TWI410083B - Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic - Google Patents

Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI410083B
TWI410083B TW97134349A TW97134349A TWI410083B TW I410083 B TWI410083 B TW I410083B TW 97134349 A TW97134349 A TW 97134349A TW 97134349 A TW97134349 A TW 97134349A TW I410083 B TWI410083 B TW I410083B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
file
enterprise
node
internal network
value
Prior art date
Application number
TW97134349A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201012125A (en
Inventor
Shin Guang Chen
Yi Kuei Lin
Original Assignee
Shin Guang Chen
Yi Kuei Lin
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shin Guang Chen, Yi Kuei Lin filed Critical Shin Guang Chen
Priority to TW97134349A priority Critical patent/TWI410083B/en
Publication of TW201012125A publication Critical patent/TW201012125A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI410083B publication Critical patent/TWI410083B/en

Links

Abstract

A method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise is applied in a software. The software includes a network model. The network model has a plurality of nodes, and each the node corresponds to one of the persons of the internal network. Each the person is tested in capacity to get a test result. The test result is described depending on a first fuzzy set to define a grade of the node. The grade is transformed into a probability distribution range. Then, the probability distribution ranges corresponding to all nodes are transformed into a system reliability. The system reliability is transformed into a linguistic performance index depending on a second fuzzy set, and then the linguistic performance index is shown in a display.

Description

利用模糊邏輯評估企業內部網路效能的方法Method of using fuzzy logic to evaluate enterprise internal network performance

本發明係關於一種企業內部網路效能評估方法,特別是關於一種利用模糊邏輯評估企業內部網路效能的方法。The present invention relates to an enterprise internal network performance evaluation method, and more particularly to a method for utilizing fuzzy logic to evaluate an enterprise internal network performance.

企業資源規劃系統(ERP)是採用一種新的管理模式來改造舊的企業內部網路之管理模式的系統,對於企業的財力、人力、資訊、技術、及硬體資源做一更有效的調配與利用,以期更有效的完成企業業務需求。Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is a system that uses a new management model to transform the management model of the old corporate intranet. It provides a more efficient deployment of financial, human, information, technology, and hardware resources. Use, in order to more effectively complete the business needs of the enterprise.

習知的研究大多著重在企業如何成功導入ERP系統,也就是探討企業導入ERP系統過程中所必須實行的調適方式,例如:組織變革、流程變更、專案成員的角色變更、導入成本及對專案時程的影響、ERP系統的升級…等對企業原本生態有重大影響的變革,從而探討出一個成功導入ERP系統的策略方法。Most of the researches in the study focus on how to successfully import ERP systems, that is, to explore the adjustment methods that enterprises must implement in the process of importing ERP systems, such as organizational changes, process changes, role changes of project members, import costs, and project considerations. The impact of the process, the upgrade of the ERP system, etc., and other changes that have a significant impact on the original ecology of the enterprise, thus exploring a strategic approach to successful introduction of the ERP system.

然而,在企業導入ERP系統來管理其員工所組成的企業內部網路之後,仍必須對企業內部網路的效能作評估。但一般的網路效能評估方法大都用來評估網際網路(Internet)或交通運輸網路等由機器或道路等硬體所組成的網路之效能,其無法有效評估由人員所組成的企業內部網路的效能。因此,需要提供一種有效的評估方法供企業經營者去預估ERP系統所管理的企業內部網路在單位時間內所能完成的工作量,進而估算該ERP系統所帶來的效益。However, after an enterprise imports an ERP system to manage the internal network of its employees, it must still evaluate the effectiveness of the internal network of the enterprise. However, most of the general network performance evaluation methods are used to evaluate the performance of a network composed of hardware such as machines or roads, such as the Internet or a transportation network, which cannot effectively evaluate the internal enterprise composed of personnel. The effectiveness of the network. Therefore, it is necessary to provide an effective evaluation method for the enterprise operator to estimate the workload that the ERP system manages the internal network of the enterprise in a unit time, and then estimate the benefits brought by the ERP system.

本發明之目的在於提供一種企業內部網路效能評估方 法,可用以評估由人員所組成的網路之工作效能。The purpose of the present invention is to provide an enterprise internal network performance evaluation party. Law, which can be used to assess the performance of a network of people.

本發明的其他目的和優點可以從本發明所揭露的技術特徵中得到進一步的了解。Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the technical features disclosed herein.

為達上述之一或部份或全部目的或是其他目的,本發明之一實施例提供一種企業內部網路效能評估方法,係應用於一軟體程式中,以評估一企業內部網路的效能。上述軟體程式係包括一網路模型、一機率函數表、一系統可靠度函數、一第一模糊集合及一第二模糊集合。上述網路模型包括複數個節點以對應企業內部網路之複數個員工。In order to achieve one or a part or all of the above or other purposes, an embodiment of the present invention provides an enterprise internal network performance evaluation method, which is applied to a software program to evaluate the performance of an enterprise internal network. The software program includes a network model, a probability function table, a system reliability function, a first fuzzy set, and a second fuzzy set. The above network model includes a plurality of nodes to correspond to a plurality of employees of the internal network of the enterprise.

上述實施例之方法步驟如下:對每一節點所對應的員工進行一測驗程序,以獲得一測驗結果;以第一模糊集合描述員工的測驗結果,以定義節點的一能力等級;以機率函數表將能力等級轉換為一機率分佈範圍,機率分佈範圍係對應節點的能力等級;以系統可靠度函數對所有的節點所對應的機率分佈範圍進行一運算,以得到一系統可靠度值;根據第二模糊集合,對系統可靠度值執行一模糊邏輯運算,以得到一具有文字描述的語言性效能指標;以及將語言性效能指標呈現於一顯示螢幕上。The method steps of the above embodiment are as follows: a test procedure is performed on the employee corresponding to each node to obtain a test result; the test result of the employee is described by the first fuzzy set to define a capability level of the node; The capability level is converted into a probability distribution range, and the probability distribution range is the capability level of the corresponding node; the system reliability value is used to perform an operation on the probability distribution range corresponding to all nodes to obtain a system reliability value; The fuzzy set performs a fuzzy logic operation on the system reliability value to obtain a linguistic performance indicator with a text description; and presents the linguistic performance indicator on a display screen.

上述的軟體程式係儲存於一記錄媒體中,其係包含於一企業資源規劃系統或一顧客關係管理系統等的電腦系統中,係藉由一微處理器來執行其運算。更詳細地說明該方法之步驟如下:提供一網路模型於軟體程式中,網路模型係對應於企業內部網路,其包括複數個節點,該些節點係對應於該些員工,並且形成複數個文件流動路徑;在網路模型中定義每一節點具有一文件容量值,而每個文件流動路徑具有一文件 流量值,其中文件容量值與文件流量值具有一第一運算關係,所有節點的文件容量值所形成的群組係被定義為一容量向量,而所有文件流動路徑的文件流量值所形成的群組係被定義為一流量向量;決定網路模型之總流量的一期望值,並將期望值儲存於記錄媒體中;對每一節點所對應的員工進行一測驗程序,以獲得一測驗結果;以一模糊集合描述員工的測驗結果,以定義節點的一能力等級;以機率函數表將能力等級轉換為一機率分佈範圍,機率分佈範圍係對應節點的能力等級,並儲存於記錄媒體中;查詢記錄媒體中的機率分佈範圍,以選定每一節點之一最大文件容量值;執行軟體程式,以讀取記錄媒體中的期望值及最大文件容量值,並根據該第一運算關係以得到所有可能的流量向量;再根據所有可能的流量向量及該第一運算關係,計算所有可能的容量向量;由所有可能的容量向量中,選出一最小容量向量;提供一系統可靠度函數,其包括機率分佈範圍及最小容量向量與一系統可靠度值之一第二運算關係;根據該第二運算關係,計算網路模型能成功處理之總流量不小於期望值時的系統可靠度值;對系統可靠度值進行一模糊邏輯運算,而轉換得到系統可靠度值對應的一語言性效能指標,並將語言性效能指標呈現於一顯示螢幕上。The software program described above is stored in a recording medium, which is included in a computer system such as an enterprise resource planning system or a customer relationship management system, and is executed by a microprocessor. The steps of the method are described in more detail as follows: a network model is provided in the software program, and the network model corresponds to the internal network of the enterprise, and includes a plurality of nodes corresponding to the employees and forming a plurality of File flow path; each node defined in the network model has a file capacity value, and each file flow path has a file The flow value, wherein the file capacity value has a first operational relationship with the file flow value, and the group formed by the file capacity values of all nodes is defined as a capacity vector, and the group formed by the file flow values of all file flow paths The group is defined as a flow vector; an expected value of the total flow of the network model is determined, and the expected value is stored in the recording medium; a test procedure is performed on the employee corresponding to each node to obtain a test result; The fuzzy set describes the test result of the employee to define a capability level of the node; the probability level is converted into a probability distribution range by the probability function table, and the probability distribution range is the capability level of the corresponding node, and is stored in the recording medium; querying the recording medium The probability distribution range in which to select the maximum file capacity value of each node; execute a software program to read the expected value and the maximum file capacity value in the recording medium, and obtain all possible traffic vectors according to the first operational relationship Calculate all possible capacitances based on all possible traffic vectors and the first operational relationship a vector; a minimum capacity vector is selected from all possible capacity vectors; a system reliability function is provided, including a probability distribution range and a second operational relationship between the minimum capacity vector and a system reliability value; according to the second operation Relationship, calculate the system reliability value when the total flow of the network model can be successfully processed is not less than the expected value; perform a fuzzy logic operation on the system reliability value, and convert to obtain a language performance indicator corresponding to the system reliability value, and The linguistic performance indicators are presented on a display screen.

在一較佳實施例中,對系統可靠度值進行一模糊邏輯運算之步驟係利用系統可靠度函數之反函數執行模糊邏輯運算以獲得語言性效能指標。In a preferred embodiment, the step of performing a fuzzy logic operation on the system reliability value performs a fuzzy logic operation using an inverse function of the system reliability function to obtain a linguistic performance indicator.

在一較佳實施例中,複數個節點係包括一起始節點、複數個中繼節點及一終端節點,所有文件流動路徑皆由起始節 點開始,經過些中繼節點,而結束於終端節點。形成複數個文件流動路徑之步驟包括:定義網路模型中每兩節點之間具有至少一程序先後關係;以及根據些程序先後關係,定義網路模型的複數個文件流動路徑。In a preferred embodiment, the plurality of nodes includes a start node, a plurality of relay nodes, and a terminal node, and all file flow paths are from the start node. The point starts, passes through some relay nodes, and ends at the terminal node. The step of forming a plurality of file flow paths includes: defining at least one program sequence relationship between each node in the network model; and defining a plurality of file flow paths of the network model according to the program sequence relationship.

在一較佳實施例中,文件容量值與文件流量值之運算關係包括:通過同一節點的所有文件流動路徑之所有文件流量值的總合不大於最大文件容量值;以及在同一時間點時,通過同一節點的所有文件流動路徑之所有文件流量值的總合不大於節點當時的文件容量值。In a preferred embodiment, the operational relationship between the file capacity value and the file flow value includes: the sum of all file flow values of all file flow paths through the same node is not greater than the maximum file capacity value; and at the same time point, The sum of all file traffic values through all file flow paths of the same node is not greater than the file capacity value of the node at that time.

在一較佳實施例中,對每一節點所對應的每一員工進行測驗程序的步驟包括:提供複數個測驗容量對每一員工進行測驗;將員工對每一測驗容量的測驗結果記錄於記錄媒體中;提供複數成員函數;於軟體程式中建立機率函數表,其包括該些成員函數、該些測驗容量、該些能力等級及該機率分佈範圍之對應關係;以及根據測驗容量及能力等級,查詢機率函數表以獲得在每一節點具有不同的能力等級時,所分別對應的機率分佈範圍。In a preferred embodiment, the step of performing a test procedure for each employee corresponding to each node includes: providing a plurality of test capacities for each employee to be tested; and recording the test results of the employee for each test capacity in the record In the medium; providing a plurality of member functions; establishing a probability function table in the software program, including the member functions, the test capacity, the capability levels, and the relationship between the probability distribution ranges; and, according to the test capacity and the capability level, The probability function table is queried to obtain a range of probability distributions corresponding to each node having different capability levels.

利用上述實施例,只需了解每個員工的文件處理能力,即可評估該企業內部網路的效能,並得到一語言性的效能指標。With the above embodiments, it is only necessary to know the file processing capability of each employee, and then the performance of the internal network of the enterprise can be evaluated, and a language performance indicator can be obtained.

有關本發明之前述及其他技術內容、特點與功效,在以下配合參考圖式之一較佳實施例的詳細說明中,將可清楚的呈現。The above and other technical contents, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.

本發明係關於一種效能評估的方法,用以評估一企業內 部網路的效能,特別是採用企業資源規劃系統(ERP)或是顧客關係管理系統(Customer Relationship Management,CRM)的企業內部網路。本文所稱之企業內部網路係由複數個員工,以及員工處理文件的程序先後關係所組成。The present invention relates to a method for evaluating effectiveness for evaluating an enterprise The effectiveness of the network, especially the enterprise internal network using Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) or Customer Relationship Management (CRM). The internal network of the enterprise referred to in this paper consists of a number of employees and the program-by-sequence relationship between the employees and the documents.

本發明之方法係先對企業內部網路中的員工劃分其工作能力等級,例如以“excellent”、“good”、“normal”、“bad”、“failed”等單字來描述員工能力等級,再將員工能力等級的相關資料輸入一電腦系統中,並利用該電腦系統進行一模糊邏輯的運算,而將員工能力等級的相關資料轉換成一具有文字敘述的語言性效能指標(Linguistic Performance Index),例如以“Declined”、“Recertified”、“Acceptable”等文字來評定企業內部網路的效能。附帶一提的是,執行本效能評估方法的電腦系統至少包括一軟體程式,其儲存於一記錄媒體中,並且藉由一微處理器來執行其運算。The method of the present invention first classifies the employees in the internal network of the enterprise by their work ability level, for example, the words "excellent", "good", "normal", "bad", "failed" and the like are used to describe the employee's ability level. Input the relevant information of the employee's ability level into a computer system, and use the computer system to perform a fuzzy logic operation, and convert the relevant data of the employee's ability level into a Linguistic Performance Index with text narrative, for example Use "Declined", "Recertified", "Acceptable" and other words to assess the effectiveness of the company's internal network. Incidentally, the computer system for performing the performance evaluation method includes at least a software program stored in a recording medium and performing an operation thereof by a microprocessor.

圖一為本效能評估方法的大體流程架構,其包含有兩個資料產生流程及一語言性效能指標計算流程:1.底限點(lower boundary point)的產生流程:此流程必須先依據企業內部網路之流程建立一網路模型(network model),並依據經營者對該企業內部網路所能負載之文件總流量的期望值d 來計算出該網路模型的底限點(1ower boundary point)。Figure 1 shows the general process architecture of the performance evaluation method, which includes two data generation processes and a language performance indicator calculation process: 1. The process of generating a lower boundary point: this process must be based on the internal The network process establishes a network model and calculates the 1 boundary point of the network model based on the expected value d of the total traffic of the file that the operator can load on the internal network of the enterprise. .

2.員工能力等級(grade)的產生流程:在對員工進行相關訓練後,進行員工測驗,以取得企業內部網路中的每一員工之工作能力等級,其包含一機率分佈範圍,其係代表該員工能成功處理不同的文件容量的所有可能性。2. The process of generating the employee's ability grade: After the relevant training for the employees, the employee test is conducted to obtain the work ability level of each employee in the internal network of the enterprise, which includes a probability distribution range, and its representative The employee can successfully handle all the possibilities of different file sizes.

3.語言性效能指標計算流程:使用排容原理與模糊邏輯的原則對底限點及機率分佈範圍進行運算,以產生語言性效能指標。3. The linguistic performance index calculation process: using the principle of displacement and fuzzy logic to calculate the bottom point and probability distribution range to generate linguistic performance indicators.

圖二A為產生底限點的細部流程圖,詳述如下。Figure 2A is a detailed flow chart for generating a bottom point, as detailed below.

首先,在軟體程式中定義該網路模型具有複數個節點b i 以模擬實體的企業內部流程網路,並對應其中的複數個員工(S201),再定義該網路模型中的每兩個節點b i 之間可能的程序先後關係(S202),由這些程序先後關係可決定複數個文件流動路徑P j (S203),經過這些步驟之後就可以得到如圖三的網路模型,文件將會在這些文件流動路徑P j 上傳送處理。First, the network model is defined in the software program to have a plurality of nodes b i to simulate an enterprise internal process network, and corresponding to a plurality of employees (S201), and then define each two nodes in the network model. The possible program sequence relationship between b i (S202), the sequence relationship of these programs may determine a plurality of file flow paths P j (S203), after which the network model of Figure 3 can be obtained, and the file will be These file flow paths P j are transferred for processing.

文件流動路徑P j 被決定之後,將經營者所設定對該企業流程網路之總流量的期望值d 分配到這些文件流動路徑P j 上(S204),每個文件流動路徑P j 上所分配的文件流量值以f j 來代表。也就是說,找出所有的文件流動路徑P j 所對應的文件流量值f j ,較佳的作法是根據一最大文件容量值m i 來決定每個文件流動路徑P j 所對應的文件流量值f j 及其所組成的流量向量F (S205)。After the file flow path P j is determined, the expected value d of the total flow of the enterprise process network set by the operator is assigned to the file flow paths P j (S204), and each file flow path P j is allocated. File traffic values are represented by f j . That is, it is preferable to find the file flow value f j corresponding to all the file flow paths P j , and it is preferable to determine the file flow value corresponding to each file flow path P j according to a maximum file capacity value m i . f j and its composed flow vector F (S205).

接著,將文件流量值f j 分配到每個文件流動路徑P j 中的每個節點身上,並推算出網路模型中每個節點在不同時間點所必須處理的文件容量值x i 的各種變化狀態,並將其定義為容量向量X (S206),由於多個文件流動路徑P j 可能通過同一節點,所以在該節點的文件容量值x i 至少應為通過該節點的所有文件流動路徑P j 的所有文件流量值f j 的總合。Next, the file flow value f j is assigned to each node in each file flow path P j , and various changes in the file capacity value x i that each node must handle at different points in the network model are derived. State, and define it as capacity vector X (S206). Since multiple file flow paths P j may pass through the same node, the file capacity value x i at the node should be at least all file flow paths P j through the node. The sum of all file traffic values f j .

較佳地,文件容量值與文件流量值之運算關係如下:一、通過同一節點的所有文件流動路徑之所有文件流量值的總合不大於最大文件容量值(maximal capacity);二、在同一時間點時,通過同一節點的所有文件流動路徑之所有文件流量值的總合不大於節點當時的文件容量值(current capacity)。Preferably, the operation relationship between the file capacity value and the file flow value is as follows: 1. The sum of all file flow values of all file flow paths through the same node is not greater than the maximum file capacity value; At the point, the sum of all file traffic values through all file flow paths of the same node is not greater than the current capacity of the node at that time.

之後,由每個員工所必須處理的文件容量值x i 的各種變化狀態中,找出一最佳集合(Ωmin )(S207),最佳集合(Ωmin )包含的每個容量變化狀態代表著要完成經營者期望的文件總流量的期望值d 所需的最少人力資源,在本文中稱為底限點(lower boundary point)。Then, from the various change states of the file capacity value x i that each employee must process, an optimal set (Ω min ) is found (S207), and each capacity change state represented by the optimal set (Ω min ) represents The minimum human resource required to complete the expected value d of the total flow of documents expected by the operator is referred to herein as the lower boundary point.

圖二B為產生員工能力等級的細部流程圖,詳述如下。首先,對企業內部網路中的所有員工作相關業務的教育訓練及測驗,以檢測該企業內部網路中的每一員工在該單位時間內對不同的文件容量之處理能力(S211)。在軟體程式中定義一第一模糊集合(fuzzy set),其包括複數種能力等級的文字描述(S212),例如:“excellent”、“good”、“normal”、“bad”、“failed”等,可用以描述員工的測驗結果。提供一機率函數表,其包括複數成員函數(membership function),由該機率函數表選擇適當的成員函數μi 對應每一節點b i ,並配合該節點的能力等級及文件容量值進行運算(S213),因為同一節點的能力等級及文件容量值為一變量,所以運算的結果可得到網路模型中的每一節點b i 在不同能力等級時,所對應的機率分佈範圍(S214),其包含具有某一能力等級的節點b i 能成功處理不同的文件容量值x i 的機率。附帶一提地,利用此機率分佈範圍可決定每一節點在該單位時間內可能完成的最大文件 容量值m iFigure 2B is a detailed flow chart for generating employee competency levels, as detailed below. First, an education training and test for all employees' work-related businesses in the internal network of the enterprise to detect the ability of each employee in the internal network of the enterprise to handle different file capacities in the unit time (S211). A first fuzzy set is defined in the software program, and includes a text description of a plurality of capability levels (S212), for example: "excellent", "good", "normal", "bad", "failed", etc. Can be used to describe the employee's test results. Providing a probability function table, comprising a membership function, selecting an appropriate member function μ i corresponding to each node b i by the probability function table, and performing operations according to the capability level and file capacity value of the node (S213) ), because the capability level and the file capacity value of the same node are a variable, the result of the operation can obtain the probability distribution range (S214) of each node b i in the network model at different capability levels, which includes A node b i with a certain capability level can successfully handle the probability of different file capacity values x i . Incidentally, the probability distribution range can be used to determine the maximum file capacity value m i that each node can complete in the unit time.

圖二C為語言性效能指標的計算流程圖,詳述如下。先提供一系統可靠度函數(S221)於該軟體程式中,其包含底限點與機率分佈範圍與一系統可靠度值的函數關係。再根據圖二A及圖二B之流程所得到的底限點與機率分佈範圍,可推算出該網路模型在單位時間內所能完成的文件總流量大於期望值d 時的系統可靠度值(S222),並使用該系統可靠度函數的反函數來將該系統可靠度值轉換成一語言性效能指標(S223),其中該系統可靠度函數的反函數運算係包含一第二模糊集合,例如:“Declined”、“Recertified”、“Acceptable”等評定企業內部網路效能的用語,即上述之「語言性效能指標」,其係呈現於一顯示螢幕上(S224)。Figure 2C is a flow chart for calculating the linguistic performance indicators, as detailed below. A system reliability function (S221) is first provided in the software program, which includes a relationship between the bottom point and the probability distribution range as a system reliability value. According to the bottom limit point and the probability distribution range obtained by the flow of FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B, the system reliability value when the total flow of the file that can be completed in the network model is greater than the expected value d can be calculated ( S222), and using the inverse function of the system reliability function to convert the system reliability value into a linguistic performance indicator (S223), wherein the inverse function operation of the system reliability function includes a second fuzzy set, for example: The terms "Declined", "Recertified", "Acceptable", etc., which evaluate the internal network performance of the enterprise, that is, the above-mentioned "linguistic performance indicators" are presented on a display screen (S224).

圖三為一個簡單的網路模型。網路模型的節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 代表企業內部網路中的員工,s為網路模型的起始節點(source node)、t為終端節點(destination node),其餘為中繼節點(succeeding node)。箭頭a 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a 6 代表每兩節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 之間的程序先後關係(process precedence relationship)及文件流動的方向。節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 與其程序先後關係可組合出多個文件流動路徑(path),例如,圖三中所有的文件流動路徑為P1 ={b 1 ,b 2 ,b 4 },P 2 ={b 1 ,b 2 ,b 3 ,b 4 },P 3 ={b 1 ,b 3 ,b 4 },P 4 ={b 1 ,b 3 ,b 2 ,b 4 }。在本實施例中,所有的文件流動路徑P i 皆由同一起始節點s開始,經過該些中繼節點,而結束於同一終端節點t。文件流動路徑P i 之定義方式可採用最小路徑(minimal path)技術。Figure 3 shows a simple network model. The nodes b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , and b 4 of the network model represent employees in the internal network of the enterprise, s is the source node of the network model, t is the destination node, and the rest is Relay node (succeeding node). The arrows a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a 4 , a 5 , a 6 represent the process precedence relationship between the two nodes b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 and the direction in which the file flows. Nodes b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 and their program sequence can combine multiple file flow paths. For example, all file flow paths in Figure 3 are P 1 ={ b 1 , b 2 , b 4 }, P 2 ={ b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 }, P 3 ={ b 1 , b 3 , b 4 }, P 4 ={ b 1 , b 3 , b 2 , b 4 } . In this embodiment, all file flow paths P i start from the same starting node s, pass through the relay nodes, and end at the same terminal node t. The file flow path P i can be defined in a manner of a minimal path technique.

本實施例係在網路模型中定義的路徑P 1 的文件流量值 為f 1 、路徑P 2 的文件流量值為f 2 、路徑P 3 的文件流量值為f 3 、路徑P 4 的文件流量值為f 4 ,並且設定網路模型在一單位時間內需要處理的文件總流量(required document flow)的期望值d =5(acceptable level),該期望值d 係被儲存於記錄媒體中。Example path P defined in the network-based model of the present embodiment of the document flow 1 is f 1, the file path P 2 flow rate value f 2, the file path P 3, the flow rate is f 3, 4 of the flow path of the file P The value is f 4 and the network model is set to an expected value d = 5 (acceptable level) of the required document flow to be processed in a unit time, and the expected value d is stored in the recording medium.

為了瞭解網路模型中的每一節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 在一單位時間內可能完成的最大文件容量值(maximal capacity)m i ,需對每一節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 所代表的員工作相關業務的教育訓練及進行一測驗程序,以檢測企業內部網路中的每一員工在該單位時間內對不同的文件量之處理能力。In order to understand the maximum file capacity m i that each node b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 in the network model may complete in a unit of time, it is necessary for each node b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 represent the education and training of the staff-related business and conduct a test procedure to detect the ability of each employee in the company's internal network to handle different amounts of documents in the unit time.

測驗程序的步驟如下:提供複數個不同的測驗容量對每一員工進行測驗,以得知員工對不同文件容量的處理能力;接著,依照每一員工的測驗結果,分別給予一能力等級(grade),用以區別每一個員工的文件處理能力。換句話說,能力等級可代表員工的測驗結果。The steps of the test procedure are as follows: a plurality of different test capacities are provided to test each employee to know the ability of the employee to handle different file capacities; and then, according to the test result of each employee, a capability level is respectively given. To distinguish the file processing capabilities of each employee. In other words, the competency level can represent the employee's test results.

本實施例係以一第一模糊集合(fuzzy set)代表不同的能力等級,第一模糊集合係由”excellent”、”good”、”normal”、”bad”及”failed”等能力等級之描述文字所構成的群組或集合,將此集合對應於一實數區間,例如[0,1],以便於電腦系統進行運算。將員工對每一測驗容量的測驗結果記錄於電腦系統的記錄媒體中;再建立機率函數表(如表二所示)於軟體程式中,該機率函數表包括成員函數μi (membership functions)、文件容量值(或測驗容量)x i 、第一模糊集合所含的能力等級,以及一機率分佈範圍的對應關係;之後執行成員函數μi 之運算,以獲得每一節點具有不同的能力等級時,能成功處理不同的文件容量的一機率分佈範圍(如表二所示), 並將該機率分佈範圍儲存於記錄媒體中。In this embodiment, a first fuzzy set represents different capability levels, and the first fuzzy set is described by capability levels such as "excellent", "good", "normal", "bad", and "failed". A group or collection of words that corresponds to a real interval, such as [0, 1], to facilitate computation by the computer system. Record the test result of each test capacity of the employee on the recording medium of the computer system; and then establish a probability function table (shown in Table 2) in the software program, the probability function table includes the member function μ i (membership functions), File capacity value (or test capacity) x i , the capability level contained in the first fuzzy set, and the correspondence of a probability distribution range; then the member function μ i is executed to obtain a different capability level for each node. , can successfully handle a range of probability distribution of different file capacity (as shown in Table 2), and store the probability distribution range on the recording medium.

表一所列為節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 的測驗結果及其對應之成員函數μ1 、μ2 、μ3 、μ4 ,例如節點b 1 的測驗結果為good,其對應的成員函數為μ1 (good);節點b 2 的測驗結果為failed,其對應的成員函數為μ2 (failed)…依此類推。Table 1 lists the test results of nodes b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , and b 4 and their corresponding member functions μ 1 , μ 2 , μ 3 , and μ 4 . For example, the test result of node b 1 is good, which corresponds to The member function is μ 1 (good); the test result of node b 2 is failed, its corresponding member function is μ 2 (failed)... and so on.

表二列舉各節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 之員工處理某個文件容量值x i 達成在不同能力等級(excellent、good..)的機率分佈範圍,其對應的文件容量值x i 不同時,機率值亦不相同。表二之上方第一列的數字0~6代表不同的文件容量值x i ,左方第一行為成員函數μiTable 2 lists the probability distribution values of the employees of each node b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , and b 4 that deal with a file capacity value x i at different capability levels (excellent, good..), and the corresponding file capacity value x When the time is different, the probability values are also different. The numbers 0~6 in the first column above Table 2 represent different file capacity values x i , and the left first behavior member function μ i .

電腦系統依照表一的測驗結果,節點b 1 的能力等級為”good”、b 2 的能力等級為”failed”、b 3 的能力等級為”good”、b 4 的能力等級為”excellent”,據此查詢表二中μ1 (good)、μ2 (failed)、μ3 (good)、μ4 (excellent)四列的機率值。舉例而言,節點b 1 在測驗中取得能力等級”good”,故取用成員函數為μ1 (good),當文件容量值x l 為6時,查表二得到節點b 1 在單位時間內能處理6份文件的機率為0.200。由於本測驗中,測驗容量最多為6份文件,此時機率值尚不為0,代表節點b 1 在該單位時間內所能處理的最大文件容量值m 1 =6。According to the test results of Table 1 , the capability level of node b 1 is "good", the capability level of b 2 is "failed", the capability level of b 3 is "good", and the capability level of b 4 is "excellent". According to this, the probability values of four columns of μ 1 (good), μ 2 (failed), μ 3 (good), and μ 4 (excellent) in Table 2 are queried. For example, the node b 1 obtains the capability level "good" in the test, so the member function is μ 1 (good), and when the file capacity value x l is 6, the table 2 is obtained by the node b 1 in the unit time. The probability of being able to process 6 documents is 0.200. Since the test capacity is up to 6 files in this test, the probability value is not yet 0, which represents the maximum file capacity value m 1 =6 that node b 1 can handle in this unit time.

依此類推,節點b 2 在測驗中取得能力等級”failed”,故取用成員函數為μ1 (failed),當文件容量值x 1 為6時,查表二得到節點b 2 能成功地處理6份經手文件的機率為0.000,代表節點b 2 在該單位時間內無法處理6份經手文件;而當文件容量值x 2 為5時,查表得到節點b 2 能成功地處理5份經手文件的機率為0.004,代表節點b 2 在該單位時間內所能處理的最大文件容量值m 2 =5。And so on, node b 2 obtains the capability level "failed" in the test, so the member function is taken as μ 1 (failed), and when the file capacity value x 1 is 6, the check table 2 gets the node b 2 successfully processed. The probability of 6 copies of the file is 0.000, which means that node b 2 cannot process 6 copies of the file in the unit time; and when the file capacity value x 2 is 5, the table b 2 can successfully process 5 copies of the file. The probability of this is 0.004, which represents the maximum file capacity value m 2 =5 that node b 2 can handle in this unit of time.

由表一及表二所整理的測輪結果可知道各節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 之員工在該單位時間內所能處理的最大文件容量值m i 分別為m 1 =6、m 2 =5、m 3 =6、m 4 =6。藉此,執行軟體程式以讀取記錄媒體中的期望值d 及最大文件容量值m i ,並根據文件容量值x i 與文件流量值f j 之運算關係,則四個文件流量值f 1 ,f 2 ,f 3 ,f 4 可以被推導出來: From the results of the wheel surveys compiled in Tables 1 and 2, it can be known that the maximum file capacity value m i that each employee of each node b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 can handle in this unit time is m 1 =6 m 2 =5, m 3 =6, m 4 =6. Thereby, the software program is executed to read the expected value d and the maximum file capacity value m i in the recording medium, and according to the operation relationship between the file capacity value x i and the file flow value f j , the four file flow values f 1 , f 2 , f 3 , f 4 can be derived:

其中f j :每個文件流動路徑P j 上的文件流量值;j :文件流動路徑的編號;F :所有文件流動路徑P j 的文件流量值f i 所形成的群組,以向量表示,稱為流量向量(flow vector);F :流量向量F 的集合。Where f j : the file flow value on each file flow path P j ; j : the number of the file flow path; F : the group formed by the file flow value f i of all file flow paths P j , expressed as a vector, Is a flow vector; F : a set of flow vectors F.

每個文件流動路徑P j 上的文件流量值f j 在不同時間點的狀態均不相同,因此流量向量F 的集合F 會有底下的結果:{(0,0,0,5),(0,0,1,4),(0,0,2,3),(0,0,3,2),(0,0,4,1),(0,0,5,0),(0,1,0,4),(0,1,1,3),(0,1,2,2),(0,1,3,1),(0,1.4,0),(0,2,0,3),(0,2,1,2),(0,2,2,1),(0,2,3,0),(0,3,0,2),(0,3,1,1),(0,3,2,0),(0,4,0,1),(0,4,1,0),(0,5,0,0),(1,0,0,4),(1,0,1,3),(1,0,2,2),(1,0,3,1),(1,0,4,0),(1,1,0.3),(1,1,1,2),(1.1,2,1),(1,1,3,0),(1,2,0,2),(1,2,1,1),(1,2,2,0).(1,3,0,1),(1,3,1,0),(1,4,0,0),(2,0,0,3),(2,0,1,2),(2,0,2,1),(2,0,3,0),(2,1,0,2),(2,1,1,1),(2,1,2,0),(2,2.0,1),(2,2,1,0),(2,3,0,0),(3,0,0,2),(3,0,1,1),(3,0,2,0).(3,1,0,1),(3,1,1,0),(3,2,0,0),(4,0,0,1),(4,0,1,0),(4,1,0,0),(5,0,0,0)}.The file flow value f j on each file flow path P j is different at different time points, so the set F of the flow vector F has the following result: {(0,0,0,5),(0 ,0,1,4),(0,0,2,3),(0,0,3,2),(0,0,4,1),(0,0,5,0),(0 ,1,0,4),(0,1,1,3),(0,1,2,2),(0,1,3,1),(0,1.4,0),(0,2 ,0,3),(0,2,1,2),(0,2,2,1),(0,2,3,0),(0,3,0,2),(0,3 ,1,1),(0,3,2,0),(0,4,0,1),(0,4,1,0),(0,5,0,0),(1,0 ,0,4),(1,0,1,3),(1,0,2,2),(1,0,3,1),(1,0,4,0),(1,1 ,0.3),(1,1,1,2),(1.1,2,1),(1,1,3,0),(1,2,0,2),(1,2,1,1 ),(1,2,2,0).(1,3,0,1),(1,3,1,0),(1,4,0,0),(2,0,0,3 ),(2,0,1,2),(2,0,2,1),(2,0,3,0),(2,1,0,2),(2,1,1,1 ), (2,1,2,0), (2,2.0,1),(2,2,1,0), (2,3,0,0), (3,0,0,2), (3,0,1,1),(3,0,2,0).(3,1,0,1),(3,1,1,0),(3,2,0,0), (4,0,0,1), (4,0,1,0), (4,1,0,0), (5,0,0,0)}.

由於每個節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 之員工可能必須處理來自多個文件流動路徑P j 的文件,所以每個員工所需處理的文件容量值x i 應為所有經手的文件流量值f j 總合。將所有節點b i 的文件容量值x i 所形成的群組以一容量向量X =(x 1 ,x 2 ,x 3 ,x 4 )(capacity vector)表示之。容量向量X =(x 1 ,x 2 ,x 3 ,x 4 )可利用上述所有可能的流量向量F 及下列運算關係來得知: Since the employees of each node b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 may have to process files from multiple file flow paths P j , the file capacity value x i that each employee needs to process should be all the files that are handled. The flow value f j sums up. The group formed by the file capacity values x i of all the nodes b i is represented by a capacity vector X = ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 ) (capacity vector). The capacity vector X = ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , x 4 ) can be known using all of the possible flow vectors F described above and the following operational relationships:

每個節點b 1b 2b 3b 4 之員工在不同時間點所經手的文件容量值x i 的變化狀態均不相同,所以可求得底下的各種容量向量X :{X 1 =(5,5,0,5),X 2 =(5,5,1,5),X 3 =(5,4,1,5),X 4 =(5,5,2,5),X 5 =(5,4,2,5),X 6 =(5,3,2,5),X 7 =(5,5,3,5),X 8 =(5,4,3,5),X 9 =(5,3,3,5),X 10 =(5,2,3,5),X 11 =(5,5,4,5),X 12 =(5,4,4,5),X 13 =(5,3,4,5),X 14 =(5,2,4,5),X 15 =(5,1,4,5),X 16 =(5,5,5,5),X 17 =(5,4,5,5),X 18 =(5,3,5,5),X 19 =(5,2,5,5),X 20 =(5,1,5,5),X 21 =(5,0,5,5)).The change of the file capacity value x i of the employees of each node b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b 4 at different time points is different, so the various capacity vectors X underneath can be obtained: { X 1 = (5,5,0,5), X 2 =(5,5,1,5), X 3 =(5,4,1,5), X 4 =(5,5,2,5), X 5 =(5,4,2,5), X 6 =(5,3,2,5), X 7 =(5,5,3,5), X 8 =(5,4,3,5) , X 9 =(5,3,3,5), X 10 =(5,2,3,5), X 11 =(5,5,4,5), X 12 =(5,4,4, 5), X 13 = (5,3,4,5 ), X 14 = (5,2,4,5), X 15 = (5,1,4,5), X 16 = (5,5, 5,5), X 17 =(5,4,5,5), X 18 =(5,3,5,5), X 19 =(5,2,5,5), X 20 =(5, 1,5,5), X 21 =(5,0,5,5)).

接著,在上述容量向量X 所代表的各種容量變化狀態中,選出最小的容量向量X (minimal capacity vector),形成一最佳集合(Ω min )為: {X 1 =(5,5,0,5),X 3 =(5,4,1,5),X 0 =(5,3,2,5),X 10 =(5,2,3,5),X 15 =(5,1,4,5),X 21 =(5,0,5,5)}.Next, among the various capacity change states represented by the capacity vector X , a minimum capacity vector X is selected to form an optimal set (Ω min ) as: { X 1 =(5,5,0, 5), X 3 = (5,4,1,5 ), X 0 = (5,3,2,5), X 10 = (5,2,3,5), X 15 = (5,1, 4,5), X 21 =(5,0,5,5)}.

上述運算過程為一種作業研究方法,該最佳集合(Ω min )中的每個最小的容量向量X 係作為該作業研究方法之一底限點(lower boundary point)。最佳集合(Ω min )包含的每個最小的容量向量X 係代表著要以此企業內部網路來完成經營者期望的文件總流量的期望值d 所需的最少人力資源,而以最少的人力資源就能完成任務將會有最高的效能。The above operation process is an operation research method, and each of the minimum capacity vectors X in the optimal set (Ω min ) is used as one of the lower boundary points of the work research method. Each of the smallest capacity vectors X contained in the optimal set (Ω min ) represents the minimum human resources required to complete the expected value d of the total file traffic expected by the operator from the internal network of the enterprise, with the least amount of manpower. Resources will be able to complete tasks with the highest performance.

接著,根據表二的機率分佈範圍及最小的容量向量X 所組成的最佳集合(Ω min ),計算該網路模型能成功處理之總流量不小於期望值時的機率值,並將該機率值呈現於一顯示螢幕上。亦即,利用機率的理論(排容原理)來求得該企業內部網路在單位時間內處理完五份以上的文件(預定的總流量的期望值d =5)時可能的系統可靠度值(R 5 )是0.6693,如下面的計算所示: Then, according to the optimal set (Ω min ) composed of the probability distribution range of Table 2 and the minimum capacity vector X , the probability value when the total flow rate successfully processed by the network model is not less than the expected value is calculated, and the probability value is calculated. Presented on a display screen. That is, using the probability theory (discharge principle) to obtain the possible system reliability value when the enterprise internal network processes more than five files per unit time (the expected total flow rate is expected to be d = 5) R 5 ) is 0.6693, as shown in the calculation below:

其中,B i 代表下列底限點(lower boundary point): Where B i represents the following lower boundary point:

再由μ的反函數μ-1 可得到對應的語言性效能指標(Linguistic Performance Index),(0.6693)=Acceptable。Μ μ then the inverse function of the corresponding language available -1 effectiveness index (Linguistic Performance Index), = (0.6693)=Acceptable.

綜上所述,系統可靠度值、實數區間與語言性效能指標的對應關係如圖四所示,橫軸代表系統可靠度值,中間的折線將系統可靠度值劃分出數個區域,每一區域被賦予不同的語言性效能指標;縱軸代表語言性效能指標所對應的實數區間[0,1]。In summary, the corresponding relationship between system reliability value, real interval and linguistic performance index is shown in Figure 4. The horizontal axis represents the system reliability value, and the middle polyline divides the system reliability value into several regions, each The region is given different linguistic performance indicators; the vertical axis represents the real interval [0, 1] corresponding to the linguistic performance indicator.

惟以上所述者,僅為本發明之較佳實施例而已,當不能以此限定本發明實施之範圍,即大凡依本發明申請專利範圍及發明說明內容所作之簡單的等效變化與修飾,皆仍屬本發明專利涵蓋之範圍內。另外本發明的任一實施例或申請專利 範圍不須達成本發明所揭露之全部目的或優點或特點。此外,摘要部分和標題僅是用來輔助專利文件搜尋之用,並非用來限制本發明之權利範圍。The above is only the preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the scope of the invention is not limited thereto, that is, the simple equivalent changes and modifications made by the scope of the invention and the description of the invention are All remain within the scope of the invention patent. In addition, any embodiment or patent application of the present invention The scope of the invention is not intended to be exhaustive or to be construed. In addition, the abstract sections and headings are only used to assist in the search of patent documents and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

企業內部網路的起始節點‧‧‧sThe starting node of the corporate intranet ‧‧‧s

企業內部網路的終端節點‧‧‧tThe endpoint of the corporate intranet ‧‧‧t

程序先後關係‧‧‧a1、a2、a3、a4、a5、a6Program relationship ‧‧‧a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6

節點‧‧‧b1、b2、b3、b4Node ‧‧‧b1, b2, b3, b4

圖一為本發明之一實施例之企業內部網路效能評估方法之作業流程示意圖。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an operation flow of an internal network performance evaluation method of an enterprise according to an embodiment of the present invention.

圖二A為根據本發明一實施例,產生底限點的細部流程示意圖。FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram showing a detailed process of generating a bottom point according to an embodiment of the invention.

圖二B為根據本發明一實施例,產生員工能力等級的細部流程示意圖。FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram showing a detailed process of generating an employee's ability level according to an embodiment of the present invention.

圖二C為根據本發明一實施例,為語言性效能指標的計算流程示意圖。FIG. 2C is a schematic diagram of a calculation process of a language performance indicator according to an embodiment of the invention.

圖三為根據本發明一實施例之一網路模型示意圖。FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a network model according to an embodiment of the present invention.

圖四為根據本發明一實施例,基於模糊邏輯運算結果之語言性效能指標示意圖。FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of language performance indicators based on fuzzy logic operation results according to an embodiment of the invention.

Claims (15)

一種企業內部網路效能評估方法,係應用於一軟體程式中,以評估一企業內部網路的效能,該軟體程式係包括一網路模型、一機率函數表、一系統可靠度函數、一第一模糊集合及一第二模糊集合,該網路模型包括複數個節點以對應該企業內部網路之複數個員工,該方法包括:對每一該節點所對應的該員工進行一測驗程序,以獲得一測驗結果;以該第一模糊集合描述該員工的該測驗結果,以定義該節點的一能力等級;以該機率函數表將該能力等級轉換為一機率分佈範圍;以該系統可靠度函數對所有的該節點所對應的該機率分佈範圍進行一運算,以得到一系統可靠度值;根據該第二模糊集合,對該系統可靠度值執行一模糊邏輯運算,以得到一具有文字描述的語言性效能指標;以及將該語言性效能指標呈現於一顯示螢幕上。 An enterprise internal network performance evaluation method is applied to a software program to evaluate the performance of an enterprise internal network. The software program includes a network model, a probability function table, a system reliability function, and a first a fuzzy set and a second fuzzy set, the network model comprising a plurality of nodes to correspond to a plurality of employees of the internal network of the enterprise, the method comprising: performing a test procedure on the employee corresponding to each of the nodes, Obtaining a test result; describing the test result of the employee by the first fuzzy set to define a capability level of the node; converting the capability level to a probability distribution range by using the probability function table; and using the system reliability function Performing an operation on all the probability distribution ranges corresponding to the node to obtain a system reliability value; performing a fuzzy logic operation on the system reliability value according to the second fuzzy set to obtain a text description a linguistic performance indicator; and presenting the linguistic performance indicator on a display screen. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該網路模型之該複數個節點係包括一起始節點、複數個中繼節點及一終端節點,並且每兩個該節點之間具有一程序先後關係,根據該程序先後關係定義複數個文件流動路徑,所有該些文件流動路徑皆由該起始節點開始,經過該些中繼節點,而結束於該終端節點。 The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of nodes of the network model include a start node, a plurality of relay nodes, and a terminal node, and each of the two nodes There is a program sequence relationship, and a plurality of file flow paths are defined according to the program sequence relationship, and all of the file flow paths start from the start node, and end through the relay nodes and end at the terminal node. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中根據該第二模糊集合,對該系統可靠度值執行一 模糊邏輯運算之步驟係利用該系統可靠度函數之反函數執行該模糊邏輯運算。 The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 1, wherein the system reliability value is performed according to the second fuzzy set. The step of the fuzzy logic operation performs the fuzzy logic operation using the inverse function of the system reliability function. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中對每一該節點所對應的每一該員工進行該測驗程序的步驟包括:提供複數個測驗容量,用以對每一該員工進行測驗;將該員工對每一該測驗容量的測驗結果記錄於該記錄媒體中;提供複數成員函數;於該軟體程式中建立該機率函數表,該機率函數表包括該些成員函數、該些測驗容量、該些能力等級及該機率分佈範圍之對應關係;以及根據該測驗容量及該能力等級,查詢該機率函數表以獲得每一該節點具有不同的該能力等級時,所分別對應的該機率分佈範圍。 The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 1, wherein the step of performing the test procedure for each of the employees corresponding to the node comprises: providing a plurality of test capacities for each The employee performs a test; records the test result of the employee for each test capacity on the record medium; provides a plural member function; and establishes the probability function table in the software program, the probability function table includes the member functions, Corresponding relationship between the test capacity, the capability levels, and the probability distribution range; and querying the probability function table according to the test capacity and the capability level to obtain each of the nodes having different capability levels, respectively corresponding to The probability distribution range. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該軟體程式係包含於一企業資源規劃系統中。 For example, the method for evaluating the internal network performance of the enterprise described in the first application of the patent scope, wherein the software program is included in an enterprise resource planning system. 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該軟體程式係包含於一顧客關係管理系統中。 For example, the method for evaluating the internal network performance of the enterprise described in claim 1, wherein the software program is included in a customer relationship management system. 一種企業內部網路效能評估方法,係應用於一電腦系統中,以評估一企業內部網路的效能,其中該電腦系統包括一軟體程式,其儲存於一記錄媒體中,並且藉由一微處理器來執行其運算,而該企業內部網路係包括複數個員工,該方法包括: 提供一網路模型於該軟體程式中,該網路模型係對應於該企業內部網路,其包括複數個節點,該些節點係對應於該些員工,並且形成複數個文件流動路徑;在該網路模型中定義每一該節點具有一文件容量值,而每個文件流動路徑具有一文件流量值,其中該文件容量值與該文件流量值具有一第一運算關係,所有該節點的該文件容量值所形成的群組係被定義為一容量向量,而所有該文件流動路徑的該文件流量值所形成的群組係被定義為一流量向量;決定該網路模型之總流量的一期望值,並將該期望值儲存於該記錄媒體中;對每一該節點所對應的該員工進行一測驗程序,以獲得一測驗結果;以一模糊集合描述該員工的該測驗結果,以定義該節點的一能力等級;以一機率函數表將該能力等級轉換為一機率分佈範圍,並儲存於該記錄媒體中;查詢該記錄媒體中的該機率函數表,並由每一該節點之該機率分佈範圍所對應的該些文件容量值中選定一最大文件容量值;執行該軟體程式,以讀取該記錄媒體中的該期望值及該最大文件容量值,並根據該第一運算關係以得到所有可能的該流量向量;再根據所有可能的流量向量及該第一運算關係,計算所 有可能的該容量向量;由所有可能的該容量向量中,選出一最小容量向量;提供一系統可靠度函數,其包括該機率分佈範圍及該最小容量向量與一系統可靠度值之一第二運算關係;根據該第二運算關係,計算該網路模型能成功處理之總流量不小於該期望值時的該系統可靠度值;對該系統可靠度值進行一模糊邏輯運算,而轉換得到該系統可靠度值對應的一語言性效能指標,並將該語言性效能指標呈現於一顯示螢幕上。An enterprise internal network performance evaluation method is applied to a computer system for evaluating the performance of an enterprise internal network, wherein the computer system includes a software program stored in a recording medium and processed by a micro processing To perform its operations, and the internal network of the enterprise includes a plurality of employees, including: Providing a network model in the software program, the network model corresponding to the enterprise internal network, comprising a plurality of nodes corresponding to the employees, and forming a plurality of file flow paths; Each of the nodes defined in the network model has a file capacity value, and each file flow path has a file flow value, wherein the file capacity value has a first operational relationship with the file flow value, and all files of the node are The group formed by the capacity value is defined as a capacity vector, and the group formed by the file flow value of all the file flow paths is defined as a flow vector; an expected value of the total flow of the network model is determined. And storing the expected value in the recording medium; performing a test procedure on the employee corresponding to each node to obtain a test result; describing the test result of the employee in a fuzzy set to define the node a capability level; converting the capability level into a probability distribution range by a probability function table, and storing in the recording medium; querying the recording medium The probability function table, and selecting a maximum file capacity value from the file capacity values corresponding to the probability distribution range of each node; executing the software program to read the expected value in the recording medium and the a maximum file capacity value, and according to the first operational relationship to obtain all possible traffic vectors; and according to all possible traffic vectors and the first operational relationship, the calculation It is possible that the capacity vector is selected from all possible capacity vectors; a system reliability function is provided, which includes the probability distribution range and the minimum capacity vector and a system reliability value. An operation relationship; according to the second operation relationship, calculating a system reliability value when the total flow rate successfully processed by the network model is not less than the expected value; performing a fuzzy logic operation on the system reliability value, and converting the system A linguistic performance indicator corresponding to the reliability value, and the linguistic performance indicator is presented on a display screen. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中對該系統可靠度值進行一模糊邏輯運算之步驟係利用該系統可靠度函數之反函數執行該模糊邏輯運算以獲得該語言性效能指標。The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 7, wherein the step of performing a fuzzy logic operation on the reliability value of the system performs the fuzzy logic operation by using an inverse function of the system reliability function to obtain the Linguistic performance indicators. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該複數個節點係包括一起始節點、複數個中繼節點及一終端節點,所有該文件流動路徑皆由該起始節點開始,經過該些中繼節點,而結束於該終端節點。The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 7, wherein the plurality of nodes includes a start node, a plurality of relay nodes, and a terminal node, and all the file flow paths are from the start node. Start, pass through the relay nodes, and end at the terminal node. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中形成該複數個文件流動路徑之步驟包括:定義該網路模型中每兩該節點之間具有至少一程序先後關係;以及根據該些程序先後關係,定義該網路模型的複數個文件流動路徑。The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 7, wherein the step of forming the plurality of file flow paths includes: defining at least one program sequence relationship between each of the two nodes in the network model; According to the sequence relationship of the programs, a plurality of file flow paths of the network model are defined. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該第一運算關係包括:通過同一該節點的所有該文件流動路徑之所有該文件流量值的總合不大於該最大文件容量值。The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 7, wherein the first operational relationship comprises: a total sum of all the file traffic values of all the file flow paths through the same node is not greater than the maximum file. Capacity value. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該第一運算關係包括:在同一時間點時,通過同一該節點的所有該文件流動路徑之所有該文件流量值的總合不大於該節點當時的該文件容量值。The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 7, wherein the first operational relationship includes: at the same time point, all the file traffic values of all the file flow paths of the same node at the same time point The value is not greater than the file capacity value of the node at the time. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中對每一該節點所對應的每一該員工進行該測驗程序的步驟包括:提供複數個測驗容量對每一該員工進行測驗;將該員工對每一該測驗容量的測驗結果記錄於該記錄媒體中;提供複數成員函數;於該軟體程式中建立該機率函數表,該機率函數表包括該些成員函數、該些測驗容量、該些能力等級及該機率分佈範圍之對應關係;以及根據該測驗容量及該能力等級,查詢該機率函數表以獲得每一該節點具有不同的該能力等級時,所分別對應的該機率分佈範圍。The method for evaluating an internal network performance of an enterprise according to claim 7, wherein the step of performing the test procedure for each of the employees corresponding to the node comprises: providing a plurality of test capacities for each of the employees a test; recording, by the employee, a test result of each test capacity in the recording medium; providing a complex member function; establishing the probability function table in the software program, the probability function table including the member functions, and the quizzes Corresponding relationship between the capacity, the capability levels, and the probability distribution range; and querying the probability function table according to the test capacity and the capability level to obtain a probability corresponding to each of the nodes having different capability levels distribution range. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評估方法,其中該電腦系統係為一企業資源規劃系統。For example, the method for evaluating the internal network effectiveness of the enterprise described in claim 7 is wherein the computer system is an enterprise resource planning system. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之企業內部網路效能評 估方法,其中該電腦系統係為一顧客關係管理系統。Such as the internal network performance evaluation of the enterprise mentioned in the scope of patent application The estimation method, wherein the computer system is a customer relationship management system.
TW97134349A 2008-09-08 2008-09-08 Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic TWI410083B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW97134349A TWI410083B (en) 2008-09-08 2008-09-08 Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW97134349A TWI410083B (en) 2008-09-08 2008-09-08 Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201012125A TW201012125A (en) 2010-03-16
TWI410083B true TWI410083B (en) 2013-09-21

Family

ID=44828877

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW97134349A TWI410083B (en) 2008-09-08 2008-09-08 Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI410083B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI457846B (en) * 2011-12-02 2014-10-21 Univ Nat Taiwan Science Tech System reliability evaluation method for manufacture network

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6029161A (en) * 1996-04-04 2000-02-22 Lycos, Inc. Multi-level mindpool system especially adapted to provide collaborative filter data for a large scale information filtering system
US6687696B2 (en) * 2000-07-26 2004-02-03 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US20040024739A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-05 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
TWI232663B (en) * 2001-06-30 2005-05-11 Intel Corp System and method for integrating network services
US20070150470A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns
US7337158B2 (en) * 2000-03-06 2008-02-26 Consona Crm Inc. System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US20080114756A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2008-05-15 Levino Authomatic, personalized online information and product services

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6029161A (en) * 1996-04-04 2000-02-22 Lycos, Inc. Multi-level mindpool system especially adapted to provide collaborative filter data for a large scale information filtering system
US20040024739A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-05 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US6711585B1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-03-23 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US20080114756A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2008-05-15 Levino Authomatic, personalized online information and product services
US7337158B2 (en) * 2000-03-06 2008-02-26 Consona Crm Inc. System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user
US6687696B2 (en) * 2000-07-26 2004-02-03 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
TWI232663B (en) * 2001-06-30 2005-05-11 Intel Corp System and method for integrating network services
US20070150470A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201012125A (en) 2010-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hensher Identifying the influence of stated choice design dimensionality on willingness to pay for travel time savings
US20060224425A1 (en) Comparing and contrasting models of business
Ozbek et al. Data envelopment analysis as a decision-making tool for transportation professionals
Xu et al. Intelligent decision system based on the evidential reasoning approach and its applications
US20070192266A1 (en) Apparatus for identification of performance scenario and methods thereof
Wei et al. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) evaluation method based on sample decision making units
Pinto et al. In search of the dependent variable: Toward synthesis in GIS implementation research
Fernstrom et al. Understanding the truly value creating resources–the case of a pharmaceutical company
Käppel et al. Evaluating predictive business process monitoring approaches on small event logs
TWI410083B (en) Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise by fuzzy logic
TW201001184A (en) Method for evaluating the performance of an internal network in an enterprise
Arciszewski et al. Inductive learning in civil engineering: rough sets approach
JP2019160089A (en) Information processor, information processing method and program
Fatima et al. A review of software architecture evaluation methods for sustainability assessment
Scholtz et al. A framework for real-world software system evaluations
Skoglund et al. Towards a goal and problem based business process improvement framework–an experience report
Calabrese The evaluation of quality of organizational communications: a quantitative model
Denise Pinnel et al. Design of visualizations for urban modeling
Watson et al. The evolving use of simulation
Morana et al. User guidance for document-driven processes in enterprise systems
Lukman et al. Integrating Quality Function Deployment and Service Excellence for Educational Quality Enhancement in Higher Education
Clark et al. Application of a scoring method for measuring the value of knowledge‐based systems to key employees
Ada et al. Decision making based on management information system and decision support system
JP2009211128A (en) Simulation device, simulation method, and program
Grobelnik et al. Rethinking User Experience Design: Sustainability in the Context of the User Centered Innovation Process in Power Tool Design

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees