Connect public, paid and private patent data with Google Patents Public Datasets

Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering

Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6041311A
US6041311A US08789758 US78975897A US6041311A US 6041311 A US6041311 A US 6041311A US 08789758 US08789758 US 08789758 US 78975897 A US78975897 A US 78975897A US 6041311 A US6041311 A US 6041311A
Authority
US
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
user
users
items
plurality
item
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08789758
Inventor
Alexander Chislenko
Yezdezard Z. Lashkari
John E. McNulty
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/3061Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F17/30699Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G06F17/30864Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems
    • G06F17/30867Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems with filtering and personalisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0202Market predictions or demand forecasting
    • G06Q30/0204Market segmentation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping
    • G06Q30/0631Item recommendations
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television, VOD [Video On Demand]
    • H04N21/20Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/25Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
    • H04N21/251Learning process for intelligent management, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies
    • H04N21/252Processing of multiple end-users' preferences to derive collaborative data
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99943Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface

Abstract

A method for recommending items to users using automated collaborative filtering stores profiles of users relating ratings to items in memory. Profiles of items may also be stored in memory, the item profiles associating users with the rating given to the item by that user or inferred for the user by the system The user profiles include additional information relating to the user or associated with the rating given to an item by the user. Similarity factors with respect to other users, and confidence factors associated with the similarity factors, are calculated for a user and these similarity factors, in connection with the confidence factors, are used to select a set of neighboring users. The neighboring users are weighted based on their respective similarity factors, and a rating for an item contained in the domain is predicted. In one embodiment, items in the domain have features. In this embodiment, the values for features can be clustered, and the similarity factors incorporate assigned feature weights and feature value cluster weights.

Description

This application is a continuation-in-part application of co-pending application Ser. No. 08/597,442 filed Feb. 2, 1996, which itself claims priority to provisional application Serial No. 60/000,598, filed Jun. 30, 1995, now expired, and provisional application 60/008,458, filed Dec. 11, 1995, now expired, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for recommending items and, in particular, to an improved method and apparatus for recommending items using automated collaborative filtering and feature-guided automated collaborative filtering.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The amount of information, as well as the number of goods and services, available to individuals is increasing exponentially. This increase in items and information is occurring across all domains, e.g. sound recordings, restaurants, movies, World Wide Web pages, clothing stores, etc. An individual attempting to find useful information, or to decide between competing goods and services, is often faced with a bewildering selection of sources and choices.

Individual sampling of all items, even in a particular domain, may be impossible. For example, sampling every restaurant of a particular type in New York City would tax even the most avid diner. Such a sampling would most likely be prohibitively expensive to carry out, and the diner would have to suffer through many unenjoyable restaurants.

In many domains, individuals have simply learned to manage information overload by relying on a form of generic referral system. For example, in the domain of movie and sound recordings, many individuals rely on reviews written by paid reviewers. These reviews, however, are simply the viewpoint of one or two individuals and may not have a likelihood of correlating with how the individual will actually perceive the movie or sound recording. Many individuals may rely on a review only to be disappointed when they actually sample the item.

One method of attempting to provide an efficient filtering mechanism is to use content-based filtering. The content-based filter selects items from a domain for the user to sample based upon correlations between the content of the item and the user's preferences. Content-based filtering schemes suffer from the drawback that the items to be selected must be in some machine-readable form, or attributes describing the content of the item must be entered by hand. This makes content-based filtering problematic for existing items such as sound recordings, photographs, art, video, and any other physical item that is not inherently machine-readable. While item attributes can be assigned by hand in order to allow a content-based search, for many domains of items such assignment is not practical. For example, it could take decades to enter even the most rudimentary attributes for all available network television video clips by hand.

Perhaps more importantly, even the best content-based filtering schemes cannot provide an analysis of the quality of a particular item as it would be perceived by a particular user, since quality is inherently subjective. So, while a content-based filtering scheme may select a number of items based on the content of those items, a content-based filtering scheme generally cannot further refine the list of selected items to recommend items that the individual will enjoy.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for recommending items to users of a system which uses automated collaborative filtering to accurately predict the rating that a user will give to an item based on the rating given to that item by users that have tastes closely correlated with that user.

In one aspect, the invention relates to a method for recommending an item to a user. A user profile is stored in memory for a number of users, and the user profiles store the ratings given to items by a particular user, as well as additional information. The additional information may be information about the user or it may be information regarding the ratings given to an item by that user. Item profiles also may be stored in memory and the item profiles store ratings given to that item by a number of users.

The information stored in the user profiles is used to calculate a set of similarity factors which indicate the amount of correlation between a user and other users of the system. A plurality of users that are closely correlated to a particular user are selected as that user's neighboring users and a weight is assigned to each of them. The ratings given to items by the neighboring users as well as the weights assigned to those neighboring users are then used to predict ratings and to make recommendations of items that the user has not yet rated.

In another aspect, the invention relates to an apparatus for recommending items which include a memory element for storing user profiles, each user profile including at least rating information. The apparatus also includes a means for calculating similarity factors between users, means for selecting neighboring users, and means for assigning a weight to those neighboring users. Also included are means for recommending one of the items to one of the users based on that user's neighboring users and the weights assigned to that user's neighboring users.

In yet another aspect, the invention relates to an article of manufacture having embodied thereon computer-readable program means for storing user profiles in a memory. The article of manufacture includes computer-readable program means for storing user profiles in a memory element, and each user profile includes at least rating information. The article of manufacture also includes computer-readable program means for calculating similarity factors between users, computer-readable program means for selecting neighboring users, and computer-readable program means for assigning a weight to those neighboring users. Also included is computer-readable program means for recommending one of the items to one of the users based on that user's neighboring users and the weights assigned to that user's neighboring users.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

This invention is pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. The above and further advantages of this invention may be better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a flowchart of one embodiment of the method;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of another embodiment of the method;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the apparatus; and

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an Internet system on which the method and apparatus may be used.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As referred to in this description, items to be recommended can be items of any type that a user may sample in a domain. When reference is made to a "domain," it is intended to refer to any category or subcategory of ratable items, such as sound recordings, movies, restaurants, vacation destinations, novels, or World Wide Web pages. Referring now to FIG. 1, a method for recommending items begins by storing user and item information in profiles.

A plurality of user profiles is stored in a memory element (step 102). One profile may be created for each user or multiple profiles may be created for a user to represent that user over multiple domains. Alternatively, a user may be represented in one domain by multiple profiles where each profile represents the proclivities of a user in a given set of circumstances. For example, a user that avoids seafood restaurants on Fridays, but not on other days of the week, could have one profile representing the user's restaurant preferences from Saturday through Thursday, and a second profile representing the user's restaurant preferences on Fridays. In some embodiments, a user profile represents more than one user. For example, a profile may be created which represents a woman and her husband for the purpose of selecting movies. Using this profile allows a movie recommendation to be given which takes into account the movie tastes of both individuals. For convenience, the remainder of this specification will use the term "user" to refer to single users of the system, as well as "composite users." The memory element can be any memory element known in the art that can store user profile data and allowing the user profiles to be updated, such as a disc drive or random access memory.

Each user profile associates items with the ratings given to those items by the user. Each user profile may also store information in addition to the user's ratings. In one embodiment, the user profile stores information about the user, e.g. name, address, or age. In another embodiment, the user profile stores information about the rating, such as the time and date the user entered the rating for the item. User profiles can be any data construct that facilitates these associations, such as an array, although it is preferred to provide user profiles as sparse vectors of n-tuples. Each n-tuple contains at least an identifier representing the rated item and an identifier representing the rating that the user gave to the item, and may include any number of additional pieces of information regarding the item, the rating, or both. Some of the additional pieces of information stored in a user profile may be calculated based on other information in the profile. For example, an average rating for a particular selection of items (e.g., heavy metal albums) may be calculated and stored in the user's profile. In some embodiments, the profiles are provided as ordered n-tuples.

A profile for a user can be created and stored in a memory element when that user first begins rating items, although in multi-domain applications user profiles may be created for particular domains only when the user begins to explore, and rate items within, those domains. Alternatively, a user profile may be created for a user before the user rates any items in a domain. For example, a default user profile may be created for a domain which the user has not yet begun to explore based on the ratings the user has given to items in a domain that the user has already explored.

Whenever a user profile is created, a number of initial ratings for items may be solicited from the user. This can be done by providing the user with a particular set of items to rate corresponding to a particular group of items. Groups are genres of items and are discussed below in more detail. Other methods of soliciting ratings from the user may include: manual entry of item-rating pairs, in which the user simply submits a list of items and ratings assigned to those items; soliciting ratings by date of entry into the system, i.e., asking the user to rate the newest items added to the system; soliciting ratings for the items having the most ratings; or by allowing a user to rate items similar to an initial item selected by the user. In still other embodiments, the system may acquire a number of ratings by monitoring the user's environment. For example, the system may assume that Web sites for which the user has created "bookmarks" are liked by that user and may use those sites as initial entries in the user's profile. One embodiment uses all of the methods described above and allows the user to select the particular method they wish to employ.

Ratings for items which are received from users can be of any form that allows users to record subjective impressions of items based on their experience of the item. For example, items may be rated on an alphabetic scale ("A" to "F") or a numerical scale (1 to 10). In one embodiment, ratings are integers between 1 (lowest) and 7 (highest). Ratings can be received as input to a stand-alone machine, for example, a user may type rating information on a keyboard or a user may enter such information via a touch screen. Ratings may also be received as input to a system via electronic mail, by telephone, or as input to a system via a local area or wide area network. In one embodiment, ratings are received as input to a World Wide Web page. In this embodiment, the user positions a cursor on a World Wide Web page with an input device such as a mouse or trackball. Once the cursor is properly positioned, the user indicates a rating by using a button on the input device to select a rating to enter. Ratings can be received from users singularly or in batches, and may be received from any number of users simultaneously.

Ratings can be inferred by the system from the user's usage pattern. For example, the system may monitor how long the user views a particular Web page and store in that user's profile an indication that the user likes the page, assuming that the longer the user views the page, the more the user likes the page. Alternatively, a system may monitor the user's actions to determine a rating of a particular item for the user. For example, the system may infer that a user likes an item which the user mails to many people and enter in the user's profile and indication that the user likes that item. More than one aspect of user behavior may be monitored in order to infer ratings for that user, and in some embodiments, the system may have a higher confidence factor for a rating which it inferred by monitoring multiple aspects of user behavior. Confidence factors are discussed in more detail below.

Profiles for each item that has been rated by at least one user may also be stored in memory. Each item profile records how particular users have rated this particular item. Any data construct that associates ratings given to the item with the user assigning the rating can be used. It is preferred to provide item profiles as a sparse vector of n-tuples. Each n-tuple contains at least an identifier representing a particular user and an identifier representing the rating that user gave to the item, and it may contain other information, as described above in connection with user profiles. Item profiles may be created when the first rating is given to an item or when the item is first entered into the system. Alternatively, item profiles may be generated from the user profiles stored in memory, by determining, for each user, if that user has rated the item and, if so, storing the rating and user information in the item's profile. Item profiles may be stored before user profiles are stored, after user profiles are stored, or at the same time as user profiles.

The additional information associated with each item-rating pair can be used by the system for a variety of purposes, such as assessing the validity of the rating data. For example, if the system records the time and date the rating was entered, or inferred from the user's environment, it can determine the age of a rating for an item. A rating which is very old may indicate that the rating is less valid than a rating entered recently, for example, users' tastes may change or "drift" over time. One of the fields of the n-tuple may represent whether the rating was entered by the user or inferred by the system. Ratings that are inferred by the system may be assumed to be less valid than ratings that are actually entered by the user. Other items of information may be stored, and any combination or subset of additional information may be used to assess rating validity. In some embodiments, this validity metric may be represented as a confidence factor, that is, the combined effect of the selected pieces of information recorded in the n-tuple may be quantified as a number. In some embodiments, that number may be expressed as a percentage representing the probability that the associated rating is incorrect or as an expected deviation of the predicted rating from the "correct" value.

The user profiles are accessed in order to calculate similarity factors for each user with respect to all other users (step 104). A similarity factor represents the degree of correlation between any two users with respect to a set of items. The calculation to be performed may be selected such that the more two users correlate, the closer the similarity factor is to zero. Specialized hardware may be provided for calculating the similarity factors between users, although it is preferred to provide a general-purpose computer with appropriate programming to calculate the similarity factors.

Whenever a rating is received from a user or is inferred by the system from that user's behavior, the profile of that user may be updated as well as the profile of the item rated. Profile updates may be stored in a temporary memory location and entered at a convenient time or profiles may be updated whenever a new rating is entered by or inferred for that user. Profiles can be updated by appending a new n-tuple of values to the set of already existing n-tuples in the profile or, if the new rating is a change to an existing rating, overwriting the appropriate entry in the user profile. Updating a profile also requires re-computation of any profile entries that are based on other information in the profile.

Whenever a user's profile is updated with new rating-item n-tuple, new similarity factors between the user and other users of this system may be calculated. The similarity factors for a user may be calculated by comparing that user's profile with the profile of every other user of the system. This is computationally intensive, since the order of computation for calculating similarity factors in this manner is n2, where n is the number of users of the system. It is possible to reduce the computational load associated with re-calculating similarity factors in embodiments that store item profiles by first retrieving the profiles of the newly-rated item and determining which other users have already rated that item. The similarity factors between the newly-rating user and the users that have already rated the item are the only similarity factors updated.

Any number of methods can be used to calculate the similarity factors. In general, a method for calculating similarity factors between users should minimize the deviation between a predicted rating for an item and the rating a user would actually have given the item.

It is also desirable to reduce error in cases involving "extreme" ratings. That is, a method which predicts fairly well for item ratings representing ambivalence towards an item but which does poorly for item ratings representing extreme enjoyment or extreme disappointment with an item is not useful for recommending items to users.

Similarity factors between users refers to any quantity which expresses the degree of correlation between two user's profiles for a particular set of items. The following methods for calculating the similarity factor are intended to be exemplary, and in no way exhaustive. Depending on the item domain, different methods will produce optimal results, since users in different domains may have different expectations for rating accuracy or speed of recommendations. Different methods may be used in a single domain, and, in some embodiments, the system allows users to select the method by which they want their similarity factors produced.

In the following description of methods, Dxy represents the similarity factor calculated between two users, x and y. Hix represents the rating given to item i by user x, I represents all items in the database, and cix is a Boolean quantity which is 1 if user x has rated item i and 0 if user x has not rated that item.

One method of calculating the similarity between a pair of users is to calculate the average squared difference between their ratings for mutually rated items. Thus, the similarity factor between user x and user y is calculated by subtracting, for each item rated by both users, the rating given to an item by user y from the rating given to that same item by user x and squaring the difference. The squared differences are summed and divided by the total number of items rated. This method is represented mathematically by the following expression: ##EQU1##

A similar method of calculating the similarity factor between a pair of users is to divide the sum of their squared rating differences by the number of items rated by both users raised to a power. This method is represented by the following mathematical expression: ##EQU2## where |Cxy | represents the number of items rated by both users.

A third method for calculating the similarity factor between users attempts to factor into the calculation the degree of profile overlap, i.e. the number of items rated by both users compared to the total number of items rated by either one user or the other. Thus, for each item rated by both users, the rating given to an item by user y is subtracted from the rating given to that same item by user x. These differences are squared and then summed. The amount of profile overlap is taken into account by dividing the sum of squared rating differences by a quantity equal to the number of items mutually rated by the users subtracted from the sum of the number of items rated by user x and the number of items rated by users y. This method is expressed mathematically by: ##EQU3## where |Cxy | represents the number of items mutually rated by users x and y.

In another embodiment, the similarity factor between two users is a Pearson r correlation coefficient. Alternatively, the similarity factor may be calculated by constraining the correlation coefficient with a predetermined average rating value, A. Using the constrained method, the correlation coefficient, which represents Dxy, is arrived at in the following manner. For each item rated by both users, A is subtracted from the rating given to the item by user x and the rating given to that same item by user y. Those differences are then multiplied. The summed product of rating differences is divided by the product of two sums. The first sum is the sum of the squared differences of the predefined average rating value, A, and the rating given to each item by user x. The second sum is the sum of the squared differences of the predefined average value, A, and the rating given to each item by user y. This method is expressed mathematically by: ##EQU4## where Ux represents all items rated by x, Uy represents all items rated by y, and Cxy represents all items rated by both x and y.

The additional information included in a n-tuple may also be used when calculating the similarity factor between two users. For example, the information may be considered separately in order to distinguish between users, e.g. if a user tends to rate items only at night and another user tends to rate items only during the day, the users may be considered dissimilar to some degree, regardless of the fact that they may have rated an identical set of items identically. Alternatively, if the additional information is being used as a confidence factor as described above, then the information may be used in at least two ways.

In one embodiment, only item ratings that have a confidence factor above a certain threshold are used in the methods described above to calculate similarity factors between users.

In a second embodiment, the respective confidence factors associated with ratings in each user's profile may be factored into each rating comparison. For example, if a first user has given an item a rating of "7" which has a high confidence factor, but a second user has given the same item a rating of "7" with a low confidence factor, the second user's rating may be "discounted." For example, the system may consider the second user as having a rating of "4" for the item instead of "7." Once ratings are appropriately "discounted", similarity factors can be calculated using any of the methods described above.

Regardless of the method used to generate them, or whether the additional information contained in the profiles is used, the similarity factors are used to select a plurality of users that have a high degree of correlation to a user (step 106). These users are called the user's "neighboring users." A user may be selected as a neighboring user if that user's similarity factor with respect to the requesting user is better than a predetermined threshold value, L. The threshold value, L, can be set to any value which improves the predictive capability of the method. In general, the value of L will change depending on the method used to calculate the similarity factors, the item domain, and the size of the number of ratings that have been entered. In another embodiment, a predetermined number of users are selected from the users having a similarity factor better than L, e.g. the top twenty-five users. For embodiments in which confidence factors are calculated for each user-user similarity factor, the neighboring users can be selected based on having both a threshold value less than L and a confidence factor higher than a second predetermined threshold.

In some embodiments, users are placed in the rating user's neighbor set based on considerations other than the similarity factor between the rating user and the user to be added to the set. For example, the additional information associated with item ratings may indicate that whenever user A has rated an item highly, User B has sampled that item and also liked it considerably. The system may assume that User B enjoys following the advice of User A. However, User A may not be selected for User B's neighbor set using the methods described above due to a number of reasons, including that there may be a number of users in excess of the threshold, L, which highly correlate with User B's profile. These highly correlated users will fill up User B's neighbor set regardless of their use in recommending new items to User B.

Alternatively, certain users may not be included in a neighbor set because their contribution is cumulative. For example, if a user's neighbor set already includes two users that have rated every Dim Sum restaurant in Boston, a third user that has rated only Dim Sum restaurants in Boston would be cumulative, regardless of the similarity factor calculated for that user, and another user who has rated different items in a different domain may be included instead.

Another embodiment in which neighbors may be chosen for a user based on the additional information stored in the user profiles concerns multi-domain settings. In these settings, a user may desire to explore a new domain of items. However, the user's neighbors may not have explored that domain sufficiently to provide the user with adequate recommendations for items to sample. In this situation, users may be selected for the exploring user's neighbor set based on various factors, such as the number of items they have rated in the domain which the user wants to explore. This may be done on the assumption that a user that has rated many items in a particular domain is an experienced guide to that domain.

A user's neighboring user set should be updated each time that a new rating is entered by, or inferred for, that user. In many applications it is desirable to reduce the amount of computation required to maintain the appropriate set of neighboring users by limiting the number of user profiles consulted to create the set of neighboring users. In one embodiment, instead of updating the similarity factors between a rating user and every other user of the system (which has computational order of n2), only the similarity factors between the rating user and the rating user's neighbors, as well as the similarity factors between the rating user and the neighbors of the rating user's neighbors are updated. This limits the number of user profiles which must be compared to m2 minus any degree of user overlap between the neighbor sets where m is a number smaller than n. In this embodiment, similar users are selected in any manner as described above, such as a similarity factor threshold, a combined similarity factor-confidence factor threshold, or solely on the basis of additional information contained in user profiles.

Once a set of neighboring users is chosen, a weight is assigned to each of the neighboring users (step 108). In one embodiment, the weights are assigned by subtracting the similarity factor calculated for each neighboring user from the threshold value and dividing by the threshold value. This provides a user weight that is higher, i.e. closer to one, when the similarity factor between two users is smaller. Thus, similar users are weighted more heavily than other, less similar, users. In other embodiments, the confidence factor can be used as the weight for the neighboring users. Users that are placed into a neighbor set on the basis of other information, i.e. "reputation" or experience in a particular domain, may have an appropriate weight selected for them. For example, if a user is selected because of their experience with a particular domain, that user may be weighted very highly since it is assumed that they have much experience with the items to be recommended. The weights assigned to such users may be adjusted accordingly to enhance the recommendations given to the user.

Once weights are assigned to the neighboring users, an item is recommended to a user (step 110). For applications in which positive item recommendations are desired, items are recommended if the user's neighboring users have also rated the item highly. For an application desiring to warn users away from items, items are displayed as recommended against when the user's neighboring users have also given poor ratings to the item. Once again, although specialized hardware may be provided to select and weight neighboring users, an appropriately programmed general-purpose computer may provide these functions.

The item to be recommended may be selected in any fashion, so long as the ratings of the neighboring users, their assigned weights, and the confidence factors, if any, are taken into account. In one embodiment, a rating is predicted for each item that has not yet been rated by the user. This predicted rating can be arrived at by taking a weighted average of the ratings given to those items by the user's neighboring users. A predetermined number of items may then be recommended to the user based on the predicted ratings.

Recommendations may also be generated using the additional information associated with the user ratings or the confidence factors associated with the similarity factors calculated between a user and the user's neighbors. For example, the additional information may be used to discount the rating given to items. In this embodiment, the additional information may indicate that a rating is possibly invalid or old would result in that rating being weighted less than other ratings. The additional information may be expressed as a confidence factor and, in this embodiment, items are recommended only if the user's neighboring user both recommends them highly and there is a high confidence factor associated with that user's rating of the item.

The predetermined number of items to recommend can be selected such that those items having the highest predicted rating are recommended to the user or the predetermined number of items may be selected based on having the lowest predicted rating of all the items. Alternatively, if a system has a large number of items from which to select items to recommend, confidence factors can be used to limit the amount of computation required by the system to generate recommendation. For example, the system can select the first predetermined number of items that are highly rated by the user's neighbors for which the confidence factor is above a certain threshold.

Recommendations can take any of a number of forms. For example, recommended items may be output as a list, either printed on paper by a printer, visually displayed on a display screen, or read aloud.

In another embodiment the user selects an item for which a predicted rating is desired. A rating can be predicted by taking a weighted average of the ratings given to that item by the user's neighboring users.

Whatever method is used, information about the recommended items can be displayed to the user. For example, in a music domain, the system may display a list of recommended albums including the name of the recording artist, the name of the album, the record label which made the album, the producer of the album, "hit" songs on the album, and other information. In the embodiment in which the user selects an item and a rating is predicted for that item, the system may display the actual rating predicted, or a label representing the predicted rating. For example, instead of displaying 6.8 out of a possible 7.0 for the predicted rating, a system may instead display "highly recommended". Embodiments in which a confidence factor is calculated for each prediction may display that information to the user, either as a number or a label. For example, the system may display "highly recommended--85% confidence" or it may display "highly recommended--very sure."

In one embodiment, items are grouped in order to help predict ratings and increase recommendation certainty. For example, in the broad domain of music, recordings may be grouped according to various genres, such as "opera," "pop," "rock," and others. Groups are used to improve performance because predictions and recommendations for a particular item are made based only on the ratings given to other items within the same group. Groups may be determined based on information entered by the users, however it is currently preferred to generate the groups using the item data itself.

Generating the groups using the item data itself can be done in any manner which groups items together based on some differentiating feature. For example, in the item domain of music recordings, groups could be generated corresponding to "pop," "opera," and others.

In the preferred embodiment, item groups are generated by, first, randomly assigning all items in the database to a number of groups. The number of desired groups can be predetermined or random. For each initial group, the centroid of the ratings for items assigned to that group are calculated. This can be done by any method that determines the approximate mean value of the spectrum of ratings contained in the item profiles assigned to the initial group, such as eigenanalysis. It is currently preferred is to average all values present in the initial group.

After calculating the group centroids, determine to which group centroid each item is closest, and move it to that group. Whenever an item is moved in this manner, recalculate the centroids for the affected groups. Iterate until the distance between all group centroids and items assigned to each group are below a predetermined threshold or until a certain number of iterations have been accomplished.

A method using grouping to improve performance calculates similarity factors for a user with respect to other users for a particular group (step 104). For example, a user may have one similarity factor with respect to a second user for the "pop" grouping of music items and a second similarity factor with respect to that same user for the "opera" grouping of music items. This is because the "pop" similarity factor is calculated using only ratings for "pop" items, while the "opera" similarity factor is calculated only for "opera" items. Any of the methods described above for calculating similarity factors may be used.

The neighboring users are selected based on the similarity factors (step 106). The neighboring users are weighted, and recommendations for items are arrived at (steps 108 and 110) as above. A weighted average of the ratings given to other items in the group can be used to recommend items both inside the group and outside the group. For example, if a user has a high correlation with another user in the "pop" grouping of music items, that similarity factor can be used to recommend music items inside the "pop" grouping, since both users have rated many items in the group. The similarity factor can also be used to recommend a music item outside of the group, if one of the users has rated an item in another group. Alternatively, a user may select a group, and a recommendation list will be generated based on the predicted rating for the user's neighboring users in that group.

Whether or not grouping is used, a user or set or users may be recommended to a user as having similar taste in items of a certain group. In this case, the similarity factors calculated from the user profiles and item profiles are used to match similar users and introduce them to each other. This is done by recommending one user to another in much the same way that an item is recommended to a user. It is possible to increase the recommendation certainty by including the number of items rated by both users in addition to the similarity factors calculated for the users.

The user profiles and, if provided, item profiles may be used to allow communication to be targeted to specific users that will be most receptive to the communication. This may be done in at least two ways.

In a first embodiment, a communication is provided which is intended to be delivered to users that have rated a particular item or set of items highly. In this embodiment, if the communication is to be targeted at users that have rated a particular item highly, then the profile for that item is retrieved from memory and users which have rated the item highly are determined. The determination of users that have rated the item highly may be done in any number of ways, for example, a threshold value may be set and users which have given a rating for the item in excess of that threshold value would be selected as targeted users.

Alternatively, if the communication is to be targeted at users that have rated a set of items highly, then each profile for each item that is to be considered can be retrieved from the memory element and a composite rating of items may be produced for each user. The composite rating may be a weighted average of the individual ratings given to the items by a user; each item may be weighted equally with all the other items or a predetermined weight may be assigned to each individual item. In this embodiment, once a composite rating for each user has been determined, then targeted users are selected. This selection may be done by setting a predetermined threshold which, when a user's composite rating is in excess of, indicates that user is a targeted user.

In either embodiment, once targeted users are selected, the communication is displayed on that user's screen whenever the user accesses the system. In other embodiments the communication may be a facsimile message, an electronic mail message, or an audio message.

In a second embodiment, the communication which is to be targeted to selected users may seek out its own receptive users based on information stored in the user profiles and ratings given to the communication by users of the system. In this embodiment, the communication initially selects a set of users to which it presents itself. The initial selection of users may be done randomly, or the communication may be "preseeded" with a user profile which is its initial target.

Once a communication presents itself to a user or set of users, it requests a rating from that user or users. Users may then assign a rating to the communication in any of the ways described above. Once a communication receives a rating or ratings from users, the communication determines a new set of users to which it presents itself based on the received rating. One way the communication does this is to choose the neighbors of users that have rated it highly. In another embodiment, the communication analyzes the ratings it has received to determine the ideal user profile for a hypothetical user in the second set of users to which it will present itself The communication does this by retrieving from memory the user profiles of each user that has given it a rating. The communication then analyzes those user profiles to determine characteristics associated with users that have given it a favorable rating.

The communication may assume that it can infer more from looking at items that users have rated favorably or it may instead attempt to gather information based on items that those users have rated unfavorably. Alternatively, some selection of items in a group may be used to determine characteristics of favorable user profiles. In this embodiment, the communication may perform a similarity factor calculation using any of the methods described above. The set of neighboring users is the set of users to which the communication will present itself.

Once the communication has presented itself to the second set of users, the series of steps repeats with the new users rating the communication and the communication using that information to further refine its ideal user to which it will present itself. In some embodiments, a limit may be placed the number of users to which a communication may present itself in the form of tokens which the communication spends to present itself to a user, perform a similarity factor calculation, or other activities on the system. For example, a communication may begin with a certain number of tokens. For each user that it presents itself to, the communication must spend a token. The communication may be rewarded for users who rate it highly by receiving more tokens from the system than it had to pay to present itself to that user. Also, a communication may be penalized for presenting itself to users who give it a low rating. This penalty may take the form of a required payment of additional tokens or the communication may simply not receive tokens for the poor rating given to it by the user. Once the communication is out of tokens, it is no longer active on the system.

Grouping, as described above, is a special case of "feature-guided automated collaborative filtering" when there is only one feature of interest. The method of the present invention works equally well for item domains in which the items have multiple features of interest, such as World Wide Web pages.

The method using feature-guided automated collaborative filtering incorporates feature values associated with items in the domain. The term "feature value" is used to describe any information stored about a particular feature of the item. For example, a feature YL, JM, AC may have boolean feature values indicating whether or not a particular feature exists or does not exist in a particular item.

Alternatively, features may have numerous values, such as terms appearing as "keywords" in a document. In some embodiments, each feature value can be represented by a vector in some metric space, where each term of the vector corresponds to the mean score given by a user to items having the feature value.

Ideally, it is desirable to calculate a vector of distances between every pair of users, one for each possible feature value defined for an item. This may not be possible if the number of possible feature values is very large, i.e., keywords in a document, or the distribution of feature values is extremely sparse. Thus, in many applications, it is desirable to cluster feature values. The terms "cluster" and "feature value cluster" are used to indicate both individual feature values as well as feature value clusters, even though feature values may not necessarily be clustered.

Feature value clusters are created by defining a distance function Δ, defined for any two points in the vector space, as well as vector combination function Ω, which combines any two vectors in the space to produce a third point in the space that in some way represents the average of the points. Although not limited to the examples presented, three possible formulations of Δ and Ω are presented below.

The notion of similarity between any two feature values is how similarly they have been rated by the same user, across the whole spectrum of users and items. One method of defining the similarity between any two feature values is to take a simple average. Thus, we define the value ν.sup.αx to be the mean of the rating given to each item containing feature value FVx.sup.α that user i has rated. Expressed mathematically: ##EQU5## Where Γp.sup.α.sbsp.x indicates the presence or absence of feature value FVx.sup.α in item p. Any distance metric may be used to determine the per-user dimension squared distance between vectors feature value αx and feature value αy for user i. For example, any of the methods referred to above for calculating user similarity may be used.

Defining δ as the per-user dimension squared distance between two feature values, the total distance between the two feature value vectors is expressed mathematically as: ##EQU6## where, the term ##EQU7## represents adjustment for missing data.

The combination function for the two vectors, which represents a kind of average for the two vectors, is expressed mathematically by the following three equations. ##EQU8## wherein ηI.sup.α.sbsp.x indicates whether νI.sup.α.sbsp.x is defined.

Another method for calculating the similarity between any two feature values is to assume the number of values used to compute νI.sup.α.sbsp.x is sufficiently large. If this assumption is made, the Central Limit Theorem can be used to justify approximating the distribution of vectors by a Gaussian distribution.

Since the Gaussian distribution can be effectively characterized by its mean, variance and sample size, each entry νI.sup.α.sbsp.x is now a triplet. ##EQU9## where ##EQU10## is the sample mean of the population, ##EQU11## is the variance of the sampling distribution, and ##EQU12## is the sample size.

The total distance between the two feature value vectors is expressed mathematically by: ##EQU13##

The feature value combination function combines the corresponding triplets from the two vectors by treating them as gaussians, and therefore is represented mathematically by: ##EQU14##

where ##EQU15##

represents the mean of the new population, ##EQU16##

represents the variance of the combined population, and

N.sub.I.sup.α.sbsp.xy' =(N.sub.I.sup.α.sbsp.x +N.sub.I.sup.α.sbsp.y)

represents the sample size of the combined population.

The third method of calculating feature value similarity metrics attempts to take into account the variance of the sampling distribution when the sample size of the population is small. A more accurate estimator of the population variance is given by the term ##EQU17##

and represents the sample variance, which is an accurate estimator of the underlying population variance.

Accordingly operator ηI.sup.α.sbsp.x is redefined as: ##EQU18##

and the triplet is defined as: ##EQU19##

Given the above, the sample variance is represented as: ##EQU20##

The sample variance and the variance of the sample distribution for a finite population are related by the following relationship: ##EQU21##

which transforms the standard deviation into: ##EQU22##

Thus, the feature value vector combination function is defined as: ##EQU23##

Regardless of the feature value combination function used, the item similarity metrics generated by them are used to generate feature value clusters. Feature value clusters are generated from the item similarity metrics using any clustering algorithm known in the art. For example, the method described above with respect to grouping items could be used to group values within each feature.

Feature values can be clustered both periodically and incrementally. Incremental clustering is necessary when the number of feature values for items is so large that reclustering of all feature values cannot be done conveniently. However, incremental clustering may be used for any set of items, and it is preferred to use both periodic reclustering and incremental reclustering.

All feature values are periodically reclustered using any clustering method known in the art, such as K-means. It is preferred that this is done infrequently, because of the time that may be required to complete such a reclustering. In order to cluster new feature values present in items new to the domain, feature values are incrementally clustered. New feature values present in the new items are clustered into the already existing feature value clusters. These feature values may or may not be reclustered into another feature value cluster when the next complete reclustering is done.

Using the feature value clusters generated by any one of the methods described above, a method for recommending an item, as shown in FIG. 2, uses feature clusters to aid in predicting ratings and proceeds as the method of FIG. 1, in that a plurality of user profiles is stored (step 102'). As above, a plurality of item profiles may also be stored. The method using feature value clusters assigns a weight to each feature value cluster and a weight to each feature based on the users rating of the item (steps 120 and 122).

A feature value cluster weight for each cluster is calculated for each user based on the user's ratings of items having that cluster. The cluster weight is an indication of how important a particular user seems to find a particular feature value cluster. For example, a feature for an item in a music domain might be the identity of the producer. If a user rated highly all items having a particular producer (or cluster of producers), then the user appears to place great emphasis on that particular producer (feature value) or cluster of producers (feature value cluster).

Any method of assigning feature value cluster weight that takes into account the user's rating of the item and the existence of the feature value cluster for that item is sufficient. However, it is currently preferred to assign feature value cluster weights by summing all of the item ratings that a user has entered and dividing by the number of feature value clusters. Expressed mathematically, the vector weight for cluster x of feature α for user I is: ##EQU24## where γp.sup.αx is a boolean operator indicating whether item p contains the feature value cluster x of feature α.

The feature value cluster weight is used, in turn, to define a feature weight. The feature weight reflects the importance of that feature relative to the other features for a particular feature. Any method of estimating a feature weight can be used; for example, feature weights may be defined as the reciprocal of the number of features defined for all items. It is preferred that feature weights are defined as the standard deviation of all cluster weight divided by the means of all cluster weights. Expressed mathematically: ##EQU25##

The feature value cluster weights and the feature weights are used to calculate the similarity factor between two users. The similarity factor between two users may be calculated by any method that takes into account the assigned weights. For example, any of the methods for calculating the similarity between two users, as described above, may be used provided they are augmented by the feature weights and feature value weights. Thus ##EQU26## represents the similarity between users I and J, where τ.sup.αx (DI,J) is a boolean operator on a vector of values indicating whether feature value cluster of x for feature α of the vector is defined and where ##EQU27##

The representation of an item as a set of feature values allows the application of various feature-based similarity metrics between items. Two items may not share any identical feature values but still be considered quite similar to each other if they share some feature value clusters. This allows the recommendation of unrated items to a user based on the unrated items similarity to other items which the user has already rated highly.

The similarity between two items p1 and p2, where P1 and P2 represent the corresponding sets of feature values possessed by these items, can be represented as some function, f, of the following three sets: the number of common feature values shared by the two items; the number of feature values that p1 possesses that p2 does not; and the number of feature values that p2 possesses that p1 does not.

Thus, the similarity between two items, denoted by S(p1, p2), is represented as:

S(p.sub.1,p.sub.2)=F(P.sub.1 ∩P.sub.2,P.sub.1 -P.sub.2,P.sub.2 -P.sub.1)

Each item is treated as a vector of feature value clusters and the item-item similarity metrics are defined as: ##EQU28##

This metric is personalized to each user since the feature weights and cluster weights reflect the relative importance of a particular feature value to a user.

Another method of defining item-item similarity metrics attempts to take into account the case where one pair of items has numerous identical feature values, because if two items share a number of identical feature values, they are more similar to each other then two items that do not share feature values. Using this method, f(P1 ∩P2) is defined as: ##EQU29##

Another method for calculating item-item similarity is to treat each item as a vector of feature value clusters and then compute the weighted dot product of the two vectors. Thus,

S(p.sub.1,p.sub.2)=g(P.sub.1 ∩P.sub.2)

where ##EQU30##

In another aspect, the system and method may be used to identify users that will enjoy a particular item. In this aspect, as above, user profiles and item profiles are stored in a memory element, and the user profiles and item profiles record ratings given to items by users. An item profile contains at least an identification of a user and the rating given to that item by that user. The item profile may contain additional information just as described in connection with user profiles. Similarity factors between items are calculated using any of the methods described above. For example, using the squared difference method for calculating similarity factors, the rating given to a first item by User A and the rating given to a second item by User A are subtracted and that difference is squared. This is done for each user that has rated both items. The squared differences are then summed and divided by the total number of users that have rated both items.

This provides an item-item similarity metric and a group of neighboring items is selected in the same way as described above. Those neighboring items are then weighted and a user, or group of users, that will be receptive to a given item are determined. Again, this may be done using any of the methods described above, including using confidence factors, item grouping, or feature guided automated collaborative filtering.

The methods described above can be provided as software on any suitable medium that is readable by a computing device. The software programs means may be implemented in any suitable language such as, C, C++, PERL, LISP, ADA, assembly language or machine code. The suitable media may be any device capable of storing program means in a computer-readable fashion. such as a floppy disk, a hard disk, an optical disk, a CD-ROM, a magnetic tape, a memory card, or a removable magnetic drive.

An apparatus may be provided to recommend items to a user. The apparatus, as shown in FIG. 3 has a memory element 12 for storing user and item profiles. Memory element 12 can be any memory element capable of storing the profiles such as, RAM EPROM, or magnetic media.

A means 14 for calculating is provided which calculates the similarity factors between users. Calculating means 14 may be specialized hardware to do the calculation or, alternatively, calculating means 14 may be a microprocessor or software running on a microprocessor resident in a general-purpose computer.

Means 16 for selecting is also provided to select neighboring users responsive to the similarity factors. Again, specialized hardware or a microprocessor may be provided to implement the selecting means 16, however preferred is to provide a software program running on a microprocessor resident in a general-purpose computer. Selecting means 16 may be a separate microprocessor from calculating means 14 or it may be the same microprocessor.

A means 18 for assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users is provided and can be specialized hardware, a separate microprocessor, the same microprocessor as calculating means 14 and selecting means 16, or a microprocessor resident in a general-purpose computer and running software.

In some embodiments a receiving means is included in the apparatus (not shown in FIG. 3). Receiving means is any device which receives ratings for items from users. The receiving means may be a keyboard or mouse connected to a personal computer. In some embodiments, an electronic mail system operating over a local are network or a wide area network forms the receiving means. In the preferred embodiment, a World Wide Web Page connected to the Internet forms the receiving means.

Also included in the apparatus is means 20 for recommending at least one of the items to the users based on the weights assigned to the users, neighboring users and the ratings given to the item by the users' neighboring users. Recommendation means 20 may be specialized hardware, a microprocessor, or, as above, a microprocessor running software and resident on a general-purpose computer. Recommendation means 20 may also comprise an output device such as a display, audio output, or printed output.

In another embodiment an apparatus for recommending an item is provided that uses feature weights and feature value weights. This apparatus is similar to the one described above except that it also includes a means for assigning a feature value cluster weight 22 and a means for assigning a feature weight 24 (not shown in FIG. 3). Feature value cluster weight assigning means 22 and feature value weight assigning means 24 may be provided as specialized hardware, a separate microprocessor, the same microprocessor as the other means, or as a single microprocessor in a general purpose computer.

FIG. 4 shows the Internet system on which an embodiment of the method and apparatus may be used. The server 40 is an apparatus as shown in FIG. 3, and it is preferred that server 40 displays a World Wide Web Page when accessed by a user via Internet 42. Server 40 also accepts input over the Internet 42. Multiple users 44 may access server 40 simultaneously. In other embodiments, the system may be a stand-alone device, e.g. a kiosk, which a user physically approaches and with which the user interacts. Alternatively, the system may operate on an organization's internal web, commonly known as an Intranet, or it may operate via a wireless network, such as satellite broadcast.

EXAMPLE 1

The following example is one way of using the invention, which can be used to recommend items in various domains for many items. By way of example, a new user 44 accesses the system via the World Wide Web. The system displays a welcome page, which allows the user 44 to create an alias to use when accessing the system. Once the user 44 has entered a personal alias, the user 44 is asked to rate a number of items, in this example the items to be rated are recording artists in the music domain.

After the user 44 has submitted ratings for various recording artists, the system allows the user 44 to enter ratings for additional artists or to request recommendations. If the user 44 desires to enter ratings for additional artists, the system can provide a list of artists the user 44 has not yet rated. For the example, the system can simply provide a random listing of artists not yet rated by the user 44. Alternatively, the user 44 can request to rate artists that are similar to recording artists they have already rated, and the system will provide a list of similar artists using the item similarity values previously calculated by the system. The user can also request to rate recording artists from a particular group, e.g. modern jazz, rock, or big band, and the system will provide the user 44 with a list of artists belonging to that group that the user 44 has not yet rated. The user 44 can also request to rate more artists that the user's 44 neighboring users have rated, and the system will provide the user 44 with a list of artists by selecting artists rated by the user's 44 neighboring users.

The user 44 can request the system to make artist recommendations at any time, and the system allows the user 44 to tailor their request based on a number of different factors. Thus, the system can recommend artists from various groups that the user's 44 neighboring users have also rated highly. Similarly, the system can recommend a predetermined number of artists from a particular group that the user will enjoy, e.g. opera singers. Alternatively, the system may combine these approaches and recommend only opera singers that the user's neighboring users have rated highly.

The system allows the user 44 to switch between rating items and receiving recommendations many times. The system also provides a messaging function, so that users 44 may leave messages for other users that are not currently using the system. The system provides "chat rooms," which allow users 44 to engage in conversation with other users 44' that are currently accessing the system. These features are provided to allow users 44 to communicate with one another. The system facilitates user communication by informing a user 44 that another user 44' shares an interest in a particular recording artist. Also, the system may inform a user 44 that another user 44 that shares an interest in a particular recording artists is currently accessing the system, the system will not only inform the user 44, but will encourage the user 44 to contact the other user 44' that shares the interest. The user 44 may leave the system by logging off of the Web Page.

EXAMPLE 2

In another example, the system is provided as a stand-alone kiosk which is used by shoppers in a retail establishment. The kiosk has an output device such as a display screen or printer, and possible an input device, such as a touch screen or keyboard. The kiosk has a memory element which allows it to store profiles for items and users. In come cases, the kiosk may be provided with a CD-ROM drive for allowing "preseeded" user and item profiles to be loaded into the kiosk.

In this example, a user may approach a kiosk to determine an item which is recommended for them. The user would input their alias from the system of EXAMPLE 1, and the kiosk could access the CD-ROM in order to load the user's profile into memory. The kiosk may also load similarity factors which have been calculated before hand or the kiosk may calculate the similarity factors now. The kiosk can then use any of the methods described above to create a list of recommended item which may be printed out for the user, displayed to the user on the display screen, or read aloud to the user through an audio device.

The kiosk may also provide the user with directions for how to find recommended items in the retail establishment, or the kiosk may allow the user to purchase the item directly by interacting with the kiosk.

Having described preferred embodiments of the invention, it will now become apparent to one of skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts may be used. It is felt, therefore, that these embodiments should not be limited to disclosed embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims (33)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for operating a machine to recommend an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the method comprising the steps of:
(a) storing, using the machine, a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(b) calculating, using the machine, for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c) selecting, using the machine, for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, the selecting step comprising the steps of, for each of the plurality of users:
(c1) comparing associated similarity factors for the user and each one of the plurality of users; and
(c2) choosing said each one of the plurality of users as one of the neighboring users if a difference between the associated similarity factors exceeds a predetermined threshold value;
(d) assigning, using the machine, a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommending, using the machine, at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein step (a) further comprises:
storing, using the machine, a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing information relating to the given ratings.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein step (a) further comprises:
storing, using the machine, a user profile in memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing information about the user.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein step (a) further comprises sub-steps of:
i) storing, in the machine, a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information; and
ii) creating, using the machine, a confidence factor for one of the given ratings based on the additional information.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein step (c) further comprises:
calculating, using the machine, for a user, a plurality of similarity factors and a plurality of similarity confidence factors, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users, and each of the similarity confidence factors representing possible imprecision in the associated similarity factor.
6. The method claim 5 wherein step (d) further comprises selecting, using the machine, for the user, a plurality of neighboring users from the plurality of other users based on the similarity factors and the similarity confidence factors.
7. The method of claim 5 wherein step (e) further comprises:
assigning, using the machine, a weight to each of the neighboring users, wherein the weight is the similarity confidence factor.
8. The method of claim 5 wherein step (e) further comprises:
i) recommending, using the machine, at least one of a plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and the ratings given to the item by the plurality of neighboring users; and
ii) generating, using the machine, a recommendation confidence factor based on the similarity confidence factors.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein step (c) further comprises:
calculating, using the machine, for a user, a plurality of similarity factors based on the ratings given to items by users and the additional information associated with the given ratings, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of storing a user profile further comprises:
i) inferring, using the machine, a user's rating for one of the plurality of items based on the user's behavior;
ii) updating, using the machine, the user's profile with the inferred rating; and
iii) calculating, using the machine, for the user a plurality of similarity factors, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another user.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the behavior of the user used to infer a user's rating includes, at least one of Web sites for which the user has created bookmarks, and a length of time that the user views a particular Web page.
12. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of storing, using the machine, an item profile in a memory for each of the plurality of items, wherein at least one of the item profiles includes a plurality of values, at least one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to the item by one of the plurality of users.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of storing a user profile further comprises:
i) inferring, using the machine, a user's rating for one of the plurality of items based on the user's behavior;
ii) retrieving, using the machine, the item profile;
iii) determining, using the machine, from the item profile, other users having ratings for the item; and
iv) calculating, using the machine, a similarity factor between the user and each of the plurality of other users that have also rated the item.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein step (d) further comprises selecting, using the machine, for the user, at least one neighboring user based on the additional information.
15. The method of claim 1 wherein step (e) further comprises:
i) recommending, using the machine, at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and the ratings given to the item by the plurality of neighboring users; and
ii) generating, using the machine, a recommendation confidence factor based on the additional information associated with the ratings given to the item.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein, in the step of selecting a plurality of neighboring users, if one of the plurality of users has cumulative item ratings, it is not selected as a neighboring user.
17. The method of claim 1 wherein, in the step of assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users, similar users are weighted more heavily that less similar users.
18. The method of claim 1 wherein, in the step of assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users, the weight is based on a confidence factors.
19. The method of claim 1 further comprising a step of grouping the plurality of items to define a plurality of groups, wherein each of the groups have a rating based on the ratings of the items defining the groups, and wherein, in the step of calculating, for a user, a plurality of similarity factors, the similarly factors are based on the ratings of the groups.
20. A computer-implemented method for operating a machine to recommend an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the method comprising the steps, performed by the machine, of:
(a) storing a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(b) calculating for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c) selecting for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, the selecting step comprising the steps of, for each of the plurality of users:
(c1) comparing associated similarity factors for the user and each one of the plurality of users; and
(c2) choosing said each one of the plurality of users as one of the neighboring users if both a difference between the associated similarity factors is less than a first predetermined threshold and a total number of selected neighboring users is less than a second predetermined threshold;
(d) assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommending at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
21. A computer-implemented method for operating a machine to recommend an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the method comprising the steps, performed by the machine, of:
(a) storing a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(b) calculating for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c) selecting for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, the selecting step comprising the steps of, for each of the plurality of users:
(c1) comparing associated similarity factors for the user and each one of the plurality of users; and
(c2) choosing said one of the plurality of users as one of the neighboring users if both a difference between the associated similarity factors is less than a first predetermined threshold and a confidence factor determined for the associated similarities factors is greater than a second predetermined threshold;
(d) assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommending at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
22. A computer-implemented method for operating a machine to recommend an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the method comprising the steps, performed by the machine, of:
(a) storing a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(b) calculating for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c) selecting for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, the selecting step comprising the steps of:
(c1) defining a domain of items to be recommended; and
(c2) choosing each one of said users as one of the neighboring users unless said one user has less than a predetermined number of ratings of the items in the domain;
(d) assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommending at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
23. A computer-implemented method for operating a machine to recommend an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the method comprising the steps, performed by the machine, of:
(a) storing a user profile in a memory for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(b) grouping the plurality of items into a plurality of groups, wherein each of the groups has a rating based on the ratings of the items contained within said each group, wherein the grouping step comprises the steps of:
(b1) randomly assigning all items to a number of initial groups;
(b2) for each of the initial groups, determining a centroid of the ratings for the items assigned to the initial group;
(b3) for each item, moving the item to the group with a centroid of ratings closest to its rating; and
(b4) repeating steps (b1) through (b3) until both a certain number of iterations has been performed and distances, between all group centroids and items assigned to each of the groups, are below a predetermined threshold;
(c) calculating for the user, a plurality of similarity factors in response to ratings given to items by the user, the additional information, and the ratings of the groups, wherein each of the plurality of similarity factors represents a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(d) selecting for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors;
(e) assigning a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(f) recommending at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
24. A computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored therein, said instructions being executed by a computer for performing the steps of claim 1.
25. A computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored therein, said instructions being excuted by a computer for performing the steps of claim 20.
26. A computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored therein, said instructions being excuted by a computer for performing the steps of claim 21.
27. A computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored therein, said instructions being excuted by a computer for performing the steps of claim 22.
28. A computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored therein, said instructions being excuted by a computer for performing the steps of claim 23.
29. A Computer-implemented apparatus for recommending an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a processor; and
(b) a memory connected to the processor and storing computer executable instructions therein;
(c) wherein the processor, in response to execution of the instructions:
(c1) stores, in the memory, a user profile for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(c2) calculates, for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c3) selects for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, by:
(c3a) comparing associated similarity factors for the user and each one of the plurality of users; and
(c3b) choosing said each one of the plurality of users as one of the neighboring users if a difference between the associated similarity factors exceeds a predetermined threshold value;
(d) assigns a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommends at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
30. A Computer-implemented apparatus for recommending an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a processor; and
(b) a memory connected to the processor and storing computer executable instructions therein;
(c) wherein the processor, in response to execution of the instructions:
(c1) stores, in the memory, a user profile for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(c2) calculates, for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c3) selects for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, by:
(c3a) comparing associated similarity factors for the user and each one of the plurality of users; and
(c3b) choosing said each one of the plurality of users as one of the neighboring users if both a difference between the associated similarity factors is less than a first predetermined threshold and a total number of selected neighboring users is less than a second predetermined threshold;
(d) assigns a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommends at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
31. A Computer-implemented apparatus for recommending an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a processor; and
(b) a memory connected to the processor and storing computer executable instructions therein;
(c) wherein the processor, in response to execution of the instructions:
(c1) stores, in the memory, a user profile for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(c2) calculates, for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c3) selects for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, by:
(c3a) comparing associated similarity factors for the user and each one of the plurality of users; and
(c3b) choosing said one of the plurality of users as one of the neighboring users if both a difference between the associated similarity factors is less than a first predetermined threshold and a confidence factor determined for the associated similarities factors is greater than a second predetermined threshold;
(d) assigns a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommends at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
32. A Computer-implemented apparatus for recommending an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a processor; and
(b) a memory connected to the processor and storing computer executable instructions therein;
(c) wherein the processor, in response to execution of the instructions:
(c1) stores, in the memory, a user profile for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(c2) calculates, for the user, a plurality of similarity factors responsive to both ratings given to items by the user and the additional information, each of the plurality of similarity factors representing a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c3) selects for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors, by:
(c3a) defining a domain of items to be recommended; and
(c3b) choosing each one of said users as one of the neighboring users unless said one user has less than a predetermined number of ratings of the items in the domain;
(d) assigns a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(e) recommends at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
33. A Computer-implemented apparatus for recommending an item to one of a plurality of users, the item not yet rated by the user, the apparatus comprising:
(a) a processor; and
(b) a memory connected to the processor and storing computer executable instructions therein;
(c) wherein the processor, in response to execution of the instructions:
(c1) stores, in the memory, a user profile for each of the plurality of users, wherein at least one of the user profiles includes a plurality of values, one of the plurality of values representing a rating given to one of a plurality of items by the user and another of the plurality of values representing additional information;
(c2) groups the plurality of items into a plurality of groups, wherein each of the groups has a rating based on the ratings of the items contained within said each group, by:
(c2a) randomly assigning all items to a number of initial groups;
(c2b) for each of the initial groups, determining a centroid of the ratings for the items assigned to the initial group;
(c2c) for each item, moving the item to the group with a centroid of ratings closest to its rating; and
(c2d) repeating steps (c2a) through (c2c) until both a certain number of iterations has been performed and distances, between all group centroids and items assigned to each of the groups, are below a predetermined threshold;
(c3) calculates, for the user, a plurality of similarity factors in response to ratings given to items by the user, the additional information, and the ratings of the groups, wherein each of the plurality of similarity factors represents a similarity between the user and another one of the plurality of users;
(c4) selects for the user, a plurality of neighboring users based on the similarity factors;
(c5) assigns a weight to each of the neighboring users; and
(c6) recommends at least one of the plurality of items to the user based on the weights assigned to the plurality of neighboring users and ratings given to the plurality of items by the plurality of neighboring users.
US08789758 1995-06-30 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering Expired - Lifetime US6041311A (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59895 true 1995-06-30 1995-06-30
US845895 true 1995-12-11 1995-12-11
US59744296 true 1996-02-02 1996-02-02
US08789758 US6041311A (en) 1995-06-30 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08789758 US6041311A (en) 1995-06-30 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
PCT/US1998/001437 WO1998033135A1 (en) 1997-01-28 1998-01-26 Improved method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US59744296 Continuation-In-Part 1996-02-02 1996-02-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6041311A true US6041311A (en) 2000-03-21

Family

ID=25148604

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08789758 Expired - Lifetime US6041311A (en) 1995-06-30 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US6041311A (en)
WO (1) WO1998033135A1 (en)

Cited By (460)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000036544A1 (en) * 1998-12-18 2000-06-22 Frog Design, Inc. System and method for configuring a product
WO2000062223A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2000-10-19 Amazon.Com, Inc. Systems and methods for assisting users in selecting and evaluating items from an electronic catalog
WO2000067183A1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2000-11-09 Decide.Com Web-based comparison shopping for consumer services
US6195657B1 (en) * 1996-09-26 2001-02-27 Imana, Inc. Software, method and apparatus for efficient categorization and recommendation of subjects according to multidimensional semantics
US6236990B1 (en) * 1996-07-12 2001-05-22 Intraware, Inc. Method and system for ranking multiple products according to user's preferences
US6249815B1 (en) * 1998-05-06 2001-06-19 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for building subscriber service profile based on subscriber related data
WO2001065334A2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2001-09-07 Baker Benjamin D Intelligence driven paging process for a chat room
WO2001071639A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-09-27 Jung Young Keun Web singer selection system and web singer selection method based on internet
US6321221B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2001-11-20 Net Perceptions, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for increasing the user value of recommendations
US6321179B1 (en) * 1999-06-29 2001-11-20 Xerox Corporation System and method for using noisy collaborative filtering to rank and present items
US20010051893A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-12-13 Atsushi Hanai Online shopping system and method
US6334127B1 (en) 1998-07-17 2001-12-25 Net Perceptions, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for making serendipity-weighted recommendations to a user
US20020004764A1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2002-01-10 Markus Stolze Electronic product catalog systems
US20020013815A1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2002-01-31 Obradovich Michael L. Technique for effective organization and communication of information
US6345264B1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2002-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Methods and apparatus, using expansion attributes having default, values, for matching entities and predicting an attribute of an entity
US20020016786A1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2002-02-07 Pitkow James B. System and method for searching and recommending objects from a categorically organized information repository
US20020024531A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-02-28 Herrell William R. Method for evaluating employees and aggregating their respective skills and experience in a searchable database for sharing knowledge resources
US6353813B1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2002-03-05 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus, using attribute set harmonization and default attribute values, for matching entities and predicting an attribute of an entity
US6356879B2 (en) * 1998-10-09 2002-03-12 International Business Machines Corporation Content based method for product-peer filtering
US20020032776A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-03-14 Yamaha Corporation Contents rating method
US20020035501A1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2002-03-21 Sean Handel A personalized product report
US6363383B1 (en) * 1997-12-26 2002-03-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information filtering for selectively limiting access
WO2002032038A2 (en) * 2000-10-13 2002-04-18 Geneed, Inc. Computer-based education system for scientific procedures with product procurement capability
US20020052783A1 (en) * 2000-06-26 2002-05-02 Turek David G. Method and apparatus for establishing a customized electronic site
US20020052873A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-05-02 Joaquin Delgado System and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US20020056109A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2002-05-09 Tomsen Mai-Lan Method and system to provide a personalized shopping channel VIA an interactive video casting system
US20020055867A1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2002-05-09 Putnam Laura T. System and method of identifying options for employment transfers across different industries
US6398556B1 (en) * 1998-07-06 2002-06-04 Chi Fai Ho Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US6405034B1 (en) 2000-01-28 2002-06-11 Leap Wireless International, Inc. Adaptive communication data retrieval system
US6412012B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2002-06-25 Net Perceptions, Inc. System, method, and article of manufacture for making a compatibility-aware recommendations to a user
EP1217554A2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-06-26 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method
US20020082955A1 (en) * 2000-04-25 2002-06-27 Patel Salil D. Computer-based education system for scientific procedures with product procurement capability
US20020087452A1 (en) * 2001-01-04 2002-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program product for improving broker's profits in electronic commerce
US20020087390A1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2002-07-04 Weathersby Robert G. Method and system of using collective human intelligence to logically group related items
US20020087600A1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2002-07-04 Newbold David Leroy Method and system for profiling users based on their relationships with content topics
US20020091715A1 (en) * 2001-01-11 2002-07-11 Aric Coady Process and system for sparse vector and matrix reperesentation of document indexing and retrieval
US6438579B1 (en) * 1999-07-16 2002-08-20 Agent Arts, Inc. Automated content and collaboration-based system and methods for determining and providing content recommendations
US6453299B1 (en) * 1995-12-19 2002-09-17 Aspen Marketing, Inc. Method for customizing queries
US20020138493A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2002-09-26 Shapiro Eileen C. System and method for structured news release generation and distribution
US20020143613A1 (en) * 2001-02-05 2002-10-03 Hong Se June Fast method for renewal and associated recommendations for market basket items
WO2002079901A2 (en) * 2001-02-16 2002-10-10 Bee-Bee, Inc. Customer preference system
US20020161770A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2002-10-31 Shapiro Eileen C. System and method for structured news release generation and distribution
US20020161664A1 (en) * 2000-10-18 2002-10-31 Shaya Steven A. Intelligent performance-based product recommendation system
US20020165755A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2002-11-07 Kitts Brendan J. Method of predicting behavior of a customer at a future date and a data processing system readable medium
US20020169851A1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2002-11-14 Robert Weathersby Internet-based system for dynamically creating and delivering customized content within remote web pages
US20020178019A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2002-11-28 Anderson Andrew V. Method and apparatus for message escalation by digital assistants
US20020188589A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-12-12 Jukka-Pekka Salmenkaita Method and business process to maintain privacy in distributed recommendation systems
US20030004835A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and product service for locating items satisfying a general requirement and ranking items according to utility
US20030017801A1 (en) * 2000-11-09 2003-01-23 Ncr Corporation Disseminating consumer information
US6526411B1 (en) 1999-11-15 2003-02-25 Sean Ward System and method for creating dynamic playlists
US20030055516A1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2003-03-20 Dan Gang Using a system for prediction of musical preferences for the distribution of musical content over cellular networks
US20030065584A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-03 Mazda Motor Corporation Vehicle sales support system, vehicle sales support program and vehicle sales support method
US20030063779A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2003-04-03 Jennifer Wrigley System for visual preference determination and predictive product selection
US20030088480A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-08 International Business Machines Corporation Enabling recommendation systems to include general properties in the recommendation process
US20030089218A1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2003-05-15 Dan Gang System and method for prediction of musical preferences
US20030097186A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V Method and apparatus for generating a stereotypical profile for recommending items of interest using feature-based clustering
US20030097196A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for generating a stereotypical profile for recommending items of interest using item-based clustering
US20030101325A1 (en) * 2001-11-29 2003-05-29 Giuseppe Desoli Transparent remote data storage device and method
US20030106057A1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2003-06-05 Predictive Networks, Inc. Television navigation program guide
US20030110056A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method for rating items within a recommendation system based on additional knowledge of item relationships
US20030115278A1 (en) * 2001-12-13 2003-06-19 Goker Mehmet H. Method and system for personalizing content to be delivered to a group factoring into account individual interests of each group member
US20030135379A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-07-17 Schirmer Andrew Lewis System and method for publishing a person's affinities
US20030145002A1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2003-07-31 Tzunami, Inc. Method and system for organizing objects according to information categories
US20030149628A1 (en) * 2000-02-21 2003-08-07 Oday Abbosh Ordering items of playable content or other works
US6611814B1 (en) * 2000-07-17 2003-08-26 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for using virtual wish lists for assisting shopping over computer networks
US20030171964A1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2003-09-11 Honda North America Inc. Online system and method for locating and referring an automobile dealer to customers
US20030187835A1 (en) * 2000-09-27 2003-10-02 Augustin Huret Search engine
US6636836B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2003-10-21 Iwingz Co., Ltd. Computer readable medium for recommending items with multiple analyzing components
WO2003090146A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2003-10-30 Marcus Hong Pre-audition cd
US20030208399A1 (en) * 2002-05-03 2003-11-06 Jayanta Basak Personalized product recommendation
US20030221541A1 (en) * 2002-05-30 2003-12-04 Platt John C. Auto playlist generation with multiple seed songs
US20030228842A1 (en) * 2002-06-05 2003-12-11 Nokia Corporation Automatic determination of access point content and services for short-range wireless terminals
US20030236698A1 (en) * 2002-06-20 2003-12-25 Praisedepot, Llc Method and system for collecting, storing, managing and distributing references using networked computer devices
US6681247B1 (en) * 1999-10-18 2004-01-20 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Collaborator discovery method and system
US20040019846A1 (en) * 2002-07-24 2004-01-29 Xerox Corporation System and method for managing document retention of shared documents
US20040019657A1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2004-01-29 Viewpoint Communications, Inc. Method of searching for, collecting and distributing information in distributed computer
US6687696B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2004-02-03 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US20040039814A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2004-02-26 Crabtree Ian B Method of updating interests
US20040059626A1 (en) * 2002-09-23 2004-03-25 General Motor Corporation Bayesian product recommendation engine
EP1406186A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2004-04-07 France Telecom System for managing access to shared information
US6721748B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-04-13 Maquis Techtrix, Llc. Online content provider system and method
US6728706B2 (en) * 2001-03-23 2004-04-27 International Business Machines Corporation Searching products catalogs
US6742032B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2004-05-25 Xerox Corporation Method for monitoring and encouraging community activity in a networked environment
US6748395B1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2004-06-08 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamic playlist of media
US20040126748A1 (en) * 1996-03-19 2004-07-01 Ho Chi Fai Computer-aided learning system and method
US20040153413A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-05 Gross John N. Notification system and method for media Queue
US20040153373A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-05 Docomo Communications Laboratories Usa, Inc. Method and system for pushing services to mobile devices in smart environments using a context-aware recommender
US20040158497A1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2004-08-12 Brand Matthew E. On-line recommender system
US20040158504A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-12 Gross John N. Method of providing access to playable media
US20040158503A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-12 Gross John N. Media queue monitor
US6778982B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-08-17 Maquis Techtrix, Llc Online content provider system and method
US20040162783A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-19 Gross John N. Media queue replenisher
US6782409B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2004-08-24 Sony Corporation Experience/sympathy information providing system
US6782370B1 (en) * 1997-09-04 2004-08-24 Cendant Publishing, Inc. System and method for providing recommendation of goods or services based on recorded purchasing history
US20040172342A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-02 Gross John N. System for providing access to playable media
US20040172267A1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2004-09-02 Jayendu Patel Statistical personalized recommendation system
US20040172274A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-02 Gross John N. Media auto exchange system and method
US20040172275A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-02 Gross John N. Media exchange system & method
US20040181540A1 (en) * 2003-03-13 2004-09-16 Younghee Jung System and method for the provision of socially-relevant recommendations
US6804675B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-10-12 Maquis Techtrix, Llc Online content provider system and method
US20040202132A1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2004-10-14 Tomi Heinonen Moving mobile wireless device having continuing service from the same internet server
US20040203639A1 (en) * 2002-05-02 2004-10-14 Stuart Ozer Media planner
US20040225509A1 (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-11 Olivier Andre Use of financial transaction network(s) information to generate personalized recommendations
US20040243570A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-12-02 Gross John N. Method of testing inventory management/shipping systems
US20040243479A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-12-02 Gross John N. Method of monitoring electronic commerce queue
US20040243480A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-12-02 Gross John N. Method of controlling electronic commerce queue
US20040260621A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2004-12-23 Foster Benjamin David Listing recommendation in a network-based commerce system
US20040267669A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2004-12-30 Gross John N. Method of processing rental requests and returns
US20040267613A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2004-12-30 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for presenting personalized content on electronic commerce web pages
US20050027612A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2005-02-03 Walker Jay S. Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US20050038819A1 (en) * 2000-04-21 2005-02-17 Hicken Wendell T. Music Recommendation system and method
US20050038893A1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2005-02-17 Paul Graham Determining the relevance of offers
US6865574B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2005-03-08 Vignette Corporation Method for client-side personalization
US20050055450A1 (en) * 2002-11-18 2005-03-10 David Gang Matching members with shared interests
US20050052405A1 (en) * 2000-04-25 2005-03-10 Sunil Maulik Computer-based educational system
US6871186B1 (en) 1997-11-14 2005-03-22 New York University System and method for dynamic profiling of users in one-to-one applications and for validating user rules
US20050073522A1 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-04-07 Markus Aholainen Service/device indication with graphical interface
US20050086127A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2005-04-21 Hastings W. R. Approach for managing rental items across a plurality of distribution locations
US20050102202A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2005-05-12 Linden Gregory D. Content personalization based on actions performed during browsing sessions
US20050113066A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-05-26 Max Hamberg Method and system for multimedia tags
US20050120015A1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2005-06-02 Marum Campos Jose M. Method and system for supporting symbolic serendipity
US20050125307A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2005-06-09 Hunt Neil D. Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US20050136837A1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-06-23 Nurminen Jukka K. Method and system for detecting and using context in wireless networks
US20050160166A1 (en) * 2003-12-17 2005-07-21 Kraenzel Carl J. System and method for monitoring a communication and retrieving information relevant to the communication
US20050159998A1 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-07-21 Orkut Buyukkokten Methods and systems for rating associated members in a social network
US20050159970A1 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-07-21 Orkut Buyukkokten Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
US20050171860A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2005-08-04 W.W. Grainger, Inc. System and method for providing product recommendations
US20050177401A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2005-08-11 Capital One Financial Corporation System and method for performing Web based in-view monitoring
US20050182705A1 (en) * 2004-01-08 2005-08-18 Mclemore Greg System and apparatus for bidding
US20050197961A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-08 Miller Gregory P. Preference engine for generating predictions on entertainment products of services
US20050203807A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2005-09-15 Bezos Jeffrey P. Computer services for identifying and exposing associations between user communities and items in a catalog
US6947922B1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2005-09-20 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method for generating implicit ratings based on user interactions with handheld devices
US20050234637A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2005-10-20 Obradovich Michael L Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US20050251564A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-11-10 Tillotson Timothy N Remote instrument control by multiple clients
US20050251566A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Martin Weel Playlist downloading for digital entertainment network
US20050251807A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Martin Weel System and method for sharing playlists
US20050256756A1 (en) * 2004-05-17 2005-11-17 Lam Chuck P System and method for utilizing social networks for collaborative filtering
US20050261987A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2005-11-24 Bezos Jeffrey P Notification service for assisting users in selecting items from an electronic catalog
US20050278326A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2005-12-15 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US6981040B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2005-12-27 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20060004621A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-05 Malek Kamal M Real-time selection of survey candidates
US20060013487A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-19 Longe Michael R Disambiguating ambiguous characters
US20060015352A1 (en) * 2004-05-10 2006-01-19 Wynn Dominic C System and method for provisioning audiovisual works
US20060020614A1 (en) * 1997-08-08 2006-01-26 Kolawa Adam K Method and apparatus for automated selection, organization, and recommendation of items based on user preference topography
US6996572B1 (en) * 1997-10-08 2006-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for filtering of information entities
US6996612B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2006-02-07 Vignette Corporation Method of providing information related to activity of a user and a data processing system program product
US20060031114A1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2006-02-09 Oleg Zommers Interactive personal information system and method
US20060036510A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2006-02-16 W.W. Grainger, Inc. System and method for directing a customer to additional purchasing opportunities
US20060041548A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-02-23 Jeffrey Parsons System and method for estimating user ratings from user behavior and providing recommendations
US20060064431A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for creating a knowledge interchange profile
US20060064404A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for receiving and responding to knowledge interchange queries
US7024381B1 (en) 2000-04-28 2006-04-04 Netflix, Inc. Approach for renting items to customers
US20060073788A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2006-04-06 Vesa Halkka Context based connectivity for mobile devices
US20060074863A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for maintaining user privacy in a knowledge interchange system
US7031952B1 (en) 1999-10-08 2006-04-18 Knowledge Filter, Inc. Knowledge filter
US20060085282A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2006-04-20 Atsushi Hanai Online shopping system and method
US20060096447A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2006-05-11 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for providing automatic classification of media entities according to melodic movement properties
US20060106670A1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2006-05-18 Simin Cai System and method for interactively and progressively determining customer satisfaction within a networked community
US7062488B1 (en) 2000-08-30 2006-06-13 Richard Reisman Task/domain segmentation in applying feedback to command control
US7062561B1 (en) * 2000-05-23 2006-06-13 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for utilizing the social usage learned from multi-user feedback to improve resource identity signifier mapping
US20060136284A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Baruch Awerbuch Recommendation system
US7072846B1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2006-07-04 Emergent Music Llc Clusters for rapid artist-audience matching
US7072888B1 (en) * 1999-06-16 2006-07-04 Triogo, Inc. Process for improving search engine efficiency using feedback
US20060149731A1 (en) * 2005-01-05 2006-07-06 Schirmer Andrew L System and method for deriving affinity relationships between objects
US20060150216A1 (en) * 1994-11-29 2006-07-06 Frederick Herz System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US20060190331A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-24 Preston Tollinger Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US20060190450A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2006-08-24 Predixis Corporation Audio fingerprinting system and method
US20060190422A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Beale Kevin M System and method for dynamically creating records
US20060200556A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-09-07 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20060206478A1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2006-09-14 Pandora Media, Inc. Playlist generating methods
US20060212478A1 (en) * 2005-03-21 2006-09-21 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for generating a subgroup of one or more media items from a library of media items
US20060212367A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2006-09-21 Gross John N Method of selecting and distributing items to consumers of electronic media
US20060212149A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-09-21 Hicken Wendell T Distributed system and method for intelligent data analysis
US20060212442A1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2006-09-21 Pandora Media, Inc. Methods of Presenting and Providing Content to a User
US20060217828A1 (en) * 2002-10-23 2006-09-28 Hicken Wendell T Music searching system and method
US20060218187A1 (en) * 2005-03-25 2006-09-28 Microsoft Corporation Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating an ordered list of one or more media items
US7117518B1 (en) * 1998-05-14 2006-10-03 Sony Corporation Information retrieval method and apparatus
US20060224260A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-10-05 Hicken Wendell T Scan shuffle for building playlists
US20060224675A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Fox Kevin D Methods and systems for providing current email addresses and contact information for members within a social network
US20060224446A1 (en) * 2005-03-29 2006-10-05 Fox Kevin D Methods and systems for member-created advertisement in a member network
US20060224442A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Round Matthew J Closed loop voting feedback
WO2006103388A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 British Telecommunications Public Limited Virtual network linking computers whose users share similar interests
US20060230065A1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-12 Microsoft Corporation Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating a suggested list of media items based upon a seed
US20060229932A1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-12 Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. Intelligent sales and marketing recommendation system
US20060235721A1 (en) * 2001-06-06 2006-10-19 Lawrence Kavanagh System and method for managing marketing applications for a website
US20060242269A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-10-26 Gross John N Hybrid Distribution Method for Playable Media
US20060242661A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2006-10-26 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and device for generating a user profile on the basis of playlists
US20060265349A1 (en) * 2005-05-23 2006-11-23 Hicken Wendell T Sharing music essence in a recommendation system
US7146369B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2006-12-05 Vignette Corporation Method and system for native-byte form handling
US20060282304A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2006-12-14 Cnet Networks, Inc. System and method for an electronic product advisor
US7151764B1 (en) 2001-11-01 2006-12-19 Nokia Corporation Service notification on a low bluetooth layer
US20060288041A1 (en) * 2005-06-20 2006-12-21 Microsoft Corporation Providing community-based media item ratings to users
US7155506B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2006-12-26 Vignette Corporation Method for continous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US20060294084A1 (en) * 2005-06-28 2006-12-28 Patel Jayendu S Methods and apparatus for a statistical system for targeting advertisements
US7159011B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2007-01-02 Maquis Techtrix, Llc System and method for managing an online message board
US20070011173A1 (en) * 2005-05-23 2007-01-11 Ebags.Com Method and apparatus for providing shoe recommendations
US20070011039A1 (en) * 2003-03-25 2007-01-11 Oddo Anthony S Generating audience analytics
US20070016599A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 Microsoft Corporation User interface for establishing a filtering engine
US20070038672A1 (en) * 2005-08-11 2007-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Single action media playlist generation
US20070042333A1 (en) * 1999-04-13 2007-02-22 Ho Chi F Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US20070050337A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-01 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof
US20070061321A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-15 Veveo.Tv, Inc. Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries
US7194506B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2007-03-20 Vignette Corporation Method and system for cache management of locale-sensitive content
US7197474B1 (en) 2001-07-12 2007-03-27 Vignette Corporation Method of modeling product demand subject to a large number of interactions
US7228305B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2007-06-05 Friskit, Inc. Rating system for streaming media playback system
US20070133357A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2007-06-14 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. User aware audio playing apparatus and method
US20070150515A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining usefulness of a digital asset
US20070150354A1 (en) * 1997-07-08 2007-06-28 Walker Jay S Method and apparatus for conducting a transaction based on brand indifference
US20070156529A1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2007-07-05 Walker Jay S Method and apparatus for conducting a transaction based on brand indifference
US20070168388A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-07-19 Microsoft Corporation Media discovery and curation of playlists
US7251687B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2007-07-31 Vignette Corporation Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization
US20070179924A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20070185899A1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2007-08-09 Msystems Ltd. Likelihood-based storage management
US20070203872A1 (en) * 2003-11-28 2007-08-30 Manyworlds, Inc. Affinity Propagation in Adaptive Network-Based Systems
US20070208679A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2007-09-06 Tseng Walter M Creation and Utilization of Relational Tags
US20070208583A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-09-06 Apple Computer, Inc. Computing popularity based upon subscriptions
US20070219984A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 Murali Aravamudan Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on a comparison of preference signatures from multiple users
US20070219995A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2007-09-20 Knowledge Filter Knowledge filter
US7278105B1 (en) 2000-08-21 2007-10-02 Vignette Corporation Visualization and analysis of user clickpaths
US20070239553A1 (en) * 2006-03-16 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative filtering using cluster-based smoothing
US20070239554A1 (en) * 2006-03-16 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Cluster-based scalable collaborative filtering
US20070244768A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-10-18 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US20070250407A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2007-10-25 Ebay, Inc. Method For Listing Goods For Sale By Telephone
US20070265803A1 (en) * 2006-05-11 2007-11-15 Deutsche Telekom Ag System and method for detecting a dishonest user in an online rating system
US20070271153A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2007-11-22 Amit Goel Method and system of aggregating listings for sale
US20070271146A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2007-11-22 Ebags.Com Method and apparatus for matching and/or coordinating shoes handbags and other consumer products
US20070288648A1 (en) * 2002-11-18 2007-12-13 Lara Mehanna Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
WO2007148342A2 (en) * 2006-06-24 2007-12-27 Bio-Ride Ltd. Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US20080005148A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Automated knowledge base of feed tags
US20080005134A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Derivation of relationships between data sets using structured tags or schemas
US20080010258A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-01-10 Infosys Technologies Ltd. Collaborative filtering-based recommendations
US20080040288A1 (en) * 2006-07-10 2008-02-14 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Method and system for using RSS-Type feeds in an E-Commerce environment
US20080052283A1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2008-02-28 Novell, Inc. Construction, manipulation, and comparison of a multi-dimensional semantic space
US20080059283A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Ebay Inc. Method and system for opportunity distribution
US20080082393A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Personal data mining
US20080092160A1 (en) * 2006-10-16 2008-04-17 Rearden Commerce, Inc. System and Method for View of Transactions and Events with Dynamic Updates
US20080091548A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-17 Kotas Paul A Tag-Driven Concept-Centric Electronic Marketplace
US20080091828A1 (en) * 2006-10-16 2008-04-17 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Method and system for fine and course-grained authorization of personal feed contents
US20080114644A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2008-05-15 Frank Martin R Convergence Of Terms Within A Collaborative Tagging Environment
US20080147500A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Malcolm Slaney Serving advertisements using entertainment ratings in a collaborative-filtering system
US20080154955A1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2008-06-26 Yahoo! Inc. Providing multiple media items to a consumer via a simplified consumer interaction
US20080159114A1 (en) * 2007-01-02 2008-07-03 Dipietro Richard Anthony High density data storage medium, method and device
US7403910B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2008-07-22 Netflix, Inc. Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US7406443B1 (en) 2000-12-18 2008-07-29 Powerloom Method and system for multi-dimensional trading
US20080183554A1 (en) * 2007-01-29 2008-07-31 W.W. Grainger, Inc. System and method for providing customized catalogs
US20080195654A1 (en) * 2001-08-20 2008-08-14 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for providing adaptive media property classification
US20080196053A1 (en) * 1998-03-04 2008-08-14 Thomas William L Program guide system with monitoring of advertisement usage and user activities
US20080195435A1 (en) * 2007-02-14 2008-08-14 Ian Bentley Lifestyle-based vehicle selection system and method
US20080209229A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-08-28 Veveo, Inc. Method of and system for selecting and presenting content based on user identification
US20080222105A1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Joseph Matheny Entity recommendation system using restricted information tagged to selected entities
US20080243638A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Chan James D Cluster-based categorization and presentation of item recommendations
US20080243637A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Chan James D Recommendation system with cluster-based filtering of recommendations
US20080243816A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Chan James D Processes for calculating item distances and performing item clustering
US7433832B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2008-10-07 Amazon.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community
US7433960B1 (en) * 2008-01-04 2008-10-07 International Business Machines Corporation Systems, methods and computer products for profile based identity verification over the internet
US20080249968A1 (en) * 2003-11-28 2008-10-09 Manayworlds Inc. Adaptive computer-based personalities
US20080255966A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2008-10-16 Ebay Method and Apparatus For Facilitating Sales of Goods By Independent Parties
US20080270250A1 (en) * 2007-04-26 2008-10-30 Ebay Inc. Flexible asset and search recommendation engines
US20080270579A1 (en) * 1997-12-05 2008-10-30 Pinpoint, Incorporated Location enhanced information delivery system
US20080275834A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2008-11-06 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20080294617A1 (en) * 2007-05-22 2008-11-27 Kushal Chakrabarti Probabilistic Recommendation System
US7461058B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2008-12-02 Thalveg Data Flow Llc Optimized rule based constraints for collaborative filtering systems
US20080307053A1 (en) * 2007-06-08 2008-12-11 Mitnick Craig R System and Method for Permitting Geographically-Pertinent Information to be Ranked by Users According to Users' Geographic Proximity to Information and to Each Other for Affecting the Ranking of Such Information
US20080306895A1 (en) * 2007-06-06 2008-12-11 Karty Kevin D Method and System for Predicting Personal Preferences
US7475057B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2009-01-06 American Calcar, Inc. System and method for user navigation
US7478054B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2009-01-13 Amazon.Com, Inc. Sharing information about purchases
US20090018918A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2009-01-15 Manyworlds Inc. Influence-based Social Network Advertising
US20090030779A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2009-01-29 Preston Tollinger Electronic coupon filtering and delivery
US20090037355A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2009-02-05 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Context-Based Content Recommendation
US20090063537A1 (en) * 2007-08-30 2009-03-05 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating a user profile
US20090070207A1 (en) * 2007-09-10 2009-03-12 Cellfire Electronic coupon display system and method
US20090077093A1 (en) * 2007-09-19 2009-03-19 Joydeep Sen Sarma Feature Discretization and Cardinality Reduction Using Collaborative Filtering Techniques
US20090077160A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2009-03-19 Concert Technology Corporation System and method for providing media content selections
US20090077081A1 (en) * 2007-09-19 2009-03-19 Joydeep Sen Sarma Attribute-Based Item Similarity Using Collaborative Filtering Techniques
US20090077496A1 (en) * 2006-04-20 2009-03-19 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US7519562B1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2009-04-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Automatic identification of unreliable user ratings
US20090144075A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2009-06-04 Manyworlds Inc. Adaptive Social Network Management
US20090144226A1 (en) * 2007-12-03 2009-06-04 Kei Tateno Information processing device and method, and program
US20090164266A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Microsoft Corporation Category aggregated opinion data
US7555287B1 (en) 2001-11-01 2009-06-30 Nokia Corporation Customized messaging between wireless access point and services
US20090182642A1 (en) * 2008-01-14 2009-07-16 Neelakantan Sundaresan Methods and systems to recommend an item
US20090210246A1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2009-08-20 Choicestream, Inc. Statistical personalized recommendation system
US20090228796A1 (en) * 2008-03-05 2009-09-10 Sony Corporation Method and device for personalizing a multimedia application
US7590696B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-09-15 Aol Llc Enhanced buddy list using mobile device identifiers
US20090234718A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2009-09-17 Novell, Inc. Predictive service systems using emotion detection
US20090271826A1 (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method of recommending broadcasting contents and recommending apparatus therefor
US20090271823A1 (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-10-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus to provide broadcasting program information on screen of broadcast receiver
US20090281906A1 (en) * 2008-05-07 2009-11-12 Microsoft Corporation Music Recommendation using Emotional Allocation Modeling
US20090277322A1 (en) * 2008-05-07 2009-11-12 Microsoft Corporation Scalable Music Recommendation by Search
US7627605B1 (en) 2005-07-15 2009-12-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating media playlists by defining paths through media similarity space
US20090300547A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2009-12-03 Kibboko, Inc. Recommender system for on-line articles and documents
US20090307345A1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-12-10 International Business Machines Corporation Automated digital media content filtration based on relationship monitoring
US20090307296A1 (en) * 2008-06-04 2009-12-10 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for anonymous collaborative filtering using matrix factorization
US7640306B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-12-29 Aol Llc Reconfiguring an electronic message to effect an enhanced notification
US7650304B1 (en) 2000-09-08 2010-01-19 Capital One Financial Corporation Solicitation to web marketing loop process
US20100017398A1 (en) * 2006-06-09 2010-01-21 Raghav Gupta Determining relevancy and desirability of terms
US7660869B1 (en) 2000-08-21 2010-02-09 Vignette Software, LLC Network real estate analysis
US7672955B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2010-03-02 Vignette Software L.L.C. Method and system for platform-independent file system interaction
US20100076857A1 (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-03-25 Harshal Ulhas Deo Methods and systems for activity-based recommendations
US20100088166A1 (en) * 2008-10-06 2010-04-08 Cellfire, Inc. Electronic Coupons
US20100088265A1 (en) * 2008-10-03 2010-04-08 Sift, Llc Method, system, and apparatus for determining a predicted rating
US20100100416A1 (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Recommender System
US20100122312A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2010-05-13 Novell, Inc. Predictive service systems
US20100138271A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-06-03 Kontera Technologies, Inc. Techniques for facilitating on-line contextual analysis and advertising
US20100169337A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Novell, Inc. Identity analysis and correlation
US20100169314A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Novell, Inc. Content analysis and correlation
US20100169328A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-01 Strands, Inc. Systems and methods for making recommendations using model-based collaborative filtering with user communities and items collections
US20100174607A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-07-08 Kontera Technologies, Inc. Contextual advertising techniques for implemented at mobile devices
US7756753B1 (en) 2006-02-17 2010-07-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Services for recommending items to groups of users
US20100192172A1 (en) * 1998-03-04 2010-07-29 United Video Properties, Inc. Program guide system with monitoring of advertisement usage and user activities
US20100191619A1 (en) * 2002-10-07 2010-07-29 Dicker Russell A User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US7774229B1 (en) 1999-08-09 2010-08-10 R-Coupon.Com, Inc. Methods of anti-spam marketing through personalized referrals and rewards
US20100217654A1 (en) * 2001-04-24 2010-08-26 Keller Thomas L Creating an incentive to author useful item reviews
US7788123B1 (en) 2000-06-23 2010-08-31 Ekhaus Michael A Method and system for high performance model-based personalization
US7788681B1 (en) 2003-09-16 2010-08-31 Vignette Software, LLC System and method for incorporating web services in a web site
USRE41754E1 (en) 1999-05-11 2010-09-21 Knight Timothy O User interface for interacting with online message board
US20100262611A1 (en) * 2008-06-19 2010-10-14 Markus Frind System and method for adaptive matching of user profiles based on viewing and contact activity for social relationship services
US7822631B1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2010-10-26 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Assessing content based on assessed trust in users
US20100280906A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2010-11-04 Lim Stanley T Economic Filtering System for Delivery of Permission Based, Targeted, Incentivized Advertising
US7831548B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2010-11-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods that use search queries to identify related lists
EP2251994A1 (en) 2009-05-14 2010-11-17 Advanced Digital Broadcast S.A. System and method for optimization of content recommendation
WO2010138977A1 (en) * 2009-05-11 2010-12-02 Amod Dange Method and apparatus for evaluating content
US20100312613A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2010-12-09 Gross John N Method of evaluating learning rate of recommender systems
US20100318622A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2010-12-16 Aol Inc. Identifying Users Sharing Common Characteristics
US20110010308A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2011-01-13 Beeber, Inc. Managing demographic-based customer ratings
US20110035439A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2011-02-10 Kontera Technologies, Inc. System and method for real-time web page context analysis for the real-time insertion of textual markup objects and dynamic content
US20110035380A1 (en) * 2008-04-11 2011-02-10 Kieran Stafford Means For Navigating Data Using A Graphical Interface
US20110041083A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-02-17 Oz Gabai System and methodology for providing shared internet experience
US20110040655A1 (en) * 2009-05-19 2011-02-17 Bradley Marshall Hendrickson System and Method for Improving the Accuracy of Marketing to Consumers Based on the Geographic Position of the Consumer as Determined Using GPS Recognition and a Consumer Profile Built From Specified Consumer Preferences and Purchases
US20110047213A1 (en) * 2009-08-20 2011-02-24 Alan David Manuel Method and process for identifying trusted information of interest
US7904924B1 (en) 2003-10-31 2011-03-08 Microsoft Corporation Video-on-demand recommendations based on previously viewed television programs
US20110060738A1 (en) * 2009-09-08 2011-03-10 Apple Inc. Media item clustering based on similarity data
US20110066497A1 (en) * 2009-09-14 2011-03-17 Choicestream, Inc. Personalized advertising and recommendation
US20110087773A1 (en) * 2009-10-14 2011-04-14 Sony Corporation Contents' relationship visualizing apparatus, contents' relationship visualizing method and its program
US20110106898A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2011-05-05 Aol Inc. Personalized Location Information for Mobile Devices
US7949611B1 (en) 2004-12-31 2011-05-24 Symantec Corporation Controlling access to profile information in a social network
US20110131163A1 (en) * 2009-12-01 2011-06-02 Microsoft Corporation Managing a Portfolio of Experts
US20110131077A1 (en) * 2009-12-01 2011-06-02 Microsoft Corporation Context-Aware Recommendation Module Using Multiple Models
US7962482B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2011-06-14 Pandora Media, Inc. Methods and systems for utilizing contextual feedback to generate and modify playlists
US7962504B1 (en) 2005-05-26 2011-06-14 Aol Inc. Sourcing terms into a search engine
US7966334B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2011-06-21 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Information retrieval systems and methods that use user-defined lists to identify related offerings
US7970722B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2011-06-28 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US7979880B2 (en) 2000-04-21 2011-07-12 Cox Communications, Inc. Method and system for profiling iTV users and for providing selective content delivery
US20110191332A1 (en) * 2010-02-04 2011-08-04 Veveo, Inc. Method of and System for Updating Locally Cached Content Descriptor Information
US20110196865A1 (en) * 2007-03-31 2011-08-11 Sony Deutschland Gmbh Method for content recommendation
US8001003B1 (en) 2007-09-28 2011-08-16 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for searching for and identifying data repository deficits
US8015019B1 (en) 2004-08-03 2011-09-06 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing a document
US8019875B1 (en) 2004-06-04 2011-09-13 Google Inc. Systems and methods for indicating a user state in a social network
US20110225153A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2011-09-15 National University Corporation Hokkaido University Content search device and content search program
US20110238730A1 (en) * 2008-07-24 2011-09-29 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Correlated Information Recommendation
US20110238194A1 (en) * 2005-01-15 2011-09-29 Outland Research, Llc System, method and computer program product for intelligent groupwise media selection
US20110246497A1 (en) * 2005-12-19 2011-10-06 Strands, Inc. User to user recommender
US8051040B2 (en) 2007-06-08 2011-11-01 Ebay Inc. Electronic publication system
US8060463B1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2011-11-15 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US8073807B1 (en) * 2007-11-02 2011-12-06 Google Inc Inferring demographics for website members
US20120005114A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Customized review system and method
US8103659B1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2012-01-24 A9.Com, Inc. Perspective-based item navigation
US8108255B1 (en) 2007-09-27 2012-01-31 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for obtaining reviews for items lacking reviews
US8108245B1 (en) 1999-09-17 2012-01-31 Cox Communications, Inc. Method and system for web user profiling and selective content delivery
US20120030050A1 (en) * 2009-04-16 2012-02-02 Jose Luis Rey Electronic notification device and electronic notification method
US20120030028A1 (en) * 2004-05-20 2012-02-02 Manyworlds, Inc. System and Method for Adaptive Soundtracks
US8150724B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2012-04-03 Emergent Discovery Llc System for eliciting accurate judgement of entertainment items
US20120089455A1 (en) * 2010-10-07 2012-04-12 Eshwar Belani System and method for real-time advertising campaign adaptation
US8175989B1 (en) 2007-01-04 2012-05-08 Choicestream, Inc. Music recommendation system using a personalized choice set
US8190475B1 (en) 2007-09-05 2012-05-29 Google Inc. Visitor profile modeling
US20120158749A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2012-06-21 Joshua Schachter System and method for providing tag-based relevance recommendations of bookmarks in a bookmark and tag database
US20120173338A1 (en) * 2009-09-17 2012-07-05 Behavioreal Ltd. Method and apparatus for data traffic analysis and clustering
FR2971597A1 (en) * 2011-02-14 2012-08-17 Imaginatio Method for calculation of social relevance index of digital documents to sort list of documents to search documents in documentary base in enterprise, involves calculating index from set of actions realized on document
US8260656B1 (en) 2001-04-19 2012-09-04 Amazon.Com, Inc. Mining of user-generated playlists for data regarding relationships between digital works
US8275673B1 (en) 2002-04-17 2012-09-25 Ebay Inc. Method and system to recommend further items to a user of a network-based transaction facility upon unsuccessful transacting with respect to an item
US20120246035A1 (en) * 2011-02-07 2012-09-27 Kenisha Cross Computer software program and fashion styling tool
US20120246032A1 (en) * 2011-03-21 2012-09-27 Joshua Beroukhim Website, user interfaces, and applications facilitating improved media search capability
US8307045B1 (en) 2001-08-22 2012-11-06 Open Text S.A. System and method for creating target-specific data conversion templates using a master style template
US8346764B1 (en) 2007-06-01 2013-01-01 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Information retrieval systems, methods, and software with content-relevancy enhancements
US20130041896A1 (en) * 2011-08-12 2013-02-14 Accenture Global Services Limited Context and process based search ranking
US8386475B2 (en) 2008-12-30 2013-02-26 Novell, Inc. Attribution analysis and correlation
US8392113B2 (en) 2009-12-11 2013-03-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for accounting for user experience in pedestrian navigation routing
US8429026B1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2013-04-23 Dietfood Corp. System and method for creating and submitting electronic shopping lists
US8458120B2 (en) 2006-08-28 2013-06-04 Manyworlds, Inc. Search-based people matching system and method
US8458257B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2013-06-04 Domingo Enterprises, Llc System and method for identifying transient friends
US20130144802A1 (en) * 2011-12-01 2013-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Personalizing aggregated online reviews
US20130191241A1 (en) * 2012-01-23 2013-07-25 Oracle International Corporation Subject matter intelligence for business applications
US20130211950A1 (en) * 2012-02-09 2013-08-15 Microsoft Corporation Recommender system
US8533094B1 (en) 2000-01-26 2013-09-10 Ebay Inc. On-line auction sales leads
US8539359B2 (en) 2009-02-11 2013-09-17 Jeffrey A. Rapaport Social network driven indexing system for instantly clustering people with concurrent focus on same topic into on-topic chat rooms and/or for generating on-topic search results tailored to user preferences regarding topic
US8543575B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2013-09-24 Apple Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US8554601B1 (en) 2003-08-22 2013-10-08 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing content based on reputation
USRE44559E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2013-10-22 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive social computing methods
US8577972B1 (en) 2003-09-05 2013-11-05 Facebook, Inc. Methods and systems for capturing and managing instant messages
US20130302775A1 (en) * 2012-04-27 2013-11-14 Gary King Cluster analysis of participant responses for test generation or teaching
US20130317891A1 (en) * 2012-05-24 2013-11-28 Rawllin International Inc. Content rating and weighting system
US8621215B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2013-12-31 Google Inc. Methods and systems for creating monetary accounts for members in a social network
US20140074650A1 (en) * 2012-03-01 2014-03-13 Qloo, Inc. Personalized cross-domain recommender system
US8676937B2 (en) 2011-05-12 2014-03-18 Jeffrey Alan Rapaport Social-topical adaptive networking (STAN) system allowing for group based contextual transaction offers and acceptances and hot topic watchdogging
US8688503B2 (en) * 2006-12-29 2014-04-01 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for targeting family members of transaction account product holders to receive supplementary transaction account products
US8701014B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2014-04-15 Facebook, Inc. Account linking
US8725740B2 (en) 2008-03-24 2014-05-13 Napo Enterprises, Llc Active playlist having dynamic media item groups
US20140136549A1 (en) * 2012-11-14 2014-05-15 Homer Tlc, Inc. System and method for automatic product matching
US8732101B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-05-20 Nara Logics, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing harmonized recommendations based on an integrated user profile
US8738468B2 (en) 2007-09-12 2014-05-27 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System and method of providing recommendations using social networks
US20140157295A1 (en) * 2012-12-03 2014-06-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and Method of Content and Merchandise Recommendation
US8756187B2 (en) 2011-09-28 2014-06-17 Nara Logics, Inc. Systems and methods for providing recommendations based on collaborative and/or content-based nodal interrelationships
USRE44968E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2014-06-24 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive self-modifying and recombinant systems
USRE44966E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2014-06-24 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive recommendations systems
USRE44967E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2014-06-24 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive social and process network systems
US20140180760A1 (en) * 2011-03-18 2014-06-26 Telefonica, S.A. Method for context-aware recommendations based on implicit user feedback
US8788487B2 (en) * 2012-11-30 2014-07-22 Facebook, Inc. Querying features based on user actions in online systems
US8832132B1 (en) 2004-06-22 2014-09-09 Google Inc. Personalizing search queries based on user membership in social network communities
US8839088B1 (en) 2007-11-02 2014-09-16 Google Inc. Determining an aspect value, such as for estimating a characteristic of online entity
US8868446B2 (en) 2011-03-08 2014-10-21 Affinnova, Inc. System and method for concept development
US8874672B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2014-10-28 Facebook, Inc. Identifying and using identities deemed to be known to a user
US8909616B2 (en) 2006-09-14 2014-12-09 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Information-retrieval systems, methods, and software with content relevancy enhancements
US20140372250A1 (en) * 2011-03-04 2014-12-18 Forbes Media Llc System and method for providing recommended content
US8924479B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2014-12-30 Waldeck Technology, Llc Contiguous location-based user networks
US20150026000A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2015-01-22 Rakuten, Inc. Information providing system, information providing method, program, and storage medium
US8965964B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-24 Facebook, Inc. Managing forwarded electronic messages
US8983998B1 (en) 2012-04-25 2015-03-17 Google Inc. Prioritizing points of interest in unfamiliar regions
US8983905B2 (en) 2011-10-03 2015-03-17 Apple Inc. Merging playlists from multiple sources
US9009082B1 (en) 2008-06-30 2015-04-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Assessing user-supplied evaluations
US9044675B2 (en) * 2010-11-17 2015-06-02 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. Automated video game rating
US20150170041A1 (en) * 2010-04-28 2015-06-18 JVC Kenwood Corporation Item Selecting Apparatus, Item Selecting Method and Item Selecting Program
US9075882B1 (en) * 2005-10-11 2015-07-07 Apple Inc. Recommending content items
WO2015013436A3 (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-09-11 Lithium Technologies, Inc. Methods of identifying relevant content and subject matter expertise for online communities
USRE45770E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2015-10-20 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive recommendation explanations
US9166714B2 (en) 2009-09-11 2015-10-20 Veveo, Inc. Method of and system for presenting enriched video viewing analytics
US9170712B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2015-10-27 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Presenting content related to current media consumption
US9178946B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2015-11-03 Black Hills Media, Llc Device discovery for digital entertainment network
US9183510B1 (en) * 2011-10-03 2015-11-10 Tastebud Technologies, Inc. Method and system for personalized recommendation of lifestyle items
US9203647B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Dynamic online and geographic location of a user
US9203879B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Offline alerts mechanism
US9208132B2 (en) 2011-03-08 2015-12-08 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc System and method for concept development with content aware text editor
US20150363502A1 (en) * 2014-06-16 2015-12-17 Google Inc. Optimizing personalized recommendations with longitudinal data and a future objective
US9246975B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2016-01-26 Facebook, Inc. State change alerts mechanism
US9256829B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2016-02-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Information propagation probability for a social network
US9262534B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2016-02-16 Apple Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US20160066038A1 (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Dozo LLP Clip List Generation
US9311383B1 (en) 2012-01-13 2016-04-12 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Optimal solution identification system and method
US9313046B2 (en) 2012-09-15 2016-04-12 Facebook, Inc. Presenting dynamic location of a user
US9312827B2 (en) 1998-01-22 2016-04-12 Black Hills Media, Llc Network enabled audio device and radio site
US9317185B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2016-04-19 Apple Inc. Dynamic interactive entertainment venue
US9336302B1 (en) 2012-07-20 2016-05-10 Zuci Realty Llc Insight and algorithmic clustering for automated synthesis
US9366542B2 (en) 2005-09-23 2016-06-14 Scenera Technologies, Llc System and method for selecting and presenting a route to a user
US9407957B2 (en) 2012-05-15 2016-08-02 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Display apparatus, external apparatus and control methods thereof and display system
US9405753B2 (en) 2000-01-24 2016-08-02 George Aposporos Dynamic ratings-based streaming media playback system
WO2016123375A1 (en) * 2015-01-30 2016-08-04 Mcneill Nathan System, method, and apparatus for providing a collaborative social network
US9466031B1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2016-10-11 Vmware, Inc. Data-agnostic methods and systems for ranking and updating beliefs
USRE46178E1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2016-10-11 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method and apparatus for evolutionary design
US9465889B2 (en) 2012-07-05 2016-10-11 Physion Consulting, LLC Method and system for identifying data and users of interest from patterns of user interaction with existing data
US9509269B1 (en) 2005-01-15 2016-11-29 Google Inc. Ambient sound responsive media player
US9537706B2 (en) 2012-08-20 2017-01-03 Plentyoffish Media Ulc Apparatus, method and article to facilitate matching of clients in a networked environment
US9647872B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-05-09 Facebook, Inc. Dynamic identification of other users to an online user
US9667585B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-05-30 Facebook, Inc. Central people lists accessible by multiple applications
US9672289B1 (en) 2013-07-23 2017-06-06 Plentyoffish Media Ulc Apparatus, method and article to facilitate matching of clients in a networked environment
US9679259B1 (en) 2013-01-25 2017-06-13 Plentyoffish Media Ulc Systems and methods for training and employing a machine learning system in evaluating entity pairs
US9712576B1 (en) 2002-06-25 2017-07-18 Susan (Zann) Gill Crowd-sourced project and transaction management system for human- and device-adaptive requester-provider networks
US9785995B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-10-10 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method and apparatus for interactive evolutionary algorithms with respondent directed breeding
US9799041B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-10-24 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method and apparatus for interactive evolutionary optimization of concepts
US9836765B2 (en) 2014-05-19 2017-12-05 Kibo Software, Inc. System and method for context-aware recommendation through user activity change detection
US9836533B1 (en) 2014-04-07 2017-12-05 Plentyoffish Media Ulc Apparatus, method and article to effect user interest-based matching in a network environment
US9870465B1 (en) 2013-12-04 2018-01-16 Plentyoffish Media Ulc Apparatus, method and article to facilitate automatic detection and removal of fraudulent user information in a network environment

Families Citing this family (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7437313B1 (en) 1998-03-11 2008-10-14 West Direct, Llc Methods, computer-readable media, and apparatus for offering users a plurality of scenarios under which to conduct at least one primary transaction
EP1798978A3 (en) 1998-08-26 2011-02-23 United Video Properties, Inc. Television message system
ES2188234T3 (en) 1998-08-26 2003-06-16 United Video Properties Inc Television chat system.
CA2351680A1 (en) * 1998-11-16 2000-05-25 Smarterkids.Com Computer-implemented educational product recommendation system
WO2000039725A3 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-03-08 Net Perceptions Inc System, method and article of manufacture for producing item compatible recommendations
US6487541B1 (en) * 1999-01-22 2002-11-26 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for collaborative filtering with applications to e-commerce
US6327590B1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2001-12-04 Xerox Corporation System and method for collaborative ranking of search results employing user and group profiles derived from document collection content analysis
US6487539B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2002-11-26 International Business Machines Corporation Semantic based collaborative filtering
GB9918692D0 (en) * 1999-08-10 1999-10-13 Int Computers Ltd Computer system for providing travel services
EP1307831A4 (en) * 2000-07-11 2007-05-09 Yahoo Inc Online playback system with community bias
WO2001053973A3 (en) * 2000-01-21 2002-08-29 Net Perceptions Inc Recommendation method and system based on rating space partitioned data
GB2365157B (en) * 2000-07-28 2004-12-08 Mba Consultants Ltd Information retrieval system
US7149804B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2006-12-12 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Method and system for providing evaluation of text-based products
WO2003030024A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-10 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Information systems
US8306908B1 (en) 2002-12-31 2012-11-06 West Corporation Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce
US20040254957A1 (en) * 2003-06-13 2004-12-16 Nokia Corporation Method and a system for modeling user preferences
US7386485B1 (en) 2004-06-25 2008-06-10 West Corporation Method and system for providing offers in real time to prospective customers
US20060036565A1 (en) * 2004-08-10 2006-02-16 Carl Bruecken Passive monitoring of user interaction with a browser application
US7178720B1 (en) 2004-09-30 2007-02-20 West Corporation Methods, computer-readable media, and computer program product for intelligent selection of items encoded onto portable machine-playable entertainment media
WO2006104534A3 (en) 2005-03-25 2007-11-22 Jr Robert Glenn Etter Scoring items based on user sentiment and determining the proficiency of predictors
US20060217994A1 (en) 2005-03-25 2006-09-28 The Motley Fool, Inc. Method and system for harnessing collective knowledge
US8019639B2 (en) 2005-07-07 2011-09-13 Sermo, Inc. Method and apparatus for conducting an online information service
CN101310278A (en) * 2005-11-16 2008-11-19 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 Method of generating and methods of filtering a user profile
FI20085399A0 (en) * 2007-12-14 2008-04-30 Xtract Oy Method and arrangement for segmenting customers, customer management system
US8869208B2 (en) 2011-10-30 2014-10-21 Google Inc. Computing similarity between media programs
EP3026584A1 (en) * 2014-11-25 2016-06-01 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Device and method for providing media resource

Citations (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3952184A (en) * 1973-04-13 1976-04-20 Societe De Depot De Margues Sodema, Societe Anonyme Apparatus for the automatic classifying and finding of groupings of series of distinguishing signs according to the risks of conflict they involve with given groupings
US4041617A (en) * 1976-07-26 1977-08-16 James Fisher Hollander Apparatus and method for indication and measurement of simulated emotional levels
US4205464A (en) * 1977-09-15 1980-06-03 Baggott Patrick D Apparatus and method for determining the extent of mutuality between partners
US4331973A (en) * 1980-10-21 1982-05-25 Iri, Inc. Panelist response scanning system
US4348740A (en) * 1978-04-04 1982-09-07 White Edward A Method and portable apparatus for comparison of stored sets of data
US4546382A (en) * 1983-06-09 1985-10-08 Ctba Associates Television and market research data collection system and method
US4602279A (en) * 1984-03-21 1986-07-22 Actv, Inc. Method for providing targeted profile interactive CATV displays
US4627818A (en) * 1984-08-28 1986-12-09 Jost Von Fellenberg Psychotechnological testing method and device therefor
US4630108A (en) * 1984-03-26 1986-12-16 A. C. Nielsen Company Preprogrammed over-the-air marketing research system
US4646145A (en) * 1980-04-07 1987-02-24 R. D. Percy & Company Television viewer reaction determining systems
US4647964A (en) * 1985-10-24 1987-03-03 Weinblatt Lee S Technique for testing television commercials
US4658290A (en) * 1983-12-08 1987-04-14 Ctba Associates Television and market research data collection system and method
US4682956A (en) * 1985-11-27 1987-07-28 Leonard Krane Apparatus and method for learning about the relationships and personalities of a group of two or more persons
US4745549A (en) * 1985-06-11 1988-05-17 Hashimoto Corporation Method of and apparatus for optimal scheduling of television programming to maximize customer satisfaction
US4775935A (en) * 1986-09-22 1988-10-04 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Video merchandising system with variable and adoptive product sequence presentation order
US4781596A (en) * 1986-06-16 1988-11-01 Weinblatt Lee S Survey technique for readership of publications
US4870579A (en) * 1987-10-01 1989-09-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method of predicting subjective reactions
US4872113A (en) * 1987-08-27 1989-10-03 Jbs Associates, Inc. Credit check scanner data analysis system
US4914694A (en) * 1988-04-11 1990-04-03 Eidak Corporation Modifying a television signal to inhibit recording/reproduction
US4996642A (en) * 1987-10-01 1991-02-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method for recommending items
US5041972A (en) * 1988-04-15 1991-08-20 Frost W Alan Method of measuring and evaluating consumer response for the development of consumer products
EP0643359A2 (en) * 1993-09-09 1995-03-15 Mni Interactive Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system
US5446891A (en) * 1992-02-26 1995-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation System for adjusting hypertext links with weighed user goals and activities
US5459306A (en) * 1994-06-15 1995-10-17 Blockbuster Entertainment Corporation Method and system for delivering on demand, individually targeted promotions
WO1995029452A1 (en) * 1994-04-25 1995-11-02 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
WO1995029451A1 (en) * 1994-04-25 1995-11-02 Apple Computer, Inc. System for ranking the relevance of information objects accessed by computer users
US5466159A (en) * 1993-02-05 1995-11-14 National Computer Systems, Inc. Collaborative and quality control scoring system
WO1996023265A1 (en) * 1995-01-23 1996-08-01 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Methods and/or systems for accessing information
US5544161A (en) * 1995-03-28 1996-08-06 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. ATM packet demultiplexer for use in full service network having distributed architecture
EP0749078A1 (en) * 1994-12-28 1996-12-18 Kabushiki Kaisya Advance Certifying system and transaction system with the certification
EP0751471A1 (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-01-02 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US5592375A (en) * 1994-03-11 1997-01-07 Eagleview, Inc. Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
US5692107A (en) * 1994-03-15 1997-11-25 Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. Method for generating predictive models in a computer system
US5699507A (en) * 1995-01-17 1997-12-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of identifying similarities in code segments
US5704017A (en) * 1996-02-16 1997-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative filtering utilizing a belief network
US5749081A (en) * 1995-04-06 1998-05-05 Firefly Network, Inc. System and method for recommending items to a user

Patent Citations (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3952184A (en) * 1973-04-13 1976-04-20 Societe De Depot De Margues Sodema, Societe Anonyme Apparatus for the automatic classifying and finding of groupings of series of distinguishing signs according to the risks of conflict they involve with given groupings
US4041617A (en) * 1976-07-26 1977-08-16 James Fisher Hollander Apparatus and method for indication and measurement of simulated emotional levels
US4205464A (en) * 1977-09-15 1980-06-03 Baggott Patrick D Apparatus and method for determining the extent of mutuality between partners
US4348740A (en) * 1978-04-04 1982-09-07 White Edward A Method and portable apparatus for comparison of stored sets of data
US4646145A (en) * 1980-04-07 1987-02-24 R. D. Percy & Company Television viewer reaction determining systems
US4331973A (en) * 1980-10-21 1982-05-25 Iri, Inc. Panelist response scanning system
US4546382A (en) * 1983-06-09 1985-10-08 Ctba Associates Television and market research data collection system and method
US4566030A (en) * 1983-06-09 1986-01-21 Ctba Associates Television viewer data collection system
US4658290A (en) * 1983-12-08 1987-04-14 Ctba Associates Television and market research data collection system and method
US4602279A (en) * 1984-03-21 1986-07-22 Actv, Inc. Method for providing targeted profile interactive CATV displays
US4630108A (en) * 1984-03-26 1986-12-16 A. C. Nielsen Company Preprogrammed over-the-air marketing research system
US4627818A (en) * 1984-08-28 1986-12-09 Jost Von Fellenberg Psychotechnological testing method and device therefor
US4745549A (en) * 1985-06-11 1988-05-17 Hashimoto Corporation Method of and apparatus for optimal scheduling of television programming to maximize customer satisfaction
US4647964A (en) * 1985-10-24 1987-03-03 Weinblatt Lee S Technique for testing television commercials
US4682956A (en) * 1985-11-27 1987-07-28 Leonard Krane Apparatus and method for learning about the relationships and personalities of a group of two or more persons
US4781596A (en) * 1986-06-16 1988-11-01 Weinblatt Lee S Survey technique for readership of publications
US4775935A (en) * 1986-09-22 1988-10-04 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Video merchandising system with variable and adoptive product sequence presentation order
US4872113A (en) * 1987-08-27 1989-10-03 Jbs Associates, Inc. Credit check scanner data analysis system
US4996642A (en) * 1987-10-01 1991-02-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method for recommending items
US4870579A (en) * 1987-10-01 1989-09-26 Neonics, Inc. System and method of predicting subjective reactions
US5034981A (en) * 1988-04-11 1991-07-23 Eidak Corporation Anti-copying video signal processing
US4914694A (en) * 1988-04-11 1990-04-03 Eidak Corporation Modifying a television signal to inhibit recording/reproduction
US5041972A (en) * 1988-04-15 1991-08-20 Frost W Alan Method of measuring and evaluating consumer response for the development of consumer products
US5446891A (en) * 1992-02-26 1995-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation System for adjusting hypertext links with weighed user goals and activities
US5466159A (en) * 1993-02-05 1995-11-14 National Computer Systems, Inc. Collaborative and quality control scoring system
EP0643359A2 (en) * 1993-09-09 1995-03-15 Mni Interactive Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system
US5583763A (en) * 1993-09-09 1996-12-10 Mni Interactive Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system
US5592375A (en) * 1994-03-11 1997-01-07 Eagleview, Inc. Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
US5692107A (en) * 1994-03-15 1997-11-25 Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. Method for generating predictive models in a computer system
WO1995029452A1 (en) * 1994-04-25 1995-11-02 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
WO1995029451A1 (en) * 1994-04-25 1995-11-02 Apple Computer, Inc. System for ranking the relevance of information objects accessed by computer users
US5459306A (en) * 1994-06-15 1995-10-17 Blockbuster Entertainment Corporation Method and system for delivering on demand, individually targeted promotions
EP0749078A1 (en) * 1994-12-28 1996-12-18 Kabushiki Kaisya Advance Certifying system and transaction system with the certification
US5699507A (en) * 1995-01-17 1997-12-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of identifying similarities in code segments
WO1996023265A1 (en) * 1995-01-23 1996-08-01 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Methods and/or systems for accessing information
US5544161A (en) * 1995-03-28 1996-08-06 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. ATM packet demultiplexer for use in full service network having distributed architecture
US5749081A (en) * 1995-04-06 1998-05-05 Firefly Network, Inc. System and method for recommending items to a user
EP0751471A1 (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-01-02 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US5704017A (en) * 1996-02-16 1997-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative filtering utilizing a belief network

Non-Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Hiraiwa et al, "Info-Plaza: A Social Information Filtering System for the World-Wide Web," Insitute for Social Information Science Fujitsu Labortories Ltd., pp. 10-15 (1996).
Hiraiwa et al, Info Plaza: A Social Information Filtering System for the World Wide Web, Insitute for Social Information Science Fujitsu Labortories Ltd., pp. 10 15 (1996). *
Jennings et al, "A Personal New Service Based on a User Neural Network," IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, No. 2, pp. 190-209 Tokyo, Japan Mar. 1992.
Jennings et al, A Personal New Service Based on a User Neural Network, IEICE Transactions on Information Systems , No. 2, pp. 190 209 Tokyo, Japan Mar. 1992. *
Lee et al. "Learning Automated Product Recommendations Without Observable Features: An Initial Investigation"; The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15213, Apr. 1995.
Lee et al. Learning Automated Product Recommendations Without Observable Features: An Initial Investigation ; The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15213, Apr. 1995. *
Lee, Mary S. and Andrew W. Moore, "Learning Automated Product Recommendations Without Observable Features: An Initial Invesitgator," The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-35 (Apr. 1995).
Lee, Mary S. and Andrew W. Moore, Learning Automated Product Recommendations Without Observable Features: An Initial Invesitgator, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1 35 (Apr. 1995). *
Resnick et al, "GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Networks" pp. 175-186 (1994).
Resnick et al, GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Networks pp. 175 186 (1994). *
Sheth et al, "Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering," Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, pp. 345-352 (Mar. 1-5, 1993).
Sheth et al, Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, pp. 345 352 (Mar. 1 5, 1993). *

Cited By (1007)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060150216A1 (en) * 1994-11-29 2006-07-06 Frederick Herz System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US20060161952A1 (en) * 1994-11-29 2006-07-20 Frederick Herz System and method for scheduling broadcast of an access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US7853600B2 (en) 1994-11-29 2010-12-14 Pinpoint, Incorporated System and method for providing access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US8056100B2 (en) 1994-11-29 2011-11-08 Pinpoint, Incorporated System and method for providing access to data using customer profiles
US6453299B1 (en) * 1995-12-19 2002-09-17 Aspen Marketing, Inc. Method for customizing queries
US20040126748A1 (en) * 1996-03-19 2004-07-01 Ho Chi Fai Computer-aided learning system and method
US9141827B2 (en) 1996-03-19 2015-09-22 Iplearn, Llc Computer-aided learning system and method
US6236990B1 (en) * 1996-07-12 2001-05-22 Intraware, Inc. Method and system for ranking multiple products according to user's preferences
US20070156529A1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2007-07-05 Walker Jay S Method and apparatus for conducting a transaction based on brand indifference
US6195657B1 (en) * 1996-09-26 2001-02-27 Imana, Inc. Software, method and apparatus for efficient categorization and recommendation of subjects according to multidimensional semantics
US20070150354A1 (en) * 1997-07-08 2007-06-28 Walker Jay S Method and apparatus for conducting a transaction based on brand indifference
US20060020614A1 (en) * 1997-08-08 2006-01-26 Kolawa Adam K Method and apparatus for automated selection, organization, and recommendation of items based on user preference topography
US7222085B2 (en) 1997-09-04 2007-05-22 Travelport Operations, Inc. System and method for providing recommendation of goods and services based on recorded purchasing history
US6782370B1 (en) * 1997-09-04 2004-08-24 Cendant Publishing, Inc. System and method for providing recommendation of goods or services based on recorded purchasing history
US20040230499A1 (en) * 1997-09-04 2004-11-18 Cendant Publishing Inc. System and method for providing recommendation of goods and services based on recorded purchasing history
US6996572B1 (en) * 1997-10-08 2006-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for filtering of information entities
US6871186B1 (en) 1997-11-14 2005-03-22 New York University System and method for dynamic profiling of users in one-to-one applications and for validating user rules
US8103611B2 (en) 1997-11-14 2012-01-24 New York University Architectures, systems, apparatus, methods, and computer-readable medium for providing recommendations to users and applications using multidimensional data
US20090327197A1 (en) * 1997-11-14 2009-12-31 New York University System and method for dynamic profiling of user in one-to-one applications and for validation of user rules
US7603331B2 (en) 1997-11-14 2009-10-13 New York University System and method for dynamic profiling of users in one-to-one applications and for validating user rules
US20080270579A1 (en) * 1997-12-05 2008-10-30 Pinpoint, Incorporated Location enhanced information delivery system
US6687703B2 (en) 1997-12-26 2004-02-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information filtering system and information filtering method
US20040139054A1 (en) * 1997-12-26 2004-07-15 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information filtering system and information filtering method
US7162487B2 (en) 1997-12-26 2007-01-09 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. Information filtering system and information filtering method
US6363383B1 (en) * 1997-12-26 2002-03-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information filtering for selectively limiting access
US9397627B2 (en) 1998-01-22 2016-07-19 Black Hills Media, Llc Network-enabled audio device
US6345264B1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2002-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Methods and apparatus, using expansion attributes having default, values, for matching entities and predicting an attribute of an entity
US9549001B1 (en) 1998-01-22 2017-01-17 Black Hills Media, Llc Method and device for sourcing and constructing a playlist
US9312827B2 (en) 1998-01-22 2016-04-12 Black Hills Media, Llc Network enabled audio device and radio site
US6353813B1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2002-03-05 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus, using attribute set harmonization and default attribute values, for matching entities and predicting an attribute of an entity
US9552188B1 (en) 1998-01-22 2017-01-24 Black Hills Media, Llc Method and device for displaying supplemental information while rendering a playlist
US20100192172A1 (en) * 1998-03-04 2010-07-29 United Video Properties, Inc. Program guide system with monitoring of advertisement usage and user activities
US20080196053A1 (en) * 1998-03-04 2008-08-14 Thomas William L Program guide system with monitoring of advertisement usage and user activities
US6249815B1 (en) * 1998-05-06 2001-06-19 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for building subscriber service profile based on subscriber related data
US7117518B1 (en) * 1998-05-14 2006-10-03 Sony Corporation Information retrieval method and apparatus
US6782409B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2004-08-24 Sony Corporation Experience/sympathy information providing system
US6398556B1 (en) * 1998-07-06 2002-06-04 Chi Fai Ho Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US7201580B2 (en) 1998-07-06 2007-04-10 Chi Fai Ho Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US20040142312A1 (en) * 1998-07-06 2004-07-22 Ho Chi Fai Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US6685478B2 (en) 1998-07-06 2004-02-03 Chi Fai Ho Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US6321221B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2001-11-20 Net Perceptions, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for increasing the user value of recommendations
US6334127B1 (en) 1998-07-17 2001-12-25 Net Perceptions, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for making serendipity-weighted recommendations to a user
US7921042B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2011-04-05 Amazon.Com, Inc. Computer processes for identifying related items and generating personalized item recommendations
US20110238525A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2011-09-29 Linden Gregory D Discovery of behavior-based item relationships
US7945475B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2011-05-17 Amazon.Com, Inc. Computer processes for identifying related items and generating personalized item recommendations
US20080033746A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2008-02-07 Jacobi Jennifer A Computer processes for identifying related items and generating personalized item recommendations
US9070156B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2015-06-30 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Automated detection and exposure of behavior-based relationships between browsable items
US7970664B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2011-06-28 Amazon.Com, Inc. Content personalization based on actions performed during browsing sessions
US20060195362A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2006-08-31 Jacobi Jennifer A Recommendation system
US20050102202A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2005-05-12 Linden Gregory D. Content personalization based on actions performed during browsing sessions
US7908183B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2011-03-15 Amazon.Com, Inc. Recommendation system
US8620767B2 (en) * 1998-09-18 2013-12-31 Amazon.Com, Inc. Recommendations based on items viewed during a current browsing session
US20080033821A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2008-02-07 Jacobi Jennifer A Computer processes for identifying related items and generating personalized item recommendations
US8024222B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2011-09-20 Amazon.Com, Inc. Computer processes for identifying related items and generating personalized item recommendations
US20080040239A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2008-02-14 Jacobi Jennifer A Computer processes for identifying related items and generating personalized item recommendations
US8407105B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2013-03-26 Amazon.Com, Inc. Discovery of behavior-based item relationships based on browsing session records
US8140391B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2012-03-20 Amazon.Com, Inc. Item recommendation service
US8433621B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2013-04-30 Amazon.Com, Inc. Discovery of behavior-based item relationships
US6356879B2 (en) * 1998-10-09 2002-03-12 International Business Machines Corporation Content based method for product-peer filtering
US8121891B2 (en) 1998-11-12 2012-02-21 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Personalized product report
US20020035501A1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2002-03-21 Sean Handel A personalized product report
WO2000036544A1 (en) * 1998-12-18 2000-06-22 Frog Design, Inc. System and method for configuring a product
US6412012B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2002-06-25 Net Perceptions, Inc. System, method, and article of manufacture for making a compatibility-aware recommendations to a user
US7571121B2 (en) 1999-04-09 2009-08-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Computer services for identifying and exposing associations between user communities and items in a catalog
US20110060664A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2011-03-10 Bezos Jeffrey P Services for enabling users to share information regarding e-commerce transactions
US8744929B2 (en) 1999-04-09 2014-06-03 Amazon.Com, Inc. Services for enabling users to share information regarding E-commerce transactions
US20070022022A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2007-01-25 Bezos Jeffrey P Notification service for assisting users in assessing merchants in an electronic marketplace
US8180689B2 (en) 1999-04-09 2012-05-15 Amazon.Com, Inc. Services for enabling users to share information regarding E-commerce transactions
US7308425B2 (en) * 1999-04-09 2007-12-11 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method, system and medium for assisting a user in evaluating a merchant in an electronic marketplace
US20050203807A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2005-09-15 Bezos Jeffrey P. Computer services for identifying and exposing associations between user communities and items in a catalog
US7254552B2 (en) 1999-04-09 2007-08-07 Amazon.Com, Inc. Notification service for assisting users in selecting items from an electronic catalog
US7970660B2 (en) 1999-04-09 2011-06-28 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Identifying associations between items and email-address-based user communities
US7082407B1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2006-07-25 Amazon.Com, Inc. Purchase notification service for assisting users in selecting items from an electronic catalog
US20090281877A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2009-11-12 Bezos Jeffrey P Identifying associations between items and email-address-based user communities
US9747629B2 (en) 1999-04-09 2017-08-29 Amazon.Com, Inc. Services for enabling users to share information regarding E-commerce transactions via user created communities
WO2000062223A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2000-10-19 Amazon.Com, Inc. Systems and methods for assisting users in selecting and evaluating items from an electronic catalog
US6963850B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2005-11-08 Amazon.Com, Inc. Computer services for assisting users in locating and evaluating items in an electronic catalog based on actions performed by members of specific user communities
US20050261987A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2005-11-24 Bezos Jeffrey P Notification service for assisting users in selecting items from an electronic catalog
US20080040238A1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2008-02-14 Bezos Jeffrey P Services for enabling users to share information regarding e-commerce transactions
US20070042333A1 (en) * 1999-04-13 2007-02-22 Ho Chi F Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners
US9792659B2 (en) 1999-04-13 2017-10-17 Iplearn, Llc Computer-aided methods and apparatus to access materials in a network environment
US7031961B2 (en) 1999-05-05 2006-04-18 Google, Inc. System and method for searching and recommending objects from a categorically organized information repository
WO2000067183A1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2000-11-09 Decide.Com Web-based comparison shopping for consumer services
US20020016786A1 (en) * 1999-05-05 2002-02-07 Pitkow James B. System and method for searching and recommending objects from a categorically organized information repository
US6493702B1 (en) 1999-05-05 2002-12-10 Xerox Corporation System and method for searching and recommending documents in a collection using share bookmarks
US7162471B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2007-01-09 Maquis Techtrix Llc Content query system and method
US6721748B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-04-13 Maquis Techtrix, Llc. Online content provider system and method
US6859807B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2005-02-22 Maquis Techtrix, Llc Online content tabulating system and method
US7159011B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2007-01-02 Maquis Techtrix, Llc System and method for managing an online message board
USRE45661E1 (en) 1999-05-11 2015-09-01 Maquis Techtrix Llc Online content tabulating system and method
US6804675B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-10-12 Maquis Techtrix, Llc Online content provider system and method
US6778982B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-08-17 Maquis Techtrix, Llc Online content provider system and method
USRE43835E1 (en) 1999-05-11 2012-11-27 Maquis Techtrix Llc Online content tabulating system and method
USRE41754E1 (en) 1999-05-11 2010-09-21 Knight Timothy O User interface for interacting with online message board
US7072888B1 (en) * 1999-06-16 2006-07-04 Triogo, Inc. Process for improving search engine efficiency using feedback
US20080215173A1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2008-09-04 Musicip Corporation System and Method for Providing Acoustic Analysis Data
US8429026B1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2013-04-23 Dietfood Corp. System and method for creating and submitting electronic shopping lists
US6321179B1 (en) * 1999-06-29 2001-11-20 Xerox Corporation System and method for using noisy collaborative filtering to rank and present items
US6438579B1 (en) * 1999-07-16 2002-08-20 Agent Arts, Inc. Automated content and collaboration-based system and methods for determining and providing content recommendations
US6636836B1 (en) * 1999-07-21 2003-10-21 Iwingz Co., Ltd. Computer readable medium for recommending items with multiple analyzing components
US7774229B1 (en) 1999-08-09 2010-08-10 R-Coupon.Com, Inc. Methods of anti-spam marketing through personalized referrals and rewards
US20020138493A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2002-09-26 Shapiro Eileen C. System and method for structured news release generation and distribution
US8214386B2 (en) 1999-08-20 2012-07-03 Newgems Llc System and method for structured news release generation and distribution
US20020161770A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2002-10-31 Shapiro Eileen C. System and method for structured news release generation and distribution
US7035848B2 (en) * 1999-08-20 2006-04-25 Newsgems Llc System and method for structured news release generation and distribution
US8108245B1 (en) 1999-09-17 2012-01-31 Cox Communications, Inc. Method and system for web user profiling and selective content delivery
US20060031114A1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2006-02-09 Oleg Zommers Interactive personal information system and method
US20020087600A1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2002-07-04 Newbold David Leroy Method and system for profiling users based on their relationships with content topics
US7043698B2 (en) 1999-09-22 2006-05-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for profiling users based on their relationships with content topics
US8548987B2 (en) 1999-09-24 2013-10-01 Thalveg Data Flow Llc System and method for efficiently providing a recommendation
US7461058B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2008-12-02 Thalveg Data Flow Llc Optimized rule based constraints for collaborative filtering systems
US8943069B2 (en) 1999-10-08 2015-01-27 Kl Internet Applications, Llc Knowledge filter
US20070219995A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2007-09-20 Knowledge Filter Knowledge filter
US7031952B1 (en) 1999-10-08 2006-04-18 Knowledge Filter, Inc. Knowledge filter
US20100005093A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2010-01-07 Michael Carl Heumann Knowledge filter
US7590636B1 (en) 1999-10-08 2009-09-15 Kl Internet Applications, Llc Knowledge filter
US6681247B1 (en) * 1999-10-18 2004-01-20 Hrl Laboratories, Llc Collaborator discovery method and system
US20080027633A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2008-01-31 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US7650234B2 (en) 1999-10-19 2010-01-19 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US20050234637A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2005-10-20 Obradovich Michael L Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US20080120024A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2008-05-22 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US20080027631A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2008-01-31 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US7739039B2 (en) 1999-10-19 2010-06-15 American Calcar, Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US20080027634A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2008-01-31 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US8467961B2 (en) 1999-10-19 2013-06-18 Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc. Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
US7983953B2 (en) 1999-10-27 2011-07-19 Ebay Inc. Method and apparatus for listing goods for sale
US20110178898A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2011-07-21 Ebay Inc. Method and apparatus for presenting information relating to a good
US7953641B2 (en) 1999-10-27 2011-05-31 Ebay Inc. Method for listing goods for sale by telephone
US20080183489A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2008-07-31 Ebay Method and Apparatus For Listing Goods For Sale
US8600826B2 (en) 1999-10-27 2013-12-03 Ebay Inc. Method and apparatus for presenting information relating to a good
US7475057B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2009-01-06 American Calcar, Inc. System and method for user navigation
US7813967B2 (en) 1999-10-27 2010-10-12 Ebay Inc. Method and apparatus for listing goods for sale
US20070250407A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2007-10-25 Ebay, Inc. Method For Listing Goods For Sale By Telephone
US20080255966A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2008-10-16 Ebay Method and Apparatus For Facilitating Sales of Goods By Independent Parties
US20110004535A1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2011-01-06 Ebay Inc. Method and Apparatus For Listing Goods For Sale
US8160988B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2012-04-17 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US7970722B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2011-06-28 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US8005777B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2011-08-23 Aloft Media, Llc System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US6526411B1 (en) 1999-11-15 2003-02-25 Sean Ward System and method for creating dynamic playlists
US7072846B1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2006-07-04 Emergent Music Llc Clusters for rapid artist-audience matching
US7860741B1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2010-12-28 Emergent Discovery Llc Clusters for rapid artist-audience matching
US8150724B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2012-04-03 Emergent Discovery Llc System for eliciting accurate judgement of entertainment items
US7433832B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2008-10-07 Amazon.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community
US7478054B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2009-01-13 Amazon.Com, Inc. Sharing information about purchases
US8229782B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2012-07-24 Amazon.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for processing distributed feedback
US7778890B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2010-08-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community
US7664669B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2010-02-16 Amazon.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for distributing information within a dynamically defined community
US6742032B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2004-05-25 Xerox Corporation Method for monitoring and encouraging community activity in a networked environment
US20100122178A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2010-05-13 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US8825853B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2014-09-02 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20080114756A1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2008-05-15 Levino Authomatic, personalized online information and product services
US8301764B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2012-10-30 Personalized User Model Method and system for personalized searching of information and product services by estimating an interest to a user
US7685276B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2010-03-23 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US8626911B2 (en) 1999-12-28 2014-01-07 Personalized User Model Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US6981040B1 (en) 1999-12-28 2005-12-27 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US9098813B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2015-08-04 Personalized User Model Methods and systems for conducting a personalized web browser search by probability estimation that is unseen document is of interest to the user
US9172761B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2015-10-27 Open Text S.A. Method of gathering information related to activity of a user and a data processing system program product
US20110029663A1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2011-02-03 Mccullough Sean M Method of gathering information related to activity of a user and a data processing system program product
US6996612B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2006-02-07 Vignette Corporation Method of providing information related to activity of a user and a data processing system program product
US7831706B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2010-11-09 Vignette Software Llc Method of gathering information related to activity of a user and a data processing system program product
US9405753B2 (en) 2000-01-24 2016-08-02 George Aposporos Dynamic ratings-based streaming media playback system
US9779095B2 (en) 2000-01-24 2017-10-03 George Aposporos User input-based play-list generation and playback system
US9547650B2 (en) 2000-01-24 2017-01-17 George Aposporos System for sharing and rating streaming media playlists
US7228305B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2007-06-05 Friskit, Inc. Rating system for streaming media playback system
US8533094B1 (en) 2000-01-26 2013-09-10 Ebay Inc. On-line auction sales leads
US20070060111A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2007-03-15 Tijerino Yuri A Adaptive communication data retrieval system
US6405034B1 (en) 2000-01-28 2002-06-11 Leap Wireless International, Inc. Adaptive communication data retrieval system
US7590415B2 (en) 2000-01-28 2009-09-15 Cricket Communications, Inc. Adaptive communication data retrieval system
US20030149628A1 (en) * 2000-02-21 2003-08-07 Oday Abbosh Ordering items of playable content or other works
US20090112702A1 (en) * 2000-02-21 2009-04-30 Accenture Ordering items of playable content or other works
US20080052283A1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2008-02-28 Novell, Inc. Construction, manipulation, and comparison of a multi-dimensional semantic space
US8131741B2 (en) 2000-02-25 2012-03-06 Novell Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc. Construction, manipulation, and comparison of a multi-dimensional semantic space
US8417729B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2013-04-09 Jedi Technologies, Inc. System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
US7401098B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2008-07-15 Baker Benjamin D System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
US20080201425A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2008-08-21 Baker Benjamin D System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
US20110137951A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2011-06-09 Baker Benjamin D System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
US7885977B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2011-02-08 Jedi Technologies, Inc. System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
US8930406B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2015-01-06 Jedi Technologies, Inc. System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
WO2001065334A2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2001-09-07 Baker Benjamin D Intelligence driven paging process for a chat room
WO2001065334A3 (en) * 2000-02-29 2002-02-21 Benjamin D Baker Intelligence driven paging process for a chat room
US9432315B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2016-08-30 Jedi Technologies, Inc. System and method for the automated notification of compatibility between real-time network participants
US20010048449A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2001-12-06 Baker Benjamin D. Intelligence driven paging process for a chat room
US20060085281A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2006-04-20 Atsushi Hanai Online shopping system and method
US20010051893A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-12-13 Atsushi Hanai Online shopping system and method
US9736209B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2017-08-15 Facebook, Inc. State change alerts mechanism
US9246975B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2016-01-26 Facebook, Inc. State change alerts mechanism
US9203879B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Offline alerts mechanism
WO2001071639A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-09-27 Jung Young Keun Web singer selection system and web singer selection method based on internet
US20090254554A1 (en) * 2000-04-21 2009-10-08 Musicip Corporation Music searching system and method
US7979880B2 (en) 2000-04-21 2011-07-12 Cox Communications, Inc. Method and system for profiling iTV users and for providing selective content delivery
US20050038819A1 (en) * 2000-04-21 2005-02-17 Hicken Wendell T. Music Recommendation system and method
US20050052405A1 (en) * 2000-04-25 2005-03-10 Sunil Maulik Computer-based educational system
US20020082955A1 (en) * 2000-04-25 2002-06-27 Patel Salil D. Computer-based education system for scientific procedures with product procurement capability
US7006990B2 (en) * 2000-04-27 2006-02-28 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic product catalog systems
US20020004764A1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2002-01-10 Markus Stolze Electronic product catalog systems
US7024381B1 (en) 2000-04-28 2006-04-04 Netflix, Inc. Approach for renting items to customers
US7617127B2 (en) 2000-04-28 2009-11-10 Netflix, Inc. Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US7403910B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2008-07-22 Netflix, Inc. Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US7546252B2 (en) 2000-04-28 2009-06-09 Netflix, Inc. Approach for managing rental items across a plurality of distribution locations
US20050125307A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2005-06-09 Hunt Neil D. Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US20050086127A1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2005-04-21 Hastings W. R. Approach for managing rental items across a plurality of distribution locations
US8255541B2 (en) 2000-05-23 2012-08-28 Rpx Corporation Method and apparatus for utilizing user feedback to improve signifier mapping
US7062561B1 (en) * 2000-05-23 2006-06-13 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for utilizing the social usage learned from multi-user feedback to improve resource identity signifier mapping
US20090119286A1 (en) * 2000-05-23 2009-05-07 Richard Reisman Method and Apparatus for Utilizing User Feedback to Improve Signifier Mapping
US7461155B2 (en) 2000-05-23 2008-12-02 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for utilizing the social usage learned from multi-user feedback to improve resource identity signifier mapping
US9158764B2 (en) 2000-05-23 2015-10-13 Rpx Corporation Method and apparatus for utilizing user feedback to improve signifier mapping
US20060167862A1 (en) * 2000-05-23 2006-07-27 Richard Reisman Method and apparatus for utilizing user feedback to improve signifier mapping
US20030145002A1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2003-07-31 Tzunami, Inc. Method and system for organizing objects according to information categories
US7072902B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2006-07-04 Tzunami Inc Method and system for organizing objects according to information categories
US8131777B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2012-03-06 Open Text S.A. Method for client-side personalization
US7668834B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2010-02-23 Vignette Software, LLC Method for client-side personalization
US7251687B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2007-07-31 Vignette Corporation Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization
US7827274B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2010-11-02 Vignette Software Llc Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization
US20050137999A1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2005-06-23 Mccullough Sean M. Method for client-side personalization
US9087350B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2015-07-21 Open Text S.A. Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization
US20110026431A1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2011-02-03 Mccullough Sean M Method for continuous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US6865574B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2005-03-08 Vignette Corporation Method for client-side personalization
US9560153B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2017-01-31 Open Text Sa Ulc Method for continuous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US9331978B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2016-05-03 Open Text S.A. Method for continuous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US20100115028A1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2010-05-06 Mccullough Sean M Method for Client-Side Personalization
US7155506B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2006-12-26 Vignette Corporation Method for continous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US9838489B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2017-12-05 Open Text Sa Ulc Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization
US8417738B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2013-04-09 Open Text S.A. Method for client-side personalization
US9043490B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2015-05-26 Open Text S.A. Method for continuous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US8631121B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2014-01-14 Open Text S.A. Method for continuous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US7860969B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2010-12-28 Vignette Software Llc Method for continuous, frame-specific click-stream recording
US8341019B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2012-12-25 Open Text, S.A. Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization
US20110173255A1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2011-07-14 Mccullough Sean M Method for Client-Side Personalization
US20090228342A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2009-09-10 Walker Jay S Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US7526440B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2009-04-28 Walker Digital, Llc Method, computer product, and apparatus for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US20050027612A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2005-02-03 Walker Jay S. Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US8224716B2 (en) 2000-06-12 2012-07-17 Facebook, Inc. Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US20070220540A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2007-09-20 Walker Jay S Methods and systems for facilitating the provision of opinions to a shopper from a panel of peers
US8712816B2 (en) 2000-06-15 2014-04-29 Rightoptions Llc Computerized apparatus for identifying industries for potential transfer of a job function
US8036924B2 (en) 2000-06-15 2011-10-11 Rightoptions Llc System and method of identifying options for employment transfers across different industries
US20020055867A1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2002-05-09 Putnam Laura T. System and method of identifying options for employment transfers across different industries
US6947922B1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2005-09-20 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method for generating implicit ratings based on user interactions with handheld devices
US7788123B1 (en) 2000-06-23 2010-08-31 Ekhaus Michael A Method and system for high performance model-based personalization
US8155992B2 (en) 2000-06-23 2012-04-10 Thalveg Data Flow Llc Method and system for high performance model-based personalization
US20100332408A1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2010-12-30 Ekhaus Michael A Method and System for High Performance Model-Based Personalization
US20020052783A1 (en) * 2000-06-26 2002-05-02 Turek David G. Method and apparatus for establishing a customized electronic site
US20030055516A1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2003-03-20 Dan Gang Using a system for prediction of musical preferences for the distribution of musical content over cellular networks
US7075000B2 (en) * 2000-06-29 2006-07-11 Musicgenome.Com Inc. System and method for prediction of musical preferences
US7102067B2 (en) * 2000-06-29 2006-09-05 Musicgenome.Com Inc. Using a system for prediction of musical preferences for the distribution of musical content over cellular networks
US20030089218A1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2003-05-15 Dan Gang System and method for prediction of musical preferences
US6748395B1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2004-06-08 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamic playlist of media
US7797272B2 (en) 2000-07-14 2010-09-14 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamic playlist of media
US20040210533A1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2004-10-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamic playlist of media
US6611814B1 (en) * 2000-07-17 2003-08-26 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for using virtual wish lists for assisting shopping over computer networks
US20100280906A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2010-11-04 Lim Stanley T Economic Filtering System for Delivery of Permission Based, Targeted, Incentivized Advertising
US8712834B2 (en) 2000-07-18 2014-04-29 Google Inc. Economic filtering system for delivery of permission based, targeted, incentivized advertising
US6801909B2 (en) * 2000-07-21 2004-10-05 Triplehop Technologies, Inc. System and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US20020052873A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-05-02 Joaquin Delgado System and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US20020056109A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2002-05-09 Tomsen Mai-Lan Method and system to provide a personalized shopping channel VIA an interactive video casting system
US7328216B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2008-02-05 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US6687696B2 (en) 2000-07-26 2004-02-03 Recommind Inc. System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models
US9185068B2 (en) 2000-07-28 2015-11-10 Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc. Technique for effective organization and communication of information
US8126960B2 (en) * 2000-07-28 2012-02-28 Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc. Technique for effective organization and communication of information
US20080033635A1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2008-02-07 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective organization and communication of information
US20020013815A1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2002-01-31 Obradovich Michael L. Technique for effective organization and communication of information
US20100153518A1 (en) * 2000-08-21 2010-06-17 Vignette Software Llc Network real estate analysis
US7660869B1 (en) 2000-08-21 2010-02-09 Vignette Software, LLC Network real estate analysis
US8392551B2 (en) 2000-08-21 2013-03-05 Open Text S.A. Network real estate analysis
US7278105B1 (en) 2000-08-21 2007-10-02 Vignette Corporation Visualization and analysis of user clickpaths
US8024448B2 (en) 2000-08-21 2011-09-20 Vignette Software Llc Network real estate analysis
US20020024531A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-02-28 Herrell William R. Method for evaluating employees and aggregating their respective skills and experience in a searchable database for sharing knowledge resources
US20110035439A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2011-02-10 Kontera Technologies, Inc. System and method for real-time web page context analysis for the real-time insertion of textual markup objects and dynamic content
US9324084B2 (en) 2000-08-30 2016-04-26 Kontera Technologies, Inc. System and method for real-time web page context analysis for the real-time insertion of textual markup objects and dynamic content
US8185545B2 (en) 2000-08-30 2012-05-22 Rpx Corporation Task/domain segmentation in applying feedback to command control
US20060161507A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2006-07-20 Richard Reisman Task/domain segmentation in applying feedback to command control
US7062488B1 (en) 2000-08-30 2006-06-13 Richard Reisman Task/domain segmentation in applying feedback to command control
US8849842B2 (en) 2000-08-30 2014-09-30 Rpx Corporation Task/domain segmentation in applying feedback to command control
US8700588B2 (en) 2000-08-30 2014-04-15 Kontera Technologies, Inc. System and method for real-time web page analysis and modification
US20110035438A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2011-02-10 Kontera Technologies, Inc. System and method for real-time web page context analysis for the real-time insertion of textual markup objects and dynamic content
US20090234718A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2009-09-17 Novell, Inc. Predictive service systems using emotion detection
US7650304B1 (en) 2000-09-08 2010-01-19 Capital One Financial Corporation Solicitation to web marketing loop process
US7970647B2 (en) 2000-09-12 2011-06-28 Capital One Financial Corporation System and method for performing web based in-view monitoring
US7567916B1 (en) 2000-09-12 2009-07-28 Capital One Financial Corporation System and method for performing Web based in-view monitoring
US20050177401A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2005-08-11 Capital One Financial Corporation System and method for performing Web based in-view monitoring
US20080015929A1 (en) * 2000-09-12 2008-01-17 Capital One Financial Corporation System and method for performing web based in-view monitoring
US7574364B2 (en) * 2000-09-13 2009-08-11 Yamaha Corporation Contents rating method
US20020032776A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-03-14 Yamaha Corporation Contents rating method
US7103592B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2006-09-05 Pertinence Data Intelligence Method and apparatus providing recommendations based on automatically enriched user profile
US20030187835A1 (en) * 2000-09-27 2003-10-02 Augustin Huret Search engine
US20040019657A1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2004-01-29 Viewpoint Communications, Inc. Method of searching for, collecting and distributing information in distributed computer
US7499911B2 (en) * 2000-10-03 2009-03-03 Viewpoint Communications, Inc. Method of searching for, collecting and distributing information in distributed computer
US20020087390A1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2002-07-04 Weathersby Robert G. Method and system of using collective human intelligence to logically group related items
US20020169851A1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2002-11-14 Robert Weathersby Internet-based system for dynamically creating and delivering customized content within remote web pages
WO2002032038A2 (en) * 2000-10-13 2002-04-18 Geneed, Inc. Computer-based education system for scientific procedures with product procurement capability
WO2002032038A3 (en) * 2000-10-13 2003-08-14 Jerry Brosnan Computer-based education system for scientific procedures with product procurement capability
US20020161664A1 (en) * 2000-10-18 2002-10-31 Shaya Steven A. Intelligent performance-based product recommendation system
US8666844B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2014-03-04 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Intelligent performance-based product recommendation system
US7809601B2 (en) 2000-10-18 2010-10-05 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Intelligent performance-based product recommendation system
US20100262556A1 (en) * 2000-10-18 2010-10-14 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. Intelligent performance-based product recommendation
US9369101B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2016-06-14 Black Hills Media, Llc Unitary electronic speaker device for receiving an assignment of a playlist from a home personal computer and rendering the playlist
US20030017801A1 (en) * 2000-11-09 2003-01-23 Ncr Corporation Disseminating consumer information
USRE46178E1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2016-10-11 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Method and apparatus for evolutionary design
US8515821B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2013-08-20 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Online system and method for locating and referring an automobile dealer to customers
US20030171964A1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2003-09-11 Honda North America Inc. Online system and method for locating and referring an automobile dealer to customers
US7493372B2 (en) * 2000-11-20 2009-02-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Method of updating interests
US20040039814A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2004-02-26 Crabtree Ian B Method of updating interests
US20040049537A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2004-03-11 Titmuss Richard J Method of managing resources
US7596591B2 (en) 2000-11-20 2009-09-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Method of managing resources
US7512678B2 (en) 2000-11-20 2009-03-31 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Information provider
US20040044658A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2004-03-04 Crabtree Ian B Information provider
US7406443B1 (en) 2000-12-18 2008-07-29 Powerloom Method and system for multi-dimensional trading
US7146369B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2006-12-05 Vignette Corporation Method and system for native-byte form handling
US7194506B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2007-03-20 Vignette Corporation Method and system for cache management of locale-sensitive content
US7672955B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2010-03-02 Vignette Software L.L.C. Method and system for platform-independent file system interaction
EP1217554A3 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-11-26 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method
US7386547B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2008-06-10 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method
EP1217554A2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-06-26 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method
US7440943B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2008-10-21 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method
US20040254911A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2004-12-16 Xerox Corporation Recommender system and method
US20020087452A1 (en) * 2001-01-04 2002-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program product for improving broker's profits in electronic commerce
US20040205063A1 (en) * 2001-01-11 2004-10-14 Aric Coady Process and system for sparse vector and matrix representation of document indexing and retrieval
US20020091715A1 (en) * 2001-01-11 2002-07-11 Aric Coady Process and system for sparse vector and matrix reperesentation of document indexing and retrieval
US7328204B2 (en) 2001-01-11 2008-02-05 Aric Coady Process and system for sparse vector and matrix representation of document indexing and retrieval
US6751628B2 (en) * 2001-01-11 2004-06-15 Dolphin Search Process and system for sparse vector and matrix representation of document indexing and retrieval
WO2003090146A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2003-10-30 Marcus Hong Pre-audition cd
US20020143613A1 (en) * 2001-02-05 2002-10-03 Hong Se June Fast method for renewal and associated recommendations for market basket items
WO2002079901A2 (en) * 2001-02-16 2002-10-10 Bee-Bee, Inc. Customer preference system
WO2002079901A3 (en) * 2001-02-16 2004-04-01 Bee Bee Inc Customer preference system
US20060085282A1 (en) * 2001-03-15 2006-04-20 Atsushi Hanai Online shopping system and method
US6728706B2 (en) * 2001-03-23 2004-04-27 International Business Machines Corporation Searching products catalogs
US20020165755A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2002-11-07 Kitts Brendan J. Method of predicting behavior of a customer at a future date and a data processing system readable medium
US20030063779A1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2003-04-03 Jennifer Wrigley System for visual preference determination and predictive product selection
US8260656B1 (en) 2001-04-19 2012-09-04 Amazon.Com, Inc. Mining of user-generated playlists for data regarding relationships between digital works
US8468046B2 (en) 2001-04-19 2013-06-18 Amazon.Com, Inc. Playlist-based detection of similar digital works and work creators
US20100217654A1 (en) * 2001-04-24 2010-08-26 Keller Thomas L Creating an incentive to author useful item reviews
US8140380B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2012-03-20 Amazon.Com, Inc. Creating an incentive to author useful item reviews
US20020188589A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-12-12 Jukka-Pekka Salmenkaita Method and business process to maintain privacy in distributed recommendation systems
US7072886B2 (en) 2001-05-15 2006-07-04 Nokia Corporation Method and business process to maintain privacy in distributed recommendation systems
US6968334B2 (en) 2001-05-15 2005-11-22 Nokia Corporation Method and business process to maintain privacy in distributed recommendation systems
US20030004937A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2003-01-02 Jukka-Pekka Salmenkaita Method and business process to maintain privacy in distributed recommendation systems
US7962482B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2011-06-14 Pandora Media, Inc. Methods and systems for utilizing contextual feedback to generate and modify playlists
US20060212442A1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2006-09-21 Pandora Media, Inc. Methods of Presenting and Providing Content to a User
US20060206478A1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2006-09-14 Pandora Media, Inc. Playlist generating methods
US8306976B2 (en) 2001-05-16 2012-11-06 Pandora Media, Inc. Methods and systems for utilizing contextual feedback to generate and modify playlists
US20020178019A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2002-11-28 Anderson Andrew V. Method and apparatus for message escalation by digital assistants
US20020178022A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2002-11-28 Anderson Andrew V. Method and apparatus for message escalation by digital assistants
US20030004835A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and product service for locating items satisfying a general requirement and ranking items according to utility
US20060235721A1 (en) * 2001-06-06 2006-10-19 Lawrence Kavanagh System and method for managing marketing applications for a website
US7197474B1 (en) 2001-07-12 2007-03-27 Vignette Corporation Method of modeling product demand subject to a large number of interactions
US20080195654A1 (en) * 2001-08-20 2008-08-14 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for providing adaptive media property classification
US8082279B2 (en) 2001-08-20 2011-12-20 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for providing adaptive media property classification
US8307045B1 (en) 2001-08-22 2012-11-06 Open Text S.A. System and method for creating target-specific data conversion templates using a master style template
US20060111801A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2006-05-25 Microsoft Corporation Automatic classification of media entities according to melodic movement properties
US20060096447A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2006-05-11 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for providing automatic classification of media entities according to melodic movement properties
US7574276B2 (en) 2001-08-29 2009-08-11 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for providing automatic classification of media entities according to melodic movement properties
US20030065584A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-03 Mazda Motor Corporation Vehicle sales support system, vehicle sales support program and vehicle sales support method
US7966334B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2011-06-21 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Information retrieval systems and methods that use user-defined lists to identify related offerings
US8452727B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2013-05-28 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Service for accepting and selectively exposing user-generated lists
US8060466B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2011-11-15 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Service for accepting and selectively exposing user-created lists of items
US8892506B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2014-11-18 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Service for accepting and selectively exposing user-generated lists
US7831548B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2010-11-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods that use search queries to identify related lists
US20030110056A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method for rating items within a recommendation system based on additional knowledge of item relationships
US20030088480A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-08 International Business Machines Corporation Enabling recommendation systems to include general properties in the recommendation process
US20040202132A1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2004-10-14 Tomi Heinonen Moving mobile wireless device having continuing service from the same internet server
US7555287B1 (en) 2001-11-01 2009-06-30 Nokia Corporation Customized messaging between wireless access point and services
US7151764B1 (en) 2001-11-01 2006-12-19 Nokia Corporation Service notification on a low bluetooth layer
US20030097196A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for generating a stereotypical profile for recommending items of interest using item-based clustering
US20030097186A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V Method and apparatus for generating a stereotypical profile for recommending items of interest using feature-based clustering
US20030101325A1 (en) * 2001-11-29 2003-05-29 Giuseppe Desoli Transparent remote data storage device and method
US20030106057A1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2003-06-05 Predictive Networks, Inc. Television navigation program guide
US20030115278A1 (en) * 2001-12-13 2003-06-19 Goker Mehmet H. Method and system for personalizing content to be delivered to a group factoring into account individual interests of each group member
US7209906B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2007-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for implementing a metrics engine for tracking relationships over time
US7249034B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2007-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for publishing a person's affinities
US9159048B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2015-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation Knowledge gathering system based on user's affinity
US7698303B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2010-04-13 International Business Machines Corporation System for categorizing and normalizing knowledge data based on user's affinity to knowledge
US7222297B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2007-05-22 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for using XML to normalize documents
US8195671B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2012-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method for distributing services for knowledge management processing
US20030154186A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-08-14 Goodwin James P. System for synchronizing of user's affinity to knowledge
US7219098B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2007-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for processing data in a distributed architecture
US20030135489A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-07-17 Goodwin James Patrick System and method for processing data in a distributed architecture
US7124353B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2006-10-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for calculating a user affinity
US7698255B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2010-04-13 International Business Machines Corporation System for organizing knowledge data and communication with users having affinity to knowledge data
US20030158867A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-08-21 Goodwin James P. System and method for mapping knowledge data based on user's affinity to knowledge
US7200592B2 (en) * 2002-01-14 2007-04-03 International Business Machines Corporation System for synchronizing of user's affinity to knowledge
US20030163485A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-08-28 Goodwin James P. Knowledge gathering system based on user's affinity
US20030154196A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-08-14 Goodwin James P. System for organizing knowledge data and communication with users having affinity to knowledge data
US20030135606A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-07-17 Goodwin James Patrick System and method for implementing a metrics engine for tracking relationships over time
US20030158866A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-08-21 Goodwin James P. System for categorizing and normalizing knowledge data based on user's affinity to knowledge
US20030177127A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-09-18 Goodwin James P System and method for distributing services for knowledge management processing
US20030135379A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-07-17 Schirmer Andrew Lewis System and method for publishing a person's affinities
US7672662B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2010-03-02 Nokia Corporation Method and system for multimedia tags
US20110016315A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2011-01-20 Nokia Corporation Method and system for multimedia tags
US7340214B1 (en) 2002-02-13 2008-03-04 Nokia Corporation Short-range wireless system and method for multimedia tags
US20050113066A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-05-26 Max Hamberg Method and system for multimedia tags
US8526916B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2013-09-03 Nokia Corporation Method and system for multimedia tags
US7589726B2 (en) 2002-03-21 2009-09-15 Nokia Corporation Service/device indication with graphical interface
US7102640B1 (en) 2002-03-21 2006-09-05 Nokia Corporation Service/device indication with graphical interface
US20050073522A1 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-04-07 Markus Aholainen Service/device indication with graphical interface
US20060004763A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2006-01-05 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US8020111B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2011-09-13 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US7685160B2 (en) * 2002-04-04 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US7904439B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2011-03-08 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US7702635B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2010-04-20 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US20050278326A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2005-12-15 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities
US9165300B2 (en) 2002-04-17 2015-10-20 Ebay Inc. Generating a recommendation
US8275673B1 (en) 2002-04-17 2012-09-25 Ebay Inc. Method and system to recommend further items to a user of a network-based transaction facility upon unsuccessful transacting with respect to an item
US20040203639A1 (en) * 2002-05-02 2004-10-14 Stuart Ozer Media planner
US8001567B2 (en) 2002-05-02 2011-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Media planner
US20030208399A1 (en) * 2002-05-03 2003-11-06 Jayanta Basak Personalized product recommendation
US6987221B2 (en) * 2002-05-30 2006-01-17 Microsoft Corporation Auto playlist generation with multiple seed songs
US20030221541A1 (en) * 2002-05-30 2003-12-04 Platt John C. Auto playlist generation with multiple seed songs
US7103313B2 (en) 2002-06-05 2006-09-05 Nokia Corporation Automatic determination of access point content and services for short-range wireless terminals
US20030228842A1 (en) * 2002-06-05 2003-12-11 Nokia Corporation Automatic determination of access point content and services for short-range wireless terminals
US20030236698A1 (en) * 2002-06-20 2003-12-25 Praisedepot, Llc Method and system for collecting, storing, managing and distributing references using networked computer devices
US9712576B1 (en) 2002-06-25 2017-07-18 Susan (Zann) Gill Crowd-sourced project and transaction management system for human- and device-adaptive requester-provider networks
US20040019846A1 (en) * 2002-07-24 2004-01-29 Xerox Corporation System and method for managing document retention of shared documents
US7171620B2 (en) 2002-07-24 2007-01-30 Xerox Corporation System and method for managing document retention of shared documents
US20090210246A1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2009-08-20 Choicestream, Inc. Statistical personalized recommendation system
US20040172267A1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2004-09-02 Jayendu Patel Statistical personalized recommendation system
US20060259344A1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2006-11-16 Choicestream, A Delaware Corporation Statistical personalized recommendation system
US20040059626A1 (en) * 2002-09-23 2004-03-25 General Motor Corporation Bayesian product recommendation engine
US8255263B2 (en) * 2002-09-23 2012-08-28 General Motors Llc Bayesian product recommendation engine
FR2845495A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2004-04-09 France Telecom access to management information system has a mixed
EP1406186A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2004-04-07 France Telecom System for managing access to shared information
US20100191582A1 (en) * 2002-10-07 2010-07-29 Dicker Russell A User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US20100191619A1 (en) * 2002-10-07 2010-07-29 Dicker Russell A User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US8326690B2 (en) 2002-10-07 2012-12-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US8370203B2 (en) 2002-10-07 2013-02-05 Amazon Technologies, Inc. User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US7831476B2 (en) 2002-10-21 2010-11-09 Ebay Inc. Listing recommendation in a network-based commerce system
US20110055040A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2011-03-03 Ebay Inc. Listing recommendation in a network-based commerce system
US8712868B2 (en) 2002-10-21 2014-04-29 Ebay Inc. Listing recommendation using generation of a user-specific query in a network-based commerce system
US20040260621A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2004-12-23 Foster Benjamin David Listing recommendation in a network-based commerce system
US20060217828A1 (en) * 2002-10-23 2006-09-28 Hicken Wendell T Music searching system and method
US8005919B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2011-08-23 Aol Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US20050055450A1 (en) * 2002-11-18 2005-03-10 David Gang Matching members with shared interests
US9053173B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-06-09 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent results related to a portion of a search query
US9053174B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-06-09 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent vendor results related to a character stream
US20070288648A1 (en) * 2002-11-18 2007-12-13 Lara Mehanna Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US8156193B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2012-04-10 Aol Inc. Enhanced buddy list using mobile device identifiers
US9171064B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-10-27 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent community based results related to a character stream
US9053175B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-06-09 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent results using a spelling correction agent
US9203647B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Dynamic online and geographic location of a user
US9203794B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for reconfiguring electronic messages
US9047364B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-06-02 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent client capability-based results related to a character stream
US7590696B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-09-15 Aol Llc Enhanced buddy list using mobile device identifiers
US9253136B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2016-02-02 Facebook, Inc. Electronic message delivery based on presence information
US9319356B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2016-04-19 Facebook, Inc. Message delivery control settings
US9356890B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2016-05-31 Facebook, Inc. Enhanced buddy list using mobile device identifiers
US8965964B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-24 Facebook, Inc. Managing forwarded electronic messages
US8954530B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-10 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent results related to a character stream
US8452849B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2013-05-28 Facebook, Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US9075868B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-07-07 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent results based on database queries
US7640306B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2009-12-29 Aol Llc Reconfiguring an electronic message to effect an enhanced notification
US9515977B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2016-12-06 Facebook, Inc. Time based electronic message delivery
US8954531B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-10 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent messaging label results related to a character stream
US9852126B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-12-26 Facebook, Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US20100077049A1 (en) * 2002-11-18 2010-03-25 Aol Llc Reconfiguring an Electronic Message to Effect an Enhanced Notification
US9769104B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-09-19 Facebook, Inc. Methods and system for delivering multiple notifications
US8701014B1 (en) 2002-11-18 2014-04-15 Facebook, Inc. Account linking
US9560000B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-01-31 Facebook, Inc. Reconfiguring an electronic message to effect an enhanced notification
US8001199B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2011-08-16 Aol Inc. Reconfiguring an electronic message to effect an enhanced notification
US8819176B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2014-08-26 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent map results related to a character stream
US9647872B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-05-09 Facebook, Inc. Dynamic identification of other users to an online user
US9729489B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-08-08 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for notification management and delivery
US9774560B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-09-26 Facebook, Inc. People lists
US9667585B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-05-30 Facebook, Inc. Central people lists accessible by multiple applications
US9563708B2 (en) * 2002-11-18 2017-02-07 Aol Inc. Matching members with shared interests
US8775560B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2014-07-08 Facebook, Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US9621376B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-04-11 Facebook, Inc. Dynamic location of a subordinate user
US9571439B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-02-14 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for notification delivery
US9571440B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2017-02-14 Facebook, Inc. Notification archive
US9075867B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-07-07 Facebook, Inc. Intelligent results using an assistant
US8954534B2 (en) 2002-11-18 2015-02-10 Facebook, Inc. Host-based intelligent results related to a character stream
US20040158504A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-12 Gross John N. Method of providing access to playable media
US20080249843A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2008-10-09 Gross John N Notification System and Method for Multiple Media Queues
US20040162783A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-19 Gross John N. Media queue replenisher
US8712867B2 (en) 2003-01-31 2014-04-29 Media Queue, Llc System for providing access to playable media
US20040158503A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-12 Gross John N. Media queue monitor
US8688462B2 (en) 2003-01-31 2014-04-01 Media Queue, Llc Media auto exchange system and method
US20040172342A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-02 Gross John N. System for providing access to playable media
US20060241967A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2006-10-26 Gross John N Playable Media Delivery Capacity Exchange Method
US20040172274A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-02 Gross John N. Media auto exchange system and method
US20040153373A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-05 Docomo Communications Laboratories Usa, Inc. Method and system for pushing services to mobile devices in smart environments using a context-aware recommender
US20040172275A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-09-02 Gross John N. Media exchange system & method
US20040153413A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-08-05 Gross John N. Notification system and method for media Queue
US20060155575A1 (en) * 2003-01-31 2006-07-13 Gross John N Media delivery prioritization system and method
US8606717B2 (en) 2003-01-31 2013-12-10 Media Queue, Llc Playable media delivery capacity exchange method
US8700538B2 (en) 2003-01-31 2014-04-15 Media Queue, Llc Media exchange system and method
US20040158497A1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2004-08-12 Brand Matthew E. On-line recommender system
US7475027B2 (en) * 2003-02-06 2009-01-06 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. On-line recommender system
US20040181517A1 (en) * 2003-03-13 2004-09-16 Younghee Jung System and method for social interaction
US20040181540A1 (en) * 2003-03-13 2004-09-16 Younghee Jung System and method for the provision of socially-relevant recommendations
US20070011039A1 (en) * 2003-03-25 2007-01-11 Oddo Anthony S Generating audience analytics
US8069076B2 (en) 2003-03-25 2011-11-29 Cox Communications, Inc. Generating audience analytics
US9531826B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2016-12-27 Facebook, Inc. Managing electronic messages based on inference scores
US9516125B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2016-12-06 Facebook, Inc. Identifying and using identities deemed to be known to a user
US9736255B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2017-08-15 Facebook, Inc. Methods of providing access to messages based on degrees of separation
US8874672B2 (en) 2003-03-26 2014-10-28 Facebook, Inc. Identifying and using identities deemed to be known to a user
US20040225509A1 (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-11 Olivier Andre Use of financial transaction network(s) information to generate personalized recommendations
US20100191663A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2010-07-29 Gross John N Method of testing item availability and delivery performance of an e-commerce site
US8249955B2 (en) 2003-05-28 2012-08-21 John Nicholas Gross Method of testing item availability and delivery performance of an e-commerce site
US7685028B2 (en) 2003-05-28 2010-03-23 Gross John N Method of testing inventory management/shipping systems
US20100312613A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2010-12-09 Gross John N Method of evaluating learning rate of recommender systems
US20040243480A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-12-02 Gross John N. Method of controlling electronic commerce queue
US20040243479A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-12-02 Gross John N. Method of monitoring electronic commerce queue
US20040243570A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2004-12-02 Gross John N. Method of testing inventory management/shipping systems
US8433622B2 (en) 2003-05-28 2013-04-30 Media Queue, Llc Method of controlling electronic commerce queue
US20060212367A1 (en) * 2003-05-28 2006-09-21 Gross John N Method of selecting and distributing items to consumers of electronic media
US7343326B2 (en) 2003-06-02 2008-03-11 W.W. Grainger System and method for providing product recommendations
US20050171860A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2005-08-04 W.W. Grainger, Inc. System and method for providing product recommendations
US8781917B2 (en) 2003-06-02 2014-07-15 W.W. Grainger, Inc. System and method for directing a customer to additional purchasing opportunities
US7313536B2 (en) 2003-06-02 2007-12-25 W.W. Grainger Inc. System and method for providing product recommendations
US20060036510A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2006-02-16 W.W. Grainger, Inc. System and method for directing a customer to additional purchasing opportunities
US20060242661A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2006-10-26 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and device for generating a user profile on the basis of playlists
US8490123B2 (en) * 2003-06-03 2013-07-16 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and device for generating a user profile on the basis of playlists
US20040267613A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2004-12-30 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for presenting personalized content on electronic commerce web pages
US8738541B2 (en) 2003-06-25 2014-05-27 Media Queue, Llc Method of processing rental requests and returns
US20040267669A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2004-12-30 Gross John N. Method of processing rental requests and returns
US20050038893A1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2005-02-17 Paul Graham Determining the relevance of offers
US8458033B2 (en) 2003-08-11 2013-06-04 Dropbox, Inc. Determining the relevance of offers
US7822631B1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2010-10-26 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Assessing content based on assessed trust in users
US8554601B1 (en) 2003-08-22 2013-10-08 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing content based on reputation
US9070118B2 (en) 2003-09-05 2015-06-30 Facebook, Inc. Methods for capturing electronic messages based on capture rules relating to user actions regarding received electronic messages
US8577972B1 (en) 2003-09-05 2013-11-05 Facebook, Inc. Methods and systems for capturing and managing instant messages
US8312480B2 (en) 2003-09-16 2012-11-13 Open Text S.A. System and method for incorporating web services in a web site
US9792262B2 (en) 2003-09-16 2017-10-17 Open Text Sa Ulc Client-side web service provider
US8966509B2 (en) 2003-09-16 2015-02-24 Open Text S.A. Client-side web service provider
US7788681B1 (en) 2003-09-16 2010-08-31 Vignette Software, LLC System and method for incorporating web services in a web site
US20100312829A1 (en) * 2003-09-16 2010-12-09 O'connell Jr Conleth S Client-Side Web Service Provider
US20060190450A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2006-08-24 Predixis Corporation Audio fingerprinting system and method
US7487180B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2009-02-03 Musicip Corporation System and method for recognizing audio pieces via audio fingerprinting
US7904924B1 (en) 2003-10-31 2011-03-08 Microsoft Corporation Video-on-demand recommendations based on previously viewed television programs
US20050120015A1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2005-06-02 Marum Campos Jose M. Method and system for supporting symbolic serendipity
US7319998B2 (en) 2003-11-14 2008-01-15 Universidade De Coimbra Method and system for supporting symbolic serendipity
US20070133357A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2007-06-14 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. User aware audio playing apparatus and method
US7613531B2 (en) * 2003-11-18 2009-11-03 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. User aware audio playing apparatus and method
US8600920B2 (en) 2003-11-28 2013-12-03 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Affinity propagation in adaptive network-based systems
USRE44559E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2013-10-22 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive social computing methods
USRE44968E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2014-06-24 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive self-modifying and recombinant systems
US8566263B2 (en) 2003-11-28 2013-10-22 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive computer-based personalities
US20070203872A1 (en) * 2003-11-28 2007-08-30 Manyworlds, Inc. Affinity Propagation in Adaptive Network-Based Systems
USRE44967E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2014-06-24 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive social and process network systems
USRE44966E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2014-06-24 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive recommendations systems
USRE45770E1 (en) 2003-11-28 2015-10-20 World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc Adaptive recommendation explanations
US20080249968A1 (en) * 2003-11-28 2008-10-09 Manayworlds Inc. Adaptive computer-based personalities
US20050160166A1 (en) * 2003-12-17 2005-07-21 Kraenzel Carl J. System and method for monitoring a communication and retrieving information relevant to the communication
US9288000B2 (en) 2003-12-17 2016-03-15 International Business Machines Corporation Monitoring a communication and retrieving information relevant to the communication
US20050136837A1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-06-23 Nurminen Jukka K. Method and system for detecting and using context in wireless networks
US20050182705A1 (en) * 2004-01-08 2005-08-18 Mclemore Greg System and apparatus for bidding
US20050159970A1 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-07-21 Orkut Buyukkokten Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
US8429091B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2013-04-23 Google Inc. Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
US8010459B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2011-08-30 Google Inc. Methods and systems for rating associated members in a social network
US20050159998A1 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-07-21 Orkut Buyukkokten Methods and systems for rating associated members in a social network
US8015119B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2011-09-06 Google Inc. Methods and systems for the display and navigation of a social network
US20100010877A1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2010-01-14 Neil Duncan Hunt Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US8271338B2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2012-09-18 Netflix, Inc. Approach for estimating user ratings of items
US20050197961A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-08 Miller Gregory P. Preference engine for generating predictions on entertainment products of services
US20050251564A1 (en) * 2004-04-15 2005-11-10 Tillotson Timothy N Remote instrument control by multiple clients
US8028323B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2011-09-27 Dryden Enterprises, Llc Method and system for employing a first device to direct a networked audio device to obtain a media item
US20050251566A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Martin Weel Playlist downloading for digital entertainment network
US20050251807A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Martin Weel System and method for sharing playlists
US8458356B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2013-06-04 Black Hills Media System and method for sharing playlists
US9584591B1 (en) 2004-05-05 2017-02-28 Black Hills Media, Llc Method and device for sharing a playlist at a dedicated media player device
US9554405B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2017-01-24 Black Hills Media, Llc Wireless speaker for receiving from a mobile phone directions to receive and render a playlist from a content server on the internet
US8028038B2 (en) * 2004-05-05 2011-09-27 Dryden Enterprises, Llc Obtaining a playlist based on user profile matching
US20080208379A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2008-08-28 Conpact, Inc. System and method for sharing playlists
US8230099B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2012-07-24 Dryden Enterprises, Llc System and method for sharing playlists
US9178946B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2015-11-03 Black Hills Media, Llc Device discovery for digital entertainment network
US9516370B1 (en) 2004-05-05 2016-12-06 Black Hills Media, Llc Method, device, and system for directing a wireless speaker from a mobile phone to receive and render a playlist from a content server on the internet
US9826046B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2017-11-21 Black Hills Media, Llc Device discovery for digital entertainment network
US20060015352A1 (en) * 2004-05-10 2006-01-19 Wynn Dominic C System and method for provisioning audiovisual works
US8346673B2 (en) 2004-05-10 2013-01-01 Blockbuster L.L.C. System and method for provisioning audiovisual works
US7689452B2 (en) * 2004-05-17 2010-03-30 Lam Chuck P System and method for utilizing social networks for collaborative filtering
US20050256756A1 (en) * 2004-05-17 2005-11-17 Lam Chuck P System and method for utilizing social networks for collaborative filtering
US20120030028A1 (en) * 2004-05-20 2012-02-02 Manyworlds, Inc. System and Method for Adaptive Soundtracks
US20120030030A1 (en) * 2004-05-20 2012-02-02 Manyworlds, Inc. System and Method for Adaptive Media Instances
US20060242269A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-10-26 Gross John N Hybrid Distribution Method for Playable Media
US8612311B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2013-12-17 Media Queue, Llc Hybrid distribution method for playable media
US9332080B1 (en) 2004-06-04 2016-05-03 Google Inc. Systems and methods for indicating a user state in a social network
US9564025B1 (en) 2004-06-04 2017-02-07 Google Inc. Systems and methods for indicating a user state in a social network
US8019875B1 (en) 2004-06-04 2011-09-13 Google Inc. Systems and methods for indicating a user state in a social network
US8832132B1 (en) 2004-06-22 2014-09-09 Google Inc. Personalizing search queries based on user membership in social network communities
US9489462B1 (en) 2004-06-22 2016-11-08 Google Inc. Personalizing search queries based on user membership in social network communities
US20060004621A1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-05 Malek Kamal M Real-time selection of survey candidates
US8826022B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2014-09-02 Google Inc. Methods and systems for creating monetary accounts for members in a social network
US9189820B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2015-11-17 Google Inc. Methods and systems for creating monetary accounts for members in a social network
US8621215B1 (en) 2004-06-30 2013-12-31 Google Inc. Methods and systems for creating monetary accounts for members in a social network
US20060013487A1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2006-01-19 Longe Michael R Disambiguating ambiguous characters
US8583087B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2013-11-12 Nuance Communications, Inc. Disambiguating ambiguous characters
US7966003B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2011-06-21 Tegic Communications, Inc. Disambiguating ambiguous characters
US7756879B2 (en) 2004-07-23 2010-07-13 Jeffrey Parsons System and method for estimating user ratings from user behavior and providing recommendations
US20060041548A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-02-23 Jeffrey Parsons System and method for estimating user ratings from user behavior and providing recommendations
US8719177B2 (en) 2004-08-03 2014-05-06 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing a document
US8280821B1 (en) 2004-08-03 2012-10-02 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing a document
US8015019B1 (en) 2004-08-03 2011-09-06 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing a document
US8756164B1 (en) 2004-08-03 2014-06-17 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing a document
US8762286B1 (en) 2004-08-03 2014-06-24 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing a document
US20060212149A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-09-21 Hicken Wendell T Distributed system and method for intelligent data analysis
US7593924B2 (en) 2004-09-20 2009-09-22 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for receiving and responding to knowledge interchange queries
US20060064431A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for creating a knowledge interchange profile
US20060064404A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for receiving and responding to knowledge interchange queries
US20060074863A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for maintaining user privacy in a knowledge interchange system
US7730010B2 (en) 2004-09-20 2010-06-01 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for maintaining user privacy in a knowledge interchange system
US7707167B2 (en) 2004-09-20 2010-04-27 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for creating a knowledge interchange profile
US20060073788A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2006-04-06 Vesa Halkka Context based connectivity for mobile devices
US20090144075A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2009-06-04 Manyworlds Inc. Adaptive Social Network Management
US20090018918A1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2009-01-15 Manyworlds Inc. Influence-based Social Network Advertising
US20060106670A1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2006-05-18 Simin Cai System and method for interactively and progressively determining customer satisfaction within a networked community
US20060136284A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Baruch Awerbuch Recommendation system
US20070271153A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2007-11-22 Amit Goel Method and system of aggregating listings for sale
US7702690B2 (en) * 2004-12-29 2010-04-20 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for suggesting/disambiguation query terms based upon usage patterns observed
US20060200556A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-09-07 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20080040314A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2008-02-14 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Identifying, Extracting, Capturing, and Leveraging Expertise and Knowledge
US8601023B2 (en) 2004-12-29 2013-12-03 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20090037355A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2009-02-05 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Context-Based Content Recommendation
US7698270B2 (en) * 2004-12-29 2010-04-13 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying, extracting, capturing, and leveraging expertise and knowledge
US20070150466A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for suggesting/disambiguation query terms based upon usage patterns observed
US20080104004A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2008-05-01 Scott Brave Method and Apparatus for Identifying, Extracting, Capturing, and Leveraging Expertise and Knowledge
US8095523B2 (en) * 2004-12-29 2012-01-10 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for context-based content recommendation
US7949611B1 (en) 2004-12-31 2011-05-24 Symantec Corporation Controlling access to profile information in a social network
US8775326B1 (en) 2004-12-31 2014-07-08 Google Inc. Methods and systems for controlling access to relationship information in a social network
US8429090B1 (en) 2004-12-31 2013-04-23 Google Inc. Methods and systems for controlling access to relationship information in a social network
US8489516B1 (en) 2004-12-31 2013-07-16 Google Inc. Methods and systems for controlling access to relationship information in a social network
US20060149731A1 (en) * 2005-01-05 2006-07-06 Schirmer Andrew L System and method for deriving affinity relationships between objects
US20110238194A1 (en) * 2005-01-15 2011-09-29 Outland Research, Llc System, method and computer program product for intelligent groupwise media selection
US9509269B1 (en) 2005-01-15 2016-11-29 Google Inc. Ambient sound responsive media player
US9262534B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2016-02-16 Apple Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US9576056B2 (en) 2005-02-03 2017-02-21 Apple Inc. Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics
US20060190331A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-24 Preston Tollinger Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US9298677B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2016-03-29 Cellfire Inc. Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US8543575B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2013-09-24 Apple Inc. System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets
US20060190330A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2006-08-24 Preston Tollinger Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US20100138299A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2010-06-03 Cellfire Inc. Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US20090030779A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2009-01-29 Preston Tollinger Electronic coupon filtering and delivery
US9785973B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2017-10-10 Cellfire Inc. Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US20100138303A1 (en) * 2005-02-04 2010-06-03 Cellfire Inc. Delivering targeted advertising to mobile devices
US20060190422A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Beale Kevin M System and method for dynamically creating records
US20060224260A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-10-05 Hicken Wendell T Scan shuffle for building playlists
US20060212478A1 (en) * 2005-03-21 2006-09-21 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for generating a subgroup of one or more media items from a library of media items
US7756388B2 (en) 2005-03-21 2010-07-13 Microsoft Corporation Media item subgroup generation from a library
US20060218187A1 (en) * 2005-03-25 2006-09-28 Microsoft Corporation Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating an ordered list of one or more media items
US20060224446A1 (en) * 2005-03-29 2006-10-05 Fox Kevin D Methods and systems for member-created advertisement in a member network
US8538810B2 (en) 2005-03-29 2013-09-17 Google Inc. Methods and systems for member-created advertisement in a member network
US9792332B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2017-10-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US8224773B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2012-07-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US9519938B2 (en) * 2005-03-30 2016-12-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US8412780B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2013-04-02 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing current email addresses and contact information for members within a social network
US8554723B2 (en) * 2005-03-30 2013-10-08 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interest
US8892508B2 (en) * 2005-03-30 2014-11-18 Amazon Techologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US8060463B1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2011-11-15 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US9160548B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2015-10-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US20150379648A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2015-12-31 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mining of user event data to identify users with common interests
US20060224675A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Fox Kevin D Methods and systems for providing current email addresses and contact information for members within a social network
US9117181B1 (en) 2005-03-30 2015-08-25 Google Inc. Methods and systems for providing current email addresses and contact information for members within a social network
US20090037566A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2009-02-05 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Computer Network
WO2006103388A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 British Telecommunications Public Limited Virtual network linking computers whose users share similar interests
US7519562B1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2009-04-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Automatic identification of unreliable user ratings
US8566144B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2013-10-22 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Closed loop voting feedback
US7779073B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2010-08-17 British Telecommunications Plc Computer network
US20060224442A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Round Matthew J Closed loop voting feedback
US7533091B2 (en) 2005-04-06 2009-05-12 Microsoft Corporation Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating a suggested list of media items based upon a seed
US20060229932A1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-12 Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. Intelligent sales and marketing recommendation system
US20060230065A1 (en) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-12 Microsoft Corporation Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating a suggested list of media items based upon a seed
US20060282304A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2006-12-14 Cnet Networks, Inc. System and method for an electronic product advisor
US8214264B2 (en) 2005-05-02 2012-07-03 Cbs Interactive, Inc. System and method for an electronic product advisor
US20110202400A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2011-08-18 Cbs Interactive, Inc. System and Method for an Electronic Product Advisor
US8805408B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-08-12 Facebook, Inc. Personalized location information for mobile devices
US20100318622A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2010-12-16 Aol Inc. Identifying Users Sharing Common Characteristics
US9204255B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Providing a log of location information for a mobile device
US8787940B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-07-22 Facebook, Inc. Personalized location information for mobile devices
US8818407B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-08-26 Facebook, Inc. Personalized location information for mobile devices
US9571975B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2017-02-14 Facebook, Inc. Identifying users of a communications system at commonn geographic locations
US9369411B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2016-06-14 Facebook, Inc. Identifying users sharing common characteristics
US9210546B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2015-12-08 Facebook, Inc. Commenting on location information for mobile devices
US8868112B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-10-21 Facebook, Inc. Personalized location information for mobile devices
US8787932B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-07-22 Facebook, Inc. Personalized location information for mobile devices
US9203787B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2015-12-01 Facebook, Inc. Identifying users sharing common characteristics
US8712431B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-04-29 Facebook, Inc. Personalized location information for mobile devices
US9197999B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2015-11-24 Facebook, Inc. Providing a location identifier for a location with multiple co-users
US8719354B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2014-05-06 Facebook, Inc. Identifying users sharing common characteristics
US9049160B2 (en) 2005-05-11 2015-06-02 Facebook, Inc. Identifying users sharing common characteristics
US20110106898A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2011-05-05 Aol Inc. Personalized Location Information for Mobile Devices
US7613736B2 (en) 2005-05-23 2009-11-03 Resonance Media Services, Inc. Sharing music essence in a recommendation system
US20070011173A1 (en) * 2005-05-23 2007-01-11 Ebags.Com Method and apparatus for providing shoe recommendations
US20060265349A1 (en) * 2005-05-23 2006-11-23 Hicken Wendell T Sharing music essence in a recommendation system
US9753972B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2017-09-05 Facebook, Inc. Searching based on user interest
US20110208768A1 (en) * 2005-05-26 2011-08-25 Aol Inc. Sourcing terms into a search engine
US7962504B1 (en) 2005-05-26 2011-06-14 Aol Inc. Sourcing terms into a search engine
US8874606B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2014-10-28 Facebook, Inc. Sourcing terms into a search engine
US8996560B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2015-03-31 Facebook, Inc. Search engine utilizing user navigated documents
US8103659B1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2012-01-24 A9.Com, Inc. Perspective-based item navigation
US7890513B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2011-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Providing community-based media item ratings to users
US20060288041A1 (en) * 2005-06-20 2006-12-21 Microsoft Corporation Providing community-based media item ratings to users
US20060294084A1 (en) * 2005-06-28 2006-12-28 Patel Jayendu S Methods and apparatus for a statistical system for targeting advertisements
US20070016599A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 Microsoft Corporation User interface for establishing a filtering engine
US7627605B1 (en) 2005-07-15 2009-12-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating media playlists by defining paths through media similarity space
US7580932B2 (en) 2005-07-15 2009-08-25 Microsoft Corporation User interface for establishing a filtering engine
US20070038672A1 (en) * 2005-08-11 2007-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Single action media playlist generation
US7680824B2 (en) 2005-08-11 2010-03-16 Microsoft Corporation Single action media playlist generation
US20070050337A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-01 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof
US7788266B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2010-08-31 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries
US20110173205A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2011-07-14 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof
US7779011B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2010-08-17 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof
US9177081B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2015-11-03 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries
US20070061321A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-15 Veveo.Tv, Inc. Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries
US7937394B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2011-05-03 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof
US8433696B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2013-04-30 Veveo, Inc. Method and system for processing ambiguous, multiterm search queries
US9366542B2 (en) 2005-09-23 2016-06-14 Scenera Technologies, Llc System and method for selecting and presenting a route to a user
US9075882B1 (en) * 2005-10-11 2015-07-07 Apple Inc. Recommending content items
US20070271146A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2007-11-22 Ebags.Com Method and apparatus for matching and/or coordinating shoes handbags and other consumer products
US8356038B2 (en) * 2005-12-19 2013-01-15 Apple Inc. User to user recommender
US20130198172A1 (en) * 2005-12-19 2013-08-01 Apple Inc. User to User Recommender
US20110246497A1 (en) * 2005-12-19 2011-10-06 Strands, Inc. User to user recommender
US8996540B2 (en) * 2005-12-19 2015-03-31 Apple Inc. User to user recommender
US7580930B2 (en) * 2005-12-27 2009-08-25 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for predicting destinations in a navigation context based upon observed usage patterns
US7693836B2 (en) * 2005-12-27 2010-04-06 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns
US7856446B2 (en) * 2005-12-27 2010-12-21 Baynote, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining usefulness of a digital asset
US20070150464A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for predicting destinations in a navigation context based upon observed usage patterns
US20070150515A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining usefulness of a digital asset
US20070150470A1 (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-06-28 Scott Brave Method and apparatus for determining peer groups based upon observed usage patterns
US7685210B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Media discovery and curation of playlists
US20070168388A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-07-19 Microsoft Corporation Media discovery and curation of playlists
US20070185899A1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2007-08-09 Msystems Ltd. Likelihood-based storage management
US20080275834A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2008-11-06 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US20070179924A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US7415449B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2008-08-19 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US8037003B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2011-10-11 Xerox Corporation Solution recommendation based on incomplete data sets
US9317185B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2016-04-19 Apple Inc. Dynamic interactive entertainment venue
US7756753B1 (en) 2006-02-17 2010-07-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Services for recommending items to groups of users
US9123071B1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2015-09-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Services for using group preferences to improve item selection decisions
US20070208583A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-09-06 Apple Computer, Inc. Computing popularity based upon subscriptions
US9349095B1 (en) 2006-03-03 2016-05-24 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Creation and utilization of relational tags
US20080114644A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2008-05-15 Frank Martin R Convergence Of Terms Within A Collaborative Tagging Environment
US8103614B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2012-01-24 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Definition and utilization of relational tags
US8402022B2 (en) * 2006-03-03 2013-03-19 Martin R. Frank Convergence of terms within a collaborative tagging environment
US20070208679A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2007-09-06 Tseng Walter M Creation and Utilization of Relational Tags
US20070226077A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2007-09-27 Frank Martin R Collaborative Structured Tagging for Item Encyclopedias
US8112324B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2012-02-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Collaborative structured tagging for item encyclopedias
US20070219984A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 Murali Aravamudan Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on a comparison of preference signatures from multiple users
US8112454B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2012-02-07 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for ordering content items according to learned user preferences
US9213755B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2015-12-15 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on context sensitive user preferences
US8380726B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-02-19 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on a comparison of preference signatures from multiple users
US20110161205A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-06-30 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US8521611B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-08-27 Apple Inc. Article trading among members of a community
US20100325111A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2010-12-23 Veveo, Inc. Methods and Systems for Selecting and Presenting Content Based on Context Sensitive User Preferences
US8478794B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-07-02 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for segmenting relative user preferences into fine-grain and coarse-grain collections
US20070266021A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-11-15 Murali Aravamudan Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content
US9128987B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2015-09-08 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on a comparison of preference signatures from multiple users
US7885904B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2011-02-08 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system
US8543516B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-09-24 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system
US20070244768A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-10-18 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US8073848B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2011-12-06 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user preference information extracted from an aggregate preference signature
US8943083B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2015-01-27 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for segmenting relative user preferences into fine-grain and coarse-grain collections
US8949231B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2015-02-03 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on activity level spikes associated with the content
US20070219985A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 Murali Aravamudan Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on context sensitive user preferences
US7949627B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2011-05-24 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on learned periodicity of user content selection
US7774294B2 (en) * 2006-03-06 2010-08-10 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on learned periodicity of user content selection
US20110131161A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-06-02 Veveo, Inc. Methods and Systems for Selecting and Presenting Content on a First System Based on User Preferences Learned on a Second System
US20100293160A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2010-11-18 Murali Aravamudan Methods and Systems for Selecting and Presenting Content Based on Learned Periodicity of User Content Selection
US20110166949A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-07-07 La La Media, Inc. Article trading process
US8583566B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-11-12 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on learned periodicity of user content selection
US9092503B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2015-07-28 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content
US7835998B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2010-11-16 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system
US8429188B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-04-23 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on context sensitive user preferences
US8438160B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-05-07 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying Microgenres Associated with the content
US8156113B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2012-04-10 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content
US20100241625A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2010-09-23 Veveo, Inc. Methods and Systems for Selecting and Presenting Content Based on User Preference Information Extracted from an Aggregate Preference Signature
US9075861B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2015-07-07 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for segmenting relative user preferences into fine-grain and coarse-grain collections
US8429155B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2013-04-23 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on activity level spikes associated with the content
US7774341B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2010-08-10 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content
US7792815B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2010-09-07 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on context sensitive user preferences
US20070271205A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-11-22 Murali Aravamudan Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on learned periodicity of user content selection
US8825576B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2014-09-02 Veveo, Inc. Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system
US20070239553A1 (en) * 2006-03-16 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative filtering using cluster-based smoothing
US8738467B2 (en) * 2006-03-16 2014-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Cluster-based scalable collaborative filtering
US20070239554A1 (en) * 2006-03-16 2007-10-11 Microsoft Corporation Cluster-based scalable collaborative filtering
US20100138271A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-06-03 Kontera Technologies, Inc. Techniques for facilitating on-line contextual analysis and advertising
US20100138452A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-06-03 Kontera Technologies, Inc. Techniques for facilitating on-line contextual analysis and advertising
US20100174607A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-07-08 Kontera Technologies, Inc. Contextual advertising techniques for implemented at mobile devices
US9710818B2 (en) 2006-04-03 2017-07-18 Kontera Technologies, Inc. Contextual advertising techniques for implemented at mobile devices
US20100138451A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-06-03 Assaf Henkin Techniques for facilitating on-line contextual analysis and advertising
US7899806B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2011-03-01 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US8688746B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2014-04-01 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user relationships
US20090077496A1 (en) * 2006-04-20 2009-03-19 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US9087109B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2015-07-21 Veveo, Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user relationships
US8423583B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2013-04-16 Veveo Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user relationships
US8086602B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2011-12-27 Veveo Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US8375069B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2013-02-12 Veveo Inc. User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on user navigation and selection actions associated with the content
US20070265803A1 (en) * 2006-05-11 2007-11-15 Deutsche Telekom Ag System and method for detecting a dishonest user in an online rating system
US20100017398A1 (en) * 2006-06-09 2010-01-21 Raghav Gupta Determining relevancy and desirability of terms
US8200683B2 (en) 2006-06-09 2012-06-12 Ebay Inc. Determining relevancy and desirability of terms
US20080010258A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-01-10 Infosys Technologies Ltd. Collaborative filtering-based recommendations
US8468155B2 (en) * 2006-06-22 2013-06-18 Infosys Limited Collaborative filtering-based recommendations
WO2007148342A3 (en) * 2006-06-24 2009-04-30 Bio Ride Ltd Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US20100094706A1 (en) * 2006-06-24 2010-04-15 Oz Gabai Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
WO2007148342A2 (en) * 2006-06-24 2007-12-27 Bio-Ride Ltd. Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US8719092B2 (en) 2006-06-24 2014-05-06 Bio-Ride Ltd. Method and system for directing information to a plurality of users
US20080005148A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Automated knowledge base of feed tags
US20080005134A1 (en) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Derivation of relationships between data sets using structured tags or schemas
US7865513B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-01-04 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Derivation of relationships between data sets using structured tags or schemas
US20080040288A1 (en) * 2006-07-10 2008-02-14 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Method and system for using RSS-Type feeds in an E-Commerce environment
US9104772B2 (en) * 2006-08-11 2015-08-11 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for providing tag-based relevance recommendations of bookmarks in a bookmark and tag database
US20120158749A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2012-06-21 Joshua Schachter System and method for providing tag-based relevance recommendations of bookmarks in a bookmark and tag database
US8458119B2 (en) 2006-08-28 2013-06-04 Manyworlds, Inc. People matching in subscription-based communities
US8515900B2 (en) 2006-08-28 2013-08-20 Manyworlds, Inc. Environment-responsive people matching system and method
US8458120B2 (en) 2006-08-28 2013-06-04 Manyworlds, Inc. Search-based people matching system and method
US8478716B2 (en) 2006-08-28 2013-07-02 Manyworlds, Inc. Proximity-based people matching system and method
US8515901B2 (en) 2006-08-28 2013-08-20 Manyworlds, Inc. Explanatory people matching system and method
US20080059283A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Ebay Inc. Method and system for opportunity distribution
US8909616B2 (en) 2006-09-14 2014-12-09 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Information-retrieval systems, methods, and software with content relevancy enhancements
US20080082393A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Personal data mining
US7930197B2 (en) * 2006-09-28 2011-04-19 Microsoft Corporation Personal data mining
US20080091548A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-17 Kotas Paul A Tag-Driven Concept-Centric Electronic Marketplace
US9008634B2 (en) 2006-10-06 2015-04-14 Napo Enterprises, Llc System and method for providing media content selections
US20090077160A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2009-03-19 Concert Technology Corporation System and method for providing media content selections
US20080092160A1 (en) * 2006-10-16 2008-04-17 Rearden Commerce, Inc. System and Method for View of Transactions and Events with Dynamic Updates
US7752328B2 (en) 2006-10-16 2010-07-06 Rearden Commerce, Inc. System and method for view of transactions and events with dynamic updates
US20080091828A1 (en) * 2006-10-16 2008-04-17 Rearden Commerce, Inc. Method and system for fine and course-grained authorization of personal feed contents
US8078884B2 (en) 2006-11-13 2011-12-13 Veveo, Inc. Method of and system for selecting and presenting content based on user identification
US20080209229A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-08-28 Veveo, Inc. Method of and system for selecting and presenting content based on user identification
US20080147500A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Malcolm Slaney Serving advertisements using entertainment ratings in a collaborative-filtering system
US20130132409A1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2013-05-23 Yahoo! Inc. Systems And Methods For Providing Multiple Media Items To A Consumer Via A Simplified Consumer Interaction
US20080154955A1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2008-06-26 Yahoo! Inc. Providing multiple media items to a consumer via a simplified consumer interaction
US8356039B2 (en) * 2006-12-21 2013-01-15 Yahoo! Inc. Providing multiple media items to a consumer via a simplified consumer interaction