US3190565A - Process for grinding rubber - Google Patents

Process for grinding rubber Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3190565A
US3190565A US219105A US21910562A US3190565A US 3190565 A US3190565 A US 3190565A US 219105 A US219105 A US 219105A US 21910562 A US21910562 A US 21910562A US 3190565 A US3190565 A US 3190565A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fines
ground
cutter
polyolefin
grinding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US219105A
Inventor
Jr William M Jayne
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Union Carbide Corp
Original Assignee
Union Carbide Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Union Carbide Corp filed Critical Union Carbide Corp
Priority to US219105A priority Critical patent/US3190565A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3190565A publication Critical patent/US3190565A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
    • C08J3/00—Processes of treating or compounding macromolecular substances
    • C08J3/12—Powdering or granulating
    • C08J3/124—Treatment for improving the free-flowing characteristics
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B1/00—Processes of grinding or polishing; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29B—PREPARATION OR PRETREATMENT OF THE MATERIAL TO BE SHAPED; MAKING GRANULES OR PREFORMS; RECOVERY OF PLASTICS OR OTHER CONSTITUENTS OF WASTE MATERIAL CONTAINING PLASTICS
    • B29B13/00—Conditioning or physical treatment of the material to be shaped
    • B29B13/10—Conditioning or physical treatment of the material to be shaped by grinding, e.g. by triturating; by sieving; by filtering
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
    • C08J2321/00—Characterised by the use of unspecified rubbers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an improved method of grinding materials which are characterized by tackiness, elasticity, and a tendency to agglomerate. More particularly, it relates to an improved method of grinding natural or synthetic rubbers which are characterized by tackiness, elasticity, and a tendency to agglomerate.
  • Grinding of soft materials is generally accomplished in a mechanical grinder, cutter, chopper, granulator or the like which utilizes cutting blades to divide the material.
  • Preferred generally are those machines which utilize rotary cutter blades, or knives.
  • a second method of grinding these materials has been through the use of machines equipped with special cutter blades which break up the material followed by dusting with talc.
  • This procedure is effective in that the material will not re-agglomerate but it is restrictive in that the talc can interfere with the end use of the material. In many cases the end product when heated results in an undesirable sintered product.
  • This method is also hampered by the additional expense of acquiring special cutters which also reduces the efiiciency of the opera- 3,13%,565 Patented June 22, 1955 tion, and it is totally impractical where only small batches of such material is to be ground as the added expense of special equipment could never be justified. For this reason the second method described above is limited to those manufacturers who handle large quantities of such materials. Until now no method had been found which simply and efficiently overcame the deficiencies of the prior art methods.
  • the polyolefin fines which are useful in the present invention are those of polyethylene and polypropylene having an average molecular weight in excess of 15,000. Polyethylene has been found to be preferable, however, in that it has a lubricating effect on the cutters which increases the time which the blade can be used without resharpening.
  • the polyolefin fines used in accordance with the present invention should have a diameter at least sufiicient to pass through a standard mesh screen of at least 40 and preferably of from to 200 mesh.
  • the amount of polyolefin fines which should be used is from: 1 part polyolefin to 15 parts material to be ground to 1 part polyolefin to 30 parts material to be ground, all parts by weight. It is preferred to use 1 part polyolefin to 30 parts material as the smaller amount of any additive which is foreign to the material granulated produces a purer ult mate material for its end use.
  • olefin fines can be added batchwise to the cutter simultaneously with or subsequent to adding the material to be granulated, it has been found desirable to continuously add the fines during the granulating operation as a smaller amount of fines is required for a satisfactory operation. The fines should never be charged to the cutter prior to the material to be ground or the prior art deficiencies will be realized.
  • Illustrative of the materials which are characterized by stickiness, elasticity and a tendency to agglomerate, to which the present invention is applicable are: the natural rubbers such as gum rubber, India rubber, para rubber, guttapercha and the like and the synthetic rubbers such as butadiene-styrene copolymer, butadieneacrylonitrile copolymer, ethylene-propylene copolymer, chloroprene (neoprene), polybutadiene, polyisobutylene, polyisoprene, butyl rubber and the like, all in unvulcanized form.
  • the natural rubbers such as gum rubber, India rubber, para rubber, guttapercha and the like
  • synthetic rubbers such as butadiene-styrene copolymer, butadieneacrylonitrile copolymer, ethylene-propylene copolymer, chloroprene (neoprene), polybutadiene, polyisobutylene, polyisopre
  • the initial size of the material to be ground is not critical and is generally limited only by the operating capacity of the grinding mill or granulator. While generally the material to be ground is in the form of a slab, large particles or pellets may be ground with equal facility.
  • the temperature of the material to be ground should be held below the rubbery transition temperature and above its freezing temperature.
  • the preferred grinding temperature is room temperature i.e. approximately 25 C.
  • the ground product is free of inorganic contaminant.
  • Example Bale rubber was cut into slabs having a size of about 2 inches by 4 inches by 8 inches. These slabs were then fed to a parallel-knife cutter in a normal manner but simultaneous with the charging of each piece of rubber was added about 30 grams of polyethylene fines having an average mesh diameter of 140. The grinding operation was continued for a period of 35 minutes. At the end of this time the product and the cutter blades were examined. The product was in the form of non-tacky rubber pellets having an average size of A" to V8. An examination of the cutter blades revealed that they were free of rubber accumulation.
  • polyolefin fines having a diameter at least sufficient to pass through a standard mesh screen of at least 40 mesh, simultaneously with or subsequent to the addition of the material to be ground to the cutter or grinder, said polyolefin selected from the group of polyethylenes and polypropylenes having an average molecular weight in excess of 15,000.
  • polyolefin fines are polyethylene fines.
  • polyolefin fines are polypropylene fines.
  • polyolefin fines are added in an amount of from 1 part olefin fines to 15 parts of material to be ground to 1 part olefin fines to 30 parts of material to be ground.

Description

United States Patent O 3,199,565 PROCESS FUR GRINDENG RUEEER Wili am 1V. .iayne, in, Basking Ridge, Ml, assignor to Union Carbide "Corporation, a corporation of New York No Draw/in". Filed Aug. 24, 1962, filer. No. 219,105 6 Claims. (6i. 24-12Z) The present invention relates to an improved method of grinding materials which are characterized by tackiness, elasticity, and a tendency to agglomerate. More particularly, it relates to an improved method of grinding natural or synthetic rubbers which are characterized by tackiness, elasticity, and a tendency to agglomerate.
For many uses in industry it has been found desirable to finely divide materials which are soft and cohesive by nature. Such fine division has been desirable or necessary in order to facilitate adequate dispersion Within the material of various agents which are desirable to have present in the ultimate product. Illustrative of such agents are vulcanizing agents, antioxidants, heat stabilizers, pigments, and the like. When the material has been adequately ground into small particles the inclusion of the treating agents becomes relatively simple due to the increased surface area of the granular material.
In addition to the greater facility of incorporating additives, it has also been found desirable to finely divide these materials as they are much more readily handled and transferred when they are in a smaller particular form.
Grinding of soft materials is generally accomplished in a mechanical grinder, cutter, chopper, granulator or the like which utilizes cutting blades to divide the material. Preferred generally are those machines which utilize rotary cutter blades, or knives.
Because of the inherent characteristics of sticky, agglomerating material, it has been almost impossible to grind, chop, or granulate such materials in standard mechanical grinders, granulators, or cutters without employing special techniques, because the material either sticks to and gathers about the cutter blades or re-agglomerates after grinding. The happening of either of these occurrences makes the grinding operation futile and impractical. The machine has to be periodically stopped while the cutter blades are cleaned of the material, if it gathers about the blades, or ceased entirely, if the material re-agglomerates as fast as it is granulated.
In the past attempts have been made to overcome the difiiculty in granulating such materials by various techniques.
One such method has been to freeze the material prior to or during granulation. This is generally accomplished by adding Dry Ice to the grinding batch. The Dry Ice hardens the surface of the material, reducing the tackiness and permitting the blades to fracture and cut the material. This method does however have several serious drawbacks; the Dry Ice also cools the cutter blades and makes them more brittle which can result in blade fracture; the Dry Ice is expensive to both obtain and maintain which reduces the efficiency of the operation; and after the material has been warmed to room temperature it tends to re-agglomerate.
A second method of grinding these materials has been through the use of machines equipped with special cutter blades which break up the material followed by dusting with talc. This procedure is effective in that the material will not re-agglomerate but it is restrictive in that the talc can interfere with the end use of the material. In many cases the end product when heated results in an undesirable sintered product. This method is also hampered by the additional expense of acquiring special cutters which also reduces the efiiciency of the opera- 3,13%,565 Patented June 22, 1955 tion, and it is totally impractical where only small batches of such material is to be ground as the added expense of special equipment could never be justified. For this reason the second method described above is limited to those manufacturers who handle large quantities of such materials. Until now no method had been found which simply and efficiently overcame the deficiencies of the prior art methods.
In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that the inclusion of a small amount of polyolefin fines to the material being ground eifectively prevents cutter buildup of the material and material agglomeration after cutting without interfering with the subsequent use of the material.
The polyolefin fines which are useful in the present invention are those of polyethylene and polypropylene having an average molecular weight in excess of 15,000. Polyethylene has been found to be preferable, however, in that it has a lubricating effect on the cutters which increases the time which the blade can be used without resharpening. The polyolefin fines used in accordance with the present invention should have a diameter at least sufiicient to pass through a standard mesh screen of at least 40 and preferably of from to 200 mesh.
The amount of polyolefin fines which should be used is from: 1 part polyolefin to 15 parts material to be ground to 1 part polyolefin to 30 parts material to be ground, all parts by weight. It is preferred to use 1 part polyolefin to 30 parts material as the smaller amount of any additive which is foreign to the material granulated produces a purer ult mate material for its end use.
While the olefin fines can be added batchwise to the cutter simultaneously with or subsequent to adding the material to be granulated, it has been found desirable to continuously add the fines during the granulating operation as a smaller amount of fines is required for a satisfactory operation. The fines should never be charged to the cutter prior to the material to be ground or the prior art deficiencies will be realized.
Illustrative of the materials which are characterized by stickiness, elasticity and a tendency to agglomerate, to which the present invention is applicable, are: the natural rubbers such as gum rubber, India rubber, para rubber, guttapercha and the like and the synthetic rubbers such as butadiene-styrene copolymer, butadieneacrylonitrile copolymer, ethylene-propylene copolymer, chloroprene (neoprene), polybutadiene, polyisobutylene, polyisoprene, butyl rubber and the like, all in unvulcanized form.
The initial size of the material to be ground is not critical and is generally limited only by the operating capacity of the grinding mill or granulator. While generally the material to be ground is in the form of a slab, large particles or pellets may be ground with equal facility.
The temperature of the material to be ground should be held below the rubbery transition temperature and above its freezing temperature. The preferred grinding temperature is room temperature i.e. approximately 25 C.
Additional advantages attained through the use of the present invention are:
(1) the ability to utilize low cost conventional cutters,
(2) the elimination of the need for Dry-Ice chilling of the rubber prior to granulating,
(3) the ground product is non-sintering, and
(4) the ground product is free of inorganic contaminant.
Example Bale rubber was cut into slabs having a size of about 2 inches by 4 inches by 8 inches. These slabs were then fed to a parallel-knife cutter in a normal manner but simultaneous with the charging of each piece of rubber was added about 30 grams of polyethylene fines having an average mesh diameter of 140. The grinding operation was continued for a period of 35 minutes. At the end of this time the product and the cutter blades were examined. The product was in the form of non-tacky rubber pellets having an average size of A" to V8. An examination of the cutter blades revealed that they were free of rubber accumulation.
This experiment was repeated exactly without adding the fines. After a period of 4 minutes the product and blades were examined. The product was in the form of re-agglomerating particles which were tacky. An examination of the blades showed that they were completely incasecl in tacky-rubber.
What is claimed is:
1. In the method of grinding materials which are characterized by tackiness, elasticity and a tendency to agglomerate, in a mechanical cutter or grinder which utilizes cutting blades, the improvement of adding polyolefin fines having a diameter at least sufficient to pass through a standard mesh screen of at least 40 mesh, simultaneously with or subsequent to the addition of the material to be ground to the cutter or grinder, said polyolefin selected from the group of polyethylenes and polypropylenes having an average molecular weight in excess of 15,000.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the polyolefin fines are polyethylene fines.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the polyolefin fines are polypropylene fines.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the polyolefin fines have a diameter suflicient to pass through a standard mesh screen of from about 100 to 200 mesh.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the polyolefin fines are added in an amount of from 1 part olefin fines to 15 parts of material to be ground to 1 part olefin fines to 30 parts of material to be ground.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the material to be ground is raw natural rubber.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,895,939 7/59 Stober et a1. 24l22 XR I. SPENCER OVERHOLSER, Primary Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. IN THE METHOD OF GRINDING MATERIALS WHICH ARE CHARACTERIZED BY TACKINESS, ELASTCITY AND A TENDENCY TO AGGLOMERATE, IN A MECHANICAL CUTTER OR GRINDER WHICH UTILIZES CUTTING BLADES, THE IMPROVEMENT OF ADDING POLYOLEFIN FINES HAVING A DIAMETER AT LEAST SUFFICIENT TO PASS THROUGH A STANDARD MESH SCREEN OF AT LEAST 40 MESH, SSIMULTANEOUSLY WITH OR SUBSEQUENT TO THE ADDITION OF THE MATERIAL TO BE GROUND TO THE CUTTER OR GRINDER, SAID POLYOLEFIN SELECTED FROM THE GROUP OF POLYETHYLENES AND POLYPROPYLENES HAVING AN AVERAGE MOLECULAR WEIGHT IN EXCESS OF 15,000.
US219105A 1962-08-24 1962-08-24 Process for grinding rubber Expired - Lifetime US3190565A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US219105A US3190565A (en) 1962-08-24 1962-08-24 Process for grinding rubber

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US219105A US3190565A (en) 1962-08-24 1962-08-24 Process for grinding rubber

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3190565A true US3190565A (en) 1965-06-22

Family

ID=22817900

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US219105A Expired - Lifetime US3190565A (en) 1962-08-24 1962-08-24 Process for grinding rubber

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3190565A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3898191A (en) * 1972-07-14 1975-08-05 Anthony J Stumpo Plasticized sulfur mortar and method for making same
US4157790A (en) * 1976-10-26 1979-06-12 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Production of low-filler rubber powders by the grinding process
EP0100434A2 (en) * 1982-07-14 1984-02-15 The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Rubber powders and methods of producing and using rubber powders
EP0186890A2 (en) * 1984-12-26 1986-07-09 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for ambient temperature grinding of soft polymers
US4607796A (en) * 1984-11-30 1986-08-26 Nauchno-Proizvodstvennoe Obiedinenie "Norplast" Method of making powder from rubber and vulcanization products
EP0196903A2 (en) * 1985-03-29 1986-10-08 AUSIMONT S.r.l. Granular compositions based on fluoroelastomers
US6200608B1 (en) 1999-03-19 2001-03-13 L. A. Dreyfus Co. Process of producing chewing gum base in particle form and product thereof
US6399676B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2002-06-04 Conoco, Inc. Drag-reducing polymer suspensions
US6576732B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2003-06-10 Conocophillips Co. Drag-reducing polymers and drag-reducing polymer suspensions and solutions
US20040112995A1 (en) * 2002-12-17 2004-06-17 Harris Jeffery R. Non-cryogenic process for grinding polyolefin drag reducing agents
US6765053B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-07-20 Conocophillips Company Drag-reducing polymer suspensions
US20060151643A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2006-07-13 Diego Tirelli Pulverization process of a vulcanized rubber material
US7905435B1 (en) 2005-12-22 2011-03-15 Kurt Scepaniak Roof grinder

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2895939A (en) * 1957-03-18 1959-07-21 Dow Chemical Co Method for coating rubber in granular form with impalpable resinous vinyl aromatic polymer dusts

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2895939A (en) * 1957-03-18 1959-07-21 Dow Chemical Co Method for coating rubber in granular form with impalpable resinous vinyl aromatic polymer dusts

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3898191A (en) * 1972-07-14 1975-08-05 Anthony J Stumpo Plasticized sulfur mortar and method for making same
US4157790A (en) * 1976-10-26 1979-06-12 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Production of low-filler rubber powders by the grinding process
EP0100434A2 (en) * 1982-07-14 1984-02-15 The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Rubber powders and methods of producing and using rubber powders
EP0100434A3 (en) * 1982-07-14 1984-10-10 The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Rubber powders and methods of producing and using rubber powders
US4607796A (en) * 1984-11-30 1986-08-26 Nauchno-Proizvodstvennoe Obiedinenie "Norplast" Method of making powder from rubber and vulcanization products
EP0186890A2 (en) * 1984-12-26 1986-07-09 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for ambient temperature grinding of soft polymers
US4650126A (en) * 1984-12-26 1987-03-17 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for ambient temperature grinding of soft polymers
EP0186890A3 (en) * 1984-12-26 1987-04-01 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for ambient temperature grinding of soft polymers
EP0196903A2 (en) * 1985-03-29 1986-10-08 AUSIMONT S.r.l. Granular compositions based on fluoroelastomers
EP0196903A3 (en) * 1985-03-29 1986-12-17 Ausimont S.P.A. Granular compositions based on fluoroelastomers
US6200608B1 (en) 1999-03-19 2001-03-13 L. A. Dreyfus Co. Process of producing chewing gum base in particle form and product thereof
US6399676B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2002-06-04 Conoco, Inc. Drag-reducing polymer suspensions
US6576732B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2003-06-10 Conocophillips Co. Drag-reducing polymers and drag-reducing polymer suspensions and solutions
US6765053B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-07-20 Conocophillips Company Drag-reducing polymer suspensions
US20060151643A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2006-07-13 Diego Tirelli Pulverization process of a vulcanized rubber material
US7654477B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-02-02 Pirelli & C. S.P.A. Pulverization process of a vulcanized rubber material
US20040112995A1 (en) * 2002-12-17 2004-06-17 Harris Jeffery R. Non-cryogenic process for grinding polyolefin drag reducing agents
WO2004060979A1 (en) 2002-12-17 2004-07-22 Baker Hughes Incorporated Non-cryogenic process for grinding polyolefin drag reducing agents
US6946500B2 (en) 2002-12-17 2005-09-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Non-cryogenic process for grinding polyolefin drag reducing agents
US7905435B1 (en) 2005-12-22 2011-03-15 Kurt Scepaniak Roof grinder

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3190565A (en) Process for grinding rubber
US7654477B2 (en) Pulverization process of a vulcanized rubber material
US4607796A (en) Method of making powder from rubber and vulcanization products
KR101045634B1 (en) The production equipment of powder material from the waste rubber
EP0100434B1 (en) Rubber powders and methods of producing and using rubber powders
US2895939A (en) Method for coating rubber in granular form with impalpable resinous vinyl aromatic polymer dusts
WO2001029121A1 (en) Devulcanisation product consisting of scrap rubber, a devulcanisation compound, a method for producing same, the reuse thereof in fresh mixtures and the use thereof for producing injection moulded parts
US3634570A (en) Elastomer granulation process
US8012390B2 (en) Elastomer composite materials in low density forms and methods
DE2648301C2 (en) Process for the production of powdered rubber powder
US10427165B2 (en) Method for comminuting heat-sensitive feedstock
US2460367A (en) Method of making abrasive articles
JPS5594942A (en) Method and apparatus for preparing rubber melt
US2966468A (en) Process of reclaiming scrap vulcanized rubber
JP4808686B2 (en) Method for preventing blocking of epoxy molding compound powder and deterioration of flow characteristics
US2767149A (en) Method of production of reclaimed rubber in discrete particle form
EP0299077A4 (en) Method of obtaining rubber powder on the basis of natural or synthetic rubber
US3214404A (en) Process for preparing a rubber molding composition
US2844327A (en) Process for preparing a moldable composition
SU1434663A1 (en) Method of disintegrating polymeric material
RU2061711C1 (en) Method for reclaiming of rubber
US2686807A (en) Tetramethyl-thiuram-monosulfide
DD253215A1 (en) METHOD FOR PREPARING THERMOPLASTIC DEVICES WITH STRENGTHENS
US20240024934A1 (en) Process for the treatment of the photopolymer material that constitutes the matrix plates in flexographic printing
RU2011660C1 (en) Process for producing rubber mixture