US3379552A - Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene - Google Patents

Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3379552A
US3379552A US323891A US32389163A US3379552A US 3379552 A US3379552 A US 3379552A US 323891 A US323891 A US 323891A US 32389163 A US32389163 A US 32389163A US 3379552 A US3379552 A US 3379552A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
thread
dacron
teflon
suture
silk
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US323891A
Inventor
Kurtz Leonard David
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sutures Inc
Original Assignee
Sutures Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sutures Inc filed Critical Sutures Inc
Priority to US323891A priority Critical patent/US3379552A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3379552A publication Critical patent/US3379552A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L17/00Materials for surgical sutures or for ligaturing blood vessels ; Materials for prostheses or catheters
    • A61L17/14Post-treatment to improve physical properties
    • A61L17/145Coating

Definitions

  • Unite ABSTRACT UP THE BIfiCLOSURE A process for modifying polyester threads, primarily surgical sutures comprising first hot stretching the polyester thread, impregnating the stretched thread with particles of polytetrafluoroethylene, and removing excess polytetrafiuoroethylene. The knotting characteristics of thread in this manner are considerably improved.
  • the present invention relates to an improved thread and a process for preparing a thread. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved surgical suture.
  • Silk as a surgical suture, is well known. Although silk is widely used as a suture, other fibres which have certain superior properties have been suggested. Dacron, a terephthalic acid polyester braided fibre, has been suggested and is now widely used. Sutures made of this polyester fibre are stronger than silk, are waterproof, and have a very low degree of reaction within the body. Because the polyfilamentous polyester suture has greater strength than a silk suture of the same diameter, the surgeon could use the Dacron polyester suture and have a greater assurance against breakage in use. He also could use a finer size suture than could be employed using silk. These and other advantages accrue when polyester is substituted for silk.
  • Dacron United States Patent Another disadvantage of Dacron is its relatively high co-eflicient of friction on its surface.
  • a surgeon ordinarily forms a surgeons knot or a simple knot above a tissue opening in the process of coapting the surface. In pulling the ends of the suture together, the knot slides down and draws the tissues together. Because of the stiffness of the Dacron, there is usually a considerable springback when the pressure of the pulling subsides and the surgeon must then push down the knot which has partly opened on forming of the succeeding knots. With Dacron, this is not easily accomplished. On sliding a second simple knot down onto the preceding knots, the preceding knot does not go back to its original position and coapting the tissues becomes clumsy or impossible.
  • the Dacron thread is impregnated with Teflon which is then run over a hot-stretch machine at temperatures of about 450 F.
  • Teflon which is then run over a hot-stretch machine at temperatures of about 450 F.
  • a series of rollers are used in this process. It seemed possible that the stretch under tension over a series of rollers might have the effect of spreading the Teflon over the surface of the Dacron thus decreasing the exposed Dacron surface. It would, therefore, seem desirable to impregnate the Dacron thread with Teflon and avoid any process which would tend to spread the Teion over the surface of the Dacron.
  • Example I Dacron polyester fibre was braided into a polyfilamentous suture on a New England Butt braider machine.
  • This machine is a well known braider and has 8 or 12. carriers in readily available models. Any type of braider will, of course, be suitable. Such machines, by varying the number of individual fibres and tensions, can provide a wide variety of sutures.
  • a finished Dacron braid can be made having a weight of from about 1,700 yards per pound to about 28,000 yards per pound.
  • a braided polyester thread is then hot-stretched by pulling the thread, under tension, over a heated platen maintained at a temperature of about 450 F. This operation serves to substantially reduce elasticity and eliminate memory (that tendency of the fibre to return to its original length.) While elongation may vary from about 10 to percent, a braid prefered for surgical use will usually be stretched about 40% during the process. Any suitable device providing the necessary tension and heat is suitable for this step.
  • the thread stretched about 40 to 50 percent is then gathered into a skein and immersed in a suspension of small Teflon particles in a dispersing medium. Agitation and/or a wetting agent may be employed to prevent settling of the Teflon particles.
  • a preferred embodiment consists of a dispersion of Teflon particles in the size range of about 0.5 micron dispersed in water with the aid of a wetting agent.
  • a suitable blend is readily available as duPont blend 2510 which contains about 58% Teflon particles by weight in water.
  • Triton X-l00 (Rohm and Haas) is a suitable wetting agent.
  • the amount of Teflon in the suspension can vary widely but the commercially available blend of about 58% by weight solids is suitable.
  • a skein of thread is kept immersed in the Teflon dispersion for a time sufficient for the discrete particles to permeate into the interstices of the thread. If the skein is very large or tightly wound, a longer time should be allowed. For skeins weighing up to 50 lbs, an immersion time of 15 minutes has been found to be more than adequate. The weight pick up, measured after final proces sing, has been found to cease much prior to the 15 minutes allowed.
  • a skein is placed in a wringer which comprises a pair of opposed rolls.
  • the function of the wringer is to remove the excess Teflon from the thread and should be accomplished rapidly. If the process is not well controlled, considerable Teflon will deposit on the surface of the sutures. To prevent this excess deposition of Teflon on the sutures, the skein must be kept wet during the process of extraction and the extraction should be quickly accomplished.
  • the skein of thread is then removed and wound as a final product.
  • the thread is approximately 6% heavier than originally. In actual practice, for a given thread, weight increases of from 5 to 7 percent (approximately) are obtainable.
  • Example II The same thread and equipment employed in Example I were treated as in Example I except that the stretching step was carried out in two distinct operations.
  • the thread was cold-stretched at room temperature to approximately 25% elongation. This step is conveniently carried out on a separate stretching device which has no provision for heating but may be performed on the machine described in Example I with the platens unheated. This cold stretch provides uniform fibers.
  • the balance of stretching, to eliminate any remaining elasticity and to eliminate memory, is performed as in Example I, at a temperature of about 450 F.
  • the platens are preferably heated to about 450 F. but this temperature may be lower Where the thread is kept on the platen for longer periods or higher if the thread is kept on the platens only long enough to heat the thread to a temperature below its melting point.
  • the theread produced according to this example has knotting characteristics like the thread in Example I.
  • Examples III and IV Examples I and II were followed except that silk thread was employed and the platens were heated to about 425 F.
  • polyester thread is provided with up to about 20% by weight excess material was present on the thread surface.
  • Teflon 5 of polytetrafluoroethylene substantially wholly Within could be accumulated in the silk up to 45% of the weight of the impreganted silk.
  • the Teflon was substantially within the interstices of the thread with none being visible on the surface under magnification. Undoubtedly, the Teflon is present on the surface to some extent. The suture appears to be well lubricated.
  • a process of modifying a multifilament polyester thread comprising subjecting the polyester thread to an elevated temperature below the melting point thereof and stretching the thread up to 50% of the original length While at the elevated temperature, subsequently immersing the stretched thread in a liquid dispersion of small particles of polytetrafiuoroethylene and removing excess polytetrafiuoroethylene while the thread is wet with said liquid dispersion whereby a thread having an exposed surface of polyester and polytetrafiuoroethylene is provided.
  • a process of modifying a polyethylene terephthalate multifilament suture to improve the knotting characteristics thereof comprising the steps of hot stretching the suture at a temperature of about 450 F. to elongale the suture up to 50% of the original length, immersing the stretched suture in an aqueous dispersion of small particles of polytetrafluoroethylene, and removing excess polytetrafluoroethylene while the suture is wet so that the suture contains up to about 20% by weight of polytetrafluoroethylene with the exposed surface comprising both polyester terephthalate and polytetrafluoroethylene and with the interstices of the suture substantially filled with polytetrafiuoroethylene.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Vascular Medicine (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)

Description

Unite ABSTRACT UP THE BIfiCLOSURE A process for modifying polyester threads, primarily surgical sutures comprising first hot stretching the polyester thread, impregnating the stretched thread with particles of polytetrafluoroethylene, and removing excess polytetrafiuoroethylene. The knotting characteristics of thread in this manner are considerably improved.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending applications Ser. Nos. 220,085 and 230,284, filed respectively Aug. 28, 1962 and Oct. 12, 1962, both applications being now abandoned.
The present invention relates to an improved thread and a process for preparing a thread. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved surgical suture.
Silk, as a surgical suture, is well known. Although silk is widely used as a suture, other fibres which have certain superior properties have been suggested. Dacron, a terephthalic acid polyester braided fibre, has been suggested and is now widely used. Sutures made of this polyester fibre are stronger than silk, are waterproof, and have a very low degree of reaction within the body. Because the polyfilamentous polyester suture has greater strength than a silk suture of the same diameter, the surgeon could use the Dacron polyester suture and have a greater assurance against breakage in use. He also could use a finer size suture than could be employed using silk. These and other advantages accrue when polyester is substituted for silk.
However, there are certain definite disadvantages resulting from the use of Dacron sutures. The primary disadvantage lies in the knotting characteristics of the polyester fibre. The widely used silk suture is relatively flaccid. When sharply flexed, as in a knot, it does not have a tendency to straighten. The knot, theerfore, does not tend to become untied. Dacron, on the other hand, is quite wiry and does not easily take the sharp flexure resulting from the knotting process. In previous applications, it was noted that the use of a Teflon-impregnant decreased the tendency of the Dacron to become untied. It was postulated that the Dacron fibres became imbedded in the Teflon matrix in the process of knotting thus forming a restraining force opposing the tendency of the Dacron to straighten. In the actual use of the suture, we have advised surgeons to snug down securely on the last knot made. This would imbed the Dacron fibres in the Teflon wax and would prevent the Dacron from straightening and becoming untied. Clinically, this has been found to be most effective. As many as twelve Dacron knots have been used in the attempt to prevent the untying phenomenon. However, twelve would become eleven would become ten and so on until the knot was gone. With the Teflon-impregnated Dacron, however, there is no tendency to become untied with proper snugging. This is the reason for the widespread acceptance of the suture in valve replacement surgery. The knots have been found to hold securely when snugging was properly done.
States Patent Another disadvantage of Dacron is its relatively high co-eflicient of friction on its surface. A surgeon ordinarily forms a surgeons knot or a simple knot above a tissue opening in the process of coapting the surface. In pulling the ends of the suture together, the knot slides down and draws the tissues together. Because of the stiffness of the Dacron, there is usually a considerable springback when the pressure of the pulling subsides and the surgeon must then push down the knot which has partly opened on forming of the succeeding knots. With Dacron, this is not easily accomplished. On sliding a second simple knot down onto the preceding knots, the preceding knot does not go back to its original position and coapting the tissues becomes clumsy or impossible. In the previous application, it was noted that the lubricity added to surface by the use of Teflon greatly simplified this process and enabled the surgeon to slide his knots downward even when his first knot had relaxed to some extent. This process, as previously noted, also occurs with silk. The surgeon is able to slide the original knot back to its original position if there has been some slipping upwards. Also, as previously mentioned, using Teflon impregnated Dacron enables the first simple or surgeons knot to hold its line of coaptation better than the unmodified Dacron. As mentioned, the Teflon acts as a binder into which the Dacron fibrils are enmeshed. This tends to prevent the opening process. When Dacron alone is used, the springiness of the Dacron thread is unopposed and there is a greater tendency toward the opening process.
In the co-pending applications Nos. 220,085 and 230,284, the underlying problems are discussed and it is suggested that the Dacron suture be impregnated with Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene). The Teflon impregnant has been found to vastly improve the knotting characteristics of Dacron. Because of this process, it was also noted that the deposition of Teflon on the surface resulted in a greatly increased lubricity which has the result of requiring more knots than would have been needed if the surface were not lubricated. Comparing the knots of Dacron, silk, and Teflon-impregnated Dacron, it was noted that two knots of Dacron has essentially the same security as three knots of silk which has essentially the same security of four knots of Teflon-impregnated Dacron. The additional knot required in the use of Teflon-impregnated Dacron has been a nuisance. The remaining characteristics of the thread have been so highly desirable that the use has increased enormously. However, it still has been most desirable to modify the thread, if possible, so that three knots of silk would equal three knots of Teflonimpregnated Dacron in security.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of coating threads with Teflon so that the thread has excellent knotting characteristics.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a thread having knotting characteristics desirable in surgical sutures.
These and other objects are achieved according to the present invention by stretching the thread, impregnating the strteched thread with Teflon, and removing the excess Teflon.
A method of modifying the thread, which involved recoating the coated Teflon-impregnated Dacron with Dacron, is described in my co-pending application Ser. No. 312,328 filed Sept. 30, 1963, now Patent. No. 3,307,971. This method, although eminently satisfactory in result, is cumbersome and requires the use of costly solvents which necessitates solvent recovery.
It is noted in the previous co-pending application, that it is desirable to restore some of the Dacron to the surface. Adding the Teflon impregnant increases the Teflon to Dacron ratio to such an extent that lubricity is excessive.
On reinvestigation of the process of manufacture, it is noted that the Dacron thread is impregnated with Teflon which is then run over a hot-stretch machine at temperatures of about 450 F. A series of rollers are used in this process. It seemed possible that the stretch under tension over a series of rollers might have the effect of spreading the Teflon over the surface of the Dacron thus decreasing the exposed Dacron surface. It would, therefore, seem desirable to impregnate the Dacron thread with Teflon and avoid any process which would tend to spread the Teion over the surface of the Dacron.
It was, therefore, decided to reverse the process of manufacture and to hot-stretch the Dacron thread to the desired diameter and subsequently to impregnate with Teflon thus avoiding a hot-stretch after the Teflon impregnation process has been accomplished. It was hoped that the impregnation after hot-stretching would have the effect of placing particulate Teflon on the surface and would, therefore, avoid the spreading or buttering over ttat would occur with tension and heat.
The result has been successful. It is now possible, to knot Teflon-impregnated Dacron with the same number of knots as required with silk. This success involves all sizes. To the touch, the surface of the suture appears to be as highly lubricated in this new process as it was in the previous process. However, the result speaks for itself. There appears to be a definite increase in the surface of Dacron exposed which is probably the factor which can account for the equality of the knotting process noted at the present time.
Obviously, for use as a suture, the impregnation of the Dacron interstices to form an essentially monofilamentous structure is of major concern. With the present process of impregnation filling of the interstices has been found to be unchanged. Similarly, the stability of this Teflonimpregnated Dacron as compared to the stability of the Tefion-irnpregnated Dacron in the previous processes is of major importance. Once again, under torture methods involving washing machines used in cycles, no discernable difference in weight could be found when the Dacron was impregnated after the hot-stretch or before the hot-stretch.
In summary, an excellently lubricated suture maintaining its essentially monofilamentous structure and requiring the same number of knots needed for security as with silk has been provided.
In my prior co-pending applications, a thread is coated with Teflon and then stretched. It has now been determined that, by performing the stretching step prior to coating, the knotting characteristics of the thread are markedly improved and the problems of excessive surface lubricity are overcome.
The invention will now be illustrated in the following examples:
Example I Dacron polyester fibre was braided into a polyfilamentous suture on a New England Butt braider machine.
This machine is a well known braider and has 8 or 12. carriers in readily available models. Any type of braider will, of course, be suitable. Such machines, by varying the number of individual fibres and tensions, can provide a wide variety of sutures. A finished Dacron braid can be made having a weight of from about 1,700 yards per pound to about 28,000 yards per pound.
A braided polyester thread is then hot-stretched by pulling the thread, under tension, over a heated platen maintained at a temperature of about 450 F. This operation serves to substantially reduce elasticity and eliminate memory (that tendency of the fibre to return to its original length.) While elongation may vary from about 10 to percent, a braid prefered for surgical use will usually be stretched about 40% during the process. Any suitable device providing the necessary tension and heat is suitable for this step.
The thread stretched about 40 to 50 percent is then gathered into a skein and immersed in a suspension of small Teflon particles in a dispersing medium. Agitation and/or a wetting agent may be employed to prevent settling of the Teflon particles. A preferred embodiment consists of a dispersion of Teflon particles in the size range of about 0.5 micron dispersed in water with the aid of a wetting agent. A suitable blend is readily available as duPont blend 2510 which contains about 58% Teflon particles by weight in water. Triton X-l00 (Rohm and Haas) is a suitable wetting agent. The amount of Teflon in the suspension can vary widely but the commercially available blend of about 58% by weight solids is suitable.
A skein of thread is kept immersed in the Teflon dispersion for a time sufficient for the discrete particles to permeate into the interstices of the thread. If the skein is very large or tightly wound, a longer time should be allowed. For skeins weighing up to 50 lbs, an immersion time of 15 minutes has been found to be more than adequate. The weight pick up, measured after final proces sing, has been found to cease much prior to the 15 minutes allowed.
After immersion, a skein is placed in a wringer which comprises a pair of opposed rolls. The function of the wringer is to remove the excess Teflon from the thread and should be accomplished rapidly. If the process is not well controlled, considerable Teflon will deposit on the surface of the sutures. To prevent this excess deposition of Teflon on the sutures, the skein must be kept wet during the process of extraction and the extraction should be quickly accomplished. The skein of thread is then removed and wound as a final product. The thread is approximately 6% heavier than originally. In actual practice, for a given thread, weight increases of from 5 to 7 percent (approximately) are obtainable. Depending on the structural nature of the thread (number and tension of fibres) a weight increase of up to 20% is obtainable. The thread feels to the touch like a lubricated polyester thread, practically identical to the polyester thread surface noted when the process is reversed and the impregnation carried on before heat treating. It is only when a knot is actually tied that the vast difference becomes apparent. Using the surgeons technique of forming the surgeons knot or simple knot and pulling it down, the knot forms smoothly and, most important, requires exactly the same number of knots as silk to give identical security. The lubricity of the surface is a highly desirable characteristic and is maintained to an equal extent, apparently, in this present suture construction.
Example II The same thread and equipment employed in Example I were treated as in Example I except that the stretching step was carried out in two distinct operations. First, the thread was cold-stretched at room temperature to approximately 25% elongation. This step is conveniently carried out on a separate stretching device which has no provision for heating but may be performed on the machine described in Example I with the platens unheated. This cold stretch provides uniform fibers. The balance of stretching, to eliminate any remaining elasticity and to eliminate memory, is performed as in Example I, at a temperature of about 450 F. In both the single hot stretch and the two-phase stretch, the platens are preferably heated to about 450 F. but this temperature may be lower Where the thread is kept on the platen for longer periods or higher if the thread is kept on the platens only long enough to heat the thread to a temperature below its melting point.
The theread produced according to this example has knotting characteristics like the thread in Example I.
Examples III and IV Examples I and II were followed except that silk thread was employed and the platens were heated to about 425 F. The resultant silk thread hand knotting characteristics of surgical silk sutures, but the Teflon particles were very uniformly distributed throughout the thread and no ethylene thread is a multifilament polyester terephthalatt suture.
3. A process according to claim 1, wherein the polyester thread is provided with up to about 20% by weight excess material was present on the thread surface. Teflon 5 of polytetrafluoroethylene substantially wholly Within could be accumulated in the silk up to 45% of the weight of the impreganted silk. As with polyester fibre, the Teflon was substantially within the interstices of the thread with none being visible on the surface under magnification. Undoubtedly, the Teflon is present on the surface to some extent. The suture appears to be well lubricated.
While a thread made according to this process has primary use as a suture, it should be apparent that the process generally relates to modifying the characteristics of thread. An analogy has been drawn to surgical silk only to show that certain properties of thread have been modified to compare with silk. In a general sense, the invention affords a means for producing a thread of modified characteristics useful wherever those characteristics are desirable. Further, the process of the invention is equally applicable to woven thread.
What I claim is:
1. A process of modifying a multifilament polyester thread comprising subjecting the polyester thread to an elevated temperature below the melting point thereof and stretching the thread up to 50% of the original length While at the elevated temperature, subsequently immersing the stretched thread in a liquid dispersion of small particles of polytetrafiuoroethylene and removing excess polytetrafiuoroethylene while the thread is wet with said liquid dispersion whereby a thread having an exposed surface of polyester and polytetrafiuoroethylene is provided.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the polythe interstices thereof.
4. A process of modifying a polyethylene terephthalate multifilament suture to improve the knotting characteristics thereof, comprising the steps of hot stretching the suture at a temperature of about 450 F. to elongale the suture up to 50% of the original length, immersing the stretched suture in an aqueous dispersion of small particles of polytetrafluoroethylene, and removing excess polytetrafluoroethylene while the suture is wet so that the suture contains up to about 20% by weight of polytetrafluoroethylene with the exposed surface comprising both polyester terephthalate and polytetrafluoroethylene and with the interstices of the suture substantially filled with polytetrafiuoroethylene.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,870,045 1/1959 Corkum 117-161 3,061,398 10/1962 Veitch 1177 FOREIGN PATENTS 630,860 11/1961 Canada. 913,158 12/1962 Great Britain.
RALPH S. KENDALL, Primary Examiner.
ALFRED L. LEAVITT, Examiner.
H. COHEN, Assistant Examiner.
US323891A 1963-11-15 1963-11-15 Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene Expired - Lifetime US3379552A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US323891A US3379552A (en) 1963-11-15 1963-11-15 Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US323891A US3379552A (en) 1963-11-15 1963-11-15 Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3379552A true US3379552A (en) 1968-04-23

Family

ID=23261162

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US323891A Expired - Lifetime US3379552A (en) 1963-11-15 1963-11-15 Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3379552A (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3527650A (en) * 1967-12-21 1970-09-08 Ethicon Inc Suture coating of polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene
US3665927A (en) * 1968-05-29 1972-05-30 Sutures Inc Impregnation of polyfilamentous sutures with synthetic polymer particles
US3807273A (en) * 1972-05-24 1974-04-30 Sutures Inc Method of making pliable, dyed and braided polyester sutures
US4470941A (en) * 1982-06-02 1984-09-11 Bioresearch Inc. Preparation of composite surgical sutures
US5222978A (en) * 1987-08-26 1993-06-29 United States Surgical Corporation Packaged synthetic absorbable surgical elements
US5312642A (en) * 1991-02-08 1994-05-17 United States Surgical Corporation Method and apparatus for calendering and coating/filling sutures
US5359831A (en) * 1989-08-01 1994-11-01 United States Surgical Corporation Molded suture retainer
US5366081A (en) * 1987-08-26 1994-11-22 United States Surgical Corporation Packaged synthetic absorbable surgical elements
US6264674B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2001-07-24 Robert L. Washington Process for hot stretching braided ligatures
US6488027B1 (en) 1998-03-10 2002-12-03 Novartis Ag Powder inhaler
US20050209639A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-22 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Fused suture knot
WO2005094741A1 (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-13 Proxy Biomedical Limited Sling for treatment of urinary stress incontinence and/or pelvic floor prolapse
US20060107907A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-25 Joe Sayatovich Method of making a lariat
US20180008744A1 (en) * 2008-06-24 2018-01-11 Bioactive Surgical, Inc. Surgical sutures incorporated with stem cells or other bioactive materials

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2870045A (en) * 1956-12-17 1959-01-20 American Thread Co Impregnated synthetic fiber sewing thread and method of making same
CA630860A (en) * 1961-11-14 E. Wiley Fred Yarns and coated fabrics
US3061398A (en) * 1960-04-22 1962-10-30 Monsanto Chemicals Aftertreatment of wet spun acrylonitrile polymer filaments with aqueous zinc oxide solution
GB913158A (en) * 1958-10-16 1962-12-19 American Cyanamid Co Coated non-absorbable surgical sutures

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA630860A (en) * 1961-11-14 E. Wiley Fred Yarns and coated fabrics
US2870045A (en) * 1956-12-17 1959-01-20 American Thread Co Impregnated synthetic fiber sewing thread and method of making same
GB913158A (en) * 1958-10-16 1962-12-19 American Cyanamid Co Coated non-absorbable surgical sutures
US3061398A (en) * 1960-04-22 1962-10-30 Monsanto Chemicals Aftertreatment of wet spun acrylonitrile polymer filaments with aqueous zinc oxide solution

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3527650A (en) * 1967-12-21 1970-09-08 Ethicon Inc Suture coating of polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene
US3665927A (en) * 1968-05-29 1972-05-30 Sutures Inc Impregnation of polyfilamentous sutures with synthetic polymer particles
US3807273A (en) * 1972-05-24 1974-04-30 Sutures Inc Method of making pliable, dyed and braided polyester sutures
US4470941A (en) * 1982-06-02 1984-09-11 Bioresearch Inc. Preparation of composite surgical sutures
US5468252A (en) * 1987-08-26 1995-11-21 United States Surgical Corporation Packaged synthetic absorbable surgical elements
US5222978A (en) * 1987-08-26 1993-06-29 United States Surgical Corporation Packaged synthetic absorbable surgical elements
US5366081A (en) * 1987-08-26 1994-11-22 United States Surgical Corporation Packaged synthetic absorbable surgical elements
US5359831A (en) * 1989-08-01 1994-11-01 United States Surgical Corporation Molded suture retainer
US5540773A (en) * 1991-02-08 1996-07-30 United States Surgical Corporation Apparatus for calendering and coating/filling sutures
US5447100A (en) * 1991-02-08 1995-09-05 United States Surgical Corporation Apparatus for calendering sutures in orthogonal directions
US5312642A (en) * 1991-02-08 1994-05-17 United States Surgical Corporation Method and apparatus for calendering and coating/filling sutures
US6488027B1 (en) 1998-03-10 2002-12-03 Novartis Ag Powder inhaler
US6264674B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2001-07-24 Robert L. Washington Process for hot stretching braided ligatures
US20050209639A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-22 Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. Fused suture knot
WO2005094741A1 (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-13 Proxy Biomedical Limited Sling for treatment of urinary stress incontinence and/or pelvic floor prolapse
US20050234291A1 (en) * 2004-03-30 2005-10-20 Peter Gingras Medical device
US20060107907A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-25 Joe Sayatovich Method of making a lariat
US7111543B2 (en) 2004-11-23 2006-09-26 Joe Sayatovich Method of making a lariat
US20180008744A1 (en) * 2008-06-24 2018-01-11 Bioactive Surgical, Inc. Surgical sutures incorporated with stem cells or other bioactive materials
US10632225B2 (en) * 2008-06-24 2020-04-28 Bioactive Surgical, Inc. Surgical sutures incorporated with stem cells or other bioactive materials

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3379552A (en) Impregnation of stretched multifilament polyester suture with polytetrafluoroethylene
CN101906671B (en) Process for making a monofilament-like product
US3187752A (en) Non-absorbable silicone coated sutures and method of making
CN101040069B (en) Process for making a monofilament-like product
US3527650A (en) Suture coating of polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene
EP0037939B1 (en) A process for producing a surgical suture and the surgical suture made by this process
US3807273A (en) Method of making pliable, dyed and braided polyester sutures
US3382662A (en) Covered elastomeric yarns
DE1936965A1 (en) Process for the production of multi-fiber, surgical sewing material with a tissue compatibility like single-fiber sewing material
US3284557A (en) Process for crimping an artificial implant for use in an animal body
US2282274A (en) "vinyon" bandage and method of making and setting it
US2019185A (en) Artificial fiber and process of producing same
DE1642079A1 (en) Multifibre nonabsorbable surgical sewing material and method of making the same
US3307971A (en) Methods of altering the surface characteristics of solid resin surfaces and articlesproduced thereby
US2368948A (en) Process for increasing the transparency of fabrics containing filament yarns
US2403305A (en) Production of high-twist artificial yarns
US3257702A (en) Method of fabricating pliable braided polyfilamentous threads
US2403304A (en) High-twist artificial yarn production
US3379091A (en) Method of making softened fabrics
US3143437A (en) Treatment of polyacrylonitrile textile materials
Conway et al. A study of arterial prostheses by scanning electron microscopy
US2326043A (en) Artificial yarn and process of producing same
US2298841A (en) Textile finishing
USRE27749E (en) Method of making softened fabrics
DE1660443A1 (en) Improvement of polyester threads