US2909738A

US2909738A - Broadband nonreciprocal devices

Info

Publication number: US2909738A
Application number: US374554A
Authority: US
Inventors: James L Davis; John H Rowen
Original assignee: Bell Telephone Laboratories Inc
Current assignee: AT&T Corp
Priority date: 1953-08-17
Filing date: 1953-08-17
Publication date: 1959-10-20
Anticipated expiration: 1976-10-20

Description

Oct. 20, 1959 J, DAVls ETAL BROADBAND NONRECIPROCAL DEVICES 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed Aug. 17, 1953 FERR/TE MICRO- MVE SOURCE 4/ AND 42 WMMQQMQ IIK 8K 9K IOK FREQUENCY /N MC.

REFLECTED ENERGY INC/DENT ENERGY FIG. 5

J LDA V/S J h. ROWE/V lNl EN TORS:

ATTORNEY Oct. 20, 1959 DAVls ETAL I 2,909,738 BROADBAND NONRECIPROCAL DEVICES Filed Aug. 17, 1953 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 POL M FIG. 6

A FERR/TE; B

V FERR/TE 5/ FIG. 7

A F 1-* i B I FIG. 8

A 4 6/ FERR/TE B FIG. 9

A 7/ ms lA/VENTORS: 04 W5 .1 H. ROWEN A 7' TOR/VEV United States Patent BROADBAND NONRECIPROCAL DEVICES James L. Davis, Scotch Plains, and John H. Rowen,

Morristown, NJ., assignors to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, New York, N.Y., a corporation of New York Application August 17, 1953, Serial No. 374,554

7 Claims. (Cl. 333-98) This invention relates to broadband nonreciprocal waveguide components.

The theorem of reciprocity states that In any network composed of linear impedances, if an electromotive force E applied between two terminals produces acurrent I at some branch in the network, then the same voltage E acting at the second point in the circuit, will produce the same current I at the first point. Most electrical networks, including microwave systems, do obey the theorem of reciprocity and are reciprocal. However, in the last few years a group of nonreciprocal microwave components have been developed which involve the interaction of the electromagnetic wave with a magnetized ferromagnetic medium of low conductivity.

These prior art nonreciprocal devices have frequently employed magnetized polycrystalline ferrites, such as (NiZn)Fe- O to produce the different amount of phase shift or attenuation for thevtwo directions of transmission through the unit. Certain devices of this type are described in C. L. Hogans article The Microwave Gyrator which appeared in vol. 31, pages 1 through 31, of the January 1952 issue of the Bell System Technical Journal. While'Hogan showed that in an infinite magnetized medium these nonreciprocal effects are theoretically independent of frequency, in practice it is observed that the electromagnetic propagation characteristics in a waveguidefusually cause the effects to be strongly dependent on the microwave frequency. For this reason, the prior art nonreciprocal units are only suitable for use in systems which utilize a relatively narrow band of frequencies.

Accordingly, the principal object of the present invention is to increase the bandwidth of nonreciprocal microwave devices.

In accordance with the invention, operating characteristics of a nonreciprocal electrical device are made substantially constant over a broad frequency band by placing the nonreciprocal element in a section of waveguide having a particular construction. More specifically and in accordance with one embodiment of the invention disclosed in detail hereinafter, a longitudinally magnetized ferromagnetic element is mounted in a resonant section of circular waveguide. The multiple reflections resulting from the resonant nature of the section containing the ferrite can be made to compensate almost entirely for the intrinsic frequency dependence of the ferrite element itself by appropriate choice of the length and the reflection coeflicients at the ends of the resonant section.

Other objects and certain features and advantages of 'theinvention will become apparent in the course of the detailed description of the drawings.

In the drawings:

Fig. 1.shows a waveguidesystem employing a broadband isolator in accordance with the invention;

Figs. 2 and 3 are cross-sectional views in planes through lines 22 and 3-3, respectively, of Fig. 1;

Fig. 4'shows plots of rotation vs. frequency for an uncompensated Faraday effect device and for the broadband device of Fig. 1;

Fig. 5 shows several plots which relate the amount of rotation with the characteristics of the resonant section of waveguide;

Figs. 6 and 7 represent alternative structures for securing multiple reflections which may be substituted for the central section of the structure of Fig. l; 7

Figs. 8 illustrates a broadband Faraday effect device in which the ferromagnetic pencil is mounted in a body of insulating material having a relatively high dielectric constant; and

Fig. 9 shows an alternative arrangement which is similar in its mode of operation to that of the arrangement of Fig. 8.

Referring more specifically to the drawings, Figs. 1 through 3 show, by way of example and for purposes of illustration, a microwave system including a Faraday effect isolator 12. A suitable source of microwave energy- 13 is coupled to the isolator 12 by means of the rectangular waveguide 14 and the rectangular to round transition section 15. Another transition section 16 couples the output from the isolator 12 to the rectangular guide 17, the broad face of which is oriented at an angle of 45 degrees with respect to the board face of the first rectangular guide 14. The conventional elements of the isolator 12 include the

resistive vanes

21 and 22 which are also axially displaced 45 degrees with respect to one another, and aligned with the

waveguides

14 and 17, respectively, and the longitudinally magnetized pencil of ferrite 23. As may be clearly observed in the cross-sectional views of Figs. 2 and 3, the plane of each of the

resistive vanes

21, 22 is parallel to planes of the broader sides of the respective adjacent

rectangular waveguide

14, 15. The coil 24 which is energized by a suitable source of voltage 25 via the variable resistance 26 provides the longitudinal magnetic field for the ferrite pencil 23.

The general mode of operation of a Faraday effect isolator such as is shown in Figs. 1 through 3 is set forth in detail in the article by C. L. Hogan cited hereinbefore, and will be reviewed only briefly here. In short, the two physical principles which are employed are (1) the rotation of the plane of polarization of electromagnetic waves passing through the longitudinally magnetized ferrite element in the same absolute angular direction for both directions of propagation, and (2) the absorption by resistive vanes of electromagnetic waves having the electric vector parallel to the vane. Thus, proceeding from left to right, the electromagnetic wave in the rectangular waveguide 14 is oriented with its electric vector in the horizontal plane parallel to the narrower side walls of the waveguide. Inasmuch as this polarization is retained in the circular guide 28, the electric vector is perpendicular to the resistive vane 21 and the electromagnetic wave passes through the section of guide containing the resistive vane 21 without attenuation. The longitudinally polarized pencil of ferrite rotates the plane of polarization of the electromagnetic wave 45 degrees clockwise as viewed from left to right, so that the electric vector is now perpendicular to the resistive vane 22 and energy readily passes on into the rectangular waveguide 17.

When an electromagnetic wave is propagatedfrom right to left in waveguide 17, however, it is dissipated in the isolator 12 as may be seen from the following analysis. The electric vector will be parallel to the narrower side wall of the rectangular waveguide 17 and thus will be perpendicular to the resistive vane 22 and will not be attentuated by it. In traversing the ferrite pencil 23, the electric vector will again be rotated clockwise (looking downthe axis of the isolator from into the plane of the resistive vane 21 where it will be absorbed. If the absorption is not complete, the reflected energy will be absorbed by'the vane 22. Therefore, electromagnetic waves applied to waveguide 14 will left to right) freely pass through the isolator 12, but energy applied in the reverse direction from waveguide 17 is dissipated in the isolator.

Before proceeding with the description of Fig. 1, reference is made to the dotted curve 41 of Fig. 4 which shows the normal variation of rotation with frequency for an uncompensated ferrite pencil. Note further that the slope of this dotted curve is so steep that for a percent frequency band centered at 8.8 kilomegacycles the rotation varies more than $20 percent. With the broad-banding techniques in accordance with the invention, however, as illustrated in the solid line curve 42 of Fig. 4, the Faraday rotation varies less than :4 percent over a frequency band equal to percent of the center frequency of 8.8 kilomegacycles. This remarkable improvement is obtained by setting up multiple reflections in the region containing the ferrite pencil in accordance with principles to be developed hereinafter.

In the arrangement shown in Figs. 1 through 3, the multiple reflections are set up in the ferrite by making the impedance in the section of guide including the dielectric element 31 substantially less than in the adjoining empty waveguide and by providing the dielectric element 31 with the

shallow tapers

32, 33. The difference in impedance between the empty and dielectric filled guide is accentuated by constricting the entire central section of waveguide 27 so that at the lower end of the fre quency band the frequency of the wave which is transmitted through the isolator is just slightly above the cutoff frequency. Under these conditions the wave imdance in the air-filled pipe will be high. Because the dielectric constant of polystyrene is between 2 and 3, the wave impedance in the polystyrene element 31 which supports the ferrite pencil 23 will be much lower than that in the air-filled region, and the impedance discontinuities will set up multiple reflections in the polystyrene and ferrite region.

The mathematical analysis of the phenomenon by which the multiple reflections broadband the Faraday effect device is exceedingly complicated, and only the results of this analysis in graphical form are presented in this application. In Fig. 5 the ratio,

ment is plotted against frequency. For convenience the frequency scale is given in terms of where l is the length of the resonant section of waveguide and A is the Wavelength of the electromagnetic waves passing through the section of the waveguide. The series of plots represent a family of curves showing qualitatively the effect of different reflection coefficients at the ends of the resonant section of waveguide. The reflection coefficient is defined as the square root of the ratio of reflected to incident energy, and the three curves 8%, 82 and 43 are plotted for values of reflection coefficient equal to 3?; and respectively. The rela tionship between the reflection coefficient R and the impedances Z and Z in the two sections of the waveguide is as follows:

Z l*R Z 1+R Now, by using a resonant cavity of the proper length so that in the desired frequency range the slope of the curves of Fig. 5 is negative, the positive slope of the rotation vs. frequency plot 41 in Fig. 4 may be compensated. For example, between 4 the slope of all of the plots of Fig. 5 is negative. However, at the low end of this frequency band the length l of the resonant cavity has to be equal to zero, so this range is not as satisfactory as the range between At the low and high ends of this frequency band the fixed length l of the resonant cavity is equal to /2 and of the wavelength, respectively. Inasmuch as the curves of Fig. 5 are repetitive, other ranges of X may be used where Z n r r at the low end of the band and at the upper end of the frequency band, where n is any integer, usually 1 or 2.

After deciding on the length of the resonant sections of waveguide by the above-noted relationships, the reflection coefficient may be varied to give the appropriate slope in this region. This may be accomplished by varying the taper of the

conical surfaces

32 and 33 of the dielectric element 31 of Fig. l, for example. Normally, as shown in this figure, moderately blunt surfaces are desirable. With higher reflection coefficients, the slopes of the family of

curves

80, 82 and 43 of Fig. 5 get steeper, and more compensation is obtained. The variable length of the resonant waveguide section therefore constitutes a means for determining the sign of the compensation and the reflection coefficient at the ends of the resonant section constitutes a means for determining the slope of the compensation.

Figs. 6 and 7 represent alternative structures which may be substituted for the central resonant section of the isolator 12 of Fig. 1. Specifically, in Fig. 6 the multiple reflections are obtained by the use of the

irises

84 and 86 which are separated by the critical distance I as noted above. In the section of waveguide 88 between the two irises, the pencil of ferrite 44 is mounted in a dielectric element 45 which may be made, for example, of polyfoam, an aerated polystyrene composition which has a dielectric constant very nearly equal to unity. The ferrite pencil could also be supported by cylinders or washers of other dielectric materials such as teflon or polystyrene. In this structure of Fig. 6, the magnitude of the reflection coefficient is determined largely by the size of the aperture in the irises. In Fig. 7 the pencil of ferrite 51 is mounted in a tube 52 of solid dielectric material, and the multiple reflections are set up at the

discontinuities

53, 54 where these elements terminate. The additional factor of the abrupt change in the diameter of the waveguide 55, from its small size between the

discontinuities

53, 54 to its larger size on either side of this dielectric and ferrite filled region, increases the reflection coeflicient at the discontinuities.

The structures of Figs. 8 and 9 are similar to those of Figs. 1, 6 and 7 in that they broaden the frequency band of a Faraday effect rotator, but operate on a different principle. Referring to Fig. 4, it may be observed that at higher frequencies far above the cut-off frequency of the waveguide (about 7.8 kilomegacycles in Fig. 4), the slope of the combined

curves

41 and 42 decreases and tends toward the horizontal. The Faraday effect devices of Figs. 8 and 9 secure a relatively little change of rotation over a broad frequency band by operating far above cut-off. This desirable feature is accomplished without increasing the waveguide size by having the active portion of the microwave rotator made of very high dielectric constant material.

In Fig. 8 the central pencil of ferrite 61 is'made of a ferrite. such as a nickel zinc ferrite which has a dielectric constant of approximately 10, which is typical of the large majority of ferrites. It is mounted in a cylinder of dielectric material 62 having substantially the same dielectric constant as that of the ferrite with the cylinder in turn being mounted in the waveguide 63. This cylinder 62 is tapered at 64 and 65 to improve the match with the air-filled waveguide. Under these conditions the cut-off wavelength in the ferrite and dielectric filled portion of the waveguide is approximately five times as great as the wavelength in this portion of the waveguide. Furthermore, the radial distribution of the electromagnetic field will not change appreciably with. frequency because, neglecting the small difference in the permeabilities of the ferrite and dielectric materials, the waveguide is filled with a uniform dielectric.

Fig. 9 shows an alternative arrangement to that of Fig.

8 in which the waveguide 71 is operated far above cutoff. In this system the ferrite element 72 is in the form of a disc completely filling the waveguide. On either side of the ferrite element are

discs

73, 74 of a suitable permanent magnet material such as barium ferrite which is made from barium oxide and iron oxide. When these permanently magnetized discs are used to apply the magnetic field to the ferrite, the magnetizing coil 24 of Fig. 1 may naturally be dispensed with. The

dielectric discs

75, 76 at either extreme of the assembly are quarterwave matching plates to match the air-filled waveguide to the ferrite-filled section.

While all of the embodiments of the invention discussed hereinbefore have the advantage of broadbanding the Faraday rotation, the structures of Figs. 1, 7 and 8 in which the ferrite pencil is mounted in dielectric ma-.

terial having a fairly high dielectric constant, have the additional advantage in the absolute increase in rotation at all frequencies. The physical reasons for this increase become apparent from the formula for therotation and an analysis of the conditions in the guide." The rotation per unit length in an infinite magnetized medium is given by the relation where are the effective permeabilities seen by the circularly polarized components of the wave,

is the rotation per unit length, to is the angular frequency, 0 is the velocity of light and e is the dielectric constant. The same relation applies to the guided wave if and e are the effective values averaged over the entire waveguide mode. Thus by increasing the dielectric constant of the region surrounding the ferrite the average value of e is increased. Since the radial distribution is also changed in such a way as to reduce the fraction of the power contained in the ferrite, the increase in rotation is less than is obtained when the waveguide diameter is reduced at the same time. 1

Although the Faraday effect element has been termed ferrite material at many points in the foregoing specification, other ferromagnetic materials having low conductivity may be employed. Specifically, very finely divided conducting magnetic powder in an insulating matrix exhibits a substantial Faraday effect. One example of a ferrite material which has proved eminently satisfactory is the polycrystalline nickel-zinc ferrite (Ni Zn )Fe O When the term low conductivity is employed in the present specification and claims, the material in question is considered to have an over-all resistivity of 100 ohmcentimeters or more.

It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Numerous other arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without-departing-from the spirit and scope of the invention. a Whatisclaimedis: a 1. 'In a Faraday effect rotator having a normal rotation versus frequency characteristic, a waveguide, a'resonant waveguide section connected in series with said'waveguide, a pencil of ferrite withinand generally aligned with said resonant waveguide section, means applying a longitudinal magnetic field to said pencil of ferrite, means for introducing electromagnetic waves of a predetermined group of wavelengths into said waveguide, all of said predetermined group of wavelengths being less than twice but greater than four-thirds the length of said resonant waveguide section'and reflection means at each end of said resonant waveguide section for providing a compensating rotation versus frequency characteristicthe slope of which is substantially equal and opposite to that of said normal rotation versus frequency characteristic. 2. In a Faraday effect rotator for-operation over a broad band of frequencies .having a normal rotation versus, frequency characteristic, a waveguide,a resonant waveguide section connected in series with said.wave guide, a pencil of ferromagnetic material of low conductivity within said resonant waveguide section,.means for applying a longitudinal magnetic field to said pencil of ferromagnetic material, the relationship between the electromagnetic waves in said band of frequencies and'the length 'of the resonant waveguide section being such that the wavelengths of said electromagnetic waves are less than twice but greater than four-thirds the length of said resonant waveguide section, and reflection means at each end of said resonant waveguide section for providing a compensating. rotation versus frequency characteristic the slope of which is substantially equal and opposite to that of said normal rotation versus frequency characteristic. 3. In a Faraday effect rotator having a normal rotation versus frequency characteristic, a waveguide, a resonant waveguide section connected in series with said waveguide, a pencil of ferromagnetic materialof low conductivity within said resonant waveguide section, means applying a longitudinal magnetic field to said pencil of ferromagnetic material, means for introducing electromagnetic waves of a predetermined group of wavelengths into said waveguide, all of said group of wavelengths being less than N but greater than times the length of said resonant waveguide section, where N is an integer, and reflection means at each end of said resonant waveguide section for providing a compensating rotation versus frequency characteristic the slope of which is substantially equal and opposite to that of said normal rotation versus frequency characteristic.

4. In a nonreciprocal microwave component, a waveguiding structure, means for introducing electromagnetic waves of a predetermined group of wavelengthsinto said waveguiding structure, a magnetically polarized element of ferromagnetic material disposed in the path of electro magnetic wave energy supported by said structure, said element having a normal variation of non-reciprocal effect with frequency, multiple reflective'means including two impedance discontinuities located on either side of said polarized element for compensating for said variation, the relationship between said electromagnetic waves and the distance between said discontinuities being such the distance between said discontinuities falls within the range of three-quarters to one-half times the wavelengths of said electromagnetic waves.

5. In a Faraday effect polarization rotator having a nor mal rotation versus frequency characteristic, a waveguide, a resonant waveguide section connected in series with said but greater than 4s ZIN times the length of said resonant waveguide section, where N is an integer, and reflective means at each end of said resonant waveguide section fixing said length of said resonant section.

6. In a Faraday effect rotator having a normal rotation versus frequency characteristic, a hollow substantially circular conducting wave guide, an element of ferrite located therein, a magnet for applying a longitudinal field to said ferrite element closely coupled therewith, means for introducing electromagnetic waves of a predetermined group of Wavelengths into said wave guide, and reflection means including the blunt ends of an element of dielectric material enclosing said ferrite element for providing a compensating rotation versus frequency characteristic the slope of which is substantially equal and opposite to that of said normal rotation versus frequency characteristic, the relationship between said electromagnetic waves and the distance between said blunt ends being such that the distance between said blunt ends falls within the range of 2N 1 to N 4 2 times the wavelengths of said electromagnetic waves, where N is an integer.

7. In a Faraday effect rotator for operation over a broad band of frequencies having a normal rotation versus frequency characteristic, a wave guide, a pencil of ferrite in the wave guide, means for longitudinally magnetically polarizing said ferrite pencil, and reflection means including a hollow cylinder of dielectric material encircling and supporting said ferrite pencil for providing a compensating rotation versus frequency characteristic the slope of which is substantially equal and opposite to that of said normal rotation versus frequency characteristic, said cylinder having a relative dielectric constant greater than two and having blunt end surfaces, the relationship between the electromagnetic Waves in said band of frequencies and the distance between said blunt ends being such that the distance between said blunt ends falls within the range of 2N l N 4 to 2 times the wavelengths of said electromagnetic waves, where N is an integer.

OTHER REFERENCES Publication I, Trier: Experiments on the Faraday Rotation of Guided Waves, Applied Scientific Research, Sect. B, vol. 3, No. 2, recd. July 27, 1953, by Pat. Off. Library, pp. 142-144.

Publication 11, Sakiotis et al.: Microwave-Antenna Ferrite Applications, Electronics, June 1952, pages 156, 58, 62 and 66.