US3063833A - New metal alloy material and method of heat treating - Google Patents

New metal alloy material and method of heat treating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3063833A
US3063833A US859162A US85916259A US3063833A US 3063833 A US3063833 A US 3063833A US 859162 A US859162 A US 859162A US 85916259 A US85916259 A US 85916259A US 3063833 A US3063833 A US 3063833A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
silicon
columbium
range
percentage
temperature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US859162A
Inventor
Benjamin F Shepherd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ingersoll Rand Co
Original Assignee
Ingersoll Rand Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ingersoll Rand Co filed Critical Ingersoll Rand Co
Priority to US859162A priority Critical patent/US3063833A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3063833A publication Critical patent/US3063833A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C9/00Alloys based on copper
    • C22C9/06Alloys based on copper with nickel or cobalt as the next major constituent

Definitions

  • a 70/30 copper-nickel alloy has the necessary characteristic of resisting corrosion, however it has relatively low physical characteristics which makes it unsatisfactory for the purpose mentioned. It is also known that the addition of silicon to this cupro-nickel will increase its physical characteristics, for example, a copper-nickel alloy containing about .5% silicon and .7% iron, about 25,000 p.s.i. yield strength is obtainable with a tensile strength of approximately 55,000 p.s.i. Unfortunately, however, the addition of this amount of silicon very seriously afiects the weldability of the material. This is an extreme disadvantage in using the material in, for example, pump casings.
  • the first experiment was conducted using a 70/30 copper-nickel alloy containing columbium in the range of 33% to .83%; manganese within the range of .83% to 1.41% and iron in the range of 50% to 1.07%. It is preferable that the manganese percentage be about twice that of silicon at the lower levels, and the iron percentage around .3% to provide corrosion resistance. Insofar as this invention is concerned it is believed that the specific percentage of the manganese and iron content is relatively unimportant and do not in any way affect the results obtained by the addition of various quantities of silicon and columbium. It is merely desirable that these two elements be present and in percentages within the stated ranges. Further reference to these elements namely, iron and manganese, 'will be omitted although it is to be understood that these two elements in approximately this proportion were present in all the tests conducted.
  • the percentage of silicon was varied over a range of from .25% to .69%.
  • the tensile strength of the material was increased approximately 15,000 p.s.i. at the lower silicon level and approximately 27,000 p.s.i. at the upper level. More particularly, the alloy with 25% silicon, but without columbium, has a tensile strength of about 47,000 p.s.i. and with .69% silicon the tensile strength is about 68,000 p.s.i., whereas when columbium was added in the quantities stated, the tensile strength at .25 silicon content Was increased to approximately 62,000 p.s.i. whereas at the silicon level of .69% the tensile strength was found to be in the neighborhood of 95,000 p.s.i.
  • the yield strength was increased from about 18,000 p.s.i. to about 26,000 p.s.i. and at the .69% silicon level the yield strength was raised from about 42,000 p.s.i. to approximately 68,000 p.s.i. by the addition of columbium.
  • the columbium at least equal to and preferably greater than the percentages of silicon. It is believed that this excess of columbium is necessary primarily in order to obtain weldability of the material; the excess of columbium over silicon would not be required at this higher silicon level, however, if it is not necessary or desirable to make the material weldable.
  • the silicon content should be not greater than about .8% due to the loss of ductility, and the combined percentage of columbium and silicon should not exceed about 1.75% and in which the columbium would be equal to or greater than the silicon percentage whenever the silicon percentage was greater than about 3%.
  • test bars were knocked out of their molds about twenty minutes after the bars were poured and, at which time, the bar temperatures were approximately 1400 F.
  • a second group of bars was permitted to cool for approximately two hours in the molds. The temperature of the bars of the second group was 500 F. at the time of knocking the bars free of the molds.
  • the slowly cooled bars had approximately 10% higher yield strength and approximately 5% higher tensile strength than the more quickly cooled bar.
  • a cupro-nickel alloy comprising copper within the range of about 66% to about 70%, manganese within the range of about .83% to about 1.41%, iron in the range of about to about 1.07%, silicon and at least one metal of the group consisting of tantalum and columbiurn the combined percentages of which do not exceed 1.75% and in which the percentage of the metal in said group consisting of tantalum and columbium is equal to or greater than the percentage of silicon when the silicon percentage exceeds 3%, and the balance nickel.
  • a cupro-nickel alloy comprising copper Within the range of about 66% to about 70%, manganese within the range of about .83% to about 1.41%, iron in the range of about 50% to about 1.07%, silicon in an amount not exceeding .8% and at least one metal of the group consisting of tantalum and columbium in a percentage equal to or greater than the silicon percent 'When the silicon percent is greater than or equal to .3% and the balance nickel.

Description

United States Patent Ofiice 3,063,833 Patented Nov. 13, 1962 3,063,833 NEW METAL ALLOY MATERIAL AND METHOD OF HEAT TREATING Beniamin F. Shepherd, Phillipsburg, N.J., assignor t Ingersoll-Rand Company, New York, N.Y., a corporation of New Jersey No Drawing. Filed Dec. 14, 1959, Ser. No. 859,162 2 Claims. (Cl. 75-159) This invention relates to a new metal alloy material and to a method of heat treating the material to increase its physical properties.
The investigation leading to the discovery of this new metal was prompted by the need for a metal which is highly resistant to corrosion and in which castings of the material are capable of withstanding high pressure and are hydrostatically sound. Specifically, the investigation related to the production of a metal which could be used in a high pressure pump for use in pumping salt water or a similar corrosive liquid.
It is known that a 70/30 copper-nickel alloy has the necessary characteristic of resisting corrosion, however it has relatively low physical characteristics which makes it unsatisfactory for the purpose mentioned. It is also known that the addition of silicon to this cupro-nickel will increase its physical characteristics, for example, a copper-nickel alloy containing about .5% silicon and .7% iron, about 25,000 p.s.i. yield strength is obtainable with a tensile strength of approximately 55,000 p.s.i. Unfortunately, however, the addition of this amount of silicon very seriously afiects the weldability of the material. This is an extreme disadvantage in using the material in, for example, pump casings.
In an effort to overcome this disadvantage and to increase the physical characteristics of a basically coppernickel alloy containing 70% copper and 30% nickel, it was found that the addition of columbium and silicon resulted in a new material having a dramatic increase in the physical properties and which is weldable even with relatively high silicon content.
The first experiment was conducted using a 70/30 copper-nickel alloy containing columbium in the range of 33% to .83%; manganese within the range of .83% to 1.41% and iron in the range of 50% to 1.07%. It is preferable that the manganese percentage be about twice that of silicon at the lower levels, and the iron percentage around .3% to provide corrosion resistance. Insofar as this invention is concerned it is believed that the specific percentage of the manganese and iron content is relatively unimportant and do not in any way affect the results obtained by the addition of various quantities of silicon and columbium. It is merely desirable that these two elements be present and in percentages within the stated ranges. Further reference to these elements namely, iron and manganese, 'will be omitted although it is to be understood that these two elements in approximately this proportion were present in all the tests conducted.
In this particular test, the percentage of silicon was varied over a range of from .25% to .69%. The tensile strength of the material, as compared to a material of similar composition except for columbium, was increased approximately 15,000 p.s.i. at the lower silicon level and approximately 27,000 p.s.i. at the upper level. More particularly, the alloy with 25% silicon, but without columbium, has a tensile strength of about 47,000 p.s.i. and with .69% silicon the tensile strength is about 68,000 p.s.i., whereas when columbium was added in the quantities stated, the tensile strength at .25 silicon content Was increased to approximately 62,000 p.s.i. whereas at the silicon level of .69% the tensile strength was found to be in the neighborhood of 95,000 p.s.i.
Similar gains were also made in the yield strength. At the .25 silicon level, the yield strength was increased from about 18,000 p.s.i. to about 26,000 p.s.i. and at the .69% silicon level the yield strength was raised from about 42,000 p.s.i. to approximately 68,000 p.s.i. by the addition of columbium.
Another point of considerable interest that was noted as a consequence of these comparative tests was that the alloy containing silicon, but no columbium, and the alloy containing both silicon and columbium had about the same percent of elongation or hardness for a given yield and tensile strength.
Subsequent to this test, additional experiments were conducted in which the amount of columbium for the percentage of silicon was varied over the silicon range to determine the effect of columbium on the increased physical characteristics and weldability of the new material. In this particular test, the combined percentage of silicon and columbium was varied over the range of from .6% to 1.5%. It was concluded that although there seemed to be a rather broad range of relationship between the comparative percentages of silicon to columbium over the range investigated, it was found that the addition of columbium at the lower silicon level very greatly increased the effectiveness of silicon in increasing the physical properties of the material. This was noted to be true particularly below silicon levels of about .3%. On the other hand, at the silicon levels above 3% it was found desirable to have the columbium at least equal to and preferably greater than the percentages of silicon. It is believed that this excess of columbium is necessary primarily in order to obtain weldability of the material; the excess of columbium over silicon would not be required at this higher silicon level, however, if it is not necessary or desirable to make the material weldable.
It was further noted that when the silicon content was increased above .8%, the hardness of the material was correspondingly greatly increased and the percentage of elongation was reduced to something less than 10%. This is believed to be generally undesirable and it was accordingly concluded that the silicon content should be not greater than about .8% due to the loss of ductility, and the combined percentage of columbium and silicon should not exceed about 1.75% and in which the columbium would be equal to or greater than the silicon percentage whenever the silicon percentage was greater than about 3%.
It was discovered further that the mechanical properties of this alloy, containing columbium and silicon in the percentages and ratios heretofore discussed, can be increased by controlling the cooling rate of the alloy. Accompanying the increase in yield and tensile strength, there was a corresponding change in the percent of elon gation. That is, the percent of elongation remained about the same for given yield and tensile strengths regardless of the cooling rate.
In the first test, several test bars were knocked out of their molds about twenty minutes after the bars were poured and, at which time, the bar temperatures were approximately 1400 F. A second group of bars was permitted to cool for approximately two hours in the molds. The temperature of the bars of the second group was 500 F. at the time of knocking the bars free of the molds. The slowly cooled bars had approximately 10% higher yield strength and approximately 5% higher tensile strength than the more quickly cooled bar.
Following this test, an additional experiment was performed in which the cast bars were subjected to what I call homogenization heat treatment. This comprised reheating the cast bars up to a temperature of within the range of 900 F. to 1550 F. and holding at that temperature for a period of time and then cooling either rapidly, as by air cooling, or slowly by furnace cooling for a period of about eight to ten hours. It was learned that heating the casting to a temperature within said range for a period of one hour followed by air cooling, resulted in no observable change in the strength of the material. However, when the temperature was held at a value Within said temperature range for a period of one hour and allowed to cool slowly in a laboratory furnace overnight down to a temperature of approximately 500 F., a very significant increase in yield and tensile strength was obtained. For example, several tests were conducted using test bars containing various percentages of silicon varying from 25% to .65% in which the bars were heated to 1200 F. and held at this temperature for a period of one hour and then permitted to cool in the furnace down to a temperature of about 500 F. There was an increase of tensile strength of between 1l,000 psi. and 7,000 psi. as compared to the same bars when knocked out of the mold two hours after pouring and permitted to air cool.
Other tests were conducted in which the casting was held at a temperature of 900 F. for a period of twentyfour hours and thereafter air cooled. This, also, resulted in a significant increase in the physical characteristics of the casting. This indicates that the homogenizing treatment to increase the yield and tensile strength of the material may be obtained either by heating for a relatively short period-e.g., approximately one hour, at a temperature within the range of 900 to 1550 F. and thereafter cooling slowly over a relatively long periode.g., around six to ten hours; or reheating to a temperature within such range and holding it at that temperature a relatively long period-cg, six to ten hours, and then cooling more rapidly. In either case, it is believed necessary to hold the temperature of the alloy at an elevated value for a sufficiently long period to permit the homogenizing process to condition the material for the cooling process.
It is generally believed that when heretofore known metals are subjected to normal foundry practice to form castings, the more rapidly cooled sections of the casting have higher mechanical properties than the more slowly cooled sections. Thus, thin sections are generally credited with superior mechanical properties to the heavier sections, which cool more slowly. It is evident from the foregoing that in this particular alloy the thin sections will have lower mechanical properties due to more rapid cooling. The homogenizing treatment will cancel the variations in cooling rates and enable the maximum strength potential to be realized in both thick and thin sections of the same casting.
I claim:
1. A cupro-nickel alloy comprising copper within the range of about 66% to about 70%, manganese within the range of about .83% to about 1.41%, iron in the range of about to about 1.07%, silicon and at least one metal of the group consisting of tantalum and columbiurn the combined percentages of which do not exceed 1.75% and in which the percentage of the metal in said group consisting of tantalum and columbium is equal to or greater than the percentage of silicon when the silicon percentage exceeds 3%, and the balance nickel.
2. A cupro-nickel alloy comprising copper Within the range of about 66% to about 70%, manganese within the range of about .83% to about 1.41%, iron in the range of about 50% to about 1.07%, silicon in an amount not exceeding .8% and at least one metal of the group consisting of tantalum and columbium in a percentage equal to or greater than the silicon percent 'When the silicon percent is greater than or equal to .3% and the balance nickel.
References Cited in the tile of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS

Claims (1)

1. A CUPRO-NICKEL ALLOY COMPRISING COPPER WITHIN THE RANGE OF ABOUT 66% TO ABOUT 70%, MANGANESE WITHINN THE RANGE OF ABOUT .83% TO ABOUT 1.41%, IRON IN THE RANGE OF ABOUT .50% TO ABOUT 1.07%, SILICON AND AT LEAST ONE METAL OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF TANTALUM AND COLUM-MBIUM THE COMBINED PERCENTAGES OF WHICH DO NOT EXCEED 1.75% AND IN WHICH THE PERCENTAGE OF THE METAL IN SAIDD GROUP CONSISTING OF TANTALUM AND COLUMBIUM IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE PERCENTAGE OF SILICON WHEN THE SILICON PERCENTAGE EXCEEDS .3%, AND THE BALANCE NICKEL..
US859162A 1959-12-14 1959-12-14 New metal alloy material and method of heat treating Expired - Lifetime US3063833A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US859162A US3063833A (en) 1959-12-14 1959-12-14 New metal alloy material and method of heat treating

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US859162A US3063833A (en) 1959-12-14 1959-12-14 New metal alloy material and method of heat treating

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3063833A true US3063833A (en) 1962-11-13

Family

ID=25330215

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US859162A Expired - Lifetime US3063833A (en) 1959-12-14 1959-12-14 New metal alloy material and method of heat treating

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3063833A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3364082A (en) * 1965-07-09 1968-01-16 Int Nickel Co Copper-nickel-vanadium alloy
US3635702A (en) * 1968-07-01 1972-01-18 Int Nickel Co Copper-nickel alloys of high-yield strength
WO1993020994A1 (en) * 1992-04-08 1993-10-28 Davidson Textron Inc. Method of forming a preform using a powder binder

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1502857A (en) * 1923-02-02 1924-07-29 Gen Electric Process of treating copper and the product thereof
US2430306A (en) * 1941-04-23 1947-11-04 American Brass Co Precipitation hardenable copper, nickel, tantalum (or columbium) alloys

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1502857A (en) * 1923-02-02 1924-07-29 Gen Electric Process of treating copper and the product thereof
US2430306A (en) * 1941-04-23 1947-11-04 American Brass Co Precipitation hardenable copper, nickel, tantalum (or columbium) alloys

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3364082A (en) * 1965-07-09 1968-01-16 Int Nickel Co Copper-nickel-vanadium alloy
US3635702A (en) * 1968-07-01 1972-01-18 Int Nickel Co Copper-nickel alloys of high-yield strength
WO1993020994A1 (en) * 1992-04-08 1993-10-28 Davidson Textron Inc. Method of forming a preform using a powder binder

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3824135A (en) Copper base alloys
JP2007056365A (en) Copper-zinc-tin alloy and manufacturing method therefor
WO2016074423A1 (en) Magnesium alloy and preparation method and use thereof
CN108359842A (en) A kind of polynary cast copper alloy of impeller high-performance and its manufacturing method and application
US3522039A (en) Copper base alloy
US3063833A (en) New metal alloy material and method of heat treating
US2240940A (en) Aluminum alloy
US3759758A (en) High strength aluminum casting alloy
US3392015A (en) Aluminum-base alloy for use at elevated temperatures
US2885286A (en) Anodizable aluminum die casting alloy
US4217136A (en) Corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel
US1848816A (en) Robert s
US2809888A (en) Cast iron with high creep resistance and method for making same
US2185452A (en) Method of heat treating magnesium base alloys
US2263823A (en) Method of producing and treating aluminum alloy castings
US1261987A (en) Method of making aluminum-alloy articles.
US2022686A (en) Aluminum alloy casting and method of making the same
US1716943A (en) Aluminum-beryllium alloy and method of treatment
US2098081A (en) Aluminum alloy
US1972248A (en) Method of treating ferrous alloys
US2185453A (en) Method of heat treating magnesium base alloys
US2123886A (en) Heat treated aluminum base alloy
US2922731A (en) Aluminum base alloy casting
US2081951A (en) Aluminum-magnesium alloys
US2060919A (en) Nonferrous metal