US5675488A  Location determination using vector measurements  Google Patents
Location determination using vector measurements Download PDFInfo
 Publication number
 US5675488A US5675488A US08440152 US44015295A US5675488A US 5675488 A US5675488 A US 5675488A US 08440152 US08440152 US 08440152 US 44015295 A US44015295 A US 44015295A US 5675488 A US5675488 A US 5675488A
 Authority
 US
 Grant status
 Grant
 Patent type
 Prior art keywords
 line
 target
 magnetic
 well
 field
 Prior art date
 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
 Expired  Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications

 G—PHYSICS
 G01—MEASURING; TESTING
 G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
 G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
 G01V3/08—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified by objects or geological structures or by detecting devices
Abstract
Description
The present invention relates to a method of determining from a measurement region, the location of a source of a physical phenomenon.
The invention is particularly suitable for applications where the source is "invisible" from the measurement location such as subterranean ranging. The measurement region could be a well borehole being drilled and the source could be an adjacent well borehole.
Nowadays, it is common practice in oil and gas extraction and exploration for a well to be drilled in the vicinity of an existing well. Sometimes it is desired that the well being drilled should communicate with the existing well. In other applications it is important that the paths of the two wells should not cross. Either way, it is necessary to determine when the path of one well is approaching the path of an adjacent well.
Various techniques have already been proposed for estimating the direction and distance away of an adjacent well. Some of these are socalled "active" techniques which involve causing a signal, such as an electric field, to be generated in the adjacent well which is measurable from the well being drilled. Other socalled "passive" techniques measure other phenomena already available from the existing or "target" well such as magnetic interference due to metal parts in the target well. Most of these earlier techniques are complicated in terms of the measurements they require for ranging the target well and do not always produce accurate results.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a simplified technique for subterranean ranging.
The present invention provides a method of determining from a measurement region the location of a source of a physical phenomenon comprising detecting the direction of the phenomenon as a vector at at least two spatially separated points in the measurement region and finding a line which is intersected by the lines including said vectors.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the physical phenomenon is a magnetic field. A drilled well usually contains some magnetically permeable material such as a metal liner extending along the borehole or possibly a drillstring itself. The metal influences the magnetic field which would normally act on an adjacent well (ie: the earth's magnetic field). This influence is generally referred to as "magnetic interference". The metal in the borehole typically behaves as a cylindrical bar magnet having the typical magnetic field pattern extending around it. The field strength decreases with distance from the borehole. The magnetic interference due to the metal in the borehole can be measured as a vector whose orientation depends on the location of the measurement point within the magnetic field. The present invention is based on the realisation that if a cylindrical bar magnet, or in this case the borehole, is viewed "end on", ie: looking down the borehole, the magnetic field vectors appear to intersect at a particular point. In other words, the magnetic field lines all intersect the longitudinal axis of the borehole.
Thus, a line intersected by all detected magnetic field vectors represents the longitudinal axis of the source of magnetic interference. Knowing the location of the longitudinal axis, the minimum distance between a well being drilled and an adjacent borehole can be determined.
In more general terms, knowing the location of the longitudinal axis of a source of a phenomenon enables an approximate determination of the distance of the source from the region where the measurements are being taken. If the azimuth and inclination of the source is already known, its position can be determined from only two measured vectors. If the azimuth and inclination are not known, three vectors will be needed to determine the position of the axis of the source with any certainty. (There are an infinite number of straight lines which will join two spatially separated straight lines but only one straight line will join three spatially separated straight lines.) For greater accuracy it will be preferable to take more than only two or three vector measurements. Then, allowing for errors, the longitudinal axis of the source will be the line which is most nearly intersected by all of the measured vectors.
In the case of a well borehole, measurements would be taken at various positions along the borehole.
It should be noted that according to the present invention it is not necessary to measure the magnitude of the phenomenon, only its orientation. Other measurable phenomena which may be used for source ranging include shock waves, sound waves, heat waves and electric fields. The only essential criterion is that the phenomenon should be "directional".
Other known ranging techniques which use magnetic field measurements require more detailed measurements, such as the magnitude and/or gradient of the magnetic field. In the present case it is not even necessary to know whether the interference field acts towards or way from the adjacent well.
A method of borehole ranging according to the invention will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates the relationship between the path of a borehole from which measurements are taken, the path of an adjacent borehole, and measured magnetic interference vectors;
FIG. 2 illustrates the magnetic field lines from which the vectors are derived;
FIG. 3 shows the vectors extended;
FIG. 4 corresponds to FIG. 3, omitting the field lines;
FIG. 5 shows the same features as FIG. 4, viewed instead along the line of the adjacent borehole;
FIG. 6 shows the same features as FIG. 4, viewed instead along the "measuring" borehole;
FIGS. 7 and 8 show how the displacement can be calculated once the line of the adjacent borehole is known;
FIG. 9 shows a practical example of typical vectors which would be measured at different locations down a borehole as an adjacent well is approached; and
FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 are mathematical diagrams used in the explanation of the transformations which may be used to mathematically solve the target line.
FIGS. 13a and 13b are diagrams to demonstrate that three vectors are insufficient to calculate a target line.
Well ranging using the method of the invention does not require any special equipment. A typical downhole survey tool is typically provided with three mutually perpendicular fluxgate magnetometers for measuring flux components to generate a flux vector, and three accelerometers for taking measurements of the gravitational field at different locations down the borehole. These are usually provided in a single sensor package and sensor information is stored to memory or transmitted to the surface using MWD (measurement while drilling) techniques, or via a wire link. As already briefly noted above, the interference from the metal in an adjacent well is normally from the tubular elements within it, eg: casing, drill pipe, collars etc. The interference surrounding them is determined by the magnetism (induced and permanent) within the metal. The shape of the interference pattern is determined by the homogeneity of the magnetism and the shape of the metal.
It is normally the case that the magnetism is homogeneous within a joint of a casing, drill pipe or collars and their shape is normally rotationally symmetrical and tubular. The effect of this on the interference pattern is that it has a sense of symmetry looking down the longitudinal axis of the cylinders. The technique of the present invention makes use of this symmetry.
Objects in a well such as pipe sections etc. are often screwed together to form a long continuous cylinder. There may be parts of cylinders inside each other and other combinations of components. However, the longitudinal axis of these items lies along the wellbore path. Thus, the origin of any magnetic interference from a borehole may generally be considered to originate in cylinders in the target well. The magnetic field emanates from the cylinders as if they were cylindrical magnets.
Under normal conditions the magnetometers of a downhole tool will detect the earth's magnetic field. In the vicinity of another well they will also detect the interference field. In order to determine the interference vector at any point downhole, first the normally present earth's magnetic field must be subtracted as will be explained in more detail below.
FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the path M of the borehole being drilled (measurement line), the line of the adjacent borehole T (target line) and the calculated interference vectors 17 measured at various points ag along path M. The illustrated interference vectors are due solely to interference from adjacent borehole T. In other words the earth's field and other interference to be described below has been subtracted from the measured values.
FIG. 2 additionally illustrates the magnetic field lines, due to "cylindrical magnets" in the target well, which cause the interference. The measured vectors are tangential to the field lines.
FIG. 3 shows the interference vectors extended (shown as dotted lines). As noted above, the magnitude of the vectors does not need to be known. Thus, in this technique, each vector is extended to an infinite line in space.
Viewed in the plane of FIG. 4 (or FIGS. 1 to 3) the lines including the vectors 17 appear to intersect at random points in space. If the view point is changed and the lines are reviewed looking down the target line T, the vectors appear to intersect at a common point. The plane of FIG. 5 is perpendicular to the target line and the lines including the vectors all cross the target line T.
It should be noted that the lines including the vectors also cross the measurement line M, as shown in FIG. 6 in which the measurement line M is parallel to the plane of the paper. Thus the lines including the vectors are a special set which all cross two lines, T and M.
The position of M is known and therefore the position of T can be found using techniques to be described below. If no information is available on the spatial location of T, at least four vectors will generally be needed to determine the azimuth, inclination and displacement D of T from M, as shown in FIG. 7. If a parameter of the target line is already known, such as azimuth, inclination or direction, generally only three vectors will be required, although it is not guaranteed that there will be a solution. Approximation techniques would be used, as explained later on. If the azimuth and inclination are already known, a solution for T can be found with only two vectors, as indicated in FIG. 8.
FIG. 9 shows a practical example of a drilling operation with the interference vectors typically measured at various points aj along the measurement line. Lines 110 are the extended lines which include the linear interference vectors.
Lines 15 are extended from interference vectors measured at points a,b,c,d,e along the measurement line M. At these points there is no appreciable influence from the target well T. The interference vectors at points a,b,c,d,e have been corrected for the effects of the earth's magnetic field and are simply due to interference from the drilling drillstring itself and inherent errors. For example, it is assumed that the measurement line follows a straight azimuth but there may in fact be slight deviations which will cause errors.
At point f on measurement line M, interference from the target well is detected and the vector extended to line 6 is due to drillstring interference, inherent errors, plus interference from the adjacent well. As drilling approaches the target well the interference becomes more marked. Lines 7,8,9,10 are extended from vectors which have been corrected for drillstring interference and inherent errors and are solely due to interference from the target well. As shown, all of the lines cross the axis of the target well which is perpendicular to the plane of FIG. 9. FIG. 9 also shows the position X at which the target well was thought to be using a gyro surveying technique.
In practice, normal surveys (readings) might be taken every 30 feet along a borehole. At the first indication of interference from an outside source it would be appropriate to reverse the tool and take additional readings between the last and present position. This will enable analysis of the position of the source of interference so that corrective action can be taken.
It should be noted that the magnetic interference can come from anywhere on the target well, it can leave the target well at any angle, and can be of any strength. It is the particular shape of the field which enables the source to be identified using the method of this invention.
The following describes some of the mathematics involved in the determination of the interference vectors and eventual calculation of the adjacent borehole location:
As noted above the drilling tool has three mutually perpendicular fluxgate magnetometers which produce measured values H_{x}, H_{y}, H_{z}, (x,y,z being the axes of the tool coordinate system) and three mutually perpendicular accelerometers which give gravitational measurements G_{x}, G_{y}, G_{z}.
Firstly it is necessary to calculate the values which would be detected by the fluxgate magnetometers if there was no interference present. This can be done using the values of G_{x}, G_{y} and G_{z}, the total earth's magnetic field intensity, H_{o}, and the magnetic dip Δ which are known and the azimuth AZ of the measurement line which can either be measured or assumed on the basis that the measurement line is straight.
From G_{x}, G_{y} and G_{z} the inclination (INC) and the gravity tool face (rotational position of the tool) (GTF) can be derived from the following equations: ##EQU1##
Then, the values of H which would be expected with no magnetic interference can be calculated as follows: ##EQU2##
The interference vectors can then be calculated as follows:
H.sub.xerdi =H.sub.x H.sub.xc
H.sub.yerdi =H.sub.y H.sub.yc
H.sub.zerdi =H.sub.z H.sub.zc
where `er` represents inherent errors, `d` represents drillstring errors and `i` represents outside interference.
It is usually convenient to transpose the vectors to the "world" coordinate system from the tool coordinate system using standard mathematical techniques which are readily available to those skilled in the art. However, where all that is required is a measurement of displacement relative to the drilling tool, this is not essential.
Having calculated values of H_{xerdi}, H_{yerdi} and H_{zerdi}, the `er` and `d` components need to be separated to give the `i` (outside interference) components. Usually the `er` and `d` components are constant and only the `i` vector changes and therefore calculation of the `i` vector is a simple matter of subtraction.
If the measurement line is approaching the target line from a distance greater than the range of influence of the interference (as shown in FIG. 9) then the initial vectors will consist only of `er` and `d` and can simply be subtracted once the `i` factor comes into play.
In rare instances the measurement line may be parallel to the target line or tangential to one of the magnetic field lines, in which case the interference vector may not change at different locations along the measurement line, and no realistic determination of the position of the target line can be made. In such unusual cases the problem can be overcome by changing the measurement line direction slightly.
There may be situations where "i" is always present and it is not possible to simply calculate the factors "er" and "d" from previous measurements. In such cases it may be possible to calculate the contributions to the vector measurements due to "er" and "d" using mathematical techniques. Alternatively, drillstring interference "d" could be eliminated or reduced to an insignificant level by isolating the survey instrument, eg: distancing the survey package from steel within the measurement well or simply using a nonmagnetic material in the measurement well. Inherent errors "er" can be removed by using a survey device to measure the azimuth which is not reliant on the magnetic field, such as a gyro.
Having determined the interference vectors the next step is to find the viewing plane at which the lines including the vectors appear to cross, as shown in FIG. 5. At the experimental stage of the invention, this has been done very simply using a 3D CAD system and changing the viewing angle or viewing plane to find the plane in which the vectors appear to cross. However, it is anticipated that a computer program could be produced to do the finding automatically, possibly by an iterative process. Of course there will be errors in the calculation of the vectors and it will be a case of identifying the "best fit" as the target line. The best fit might be the line which all vectors approach most closely, which can be calculated by the program.
Once the target line has been determined, and knowing the coordinates of the measurement line from the survey tool, it is a straightforward mathematical calculation to determine the minimum distance between the two lines, equivalent to the displacement D between the two boreholes.
Hereinafter follows an explanation of the mathematics involved in finding the "best fit" for the interference vectors, with reference to FIGS. 10, 11 and 12.
It is shown in FIGS. 13a and 13b that three vectors are not sufficient in general to unambiguously define a target line:
Given three arbitrary vectors a, b and c passing through a line M (Measured line), and three lines A, B and C representing the infinite extensions of the vectors a, b and c respectively, we wish to find a line T intersecting A, B and C.
Suppose a point is chosen arbitrarily on line A, referred to as a_{1}, and a line is then extended from a_{1} to any point on B, there is an infinite choice of lines, all of which lie in a plane containing a_{1} and B (see FIG. 13a), which we call plane P_{1}. It is evident that any point in P_{1} lies on a line from a_{1} to a point on B (except points on a line from a_{1} in direction b). Line C also passes through plane P_{1} (unless it is a special case and runs parallel to P_{1}) at a point referred to as c_{1}.
It is therefore clear that a line can be extended from a_{1} through c_{1} (in plane P_{1}), which must also at some point pass through B, at a point referred to as b_{1}.
This line therefore passes through A, B and C and therefore satisfies the requirement for T.
However, this line T is not unique as the point a was chosen; there are an infinite number of possible choices for point a_{1} (a_{2}, a_{3} . . . ) giving rise to an infinite number of possible lines T (T_{1}, T_{2} . . . ). Thus T is not unique (see FIG. 13b for an example of another line T_{2}), and it is straightforward to show that there are always lines T_{a} and T_{b} which could be at an angle to one another of between 0 and 90 degrees.
At least 4 vectors are therefore needed to get a fixed line T representing the borehole to be located. There is no guarantee that there would be solution for a set of four vectors (apart from line M). The set of points t which could lie on any line T_{n} in the above analysis is a nontrivial surface, and a fourth arbitrary line D would not be guaranteed to pass through it.
The basic problem is therefore the determination of the line of target from four given interference vectors emanating from the target line and measured from given measurement points on the measurement line. The target line has the property that, if we look along it, the interference vectors appear to be concurrent (i.e. pass through a common point). It is this property that will be utilised to determine the target line (FIG. 1). The search for the target line may be done computationally, with or without the aid of computer graphics. Using computer graphics does, however, provide us with an effective visual aid, and is particularly useful in establishing an initial search region, and in enabling us to decide whether the search is converging satisfactorily. We are thus faced with the problem of representing a threedimensional object (the target vectors and measurement line) in two dimensions (the viewplane or plane of projection). If we could take a snapshot of the four vectors from a distance, along a particular direction (or line of sight), they would appear to be four straight lines in the plane of the photograph. These straight lines (extended, if necessary), would, in general, intersect at six points. To determine the target line, therefore, it is necessary to change systematically the line of sight to bring these points closer together until some specified criterion of `convergence` has been met.
Transformations
The twodimensional representation of threedimensional objects requires the introduction of certain mathematical transformations.
The target interference vectors are specified by their start and finish xyz coordinates in a certain threedimensional coordinate system. This coordinate system is known as the world coordinate system. If we wish to project the threedimensional object on to a twodimensional viewing plane, other coordinate systems have to be introduced, namely the threedimensional eye coordinate systems, and the twodimensional screen coordinate system. A point on our threedimensional object, specified by its world coordinates (X_{w}, Y_{w}, Z_{w}), has to be mapped to a corresponding point specified by its screen coordinates (X,Y).
The mapping from world coordinates to screen coordinates is carried out in two stages. We first of all assume that our eye is in a certain position in threedimensional space (the viewpoint). We then choose a coordinate system such that the origin is at the viewpoint, and the zaxis points to the origin of the world coordinate system (FIG. 10). This coordinate system is the eye coordinate system.
A point with world coordinates (x_{w},y_{w},z_{w}) is transformed to a point with eye coordinates (x_{e},y_{e},z_{e}). This transformation is called the viewing transformation. It may be shown that the transformation equations between coordinate systems are given by the matrix equation
(x.sub.e,y.sub.e,z.sub.e)=(x.sub.w,y.sub.w,z.sub.w)V
where V is the viewpoint transformation matrix given by ##EQU3## where p, Θ, and φ are the spherical coordinates of the viewpoint in world coordinate space. Alter p, Θ, and φ changes the viewpoint and hence the line of sight. Thus given the spherical coordinates of the viewpoint, we can compute the eye coordinates of a point from its world coordinates.
The transformation from the eye coordinate system to the twodimensional screen coordinate system is known as the perspective transformation. FIG. 11 illustrates this transformation.
Point P is a point in the eye coordinate system, and P' is the corresponding mapped point in the screen coordinate system. If d is the distance from eye to screen then the screen coordinates (X,Y) are given by
X=dx.sub.c /z.sub.e and Y=dy.sub.e /z.sub.e
From the previous discussion, we have seen how to transform a point in the threedimensional world system to a point in the twodimensional plane screen. Now, a target interference vector is specified by two points, namely its initial and final points specified in world coordinates. For a given viewpoint, we can now calculate the corresponding twodimensional screen coordinates of these points. These two points on the screen plane specify a unique straight line. Thus, when we transform the four target interference vectors, we obtain four straight lines in the screen plane. The equation of these straight lines are easily obtainable, since the equation of a straight line passing through two points with screen coordinates (X_{1},Y_{1}), and (X_{2},Y_{2}) is ##EQU4## or
Y=mX+c
where m is the gradient of the straight line, and c is its intercept on the Yaxis. Our four target reference vectors, when transformed as above, thus give rise four equations
Y=m.sub.1 X+c.sub.1
Y=m.sub.2 X+c.sub.2
Y=m.sub.3 X+c.sub.3
Y=m.sub.4 X+c.sub.4
where m_{1}, m_{2}, m_{3}, m_{4}, c_{1}, c_{2}, c_{3}, and c_{4} are known constants. These equations may now be solved in pairs to produce the six points of intersection of the four straight lines.
The next step in the determination of the line of target is to vary the viewpoint/origin vector until the six points of intersection coincide or are sufficiently close. Once the convergence criterion has been met the values of Θ, the inclination, and φ, the asimuth provide the direction of the line of sight. We can now therefore project the projected point corresponding to target line back into world coordinates to establish the target line 4.
Some Notes on Implementation
We shall assume that initial estimates Θ_{1} of Θ and φ are provided. A `viewing cone` would be set up to investigate values of Θ and φ lying between Θ_{i} ±Θ_{m} and φ_{i} ±φ_{m} for some suitable viewing distance. A grid of viewpoints can thus be established, the values of ΔΘ and Δφ being chosen according to the fineness of sweep required. The sweep through the values to determine the best one can be done in a straightforward systematic way, or using a more sophisticated search algorithm. For each value of Θ and φ, a convergence criterion is checked to see if it is satisfied. When it is, convergence will be assumed. There are several possible criteria which may be chosen. For instance, the 2d variance of the intersection points could be calculated, a value of 0 meaning all lines intersect at a point.
Furthermore, the intersection points could be weighted according to the angles between the intersecting lines (projected or in real space); lines that are almost parallel will have a highly variable point of intersection depending on the accuracy to which they are known, and should have a low weighting. Conversely, intersection points of lines which are close to perpendicular should be given a high weighting.
Once this criterion has been satisfied, the search can be made finer by decreasing the viewing distance.
The convergence of the intersection points on depends on Θ, and φ, so that we are trying to solve F(Θ,φ)=∘ computationally. A more sophisticated search algorithm such as one belonging to the quasiNewton class of algorithms could be employed to accelerate the search.
As remarked before, the search procedure could also be implemented using interactive computer graphics. The calculations to be carried out are not complex, and the speed of present computers allied to high resolution graphics could lead to an effective means of solution using a combination of userdriven and algorithmdriven search techniques.
Shortest Distance between Measurement Line and Target Line
Once the target line has been determined, it is of interest to calculate the shortest distance between these two lines. Now, we know the directions of both lines, and we know a point on each line, so we can write the equations of the two lines in the form ##EQU5## where l_{1}, m_{1}, n_{1} and l_{2}, m_{2}, n_{2} are the direction cosines of the two lines, and (x_{1},y_{1},z_{1}) and (x_{2},y_{2},z_{2}) are points on each line respectively. The direction ratios of the common perpendicular are
(m.sub.2 n.sub.2 m.sub.2 n.sub.1):(n.sub.1 l.sub.2 n.sub.2 l.sub.1):(l.sub.1 m.sub.2 l.sub.2 m.sub.1)
and using simple analytic geometry, it is straightforward to calculate the length of this common perpendicular (i.e. the shortest distance between the two lines).
As briefly noted in the introduction, above, the technique of the present invention could be used to locate targets emitting other fields. Other examples include seismic fields, alternating electromagnetic fields and possibly even gravitational fields.
It should also be noted that the technique has many other applications apart from oil and gas exploration. For example, parallel wells are often used in the creation of impermeable (ground freeze, grouting) barriers and permeable (drainage) barriers. If a "target" well contains no metal, a metal target could be placed in it to enable it to be located. This way, the target could be moved while the measuring point remained fixed.
Parallel wells are used in the explosives industry for trimming of rock faces and bulk blasting to prefractured boundaries. It is normally important for the relative displacement and the position of these wells to be known to create effective trims and contain a bulk blast to prevent it from fracturing adjacent rock.
Wells or boreholes are also used in the creation of tunnels, such as underneath rivers. A "target" could be placed on a river bed to ensure that a borehole was always a predetermined distance beneath the earth's surface.
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

GB9409550  19940512  
GB9409550A GB9409550D0 (en)  19940512  19940512  Location determination using vector measurements 
Publications (1)
Publication Number  Publication Date 

US5675488A true US5675488A (en)  19971007 
Family
ID=10755039
Family Applications (1)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US08440152 Expired  Lifetime US5675488A (en)  19940512  19950512  Location determination using vector measurements 
Country Status (5)
Country  Link 

US (1)  US5675488A (en) 
EP (1)  EP0682269B1 (en) 
CA (1)  CA2149196C (en) 
DE (2)  DE69522040T2 (en) 
GB (1)  GB9409550D0 (en) 
Cited By (37)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US20040160223A1 (en) *  20030218  20040819  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Passive ranging techniques in borehole surveying 
US20040163443A1 (en) *  20030218  20040826  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Downhole referencing techniques in borehole surveying 
US20040249573A1 (en) *  20030609  20041209  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Well twinning techniques in borehole surveying 
US20050234647A1 (en) *  20040419  20051020  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced measurement of azimuthal dependence of subterranean parameters 
US20050268476A1 (en) *  20040607  20051208  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determining a borehole azimuth from tool face measurements 
US7002484B2 (en)  20021009  20060221  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Supplemental referencing techniques in borehole surveying 
US20060065441A1 (en) *  20040928  20060330  Vector Magnetics Llc  Single solenoid guide system 
US20060096105A1 (en) *  20041109  20060511  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determination of borehole azimuth and the azimuthal dependence of borehole parameters 
US20060131013A1 (en) *  20041220  20060622  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Magnetization of target well casing strings tubulars for enhanced passive ranging 
US20060208738A1 (en) *  20050315  20060921  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Well logging apparatus for obtaining azimuthally sensitive formation resistivity measurements 
US20070030007A1 (en) *  20050802  20070208  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Measurement tool for obtaining tool face on a rotating drill collar 
US20070223822A1 (en) *  20060320  20070927  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Data compression method used in downhole applications 
US20080012672A1 (en) *  20060717  20080117  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Apparatus and method for magnetizing casing string tubulars 
US20080177475A1 (en) *  20070123  20080724  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Distance determination from a magnetically patterned target well 
US20080275648A1 (en) *  20070503  20081106  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Method of optimizing a well path during drilling 
US20080294343A1 (en) *  20070522  20081127  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Gravity zaimuth measurement at a nonrotting housing 
US20090030616A1 (en) *  20070725  20090129  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Probablistic imaging with azimuthally sensitive MWD/LWD sensors 
US20090201026A1 (en) *  20041220  20090813  Smith International, Inc.  Method of Magnetizing Casing String Tubulars for Enhanced Passive Ranging 
US7712519B2 (en)  20060825  20100511  Smith International, Inc.  Transverse magnetization of casing string tubulars 
US20100241410A1 (en) *  20090317  20100923  Smith International, Inc.  Relative and Absolute Error Models for Subterranean Wells 
US20100286916A1 (en) *  20090508  20101111  Smith International, Inc.  Directional resistivity imaging using harmonic representations 
US20110161009A1 (en) *  20091231  20110630  Smith International, Inc.  Binning method for borehole imaging 
CN102419457A (en) *  20110729  20120418  重庆大学  Method for determining deep rock structural surface attitude by utilizing television image of single vertical drilling hole 
US20120209988A1 (en) *  20110216  20120816  International Business Machines Corporation  Automatic server position determination 
US8294468B2 (en)  20050118  20121023  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Method and apparatus for wellbore proximity measurement while drilling 
US8600115B2 (en)  20100610  20131203  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Borehole image reconstruction using inversion and tool spatial sensitivity functions 
WO2014116450A1 (en) *  20130123  20140731  Microseismic, Inc.  Method for determining fracture plane orientation using passive seismic signals 
US8912915B2 (en)  20090702  20141216  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Borehole array for ranging and crosswell telemetry 
US9010461B2 (en)  20090601  20150421  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Guide wire for ranging and subsurface broadcast telemetry 
US9121967B2 (en)  20070831  20150901  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Method and apparatus for wellbore proximity measurement while drilling 
US9151150B2 (en)  20121023  20151006  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Apparatus and methods for wellbore proximity measurement while drilling 
US9238959B2 (en)  20101207  20160119  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Methods for improved active ranging and target well magnetization 
US9422803B2 (en)  20121101  20160823  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Passive magnetic ranging for SAGD and relief wells via a linearized trailing window kalman filter 
EP3093691A1 (en) *  20150512  20161116  The Boeing Company  Sensing of a magnetic target 
US9581718B2 (en)  20100331  20170228  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Systems and methods for ranging while drilling 
US9658360B2 (en)  20101203  20170523  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  High resolution LWD imaging 
US9726157B2 (en)  20120509  20170808  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced geothermal systems and methods 
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US5960370A (en) *  19960814  19990928  Scientific Drilling International  Method to determine local variations of the earth's magnetic field and location of the source thereof 
US8828225B2 (en)  20040806  20140909  Asahi Kasei Medical Co., Ltd.  Polysulfone hemodialyzer 
US8947094B2 (en) *  20110718  20150203  Schlumber Technology Corporation  Atbit magnetic ranging and surveying 
US20140374159A1 (en)  20130625  20141225  Gyrodata, Incorporated  Positioning techniques in multiwell environments 
Citations (4)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

GB2179455A (en) *  19850821  19870304  Nl Industries Inc  Conducting enclosures for magnetometers 
GB2241583A (en) *  19900303  19910904  Baroid Technology Inc  Determination of magnetic interference in a borehole 
WO1992013173A1 (en) *  19910118  19920806  Bergwerksverband Gmbh  Device for the generation of an absolute, locationindependent reference direction 
US5541517A (en) *  19940113  19960730  Shell Oil Company  Method for drilling a borehole from one cased borehole to another cased borehole 
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US3725777A (en) *  19710607  19730403  Shell Oil Co  Method for determining distance and direction to a cased borehole using measurements made in an adjacent borehole 
US4072200A (en) *  19760512  19780207  Morris Fred J  Surveying of subterranean magnetic bodies from an adjacent offvertical borehole 
WO1994004938A1 (en) *  19920814  19940303  British Telecommunications Public Limited Company  Position location system 
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

GB2179455A (en) *  19850821  19870304  Nl Industries Inc  Conducting enclosures for magnetometers 
GB2241583A (en) *  19900303  19910904  Baroid Technology Inc  Determination of magnetic interference in a borehole 
WO1992013173A1 (en) *  19910118  19920806  Bergwerksverband Gmbh  Device for the generation of an absolute, locationindependent reference direction 
US5541517A (en) *  19940113  19960730  Shell Oil Company  Method for drilling a borehole from one cased borehole to another cased borehole 
NonPatent Citations (6)
Title 

Bosum W. et al. "A gyrooriented 3compentent borehole magnetometer for mineral prospecting with examples of its application"; Geophysical Prospecting 36, 933961 1988. 
Bosum W. et al. A gyro oriented 3 compentent borehole magnetometer for mineral prospecting with examples of its application ; Geophysical Prospecting 36, 933 961 1988. * 
Jones D. L. "Improved magnetic model for determination of range and direction to a blowout well"; SPE Drill Eng. v 2, n 4, pp. 316322 Dec. 1987. 
Jones D. L. Improved magnetic model for determination of range and direction to a blowout well ; SPE Drill Eng. v 2, n 4, pp. 316 322 Dec. 1987. * 
Minear, J. W. "Initial results from an acoustic logginf\dwhiledrilling tool", Proceedings of the 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibitition, pp. 529540. Oct. 1996. 
Minear, J. W. Initial results from an acoustic logginf d while drilling tool , Proceedings of the 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibitition, pp. 529 540. Oct. 1996. * 
Cited By (74)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US7002484B2 (en)  20021009  20060221  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Supplemental referencing techniques in borehole surveying 
US20040163443A1 (en) *  20030218  20040826  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Downhole referencing techniques in borehole surveying 
US6882937B2 (en)  20030218  20050419  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Downhole referencing techniques in borehole surveying 
US6937023B2 (en)  20030218  20050830  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Passive ranging techniques in borehole surveying 
US20040160223A1 (en) *  20030218  20040819  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Passive ranging techniques in borehole surveying 
US6985814B2 (en)  20030609  20060110  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Well twinning techniques in borehole surveying 
US20040249573A1 (en) *  20030609  20041209  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Well twinning techniques in borehole surveying 
US7027926B2 (en)  20040419  20060411  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced measurement of azimuthal dependence of subterranean parameters 
US20050234647A1 (en) *  20040419  20051020  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced measurement of azimuthal dependence of subterranean parameters 
US7403857B2 (en)  20040419  20080722  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced measurement of azimuthal dependence of subterranean parameters with filters and/or discretely sampled data 
US20060173627A1 (en) *  20040419  20060803  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced measurement of azimuthal dependence of subterranean parameters with filters and/or discretely sampled data 
US20050268476A1 (en) *  20040607  20051208  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determining a borehole azimuth from tool face measurements 
US7080460B2 (en)  20040607  20060725  Pathfinder Energy Sevices, Inc.  Determining a borehole azimuth from tool face measurements 
WO2006037020A3 (en) *  20040928  20070315  Vector Magnetics Llc  Single solenoid guide system 
US7219749B2 (en) *  20040928  20070522  Vector Magnetics Llc  Single solenoid guide system 
WO2006037020A2 (en) *  20040928  20060406  Vector Magnetics, Llc  Single solenoid guide system 
US20060065441A1 (en) *  20040928  20060330  Vector Magnetics Llc  Single solenoid guide system 
US20060096105A1 (en) *  20041109  20060511  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determination of borehole azimuth and the azimuthal dependence of borehole parameters 
US20060248735A1 (en) *  20041109  20061109  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determination of borehole azimuth and the azimuthal dependence of borehole parameters 
US7143521B2 (en)  20041109  20061205  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determination of borehole azimuth and the azimuthal dependence of borehole parameters 
US7103982B2 (en)  20041109  20060912  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Determination of borehole azimuth and the azimuthal dependence of borehole parameters 
US20100194395A1 (en) *  20041220  20100805  Smith International, Inc.  Enhanced passive ranging methodology for well twinning 
US20090201025A1 (en) *  20041220  20090813  Smith International, Inc.  Magnetization of Target Well Casing String Tubulars for Enhanced Passive Ranging 
US8026722B2 (en)  20041220  20110927  Smith International, Inc.  Method of magnetizing casing string tubulars for enhanced passive ranging 
US7816922B2 (en)  20041220  20101019  Smith International, Inc.  Magnetization of target well casing string tubulars for enhanced passive ranging 
US20060131013A1 (en) *  20041220  20060622  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Magnetization of target well casing strings tubulars for enhanced passive ranging 
US7816923B2 (en)  20041220  20101019  Smith International, Inc.  Enhanced passive ranging methodology for well twinning 
US7656161B2 (en)  20041220  20100202  Smith International, Inc.  Magnetization of target well casing strings tubulars for enhanced passive ranging 
US20090201026A1 (en) *  20041220  20090813  Smith International, Inc.  Method of Magnetizing Casing String Tubulars for Enhanced Passive Ranging 
US8294468B2 (en)  20050118  20121023  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Method and apparatus for wellbore proximity measurement while drilling 
US20060208738A1 (en) *  20050315  20060921  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Well logging apparatus for obtaining azimuthally sensitive formation resistivity measurements 
US20080284440A1 (en) *  20050315  20081120  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Logging while drilling tool for obtaining azimuthally sensitive formation resistivity measurements 
US7557582B2 (en)  20050315  20090707  Smith International Inc  Logging while drilling tool for obtaining azimuthally sensitive formation resistivity measurements 
US7436184B2 (en)  20050315  20081014  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Well logging apparatus for obtaining azimuthally sensitive formation resistivity measurements 
US7414405B2 (en)  20050802  20080819  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Measurement tool for obtaining tool face on a rotating drill collar 
US20070030007A1 (en) *  20050802  20070208  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Measurement tool for obtaining tool face on a rotating drill collar 
US20070223822A1 (en) *  20060320  20070927  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Data compression method used in downhole applications 
US7679480B2 (en)  20060717  20100316  Smith International, Inc.  Method for magnetizing casing string tubulars 
US20090195340A1 (en) *  20060717  20090806  Smith International, Inc.  Method for Magnetizing Casing String Tubulars 
US20080012672A1 (en) *  20060717  20080117  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Apparatus and method for magnetizing casing string tubulars 
US7679481B2 (en)  20060717  20100316  Smith International, Inc.  Magnetized casing string tubulars 
US7538650B2 (en)  20060717  20090526  Smith International, Inc.  Apparatus and method for magnetizing casing string tubulars 
US7712519B2 (en)  20060825  20100511  Smith International, Inc.  Transverse magnetization of casing string tubulars 
US7617049B2 (en) *  20070123  20091110  Smith International, Inc.  Distance determination from a magnetically patterned target well 
US20080177475A1 (en) *  20070123  20080724  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Distance determination from a magnetically patterned target well 
US20080275648A1 (en) *  20070503  20081106  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Method of optimizing a well path during drilling 
US8010290B2 (en)  20070503  20110830  Smith International, Inc.  Method of optimizing a well path during drilling 
US20080294343A1 (en) *  20070522  20081127  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Gravity zaimuth measurement at a nonrotting housing 
US7725263B2 (en)  20070522  20100525  Smith International, Inc.  Gravity azimuth measurement at a nonrotating housing 
US7558675B2 (en)  20070725  20090707  Smith International, Inc.  Probablistic imaging with azimuthally sensitive MWD/LWD sensors 
US20090030616A1 (en) *  20070725  20090129  Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc.  Probablistic imaging with azimuthally sensitive MWD/LWD sensors 
US9121967B2 (en)  20070831  20150901  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Method and apparatus for wellbore proximity measurement while drilling 
US20100241410A1 (en) *  20090317  20100923  Smith International, Inc.  Relative and Absolute Error Models for Subterranean Wells 
US20100286916A1 (en) *  20090508  20101111  Smith International, Inc.  Directional resistivity imaging using harmonic representations 
US8195400B2 (en)  20090508  20120605  Smith International, Inc.  Directional resistivity imaging using harmonic representations 
US9010461B2 (en)  20090601  20150421  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Guide wire for ranging and subsurface broadcast telemetry 
US8912915B2 (en)  20090702  20141216  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Borehole array for ranging and crosswell telemetry 
US8271199B2 (en)  20091231  20120918  Smith International, Inc.  Binning method for borehole imaging 
US20110161009A1 (en) *  20091231  20110630  Smith International, Inc.  Binning method for borehole imaging 
US9581718B2 (en)  20100331  20170228  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Systems and methods for ranging while drilling 
US8600115B2 (en)  20100610  20131203  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Borehole image reconstruction using inversion and tool spatial sensitivity functions 
US9658360B2 (en)  20101203  20170523  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  High resolution LWD imaging 
US9238959B2 (en)  20101207  20160119  Schlumberger Technology Corporation  Methods for improved active ranging and target well magnetization 
US8868738B2 (en)  20110216  20141021  International Business Machines Corporation  Automatic server position determination 
US20120209988A1 (en) *  20110216  20120816  International Business Machines Corporation  Automatic server position determination 
US8856320B2 (en) *  20110216  20141007  International Business Machines Corporation  Locating a target computer device in an array 
CN102419457B (en)  20110729  20130403  重庆大学  Method for determining deep rock structural surface attitude by utilizing television image of single vertical drilling hole 
CN102419457A (en) *  20110729  20120418  重庆大学  Method for determining deep rock structural surface attitude by utilizing television image of single vertical drilling hole 
US9726157B2 (en)  20120509  20170808  Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.  Enhanced geothermal systems and methods 
US9151150B2 (en)  20121023  20151006  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Apparatus and methods for wellbore proximity measurement while drilling 
US9422803B2 (en)  20121101  20160823  Baker Hughes Incorporated  Passive magnetic ranging for SAGD and relief wells via a linearized trailing window kalman filter 
WO2014116450A1 (en) *  20130123  20140731  Microseismic, Inc.  Method for determining fracture plane orientation using passive seismic signals 
US8960280B2 (en)  20130123  20150224  Microseismic, Inc.  Method for determining fracture plane orientation using passive seismic signals 
EP3093691A1 (en) *  20150512  20161116  The Boeing Company  Sensing of a magnetic target 
Also Published As
Publication number  Publication date  Type 

EP0682269A3 (en)  19980128  application 
EP0682269B1 (en)  20010808  grant 
CA2149196A1 (en)  19951113  application 
GB9409550D0 (en)  19940629  grant 
CA2149196C (en)  20051101  grant 
EP0682269A2 (en)  19951115  application 
DE69522040T2 (en)  20011115  grant 
DE69522040D1 (en)  20010913  grant 
Similar Documents
Publication  Publication Date  Title 

US3406766A (en)  Method and devices for interconnecting subterranean boreholes  
US5821414A (en)  Survey apparatus and methods for directional wellbore wireline surveying  
US6459266B1 (en)  Sonde locator  
Raab et al.  Magnetic position and orientation tracking system  
US4646277A (en)  Control for guiding a boring tool  
US6145378A (en)  Aided inertial navigation system  
US6508316B2 (en)  Apparatus to measure the earth's local gravity and magnetic field in conjunction with global positioning attitude determination  
US7659722B2 (en)  Method for azimuthal resistivity measurement and bed boundary detection  
Maillet  The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting  
Storms et al.  Magnetic field navigation in an indoor environment  
US5155916A (en)  Error reduction in compensation of drill string interference for magnetic survey tools  
US5343152A (en)  Electromagnetic homing system using MWD and current having a funamental wave component and an even harmonic wave component being injected at a target well  
US6735888B2 (en)  Virtual camera on the bucket of an excavator displaying 3D images of buried pipes  
Zhdanov et al.  Threedimensional regularized focusing inversion of gravity gradient tensor component data  
US6466020B2 (en)  Electromagnetic borehole surveying method  
US20030085059A1 (en)  Relative drill bit direction measurement  
US6212476B1 (en)  Apparatus to measure the earth's local gravity and magnetic field in conjunction with global positioning attitude determining  
US7069780B2 (en)  Gravity techniques for drilling and logging  
Yu et al.  Slip in the 1868 Hayward earthquake from the analysis of historical triangulation data  
US6321456B1 (en)  Method of surveying a bore hole  
US20050256642A1 (en)  [method of correcting triaxial induction arrays for borehole effect]  
US20060074561A1 (en)  Methods for visualizing distances between wellbore and formation boundaries  
Wolff et al.  Borehole position uncertaintyanalysis of measuring methods and derivation of systematic error model  
US6476610B1 (en)  Magnetic anomaly sensing system and methods for maneuverable sensing platforms  
US4781062A (en)  Conjugate fracture systems and formation stresses in subterranean formations 
Legal Events
Date  Code  Title  Description 

AS  Assignment 
Owner name: HALLIBURTON COMPANY, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MCELHINNEY, GRAHAM;REEL/FRAME:008547/0798 Effective date: 19970415 Owner name: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:HALLIBURTON COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:008547/0801 Effective date: 19961212 

AS  Assignment 
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK TEXAS, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, T Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:011461/0670 Effective date: 20001016 

REMI  Maintenance fee reminder mailed  
SULP  Surcharge for late payment  
FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 4 

FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 8 

FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 12 

AS  Assignment 
Owner name: PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC., TEXAS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TOWELLS FARGO BANK TEXAS, N.A. (AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT);REEL/FRAME:022520/0291 Effective date: 20090226 