US3705979A

US3705979A - Method of processing production well logging data

Info

Publication number: US3705979A
Authority: US
Inventors: Yves Nicolas
Original assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corp
Current assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority date: 1970-08-12
Filing date: 1971-09-11
Publication date: 1972-12-12
Anticipated expiration: 1989-12-12
Also published as: GB1364926A; AU3222271A; ZA715344B; FR2101037A1; FR2101037B1; AU473803B2; CA1006267A; US3909603A

Description

Dec. 12, 1972 Y. NICOLAS 3,705,979

METHOD OF PROCESSING PRODUCTION WELL LOGGING DATA Filed Aug. 11, 1971 5 Sheets-Sheet 1 4C wATE'R HOLI DUP E h/z/ 2 g 10 .J m

AP'APPARENT" DENSITY DIFFERENCE (LBS/ IN INVENTOR.

Yves Nicolas Y. NICOLAS Dec. 12, 1972 METHOD OF PROCESSING PRODUCTION WELL LOGGING DATA 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed Aug. 11, 1971 7 WATER HOLDUP Yw Y. NICOLAS Dec. 12, 1972 METHOD OF PROCESSING PRODUCTION WELL LOGGING DATA Filed Aug. 11, 1971 5 Sheets-Sheet 3 VUFT/MIN) BA RRELS DAY Dec. 12, 1972 Filed Aug. 11, 1971 Y. NICOLAS METHOD OF PROCESSING PRODUCTION WELL LOGGING DATA 5 Sheets-Sheet 4 .SIGNAL PROCESSING CIRCUITS +0.c. +o.c.

+D.C. A PW NV; AP ,45

vs Vs COMP-GT5- I -'COMPU1"ER "I CIRCUIT 46 COMPUTER I COMPUTER I I W( W) I 47/ Y (1-Y v A /49 MULTIPLY Y l CIRCUIT WQ+ l l 7 50 l DIFF. I

' l Li fl i, V l RECORDER w FIG.5A

56 57 l I F- x225 so 55 DIFF. CKT.

Dec. 12, 1972 Y. NICOLAS METHOD OF PROCESSING PRODUCTION WELL LOGGING DATA Filed Aug. 11, 1971 FIG. 7

5 Sheets-Sheet 5 LSET INTERVAL couNTER UTG2 READ vUFPER 8. LOWER DEPTH LEVEL U &L FOR INTERVAL TO BE CONSIDERED AND STORE IN MEMORY READ CONSTANT PARAMETERS A9,9w,,u- ,AD,O' & MEASURED PARAMETERS Yw & Q FOR INT- ERVAL TO BE CONSIDERED & STORE IN MEMORY I! COMPUTE A? wITH EQ. (a)

7 sET D LowER DEPTH LEvEL L I; READ MEASURED PARAMETERS fw -a QT AT DEPTH LEvEL D 75ACOMPUTE v USING EQ.(7)

COMPUTE cm 8. Q0 wITH EQ5.,(5) & (e) & VALUE OF vs COMPUTED IN 76 PRECEEDING STEP DBY INCREMENT /81 I NCREM ENT INTERVAL INTERVAL TO BE YES COUNTER CONSIDERED BY ONE United States Patent Office 3,705,979 Patented Dec. 12, 1972 3,705,979 METHOD OF PROCESSING PRODUCTION WELL LOGGING DATA Yves Nicolas, Versailles, France, assignor to Schlumberger Technology Corporation, New York, N.Y.

Filed Aug. 11, 1971, Ser. No. 170,806 Claims priority, appligatiorz France, Aug. 12, 1970,

Int. Cl. G061? 15/20; G06g 7/57 ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE In accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, a method is disclosed for processing production logging data in order to determine, in a twophase, water-oil, flow, the flowrate of one of the phases at different depths of a production well. At each depth, data representative of the total flowrate and of the proportion of total cross section of pipe occupied by. one of the phases, designated hold up, is generated. For each depth, the slippagevelocity between the two phases is computed from the data representative of hold up and of a parameter which is a function of the difference in density between the two phases. The flowrate of each phase is then computed from the previously computed values of slippage velocity and from the data representative of total flowrate and hold-up. This method gives precise quantitative data making it possible to determine the operations required to improve the production of the well.

This invention relates to a method for the processing of production logging data and more particularly to a method making it possible to determine the flowrate of each phase of a multiple-phase flow in a production well.

After a wellbore is drilled in the earth, and sufficient quantities of easily'removable oil and/or gas are found, the well is cased and cemented, and perforated at desired depths to produce (bring to the surface) the oil and/or gas. Production logging concerns the measurement of parameters useful in evaluating the well after completion, and particularly, \for evaluating the nature and movement of fluids within the well. e

The fluid flowing in a production well is generally amixture of several phases, water, gas and oil, coming from the different producing layers. One of the purposes of production logging is to determine, at different levels of a production well the nature and the quantity of the phases in the flowing fluid. To accomplish this in the case of two-phase flows, a conventional method is to measure at each of these levels, the total flowrate of the fluid and also the hold-up of each phase. Total flowrate is the instantaneous flow of all fluids within the well and will vary from one depth level to another since most wells are perforated at a number of depth levels thus causing fluid to enter the well at a number of levels. Hold up is the proportion of the total cross section of a well occupied by a given phase. Thus, there can be water hold-up, oil hold-up and gas hold-up.

There are numerous apparatus available for measuring this information. To measure the total flowrate, spinner flowmeters are generally used, in particular as described in copending applications Ser. No. 867,994 filed by Pierfort on'Oct. 21, 1969, and now abandoned, and Ser. No. 872,971 filed by Bonnet on Oct. 31, 1969, now Pat. No. 3,630,078. To obtain the hold-up of each phase, one may for example measure the average density of the flowing fluid either by means of a differential pressure apparatus, called a gradiomanometer, of the,typ ev described in the US. Pat. 3,455,157 issued to Lahye et al. on July-15, 1969, or by means of a vibrating densimeter, in particular as described in the US. Pat. 3,225,588. It is also possible to obtain the composition of the flowing fluid by means of nuclear apparatus of the gamma ray emission type, or in certain cases by average capacitance measurement. Another known method is to combine two of the above sensors. so as to obtain with a single apparatus the total flowrate and the hold-up of each phase.

It may be thought that, from these two quantities, it is simple to determine the relative flowrate of each phase. In fact, in a vertical rising flow, the phases have different velocities, the lighter phase flowing faster than the heavier phase. Consequently, the cu of the phase (i.e. the flowrate of each phase divided by the total flowrate) is different from the measured hold-up. In order to determine the flowrate of each phase, it is necessary to knowanother quantity, for example the slippage velocity, i.e. the difference in velocity between the two phases. It has hitherto been assumed that this slippage velocity is constant along the entire length of the well, and only a function of the density difference between the two phases. When making this assumption for high flowrates, it is possible to obtain reasonably accurate results due to the fact that the slippage velocity remains low in relation to total flowrate for such high flow rates. On the other hand, in the case of low flowrates, the above assumption leads to erroneous results.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to determine with reasonable accuracy the slippage velocity and/or the flowrate of individual phases in a multiple phasic flow for both high and low flow rates.

A further object of the invention is to provide an accurate representation of the nature and of the composition of the fluid produced at different levels of a well.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a method of processing well logging data comprises deriving a measurement representative of the proportion of one phase of a multiple phase flow in a well at a selected depth level and using this derived measurement in conjunction with a predetermined value of the apparent difference in density between the two phases of the multiple phase flow to produce a representation of the difference in velocity between two phases of the multiple phase flow at the selected depth level.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method .of processing well logging data comprises deriving a measurement representative of the proportion of one phase of a multiple phase flow in a well at a selected depth level and deriving a measurement representative of the total rate of flow of the fluid in the well at the selected depth level. These derived measurements are combined to produce a representation of the flow rate of at least one phase of the multiple phase flow at the selected depth level. One of the constants used in producing the representation of flow rate is a predetermined value for the apparent density dilference between the above mentioned two phases. This predetermined value can vary from one well to another, or perhaps even between horizons of one Well.

'The characteristics and advantages of the invention will be better understood through the description to follow given by way of non-limitatiive examples with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of a diphasic flow in a producing well;

FIG. 2 is a plot of the slippage velocity versus the density difference between the two phases of a flowing fluid for different values of water hold-up;

FIG. 3 is a plot of slippage velocity versus their density difference for diiferent values of water hold-up;

FIG. 4 is a chart giving a graphical solution of the method'of the invention;

FIG. 5 is the diagram of circuits for the processing of data in accordance with the method of the invention;

FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a circuit of FIG. 5;

FIG. 6 is a form of presentation of the results obtained by the method of the present invention; and

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram representation of a computer program for processing production logging data in accordance with the present invention.

For a proper understanding of the invention, we shall first establish the equations which relate the different parameters of a diphasic flow. In this connection, referring to 'FIG. 1, a schematic representation is given of a section of a casing of a producing well. In this casing flows a diphasic fluid produced by underground formations and including a heavy phase -11, for example water, and a light phase 12, for example oil. To permit the equations to be formulated, two separate phases are represented, flowing parallel to each other. In reality, the two phases are mixed, one of these phases generally being in the form of bubbles in suspension in the other phase which is called the continuous phase. If Y is the water hold-up, i.e. the ratio between the volume of water in place and the total volume of the fluid, it can be seen that the water flowrate Q and the oil flowrate Q,, are given by the equations:

in which A is the internal area of the cross-section of the casing and V and V are respective fiowrates of the water phase and the oil phase.

Moreover, the total flowrate Q, is given by the equation:

If the quantities Q, and Y can be obtained through measurements in the well, there are three equations with four unknowns, namely Q Q V and V To solve this system of equations, a fourth equation is needed, for example:

in which V is the slippage velocity between the two phases. If this slippage velocity can be determined, we can in fact solve the system of Equations 1 to 4 to obtain Q and Q as follows:

As discussed earlier, it has in the past been assumed that the slippage velocity is constant along the length of the well and only a function of the density dilference between the two phases. Thus, in the past, the density difference would be first determined from density measurements to enable a determination of a value of slippage velocity for the well. To determine this one shot value of slippage velocity for bubble flow, the following equation can be used for bubbles of diameter .1 cm. to 2 cm.:

Flow Systems in vol. 87 of the Journal of Heat Transfer 7 by Zuber and Findley.

After finding the value of V Equations Sand 6 could be solved for Q and Q However, after a great deal of research, it has been found that this assumption of one value of slippage velocity is not always correct. Recent labo y earch has shown tha h lipp g velocit V is a function of both the water hold-up Y and of certain physical properties of the phases such as their density, their viscosity, and the surface tension of the bubbles. More specifically, this research has found that the slippage velocity V is given by the following expression:

p., is the density of water and p is the density of oil.

As it is practically impossible to obtain the value of the surface tension, two possibilities exist for determining the parameter Ap'. One can measure the'density difference A in accordance with Equation 9 at the surface and correct this measuredvalue to take into account the temperature and pressure conditions at the considered depth. This corrected value can be used as the value of the parameter Ap' with the understanding that average values for the interfacial tension 0' and the oil viscosity are being used. The other possibility is to determine the value of the parameter Ap' from surface measurements of the total fiowrate Q, and water flowrate Q and also from a measurement of Y made immediately above the production zone closest to the surface, this measurement Y corresponding to the surface flow. From these values, Q Q and Y one can determine the slippage velocity by using Equation 5. By means of Equation 7, knowing Y and V one can obtain the value of the parameter Ap' applicable over the entire length of the well. This value, which includes the parameter Ap (Equation 8), takes into account the surface tension and the viscosity and probably will not be equal to the actual density difference A between the phases.

FIG. 2 shows Equations 7-9 in graphical form. In FIG. 2, a set of curves 13 to 21 has been plotted, each of which represents, for a given water hold-up, the slippage velocity V as a function ofthe. parameter A given in Equation 8.

From FIG. 2, it is possible to make two observations. It can first of allbe seen that the slippage velocity increases when the density difference increases. Moreover, it is seen that this slippage velocity increases when the water hold-up Y increases. It was hitherto considered that the slippage velocity was constant along the entire length of a producing well, even when the water hold-up varied. The curves of FIGVZ show that this prior method of interpretation gives erroneous results, especially for low flowrates in which the slippage velocity is relatively high compared with the average flowrate of the fluid.

It would perhaps be more useful to represent Equation 7 by a plot of slippage velocity V vs. water hold-up Y for different values of A since a value of Ap' is selected before computing slippage velocity V with measured values of water hold-up Y Using the curves of FIG. 3 and having a predetermined value of A it is possible, in accordance with the present invention, to determine the slippage velocity V with values of water hold-up Y measured by a densimeter or a gradiomanometer. Once this magnitude V has been obtained, it will be easy to determine the flowrates Q and Q, by means of

Equations

5 and 6.

Just as it is possible, from the curves of FIG. 3, to find the equation which relates the slippage velocity to the apparent density difference and to the water hold-up, one can also solve Equations 5 and '6 graphically. In order for this graphical solution to be applicable to all well Casings of any internal area A, a parameter V, called the superficial velocity, and defined as the flow per unit area is used. This superficial velocity is then independent of the dimensions of the casing, and we have:

where the subscripts t, w and have the same meaning as before. Combining

Equations

10, 11 and 12 with Equations and 6, the superficial velocities of the water and oil are then given by the equations:

V =Y V Y (lY V (13) o=( w) t+ w( w) s FIG. 4 represents an alignment chart permitting the graphical solution of the

Equations

13 and 14. This figure represents, from left to right, threeaxes, 23, 24 and 25, on which are located respectively the values 7 'V and V A family of curves 26, corresponding to the different values of A is intersected by vertical lines 27 corresponding to the different values of the water hold-up Y To each value of A there thus corresponds a curve of the family 26 and to each value of Y a point on this curve. If the total superficial velocity V, is known, we need only join this value, located on the axis 23 on the left, to the previously defined point of the curve of the family 26. This line intersects the

axes

24 and 25 at two points which give respectively the sought values of V and V Conversely, by means of the alignment chart of FIG.

4, it is possible to determine the value of the parameter Ap' applicable over the entire length of the well if one knows the values of V V and Y corresponding to the same flow. As the values V and V can be easily determined for the flow at the surface of the well, one need only carry out a measurement of Y in the part of the casing located immediately over the perforations closest to the surface. The line joining the values V and '1 measured on the surface will intersect the vertical line of the abscissa Y at a point defining a curve of the family 29 which corresponds to the sought value of Ap.

From the foregoing, it can be seen that it is possible to determine at different depths the flowrate of the water and oil flowing in the well with oil bubbles in suspension in a continuous water phase. In simple cases, these values may be determined manually, either by calculation, or

graphically, as indicated above. On the other hand, for

more complex cases, it will be necessary to use automatic computation methodsThe method of the invention may be perfectly adapted to automatic calculations performed by a computer for-example. In fact, as all of the relationships between the different parameters are known, calculations may be carried out by means of electronic circuits adapted to automatically process signals representative of the total flowrate Q, and of the water holdup Y FIG. 5 shows such circuits. In FIG. 5, a well tool 33 is supported in a cased well 34 by a cable 35. The well 34 is perforated at a plurality of points 36 such that formation fluid will enter the well at these points. The well tool 33 includes a spinner flowmeter and gradiomanometer to measure the total flowrate Q and mixture density pM of the fluid. From pM the water hold-up Y can be derived from the following expression:

PM (Po) BH where and (p are predetermined values of bottom hole oil density and water density respectively.

The signals from the well tool 33 are applied to signal processing circuits 37 which perform a number of standard operations, such as impedance-matching, calibration correction, etc. The gradiomanometer signal p is applied to a computing circuit 39 which computes the value of water hold-up Y To accomplish this, a signal proportional to (p derived from a potentiometer 41 is subtracted from the p signal by a difference circuit 40 and the resulting signal divided by the constant through the action of a potentiometer 42 to produce Y This Y signal as well as the total flowrate signal Q are applied to a computer circuit 45 to compute Q and Q To accomplish this, the signals proportional to Y and Q are applied to a computer circuit 46 to which is also applied signals representative of the predetermined constants Ap' and p The circuit 46 delivers an output signal proportional to V computed in accordance with Equation 7. The signal Y is also applied to a calculation circuit 47 adapted to deliver an output signal proportional to Y (1Y The

circuits

46 and 47 are connected to the inputs of another calculation circuit 48 to which is applied the value of the area A so as to generate a signal representative of Y (1Y V A. The signal Y and a signal representative of Q, are also applied to a multiplication circuit 49 whose output signal is proportional to Y Q The outputs of the

circuits

48 and 49 are connected to the input of a subtraction circuit 50 which gives the difference of these two input signals; that is,

The signal Q and the signal Q, are applied to a recorder 51 whose movement is proportional to depth by virtue of a wheel 52 coupled to the cable 35 to rotate therewith and driving a mechanical linkage 53 coupled to the film drive of the recorder 51.

FIG. 5A shows how the V computer 46 might be constructed. The measured quantity Y and the predetermined constants A and p are applied to a computation circuit 55 which computes The fourth root of this quantity is taken by a circuit 56, multiplied by 22.5 in a circuit 57. A circuit 58 computes 24(1Y and a circuit 59 takes the third root of this quantity. A difference circuit 60 is responsive to the output signals from

circuits

57 and 59 to produce a signal proportional to V FIG. 6 represents a recording which may be given by the recorder 51. On the left part is a schematic representation of the production well consisting of a casing 61, perforated opposite two

production zones

62 and 63. On the upper part of the casing 61 is fixed the lower end of a production string 64. To the right of this schematic representation there is a zone whose ordinate is graduated in depths and whose abscissa in flowrate units (barrels/day, for example). In this zone a first curve 65 is shown representing the total flowrate Q given for example by a spinner flowmeter. A second curve 66 represents the water flowrate Q calculated in accordance with the method of the invention from the measurements of the flowmeter and a gradiomanometer for example. The zone located between the

curves

65 and 66 thus represents the oil production of the well. By means of such curves, one immediately sees the nature and the composition of the fluid produced by each zone. Thus, for example, the zone 63 is composed of a lower part which produces only water, a middle part which does not produce any fluid and an upper part which produces both water and oil in the proportions of 20% water and oil. These curves thus give precise quantitative information which is directly utilizable and which in particular makes it possible to determine the operations to be performed to improve the production and the efliciency of the well.

Now turning to FIG. 7, there is shown a flow diagram representation of a computer program for practicing the method of the present invention. After the program start, the numerical values in feet of the upper and lower depth levels U and L respectively of the interval for which data is to be processed are read and stored in memory as represented by block 70. Next, the constant parameters Ap, p and AD and the measured parameters Y and Q are read interval L to U, as represented by block 71. (AD is the interval between depth levels to be considered.) Then A is computed from Equation 8 and D, the depth level presently under consideration, is set equal to L. (See blocks 72 and 73.) Next, the measured quantities Y and Q at the presently considered depth level D are read from memory and V is computed in accordance with Equation 7. (See

blocks

74 and 75.) Then, Q and Q are computed using the value of V computed in step 75 as well as the measured values of Y and Q at depth level D and all desired computations are outputted. (See

elements

76 and 77.)

As represented by a decision element 78, it is determined if the last depth level of the interval to be considered has been reached and if not, D is incremented by AD (see element 79) and the program recycles to step 74 to consider the next depth level. If D is U, the program can, if desired, have facility to determine if another interval is to be considered. Otherwise, the program stops at this point, as represented by the dashed line connection between element 78 and element 80. If the program is to be able to consider other depth levels, an interval counter is needed. (See

elements

81 and 82.)

While there have been described what are at present considered to be preferred embodiments of this invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention, and it is, therefore, intended to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

What is claimed is 1. A method of machine processing well logging data, comprising:

deriving a measurement representative of the proportion of one phase of a multiple phase flow in a well at a selected depth level; deriving a measurement representative of the total rate of flow of the fluid in a well at said selected depth level; and

combining with a machine said derived measurements with a predetermined value of the apparent difference in density between two phases of said multiple phase flow to produce a representation of the flow rate of at least one phase of said multiple phase flow at said selected depth level in a well.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of combining includes combining said phase proportion measurement with said predetermined density difference value to compute a representation of the difference in velocity between said two phases, and combining said representation of velocity difference with said derived measurements to produce said flow rate representation.

3. A method of machine processing well logging data to determine in a two phase, water, oil flow through a conduit, the flow rate of at least one phase wherein a value of the apparent difference in density between said water and oil is predetermined before processing data, comprismg:

deriving a measurement representative of the proportion of one phase of said two phase flow in a well at a selected depth level; deriving a measurement representative of the total rate of flow ofthe fluid in a well at said selected depth level; and

combining with a machine said derived measurements with said predetermined density difference value to produce a representation of the flow rate of at least one phase of said two phase flow at said selected depth level in a well.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the step of combining includes combining said phase proportion measurement with said predetermined density difference value to compute a representation of the difference in velocity between said two phases, and combining said representation of velocity difference with said derived measurements to produce said flowrate representation.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said phase proportion measurement is the proportion of water in said two phase flow.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said water proportion measurement Y is combined with said value of density difference A to produce said velocity difference representation V in accordance with the expression:

where X and Z are constants and pW is a predetermined value of the density of water.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said representation V is combined with said fiowrate measurement Q and said water phase proportion measurement Y to produce representations of the flowrate Q of said water phase and the flowrate Q of said oil phase in accordance with the expressions:

where A is the internal area of the cross section of conduit through which said water oil passes.

8. A method of machine processing well logging data, comprising:

deriving a measurement representative of the proportion of one phase of a multiple phase flow in a well at a selected depth level;

using said derived measurement in conjunction with a predetermined value of the apparent difference in density between two phases of said flow to produce with a machine a representation of the difference in velocity between said two phases of said multiple phase flow at said selected depth level in a well.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said two phases are water and oil and said phase proportion measurement is the proportion of water in said two phase flow.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein said water proportion measurement Y is combined with said value of apparent density difference A to produce said velocity difference representation V in accordance with the express1on:

where X and Z are constants and p is a predetermined value of the density of water.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,304,766 2/1967 Hubby 736l.l 3,385,108 5/1968 Rosso 73194 3,488,996 l/l970 Pfrehm 736l.1 3,545,270 12/1970 Chang 73-l94 MALCOLM A. MORRISON, Primary Examiner R. S. DILDINE, IR., Assistant Examiner US. Cl. X.R.

73-6l.1 R, 194 R; 324ll; 444l