US2919802A - Method of concentrating ores - Google Patents

Method of concentrating ores Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2919802A
US2919802A US598507A US59850756A US2919802A US 2919802 A US2919802 A US 2919802A US 598507 A US598507 A US 598507A US 59850756 A US59850756 A US 59850756A US 2919802 A US2919802 A US 2919802A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
per
slimes
ore
concentrate
mannogalactan
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US598507A
Inventor
Reginald T N Drake
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Viridian Inc Canada
Original Assignee
Sherritt Gordon Mines Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sherritt Gordon Mines Ltd filed Critical Sherritt Gordon Mines Ltd
Priority to US598507A priority Critical patent/US2919802A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2919802A publication Critical patent/US2919802A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/016Macromolecular compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/06Depressants
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an improved method for the concentration of ores.
  • the invention is particularly directed to improving the efiiciency of the froth flotation of ores, and particularly the concentration by froth flotation of ores which contain, in addition to desired minerals or metal values, minerals such as talc, clay, magnesia, calcium, silica and the like which, under the conditions prevailing in the preparation for and in treatment by froth flotation, convert to slimes from which it is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain a satisfactory separation of desired minerals.
  • the difiiculty is that as the amount of slimes in the ores increases, the amount of dextrin and/or starch must be increased until the point is reached at which the addition of further amounts ofstarchor dextrin serves no useful purpose and interferes with the efiicient separation and recovery of desired minerals.
  • the present invention is, of course, based on results obtained in exhaustive investigations conducted withfthe object of overcoming the problem attendant with the presence of appreciable amounts of. slimes in the ores and is entirely independent of hypothetical considerations. It is known that clay and talc slimes are relatively easy to fiocculate but that slimes which contain insoluble carbonates, silicates and sulphides are diflicult'to flocculate. Also, flocs of sulphide slimes, when formed, are less stable than clay flocs and are easily destroyed. A l
  • the addition of the depressant for the slimes tends to depress the slimes, it also results in the loss of desired metal values, thus lowe 'ng the overall efiiciency of thefrecovery of desired minerals'
  • a disper'sant for the slimes is added to the pii-lp' mixtur'e prior to the addition of the depressant, the slim'particlesafi dispersed in the pulp to the extent that" when the depressant is added they become inertto the action of the collector employed for the collection ofthe desiredininer als and remain suspehdedin the pulp mixture while the desired minerals riseto and overflow from the Upper part of the flotation cell.
  • a relatively'clean separation of desired minerals can be 'olbtair'ied fromforeshwhich contain a relatively high slirfieorin'sofl content with resulting recovery of a 's'htisfac'tory concentrate in which the insol content is substantially reduced without adversely affecting the overall recovery of desired minerals.
  • mannogalactan possesses unusual and unexpected properties as a depressant for slimes, particularly when they are associated with an ore which contains metal values. Mannogalactan occurs in the seeds or many legumes, an example of which is the endosperm of the pod bearingflegume known as guar. Mannogalactan which occurs in guar seeds consists of approximately 67% mannose units and 33% galactose units.
  • mannogalactan alone is not sufiicient for the purpose of the present invention. It must be preceded by the'addition of a dispersant to prevent flocculation of slimes with attendant entrainment of desiredjmin i l h s, according to the present invention, a suitabledispersant is added to the pulp prior to theaddition ofthe depressant for the slimes.
  • the dispersing agent must be a relatively highly io-niz ed salt, particularly in the treatment of ores which contain a high slimes content.
  • Alkali metal phosphates such as, sodium phosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium pyrophosphate a'nd sodium hexa: metaphospha'f'e and alkalimetal.
  • silicates such 'as'sodium silicate. are illustrative of highly'ioriizedsalts suitable for use as dispersants in the present'invention. It is found further that the dispersing'ag'en't, in'order toobtain maxi mum effectiveness, must be added to the ore pulp or slurry prior to the addition of the collector.
  • the ore In conventional flotation practice, the ore usually is subjected to a preliminary conditioning step during which the, usual collector, such as a sodium or potassium xa'n'that'efand frothing agent such as a high alcohol, are added.
  • the conditioned ore pulp is then passed to the flotation cells.
  • the dispersant for the slimes to the conditioning step, during which it is dispersed throughout the pulp mixture.
  • the mannogalactan depressant then caiijb'ef added to the stream of pulp as it is passed from the conditioner to the flotation cells.
  • the various agents can be added at any other suitable point to the feed to the cells.
  • the ore subjected to the concentration process of this invention contained pentlandite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite.
  • the gangue minerals were principally talc, pyroxine and hornblende.
  • the flotation circuit comprised a, roughencircuit. which produced a bulk nick 1 copper concentrate, 'a nickel'middling circuit final tailings were discharged and a cleaner circuit.
  • the bulk nickel-copper concentrate was, separated in a. separation circuit into a high grade nickel concentrate and a high grade copper concentrate. Concentrate from the nickel middling cleaner circuit was added to the high grade nickel concentrate and tailings from that circuit were returned to the middling circuit.
  • the rougher and middling circuits were alkaline, from about pH 8 to 10, and the middling cleaner circuit was acid, about pH 6.5 with added sulphur dioxide.
  • the ore subjected to treatment contained about 1.90% nickel, about 0.79% copper and about 65.6% insol.
  • the potassium amyl xanthate is a known conventional collector
  • the mannogalactan functions as a depressor for slimes, or insol, and also, has a selective fiocculating effect on sulphides
  • the dispersant functions as a slimes dispersant and froth modifier, producing a more selective froth than is obtained by conventional practice.
  • the use of the mannogalactan has effectively reduced the amount of collector and frother oil by about one-third of that which otherwise would be required.
  • the effective range of the mannogalactan appears to be of the order of from about 0.1 to about 0.5 pounds per
  • the process of the present invention processes a number of important advantages.
  • the slimes or insol content of an ore which contains a high slimes con-v tent is substantially reduced to the extent that a satisfactory ore concentrate can be produced with which no particular difliculties are encountered during its subsequent treatment, whetherby pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical methods for the extraction and recovery of desired metal values.
  • the use of the auxiliary reagents does not add appreciably to the overall cost per ton of preparing the ore concentrate.
  • the reagents can be added easily to the pulp mixture and their presence does not create new problems either in the froth flotation process or in subsequent treatment processes to which the ore concentrate is subjected.
  • a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores which contain slime forming constituents comprising subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, a finite amount of mannogalactan as a depressant for slimes and a finite amount of a compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates and alkali metal silicates as a dispersant for said slimes, said dispersant having been added to the ore pulp prior to the addition of the mannogalactan.
  • a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores which contain slime forming constituents comprising subjecting a metal bearing sulphide-ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, a finite amount of mannogalactan as a depressant for slimes, and a finite amount of a dispersant for slimes of the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates, alkali metal pyrophosphates, alkali metal polyphosphates, and sodium silicate, the dispersant having been added to the ore pulp nrior to the addition of the mannogalactan.
  • a method of separating valuable constituents from 10 metal bearing sulphide ores which contain slime forming constituents comprising subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, from about 0.1 to 0.5 pound of mannogalactan as a depressant for slimes per ton of ore and from about 0.2 to 0.5 pound per ton of ore of a dispersant for slimes of the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates, alkali metal pyrophosphates, alkali metal polyphosphates, and sodium silicate, the dispersant having been added to the ore pulp.
  • a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores comprising subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, from about 0.1 to about 0.5 pound of guar per ton of ore and from about 0.2 to about 0.5 pound per ton of ore of a compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates and alkali metal silicates, the said compound having been added to the ore pulp prior to the addition of the guar.
  • a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores comprising subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, from about 0.1 to 05 pound of guar per ton of ore and from about 0.2 to 0.5 pounds of sodium silicate per ton of ore, the sodium silicate having been added to the ore pulp prior to the addition of guar.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)

Description

United States 2,919,802" METHOD OF CONCENTRATING oREsv No Drawing. Application July 18, 1956 Serial No. 598,507
6 Claims. (Cl. 209-167) This invention relates to an improved method for the concentration of ores. The invention is particularly directed to improving the efiiciency of the froth flotation of ores, and particularly the concentration by froth flotation of ores which contain, in addition to desired minerals or metal values, minerals such as talc, clay, magnesia, calcium, silica and the like which, under the conditions prevailing in the preparation for and in treatment by froth flotation, convert to slimes from which it is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain a satisfactory separation of desired minerals.
The problem of the presence of slimes in the operation of conventional froth flotation processes is known and a number of addition agents have been used in an endeavour to overcome it. For. example, reagents such as dextrin and starch have been employed to arrest the tendency of the slimes to interfere with the action of the mineral collector. It is believed that the dextrin and/or starch neutralize the slime particles in such a Way that they disperse throughout the pulp and allow the collector to move between the slime particles rather than being bound in and trapped by-them.
The presence of a small amount of slimes in ore subjected to concentration by froth flotation does not present a serious problem, particularly in the preparationofore concentrates for extraction and recovery of desired minerals by conventional pyrometallurgical methods. However, the presence of appreciable amounts of slimes in the ore interferes with the efi'icient recovery of desired minerals by froth flotation, and the presence of appreciable amounts of such slimes in the ore concentrates presents a serious problem in the extraction and recovery of desired minerals, and particularly if metal values are to be extracted and recovered by hydrometallurgical processes. The difiiculty is that as the amount of slimes in the ores increases, the amount of dextrin and/or starch must be increased until the point is reached at which the addition of further amounts ofstarchor dextrin serves no useful purpose and interferes with the efiicient separation and recovery of desired minerals.
It has been found that the problem of the presence of appreciable amounts of slimes, hereinafter referred to as insoluble matter or insol, in ore subjected to'froth flotation can be overcome by the use of a combination of auxiliary agents, one of which functions as a dispersant for the slimes and the other functions in the ore pulp, as a depressant for the slimes.
The present invention is, of course, based on results obtained in exhaustive investigations conducted withfthe object of overcoming the problem attendant with the presence of appreciable amounts of. slimes in the ores and is entirely independent of hypothetical considerations. It is known that clay and talc slimes are relatively easy to fiocculate but that slimes which contain insoluble carbonates, silicates and sulphides are diflicult'to flocculate. Also, flocs of sulphide slimes, when formed, are less stable than clay flocs and are easily destroyed. A l
2,919,802. mis re t J r 1. 9
reasonable explanation of the phenomenon takes place in the operation of this invention is that the addition of a depressant for the slimes alone tends to flocculate them, entraining in .thefl oc values of minerals, par ticularly metal values, which it is desired to separateand recover from the gangue material in the pulp. Thus, while the addition of the depressant for the slimes tends to depress the slimes, it also results in the loss of desired metal values, thus lowe 'ng the overall efiiciency of thefrecovery of desired minerals' However, if a disper'sant for the slimes is added to the pii-lp' mixtur'e prior to the addition of the depressant, the slim'particlesafi dispersed in the pulp to the extent that" when the depressant is added they become inertto the action of the collector employed for the collection ofthe desiredininer als and remain suspehdedin the pulp mixture while the desired minerals riseto and overflow from the Upper part of the flotation cell. Thus, a relatively'clean separation of desired minerals can be 'olbtair'ied fromforeshwhich contain a relatively high slirfieorin'sofl content with resulting recovery of a 's'htisfac'tory concentrate in which the insol content is substantially reduced without adversely affecting the overall recovery of desired minerals.
It is found that mannogalactan possesses unusual and unexpected properties as a depressant for slimes, particularly when they are associated with an ore which contains metal values. Mannogalactan occurs in the seeds or many legumes, an example of which is the endosperm of the pod bearingflegume known as guar. Mannogalactan which occurs in guar seeds consists of approximately 67% mannose units and 33% galactose units.
However, the addition of mannogalactan alone is not sufiicient for the purpose of the present invention. It must be preceded by the'addition of a dispersant to prevent flocculation of slimes with attendant entrainment of desiredjmin i l h s, according to the present invention, a suitabledispersant is added to the pulp prior to theaddition ofthe depressant for the slimes.
'Itis found that the dispersing agent must be a relatively highly io-niz ed salt, particularly in the treatment of ores which contain a high slimes content. Alkali metal phosphates such as, sodium phosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium pyrophosphate a'nd sodium hexa: metaphospha'f'e and alkalimetal. silicates such 'as'sodium silicate. are illustrative of highly'ioriizedsalts suitable for use as dispersants in the present'invention. It is found further that the dispersing'ag'en't, in'order toobtain maxi mum effectiveness, must be added to the ore pulp or slurry prior to the addition of the collector.
In conventional flotation practice, the ore usually is subjected to a preliminary conditioning step during which the, usual collector, such as a sodium or potassium xa'n'that'efand frothing agent such as a high alcohol, are added. The conditioned ore pulp is then passed to the flotation cells. It has been found by this invention that it is very cohVeniEnFtU'aHd the dispersant for the slimes to the conditioning step, during which it is dispersed throughout the pulp mixture. The mannogalactan depressant then caiijb'ef added to the stream of pulp as it is passed from the conditioner to the flotation cells. Alternatively, of course, the various agents can be added at any other suitable point to the feed to the cells.
In the following examples which illustrate the operation of the invention, the ore subjected to the concentration process of this invention, contained pentlandite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite. The gangue minerals were principally talc, pyroxine and hornblende. The flotation circuit comprised a, roughencircuit. which produced a bulk nick 1 copper concentrate, 'a nickel'middling circuit final tailings were discharged and a cleaner circuit. The bulk nickel-copper concentrate was, separated in a. separation circuit into a high grade nickel concentrate and a high grade copper concentrate. Concentrate from the nickel middling cleaner circuit was added to the high grade nickel concentrate and tailings from that circuit were returned to the middling circuit.
The rougher and middling circuits were alkaline, from about pH 8 to 10, and the middling cleaner circuit was acid, about pH 6.5 with added sulphur dioxide. The ore subjected to treatment contained about 1.90% nickel, about 0.79% copper and about 65.6% insol.
The ore pulp, mixture of ore and water, about 40% by weight solids, was first conditioned for five minutes with the dispersant, about 0.4 pounds sodium hexametaphosphate per ton of ore, and the collector, potassium amyl xanthate. Aerofroth 70 was employed as a frothing agent. Mannogalactan was then added in the form of guar, about 0.3 pound per ton of ore, and the pulp was conditioned for about minute and passed to the first rougher cells. If a conditioner cell is not employed, the various agents can be added to the overflow from the classifier or to such other source of feed to the flotation circuit which may be employed.
Additional guar and dispersant were added to either or both the middling and middling cleaner circuits of the ton of ore. Greater amounts of these reagents appear to have a depressing effect on the sulphides with resultant lower metals recovery. Optimum results appear to be obtained by the use of from 0.25 to 0.35 pounds of mannogalactan and 0.35 and 0.45 pounds of dispersant per ton of ore. It is not intended that the invention should be limited to any specific amount of either or both these auxiliary reagents as these amounts must be varied with the slimes or insol content of the specific ore being treated.
In the use of the reagents employed in the operation of the present invention, the potassium amyl xanthate is a known conventional collector, the mannogalactan functions as a depressor for slimes, or insol, and also, has a selective fiocculating effect on sulphides, and the dispersant functions as a slimes dispersant and froth modifier, producing a more selective froth than is obtained by conventional practice. In addition to its functions as a slimes or insol depressant, the use of the mannogalactan has effectively reduced the amount of collector and frother oil by about one-third of that which otherwise would be required.
The improved results obtained in the operation of the present invention are illustrated in the following tables.
TABLE 1 The efiecl of using increasing amounts of guar without dispersant [Rougher circuit pH 8.6]
Assays Recoveries Tailings Guar, LbsJton of ore Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu Blank, Rougher Concentrate 8. 24 4.00 40. 7 84.1 93. 3 8. 60 .27 .05 0.1# Rougher Concentrate- 8.00 3. 55 38. 2 89. 1 93. 2 8. 71 .19 .05 0.2# Rougher Concentrated 8. 24 3.60 34.8 89. 5 91. 7 7. 70 18 .05 0.3# Rougher Concentrate 9. 4. 30.0 89.0 92. 1 5. 78 18 .06 0.4# Rougher Concentrate. 9. 72 4. 55 26. 4 88. 2 90. 5 4. 83 19 .07 0.5# Rougher Concentrate 10. 20 4. 80 24.3 88. 1 90. 5 4. 20 19 .07
order of about 0.2 pounds of each reagent per ton of ore. In this, it has been found that the effectiveness of the depressant is at least partially destroyed when it is present in a pulp mixture passed through a pump. Thus, it is best to add at least this reagent to the mixture be- The use of guar alone improved the grade of concentrate by about 2%. It increased the overall recovery of metal values by about 4% and it effected a substantial reduction in the slimes or insol in the resulting concentrate.
TABLE 2 Effect of increasing amounts of guar using 0.4 lbs. sodium hexametaphosphate per ton of ore [Rougher circuit pH 9.6]
Assays Recoveries Taillngs Sodium Hexameta- Guar, Lbs/ton phosphate, Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Lbs./ton cent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu 0.20# Rougher C0ncentrate 10.37 4.08 28. 5 86.0 90. 3 8.03 .35 .09 0.25# Rougher Concentrate 10.69 4. 26 24. 7 86. 0 91.3 6. 67 .34 .08 0.30# Rougher Concentrate 11. 12 4. 45 22. 7 85.8 90.1 5. 8 .34 .09 0.35# Rougher Concentrate 11. 4. 55 19. 8 86. 2 88.2 4. 98 .34 .11 0.40# Rougher Concentrate" 11.92 4. 18. 3 85.0 89. 1 4. 48 .36 .10
tween a pump which is employed for moving it to its point of use.
The effective range of the mannogalactan appears to be of the order of from about 0.1 to about 0.5 pounds per The addition of the dispersing agent, sodium hexametaphosphate, increased the grade of the concentrate and reduced the amount of insol with only a slight de- 75 crease in the overall recovery of metal values.
TABLE 7 Efiects of increasing amounts of sodium phosphate- Na I-1PO with 0.27# guar Assays Recoveries Taflings Sodium Phosphate Gum, lbs/ton NmHPO Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Lbs./ton cent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu 0.18;. 0.273 Rongher Concentrate" 9. 4. 32 31. 2 87.5 89.1 6. 43 22 .09 0.27;? .do 10. 12 4. 67 28. 8 86. 7 87. 8 5. 46 24 10 6? 8.84 4.22 28 3 88.0 90. 2 6.00 .21 .08
Hexametephosphate, lbs/ton:
0.362 0.279 Standard Concentrate. 9.28 4.37 30 3 88 8 89 2 6 25 .20 .09
TABLE 8 Efiects of increasing amounts of tripolyphospkate- Na P O with 0.264%: guar Sodium Assays Recoveries Tailings Tripoly- Phosphate Guar, 1bs./ton N 21 F 01), Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Pen Per- Lbs./ton cent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu 0.17# 0.269 Rougher Concentrate.. 7.92 3.62 28.8 88.7 93.0 7.63 .22 .06 7. 76 3. 55 28. 3 88. 6 91. 8 7. 58 22 .07 8. 32 3. 90 26. 7 87. 6 93. 0 6. 70 24 08 8.72 4.08 23.7 87.9 90.3 5.4 .22 .08
Hexameta- Phosphate, lbs/ton:
0.34# 0.260 Standard Concentrate. 8.56 3.97 27.6 87.8 88 3 6.48 .23 .10
TABLE 9 Efiects of increasing amounts of pyrophosphate Na P 0 with 0.31? guar Assays Recoveries Tailings Pyrophosphate Guar, lbs/ton N84PQO7, Per- Per- Pcr- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- LbsJton cent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu lnsol. Ni 11 0.2%. 0.32 Rougher Concentrate... 9 96 4.40 25.0 85.2 92. 5 5.36 .06 0.3%. d0 9 24 3.92 23.2 88.6 92.7 6.66 .23 .06 0.459 8. 56 3. 72 22. 6 38. 0 91. 6 5. 90 24 07 0.51; 9. 96 4. 30 18.8 87.7 91. 3 4. 14 24 Sodium Hexemeta- Phosphate. lbsJton:
0.4% 0.3;? Standard Concentrate- 9.00 3.85 25.3 87 9 90 3 6. 11 .24 .08
TABLE Efiects of increasing amounts of sodium silicate with 0.3# guar Assays Recoveries Taflmgs Sodium Silicate, Guer, lbs/ton LbsJton Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Per- Percent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent N1 Cu Insol. Ni Cu Insol. Ni Cu 0.53 0.3{1Rougher Concentrate-.. 10. 16 4. 57 24. 1 88 2 89.8 4 71 .21 .08 1.0# do 11. 46 5. 20.1 87 4 90. 7 3 41 22 07 1.53-. 10.92 4.95 20.7 87 5 90.9 3 72 .22 .07 2.0# 12. 5. 17. 2 86 0 89. 4 2 69 24 08 2.5;? 12.32 5.65 16.4 86 6 89.6 2 61 .23 Sodium Hexameta- Phosphate. lbs/ton;
The process of the present invention processes a number of important advantages. Primarily, the slimes or insol content of an ore which contains a high slimes con-v tent is substantially reduced to the extent that a satisfactory ore concentrate can be produced with which no particular difliculties are encountered during its subsequent treatment, whetherby pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical methods for the extraction and recovery of desired metal values. The use of the auxiliary reagents does not add appreciably to the overall cost per ton of preparing the ore concentrate. Also, of course, the reagents can be added easily to the pulp mixture and their presence does not create new problems either in the froth flotation process or in subsequent treatment processes to which the ore concentrate is subjected.
It will be understood, of course, that modifications can be made in the operation of the process of the present invention Without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
What I claim as new and desire to protect by Letters Patent of the United States is:
1. In a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores which contain slime forming constituents, the improvement which comprises subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, a finite amount of mannogalactan as a depressant for slimes and a finite amount of a compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates and alkali metal silicates as a dispersant for said slimes, said dispersant having been added to the ore pulp prior to the addition of the mannogalactan.
2. In a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores which contain slime forming constituents, the improvement which comprises subjecting a metal bearing sulphide-ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, a finite amount of mannogalactan as a depressant for slimes, and a finite amount of a dispersant for slimes of the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates, alkali metal pyrophosphates, alkali metal polyphosphates, and sodium silicate, the dispersant having been added to the ore pulp nrior to the addition of the mannogalactan.
3. In a method of separating valuable constituents from 10 metal bearing sulphide ores which contain slime forming constituents, the improvement which comprises subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, from about 0.1 to 0.5 pound of mannogalactan as a depressant for slimes per ton of ore and from about 0.2 to 0.5 pound per ton of ore of a dispersant for slimes of the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates, alkali metal pyrophosphates, alkali metal polyphosphates, and sodium silicate, the dispersant having been added to the ore pulp.
prior to the addition of the mannogalactan.
4. In a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores, the improvement which comprises subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, from about 0.1 to about 0.5 pound of guar per ton of ore and from about 0.2 to about 0.5 pound per ton of ore of a compound selected from the group consisting of alkali metal phosphates and alkali metal silicates, the said compound having been added to the ore pulp prior to the addition of the guar.
5. The method according to claim 4 in which the said compound is a member selected from the group consisting of alkali metal pyrophosphates and alkali metal polyphosphates.
6. In a method of separating valuable constituents from metal bearing sulphide ores, the improvement which comprises subjecting a metal bearing sulphide ore pulp to froth flotation in the presence of a mineral collector, from about 0.1 to 05 pound of guar per ton of ore and from about 0.2 to 0.5 pounds of sodium silicate per ton of ore, the sodium silicate having been added to the ore pulp prior to the addition of guar.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,454,838 Borcherdt May 8, 1923 2,696,912 Atwood Dec. 14, 1954 2,724,499 Smith Nov. 22, 1955 2,740,522 Aimone Apr. 3, 1956 OTHER REFERENCES Taggart: Handbook of Mineral Dressing, 1945, p. 12-21, 12-108.

Claims (1)

1. IN A METHOD OF SEPARATING VALUABLE CONSTITUENTS FROM METAL BEARING SULPHIDE ORES WHICH CONTAIN SLIME FORMING CONSTITUENTS, THE IMPROVEMENT WHICH COMPRISES SUBJECTING A METAL BEARING SULPHIDE ORE PULP TO FROTH FLOTATION IN THE PRESENCE OF A MINERAL COLLECTOR, A FINITE AMOUNT OF MANNOGALACTAN AS A DEPRESSANT FOR SLIMES AND A FINITE AMOUNT OF A COMPOUND SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF ALKALI METAL PHOSPHATES AND ALKALI METAL SILICATES AS A DISPERSANT FOR SAID SLIMES, SAID DISPERSANT HAVING BEEN ADDED TO THE ORE PULP PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF THE MANNOGALACTAN.
US598507A 1956-07-18 1956-07-18 Method of concentrating ores Expired - Lifetime US2919802A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US598507A US2919802A (en) 1956-07-18 1956-07-18 Method of concentrating ores

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US598507A US2919802A (en) 1956-07-18 1956-07-18 Method of concentrating ores

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2919802A true US2919802A (en) 1960-01-05

Family

ID=24395834

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US598507A Expired - Lifetime US2919802A (en) 1956-07-18 1956-07-18 Method of concentrating ores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2919802A (en)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3919079A (en) * 1972-06-28 1975-11-11 David Weston Flotation of sulphide minerals from sulphide bearing ore
US4853114A (en) * 1988-04-05 1989-08-01 American Cyanamid Copany Method for the depressing of hydrous, layered silicates
US4880529A (en) * 1988-05-11 1989-11-14 Falconbridge Limited Separation of polymetallic sulphides by froth flotation
US4952329A (en) * 1988-05-11 1990-08-28 Falconbridge Limited Separation of polymetallic sulphides by froth flotation
US4979987A (en) * 1988-07-19 1990-12-25 First Miss Gold, Inc. Precious metals recovery from refractory carbonate ores
US5030340A (en) * 1990-06-08 1991-07-09 American Cyanamid Company Method for the depressing of hydrous silicates and iron sulfides with dihydroxyalkyl polysaccharides
US20060133974A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Placer Dome Technical Services Limited Reduction of lime consumption when treating refractory gold ores or concentrates
US20070012630A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2007-01-18 Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US20070217285A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2007-09-20 Barrick Gold Corporation Autoclave with underflow dividers
US20070292326A1 (en) * 2006-06-15 2007-12-20 Barrick Gold Corporation Process for reduced alkali consumption in the recovery of silver
US20080017552A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-01-24 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US20080029460A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-02-07 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc. Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
WO2009086606A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US20110038770A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2011-02-17 Geoffery David Senior Processing Nickel Bearing Sulphides
US7913852B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2011-03-29 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8092686B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2012-01-10 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8702993B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2014-04-22 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US10315202B2 (en) 2015-07-14 2019-06-11 International Business Machines Corporation Engulfed nano/micro bubbles for improved recovery of large particles in a flotation cell

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1454838A (en) * 1919-03-19 1923-05-08 New Jersey Zinc Co Concentration of minerals
US2696912A (en) * 1953-02-02 1954-12-14 Duval Sulphur & Potash Company Concentrating or separating of the values from soluble ores
US2724499A (en) * 1951-09-19 1955-11-22 American Metal Co Ltd Concentration of potash ores containing sylvite
US2740522A (en) * 1953-04-07 1956-04-03 American Cyanamid Co Flotation of ores using addition polymers as depressants

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1454838A (en) * 1919-03-19 1923-05-08 New Jersey Zinc Co Concentration of minerals
US2724499A (en) * 1951-09-19 1955-11-22 American Metal Co Ltd Concentration of potash ores containing sylvite
US2696912A (en) * 1953-02-02 1954-12-14 Duval Sulphur & Potash Company Concentrating or separating of the values from soluble ores
US2740522A (en) * 1953-04-07 1956-04-03 American Cyanamid Co Flotation of ores using addition polymers as depressants

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3919079A (en) * 1972-06-28 1975-11-11 David Weston Flotation of sulphide minerals from sulphide bearing ore
US4853114A (en) * 1988-04-05 1989-08-01 American Cyanamid Copany Method for the depressing of hydrous, layered silicates
AU608430B2 (en) * 1988-04-05 1991-03-28 American Cyanamid Company Method for the depressing of hydrated silicates
US4880529A (en) * 1988-05-11 1989-11-14 Falconbridge Limited Separation of polymetallic sulphides by froth flotation
WO1989010792A1 (en) * 1988-05-11 1989-11-16 Falconbridge U.S., Inc. Separation of polymetallic sulphides by froth flotation
US4952329A (en) * 1988-05-11 1990-08-28 Falconbridge Limited Separation of polymetallic sulphides by froth flotation
US4979987A (en) * 1988-07-19 1990-12-25 First Miss Gold, Inc. Precious metals recovery from refractory carbonate ores
US5030340A (en) * 1990-06-08 1991-07-09 American Cyanamid Company Method for the depressing of hydrous silicates and iron sulfides with dihydroxyalkyl polysaccharides
US20100024603A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2010-02-04 Placer Dome Technical Services Ltd. Reduction of lime consumption when treating refractory gold ores or concentrates
US8029751B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2011-10-04 Placer Dome Technical Services Limited Reduction of lime consumption when treating refractory gold ores or concentrates
US20060133974A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Placer Dome Technical Services Limited Reduction of lime consumption when treating refractory gold ores or concentrates
US7604783B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2009-10-20 Placer Dome Technical Services Limited Reduction of lime consumption when treating refractor gold ores or concentrates
US20070012630A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2007-01-18 Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8011514B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2011-09-06 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US10150839B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2018-12-11 Ingevity South Carolina, Llc Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8127930B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2012-03-06 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8092686B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2012-01-10 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US20080017552A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-01-24 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US20080029460A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-02-07 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc. Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8757389B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2014-06-24 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US7913852B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2011-03-29 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8702993B2 (en) 2004-12-23 2014-04-22 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Amine-aldehyde resins and uses thereof in separation processes
US8061888B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2011-11-22 Barrick Gold Corporation Autoclave with underflow dividers
US20070217285A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2007-09-20 Barrick Gold Corporation Autoclave with underflow dividers
US20070292326A1 (en) * 2006-06-15 2007-12-20 Barrick Gold Corporation Process for reduced alkali consumption in the recovery of silver
US8252254B2 (en) 2006-06-15 2012-08-28 Barrick Gold Corporation Process for reduced alkali consumption in the recovery of silver
US20110039477A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2011-02-17 Geoffery David Senior Processing Nickel Bearing Sulphides
US8753593B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2014-06-17 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd. Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US20110038770A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2011-02-17 Geoffery David Senior Processing Nickel Bearing Sulphides
EA020534B1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2014-11-28 БиЭйчПи БИЛЛИТОН ЭсЭсЭм ДИВЕЛОПМЕНТ ПТИ ЛТД. Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US9028782B2 (en) * 2008-01-09 2015-05-12 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd. Processing nickel bearing sulphides
WO2009086606A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Bhp Billiton Ssm Development Pty Ltd Processing nickel bearing sulphides
US10315202B2 (en) 2015-07-14 2019-06-11 International Business Machines Corporation Engulfed nano/micro bubbles for improved recovery of large particles in a flotation cell
US12070757B2 (en) 2015-07-14 2024-08-27 International Business Machines Corporation Engulfed nano/micro bubbles for improved recovery of large particles in a flotation cell

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2919802A (en) Method of concentrating ores
CA1078976A (en) Beneficiation of lithium ores by froth flotation
CN105903552B (en) Beneficiation method for efficiently recovering micro-fine particle molybdenum ore
US4229287A (en) Tin flotation
US4877517A (en) Depressant for flotation separation of polymetallic sulphidic ores
WO1993004783A1 (en) Processing of ores
US4735783A (en) Process for increasing the selectivity of mineral flotation
US3430765A (en) Beneficiation of fluorspar ores
US2011176A (en) Ore concentration
US3167502A (en) Process for recovering cassiterite from ores
US4268380A (en) Froth flotation process
US3386572A (en) Upgrading of copper concentrates from flotation
US2676705A (en) Concentration of phosphate ores
US4113106A (en) Process of tin flotation
US3331505A (en) Flotation process for reagent removal
US4246096A (en) Flotation process
US3847357A (en) Separation of copper minerals from pyrite
US4606817A (en) Recovery of molybdenite
CA1046656A (en) Use of tetraalkylammonium halides as flotation collectors
US2395475A (en) Beneficiation of beryllium ores
US3032189A (en) Beneficiation of phosphatic ores
US3309029A (en) Activation of sulfide ores for froth flotation
US2162525A (en) Flotation of fine oxide ore minerals
US1728352A (en) Flotation concentration
GB2067098A (en) Flotation of molybdenite