US4041642A - Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light - Google Patents

Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4041642A
US4041642A US05/694,264 US69426476A US4041642A US 4041642 A US4041642 A US 4041642A US 69426476 A US69426476 A US 69426476A US 4041642 A US4041642 A US 4041642A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
beets
yield
night
sugar
illuminated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US05/694,264
Inventor
Joel I. Krugler
William F. Nelson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Verizon Laboratories Inc
Original Assignee
GTE Laboratories Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GTE Laboratories Inc filed Critical GTE Laboratories Inc
Priority to US05/694,264 priority Critical patent/US4041642A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US4041642A publication Critical patent/US4041642A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01GHORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
    • A01G7/00Botany in general
    • A01G7/04Electric or magnetic or acoustic treatment of plants for promoting growth
    • A01G7/045Electric or magnetic or acoustic treatment of plants for promoting growth with electric lighting
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P60/00Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
    • Y02P60/14Measures for saving energy, e.g. in green houses
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S47/00Plant husbandry
    • Y10S47/06Plant growth regulation by control of light thereon

Definitions

  • This invention relates to plant husbandry and to a process for improving crop yield. Specifically, this invention concerns a process wherein artificial light is utilized to improve the yield of sugar beets.
  • this invention is a method for increasing the amount of recoverable sugar yielded by sugar beets by illuminating them during at least a portion of the night with light having a wavelength in the range of 560nm to 700nm.
  • the phytochrome system is a proteinaceous photoreceptor existing in two forms within plants and controlling a variety of plant processes, such as flowering, stem elongation and seed germination. At least two forms of phytochrome exist and are hereinafter referred to as P r and P fr .
  • P r is photoconverted to P fr by light having wavelengths of approximately 560nm to 700nm, with peak conversion efficiency occurring at approximately 660nm.
  • P fr the active form, decays to P r during the night or in response to plant illumination with light of 700nm to 800nm.
  • the phytochrome either regulates the nutrient uptake of the beets, controls the distribution of the biochemical energy derived from the nutrients, or controls the efficiency with which the plant utilizes photoenergy by either controlling the photosynthesis or regulating the transportation and restoration rates to affect the oxygen/carbon dioxide balance. Stimulation of the phytochrome to maintain a constantly high average P fr level causes an increase in sugar production by the beet biosystem.
  • a light source having a predominant spectral emission in the range of 560nm to 700nm consisting of a Lumalux® lamp and a metal halide arc discharge lamp containing lithium with a peak emission at 670nm.
  • Lumalux is a trademark owned by GTE Sylvania for high pressure sodium lamps.
  • the lamps were filtered by means of amber filters having a low optical cutoff at 560nm.
  • the beets were illuminated for four hours each night from emergence until harvest.
  • the night-time illumination hereinafter called night interruption
  • the night interruption was centered around solar midnight on the theory that a maximum photoconversion of P r to P fr occurs if the plants are appropriately illuminated several hours into the night period rather than immediately after sundown. It is theorized that the P fr level in a plant is near saturation by sunset and an intervening dark period between daylight and illumination thereby allows a sufficient decay in the P fr level.
  • solar midnight was selected as a convenient reference.
  • the preferred intensity of illumination was found to be less than 0.47 ⁇ W/cm 2 when four hours of illumination were provided each night. Since an intensity of 0.47 ⁇ W/cm 2 applied for four hours supplies 70J/m 2 of optical energy, it may be deduced that the night interruption of sugar beets with 560nm to 700nm light at total delivered energies of 70J/m 2 or less will optimally increase sugar yield.
  • light delivery systems may comprise light sources mounted either permanently on poles, in the fields, or preferably on mobile units which could travel through the beet field each night illuminating each portion of the field, along the way, for a period in the order of minutes.
  • each illuminated plot was interjacent to a pair of control plots. Also within each strip were a pair of additional control plots more distantly located from the illuminated plot to characterize the geographical variability of the soil.
  • each plot were four subplots, each being subjected to a particular mean light intensity and each comprising three rows of variety A1 and three rows of variety D2. In effect, then each strip comprised a replicate of four illuminated subplots.
  • the light source comprised a Lumalux lamp and a metal halide arc discharge lamp containing lithium with a peak emission at 670nm.
  • the lamps were filtered by means of amber filters having low optical cutoff at 560nm. Louvres affixed to the lamp fixtures prevented the light from impinging on the control plots.
  • the filtered spectral output from the sources was:
  • the ratio of field illumination from the Lumalux and metal halide lamps varied from 1:1 to 3:1 (Lumalux: metal halide).
  • the horizontal illumination that is to say the light intercepted by the horizontal plane, was determined for each subplot and is considered the effective parameter owing to the essentially horizontal canopy formed by the beet leaves.
  • Table III somewhat better results were obtained for the lower intensities, and it may be accordingly theorized that the increase in sugar yield will occur with a peak efficiency at a light intensity equal to, or below, 0.47 ⁇ W/cm 2 . It is additionally apparent, that the maintenance of a precise intensity is not necessary in generating an increase, thereby enhancing the practical aspects of the process.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Ecology (AREA)
  • Forests & Forestry (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)

Abstract

A method for increasing the yield of recoverable sugar from sugar beets is disclosed, wherein the beets are illuminated during at least a portion of the night with light having a wavelength in the range of 560nm to 700nm.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to plant husbandry and to a process for improving crop yield. Specifically, this invention concerns a process wherein artificial light is utilized to improve the yield of sugar beets.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Increases in sugar beet yield have heretofore been obtained by selective breeding of the beets and by careful control of soil fertilization.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In its broadest aspect, this invention is a method for increasing the amount of recoverable sugar yielded by sugar beets by illuminating them during at least a portion of the night with light having a wavelength in the range of 560nm to 700nm.
Although the mechanism by which the sugar content is thus increased can not be explained with total certainty, it is theorized that the phytochrome system of the plant is directly or indirectly utilized.
The phytochrome system is a proteinaceous photoreceptor existing in two forms within plants and controlling a variety of plant processes, such as flowering, stem elongation and seed germination. At least two forms of phytochrome exist and are hereinafter referred to as Pr and Pfr. Pr is photoconverted to Pfr by light having wavelengths of approximately 560nm to 700nm, with peak conversion efficiency occurring at approximately 660nm. Pfr, the active form, decays to Pr during the night or in response to plant illumination with light of 700nm to 800nm.
It is believed that the phytochrome either regulates the nutrient uptake of the beets, controls the distribution of the biochemical energy derived from the nutrients, or controls the efficiency with which the plant utilizes photoenergy by either controlling the photosynthesis or regulating the transportation and restoration rates to affect the oxygen/carbon dioxide balance. Stimulation of the phytochrome to maintain a constantly high average Pfr level causes an increase in sugar production by the beet biosystem.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
A light source having a predominant spectral emission in the range of 560nm to 700nm was utilized consisting of a Lumalux® lamp and a metal halide arc discharge lamp containing lithium with a peak emission at 670nm. Lumalux is a trademark owned by GTE Sylvania for high pressure sodium lamps. The lamps were filtered by means of amber filters having a low optical cutoff at 560nm.
As will be more fully described in the example below, the beets were illuminated for four hours each night from emergence until harvest. The night-time illumination, hereinafter called night interruption, was centered around solar midnight on the theory that a maximum photoconversion of Pr to Pfr occurs if the plants are appropriately illuminated several hours into the night period rather than immediately after sundown. It is theorized that the Pfr level in a plant is near saturation by sunset and an intervening dark period between daylight and illumination thereby allows a sufficient decay in the Pfr level. On the other hand, it is believed preferable to maintain a high average Pfr level during the night and it is, therefore, desirable to illuminate the plants before the Pfr level has fallen too low. Accordingly, solar midnight was selected as a convenient reference.
As will be apparent from the following example, the preferred intensity of illumination was found to be less than 0.47μW/cm2 when four hours of illumination were provided each night. Since an intensity of 0.47μW/cm2 applied for four hours supplies 70J/m2 of optical energy, it may be deduced that the night interruption of sugar beets with 560nm to 700nm light at total delivered energies of 70J/m2 or less will optimally increase sugar yield.
It is accordingly envisioned that light delivery systems may comprise light sources mounted either permanently on poles, in the fields, or preferably on mobile units which could travel through the beet field each night illuminating each portion of the field, along the way, for a period in the order of minutes.
EXAMPLE
In terms of physical arrangement, the field was divided into four strips, each containing a similarly illuminated plot. Within each strip, each illuminated plot was interjacent to a pair of control plots. Also within each strip were a pair of additional control plots more distantly located from the illuminated plot to characterize the geographical variability of the soil.
Within each plot were four subplots, each being subjected to a particular mean light intensity and each comprising three rows of variety A1 and three rows of variety D2. In effect, then each strip comprised a replicate of four illuminated subplots.
The light source comprised a Lumalux lamp and a metal halide arc discharge lamp containing lithium with a peak emission at 670nm. The lamps were filtered by means of amber filters having low optical cutoff at 560nm. Louvres affixed to the lamp fixtures prevented the light from impinging on the control plots. The filtered spectral output from the sources was:
______________________________________                                    
METAL HALIDE LAMP LUMALUX LAMP                                            
         OUTPUT                  OUTPUT                                   
λ WATTS        λ   WATTS                                    
______________________________________                                    
380 - 540nm                                                               
         <0.1             380 - 540nm                                     
                                   <0.1                                   
540nm - 560                                                               
         3.9              540 - 560                                       
                                   .7                                     
560 - 580                                                                 
         2.2              560 - 570                                       
                                   7.1                                    
580 - 600                                                                 
         8.6              570 - 580                                       
                                   5.4                                    
600 - 620                                                                 
         7.1              580 - 590                                       
                                   11.0                                   
620 - 640                                                                 
         1.4              590 - 600                                       
                                   13.3                                   
640 - 670                                                                 
         1.6     35.0     600 - 610                                       
                                   5.2                                    
670 - 680                                                                 
         18.3             610 - 620                                       
                                   3.8                                    
680 - 690                                                                 
         4.7              620 - 640                                       
                                   2.5   15.1                             
690 - 700                                                                 
         1.9              640 - 660                                       
                                   1.5                                    
700 - 720                                                                 
         2.1              660 - 680                                       
                                   1.2                                    
720 - 740                                                                 
         1.4     6.8      680 - 700                                       
                                   0.9                                    
740 - 760                                                                 
         1.1              700 - 720                                       
                                   0.6                                    
760 - 780                                                                 
         1.2              720 - 740                                       
                                   0.5                                    
780 - 800                                                                 
         0.9              740 - 760                                       
                                   .5   4.2                               
800 - 950                                                                 
         9.0              760 - 780                                       
                                   2.0                                    
                          780 - 800                                       
                                   .6                                     
TOTAL    65.4W            800 - 950                                       
                                   19.1                                   
                          TOTAL    75.9                                   
______________________________________                                    
The ratio of field illumination from the Lumalux and metal halide lamps varied from 1:1 to 3:1 (Lumalux: metal halide).
An initial comparison of the median weight of sugar recovered from the illuminated beets with the median weight obtained from the controls revealed a 20.7% increase in illuminated A1 and a 13.6% increase in D2.
              TABLE I                                                     
______________________________________                                    
Median Weight of Recoverable Sugar Per Acre                               
Illuminated    Control       % Increase                                   
______________________________________                                    
A1    7275 lbs./acre                                                      
                   6025 lbs./acre                                         
                                 20.7%                                    
D2    6800         5975          13.8%                                    
______________________________________                                    
The mean increase in recoverable sugar per acre for illuminated plots over control plots in each strip is shown in Table II.
              TABLE II                                                    
______________________________________                                    
Percent Increases in Recoverable Sugar                                    
      Strip                               Overall                         
Variety                                                                   
      No:    1        2     3      4      Mean                            
______________________________________                                    
A1           +22.3%   +2.3% +16.2% +28.7% +17.4%                          
D2           +11.2%   -1.4% +17.1% +24.4% +12.8%                          
______________________________________                                    
Next, the data was analyzed to determine the effects of light intensity on sugar yield. The horizontal illumination, that is to say the light intercepted by the horizontal plane, was determined for each subplot and is considered the effective parameter owing to the essentially horizontal canopy formed by the beet leaves. As is shown in Table III, somewhat better results were obtained for the lower intensities, and it may be accordingly theorized that the increase in sugar yield will occur with a peak efficiency at a light intensity equal to, or below, 0.47μW/cm2. It is additionally apparent, that the maintenance of a precise intensity is not necessary in generating an increase, thereby enhancing the practical aspects of the process.
              TABLE III                                                   
______________________________________                                    
Beet Variety  Intensity        % Increase                                 
______________________________________                                    
A1            .47 - 1μW/cm.sup.2                                       
                               23.2%                                      
              1 - 2μW/cm.sup.2                                         
                               19.7%                                      
              4 - 6μW/cm.sup.2                                         
                               11.9%                                      
              8 - 13μW/cm.sup.2                                        
                               12.3%                                      
D2            .47 - 1μW/cm.sup.2                                       
                               23.2%                                      
              1 - 2μW/cm.sup.2                                         
                                8.1%                                      
              4 - 6μW/cm.sup.2                                         
                                8.1%                                      
              8 - 13μW/cm.sup.2                                        
                               11.6%                                      
______________________________________                                    
It may be appreciated that there are variations in the method set forth which are obvious to one skilled in the art and are within the spirit of the invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims (5)

We claim:
1. A method for improving the yield of sugar beets comprising the step of illuminating the beets during at least a portion of the night with low intensity light having predominant spectral components with wavelengths in the range of 560nm to 700nm.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the beets are illuminated approximately every night.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the period of illumination is generally centered about solar midnight.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the beets are illuminated for approximately four hours each night at an intensity in the order of 0.5μW/cm2.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the beets are subjected to sufficient illumination to provide a quantity of optical energy in the order of 70 Joules/m2.
US05/694,264 1976-06-09 1976-06-09 Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light Expired - Lifetime US4041642A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US05/694,264 US4041642A (en) 1976-06-09 1976-06-09 Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US05/694,264 US4041642A (en) 1976-06-09 1976-06-09 Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4041642A true US4041642A (en) 1977-08-16

Family

ID=24788099

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US05/694,264 Expired - Lifetime US4041642A (en) 1976-06-09 1976-06-09 Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US4041642A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1988000433A1 (en) * 1986-07-16 1988-01-28 Biofutura Oy Ltd. A method and mixture for controlling the growth and preventing growth disturbances of plants as well as a method for producing the said mixture
US4724633A (en) * 1983-07-22 1988-02-16 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Method of accelerating dehiscence and of reducing pull force of fruits
US4819373A (en) * 1983-07-22 1989-04-11 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Method of thinning fruitlets or fruits of crops
US4906398A (en) * 1986-07-30 1990-03-06 Jose Velasco Perez Reactive absorbents for the conservation of harvested vegetable products
WO1996036207A1 (en) 1995-05-19 1996-11-21 Nikolai Fedorovich Morozov Method of treating seeds before sowing and a device for that purpose
CN106386051A (en) * 2016-08-30 2017-02-15 铜陵翔宇商贸有限公司 High-yield planting method for nutritional beets
RU205828U1 (en) * 2020-12-24 2021-08-11 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Рязанский государственный агротехнологический университет имени П.А. Костычева" (ФГБОУ ВО РГАТУ) DEVICE FOR MAGNETIC SEED TREATMENT

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3340648A (en) * 1963-08-19 1967-09-12 Northern Gas Products Company Crop growth improvement by means of propane actuated thermopile

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3340648A (en) * 1963-08-19 1967-09-12 Northern Gas Products Company Crop growth improvement by means of propane actuated thermopile

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Lighting for Plant Growth, Bickford et al., 1972, Kent St. Univ. Press, pp. 87, 89, 126, 133, 210 cited. *
Sleepless Sugar, Life, Feb. 6, 1950, p. 79. *
The Reaction Controlling --, Borthwick et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Nov. 1952, pp. 929-934. *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4724633A (en) * 1983-07-22 1988-02-16 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Method of accelerating dehiscence and of reducing pull force of fruits
US4819373A (en) * 1983-07-22 1989-04-11 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Method of thinning fruitlets or fruits of crops
WO1988000433A1 (en) * 1986-07-16 1988-01-28 Biofutura Oy Ltd. A method and mixture for controlling the growth and preventing growth disturbances of plants as well as a method for producing the said mixture
US4906398A (en) * 1986-07-30 1990-03-06 Jose Velasco Perez Reactive absorbents for the conservation of harvested vegetable products
WO1996036207A1 (en) 1995-05-19 1996-11-21 Nikolai Fedorovich Morozov Method of treating seeds before sowing and a device for that purpose
CN106386051A (en) * 2016-08-30 2017-02-15 铜陵翔宇商贸有限公司 High-yield planting method for nutritional beets
RU205828U1 (en) * 2020-12-24 2021-08-11 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Рязанский государственный агротехнологический университет имени П.А. Костычева" (ФГБОУ ВО РГАТУ) DEVICE FOR MAGNETIC SEED TREATMENT

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mortensen et al. Effects of light quality on some greenhouse crops
Batutis et al. Far-red reversal of red light effect during long-night induction of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuberization
Wheeler et al. Soybean stem growth under high‐pressure sodium with supplemental blue lighting
Deregibus et al. Effects of light quality on tiller production in Lolium spp.
US5269093A (en) Method and apparatus for controlling plant growth with artificial light
CA2467852A1 (en) Method and apparatus for irradiation of plants using light emitting diodes
EP3666062B1 (en) Plant cultivation method and plant cultivation device
Mor et al. Dual effect of light on flowering and sprouting of rose shoots
US4041642A (en) Process for improving the yield of sugar beets using low intensity light
US4788793A (en) Method of inhibiting premature budding of short-day floral crops
Cathey et al. Significance of dark reversion of phytochrome in flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium
Vince-Prue et al. Horticultural significance of photomorphogenesis
Moe Physiological aspects of supplementary lighting in horticulture
Khosh-Khui et al. Responses of glasshouse roses to light conditions
Shillo et al. Flower and corm development in gladiolus as affected by photoperiod
Knight et al. Growth and yield characteristics of ‘Waldmann's Green’leaf lettuce under different photon fluxes from metal halide or incandescent+ fluorescent radiation
US4506474A (en) Use of night-break lighting to increase fruit set in economically important fruit crops
McCreary et al. Regulation of Douglas-fir seedling growth and hardiness by controlling photoperiod
Hoddinott et al. The responses of photosynthesis and translocation rates to changes in the ζ ratio of light
Blackburn et al. Effects of light intensity and quality on the growth of Elodea densa and Heteranthera dubia
Lecharny et al. Phytochrome and internode elongation in Chenopodium polyspermum L. The light fluence rate during the day and the end-of-day effect
Appelgren Effects of supplementary light to mother plants on adventitious shoot formation in flower peduncle segments of Begonia× hiemalis Fotsch in vitro
Intrieri et al. Physiological response of grapevine leaves to lightflecks
CHINTRARUCK et al. Interaction of vernalization, photoperiod and high temperature in flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) HEYNH.
Noble et al. Variation in chrysanthemums grown five to a pot: The influence of light