BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to integrated circuit devices, and more specifically to high speed clocked memories having redundant arrays.
Redundant arrays are frequently used in memories to increase the overall yield above that which would normally be possible based on the random defect population density of a process. Random defect population density of a process may be caused by a number of factors, although particle defects, such as broken or shorted out rows, are the most normal cause of random process defects. Redundant row arrays, for example, are thus used to replace defective rows of the standard row array which are discovered during initial testing of the memory device. Redundant column arrays are similarly used to replace defective columns.
Continuing with the redundant row example, since it can not be known which row or rows of the standard row array may be defective, effective replacement of defective rows is accomplished using a redundant row array which may be programmed to replace any desired row of the standard row array. Programmability of the redundant row array is typically accomplished through the use of an electrical programming element, such as a laser fuse-link or anti-fuse, and a row decode tree. While this method provides the desired programmability, the result is, unfortunately, a redundant row array which is typically much slower than the normal row decode function.
This speed differential is especially of concern in high speed clocked memory devices where the overall memory access speed is often enhanced by pre-decoding much of the row addresses prior to the active clock edge during the address setup time. Thus, there is a current unmet need in the art to accomplish replacement of defective elements of the standard array with a redundant array in an efficient manner such that there is little or no speed differential between the normal decode function and the redundant decode function of the high speed clocked memory device.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It would be advantageous in the art to speed up the rate at which defective elements may be replaced from a redundant array in high speed clocked memory devices.
Therefore, according to the present invention, replacement of defective elements of an integrated circuit memory device by a redundant array is accomplished using a redundant decode scheme which is as fast as or faster than the standard decode. An exclusionary wired-connection redundant select circuit, which is programmable and pre-charged, allows the redundant array to be programmed such that any defective element may be replaced in a quick manner.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, and further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of exclusionary wired-AND redundant row select circuitry, according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of fuse enable circuitry, according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of row decode output slave latch circuitry, according to the present invention; and
FIG. 4 is a timing diagram, according to the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In high speed clocked memory devices, the overall memory access speed is often enhanced by performing a pre-decoding function of much of the row or column addresses prior to the active edge of the clock during the address setup time. The present invention utilizes this principle to render a redundant decode scheme which is as fast as or faster than the standard decode. The present invention is equally effective for replacement of various defective elements, such as both defective rows and defective columns. An exclusionary wired-connection redundant select circuit, which is programmable and pre-charged, allows the redundant array to be programmed such that any defective element may be replaced in a quick manner.
Referring to FIG. 1, exclusionary wired-AND redundant row select circuitry 10 is shown. The wired-connection shown in FIG. 1 is wired-AND. It is recognized, however, that other types of wired-connections may be used. A wired-OR scheme, for instance, may be used by simply changing the polarity of transistors T1 to T19 from p-channel to n-channel transistors, changing the polarity of transistor T20 from a n-channel to p-channel transistor, and reversing the polarity of the supply voltages Vcc and Vss.
Circuitry 10 has a number of address input signals ain<0:3>, bin<0:3>, cin<0:7>, and din<0:1> which control a number of transistors which are in turn connected to removable laser fuse links that are programmable elements. The address input signals may be address signals directly or they ,may be derivatives of address signals derived from an address pre-decoding scheme, for instance. One skilled in the art will appreciate that other programmable elements, such as anti-fuses and active devices such as PROMs (Programmable Read Only Memories), EPROMs (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories), EEPROMs (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories, and Flash EPROMs, may be used in lieu of the laser fuse links. Circuitry 10 is programmed upon appropriate programming of the laser fuse links by leaving intact the laser fuse links corresponding to the row address combination which is to be replaced, thereby excluding all but the selected replacement row address. If anti-fuses are used, the appropriate programming would be accomplished by simply leaving intact the anti-fuses corresponding to row address combinations which are not to be replaced.
Input signals ain<0:3> control the gates of p-channel transistors T1, T2, T3, and T4; a first sourcerain of transistors T1, T2, T3, and T4 in turn are connected to a first terminal of laser fuse links F1, F2, F3, and F4, respectively, as shown. Input signals bin<0:3> control the gates of p-channel transistors T10, T11, T12, and T13; a first source/drain of transistors T10, T11, T12, and T13 in turn are connected to a first terminal of laser fuse links F10, F11, F12, and F13, respectively. Input signals cin<0:7> control the gates of p-channel transistors T5, T6, T7, T8, T14, T15, T16, and T17; a first source/drain of transistors T5, T6, T7, T8, T14, T15, T16, and T17 are in turn connected to a first terminal of laser fuse links F5, F6, F7, F8, F14, F15, F16, and F17. Finally, input signals din<0:1> control the gates of p-channel transistors T9 and T18; a first source/drain of transistors T9 and T18 in turn are connected to a first terminal of laser fuse links F9 and F18.
The other input signals to circuitry 10 are controlling clock signals Clock1 and Clock2, and power on reset signal POR (an active low signal). POR is an input signal to Fuse Enable Block 22 which contains fuse-based circuitry which enables circuitry 10 and is shown and described in conjunction with FIG. 2. The output signal 24 of Fuse Enable Block 22, and controlling clock signals Clock1 and Clock 2 are input signals to NOR gate 18 and together determine the state of signal 26. Similarly, signal 24 and controlling clock signal Clock2 are input signals to NOR gate 20 and thus together determine the state of signal 28. Signal 26 controls the gate of pull-down transistor T20, and signal 28 controls the gate of pull-up transistor T19. Even though two controlling signals Clock1 and Clock 2 are shown and described with regard to FIG. 1, it is recognized that with only minor circuit changes, one clock signal could be an input signal to both NOR gate 18 and NOR gate 20 such that a single clock signal would control the gate of pull-up transistor T19 and pull-down transistor T20. Thus, while two clock signals are shown in the preferred embodiment of FIG. 1, it is understood that only a single clock signal is necessary.
A first source/drain of pull-up transistor T19 is connected to supply Vcc, and a second source/drain of transistor T19 is connected to each of the second source/drains of transistors T1 through T18, inclusive, to form node N1. A first source/drain of pull-down transistor T20 is connected to supply Vss, and a second source/drain of transistor T20 is connected to laser fuse links F1 to F18, inclusive, as well as the inputs of inverters 13 and 14, and the output of inverter 12 to form node N2. The output of inverter 13 is connected to the input of 12 to form a weak latch which is easily overcome. Redundant Row Select signal 29, the output signal of inverter 14, is the output signal of circuitry 10.
Referring now to FIG. 2, fuse enable circuitry 30 is the circuitry contained within Fuse Enable Block 22 of FIG. 1, and it allows circuitry 10 of FIG. 1 to be enabled. Fuse enable circuitry 30 is comprised of laser fuse link FUSE, inverters 34, 40, 42, and transistors 36 and 38. Power on reset signal POR 32 is equivalent to POR signal 16 of FIG. 1. Circuitry 10 is enabled upon programming a programmable element of fuse enable circuitry 30; thus, disconnecting laser fuse link FUSE enables circuitry 10 of FIG. 1. When FUSE is blown, Enable bar signal 44 is a logic low level and circuitry 10 of FIG. 1 is enabled. On the other hand, allowing laser fuse link FUSE to remain intact means that circuitry 10 is not enabled. Enable bar signal 44 is equivalent to output signal 24 of Fuse Enable Block 22 of FIG. 1.
It is assumed that laser fuse link FUSE of fuse enable circuitry 30 has been disconnected and thus circuitry 10 of FIG. 1 is now enabled. Referring again to FIG. 1, circuitry 10 is pre-charged to a selected state during the inactive portions of controlling clock signals Clock1 and Clock2. During this period, the address input signals which are representative of the defective row to be replaced become valid at decode circuitry 10. When the active edge of the controlling clock is detected, pre-charging of circuitry 10 ceases, and the current state of Redundant Row Select output signal 29 of exclusionary wired-OR redundant row select circuitry 10 is transmitted to and stored in output latch circuitry to be described in conjunction with FIG. 3.
Referring now to FIG. 3, row decode output slave latch circuitry 50 captures and stores Redundant Row Select signal 29 of FIG. 1. Circuitry 50 is comprised of inverters 58 and 68, passgate 60, and transistors 62, 64, and 66. Clock1 input signal 52 is equivalent to Clock1 signal 12 of FIG. 1; Clock1 bar signal 56 is simply the inverse of Clock1 signal 52. Signal 67 is the output signal of passgate 60 and input signal of inverter 68. Redundant Row Select signal 54 is equivalent to Redundant Row Select signal 29 of FIG. 1.
Following is an example of how the present inventions works. Assume that the row addressed by address input signals ain<0>, bin<0>, cin<0>, and din<0> is defective and thus is to be replaced from the redundant row array. All the laser fuse links which do not correspond to the defective row must be removed; thus, all laser fuse links of FIG. 1, except for laser fuse links F1, F5, F9, and F10 which do correspond to the defective row are disconnected by blowing the laser fuse link. Also, the laser fuse link FUSE of FIG. 2 must be disconnected so that circuitry 10 of FIG. 1 is rendered operational.
When controlling clock signals Clock1 and Clock2 are both inactive (logic low), node N2 of FIG. 1 is pre-charged to a logic low or row selected condition. Address input signals ain<0>, bin<0>, cin<0>, and din<0> also become valid and stable when controlling clock signals Clock1 and Clock2 are inactive. When controlling clock signals Clock1 and Clock2 go to an active or high logic level, the state of node N1 resolves to the correct logic state based on address input signals ain<0>, bin<0>, cin<0>, and din<0>. If all address input signals ain<0>, bin<0>, cin<0>, and din<0> are a high logic level, then node N2 remains low and selected. If, however, any of address input signals ain<0>, bin<0>, cin<0>, and din<0> are a low logic level, then node N2 goes high to a deselected state. This resolved logic state at node N1 propagates through as Redundant Row Select signal 29 of FIG. 1 into the row decode output slave latch circuitry 50 of FIG. 3 where it is stored. The timing diagram of the present invention with regard to FIGS. 1 and 3 is shown in FIG. 4.
The redundant decode scheme of the present invention allows defective elements, such as rows or columns, of a high speed clocked memory device to be replaced from a redundant array without unnecessarily slowing down the memory device. The pre-charged and programmable exclusionary wired-connection redundant select circuit of the present invention provides for the programming of the address of any defective element such that the defective element may be replaced in a quick manner. After the exclusionary wired-connection redundant select circuit is enabled, it is programmed by removing all programmable elements, such as anti-fuses, laser fuse links, and active devices, not representative oil the defective element to be replaced. The redundant decode scheme offers the advantage of being as fast as or faster than the standard decode function.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.