US3279198A - Method for reducing gas concentrations in cargo tanks - Google Patents
Method for reducing gas concentrations in cargo tanks Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3279198A US3279198A US404192A US40419264A US3279198A US 3279198 A US3279198 A US 3279198A US 404192 A US404192 A US 404192A US 40419264 A US40419264 A US 40419264A US 3279198 A US3279198 A US 3279198A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- tank
- vapor
- cargo
- air
- tanks
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B57/00—Tank or cargo hold cleaning specially adapted for vessels
- B63B57/04—Tank or cargo hold cleaning specially adapted for vessels by ventilating
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/8593—Systems
- Y10T137/86348—Tank with internally extending flow guide, pipe or conduit
- Y10T137/86372—Inlet internally extending
Definitions
- This invention relates to tank vessels and, more particularly, to a method for removing hydrocarbon vapors from the cargo tanks of a tanker. Essentially it is a safety measure to insure that cargo tanks (when empty) are in a non-explosive condition.
- This invention is directed to a method for degassing cargo tanks in a tanker.
- a cargo tank is presumed to be degassed when the concentration of hazardous vapors within a tank is reduced below the explosive range.
- the explosive limits may be based on this gas.
- the lower explosive limit for butane is 1.69% butane by volume in air. Below this limit, a mixture is too lean to ignite.
- the upper explosive limit for butane is considered to be 6.5% butane by volume in air and above this limit the mixture is too rich to ignite.
- the butane concentration is reduced to one-half of the lower explosion limit, the tank has been degassed and that no danger of an explosion exists, one-half being used to insure a generous safety factor.
- gas-free is used in referring to a tank from which substantially all hydrocarbon vapor has been removed.
- the admission of the gasoline into the tank results in the immediate release of some gasoline vapor.
- the quantity of vapor released depends upon the surface area of the liquid in the tank, the temperature, the vapor pressure of the gasoline and the turbulence at the surface of the gasoline.
- pure gasoline vapor has a density of three to four times that of air and hence the rate of diffusion of the heavy gasoline vapor into the upper layer of air in the cargo tank is relatively slow.
- the vapor layer that has a concentration above the lower explosion limit may have a depth of three of five feet when the tank is about three-quarters full. During the balance of loading and topping-off some of the vapor expelled from the tank will be within the explosive range in the vicinity of the tank vent.
- Kerosene turbine fuel 0-0.3 times the lower explosive limit.
- the liquid level will fall and air will enter the tank.
- the space above the product normally is well above the explosive limit at the start of discharge, but as this small volume of vapor becomes diluted with air a layer of vapor at the interface will be produced which will fall to a level within the explosive range. The depth of this layer will increase as the discharge proceeds. Because of the relative lightness of the entering air in contrast to the gasoline vapors, the air tends to form a blanket above the gasoline vapor and thus, at the conclusion of discharge of the product, the upper one-third to one half of the tank is likely to contain a vapor with a concentration below the lower explosive limit.
- tanks After the discharge of cargo the tanker normally returns to a loading port, certain tanks being ballasted with sea water to provide adequate stability. Normally, during the ballast voyage, tanks are washed in anticipation of a change of cargo but, if there is to be no change of product, tanks may be shut down after discharge and left alone.
- the method of this invention is directed to the problem of degassing tanks that are empty and stripped of subtantially all liquid hydrocarbons and is advantageously but not neccessarily practiced as soon as possible after discharge of cargo. Further, this invention seeks to reduce the time required to degas the tanks.
- the degassing of tanks by the method of this invention is attained by providing the tank with a vent or standpipe that extends to the bottom of the tank and an inlet in the top of the tank.
- the standpipe is provided with a flowinducing means to remove vapor from the tank.
- the inlet is provided with means for directing the air entering the tank into a horizontal layer, such as a horizontal baffle or slotted diffuser pipe.
- the horizontal air layer moves down the tank with a piston-like movement as additional vapor is removed.
- the combination of removing vapor from the bottom of the tnak and directing the entering air into a horizontal layer results in the degassing of the tank in a minimum time. Normally a volume of vapor equivalent to only one to one and one-half times the volume of the tank must be removed to degas the tank.
- the longitudinal bulkheads 11 and 12 forming the sides of a tank.
- the longitudinal bulkheads are provided with longitudinal members 13 and a transverse bottom frame 14.
- the bottom of the tank is also provided with longitudinal members 15 and a central keel 16.
- the top of the tank is also provided with a transverse frame 17, longitudinals 18 and center girder 19.
- the cargo tank is equipped with a standpipe 20, which terminates in an open end 21 near the bottom of the tank. Goodresults, using the method of this invention, have been achieved when the lower end of the standpipe termi nated 1218 inches above the bottom of the tank.
- the standpipe 20 passes through the deck 22 and terminates in an open end 23 above the deck.
- the upper end 23 of the standpipe is equipped with a hinged cover 24 which is opened only when the tank is being exhausted.
- an exhausting means Positioned with the standpipe 22 at or above the deck level is an exhausting means for removing the vapor from the cargo tank.
- the exhausting means may consist of a restricted passage 25 and a steam jet 26 pointed vertically upward. Thus by passing steam through the jet 26 a suction effect can be created and the vapor removed from the interior of the tank.
- other means of exhausting could be used as, for example, an axial fan driven by an electric motor or steam turbine.
- an opening 27 for admitting air into the tank to replace the vapor that is removed therefrom.
- the opening 27 may be a Butterworth opening present in the top of a typical tank that is normally used to admit washing equipment into the tank.
- a cone-shaped diffusing member 28 Positioned immediately below the opening 27 is a cone-shaped diffusing member 28.
- the diffusing member may take various shapes, the coneshaped member illustrated in the attached drawing having been found to be entirely satisfactory.
- the important features to 'be considered when designing the diffusing member 28 is that it should extend laterally beyond the edge of the opening in the deck 22 and should be mounted below the internal tank structure and relatively close to the opening 27.
- the function of the diffusing member 28 is to eliminate the jet effect of the entering air, which could cause mixing of the air with the hydrocarbon vapors, and to cause the air entering the tank to be displaced in a horizontal layer so that it moves downward in substantially a piston-like movement. Because the air is lighter than the hydrocarbon vapor the horizontal layer of entering air moves from the top of the tank toward the bottom with a minimum of mixing between the entering air and the vapor present in the tank.
- the vapor removal means as for example the steam jet 26, is placed in operation. This removes the vapor from the bottom of the cargo tank through the standpipe 20 and exhausts it to the atmosphere through the open end 23 of the standpipe, or an extension thereof.
- the steam-vapor mixture leaves the top of the end 23 at a velocity to carry it Well above the deck level and has a hydrocarbon vapor concentration below the lower explosive limit.
- a layer 30 consisting of air, substantially immixed with hydrocarbon vapor, is maintained in the upper part of the cargo tank while the hydrocarbon vapor remains in a layer 31 in the lower part of the tank.
- a layer 30 consisting of air, substantially immixed with hydrocarbon vapor, is maintained in the upper part of the cargo tank while the hydrocarbon vapor remains in a layer 31 in the lower part of the tank.
- the vapor level within the tank can be lowered below the lower explosive level by withdrawing through the standpipe 20 approximately one to one and one-half times the volume of the cargo tank.
- substantially no mixing takes place between the entering air and the vapor being removed.
- the internal structural members retard the movement of vapor to the standpipe. Thus a little turbulence is desired at the tank bottom at this time.
- the diffuser 28 may be provided with a removable center section 29.
- the center section 29 can be removed, thereby directing a small but effective jet of incoming air to the tank bottom which creates the minor turbulence required.
- the tank bottom includes considerable internal structure
- a collection system in combination with the standpipe 20.
- the collection system included a plurality of intakes designed to permit the standpipe to remove vapor from all locations in the bottom of the tank.
- the internal tank structure will have sufiicient openings in it to permit the use of a single open-ended standpipe 20.
- important features of this invention include means for removing the vapors from the bottom of the cargo tank; a means for introducing air into the upper part of the cargo tank to replace the removed vapors; and a means for diffusing the entering air to cause it to form a substantially horizontal, non-turbulent layer that travels toward the bottom of the tank as a piston. Utilizing these three features, it is possible to substantially degas cargo tanks in a tanker with improved safety by exhausting air and hydrocarbon vapors to the extent 5 of only one to one and one-half times the volume of the cargo tank, thus reducing the time required.
- a gas-free tank is one in which vapors remaining in the tank are not only below the explosive concentration for the particular vapors but in addition low enough for humans to enter safely.
- a method for eliminating the vapor hazard in cargo tanks of tank vessels carrying liquid hydrocarbons which method comprises:
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Loading And Unloading Of Fuel Tanks Or Ships (AREA)
Description
Oct. 18, 1966 AYERS ETAL 3,279,198
METHOD FOR REDUCING GAS CONCENTRATIONS IN CARGO TANKS Filed Got. 15, 1964 25 22 I8 I 1 W H i l L! 2?? m 7 \JJDC Q Q 29 2s BUM {4041/ THEIR ATTORNEY United States Patent "ice 3,279,198 METHOD FOR REDUCING GAS CONCENTRA- TIONS 1N CARGO TAN-KS Ellsworth B. Ayers, Alpharetta, Ga., David K. Laidlaw,
Mount Kisco, N.Y., and Samuel F. Spencer, Philadelphia, Pa., assignors to Shell Oil Company, New York, N.Y., a corporation of Delaware Filed Oct. 15, 1964, Ser. No. 404,192 1 Claim. (Cl. 6245) This invention relates to tank vessels and, more particularly, to a method for removing hydrocarbon vapors from the cargo tanks of a tanker. Essentially it is a safety measure to insure that cargo tanks (when empty) are in a non-explosive condition.
After discharge of cargo and stripping of tanks, it is normal practice for tankers in the clean products trade to wash cargo tanks and lines during the ballast voyage. This is done to avoid contamination when there is to be a change of product. The method of removing residual cargo from tanks and lines used in conjunction with this system of removing hydrocarbon vapors, is to flush the cargo lines back into the tanks with water. The resultant water and hydrocarbon mixture is then stripped out and transferred to a slop tank. A more usual method of removing product from cargo tanks and lines is to wash tanks with a machine equipped with rotating nozzles which direct jets of water at high pressure against the interior of the tanks. The slop is then stripped out through the cargo lines and discharged overboard.
The removal of substantially all of the liquid product from cargo tanks and lines, as well as eliminating a possible source of contamination of a subsequent product, removes a source of generation of more hydrocarbon vapors but does not remove the vapors remaining in the tank after discharge of cargo. The concentration of these vapors may be such as to create an explosive gas mixture within a tank. In recent years several explosions have occurred in tankers during tank washing operations.
This invention is directed to a method for degassing cargo tanks in a tanker. As used in this invention, a cargo tank is presumed to be degassed when the concentration of hazardous vapors within a tank is reduced below the explosive range. In the following evaluation, it is assumed that, as butane is one of the principal components of vapors associated with gasoline and similar low flash hydrocarbons, the explosive limits may be based on this gas. The lower explosive limit for butane is 1.69% butane by volume in air. Below this limit, a mixture is too lean to ignite. The upper explosive limit for butane is considered to be 6.5% butane by volume in air and above this limit the mixture is too rich to ignite. Further. it is assumed that if the butane concentration is reduced to one-half of the lower explosion limit, the tank has been degassed and that no danger of an explosion exists, one-half being used to insure a generous safety factor.
In order to provide a better understanding of this invention a complete operating cycle of tanker according to present practice will be reviewed. First it is assumed that a gas-free tank is being loaded with a normal automotive type of gasoline. The term. gas-free is used in referring to a tank from which substantially all hydrocarbon vapor has been removed. The admission of the gasoline into the tank results in the immediate release of some gasoline vapor. The quantity of vapor released depends upon the surface area of the liquid in the tank, the temperature, the vapor pressure of the gasoline and the turbulence at the surface of the gasoline. It should be noted that pure gasoline vapor has a density of three to four times that of air and hence the rate of diffusion of the heavy gasoline vapor into the upper layer of air in the cargo tank is relatively slow. Under normal 3,279,198 Patented Dot. 18, 1966 loading conditions the vapor layerthat has a concentration above the lower explosion limit may have a depth of three of five feet when the tank is about three-quarters full. During the balance of loading and topping-off some of the vapor expelled from the tank will be within the explosive range in the vicinity of the tank vent.
Of course, for products that are less volatile than gasoline, the depth and concentration of the vapor layer will be reduced.
The above data are based on the assumption that the cargo tank was substantially gas-free at the start of loading. If, in fact, there were hydrocarbon gases remaining within the tank, then these gases, augmented by the vaporization of the product being loaded, would be displaced from the tank, thereby adding to the volume of hazardous gases expelled from the tank.
After completion of loading, the ullage space above the product continues to be subject to diffusion and equalization of vapor pressures, with the gas concentration continuing to rise until equilibrium is reached. The following table indicates typical equilibrium levels of concentration reached for various products:
Motor gasoline, 3040 times the lower explosive limit.
Military jet fuel, 3-6 times the lower explosive limit.
Kerosene turbine fuel, 0-0.3 times the lower explosive limit.
Kerosene, negligible.
Furnace oil, negligible.
From this data it will be noted that only in the case of military jet fuel is an explosion vapor likely to exist in the ullage space of a tank during the loaded. voyage.
During the discharge of the product, the liquid level will fall and air will enter the tank. In the case of gasoline, as noted above, the space above the product normally is well above the explosive limit at the start of discharge, but as this small volume of vapor becomes diluted with air a layer of vapor at the interface will be produced which will fall to a level within the explosive range. The depth of this layer will increase as the discharge proceeds. Because of the relative lightness of the entering air in contrast to the gasoline vapors, the air tends to form a blanket above the gasoline vapor and thus, at the conclusion of discharge of the product, the upper one-third to one half of the tank is likely to contain a vapor with a concentration below the lower explosive limit. Below this there will be a layer within the explosive range, and at the bottom a layer of vapor which is over rich and well above the upper explosive limit. The thickness of the various layers can vary widely and will depend on the rate of discharge, the vapor pressure of the gasoline and the temperature.
Other products follow substantially the same pattern as for automotive gasoline but with products of lower volatility a larger portion of the tank will be below the lower explosive limit. In the case of kerosene and less volatile products, the vapor concentration throughout the empty tank is likely to be well below the lower explosive limit.
After the discharge of cargo the tanker normally returns to a loading port, certain tanks being ballasted with sea water to provide adequate stability. Normally, during the ballast voyage, tanks are washed in anticipation of a change of cargo but, if there is to be no change of product, tanks may be shut down after discharge and left alone.
In this case the layering effect of the vapors, noted after discharge, will gradually dissipate and mixing will tend to bring about a uniform concentration of vapor in the tank.
The method of this invention is directed to the problem of degassing tanks that are empty and stripped of subtantially all liquid hydrocarbons and is advantageously but not neccessarily practiced as soon as possible after discharge of cargo. Further, this invention seeks to reduce the time required to degas the tanks.
The degassing of tanks by the method of this invention is attained by providing the tank with a vent or standpipe that extends to the bottom of the tank and an inlet in the top of the tank. The standpipe is provided with a flowinducing means to remove vapor from the tank. The inlet is provided with means for directing the air entering the tank into a horizontal layer, such as a horizontal baffle or slotted diffuser pipe. The horizontal air layer moves down the tank with a piston-like movement as additional vapor is removed. The combination of removing vapor from the bottom of the tnak and directing the entering air into a horizontal layer results in the degassing of the tank in a minimum time. Normally a volume of vapor equivalent to only one to one and one-half times the volume of the tank must be removed to degas the tank.
This invention will be further described with reference to the attached drawing showing a cross section of a typical center tank of a tanker with a degassing apparatus installed.
There is shown the longitudinal bulkheads 11 and 12 forming the sides of a tank. The longitudinal bulkheads are provided with longitudinal members 13 and a transverse bottom frame 14. The bottom of the tank is also provided with longitudinal members 15 and a central keel 16. The top of the tank is also provided with a transverse frame 17, longitudinals 18 and center girder 19. The cargo tank is equipped with a standpipe 20, which terminates in an open end 21 near the bottom of the tank. Goodresults, using the method of this invention, have been achieved when the lower end of the standpipe termi nated 1218 inches above the bottom of the tank. The standpipe 20 passes through the deck 22 and terminates in an open end 23 above the deck. The upper end 23 of the standpipe is equipped with a hinged cover 24 which is opened only when the tank is being exhausted.
Positioned with the standpipe 22 at or above the deck level is an exhausting means for removing the vapor from the cargo tank. As illustrated in the attached drawing, the exhausting means may consist of a restricted passage 25 and a steam jet 26 pointed vertically upward. Thus by passing steam through the jet 26 a suction effect can be created and the vapor removed from the interior of the tank. Of course, other means of exhausting could be used as, for example, an axial fan driven by an electric motor or steam turbine.
Also positioned in the deck 22, in the way of the tank, is an opening 27 for admitting air into the tank to replace the vapor that is removed therefrom. The opening 27 may be a Butterworth opening present in the top of a typical tank that is normally used to admit washing equipment into the tank. Positioned immediately below the opening 27 is a cone-shaped diffusing member 28. The diffusing member may take various shapes, the coneshaped member illustrated in the attached drawing having been found to be entirely satisfactory. The important features to 'be considered when designing the diffusing member 28 is that it should extend laterally beyond the edge of the opening in the deck 22 and should be mounted below the internal tank structure and relatively close to the opening 27. The function of the diffusing member 28 is to eliminate the jet effect of the entering air, which could cause mixing of the air with the hydrocarbon vapors, and to cause the air entering the tank to be displaced in a horizontal layer so that it moves downward in substantially a piston-like movement. Because the air is lighter than the hydrocarbon vapor the horizontal layer of entering air moves from the top of the tank toward the bottom with a minimum of mixing between the entering air and the vapor present in the tank.
To operate the system of this invention, after discharge of cargo the vapor removal means, as for example the steam jet 26, is placed in operation. This removes the vapor from the bottom of the cargo tank through the standpipe 20 and exhausts it to the atmosphere through the open end 23 of the standpipe, or an extension thereof. The steam-vapor mixture leaves the top of the end 23 at a velocity to carry it Well above the deck level and has a hydrocarbon vapor concentration below the lower explosive limit.
As the hydrocarbon vapor is removed, air from the surrounding atmosphere enters through the opening 27 to replace the removed vapor. The entering air is diffused into a horizontal layer across the upper portion of the tank by means of the diffuser or baflie 28. As additional vapor is removed, the air in the upper part of the tank moves down-ward vertically as a piston, thus displacing the removed vapor without any appreciable mixing between the entering air and the vapor being removed.
As shown in the attached drawing, a layer 30 consisting of air, substantially immixed with hydrocarbon vapor, is maintained in the upper part of the cargo tank while the hydrocarbon vapor remains in a layer 31 in the lower part of the tank. Continued removal of vapor is followed by the lowering of the bottom of the horizontal layer of air, thus displacing the vapor.
From actual operations, it has been found that the vapor level within the tank can be lowered below the lower explosive level by withdrawing through the standpipe 20 approximately one to one and one-half times the volume of the cargo tank. Thus, it is seen that, except at the interface, substantially no mixing takes place between the entering air and the vapor being removed. Near the completion of the procedure, it has been found that the internal structural members retard the movement of vapor to the standpipe. Thus a little turbulence is desired at the tank bottom at this time.
To create the desired turbulence suitable means for flowing air to the tank bottom are provided. For example, the diffuser 28 may be provided with a removable center section 29. The center section 29 can be removed, thereby directing a small but effective jet of incoming air to the tank bottom which creates the minor turbulence required.
In some cases, particularly where the tank bottom includes considerable internal structure, it may be necessary to use a collection system in combination with the standpipe 20. The collection system included a plurality of intakes designed to permit the standpipe to remove vapor from all locations in the bottom of the tank. Often the internal tank structure will have sufiicient openings in it to permit the use of a single open-ended standpipe 20.
In contrast to the method of the present invention, it has been the practice in the past to blow or force air into a cargo tank. This causes a considerable amount of turbulence and mixing of the entering air with the vapors present within the tank. Thus, the process is one of dilution and a large volume of air mus-t be introduced to lower the vapor concentration within the tank below the lower explosive limit. This is inefiicient and delays the time when all cargo tanks will be degassed to the point where an explosive danger no longer exists. Furthermore, as dilution and mixing take place, the airvapor mixture throughout practically the entire tank will assume a composition within the explosive range and will remain within this range for an extended period before the tank is degassed.
Therefore, important features of this invention include means for removing the vapors from the bottom of the cargo tank; a means for introducing air into the upper part of the cargo tank to replace the removed vapors; and a means for diffusing the entering air to cause it to form a substantially horizontal, non-turbulent layer that travels toward the bottom of the tank as a piston. Utilizing these three features, it is possible to substantially degas cargo tanks in a tanker with improved safety by exhausting air and hydrocarbon vapors to the extent 5 of only one to one and one-half times the volume of the cargo tank, thus reducing the time required.
Of course, when it is desired to gas-free the cargo tank, a considerably larger amount of air and vapor must be withdrawn, for example, at least several times the volume of the cargo tank. A gas-free tank is one in which vapors remaining in the tank are not only below the explosive concentration for the particular vapors but in addition low enough for humans to enter safely.
We claim as our invention:
A method for eliminating the vapor hazard in cargo tanks of tank vessels carrying liquid hydrocarbons, which method comprises:
(a) after removing substantially all of the liquid hydrocarbon from the tank, removing vapor from the tank from a location adjacent to the bottom thereof;
(b) admitting atmospheric air to the top of the tank and distributing the air substantially as a horizontal, non-turbulent layer; (c) causing the air in said horizontal layer to flow downward over substantially the full tank area and 5 to act as a piston to displace the vapor without substantial mixing; and (d) continuing to remove the vapor and replacing it with air until the hydrocarbon vapor remaining in the tank is below the explosive level.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,443,986 2/1923 Forcier 98-33 X 15 MEYER BERLIN, Primary Examiner.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US404192A US3279198A (en) | 1964-10-15 | 1964-10-15 | Method for reducing gas concentrations in cargo tanks |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US404192A US3279198A (en) | 1964-10-15 | 1964-10-15 | Method for reducing gas concentrations in cargo tanks |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3279198A true US3279198A (en) | 1966-10-18 |
Family
ID=23598557
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US404192A Expired - Lifetime US3279198A (en) | 1964-10-15 | 1964-10-15 | Method for reducing gas concentrations in cargo tanks |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3279198A (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3557740A (en) * | 1967-10-10 | 1971-01-26 | British Petroleum Co | Venting arrangement for storage tanks |
US3938347A (en) * | 1974-04-12 | 1976-02-17 | Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. | Level control apparatus and method for cryogenic liquids |
US3965689A (en) * | 1974-07-18 | 1976-06-29 | University Engineers, Inc. | Venting of cryogenic storage tanks |
US4498304A (en) * | 1982-08-03 | 1985-02-12 | Gaz De France | Storage tank for cryogenic liquefied gas |
US4626128A (en) * | 1985-04-11 | 1986-12-02 | Devine Thomas H | Underwater gas pocket work unit and removal of dangerous fumes and gases therefrom |
US4718240A (en) * | 1985-03-01 | 1988-01-12 | Helix Technology Corporation | Cryopump regeneration method and apparatus |
US5291739A (en) * | 1992-06-29 | 1994-03-08 | General Electric Company | Adjustable alignment for cryogen venting system for superconducting magnet |
WO2009015719A1 (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-05 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Device for blowing gases |
DE102014009662A1 (en) * | 2014-06-24 | 2015-12-24 | MEYER WERFT GmbH & Co. KG | Method and arrangement for reducing the risks of release of flammable gases and highly flammable vapors. |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1443986A (en) * | 1920-11-19 | 1923-02-06 | William G Forcier | Building construction |
-
1964
- 1964-10-15 US US404192A patent/US3279198A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1443986A (en) * | 1920-11-19 | 1923-02-06 | William G Forcier | Building construction |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3557740A (en) * | 1967-10-10 | 1971-01-26 | British Petroleum Co | Venting arrangement for storage tanks |
US3938347A (en) * | 1974-04-12 | 1976-02-17 | Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. | Level control apparatus and method for cryogenic liquids |
US3965689A (en) * | 1974-07-18 | 1976-06-29 | University Engineers, Inc. | Venting of cryogenic storage tanks |
US4498304A (en) * | 1982-08-03 | 1985-02-12 | Gaz De France | Storage tank for cryogenic liquefied gas |
US4718240A (en) * | 1985-03-01 | 1988-01-12 | Helix Technology Corporation | Cryopump regeneration method and apparatus |
US4626128A (en) * | 1985-04-11 | 1986-12-02 | Devine Thomas H | Underwater gas pocket work unit and removal of dangerous fumes and gases therefrom |
US5291739A (en) * | 1992-06-29 | 1994-03-08 | General Electric Company | Adjustable alignment for cryogen venting system for superconducting magnet |
WO2009015719A1 (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-05 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Device for blowing gases |
DE102014009662A1 (en) * | 2014-06-24 | 2015-12-24 | MEYER WERFT GmbH & Co. KG | Method and arrangement for reducing the risks of release of flammable gases and highly flammable vapors. |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3279198A (en) | Method for reducing gas concentrations in cargo tanks | |
US3710549A (en) | Fuel tank inerting system | |
US3788039A (en) | Fuel tank inerting system with means to improve thermal stability of fuel | |
RU2103197C1 (en) | Method of unloading/loading oil tanker; method of transportation or oil in tanker and system of pipe lines and valves for oil tanker | |
KR100614199B1 (en) | Vessel nitrogen gas supply system | |
KR101876977B1 (en) | Exhausting Gas System and Method of the Same for a Ship | |
US3929434A (en) | Corrosion reduction of tanker vessel cargo compartments | |
US3229446A (en) | Combustion inhibiting method | |
JP5192211B2 (en) | Gas exhaust method and system | |
US5092259A (en) | Inert gas control in a system to reduce spillage of oil due to rupture of ship's tank | |
US2928436A (en) | Vapor sealed liquid carriers | |
US3746023A (en) | Method for cleaning oil tanker holds | |
US3450086A (en) | Method for disposal of crude oil residues | |
ES8205684A1 (en) | Apparatus for treating ship hulls | |
KR20180010647A (en) | Container Ship | |
US3754399A (en) | Exhaust gas purifying device for an outboard propulsion unit | |
US2543362A (en) | Method of inerting enclosed spaces to prevent or extinguish fires | |
AU701237B2 (en) | Refilling liquid storage tanks | |
US4981153A (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing hydrocarbon vapor emission from a storage tank | |
US2497946A (en) | Purging of hydrocarbon-containing chambers | |
US2858040A (en) | Apparatus for gas-freeing a fuel tank | |
US1747424A (en) | Filling device for tanks | |
KR102183926B1 (en) | Ship | |
JP3663167B2 (en) | Fuel system apparatus having fuel tank explosion-proof function and fuel supply method | |
KR102100396B1 (en) | Funnel Structure of Ship |