US2463919A

US2463919A - Separation of close-boiling naphthenes by azeotropic distillation

Info

Publication number: US2463919A
Application number: US588718A
Authority: US
Inventors: Josephine M Stribley; George R Lake
Original assignee: Union Oil Company of California
Current assignee: Union Oil Company of California
Priority date: 1945-04-16
Filing date: 1945-04-16
Publication date: 1949-03-08
Anticipated expiration: 1966-03-08

Description

- Patented 8, 1949 Y SEPARATION OF CLOSE-BOILING NAPH- THENES BY AZEOTROPIO DISTILLA- TION J os'ephine M. Stribley and George R. Lake. Long Beach, Calif., aasiznors to Union Oil Company of California, Los Angelea, Calif., a corporation of California No Drawing. Application April is, 1945, Serial No. 588,718

'1 Claims; (01. 202-42) components contained in the fraction thus causing a disturbance of the vapor pressure equilibrium that formerly existed in the fraction in such a manner that the partial vapor pressure of 'fugacity of at least one component within the fraction is changed sufficiently to permit its separation by controlled fractional distillation.

Such an azeotroplng process has found wide spread usage in the treatment of hydrocarbon fractions for the separation of the relatively more parafiinic hydrocarbons from the relatively more aromatic hydrocarbons contained in the fraction. In most cases the azeotrope former employed has 2 an aromatic such as cyclohexane from benzene or of a paraflin fraction from an aromatic, or of a paraflin-naphthene mixture from an aromatic such as the separation of the parafllns and naphthenes boiling in the range of toluene from toluene by the addition to such a mixture of an azeotrope former having the effect of increasing the vapor pressure of the paramns and naphthenes in the fraction whereby they maybe separated more readily by a controlled distillation from the toluene in the fraction.

There are many cases. however. where it is deslrable to improve the means of separation of two or more members of a homologous series such as for example two or more naphthenic hydrocarbons. It has been repeatedly observed in such mixtures that the relative ease of separation is not as closely correlated to the differences in boiling points existing between the members of the series as might be reasonably expected. For example, in a mixture of methylcyclopentane, boiling point 71.9 C.. and cyclohexane, boiling point 80.8 C., it would be expected on the basis of an 8.9 C. difference in the boiling points of had the effect of increasing the vapor pressure of the relatively non-aromatic hydrocarbons in the fraction thus permitting their removal from the fraction as an overhead distillate together with the azeotrope former. In the present description of our invention the aforesaid type of distillation will hereinafter be referred to as azeotropic distillation, and the overhead product consisting of the azeotrope former together with the component or components most effected by said azeotrope former will hereinafter be referred to as the azeotropic distillate, while the residue remaining as bottoms from the azeotropic distillation will hereinafter be referred to as the "azeotropic bottoms." v

Heretofore the process of azeotropic distillation has been employed primarily for the separation tillation is in the separation of a naphthene from these two compounds that their separation by conventlonal fractional distillation could be readily accomplished. However, it appears that the binary mixture of methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane deviates sufficiently from an ideal solution to prevent their efiicient separation. Thus, we have found that if an equal volume mixture of methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane is distilled under controlled conditions in-a fractionating column of approximately 30 theoretical plates it is only possible to recover from about 50% to 55% of each of these components in the pure state. This difficulty appears to exist throughout the naphthenic hydrocarbon series and has been Observed specifically in such mixtures as dimethylcyclopentanes, boiling-point C. to 99 C., and methylcyclohexane, boiling point 100.8" C., methylcyclohexane and ethylcyclopentane, I boiling point 103.2 0., ethylcyclohexane, boiling point -130.4 C. and dimethylcyclohexane, boiling point 119 C. to C., dimethylcyclohexane and propylcyclopentan'e, boiling point 130.8 0., and the like. Similarly, this difflculty of separation to a degree in excess ofwhat might be expected from the differences in the boiling points of the naphthenic hydrocarbons has been observed between the members of the various isomeric.v forms of any particular naphthenes. For example. trans. 1,2-dimethylcyclopentane, boiling at approximately 92 C. is dimcult to separate from the 'cisisomer boiling at approximately 99 C. and in like manner the ole and trans forms of the dimethylcyclohexanes boiling from 4? C. to 5 C. apart are diflicult to separate by ordinary fractional distillation. Still further. .we have found that the naphthenic hydrocarbons differing from each other solely in the isomeric forms of the alkylating groups are more difficult to separate than would be expected from an observation of their boiling points. Thus, propyl cyclopentane, boiling at 130.8 C. and isopropyl cyclopentane, boiling at 126.4 C. are diflicult to separate by ordinary fractional distillation as are mixtures of isobutyl cyclopentane, boiling at 108.3 C. and tertiary butyl cyclopentane, boiling at 145.2 C. These examples serve only to show the difilculty arising in the separation of the various forms of naphthenic hydrocarbons boiling from 3 C. to

C. apart, which difllcultyapparently resides.

in the formation of a non-ideal solution between these naphthenic hydrocarbons.

It is an object of our invention to prepare hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon fractions which are difllcult to separate by ordinary fractional distillation.

More specifically it is an object of our invention to prepare substantially pure naphthenic hydrocarbons from fractions thereof by means of azeotropic distillation employing the azeotrope formers hereinafter disclosed.

It is a further object of our invention to facilitate the separation of naphthenic hydrocarbons boiling from about 3 C. to about 10 C. apart, which are diflicult to separate by conventional means due to the formation of a non-ideal solution.

Other objects and advantages of our invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art as the description thereof proceeds. I

We have discovered that it is possible by employing azeotrope formers as hereinafter disclosed to improve the separation of naphthenic hydrocarbons. As azeotrope formers for this separation we have found the organic esters to be particularly eflective. Esters are classified as the combination product of an alcohol and an acid in which water is eliminated between the two by combination of the OH group of the alcohol with a hydrogen ofthe acid. The preparation of esters is not confined to this reaction but the end product may be classified as such. In

this groupage are included not only the esters of organic acids but of mineral acids as well and for convenience in this disclosure these will be divided into halogenides and oxy en esters to distinguish the esters of hydrogen halides from the esters of the oxygen-containing acids either organic or inorganic in nature. genides and oxygen esters have the effect of forming with the lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon in the mixture a minimum boiling azeotrope which is more readily separated from 4 hydrocarbon is considerably more readily separated from a second hydrocarbon than is the given hydrocarbon itself. Thus we have found that the formation of 'an' azeotrope between the lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon in a binary mixture and the azeotropic formers herein disclosed yielding anazectropic drop of only a few degrees is considerably easier to separate from the higher boiling naphthene in the mixture by distillation than is the lower boiling naphthene itself. This we have throughout the range of naphthenic hydrocarbons and as a result have been able; to separate these hydrocarbons by azeotropic distillation even in those cases where a large azeotropic drop is not obtained. However, it is to be understood that we prefer to employ those halogenides and esters which result in the greatest boiling point spread between the azeotrope of the lower boiling naphthene and the higher boiling naphthene or an azeotrope formed therewith.

We have found that in the separation of naphthenic hydrocarbons employing the esters and halogenides as azeotrope formers that it is necessary to employ the oxygenesters or the halogenides which boil at least 10 C. below the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbons, and not more than 15 C. below the lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbons which are desired to be separated. As pointed out above it is not necessary in each case that the azeotrope former effect a spread in the boiling points of the two components inasmuch as azeotropes may be formed between each of the naphthenic hydrocarbons and the azeotrope former employed boiling the same distance apart or even slightly'less distance apart than the naphthenic hydrocarbons themselves without defeating the purpose of our invention which is essentially to improve the separation of the various naphthenic hydrocarbons.

The oxygen esters which we may employ in the process of our invention are those organic esters in which the hydrocarbon radical is of comparatively low molecular weight and the ester group is selected or is derived from such acids as boric, nitric, formic; acetic, propionic, butyric and the like. Thus we may employ such compounds as methyl borate, isobutylnitrite, nor- These halo-.

the remaining naphthenic hydrocarbons by means of ordinary fractional distillation.

In this regard it appears that the azeotropic drop; that is, the difference in the boiling points of the azeotrope and of the lower boiling component of a binary mixture is of greater significance than would be expected.

It has been reported in the literature and is confirmed by our investigations that azeotropes of a given boiling point spread are in many cases more readily separated by fractional distillation than are two hydrocarbons of the same boiling point spread. Further an azeotrope with a given hydrocarbon boiling only slightly below the given mal butyl formate, isobutyl formate, methyl acetate, ethyl propionate, and the like, providing such esters conform to the boiling point limitations established for the particular naphthenic hydrocarbon mixture to be separated. In like manner we may employ any halogenide conforming to the necessary boiling point specifications such as isobutyl chloride, chloroform, iodo ethane. l-chloropropane, normal butyl chloride, l-bromobutane, l-fiuoropentane, and the like. Thus, for example in the separation of methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane we may use such esters as isobutyl nitrite and methyl borate; and such halogenides as isobutyl chloride and'chloroform, and in the separation of methylcyclohexane from ethylcyclopentane we may use suchvesters as ethyl nitrate. and such halogenides as isopropyl iodide and the like and in the separation of dimethylcyclohexane from propyl cyclopentane we may use such esters as normal butyl formate, normal propyl nitrate and the like and such halogenides as normal amyl chloride'and normal heptyl fluoride and the like. I

In the application of our process the presence of hydrocarbons other than naphthenic hydrocarbons is immaterial to the eflectivenessof the process inasmuch as these hydrocarbons when found to be true present may be taken as overhead with the azeotrope or remain in the azeotropic residue depending upon the nature and relative boiling point, and may thereafter be separated from the corresponding naphthenic hydrocarbon by methods known in the art such as for example fractional distillation, azeotropic distillation, extractive distillation, solvent extraction and the like. Due to the dimculty of separating parafiins and naphthenes by these methods parafllns may remain as impurities in the naphthene fractions if their boiling points are too close. However, we have found that these extraneous hydrocarbons donot hinder the improved separation of the naphthenic hydrocarbons by our process.

It is within the scope of our invention to use any manner of separation of the azeotrope former from the naphthenic azeotrope after the separation of the azeotrope from the remaining naphthenic hydrocarbons such as for example secondary azeotropic distillation, solvent extraction, extractive distillation, or the like. The part cular method employed for separating or breaking the aaeotrope is a function of the particular azeotrope former employed, of the availability of solvents or secondary azeotrope formers and of the A mixture of 50 volumes of cyclohexane and 50 volumes of methylcyclopentane was fractionated in a distillation column of approximately 30 theoretical plates with an internal reflux ratio of to 1 in the absence of any azeotrope former resulting in the recovery of 27 /2 volumes of pure methylcyclopentane and of 27 volumes of pure cyclohexane, the remainder being a mixture of the two hydrocarbons. A second m xture of 100 volumes of methylcyclopentane. boiling point 71.9 C.. and 100 volumes of cyclohexane, boiling point 80.8 0.. and 200 volumes of methyl borate, boiling point 65 C.. was fractionated in the same 30 theoretical plate column at an internal reflux ratio of 20 to 1. In this azeotropic distillat on an initial fraction was taken overhead amounting to 57.3% of the original charge and comprising 100 volumes of methylcyclopentane, and 129 volumes of methyl borate at avapor temperature of 64 C. A transition fraction was obtained bollng between 64" C. and 65 C. representing 17.7% of the original mixture and comprising 71 volumes of methyl borate. The azeotropic residue from this distillation consisted of essentially pure cyclohexanecontaminated by only a trace of methyl borate. It is apparent from these data that an excess of methyl borate was employed over and above that necessary for eflfective separation of the naphthenes. Of still more importance is the fact that these data indicate that in this instance at least when the boiling point limitations established for the azeotrope formers are observed no azeotrope is formed with the higher boiling naphthene. Thus, methyl borate apparently does not form an azeotrope with the cyclohexane. It is evident from these two distillations that the azeotropic process of our invention results in a decided increase in the recovery of the pure naphthenic hydrocarbon.

Example II Another azeotropic distillation was performed employing a halogenide as the azeotrope former for the separation of methylcyclo'hexane and ethylcyclopentane. In this distillation 100volumes or methylcyclohexane, boiling point 100.8" C.. 100 volumes of ethyloyclopentane, boiling point 103.2 C.. and 200 volumes of 2-iodo propane. boiling point 89.5 C. was distilled in a column of approximately 30 theoretical plates at an internal reflux ratio of 18 to 1. The initial fraction from this distillation representing 44% of the original mixture was obtained at a vapor temperature of 88 C. and comprised of 98 volumes of methylcyclohexane and 180 volumes of 2-iodo propane. A transition fractonrepresentlng 6.7% of the original fraction was obtained at a vapor temperature in the range of 88 C. to 90 C. and comprised of 20 volumes of 2-iodo propane, 3 volumes of ethylcyclopentane, and 4 volumes of ethylcyclohexane. The residue from this distillation amounted to 97 volumes of ethylcyclopentane contaminated by only slight traces of the azeotrope former.

The recoveries given in these examples are based on 100% recovery in the distillation, the 1'% or 2% loss in the distillation is assumed to have been spread throughout.

Having described and illustrated our invention and realizing it is understood that we do not intend to be limited to the particular examples given inasmuch as our process is applicable over the range of naphthenic hydrocarbons and is lim-- ited only by the usage of such esters and halogenides as conform to the temperature limitations established for satisfactory azeotropy, we claim:

1. A process for the treatment of a complex hydrocarbon fraction to separate one naphthenic hydrocarbon from another close boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon contained therein which comprises azeotropically distilling said complex hydrocarbon fraction in the presence of a sufllcient amount of an ester boiling at least 10 C. below the boiling point of the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon in said complex hydrocarbon fraction and not more than 15 C. below the boiling point of the lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon in said fraction, said ester having the effect of forming a minimum boiling mixture with the lower boiling of said naphthenic hydrocarbons whereby said lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon is obtained in the azeotropic distillate and the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon remains in the azeotropic bottoms.

2. A process for the treatment of a complex hydrocarbon fraction to separate one naphthenic hydrocarbon from another naphthenic hydrocarbon contained therein which naphthenic hydrocarbons have boiling points differing by not more than about 10 C., which process comprises azeotropically distilling said complex hydrocarbon fraction in-the presence of a sufllcient amount of an azeotropic former having a boiling point at least 10 C. below the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon of said complex hydrocarbon fraction and not more than 15 C. below the lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon of said fraction, said azetropic former being selected from the class of compounds consisting of the esters of organic and inorganic acids having the eflect of forming a minimum boiling mixture with the lower boiling of said naphthenic hydrocarbons whereby said lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon is obtained in the azeotropic distillate and the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon remains in the azeotropic bottoms.

3. A process for the treatment of a complex hydrocarbon fraction to separate one naphthenic hydrocarbon from another naphthenic hydrocarbon contained therein which naphthenic hydrocarbons have boiling points diilering by between about 3 and C., which process comprises azeotropically distilling said complex hydrocarbon fraction in the presence of a sumcient amount of an ester of an oxygen-containing acid which boils at least 10 C. below the boiling point and the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon remains in the azeotropic bottoms.

4. A process for the treatment of a complex hydrocarbon fraction to separate one naphthenic hydrocarbon from another naphthenic hydrocarbon contained therein which comprises azeotropically distilling said complex hydrocarbon fraction in the presence of a suflicient amount of an inorganic halogenide which boils at least 10 C. below the boiling point of the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon in said traction and not more than C. below the boiling point of the lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon in said fraction which halogenide has the eil'ect of forming a minimum boiling mixture with the lower boiling of said naphthenic hydrocarbons whereby said lower boiling naphthenic hydrocarbons is obtained in the azeotropic distillate and the higher boiling naphthenic hydrocarbon remains in the azeotropic bottoms.

5. A process for the separation of cyclohexane and methylcyclopentane which comprises azeotropically distilling the cyclohexane-methylcyclopentane containing fraction in the presence of a I bottoms.

6. A process for the separation of cyclohexa and methylcyclopentane which comprises azeo tropically distilling the cyclohexane-methylcyclo pentane containing fraction in the presence 0 a suflicient amount of chloroform whereby a azeotrope of chloroform and methyicyclopentane is obtained as the azeotropic distillateand the cyclohexane remains as the azeotropic bottoms.

7. A process for the separation of cyclohexane and methylcyclopentane which comprises azeo tropically distilling the cyclohexane-methylcyclo. pentane containing fraction in the presence of a suflicient amount of isobutyl nitrite whereby an azeotrope of isobutyl nitrite and methylcyclopentane is obtained as the azeotropic distillate and the cyclohexane remains as the azeotropic bottoms.

JOSEPHINE M. STRIBLEY. GEORGE R. LAKE.

REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS OTHER REFERENCES 'Mair et al., Bureau of Standards Journal of Research, vol. 27, pages 44, 45, 46, 49, 55, 56, 5"! (1941). (Copy in Scientific Library.)