US3678233A - Standardized set of compensating filters for mantle-field radiation therapy - Google Patents
Standardized set of compensating filters for mantle-field radiation therapy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3678233A US3678233A US25075A US3678233DA US3678233A US 3678233 A US3678233 A US 3678233A US 25075 A US25075 A US 25075A US 3678233D A US3678233D A US 3678233DA US 3678233 A US3678233 A US 3678233A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- filter
- filter means
- cervical
- supraclavicular
- mantle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000001959 radiotherapy Methods 0.000 title abstract description 9
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 15
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 210000001165 lymph node Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000001370 mediastinum Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 4
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-OUBTZVSYSA-N Cobalt-60 Chemical compound [60Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 208000017604 Hodgkin disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000010747 Hodgkins lymphoma Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001099 axilla Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004980 dosimetry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229920005479 Lucite® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 201000007100 Pharyngitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010040914 Skin reaction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical group [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001678 irradiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002751 lymph Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000430 skin reaction Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000035483 skin reaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000278 spinal cord Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21K—TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
- G21K1/00—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating
- G21K1/10—Scattering devices; Absorbing devices; Ionising radiation filters
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/10—Safety means specially adapted therefor
- A61B6/107—Protection against radiation, e.g. shielding
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N2005/1092—Details
- A61N2005/1095—Elements inserted into the radiation path within the system, e.g. filters or wedges
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N2005/1092—Details
- A61N2005/1096—Elements inserted into the radiation path placed on the patient, e.g. bags, bolus, compensators
Definitions
- the instant invention relates to radiation therapy, and relates particularly to a standardized set of compensating filters to be interposed between a patient and a radiation source during radiation treatment of the mantle-field of the patient.
- the lower mediastinal area tends to be underdosed using this technique as a consequence of (l) the relatively greater tumor depth than for other target volumes, and (2) the inherently lower dose rate at the margin of the field.
- the superficial cervical and supraclavicular lymph nodes receive a markedly higher daily dose than the mid-mediastinal lymph nodes.
- a primary object of the instant invention' is the provision of a standardized set of compensating filters for homogenizing" the tumor dose distribution, both temporal and spatial, for the mantle field.
- This invention provides, in effect, for individualized custom filters, which may be easily and rapidly assembled and which will insure a uniform dosage distribution for individual patients.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic showing of a typical mantle-field illustrating the lung blocks and approximate field margins, the numbered points referring to the data in Table 2 hereinafter;
- FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the treatment position for the mantle-field technique showing the relative positions of the compensating filter, the radiation source, the patient and the lymph nodes;
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a mediastinal filter means according to the instant inventive concepts, a modified embodiment thereof being shown in dotted lines;
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a lateral cervical filter means according to the instant inventive concepts
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an axillary filter means according to the instant inventive concepts
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means according to the instant inventive concepts
- FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a filter holder according to the instant invention, partly broken away for illustrative clarity, and showing in dot-dash lines the position of the various filter means in the assembled relationship;
- FIG. 8 is a perspective view of an assembly of slightly modified filter means according to this invention.
- FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of decrement lines for field sizes greater than 20 cm for the Theratron 80* Tradename of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.) cobalt unit.
- FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of the transmission of Cobalt 60 gamma rays by copper and brass.
- FIG. 1 a schematic illustration of the mantle-field of a patient will be seen, the dashed lines 10 indicating the approximate field margins and the lung blocks being designated as 11. Reference to the numbered points 12-30 will be made hereinafter with respect to Table 2.
- FIG. 2 a schematic illustration of the treatment position for the mantle-field technique of a patient 35 is shown with the source of radiation being designated by the reference numeral 36, the set of compensating filters of the instant invention being designated generally by the reference numeral 38, a platform for conventional field shaping blocks being designated generally by the reference numeral 40, the center of the field on the sternal notch being designated by the reference numeral 42, and the lymph nodes to be treated being designated by the reference numerals 44.
- FIG. 2 there is a significant difference in the relative depth of the lymph nodes in the various anatomic sites.
- a filter holder is designated generally by the reference numeral 50 and is formed of a plastic material having a depression 52 corresponding in shape to the overall outline of the set of compensating filters.
- the filter set includes a mediastinal filter means shown in FIG. 3 and designated generally by the reference numeral 55, a pair of mirror-image lateral cervical filter means, one of which is shown in FIG. 4 and designated generally by the reference numeral 60, a pair of mirror-image axillary filter means, one of which is shown in FIG. 5, and designated generally by the reference numeral 65, and a rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means shown in FIG. 6, and designated generally by the reference numeral 70.
- the location of the individual filter elements in the filter holder 50 is shown by the dot-dash lines in FIG. 7.
- the rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70 as shown in FIG. 6 is generally T-shaped and includes a rnidline cervical portion 72 forming the stem of the T and a pair of mirror-image supraclavicular portions 74 forming the crossbar of the T.
- the rnidline cervical portion 72 of the filter means 70 is the relatively thickest portion of all of the filter elements. The reason for this will be recognized from the showings in FIGS. 1 and 2. First of all, the lymph nodes to be treated by this area are relatively shallow. Additionally, certain of the lymph nodes are directly in line with the center 42 of the radiation field. Those lymph nodes toward the edge of the field, such as in a chin portion of the patient, are somewhat closer to the radiation source 36. Thus, the relative thickness of the midline cervical portion 72 of the filter means 70 compensates for the foregoing conditions, in addition to reducing the radiation dose to the cervical spinal cord.
- the supraclavicular portions 74 of the filter means 70 are relatively thicker than the other filter means, but somewhat thinner than the midline cervical portion 72.
- the supraclavicular portions 74 are between the collar bone of the patient 35 and the radiation source 36, whereby the length of these portions is merely designed to be sufficient to cover the collar bone area.
- the mediastinal filter means 55 is positioned centrally above the cross-bar of the T of the rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70 in the assembled relationship of the filter elements.
- This filter means 55 includes a portion 76 juxtaposed to the cross-bar of the T of the cervical and supraclavicular filter means, which is relatively thicker than the remainder 78 of the mediastinal filter means 55, but relatively thinner than the midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70.
- An even further step 79 shown in dotted lines in FIG. 3, may be provided for certain applications. It will be noted from FIG. 2 that the lymph nodes covered by the mediastinal filter means are located relatively deep with relation to the skin surface, whereby a greater dosage of radiation is necessary to provide uniform treatment.
- the thinner portion 78 of the mediastinal filter means 55 is that portion located toward the edge of the radiation field.
- the lateral cervical filter means 60 includes a relatively thicker portion 80 positioned adjacent the underside of the cross-bar of the T of the rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70 and a relatively thinner portion 82 positioned toward the edge of the radiation field.
- the axillary filter means is relatively thin throughout and is positioned on opposite sides of the mediastinal filter means 55.
- the individual filter means may be milled from solid metallic blocks as in the embodiment of FIGS. 36 or built-up from thin sheets as in the embodiment of FIG. 8 where portions similar to the embodiment of FIGS. 3-6 are designated by the sarne reference numeral followed by the sulfur a.
- the filter means of the instant invention was particularly designed for use with Cobalt 60 teletherapy so as to deliver a homogeneous dose to the various lymph node regions included within the mantle-field tissue volume. Initially, the filters were individually constructed for each patient. After analyzing the characteristics of such custom filters for 64 patients, a standard set of components was designed from which individualized" filters could be easily and rapidly assembled.
- the custom filters for the 64 patients were constructed in the following manner: 2 U4;
- the perpendicular source-to-surface distance (SSD) of to 30 surface points within the mantle-field portal were measured with conventional equipment.
- a tumor depth was arbitrarily assigned to each point following the scheme shown in Table I.
- a relative dose, D, at the tumor depth for each point was calculated from the following:
- the filters were constructed of l/32-inch copper sheet with the thickness for each portion of the filter being determined from the percent transmission and the graph shown in FIG. 10.
- the copper filter was fastened to a 0.25- inch Lucite plate which fit into the filter holder on the Cobalt 60 unit.
- the transmission characteristics of these custom filters were checked using LiF dosimetry in a presdwood phantom. Each point used to determine the filter was checked with dosimeters being placed at the appropriate coordinates (depth, SSD, and distance from the central axis). Dosimetric measurements were made for the following number of points under each filter: five to nine in the mediastinum, five to eight in the midline neck, three in each axilla and each side of the neck, and two in each supraclavicular region. On the average, the tumor dose at the various points under the filter was 4,000: I65 rads with an intended uniform tumor dose of 4,000 rads.
- the subfilters are combined in an appropriate manner for each patient to form a composite filter as schematically illustrated in FIG. 7.
- a semi-customized compensating filter can be assembled rapidly for each individual patient with a standard set of components. It has been demonstrated with LiF dosimetry that these standard filters produce as homogeneous a dose distribution as the more laboriously constructed custom filters.
- Table 2 summarizes a representative dose-distribution measured in a Machlet-Alderson Rando Phantom Man with thermoluminescent dosimeters. The points selected for measurement are those schematically illustrated in FIG. 1, using the tumor depths given in Table I.
- the recess 52 in the filter holder 50 is approximately onesixteenth inch with a small plastic locator shown in dotted lines at 85 being used with the mediastinum filter means 55 since these elements vary in length.
- a variety of treatment port arrangements may be used for irradiation of the mantle-field.
- a single anterior field tends to overdose the anterior mediastinal structures, including the heart, although the cervical, supraclavicular and axillary regions can be satisfactorily irradiated through an anterior field only, particularly when the am are extended over the head to expose the axillae.
- a second option is the use of parallel opposing mantle-fields which requires alternating the patient between the supine and prone positions for successive treatments. This can be accomplished but requires considerable care to obtain perfect matching of the anterior and posterior fields. It has been found relatively simpler to treat the entire mantle-field through an anterior field except for the mediastinum which on alternate days is irradiated through a posterior port. This permits the patient to remain in a supine position and takes advantage of the isocentric mount on the Theratron for precise matching of the anterior and posterior mediastinal ports.
- a shrinking field technique is usually used, whereby the field size is appropriately reduced as the desired tumor dose to different lymph node areas is reached.
- the timedose relationship to different areas varies considerably.
- the compensating filter of this invention all nodal areas receive the desired tumor dose at the same dose rate. This has resulted in visibly more uniform skin reactions and has improved patient tolerance to treatment, especially by reducing the radiation pharyngitis caused by intensive dose fractions to the cervical region.
- Introduction of these compensating filters into routine use has not compromised the therapeutic effectiveness in any manner.
- Over an extended period, during which 80 patients with Hodgkin's disease have been treated with the use of the compensating filters of this invention only one recurrence has developed within the treated field. This recurrence was observed at the margin of the treated area and was quite likely the result of underdosage due to sub-optimal field placement.
- a clinical radiotheraphy device for mantle field irradiation comprising a set of compensating filters to be interposed between a patient and a radiation source, said set of compensating filters including a filter holder, and a plurality of individual filter elements, selected filter elements being combined and supported by said filter holder to simultaneously provide selected portions of the mantle-field of a patient with different predetermined, reproducible, radiation dosages, said individual filter elements including lateral cervical filter means, rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means, axillary filter means and mediastinal filter means, said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means being generally T- shaped including a midline cervical portion fomiing the stem of the T and a pair of mirror-image supraclavicular portions forming the crossbar of the T, said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means being relatively thicker than the remainder of said filter means.
- said filter holder is formed of plastic and includes a recessed portion corresponding in shape to the overall outline of said set of compensating filters.
- said lateral cervical filter means comprises a pair of mirror-image lateral cervical filter members positioned on opposite sides of said midline cervical portion in said filter holder, said lateral cervical filter members each including a portion juxtaposed to said supraclavicular portions of said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means which is relatively thicker than the remainder of said lateral cervical filter members.
- said mediastinal filter means is positioned centrally of the crossbar of the T of said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means on the side of said crossbar opposite to the stem of the T, said mediastinal filter means including a portion juxtaposed to the crossbar of the T of said cervical and supraclavicular filter means which is relatively thicker than the remainder of said mediastinal filter means.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radiation-Therapy Devices (AREA)
Abstract
A standardized set of compensating filters for ''''mantle-field'''' radiotherapy. The set of compensating filters is supported in a filter-holder interposed between the radiation source and the patient and includes a plurality of individual filter elements which are selectively combined to provide the various portions of the mantle-field of the patient with a predetermined, reproducible radiation dosage.
Description
O United States Patent [151 3,678,233 Faw et al. [451 July 18, 1972 [54] STANDARDIZED SET OF [56] References Cited COMPENSATING FILTERS FOR UNITED STATES PA NT S MANTLE-FIELD RADIATION THERAPY TE 2,405,444 8/1946 Moreau ..250/86 1 Inventors Frederick Faw, vlenna Va; Ralph 3,24s,s47 4/1966 Van De Geijn Johnson, Rockville, Md.; Constance A. warren; Ithaca, Dwight Glenn, Primary Examiner-James W. Lawrence Adelphl, Assistant Examiner-C. E. Church 73 Assignee: The United States of America as stem represented by the Secretary of Health Education and Welfare [57] ABSTRACT A standardized set of compensating filters for mantle-field" [22] Flled' 1970 radiotherapy. The set of compensating filters is supported in a [21] Appl. No.: 25,075 filter-holder interposed between the radiation source and the patient and includes a plurality of individual filter elements which are selectively combined to provide the various por- [52] US. Cl ..250/86, 250/105 tions of the manfle field of the patient i a predetermined, [5 l Int. Cl. ..H05g 3/00 reproducible radiation dosage [58] Field of Search ..250/86 5 Clains, 10 Drawing Figures PATENTED JUL 1 8 m2 SHEET 2 BF 3 1611/ /45 Jax/lvso/v STANDARDIZED SET OF COMPENSATING FILTEQS FOR MAN'ILE-FIELD RADIATION THERAPY The instant invention relates to radiation therapy, and relates particularly to a standardized set of compensating filters to be interposed between a patient and a radiation source during radiation treatment of the mantle-field of the patient.
The use of wide-field techniques in clinical radiotherapy frequently results in considerable tumor dose inhomogeneity because, in part, of the variation in physical characteristics of the irradiated volumes. Such a situation is exemplified by the so-called mantle-field which is widely employed in the treatment of Hodgkins disease. Although shielding of normal uninvolved tissues, such as the lung, has received attention, detailed consideration of the tumor dose inhomogeneities using this technique has not been adequately dealt with. There is a marked difierence in the relative depth of the critical tumor volumes, that is, the lymph noda, in various anatomic sites. The dose distribution is further complicated by the nonnormal incidence of the radiations on the patient as produced by the irregular surfaces included in the mantle field treatment portal. In general the lower mediastinal area tends to be underdosed using this technique as a consequence of (l) the relatively greater tumor depth than for other target volumes, and (2) the inherently lower dose rate at the margin of the field. Conversely, the superficial cervical and supraclavicular lymph nodes receive a markedly higher daily dose than the mid-mediastinal lymph nodes.
Both beam modifying and compensating filters have been used in clinical radiology heretofore. With the advent of megavoltage radiotherapy, compensating filters often replaced bolus so that skin sparing could be preserved.
A primary object of the instant invention'is the provision of a standardized set of compensating filters for homogenizing" the tumor dose distribution, both temporal and spatial, for the mantle field. This invention provides, in effect, for individualized custom filters, which may be easily and rapidly assembled and which will insure a uniform dosage distribution for individual patients.
Other objects and advantages of the instant invention will be seen by reference to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic showing of a typical mantle-field illustrating the lung blocks and approximate field margins, the numbered points referring to the data in Table 2 hereinafter;
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the treatment position for the mantle-field technique showing the relative positions of the compensating filter, the radiation source, the patient and the lymph nodes;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a mediastinal filter means according to the instant inventive concepts, a modified embodiment thereof being shown in dotted lines;
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a lateral cervical filter means according to the instant inventive concepts;
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an axillary filter means according to the instant inventive concepts;
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means according to the instant inventive concepts;
FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a filter holder according to the instant invention, partly broken away for illustrative clarity, and showing in dot-dash lines the position of the various filter means in the assembled relationship;
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of an assembly of slightly modified filter means according to this invention;
FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of decrement lines for field sizes greater than 20 cm for the Theratron 80* Tradename of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.) cobalt unit; and
FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of the transmission of Cobalt 60 gamma rays by copper and brass.
Like reference characters refer to like parts throughout the several view of the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIG. 1, a schematic illustration of the mantle-field of a patient will be seen, the dashed lines 10 indicating the approximate field margins and the lung blocks being designated as 11. Reference to the numbered points 12-30 will be made hereinafter with respect to Table 2.
In FIG. 2, a schematic illustration of the treatment position for the mantle-field technique of a patient 35 is shown with the source of radiation being designated by the reference numeral 36, the set of compensating filters of the instant invention being designated generally by the reference numeral 38, a platform for conventional field shaping blocks being designated generally by the reference numeral 40, the center of the field on the sternal notch being designated by the reference numeral 42, and the lymph nodes to be treated being designated by the reference numerals 44. As will be seen by FIG. 2, there is a significant difference in the relative depth of the lymph nodes in the various anatomic sites.
As will be also seen from FIG. 2, there is a marked difference in the source-to-surface (skin) distance at various points in the mantle-field as well as a difference in radiation due to the distance of a given anatomic point from the center 42 of the field. The instant inventive concepts compensate for each of the foregoing parameters.
Referring now to FIG. 7, a filter holder according to this invention is designated generally by the reference numeral 50 and is formed of a plastic material having a depression 52 corresponding in shape to the overall outline of the set of compensating filters. The filter set includes a mediastinal filter means shown in FIG. 3 and designated generally by the reference numeral 55, a pair of mirror-image lateral cervical filter means, one of which is shown in FIG. 4 and designated generally by the reference numeral 60, a pair of mirror-image axillary filter means, one of which is shown in FIG. 5, and designated generally by the reference numeral 65, and a rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means shown in FIG. 6, and designated generally by the reference numeral 70. The location of the individual filter elements in the filter holder 50 is shown by the dot-dash lines in FIG. 7.
The rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70 as shown in FIG. 6 is generally T-shaped and includes a rnidline cervical portion 72 forming the stem of the T and a pair of mirror-image supraclavicular portions 74 forming the crossbar of the T.
The rnidline cervical portion 72 of the filter means 70 is the relatively thickest portion of all of the filter elements. The reason for this will be recognized from the showings in FIGS. 1 and 2. First of all, the lymph nodes to be treated by this area are relatively shallow. Additionally, certain of the lymph nodes are directly in line with the center 42 of the radiation field. Those lymph nodes toward the edge of the field, such as in a chin portion of the patient, are somewhat closer to the radiation source 36. Thus, the relative thickness of the midline cervical portion 72 of the filter means 70 compensates for the foregoing conditions, in addition to reducing the radiation dose to the cervical spinal cord.
The supraclavicular portions 74 of the filter means 70 are relatively thicker than the other filter means, but somewhat thinner than the midline cervical portion 72. The supraclavicular portions 74 are between the collar bone of the patient 35 and the radiation source 36, whereby the length of these portions is merely designed to be sufficient to cover the collar bone area.
The mediastinal filter means 55 is positioned centrally above the cross-bar of the T of the rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70 in the assembled relationship of the filter elements. This filter means 55 includes a portion 76 juxtaposed to the cross-bar of the T of the cervical and supraclavicular filter means, which is relatively thicker than the remainder 78 of the mediastinal filter means 55, but relatively thinner than the midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70. An even further step 79, shown in dotted lines in FIG. 3, may be provided for certain applications. It will be noted from FIG. 2 that the lymph nodes covered by the mediastinal filter means are located relatively deep with relation to the skin surface, whereby a greater dosage of radiation is necessary to provide uniform treatment. The thinner portion 78 of the mediastinal filter means 55 is that portion located toward the edge of the radiation field.
Similarly, the lateral cervical filter means 60 includes a relatively thicker portion 80 positioned adjacent the underside of the cross-bar of the T of the rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means 70 and a relatively thinner portion 82 positioned toward the edge of the radiation field.
Finally, the axillary filter means is relatively thin throughout and is positioned on opposite sides of the mediastinal filter means 55.
The individual filter means may be milled from solid metallic blocks as in the embodiment of FIGS. 36 or built-up from thin sheets as in the embodiment of FIG. 8 where portions similar to the embodiment of FIGS. 3-6 are designated by the sarne reference numeral followed by the sulfur a.
The filter means of the instant invention was particularly designed for use with Cobalt 60 teletherapy so as to deliver a homogeneous dose to the various lymph node regions included within the mantle-field tissue volume. Initially, the filters were individually constructed for each patient. After analyzing the characteristics of such custom filters for 64 patients, a standard set of components was designed from which individualized" filters could be easily and rapidly assembled.
The custom filters for the 64 patients were constructed in the following manner: 2 U4;
The perpendicular source-to-surface distance (SSD) of to 30 surface points within the mantle-field portal were measured with conventional equipment. A tumor depth was arbitrarily assigned to each point following the scheme shown in Table I.
TABLE 1 Lymph Node Depths in the Mantle-field* Area Depth from anterior surface One-half the anteroposterior diameter Two-thirds the anteroposterior diameter One-half the anteroposterior diameter Mediastinum Neck (Midline) Neck (Lateral) supraclavicular Axillae The arbitrarily assigned tumor depths are for our technique of irradiating the mantle-field through an anterior treatment portal except for the mediastinum which is irradiated through a posterior portal on alternate days.
A relative dose, D, at the tumor depth for each point was calculated from the following:
Transmission 100 X D/D where D is the relative dose for the point and D is the minimum relative dose of all points. In nearly every instance, D refers to the relative dose at the lower margin of the mediastinurn. The filters were constructed of l/32-inch copper sheet with the thickness for each portion of the filter being determined from the percent transmission and the graph shown in FIG. 10. The copper filter was fastened to a 0.25- inch Lucite plate which fit into the filter holder on the Cobalt 60 unit.
The transmission characteristics of these custom filters were checked using LiF dosimetry in a presdwood phantom. Each point used to determine the filter was checked with dosimeters being placed at the appropriate coordinates (depth, SSD, and distance from the central axis). Dosimetric measurements were made for the following number of points under each filter: five to nine in the mediastinum, five to eight in the midline neck, three in each axilla and each side of the neck, and two in each supraclavicular region. On the average, the tumor dose at the various points under the filter was 4,000: I65 rads with an intended uniform tumor dose of 4,000 rads.
The information collected in designing these 64 custom filters was then reviewed and four anatomic areas were identified for purposes of detemrining the measurement ranges. For each of the four anatomic areas, namely the rnidline cervical-supraclavicular, lateral neck, axillary, and mediastinal areas, a set of subfilters was constructed to encompass the range of measurements encountered in the 64 custom filters. These subfilters have been constructed of brass which has nearly the same absorption coefficient as copper but better machining properties, (See FIG. 10), although other easily machinable metals may be used with appropriate alterations in thickness, depending on the absorption coefficient.
The subfilters are combined in an appropriate manner for each patient to form a composite filter as schematically illustrated in FIG. 7. In this fashion, a semi-customized compensating filter can be assembled rapidly for each individual patient with a standard set of components. It has been demonstrated with LiF dosimetry that these standard filters produce as homogeneous a dose distribution as the more laboriously constructed custom filters. Table 2 summarizes a representative dose-distribution measured in a Machlet-Alderson Rando Phantom Man with thermoluminescent dosimeters. The points selected for measurement are those schematically illustrated in FIG. 1, using the tumor depths given in Table I.
The numbers refer to the points shown schematically in FIG. 1.
The requirement for using these standard compensating filters for mantle-field radiotherapy is adherence to a consistent treatment plan. The center of the field (central axis) must be precisely reproducible for each patient, so that the break in filter thickness between the lower mid-cervical and mediastinal filter means will remain centered over the sternal notch. Likewise, the filters have been designed for placement in a filter holder located 45 cm from the source. For other relative filter locations between the source and patient, as well as for other treatment distances, the filter means need only have their size adjusted, the scaling easily being done using the similar triangles concept from plane geometry.
Exemplary dimensions for the individual filter means are shown in Table 3, the dimensions given being in inches:
TABLE 3 *Case C =Case B plus step 79 ill 6 3l4 2 3/4 For Case A: For Case B: For Case C:
Lateral Ceruical Filter Means Identification II 1/ 32 111 IV V V1 i,=2; i,=3 i -Z 7/ 16;'
Height, 11,
Axilla Filter Means Height, )1 Identification 0 1/32 l/ l 6 3/32 l/8 5/32 \a an e-:
Midline Cervical and Supraclavicular Filter Means Height, It
Identification Filter Holder i =9 l/4 i =l 0 H2 It is to be understood that the above dimensions are illustrative of a preferred set of compensating filters for the mantlefield, according to the instant inventive concepts. It will be noted that a total of 32 separate elements are provided with the lateral cervical and axillary filter means being made to form pairs.
The recess 52 in the filter holder 50 is approximately onesixteenth inch with a small plastic locator shown in dotted lines at 85 being used with the mediastinum filter means 55 since these elements vary in length.
Heretofore, the construction of individual custom filters from the mantle-field technique required a considerable amount of time. The entire procedure took several hours including measurement of the patients contour, calculation of thickness and design of the filter, reduction in size for beam divergence, and final construction. Utilizing the standardized set of filters of the instant invention, individualized" compensating filters can be assembled in about 15 minutes, including the time for patient measurement. The only measurement required to select the correct individual filter elements for specific patients are four antero-posterior patient thicknesses and two source-surface distances at preselected points in the field. It has been found that the required standardization of the treatment, such as centering the field at a uniform location, is not a constraint to the radiotherapist. Rather, stan dardization has tended to facilitate the daily reproduction of accurate treatment conditions for the medial and technical stafi alike.
A variety of treatment port arrangements may be used for irradiation of the mantle-field. A single anterior field tends to overdose the anterior mediastinal structures, including the heart, although the cervical, supraclavicular and axillary regions can be satisfactorily irradiated through an anterior field only, particularly when the am are extended over the head to expose the axillae. A second option is the use of parallel opposing mantle-fields which requires alternating the patient between the supine and prone positions for successive treatments. This can be accomplished but requires considerable care to obtain perfect matching of the anterior and posterior fields. It has been found relatively simpler to treat the entire mantle-field through an anterior field except for the mediastinum which on alternate days is irradiated through a posterior port. This permits the patient to remain in a supine position and takes advantage of the isocentric mount on the Theratron for precise matching of the anterior and posterior mediastinal ports.
Unless compensating filters are used, a shrinking field technique is usually used, whereby the field size is appropriately reduced as the desired tumor dose to different lymph node areas is reached. With this technique, the timedose relationship to different areas varies considerably. With the compensating filter of this invention, all nodal areas receive the desired tumor dose at the same dose rate. This has resulted in visibly more uniform skin reactions and has improved patient tolerance to treatment, especially by reducing the radiation pharyngitis caused by intensive dose fractions to the cervical region. Introduction of these compensating filters into routine use has not compromised the therapeutic effectiveness in any manner. Over an extended period, during which 80 patients with Hodgkin's disease have been treated with the use of the compensating filters of this invention, only one recurrence has developed within the treated field. This recurrence was observed at the margin of the treated area and was quite likely the result of underdosage due to sub-optimal field placement.
Thus, it will now be seen that there is herein provided a standardized set of compensating filters for use in radiation treatment of the mantle-field which provides all the advantages set forth hereinabove, and others which will be readily recognized by those skilled in the art. Accordingly,
What is claimed is:
l. A clinical radiotheraphy device for mantle field irradiation comprising a set of compensating filters to be interposed between a patient and a radiation source, said set of compensating filters including a filter holder, and a plurality of individual filter elements, selected filter elements being combined and supported by said filter holder to simultaneously provide selected portions of the mantle-field of a patient with different predetermined, reproducible, radiation dosages, said individual filter elements including lateral cervical filter means, rnidline cervical and supraclavicular filter means, axillary filter means and mediastinal filter means, said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means being generally T- shaped including a midline cervical portion fomiing the stem of the T and a pair of mirror-image supraclavicular portions forming the crossbar of the T, said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means being relatively thicker than the remainder of said filter means.
2. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said individual filter elements are formed of brass.
3. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said filter holder is formed of plastic and includes a recessed portion corresponding in shape to the overall outline of said set of compensating filters.
4. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said lateral cervical filter means comprises a pair of mirror-image lateral cervical filter members positioned on opposite sides of said midline cervical portion in said filter holder, said lateral cervical filter members each including a portion juxtaposed to said supraclavicular portions of said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means which is relatively thicker than the remainder of said lateral cervical filter members.
5. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said mediastinal filter means is positioned centrally of the crossbar of the T of said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means on the side of said crossbar opposite to the stem of the T, said mediastinal filter means including a portion juxtaposed to the crossbar of the T of said cervical and supraclavicular filter means which is relatively thicker than the remainder of said mediastinal filter means.
Claims (5)
1. A clinical radiotheraphy device for mantle field irradiation comprising a set of compensating filters to be interposed between a patient and a radiation source, said set of compensating filters including a filter holder, and a plurality of individual filter elements, selected filter elements being combined and supported by said filter holder to simultaneously provide selected portions of the mantle-field of a patient with different predetermined, reproducible, radiation dosages, said Individual filter elements including lateral cervical filter means, midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means, axillary filter means and mediastinal filter means, said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means being generally T-shaped including a midline cervical portion forming the stem of the T and a pair of mirror-image supraclavicular portions forming the crossbar of the T, said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means being relatively thicker than the remainder of said filter means.
2. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said individual filter elements are formed of brass.
3. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said filter holder is formed of plastic and includes a recessed portion corresponding in shape to the overall outline of said set of compensating filters.
4. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said lateral cervical filter means comprises a pair of mirror-image lateral cervical filter members positioned on opposite sides of said midline cervical portion in said filter holder, said lateral cervical filter members each including a portion juxtaposed to said supraclavicular portions of said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means which is relatively thicker than the remainder of said lateral cervical filter members.
5. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said mediastinal filter means is positioned centrally of the crossbar of the T of said midline cervical and supraclavicular filter means on the side of said crossbar opposite to the stem of the T, said mediastinal filter means including a portion juxtaposed to the crossbar of the T of said cervical and supraclavicular filter means which is relatively thicker than the remainder of said mediastinal filter means.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US2507570A | 1970-04-02 | 1970-04-02 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3678233A true US3678233A (en) | 1972-07-18 |
Family
ID=21823916
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US25075A Expired - Lifetime US3678233A (en) | 1970-04-02 | 1970-04-02 | Standardized set of compensating filters for mantle-field radiation therapy |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3678233A (en) |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3917954A (en) * | 1973-11-09 | 1975-11-04 | Gundersen Clinic Ltd | External x-ray beam flattening filter |
JPS5186698A (en) * | 1975-01-28 | 1976-07-29 | Masaki Nabeyama | HOSHORO KABAN |
US4020356A (en) * | 1974-04-10 | 1977-04-26 | Scanditronix, Instrument Ab | Absorption body |
DE2816015A1 (en) * | 1977-04-25 | 1978-10-26 | Philips Nv | ROENTINE PIPE |
US4246488A (en) * | 1979-03-09 | 1981-01-20 | Picker Corporation | Radiation collimator |
US4266139A (en) * | 1980-01-07 | 1981-05-05 | Louis Sportelli | Composite shielding means and mounting means for x-ray machines |
US4286167A (en) * | 1979-05-14 | 1981-08-25 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Multi-element X-ray equalizing filter |
EP0173757A1 (en) * | 1983-03-04 | 1986-03-12 | STB Strahlentechnische Bilddiagnostik Heinz Fleck | Apron-like mask for X-ray photography |
US4707846A (en) * | 1985-06-12 | 1987-11-17 | Louis Sportelli | Full spine shielding means |
US5056128A (en) * | 1989-04-17 | 1991-10-08 | George Thompson | X-ray filtration apparatus |
US6381304B1 (en) * | 2000-08-17 | 2002-04-30 | S&S X-Ray Products, Inc. | Machinable plastic compensator filter |
US20030086527A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-08 | Speiser Burton L | Radiation modulating apparatus and methods therefore |
US20040015073A1 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2004-01-22 | Michael Schell | Target repositioning error correction filter and method |
EP0695560B1 (en) * | 1994-05-17 | 2004-08-04 | Nomos Corporation | Apparatus for conformal radiation therapy |
US20090200476A1 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2009-08-13 | Caterina Brusasco | Dosimetry device for verification of a radiation therapy apparatus |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2405444A (en) * | 1942-08-05 | 1946-08-06 | Moreau Santiago | Radiographic filter |
US3248547A (en) * | 1963-10-21 | 1966-04-26 | Picker X Ray Corp | Device for accurately positioning X-ray filters in the beam path |
-
1970
- 1970-04-02 US US25075A patent/US3678233A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2405444A (en) * | 1942-08-05 | 1946-08-06 | Moreau Santiago | Radiographic filter |
US3248547A (en) * | 1963-10-21 | 1966-04-26 | Picker X Ray Corp | Device for accurately positioning X-ray filters in the beam path |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3917954A (en) * | 1973-11-09 | 1975-11-04 | Gundersen Clinic Ltd | External x-ray beam flattening filter |
US4020356A (en) * | 1974-04-10 | 1977-04-26 | Scanditronix, Instrument Ab | Absorption body |
JPS5186698A (en) * | 1975-01-28 | 1976-07-29 | Masaki Nabeyama | HOSHORO KABAN |
DE2816015A1 (en) * | 1977-04-25 | 1978-10-26 | Philips Nv | ROENTINE PIPE |
US4246488A (en) * | 1979-03-09 | 1981-01-20 | Picker Corporation | Radiation collimator |
US4286167A (en) * | 1979-05-14 | 1981-08-25 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Multi-element X-ray equalizing filter |
US4266139A (en) * | 1980-01-07 | 1981-05-05 | Louis Sportelli | Composite shielding means and mounting means for x-ray machines |
EP0173757A1 (en) * | 1983-03-04 | 1986-03-12 | STB Strahlentechnische Bilddiagnostik Heinz Fleck | Apron-like mask for X-ray photography |
US4707846A (en) * | 1985-06-12 | 1987-11-17 | Louis Sportelli | Full spine shielding means |
US5056128A (en) * | 1989-04-17 | 1991-10-08 | George Thompson | X-ray filtration apparatus |
EP0695560B1 (en) * | 1994-05-17 | 2004-08-04 | Nomos Corporation | Apparatus for conformal radiation therapy |
US6381304B1 (en) * | 2000-08-17 | 2002-04-30 | S&S X-Ray Products, Inc. | Machinable plastic compensator filter |
US20030086527A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-08 | Speiser Burton L | Radiation modulating apparatus and methods therefore |
WO2003039672A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-15 | Radiation Systems Of Arizona, Llc | Radiation modulating apparatus and methods therefor |
US20040015073A1 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2004-01-22 | Michael Schell | Target repositioning error correction filter and method |
US20090200476A1 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2009-08-13 | Caterina Brusasco | Dosimetry device for verification of a radiation therapy apparatus |
US8338783B2 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2012-12-25 | Ion Beam Applications S.A. | Dosimetry device for verification of a radiation therapy apparatus |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3678233A (en) | Standardized set of compensating filters for mantle-field radiation therapy | |
Fraass et al. | Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation | |
Wu et al. | Physics of gamma knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery | |
Khan et al. | Clinical and dosimetric implications of air gaps between bolus and skin surface during radiation therapy | |
Sasaoka et al. | Dosimetric evaluation of whole breast radiotherapy using field-in-field technique in early-stage breast cancer | |
Fontenla et al. | Effects of beam modifiers and immobilization devices on the dose in the build-up region | |
Sripathi et al. | Cardiac dose reduction with deep-inspiratory breath hold technique of radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer | |
Karlsson et al. | Matching of electron and photon beams with a multi-leaf collimator | |
Jo et al. | Dosimetric evaluation of the skin-sparing effects of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left breast cancer | |
Yu et al. | Extracranial radiation doses in patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery | |
Antolak et al. | Fetal dose estimates for electron‐beam treatment to the chest wall of a pregnant patient | |
Hasanzadeh et al. | Assessment of absorbed dose to thyroid, parotid and ovaries in patients undergoing Gamma Knife radiosurgery | |
Tait | Conformal therapy. | |
Linthout et al. | Evaluation of dose calculation algorithms for dynamic arc treatments of head and neck tumors | |
Murali et al. | Monte Carlo and ray tracing algorithms in the cyberknife treatment planning for lung tumours-comparison and validation | |
Yaparpalvi et al. | Improved dose homogeneity in scalp irradiation using a single set-up point and different energy electron beams | |
US7151252B2 (en) | Radiation phantom with humanoid shape and adjustable thickness | |
Mamballikalam et al. | Time motion study to evaluate the impact of flattening filter free beam on overall treatment time for frameless intracranial radiosurgery using Varian TrueBeam® linear accelerator | |
Meurk et al. | Phantom dosimetry study of shaped Cobalt-60 fields in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease | |
FAW et al. | A STANDARD SET OF" INDIVIDUALIZED" COMPENSATING FILTERS FOR MANTLE FIELD RADIOTHERAPY OF HODGKIN’S DISEASE | |
Datta et al. | Dosimetry study of split beam technique using megavoltage beams and its clinical implications—I megavoltage beams and its clinical implications—I: 60Co beam, head and neck tumors | |
Castro-Vita et al. | Cerebellar medulloblastoma: spread and failure patterns following irradiation | |
Diamantopoulos et al. | In vivo dosimetry in the field junction area for 3D-conformal radiation therapy in breast and head & neck cancer cases: A quality assurance study | |
Kongsa et al. | Improvement of matching fields using coplanar field border method in postmastectomy radiotherapy | |
Saeb et al. | Evaluation of targeted image-guided radiation therapy treatment planning system by use of american association of physicists in medicine task group-119 test cases |