US2600461A

US2600461A - Shoe sole composition

Info

Publication number: US2600461A
Application number: US82022A
Authority: US
Inventors: Cecil F Backus
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1949-03-17
Filing date: 1949-03-17
Publication date: 1952-06-17
Anticipated expiration: 1969-06-17

Description

Patented June 17, 1952 SHOE SOLE COMPOSITION Cecil F. Backus, Wilmington, Del.

No Drawing. Application March 17, 1949, Serial No. 82,022

4 Claims.

This invention pertains to a moldable, selfadherent, and durable coating composition and to a method for preparing the same. For illustrative purposes only, the invention will be particularly described as utilized in connection with the heeling and soling of shoes although it is obviously not limited thereto. This application is a continuation-in-part of application, Serial No. 58,361, filed November 4, 1948, now abandoned.

In addition to leather, many compositions have been proposed for use in the soling of shoes. These compositions have usually employed rubbeer or other synthetic materials, or mixtures of these as base materials. To these base compositions different types of fillers have also been added in varying concentrations. The type and quantity of filler used is largely dependent on the wearability and flexibility ultimately desired in the finished sole.

These compositions, however, are manufactured in sheet or board form and must be cut to size by the skilled shoe worker or repairman when repairing shoes. In some instances, these soles are stamped or pressed in different shoe sole and heel sizes at the plant thus relieving the worker of some waste and the extended cutting step.

Before the sole, either composition or leather, is placed on the shoe bottom, a binder is generally applied to the shoe bottom or sole to secure the two together. This binder may take the form of an adhesive and its use may require the application of heat and pressure to insure a good bond. Where the sole is of a thermo-plastic nature, the step of vulcanization may be required. Furthermore, where vulcanization or gluing is not suitable, it is usual to rivet, nail, sew, or by similar mechanical means secure the sole to the shoe bottom.

- Thus, it is apparent that in the process of soling shoes there has'existed for some time the step of cutting or stamping, etc., the sole material before it can be placed on the shoe bottom requiring skilled workmanship with the further requirement of an additional material, and very possibly an additional step being needed to secure the sole to the shoe bottom.

It is, therefore, an object of this invention to provide a moldable, self-adherent and durable coating composition.

It is another object of this invention to provide a shoe sole composition that may be shaped without cutting or stamping and may be secured to shoe bottoms without the need of adhesives, heat, pressure, or mechanical attaching means.

It is still another obj ct of this invention to 2 provide a method for making a shoe sole composition characterized by the fact that it can be directly applied to shoe bottoms and shaped without cutting or stamping and without the necessity of employing adhesives, heat, pressure, or

vide a method for applying a shoe sole composition to a shoe bottom without the necessity of cutting or stamping the material or of applying heat, pressure, adhesives, or mechanical securing means.

It has now been found that polymerized ohlorov 2-butadiene-1,3 of the AC type, when milled for a determinable period of time breaks down and can be readily dissolved in a volatile, hydrocarbon-type solvent and, on the addition of a filler, and preferably a resin, which are thoroughly mixed therewith, forms a moldable, shoe sole composition. This semi-plastic composition can then be applied by unskilled persons by means of a spatula to a cleaned, dry and roughened shoe bottom, and on drying by the evaporation of the solvent forms a self-adherent, tough, long-wearing shoe sole.

This polymerized chloro2-butadiene-1,3 of the AC type as manufactured by the Du Pont Company, hereinafter called neoprene, should conform to A. S. T. M. requirements as shown in their specification entitled Tentative method of test for plasticity and recovery of rubber and rubberlike materials by the parallel plate plastometer, A. S. T. M.D92647T, with plasticity numbers (readings made in millimeters) of 302 to 37'? and recovery numbers of 38 to 53 at C. and 3 minutes. The neoprene has a specific gravity of about 1.23, and it can contain traces of iron compounds, some soap or antioxidants such as are Well known'to those skilled in the art.

If about 1 pounds of this neoprene are milled on a two roll, water-cooled, 12 inch rubber mill for less than about 10 minutes, however, or not at all, the neoprene swells in the hydrocarbon 'solvent and will not readily go into solution to form a composition that can be used for soles. On the other hand, if the neoprene is milled for over 30 minutes, it has been found that the resulting composition has become too soft and sticky, and 7 due to too much flow it lacks the quality of re-' taining its shape when applied to shoe bottoms and on evaporation of the solvent. A milling 3 period of from about to about 30 minutes has been found to give very satisfactory results. The shoe sole composition made with this milled neoprene after being applied to the shoe bottom and an evaporation of the solvent is adhesive and does not exhibit any tendency to cold flow. Excellent shoe sole compositions have been obtained when using neoprene milled for about twenty minutes. The plasticity numbers of this milled neoprene should be from about 280 to 355 at 80 C.

Although it has been shown above that the plasticity numbers for the neoprene before milling are from about 302 to about 377, the unmilled neoprene lacks adhesive properties, its molecular structure is such that it will gel in the'solvent'; or it will not properly go into solution until it has been milled for about 10 to 30 minutes. Fur-'- of rubber milling machines than thatdisclosed above and where the rollers are very closely positioned together and operated atdifierent speeds so that the rubber is crushed and rubbed rather than rolled around. It is, of course, obvious to those skilled in the art that when milling on other machines, the time will vary somewhat from'the above depending on the sizeof the rubber'mill, the quantity of neoprene, the speed of the rolls, the temperature, the spacing between the rolls, etc. For example, it will take from 40 to 90 minutes to obtain sufficient milling on a 60 inch mill, toresult in a milled'neoprene havin the above desirable properties as represented by its plasticity numbers of from 285 to 355. From to minutes is required on a 30inch mill. A refiner, i. e., a mill where one roll is usually larger than the other and which is generally usedin the rubber reclaimingindustry, canlikewise be employed to mill the neoprene.

After milling, the neoprene is dissolved in a suitable hydrocarbon solvent. This-can be conveniently accomplished by adding the solvent to the milled neoprene in a cement churn,- or dough or paddle-type mixer. The milled neoprene can be grated, chopped, ground or otherwise finely divided in order to facilitate dissolving it in the solution. This can be obtained by first freezing or chillin the neoprene followed-by frictional disintegration, etc. The time requiredto mix and dissolve the neoprene will vary fromabout two to about five hours depending on the quantities of neoprene and solvent used. About three hours mixing time at room temperature isusually sufficient to dissolve the milled neoprene.

It has been found that from about 20 to about 28% by weight of the milled neoprene in the hy-- drocarbon solvent results in an excellent base composition. Expressed in another way, there can be from 100 parts by weight of the dry,:milld neoprene to from 250 to 400 parts by weight of the hydrocarbon solvent. provides good results is prepared by mixing from to parts by volume of toluene with from 6i) to 4.0 parts by volume of gasoline. The primary function of the toluene is to dissolve the milled neoprene while the primary functionof the gasoline is to promote evaporation. Benzene or xylene may be substituted for the toluene, and in place of the gasoline, heptane, hexane, orpentaneca-n be used: It is; of course, obvious to these A solvent. solution which:

i skilled in the art that many other hydrocarbon solvent can be utilized in this invention besides the ones listed above.

While this process provides a shoe sole composition that is applied to shoes without the necessity of vulcanizing, heating, using pressure, adhesives or mechanical securing means and which, of itself, is strongly adherent to the shoe bottom, certain specific resinous materials may be added to the composition, if found desirable, to improve somewhat the initial tack and bond strength of the resulting composition. These materials include wood rosin derivatives (such as hydrogenated methyl abictate) rosin ester derivatives such as staybelite ester (polyhydric alcohol ester of hydrogenated rosin) or ester gum (glycerol ester of rosin), phenol-formaldehyde resins, resorclnol-iormaldehyde resins, coumarone indene resins, etc. They are generally added to the neoprene solution prior to the addition of the filler in the proportion of about 1 to 10 partsbyweight of the resin to about parts by weight of the dry neoprene.

When: the milled neoprene has completely disi solved in the solvent, and after the resinous materials have been added thereto, a, filler is thenmilled on the rubber mill, and, thus, the time of preparation ofthe shoe sole composition can be easily, reduced. The ratio'of filler to neoprene is from 30 to 70 arts by weight of filler to 100 parts by-weight of dry neoprene. If the composition contains more than 70 parts of filler, itis tooviscous to'handle readily and adherence is poor whileless than 30 parts of filler results in less strength, poor wearing qualities, and-slow drying.

At least eo% by weight of this filler must be fibrous in order to obtain satisfactory product. The fibrous filler aids in shaping the-sole when using a spatula or similar tool, improves the wearability of the resulting sole, andpromotesevaporation of the solvent. An example of a suitable fibrous filler-is leather fiber; or, amixture of leather fibers and cotton fibers may be advantageously used, the cotton fibers havin lengths of from 0.060 inch to 0.25 inch. The cotton and leather fibers can be mixedin any proportion, although it is preferred to mix themin the ratio of from about 25to 75 parts .by weight of. leather to from about 75 to 25 parts by Weight ofcotton. Other suitable organic and'mineral-fillers, having good abrasive and wear. qualities can beadded in amounts up to 60% by weight of the total filler material in the neoprene solution. These additional fillers can be added singly or mixed together and include rock wool, clay, hydrated calcium silicate, carbon black, metallic particles, cellulose flock, Woodflour, ground cork, nut shell meal or flour, leather dust; leather blocks or particles, hard rubber dust, Vinylite or styrene-endothersynthetic or resinous dusts, .woodfiberandsym thetic yarn fiber -(viscose: rayon-or cellulose acetate) At the time thefiller; is added to thesolutionin the mixer, a small amount of dispersingagent can also be added to reduce the overall'mixingttime. From about /2 to about 5 parts by weight-of'lignin per 100 parts by weight of the dry neopreneis an excellent material for thispurpose;

The neoprene in the composition can liberate small amounts ,of hydrochloric acidduring stor.--

fore, desirable in some cases to add acid acceptors to the composition. For this purpose about four parts of calcined magnesia and about five parts of zinc oxide per 100 parts of the dry neoprene can be used.

To change the color of the composition small amounts of organic and inorganic dyes such as are well known to those skilled in the art may likewise be added to the composition.

The shoe sole composition can now be readily applied by unskilled persons at home to a shoe bottom which has been roughened, cleaned and dried. It is preferred to first rub some of the composition over the entire surface of the prepared shoe bottom. This thin layer doesnot have to thoroughly dry. Then a spatula, dipped in water to prevent the adherence of the composition to it, can be used to apply a thick coating of the composition to the shoe bottom. In place of a spatula, it is obvious that a knife or other simple tool can be employed. As soon as a skim coat has formed on the surface of the thick coating, the coatingcan be shaped by means of the spatula to conform to the configuration of the shoe bottom. Alternatively, the coating can be shaped before the skim coat forms by using the spatula which has been dipped in water. After applying the composition sole, the shoes are placed with their soles up in order to dry. Thick coats on soles take about 48 hours to dry. Thin 1% inch to inch thick. By applying successive.

coats a substantially non=porous, water-proof, adherent sole of the desired shape and dimensions can be obtained.

This neoprene shoe sole composition containing a volatile solvent and a filler has excellent keeping qualities if suitably packaged so that the solvent will not readily evaporate. The material does not need to be used immediately after compounding as no polymerization or other adverse reactions set in. Packaged in commercially available screw cap containers or other scalable containers having metal surfaces of tin, aluminum or glass which do not cause deterioration of the neoprene, it will maintain its semiplastic condition for extended periods of time, and can be used as required to cover shoe bottoms. Where iron containers are used, the composition may discolor over a period of time. The introduction of certain ingredients like zinc oxide or calcium silicate in an amount of about 5 parts per 100 parts of dry neoprene will serve to prevent this discoloration. Magnesium oxide in an amount up to four parts per 100 parts of dry neoprene will also serve to improve the stability of the composition.

The following example will serve to illustrate the invention with more particularity:

parts by weight (about 1.5 pounds) of neoprene was milled for 20 minutes on a 6 x 12 inch, 2-roll rubber mill having a clearance between rollers of approximately 0.030". The speed of the front roll was 18 R. P. M. while the speed of the rear roll was 26 R. P. M. The gear ratio was thus about 1.4. The rolls were cooled by circulating water through them. After mill- 6. ing, the neoprene was removed from the mill and dissolved in '75 parts by weight of a hydrocarbon solvent composed of 40% of toluene and 60% of gasoline. To this solution was then added 15 parts by weight of leather fibers and 1.3 parts by weight of coumarone-indene resin,

both based on the dry weight of the neoprene. The mix was then thoroughly stirred and the resulting, semi-solid, or plastic mass was applied by means of a spatula to a clean, dry, roughened shoe bottom to form a soleabout thick without the use of any heat, pressure, adhesives, etc. After an air drying period of about 48 hours, the

composition shoe sole was tested and its adher 1 once and wearability were found to be excellent.

The precise chemical or physical reactions which occur in this novel process, to result in such a tightly adherent shoe sole composition, are not clearly understood. It is thought, however, that by milling polymerized chIOro-Z-butadiene-IB' which will go into solution and form a composition having excellent adhesive properties. Furthermore, milling changes the viscosity of the solution of neoprene. For example, a solution of an unmilled neoprene having a plasticity number-of 830 will have a viscosity of 1 to 1 minutes while a solution of a milled neoprene of the same plasticity will have a viscosity of to minute as shown by the Modified Gardner- Holdt test. The dissolution of neoprene in the solvent also seems to facilitate, on the addition of the fibrous filler, an intimate association, dispersion or mixture. These finely divided particles on drying appear to form a strong neo= prene-to-fiber bond giving exceptionally good tensile strength. Furthermore, since the neoprene appears to have been reduced in molecular size or changed in molecular structure, it readily penetrates the fibrous leather surface of the shoe bottom permittinggreat adherence of the neoprene with the shoe bottom. It is also believed that the increased density of the mass resulting from this intimate association of fine particles renders the composition hard and durable as well as adherent and substantially nonporous. Such porosity as may exist in the dried coating is in the form of microscopic air pockets which are probably unconnected, for the dried coating is actually not only water-resistant but.

water-proof.

This neoprene shoe sole composition can be applied to heels as well as to shoe bottoms. It will also adhere to the soles of shoes where the sole is firmly attached to the shoe bottom and is in good condition, thereby, eliminating the need of removing the old shoe sole. It also adheres readily to previous soles of this composition. It may also be used-to cover the sides or uppers of the shoe to render them water-proof. Likewise, the soling composition can be employed to coat other composition soles or rubber soles as found in slippers, boots, rubbers, galoshes, etc. By roughening, cleaning, and drying the bottom, the soling composition is easily placed thereon and adheres as satisfactorily as when placed on leather bottoms. In the case of rubber articles, it is believed that the solvent in the soling composition 7 partially dissolves the rubber on the surface of the galosh or rubber forming a strong bond at the interface between the old rubber surface and the new composition sole.

To determine the flexibility and resistance to abrasion of the shoe sole composition, samples were prepared having a weight and density approximately that of leather. Several thin dried sheets'of the composition about /5 to thick, which were slightly porous, were placed together, heated to 150 F. and pressed together in a press operating at pressure of 500 lbs. sq. .in. The resulting samples in the form of strips 1" x 6" 1x 1%" were compared with oak tan leather strips of the'same dimensions in a Ross Flexer. Both the leather and the composition sole material would take from 10,000 to 30,000 flexes before a 0.5 :inch cracking was observed. The abrasion resistance was determined by ASTM D--39437, method B. The National Bureau of Standards type of abrader was used. 0.1 inch of leather was removed in from 100 to 250 revolutionswhile 0.1 inch of the sample of composition material was removed in from 100 to 200 revolutions.

In summary, it will be apparent that there has been disclosed a novel method of preparing a shoe sole composition which will satisfactorily adhere to shoe bottoms without the necessity of usin adhesives, heat, pressure, etc. This composition has been made'possible by the discovery that,

if neoprene of a certain special type, as heretofore described, is milled for a period of about 10 minutes but not more than about minutes on a 12" mill, it has been placed in a very excellent physical condition for ultimately forming a composition with a fibrous filler material that will suitably adhere to shoe bottoms. This invention, thus,provides a novel, easy and inexpensive process for making or repairing shoe bottoms; utilizing a moldable and self -adherent composition, and eliminating the former steps of cutting or prestamping soles before applying them to shoe bottoms, as well as the need for binding materials or operations or for skilled workmanship.

It is to be understood that while the invention has been described with particular emphasis on the 'heeling and. soling of shoes, it is quite ob-.

vious that the composition and its method of application described herein have a great many other useful applications. For example, the novel composition can find many uses where a tough, moldable, and self-adherent coating material is required. It can readily be used to repair leather goods such as suitcases and briefcases or canvas articles such as tents and awnings, etc.

What is claimed is:

1. A coating composition for spreading with a spatula 'or'the like and having good adhesive and drying properties, and flexibility together with high resistance to cold-flow and wear in the dry condition, comprising 100 parts milled polychloro-Z-butadiene 1,3 substantially insoluble in hydrocarbon solvent prior to milling and alone having optimum stickiness and a plasticity within the approximate ASTM number range of 230 to 355 based on a temperature of 80- C. and said polymer being dissolved in'about 250 to 400 parts by weight of a hydrocarbon'solvent, 1 to 10 parts of an initial tack and bond strength improving resin of the group consisting of wood rosin derivatives, phenol-formaldehyde resins and coumarone-indene resin, and about 30 to parts by weight filler of which at least about 40% is made up of fibers.

2. A coating composition as'defined in claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon solvent consists of from 40 to 60 parts by volume of toluene and from 60 to 40 parts by volume of gasoline.

3. The coating composition of claim 1 wherein said filler is made up of at least 40% leather fibers.

4. A coating composition for spreading with a spatula or the like and having good adhesive and. drying properties, and flexibility together with high resistance to cold-flow and wear in the dry condition, comprising 25 parts milled polychloro-2-butadiene 1,3 substantially insoluble in hydrocarbon solvent prior to milling and alone having optimum stickiness and a plasticity within the approximate ASTM number range of 280 to 355 based on a temperature of 80 C. and said polymer being dissolved in about parts by weight of a hydrocarbon solvent, about 1.3 parts by weight of a coumarone-indene resin and about 15 parts by weight of leather fibers.

CECIL F. BACKUS.

REFERENCES CETED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 1,640,948 Loomis et al Aug. 30, 1927 1,786,907 Geppert Dec. 30, 1930 2,163,609 MacDonald June 27, 1939 2,332,000 Murray Oct. 19, 1943 2,367,481 Burger Jan. 16, 1945 2,376,854 Saunders May 22, 194.5 2,431,001 Sullivan Nov. 18, 1947 OTHER REFERENCES Neoprene Type AC, Report 48-3, June 1948, pp. 3 to 7 and 15, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware.

Claims

1. A COATING COMPOSITION FOR SPREADING WITH A SPATULA OR THE LIKE AND HAVING GOOD ADHESIVE AND DRYING PROPERTIES, AND FLEXIBILITY TOGETHER WITH HIGH RESISTANCE TO COLD-FLOW AND WEAR IN THE DRY CONDITION, COMPRISING 100 PARTS MILLED POLYCHLORO-2-BUTADIENE 1,3 SUBSTANTIALLY INSOLUBLE IN HYDROCARBON SOLVENT PRIOR TO MILLING AND ALONE HAVING OPTIMUM STICKINESS AND A PLASTICITY WITHIN THE APPROXIMATE ASTM NUMBER RANGE OF 280 TO 355 BASED ON A TEMPERATURE OF 80* C. AND SAID POLYMER BEING DISSOLVED IN ABOUT 250 TO 400 PARTS BY WEIGHT OF A HYDROCARBON SOLVENT, 1 TO 10 PARTS OF AN INITIAL TACK AND BOND STRENGTH IMPROVING RESIN OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF WOOD ROSIN DERRIVATIVES, PHENOL-FORMALDEHYDE RESINS AND COUMARONE-INDENE RESIN, AND ABOUT 30 TO 70 PARTS BY WEIGHT FILLER OF WHICH AT LEAST ABOUT 40% IS MADE UP OF FIBERS.