US476100A

US476100A - John thomson

Info

Publication number: US476100A
Authority: US
Publication date: 1892-05-31
Anticipated expiration: 1909-05-31

Description

(NQ Model.)

.LETHOMSON POSITIVE PROPORTIONAL WATER METER.

No. 476,100. Patented May 81, 1892.

UNITED 'STATES PATENT OFFICE.

JOHN THOMSON, OF BROOKLYN, ASSIGNOR TO THE THOMSON METER COMPANY, OF NET YORK, N. Y.

POSITIVE PROPORTIONAL WATER-METER.

SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 476,109, dated May 31, 1892. Application tiled January l2, 1892. Serial No. 417,848. (No model.)

To @ZZ whom it may concern:

Be it known that I, JOHN THOMSON, a citi` zen of the United States, residing in the city of Brooklyn, Kings county, State of New York, have invented certain lmprovements in Positive Proportional Meters, of which the following is a specification.

This invention relates to positive proportional meters; and it has for its object to provide means for controlling the proportional flow of two separate streams through a meter, which means shall be positively operated by diierences of pressure between the several chambers of the meter, and in which an increase of resistance in the measuring-instrument shall cause the controlling means to restrict the passage of the fluid through the meter, while a decrease of resistance in the measuring mechanism will resultin opening the passages through the meter.

The invention consists in means for accomplishing these results, and while they maybe varied by those skilled in the art without departing from the principles of the invention I have chosen to illustrate the invention in connection with a valve mechanism such as is disclosed in the accompanying drawings, in which* Figurel is a vertical longitudinal sectional elevation of an apparatus embodying my in- Vention, and Fig. 2 is a transverse center section of Fig. l.

Referring to the embodiment of the invention illustrated in the drawings, the valve C is shown as ot' the plunger type, having threeV transverse sections of different diameters, and is contained within a valve-casing D, mounted within the main casing 5. Such a valve might properly be designated as aco1n pound differential valve. The smallest section 6 of the valve is iitted to the cylinder 7, through which the main volume is discharged, as see arrows 8. The largest diameter Q-the mid-section of the valve-is mounted in the cylinder l0, which receives the discharge from the measuring-chamber B through the cored water-way 1l and valve-casing port 12, while the intermediate diameter 13 operates in still another cylinder lll; but from this cylinder there is no discharge.

A more ready comprehension of the device and its function will be obtained by giving numerical values to the areas of the different valve-sections. Thus, assume the smallest section G equal to an area of one squareinch, the largest section 9 equal to three square inches, and the intermediate section 13 equal to 1.5 square inches. Now, it is to be 0bserved that the ends 6 and 13 of the valve are both exposed to the pressure of the main i nlet-chamber H, in which, also, the measuring device B is contained, while the section 9 is reached only by the water discharged from the measuring device.

It is to be noted that the valve acts by gravity to close the

ports

15 and 16, the eX- tent of which effec't is to make sufficient difference of pressure between the main inlet- `chamber H and the main outlet-chamber M to overcome the inertia and normal friction of the measuring device.

The operation is as follows: First, assume the valve full down to close the ports and a draft made from chamber M, causing an immediate difference of pressure between the main chambers M and H; second, su ppose this difference of pressure to equal one-pound pressure to each square inch. Then there will be a total pressure exerted upon the end 13 of the valve of 1.5 X 1:1.5 pounds and upon the small end 6 of valve one multiplied by one equals one pound. The effect of the pressure upon the small end 6 of the valve is to elevate it and open the ports, while that upon the other end 13 tends to depress it and keep the ports closed, the extent of which tendencyis the difference of pressure upon the two ends, or 1.5-1=O.5, the net downward thrust in pounds. Hence it is clear that the effect of creating in chamber H a greater pressure than in chamber M is to tend to depress the valve and close the valve-ports 15 16 5 but, as already stated, the measuring mechanism Bis also situated within the compass of chamber H. Therefore when theV difference of pressure between M and H `is sufficient to overcome the resistance'of the measuring mechanism the pressure transmitted by the measured stream will reach to and act within the annular chamber 17, form ed by the valve-casing and the large diameter 9 of IOO the valve. The end-pressure surface 18 of the valve in this annular chamber is to be greater than that of the upper outer end 13, and for present illustration will be taken as equal to two square inches. Now, as the pressure upon the valve in the annular chamber acts in a similar direction with the pressure upon the small end 6, we have the coinbined areas of two plus one equals three square inches to open the valve-ports opposed by the area of 1.5 square inches. Hence the valve will be elevated against the action of gravity and also against the pressnre on the end 13,which action will continue until some position of equilibrium will again have been reached. lf, then, an obstructio-n comes to the iiow of the measured stream, the consequence of this will be to prevent an equal effect in pressure from reaching the annular chamber and to also in like degree increase the pressure in the main inlet-chamber H. The result of this is, by relieving the valve at 18 and increasing at 13, to force the valve downward, both by gravityand by direct pesitive pressure, and to throttle the ports until another position of equilibrium is automatically established. On the contrary, if theresistance of the measuring device is relieved this will increase the pressure in the annular chamber and decrease the pressure in the main inlet-chambers, Wherefore the valve will be elevated and the ports opened.

It is to be understood that the ports through which the two streams are ejected bear a constant relation to each other iu respect of their areas.

By making the endsurface area of the Valve in the annular chamber but slightly greater than that of the outer end 13 a valve of compact proportions and moderate weight may be employed and vet require a considerable difference of pressure between the main chambers to cause its operation-as, for in` stance, if the area of the face 1S were but 0.1 square inch greater than that ot' the end 13 and the weight of the valve were one pound,

then it would require -)210. pounds pressure per square inch to lift the valve.

It will of course be evident without. illustration that a spring may be employed to act with or take the place of gravity and that the conditions of operation may be readily reversed without affecting the principles involved. So, too, the ends of the valve might be of equal diameters, in which case the proportional control would be between the discharge of the measured stream and the weight of the valve or its resilient resistance; but in such instance, as well as in that illustrated, the operationof the valve can only takeplace after or upon the operation of the measuring device, and the consequence of either a temporary or permanent increase in the friction of the measuring device is to close and throttle the ports, and thus maintain a practically invariable proportionate discharge under all Y conditions of action.

Other modifications in construction and arrangements will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art, and need not be recited in detail here, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the construction shown and described above.

What I claim is- 1. In a proportional meter, the compound differential valve having ends of unequal diameters exposed to the pressure of the main inlet-chamber and a mid-section connected to the discharge from the measuring mechanism, the face surface of said mid-section being greater than that of either of the ends, substantially as described.

2. In a proportional meter, the compound diiferential valve having ends of unequal diameters exposed to the pressure of the main inlet-chamber and a mid-section having one of its faces whose surface is greater than that of eitherof the ends connected to receive the flow from the measuring mechanism, the greater end diameter being formed upon that side of the aforesaid mid-section reverse to its receiving-surface.

3. In a proportional meter, the compound differential valve having ends of unequal diameters exposed to the pressure of the main inlet-chamber and a mid-section having one of its faces whose surface is greater than that of either of the ends connected to receive the flow from the measuring mechanism, the lesser end diameter being formed upon the receiving side of the aforesaid inid-seetion- 4t. In a proportional meter, the compound differential valve having ends of unequal diameters exposed to the pressure of the main inlet-chamber and a mid-section having one of its faces whose surface is greater than that of either of the ends connected to receive the flow from the measuring mechanism, the greater end diameter operating in an unported cylinder, while the lesser end diameter operates in a ported cylinder which receives the un measured iuid and the mid-section operates in a ported cylinder from whence the measured volume is ejected.

In testimony whereof I have signed my name to this specification in the presence of two subscribing Witnesses.

J OI-IN THOMSON.

Witnesses:

J. F. OonFIN, HERMANN PRILLWITZ.

IOO

IIO