US3253910A - Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability - Google Patents

Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3253910A
US3253910A US393368A US39336864A US3253910A US 3253910 A US3253910 A US 3253910A US 393368 A US393368 A US 393368A US 39336864 A US39336864 A US 39336864A US 3253910 A US3253910 A US 3253910A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
inclusions
brass
machinability
free
silica
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US393368A
Inventor
Henry L Burghoff
Parker Frederick Gerald
Mends David
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chase Brass and Copper Co Inc
Original Assignee
Chase Brass and Copper Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chase Brass and Copper Co Inc filed Critical Chase Brass and Copper Co Inc
Priority to US393368A priority Critical patent/US3253910A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3253910A publication Critical patent/US3253910A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C9/00Alloys based on copper
    • C22C9/04Alloys based on copper with zinc as the next major constituent

Definitions

  • Fig. 5 Micro Specimen of e 1 (x1000) m inclusions. Polished unetched. (x1000) Fig. 6 Micro Specimen of Type 1 (lower right) and Type 2 (upper left) inclusions. Polished, unetched. (X1000) Fig. 7 Micro Specimen of Type 2 inclusions. Polished, unetched. (x1000) Fig. 8 Micro Specimen of Type 2 inclusion. Polished, unetched.
  • This invention is concerned with improvement in the machinability of copper-base alloys, and moreparticularly in leaded brasses, of the type used in large quantity for producing machined parts.
  • the invention is especially directed to copper alloys for producing rod from which such parts, commonly characterized as screw machine parts, are fabricated by repetitive operations on an automatic machine. In such operations the resistance to wear of cutting tools which results from high rates of-sustained, repetitive machining operations, is a vitally important factor in achieving maximum'machine production while maintaining dimensional tolerance and surface finish requirements in the parts produced.
  • the machinability of these copper-base alloys is remarkably affected by certain hitherto unsuspected characteristics of these alloys. As a result of this, we have found means whereby deleterious variations in machinability may be minimized and new heights of machinability obtained.
  • Leaded brasses ofnumerous compositions have long been used in industry because of the case with which they canbe machined.
  • the lead which is present in such alloys imparts the characteristic of free machining.
  • lead may be present to as much as about 4%. The higher the lead content within this range, the higher or better is the machinability.
  • Alloys of intermediate lead content represent a compromise between easy machinability on the one hand, and other types of workability on the other hand, such as 'flanging, knurling, thread rolling, forming and drawing.
  • An alloy known generally as free-cutting brass having a nominal composition of 60-63% copper, 2.5%- 3.7% lead, the remainder zinc except for the usual incidental impurities, is the alloy most frequently used in making arts on automatic screw machines. This composition range represents a combination of high machinability and desirable mechanical properties.
  • This composition range represents a combination of high machinability and desirable mechanical properties.
  • tool life is definitely related to both types of inclusions. Where there is substantially no silica present and the observed average count of zinc sulfide inclusions is on the order of 20 to 40 per square millimeter, the tool life found is the best expected for normal conventional rod. Our studies clearly show that where any silica particles are present, form tool life is adversely affected. When on the average as few as two of these inclusions per square millimeter of metal surface as examined under a microscope are observed, the form tool life is drastically reduced from the best life expected in the cutting of normal conventional rod.
  • the free-cutting brass contain an abserved average of about 70 inclusions of zinc sulfide per square millimeter of examined surface, but with substantially no silica present, the tool life is also reduced appreciably below the best expected life. But Where there are substantially no inclusions, either of silica or of zinc sulfide, a remarkable increase in tool life is found amounting to from 2 to 5 times the normal best expected life for conventional free-cutting brass.
  • Inclusions of one or both types described above have been found in some free-cutting brass rod of all of the various sources of supply tested, indicating their widespread and uncontrolled occurrence in commercial material.
  • Visual identification of the inclusions can be made provided a magnification of at least 1000 is employed.
  • Using this order of magnificatiomthe silica and zinc sulfide inclusions can be visually identified by their shape, color, location and size.
  • the shape is usually oblong or irregular, ranging, as indicated above, in maximum dimension from about 1 micron to 50 microns.
  • the silica inclusions are dark blue-gray in color and stand out in relief when polished. Commonly there are imperfections in the inclusions and their surface is pitted.
  • the silica inclusions are never spherical which helps to distinguish them from the zinc sulfide inclusions.
  • the latter are generally spherical or geometrical in shape and sometimes have a tail or irregularity attached to the nodule.
  • These sulfide inclusions polish flat and range in color from light to dark gray, often being mottled in appearance. Their distribution is apparently quite random throughout the cross-section of the rod and they range from about 1 to 5 microns in size.
  • KI-IN Knopp hardness numbers
  • Zinc sulfide inclusions are not as detrimental to tool life as are the silica inclusions, unless the sulfide count is greater than about 70 to inclusions per millimeter. Quite commonly the zinc sulfide count in commercial free-cutting brass is between 20 to 40 per square millimeter.
  • the next step is to provide a cure.
  • a suitable reagent metal to the melt shortly before casting.
  • Magnesium is particularly effective but other reagent metals can also remove the undesirable inclusions from brass either partially or wholly. These include sodium and certain rare earth mixtures which are rich in lanthanum and/or cerium. Manganese appears definitely not to be effective.
  • the effect of the magnesium appears to be synergistic, for tool life with some magnesium-containing material is far greater than with non-magnesium treated material having low or no undesirable inclusions.
  • Production of magnesium-containing copper alloy may be accomplished in several different Ways.
  • the preparation of a nominal 0.2% magnesium-bearing copper alloy was accomplished from a charge consisting entirely of free-cutting brass scrap. This was charged into a furnace and immediately after melt-down, with the melt relatively cool, the dross was raked off the melt and magnesium was added in the form of an 80% Cu% Mg master alloy.
  • the master alloy was introduced by thrusting it beneath the surface with a ladle, with the furnace power on. When the furnace reached pouring temperature, power was turned off and the melt allowed to stand for five minutes. The melt was then skimmed and poured into a mold.
  • magnesium added to the melt may be accomplished by the use of unalloyed magnesium metal as well as in the form of a master copper-magnesium alloy specifically mentioned in the foregoing examples.
  • magnesium in the melt exerts a marked effect on the tendency of zinc to burn during pouring.
  • the stream of metal becomes covered with a thin skin of adherent oxide which protects the zinc from burning.
  • the magnesium additions although they may cause the formation of more dross than usual, tend to decrease zinc stack losses which is definitely a favorable factor.
  • the amount of reagent metal which is added should be substantially less than that-of magnesium.
  • the invention is not limited to free-cutting brass but .is applicable to commercial brasses, generally.
  • Table I an example of flanging brass is given, in which the And the same is applicable to low-leaded brass having a nominal composition of 66.5% copper-0.5% lead, balance zinc.
  • the latter alloy shows inclusion counts typically of 4 silica, 30 zinc sulfide inclusions per square millimeter.
  • the invention limited to leaded brasses as it may be applied to nominally lead-free alloys, such as cartridge brass (nominally 70% copper-30% zinc), and jewelry bronze (nominally 87.5% copper-12.5% zinc).
  • a leaded brass alloy of improved machinability containing as inclusion-reducing reagent metal at least one member selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, the amount of said reagent metal retained in the alloy being an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of silica inclusions commonly present in the untreated alloy.
  • a leaded brass of improved machinability which has been treated to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated metal, said treated brass containing as an inclusion-reducing reagent metal a member selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, in an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of such inclusions, the maximum amount of reagent metal retained in said brass being about 0.30% by weight.
  • a leaded brass of superior machinability which has been treated to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated metal, said treated leaded brass containing an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of such inclusions, up to 0.30% of an inclusion-reducing reagent metal selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium.
  • a free-cutting brass of superior machinability having a'nominal analysis of 60% to 63% copper, 2.5% to 3.7% lead, the remainder zinc except for incidental impurities and an inclusion-reducing reagent metal in a retained small but effective amount, up to 0.30% by weight, sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present inordinary free-cutting brass and being selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium.
  • the method of treating leaded brass to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated metal in order to improve the machinability thereof which comprises introducing into the brass melt at least one reagent metal selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, in amount sufficient to provide in the cast alloy an effective amount sufiicient to effect substantially complete elimination of such inclusions, up to 0.30% by weight of said reagent metal.
  • thev amount of reagent metal is sufficient to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions in the untreated alloy matrix to an average of not more than one silica and ten zinc sulfide inclusions per square millimeter of metal cross-sectional surface.
  • the method of treating free-cutting brass having a nominal composition of 6063% copper, 2.5%-3.7% lead, balance zinc, to improve the machinability thereof which comprises introducing into the alloy melt at least one reagent metal selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, in an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated brass, and to provide in the cast alloy not more than 0.30% of said reagent metal.
  • a leaded free-cutting brass of improved machineability that has been treated to reduce inclusions that are commonly present in ordinary free-cutting brass and harmful to tool life, said treated brass containing as an inclusion-reducing reagent metal a small but effective retained amount, sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting, of a member selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum, cerium, and mixtures thereof.
  • a leaded free-cutting brass of improved machineability that has been treated to reduce inclusions that are commonly present in ordinary free-cutting 'brassand harmful to tool life, said-treated 'brass'containing as an inclusion-reducing reagent metal a small but effective retained amount of sodium, sufficient to effect substanmachineability by changing conditions harmful to tool life by eflfecting substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting brass, said metal being selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum, cerium, and mixtures thereof.
  • a method of treating a free-cutting leaded brass having a nominal analysis of from about 60% to about 65% copper, about 0.5% to about 3.7% lead, and the remainder zinc except for incidental impurities, in order to improve the machineability thereof that comprises introducing into a melt thereof an amount of a reagent metal sufficient to reduce the incidence of inclusions normally present in such alloys and to improve machineability, and to provide in the brass as cast a small retained amount of the reagent metal, suificient to effect substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting brass,
  • the reagent metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum, cerium, and mixtures thereof.

Description

M y 1966 H. BURG HOFF ETAL 3,253,910
\ COPPER BASE ALLOYS AND THE METHOD OF TREATING THE SAME To IMPROVE THEIR MACHINABILITY 5 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed Au 31, 1964 Fig. 1 Microotructure of typical showing Type 1 inclusion. Polished,
unetched. (X300) (Inclusion positioned between diamond-shaped locating marks) Fig. 3 Microstructure of typical commercial free-cutting brass rod showing Type 1 131cl1(1sion. Polished,
unetched. X300 Inclusion positioned between diamond-shaped locating marks) DAVID MENDS INVENTORS May 31, 1966 Filed Aug. 51. 1964 H. BURGHOFF ETAL 3,253,910 COPPER BASE. ALLOYS AND THE METHOD OF TREATING THE SAME TO IMPROVE THEIR MACHINABILITY 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 Fig. 4 I Micro Specimen of Type 1 inclusion. Polished, unetched.
Fig. 5 Micro Specimen of e 1 (x1000) m inclusions. Polished unetched. (x1000) Fig. 6 Micro Specimen of Type 1 (lower right) and Type 2 (upper left) inclusions. Polished, unetched. (X1000) Fig. 7 Micro Specimen of Type 2 inclusions. Polished, unetched. (x1000) Fig. 8 Micro Specimen of Type 2 inclusion. Polished, unetched.
HENRI L. HIRGHOFF F. GERAID PARKER DAVID MENIB INVENTORS y 1, 1966 H. BURGHOFF ETAL 3,253,910
COPPER BASE ALLOYS AND THE METHOD OF TREATING THE SAME TO IMPROVE THEIR MACHINABILITY Filed Aug. 31 1964 5 Sheets-Sheet 5 7- Tool Life vs. Silica Inclusions /mm m 5 5- O f Standard Free-Cutting Brass Rod(Silico Free) E, Fl 6 9 2 2 o o o o L 1 2 4 6 8 l0 l2 Silica inclusions /mm 7 Tool Life vs. 6- Zinc Sulfide Inclusions /mm m F I (5 IO 0 I l l I l I 0 IO 3O 5 7Q Zinc Sulfide Inclusions/mm EM L. manom- F. GERALD PARKER DAVID MENIB IN VEN TORS United States Patent 3,253,910 COPPER BASE ALLUYS AND THE METHOD OF TREATING THE SAME TO IMPROVE THEIR MACHINABKLITY Henry L. Burgholf and Frederick GeraldParker, Waterbury, and David Mends, Newtown, Conn., assignors to Chase Brass and Copper Co. Incorporated Filed Aug. 31, 1964, Ser. No. 393,368 15 Claims. (Cl. 75135) This application is a continuation-in-part of the earlier application of Henry L. Burghoif and Frederick Gerald Parker, United States Serial No. 119,009, filed May 8, 1961, now United States Patent 3,15 8,470, granted November 24, 1964.
This invention is concerned with improvement in the machinability of copper-base alloys, and moreparticularly in leaded brasses, of the type used in large quantity for producing machined parts. The invention is especially directed to copper alloys for producing rod from which such parts, commonly characterized as screw machine parts, are fabricated by repetitive operations on an automatic machine. In such operations the resistance to wear of cutting tools which results from high rates of-sustained, repetitive machining operations, is a vitally important factor in achieving maximum'machine production while maintaining dimensional tolerance and surface finish requirements in the parts produced. We have found that the machinability of these copper-base alloys is remarkably affected by certain hitherto unsuspected characteristics of these alloys. As a result of this, we have found means whereby deleterious variations in machinability may be minimized and new heights of machinability obtained.
Leaded brasses ofnumerous compositions have long been used in industry because of the case with which they canbe machined. The lead which is present in such alloys imparts the characteristic of free machining. In wrought alloys, lead may be present to as much as about 4%. The higher the lead content within this range, the higher or better is the machinability. Alloys of intermediate lead content represent a compromise between easy machinability on the one hand, and other types of workability on the other hand, such as 'flanging, knurling, thread rolling, forming and drawing.
An alloy known generally as free-cutting brass, having a nominal composition of 60-63% copper, 2.5%- 3.7% lead, the remainder zinc except for the usual incidental impurities, is the alloy most frequently used in making arts on automatic screw machines. This composition range represents a combination of high machinability and desirable mechanical properties. Despite its long record of being one of the most machinable of alloys, there have been complaints with regard to the variability of its performance, inconsistent and premature wearingof cutting tools, consequential damage to tools and interruption of operations in order tore-grind the cutting edge or to replace the tools. Sometimes it is necessary to reduce the speed of machining in order to extend tool life or to be able to make a satisfactory part.
It has been suggested from time to time that hard inclusions, such as'particles of undissolved steel or iron in the brass might be responsible for the poor performance on such occasions, and diligent searches have been made and samples of such brass carefully investigated for such inclusions. It is a known fact that foreign material such as iron or steel is often included in the metal scrap which conventionally is included in the starting charge in the melting and casting of the alloy. On rare occasions such metallic inclusions have indeed been found in the finished product. Much more often, however, no rational explanation of the untoward behavior has been found and gen- "ice erally the incidents 'have been passed off as operational inefiiciency,poor machine set-up or personal idiosyncrasies of the machine operator.
In order to arrive at a better understanding of the machining characteristics of brass, we have undertaken a program to evaluate factors important to matching, including: composition with respect to actual content of copper, lead and zinc, the basic ingredients; impurities which may be brought in from various sources and including elements such as iron, tin, aluminum, silicon, chromium; also the microstructure of the alloy; temper of the rod; surface finish and cleanliness of the rod; angles and feeds of tools; and speed of rotation of the rod.
With the foregoing factors in mind we have used'an automatic form and cutoff machine capable of unusually high maximum rotational speeds for the determination of the machinability behavior of free-cutting brass rod heretofore; generally available from various commercial sources. A'variety 'of cutting operations including forming, drilling, reaming, balance turning and cut-ofi" have been examined and a statistical analysis has been made of variation in diameter of successive work pieces produced by this machine from these materials and its relation to the "machine capability. Consistent and rational results have been obtained in this investigation, and they are found to substantiate general experience in commercial screw machine shops. Thus, for commercial free-cutting brass generally available heretofore, a 4-hour life has been established as the normal best expectancy for a high speed steel form tool, before re-sharpening, when operating at a spindle speed of 12,000 r.p.m. and a tool feed of 0.002 inch per revolution on /z" diameter rod to produce a given work piece. It has been found, however, that the machining characteristics of different lots of free-cutting brass rod may vary widely, and in fact a lot of rod used in one test can give vastly different machinability results from another'lot of rod, nominally of'the same composition and production history, subjected to the same "control test. Forexample, instead of obtaining-the normally best expected 4-hour tool life, a life of only 2 hours, or even less, is all that is obtained with certain lots of rod and, furthermore, the tools in these instances are worn as though they have been ground with an abrasive.
Examination of the microstructure of rod giving such inferior results, in order to determine if any deleterious inclusions were present, was fruitless at first. This is not surprising in view of the difiiculty of' finding minute foreign particles amidst the myriad of discrete particles of 'lead which are present characteristically in the alloy. Reference to FIG. 1 of the drawings will bear this out, wherein the microstructure of typical free-cutting brass, free of any beta phase, is shown in the photomicrograph. However, after persistently examining carefully prepared samples at a high magnification, on the order of 1,000-diameters, under the microscope, we have discovered that there are, indeed, inclusions present in conventional free-cutting brass that cannot be rationalized from knowledge of the ordinary chemical analyses of composition of the alloy. These inclusions generally range in their longest dimension from something less than 1 micron to as much as 50 microns. Application of a Bergsman microhardness tester to these fine particles indicates that they are of two general levels of hardness. The first, originally classified as type 1 and now believed to'be essentially silica, SiO has a hardness about ten times as greatas that of the brass itself. The other type, type 2 and now believed to be essentially zinc sulfide, ZnS, has about two to three times the hardness of brass itself. FIGS. 28 of the drawings illustrate various forms of these inclusions at magnifications of 300 and l000 Positive compositional identification of these two types of particles is extremely difficult but we believe that the characterization of them as silica and zinc sulfide is now reasonably accurate and assured. For convenience, therefore, in the discussion which follows they will be referred to by these terms.
Upon arriving at the foregoing discovery, in carrying out machining tests on numerous lots of rod obtained from a wide variety of commercial sources, we have found that tool life is definitely related to both types of inclusions. Where there is substantially no silica present and the observed average count of zinc sulfide inclusions is on the order of 20 to 40 per square millimeter, the tool life found is the best expected for normal conventional rod. Our studies clearly show that where any silica particles are present, form tool life is adversely affected. When on the average as few as two of these inclusions per square millimeter of metal surface as examined under a microscope are observed, the form tool life is drastically reduced from the best life expected in the cutting of normal conventional rod. Where the free-cutting brass contain an abserved average of about 70 inclusions of zinc sulfide per square millimeter of examined surface, but with substantially no silica present, the tool life is also reduced appreciably below the best expected life. But Where there are substantially no inclusions, either of silica or of zinc sulfide, a remarkable increase in tool life is found amounting to from 2 to 5 times the normal best expected life for conventional free-cutting brass.
For the purposes of this discussion and in the appended claims, the expressions substantially complete elimination of inclusions, or substantially complete absence of inclusions are employed to mean the following: In the case of silica, these expressions denote that not more than one such inclusion, and preferably none at all, is observed under the conditions hereinafter explained per square millimeter of representative alloy surface; and in the case of zinc sulfide, not more than ten and preferably less than five inclusions are observed per square millimeter of alloy surface.-
The presence of sulfur in copper alloys has in the past,
never been regarded as harmful to machinability. In-
deed, it is customary to add as. much as 0.25% sulfur to copper to form a commercial alloy whose distinguishing characteristic is improved machinability with respect to pure copper itslef. In copper, this sulfur exists as discrete particles of copper sulfide. Similarly, sulfur is added to certain steels for the purpose of improving machinability. Our finding that sulfur in brass is detrimental to its machinability is therefore most unexpected and contrary to reasonable anticipation and is of very significant commercial importance.
Inclusions of one or both types described above have been found in some free-cutting brass rod of all of the various sources of supply tested, indicating their widespread and uncontrolled occurrence in commercial material. Visual identification of the inclusions can be made provided a magnification of at least 1000 is employed. Using this order of magnificatiomthe silica and zinc sulfide inclusions can be visually identified by their shape, color, location and size. In the case of the silica inclusions, the shape is usually oblong or irregular, ranging, as indicated above, in maximum dimension from about 1 micron to 50 microns. The silica inclusions are dark blue-gray in color and stand out in relief when polished. Commonly there are imperfections in the inclusions and their surface is pitted. The silica inclusions are never spherical which helps to distinguish them from the zinc sulfide inclusions.
The latter are generally spherical or geometrical in shape and sometimes have a tail or irregularity attached to the nodule. These sulfide inclusions polish flat and range in color from light to dark gray, often being mottled in appearance. Their distribution is apparently quite random throughout the cross-section of the rod and they range from about 1 to 5 microns in size.
Microhardness tests on the inclusions themselves vary from around 1,000 to 1,600 Knopp hardness numbers (KI-IN), for the silica, while the zinc sulfide inclusions range between 180 to 380 KHN.
Wherever examination of the alloy reveals an inclusion count which, on the average, indicates the presence of 1 silica inclusion per square millimeter of surface examined, the life of the cutting edge of the tool is reduced by about one-fourth as compared with the life of that tool when cutting silica-free rod. Thus it is apparent that silica inclusions in the rod have an extremely important effect on tool life. The effect of silica inclusions on tool life when forming or machining free-cutting brass is illustrated graphically in FIG. 9 of the accompanying drawings. The data plotted on this chart was obtained from machining various samples of /2 diameter free-cutting brass rod using a molybdenum high speed steel form tool having a back rake angle of +2. A chemical lubricant, diluted 1:25 with Water, was applied during the machining operation and the cutting speed was 1570 surface feet per minute at a feed rate of 0.002 inch per revolution.
The effect of zinc sulfide inclusions on tool life, in the absence of silica, is shown on the graph of FIG. 10 from which it is noted that tool life increases as the zinc sulfide count decreases. Zinc sulfide inclusions, however, are not as detrimental to tool life as are the silica inclusions, unless the sulfide count is greater than about 70 to inclusions per millimeter. Quite commonly the zinc sulfide count in commercial free-cutting brass is between 20 to 40 per square millimeter.
Some appreciation of the difiiculty of identifying the deleterious zinc sulfide inclusions in the brass matrix already peppered with lead inclusions can be gained when it is considered that many of these approach 1 micron in size.
In spite of the smallness of these sulfide inclusions, however, as little as 0.00*1% sulfur in the brass can produce on the order 5 10 particles of 1 micron size per cubic inch of metal, which explains in some measure their effect on tool life.
In order to determine the inclusion count, this is made with a microscope using a magnification of l000 over a sufficient number of difierent fields to provide a representative count for a total examined area equivalent to one square millimeter. Fields near the outside surface of the material are included in order, to make sure that silica inclusions, if present, will be found.
Having thus determined the cause or reason 'for the difficulties and variable results in machinability of the copper base alloys, the next step is to provide a cure. We have found that the foregoing zinc sulfide inclusions and, surprisingly, the silica inclusions also can be eliminated from the alloy by the addition of a suitable reagent metal to the melt shortly before casting. Magnesium is particularly effective but other reagent metals can also remove the undesirable inclusions from brass either partially or wholly. These include sodium and certain rare earth mixtures which are rich in lanthanum and/or cerium. Manganese appears definitely not to be effective.
In the case of magnesium, useful improvements in clearing the microstructure and in obtaining better machin bility are obtained with from about 0.01% to as high as 0.23% residual magnesium in the free-cutting brass. Residual magnesium of 0.35% produces hot shortness in extrusion and cold shortness in cold drawing of rod of the alloy, both operations being conventional in commercial production. The upper limit of retained magnesium practical in the brass thus appears to be in the neighborhood of 0.3%. Optimum content, both from machina bility as well as economic consideration, is on the order of 0.02% to 0.18% magnesium.
The effect of the magnesium appears to be synergistic, for tool life with some magnesium-containing material is far greater than with non-magnesium treated material having low or no undesirable inclusions.
The beneficial effect of magnesium is set forth in the accompanying Table I which shows form tool life for a standard test as great as 20 hours for one magnesium-bearing rod, pronounced improvement over commercial inclusion-containing material for all magnesium contents in the useful range.
The improvement from the use of magnesium is obtained despite the fact that it, too, produces discrete particles of a phase which is also harder by 2 to 3 times than the brass in which it occurs. Such a phase will be found with magnesium contents ofabout 0.06% and higher.
TABLE I.-EFFECT OF MAGNESIUM IN BRASS ON TOOL LIFE DIAMETER FREE-CUTTING BRASS ROD [Nominal composition: 61% Cu, 3.2% Pb, bal. Zn]
Inclusions/mm. Rod. No. Magnesium, Tool lite,
percent hours Silica Zinc sulfide 1 1. 2 9 2 2. 0 8 66 3.. 1.9 19 4.. 2.0 4 38 5 3. 2 0 80 6 4. 0 0 56 7-. 3, 1 0 40 8.. 3. 0 0 45 9-. 3. 8 0 41 10 3.0 0 40 11 4. 4 0 38 12. 4.6 0 31 13 3. 1 0 28 14 4. 0 0 25 15. 5. 7 0 O 1ti 20. 8 0 0 17 13. 3 0 0 18... 17. 1 0 0 19 1 17. 0 0 0 20. 0. 080 9. 3 0 0 2L 0. 11 10. 1 0 0 22 0.16 12. 2 0 0 23... 0. 17 10.4 0 0 24 0. l8 7. 8 0 0 25 0. 23 5. 5 0 0 io HEXAGONAL FREE-CUTTING BRASS ROD [Same nominal composition as above] %4 DIAMETER LEADED FLANGING BRASS ROD [Nominal composition: 62.5% Cu, 2% Pl), bal. Zn]
1 Test discontinued; tool still in good condition.
Production of magnesium-containing copper alloy may be accomplished in several different Ways. In the first of a series of heats of commercial size, the preparation of a nominal 0.2% magnesium-bearing copper alloy was accomplished from a charge consisting entirely of free-cutting brass scrap. This was charged into a furnace and immediately after melt-down, with the melt relatively cool, the dross was raked off the melt and magnesium was added in the form of an 80% Cu% Mg master alloy. The master alloy was introduced by thrusting it beneath the surface with a ladle, with the furnace power on. When the furnace reached pouring temperature, power was turned off and the melt allowed to stand for five minutes. The melt was then skimmed and poured into a mold.
Mechanical properties, assay results, inclusion counts and machinability data .for a typical Melt A prepared in this way are shown in the accompanying Tables H, III and IV.
A second series of ingots was cast from charges consisting mainly of scrap, including small amounts of chips. Magnesium was again added as the copper-magnesium master alloy, and the metal allowed to stand for 2 minutes 6 with the furnace off before pouring. The results of this are typified by the data given for Melt B in the accompanying Tables II, III and IV.
Ingots containing no magnesium addition were also poured for comparison purposes, and the properties of a representative ingot from this group are shown in the accompanying tables as Melt C.
A further series of ingots was produced with contents up to 0.35% magnesium. Hot extruded and coiled rod with 0.35% Mg was found to contain intercrystalline cracks. It also proved impossible to point the ends of the rods without further cracking them. Examination of the microstructure of this rod showed lead and both alpha and beta phases to be present, together with particles produced by the magnesium, mainly in the form of an intercrystallin'e network. This was probably the cause of the cracking and thus indicates definitely an upper limit for the magnesium content.
The addition of magnesium to the melt may be accomplished by the use of unalloyed magnesium metal as well as in the form of a master copper-magnesium alloy specifically mentioned in the foregoing examples.
The presence of magnesium in the melt exerts a marked effect on the tendency of zinc to burn during pouring. Thus it is observed that the stream of metal becomes covered with a thin skin of adherent oxide which protects the zinc from burning. The magnesium additions, although they may cause the formation of more dross than usual, tend to decrease zinc stack losses which is definitely a favorable factor.
From the results shown in Tables II, III and IV, it is seen that there is no significant difference in mechanical properties, grain size or beta content as a result of magnesium additions. On the other hand, there is a marked increase in tool life in the magnesium-bearing brasses.
TABLE II.MECHANIOAL PROPERTIES Melt Properties Percent Mg (retained) Q 0.17 0. 11 Tensile strength, p.s.i 61, 600 66, 300 66, 300 Yield strength, p.s.i. 43, 000 45, 500 42, 200 Percent elongation (2) 17 17 Grain size 0. 030 0. 030 07 030 Hardness (Rockwell B):
Surfa 77 76 75 Mid-radiu 73 76 75 Centel 71 74 76 Percent beta ph 1 1 2 TABLE IIL-ASSAY RESULTS (PERCENT) Melt Analysis TABLE IV.INCLUSION COUNTS AND TOOL LIFE Melt A i B i 0 Mg (percent). 0. 17 0. 11 Inclusions/mm nominal lead content is on the order of 2%.
As previously mentioned we have found that reagent metal additions other than magnesium are useful for removing the undesirable inclusions.
In another case, the addition of approximately 0.14%
of misch metal (lanthanum-cerium alloy) is also beneficial. In all of these cases, the amount of reagent metal which is added should be substantially less than that-of magnesium.
The brasses have long been recognized as among the cleanest alloys structure-wise of all those commercially used, by virtue of their zinc content and the purging action which this element itself exerts in the melting operation. The beneficial effect of additions of a reagent metal under this circumstance is therefore a most unusual thing. 1
The invention is not limited to free-cutting brass but .is applicable to commercial brasses, generally. In Table I an example of flanging brass is given, in which the And the same is applicable to low-leaded brass having a nominal composition of 66.5% copper-0.5% lead, balance zinc. The latter alloy shows inclusion counts typically of 4 silica, 30 zinc sulfide inclusions per square millimeter. Nor is the invention limited to leaded brasses as it may be applied to nominally lead-free alloys, such as cartridge brass (nominally 70% copper-30% zinc), and jewelry bronze (nominally 87.5% copper-12.5% zinc). The latter alloy particularly is much used in the manufacture of slide fasteners and has been found to produce large variation in the wear of the cut-off tool used in making the fastener elements. Typical inclusion counts for this jewelry bronze show up to 5 silica and to 12 zinc sulfide particles per square millimeter. The cartridge brass mentioned above shows, typically, silica counts of 6 to 7 and zinc sulfide counts as high as 75 on occasion. Re-
moval of these inclusions from any of these alloys by the technique disclosed herein is beneficial.
TABLE V.-EFFECT OF SODIUM IN BRASS ON TOOL IIIFE V DIAMETER FREE-CUTTING BRASS ROD [Nominal composition: 61% Cu, 3.2% Pb, bal. Zn]
What is claimed is:
1. A leaded brass alloy of improved machinability containing as inclusion-reducing reagent metal at least one member selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, the amount of said reagent metal retained in the alloy being an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of silica inclusions commonly present in the untreated alloy.
2. A leaded brass alloy as defined in claim 1, wherein the amount of said reagent metal is an effective amount sufficient also to effect substantially complete elimination of zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated alloy.
3. A leaded brass of improved machinability which has been treated to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated metal, said treated brass containing as an inclusion-reducing reagent metal a member selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, in an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of such inclusions, the maximum amount of reagent metal retained in said brass being about 0.30% by weight.
4. A leaded brass of superior machinability which has been treated to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated metal, said treated leaded brass containing an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of such inclusions, up to 0.30% of an inclusion-reducing reagent metal selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium. I
5. A free-cutting brass of superior machinability having a'nominal analysis of 60% to 63% copper, 2.5% to 3.7% lead, the remainder zinc except for incidental impurities and an inclusion-reducing reagent metal in a retained small but effective amount, up to 0.30% by weight, sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present inordinary free-cutting brass and being selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium.
6. A free-cutting brass as defined in claim 5, wherein the reagent metal is sodium in amount of from about 0.000l% to 0.0005% by weight.
7. The method of treating leaded brass to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated metal in order to improve the machinability thereof, which comprises introducing into the brass melt at least one reagent metal selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, in amount sufficient to provide in the cast alloy an effective amount sufiicient to effect substantially complete elimination of such inclusions, up to 0.30% by weight of said reagent metal.
8. The method as defined in claim 7, wherein thev amount of reagent metal is sufficient to reduce silica and zinc sulfide inclusions in the untreated alloy matrix to an average of not more than one silica and ten zinc sulfide inclusions per square millimeter of metal cross-sectional surface.
9. The method of treating free-cutting brass having a nominal composition of 6063% copper, 2.5%-3.7% lead, balance zinc, to improve the machinability thereof, which comprises introducing into the alloy melt at least one reagent metal selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum and cerium, in an effective amount sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of silica and zinc sulfide inclusions commonly present in the untreated brass, and to provide in the cast alloy not more than 0.30% of said reagent metal.
10. The method as defined in claim 9, wherein the amount of reagent metal added is sufficient to reduce silica and Zinc sulfide inclusions in the untreated alloy .matrix to an average of not more than one silica and ten zinc sulfide inclusions per square millimeter of metal cross-sectional surface.
11. A leaded free-cutting brass of improved machineability that has been treated to reduce inclusions that are commonly present in ordinary free-cutting brass and harmful to tool life, said treated brass containing as an inclusion-reducing reagent metal a small but effective retained amount, sufficient to effect substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting, of a member selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum, cerium, and mixtures thereof.
12. A leaded free-cutting brass of improved machineability that has been treated to reduce inclusions that are commonly present in ordinary free-cutting 'brassand harmful to tool life, said-treated 'brass'containing as an inclusion-reducing reagent metal a small but effective retained amount of sodium, sufficient to effect substanmachineability by changing conditions harmful to tool life by eflfecting substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting brass, said metal being selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum, cerium, and mixtures thereof.
14. A method of treating a free-cutting leaded brass to create a product that is characterized by substantial freedom from inclusions that are Commonly present in ordinary free-cutting brass and harmful to tool life, and that is further characterized by improved machineability, comprising introducing into a melt thereof an amount of sodium sufiicient to provide in the brass as cast a small retained amount of sodium, that is sufiicient to effect substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting brass.
15. A method of treating a free-cutting leaded brass having a nominal analysis of from about 60% to about 65% copper, about 0.5% to about 3.7% lead, and the remainder zinc except for incidental impurities, in order to improve the machineability thereof, that comprises introducing into a melt thereof an amount of a reagent metal sufficient to reduce the incidence of inclusions normally present in such alloys and to improve machineability, and to provide in the brass as cast a small retained amount of the reagent metal, suificient to effect substantially complete elimination of inclusions commonly present in untreated free-cutting brass, Where the reagent metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium, lanthanum, cerium, and mixtures thereof.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,937,934 12/1933 Zimmerli.
2,173,254 9/1939 Hensel et al.
2,795,501 6/1957 Kelly 75l53 XR 2,879,159 3/1959 Bolkcom et a1.
2,970,248 1/1961 Sahagun 75-153 XR DAVID L. RECK, Primary Examiner.

Claims (1)

  1. 7. THE METHOD OF TREATING LEADED BRASS TO REDUCE SILICA AND ZINC SULFIDE INCLUSIONS COMMONLY PRESENT IN THE UNTREATED METAL IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE MACHINABILITY THEREOF, WHICH COMPRISES INTRODUCING INTO THE BRASS MELT AT LEAST ONE REAGENT METAL SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF SODIUM, LANTHANUM AND CERIUM, IN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE IN THE CAST ALLOY AN EFFECTIVE AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO EFFECT SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE ELIMINTION OF SUCH INCLUSIONS, UP TO 0.30% BY WEIGHT OF SAID REAGENT METAL.
US393368A 1964-08-31 1964-08-31 Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability Expired - Lifetime US3253910A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US393368A US3253910A (en) 1964-08-31 1964-08-31 Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US393368A US3253910A (en) 1964-08-31 1964-08-31 Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3253910A true US3253910A (en) 1966-05-31

Family

ID=23554410

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US393368A Expired - Lifetime US3253910A (en) 1964-08-31 1964-08-31 Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3253910A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3976477A (en) * 1974-12-23 1976-08-24 Olin Corporation High conductivity high temperature copper alloy
EP0007883A1 (en) * 1978-07-31 1980-02-06 Trefimetaux Process for the heat treatment of drawn rods of brass containing lead
US4202688A (en) * 1975-02-05 1980-05-13 Olin Corporation High conductivity high temperature copper alloy
US4233069A (en) * 1979-11-05 1980-11-11 Olin Corporation Modified brass alloys with improved stress relaxation resistance
US4238249A (en) * 1977-12-30 1980-12-09 Diehl Gmbh & Co. Process for the preparation of a copper-zinc material
US5118341A (en) * 1991-03-28 1992-06-02 Alcan Aluminum Corporation Machinable powder metallurgical parts and method
US20110163447A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2011-07-07 Jx Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation High-Purity Copper or High-Purity Copper Alloy Sputtering Target, Process for Manufacturing the Sputtering Target, and High-Purity Copper or High-Purity Copper Alloy Sputtered Film
US9476134B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2016-10-25 Jx Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation High purity copper and method of producing high purity copper based on electrolysis

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1937934A (en) * 1932-02-03 1933-12-05 Du Pont Metallurgical process
US2173254A (en) * 1939-02-24 1939-09-19 Mallory & Co Inc P R Copper alloy
US2795501A (en) * 1955-01-28 1957-06-11 Westinghouse Electric Corp Copper base alloys
US2879159A (en) * 1955-04-26 1959-03-24 American Metallurg Products Co Copper and copper base alloys and methods of making the same
US2970248A (en) * 1957-11-12 1961-01-31 Pacific Semiconductors Inc Pin material for glass seal semiconductor rectifier

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1937934A (en) * 1932-02-03 1933-12-05 Du Pont Metallurgical process
US2173254A (en) * 1939-02-24 1939-09-19 Mallory & Co Inc P R Copper alloy
US2795501A (en) * 1955-01-28 1957-06-11 Westinghouse Electric Corp Copper base alloys
US2879159A (en) * 1955-04-26 1959-03-24 American Metallurg Products Co Copper and copper base alloys and methods of making the same
US2970248A (en) * 1957-11-12 1961-01-31 Pacific Semiconductors Inc Pin material for glass seal semiconductor rectifier

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3976477A (en) * 1974-12-23 1976-08-24 Olin Corporation High conductivity high temperature copper alloy
US4202688A (en) * 1975-02-05 1980-05-13 Olin Corporation High conductivity high temperature copper alloy
US4238249A (en) * 1977-12-30 1980-12-09 Diehl Gmbh & Co. Process for the preparation of a copper-zinc material
EP0007883A1 (en) * 1978-07-31 1980-02-06 Trefimetaux Process for the heat treatment of drawn rods of brass containing lead
FR2432558A1 (en) * 1978-07-31 1980-02-29 Trefimetaux LEADED BRASS STRETCHED BARS AND HEAT TREATMENT METHOD FOR SAID BARS
US4233069A (en) * 1979-11-05 1980-11-11 Olin Corporation Modified brass alloys with improved stress relaxation resistance
US5118341A (en) * 1991-03-28 1992-06-02 Alcan Aluminum Corporation Machinable powder metallurgical parts and method
US20110163447A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2011-07-07 Jx Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation High-Purity Copper or High-Purity Copper Alloy Sputtering Target, Process for Manufacturing the Sputtering Target, and High-Purity Copper or High-Purity Copper Alloy Sputtered Film
US9441289B2 (en) * 2008-09-30 2016-09-13 Jx Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation High-purity copper or high-purity copper alloy sputtering target, process for manufacturing the sputtering target, and high-purity copper or high-purity copper alloy sputtered film
US9476134B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2016-10-25 Jx Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation High purity copper and method of producing high purity copper based on electrolysis

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3903297B2 (en) Dezincing resistant copper base alloy
EP2761042B1 (en) Leadless free-cutting copper alloy
US5507885A (en) Copper-based alloy
JP6799305B1 (en) Method for manufacturing free-cutting copper alloy castings and free-cutting copper alloy castings
US3253910A (en) Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability
US3158470A (en) Copper base alloys and the method of treating the same to improve their machinability
KR100191702B1 (en) Brass alloy
KR910009969B1 (en) Intermetallic compound type alloy having improved toughness machinability and wear resistance
EP1214456B1 (en) A free machining aluminum alloy containing bismuth or bismuth-tin for free machining and a method of use
US10745779B1 (en) Wrought machinable brass alloy
JPH0285331A (en) Aluminum alloy having excellent cross feed machinability and its manufacture
US2038136A (en) Copper-selenium alloys
US2315700A (en) Silicon brass rod
JPS6086237A (en) Cu-alloy for slide member
US2026541A (en) Free cutting alloys
US3713814A (en) Copper-zinc alloy
JPS6154852B2 (en)
US2026551A (en) Free cutting alloys
US3298828A (en) Treatment of leaded brass alloys for improving machineability and products so produced
US2237243A (en) Method of making corrosion resistant metal strip
US2184693A (en) Free cutting alloys
US2271969A (en) Alloy
JPH02107738A (en) Wear-resistant aluminum alloy stock for machining excellent in toughness
JPH01272741A (en) Aluminum alloy having excellent wear resistance and machinability
JP2505611B2 (en) Free cutting copper alloy