US3190745A - Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke - Google Patents

Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3190745A
US3190745A US224232A US22423262A US3190745A US 3190745 A US3190745 A US 3190745A US 224232 A US224232 A US 224232A US 22423262 A US22423262 A US 22423262A US 3190745 A US3190745 A US 3190745A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
furnace
petroleum coke
coke
raw petroleum
blast furnace
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US224232A
Inventor
Alfred A Triska
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SGL Carbon Corp
Original Assignee
Great Lakes Carbon Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to NL129094D priority Critical patent/NL129094C/xx
Priority to NL297825D priority patent/NL297825A/xx
Application filed by Great Lakes Carbon Corp filed Critical Great Lakes Carbon Corp
Priority to US224232A priority patent/US3190745A/en
Priority to GB31866/63A priority patent/GB999351A/en
Priority to DEG38470A priority patent/DE1212567B/en
Priority to FR945573A priority patent/FR1367299A/en
Priority to LU44327D priority patent/LU44327A1/xx
Priority to JP38045276A priority patent/JPS5010801B1/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3190745A publication Critical patent/US3190745A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B5/00Making pig-iron in the blast furnace
    • C21B5/007Conditions of the cokes or characterised by the cokes used

Definitions

  • blast furnaces may be considered as having five parts: (1) the bottom, (2) the hearth, (3) the bosh, (4) the stack, and (5) the furnace top.
  • Raw materials including the burden are charged through the top of the furnace.
  • the burden or ore to be reduced may consist of raw screened and'blended ores,
  • the coke is consumed or gasified by means of a preheated blast of air which is forced into the furnace under pressure through tuyeres at the top of the hearth.
  • This gasification of carbon supplies the necessary reducing gases and heat to promote the chemical reactions of reduction and also melt the iron and slag formed.
  • the preheated hot blast may range in temperatures from about 1000" to over 1800 F. subject to limitations of heating capacity and refractory linings used.
  • the blast may be modified or enriched with oxygen; steam; and gaseous, liquid, or solid fuels.
  • this hanging is characterized by rapidly increasing blast pressures and lack of movement of the burden in the upper reaches of the stock column. Initially this hanging may be caused by several conditions, either singly or in combination, such as:
  • Fused slag may resolidify
  • Coke and burden fines may plug the void space and cause both arching of the solid material and resistance to flow of the gases;
  • Redeposited carbon from the reaction may fill the voids between particles of ore and thus impervious masses.
  • the quantity of blast has been reduced in order to lower its buoyant effect, with the result that the weight of the material above the scaffolding incrustation is sometimes able to break the incrustation.
  • This is referred to as a bosh slip.
  • the incrustation can be removed'by the use of quartzSi0 addition which acts on the deposits like rocksalt on ice. 'Sometimes extra metallurgical or foundry coke over the amount normally used has been, added and found to be helpful. In extreme cases a number of holes may be drilled at various levels of the furnace to blast or dynamite out the incrustation or bridges, etc.
  • An additional complicating factor in blast furnace operation is that the blast furnace operator must think about 8 to 10 hours ahead of the furnace because any burden or charge change will require that time to travel through the furnace and reach the hearth where its effect will be mainly manifested.
  • raw petroleum coke has low ash content (typically about 0.3% as compared to 7-14% ash, for normal furnace coke), upon burning, it contrib utes very little if any to slag build-up as does normal furnace coke upon burning. Further it permits a limestone burden adjustment which forms a more nearly finished slag in the bosh or primary melting zone.
  • EXAMPLE 1 A blast furnace having a hearth 23 feet in diameter and a working volume of 28,000 cubic feet was sick" or cold for months, had an in-wall temperature fifteen feet above the bosh of 900-l000 F., and was producing only about 150 tons of hot metal per day. Thirty-two tons of raw petroleum coke, having a volatile content of 12.5% and a particle size of 100% 4 inch mesh and approximately 50% inch mesh, was charged through the top of said furnace and added to the normal furnace charge already therein. Within 48 hours the in-wall temperatures 15 feet above the bosh had increased by about 100-400 F. to 1000-1300 F., 1100 F. average. After this 48 hours, thirty-two more tons of the same raw petroleum coke were charged into the furnace in the same manner.
  • the raw petroleum coke employed in this invention is typically of the type produced from a delayed coker system and generally will have a volatile matter content between about 8 and about 15% with about 12 to 14% being typical. It is preferable also that a substantial proportion of the raw petroleum coke employed be not too large nor too fine. Raw petroleum coke particles which are retained on a inch screen and which pass through a inch screen are typical of preferred particle sizes, but this should not be interpreted as precluding the use of minor percentages of raw petroleum coke coarser than 5 inches or finer than inch. The ash content of the raw petroleum coke is preferably no higher than about one percent.
  • the invention although most applicable to blast furnaces, can be applied to any shaft furnace, such as hot blast basic cupolas, in which incrustation or build-up of viscous material along the in-walls is a problem.
  • a method of assisting in restoring a shaft furnace to normal operating temperature after the temperature of said furnace has been reduced below said normal operating'temperature because of scaffolding which comprises adding to the shaft furnace as extra coke, raw petroleum coke, having a volatile matter content between about 8% and about 15% and an ash content less than about 1%, in an amount sufficient to increase said reduced operating temperature toward said normal operating temperature.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
  • Refinement Of Pig-Iron, Manufacture Of Cast Iron, And Steel Manufacture Other Than In Revolving Furnaces (AREA)
  • Vertical, Hearth, Or Arc Furnaces (AREA)

Description

United States Patent It is well known to those skilled in the art that the blast furnace, even in its highest development is by no means the even-going, easily-regulated monster the casual ob- Server may take it to be. Although furnace operations are under better control now than ever before, such furnaces are still capable of acting in unpredictable ways.
In general and as illustrated on page 62 of Brays Ferrous Process Metallurgy, published in 1954 by John Wiley and Sons, Inc., blast furnaces may be considered as having five parts: (1) the bottom, (2) the hearth, (3) the bosh, (4) the stack, and (5) the furnace top.
The construction and operation of such furnaces are described in many standard reference works on the subject such as the aforecited volume by Bray or the Annual Proceedings published by the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers on Blast Furnace, Coke Oven, and Raw Materials, etc.
Raw materials including the burden are charged through the top of the furnace. The burden or ore to be reduced may consist of raw screened and'blended ores,
prepared sinter, or agglomerated ore concentrates such as pellets. This burden along with limestone and coke constitutes the charge. Such additional materials as open hearth slag, scrap, and roll scale may be added in minor percentages as available.v
In a typical furnace operation the coke is consumed or gasified by means of a preheated blast of air which is forced into the furnace under pressure through tuyeres at the top of the hearth. This gasification of carbon supplies the necessary reducing gases and heat to promote the chemical reactions of reduction and also melt the iron and slag formed. The preheated hot blast may range in temperatures from about 1000" to over 1800 F. subject to limitations of heating capacity and refractory linings used. In addition the blastmay be modified or enriched with oxygen; steam; and gaseous, liquid, or solid fuels. As the coke of successive charges is consumed the furnace is replenished by adding charges to the top and the finished iron (hot metal) and slag are periodically drained or tapped from the hearth. Thus a charge will require about 8-12 hours to smoothly move to the hearth of a furnace Where the coke will be consumed and the hot metal and slag removed.
When a furnace fails to operate smoothly it is said to be hanging during periods when the burden fails to move downward in a normal and smooth manner. This hanging is characterized by rapidly increasing blast pressures and lack of movement of the burden in the upper reaches of the stock column. Initially this hanging may be caused by several conditions, either singly or in combination, such as:
(1) Fused slag may resolidify;
(2) Coke and burden fines may plug the void space and cause both arching of the solid material and resistance to flow of the gases;
(3) Redeposited carbon from the reaction may fill the voids between particles of ore and thus impervious masses.
3,190,745 Patented June 22, 1%65 As the coke is gasified and the iron and slag is melted below the area in which the hanging occurs, a'large void is created especially when the furnace hangs for any appreciable time. When the unsupported burden even- Iually breaks loose, the furnace is said to slip. This slip is characterized by an explosive release of high temperature gas along with the sudden movement of the burden. The sudden release of the gas causes asharp increase in top gas temperature and pressure usually causing the bleeders or safety valves to open. The burden dropping into the bosh causes a marked cooling of the area since this burden has been improperly heated due to the poor gas-solid contact during the period of blockage or hanging.
Recurrent slips of this nature lead to deposits along the periphery of the bosh. These scabs or scaffolds further interfere with'normal furnace operation by restrict ing the flow of the gases and also the countercurrent flow of the burden. Thus scaffolds, once formed, cause irregular operation and promote further encrustation on the furnace walls. 7
' As these scalfolds increase the furnace continually hangs and slips and must be operated at greatly reduced blast volumes and production rates. For example, one blast furnace with a 23 ft. diameter hearth and 28,000 cubic feet working volume, but which had a substantial amount of scaffolding, was producing only tons per day of hot metal as compared to normal production of about 900 tons per day. This furnace had an in wall temperature fifteen feet above the bosh of 9001000 R, which was about SOD-600 F. below normal- Several different approaches to solving, or minimizing or eliminating such adverse phenomena, and for improving furnace performance have been suggestedor tried with varying degrees of success. For example, in some cases the quantity of blast has been reduced in order to lower its buoyant effect, with the result that the weight of the material above the scaffolding incrustation is sometimes able to break the incrustation. This is referred to as a bosh slip. Sometimes the incrustationcan be removed'by the use of quartzSi0 addition which acts on the deposits like rocksalt on ice. 'Sometimes extra metallurgical or foundry coke over the amount normally used has been, added and found to be helpful. In extreme cases a number of holes may be drilled at various levels of the furnace to blast or dynamite out the incrustation or bridges, etc. An additional complicating factor in blast furnace operation is that the blast furnace operator must think about 8 to 10 hours ahead of the furnace because any burden or charge change will require that time to travel through the furnace and reach the hearth where its effect will be mainly manifested.
It has now been found that a very elfective, efficient, and economical way to restore a blast furnace to its normal stock movement, temperature profile, and hot metal output basis, after these have been reduced due to such conditions as scaffolding or bridging or hanging, etc., is to charge substantial quantities of raw petroleum coke to the slow moving charge already contained in said furnace. Such raw petroleum coke develops very high and intense temperatures upon burning, resulting in temperatures sufliciently high to weaken the scaffolding by softening or increasing the fluidity of the highly viscous slag. Also, because raw petroleum coke has low ash content (typically about 0.3% as compared to 7-14% ash, for normal furnace coke), upon burning, it contrib utes very little if any to slag build-up as does normal furnace coke upon burning. Further it permits a limestone burden adjustment which forms a more nearly finished slag in the bosh or primary melting zone.
The high temperature at which petroleum coke burns in relation to metallurgical coke is caused by its structure. Micro photographs show petroleum coke to have very troleum coke will produce higher concentrations of carbon dioxide and therefore the heat release is substantially higher resulting in higher combustion temperature.
The process of this invention is illustrated by the following example.
EXAMPLE 1 A blast furnace having a hearth 23 feet in diameter and a working volume of 28,000 cubic feet was sick" or cold for months, had an in-wall temperature fifteen feet above the bosh of 900-l000 F., and was producing only about 150 tons of hot metal per day. Thirty-two tons of raw petroleum coke, having a volatile content of 12.5% and a particle size of 100% 4 inch mesh and approximately 50% inch mesh, was charged through the top of said furnace and added to the normal furnace charge already therein. Within 48 hours the in-wall temperatures 15 feet above the bosh had increased by about 100-400 F. to 1000-1300 F., 1100 F. average. After this 48 hours, thirty-two more tons of the same raw petroleum coke were charged into the furnace in the same manner. (The furnace was charged in a conventional manner during the intervening 48 hours with ore, coke and limestone according to a typical blast furnace charging cycle such as suggested on pages 73 and 74 of the volume by Bray.) Within 24 hours the temperature of the furnace 15 feet above the bosh had risen to 1200 1400 F., 1300 F. average. Five days later 64 tons of the same raw petroleum coke was added to the furnace and within 24 hours the in-wall temperature 15 feet above the bosh averaged about 1500 F. In other words, furnace temperatures were restored to normal; as was also hot metal output.
As is apparent from the foregoing example, the material employed to effect this restoration to normalcy was utilized in the ore reduction process, the blast furnace was operated continuously while the restoration was taking placeand without the employment of extraordinary labor or blasting, or extraneous additives.
The raw petroleum coke employed in this invention is typically of the type produced from a delayed coker system and generally will have a volatile matter content between about 8 and about 15% with about 12 to 14% being typical. It is preferable also that a substantial proportion of the raw petroleum coke employed be not too large nor too fine. Raw petroleum coke particles which are retained on a inch screen and which pass through a inch screen are typical of preferred particle sizes, but this should not be interpreted as precluding the use of minor percentages of raw petroleum coke coarser than 5 inches or finer than inch. The ash content of the raw petroleum coke is preferably no higher than about one percent.
The invention, although most applicable to blast furnaces, can be applied to any shaft furnace, such as hot blast basic cupolas, in which incrustation or build-up of viscous material along the in-walls is a problem.
Having thus described the nature of my invention, but
7 being limited only by the appended claims with respect to its scope, I claim:
1. A method of assisting in restoring a shaft furnace to normal operating temperature after the temperature of said furnace has been reduced below said normal operating'temperature because of scaffolding, which comprises adding to the shaft furnace as extra coke, raw petroleum coke, having a volatile matter content between about 8% and about 15% and an ash content less than about 1%, in an amount sufficient to increase said reduced operating temperature toward said normal operating temperature.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein over of the raw petroleum coke possesses a particle size larger than one-eighth inch.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,184,318 12/39 Ruzicka 42 3,058,821 10/62 Triska 75-41 OTHER REFERENCES Clements: Blast Furnace Practice, vol. III, published by E. Benn, Ltd., London 1929, pages 81-85.
Elliot et al.: Practical Ironmaking, published by United Steel Cos. Ltd., Shefiield, UK, 1959, pages 205206.
DAVID L. RECK, Primary Examiner.
WINSTON A. DOUGLAS, Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A METHOD OF ASSISTING IN RESTORING A SHAFT FURNACE TO NORMAL OPERATING TEMPERATURE AFTER THE TEMPERATURE OF SAID FURNACE HAS BEEN REDUCEC BELOW SAID NORMAL OPERATING TEMPERATURES BECAUSE OF SCAFFOLDING, WHICH COMPRISES ADDING TO THE SHAFT FURNACE AS EXTRA COKE RAW PETROLEUM COKE, HAVING A VOLATILE MATTER CONTENT BETWEEN ABOUT 8% AND ABOUT 15% AND AN ASH CONTENT LESS THAN ABOUT 1%, IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO INCREASE SAID REDUCED OPERATING TEMPERATURE TOWARD SAID NORMAL OPERATING TEMPERATURE.
US224232A 1962-09-17 1962-09-17 Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke Expired - Lifetime US3190745A (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL129094D NL129094C (en) 1962-09-17
NL297825D NL297825A (en) 1962-09-17
US224232A US3190745A (en) 1962-09-17 1962-09-17 Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke
GB31866/63A GB999351A (en) 1962-09-17 1963-08-13 Method of improving blast or cupola furnace performance
DEG38470A DE1212567B (en) 1962-09-17 1963-08-14 Process for normalizing the furnace passage of a shaft furnace
FR945573A FR1367299A (en) 1962-09-17 1963-08-23 Process for improving the efficiency of blast furnaces
LU44327D LU44327A1 (en) 1962-09-17 1963-08-26
JP38045276A JPS5010801B1 (en) 1962-09-17 1963-08-28

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US224232A US3190745A (en) 1962-09-17 1962-09-17 Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3190745A true US3190745A (en) 1965-06-22

Family

ID=22839798

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US224232A Expired - Lifetime US3190745A (en) 1962-09-17 1962-09-17 Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US3190745A (en)
JP (1) JPS5010801B1 (en)
GB (1) GB999351A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3770418A (en) * 1968-03-04 1973-11-06 T Wilde Method of melting iron with lumps of carbon coke
US4144053A (en) * 1976-11-03 1979-03-13 Republic Steel Corporation Processes for blast furnace operations

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2184318A (en) * 1934-11-15 1939-12-26 Ruzicka Stevan Process for simultaneous production of alumina cement and pig iron in blast furnaces
US3058821A (en) * 1960-02-18 1962-10-16 Great Lakes Carbon Corp Manufacture of coke

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2184318A (en) * 1934-11-15 1939-12-26 Ruzicka Stevan Process for simultaneous production of alumina cement and pig iron in blast furnaces
US3058821A (en) * 1960-02-18 1962-10-16 Great Lakes Carbon Corp Manufacture of coke

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3770418A (en) * 1968-03-04 1973-11-06 T Wilde Method of melting iron with lumps of carbon coke
US4144053A (en) * 1976-11-03 1979-03-13 Republic Steel Corporation Processes for blast furnace operations

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB999351A (en) 1965-07-21
JPS5010801B1 (en) 1975-04-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Geerdes et al. Modern blast furnace ironmaking: an introduction (2020)
US20060105901A1 (en) Slag conditioner composition, process for manufacture and method of use in steel production
US3765869A (en) Method of producing iron-ore pellets
US3953196A (en) Process for the direct reduction of metal oxides
RU2690251C2 (en) Metallurgical furnace for production of metal alloys
US4015977A (en) Petroleum coke composition
WO1996015277A1 (en) Method of operating blast furnace
US3190745A (en) Method of improving blast furnace performance using raw petroleum coke
US1994378A (en) Iron-bearing briquette and method of making the same
Haque et al. Reduction of iron ore fines by coal fines in a packed bed and fluidized bed apparatus—A comparative study
US1945341A (en) Reduction and smelting of ores
US2080028A (en) Process for producing sponge iron
US3097945A (en) Process of agglomerating fines of materials containing iron of which a portion has been completely reduced
JP4529838B2 (en) Sinter ore and blast furnace operation method
US2745732A (en) Method of reducing ores by a particular fuel combustion mixture
US4238222A (en) Waelz process of volatilizing zinc and lead from iron oxide-containing materials
US3231367A (en) Iron producing blast furnace operations
US1832356A (en) Reducing zinciferous materials
JP4759977B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
Buehl et al. Smelting iron ore with anthracite: Bureau of Mines experimental blast furnace
US866280A (en) Ore-reducing furnace.
US1259467A (en) Smelting copper and like ores.
US1826882A (en) Method of purifying steel in the open hearth process
US2784078A (en) Process of smelting finely divided metallic ore
US2745734A (en) Metal reduction and combustion process