US3367771A - Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys - Google Patents

Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3367771A
US3367771A US434606A US43460665A US3367771A US 3367771 A US3367771 A US 3367771A US 434606 A US434606 A US 434606A US 43460665 A US43460665 A US 43460665A US 3367771 A US3367771 A US 3367771A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
magnesium
ferrosilicon
percent
weight percent
preparation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US434606A
Inventor
John C Robertson
Tress William R Von
James H Enos
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dow Chemical Co
Original Assignee
Dow Chemical Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dow Chemical Co filed Critical Dow Chemical Co
Priority to US434606A priority Critical patent/US3367771A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3367771A publication Critical patent/US3367771A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C28/00Alloys based on a metal not provided for in groups C22C5/00 - C22C27/00

Definitions

  • ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys wherein a ferrosilicon and a magnesium silicide are provided, the amount of the magnesium silicide being such to give about the equivalent amount of magnesium desired in the final magnesium ferrosilicon product.
  • the two reactants are heated together at a temperature of from about 1,100 to about 1,450 C. and maintained in the molten state for about 30 seconds to about 25 minutes following which the resultant molten magnesium ferrosilicon product ordinarily is cast into a mold of a predetermined form and solidified.
  • This invention relates to a novel process for alloy production and more particularly is concerned with a novel process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys.
  • Magnesium ferrosilicon alloys are used extensively as a source material for introducing magnesium into molten ferrous melts particularly for use in the nodularization of graphite in cast iron.
  • a popular commercial source material for this use is a magnesium ferrosilicon containing about 9 weight percent magnesium.
  • this additive material as sold commercially is specified as containing magnesium within the range of from about 7.5 to about 9.5 weight percent magnesium because of the difficulty in maintaning a close control of magnesium content in conventional processes of preparation.
  • magnesium ingot is plunged into a ladle of molten ferrosilicon or molten ferrosilicon is poured onto magnesium ingot placed in the bottom of a ladle.
  • molten ferrosilicon is poured onto magnesium ingot placed in the bottom of a ladle.
  • magnesium silicide Mg Si
  • ferrosilicon a ferrosilicon while the mix reactants are in a molten state.
  • a ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide are provided, the amount of the magnesium silicide being such to provide about the equivalent amount of magnesium desired in the final magnesium ferrosilicon product.
  • the two reactants are heated together at a temperature of from about 1,100 C. to about 1,450" 0, preferably from about 1,200 C. to about 1,300 C. and maintained in the molten state for a period of from about 30 seconds to about 25 minutes, ordinarily from about 2 to about 20 minutes and preferably from about 10 to about 15 minutes.
  • This treatment ordinarily is carried out under an inert atmosphere, e.g., substantially anhydrous argon, which assures a minimum or even no undesirable side reaction of the mix reactants.
  • a minimum pressure equivalent to about the natural atmospheric pressure is used.
  • a positive pressure slightly in excess of atmospheric is used, e.g., from about 15.5 to about 20 pounds per square inch absolute, to assure the maintenance of the inert gas in contact with the reaction mass.
  • an inert pad, covering or other melt protecting means can be used to protect the reaction mixture from contact with air during the heating stage of the operation.
  • the resultant molten magnesium ferrosilicon product ordinarily is cast into a mold of a predetermined form and solidified.
  • magnesium silicide and a ferrosilicon are placed in a crucible, furnace or other melting apparatus and the assembly then heated to the operating temperature and maintained at this temperature for the disclosed reaction period.
  • magnesium silicide can be added to a molten ferrosilicon charge by introduction onto the surface of or by being rabbled in the melt.
  • molten ferrosilicon can be poured onto solid magnesium silicide positioned in a ladle or other melt retaining apparatus.
  • particulated ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide are used to provide a relatively large surface area per unit mass thereby assuring ready and rapid dissolution upon heating to the molten temperature.
  • Relatively finely divided materials e.g., minus mesh (US. Standard Sieve) are very satisfactory although both fine powders and coarse lumps are equally suitable for use in the present process.
  • Equipment suitable for use in the process of the present invention is melting, molten metal handling, metal transport and metal casting apparatus employed in foundry and the like metal melting, handling and casting arts.
  • the present process readily is applicable to the preparation of other magnesium containing agents suit-able for use as additives to molten ferrous based melts.
  • These include, for example, nickel, copper, nickel and silicon mixtures and alloys and copper and nickel mixtures and alloys.
  • magnesium silicide and other specified mix reactants are provided and melted together at appropriate temperatures.
  • the present novel process readily can be used to prepare the corresponding magnesium containing products having a magnesium content of 3 weight percent or lower and has as high as 35 weight percent or more.
  • Example 1 A charge of about 96 grams of minus 100 mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve) of 50 percent ferrosilicon and about 17 grams of minus 100 mesh magnesium silicide (59.7 weight percent Mg) was loaded into a round cup-shaped graphite crucible and the crucible placed in an induction furnace. The crucible was covered with a graphite lid having a hole at its edge for passage of a thermocouple and a hole in its center having a graphite stirring rod passing therethrough. A Vycor quartz glass beaker was inverted over the crucible, its open top edge resting on top of the furnace. The beaker had a hole in the center of the upwardly extended bottom through which the stirrer shaft extended.
  • minus 100 mesh U.S. Standard Sieve
  • a glass tube through the bottom of the beaker extended upward from the outside of the bottom of the beaker.
  • a rubber tube was fitted to this glass tube and to a pressurized argon gas cylinder through appriate pressure and fiow controls.
  • This beaker assembly served as a mantle for maintaining an inert gas blanket above the reaction mixture.
  • a thermocouple in a graphite sheath was placed in the crucible through the thermocouple passage in the lid.
  • Example 3 using the apparatus and procedure described in Example 1, a number of ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide products were prepared from chunks of the reactant materials about 0.25 inch on a side. The melt was heated to a temperature of about 1,250 C. and maintained at between 1,250 to 1,300 C. for a period of 10 to 12 minutes. Four separate runs were made. Table I summarizes the results of these preparations.
  • a low volume argon flow was introduced and maintained over the charge.
  • a 6-kilowatt high frequency convertor connected to the induction furnace was energized and the crucible and charge heated. The charge was heated to the molten state and raised to a temperature of about 1,250" C. and the convertor then shut off. The resulting melt was stirred for about seconds with the graphite rod and the rod then withdrawn from the crucible.
  • the alloy product mass was solidified and cooled to ambient temperature while maintaining the argon blanket.
  • the cooled ingot was removed from the crucible and found to weight about 112.8 grams.
  • the .ingot was analyzed for magnesium and silicon and found to contain 8.5 weight percent Mg and 44.8 weight percent silicon. The theoretical magnesium content as calculated from the reactants charged was 8.98 weight percent. This preparation therefore showed an efiiciency of about 94.6 percent based on magnesium recovery.
  • Example 2 using the apparatus and procedure described for Example 1, a charge of about 94 grams of the percent ferrosilicon (minus 100 mesh US. Standard Sieve) and about 17 grams of the magnesium silicide (minus 100 mesh) (calculated to provide a magnesium ferrosilicon having about 9.15 weight percent Mg) was heated to about 1,250 C. and maintained at this temperature for about 10 minutes. The cast product resulting from this preparation showed a magnesium content of about 8.1 weight percent magnesium indicative of an 88.5 percent magnesium recovery.
  • This preparation was repeated with the same size charge and the same reactant concentrations except that a coarser reaction mixture (minus 20 mesh) was used.
  • the resulting product again contained about 8.1 weight percent magnesium or 88.5 percent magnesium recovery.
  • Example 4 A reactant mixture of about 28.35 grams of magnesium silicide (Mg Si containing about 59.7% Mg), about 25.05 grams of 50 percent ferrosilicon and about 46.60 grams of percent ferrosilicon, all of minus 20 mesh, was melted in the apparatus described in Example 1 by heating to a temperature of about 1,250 C. and maintaining this temperature for about 10 minutes. The magnesium in the charge was calculated to be 16.92 weight percent. Analysis of the resulting solidified, cooled ingot showed 16.1 weight percent magnesium, i.e., a 95.2 per-cent magnesium recovery.
  • Mg Si magnesium silicide
  • This run was repeated except the reaction charge was changed to contain about 47.25 grams of the Mg Si, about 18.45 grams of the 50 percent fcrrosilicon and about 34.50 grams of the 85 percent ferrosilicon and the actual melting of the charge was carried out at a temperature of about 1,200 C. for a period of about 10 minutes.
  • This run was designed to give a high magnesium content alloy (calculated to be 28.2 weight percent magnesium) particularly suitable for deep plunging treatment of ductile iron.
  • the ingot analyzed 26.7 weight percent magnesium which is a 94.7 percent magnesium recovery.
  • Example 5 The same apparatus as described in the preceding examples was employed in the preparation of magnesium terrosilicon. The manipulative procedure was changed in that the minus 20 mesh particulate 50 percentferrosilicon was charged to the furnace, melted and brought to a temperature of about 1,300 C. under an argon atmosphere. Magnesium silicide (minus 20 mesh) was added, stirred into the melt and the resultant mix held at temperature for about three minutes. The charge was then cooled and solidified into a billet of magnesium ferrosilicon. The results of two separate runs are summarized in Table III which follows:
  • Example 2 Furnace Magne- Magne- Charge Magnesium sium in sium in Magnesium Run Ferro- Silicide Charge, Product, Recovery, N silicon (g.) weight weight percent (g.) percent percent percent CONTROL EXAMPLE
  • the same apparatus as described in Example 1 was used to prepare a magnesium ferrosilicon alloy in accordance with conventional processes. About 9.5 grams of magnesium granules (minus 14 to plus 20 mesh US. Standard Sieve size range) was placed in the bottom of the furnace and about 90.5 grams of 50 percent ferrosilicon (minus 20 mesh) placed on top of the magnesium. This charge was heated to 1,300 C. and held at this temperature for about minutes and then cooled and solidified.

Description

United States Patent ()fiice 3,367,771 Patented Feb. 6, 1968 3,367,771 PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF MAGNESIUM FERROSILICON ALLOYS John C. Robertson, Midland, Mich, and William R. Von Tress, Lake Jackson, and James H. Enos, Angleton, Tex., assignors to The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich., a corporation oi? Delaware No Drawing. Filed Feb. 23, 1965, Ser. No. 434,606 3 Claims. (Cl. 75-129) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys wherein a ferrosilicon and a magnesium silicide are provided, the amount of the magnesium silicide being such to give about the equivalent amount of magnesium desired in the final magnesium ferrosilicon product. The two reactants are heated together at a temperature of from about 1,100 to about 1,450 C. and maintained in the molten state for about 30 seconds to about 25 minutes following which the resultant molten magnesium ferrosilicon product ordinarily is cast into a mold of a predetermined form and solidified.
This invention relates to a novel process for alloy production and more particularly is concerned with a novel process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys.
Magnesium ferrosilicon alloys are used extensively as a source material for introducing magnesium into molten ferrous melts particularly for use in the nodularization of graphite in cast iron. A popular commercial source material for this use is a magnesium ferrosilicon containing about 9 weight percent magnesium. Normally, this additive material as sold commercially is specified as containing magnesium within the range of from about 7.5 to about 9.5 weight percent magnesium because of the difficulty in maintaning a close control of magnesium content in conventional processes of preparation.
conventionally in making such magnesium ferrosilicon materials, magnesium ingot is plunged into a ladle of molten ferrosilicon or molten ferrosilicon is poured onto magnesium ingot placed in the bottom of a ladle. Both of these techniques sufier from a number of disadvantages. These include; magnesium recoveries are relatively low, being in the range of only 65 to 75 percent at a maximum; the reaction between magnesium and molten ferrosilicon is somewhat hazardous in that it is violent and accompanied with considerable amounts of pyrotechnics, smoking and fuming; the contained magnesium cannot be held within close limits.
Now, unexpectedly a novel process has been found for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys which overcomes the disadvantages of the present methods employed to prepare these materials.
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide a novel process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon wherein there is magnesium recovery much higher than realized in processes employed heretofore.
It is also an object of the present invention toprovide a novel process for preparing magnesuim ferrosilicon alloys wherein the magnesium content can be maintained within a narrow, readily reproducible range from product to product thereby providing improved quality control to the foundry when such materials are employed in the treatment of ferrous based melts.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys which produces markedly less pyrotechnics, fuming and violet reactivity than presently known processes and thereby is markedly less hazardous than the present techniques.
These and other objects and advantages are realized in accordance with the present novel process wherein magnesium silicide (Mg Si) is reacted with a ferrosilicon while the mix reactants are in a molten state.
In the actual practice of the present invention a ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide are provided, the amount of the magnesium silicide being such to provide about the equivalent amount of magnesium desired in the final magnesium ferrosilicon product. The two reactants are heated together at a temperature of from about 1,100 C. to about 1,450" 0, preferably from about 1,200 C. to about 1,300 C. and maintained in the molten state for a period of from about 30 seconds to about 25 minutes, ordinarily from about 2 to about 20 minutes and preferably from about 10 to about 15 minutes. This treatment ordinarily is carried out under an inert atmosphere, e.g., substantially anhydrous argon, which assures a minimum or even no undesirable side reaction of the mix reactants. With such an atmosphere ordinarily a minimum pressure equivalent to about the natural atmospheric pressure is used. Preferably, a positive pressure, slightly in excess of atmospheric is used, e.g., from about 15.5 to about 20 pounds per square inch absolute, to assure the maintenance of the inert gas in contact with the reaction mass. Alternatively, an inert pad, covering or other melt protecting means can be used to protect the reaction mixture from contact with air during the heating stage of the operation.
Following the heating period, the resultant molten magnesium ferrosilicon product ordinarily is cast into a mold of a predetermined form and solidified.
Usually in the present novel process, magnesium silicide and a ferrosilicon are placed in a crucible, furnace or other melting apparatus and the assembly then heated to the operating temperature and maintained at this temperature for the disclosed reaction period. If desired, however, magnesium silicide can be added to a molten ferrosilicon charge by introduction onto the surface of or by being rabbled in the melt. Alternatively, molten ferrosilicon can be poured onto solid magnesium silicide positioned in a ladle or other melt retaining apparatus.
Conveniently particulated ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide are used to provide a relatively large surface area per unit mass thereby assuring ready and rapid dissolution upon heating to the molten temperature. Relatively finely divided materials, e.g., minus mesh (US. Standard Sieve) are very satisfactory although both fine powders and coarse lumps are equally suitable for use in the present process.
Equipment suitable for use in the process of the present invention is melting, molten metal handling, metal transport and metal casting apparatus employed in foundry and the like metal melting, handling and casting arts.
The present process readily is applicable to the preparation of other magnesium containing agents suit-able for use as additives to molten ferrous based melts. These include, for example, nickel, copper, nickel and silicon mixtures and alloys and copper and nickel mixtures and alloys. In the preparation of such materials, magnesium silicide and other specified mix reactants are provided and melted together at appropriate temperatures.
The present novel process readily can be used to prepare the corresponding magnesium containing products having a magnesium content of 3 weight percent or lower and has as high as 35 weight percent or more.
The following examples will serve to further illustrate the present invention but are not meant to limit it thereto.
Example 1.A charge of about 96 grams of minus 100 mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve) of 50 percent ferrosilicon and about 17 grams of minus 100 mesh magnesium silicide (59.7 weight percent Mg) was loaded into a round cup-shaped graphite crucible and the crucible placed in an induction furnace. The crucible was covered with a graphite lid having a hole at its edge for passage of a thermocouple and a hole in its center having a graphite stirring rod passing therethrough. A Vycor quartz glass beaker was inverted over the crucible, its open top edge resting on top of the furnace. The beaker had a hole in the center of the upwardly extended bottom through which the stirrer shaft extended. A glass tube through the bottom of the beaker extended upward from the outside of the bottom of the beaker. A rubber tube was fitted to this glass tube and to a pressurized argon gas cylinder through appriate pressure and fiow controls. This beaker assembly served as a mantle for maintaining an inert gas blanket above the reaction mixture. A thermocouple in a graphite sheath was placed in the crucible through the thermocouple passage in the lid.
Example 3.Using the apparatus and procedure described in Example 1, a number of ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide products were prepared from chunks of the reactant materials about 0.25 inch on a side. The melt was heated to a temperature of about 1,250 C. and maintained at between 1,250 to 1,300 C. for a period of 10 to 12 minutes. Four separate runs were made. Table I summarizes the results of these preparations.
The products from runs 1, 2 and 3 were used in the treatment of separate melts of cast iron at 2,750 F. following conventional plunging techniques. The results of these tests are summarized in Table II which follows.
A low volume argon flow was introduced and maintained over the charge. A 6-kilowatt high frequency convertor connected to the induction furnace was energized and the crucible and charge heated. The charge was heated to the molten state and raised to a temperature of about 1,250" C. and the convertor then shut off. The resulting melt was stirred for about seconds with the graphite rod and the rod then withdrawn from the crucible. The alloy product mass was solidified and cooled to ambient temperature while maintaining the argon blanket. The cooled ingot was removed from the crucible and found to weight about 112.8 grams. The .ingot was analyzed for magnesium and silicon and found to contain 8.5 weight percent Mg and 44.8 weight percent silicon. The theoretical magnesium content as calculated from the reactants charged was 8.98 weight percent. This preparation therefore showed an efiiciency of about 94.6 percent based on magnesium recovery.
Example 2.Using the apparatus and procedure described for Example 1, a charge of about 94 grams of the percent ferrosilicon (minus 100 mesh US. Standard Sieve) and about 17 grams of the magnesium silicide (minus 100 mesh) (calculated to provide a magnesium ferrosilicon having about 9.15 weight percent Mg) was heated to about 1,250 C. and maintained at this temperature for about 10 minutes. The cast product resulting from this preparation showed a magnesium content of about 8.1 weight percent magnesium indicative of an 88.5 percent magnesium recovery.
This preparation was repeated with the same size charge and the same reactant concentrations except that a coarser reaction mixture (minus 20 mesh) was used. The resulting product again contained about 8.1 weight percent magnesium or 88.5 percent magnesium recovery.
Another preparation was made using the same coarser reactant materials and following the same procedure except that about 5.4 percent, based on the total charge, of a flux material composed of 34 percent magnesium chloride, percent potassium chloride, 9 percent barium chloride and 2 percent fiuorspar was placel on the melt surface. The resulting magnesium ferrosilicon product was substantially the same. The product showed 7.9 weight percent magnesium indicative of a 96.4 percent magnesium recovery.
These studies illustrate the exceptionally close quality control and residual magnesium contents resulting when molten cast iron is treated with magnesium ferrosilicon alloys prepared in accordance with the process of the present invention.
Example 4.A reactant mixture of about 28.35 grams of magnesium silicide (Mg Si containing about 59.7% Mg), about 25.05 grams of 50 percent ferrosilicon and about 46.60 grams of percent ferrosilicon, all of minus 20 mesh, was melted in the apparatus described in Example 1 by heating to a temperature of about 1,250 C. and maintaining this temperature for about 10 minutes. The magnesium in the charge was calculated to be 16.92 weight percent. Analysis of the resulting solidified, cooled ingot showed 16.1 weight percent magnesium, i.e., a 95.2 per-cent magnesium recovery.
This run was repeated except the reaction charge was changed to contain about 47.25 grams of the Mg Si, about 18.45 grams of the 50 percent fcrrosilicon and about 34.50 grams of the 85 percent ferrosilicon and the actual melting of the charge was carried out at a temperature of about 1,200 C. for a period of about 10 minutes. This run was designed to give a high magnesium content alloy (calculated to be 28.2 weight percent magnesium) particularly suitable for deep plunging treatment of ductile iron.
The ingot analyzed 26.7 weight percent magnesium which is a 94.7 percent magnesium recovery.
It is to be noted that in both of these runs, although products with high magnesium contents were produced there was substantially no violence, excessive fuming, pyrotechnics or metal splattering during the melting operation. The process was smooth and proceeded in a controlled, active manner.
Example 5.The same apparatus as described in the preceding examples was employed in the preparation of magnesium terrosilicon. The manipulative procedure was changed in that the minus 20 mesh particulate 50 percentferrosilicon was charged to the furnace, melted and brought to a temperature of about 1,300 C. under an argon atmosphere. Magnesium silicide (minus 20 mesh) was added, stirred into the melt and the resultant mix held at temperature for about three minutes. The charge was then cooled and solidified into a billet of magnesium ferrosilicon. The results of two separate runs are summarized in Table III which follows:
TABLE III Furnace Magne- Magne- Charge Magnesium sium in sium in Magnesium Run Ferro- Silicide Charge, Product, Recovery, N silicon (g.) weight weight percent (g.) percent percent percent CONTROL EXAMPLE The same apparatus as described in Example 1 Was used to prepare a magnesium ferrosilicon alloy in accordance with conventional processes. About 9.5 grams of magnesium granules (minus 14 to plus 20 mesh US. Standard Sieve size range) was placed in the bottom of the furnace and about 90.5 grams of 50 percent ferrosilicon (minus 20 mesh) placed on top of the magnesium. This charge was heated to 1,300 C. and held at this temperature for about minutes and then cooled and solidified. During this time the charge was being heated at 1,300 0., there was evidence of considerable fuming, i.e., white smoke, and metal sparking. The ingot product resulting from this process had a number of large hollow spaces on the bottom. Analysis of the ingot indicated a magnesium concentration of 5.7 weight percent. This represented a magnesium recovery of only 60 percent.
Various modifications can be made in the process of the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof for it is understood that we limit ourselves only as defined in the appended claims.
We claim:
1. In a process for preparing magnesium ferrosilicon alloys by reacting a magnesium metal source with a ferrosilicon the improvement which comprises;
(a) providing a reaction mixture of a ferrosilicon and magnesium silicide, said magnesium silicide being present in an amount to provide an amount of mag nesium ranging from about 3 to about 30 Weight percent in the resulting ferrosilicon product,
(b) heating said mixture at a temperature of from about 1,200 to about 1,300" C. for a period of from about 30 seconds to about 25 minutes,
(c) casting the resulting molten magnesium ferrosilicon product, and
(cl) recovering said magnesium ferrosilicon product.
2. The process as defined in claim 1 and including the step of maintaining the reaction mixture under an inert gas atmosphere during the heating period of process operation.
3. The process as defined in claim 2 wherein substantially anhydrous argon at a positive pressure, slightly in excess of atmospheric is used as the inert gas.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 938,758 11/1909 Goldschmidt et al. 1,376,113 4/1921 Pistor et a1. -129 1,927,819 9/1933 DeFries et a]. 75-129 2,656,269 10/1953 Dunn et al. 75-129 X 2,762,705 9/1956 Spear et al. 75-130 3,094,412 6/1963 Kaess et al. 75-135 3,113,019 12/1963 Adams et al. 75-130 3,138,450 6/1964 Figge et a1 75-135 X 3,177,071 4/1965 Ebert et al. 75-129 DAVID L. RECK, Primary Examiner.
H. W. TARRING, Assistant Examiner.
US434606A 1965-02-23 1965-02-23 Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys Expired - Lifetime US3367771A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US434606A US3367771A (en) 1965-02-23 1965-02-23 Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US434606A US3367771A (en) 1965-02-23 1965-02-23 Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3367771A true US3367771A (en) 1968-02-06

Family

ID=23724910

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US434606A Expired - Lifetime US3367771A (en) 1965-02-23 1965-02-23 Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3367771A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4269624A (en) * 1979-02-05 1981-05-26 Saes Getters S.P.A. Method for the production of non-evaporable ternary gettering alloys
US20080093046A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-04-24 National Central University Manufacturing method for isothermal evaporation casting process

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US938758A (en) * 1908-06-29 1909-11-02 Goldschmidt Ag Th Method of manufacturing calcium-silicon alloys, &c.
US1376113A (en) * 1916-11-11 1921-04-26 Firm Of Chem Fab Griesheim Ele Method of producing ferro-silico-magnesium alloy
US1927819A (en) * 1928-05-22 1933-09-26 Ludlum Steel Company Alloying
US2656269A (en) * 1951-03-08 1953-10-20 Vanadium Corp Of America Magnesium alloys and method of making the same
US2762705A (en) * 1953-01-23 1956-09-11 Int Nickel Co Addition agent and process for producing magnesium-containing cast iron
US3094412A (en) * 1957-01-24 1963-06-18 Sueddeutsche Kalkstickstoff Preparation of magnesium-containing silicon alloys
US3113019A (en) * 1962-04-18 1963-12-03 Ford Motor Co Nodular iron production
US3138450A (en) * 1959-03-26 1964-06-23 Metallgesellschaft Ag Production of silicon alloys containing one or more relatively volatile metals
US3177071A (en) * 1961-09-25 1965-04-06 Knapsack Ag Process for the manufacture of ironsilicon magnesium prealloys

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US938758A (en) * 1908-06-29 1909-11-02 Goldschmidt Ag Th Method of manufacturing calcium-silicon alloys, &c.
US1376113A (en) * 1916-11-11 1921-04-26 Firm Of Chem Fab Griesheim Ele Method of producing ferro-silico-magnesium alloy
US1927819A (en) * 1928-05-22 1933-09-26 Ludlum Steel Company Alloying
US2656269A (en) * 1951-03-08 1953-10-20 Vanadium Corp Of America Magnesium alloys and method of making the same
US2762705A (en) * 1953-01-23 1956-09-11 Int Nickel Co Addition agent and process for producing magnesium-containing cast iron
US3094412A (en) * 1957-01-24 1963-06-18 Sueddeutsche Kalkstickstoff Preparation of magnesium-containing silicon alloys
US3138450A (en) * 1959-03-26 1964-06-23 Metallgesellschaft Ag Production of silicon alloys containing one or more relatively volatile metals
US3177071A (en) * 1961-09-25 1965-04-06 Knapsack Ag Process for the manufacture of ironsilicon magnesium prealloys
US3113019A (en) * 1962-04-18 1963-12-03 Ford Motor Co Nodular iron production

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4269624A (en) * 1979-02-05 1981-05-26 Saes Getters S.P.A. Method for the production of non-evaporable ternary gettering alloys
US20080093046A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-04-24 National Central University Manufacturing method for isothermal evaporation casting process
US7648598B2 (en) * 2006-10-23 2010-01-19 National Central University Manufacturing method for isothermal evaporation casting process

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3704230A (en) Exothermic compositions
US3545960A (en) Alloy addition process
US3503738A (en) Metallurgical process for the preparation of aluminum-boron alloys
US2829961A (en) Producing aluminum
US3367771A (en) Process for preparation of magnesium ferrosilicon alloys
US2481599A (en) Alloy addition agent
US3953579A (en) Methods of making reactive metal silicide
US2247262A (en) Composition and method for treating molten metals
CA1175661A (en) Process for aluminothermic production of chromium and chromium alloys low in nitrogen
US2823112A (en) Flux compound
US5782955A (en) Low oxygen-content metallurgical silicon and ferrosilicon
US3355281A (en) Method for modifying the physical properties of aluminum casting alloys
US4177059A (en) Production of yttrium
US3615354A (en) Method of removing contaminants from steel melts
US3850623A (en) Method for reducing uranium tetrafluoride to metallic uranium
US4444590A (en) Calcium-slag additive for steel desulfurization and method for making same
US3440040A (en) Process of making rare earth metals and silicon alloys
US5370726A (en) Metallothermal reaction mixture
EP0142585B1 (en) Alloy and process for producing ductile and compacted graphite cast irons
US4022613A (en) Metallurgical material and process for treating iron or steel therewith
US4460407A (en) Method of preparing magnesium alloy particles
US3508914A (en) Methods of forming and purifying nickel-titanium containing alloys
US2875034A (en) Production of metals
US4375371A (en) Method for induction melting
JPS5843456B2 (en) Rare earth↓-silicon alloy manufacturing method