US2503479A

US2503479A - Removal of impurities from zinc electrolyte solutions

Info

Publication number: US2503479A
Application number: US778272A
Authority: US
Inventors: Griffith Dinsmore Laurence; Rankin Mavis Jean
Original assignee: Hudson Bay Mining and Smelting Co Ltd
Current assignee: Hudson Bay Mining and Smelting Co Ltd
Priority date: 1946-07-18
Filing date: 1947-10-06
Publication date: 1950-04-11
Anticipated expiration: 1967-04-11
Also published as: FR955509A; GB638651A; DE809111C

Description

Patented Apr. 11, 1950 REMOVAL or IMPURILEIESTFRQMZINC ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS .-Dinsmor,e Laurence Griffithand Mavis JeanRankin, Flin-Flon, Manitoba, iCa-nada, assignorsito Hudson Bay Mining and;SmeltingrGo.,:Limited, "Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, a corporation of Canada No Drawing. Application October G, 1947, Serial No. 778,272. In Canada July 18, 1946 3 Claims. 1

This invention relates to the removal of impurities present in zinc electrolyte solutions prior to the recovery of zinc therefrom by the electrolytic method.

It has for many years been known that purification of an electrolyte may be effected by the displacement of one metal from the solution by another higher in the electromotive series and that such a displacement may be aided by the presence of a metal low in the electromotive series. Thus it is common, after iron and other metals have been precipitated by treating an electrolyte with zinc oxide or roasted zinc ore or lime while air is blown through the solution, to treat it with small amounts of zinc dust and to increase the purifying action of the zinc dustby using small amounts of copper and antimony along with the zinc dust.

On the basis of the above generalization as to removal of one metal in solution by another metal higher in the electromotive series, and this removal being aided by the presence of a metal low in the electromotive series, one would expect that all of the impurities could be removed without serious difficulties. It has, however, been found exceedingly difficult completely to precipitate from the electrolyte certain deleterious elements which greatly reduce the current efficiency obtainable and. the quantity of which in the electrolyte should at all times be kept at a minimum.

We have observed that the difiiculty in removing the deleterious elements is often, if not always, to be attributed to the ease with which they re-dissolve after precipitation, and have discovered that the use of small amounts of lead together with the usual amounts of zinc dust, copper and antimony, increases the degree of precipitation of the impurities, particularly cobalt and antimony, and slows the re-solution of these impurities so that the purification oi the electrolyte becomes more complete and dependable. The quantity of lead used is not critical, but it has been found that a small quantity within the range of about 50 to about 200 milligrams per litre is sufiicient.

Our discovery is illustrated by two experiments, lead being added to one, but not the other. In each case the experiment was carried out with a sample of tank house electrolyte containing about 120 grams per litre of zinc as sulphate, 20.6 milligram per litre of cobalt, and 0.026 milligram per litre of antimony. To each of the samples were added 2.5 grams per litre of zinc dust, 0.7 gram per litre of copper as copper sul- Time Test No. 1, Lead Used Test No. 2, N 0 lead used Antimony,

It will be observed that the degree of purification with respect both to cobalt and antimony was greater in test 1 than in test 2, that the reappearance of the impurities was much Slower, indicating the slowing down of the re-solution of the cobalt and antimony, and that the final results after four hours showed less impurity in the case of the test carried out with lead additions.

The improvement in purification obtained is also illustrated by the following series of tests using a sample of tank house electrolyte containing about 120 grams per litre of zinc as sulphate, 0.6 milligram per litre of copper, 20.0 milligrams per litre of cobalt, 0.1 milligram per litre of antimony and no detectable quantity of lead. Since the above tests indicated that, with the particular stirring equipment used, the impurity content was the lowest after stirring for minutes when lead was used and about 45 minutes when lead was not used, stirring was carried out for these periods. In the following table the quantities of zinc dust, copper, tartar emetic and lead are given for each test, as well as the filter assays, and ND indicates not detectable.

3 What we claim is:

1. A method of removing impurities from zinc electrolyte solutions, comprising adding to the electrolyte small amounts of zinc dust, copper sulphate, tartar emetic, and from about 50 to about 200 milligrams per litre of lead acetate.

2. A method of removing impurities from zinc electrolyte solutions, comprising contacting the electrolyte with small amounts of zinc dust in the presence of small amounts of soluble copper and antimony compounds and from about 50 to about 200 milligrams per litre of lead in the form of a soluble compound.

3. A method of removing impurities from zinc electrolyte solutions comprising adding to the 2,396,569

DINSMORE LAURENCE GRIFFITH. MAVIS JEAN RANKIN.

REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS Name D to Number a Griffith et a1. Mar. 12, 1946

Claims

3. A METHOD OF REMOVING IMPURITIES FROM ZINC ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS COMPRISING ADDING TO THE ELECTROLYTE SMALL AMOUNTS OF ZINC DUST, COPPER SULPHATE, A SOLUBLE COMPOUND OF ANTIMONY AND FROM ABOUT 50 TO ABOUT 200 MILLIGRAMS PER LITRE OF LEAD IN THE FORM OF A SOLUBLE COMPOUND.