US3358175A - Cathode ray tube with mosaic type phosphor screen - Google Patents

Description

4 Sheets-Sheet l A. M. MORRELL ETAL Dec. 12, 1967 CATHODE RAY TUBE WITH MOSAIC TYPE PHOSPHOR SCREEN Origlnal Filed July 6. 1962 Dec. l2, 1967 A. MY. MORRELL ETAL CATHOEE R TUBE WITH MOSAIC TYPE PHQSPHOR SCREEN Orglnal Filed July 6, 1962 4 Sheets-Sheet 2 l NV TOR wann/122ML f l 17e/: Y

I Dec. 12, 196.7 A M. MORRELL. ETAL 3,353,175

CATHODEI RY TUBE WITH MOSAIC TYPE PHO'SPHOR SCREEN 4 Original Filed J\1ly 6, 1962 A 4 Sheets-Sheet I5 Dec. l2, 1967 A. M. MORRELL ETAL 3,358,175

CATHODE RAY TlBE WI-I'H MOSAIC TYPE PHOSPHOR SCREEN Origlnal Filed July 6, 1962 4 Sheets-Sheet 4 MKM/MQ (IC W MIP off TZ WZ m WM# ,i ,KW/,ww Y B United States Patent O 3,358,175 CATHODE RAY TUBE WITH MOSAIC TYPE PHOSPHOR SCREEN Albert M. Morrell, East Petersburg, and Richard H. Godfrey, Lancaster, Pa., assignors to Radio Corporation of America, a corporation of Delaware Original application July 6, 1962, Ser. No. 208,044, now Patent No. 3,282,691, dated Nov. 1, 1966. Divided and this application May 16, 1966, Ser. No. 567,024

11 Claims. (Cl. 313-92) ABSTRACT F THE DISCLOSURE The mosaic phosphor screen of a shadow mask color picture tube is made up of phosphor dot trios which are shaped to register with the associated beam spot trios. The spot trios are horizontally compressed at the 9 and 3 oclock positions and vertically compressed at the l2 and 6 oclock positions by the astigmatic beam deflecting field. The dot trios are photographically printed on the screen support with the light source positioned substantially at a second order color center, for each color, in order to produce similar compression of the dot trios, and therefore provide improved registry of the spots with the dots. A wedge-shaped refractive device is used in the photographic printing operation to correct for foreshortening. The spacing between the mask and the screen decreases from a maximum at the center of the screen to a minimum at the edge to correct for degrouping. Incidental to the use of second order printing, the screen includes at the periphery thereof some phosphor dots which are shadowed from and not excited by the electron beams by the mask during operation of the tube.

This application is a division of copending application Ser. No. 208,044, filed July 6, 1962, now Patent No. 3,282,691, granted Nov. l, 1966i.

This invention relates to color cathode ray tubes of the type comprising a plurality of electron guns, an apertured shadow mask, and a mosaic screen of systematically arrayed phosphor dots. The invention is particularly related to such tubes having an array of three guns and to improved mosaic screens for such tubes.

The phosphor dots of the screen of such a tube may be laid down in trios (groups of three dots of different phosphors) by a known direct photographic printing technique, wherein a photosensitive coating on the faceplate of the tube is exposed to a point source of light through the apertures of the shadow mask. Phosphor powder may, e.g., be mixed directly with the photosensitive coating before application to the faceplate or else applied to the photosensitive coating after it has been exposed.

In operation of the tube, the electron beams are subjected to scanning forces and dyanmic convergence forces, both of which affect the electron beam paths (and hence the landing spots of the electron beams on the screen) in a way that the screen-printing light rays are not affected. Unless some degree of compensation is made for the difference between the electron beam and light ray paths, serious misregister of the beam spots with the phosphor dots will result, that is, the spot and dot centers will not coincide.

Hereinafter the phospor dots may be referred to simply as dots as distinguished from the beam spots which may be referred to simply as spots.

Misregister of the type wherein a trio of beam spots is shifted as a unit radially outward away from its associated trio of phosphor dots because of an axial shift of the deflection centers of the electron beams with changing angles of deflection, is termed radial misregister.

Fice

Misregister of the type wherein the individual beam spots of a spot' trio are all three moved away from each other principally because of a deflection of the beams to obtain dynamic convergence, is termed degrouping misregister.

Misregister of the type wherein beam spots of a trio are distorted away from equilateralism because of nonuniformities of the raster scanning deflection elds and/ or the phosphor dots of la trio are distorted away from equilateralism because of inherent characteristics of the dot printing system, is herein termed astigmatic misregister.

Misregister of the type wherein a phosphor dot and its associated beam spot are individually moved different distance relative to the centers of their respective trios due to an apparent decrease of the spacing of the dot printing light sources and of the electron beams from the central tube axis at increasing angles of deflection, is termed foreshortening misregister.

All four of the above-mentioned types of misregister and their causes are hereinafter more -fully described.

In the commercial manufacture of the prior art tubes of the type in question, compensation for radial, degroup ing and foreshortening misregisters has, to a degree, been provided in the form of selected tube geometry and in the use of unique screen fabrication methods and apparatus. One example of such compensation is taught in U.S. Patent 2,885,935, issued to D. W. Epstein et al. In the case of tubes having a maximum beam deflection angle of the Epstein et al. technique has proved to be entirely satisfactory for home television. Yet in tubes with larger deflection angles, e.g., the differences between the electron beam paths and the screen-printing light ray paths are great enough so that improvement over prior art techniques for providing this compensation are desirable, even for home television purposes.

Spot-dot misregister in prior art tubes occurs primarily because of an inherent characteristic of prior art screen fabrication techniques, viz., as the dot trios near the edge of the screen (where the greatest degrouping correction is needed) are enlarged through optically directing the dotprinting light rays so that these dot trios correspond in size with their associated Vbeam spot trios, the shapes of these dot trios are undesirably astigmatically distorted to a shape other than that of their associated spot trios. Thus, obtaining of the desired dot trio size conflicts with the obtaining of the desired dot trio shape. According to prior art design parameters, average dot trio size at the edge of the screen is made smaller than the dot trio size at the center of the screen in order to limit the undesirable dot trio shape distortion. At the same time, in order to obtain an acceptable dot trio size at the edge of the screen, some degree of astigmatic distortion of the dot trios at the edge of the screen is accepted.

As used herein, the size of a phosphor dot trio or a. beam spot trio is defined as being proportional to the average of the distances between the center of the trio and each of the centers of the dots or spots thereof. The center of the trio is the center of a circle inscribed in the triangle whose vertexes lie at the centers of the dots or spots of the trio.

It is therefore an object an object of this invention to provide a new and improved color cathode ray tube of the shadow mask, mosaic dot screen type which exhibits reduced misregister of the beam spots with the phosphor dots on the screen.

According to one feature yof this invention, a cathode ray tube of the type described includes an improved mosaic dot screen in which the size of dot trios adjacent to the edge thereof is substantially equal to the size of the dot trios at the center of the screen and more closely approaches the size of the associated beam spot trios than do the dot trios in -prior art tubes of this type. According to another feature of the invention, the shapes of the phosphor dot trios are similar to the shapes of astigmatically distorted beam spot trios which result when a conventional magnetic deflection yoke is used to scan the beams over the screen and dynamic convergence is simultaneously applied thereto. Both the size of the dot trios at the edges of the screen and the novel shaping of the dot trios serve to more nearly concentrically register the beam spots with the phosphor dots over the entire viewing area of the screen.

The above-described improved mosaic screen is obtained by a unique positioning of the dot-printing light source. This positioning is such as to be characterized by one or more of the following conditions: (a) the light sources are located at points such that the light rays which print a given phosphor dot pass through a different mask aperture than does an electron beam when it excites that given dot; (b) the light sources are located at points such that the paths of light rays which print the dots of the same dot trio are convergent in the region between the mask and screen.

Foreshortening misregister is prevented, and astigmatic misregister is at the same time further reduced, by disposing in the paths of the dot-printing light rays suitable light refractive means which will effect a desired differential amount of shift of the phosphor dots toward the centers of their trios.

Radial spot-dot misregister correction preferably is provided using a modification of prior art light refractive devices such as those taught, e.g., in U.S. Patents 2,8l7, 276, issued on Dec. 24, 1957, or 2,885,935, issued on May l2, 1959, both to Epstein et al. The different light refractive properties desired for correcting astigmatic, radial, and foreshortening misregister errors may be provided either in a plurality of refractive elements, or the desiredk refractive properties may be integrated and provided in a single refractive element.

In the drawings:

FIG. l is a schematic illustration of a three-beam shadow mask cathode ray tube showing the causes of radial and degrouping spot-dot misregister;

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between a system of second order color centers and their associated first order color center;

FIG. 3 is a diagram comparing the effects of phosphor dot printing from first order color centers with effects of phosphor dot printing from second order color centers;

FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 are schematic illustrations showing the relationship of a phosphor dot trio and an associated belam spot trio at various screen positions of prior art tu es;

FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 are schematic illustrations showing the relationship of a phosphor dot trio and an associated beam spot trio at various screen positions of a cathode ray tube embodying to this invention;

FIG. 1() is a partial section of apparatus suitable for printing the screen of the invention; and

FIGS. ll, l2 and 13 are diagrams useful in explaining a procedure for printing the screen.

FIG. 1 illustrates a cathode ray tube of the type described which comprises an envelope 10 containing therein a plurality of electron guns 11, 12 and 13, dynamic beam convergence means 14, an apertured shadow mask 15, and a dot mosaic phosphor screen 16. A magnetic beam deflection means, e.g., a magnetic deflection yoke 17 is disposed around the neck of the envelope 10 for scanning the electron beams of the guns 11, 12 and 13 in mutually perpendicular directions over the shadow mask and phosphor screen 16.

The electron guns 11, 12 and 13'rnay, for example, be disposed co-planar or in a triangular array. A delta triangular array symmetrically disposed about the `central axis A-A of the tube is preferred.

lf a delta array of three guns is used, the shadow mask 1S is provided with a multiplicity of apertures systematically hexagonally arrayed thereover; and the mosaic screen 16 includes a multiplicity of phosphor dots also systematically hexagonally arrayed, with a trio of three dots, each of a different color emitting phosphor, being provided for each of the apertures in the shadow mask 15. If a `co-planar or nonequilateral triangular gun array is used an aperture array in the mask is provided which operatively corresponds thereto.

In operation of the tube, three separate electron beams are projected from the guns 11, 12 and 13 and are directed to be converged to a cr0ssover point at the screen 16 by virtue of the mechanical disposition of the guns and/or convergence forces generated by the convergence means 14. The beams impinge upon the mask 15 and portions thereof pass through the mask apertures. Because of their angular relationship the portions of three beams passing through any given mask aperture are divergent in their transit from the mask to the screen and thus excite different color-emitting phosphor dots of the same phosphor dot trio. T o simplify the explanation of the invention, in FIG. 1 the numerals 18, 20 and 22 indicate the paths of three beams which converge to a point at a central aperture of the mask 15, instead of at the screen 16.

With zero beam deflection, the centers of deflection 24. 25, 26 of the beams lie in plane P-P perpendicular to the axis A-A, which plane is approximately at the axial center of the deflection yoke 17. This plane is referred to as the plane of deflection of the tube at zero beam deflection.

When the beams are deflected away from the paths 18, 20, 22 to, e.g., the beam paths 28, 29, 30, the beams would, in the absence of dynamic convergence forces being `applied thereto, converge to a cross-over before they reach the screen 16. To prevent such Ia premature cross-over, the beams are spread apart by dynamic convergence forces established by the convergence means 14. For example, the dashed lines 28 and 30', by cornparison with the beam paths 18 and 22, illustrate the spread that the beams from guns 11 and 13 are given by the convergence means 14 when they are deflected by the deflection means 17 to follow the paths 28 and 30.

For a deflected beam, the center of deflection is defined as the point of intersection of the undeilected beam path and the rearward projection of the beam path after the beam leaves the influence of the deflecting field. Thus, the deflection centers of the deflected electron beams following paths 28, 29 and 30 are respectively indicated by the points 32, 33 and 34.

As noted in FIG. 1, when the electron beams are dellected from the center of the screen, and proper convergence beam-spread is provided, the centers of the deJ flection of the beams move both forward and outward to the new points 32, 33, 34, and the plane of deflection P P moves forward a corresponding distance. The cene ter of deflection of each beam lthus defines a locus of points along a path. The forward shift of the centers of deflection along the tube axis A-A is caused by the deflection of the beams by the yoke 17 away from the central portion of the screen; the outward shift away from the axis A-A is caused by the spreading of the beam paths by the dynamic convergence forces produced by the convergence means 14.

As a result of the forward axial shift of the centers of deflection, the landing spots of the electron beams are shifted radially outward on the screen 16. This radial shift will occur substantially equally for each spot of any trio of beam spots. Unless a correction is made for this forward shift of the deflection centers, radial misregister of the beam spots with the phosphor dots will result. As a result of the outward shift of the deflection centers of the beams, the trio of beam spots will be spread apart, or enlarged, at outer portions of the screen f6. Unless this outward shift is compensated for, the trio of beam spots will be larger than its associated trio of phosphor dots, and degrouping misregister will result. Both radial misregister and degrouping misregister are manifest in all directions from the center of the screen, and increase as a function of increasing distance from the center of the screen.

Another type of spot-dot misregister can occur because of the inherent characteristics of the dot-printing system itself. In laying down a mosaic dot screen by a direct photographic process, a separate light exposure is made for each of the dot arrays of different phosphors, i.e., red, green, and blue emitting phosphors. In making each exposure, a small area light source is positioned at a location which is related to the deflection center of the associated electron beam. 'I'he light source location is different for each of the different exposures so that the dots of one array are displaced from the dots of the other arrays. In the case of a tube having a delta array of three guns, the location of the light source for each exposure is displaced from the central axis A-A of the tube.

In printing phosphor dots displaced from the center of the screen in the same or opposite direction as the direction the light source is displaced from the central axis A-A, the apparent spacing of the light source from the axis is foreshortened, or effectively decreased. This foreshortening will produce nonequilateral dot trios when the screen support is other than parallel to the plane of defiection, e.g., concave. Such a shift of the phosphor dots causes a distortion of the dot trios, and in tubes which do not exhibit an equal foreshortening effect of the beam spots, a consequent spot-dot misregister known as fore- `shortening misregister is produced. Even if misregister is not encountered the distorted shape of the dot trio due to foreshortening is nevertheless objectional because of the phosphor dot coverage of the screen support surface which necessarily results.

Because foreshortening increases with increasing distance from the center of the screen, and because it oc curs unequally in different radial directions from the center of the screen (varying for a given dot or spot from a maximum to a minimum along a tangential arc of 90) the dot trio distortion is nonuniform both radially and tangentially from the geometric center of the screen. As will be apparent from a later discussion with reference to FIG. 3, shift of the dots due to foreshortenng may be either towa-rd or away from the trio center depending upon the location of the light source and the overall dot printing system used.

Still another type of spot-dot misregister can occur because of the astigmatism of the deflection field produced by the deflection means 17. Although an astigmatic (or at least less astigmatic) deflection yokes can theoretically be fabricated, such yokes are not commonly available because of the manufacturing complexity thereof. The effect of yoke astigmatism is to distort the beam spot trio out of equilateralism as the beams are deected away from the center of the screen. Astigmatism in yokes of conventional design cause the spot trio to have a greater vertical than horizontal dimension when the beams are deflected horizontally away from the center of the screen, and to have a greater horizontal than vertical dimension when deflected vertically away from the center of the screen.

The misregister which results from astigmatically distorted beam spot trios, is compounded by prior art dotprinting system designed to correct degrouping misregister. Such methods cause a slight distortion of the phosphor dot trios which is opposite to (out of phase with) the beam spot trio astigmatic distortion and which increases with increasing defiection angles.

According to prior art screen printing methods the light source for each phosphor-dot-printing photoexposure is located substantially at a position termed the color center of the beam, hereinafter more specifically termed the first order color center of the beam. The first order color center of a beam may be defined as the intersection of a line extending through the centers of a given phosphor dot and its associated mask aperture with the plane of deflection (hereinbefore defined) associated with the given phosphor dot.

In a cathode ray tube which has proper spot-dot register, the first order color center thus corresponds to the deflection center; and for a given array of the same coloremitting phosphor dots, the first order color centers constitute a locus of points corresponding to the locus of deliection center points of the electron :beam which excites those dots. For example, the points 24 and 32 are first order color centers of the beam from electron gun 11. The beam paths 18 and 2S may be termed first order color center paths of that beam even though the beam 28 does not pass through the color center when it is deflected.

In accordance with one feature of this invention, the light source for each phosphor-dot-printing exposure is positioned substantially at or primarily with respect to, a higher order color center of the associated beam, i.e., second order, third order, etc. A second order color center may be defined as that position in a given plane of defiection to which a given elemental screen area is exposed through a mask aperture which is adjacent to the mask aperture through which the given elemental area is exposed to the first order color center. A third order color center is that position to which the given elemental screen area is exposed through an aperture which is two apertures removed from the aperture through which the first order color center is exposed.

There are a plurality of second order color centers for each first order color center, the number thereof depending upon the mosaic pattern of the mask and screen. In cathode ray tubes having an equilateral array of three electron guns, the shadow mask apertures are systematically hexagonally arrayed, i.e., each aperture has six surround- Ving or adjacent apertures. Thus there are six second order color centers for each first order color center for such a tube geometry.

FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship of the second order color centers with their associated first order color center. In FIG. 2 the central tube axis A-A (FIG. 1) is perpendicular to the paper at the intersection of the mutually perpendicular axes X--X land Y--Y. The points 24, 25, and 26 represent the first order color centers for the three undeflected beams from the electron guns 11, 12 and 13. These points correspond respectively to the like numbered centers of defiection of the three beams in the plane P-P of FIG. 1. The first order color centers 24, 25, and 26 are equilaterally arrayed and symmetrically disposed about the central axis A-A. Each first order color center is spaced a distance s from the tube axis A-A along an axis which is perpendicular to the axis A-A and which is termed the S axis of the dot-printing pattern. Positive displacements along the S axis are measured from the tube axis A-A in the direction of the first order color center.

In FIG. 2 points 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, and 65 represent the second order color centers of the first order color center 26. The other first order color centers 24 and 25 have a similar array or system of second order color centers (not shown). The second order color centers for each of the first order color centers are spaced equidistantly from their associated first order color center on six equally angularly spaced radii, one of which passes through the central axis A-A and coincides with the S axis of the associated first order color center.

The spacing of a second order color center from its first order color center in terms of the distance s may `be obtained from the formula where q is the mask to screen spacing, L is the spacing between the color center and the screen, a is the spacing between adjacent mask apertures, and s is the spacing of the first order color center from the central axis of the tube in the zero deflection plane of deflection. The derivation of this formula is treated in detail in an article by H. P. Law, entitled A Three-Gun Shadow-Mask Color Kinescope, in the October 1951 issue of the Proceedings of The IRE. This formula defines the relationship of s, L, q, and a for a tube geometry including an equilater-al array of three guns, a flat mask and a flat mosaic screen having an equilateral array of tangent phosphor dots at the center of the screen. When the formula is solved for the location of a second order color center in terms of the definition of a second order color center, it states that in the zero defiection plane of defiection the second order color center is displaced a distance equal to 3s from its associated first order color center. This relationship is indicated by the FIG. 2 diagram.

FIG. 3 is a flattened-out section of FIG. 2 taken along line 3-3 thereof and containing the axis A-A and the two first order color centers 24 and 26. FIG. 3 illustrates how a second order color center, positioned in accordance with that shown in FIG. 2, does in fact conform to the definition as set forth above. In FIG. 3 the screen surface 16, shadow mask 15, plane of deflection P-P, and the central tube axis A--A corresponding to the same elements illustrated in FIG. 1, are schematically shown. Points 24 and 26 are two first order color centers and correspond to those points illustrated in FIG. 2.

In FIG. 3 the dashed lines 66 and 67 represent light rays from the first order color centers 24 and 26 which pass through a given mask aperture 68 and print. a pair of phosphor dots at points 69 and 70. The rays 66 and 67 follow paths which cross-over at the mask 15 and then (like the dot-exciting portions of the electron beams) diverge in the region between the mask and screen. Point 60 in FIG. 3 constitutes one of the second order color centers for the first order color center 26 and corresponds to the second vorder color center 60 shown in FIG. 2. This specific second order color center is that one which is displaced from its first order color center in the same direction as is the central tube axis A-A. Since each of the second order color centers is positioned a distance 3s from its first order color center, the second order center 60 lies on the `--S axis on the opposite side of the axis A-A from the first order color center 26 and is spaced twice as far from the axis A-A as is the first order color center 26.

In practicing the method of this invention each dotprinting exposure is preferably made from a specific second order color center which bears the same realtion to its first order color center as the second order center 60 does to its first order center 26. Point 71 is the second order color center which bears this same relationship to the first order color center 24. The solid lines 72 and 73 represent light rays from the second order color center 60 and 71 which pass through mask apertures 74 and 75 adjacent to the given mask aperture 68 to print the two phosphor dots at points 70 and 69. The rays 72. and '73 are convergent in the region between the mask 15 and screen 16.

Even though the phosphor dots of a tube are printed from second order color centers, the electron beams in operation of the tube are projected along first order color center paths and thus appear to originate from the first order color centers of the respective beams. Thus in second order color center printing the light rays which print a given phosphor dot pass through a different mask aperture than does an electron beam when it excites that given dot. Moreover, the mask apertures through which light rays pass to print the different dots of the same trio are different from each other. For example, the phosphor dots at points 70 and 69 are printed by light rays from the second order color centers 60 and 71 which pass through mask apertures 74 and 75, whereas these same phosphor dots at points 70 and 69 are excited by two electron beams which both pass through the same mask aperture 68.

In tubes wherein the mosaic dot screen has been printed from second order color centers, a unique spot-dot relationship is produced at the screen periphery. Each one of the different (e.g., three) color-emitting phosphor dot arrays produced by such a dot printing exposure includes a row of dots on the -j-S (FIG. 2) side of the screen 16 (FIG. 3) for which there are no associated electron beam spots. Conversely, on the -S side of the screen a row of beam spots will -be produced in operation of the tube for which there are no associated phosphor dots. This condition results because the dot printing light originates from a second order color center while the spot forming beam originates from a first order color center. Thus, although the associated beam spot and phosphor dot arrays are similar to each other and have corresponding spot and dot elements, these arrays are shifted with respect to each other on the faceplate. Consequently, a given beam spot excites the phosphor dot adjacent to that dot which has a position in the dot array corresponding to the position which the beam spot has in the spot array. For this reason, on the -j-S side of the screen the imperforate peripheral portion of the mask 15 shadows the row of phosphor dots from all of the electron beams, one of which would otherwise excite these dots.

Since the S axis of each of the three dot printing exposures is angularly displaced from the others in a 3-gun tube as shown, the condition of unexcited dots and nonexciting beam spots exists completely around the periphery of the tube.

One of the major differences in the eects of printing from the first order color centers 24 and 26 or from the second order color centers 71 and 60 is concerned with the effect which a variation of tube magnification has in the relative positioning of the phosphor dots at points 69 and 70. As used herein, magnification is the ratio of the spacing L-q between the plane of defiection and the shadow mask to the spacing q between the shadow mask and screen. Consider for example, that the mask to screen spacing in FIG. 3 is decreased to a Value q by moving the screen 16 closer to the mask 15 so that it lies in the plane E-E. This is effectively a condition which exists at the edge of the screen in preferred practice where the magnification is greater. When such as the case, the light rays 66 and 67 emanating from the first order color centers 24 and 26 print phosphor dots at points 76 and 77. On the other hand, the light rays 72 and 73 emanating from the second order color centers 60 and 71 print phosphor dots at points 78 and 79. From this it can be seen that a decrease in the mask to screen spacing of the tube results in the phosphor dots being printed closer together when exposure is made from the first order color centers, but farther apart when exposure is made from the second order color centers. This difference, of course, is manifest because the first order printing rays 66 and 67 are diverging as they approach the screen 16, whereas the second order printing rays 72 and 73 are converging as they approach the screen 16. As is explained more fully hereinafter, this opposite effect of increased magnification in the tube geometry may be used to achieve the improved degrouping and astigmatism misregister correction.

Point S0 represents a third order color center for the first order color center 26. In the plane P-P it is displaced from its associated second order color center 60 the same distance 3S as the second order color center 60 is from its first order color center 26. The dotted line 81 indicates the path of light rays from the third order color center y which pass through mask aperture 82 to print the phosphor dot at point 70. The aperture 82 is adjacent to the aperture 74 through which exposure is made from the second order color center 60, and is one more aperture removed from the aperture 68 through which exposure is made from the first order color center 26.

As shown by the intersection of light path 81 with plane E-E, use of third order color centers for dot-printing eiect an even greater degrouping of the phosphor dots of a trio for a given decrease of mask to screen spacing than does second order color center printing. Exposure from the third order color center 80 would print a phosphor dot at the point 83 rather than at the point 78 where a dot would be printed by exposure from the second order color center 60.

The greater rate of degrouping which third, and even higher, order color center printing yields, may -be desirable in the making of some tube types. However, in the printing of phosphor dot screens for a direct-view color cathode ray tube for home television use which has a maximum deection angle of 90, second order color center printing is preferred. Therefore, so as to present a less complex explanation, the remainder of this disclosure will describe the use of second order color centers as applied to the making of such a 90 tube. However, it will be appreciated that even higher order color centers may be used, and tubes with larger maximum deflection angles may be made.

An appreciation of the advantages of printing phosphor dots from second order color centers and the way in which such advantages are obtained can best be had by first understanding the limitations ot prior art first order color center dot-printing systems, and then comparing such systems with second order color center printing described herein.

FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 illustrate the distortions of spot and dot trios in tubes of the prior a-rt. The distortion of the Spot trios is that which results from use of deflection yokes of known design whose fields are inherently astigmatic. The distortion of the dot trios is that which results because of inherent characteristics of prior art irst order color center dot-printing. For the purpose of more clearly illustrating the distortions, they are exaggerated in degree. FIG. 4 illustrates the shape `and size Iof the spot and dot trios at the center of the screen; FIG. 5 illustrates the shape and size of the spot and dot trios at the 12 oclock and 6 oclock screen positions; and FIG. 6 illustrates the shape and size of the spot and dot trios at the 9 oclock and 3 oclock screen positions. In FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 the phosphor dots are represented, respectively, by the larger circles 90, 91, and 92, and the beam spots are represented, respectively, by the smaller circles 93, 94, and 95.

At the center of the screen (FIG. 4), the trio of phosphor dots 90 and the trio of beam spots 93 are equilateral with the centers of the phosphor dots 90 and the centers of the beam spots 93 being substantially coincident. The triangle 96 illustrates both the shape of the trio of spots 93 and the trio of dots 90. At the 12 oclock and 6 oclock screen positions (FIG. 5), the trio of beam spots 94 is astigmatically distorted from equilateralism to have a greater horizontal than vertical dimension. Triangle 97 illustrates the shape of the trio of beam spots 94. At the 9 oclock and 3 oclock screen positions (FIG. 6), the trio of beam spots 95 is -astigmatically ldistorted from equilateralism to have a greater vertical than horizontal dimension. The triangle 98 illustrates the shape of the trio of beam spots 95.

In order to correct for degrouping misregister, the prior art provided a variable mask to screen spacing which decreased from the center to the edge of the screen and used a light refracting device in the dot-printing exposures. The decreased spacing was designed to selectively group the beam spots at the edge of the screen to produce a spot'trio substantially equal in size to the spot trio at the center of the screen. In order to prevent this decreased mask to screen spacing from producing excessive crowding of the phosphor dots at the edge of the screen, an appropriate light refracting means, which tended to degroup the dots, was used in the dot-printing exposure. However, because of the inherent characteristics of such an approach to degrouping correction, the phosphor dot trios were distorted in shape in a phase opposite to that of the beam spot trios and were moreover made similar than that which would produce optimum spot-dot register.

In FIG. 5 the trio of phosphor dots 91 at the 12 oclock and 6 oclock screen positions are shown distorted to a nonequilateral triangular array which is horizontally compressed and/ or vertically elongated. The triangle 99 illustrates the shape of the trio of phosphor dots 91. The distortion of the dot triangle 99 is substantially opposite (out of phase with) that of the spot triangle 97, and the beam spots are so eccentric relative to the phosphor dots that they barely land thereon.

Also, both the phosphor dots 91 and the trio thereof are smaller than the corresponding dots and trio thereot` at the center of the screen. Because of the distorted shape of the dot trios at 12 oclock and 6 oclock the dots 91 have to be made smaller to prevent the upper two dots, as shown in FIG. 5, from overlapping each other. Although greater refraction of the dot-printing light rays could have been used to further degroup the dots 91 and thus permit the use of both larger dots 91 and a larger trio thereof, to do so would have even further aggravated the undesirable distortion of the dot trio shape and its misregister with the beam spots to the point that the beam spots might not fall entirely on their associated phosphor dots. Thus, a compromise between trio size and trio shape was made. Some degree of undesirability -of each of these parameters was accepted in making the compromise.

In FIG. 6 the trio of phosphor dots 92 at the 9 oclock and 3 oclock screen positions are shown distorted to la nonequilateral triangular array which is vertically compressed and/ or horizontally elongated. The triangle illustrates the shape of the trio of phosphor dots 92. The resulting condition is similar to that described above for the 12 oclock yand 6 oclock screen positions. The distortion of the dot triangle 100 is substantially opposite that of the spot triangle 98, and the dots 92 -and the trio thereof are smaller than those at the center of the screen. As a consequence, the beam spots are so eccentric relative to the phosphor dots that they barely land thereon.

FIGS. 7, 8, and 9 illustrate the unique shaping of the phosphor dot trios and the relationship of the beam spot trios therewith at various representative screen positions in a screen embodying the invention. In FIGS. 7, 8, and 9 the phosphor dots are represented bythe large circles 101, 102, and 103 respectively, and the beam spots are represented by the hatched small circles 93, 94, and 95, respectively. The beam spot'trios in FIGS. 7, 8, Iand 9 are respectively, substantially identical with those of FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 since their astigmatic distortion occurs not because of tube structure or method of fabrication,

but because of the nonuniformities of the deflection yoke which may be substantially the same in both cases.

The triangles 96, 97, and 98 which define the spot trios, also substantially dene their -associated dot trios. The desired nonequilateral shaping of the dot trios at the representative screen positions shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, are opposite to, or out-of-phase with, the undesired astigmatic distortion of the prior art dot trios at corresponding screen positions shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. Because of this reversal of dot trio shaping, the phosphor dots according to this invention at any of the representative screen positions are more nearly concentric with their associated trio of beam spots.

Even though the phosphor dots 102 and 103 are smaller at the edge of the screen than are the phosphor shown in FIGS. 7, 8, and 9, a suitable tube geometry dots 101 at the center of the screen, the trios thereof are not also undesirably reduced in size as was the case of the prior art dot trios shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. The phosphor dots 102 and 103 are made smaller than the phosphor dots 101 in order to permit the printing of an enlarged dot trio toward the edge of the screen without,

at the same time, having the dots of one trio overlap the dots of a neighboring trio. Such an enlarged dot trio will more nearly match the size of the enlarged or degrouped spot trios. In the prior art the dots were made smaller in order to prevent their overlapping other dots of the same trio which could not be further enlarged to match the size of the spot tro without incurring an attendant, undesirable distortion of the dot trio.

To photographically print the phosphor dot trios as shown in FIGS. 7, 8, and 9, a suitable tube geometry must first be established. The tube geometry as discussed with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3 and the equation determines the location of the preferred second order color center.

The specific points at which the phosphor dots will be printed at a given screen position is also dependent upon the magnification of the cathode ray tube at that screen position. Thus, in accordance with teachings hereinbefore set forth, the magnification of the tube is made to vary from a minimum at the center of the screen to a maximum at the edge of the screen. Such variation in magnification is preferably achieved at least in part by a mask-to-screen spacing which decreases from the center to the edge of the screen. The variation in magnification is such that when phosphor dots are printed from second order color centers, the size of the dot trios at a given screen position is increased while at the same time the associated beam spot trios produced in the subsequent operation of the tube are decreased. Considering separately dot trio shape distortion due to foreshortening, this appropriate selection of mask-screen spacing in itself substantially corrects for the differences in spot trio and dot trio size which causes degrouping misregister. Thus in correcting for degrouping misregister in second order color center printing, refractive devices .in the path of the dot printing light rays as employed by the prior art may be omitted. Because refractive means is not used. to effect a degrouping of the phosphor dots of the dot trios, misregister due to astigmatism of the beam spot trios is reduced. This advantage follows from the fact that the use of refractive means having special properties to effect dot degrouping in first order color center printing inherently distorts the dot trios in such a way as to aggravate the misregister resulting from spot trio astigmatism. Such distortion is reduced or avoided by using second or higher order color center printing.

In second order color center printing, refractive means is used for the correction of radial and foreshortening misregister, but not for degrouping misregister as in rst order color center printing. Although refractive means in the path of the dot printing light rays may be used in higher order color center printing, it is used for a different purpose, in a different way, and produces a different effect than that of the prior art. Foreshortening of the spacing of the light source from the central axis of the tube occurs in second order color center printing as well as in first order color center printing. However, due to the nature of second order color center printing, the effects of foreshortening can be opposite from the effects encountered in first order color center printing-namely, in second order color center printing, the phosphor dots are shifted away from, instead of toward, the centers of their trios. Thus, whereas the occurrence and correction of foreshortening undesirably aggravated astigmatic misregister in first order color center printing, they advantageously alleviate it in second order color center printing.

Foreshortening results in some of the phosphor dots of a given exposure being shifted parallel to the S axis of that exposure. The amount of shift, which is different for different dots, increases with increasing distance from the center of the screen and varies from a maximum to zero through a tangential arc from the S axis (FIG. 2) to the PS (perpendicular to S) axis (FIG. 1l). Thus, refractive means which will tend to compensate for foreshortening should have refractive properties of a wedge or wedgelike element. As used herein wedge means a plate-like element whose thickness varies from a maximum to a minimum in one direction across its surface and is of relatively uniform thickness in the perpendicular direction. However, this is not to preclude some thickness variation or curvature being present in the perpendicular direction which might inherently result because of the particular wedge fabricating procedure used or might be provided by design to compensate for some secondary factor. Such wedge refractive properties may be: (a) provided in the form of a separate contoured wedge; (b) integrated with the refractive properties for correcting radial misregister in a single refractive element; or (c) provided as a combination of both (a) and (b).

In second order color center printing the spacing between the center of a phosphor dot and the center of its trio is determined by two substantially independently variable parameters: (1) the tube magnification, i.e., ratio of (L-q)/q and (2) the manifestation of foreshortening and the correction made therefor. A change of magnification simultaneously effects a substantially equal shift (but in different directions) of each of the dots of a trio and is effected substantially equally for dots on both the S and PS axes. Foreshortening and correction therfore effects a change of dot spacing independently for the three dots of a trio and a maximum for dots on the S axis and varies through a 90 tangential arc to a minimum for dots on the PS axis. Each of the dots of the trio can be shifted differently from the shift given the other dots of the trio by using foreshortening-correction refracting means of different strengths for the three different dot printing exposures. Since these two dot spacing parameters are substantially independent of each other, the former can be used primarily to obtain a desired trio size while the latter can be used to obtain a desired trio shape. Such a freedom in dot trio sizing and shaping is not possible in prior art first order color center printing because the size of the dot trio is primarily adjusted by the refractive element that also sets the shape of the trio in correcting for foreshortening errors.

Apparatus 110, such as illustrated in FIG. 10, can be used in printing the phosphor dots. In the art of photographically printing mosaic dot screens, such an apparatus is referred to as a lighthouse The lighthouse comprises an open-top cabinet 111 having a shoulder 112 and which a bowl-shaped faceplate lpanel 114 of a cathode ray tube may be disposed. The faceplate panel 114 is adapted to be subsequently sealed at its open end 11S to another member (not shown) to form a completed cathode ray tube bulb. The panel 114 includes a surface 116 for supporting the phosphor screen 16 (FIG. 1) and a plurality of studs 118 on which the apertured shadow mask 15 (FIG. l) can be removably mounted. Prior to mounting the panel 114 on the cabinet 111, the surface 116 is coated with a conventional photoresi-st material. On the external surface of the panel 114 are a plurality of bosses 119 which cooperate with mating recesses in the cabinet 111, whereby the faceplate panel 114 may be positioned in a prescribed orientation on the lighthouse 110.

At the base of the cabinet 111 is a housing 120 which contains a lamp 121 and a tapered light conductor or collimator 122. The lamp 121 may, for example, comprise an ultraviolet emitting `device such as a General Electric Company 1 kilowatt, high pressure, mercury arc lamp, Type BHG. The collimator 122 is positioned above the UV lamp 121 and tapers away therefrom to a small area point 124. The point 124 is positioned in a selected 13 plane of deection P-P at a predetermined distance from the -central axis A-A of the faceplate panel 114. The lateral `displacement of the small area light source 124 is preferably a distance of approximately 2S from the axis A-A, substantially at a second order color center of the cathode ray tube system into which the mosaic dot screen being printed is to be incorporated.

The light housing 120 may, as shown, be mounted on a rotatable table 125 which can be indexed at a plurality of predetermined positions. Means 126 including a spring loaded plunger is provided which cooperates with mating depressions in the rim of the table 125 to x the table 125 in these predetermined positions. Such indexing of the table 125 and housing 120 is designed to selectively-position the light source 124 at dierent locations corresponding to, e.g., a selected second order color center for each of the plurality of dot printing exposures required.

A support bracket -127 disposed between the light source 124 and the faceplate panel 114 is supported on a plurality of legs 128 from the table 125. The bracket 127 has anI opening 129 therein opposite the light source 124 :across which suitable light ray refracting means 130 is supported. The refractive means |130 is thus maintained in a fixed angular relationship with the light source 124 when it -is moved.

Alternatively, the table 125 may be omitted, the light housing 120 mounted directly on the base of the cabinet 111, and the bracket 127 mounted directly on the Wall of the cabinet 111. In such case the light source 124 and the refractive means 130 are fixed in their location. A plurality of similar lighthouses 110 are then provided for making the plurality of required dot printing exposures on a given faceplate panel 114. In each of such a plurality of lig-hthouses 110, the light source .124 is positioned with respect to a different one of the required second order color centers.

The refracting means 130 may, as hereinbefore stated, alternatively comprise: (1) a single element which is so contoured as to possess all the desired misregister-correcting refractivepropertes, (2) two separate elements, one of which possesses radial misregister correcting properties and one of'which possesses foreshortening misregister properties, or (3) a plurality of elements which combine the features of alternatives (l) and (2). In the embodiment shown, the refracting means 130 is of the nature of alternative (3). The refracting means 130 comprises a plurality of separate elements 131 and 132 which are disposed back-to-back either spaced from or contacting each other. The upper element 131 is fabricated according to U.S. Patent 2,885,935, Epstein et al., to provide both the desired correction for radial misregister and some wedge refractionproperties for at least partial correction of foreshortening effects. The lower element 132, which may 'be cernented'to the upper element 131, comprises a wedge contoured to provide the remaining correction for foreshortening misregister and to desirably shape the phosphor dot trios'. In the combinationv optics 121-132, whatever the refractive properties of one of the elements, the other element is so contoured to complement the vfirst so as to provide the overall refraction desired; The contoured wedge 132 may, for example, be circular, be of uniform thickness in one direction across its surface (e.g., in the direction perpendicular to the paper), and vary in thickness in the perpendicular surface direction. Preferably, the contoured surface 134 tapers from botha thick side 135 and a thin side 136 of the wedge toward the center 137 where the surface 134 is substantially parallel to the planar wedge surface 138. The slope of the surface 134 is of the same polarity at all points from one end to the other and decreases from a maximum on one side of the center to a minimum (e. g. zero) at the center and then increases to Ia maximum on the other side of the center. Such a contour results in substantially zero refraction in the S direction of light rays passing through the central portion '137 which print phosphor dots along the'PS axis and in increasing amounts of refraction of light rays passing through the wedge at increasing distances toward either the thick side or the tbin side 136 which print dots displaced from the PS axis. The refraction of the dot printing light rays is lmanifest primarily in the direction of the S axis, and the wedge 132 (as well as the upper element 131) is so oriented that the refraction due to the wedge properties thereof is such as to shift the apparent source of the light rays in the -S direction. The specific dimensional shaping of the contoured surface of the two elements 131 and 132 are such that light rays passing therethrough will be refracted :and print an array of phosphor dots so as to compensate for the foreshortening of the dots from the centers of their trios to a degree that will also alleviate astigmatic misregister.

Various design parameters of the cathode ray tube and the system in which it is to be used are rst established before preparing the wedge 132. Among such parameters are the following: (a) the size and shape of the cathode ray tube bulb; (b) the electron gun structure of the tube and its position within the bulb relative to the phosphor screen; (c) the deflection yoke system used to scan the beams over the phosphor screen; (d) the dynamic convergence system used to maintain the electron beams yconverged during scanning thereof; (e) the spacing between apertures of the apertured shadow mask of the tube; (f) the mask-to-screen spacing at the center of the screen, the size of the apertures of the apertured shadow mask, and the photographic dot printing parameters designed to produce tangent phosphor dots in the center of the screen.

The specific procedure to be used in practicing the method of this invention is somewhat dependent upon the particular design of the tube in question, the overall system in which it is to be incorporated, the design facilities available, etc. One procedure may be as follows:

(1) Design and fabricate the light refracting element 131 (FIG. 10) for correcting radial misregister for the tube in question in known fashion. The design of the refracting device may, for example, be in accordance with the teachings of the Epstein et al. Patent 2,885,935 as applied to the making of the 70 21FBP22 direct view color cathode ray tube. Such design may be obtained mathematically by calculating the contour of the refracting element asl based on the calculated or measured axial movement of the deflection centers of the electron `beams as a function of the scanning deflection of the beams. Alternatively, such design may be obtained empirically by printing selected ones or all of the phosphor dots of a mosaic dot screen, fabricating this screen into a completed tube, operating the tube, and noting and measuring the radial misregister of the beam spot with its associated phosphor dot. From this measured misregister, the contour of the element 131 necessary to provide the desired correction may be-calculated.

(2) Fabricate an apertured shadow mark according to an assumed mask contour. In order to simplify subsequent calculations, it may be preferable that the assumed mask contour be such as to provide constant magnification.

(3) Using the radial correction device 131 of step (l) vand the assumed contour shadow mask of step (2), print a complete mosaic dot phosphor screen with the dot printing light sources located at rst order color centers. For this particular step, rst order color centers are used because uncorrected foreshortening misregister is so pronounced at this point in second order color center printing, that if the second order centers were used, subsequent evaluation of the dot arrays would be diiicult. In making the mosaic dot screen of this step, consideration should be given to mechanical errors, e.g., that caused by faceplate sag during evacuation of the tube, and to magnetic errors, e.g., that caused by the earths magnetic field.

(4) Fabricate a completed tube using the mosaic dot screen of step (3) and the assumed contour mask of step (2). Referring to FIG. ll, operate the tube and note and measure the degrouping misregister Ad on each end of the PS axes at various radial distances r1, r2, r3, etc., from the center of the screen for each of the different color phosphor arrays of dots. The measure of misregister Ad is the distance between the center of a beam spot and the center of its associated phosphor d-ot in the direction toward or away from the center of the phosphor dot trio.

As shown in FIG. 1l, in a three-gun tube having three arrays of different color phosphor dots, six measurements would be taken at each radial distance. In FIG. 1l trios of red, green, and blue dots 150, 151, and 152 respectively, are shown at various radial distances r1, r2, and r3 on each of the red, green, and blue PS axes. Red, green and blue misregisters, Adr, Adg, and Adb respectively, are representatively shown at three screen positions 153, 154, 15S, wherein the red, green, and `blue beam spots 156, 157, and 15S are shown eccentric with their associated phosphor dots. The three values of Ad shown, together with the other three (not shown) at screen positions 160, 161, 162 are averaged to obtain the average misregister Ad at radial distance r3. Averaging misregisters at given radial distances simplifies fabrication of the calculated mask contour, since the mask can be made axially symmetrical.

(5) Using the averaged misregister measurements of step (4), calculate the required value of q at each of the radial distances where misregister measurements are taken to give -a revised mask contour which will eliminate the degrouping misregister noted in step (4). In making this calculation the following formula is used:

where and represents the distance from the center of a phosphor dot to the center of its dot trio p=L-qa, Ad is the average misregister of step (4), qr is the revised mask-toscreen spacing, and qa is the assumed mask-to-screen spacing of step (2).

(6) Fabricate a shadow mask according to the q1. values calculated in step (5).

(7) Using the mask of revised contour of step (6) and the radial correction element 131 of step (1), print a mosaic dot screen from second order color centers. Fabricate a complete tube using the screen of this step and revised mask of step (6).

(8) Operate the tube of step (7) and note and measure the spot-dot misregister along each of the S axes at various radial distances from the center of the screen for each of the different color dot arrays. This spot-dot misregister represents foreshortening misregister in excess of that which is corrected by the wedge properties included in the yradial correction element 131 of step (l). These foreshortening misregister measurements are taken in a manner similar to those of step (4) described with reference to FIG. l1, except that they are taken on the three S axes instead of the three PS axes. These measurements may be averaged as in step (4) to design a yrefractive device Which will provide an average correction for the excess foreshortening misregister for all three of the dotprinting exposures. Alternatively, the misregisters measured at the various radial distances along each of the three S axes may be considered as separate groups of data, and individual refractive correcting devices separately designed for each ofthe three color exposures.

(9) Determine the surface contour of the wedge-like refracting element 132 (FIG. 10) which will produce the required shift of location of apparent light source to correct the excess foreshortening misregisters noted in step (8). In making this determination, steps (10) through (16) as follows may be used:

(10) Select a suitable material of known index of refraction and assume a thickness of a plano-parallel plate thereof. The assumed thickness should be such as to facilitate fabrication and handling of the refractive device and to provide a desired mechanical strength.

(11) Calculate the effects of refraction at various angles of incidence in terms of axial shift Z of the light source from an apparent plane of deflection P-P to an actual plane of deflection P-P. Use the following formula:

where t equals the assumed thickness of the refractive plate; N equals the index of refraction of the refractive plate; gb is the angle of incidence corresponding to selected deflection angles; and Z is the apparent shift of the light source parallel to the axis A-A. For convenience the calculated values of Z may be plotted to construct a graph illustrating the non-linear variation of Z as a function of tp.

In Equation 2 Z represents a variable radial misregister error introduced by the presence of the plano-parallel plate itself. If desired, correction for this radial error can be compensated for in the radial correction element 131 of step (1). However, as a practical matter this need not be done, lbut instead the source may be shifted to a compromise position by an amount AZ.

(12) Referring to FIG. 12, shift the axial position of the light source a distance AZ to a new plane P-P' (FIG. 10) in the dot printing apparatus, where AZ is a selected fraction of the maximum Z distance from its apparent initial location so as to more equally distribute from the center to the edge of the screen the radial misregister error introduced by the refractive plate from which the foreshortening correction wedge is to be fabricated. In a cathode ray tube having a maximum deflection angle of a judicious distribution of the error is provided when zero error is established at a deflection angle of about 76.

(13) Disassemble the tube from which the foreshorteningy misregisters were noted in step (8), and reposition the screen-bearing-faceplate onto the apparatus (now containing the plano-parallel plate and the element 131) which was used to print the mosaic dot screen in step (7). Referring to FIG. 13, shift the light source of the apparatus a distance AS1 laterally from its initial point 170 along one of the three S axes to a first point 171 in plane P'P so as to obtain a register of the dot-printing light spot on the screen with the misregistered location of the beam spot that was noted in step (8) on that axis. Note and measure the amount of lateral shift AS1 of the light source which was required to produce this register. Now shift the light source axially a distance AP and laterally a distance AS2 to a second point 172 at which register of the dot-printing light spot on the screen with the misregistered location of the beam spot is again obtained. Note and measure the values of AP and AS2. Repeat the step (13) procedure described above for a number of different screen positions to obtain a series of AS1, AP, and A52 values.

(14) Again referring to FIG. 13, calculate the slope of the contoured surface 177 of the wedge 132 (FIG. l0) at various angles of deflection to give the AS1 values determined in step (13). Deflection angles on the -S side of the axis A-A are given by the formula:

sin (2l-sin 02 fractive plate contoured as at 177 in order to emerge from f the plate to follow the desired path 175; AS1 is the distance i in the plane P-P which the light source must be shifted from its actual location to obtain the desired register when exposing through a at refractive plate-this distance is the apparent shift of the light source which the contoured wedge is to produce; AS2 and AP are respectively the lateral and axial shifts from first to second light source locations which produce the desired register when exposing through a plano-parallel plate; Z is the distance along the axis A-A from the plane of deflection P'-P to the near, contoured surface 134 of the Wedge plate; tan 1; is the slope of the contour surface of the wedge at the point ofincidence of the light paths 174'and 176; and N is the index of refractionof the material from which the wedge plate is made. Y

Deflection angles on the +S side of the axis A-A are given by the formula:

tan 1] nAn-S1112 01-'COS02 where AS tan 02-tan til--Z- (7) and the symbols of the formula are the same as for Formula 4.

(l5) Still referring to FIG. 13, calculate the positions on the surface of the refractive plate at which the slope values of step (14) fall. Use the following formula:

where H is the distance along the S axis measured from the center of the wedge.

(16) Using the slope values tan o7 of step (14) and the positions or displacements H of step (15) calculate a series of thickness values of the wedge. Then using these thickness values determine a smooth contour, such as by fitting a polynomial to the slope values by known techniques, and fabricate a Wedge 132 according thereto suitable for combining with the radial correction device 131 of step (1) in the lighthouse 110.

(17) Usingthe revised contour mask of step (6), the radial correction device 131 0f step (1), and the wedge 132`of step (16), fabricate tubes, printing the dots thereof from second order color centers.

(18) Operate the tubes of step (17 and calculate any adjustments of mask contour and wedge contour 134 which are necessary to give optimum screen fabrication results. One or more of steps (1) through (16) may be repeated, if desired, in making these adjustments.

In making mosaic dot screens by a direct photographic method, it is known to slightly offset the light source from the color center where it would otherwise be positioned in order to compensate for small secondary factors. Examples of such factors are: (a) faceplate sag due to evacuation of the tube (see step 3 above), (b) refractions of the dot-printing light rays due to a finite thickness of glass in the paths thereof (see Steps 11 and 12 above), and (c) the beam deflection effects of the vertical component of the earths magnetic iield. Therefore, when stated herein that the light source is positioned substantially at a color center (e.g., higher order or second order color center) it is intended to include those instances when the light source is actually displaced from the color center in question for the purpose of compensating for these or other such factors. To be positioned substantially at a second order color center is, in a broad sense, meant to describe a positioning which is made primarily with respect to the second order color center instead of eg. the first order color center, and wherein compensation displacement for any such minor purpose is measured from the secondy order color center rather than from the first order color center.

One example of practicing this invention in accordance with the teachings hereinbefore set forth involve the following speciic dimensions, spacings, etc.:

(A) Spacing of each electron beam from the central tube axis A-A in the plane of deflection at zero deiiection, 0.205 inch.

(B) Spacing of the plane of deection at zero deflection from the shadow mask 15 along the axis A-A, 11.205 inches.

(C) Spacing of mask 15 from screen 16 along the beam paths where ris the radial displacement from the center of the mask in inches and q is the mask-to-screen spacing in inches:

r q r fr (D) Spacing of light source from central tube axis A-A 0.410 inch on opposite side of axis A-A from the associated electron beam.

(E) Spacing 0f light source from A--A, 11.372 inches.

(F) Spacing of interface 138 (FIG. 10) between the two refracting elements 131 and 132 from the mask 15 along the axis A-A, 6.546 inches.

(G) Radius of curvature of mosaic dot screen 16, 26.330

inches.

(H) `Diameter of aperture in shadow mask 15, 0.012 inch at center of mask decreasing to 0.010 inch at 9.35 inches from the center of mask.

(I) Spacing between adjacent apertures of mask 15, 0.028

inch.

(I) Contour data for the wedge refractive element 132 (FIG. 10) Where: H is the displacement in inches of a section of the wedge from the center thereof, positive values of H being in one direction from the center and negative values being in the opposite direction, t is the thickness in mils of the section at H displacement, and tan n is the slope of the contoured surface 134 (FIG. 10) at H displacement:

mask 15 along the axis H (inches) t (mils) n Tan H (inches) t (mils) 11 Tan II (inches) t (mils) n Tan H (inches) t (Inils) n Tan 000 375. 00 0011642 2. 550 353. 69 0169985 050 374. 94 0012931 2. 600 352. 83 0173400 100 374. 87 0014419 2. 650 351. 9G 0176750 150 374. 79 0016097 2. 700 351. 06 0180018 200 374. 71 0017951 2. 750 350. 16 0183189 250 374. 61 0019972 2. 800 349. 23 0186244 300 374. 51 0022147 2. 850 348. 29 0189165 350 374. 39 0024465 2. 900 347. 34 0191930 400 374. 26 0026914 2. 950 346. 37 0194516 450 374. 12 0029484 3. 000 345. 39 0196899 500 373. 97 0032162 3. 050 344. 40 0199052 550 373. 80 0034939 3. 100 343. 40 0200948 600 373. 62 0037805 3. 150 342. 40 0202555 650 373. 42 0040748 3. 200 341. 38 0203842 700 373. 21 0043761 3. 250 340. 36 0204776 750 372. 99 0046834 3. 300 339. 33 0205319 800 372. 74 0049959 3. 350 338. 30 0205435 850 372. 48 0053129 3. 400 337. 28 0205083 900 372. 21 0056338 3. 450 336. 26 0204219 950 371. 92 0059579 3. 500 335. 24 0202801 1. 000 371. 62 0062846 3. 550 334. 23 0200780 1. 050 371. 29 0066136 3. 600 333. 23 0198106 1. 100 370. 96 0069444 3. 650 332. 25 0194728 1. 150 370. 60 0072768 3. 700 331. 28 0190591 1. 200 370. 23 0076104 3. 750 330. 34 0185637 1. 250 369. 84 0079451 3. 800 329. 43 0179806 1. 300 369. 43 0082808 3. 850 328. 55 0173032 1. 350 369. 01 0086174 3. 900 327. 70 0165251 1. 400 368. 57 0089547 3. 950 326. 90 0156390 1. 450 368. 12 0092929 4. 000 326. 14 0146376 1. 500 367. 64 0096320 4. 050 325. 42 0135129 1. 550 367. 15 0099721 4. 100 325. 74 0124604 1. 600 366. 64 0103132 4. 150 324. 10 0120821 1. 650 366. 12 0106555 4. 200 323. 48 0119076 1. 700 305. 58 0109991 4. 250 322. 87 0118397 1. 750 365. 02 0113440 4. 300 322. 27 0118000 1. S00 364. 44 0116904 4. 350 321. 68 0118000 1. 850 363. 85 0120384 4. 400 321. 0'.) 0118000 1. 900 363. 24 0123881 4. 450 320. 50 0113000 1. 950 362. 61 0127393 4. 500 319. 92 0118000 2. 000 361. 97 0130921 4. 550 319. 33 0118000 2. 050 361. 30 0134465 4. 600 318. 74 0118000 2. 100 360. 62 0138022 4. 650 318. 15 0118000 2. 150 359. 92 0141590 4. 700 317. 56 0118000 2. 200 359. 21 0145167 4. 750 316. 97 0118000 2. 250 358. 47 0148748 4. 800 316. 38 0118000 2. 300 357. 72 0152329 4. 850 315. 79 0118000 2. 350 356. 95 0155903 4. 900 315. 20 0118000 2. 400 l356. 16 0159465 4. 950 314. 62 0118000 2. 450 355. 35 0163006 5. 000 314. 03 0118000 2. 500 354. 53 0166516 2.0 (K) Contour data for the wedged-radial correction element 131 (FIG. 10) where H is the displacement in inches of a section of the element from the center thereof and t is the thickness in inches of the section at H displacement. This data may be expanded by tting` a polynomial thereto to generate additional t values.

ALONG S AXIS IN PLUS DIRECTION H t II 1 1I 1 0 o. 2200 1. 750 0. 21805 3. 000 0. 22430 0. 250 0. 21000 2. 000 0. 21700 3. 750 0. 22720 0. 500 o. 21075 2. 250 0. 21005 4. 000 0. 23005 o. 750 o. 21045 2. 000 0. 21015 4. 250 0. 23405 1. 000 0. 21005 2. 700 0. 21010 4. 500 0. 21015 1` 25o 0. 21805 a. 000 0. 21000 4. 750 o. 24040 1. 500 0. 21030 3.250 0. 22205 5. 000 o. 25420 ALoNG s AXIS 1N MINUS DIRECTION II z II 1 II 1 0. 250 0. 21000 2.000 0. 21275 3. 500 o. 20100 0. 500 0. 21005 2. 250 0. 21100 3. 750 o. 10045 0. 750 0. 21010 2. 000 o. 20800 4. 000 o. 10030 1.000 0. 21835 2. 750 0 20000 4.250 0.10755 1. 200 0. 21735 3. 000 o. 20475 4. 500 0. 10735 1. 500 0. 21005 3. 250 0. 20275 4. 700 0. 10005 1. 750 0. 21450 5.000 0.20010 ALONG Ps AXIS IN BOTH PLUS AND MINUS DIRECTIONS H t H c E t o 0. 2200 1. 750 o. 21030 3. 500 0. 21200 0. 250 0. 21000 2. 000 0. 21535 a. 750 o. 21330 0. 500 0. 21005 2. 200 0. 21445 4. 000 0.21445 0. 700 0. 21025 2. 000 0. 21305 4. 250 0. 21025 1.000 0.21005 2. 750 0. 21305 4. 000 0.21875 1.250 0. 21705 3.000 0. 21200 4.700 0. 22225 1. 500 0 21715 3.250 0 21200 0.000 0.22714 (L) Beam spot trio shapes at various screen positions indicative of the deflection field characteristics of the yoke 17 and dynamic convergence system 14 as represented by spacings in mils between the red and blue spots, the blue and green spots, and the green and red spots. The tri spots are equally spaced 161.9 mils from each other at the center of the screen.

Screen Position Beam spot spacings Inches from 12 oclock 3 oclock 6 o'cloek 9 o'clock center of screen Red-Blue 15. 5 17. 5 16. 4 17. 35 Blue-Green- 6 15. 6 17. 5 16. 4 17. 25 Green-Red.. 17. 7 15. 35 18. 15 15. 25 Red-Blue-. 15. 1 18. 3 16. 1 18. 4 Blue-Green. 8 15. 25 18.0 15. 9 18. 1 Green-Red 19. 35 14. 75 10. 3 14.0v Red-Blue.. 19. 1 19. 4 Blue-Green. 18. 7 19. 4 Green-Red 13. 86 14. 15

What 1s claimed 1s:

1. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a systematic array of apertures therein,

(b) a mosaic type phosphor screen disposed adjacent to said mask and comprising a corresponding systematic array of phosphor dot trios, and

(c) a delta array of three electron guns disposed to project their electron beams onto said mask and screen,

(d) said dot trios being substantially equilateral at the center of said screen, relatively horizontally compressed out of equlateralism at screen positions horizontally displaced from said center, and relatively vertically compressed out of equilateralism at screen 75 positions vertically displaced from said center.

2. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a systematic array of apertures therein,

(b) a mosaic type phosphor screen adjacent to said mask and comprising a systematic array of phosphor dots, there being a different trio of dots associated with substantially each mask aperture, and

(c) a delta array of three electron guns adapted to have their electron beams deiiected to scan said mask and screen in a raster of substantially parallel lines having a predetermined angular orientation with said screen,

(d) said dot trios being substantially equilateral at the center of said screen, relatively compressed in the direction of said lines out of equilateralis-m at screen positions displaced from said center in the direction of said lines, and relatively compressed in the direction perpendicular to said lines out of equilateralism at screen positions displaced from said center in the direction perpendicular to said lines.

3. A cathode ray tube as in claim 11, wherein the size of said phosphor dot trios at the edge of said screen is substantially equal to the size thereof at the center of said screen.

4. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a systematic array of apertures therein,

(b) a mosaic type phosphor screen spaced adjacent to said mask and comprising a systematic array of phosphor'dots printed from second order color center exposures, there being a different trio of dots associated with substantially each mask aperture,

(c) a delta array `of three electron guns for projecting three electron beams along first order color center paths and onto said mask and screen, and

(d) dynamic beam convergence means which in operation of said tube tends to cause the trio of landing spots of said beams on said screen to be undesirably degrouped at screen positions spaced from the center thereof,

(e) the spacing between said mask and said screen decreasing from a maximum at the center of said screen to a minimum at the edge of said screen in a manner such that the trios of phosphor dots are substantially the same size as their associated beam spot trios.

5. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a systematic array of apertures therein,

(b) a mosaic type phosphor screen spaced adjacent to said mask and comprising a systematic array of phosphor dots photographically printed through said mask apertures from second order color center exposures, there being a diiferent trio of dots associated with substantially each mask aperture,

(c) a delta array f three electron guns for projecting three electron beams along rst order color center paths and onto said mask and screen, and

(d) dynamic beam convergence means which in `operation of said tube tends to cause the trio of landing spots of said beams on said screen to be undesirably degrouped at screen positions spaced from the center thereof,

(e) the spacing between said mask and said screen decreasing from a maximum at the center of said screen to a minimum at the edge of said screen in a manner such that the size to which the dot trios are degrouped due to reduced mask-screen spacing and second order color center printing is substantially equal to the size to which the associated spot trios are grouped due t-o reduced mask-screen spacing.

6. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a multiapertured shadow mask,

(b) a phosphor screen support surface adjacent to and facing said shadow mask on one side thereof,

(c) a mosaic dot phosphor screen on said support surface,

(d) means on the other side of said mask for projecting a plurality of electron beams through the apertures of said mask and onto phosphor dots of said screen,

(e) said screen including at the periphery thereof phosphor dots which are shadowed from said electron beams by said mask and are thus not excited by said beams during operation of said tube.

7. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a multiapertured central portion surrounded by an imperforate peripheral portion,

(b) a phosphor screen support surface adjacent to and yfacing said shadow mask on one side thereof,

(c) a mosaic dot phosphor screen on said support surface,

(d) a plurality of electron guns on the other side of said -mask for projecting a plurality of electron beams through the apertures of said mask and onto phosphor dots of said screen,

(e) said screen including only at the periphery thereof phosphor dots which are shadowed from said electron beams by said imperforate mask portion and are thus not excited by said beams during operation of the tube.

8. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a multiapertured shadow mask,

(b) a phosphor screen support surface adjacent to and facing said shadow mask on one side thereof,

(c) a mosaic dot phosphor screen which has been photographically laid down on said support surface by exposures through the apertures of said mask, there being no masking element other than said shadow mask in the path of the dot-printing light rays,

(d) a plurality of electron guns on the other side of said mask for projecting a plurality of electron beams through the apertures of said mask and onto phosphor dots of said screen,

(e) said mask including only at the periphery thereof apertures through which light rays passed to print phosphor dots in the photographic deposition of said screen but through which said electron beams pass to impinge on a dot-less area of said screen support.

9. A cathode ray tube comprising:

(a) a multiapertured shadow mask,

(b) a phosphor screen support surface adjacent to and facing said shadow mask on one side thereof,

(c) a mosaic dot phosphor screen which has been photographically laid down on said support surface by exposures through the apertures of said mask,

(d) means on the other side of said mask for projecting a plurality of electron beams through the apertures of said mask and onto phosphor dots of said screen,

(e) said mask including only at the periphery thereof apertures through which light rays passed to print phosphor dots in the photographic deposition of said screen but through which said electron beams pass to impinge on an area of said screen support on which no phosphor dots were printed.

19. A cathode ray tube adapted to be used in a predetermined orientation with means for generating an astigmatic electron-beam deflection lield, said tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a systematic array of apertures therein,

(b) a mosaic type phosphor screen adjacent to said mask and comprising a systematic array of phosphor dots, there being a different trio of dots associated with substantially each mask aperture, and

(c) means for projecting three separate electron beams in triangular array through said astigmatic field and through the apertures of said mask and onto said screen, whereby the trios of beam spots thus produced on said screen at horizont-al and vertical remote from 23 the center thereof are distored from equilateralism because ofthe astigmatism of said field,

(d) said phosphor dot trios at said horizontal and vertical screen positions remote from the center of said screen being nonequilaterally shaped to more nearly correspond to the shapes of the associated distorted beam spot trios at said positions.

11. A cathode ray tube adapted to be used in a predetermined orientation with means for generating an astigmatic electron-beam rdeilection field, said tube comprising:

(a) a shadow mask having a systematic array of apertures therein,

(b) a mosaic type phosphor screen adjacent to said mask and comprising a systematic array of phosphor dots, there being a different trio of dots associated with substantially each mask aperture,

(c) a triangularly equilateral array of three electron guns for projecting three separate electron beams through said astigniatic eld and through the apertures of said mask and onto said screen, whereby the trios of beam spots thus produced on said screen at horizontal and vertical positions remote from the center thereof are distored from equilateralism because of the astigmatism of said Iield, and

(d) dynamic beam convergence means which in operation of said tube tends to cause the trio of landing spots of said beams on said screen to be undesirably degrouped at screen positions remote from the center thereof,

(e) said phosphor dots of said mosaic screen being so relatively disposed as to compensate for the degrouping of said beam spots caused by said dynamic convergence,

(f) said phosphor dot trios at said horizontal and vertical screen positions remote from the center of said screen being non equilaterally shaped to more nearly correspond to the shapes of the associated beam spot trios at said positions.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,043,975 7/1962 Burdick 313-92 3,109,117 10/1963 Kaplan 313-92 JAMES W. LAWRENCE, Primary Examiner.

V. LAFRANCHI, Assistant Examiner.

UNTTED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE. 0F CORRECTION Patent No. 3,358,175 December 12, 1967 Albert M. Morrell et a1.

It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.

Column 3, line 7, for "edges" read edge line 5S, strike out "to"; column 5, line 34, before "phosphor" insert lessened line 65, for "system" read systems column 10, line 2, for "similar" read smaller line 69,

strike out "shown in FIGS. 7, 8, and 9, a suitable tube geometry"; column 12, line 32, for "a", second occurrence,

read is column 13, line 57, for "121" read 131 column 14, line l0, for "surface" read surfaces line 55, for "mark" read mask column 20, line 43, for "tri" read trio column 22, line 75, after "vertical" insert positions column Z3, line Z4, for "distored" read Signed and sealedV this 18th day of February 1969.

(SEAL) Attest:

EDWARD M.PLETCHER,JR. EDWARD J. BRENNER Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents

Claims (1)

1. A CATHODE RAY TUBE COMPRISING: (A) A SHADOW MASK HAVING A SYSTEMATIC ARRAY OF APERTURES THEREIN, (B) A MOSAIC TYPE PHOSPHOR SCREEN DISPOSED ADJACENT TO SAID MASK AND COMPRISING A CORRESPONDING SYSTEMATIC ARRAY OF PHOSPHOR DOT TRIOS, AND (C) A DELTA ARRAY OF THREE ELECTRON GUNS DISPOSED TO PROJECT THEIR ELECTRON BEAMS ONTO SAID MASK AND SCREEN,

Images