US3119688A - Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel - Google Patents

Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3119688A
US3119688A US55727A US5572760A US3119688A US 3119688 A US3119688 A US 3119688A US 55727 A US55727 A US 55727A US 5572760 A US5572760 A US 5572760A US 3119688 A US3119688 A US 3119688A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
steel
alloy
weight
manganese
percent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US55727A
Inventor
Rodgers William
Andrew G Forrest
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Republic Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Republic Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Republic Steel Corp filed Critical Republic Steel Corp
Priority to US55727A priority Critical patent/US3119688A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3119688A publication Critical patent/US3119688A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/04Removing impurities by adding a treating agent
    • C21C7/06Deoxidising, e.g. killing

Definitions

  • the amount and type of non-metallic inclusions is of importance with respect to the aging and other properties of the steel.
  • the silicon content of the steel be as low as possible and that the steel be substantially free of silicate inclusions.
  • these inclusions appear in and near the surface of the finished products. This detracts from the surface appearance and smoothness of the finished product and is highly undesirable.
  • one of the main sources of silicate inclusions is from the refractories used in the furnace spout, ladle, and pouring nozzle.
  • Various methods have been practiced for producing a clean steel, based mainly on the reduction of the oxygen content of the steel by maintaining a reducing or deoxidizing slag. Also, the use of purer raw materials has been contemplated.
  • final deoxidizers such as aluminum, silicon, etc., have been used to remove the oxygen from the iron oxide dissolved in the steel.
  • any unavoidable inclusions it is desirable that these not be present in or near the surface. Therefore, in ingot formation, while it is most desirable to have the inclusions rise to the top of the molten ingot, any inclusions which do not so rise are located desirably near the center of the ingot. This location of any unavoidable inclusions favors fewer inclusions at or near the surface upon deep drawing of the resultant solid ingot.
  • the amount of silicate inclusion in steels can be decreased most effectively and the location of such inclusions be improved so as to produce a substantially clean steel by the use of a deoxidizing alloy consisting essentially of 50-75% by weight of man ganese and 50-25% by weight of aluminum.
  • This deoxidizing alloy advantageously is added to the steel in the ladle.
  • the amount of such alloy to be added for this purpose is advantageously in the range of -20 pounds, preferably 12-18 pounds of alloy per ton of the total charge.
  • the silicon content of the charge materials and the deoxidizers are kept as low as possible and contact with silicate refractories is kept to a practical minimum. Silicon content advantageously is kept below 0.01% by weight.
  • the alloy can be added immediately after the steel is poured into the mold. In such cases, less time is required for reaction of the small amount of contam- 3,119,688 Patented Jan. 28, 1964 "ice inant and very often this can be effected before the steel has solidified. However, ladle addition generally is preferred.
  • EXAMPLE I Various steel heatings are prepared in a basic openhearth furnace, according to normal practice, having the preliminary analyses indicated in the table below. The first two of these heatings are controls, controls A and B using steels which are killed with a ferro-manganese alloy and aluminum bar. In heatings I-V a manganese-aluminum alloy is added in the amounts indicated in the table. In each case the metal or alloy used to kill the steel is added to the steel in the ladle, and 200 pounds of cryolite also is added to the ladle. In each case also the silicon content is less than 0.01% by weight in both analyses. The resultant ladle analyses are given in the table.
  • Aluminum .09 .06 .025 06 .04 09 08 An alloy of 59.76% Mn and 39.99% Aladded to the ladle. Alloy of Mn (medium carbonapprox. 1%)added to the ladle. Aluminum bars-added to the ladle.
  • the various products are processed through the blooming mill, the hot mill, the cold mill, and tested by pickling and etching.
  • the steels which are killed with the alloy show, upon microscopic examination, to be much cleaner than the two controls. These steels have excellent surface appearance and cleanliness in comparison with the controls.
  • the deep etch test shows these alloy-killed steels to be sound and free from sub-surface inclusions, much more so than the control steels.
  • these alloykilled steels In the blooming mill, hot mill, and cold mill tests, these alloykilled steels have excellent rolling and surface qualities and show uniformity of hardness, ductility, grain size, and grain shape. In the pickling test, these alloy-killed steels have improved surfaces.
  • the preferred proportions of metals in the alloy are approximately 60% manganese and 40% aluminum, as used in the above example, improved results also are obtained'when the manganese content varies from 50% to 75% and the aluminum content from 50% to 25% in the alloy. While the proportion of alloy can vary from approximately pounds to pounds per ton of steel with improved results, preferably the amount is about 12-18 pounds of alloy per ton of steel.
  • the alloy can be added as shot, buttons, bars, or small ingots.
  • a process for producing a deep-drawing steel comprising the addition to said steel of a manganesealuminum alloy subsequent to tapping of the furnace and while said steel is still in a molten state, saidalloy consisting essentially of at least about 50 percent by weight manganese and percent by weight of aluminum, and no more than about 75 percent by weight of manganese and percent by weight of aluminum, said steel and said alloy each containing prior to said addition less than 0.01 percent by weight of silicon, and said alloy being added in a form at least as large as shot and in an amount of at least a about 10 pounds and no more than about 20 pounds per ton of steel.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)

Description

United States Patent 3,119,683 MANGANESE ALUMHJUM ALLOY FOR DEUXIDIZING STEEL William Rodgers, Shaker Heights, and Andrew G. Forrest, Pepper Pike, Ohio, assignors to Republic Steel glorporation, Cleveland, Ohio, a corporation of New ersey N0 Drawing. Filed Sept. 13, 1960, Ser. No. 55,727 5 Claims. (Cl. 75129) This invention relates to the manufacture of steel. More particularly, it relates to an improvement in the surface quality and internal cleanliness of steel effected by control of the non-metallic inclusions therein.
In the production of high quality steel, the amount and type of non-metallic inclusions is of importance with respect to the aging and other properties of the steel. For many purposes, it is necessary that the silicon content of the steel be as low as possible and that the steel be substantially free of silicate inclusions. Particularly in deep drawing steels, these inclusions appear in and near the surface of the finished products. This detracts from the surface appearance and smoothness of the finished product and is highly undesirable.
In the basic open-hearth furnace operation, for example, one of the main sources of silicate inclusions is from the refractories used in the furnace spout, ladle, and pouring nozzle. Various methods have been practiced for producing a clean steel, based mainly on the reduction of the oxygen content of the steel by maintaining a reducing or deoxidizing slag. Also, the use of purer raw materials has been contemplated. Moreover, final deoxidizers, such as aluminum, silicon, etc., have been used to remove the oxygen from the iron oxide dissolved in the steel.
Most of these methods merely substitute one type of inclusion for another for the purpose of producing a less objectionable type of inclusion, that is one which has a more favorable effect on the aging properties of the steel. For certain types of steel, such as deep-drawing steels or steels which are heavily deformed in the course of fabrication, is is particularly desirable that the steel be substantially free of silicate inclusions, regardless of whether such inclusions result from the original charge, the flux, the deoxidizers, or from the refractories with which the steel comes in contact.
With regard to any unavoidable inclusions, it is desirable that these not be present in or near the surface. Therefore, in ingot formation, while it is most desirable to have the inclusions rise to the top of the molten ingot, any inclusions which do not so rise are located desirably near the center of the ingot. This location of any unavoidable inclusions favors fewer inclusions at or near the surface upon deep drawing of the resultant solid ingot.
It has now been found that the amount of silicate inclusion in steels can be decreased most effectively and the location of such inclusions be improved so as to produce a substantially clean steel by the use of a deoxidizing alloy consisting essentially of 50-75% by weight of man ganese and 50-25% by weight of aluminum. This deoxidizing alloy advantageously is added to the steel in the ladle. The amount of such alloy to be added for this purpose is advantageously in the range of -20 pounds, preferably 12-18 pounds of alloy per ton of the total charge. Advantageously, the silicon content of the charge materials and the deoxidizers are kept as low as possible and contact with silicate refractories is kept to a practical minimum. Silicon content advantageously is kept below 0.01% by weight.
In cases where the silicon or silicate contamination is very small, the alloy can be added immediately after the steel is poured into the mold. In such cases, less time is required for reaction of the small amount of contam- 3,119,688 Patented Jan. 28, 1964 "ice inant and very often this can be effected before the steel has solidified. However, ladle addition generally is preferred.
While applicant does not wish to be restricted to any theory, it is believed that the intimate contact of manganese and aluminum in the alloy favors simultaneous and intimate reaction with the silicates to produce lower melting mixed silicates than are produced by the individual metals. The individual si'l-icates having higher melting points precipitate nearer the outer surface of the ingot whereas the lower melting mixed silicate stays molten longer, giving it more time to rise to the top of the ingot or at least to migrate to the center part of the ingot.
The invention is illustrated best by the following examples which are intended to be merely illustrative of various methods of practicing the invention and are not to be regarded in any way as limiting the scope of the invention. Parts and percentages, here and throughout the specification, are parts and percentages by weight unless otherwise indicated.
EXAMPLE I Various steel heatings are prepared in a basic openhearth furnace, according to normal practice, having the preliminary analyses indicated in the table below. The first two of these heatings are controls, controls A and B using steels which are killed with a ferro-manganese alloy and aluminum bar. In heatings I-V a manganese-aluminum alloy is added in the amounts indicated in the table. In each case the metal or alloy used to kill the steel is added to the steel in the ladle, and 200 pounds of cryolite also is added to the ladle. In each case also the silicon content is less than 0.01% by weight in both analyses. The resultant ladle analyses are given in the table.
Table 0 ontrol Heatings Preliminary Analyses of Steel A B I II III IV V Carbon 1. 05 1. 08 1. 09 1. 20 1. 50 49 .74 Manganese .14 .11 .14 10 .21 Phosphorus. 031 .027 035 030 .036 .02 025 Sulfur 042 04 047 041 042 048 045 Tons of Steel 227 204 222 203. 5 222 222 240. 5 Mil-Al alloy (Lbs) 2, 800 3,600 3, 600 3, 600 3, G00 Fe-Mn alloy h (Lbs) 2,100 1, 800
Manganese- 32 3O .24 .34 .31 .37 .34 Phosphorus .009 .010 .010 010 006 006 .008 Sulfur 027 .032 029 .029 .030 025 .034 Aluminum .09 .06 .025 06 .04 09 08 An alloy of 59.76% Mn and 39.99% Aladded to the ladle. Alloy of Mn (medium carbonapprox. 1%)added to the ladle. Aluminum bars-added to the ladle.
In each case the various products are processed through the blooming mill, the hot mill, the cold mill, and tested by pickling and etching. In each case the steels which are killed with the alloy show, upon microscopic examination, to be much cleaner than the two controls. These steels have excellent surface appearance and cleanliness in comparison with the controls. The deep etch test shows these alloy-killed steels to be sound and free from sub-surface inclusions, much more so than the control steels. In the blooming mill, hot mill, and cold mill tests, these alloykilled steels have excellent rolling and surface qualities and show uniformity of hardness, ductility, grain size, and grain shape. In the pickling test, these alloy-killed steels have improved surfaces.
While the preferred proportions of metals in the alloy are approximately 60% manganese and 40% aluminum, as used in the above example, improved results also are obtained'when the manganese content varies from 50% to 75% and the aluminum content from 50% to 25% in the alloy. While the proportion of alloy can vary from approximately pounds to pounds per ton of steel with improved results, preferably the amount is about 12-18 pounds of alloy per ton of steel. The alloy can be added as shot, buttons, bars, or small ingots.
Certain featuresof this invention have been described in detail with respect to various embodiments thereof. However, it will, of course, be apparent that other modifications can be made within the spirit and scope of this invention, and it is not intended to limit the invention to the exact details shown above except insofar as they are defined in the following claims.
The invention claimed is:
1. In a process for producing a deep-drawing steel, the step comprising the addition to said steel of a manganesealuminum alloy subsequent to tapping of the furnace and while said steel is still in a molten state, saidalloy consisting essentially of at least about 50 percent by weight manganese and percent by weight of aluminum, and no more than about 75 percent by weight of manganese and percent by weight of aluminum, said steel and said alloy each containing prior to said addition less than 0.01 percent by weight of silicon, and said alloy being added in a form at least as large as shot and in an amount of at least a about 10 pounds and no more than about 20 pounds per ton of steel.
2. A process of claim 1 in-which said alloy is added to the steel while said steel is in the ladle.
3. A process of claim 1 in which said alloy is added immediately after the steel is poured into the ladle.
4. A process of claim 1 in which said alloy consists essentially of about parts by weight of manganeseancl 40 parts by weight of aluminum.
5. A process of claim 1 in which said alloy consists essentially of about 60 parts by weight of manganese and 40 parts by weight of aluminum, and said alloy is added in an amount of approximately 12-18 pounds per ton of steel.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 501,233 Richards et a1 July 11, 1893 1,744,418 Smith Jan. 21, 1930 2,767,084 Chandler Oct. 16, 1956 FOREIGN PATENTS 144,584 Germany July 2, 1902 OTHER REFERENCES The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 7th Edition, United States Steel, 1958, p. 328.

Claims (1)

1. IN A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A DEEP-DRAWING STEEL, THE STEP COMPRISING THE ADDITION TO SAID STEEL OF A MANGANESEALUMINUM ALLOY SUBSEQUENT TO TAPPING OF THE FURNACE AND WHILE SAID STEEL IS STILL IN A MOLTEN STATE, SAID ALLOY CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF AT LEAST ABOUT 50 PERCENT BY WEIGHT MANGANESE AND 25 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF ALUMINUM, AND NO MORE THAN ABOUT 75 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF MANGANESE AND 50 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF ALUMINUM, SAID STEEL AND SAID ALLOY EACH CONTAINING PRIOR TO SAID ADDITION LESS THAN 0.01 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF SILICON, AND SAID ALLOY BEING ADDED IN A FORM AT LEAST AS LARGE AS SHOT AND IN AN AMOUNT OF AT LEAST ABOUT 10 POUNDS AND NO MORE THAN ABOUT 20 POUNDS PER TON OF STEEL.
US55727A 1960-09-13 1960-09-13 Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel Expired - Lifetime US3119688A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55727A US3119688A (en) 1960-09-13 1960-09-13 Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US55727A US3119688A (en) 1960-09-13 1960-09-13 Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3119688A true US3119688A (en) 1964-01-28

Family

ID=21999751

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US55727A Expired - Lifetime US3119688A (en) 1960-09-13 1960-09-13 Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3119688A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3540882A (en) * 1967-07-24 1970-11-17 Res Inst Iron Steel Metal refining agent consisting of al-mn-ca alloy
US4171215A (en) * 1978-07-03 1979-10-16 Foote Mineral Company Alloying addition for alloying manganese to aluminum
CN100408701C (en) * 2006-04-29 2008-08-06 危松林 High-manganese low-carbon composite alloy and method for preparing same

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE144584C (en) *
US501233A (en) * 1893-07-11 Alloy
US1744418A (en) * 1925-02-16 1930-01-21 Central Alloy Steel Corp Manufacture of steel
US2767084A (en) * 1955-09-15 1956-10-16 Vanadium Corp Of America Alloy for deoxidizing steel

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE144584C (en) *
US501233A (en) * 1893-07-11 Alloy
US1744418A (en) * 1925-02-16 1930-01-21 Central Alloy Steel Corp Manufacture of steel
US2767084A (en) * 1955-09-15 1956-10-16 Vanadium Corp Of America Alloy for deoxidizing steel

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3540882A (en) * 1967-07-24 1970-11-17 Res Inst Iron Steel Metal refining agent consisting of al-mn-ca alloy
US4171215A (en) * 1978-07-03 1979-10-16 Foote Mineral Company Alloying addition for alloying manganese to aluminum
CN100408701C (en) * 2006-04-29 2008-08-06 危松林 High-manganese low-carbon composite alloy and method for preparing same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3102831A (en) Production of columbium containing steels
US4440568A (en) Boron alloying additive for continuously casting boron steel
US2269407A (en) Addition agent and its use in the treatment of iron and steel
US2360717A (en) Method of eliminating aluminate and silicate inclusions
US3725143A (en) Aging resistant cold rolled sheet products
US4255187A (en) Bismuth-containing steel
US4247326A (en) Free machining steel with bismuth
US3412781A (en) Process of using a low carbon steel composition in a continuous casting process
US4073643A (en) Continuously cast steel slabs for steel sheets having excellent workabilities and method for production thereof
US3119688A (en) Manganese aluminum alloy for deoxidizing steel
US2253502A (en) Malleable iron
US3131058A (en) Method of manufacturing fine grained and clean steels
US2683661A (en) Fine grain iron and method of production
US2643949A (en) Method for the production of iron and steel
CN114645200B (en) High-toughness and high-thermal-stability die steel and preparation method thereof
US2683662A (en) Manufacture of iron and steel and products obtained
US3459540A (en) Production of clean fine grain steels
US3990887A (en) Cold working steel bar and wire rod produced by continuous casting
US3304174A (en) Low oxygen-silicon base addition alloys for iron and steel refining
US2768892A (en) Non-aging steel
US4014683A (en) Method of making Drawing Quality steel
CN111961805A (en) High manganese steel liquid purification method, product and application
US3846184A (en) Wear resistant steel
US3305354A (en) Method of producing low oxygen oriented silicon-iron
US3540882A (en) Metal refining agent consisting of al-mn-ca alloy