enabling multiple hierarchical points of view
US20050086215A1 (en) * 2002-06-14 2005-04-21 Igor Perisic System and method for harmonizing content relevancy across structured and unstructured data
US9792269B2 (en) 2002-07-19 2017-10-17 Open Invention Network, Llc Registry driven interoperability and exchange of documents
US20080229187A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2008-09-18 Mahoney John J Methods and systems for categorizing and indexing human-readable data
US8495073B2 (en) * 2002-08-12 2013-07-23 John J. Mahoney Methods and systems for categorizing and indexing human-readable data
US20040088308A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-05-06 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information analysing apparatus
US6886010B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-04-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US20040064438A1 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-04-01 Kostoff Ronald N. Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US7243085B2 (en) 2003-04-16 2007-07-10 Sony Corporation Hybrid personalization architecture
US8477786B2 (en) 2003-05-06 2013-07-02 Apple Inc. Messaging system and service
US7685117B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2010-03-23 Hayley Logistics Llc Method for implementing search engine
US7890363B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2011-02-15 Hayley Logistics Llc System and method of identifying trendsetters
US20040249713A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-09 Gross John N. Method for implementing online advertising
US7966342B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2011-06-21 Hayley Logistics Llc Method for monitoring link & content changes in web pages
US8103540B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2012-01-24 Hayley Logistics Llc System and method for influencing recommender system
US8751307B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2014-06-10 Hayley Logistics Llc Method for implementing online advertising
US7885849B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2011-02-08 Hayley Logistics Llc System and method for predicting demand for items
US20040249700A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-09 Gross John N. System & method of identifying trendsetters
US8140388B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2012-03-20 Hayley Logistics Llc Method for implementing online advertising
US20040260688A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-23 Gross John N. Method for implementing search engine
US20040267604A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-30 Gross John N. System & method for influencing recommender system
US20040260600A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-23 Gross John N. System & method for predicting demand for items
US7689432B2 (en) 2003-06-06 2010-03-30 Hayley Logistics Llc System and method for influencing recommender system & advertising based on programmed policies
US20040254957A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2004-12-16 Nokia Corporation Method and a system for modeling user preferences
US20040254920A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-16 Brill Eric D. Systems and methods that employ a distributional analysis on a query log to improve search results
US7617202B2 (en) * 2003-06-16 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods that employ a distributional analysis on a query log to improve search results
US8209339B1 (en) 2003-06-17 2012-06-26 Google Inc. Document similarity detection
US8650199B1 (en) 2003-06-17 2014-02-11 Google Inc. Document similarity detection
US7734627B1 (en) * 2003-06-17 2010-06-08 Google Inc. Document similarity detection
US8136025B1 (en) 2003-07-03 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Assigning document identification tags
US8868559B2 (en) 2003-07-03 2014-10-21 Google Inc. Representative document selection for a set of duplicate documents
US20100076954A1 (en) * 2003-07-03 2010-03-25 Daniel Dulitz Representative Document Selection for Sets of Duplicate Dcouments in a Web Crawler System
US7984054B2 (en) 2003-07-03 2011-07-19 Google Inc. Representative document selection for sets of duplicate documents in a web crawler system
US8260781B2 (en) 2003-07-03 2012-09-04 Google Inc. Representative document selection for sets of duplicate documents in a web crawler system
US9411889B2 (en) 2003-07-03 2016-08-09 Google Inc. Assigning document identification tags
US7627613B1 (en) * 2003-07-03 2009-12-01 Google Inc. Duplicate document detection in a web crawler system
US20070174267A1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2007-07-26 David Patterson Computer aided document retrieval
US7747593B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2010-06-29 University Of Ulster Computer aided document retrieval
WO2005036368A3 (en) * 2003-10-10 2006-02-02 Humanizing Technologies Inc Clustering based personalized web experience
US20050102303A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation Computer-implemented method, system and program product for mapping a user data schema to a mining model schema
US20050114360A1 (en) * 2003-11-24 2005-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Computerized data mining system, method and program product
US7523106B2 (en) * 2003-11-24 2009-04-21 International Business Machines Coporation Computerized data mining system, method and program product
US20090144276A1 (en) * 2003-11-24 2009-06-04 Feng-Wei Chen Russell Computerized data mining system and program product
US20050125440A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2005-06-09 Roy Hirst Systems and methods for improving information discovery
US7472118B2 (en) * 2003-12-05 2008-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for improving information discovery
US7987170B2 (en) 2003-12-05 2011-07-26 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for improving information discovery
US20090089271A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2009-04-02 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for improving information discovery
US7082429B2 (en) * 2003-12-10 2006-07-25 National Chiao Tung University Method for web content filtering
US20050202845A1 (en) * 2004-03-01 2005-09-15 Mikio Sasaki Interface device, inferring system, and visual expression method
US7668824B2 (en) * 2004-03-01 2010-02-23 Denso Corporation Interface device, inferring system, and visual expression method
US20050234763A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model augmentation by variable transformation
US20050234762A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Dimension reduction in predictive model development
US8165853B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2012-04-24 Knowledgebase Marketing, Inc. Dimension reduction in predictive model development
US8170841B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2012-05-01 Knowledgebase Marketing, Inc. Predictive model validation
US8751273B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2014-06-10 Brindle Data L.L.C. Predictor variable selection and dimensionality reduction for a predictive model
US7725300B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-05-25 Fortelligent, Inc. Target profiling in predictive modeling
US20050234761A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model development
US7562058B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2009-07-14 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model management using a re-entrant process
US20050234753A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model validation
US7730003B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-06-01 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model augmentation by variable transformation
US7499897B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2009-03-03 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model variable management
US20100010878A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2010-01-14 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model development
US20050234688A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Pinto Stephen K Predictive model generation
US7933762B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2011-04-26 Fortelligent, Inc. Predictive model generation
US7440934B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2008-10-21 Kuelzow Christopher J Method and system for decomposing and categorizing organizational information
US20050246319A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Zybic, Inc. Method and system for decomposing and categorizing organizational information
WO2006014467A3 (en) * 2004-07-06 2007-01-25 Content Analyst Company Llc Taxonomy discovery
WO2006014467A2 (en) * 2004-07-06 2006-02-09 Content Analyst Company, Llc Taxonomy discovery
US8903788B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2014-12-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Synchronizing distributed work through document logs
US7949666B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2011-05-24 Ricoh, Ltd. Synchronizing distributed work through document logs
US20070288441A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2007-12-13 Wolff Gregory J Synchronizing distributed work through document logs
US20060010095A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-12 Wolff Gregory J Synchronizing distributed work through document logs
US20070219942A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2007-09-20 Wolff Gregory J Synchronizing distributed work through document logs
US20060026147A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Cone Julian M Adaptive search engine
US20060053151A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Bio Wisdom Limited Multi-relational ontology structure
US20060053174A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Bio Wisdom Limited System and method for data extraction and management in multi-relational ontology creation
US7505989B2 (en) 2004-09-03 2009-03-17 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating customized ontologies
US20060053382A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for facilitating user interaction with multi-relational ontologies
US7496593B2 (en) * 2004-09-03 2009-02-24 Biowisdom Limited Creating a multi-relational ontology having a predetermined structure
US20060053171A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for curating one or more multi-relational ontologies
US20060053173A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for support of chemical data within multi-relational ontologies
US20060053175A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating, editing, and utilizing one or more rules for multi-relational ontology creation and maintenance
US20060074836A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-04-06 Biowisdom Limited System and method for graphically displaying ontology data
US20060074833A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-04-06 Biowisdom Limited System and method for notifying users of changes in multi-relational ontologies
US7493333B2 (en) 2004-09-03 2009-02-17 Biowisdom Limited System and method for parsing and/or exporting data from one or more multi-relational ontologies
US20060053172A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating, editing, and using multi-relational ontologies
US7657519B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2010-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Forming intent-based clusters and employing same by search
US20060074902A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Forming intent-based clusters and employing same by search
US20060167930A1 (en) * 2004-10-08 2006-07-27 George Witwer Self-organized concept search and data storage method
US7483921B2 (en) * 2004-10-29 2009-01-27 Panasonic Corporation Information retrieval apparatus
US7725486B2 (en) * 2004-10-29 2010-05-25 Panasonic Corporation Information retrieval apparatus
US20060167918A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-07-27 Takashi Tsuzuki Information retrieval apparatus
US20060206471A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-09-14 Takashi Tsuzuki Information retrieval apparatus
US7529765B2 (en) 2004-11-23 2009-05-05 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Methods, apparatus, and program products for performing incremental probabilistic latent semantic analysis
US20060112128A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-25 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Methods, apparatus, and program products for performing incremental probabilitstic latent semantic analysis
US7698270B2 (en) * 2004-12-29 2010-04-13 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20070150466A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for suggesting/disambiguation query terms based upon usage patterns observed
US7702690B2 (en) * 2004-12-29 2010-04-20 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for suggesting/disambiguation query terms based upon usage patterns observed
US8095523B2 (en) 2004-12-29 2012-01-10 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for context-based content recommendation
US20090037355A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2009-02-05 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Context-Based Content Recommendation
US20060200556A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-09-07 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US8601023B2 (en) 2004-12-29 2013-12-03 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20080040314A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2008-02-14 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Identifying, Extracting, Capturing, and Leveraging Expertise and Knowledge
US20080104004A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2008-05-01 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Identifying, Extracting, Capturing, and Leveraging Expertise and Knowledge
US20080133601A1 (en) * 2005-01-05 2008-06-05 Musicstrands, S.A.U. System And Method For Recommending Multimedia Elements
US20100198818A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2010-08-05 Strands, Inc. Dynamic identification of a new set of media items responsive to an input mediaset
US20060173910A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-03 Mclaughlin Matthew R Dynamic identification of a new set of media items responsive to an input mediaset
US7693887B2 (en) 2005-02-01 2010-04-06 Strands, Inc. Dynamic identification of a new set of media items responsive to an input mediaset
US7734569B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2010-06-08 Strands, Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US9262534B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2016-02-16 Apple Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US9576056B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2017-02-21 Apple Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US8312017B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2012-11-13 Apple Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US20110213776A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2011-09-01 Strands, Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US7797321B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2010-09-14 Strands, Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US8543575B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2013-09-24 Apple Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US20060179414A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-10 Musicstrands, Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US8185533B2 (en) * 2005-02-04 2012-05-22 Apple Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US7945568B1 (en) 2005-02-04 2011-05-17 Strands, Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US20060218140A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-09-28 Battelle Memorial Institute Method and apparatus for labeling in steered visual analysis of collections of documents
US20060179051A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-08-10 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods and apparatus for steering the analyses of collections of documents
US20080104047A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2008-05-01 Transaxtions Llc Intelligent search with guiding info
US7792811B2 (en) 2005-02-16 2010-09-07 Transaxtions Llc Intelligent search with guiding info
US20060190225A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Brand Matthew E Collaborative filtering using random walks of Markov chains
US20060230036A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-12 Kei Tateno Information processing apparatus, information processing method and program
US8468156B2 (en) 2005-04-06 2013-06-18 Google Inc. Determining a geographic location relevant to a web page
US7739258B1 (en) 2005-04-06 2010-06-15 Google Inc. Facilitating searches through content which is accessible through web-based forms
US20060230033A1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-12 Halevy Alon Y Searching through content which is accessible through web-based forms
US8037068B2 (en) * 2005-04-06 2011-10-11 Google Inc. Searching through content which is accessible through web-based forms
US7739253B1 (en) * 2005-04-21 2010-06-15 Sonicwall, Inc. Link-based content ratings of pages
US20110125896A1 (en) * 2005-04-22 2011-05-26 Strands, Inc. System and method for acquiring and adding data on the playing of elements or multimedia files
US20090083307A1 (en) * 2005-04-22 2009-03-26 Musicstrands, S.A.U. System and method for acquiring and adding data on the playing of elements or multimedia files
US8312024B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2012-11-13 Apple Inc. System and method for acquiring and adding data on the playing of elements or multimedia files
US7840570B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2010-11-23 Strands, Inc. System and method for acquiring and adding data on the playing of elements or multimedia files
US7844566B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2010-11-30 Content Analyst Company, Llc Latent semantic clustering
US20060242190A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Content Analyst Comapny, Llc Latent semantic taxonomy generation
US20060242098A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Content Analyst Company, Llc Generating representative exemplars for indexing, clustering, categorization and taxonomy
US20060242140A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Content Analyst Company, Llc Latent semantic clustering
US8606781B2 (en) * 2005-04-29 2013-12-10 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Systems and methods for personalized search
US20060248059A1 (en) * 2005-04-29 2006-11-02 Palo Alto Research Center Inc. Systems and methods for personalized search
US20110202400A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2011-08-18 Cbs Interactive, Inc. System and Method for an Electronic Product Advisor
US20060259494A1 (en) * 2005-05-13 2006-11-16 Microsoft Corporation System and method for simultaneous search service and email search
US20060277290A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Sam Shank Compiling and filtering user ratings of products
US7516152B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2009-04-07 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications
US7509337B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2009-03-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting parameters for data mining modeling algorithms in data mining applications
US20070011188A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting a data mining modeling algorithm for data mining applications
US20070011135A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting parameters for data mining modeling algorithms in data mining applications
US7512626B2 (en) 2005-07-05 2009-03-31 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting a data mining modeling algorithm for data mining applications
US20070011187A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for generating and selecting data mining models for data mining applications
US20070016576A1 (en) * 2005-07-13 2007-01-18 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for blocking objectionable multimedia information
US7853618B2 (en) 2005-07-21 2010-12-14 The Boeing Company Methods and apparatus for generic semantic access to information systems
US7536366B2 (en) * 2005-09-15 2009-05-19 Microsoft Corporation Contingency table estimation via sketches
US20070136225A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-06-14 Microsoft Corporation Contingency table estimation via sketches
US20070083506A1 (en) * 2005-09-28 2007-04-12 Liddell Craig M Search engine determining results based on probabilistic scoring of relevance
US7562074B2 (en) * 2005-09-28 2009-07-14 Epacris Inc. Search engine determining results based on probabilistic scoring of relevance
US8745048B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2014-06-03 Apple Inc. Systems and methods for promotional media item selection and promotional program unit generation
US20090070267A9 (en) * 2005-09-30 2009-03-12 Musicstrands, Inc. User programmed media delivery service
US20110119127A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2011-05-19 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for promotional media item selection and promotional program unit generation
US20070265979A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-11-15 Musicstrands, Inc. User programmed media delivery service
US20070078836A1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-04-05 Rick Hangartner Systems and methods for promotional media item selection and promotional program unit generation
US7877387B2 (en) 2005-09-30 2011-01-25 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for promotional media item selection and promotional program unit generation
US8276076B2 (en) * 2005-10-04 2012-09-25 Apple Inc. Methods and apparatus for visualizing a media library
US20070233726A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-10-04 Musicstrands, Inc. Methods and apparatus for visualizing a music library
US7650570B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2010-01-19 Strands, Inc. Methods and apparatus for visualizing a music library
US20100095212A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2010-04-15 Strands, Inc. Methods and apparatus for visualizing a media library
EP1791114A1 (en) 2005-11-25 2007-05-30 Swisscom Mobile Ag A method for personalization of a service
EP2109097A1 (en) 2005-11-25 2009-10-14 Generaldirektion PTT A method for personalization of a service
US20070127692A1 (en) * 2005-12-02 2007-06-07 Satyam Computer Services Ltd. System and method for tracking customer satisfaction index based on intentional context
US7801761B2 (en) 2005-12-02 2010-09-21 Satyam Computer Services Ltd. System and method for tracking customer satisfaction index based on intentional context
US8478781B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2013-07-02 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus, information processing method and program
US20090106195A1 (en) * 2005-12-05 2009-04-23 Sony Corporation Information Processing Apparatus, Information Processing Method and Program
US8356038B2 (en) 2005-12-19 2013-01-15 Apple Inc. User to user recommender
US8996540B2 (en) 2005-12-19 2015-03-31 Apple Inc. User to user recommender
US20070203790A1 (en) * 2005-12-19 2007-08-30 Musicstrands, Inc. User to user recommender
US7962505B2 (en) 2005-12-19 2011-06-14 Strands, Inc. User to user recommender
WO2007075622A3 (en) * 2005-12-19 2008-06-26 Strands Inc User-to-user recommender
US20070162546A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-07-12 Musicstrands, Inc. Sharing tags among individual user media libraries
US20070150515A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining usefulness of a digital asset
US7580930B2 (en) * 2005-12-27 2009-08-25 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for predicting destinations in a navigation context based upon observed usage patterns
US20070150470A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns
US20070150464A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for predicting destinations in a navigation context based upon observed usage patterns
US7856446B2 (en) * 2005-12-27 2010-12-21 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining usefulness of a digital asset
US7693836B2 (en) * 2005-12-27 2010-04-06 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns
US8015194B2 (en) * 2005-12-29 2011-09-06 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Refining based on log content
US7970738B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2011-06-28 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Always on and updated operation for document logs
US20070156777A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Log integrity verification
US20070156672A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Refining based on log content
US20070156683A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Always on and updated operation for document logs
US8095537B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2012-01-10 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Log integrity verification
US20070156632A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Wolff Gregory J Coordination and tracking of workflows
US7849053B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2010-12-07 Ricoh Co. Ltd. Coordination and tracking of workflows
US20080281909A1 (en) * 2005-12-31 2008-11-13 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Information issuing system, public media information issuing system and issuing method
US20070179924A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US7415449B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2008-08-19 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US8037003B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2011-10-11 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20080275834A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2008-11-06 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20090210415A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2009-08-20 Strands, Inc. Mediaset generation system
US8583671B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2013-11-12 Apple Inc. Mediaset generation system
US20070244880A1 (en) * 2006-02-03 2007-10-18 Francisco Martin Mediaset generation system
US7743009B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2010-06-22 Strands, Inc. System and methods for prioritizing mobile media player files
US20090132453A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2009-05-21 Musicstrands, Inc. Systems and methods for prioritizing mobile media player files
US20090222392A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2009-09-03 Strands, Inc. Dymanic interactive entertainment
US8214315B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2012-07-03 Apple Inc. Systems and methods for prioritizing mobile media player files
US9317185B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2016-04-19 Apple Inc. Dynamic interactive entertainment venue
US7987148B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2011-07-26 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for prioritizing media files in a presentation device
US20110166949A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-07-07 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US8521611B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-08-27 Apple Inc. Article trading among members of a community
US20070244768A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-10-18 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US20110161205A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-06-30 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US20070214131A1 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-13 Microsoft Corporation Re-ranking search results based on query log
US7818315B2 (en) * 2006-03-13 2010-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Re-ranking search results based on query log
US20070239431A1 (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Scalable probabilistic latent semantic analysis
US7844449B2 (en) * 2006-03-30 2010-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Scalable probabilistic latent semantic analysis
US7809685B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2010-10-05 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Secure and efficient methods for logging and synchronizing data exchanges
US20120215765A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2012-08-23 Olcan Sercinoglu Systems and Methods for Generating Statistics from Search Engine Query Logs
US20070276831A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-29 Nhn Corporation Method for retrieving keyword showing difference between two groups and system for executing the method
US9262767B2 (en) * 2006-05-09 2016-02-16 Google Inc. Systems and methods for generating statistics from search engine query logs
US7958118B2 (en) * 2006-05-09 2011-06-07 Nhn Corporation Method for retrieving keyword showing difference between two groups and system for executing the method
US20080010258A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-01-10 Infosys Technologies Ltd. Collaborative filtering-based recommendations
US8468155B2 (en) * 2006-06-22 2013-06-18 Infosys Limited Collaborative filtering-based recommendations
US8965874B1 (en) 2006-08-04 2015-02-24 Google Inc. Dynamic aggregation of users
US8479004B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2013-07-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd Paper-based document logging
US7930197B2 (en) * 2006-09-28 2011-04-19 Microsoft Corporation Personal data mining
US20080082393A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Personal data mining
US20100328312A1 (en) * 2006-10-20 2010-12-30 Justin Donaldson Personal music recommendation mapping
US7822750B2 (en) 2007-01-17 2010-10-26 Aptima, Inc Method and system to compare data entities
US20080250064A1 (en) * 2007-01-17 2008-10-09 Aptima, Inc. Method and system to compare data entities
US20080183685A1 (en) * 2007-01-26 2008-07-31 Yahoo! Inc. System for classifying a search query
US7603348B2 (en) * 2007-01-26 2009-10-13 Yahoo! Inc. System for classifying a search query
US8407219B1 (en) 2007-02-16 2013-03-26 Google Inc. Collaborative filtering
US8135718B1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Collaborative filtering
US9177048B1 (en) 2007-02-16 2015-11-03 Google Inc. Collaborative filtering
US8407226B1 (en) 2007-02-16 2013-03-26 Google Inc. Collaborative filtering
US8374985B1 (en) 2007-02-19 2013-02-12 Google Inc. Presenting a diversity of recommendations
US8065254B1 (en) 2007-02-19 2011-11-22 Google Inc. Presenting a diversity of recommendations
US8006094B2 (en) 2007-02-21 2011-08-23 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Trustworthy timestamps and certifiable clocks using logs linked by cryptographic hashes
US8412946B2 (en) 2007-02-21 2013-04-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Trustworthy timestamps and certifiable clocks using logs linked by cryptographic hashes
US20080222105A1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Joseph Matheny Entity recommendation system using restricted information tagged to selected entities
US8185461B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2012-05-22 Expanse Networks, Inc. Longevity analysis and modifiable attribute identification
US20080228723A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition Prediction Using Attribute Combinations
US8655908B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2014-02-18 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Predisposition modification
US8458121B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2013-06-04 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition prediction using attribute combinations
US8051033B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2011-11-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition prediction using attribute combinations
US8655899B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2014-02-18 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Attribute method and system
US8055643B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2011-11-08 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition modification
US8606761B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2013-12-10 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Lifestyle optimization and behavior modification
US8065324B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2011-11-22 Expanse Networks, Inc. Weight and diet attribute combination discovery
US9582647B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2017-02-28 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Attribute combination discovery for predisposition determination
US20110184944A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2011-07-28 Expanse Networks, Inc. Longevity analysis and modifiable attribute identification
US20080228767A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Attribute Method and System
US20110040791A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2011-02-17 Expanse Networks, Inc. Weight and Diet Attribute Combination Discovery
US20110016105A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2011-01-20 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition Modification
US20080228735A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Lifestyle Optimization and Behavior Modification
US20080228768A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Individual Identification by Attribute
US20080227063A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc Career Selection and Psychological Profiling
US8788283B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2014-07-22 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Modifiable attribute identification
US20110184656A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2011-07-28 Expanse Networks, Inc. Efficiently Determining Condition Relevant Modifiable Lifestyle Attributes
US9170992B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2015-10-27 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Treatment determination and impact analysis
US20080228705A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Predisposition Modification Using Co-associating Bioattributes
US8224835B2 (en) 2007-03-16 2012-07-17 Expanse Networks, Inc. Expanding attribute profiles
US20080228797A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Creation of Attribute Combination Databases Using Expanded Attribute Profiles
US20080243751A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Michael Gormish Method and Apparatus for Recording Associations with Logs
US20080243688A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Hart Peter E Method and Apparatus for Recording Transactions with a Portable Logging Device
US8996483B2 (en) 2007-03-28 2015-03-31 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for recording associations with logs
US20080250323A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-10-09 Huff Gerald B Method and apparatus for recommending an application-feature to a user
US20080270242A1 (en) * 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Cvon Innovations Ltd. Method and arrangement for providing content to multimedia devices
US8671000B2 (en) 2007-04-24 2014-03-11 Apple Inc. Method and arrangement for providing content to multimedia devices
US20080270250A1 (en) * 2007-04-26 2008-10-30 Ebay Inc. Flexible asset and search recommendation engines
US8050998B2 (en) 2007-04-26 2011-11-01 Ebay Inc. Flexible asset and search recommendation engines
US7953724B2 (en) 2007-05-02 2011-05-31 Thomson Reuters (Scientific) Inc. Method and system for disambiguating informational objects
US9183290B2 (en) 2007-05-02 2015-11-10 Thomas Reuters Global Resources Method and system for disambiguating informational objects
US20080275859A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Thomson Corporation Method and system for disambiguating informational objects
US8027977B2 (en) * 2007-06-20 2011-09-27 Microsoft Corporation Recommending content using discriminatively trained document similarity
US20080319973A1 (en) * 2007-06-20 2008-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Recommending content using discriminatively trained document similarity
US20090019027A1 (en) * 2007-07-09 2009-01-15 Microsoft Corporation Disambiguating residential listing search results
US7949651B2 (en) 2007-07-09 2011-05-24 Microsoft Corporaiton Disambiguating residential listing search results
US9292483B2 (en) * 2007-07-10 2016-03-22 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent text annotation
US20090019356A1 (en) * 2007-07-10 2009-01-15 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent Text Annotation
US8788286B2 (en) 2007-08-08 2014-07-22 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Side effects prediction using co-associating bioattributes
US9081852B2 (en) * 2007-10-05 2015-07-14 Fujitsu Limited Recommending terms to specify ontology space
US20090094020A1 (en) * 2007-10-05 2009-04-09 Fujitsu Limited Recommending Terms To Specify Ontology Space
US20090125934A1 (en) * 2007-11-11 2009-05-14 Microsoft Corporation User rating mechanism for media content
US8176144B2 (en) * 2007-12-06 2012-05-08 Eastman Kodak Company Pseudo real time indexing of digital media files
US20090150519A1 (en) * 2007-12-06 2009-06-11 Eastman Kodak Company Pseudo real time indexing of digital media files
US20090187551A1 (en) * 2008-01-17 2009-07-23 Oracle International Corporation Search results when searching for records of a business object
US7904530B2 (en) * 2008-01-29 2011-03-08 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Method and apparatus for automatically incorporating hypothetical context information into recommendation queries
US20090193099A1 (en) * 2008-01-29 2009-07-30 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Method and apparatus for automatically incorporating hypothetical context information into recommendation queries
US20090234825A1 (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-17 Fujitsu Limited Information distribution system and information distribution method
US8326847B2 (en) * 2008-03-22 2012-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Graph search system and method for querying loosely integrated data
US20090240682A1 (en) * 2008-03-22 2009-09-24 International Business Machines Corporation Graph search system and method for querying loosely integrated data
US9081853B2 (en) 2008-04-03 2015-07-14 Graham Holdings Company Information display system based on user profile data with assisted and explicit profile modification
US20090254838A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-08 Icurrent, Inc. Information display system based on user profile data with assisted and explicit profile modification
US9727532B2 (en) * 2008-04-25 2017-08-08 Xerox Corporation Clustering using non-negative matrix factorization on sparse graphs
US20090271148A1 (en) * 2008-04-25 2009-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Cold-start in situation-aware systems
US8234893B2 (en) * 2008-04-25 2012-08-07 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Cold-start in situation-aware systems
US20090271433A1 (en) * 2008-04-25 2009-10-29 Xerox Corporation Clustering using non-negative matrix factorization on sparse graphs
US20090276368A1 (en) * 2008-04-28 2009-11-05 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for providing personalized recommendations of products and services based on explicit and implicit user data and feedback
US20090276351A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Strands, Inc. Scaleable system and method for distributed prediction markets
US20090276722A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Jonathan Segel Method and apparatus for dual mode content searching, selection, delivery, and playout
US20090300008A1 (en) * 2008-05-31 2009-12-03 Strands, Inc. Adaptive recommender technology
US20090299945A1 (en) * 2008-06-03 2009-12-03 Strands, Inc. Profile modeling for sharing individual user preferences
US20090327228A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2009-12-31 Microsoft Corporation Balancing the costs of sharing private data with the utility of enhanced personalization of online services
US20090327270A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2009-12-31 Microsoft Corporation Using Variation in User Interest to Enhance the Search Experience
US8346749B2 (en) * 2008-06-27 2013-01-01 Microsoft Corporation Balancing the costs of sharing private data with the utility of enhanced personalization of online services
US9372888B2 (en) 2008-07-29 2016-06-21 Oracle International Corporation Reducing lag time when searching a repository using a keyword search
US20100030762A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Oracle International Corporation Reducing lag time when searching a repository using a keyword search
US8745079B2 (en) 2008-07-29 2014-06-03 Oracle International Corporation Reducing lag time when searching a repository using a keyword search
US8090794B1 (en) * 2008-08-25 2012-01-03 Intuit Inc. Technique for customizing displayed content
US8200509B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2012-06-12 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked data record access
US8452619B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2013-05-28 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked data record access
US20100076950A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-25 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked Data Service Selection
US20100063843A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked Data Record Access
US8326648B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2012-12-04 Expanse Networks, Inc. System for secure mobile healthcare selection
US8458097B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2013-06-04 Expanse Networks, Inc. System, method and software for healthcare selection based on pangenetic data
US20100063830A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Expanse Networks, Inc. Masked Data Provider Selection
US20110153356A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2011-06-23 Expanse Networks, Inc. System, Method and Software for Healthcare Selection Based on Pangenetic Data
US20100088512A1 (en) * 2008-10-02 2010-04-08 Schwartz Edward L Method and Apparatus for Automatically Publishing Content Based Identifiers
US8332406B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2012-12-11 Apple Inc. Real-time visualization of user consumption of media items
US8185733B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2012-05-22 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for automatically publishing content based identifiers
US20100100516A1 (en) * 2008-10-20 2010-04-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Predicting User-Item Ratings
US8103675B2 (en) * 2008-10-20 2012-01-24 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Predicting user-item ratings
US20100100517A1 (en) * 2008-10-21 2010-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Future data event prediction using a generative model
US8126891B2 (en) * 2008-10-21 2012-02-28 Microsoft Corporation Future data event prediction using a generative model
US20100169340A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic Web Item Recommendation System
US8255403B2 (en) 2008-12-30 2012-08-28 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic web satisfaction prediction system
US8386519B2 (en) 2008-12-30 2013-02-26 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic web item recommendation system
US20100169342A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic Web Satisfaction Prediction System
US20100169262A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Mobile Device for Pangenetic Web
US9031870B2 (en) 2008-12-30 2015-05-12 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Pangenetic web user behavior prediction system
US20100169313A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Expanse Networks, Inc. Pangenetic Web Item Feedback System
US8655915B2 (en) 2008-12-30 2014-02-18 Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. Pangenetic web item recommendation system
US20100169328A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-01 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for making recommendations using model-based collaborative filtering with user communities and items collections
US8768960B2 (en) * 2009-01-20 2014-07-01 Microsoft Corporation Enhancing keyword advertising using online encyclopedia semantics
US20100185689A1 (en) * 2009-01-20 2010-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Enhancing Keyword Advertising Using Wikipedia Semantics
US20100211533A1 (en) * 2009-02-18 2010-08-19 Microsoft Corporation Extracting structured data from web forums
US9245033B2 (en) 2009-04-02 2016-01-26 Graham Holdings Company Channel sharing
US9881080B2 (en) 2009-04-22 2018-01-30 Microsoft Israel Research And Development (2002) Ltd System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8346685B1 (en) 2009-04-22 2013-01-01 Equivio Ltd. Computerized system for enhancing expert-based processes and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8527523B1 (en) 2009-04-22 2013-09-03 Equivio Ltd. System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8533194B1 (en) 2009-04-22 2013-09-10 Equivio Ltd. System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US9411892B2 (en) 2009-04-22 2016-08-09 Microsoft Israel Research And Development (2002) Ltd System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US8914376B2 (en) 2009-04-22 2014-12-16 Equivio Ltd. System for enhancing expert-based computerized analysis of a set of digital documents and methods useful in conjunction therewith
US20100306235A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Yahoo! Inc. Real-Time Detection of Emerging Web Search Queries
US9678623B2 (en) 2009-06-11 2017-06-13 Apple Inc. User interface for media playback
US20110029928A1 (en) * 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Apple Inc. System and method for displaying interactive cluster-based media playlists
US20110060738A1 (en) * 2009-09-08 2011-03-10 Apple Inc. Media item clustering based on similarity data
US8620919B2 (en) 2009-09-08 2013-12-31 Apple Inc. Media item clustering based on similarity data
US20110213761A1 (en) * 2010-03-01 2011-09-01 Microsoft Corporation Searchable web site discovery and recommendation
US8650172B2 (en) * 2010-03-01 2014-02-11 Microsoft Corporation Searchable web site discovery and recommendation
US20110225192A1 (en) * 2010-03-11 2011-09-15 Imig Scott K Auto-detection of historical search context
US8972397B2 (en) 2010-03-11 2015-03-03 Microsoft Corporation Auto-detection of historical search context
US8706659B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2014-04-22 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8909568B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2014-12-09 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US9189747B2 (en) 2010-05-14 2015-11-17 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8473431B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-06-25 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8438122B1 (en) 2010-05-14 2013-05-07 Google Inc. Predictive analytic modeling platform
US8489538B1 (en) 2010-05-25 2013-07-16 Recommind, Inc. Systems and methods for predictive coding
US8554716B1 (en) 2010-05-25 2013-10-08 Recommind, Inc. Systems and methods for predictive coding
US7933859B1 (en) * 2010-05-25 2011-04-26 Recommind, Inc. Systems and methods for predictive coding
US9595005B1 (en) 2010-05-25 2017-03-14 Recommind, Inc. Systems and methods for predictive coding
US8666915B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2014-03-04 Sony Corporation Method and device for information retrieval
US20120030711A1 (en) * 2010-07-28 2012-02-02 Yahoo! Inc. Method or system to predict media content preferences
US9137574B2 (en) * 2010-07-28 2015-09-15 Yahoo! Inc. Method or system to predict media content preferences
US9529822B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2016-12-27 Yahoo! Inc. Media or content tagging determined by user credibility signals
US8924395B2 (en) 2010-10-06 2014-12-30 Planet Data Solutions System and method for indexing electronic discovery data
US9160808B2 (en) 2010-11-17 2015-10-13 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Transmitting product information
US8595154B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2013-11-26 Google Inc. Dynamic predictive modeling platform
US8396871B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2013-03-12 DiscoverReady LLC Document classification and characterization
US8533222B2 (en) * 2011-01-26 2013-09-10 Google Inc. Updateable predictive analytical modeling
US20120191630A1 (en) * 2011-01-26 2012-07-26 Google Inc. Updateable Predictive Analytical Modeling
US9703863B2 (en) 2011-01-26 2017-07-11 DiscoverReady LLC Document classification and characterization
US9239986B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2016-01-19 Google Inc. Assessing accuracy of trained predictive models
US8533224B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2013-09-10 Google Inc. Assessing accuracy of trained predictive models
US9785634B2 (en) 2011-06-04 2017-10-10 Recommind, Inc. Integration and combination of random sampling and document batching
US8533195B2 (en) 2011-06-27 2013-09-10 Microsoft Corporation Regularized latent semantic indexing for topic modeling
US8489632B1 (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-07-16 Google Inc. Predictive model training management
US9141622B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-09-22 Google Inc. Feature weight training techniques
US8983905B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2015-03-17 Apple Inc. Merging playlists from multiple sources
US9667514B1 (en) 2012-01-30 2017-05-30 DiscoverReady LLC Electronic discovery system with statistical sampling
US9317588B1 (en) * 2012-03-22 2016-04-19 Google Inc. Resource identification from organic and structured content
US9589028B1 (en) 2012-03-22 2017-03-07 Google Inc. Resource identification from organic and structured content
US9477757B1 (en) 2012-06-14 2016-10-25 Google Inc. Latent user models for personalized ranking
US9189965B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2015-11-17 International Business Machines Corporation Enhancing posted content in discussion forums
US9760622B2 (en) 2012-08-08 2017-09-12 Microsoft Israel Research And Development (2002) Ltd. System and method for computerized batching of huge populations of electronic documents
US9002842B2 (en) 2012-08-08 2015-04-07 Equivio Ltd. System and method for computerized batching of huge populations of electronic documents
US9471581B1 (en) 2013-02-23 2016-10-18 Bryant Christopher Lee Autocompletion of filename based on text in a file to be saved
US8620842B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2013-12-31 Gordon Villy Cormack Systems and methods for classifying electronic information using advanced active learning techniques
US8838606B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-16 Gordon Villy Cormack Systems and methods for classifying electronic information using advanced active learning techniques
US8713023B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-04-29 Gordon Villy Cormack Systems and methods for classifying electronic information using advanced active learning techniques
US9678957B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-06-13 Gordon Villy Cormack Systems and methods for classifying electronic information using advanced active learning techniques
US9122681B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-09-01 Gordon Villy Cormack Systems and methods for classifying electronic information using advanced active learning techniques
US20150170038A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-18 Industrial Technology Research Institute Method And System For Generating Item Recommendation
US9836765B2 (en) 2014-05-19 2017-12-05 Kibo Software, Inc. System and method for context-aware recommendation through user activity change detection
US9703658B2 (en) * 2015-08-21 2017-07-11 Synopsys, Inc. Identifying failure mechanisms based on a population of scan diagnostic reports
US20170052861A1 (en) * 2015-08-21 2017-02-23 Synopsys, Inc. Identifying failure mechanisms based on a population of scan diagnostic reports

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20040034652A1 (en) 2004-02-19 application
US7328216B2 (en) 2008-02-05 grant
US20020107853A1 (en) 2002-08-08 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lika et al. Facing the cold start problem in recommender systems
Sheth et al. Semantics for the semantic web: The implicit, the formal and the powerful
Hüllermeier Fuzzy methods in machine learning and data mining: Status and prospects
Jannach et al. Recommender systems: an introduction
Zhu et al. StatSnowball: a statistical approach to extracting entity relationships
McCallum et al. Automating the construction of internet portals with machine learning
Liu et al. Enhancing collaborative filtering by user interest expansion via personalized ranking
Degemmis et al. A content-collaborative recommender that exploits WordNet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation
Anderson et al. Relational Markov models and their application to adaptive web navigation
Liu et al. Mining topic-specific concepts and definitions on the web
Avesani et al. A large scale taxonomy mapping evaluation
Mooney et al. Book recommending using text categorization with extracted information
US7272594B1 (en) Method and apparatus to link to a related document
Baraglia et al. Dynamic personalization of web sites without user intervention
US6981040B1 (en) Automatic, personalized online information and product services
Turtle et al. A comparison of text retrieval models
Soman et al. Machine learning with SVM and other kernel methods
Li et al. Pachinko allocation: DAG-structured mixture models of topic correlations
Hotho et al. A brief survey of text mining.
Arotaritei et al. Web mining: a survey in the fuzzy framework
Roussinov et al. A scalable self-organizing map algorithm for textual classification: A neural network approach to thesaurus generation
US6868411B2 (en) Fuzzy text categorizer
US7289985B2 (en) Enhanced document retrieval
De Gemmis et al. Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender
US7305389B2 (en) Content propagation for enhanced document retrieval

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: RECOMMIND INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOFMANN, THOMAS;PUZICHA, JAN CHRISTIAN;REEL/FRAME:012605/0651;SIGNING DATES FROM 20011127 TO 20011212

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
SULP Surcharge for late payment
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12