US2553330A - Hot workable alloy - Google Patents

Hot workable alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2553330A
US2553330A US194577A US19457750A US2553330A US 2553330 A US2553330 A US 2553330A US 194577 A US194577 A US 194577A US 19457750 A US19457750 A US 19457750A US 2553330 A US2553330 A US 2553330A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
nil
cerium
per cent
lanthanum
nickel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US194577A
Inventor
Carl B Post
Donald G Schoffstall
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Carpenter Steel Co
Original Assignee
Carpenter Steel Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carpenter Steel Co filed Critical Carpenter Steel Co
Priority to US194577A priority Critical patent/US2553330A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2553330A publication Critical patent/US2553330A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/52Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with cobalt
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05BELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B3/00Ohmic-resistance heating
    • H05B3/10Heater elements characterised by the composition or nature of the materials or by the arrangement of the conductor

Definitions

  • This invention relates to alloys, including ferrous alloys, containing nickel and at least one of the elements chromium, molybdenum and tungsten, from nil to 0.50% of carbon and ranges of proportions from nil to the approximate amount stated of one or more other elements as hereinafter described.
  • Such alloys have one or more of the following valuable properties which include corrosion resistance, resistance to attack by acids including sulphuric, nitric and hydrochloric acids, high strength at high temperatures, resistance to sealing and creep at high temperatures and other valuable properties. Those properties are important in numerous applications such as acid resistant equipment in the chemical and other industries, heat resistant baffles and shields, heat resistant parts” for jet and turbo-jet aeroplanes, and heat and corrosion-resistant valves for internal combustion engines.
  • Chromium imparts resistance to chemical attack in the presence of specific media and resistance to oxidation.
  • Nickel imparts resistance to reducin media and in alloys containing iron promotes the formation of austenite of varying degrees of stability.
  • Carbon imparts considerable strength at room and elevated temperatures, in alloys containing iron and/or nickel as the base element.
  • Cobalt imparts considerable strength at room and elevated temperatures.
  • Molybdenum and tungsten increase the resistance to creep at elevated temperatures and increase the strength at room and elevated temperatures.
  • Molybdenum especially in the chromium-nickel stainless steels, increases the resistance to pitting which may occur in chloride and other salt solutions.
  • Molybdenum in nickel alloys markedly increases the resistance to reducing acids such as hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids.
  • Chromium, molybdenum and tungsten have the common effect of closing the gamma-loop in alloys containing nickel and iron as the base components. This common effect is especially important in questions relating to hot workability, and this will be apparent in the alloys to be discussed later.
  • Nitrogen is used to increase strength at room and elevated temperatures without impairing corrosion resistance.
  • Silicon increases the general oxidation resistance as well as resistance to the corrosive effects of acid, for example weak solutions of H280. or IE1.
  • Manganese has an effect similar to nickel but is much less effective.
  • Columbium, titanium and tantalum are used where intergranular stabilization is required. They are used to combine with carbon to form Serial No. 194,577
  • carbides i. e., columbium carbide, titanium carbide and tantalum carbide and thus prevent the phenomenon known as intergranular corrosion.
  • the proportions of these elements by weight to combine with carbon and form the corresponding carbides are usually taken as follows: in the case of columbium, 10 times the carbon content, in the case of titanium, 5 times the carbon content, and in the case of tantalum, 20 times the carbon content. They may be used singly or together.
  • Vanadium is a carbide and nitride former but is not as potent as columbium, titanium or tantalum in fixing the carbides.
  • Elements such as aluminum, zirconium, beryllium and boron are also used in varying proportions, for purposes known in the art.
  • aluminum can be used as an adjunct with chromium in some alloys to increase resistance to scale formation at high temperatures.
  • Beryllium and boron can be used to impart agehardening tendencies to austenitic alloys.
  • Zirconium can be used to fix the nitrogen in stainless steels and also serves a useful purpose in fixin the sulfur content into discrete particles for free-machining purposes:
  • the alloys of this example can be satisfactorily cast but cannot be hot worked, and when hot working is attempted on such alloys the resulting bars are so badly torn and cracked as to make them unusable.
  • lanthanum means not only lanthanum per se but also all of the rare earth components of misch metal with the exception of cerium. These rare earth metals with the exception of cerium include lanthanum as the greater percentage, neodymium and similar elements in smaller percentages.
  • the nickel content of any of the alloys of this invention determines the minimum and maximum allowable ranges of cerium and/ or lanthanum which will promote hot workability.
  • a minimum content of cerium and/or lanthanum is required to obtain hot workability where it does not exist and to improve hot workability where it already exists in some degree and where improvement is desirable.
  • too much cerium and/or lanthanum produces the opposite effect, and if the critical maximum proportion thereof for an alloy having a given nickel content is exceeded, the hot workability is impaired.
  • the allowable range of cerium and/or lanthanum which can be used to promote hot workability is narrowed, as shown by the following table:
  • Per Cent Cerium Per Cent Nickel and Lgmthanulm 4 about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 1:05 about 0.02 to 0.00 about 0.02 to 0.75 about 0.02 to 0.60 50. about 0.02 to 0.45 60 about 0.02 to 0.30 70 about 0.02 to 0.1 5
  • narrower critical ranges of the cerium substance may be necessary because of the efiect of relatively large said group not exceeding 30 per cent, 4 to 70 per cent of nickel, and a substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
  • the minimum proportion thereof is about 10 per cent but where more than one are used, the minimum proportion of any one is 1 per cent, provided the sum of two or more thereof is about 10 per cent.
  • Nil to 0.50 At least one element of the group consisting of chromium, molybdenum and tungsten The amount of any individual element of said group not exceeding 30 percent Nickel 4 to '70 Copper Nil to about 10 Nitrogen. Nil to about 0.30 Cobalt Nil to about 40 Manganese Nil to about 20 Silicon Nil to about 4 At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Nil to about 8 Titanium Nil to about 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
  • Per Cent said Per Cent Nickel Substance about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 1. 5 about 0.02 to 0.90 about 0.02 to 0.75 about 0.02 to 0.00 about 0.02 to 0.45 about 0.02 to 0.30 about 0.02 to 0.15
  • Example 47 An alloy was selected having the following analysis:
  • Pancakes which are rated as poor have extremely deep and sharp tears on the outside face, those rated as fair will show some tears, but the majority of the outside surface will be smooth and free of hot tears, while those rated as .good will be entirely smooth on the outside surface similar to that obtained with SAE 1020 steel.
  • the metal was rated as poor when no cerium or misch metal was used in the melting. Similarly, a 4 pound addition per ton of misch metal to this analysis caused little or no improvement in hot-working.
  • Example 48 A The hot-workability of an analysis of the following composition:
  • Example 49 To further illustrate the marked advantages in hot-working obtained in accordance with this invention by adding cerium and/or lanthanum to the above analysis in the restricted range set forth above, a 1000 pound high-frequency Ajax charge was melted.
  • the charge consisted of approximately percent solid scrap of the approximate analysis: carbon 0.10 percent maximum, manganese 1.00%, silicon 1.00%, chromium 20.00%, nickel 22.00%, copper 1.25%, molybdenum 2.00%, together with ingot iron, plate nickel, copper, molybdenum and ferro-chromium to complete the analysis.
  • the melt was deoxidized at tap with 4 pounds of CaSi and 6 pounds of misch metal were added before tap.
  • This heat designated as O-13569 was cast into 7 inch ingots and hammer cogged successfully to 3 inch square billets.
  • the prepared billet yield was about 70 precent of the ingot weight.
  • the analysis of O-13569 is as follows: carbon 0.060 percent, manganese 0.74%, silicon 3.02%, phosphorus 0.013%, sulfur 0.007%, chromium 19.30%, nickel 22.89%, copper 1.45%, molybdenum 2.53%, cerium 0.175%, lanthanum 0.10%.
  • Ezvample 50 A 1000 pound Ajax production heat with a variation of the above austenitic analysis was melted containing the equivalent of 12 pounds of misch metal per ton. The charge again consisted of 70 percent solid scrap as shown above with the necessary ferro alloys to complete the analysis. The melt was deoxidized with 4 pounds of Casi and 6 pounds of misch metal.
  • the 7 inch ingots from this heat were of the following analysis, carbon 0.058%, manganese 0.96%, silicon 0.69%, phosphorus 0.012%, sulfur 0.006%, chromium 19.80%, nickel 27.91%, copper 2.46%, molybdenum 2.01%, cerium 0.14%, lanthanum 0.08%.
  • the ingot to prepared billet yield of the ingot weight was about 85%.
  • the hot-workability was rated by means of the cone tests. The addition of 6 pounds of cerium per ton produced cones which were rated as fair while the addition of 12 pounds of cerium per ton produced cones which were rated as "good. The cerium aditions in these heats is equivalent to 0.30 percent and 0.60 percent added cerium, respectively.
  • Hot charpy tests in the temperature range of 1900 F. to 2200 F. show an improvement in impact tests of about 400 percent to 500 percent improvement can be obtained by the use of cerium and/or lanthanum in the ranges set forth in the appended claims.
  • cerium and/or lanthanum into the molten steel by an addition of misch metal just before tap in the case of Ajax high-frequency melting.
  • electric arc metling we prefer to add the cerium and/or lanthanum in the form of misch metalin the ladle after the heat is tapped from the furnace.
  • the cerium must be quickly plunged below the surface of the bath to incorporate the desired quantities of the cerium and/or lanthanum into the molten metal and to avoid undue loss.
  • Percent said Percent nickel b tance about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 0 2.
  • Nilto40 Ni1t020 Nilto 4 At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Titanium Nilto 8 Nilto 2
  • the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
  • molybdenum and tungsten 10 to The amount of any individual element of said group not exceeding 30 per cent
  • An austenitic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
  • Titanium I said alloy containing cerium plus lanthanum in amounts from 0.80 to 0.04, the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
  • An austenitic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
  • An austentic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
  • An austenltic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
  • Copper said alloy also containing 0.10 to 0.20 per cent of cerium and 0.04 to 0.12 per cent of lanthanum and the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
  • An austenitic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:

Description

Patented May 15, 1951 HOT WORKABLE ALLOY Carl B. Post, Wyomissing, and Donald G. Schoiistall, Reading, Pa., assignors to The Carpenter Steel Company, Reading, Pa., a corporation of New Jersey.
No Drawing. Application November 7, 1950,
13 Claims.
This invention relates to alloys, including ferrous alloys, containing nickel and at least one of the elements chromium, molybdenum and tungsten, from nil to 0.50% of carbon and ranges of proportions from nil to the approximate amount stated of one or more other elements as hereinafter described.
Such alloys have one or more of the following valuable properties which include corrosion resistance, resistance to attack by acids including sulphuric, nitric and hydrochloric acids, high strength at high temperatures, resistance to sealing and creep at high temperatures and other valuable properties. Those properties are important in numerous applications such as acid resistant equipment in the chemical and other industries, heat resistant baffles and shields, heat resistant parts" for jet and turbo-jet aeroplanes, and heat and corrosion-resistant valves for internal combustion engines.
Chromium imparts resistance to chemical attack in the presence of specific media and resistance to oxidation.
Nickel imparts resistance to reducin media and in alloys containing iron promotes the formation of austenite of varying degrees of stability.
Carbon imparts considerable strength at room and elevated temperatures, in alloys containing iron and/or nickel as the base element.
Cobalt imparts considerable strength at room and elevated temperatures.
Copper improves resistance to sulphuric acid,
brine and chloride solutions.
Molybdenum and tungsten increase the resistance to creep at elevated temperatures and increase the strength at room and elevated temperatures. Molybdenum, especially in the chromium-nickel stainless steels, increases the resistance to pitting which may occur in chloride and other salt solutions. Molybdenum in nickel alloys markedly increases the resistance to reducing acids such as hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids.
Chromium, molybdenum and tungsten have the common effect of closing the gamma-loop in alloys containing nickel and iron as the base components. This common effect is especially important in questions relating to hot workability, and this will be apparent in the alloys to be discussed later.
Nitrogen is used to increase strength at room and elevated temperatures without impairing corrosion resistance.
Silicon increases the general oxidation resistance as well as resistance to the corrosive effects of acid, for example weak solutions of H280. or IE1.
Manganese has an effect similar to nickel but is much less effective.
Columbium, titanium and tantalum are used where intergranular stabilization is required. They are used to combine with carbon to form Serial No. 194,577
carbides, i. e., columbium carbide, titanium carbide and tantalum carbide and thus prevent the phenomenon known as intergranular corrosion. The proportions of these elements by weight to combine with carbon and form the corresponding carbides are usually taken as follows: in the case of columbium, 10 times the carbon content, in the case of titanium, 5 times the carbon content, and in the case of tantalum, 20 times the carbon content. They may be used singly or together.
Vanadium is a carbide and nitride former but is not as potent as columbium, titanium or tantalum in fixing the carbides. Columbium, titanium, tantalum or vanadium when used in quantities greater than that required to form the carbides, have a considerable efiect in increasing the resistance to creep at high temperatures.
Elements such as aluminum, zirconium, beryllium and boron are also used in varying proportions, for purposes known in the art. For instance, aluminum can be used as an adjunct with chromium in some alloys to increase resistance to scale formation at high temperatures. Beryllium and boron can be used to impart agehardening tendencies to austenitic alloys. Zirconium can be used to fix the nitrogen in stainless steels and also serves a useful purpose in fixin the sulfur content into discrete particles for free-machining purposes:
A principal obstacle to the full utilization of the properties of such alloys has been the difficulty or practical impossibility of hot working, becauseunless such alloys can be readily and economically hot worked, i. e., forged, rolled, and so forth into various desired shapes such as sheets, rods, tubes and so forth, their practical utility is greatly limited.
That obstacle has existed for years and numerous efforts have been made to solve the problem.
For example, there have been available for many years various alloys containing nickel, chromium, molybdenum and copper which possess the property of satisfactorily withstanding corrosion, including resistance to the corrosive action of materials having a pronounced corroding action as, for example, sulphuric acid, weak muriatic acid and hot concentrated solutions of acetic and phosphoric acids. These alloys may be illustrated by the following composition:
Percent by Component weight Carbon 0.20 Maxi- Manganese I 1 Substantially the balance.
The alloys of this example can be satisfactorily cast but cannot be hot worked, and when hot working is attempted on such alloys the resulting bars are so badly torn and cracked as to make them unusable. This has seriously limited the fields of usefulness of the said alloys since they consisting of chromium, molybdenum and tungsten, the amount of any individual element of have been limited to those fields in which castcerium or pure lanthanum may be used separately, combinations of the two metals have been found effective and such is readily obtained by the use of misch metal, the major part of which consists of cerium and lanthanum. It is to be understood in the parts of the specification which follow that the term lanthanum means not only lanthanum per se but also all of the rare earth components of misch metal with the exception of cerium. These rare earth metals with the exception of cerium include lanthanum as the greater percentage, neodymium and similar elements in smaller percentages.
We have discovered that the nickel content of any of the alloys of this invention determines the minimum and maximum allowable ranges of cerium and/ or lanthanum which will promote hot workability. A minimum content of cerium and/or lanthanum is required to obtain hot workability where it does not exist and to improve hot workability where it already exists in some degree and where improvement is desirable. On the other hand, too much cerium and/or lanthanum produces the opposite effect, and if the critical maximum proportion thereof for an alloy having a given nickel content is exceeded, the hot workability is impaired. We have discovered, that as the nickel content increases in any of these alloys, that the allowable range of cerium and/or lanthanum which can be used to promote hot workability is narrowed, as shown by the following table:
Per Cent Cerium Per Cent Nickel and Lgmthanulm 4 about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 1:05 about 0.02 to 0.00 about 0.02 to 0.75 about 0.02 to 0.60 50. about 0.02 to 0.45 60 about 0.02 to 0.30 70 about 0.02 to 0.1 5
Within the above maximum nanges, narrower critical ranges of the cerium substance may be necessary because of the efiect of relatively large said group not exceeding 30 per cent, 4 to 70 per cent of nickel, and a substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per Cent said Per Cent Nickel Substance about 0 about 0. 0 45 about0:02to0.15
Where only one of the elements chromium, molybdenum and tungsten is used, the minimum proportion thereof is about 10 per cent but where more than one are used, the minimum proportion of any one is 1 per cent, provided the sum of two or more thereof is about 10 per cent.
Within the generic scope and definition above stated one or more of numerous elements not stated therein may be included to provide the properties imparted thereby and therefore in accordance with the invention alloys are provided comprising the following components in the stated ranges of proportions:
- Per cent by weight Carbon. Nil to 0.50 At least one element of the group consisting of chromium, molybdenum and tungsten The amount of any individual element of said group not exceeding 30 percent Nickel 4 to '70 Copper Nil to about 10 Nitrogen. Nil to about 0.30 Cobalt Nil to about 40 Manganese Nil to about 20 Silicon Nil to about 4 At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Nil to about 8 Titanium Nil to about 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per Cent said Per Cent Nickel Substance about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 1. 5 about 0.02 to 0.90 about 0.02 to 0.75 about 0.02 to 0.00 about 0.02 to 0.45 about 0.02 to 0.30 about 0.02 to 0.15
Elements such as one or more of those listed below may also be included in the illustrative proportions stated:
Beryllium Nil to about 5 Boron Nil to about 2 Aluminum Nil to about 5 Zirconium Nil to about 2 Per cent by weight 6 Where free-machining in the corrosion resisttions of components other than iron do not equal ant steel alloys is desired, sulfur, selenium, teilu- 100 per cent, the balance is iron and incidental rium, phosphorus or arsenic are added as well impurities. The invention applies not only to known in the steel industry. See Palmer Patents ferrous alloys (containing more than 50 per cent 1,835,960; 1,846,140; 2,009,713; and 1,961,777. 5 iron) but also to non-ferrous alloys (containing The invention is illustrated by composition less than 50 per cent iron and no iron). ranges shown in Table A and further illustrated As shown in said tables, the ranges for cerium by specific compositions shown in Table B. In plus lanthanum are th same as the'ranges for the tables and other examples where the proporcerium per se and lanthanum per se, respectively.
TABLE A Groups I 11 111 1V V VI VII 1111-. 50 1111a 50 nil. 50 nil-.50 nil-.50 1111-. 50 nil-.50 1030 m1 nil 1-30 1-.30 nil 1 30 nil -30 nil 1-30 nil 1-30 1-30 nil nil 10:30 nil 1-30 1-a0 1-30 nil nil nil 10-60 nil nil nil nil nil nil nil 10-60 nil nil nil nil nil nil nil 10-60 nil nil nil nil nil nil nil 10-60 140 4-70 p 4:10 4-70 4-10 4-70 4-70 nil-l0 nil-l0 nil-l0 nil-l0 nil-10 nil-l0 nil-10 nil. 30 nil. 3O nil. 30 nil. 30 nil. 30 nil. 30 nil. 30 nil-40 nil-40 nil-40 nil-40 nil-40 nil-40 111140 nilnil-20 nil-2O nil-20 nil-20 nil-20 nil-20 nil-4 nil 4 nil-4 nil-4 nil-4 nil-4 nil-4 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-8 nil-2 nil-2 nil-2 nil-2 nil-2 nil-2 nil-2 02-1. 10 02-1. 10 .02-1. 10 02-1. 10 02-1. 10 02-1. 10 02-1. 10 .02-1. 10 02-1. 10 02-1 10 02-1. 10 02-1. 10 02-1. 10 02-1 10 or Oe+La .02r1.10 .02-1.10 .02-1110 .02-1.10 .02-1.10 .02-1.10 .02-1110 TABLE B GTOZLPI Alloys 1 2 s 4 5 5 7 s 9 10 11 12 .15 .15 .12 nil 5 20 nil nil nil nil nil nil --nll nil nil nil nil nil n11 gb'l'Tafll'v'" m1 nil nil nil 1111 m1 nil ml nil 1.0 2.0 00' .02 .03 .03 .03 .08 .07 .03 .07 .04 .02 .02 La .02 .02 .02 .02 .04 .04 .02 .04 .02 .02 .02 Ce-l-La .04 .05 .05 .05 ..12 .11 .05 .11 .00 .04 .04
TABLE Hammad 4 om rv j 4 a a 1 a 9 1o 11 12 13 1f nil 1111 B11 nil n11 I111 111] 22 20 18 28 38 32 22. 25 21. 5 20 20. 5
u 30 30 30 20 20 28 114 14 nil 1111 I111 nil nil 3. 25 nil 3. 5 5. nil n11 n11 nil nil nil nil nil nil n11 nil nil nil nil nil n11 ml nil nil nil mi 1111 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 75 .75 .90 .75 1 5 1.5 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .90 .75 .40 .40 nil nil 1111 1111 nil ml nil 70 nil nil nil 1111 1111 nll nil n11 nil nil nil nil m1 nil nil nil nil 111] 1111 ml 111] 1111 1111 n11 nil n11 n i l nil n11 1111 1111 nil- 03-. 17 04-. 26 06-. 2] 07-. 02-. 15 025-.12 06-. .15 03-.16 03-. 17 03-. 16 06-. 11 02- 10 02 07 03-.16 10 06-. 33 07-. 43 09-. 37 13-. 26 04-. 045-. 19 09-. 36 25 17 Further specific examples are shown as follows:
Example 47 An alloy was selected having the following analysis:
Percent Component; by
. Weight Carbon To this analysis was added 4 pounds, 8 pounds, pounds, 12 pounds and 25 pounds per ton of misch metal. The addition was made to the molten metal just before tapping and casting. The hot workability was rated by means of a cone test which is a conical-shaped cast section having a base 2 inches in diameter by A. of an inch thick. A truncated cone section extends 2 A.; inches above the base, having a taper of approximately A, of an inch per inch. The fiat-top section of the cone is of an inch in diameter while the base of the cone proper is approximately 1% of an inch in diameter. The cones are hot forged at a hammer by striking the hot cone with three hammer blows to form a pancake. This is an extremely severe test to judge the hot-workability of steels, and if the metal is not completely ductile at the forging and rolling temperatures the pancake will show tears in the reduced cone section and also in the heavy base section.
Pancakes which are rated as poor have extremely deep and sharp tears on the outside face, those rated as fair will show some tears, but the majority of the outside surface will be smooth and free of hot tears, while those rated as .good will be entirely smooth on the outside surface similar to that obtained with SAE 1020 steel.
The correlation of the cone test with actual ingot behavior in these austenitic alloys during hot-working is that those ingots made from metal which are rated poor on the cone test will check and tear apart during the first break-down operations. Ingots made from metal rated as fair on the cone test can be broken down with some difficulty. Ingots made from metal rated as good on the cone test can be broken down at the hammer without difficulty, and will need only slight surface preparation to prepare the resulting billets.
In the above example, the metal was rated as poor when no cerium or misch metal was used in the melting. Similarly, a 4 pound addition per ton of misch metal to this analysis caused little or no improvement in hot-working.
Additions of 8 pounds and 12 pounds of misch metal per ton yielded metal which was rated as fair and could be hot-worked commercially.
Additions of 20 pounds and 50 pounds of misch metal per ton to the analysis caused the metal to be rated as poor, and in fact was worse than the analysis without any additions of misch metal.
The analytical cerium and lanthanum contents corresponding to additions of misch metal of 8 to 12 pounds per ton are eerium=.10 to .20 percent and lanthanum=.04 to .12 percent. The
18 differences between these values and the added amounts are due to losses.
It is also to be noted that the'presence of 5 percent manganese in the above alloy was not effective in promoting the hot-workability of the alloy. This is in accord with prior art experience in the alloys under discussion, that is. the presence of manganese in the range 1 percent to 4 percent is no criterion of hot-workability, and has not resulted in. commercially forged and rolled products in the above range of compositions.
Example 48 A The hot-workability of an analysis of the following composition:
Per cent Component by Weight Carbon 0. 066 Manganese 0. Si1ie0n 3. 06 Phosphorus 0. 012 Sulfur 0.013 Chromium. 19. 26 Nickel 23. 14 Molybdenum 2. 73 Copper 1. 78
was studied by means of the cone test and forging experiments.
An addition of 4 pounds of misch metal per ton of metal caused some improvement in the hotworkability, so that the cones were rated as fair."
Additions of 8 pounds and 12 pounds per ton of misch metal caused a definite improvement andthe metal was rated as good on the hot forging cone test.
An addition of 20 pounds of misch metal per ton caused the metal to be again rated as poor on the hot forging test.
The preferred analytical cerium and lanthanum contents corresponding to additions of 8 to 12 pounds of misch metal per ton are, cerium=0.05 to 0.15 per cent, lanthanum=0.04 to 0.12 percent.
Example 49 To further illustrate the marked advantages in hot-working obtained in accordance with this invention by adding cerium and/or lanthanum to the above analysis in the restricted range set forth above, a 1000 pound high-frequency Ajax charge was melted. The charge consisted of approximately percent solid scrap of the approximate analysis: carbon 0.10 percent maximum, manganese 1.00%, silicon 1.00%, chromium 20.00%, nickel 22.00%, copper 1.25%, molybdenum 2.00%, together with ingot iron, plate nickel, copper, molybdenum and ferro-chromium to complete the analysis. The melt was deoxidized at tap with 4 pounds of CaSi and 6 pounds of misch metal were added before tap.
This heat, designated as O-13569 was cast into 7 inch ingots and hammer cogged successfully to 3 inch square billets. The prepared billet yield was about 70 precent of the ingot weight. The analysis of O-13569 is as follows: carbon 0.060 percent, manganese 0.74%, silicon 3.02%, phosphorus 0.013%, sulfur 0.007%, chromium 19.30%, nickel 22.89%, copper 1.45%, molybdenum 2.53%, cerium 0.175%, lanthanum 0.10%.
Ajax production lots of similar anaylsis melted with similar scrap mixes but without misch metal were scrapped at the hammer due to deep corner and surface tears.
Ezvample 50 A 1000 pound Ajax production heat with a variation of the above austenitic analysis was melted containing the equivalent of 12 pounds of misch metal per ton. The charge again consisted of 70 percent solid scrap as shown above with the necessary ferro alloys to complete the analysis. The melt was deoxidized with 4 pounds of Casi and 6 pounds of misch metal.
The 7 inch ingots from this heat were of the following analysis, carbon 0.058%, manganese 0.96%, silicon 0.69%, phosphorus 0.012%, sulfur 0.006%, chromium 19.80%, nickel 27.91%, copper 2.46%, molybdenum 2.01%, cerium 0.14%, lanthanum 0.08%. The ingot to prepared billet yield of the ingot weight was about 85%.
Previous attempts at hammer cogging austenitic alloys of this similar type without the addition 1 Maximum, 28.16.
To the above analysis was added the equivalent of 6 pounds and 12 pounds, respectively, of cerium per ton in the form of pure cerium (91.9% cerium).
The hot-workability was rated by means of the cone tests. The addition of 6 pounds of cerium per ton produced cones which were rated as fair while the addition of 12 pounds of cerium per ton produced cones which were rated as "good. The cerium aditions in these heats is equivalent to 0.30 percent and 0.60 percent added cerium, respectively.
The marked advantages in hot-workability of alloys in the range of analyses of this invention can also be demonstrated by impact tests made from ingots or forged bars. Hot charpy tests in the temperature range of 1900 F. to 2200 F. show an improvement in impact tests of about 400 percent to 500 percent improvement can be obtained by the use of cerium and/or lanthanum in the ranges set forth in the appended claims.
We have found it desirable to incorporate the cerium and/or lanthanum into the molten steel by an addition of misch metal just before tap in the case of Ajax high-frequency melting. In the case of electric arc metling we prefer to add the cerium and/or lanthanum in the form of misch metalin the ladle after the heat is tapped from the furnace. The cerium must be quickly plunged below the surface of the bath to incorporate the desired quantities of the cerium and/or lanthanum into the molten metal and to avoid undue loss.
, This application is a continuation-in-part of our co-pending application, Serial No. 100,546, filed June 1, 1949, which is a continuation-in-part of our application, Serial No. 718,254, filed December 24, 1946, now abandoned.
What is claimed is:
1. An alloy capable of being hot worked, said alloy comprising nil to 0.50 per cent carbon,
Percent said Percent nickel b tance about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 0 2. An alloy capable of being hot worked and comprising the following components in the per cent Nickel 4 to '70 Copper Nil to about 10 Nitrogen Nil to about 0.30 Cobalt Nil to about 40 Manganese Nil to about 20 Silicon Nil to about 4 At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Nil to about 8 Titanium Nil to'about 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per cent said sub- Per cent nickel stance assesses 3. An alloy capable of being hot worked and comprising the following components in the stated proportions:
Per cent by weight Carbon Nil to 0.50 Chromium 10 to 30 Nickel 4 to 70 Copper Nil to 10 Nitrogen Nilto 0.30 Cobalt Nil to 40 Manganese Nil to 20 Silicon N11 to 4 At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Nil to 8 Titanium Per cent by weight Nil to 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per cent nickel Per cent said substance 4. An alloy capable of being hot worked and comprising the following components in the stated proportions:
Per cent by weight Carbon Molybdenum Nickel Copper Nitrogen Cobalt Manganese Silicon Nilto 0.50
Nilt010 Nilto 0.30
Nilto40 Ni1t020 Nilto 4 At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Titanium Nilto 8 Nilto 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per cent nickel Per cent said substance 5. An alloy capable of being hot worked and comprising the following components in the stated proportions:
Per cent by weight Carbon Tungsten, Nickel Copper Nitrogen Cobalt Manganese Silicon Nilto 10 Nil to 0.30
Nilto40 Nil to Nilto 4 Nilto 0.50 10 to At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Titanium Nilto 8 Nilto 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per cent nickel Per cent said substance about 0.02 to 1.10 about 0.02 to 1.05
consisting essentially of the following composition:
Carbon At least one element of the group Per cent by weight consisting of chromium, molybdenum and tungsten The amount of any individual element of said group not exceeding 30 per cent Nickel A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per cent nickel Per cent said substance about 0.02 m 0.15
tion
the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
7. An alloy capable of being hot worked and consisting essentially of the following composi- Per /cent by weight Carbon Nilto 0.50
At least one element of the group consisting of chromium,
molybdenum and tungsten 10 to The amount of any individual element of said group not exceeding 30 per cent At least one element of the group consisting of columbium, tantalum and vanadium Nil to about 8 Titanium Nil to about 2 A substance of the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum and cerium plus lanthanum in amounts correlated with and dependent on the nickel content as follows:
Per cent nickel Per cent said substance about 0.02 to the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
8. An austenitic alloy according to claim 7 in which the content of nickel is not less than about 10%.
9. An austenitic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
Component Per cent times the carbon. times the carbon.
Titanium I said alloy containing cerium plus lanthanum in amounts from 0.80 to 0.04, the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
10. An austenitic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
Per Cent by Component Weight Copper said alloy containing cerium plus lanthanum in amounts from 0.80 to 0.04 per cent, the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
11. An austentic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
Component Per g by Weig t said alloy containing cerium plus lanthanum in amounts from 0.80 to 0.04 per cent, the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
24 12. An austenltic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
Per cent by Component w 61 gm Carbon Manganese Silicon Chromium. N k
Copper said alloy also containing 0.10 to 0.20 per cent of cerium and 0.04 to 0.12 per cent of lanthanum and the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
13. An austenitic corrosion resistant ferrous alloy capable of being hot worked and having an analysis as follows:
Component Pe r genfitb Carbon said alloy also containing 0.05 to 0.15 per cent cerium and 0.04 to 0.12 per cent lanthanum and the balance being iron except incidental impurities.
CARL B. POST. DONALD G. SCHOFFSTALL.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS

Claims (1)

1. AN ALLOY CAPABLE OF BEING HOT WORKED, SAID ALLOY COMPRISING NIL TO 0.50 PER CENT CARBON, 10 TO 60 PER CENT OF AT LEAST ONE ELEMENT OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF CHROMIUM, MOLYBDENUM AND TUNGSTEN, THE AMOUNT OF ANY INDIVIDUAL ELEMENT OF SAID GROUP NOT EXCEEDING 30 PER CENT, 4 TO 70 PER CENT OF NICKEL, AND A SUBSTANCE OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF CERIUM, LANTHANUM AND CERIUM PLUS LANTHANUM IN AMOUNTS CORRELATED WITH AND DEPENDENT ON THE NICKEL CONTENT AS FOLLOWS:
US194577A 1950-11-07 1950-11-07 Hot workable alloy Expired - Lifetime US2553330A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US194577A US2553330A (en) 1950-11-07 1950-11-07 Hot workable alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US194577A US2553330A (en) 1950-11-07 1950-11-07 Hot workable alloy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2553330A true US2553330A (en) 1951-05-15

Family

ID=22718120

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US194577A Expired - Lifetime US2553330A (en) 1950-11-07 1950-11-07 Hot workable alloy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2553330A (en)

Cited By (55)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2643949A (en) * 1951-07-10 1953-06-30 Molybdenum Corp Method for the production of iron and steel
US2683663A (en) * 1951-10-31 1954-07-13 Molybdenum Corp Stainless steel and method of production
US2684298A (en) * 1952-11-20 1954-07-20 Allegheny Ludlum Steel Austenitic stainless steel
US2777766A (en) * 1952-06-04 1957-01-15 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp Corrosion resistant alloys
US2823992A (en) * 1956-11-09 1958-02-18 American Metallurg Products Co Alloy steels
DE1030036B (en) * 1954-09-14 1958-05-14 Metallgesellschaft Ag Process for improving the mechanical properties of the metals molybdenum, tungsten, thorium, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, hafnium, chromium and uranium or their alloys that are contaminated by oxygen and / or nitrogen
US2865741A (en) * 1957-11-06 1958-12-23 United States Steel Corp Acid resistant austenitic stainless steel
DE1063391B (en) * 1951-09-03 1959-08-13 Boehler & Co Ag Geb Process to improve the hot formability of high fatigue strength, purely austenitic alloys
US2984563A (en) * 1957-12-18 1961-05-16 Tanczyn Harry Stainless steel and method
US3020153A (en) * 1958-11-06 1962-02-06 Linz Arthur Iron and steel production
DE1161436B (en) * 1951-09-03 1964-01-16 Boehler & Co Ag Geb Highly durable, easy to process, austenitic alloys
US3119687A (en) * 1959-10-22 1964-01-28 Kloeckner Werke Ag Radiation resistant steel
US3168397A (en) * 1962-01-03 1965-02-02 Carpenter Steel Co Steel alloy
DE1231439B (en) * 1964-03-31 1966-12-29 Int Nickel Ltd Use of a rustproof nickel-chromium-cobalt steel alloy for objects with a high yield point
US3493366A (en) * 1965-11-12 1970-02-03 Int Nickel Co Alloy for service in petrochemical and hydrocarbon processing
US3647424A (en) * 1969-11-03 1972-03-07 Wilber B Driver Co Machinable alloys
US3833358A (en) * 1970-07-22 1974-09-03 Pompey Acieries Refractory iron-base alloy resisting to high temperatures
DE2421604A1 (en) * 1973-05-04 1974-11-14 Nippon Steel Corp STAINLESS STEEL
US3977837A (en) * 1973-11-06 1976-08-31 Chromalloy American Corporation Titanium carbide tool steel having improved properties
US3989514A (en) * 1974-07-25 1976-11-02 Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. Heat-resisting austenitic stainless steel
DE2617419A1 (en) * 1975-04-25 1976-11-11 Allegheny Ludlum Ind Inc AGAINST PUNCH CORROSION RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL WITH IMPROVED HOT FORMING PROPERTIES AND PROCESS FOR THEIR PRODUCTION
US4043838A (en) * 1975-04-25 1977-08-23 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Method of producing pitting resistant, hot-workable austenitic stainless steel
US4050928A (en) * 1976-02-17 1977-09-27 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Corrosion-resistant matrix-strengthened alloy
US4063935A (en) * 1973-12-22 1977-12-20 Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. Oxidation-resisting austenitic stainless steel
US4099966A (en) * 1976-12-02 1978-07-11 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Austenitic stainless steel
US4102677A (en) * 1976-12-02 1978-07-25 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Austenitic stainless steel
US4126447A (en) * 1977-10-31 1978-11-21 Crucible Inc. Lanthanum-modified high-temperature alloy
US4135919A (en) * 1978-04-25 1979-01-23 Carondelet Foundry Company Alloy resistant to sulfuric acid corrosion
DE2853014A1 (en) * 1977-12-08 1979-06-13 Asahi Glass Co Ltd ROLLER FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FLOAT GLASS
US4172716A (en) * 1973-05-04 1979-10-30 Nippon Steel Corporation Stainless steel having excellent pitting corrosion resistance and hot workabilities
US4201574A (en) * 1977-03-02 1980-05-06 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Low carbon Ni-Cr austenitic steel having an improved resistance to stress corrosion cracking
US4224062A (en) * 1974-08-24 1980-09-23 Avesta Jernverks Aktiebolag High temperature creep resistant structural steel
US4227923A (en) * 1978-11-27 1980-10-14 Daido Seiko Kabushiki Kaisha Plastic molding steel having improved resistance to corrosion by halogen gas
DE2945164A1 (en) * 1979-11-08 1981-05-14 Vladimir Vasil'evič Leningrad Šitkov Weldable martensitic stainless steel - contains niobium and/or zirconium plus yttrium, cerium and/or lanthanum to improve weldability and corrosion resistance
US4329173A (en) * 1980-03-31 1982-05-11 Carondelet Foundry Company Alloy resistant to corrosion
US4421557A (en) * 1980-07-21 1983-12-20 Colt Industries Operating Corp. Austenitic stainless steel
US4554028A (en) * 1983-12-13 1985-11-19 Carpenter Technology Corporation Large warm worked, alloy article
US4699671A (en) * 1985-06-17 1987-10-13 General Electric Company Treatment for overcoming irradiation induced stress corrosion cracking in austenitic alloys such as stainless steel
GB2194248A (en) * 1986-08-21 1988-03-02 Cabot Corp Catalyst support grids
DE3737314A1 (en) * 1986-11-10 1988-05-19 Nippon Yakin Kogyo Co Ltd EXTERNAL PROTECTIVE COVER MADE OF AUSTENITIC, STAINLESS STEEL FOR A HEATING DEVICE WITH A COVERED HEATING ELEMENT
DE3720605A1 (en) * 1987-06-23 1989-01-05 Thompson Gmbh Trw AUSTENITIC STEEL FOR GAS EXCHANGE VALVES OF COMBUSTION ENGINES
US4818484A (en) * 1983-12-13 1989-04-04 Carpenter Technology Corporation Austenitic, non-magnetic, stainless steel alloy
US4873055A (en) * 1988-12-20 1989-10-10 Carondelet Foundry Company Corrosion resistant Fe-Ni-Cr alloy
US4904540A (en) * 1986-04-21 1990-02-27 Kawasaki Steel Corp. Fe-Cr-Al stainless steel having high oxidation resistance and spalling resistance and Fe-Cr-Al steel for catalyst substrate of catalytic converter
US4999158A (en) * 1986-12-03 1991-03-12 Chrysler Corporation Oxidation resistant iron base alloy compositions
US5019331A (en) * 1989-04-05 1991-05-28 Kubota Corporation Heat-resistant alloy
US5330705A (en) * 1993-06-04 1994-07-19 Carondelet Foundry Company Heat resistant alloys
EP0613960A1 (en) * 1993-02-03 1994-09-07 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat-resistant, austenitic cast steel and exhaust equipment member made thereof
US5800152A (en) * 1995-04-04 1998-09-01 Sumitomo Special Metals Company, Limited Oxidation resistant metallic materials
US20060266450A1 (en) * 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute & Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. Cerium-containing austenitic nickel-base alloy having enhanced intergranular attack and stress corrosion cracking resistances, and preparation method thereof
US20070041863A1 (en) * 2001-12-11 2007-02-22 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab Precipitation hardenable austenitic steel
DE10208855B4 (en) * 2001-03-02 2013-01-03 Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd. High strength alloy with low thermal expansion and improved torsional properties, as well as wire of said alloy
US20140154128A1 (en) * 2011-05-11 2014-06-05 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) Heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel having excellent cyclic oxidation resistance
WO2015051162A1 (en) * 2013-10-02 2015-04-09 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Recrystallization, refinement, and strengthening mechanisms for production of advanced high strength metal alloys
US20190241995A1 (en) * 2018-02-07 2019-08-08 General Electric Company Nickel Based Alloy with High Fatigue Resistance and Methods of Forming the Same

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB451601A (en) * 1934-03-24 1936-08-07 Heraeus Vacuumschmelze Ag Improvements in and relating to the production of heat-resistant articles for use at high temperatures
GB459848A (en) * 1935-05-09 1937-01-11 William Thomas Griffiths Improvements in heat resistant alloys
US2104836A (en) * 1935-03-07 1938-01-11 Firm Heracus Vacuumschmelze Ag Heat-resisting implement
US2255895A (en) * 1936-10-06 1941-09-16 Int Nickel Co Workable nickel and nickel alloy
US2304353A (en) * 1935-05-09 1942-12-08 Int Nickel Co Heat resistant alloy

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB451601A (en) * 1934-03-24 1936-08-07 Heraeus Vacuumschmelze Ag Improvements in and relating to the production of heat-resistant articles for use at high temperatures
US2104836A (en) * 1935-03-07 1938-01-11 Firm Heracus Vacuumschmelze Ag Heat-resisting implement
GB459848A (en) * 1935-05-09 1937-01-11 William Thomas Griffiths Improvements in heat resistant alloys
US2304353A (en) * 1935-05-09 1942-12-08 Int Nickel Co Heat resistant alloy
US2255895A (en) * 1936-10-06 1941-09-16 Int Nickel Co Workable nickel and nickel alloy

Cited By (60)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2643949A (en) * 1951-07-10 1953-06-30 Molybdenum Corp Method for the production of iron and steel
DE1161436B (en) * 1951-09-03 1964-01-16 Boehler & Co Ag Geb Highly durable, easy to process, austenitic alloys
DE1063391B (en) * 1951-09-03 1959-08-13 Boehler & Co Ag Geb Process to improve the hot formability of high fatigue strength, purely austenitic alloys
US2683663A (en) * 1951-10-31 1954-07-13 Molybdenum Corp Stainless steel and method of production
US2777766A (en) * 1952-06-04 1957-01-15 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp Corrosion resistant alloys
US2684298A (en) * 1952-11-20 1954-07-20 Allegheny Ludlum Steel Austenitic stainless steel
DE1030036B (en) * 1954-09-14 1958-05-14 Metallgesellschaft Ag Process for improving the mechanical properties of the metals molybdenum, tungsten, thorium, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, hafnium, chromium and uranium or their alloys that are contaminated by oxygen and / or nitrogen
US2823992A (en) * 1956-11-09 1958-02-18 American Metallurg Products Co Alloy steels
US2865741A (en) * 1957-11-06 1958-12-23 United States Steel Corp Acid resistant austenitic stainless steel
US2984563A (en) * 1957-12-18 1961-05-16 Tanczyn Harry Stainless steel and method
US3020153A (en) * 1958-11-06 1962-02-06 Linz Arthur Iron and steel production
US3119687A (en) * 1959-10-22 1964-01-28 Kloeckner Werke Ag Radiation resistant steel
US3168397A (en) * 1962-01-03 1965-02-02 Carpenter Steel Co Steel alloy
DE1231439B (en) * 1964-03-31 1966-12-29 Int Nickel Ltd Use of a rustproof nickel-chromium-cobalt steel alloy for objects with a high yield point
US3493366A (en) * 1965-11-12 1970-02-03 Int Nickel Co Alloy for service in petrochemical and hydrocarbon processing
US3647424A (en) * 1969-11-03 1972-03-07 Wilber B Driver Co Machinable alloys
US3833358A (en) * 1970-07-22 1974-09-03 Pompey Acieries Refractory iron-base alloy resisting to high temperatures
DE2421604A1 (en) * 1973-05-04 1974-11-14 Nippon Steel Corp STAINLESS STEEL
US4172716A (en) * 1973-05-04 1979-10-30 Nippon Steel Corporation Stainless steel having excellent pitting corrosion resistance and hot workabilities
US3977837A (en) * 1973-11-06 1976-08-31 Chromalloy American Corporation Titanium carbide tool steel having improved properties
US4063935A (en) * 1973-12-22 1977-12-20 Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. Oxidation-resisting austenitic stainless steel
US3989514A (en) * 1974-07-25 1976-11-02 Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. Heat-resisting austenitic stainless steel
US4224062A (en) * 1974-08-24 1980-09-23 Avesta Jernverks Aktiebolag High temperature creep resistant structural steel
US4007038A (en) * 1975-04-25 1977-02-08 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Pitting resistant stainless steel alloy having improved hot-working characteristics
US4043838A (en) * 1975-04-25 1977-08-23 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Method of producing pitting resistant, hot-workable austenitic stainless steel
DE2617419A1 (en) * 1975-04-25 1976-11-11 Allegheny Ludlum Ind Inc AGAINST PUNCH CORROSION RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL WITH IMPROVED HOT FORMING PROPERTIES AND PROCESS FOR THEIR PRODUCTION
US4050928A (en) * 1976-02-17 1977-09-27 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Corrosion-resistant matrix-strengthened alloy
US4099966A (en) * 1976-12-02 1978-07-11 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Austenitic stainless steel
US4102677A (en) * 1976-12-02 1978-07-25 Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. Austenitic stainless steel
US4201574A (en) * 1977-03-02 1980-05-06 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Low carbon Ni-Cr austenitic steel having an improved resistance to stress corrosion cracking
US4126447A (en) * 1977-10-31 1978-11-21 Crucible Inc. Lanthanum-modified high-temperature alloy
DE2853014A1 (en) * 1977-12-08 1979-06-13 Asahi Glass Co Ltd ROLLER FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FLOAT GLASS
US4293335A (en) * 1977-12-08 1981-10-06 Asahi Glass Company, Ltd. Roll for manufacturing float glass
US4135919A (en) * 1978-04-25 1979-01-23 Carondelet Foundry Company Alloy resistant to sulfuric acid corrosion
US4227923A (en) * 1978-11-27 1980-10-14 Daido Seiko Kabushiki Kaisha Plastic molding steel having improved resistance to corrosion by halogen gas
DE2945164A1 (en) * 1979-11-08 1981-05-14 Vladimir Vasil'evič Leningrad Šitkov Weldable martensitic stainless steel - contains niobium and/or zirconium plus yttrium, cerium and/or lanthanum to improve weldability and corrosion resistance
US4329173A (en) * 1980-03-31 1982-05-11 Carondelet Foundry Company Alloy resistant to corrosion
US4421557A (en) * 1980-07-21 1983-12-20 Colt Industries Operating Corp. Austenitic stainless steel
US4554028A (en) * 1983-12-13 1985-11-19 Carpenter Technology Corporation Large warm worked, alloy article
US4818484A (en) * 1983-12-13 1989-04-04 Carpenter Technology Corporation Austenitic, non-magnetic, stainless steel alloy
US4699671A (en) * 1985-06-17 1987-10-13 General Electric Company Treatment for overcoming irradiation induced stress corrosion cracking in austenitic alloys such as stainless steel
US4904540A (en) * 1986-04-21 1990-02-27 Kawasaki Steel Corp. Fe-Cr-Al stainless steel having high oxidation resistance and spalling resistance and Fe-Cr-Al steel for catalyst substrate of catalytic converter
GB2194248A (en) * 1986-08-21 1988-03-02 Cabot Corp Catalyst support grids
GB2194248B (en) * 1986-08-21 1991-03-13 Cabot Corp Manufacture of catalyst supports
DE3737314A1 (en) * 1986-11-10 1988-05-19 Nippon Yakin Kogyo Co Ltd EXTERNAL PROTECTIVE COVER MADE OF AUSTENITIC, STAINLESS STEEL FOR A HEATING DEVICE WITH A COVERED HEATING ELEMENT
US4999158A (en) * 1986-12-03 1991-03-12 Chrysler Corporation Oxidation resistant iron base alloy compositions
DE3720605A1 (en) * 1987-06-23 1989-01-05 Thompson Gmbh Trw AUSTENITIC STEEL FOR GAS EXCHANGE VALVES OF COMBUSTION ENGINES
US4873055A (en) * 1988-12-20 1989-10-10 Carondelet Foundry Company Corrosion resistant Fe-Ni-Cr alloy
US5019331A (en) * 1989-04-05 1991-05-28 Kubota Corporation Heat-resistant alloy
EP0613960A1 (en) * 1993-02-03 1994-09-07 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat-resistant, austenitic cast steel and exhaust equipment member made thereof
US5489416A (en) * 1993-02-03 1996-02-06 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat-resistant, austenitic cast steel and exhaust equipment member made thereof
US5330705A (en) * 1993-06-04 1994-07-19 Carondelet Foundry Company Heat resistant alloys
US5800152A (en) * 1995-04-04 1998-09-01 Sumitomo Special Metals Company, Limited Oxidation resistant metallic materials
DE10208855B4 (en) * 2001-03-02 2013-01-03 Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd. High strength alloy with low thermal expansion and improved torsional properties, as well as wire of said alloy
US20070041863A1 (en) * 2001-12-11 2007-02-22 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab Precipitation hardenable austenitic steel
US20060266450A1 (en) * 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute & Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. Cerium-containing austenitic nickel-base alloy having enhanced intergranular attack and stress corrosion cracking resistances, and preparation method thereof
US20140154128A1 (en) * 2011-05-11 2014-06-05 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) Heat-resistant austenitic stainless steel having excellent cyclic oxidation resistance
WO2015051162A1 (en) * 2013-10-02 2015-04-09 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Recrystallization, refinement, and strengthening mechanisms for production of advanced high strength metal alloys
US9284635B2 (en) 2013-10-02 2016-03-15 The Nanosteel Company, Inc. Recrystallization, refinement, and strengthening mechanisms for production of advanced high strength metal alloys
US20190241995A1 (en) * 2018-02-07 2019-08-08 General Electric Company Nickel Based Alloy with High Fatigue Resistance and Methods of Forming the Same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2553330A (en) Hot workable alloy
JP4803174B2 (en) Austenitic stainless steel
US3904401A (en) Corrosion resistant austenitic stainless steel
US3303023A (en) Use of cold-formable austenitic stainless steel for valves for internal-combustion engines
US6280540B1 (en) Copper-containing Ni-Cr-Mo alloys
US3645725A (en) Austenitic steel combining strength and resistance to intergranular corrosion
SE501321C2 (en) Ferrite-austenitic stainless steel and use of the steel
US3044872A (en) Steel alloy composition
CA1191724A (en) High chromium nickel base alloys
US4533414A (en) Corrosion-resistance nickel alloy
GB2084187A (en) Ferritic stainless steel
US3082083A (en) Alloy of stainless steel and articles
US3615366A (en) Stainless steel
US3401036A (en) Valve steel
US3658513A (en) Precipitation-hardenable stainless steel
US3989474A (en) Austenitic stainless steel
US3355280A (en) High strength, martensitic stainless steel
US2432615A (en) Iron-base alloys
US3940266A (en) Austenitic stainless steel
US3201232A (en) Use of steel involving prolonged stressing at elevated temperatures
US4643767A (en) Nuclear grade steels
EP0816523B1 (en) Low-Cr ferritic steels and low-Cr ferritic cast steels having excellent high-temperature strength and weldability
US3759705A (en) Chromium containing alloy steel and articles
US2384565A (en) Alloy steel and articles
US3373015A (en) Stainless steel and product