US2634225A - Ammonium chromate rinse for phosphate coated metal surfaces - Google Patents
Ammonium chromate rinse for phosphate coated metal surfaces Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US2634225A US2634225A US169517A US16951750A US2634225A US 2634225 A US2634225 A US 2634225A US 169517 A US169517 A US 169517A US 16951750 A US16951750 A US 16951750A US 2634225 A US2634225 A US 2634225A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- rinsing
- solution
- metal surfaces
- coating
- chromic acid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C22/00—Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
- C23C22/82—After-treatment
- C23C22/83—Chemical after-treatment
Definitions
- This invention relates to the art of finishing metal surfaces and is especially concerned with the provision of an improved method for finishing ferriierous and zinciferous surfaces with a final siccative coating such as paint, varnish, lacquer, japanor the like.
- a final siccative coating such as paint, varnish, lacquer, japanor the like.
- the quality, beauty, permanence and corrosion resistance of a final siccative coating on metal surfaces depends to a largefaextent upon the manner in which the surface, of the metal is prepared prior to the time that the siccative coating is applied.
- Many methodsof pre-treatment are known to the art and most of them involve the formation of some sort ofa protective coating on the metal as a base upon which to apply the siccative finish.
- One of the more important preparatory treatments involves the application to the surface of anon-metallic crystalline phosphate coat'ng by means of suitable acid aqueous solutions which react chemically with the metal to produce the desired coat.
- suitable acid aqueous solutions which contain dissolved zinc or manganese and where this is so the resulting coating will be rich in these metals.
- Processes of this kind are very well known to, the art and need not be specifically described although they constitute one step in my improved method of finishing metal.
- the factor which is important in connection with this disclosure is that one of the non-metallic crystalline phosphate coatings must be employed in order to realize the full benefits of my invention.
- the principal objects of my invention are to improve the quality and beauty of the final siccative finish, to increase its adherence and to enhance its corrosion resistance and, in connection with the latter, the improvement afforded by my invention is so marked as to greatly minimize and, in fact, almost to eliminate completely the efiects of exposure to conditions of high humidity. In other words, with my invention all these factors are markedly improved and blis-' tering of the final finish is almost completely eliminated.
- the present invention residesin the discovery that an ammonium chromate or dichromate rinse for a crystalline phosphate coating, especially when used within certain limits of concentration, will greatly enhance the corrosion resistance and other qualities of the subsequently applied siccative coating.
- the amount of chromate per gallons of water should be between 1 and 40 ounces expressed as C103 and there must be no free chromic acid in the solution.
- the minimum pH of such a solution in distilled water lies between 4.0 and 4.5 (depending upon the amount of chromate ion used) and such a pH corresponds to that of a C. P. solution of ammonium dichromate within the recommended range. of concentration.
- the maximum pH will be in the neighborhoodof 9.1 and such a pH corresponds to a solution of ammonium chromate containing excess ammonia which does no harm.
- the solution contains, as essential ingredients, substances dehumidity which is characteristic of my invention I wish to cite the following example.
- Aplurality of metal panels where given identical phosphate coating and painting treatments, the phosphate coating being a crystalline phosphate coating where the solution employed contained dissolved zinc in the manner well understood in this art. After being phosphate coated and prior to being painted the panels were rinsed in solutions corresponding toe ounces of chromic acid per 100 gallons of 'water to which varying amounts of ammo'unium hydroxide were added so as to give an ascending series of pH values.
- the pH of the simple 'chroinic acid rinsing solution was 2.8 which corresponds to a solution of pure chromic acid at the concentration specified.
- the pHs resultingfifrom the "additions of ammonium h'yeroxide which I empioyed are shown in the fol-
- the iin'al pH of 9.1 shown in the above table corresponds to a solution of ammonium chro- .mate and ammonium hydroxide.
- the temperature of the rinsing bath is not particularly important it might be noted that, in accordance with customary practice in this art, it can be heated and it is usual to heat it to upwards of 160 F. in order to facilitate subse- 'quent drying.
- the siccative coating employed was a commercial finish which is unusually subject to blisteringin atmospheres of high humidity.
- the panels. were exposed to. an atmosphere of 95 to 100% relative humidity, the temperature being maintained at approximately 100 for four weeks after which theywere rated and the results of the rating are included in the-second column of the table.
- a rating of 1-0 is perfect andia rating of. 7 is barely passing by commercial standards.
- the concentration of 4 ounces of chromic acid .per 100 gallons of water is representative of conventional commercial rinsing practice.
- the time of treatment of the work with the final rinsing solution need only be long enough to insure thorough replacement of adhering rinse water, etc. and complete wetting of the surface with the final rinsing solution. If, as is often the case, the rinsing solution is used hot, it is generally desirable to leave the work to be rinsed in contact with the solution until it is hot enough to be readily dried. I-have found that it is rare-'- ly necessary to increase the rinsing time beyond one'minute.
- the rinsing solu'ti'on should be kept substantially free of dissolved extraneous salts, although the presence of the chromate minimizes the blistering tenden- 'cies due to the presence of small amounts of such salts. This is best done-(a) by making up the rinsing solution out of clear fresh water; (1)) by adding to the water no soluble salts except those derivable from dissolved 'chromic acid and ammonia; and '(c) by continually overflowing and/or renewing the rinsing solution to minimize contamination.
- the method which includes producing on the surface a crystalline phosphate coating by chemical reaction with the m'etaL rins- "ing the coated surface with an aqueou'ssolution containing as its essential ingredients for each gallons of solution from 1 to 40 ounces of :chromate expressed as 'CrOs and a quantity of ammonia 'suflicient to yield a pH which is high enough to preclude the presence of free chromic acid, said rinsing solution being kept substam tially free of dissolved extraneous salts, drying the rinsed surface and then applying a sicc'ative finishing "coatt'o the dry surface.
Description
Patented Apr. 7, 1:953
AMMONIUM CHROMATE RINSE FOR PHOS PHATE COATED METAL SURFACES H Harry J. Benzing, Devon, Pa., assignor to Ameri- I can Chemical Paint Company, Ambler, Pa... a
corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application June 21, 1950,
Serial No. 169,517
2 Claims. (01. 148-6.16)
This invention relates to the art of finishing metal surfaces and is especially concerned with the provision of an improved method for finishing ferriierous and zinciferous surfaces with a final siccative coating such as paint, varnish, lacquer, japanor the like. As is well known in the art the quality, beauty, permanence and corrosion resistance of a final siccative coating on metal surfaces depends to a largefaextent upon the manner in which the surface, of the metal is prepared prior to the time that the siccative coating is applied. Many methodsof pre-treatment are known to the art and most of them involve the formation of some sort ofa protective coating on the metal as a base upon which to apply the siccative finish. One of the more important preparatory treatments involves the application to the surface of anon-metallic crystalline phosphate coat'ng by means of suitable acid aqueous solutions which react chemically with the metal to produce the desired coat. Typical of these are acid aqueous solutions which contain dissolved zinc or manganese and where this is so the resulting coating will be rich in these metals. Processes of this kind, as indicated above, are very well known to, the art and need not be specifically described although they constitute one step in my improved method of finishing metal. The factor which is important in connection with this disclosure is that one of the non-metallic crystalline phosphate coatings must be employed in order to realize the full benefits of my invention.
The principal objects of my invention are to improve the quality and beauty of the final siccative finish, to increase its adherence and to enhance its corrosion resistance and, in connection with the latter, the improvement afforded by my invention is so marked as to greatly minimize and, in fact, almost to eliminate completely the efiects of exposure to conditions of high humidity. In other words, with my invention all these factors are markedly improved and blis-' tering of the final finish is almost completely eliminated.
Byway of background and in order to fully appreciate the nature of my invention it should 2 coating and to the extent that this takesplace, naturally the corrosion resistance and quality of the final siccative finish will be impaired, This difficulty is particularly true of those coatings which are rich in zinc or manganese. For instance, in commercial practice, when using the customary chromic acid rinses, as much as fifty percent (50%) of the phosphate coating may be dissolvedlfrom the surface of the metal duringthe rinsing step. Therefore, ;whenusing chromic acid rinses, one is confronted with a paradox, namely, that while it is desirable to leave as much chromate as possible on the surface of the crystalline phosphate so as to secure greater resistance to underi-film corrosionv yet at the same time the actioni'of the chromic acid tends to remove a portion of the important chrystalline phosphate base and the greater the increase in the concentration of the chromic acid rinsing solution employed the greater will be the quantity of the crystalline phosphate coating which will be removed. As a practical, matter, therefore, it has been impossible to use. rinsing solutions which are strong in chromic acid much as that might appear to be desirable from theoretical considerations. 7
Another prior practice has been. to treat the crystalline phosphate coating with solutions of sodium or other dichromates but, Where. the treated surface is to be given a final siccative finish, it has been impractical to employ such dichromate rinses because they have beenfound to stimulate the formation of blisters as well as to markedly lower the adherence of the siccative coating. i
The present invention residesin the discovery that an ammonium chromate or dichromate rinse for a crystalline phosphate coating, especially when used within certain limits of concentration, will greatly enhance the corrosion resistance and other qualities of the subsequently applied siccative coating. 'For best results the amount of chromate per gallons of water should be between 1 and 40 ounces expressed as C103 and there must be no free chromic acid in the solution. The minimum pH of such a solution in distilled water lies between 4.0 and 4.5 (depending upon the amount of chromate ion used) and such a pH corresponds to that of a C. P. solution of ammonium dichromate within the recommended range. of concentration. 1 The maximum pH will be in the neighborhoodof 9.1 and such a pH corresponds to a solution of ammonium chromate containing excess ammonia which does no harm. In any case the solution contains, as essential ingredients, substances dehumidity which is characteristic of my invention I wish to cite the following example. Aplurality of metal panels where given identical phosphate coating and painting treatments, the phosphate coating being a crystalline phosphate coating where the solution employed contained dissolved zinc in the manner well understood in this art. After being phosphate coated and prior to being painted the panels were rinsed in solutions corresponding toe ounces of chromic acid per 100 gallons of 'water to which varying amounts of ammo'unium hydroxide were added so as to give an ascending series of pH values. The pH of the simple 'chroinic acid rinsing solution was 2.8 which corresponds to a solution of pure chromic acid at the concentration specified. The pHs resultingfifrom the "additions of ammonium h'yeroxide which I empioyed are shown in the fol- The iin'al pH of 9.1 shown in the above table corresponds to a solution of ammonium chro- .mate and ammonium hydroxide.
While the temperature of the rinsing bath is not particularly important it might be noted that, in accordance with customary practice in this art, it can be heated and it is usual to heat it to upwards of 160 F. in order to facilitate subse- 'quent drying.
The siccative coating employed was a commercial finish which is unusually subject to blisteringin atmospheres of high humidity. After the pho'sphates coating treatment and the rinsing treatment in this series of rinsing solutions the panels. were exposed to. an atmosphere of 95 to 100% relative humidity, the temperature being maintained at approximately 100 for four weeks after which theywere rated and the results of the rating are included in the-second column of the table. In this latter connectionit should be noted that a rating of 1-0 is perfect andia rating of. 7 is barely passing by commercial standards. The concentration of 4 ounces of chromic acid .per 100 gallons of water is representative of conventional commercial rinsing practice.
The. foregoing tests clearly demonstrate the improved resultsv which "can be secured by the process of my invention insofar as resistance to humidity bliste'ring. is concerned which, of course, ista very importantiindex to the value of the invention. In addition I wish to cite the improve:- m'entin result. which. ispossible as measured by a 'standard salt fog't'est: A series of panels which were prepared in accordance with the method I have disclosed (i. e., panels which were phosphate coated with a coating rich in zinc and then rinsed, dried and painted with a commercial finish), were scribed and exposed for a period of two weeks to the atmosphere in *a standard salt fog "cabinet. The results, insofar as salt spray scratch failure is concerned, were compared with that which occurred on panels that were given a conventional chromic acid rinse and showed a twenty-one percent (21%) lower salt spray scratch failure record which is a marked improvement over prior practice.
The time of treatment of the work with the final rinsing solution need only be long enough to insure thorough replacement of adhering rinse water, etc. and complete wetting of the surface with the final rinsing solution. If, as is often the case, the rinsing solution is used hot, it is generally desirable to leave the work to be rinsed in contact with the solution until it is hot enough to be readily dried. I-have found that it is rare-'- ly necessary to increase the rinsing time beyond one'minute.
Furthermore, as is customary with the chromic acid rinses of the prior art the rinsing solu'ti'on should be kept substantially free of dissolved extraneous salts, although the presence of the chromate minimizes the blistering tenden- 'cies due to the presence of small amounts of such salts. This is best done-(a) by making up the rinsing solution out of clear fresh water; (1)) by adding to the water no soluble salts except those derivable from dissolved 'chromic acid and ammonia; and '(c) by continually overflowing and/or renewing the rinsing solution to minimize contamination.
I claim:
1.. In the art of finishing ferriferous and zinciferous metal surfaces, the method which includes producing on the surface a crystalline phosphate coating by chemical reaction with the m'etaL rins- "ing the coated surface with an aqueou'ssolution containing as its essential ingredients for each gallons of solution from 1 to 40 ounces of :chromate expressed as 'CrOs and a quantity of ammonia 'suflicient to yield a pH which is high enough to preclude the presence of free chromic acid, said rinsing solution being kept substam tially free of dissolved extraneous salts, drying the rinsed surface and then applying a sicc'ative finishing "coatt'o the dry surface.
-2. The process of claim 1 where the phosphate coating isrich in metal from the class of zinc and manganese.
J. BENZING.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS umber Name "Date 2,24550'9 Ronlig i June 17, 1941 2,312,855 Thompson Mar. -'2, 1943 2,500,915 Tanner s Man 13, 1950 2,563,431 {spruance Aug. *7, 19'51 FOREIGN PATENTS Number Country Date
Claims (1)
1. IN THE ART OF FINISHING FERRIFEROUS AND ZINCIFEROUS METAL SURFACES, THE METHOD WHICH INCLUDES PRODUCING ON THE SURFACE A CRYSTALLINE PHOSPHATE COATING BY CHEMICAL REACTION WITH THE METAL, RINSING THE COATED SURFACE WITH AN AQUEOUS SOLUTION CONTAINING AS ITS ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS FOR EACH 100 GALLONS OF SOLUTION FROM 1 TO 40 OUNCES OF CHROMATE EXPRESSED AS CRO3 AND A QUANTITY OF AMMONIA SUFFICIENT TO YIELD A PH WHICH IS HIGH ENOUGH TO PRECLUDE THE PRESENCE OF FREE CHROMIC ACID, SAID RINSING SOLUTION BEING KEPT SUBSTANTIALLY FREE OF DISSOLVED EXTRANEOUS SALTS, DRYING THE RINSED SURFACE AND THEN APPLYING A SICCATIVE FINISHING COAT TO THE DRY SURFACE.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US169517A US2634225A (en) | 1950-06-21 | 1950-06-21 | Ammonium chromate rinse for phosphate coated metal surfaces |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US169517A US2634225A (en) | 1950-06-21 | 1950-06-21 | Ammonium chromate rinse for phosphate coated metal surfaces |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US2634225A true US2634225A (en) | 1953-04-07 |
Family
ID=22616031
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US169517A Expired - Lifetime US2634225A (en) | 1950-06-21 | 1950-06-21 | Ammonium chromate rinse for phosphate coated metal surfaces |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US2634225A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3104177A (en) * | 1961-12-12 | 1963-09-17 | Lubrizol Corp | Phosphating process |
US3245841A (en) * | 1961-08-31 | 1966-04-12 | Clarke Sydney George | Production of iron powder having high electrical resistivity |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2245609A (en) * | 1940-03-07 | 1941-06-17 | American Chem Paint Co | Metal finishing process |
DE727194C (en) * | 1938-05-11 | 1942-10-28 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | Manufacture of phosphate coatings, especially on iron and steel |
US2312855A (en) * | 1940-09-07 | 1943-03-02 | Parker Rust Proof Co | Method of coating aluminum |
US2500915A (en) * | 1942-10-17 | 1950-03-14 | Parker Rust Proof Co | Method of producing ferrous sheet for manufacturing receptacles |
US2563431A (en) * | 1951-08-07 | Method of improving the resistance |
-
1950
- 1950-06-21 US US169517A patent/US2634225A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2563431A (en) * | 1951-08-07 | Method of improving the resistance | ||
DE727194C (en) * | 1938-05-11 | 1942-10-28 | Metallgesellschaft Ag | Manufacture of phosphate coatings, especially on iron and steel |
US2245609A (en) * | 1940-03-07 | 1941-06-17 | American Chem Paint Co | Metal finishing process |
US2312855A (en) * | 1940-09-07 | 1943-03-02 | Parker Rust Proof Co | Method of coating aluminum |
US2500915A (en) * | 1942-10-17 | 1950-03-14 | Parker Rust Proof Co | Method of producing ferrous sheet for manufacturing receptacles |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3245841A (en) * | 1961-08-31 | 1966-04-12 | Clarke Sydney George | Production of iron powder having high electrical resistivity |
US3104177A (en) * | 1961-12-12 | 1963-09-17 | Lubrizol Corp | Phosphating process |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3895970A (en) | Sealing rinse for phosphate coatings of metal | |
DE977586C (en) | Process for the production of coatings on aluminum and its alloys | |
DE60110470T2 (en) | Corrosion protection coatings for aluminum and aluminum alloys | |
US2796370A (en) | Composition and method for producing corrosion resistant protective coating on aluminum and aluminum alloys | |
US4539051A (en) | Process for producing phosphate coatings | |
EP0187917B1 (en) | Process for improving the protection against corrosion of resin layers autophoretically deposited on metal surfaces | |
US3876435A (en) | Chromate conversion coating solutions having chloride, sulfate, and nitrate anions | |
US4311535A (en) | Composition for forming zinc phosphate coating over metal surface | |
US2678291A (en) | Method of and materials for producing coated aluminum | |
US3501352A (en) | Composition and method for treating zinc surfaces | |
US2329065A (en) | Corrosion resistant coating for metal surfaces | |
DE2446492A1 (en) | PROCESS FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF ALUMINUM AND ALUMINUM ALLOYS | |
US2563431A (en) | Method of improving the resistance | |
US2121574A (en) | Art of coating zinc | |
US3957543A (en) | Method for rinsing a conversion coated metal surface | |
DE2406411A1 (en) | PROCESS FOR INCREASING THE CORROSION RESISTANCE OF METALS | |
DE3245411C2 (en) | ||
US3720547A (en) | Permanganate final rinse for metal coatings | |
US3454483A (en) | Electrodeposition process with pretreatment in zinc phosphate solution containing fluoride | |
US3404046A (en) | Chromating of zinc and aluminum and composition therefor | |
EP0486576B1 (en) | Process for producing manganese-containing zinc phosphate coatings on galvanized steel | |
US3664887A (en) | Process for increasing corrosion resistance of conversion coated metal | |
US3032435A (en) | Process for improving the corrosion resistance of pieces of light metals and light metal alloys | |
US2634225A (en) | Ammonium chromate rinse for phosphate coated metal surfaces | |
US2563430A (en) | Method op improving the resistance |