US3304209A - Aluminum base alloy - Google Patents

Aluminum base alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3304209A
US3304209A US524822A US52482266A US3304209A US 3304209 A US3304209 A US 3304209A US 524822 A US524822 A US 524822A US 52482266 A US52482266 A US 52482266A US 3304209 A US3304209 A US 3304209A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
alloys
alloy
zirconium
percent
chromium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US524822A
Inventor
William A Anderson
William D Vernam
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Howmet Aerospace Inc
Original Assignee
Aluminum Company of America
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aluminum Company of America filed Critical Aluminum Company of America
Priority to US524822A priority Critical patent/US3304209A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3304209A publication Critical patent/US3304209A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/10Alloys based on aluminium with zinc as the next major constituent

Definitions

  • This invention relates to aluminum base alloys suitable for making wrought structural members, and it is more particularly concerned with those alloys which contain zinc and magnesium as the principal added elements in respect to the amounts present in the alloys.
  • Aluminum base alloys of the type just referred to have been known for many years. When worked, solution heat treated and age hardened, they develop high tensile and yield strengths, especially if a small amount of copper is included in the composition. Although the attainment of a high strength is advantageous in many instances, the alloys may be deficient in other respects, such as resistance to stress corrosion, weldability and notch toughness. We have discovered that within relatively narrow limits zinc, magnesium and other elements unite to produce an alloy which, in the absence of copper (except as an impurity), possesses a unique combination of properties.
  • the combination consisting essentially of 3.5 to 8% zinc, 0.75 to 4.3% magnesium, 0.05 to 0.75% manganese, 0.06 to 0.30% chromium, 0.06 to 30% zirconium and 0.01 to 0.15% titanium with aluminum yields an alloy which is free from segregation, if the proper portions of high melting elements are employed, and which when worked and age hardened has unexpectedly high properties.
  • the foregoing percentage values refer to percent by weight of the several elements.
  • the alloys so produced possess a high strength, a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking, a high notch toughness at low temperatures and an excellent welda-bility.
  • the combination of these properties and their high values which characterize our alloys are not found in the alloys which are devoid of the high melting point elements manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium.
  • the alloys should be free from copper, that is, the alloys should contain not more than 0.1% of this element. Iron should not exceed 0.4% and silicon should not exceed 0.35%, the total iron plus silicon preferably not exceeding 0.6%.
  • the wrought products made from the alloys should be free from segregation of the relatively insoluble high melting point elements manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium. This means that these elements and any constituents they form with aluminum or with each other or both should be in a finely divided condition and be uniformly dispersed, as compared to coarse particles many times the size of the fine particles which may be Patented Feb. 14, 1967 non-uniformly distributed throughout the alloy products.
  • the zinc and magnesium components are soluble in solid aluminum and they are chief contributors to strength when the alloy is age hardened. If less than the minimum amounts are employed, the strength suffers while if the maximum quantities are exceeded, fabrication and corrosion problems are encountered.
  • the zinc content should, in any case, exceed the magnesium content of the alloy.
  • these components may desirably be present in such proportions as 4% zinc and 2% magnesium or 7% zinc and 1% magnesium.
  • age hardened refers to both spontaneous aging at room temperature and to a low temperature treatment applied to an alloy where a substantial amount of the zinc and magnesium is in a state of solid solution before age hardening is started, as more particularly described below.
  • the combination of manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium in the alloys containing zinc and magnesium within the ranges mentioned above also improves the resistance to stress corrosion cracking, notch toughness, and minimizes the occurrence of cracks Where the alloys are being fusion welded. Alloys without the four high melting point elements do not have the resistance to corrosion that is generally required nor do they possess high notch toughness, especially at low temperatures. The alloys are especially sensitive to the presence or absence of zirconium, where the other three elements are present, in respect to improved weldability, i.e. freedom from cracks in or adjacent to the weld bead, when a filler metal is used which also contain-s zinc and magnesium as the chief added alloy components.
  • the manganese, chromium and titanium components are also important in obtaining a good welded joint and in obtaining improved resistance to corrosion and stress corrosion cracking.
  • Solution heat treatment can be effected by heating at a temperature between 700 and 970 F. for a sufiicient length of time to bring about solution of the zinc and magnesium, for example, /2 to 24 hours depending upon the mass of material being treated, the temperature and other well-known factors.
  • the alloys are cooled to room temperature or slightly above that temperature by quenching in a suitable medium. The alloys can be cooled relatively rapidly or slowly and for this reason they are considered to have a low quench sensitivity which is an important operational advantage.
  • the resistance to stress corrosion cracking is, however, affected by the thermal treatments, the maximum resistance being achieved through a sequence of thermal treatment steps being achieved through a sequence of thermal treatment steps as described and claimed in our copending patent application Serial No. 276,156.
  • the alloy products can be given a conventional single step age hardening treatment.
  • the artificial age hardening treatment in any case consists of heating the alloys containing the zinc and magnesium in solid solution to a temperature between 200 and 320 F. and holding them within that range for a total period of to 48 hours whereupon the alloys are cooled to room temperature.
  • the wrought products of these alloys have received a solution heat treatment and are quenched, they may be allowed to age harden at room temperature.
  • the notch toughness of our alloys in the age hardened condition is significantly higher than that of some of the present commercial high strength alloys, particularly at sub-zero temperatures.
  • the test used to determine notch toughness is described in the Bulletin of the American Society for Testing Materials for January 1960, pages 29 to 40 and February 1960, pages 17 to 28.
  • the tensile strength is determined on notched specimens at the desired temperature and the values compared to those of unnotched specimens, the result being expressed in a ratio of the former to that of the latter.
  • alloys which have been described can be melted and cast according to normal practices.
  • any of the conventional metal working processes can be used such as rolling, forging, extrusion, drawing and the like.
  • Alloys A and B were cast and rolled to sheet 0.063 inch in thickness in conventional manner. Samples of the sheet were solution heat treated 1 hour at 860 F., quenched in cold water and age hardened by heating at 250 F. for 48 hours. Tensile properties and notch tensile strength were determined at 75 and 320 F. with the following results at a theoretical stress concentration above the thermally treated alloys are highly resistant to factor of 17.
  • ballistic members made of these alloys when solution heat treated and age hardened, are more resist- :ant to impact than members made of a conventional alloy composed of aluminum, 4.5% magnesium, 0.45% manganese and 0.1% chromium. It has been observed, for example, that a higher protection is obtained on a weight basis than with the aforesaid conventional alloy.
  • a property known as notch toughness
  • Alloys C and D were cast and rolled to plate 1% inch in thickness, solution heat treated, quenched and aged at the same temperatures and for the same length of time as the preceding sheet specimens. Transverse specimens were cut from the plate and tensile and notch properties determined as above with a theoretical stress concentration factor of 12. The results are given in Table III.
  • a filler metal wire was used having the following cor'nposition: 3.90% magnesium, 2.00% zinc, 0.51% manganese, 0.10% chromium, 0.12% titanium, 0.14% iron and 0.10% silicon, the balance being aluing procedures Were followed one in which the fillet was minum. Hot rolled plates were used in the as-rolled condition, the plates having the compositions stated in Table V.
  • the alloys were cast and rolled to sheet 0.064 inch in thickness according to usual practice. Sections cut from the sheet were solution heat treated 1 hour at 860 F., quenched in cold Water, and age hardened 48 hours at 250 F. Test specimens were stressed to 75% of the yield strength of the alloys and exposed to the wellknown alternate immersion test in an aqueous solution of 3 /2% NaCl. All of the specimens of alloy E failed within 33 days whereas all of the specimens of alloy F remained intact. The improvement gained by the presence of zirconium is clearly evident.
  • the elfect of manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium upon the tendency for weld beads to crack between structural members is illustrated in the following test which involved welding a /2 inch thick plate 10 inches in length to a 1 inch thick plate of the same length in the form of a T-joint. Welding was performed by the inert gas arc Welding method wherein a filler rod was used to form a fillet on both sides of the junction of the /2 inch plate with the 1 inch plate. Two weldformed in a single pass from one end of the plate to the other, and a second one on another specimen wherein the fillet formation was interrupted and then continued. Cracks generally occur longitudinally of the weld bead and the length of the crack is considered to indicate relative weldability of the structural or parent metal mem bers.
  • a copper-free aluminum base alloy consisting essentially of aluminum, 3.5 to 8% zinc, 0.75 to 4.3% magnesium, wherein the zinc content always exceeds the magnesium content, 0.05 to 0.75% manganese, 0.06 to 0.30% chromium, 0.06 to 0.30% zirconium and 0.01 to 0.15% titanium, the iron impurity not exceeding 0.4% and the silicon impurity not exceeding 0.35%, said manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium being employed in amounts within the foregoing ranges such that the sum of percent chromium-i-percent zirconium-H23 percent titanium+0.19 percent manganese does not exceed 0.6%, said alloy being characterized by substantial freedom from segregation of said manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium components.
  • An alloy according to claim 1 having an internal structure developed by age hardening at 200 to 320 F. for a total period of 10 to 48 hours.
  • An alloy according to claim 1 having an internal structure resulting from a solution heat treatment at 700 to 970 F., and age hardening at 200 to 320 F. for a total period of 10 to 48 hours.

Description

United States Patent 3,304,209 ALUMINUM BASE ALLOY William A. Anderson, Verona, and William D. Vernam,
New Kensington, Pa., assignors to Aluminum Company of America, Pittsburgh, Pa., a corporation of Pennsylvania No Drawing. Filed Feb. 3, 1966, Ser. No. 524,822 4 Claims. (Cl. 14832.5)
This application is a continuation-in-part of our 00- pending patent application Serial No. 304,677, filed August 26, 1963, and now abandoned.
This invention relates to aluminum base alloys suitable for making wrought structural members, and it is more particularly concerned with those alloys which contain zinc and magnesium as the principal added elements in respect to the amounts present in the alloys.
Aluminum base alloys of the type just referred to have been known for many years. When worked, solution heat treated and age hardened, they develop high tensile and yield strengths, especially if a small amount of copper is included in the composition. Although the attainment of a high strength is advantageous in many instances, the alloys may be deficient in other respects, such as resistance to stress corrosion, weldability and notch toughness. We have discovered that within relatively narrow limits zinc, magnesium and other elements unite to produce an alloy which, in the absence of copper (except as an impurity), possesses a unique combination of properties.
It is one of the objects of our invention to provide a strong aluminum base alloy which in the age hardened condition is also resistant to stress corrosion cracking. Another object is to provide an alloy which can be readily Welded. Still another object is to provide an alloy product which is free from segregation of relatively insoluble constituents. Still another object is to provide an alloy, which, particularly in the solution heat treated and age hardened condition, has a high notch toughness. These and other objects and advantages will become apparent from the following description and examples.
We have found that the combination consisting essentially of 3.5 to 8% zinc, 0.75 to 4.3% magnesium, 0.05 to 0.75% manganese, 0.06 to 0.30% chromium, 0.06 to 30% zirconium and 0.01 to 0.15% titanium with aluminum yields an alloy which is free from segregation, if the proper portions of high melting elements are employed, and which when worked and age hardened has unexpectedly high properties. The foregoing percentage values refer to percent by weight of the several elements. In particular, the alloys so produced possess a high strength, a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking, a high notch toughness at low temperatures and an excellent welda-bility. The combination of these properties and their high values which characterize our alloys are not found in the alloys which are devoid of the high melting point elements manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium.
In respect to impurities, the alloys should be free from copper, that is, the alloys should contain not more than 0.1% of this element. Iron should not exceed 0.4% and silicon should not exceed 0.35%, the total iron plus silicon preferably not exceeding 0.6%.
The wrought products made from the alloys should be free from segregation of the relatively insoluble high melting point elements manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium. This means that these elements and any constituents they form with aluminum or with each other or both should be in a finely divided condition and be uniformly dispersed, as compared to coarse particles many times the size of the fine particles which may be Patented Feb. 14, 1967 non-uniformly distributed throughout the alloy products.
Freedom from segregation serves to improve the prop erties referred to above. To assure such freedom from segregation the high melting point elements should be employed in amounts within the above-described ranges therefor such that the sum of percent chromium per-cent zirconium+ 1.23
percent titanium-l-O. 19 X percent manganese does not exceed 0.6%, and preferably does not exceed 0.5%. This means that all of these four elements cannot be used at one time in the maximum amounts stated above. It will be appreciated that if the alloys are free from segregation in their initial form, that freedom will persist during subsequent working operations and thermal treatments.
The zinc and magnesium components are soluble in solid aluminum and they are chief contributors to strength when the alloy is age hardened. If less than the minimum amounts are employed, the strength suffers while if the maximum quantities are exceeded, fabrication and corrosion problems are encountered. The zinc content should, in any case, exceed the magnesium content of the alloy. For example, these components may desirably be present in such proportions as 4% zinc and 2% magnesium or 7% zinc and 1% magnesium. The term age hardened as used herein refers to both spontaneous aging at room temperature and to a low temperature treatment applied to an alloy where a substantial amount of the zinc and magnesium is in a state of solid solution before age hardening is started, as more particularly described below.
The combination of manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium in the alloys containing zinc and magnesium within the ranges mentioned above also improves the resistance to stress corrosion cracking, notch toughness, and minimizes the occurrence of cracks Where the alloys are being fusion welded. Alloys without the four high melting point elements do not have the resistance to corrosion that is generally required nor do they possess high notch toughness, especially at low temperatures. The alloys are especially sensitive to the presence or absence of zirconium, where the other three elements are present, in respect to improved weldability, i.e. freedom from cracks in or adjacent to the weld bead, when a filler metal is used which also contain-s zinc and magnesium as the chief added alloy components. Filler metal compositions especially suited for use with the alloys described herein are described and claimed in the co-pending patent application of Dudas and Collins, Serial No. 306,622. The presence of zirconium in the alloys being welded is especially effective in eliminating cracks in or adjacent to the weld deposit under those conditions. The amount of zirconium which is effective for this purpose, as well as the other purposes named above, is small, less than 0.06% failing to have any significant effect while more than 0.30% introduces problems of segregation.
The manganese, chromium and titanium components are also important in obtaining a good welded joint and in obtaining improved resistance to corrosion and stress corrosion cracking.
As mentioned above, wrought alloys of this type develop their highest strength following a solution heat treatment and age hardening. Solution heat treatment can be effected by heating at a temperature between 700 and 970 F. for a sufiicient length of time to bring about solution of the zinc and magnesium, for example, /2 to 24 hours depending upon the mass of material being treated, the temperature and other well-known factors. To retain a substantial portion of the dissolved elements in a state of solution the alloys are cooled to room temperature or slightly above that temperature by quenching in a suitable medium. The alloys can be cooled relatively rapidly or slowly and for this reason they are considered to have a low quench sensitivity which is an important operational advantage.
The resistance to stress corrosion cracking is, however, affected by the thermal treatments, the maximum resistance being achieved through a sequence of thermal treatment steps being achieved through a sequence of thermal treatment steps as described and claimed in our copending patent application Serial No. 276,156. Where structures made from these alloys are not exposed to stress corroding conditions, or the conditions are relatively mild, the alloy products can be given a conventional single step age hardening treatment. The artificial age hardening treatment in any case consists of heating the alloys containing the zinc and magnesium in solid solution to a temperature between 200 and 320 F. and holding them within that range for a total period of to 48 hours whereupon the alloys are cooled to room temperature. However, if the wrought products of these alloys have received a solution heat treatment and are quenched, they may be allowed to age harden at room temperature. Al-
measure of resistance to impact. The notch toughness of our alloys in the age hardened condition is significantly higher than that of some of the present commercial high strength alloys, particularly at sub-zero temperatures. The test used to determine notch toughness is described in the Bulletin of the American Society for Testing Materials for January 1960, pages 29 to 40 and February 1960, pages 17 to 28. The tensile strength is determined on notched specimens at the desired temperature and the values compared to those of unnotched specimens, the result being expressed in a ratio of the former to that of the latter.
The alloys which have been described can be melted and cast according to normal practices. For those that are to be made into wrought products any of the conventional metal working processes can be used such as rolling, forging, extrusion, drawing and the like.
The advantages of our invention are illustrated by the following test data.
The tensile properties and notch toughness of alloys, with and without zirconium, are shown from the following tests at room temperature and at 320 F. The composition of the alloys is given in Table I below.
TABLE I.PERC-ENT COMPOSITION OF ALLOYS Alloy Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Zn Mg 1 11 Cr Ti Zr Cu Fe Si 4. 10 2. 24 0. 22 0.12 0. O1 O. 04 0.17 0. 1O 4. 15 1. 92 0. 22 O. 11 0. 01 0. l2 0. 03 0. 18 0. 08 4. 32 2. 51 0. 28 0. 16 0. 02 0. 03 0. l7 0. 08 4. 18 2. 67 0. 26 0. 16 0. 02 0.14 0.03 0. 16 0. 08
though the thermal treatments are important in developing strength, resistance to corrosion and other properties, the presence of the relatively insoluble elements mangan ese, chromium, zirconium and titanium are also important, for in their absence the desired properties are not attained.
In addition to possessing the properties mentioned Alloys A and B were cast and rolled to sheet 0.063 inch in thickness in conventional manner. Samples of the sheet were solution heat treated 1 hour at 860 F., quenched in cold water and age hardened by heating at 250 F. for 48 hours. Tensile properties and notch tensile strength were determined at 75 and 320 F. with the following results at a theoretical stress concentration above the thermally treated alloys are highly resistant to factor of 17.
TABLE II.TENSILE PROPERTIES AND NOTGH STRENGTH OF SHEET SPECIMENS Tensile Properties Ratio Notch Alloy Tcmp., Percent Tensile F. Tensile Yiclrl Elongation Strength, Notch T.S.l Notch TSJ Strength, Strength, p.s.i. Unnotched Unnntched p.s.i. psi. 'l.S. Y.S.
75 65, 200 58, 600 10. 5 63, 800 0. 98 l. 09 --320 83, 900 70, 400 15. 0 59, 000 0. 68 O. 81 75 64, 300 58, 890 11. 0 63, 900 0. 99 l. 09 3'20 83, S00 70, 100 15. 5 72, 200 0. 86 1. 03
impact such as encountered in ballistic plate. It has been found that ballistic members made of these alloys, when solution heat treated and age hardened, are more resist- :ant to impact than members made of a conventional alloy composed of aluminum, 4.5% magnesium, 0.45% manganese and 0.1% chromium. It has been observed, for example, that a higher protection is obtained on a weight basis than with the aforesaid conventional alloy.
A property, known as notch toughness, is another Alloys C and D were cast and rolled to plate 1% inch in thickness, solution heat treated, quenched and aged at the same temperatures and for the same length of time as the preceding sheet specimens. Transverse specimens were cut from the plate and tensile and notch properties determined as above with a theoretical stress concentration factor of 12. The results are given in Table III.
TABLE III.-TENSILE PROPERTIES AND NOTCH STRENGTH OF PLATE SPECIMENS Tensile Properties Rat-i0 KNOtClII Allo Tern Percent ensi e y Tensile Yield Elongation Strength, Not-ch T.S./ Notch T.S. Strength, Strength, p.s.i. Tensile 'I.S. Tensile Y.S.
p.s.i. p.s.i.
68, 60. 000 13. 0 89, 400 p 1. 31 1. 49 320 86,100 71. 800 13.0 75, 800 0. 88 1. 06 75 6'7, 200 59. 100 13.5 90. 800 1.35 l. 54: 32[) 85, 600 70, 800 13. O 84, 400 0. 98 1. 19
In the test a filler metal wire was used having the following cor'nposition: 3.90% magnesium, 2.00% zinc, 0.51% manganese, 0.10% chromium, 0.12% titanium, 0.14% iron and 0.10% silicon, the balance being aluing procedures Were followed one in which the fillet was minum. Hot rolled plates were used in the as-rolled condition, the plates having the compositions stated in Table V.
TABLE V.PERCENT COMPOSITION OF ALLOYS Alloy Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Zn Mg Mn Cr Zr i Cu Fe Si zirconium is to be seen in the following examples. Two alloys were employed which had the composition appearing in Table IV.
TABLE IV.PERCENT COMPOSITION OF ALLOYS Alloy Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Zn Mg Mn 1 7.1 Ti
The alloys were cast and rolled to sheet 0.064 inch in thickness according to usual practice. Sections cut from the sheet were solution heat treated 1 hour at 860 F., quenched in cold Water, and age hardened 48 hours at 250 F. Test specimens were stressed to 75% of the yield strength of the alloys and exposed to the wellknown alternate immersion test in an aqueous solution of 3 /2% NaCl. All of the specimens of alloy E failed within 33 days whereas all of the specimens of alloy F remained intact. The improvement gained by the presence of zirconium is clearly evident.
The elfect of manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium upon the tendency for weld beads to crack between structural members is illustrated in the following test which involved welding a /2 inch thick plate 10 inches in length to a 1 inch thick plate of the same length in the form of a T-joint. Welding was performed by the inert gas arc Welding method wherein a filler rod was used to form a fillet on both sides of the junction of the /2 inch plate with the 1 inch plate. Two weldformed in a single pass from one end of the plate to the other, and a second one on another specimen wherein the fillet formation was interrupted and then continued. Cracks generally occur longitudinally of the weld bead and the length of the crack is considered to indicate relative weldability of the structural or parent metal mem bers.
A pair of plates of alloy G Were welded by each of the two welding procedures. Plates of alloy H were welded in the same manner. The length of cracks in the Weld beads produced by the two methods was measured and an average value determined. It was found that in the case of alloy G the cracks extended over 49% of the total length of the weld bead whereas in the case of alloy H, the carcks amounted to only 3% of the total length of the weld beads. This is considered to show quite clearly the superior welding characteristics of the alloys of the invention.
Having thus described our invention and certain embodiments thereof, we claim:
1. A copper-free aluminum base alloy consisting essentially of aluminum, 3.5 to 8% zinc, 0.75 to 4.3% magnesium, wherein the zinc content always exceeds the magnesium content, 0.05 to 0.75% manganese, 0.06 to 0.30% chromium, 0.06 to 0.30% zirconium and 0.01 to 0.15% titanium, the iron impurity not exceeding 0.4% and the silicon impurity not exceeding 0.35%, said manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium being employed in amounts within the foregoing ranges such that the sum of percent chromium-i-percent zirconium-H23 percent titanium+0.19 percent manganese does not exceed 0.6%, said alloy being characterized by substantial freedom from segregation of said manganese, chromium, zirconium and titanium components.
2. An alloy according to claim 1 wherein the zinc content exceeds the magnesium content and the sum referred to does not exceed 0.5%.
3. An alloy according to claim 1 having an internal structure developed by age hardening at 200 to 320 F. for a total period of 10 to 48 hours.
4. An alloy according to claim 1 having an internal structure resulting from a solution heat treatment at 700 to 970 F., and age hardening at 200 to 320 F. for a total period of 10 to 48 hours.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,106,827 2/1938 Brown 146 X 2,146,330 2/ 1939 Comstock 75146 2,985,530 5/1961 Fetzer et al. 75146 2,993,783 7/ 1961 Martin 75146 3,133,839 5/1964 Thomas 75146 FOREIGN PATENTS 656,476 8/ 1951 Great Britain. 932,575 12/1947 France.
DAVID L. RECK, Primary Examiner,
Q. N. LOVELL, Assislan; Examiner,
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3, 304, 209 February 14, 1967 William A. Anderson et a1 It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
Column 1, line 45, for "30%" read 0 30% column 2, line 7 for "chromium read chromium column 6, line 5, strike out "ing procedures were followed one in which the fillet was" and insert the same after "weld-" in line 48, column 5; column 6, line 25, for "carcks" read cracks Signed and sealed this 17th day of October 1967 (SEAL) Attest:
EDWARD J. BRENNER Commissioner of Patents Edward M. Fletcher, Jr.
Attesting Officer Dedication 3,30%,209.William A. Anderson, Verona and Wflliam D. Vernam, New Kensinglbon, Pa. ALUMINUM BAE ALLOY. Patent dated Feb. 14, 196 Dedication filed Apr. 16, 1970, by the assignee, Aluminum Company of America. Hereb dedicates the entire patent to the Public.
[ 72ml Gazette August 18, 1970.]

Claims (1)

1. A COPPER-FREE ALUMINUM BASE ALLOY CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF ALUMINUM, 3.5 TO 8% ZINC, 0.75 TO 4.3% MAGNESIUM, WHEREIN THE ZINC CONTENT ALWAYS EXCEEDS THE MAGNESIUM CONTENT, 0.05 TO 0.75% MANGANESE, 0.06 TO 0.30% CHROMIUM, 0.06 TO 0.30% ZIRCONIUM AND 0.01 TO 0.15% TITANIUM, THE IRON IMPURITY NOT EXCEEDING 0.4% AND THE SILICON IMPURITY NOT EXCEEDING 0.35%, SAID MANGANESE, CHROMIUM, ZIRCONIUM AND TITANIUM BEING EMPLOYED IN AMOUNTS WITHIN THE FOREGOING RANGES SUCH THAT THE SUM OF PERCENT CHROMIUM + PERCENT ZIRCONIUM + 1.23 X PERCENT TITANIUM + 0.19 X PERCENT MANGANESE DOES NOT EXCEED 0.6%, SAID ALLOY BEING CHARACTERIZED BY SUBSTANTIAL FREEDOM FROM SEGREGATION OF SAID MANGANESE, CHROMIUM, ZIRCONIUM AND TITANIUM COMPONENTS.
US524822A 1966-02-03 1966-02-03 Aluminum base alloy Expired - Lifetime US3304209A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US524822A US3304209A (en) 1966-02-03 1966-02-03 Aluminum base alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US524822A US3304209A (en) 1966-02-03 1966-02-03 Aluminum base alloy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3304209A true US3304209A (en) 1967-02-14

Family

ID=24090808

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US524822A Expired - Lifetime US3304209A (en) 1966-02-03 1966-02-03 Aluminum base alloy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3304209A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3531337A (en) * 1966-12-26 1970-09-29 Ichiro Kawakatsu Hard aluminum alloy
US4030947A (en) * 1975-09-10 1977-06-21 Kemper Eugene L Heating treatment method and system of utilizing same
GB2246578A (en) * 1990-07-31 1992-02-05 Korea Advanced Inst Sci & Tech High strength aluminum alloy with good weldability
US5769972A (en) * 1995-11-01 1998-06-23 Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Method for making can end and tab stock
US6368427B1 (en) 1999-09-10 2002-04-09 Geoffrey K. Sigworth Method for grain refinement of high strength aluminum casting alloys
US6645321B2 (en) 1999-09-10 2003-11-11 Geoffrey K. Sigworth Method for grain refinement of high strength aluminum casting alloys

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2106827A (en) * 1936-05-25 1938-02-01 Aluminum Co Of America Aluminum alloy
US2146330A (en) * 1937-02-18 1939-02-07 Titanium Alloy Mfg Co Aluminum-zinc alloys
FR932575A (en) * 1939-08-24 1948-03-25 Rolls Royce Aluminum alloy
GB656476A (en) * 1948-03-02 1951-08-22 Rolls Royce Aluminium alloy
US2985530A (en) * 1959-03-11 1961-05-23 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Metallurgy
US2993783A (en) * 1960-07-21 1961-07-25 William F Jobbins Inc Aluminum base alloys
US3133839A (en) * 1961-05-11 1964-05-19 Thomas Gareth Process for improving stress-corrosion resistance of age-hardenable alloys

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2106827A (en) * 1936-05-25 1938-02-01 Aluminum Co Of America Aluminum alloy
US2146330A (en) * 1937-02-18 1939-02-07 Titanium Alloy Mfg Co Aluminum-zinc alloys
FR932575A (en) * 1939-08-24 1948-03-25 Rolls Royce Aluminum alloy
GB656476A (en) * 1948-03-02 1951-08-22 Rolls Royce Aluminium alloy
US2985530A (en) * 1959-03-11 1961-05-23 Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp Metallurgy
US2993783A (en) * 1960-07-21 1961-07-25 William F Jobbins Inc Aluminum base alloys
US3133839A (en) * 1961-05-11 1964-05-19 Thomas Gareth Process for improving stress-corrosion resistance of age-hardenable alloys

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3531337A (en) * 1966-12-26 1970-09-29 Ichiro Kawakatsu Hard aluminum alloy
US4030947A (en) * 1975-09-10 1977-06-21 Kemper Eugene L Heating treatment method and system of utilizing same
GB2246578A (en) * 1990-07-31 1992-02-05 Korea Advanced Inst Sci & Tech High strength aluminum alloy with good weldability
GB2246578B (en) * 1990-07-31 1995-03-01 Korea Advanced Inst Sci & Tech High strengh aluminium alloy with good weldability
US5769972A (en) * 1995-11-01 1998-06-23 Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Method for making can end and tab stock
US6368427B1 (en) 1999-09-10 2002-04-09 Geoffrey K. Sigworth Method for grain refinement of high strength aluminum casting alloys
US6645321B2 (en) 1999-09-10 2003-11-11 Geoffrey K. Sigworth Method for grain refinement of high strength aluminum casting alloys

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3198676A (en) Thermal treatment of aluminum base alloy article
US2915391A (en) Aluminum base alloy
US3160500A (en) Matrix-stiffened alloy
CA2135790C (en) Low density, high strength al-li alloy having high toughness at elevated temperatures
US3303023A (en) Use of cold-formable austenitic stainless steel for valves for internal-combustion engines
JP2892666B2 (en) Ultra-high strength weldable aluminum-lithium alloy
US2915390A (en) Aluminum base alloy
US3346370A (en) Aluminum base alloy
US4610733A (en) High strength weldable aluminum base alloy product and method of making same
US4113472A (en) High strength aluminum extrusion alloy
US3304209A (en) Aluminum base alloy
US3542606A (en) Hot worked metal article of aluminum base alloy and method of producing same
US2985530A (en) Metallurgy
US2240940A (en) Aluminum alloy
US3674448A (en) Anodic aluminum material and articles and composite articles comprising the material
CA1071902A (en) Cold fabricatable aluminum alloy
US2829968A (en) Aluminum bronze alloy having improved resistance to intergranular oxidation by the addition of tin
USRE26907E (en) Aluminum alloys and articles made therefrom
US3366476A (en) Aluminum base alloy
US3843357A (en) High strength aluminum alloy
Kent Weldable Al: Zn: Mg alloys
WO1985005129A1 (en) High chromium duplex stainless steel
US4578320A (en) Copper-nickel alloys for brazed articles
US4861550A (en) Corrosion-resistant nickel-base alloy having high resistance to stress corrosion cracking
US2225925A (en) Heat treated alloy