US3928088A - Ferritic stainless steel - Google Patents

Ferritic stainless steel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3928088A
US3928088A US414257A US41425773A US3928088A US 3928088 A US3928088 A US 3928088A US 414257 A US414257 A US 414257A US 41425773 A US41425773 A US 41425773A US 3928088 A US3928088 A US 3928088A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
stainless steel
ferritic stainless
free
percent
set forth
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US414257A
Inventor
Donald K Schlosser
Lewis P Myers
Robert L Caton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Carpenter Technology Corp
Original Assignee
Carpenter Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carpenter Technology Corp filed Critical Carpenter Technology Corp
Priority to US414257A priority Critical patent/US3928088A/en
Priority to CA210,280A priority patent/CA1031601A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3928088A publication Critical patent/US3928088A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/22Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/60Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur

Definitions

  • Cited incidental impurities characterized by a unique com- UNrrED STATES PATENTS bination of corrosion resistance and impact toughness, 1.956.645 5/l934 Langenberg 75/128 P plus free machinability in its preferred form. 2,384,565 9/[945 Schaufus 75/128 F 2.624.669 U195!
  • This invention relates to ferritic stainless steel and, more particularly, to a ferritic stainless steel characterized by a unique combination of free machinability, corrosion resistance and toughness, the latter as measured by the V-notch Charpy impact test.
  • Chromium steels modified with molybdenum and sulfur have hitherto been known.
  • One such steel, here designated Alloy A for convenience, as published, contained, nominally, 18% chromium, 2% molybdenum and 0.20% sulfur. The remainder of Alloy A was 0.15% carbon, 0.30% silicon, 0.80% manganese, a maximum of 0.040% phosphorus, and the balance iron plus incidental impurities.
  • Alloy B contained a maximum of 0.03% carbon, 17.50l9.50% chromium, a maximum of 1.50% manganese, a maximum of 1.0% silicon, a maximum of 0.04% phosphorus, 0.30-0.35% sulfur, 1.50-2.50% molybdenum, and the balance iron plus incidental impurities. Depending upon how such steels were produced they might contain up to about 0.040% nitrogen as a residual or incidental impurity even though none would be intentionally added. Alloys A and B are essentially the same and are commonly designated as 18 Cr-2 Mo stainless steel with additives for machinability.
  • a ferritic stainless steel which in its annealed condition contains about 5-5() percent, preferably about 5 to 20 percent, highly tempered not fully decomposed martensite, from which such parts construction fasteners, valves for handling chemicals, machine shafts, food-processing equipment, screw machine parts and others can be made having good corrosion resistance and toughness and which preferably also have good machinability.
  • our composition in its broad and preferred ranges contains in weight percent and the balance iron plus incidental impurities.
  • Silicon is not an essential alloying addition to our alloy, but it is preferably used in the customary way for deoxidatiou. With less than 0.2% silicon, deoxidation is not usually carried far enough, and above about 0.6%, the silicon has the objectionable effect of forming undesired silicates and tends to raise the impact transition temperature of the composition. Thus, while up to about 1% silicon is tolerable, 02-06 percent best favors desired deoxidation and, by its effect on microstructure, optimum mechanical properties.
  • Carbon in addition to being a strong austenite former, results in the formation of undesired grain boundary constituents and is, therefore, limited to no more than about 0.08 percent, preferably no more than about 0.06 percent.
  • the minimum amount of nitrogen required in accordance with the present invention need not be adjusted. However, if the carbon content is reduced below about 0.01 percent, the minimum of nitrogen required should be adjusted upward from 0.06 percent by an equal amount.
  • At least about 0.06% nitrogen is required in our composition and preferably at least 0.08 percent to provide the toughness and reduced impact transition temperature of the composition.
  • impact transition temperature is meant the lowest temperature at which the impact specimens show predominantly ductile fracture.
  • Up to about 0.20% nitrogen can be included to offset the maximum permissible amounts of the ferrite-forming elements which include chromium and molybdenum and thereby ensure the required minimum amount of martensite.
  • Preferably 0.08-0.16% or, better yet, 0.08-0. 14% nitrogen is present with the larger amounts of nitrogen being balanced with the larger amounts of chromium and molybdenum so that at least the small but definite amount of martensite required, about 5-20 percent, is present when, following hot working, the material is to be annealed.
  • the maximum amounts of carbon and nitrogen in the broad range are used together as much as about may be martensite following hot working.
  • Manganese and sulfur (and/or selenium) work together and are added to provide the best free machinability in our composition.
  • Manganese in excess of about 2.5 percent does not contribute significantly to free machinability.
  • manganese is limited to no more than about 2.2 percent, and best results are provided with about l.72.2% manganese.
  • sulfur is not present in sufficient quantity to prevent the formation of long stringy chips which tend to clog the machine and cause it to wear excessively. Therefore, at least 0. [5% sulfur and preferably about 0.250.40 percent is included for best results. Above about 0.50 percent, not enough improvement is obtained to offset the accompanying disadvantages to warrant further additions of sulfur.
  • Chromium and molybdenum primarily contribute to the corrosion resistance of our composition and, as ferrite formers, work to insure an essentially single phase ferritic microstructure in our composition in its annealed and quenched condition. To this end, both chromium and molybdenum are limited to the critical ranges indicated. To provide the desired resistance to corrosion in oxidizing media, at least about l7.5% chromium is required. Above about 19.5% chromium, insufficient improvement in corrosion resistance is obtained, and larger additions of chromium are not warranted. Beyond that, increasing chromium above 19.5 percent objectionably affects the impact transition temperature by causing it to rise, and also increases the tendency toward 885F embrittlement. Best results are obtained with about l8.0 to 19.0% chromium.
  • Our alloy is prepared and shaped using customary metallurgical practices suitable for the making and shaping of ferritic stainless steel containing about 18% chromium.
  • Hot working is carried out at about l,800 to 2,200F, preferably between about l,900 to 2,lF, the higher hot working temperature, e.g., from about l,950 to 2,200F being best suited for initially breaking down the composition containing the larger amounts of nitrogen.
  • the shapes are cooled in air, and some martensite is formed, but at a temperature (M,,) below l,000F with the result that the intermetallic phases, e.g., nitrides and carbides are not formed, the carbon and nitrogen being retained in solution in the martensite (body centered tetragonal) formed from the austenite which had been present at the hot work temperature.
  • the material is heat treated by annealing at about l,200 to l,6()0F, preferably between about l,300 to l,500F, and better yet between about l,400 to l,500F.
  • the parts are held at the annealing temperature for up to about 4 hours, shorter times of 1 to 2 hours or less being preferred.
  • the martensite is seen as highly tempered, not fully decomposed martensite.
  • highly tempered, not fully, that is partially, decomposed martensite is meant the ferritic structure obtained by quenching from the annealing temperature and in which no trace of the acicular structure characteristic of tempered martensite can be found, but the relatively fine nitrides remain to identify the prior location of tempered martensite.
  • an excessively high annealing temperature leads to undesired agglomeration of the nitrides and other intermetallic phases that may be present.
  • quenching following annealing is carried out more rapidly than can be done in air except for relatively small cross-sections or for parts containing the larger amounts of nitrogen with or without the larger amounts of carbon contemplated herein.
  • quenching should be sufficiently rapid to prevent or minimize precipitation of undesired phases, e.g., a plate-like nitride, in the grain boundaries.
  • Examples l-6 prepared as small experimental heats are illustrative of our invention and had the composition indicated in Table l with the balance iron and incidental impurities which included small amounts of but less than 0.005% phosphorus, less than 0.2% nickel, and less than 0.2% copper.
  • Examples l-6 were melted under an argon atmosphere to facilitate controlling the nitrogen content for experimental purposes.
  • Examples l to 2 were poured and cast as ingots from the same heat, but with added carbon in Example 2.
  • Examples 3 and 6 and Examples 4 and 5 were formed from split heats, the variation between Examples 3 and 6 being in the nitrogen content and between Examples 4 and 5 being in the carbon content.
  • the machinability of the specimens of each of the examples as annealed and quenched was determined as the average depth of penetration in inches into the specimens under carefully controlled conditions. While there is no generally accepted standard for measuring machinability, the free machining values were obtained by measuring the depth of penetration into the specimens by a quarter-inch drill in a time interval of seconds with the drill rotating at or very close to 670 r.p.m. under constant torque. Before the start of each drilling operation, the drill mounted in a conventional drill press was brought against the surface of the specimen where it was maintained by a constant weight of 100 pounds. The results of the tests are recorded in Table IV under drill penetration (DRILL PENE.) and each is an average of two sets of 3 hole tests. The carbon and nitrogen contents are included for easy reference.
  • Example 2 was found to be at about ll0F
  • Example 4 it was found to be about room temperature (72F)
  • Alloy C it was found to be at about F.
  • manganese and sulfur become optional and need not be present in amounts any greater than usual depending upon the manner in which the steel is made.
  • manganese can be as low as 0.2 percent although even smaller amounts may be present when vacuum melting practices are used.
  • sulfur would not exceed about 0.03 percent.
  • the balance being essentially iron and incidental impurities, in which selenium can be substituted for all or part of the sulfur on a l for l basis and tungsten can be substituted for all or part of the molybdenum in the ratio of about 1.5% tungsten to l% molybdenum, and said stainless steel when annealed at about l,200-l,600F and quenched after having been hot worked from about l,8002,2()0F contains about to 50% highly tempered partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.
  • Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 2 containing about 0.06% maximum carbon, about l.72.2% manganese and about 0.08-0.l6% nitrogen.
  • Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 4 containing about l.7-2.2% molybdenum.
  • Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 7 containing about 5 to 20 percent highly tempered partially decomposed martensite.
  • Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 9 containing about 0.l300.l40% nitrogen.
  • the stainless steel article set forth in claim I] formed from a ferritic stainless steel containing O.250.4% sulfur, about l.7-2 .2% manganese, about 0.08-0.l6% nitrogen, about l8.0-l9.0% chromium, about 1.7-2.2% molybdenum, a maximum of about 0.06% carbon, andabout 5 to 20 percent highly tempered, partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)

Abstract

Ferritic, preferably free-machining stainless steel containing 0.08% max. carbon, 0.06-0.20% nitrogen, 2.5% max. manganese, 0.50% max. sulfur (and/or selenium), 17.5-19.5% chromium, 1.52.5% molybdenum with the balance iron plus optional elements and incidental impurities, characterized by a unique combination of corrosion resistance and impact toughness, plus free machinability in its preferred form.

Description

United States Patent Schlosser et al. [4 Dec. 23, 1975 1 FERRI'IIC STAINLESS STEEL 2.848.323 8/1958 Harris 75/126 1 4 2,905,577 9/1959 Harris 75/l26 C [75] Invemm' M shnmgmn 3.645.722 2/1912 74111611153611 15/128 P Wis R" Cam", 5.799.765 5/1914 Clarke 75/126 L both of g. all Of B4l6,399 1/1975 061mm. Jr. 15/126 L 1223.685 7/l953 Clarke [73) W TM 1127.226 5/1965 Moskowitz 75/128 F Reading. Pa.
[22] Filed: 1973 Primary Examiner-R. Dean 211 App], 414,157 Assistant Examiner-Arthur J. Steiner Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Edgar N. Jay
[52] US. Cl. 148/37; 75/126 C; 75/126 J;
15/126 1.; 75Il26 M; 75/128 P; 75/128 19; 1 1 ABSTRACT 75ll28 w [51] 1111. C1. c22c 38/22; c22c 38/60 mf'g'gggfg ffi $3 222 I ml $1 3;, 2.5% max. manganese, 0.50% max. sulfur (and/or selenium), l7.5l9.5% chromium, l.52.5% molybdenum with the balance iron plus optional elements and [56] Cited incidental impurities, characterized by a unique com- UNrrED STATES PATENTS bination of corrosion resistance and impact toughness, 1.956.645 5/l934 Langenberg 75/128 P plus free machinability in its preferred form. 2,384,565 9/[945 Schaufus 75/128 F 2.624.669 U195! 12 Claims, No Drawings Crafts IS/I26 J FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to ferritic stainless steel and, more particularly, to a ferritic stainless steel characterized by a unique combination of free machinability, corrosion resistance and toughness, the latter as measured by the V-notch Charpy impact test.
Chromium steels modified with molybdenum and sulfur have hitherto been known. One such steel, here designated Alloy A for convenience, as published, contained, nominally, 18% chromium, 2% molybdenum and 0.20% sulfur. The remainder of Alloy A was 0.15% carbon, 0.30% silicon, 0.80% manganese, a maximum of 0.040% phosphorus, and the balance iron plus incidental impurities. Another such composition, Alloy B, contained a maximum of 0.03% carbon, 17.50l9.50% chromium, a maximum of 1.50% manganese, a maximum of 1.0% silicon, a maximum of 0.04% phosphorus, 0.30-0.35% sulfur, 1.50-2.50% molybdenum, and the balance iron plus incidental impurities. Depending upon how such steels were produced they might contain up to about 0.040% nitrogen as a residual or incidental impurity even though none would be intentionally added. Alloys A and B are essentially the same and are commonly designated as 18 Cr-2 Mo stainless steel with additives for machinability.
We have found that such 18% Cr-2% Mo stainless steels leave much to be desired when, in particular, room temperature toughness or impact strength as measured by the V-notch Cbarpy impact test and where lower impact transition temperature are wanted in such parts as construction fasteners for the building trade, valves for handling chemicals, machine shafts, food-processing equipment, and generally any screw machine parts, especially where any such parts would be exposed in service to subfreezing temperatures.
SUMMARY OF THE lNVENTlON It is, therefore, a principal object of this invention to provide an 18% Cr-2% Mo stainless steel which has improved toughness and good corrosion resistance, and in its preferred form also has good machinability.
1n accordance with our invention a ferritic stainless steel is provided which in its annealed condition contains about 5-5() percent, preferably about 5 to 20 percent, highly tempered not fully decomposed martensite, from which such parts construction fasteners, valves for handling chemicals, machine shafts, food-processing equipment, screw machine parts and others can be made having good corrosion resistance and toughness and which preferably also have good machinability. By way of summary our composition in its broad and preferred ranges contains in weight percent and the balance iron plus incidental impurities.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS By tabulating the ranges of our composition to provide a convenient summary, it is not intended to restrict our alloy to the stated broad and preferred combinations thereof, it being intended to include within the scope of this invention as defined by the claims, elements equivalent to those stated and combinations of one or more of the broad ranges with one or more of the preferred ranges.
As incidental impurities several hundredths percent of one or more of such elements as phosphorus, copper and nickel may be included, but, no more than 0.04% phosphorus, 0.5% copper or 0.5% nickel. Strong stabilizing elements such as titanium and columbium are not desirable additions to our alloy because they tie up nitrogen. Selenium can be substituted for all or part of the sulfur on a 1 for 1 basis, and tungsten can be substituted for all or part of the molybdenum in the ratio of about 1.5 to 1.
Silicon is not an essential alloying addition to our alloy, but it is preferably used in the customary way for deoxidatiou. With less than 0.2% silicon, deoxidation is not usually carried far enough, and above about 0.6%, the silicon has the objectionable effect of forming undesired silicates and tends to raise the impact transition temperature of the composition. Thus, while up to about 1% silicon is tolerable, 02-06 percent best favors desired deoxidation and, by its effect on microstructure, optimum mechanical properties.
Both nickel and copper are not desired in our composition. Though each is tolerable in amounts up to about 0.5 percent, neither should be present in excess of that amount because of their adverse effect upon the resistance to cracking while under stress when exposed to such media as hot chlorides.
Carbon, in addition to being a strong austenite former, results in the formation of undesired grain boundary constituents and is, therefore, limited to no more than about 0.08 percent, preferably no more than about 0.06 percent. When carbon is present in an amount of no less than about 0.02 percent, the minimum amount of nitrogen required in accordance with the present invention need not be adjusted. However, if the carbon content is reduced below about 0.01 percent, the minimum of nitrogen required should be adjusted upward from 0.06 percent by an equal amount.
At least about 0.06% nitrogen is required in our composition and preferably at least 0.08 percent to provide the toughness and reduced impact transition temperature of the composition. By impact transition temperature is meant the lowest temperature at which the impact specimens show predominantly ductile fracture. Up to about 0.20% nitrogen can be included to offset the maximum permissible amounts of the ferrite-forming elements which include chromium and molybdenum and thereby ensure the required minimum amount of martensite. Preferably 0.08-0.16% or, better yet, 0.08-0. 14% nitrogen is present with the larger amounts of nitrogen being balanced with the larger amounts of chromium and molybdenum so that at least the small but definite amount of martensite required, about 5-20 percent, is present when, following hot working, the material is to be annealed. However, it is to be noted that when the maximum amounts of carbon and nitrogen in the broad range are used together as much as about may be martensite following hot working.
Manganese and sulfur (and/or selenium) work together and are added to provide the best free machinability in our composition. To this end, a minimum of about l.5 percent, preferably at least L60 percent, is included to provide with the sulfur the best freemachining properties characteristic of our alloy. Manganese in excess of about 2.5 percent does not contribute significantly to free machinability. Preferably, manganese is limited to no more than about 2.2 percent, and best results are provided with about l.72.2% manganese. Below about 0.15 percent, sulfur is not present in sufficient quantity to prevent the formation of long stringy chips which tend to clog the machine and cause it to wear excessively. Therefore, at least 0. [5% sulfur and preferably about 0.250.40 percent is included for best results. Above about 0.50 percent, not enough improvement is obtained to offset the accompanying disadvantages to warrant further additions of sulfur.
Chromium and molybdenum primarily contribute to the corrosion resistance of our composition and, as ferrite formers, work to insure an essentially single phase ferritic microstructure in our composition in its annealed and quenched condition. To this end, both chromium and molybdenum are limited to the critical ranges indicated. To provide the desired resistance to corrosion in oxidizing media, at least about l7.5% chromium is required. Above about 19.5% chromium, insufficient improvement in corrosion resistance is obtained, and larger additions of chromium are not warranted. Beyond that, increasing chromium above 19.5 percent objectionably affects the impact transition temperature by causing it to rise, and also increases the tendency toward 885F embrittlement. Best results are obtained with about l8.0 to 19.0% chromium.
Molybdenum enhances corrosion resistance and crevice corrosion resistance in reducing or pitting media, e.g., sulfuric acid, dilute ferric chloride, or salt water. It also tends to raise the impact transition temperature. For these reasons, molybdenum in an amount ranging from about 1.5-2.5 percent is used and for best results about l.7-2.2% molybdenum should be used.
Our alloy is prepared and shaped using customary metallurgical practices suitable for the making and shaping of ferritic stainless steel containing about 18% chromium. Hot working is carried out at about l,800 to 2,200F, preferably between about l,900 to 2,lF, the higher hot working temperature, e.g., from about l,950 to 2,200F being best suited for initially breaking down the composition containing the larger amounts of nitrogen.
Following hot working, the shapes are cooled in air, and some martensite is formed, but at a temperature (M,,) below l,000F with the result that the intermetallic phases, e.g., nitrides and carbides are not formed, the carbon and nitrogen being retained in solution in the martensite (body centered tetragonal) formed from the austenite which had been present at the hot work temperature. The material is heat treated by annealing at about l,200 to l,6()0F, preferably between about l,300 to l,500F, and better yet between about l,400 to l,500F. Depending upon the thickness of the section, the parts are held at the annealing temperature for up to about 4 hours, shorter times of 1 to 2 hours or less being preferred. Following annealing and quenching, the martensite is seen as highly tempered, not fully decomposed martensite. By highly tempered, not fully, that is partially, decomposed martensite is meant the ferritic structure obtained by quenching from the annealing temperature and in which no trace of the acicular structure characteristic of tempered martensite can be found, but the relatively fine nitrides remain to identify the prior location of tempered martensite. ln practice, an excessively high annealing temperature leads to undesired agglomeration of the nitrides and other intermetallic phases that may be present.
Best results are obtained when the quenching following annealing is carried out more rapidly than can be done in air except for relatively small cross-sections or for parts containing the larger amounts of nitrogen with or without the larger amounts of carbon contemplated herein. In any event, whether in air or in faster quenching media such as oil or water, quenching should be sufficiently rapid to prevent or minimize precipitation of undesired phases, e.g., a plate-like nitride, in the grain boundaries.
Examples l-6 prepared as small experimental heats are illustrative of our invention and had the composition indicated in Table l with the balance iron and incidental impurities which included small amounts of but less than 0.005% phosphorus, less than 0.2% nickel, and less than 0.2% copper.
TABLE I Ex. No. C Mn Si S Cr Mo N 1 .011 1.83 .40 .35 18.4! 2.01 .092 2 .038 L .40 .35 18.44 2.01 .092 3 .057 1.110 .37 .34 18.43 2.02 .085 4 .012 1.88 .41 .35 13.59 2.03 .139 5 .041 I88 .41 .35 [8.60 2.02 .139 s .056 [.83 .36 .35 18.45 2.01 .130
Examples l-6 were melted under an argon atmosphere to facilitate controlling the nitrogen content for experimental purposes. Examples l to 2 were poured and cast as ingots from the same heat, but with added carbon in Example 2. Similarly, Examples 3 and 6 and Examples 4 and 5 were formed from split heats, the variation between Examples 3 and 6 being in the nitrogen content and between Examples 4 and 5 being in the carbon content.
The thus formed 2% inch ingots were forged from 2,000F to 1% inch square bars, reheating being carried out at 178 inch square. After hot working, annealing for r hour at l,500F followed by water quenching was carried out before the H4; inch square bars were shaped into test specimens. Standard tensile test specimens having a 0.252 inch gage diameter and a l-inch gage length were formed as well as standard V-notch Charpy impact test specimens. The results of room temperature (72F) mechanical property tests are given in Ta bles ll and Ill. In Table ll, the 0.2 percent yield strength in thousands of pounds per square inch is given under 0.2YS (KSl), the ultimate tensile strength is given under UTS (KS1), and the percent elongation and percent reduction in area are given under EL and RA respectively. The data tabulated is, in each instance, an
average of two tests.
TABLE II .2YS UTS Ex. No. (KSI) (KSI) if El '4 RA I 55.5 77 27 51 2 58.9 8L5 27.5 50.5 3 61 84.5 27.5 56 4 60.5 84 25.5 48 5 (1L5 27 53 6 02.5 ss 20 49 TABLE III VNC IMPACT STRENGTH (Ff. LBS.)
HARDNESS 41) Ex. No.
The machinability of the specimens of each of the examples as annealed and quenched was determined as the average depth of penetration in inches into the specimens under carefully controlled conditions. While there is no generally accepted standard for measuring machinability, the free machining values were obtained by measuring the depth of penetration into the specimens by a quarter-inch drill in a time interval of seconds with the drill rotating at or very close to 670 r.p.m. under constant torque. Before the start of each drilling operation, the drill mounted in a conventional drill press was brought against the surface of the specimen where it was maintained by a constant weight of 100 pounds. The results of the tests are recorded in Table IV under drill penetration (DRILL PENE.) and each is an average of two sets of 3 hole tests. The carbon and nitrogen contents are included for easy reference.
To demonstrate the effect of nitrogen on the impact transition temperature, standard V-notch Charpy test specimens were prepared from Examples 2 and 4 and tested at 32, 72, 150, and 200F. In addition, standard V-notch Charpy specimens were prepared for comparision of an Alloy C having the following composition:
w/o Carbon 0.037 Manganese l .92 Silicon 0.43 Sulfur 0.36 Chromium 18.00 Molybdenum 2.05 Nitrogen 0.039
and the balance iron plus incidental impurities. These and the test specimens yet to be referred to herein prepared from Alloy C were made from bars hot worked, annealed and quenched as was described in connection with Examples l-6. Except in the case of Example 2 where the transition temperature was determined by interpolation, the determination of the transition temperature was based on the measured impact strengths and the appearance of the fractures at the temperature indicated, the impact transition tempera ture being based on the lowest temperature to give a predominately ductile fracture appearance. The transition temperature for Example 2 was found to be at about ll0F, for Example 4 it was found to be about room temperature (72F), and for Alloy C it was found to be at about F.
It should also be noted that Alloy C tensile specimens when prepared and tested as was described in connection with Examples 1-6 gave a 0.2 percent yield strength of 53 KSI, an ultimate tensile strength of 74.5 KSl, an elongation of 29.5 percent and a reduction in area of 57 percent. The annealed and quenched hardness was R,,90 and the V-notch Charpy impact strength was 7 ft. lbs., all being averages of two tests.
Corrosion rates of duplicate test coupons formed from the forged and heat treated bars prepared as was previously described herein of each of Examples 1-6 and Alloy C and immersed for five 48-hour periods each in boiling 65% by weight nitric acid were found to have lost metal at the calculated average rate in mils per year (MPY) as indicated in Table V.
From the data in Table V, it is apparent that the addition of nitrogen in accordance with the present invention does not adversely affect the corrosion resistance of our composition in such media as 65 percent by weight boiling nitric acid.
Further important advantages of our composition reside in that its corrosion resistance is at least as good as that of A.l.S.l. Type 303 as measured by such tests as salt spray corrosion resistance, resistance to nitric acid, and other media. The machinability of our composition is superior to that of Type 303 both when measured by the drill test and also when measured on a lathe.
When the unique combination of free machinability with good impact toughness and corrosion resistance of our alloy is not required, the elements manganese and sulfur become optional and need not be present in amounts any greater than usual depending upon the manner in which the steel is made. In the case of steel manufactured in air under a slag, manganese can be as low as 0.2 percent although even smaller amounts may be present when vacuum melting practices are used. And sulfur would not exceed about 0.03 percent.
The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation. and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof,
but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed.
We claim:
I. A ferritic stainless steel consisting essentially in weight percent of about Carbon 0.08 Max. Manganese 2.5 Max. Silicon l Max. Phosphorus 0.04 Max Sulfur 050 Max. Chromium l7.5-l9.5 Molybdenum 1.5-2.5 Nickel 0.5 Max. Copper 0.5 Max. Nitrogen 0.06-0.20
the balance being essentially iron and incidental impurities, in which selenium can be substituted for all or part of the sulfur on a l for l basis and tungsten can be substituted for all or part of the molybdenum in the ratio of about 1.5% tungsten to l% molybdenum, and said stainless steel when annealed at about l,200-l,600F and quenched after having been hot worked from about l,8002,2()0F contains about to 50% highly tempered partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.
2. Ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 1 containing 0.25-0.4% sulfur.
3. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 2 containing about 0.06% maximum carbon, about l.72.2% manganese and about 0.08-0.l6% nitrogen.
4. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 3 containing about LO-19.0% chromium.
5. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 3 containing about l.72.2% molybdenum.
6. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 4 containing about l.7-2.2% molybdenum.
7. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 6 containing about ODS-0.14% nitrogen.
8. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 7 containing about 5 to 20 percent highly tempered partially decomposed martensite.
9. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 3 containing about 1.8% manganese, about 0.4% silicon, 0.35% sulfur, about l8.4 to l8.6% chromium, about 2% molybdenum, about 0.085-0.l4% nitrogen, and about 5 to 20 percent highly tempered partially decomposed martensite.
l0. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 9 containing about 0.l300.l40% nitrogen.
II. A stainless steel article formed from a ferritic stainless steel having the composition set forth in claim 1 hot worked from about l,8002,200F, annealed at about l,200l ,600F and quenched so as to contain about 5 percent to 50 percent highly tempered, partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.
12. The stainless steel article set forth in claim I] formed from a ferritic stainless steel containing O.250.4% sulfur, about l.7-2 .2% manganese, about 0.08-0.l6% nitrogen, about l8.0-l9.0% chromium, about 1.7-2.2% molybdenum, a maximum of about 0.06% carbon, andabout 5 to 20 percent highly tempered, partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.

Claims (12)

1. A FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY IN WEIGHT PERCENT OF ABOUT
2. Ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 1 containing 0.25-0.4% sulfur.
3. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 2 containing about 0.06% maximum carbon, about 1.7-2.2% manganese and about 0.08-0.16% nitrogen.
4. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 3 containing about 18.0-19.0% chromium.
5. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 3 containing about 1.7-2.2% molybdenum.
6. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 4 containing about 1.7-2.2% molybdenum.
7. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 6 containing about 0.08-0.14% nitrogen.
8. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 7 containing about 5 to 20 percent highly tempered partially decomposed martensite.
9. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 3 containing about 1.8% manganese, about 0.4% silicon, 0.35% sulfur, about 18.4 to 18.6% chromium, about 2% molybdenum, about 0.085-0.14% nitrogen, and about 5 to 20 percent highly tempered partially decomposed martensite.
10. Free-machining ferritic stainless steel as set forth in claim 9 containing about 0.130-0.140% nitrogen.
11. A stainless steel article formed from a ferritic stainless steel having the composition set forth in claim 1 hot worked from about 1,800*-2,200*F, annealed at about 1,200*-1,600*F and quenched so as to contain about 5 percent to 50 percent highly tempered, partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.
12. The stainless steel article set forth in claim 11 foRmed from a ferritic stainless steel containing 0.25-0.4% sulfur, about 1.7-2.2% manganese, about 0.08-0.16% nitrogen, about 18.0-19.0% chromium, about 1.7-2.2% molybdenum, a maximum of about 0.06% carbon, and about 5 to 20 percent highly tempered, partially decomposed martensite free of acicular structure.
US414257A 1973-11-09 1973-11-09 Ferritic stainless steel Expired - Lifetime US3928088A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US414257A US3928088A (en) 1973-11-09 1973-11-09 Ferritic stainless steel
CA210,280A CA1031601A (en) 1973-11-09 1974-09-27 Ferritic stainless steel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US414257A US3928088A (en) 1973-11-09 1973-11-09 Ferritic stainless steel

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3928088A true US3928088A (en) 1975-12-23

Family

ID=23640641

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US414257A Expired - Lifetime US3928088A (en) 1973-11-09 1973-11-09 Ferritic stainless steel

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US3928088A (en)
CA (1) CA1031601A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4047981A (en) * 1976-06-30 1977-09-13 Armco Steel Corporation Internally nitrided ferritic stainless steel strip, sheet and fabricated products and method therefor
US4219356A (en) * 1977-09-20 1980-08-26 Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha Machinable ferritic stainless steels
US4464207A (en) * 1978-08-14 1984-08-07 The Garrett Corporation Dispersion strengthened ferritic stainless steel
US6921511B2 (en) * 2001-11-26 2005-07-26 Ugitech Sulphur-containing ferritic stainless steel that can be used for ferromagnetic parts
CN108179360A (en) * 2018-01-30 2018-06-19 东北大学 A kind of super-purity ferrite stainless steel of tin copper synergistic effect and preparation method thereof
CN110106442A (en) * 2019-05-28 2019-08-09 南京钢铁股份有限公司 A kind of ultra-fine acicular structure structural steel and its production method
CN110343948A (en) * 2019-06-12 2019-10-18 鹰普(中国)有限公司 A kind of ferritic stainless steel CB30 material and its heat treatment process

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1956645A (en) * 1931-01-19 1934-05-01 Us Pipe & Foundry Company Ferrous alloy
US2384565A (en) * 1940-12-13 1945-09-11 Rustless Iron & Steel Corp Alloy steel and articles
US2624669A (en) * 1951-01-19 1953-01-06 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp Ferritic chromium steels
US2848323A (en) * 1955-02-28 1958-08-19 Birmingham Small Arms Co Ltd Ferritic steel for high temperature use
US2905577A (en) * 1956-01-05 1959-09-22 Birmingham Small Arms Co Ltd Creep resistant chromium steel
US3645722A (en) * 1969-09-04 1972-02-29 Carpenter Technology Corp Free machining stainless steel alloy
US3799765A (en) * 1972-02-29 1974-03-26 Armco Steel Corp Free-machining stainless steel

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1956645A (en) * 1931-01-19 1934-05-01 Us Pipe & Foundry Company Ferrous alloy
US2384565A (en) * 1940-12-13 1945-09-11 Rustless Iron & Steel Corp Alloy steel and articles
US2624669A (en) * 1951-01-19 1953-01-06 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp Ferritic chromium steels
US2848323A (en) * 1955-02-28 1958-08-19 Birmingham Small Arms Co Ltd Ferritic steel for high temperature use
US2905577A (en) * 1956-01-05 1959-09-22 Birmingham Small Arms Co Ltd Creep resistant chromium steel
US3645722A (en) * 1969-09-04 1972-02-29 Carpenter Technology Corp Free machining stainless steel alloy
US3799765A (en) * 1972-02-29 1974-03-26 Armco Steel Corp Free-machining stainless steel

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4047981A (en) * 1976-06-30 1977-09-13 Armco Steel Corporation Internally nitrided ferritic stainless steel strip, sheet and fabricated products and method therefor
US4219356A (en) * 1977-09-20 1980-08-26 Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha Machinable ferritic stainless steels
US4270950A (en) * 1977-09-20 1981-06-02 Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha Machinable ferrite stainless steels
US4464207A (en) * 1978-08-14 1984-08-07 The Garrett Corporation Dispersion strengthened ferritic stainless steel
US6921511B2 (en) * 2001-11-26 2005-07-26 Ugitech Sulphur-containing ferritic stainless steel that can be used for ferromagnetic parts
CN108179360A (en) * 2018-01-30 2018-06-19 东北大学 A kind of super-purity ferrite stainless steel of tin copper synergistic effect and preparation method thereof
CN110106442A (en) * 2019-05-28 2019-08-09 南京钢铁股份有限公司 A kind of ultra-fine acicular structure structural steel and its production method
CN110343948A (en) * 2019-06-12 2019-10-18 鹰普(中国)有限公司 A kind of ferritic stainless steel CB30 material and its heat treatment process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1031601A (en) 1978-05-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3093519A (en) Age-hardenable, martensitic iron-base alloys
EP0545753B1 (en) Duplex stainless steel having improved strength and corrosion resistance
CA1238841A (en) Large, warm worked, alloy article
US4837108A (en) Austenitic free cutting stainless steels
US6743305B2 (en) High-strength high-toughness precipitation-hardened steel
US4886640A (en) Hot work tool steel with good temper resistance
US4798634A (en) Corrosion resistant wrought stainless steel alloys having intermediate strength and good machinability
JPH01222036A (en) Malageing steel
SE528454C2 (en) Extractable curable martensitic stainless steel including titanium sulfide
US3928088A (en) Ferritic stainless steel
US6146475A (en) Free-machining martensitic stainless steel
KR20010083939A (en) Cr-mn-ni-cu austenitic stainless steel
US5362337A (en) Free-machining martensitic stainless steel
US4502886A (en) Austenitic stainless steel and drill collar
US5525167A (en) Elevated nitrogen high toughness steel article
US3424576A (en) Free machining steels
JPH0555585B2 (en)
US3389991A (en) Stainless steel and method
JPH0218381B2 (en)
US5788922A (en) Free-machining austenitic stainless steel
JPH0643626B2 (en) Martensitic stainless steel for oil country tubular goods
US3677744A (en) Age hardening stainless steel
WO1987004731A1 (en) Corrosion resistant stainless steel alloys having intermediate strength and good machinability
US4818484A (en) Austenitic, non-magnetic, stainless steel alloy
US3373015A (en) Stainless steel and product