US2442455A - Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals - Google Patents

Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2442455A
US2442455A US550852A US55085244A US2442455A US 2442455 A US2442455 A US 2442455A US 550852 A US550852 A US 550852A US 55085244 A US55085244 A US 55085244A US 2442455 A US2442455 A US 2442455A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
ton
water
flotation
concentrate
reagents
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US550852A
Inventor
Booth Robert Ben
Carpenter Joseph Emmett
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wyeth Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
American Cyanamid Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by American Cyanamid Co filed Critical American Cyanamid Co
Priority to US550852A priority Critical patent/US2442455A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2442455A publication Critical patent/US2442455A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/012Organic compounds containing sulfur
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • B03D1/021Froth-flotation processes for treatment of phosphate ores
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S209/00Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
    • Y10S209/902Froth flotation; phosphate

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the beneflciation oi' the mineral values of various ores. More particularly, the invention relates to an improved process of beneficiating ores containing salts of the alkaline earth metals.
  • the alkaline earth metal compounds may constitute the desirable portions and in other cases constitute the gangue.
  • the alkaline earth metal is the desired valuable constituent and in other cases the negative radical constitutes the important product.
  • This type of reagent includes material such as the fatty acids per se, talloel, naphthenic acids, resin acids, mixtures of these and also soaps thereof.
  • alkaline earth metal silicates such as talc
  • anionic type collectors Most of the others, such as the micas, generally require reagents of the cationic type to obtain a satisfactory beneficiation. With this latter group, which require the use of cationic type reagents, the present invention is not concerned. Actually most of these materials are alkali rather than alkaline earth salts. The process is concerned only with those alkaline earth salts which are normally responsive to an anionic reagent, such as are commonly used in the flotation of non-metallics.
  • the ores in most cases are those of minerals such as calcite and pebble-phosphate, which must be handled in large quantities at the minimum expense.
  • most of the available low-cost anionic collectors are not as effective for the purpose as may be desired.
  • Many of the reagents require the use of excessive quantities to obtain the desired result, the economic benefits being offset by the reagent consumption.
  • Others are not sufllciently selective, so that when used in suitable amountsthey do not produce a concentrate which is of sufllciently high-grade.
  • the desired objects of the present invention are accomplished by carrying out a beneflciating operation dependent on surface conditions on the ore to separate the mineral values from the gangue while making use of a promoter comprising sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons of the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubricating oils, or salts or soaps of such acids.
  • a promoter comprising sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons of the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubricating oils, or salts or soaps of such acids.
  • the sulfonate is used in combination with an auxiliary reagent having a high degree of oiliness.
  • the most commQ 9i such operations is froth flotation.
  • other procedures dependent on surface phenomena such as agglomerate tabling, belt tabling, and the like, may be used to take advantage of the highly desirable properties of the reagents of the present invention.
  • Sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons such as those which constitute the principal reagent in carrying out the novel process of the present invention, are commercially available in a number of different forms.
  • their principal source is as by-products from the refining of lubricating oil fractions in the course of treatment with fuming sulfuric acids or sulfuric acids.
  • these by-products are generally found to be salts of the sulfonated hydrocarbons.
  • the metallic radical of the salt is sodium.
  • salts of other metals such as the ammonium salts or salts of the alkaline earth metals, aluminum and the like, are encountered. In some cases, no attempt has been made to neutralize the acid product or only partially to neutralize the acid product.
  • the present invention makes little difference whether the sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbon is used per se or as a salt; whether or not the sulfur is present in a sulfate or a sulfonate group, there usually being some of both present; or whether the compounds are used in acidic form, that is without neutralization or in partially neutralized form or as the ammonium salts or the salts of sodium, potassium, calcium, barium, aluminum, and the like, Nor need the materials be purified, since mixtures of these compounds produce wholly satisfactory results.
  • the term sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons is, therefore, intended to include such mixtures as are found in the commercial products.
  • the commercially-available sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons may be divided on a functional basis into two distinct groups.
  • One of these is the group variously known as maho any acids, mahogany soaps and the like. This group is characterized in that its constituents are generally oil-soluble but may be waterdispersible. Usually, but not necessarily, these compounds have a deepmahogany color which gives rise to the generic designation as "mahogany" compounds.
  • the other group is generally. but not necessarily, characterized by a green coloration.
  • compounds of this group are usually referred to as "green” acids or “green soaps. More important than the color distinction, however, is the fact that the so-called “green compounds are characterized by being water-soluble.
  • the two groups of compounds are by no means necessarily equivalents each to the other. Particularly is this true as in the present invention, when they are applied to ore dressing problems.
  • the instant application is primarily concerned with the use of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates. i. e., the green sulfuric acids and salts or soaps thereof, which require considerably different treatment than those of the mahogany or oilsoluble type.
  • the process of the present'invention comprises the steps of reducing the ore, if necessary, to a size suitable for feed to a froth flotation operation; desliming the ore, if necessary; making a pulp of the ore with water; adding the reagents thereto; subjecting the pulped ore to froth flotation and finally collecting the fro h concentrate in the usual manner,
  • the flotation concentrate will contain the valuable constituents.
  • the flotation may be conducted to remove certain minerals from a valuable product which is retained as the flotation tailing.
  • Pulp densities of about 60-65% solids were found to give excellent results and to be ordinarily preferable.
  • the green type of petroleum sulfonates and/or their derivatives which are used in the present process are characterized. as noted above, by their solubility in water. While this solubility is not always complete, it is sufllciently high so that when used alone the reagent may not always produce the optimum concentration of certain minerals. These green compounds appear to lack certain water-repellant properties which are helpful in making successful concentration. In the process of the present invention, this difiiculty is readily overcome by the addition of an amount of a more hydrophobic material. This may be done by adding an oil in suitable quantity or by mixing a portion of oil-soluble petroleum sulfonates with the water-soluble type, Any of the commercially available oils of animal, vegetable or mineral origin may be used for this purpose.
  • Unsulfonated petroleum derivatives such as crude oil, kerosene or fuel oil are very suitable.
  • Saponiflable oils such as coconut oil, cotton seed oil and other glyceride oils may be used.
  • Anionic materials such as the fatty acids and the like may be used in certain cases.
  • Talloel in view of its low cost, is especially useful in such operations.
  • fatty acids with a water-soluble petroleum sulfonate provides a very flexible reagent combination. It is suitable for the treatment of a wide variety of ores and minerals since it enables a wide control of the froth characteristics.
  • a strong promoter such as a fatty acid.
  • Such a promoter is needed on many diflicultly-floatable ores, yet it cannot be used because under the operating conditions a heavy, sticky froth is produced.
  • the froth characteristics tend to entrap gangue particles, and, therefore, the concentrate obtained is too low in grade.
  • the flotation reagent compounds of the present invention may be used to marked advantage under other conditions,
  • concentration of scheelite by froth flotation ordinarily requires the use of highly alkaline dispersing agents. Their use often has a marked effect on the characteristics of the froth obtainable when using an anionic promoter of the fatty acid type such as oleic acid or talloel.
  • anionic promoter of the fatty acid type such as oleic acid or talloel.
  • the use of such reagents in conjunction with a water-soluble petroleum sulfonate enables the operator to control the froth characteristics so as to obtain the optimum benefit.
  • Amounts of the hydrophobic materials used will obviously vary with the particular circumstances. The most pronounced variations in demand are caused by the nature of the ore and the particular water-soluble petroleum sulfonates being used. No general rule can, therefore, be empirically established for all cases. In general, however, the amounts required have been found to fall within the range of about 0.1-2.5 pounds/ton of ore treated. Ordinarily, however, the amounts used will be between about 0.5 and 1.5 pounds/ton. Variations in the temperature at which the flotation is carried out i have also been found to have an effect on the amount of these hydrophobic-materials required.
  • the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates are frequently available as water solutions as well as in paste or dry forms. Frequently these products contain oil, sodium sulfate, caustic and other impurities. While it is unnecessary to remove these impurities before using the sulfonates in flotation, the amount of reagent used in any particular operation will depend frequently on the dilution and the amount of impurities present.
  • the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates have generally proved to be satisfactory when used as the principal promoter.
  • certain external circumstances may require that the actual froth flotation operation be carried out in the presence of other substances such as oleic acid, talloel and the like, which are themselves well known anionic-type reagents.
  • This condition may be brought about by the nature of the flow scheme employed, the presence of these additional agents being due to other operations which are being carried out in the same plant. For example, these reagents are frequently carried along in reusing process water. It has been found that the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates are perfectly effective in the presence of these extraneous reagents.
  • EXAMPLE 2 A sample of Pennsylvania cement rock containing chiefly calcite, quartz, and mica was ground and conditioned for 30 seconds at about 22% solids with 0.5 pound/ton of reagent A and 1.0 pound/ton of fuel oil, followed by two additional conditioning flotation stageseach of which used 0.5 pound/ton of water-soluble petroleum sulfonate and 1.0 pound/ton fuel oil. The resultant concentrates were combined and cleaned. From a feed to flotation assaying about 72.9% CaCOs, a cleaned concentrate was obtained assaying 93.4% CaCOa, representing a recovery of 88.7% of the carbonate in the feed.
  • EXAMPLE 3 A sample of Pennsylvania cement rock containing calcite, quartz, mica, and carbonaceous material and assaying about 75.5% CaCOa was ground to minus 325 mesh, Samples of this ground mixture were conditioned with 1.5 pound/ton of crude calcium lignin sulfonate in a Fagergren flotation machine, The reagents were varied. The metallurgical results and reagents are shown in the following table.
  • Example 5 scribed in Example 5 were deslimed and condi- Per Cent CaCO:
  • a Texas ore containing celestite, dolomite and feldspars and having a SrSOs-content of about 78% was crushed to minus 200 mesh, conditioned tioned at high solids with reagent A and various auxiliary agents. The conditioned pulp was then at 22% solids with 5 pounds/ton sodium silicate, 6o floated and the resulting concentrate cleaned by 1 pound/ton of reagent A and 2 pounds/ton of refloating. The results of these tests are preiuel oil. On treatment by froth flotation in a sented in the following table. 2.0 pounds/ton of Fagergren machine, a rougher concentrate was obtained which, after a single cleaning, gave a concentrate containing about 71% of the celestite in a 95.24% SrSO4 grade.
  • caustic soda may be used to advantage in phosphate treatment as indicated in the following tests.
  • a sample of Florida phosphate rock was deslimed hydraulically, conditioned with reagents at high solids,-and floated in a Fagergren flotation machine. The flotation concentrate was cleaned twice. The feed to flotation assayed about 36.5% B. P. L. The results of several flotation tests follow. In all tests 2.4 pounds/ton of a neutralized water-soluble petroleum sulfonate from Sun Oil Company, 0.99 pound/ton talloel. and 5.0 pounds/ton 22 B. fuel oil were used and the caustic soda varied in It will be noted that good results were obtained without the use of caustic. However, improve-- ment was obtained when caustic was employed.
  • EXAMPLE 9 An Illinois fluorite ore, containing chiefly fluorite (about 72% CaFz) and limestone (about 18.5% 02.603) were round to minus 65 mesh, and deslimed using a 2 pounds/ton of soda. ash and 0.1 pound/ton of quebracho. The deslimed pulp was then made up to 22% solids and conditioned for 1 minute with about 0.1 pound/ton of quebracho and varying amounts of green acids. In different tests the pulp was treated at diflerent temperatures. The conditioned pulp was subjected to froth flotation in a Fagergren flotation machine. The concentrate was cleaned once using 0.25 pound/ton of quebracho.
  • EXAMPLE 11 A New York talc ore was ground, diluted to flotation density without desliming, conditioned with 6.0 pounds/ton of a water-soluble petroleum sulionate, containing about 30% sulfonates. The sulfonate was added as an emulsion with 3.0 pounds/ton of fuel oil, a small amount of sulfuric acid being used as anemulsion stabilizer. The pulp was conditioned with the sulfonatefuel oil combination for 1 minute and floated for 2 minutes in a Fagergren flotation machine. The resulting concentrate was cleaned twice, each cleaning operation being preceded by a 1-minute conditioning with 1.0 pound/ton sodium silicate. From a feed to flotation containing about 71% tale, a concentrate containing 96% talc and representing a recovery of 62% was obtained.
  • the improvement in beneflciating ores of a mineral selected from the group consisting of barite, calcite, celesg5 tite, dolomite, phosphate rock, gypsum, magnesite, scheelite and talc which comprises the steps of forming apulp of the ore with water, treating the ore with an eflective amount of a material selected from the group consisting of the watersoluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons oi the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubrieating oils, and soaps and water-soluble salts of such acids and subjecting the treated pulp to conditions under which the selectively-.eflected constituents are separated from the non-effected cone stituents.
  • pounds per ton of ore and its efliciency is enhanced by the conjoint use of from about 0.1 to 3.0 pounds per ton of a hydrophobic agent.
  • a hydrophobic material selected from the group consisting of the animal, vegetable and mineral oils, fatty acids, talloel, water-insoluble sulfonated derivatives thereoi, and the sodium, potassium and ammonium soaps of such oils, fatty acids and sulfonated derivatives thereof.

Description

Patented June 1, 1948 conoan'rmmon or nommcacaous, WATER-INSOLUBLE ALKALINE-EARTH METAL sammnraars Robert Ben Booth, Springdal'e, and Joseph Ems mett Carpenter, Greenwich, Conn., assignora to American Cyanamid Company, New York, N. L, a corporation of Maine No Drawing.
Application August 23, 1944, Serial No. 550.852
8 Claims. (Cl. 209-166) This invention relates to the beneflciation oi' the mineral values of various ores. More particularly, the invention relates to an improved process of beneficiating ores containing salts of the alkaline earth metals.
Many of the common minerals occur as compounds which chemically may be considered salts of the alkaline earth metals. In concentrating these minerals or in the beneflciation of ores containing them, the alkaline earth metal compounds may constitute the desirable portions and in other cases constitute the gangue. In some cases the alkaline earth metal is the desired valuable constituent and in other cases the negative radical constitutes the important product.
In our copending application, now U. S. Letters Patent 2,410,770, an excellent procedure for beneflciating fluorite, a mineral of this type, has been shown. It now has been found that similar teachings are adaptable to other minerals. Typical members of the group of minerals with which the present invention are concerned are calcite, barite, pebble-phosphate, gypsum, celestite, magnesite, dolomite, scheelite, and the like. These minerals, so far as concentration by flotation is concerned, have one characteristic in common, other than being salts of alkaline earth metals. They react in general in the same way when subjected to flotation in the presence of anionic collectors of the fatty acid type, such as are commonly used in beneficiating non-metallic, nonsulflde minerals. This type of reagent includes material such as the fatty acids per se, talloel, naphthenic acids, resin acids, mixtures of these and also soaps thereof.
So far as the response of minerals in general to collecting agents of the anionic type is concerned, an exception should be noted. Some of the alkaline earth metal silicates, such as talc, are satisfactorily responsive to anionic type collectors, Most of the others, such as the micas, generally require reagents of the cationic type to obtain a satisfactory beneficiation. With this latter group, which require the use of cationic type reagents, the present invention is not concerned. Actually most of these materials are alkali rather than alkaline earth salts. The process is concerned only with those alkaline earth salts which are normally responsive to an anionic reagent, such as are commonly used in the flotation of non-metallics.
Many of these alkaline earth salts are commercially of great importance despite the fact that they occur in nature in deposits which are not as high-grade as is ordinarily desira le. i0!
commercial utility. Therefore, beneflciation of some type is very widely practiced on these ores. In general, a number of analogous problems are presented.
First, the ores in most cases are those of minerals such as calcite and pebble-phosphate, which must be handled in large quantities at the minimum expense. Unfortunately. most of the available low-cost anionic collectors are not as effective for the purpose as may be desired. Many of the reagents require the use of excessive quantities to obtain the desired result, the economic benefits being offset by the reagent consumption. Others are not sufllciently selective, so that when used in suitable amountsthey do not produce a concentrate which is of sufllciently high-grade.
Secondly, many of these minerals occur in ores containing gangue which produces large quantities of slimes, or the valuable minerals may be sufficiently soft so as toproduce considerable slimes during their preparation for flotation. Unfortunately, the ordinary anionic collectors such as the fatty acids, talloel, naphthenic acids and the like, or their sodium, potassium, and ammonium soaps have a certain tendency to become less eflective in the presence of excessive slimes. Consequently, some corrective steps, either by addition of auxiliary reagents or by desliming the ore, must be taken. In many instances these latter, to be effective, require suflicient expenditure to offset anyutility the process may otherwise possess,
There is, therefore, a demand for a suitable process of beneficiating minerals of the previously-described type which is of general utility, uses cheap and readily available reagents, does not require excessive reagent consumption and is not excessively sensitive to the presence of slimes. It is the principal object of the present invention to develop such a process, making use of a novel type of reagent which secures for the new process these desired advantages.
In general, the desired objects of the present invention are accomplished by carrying out a beneflciating operation dependent on surface conditions on the ore to separate the mineral values from the gangue while making use of a promoter comprising sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons of the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubricating oils, or salts or soaps of such acids. Preferably, also the sulfonate is used in combination with an auxiliary reagent having a high degree of oiliness. The most commQ 9i such operations is froth flotation. However, other procedures dependent on surface phenomena such as agglomerate tabling, belt tabling, and the like, may be used to take advantage of the highly desirable properties of the reagents of the present invention.
Sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons, such as those which constitute the principal reagent in carrying out the novel process of the present invention, are commercially available in a number of different forms. However, as shown, for example, in U. S. Patent 2,331,049, their principal source is as by-products from the refining of lubricating oil fractions in the course of treatment with fuming sulfuric acids or sulfuric acids. When so produced, these by-products are generally found to be salts of the sulfonated hydrocarbons. Most commonly, the metallic radical of the salt is sodium. However, salts of other metals such as the ammonium salts or salts of the alkaline earth metals, aluminum and the like, are encountered. In some cases, no attempt has been made to neutralize the acid product or only partially to neutralize the acid product.
So far as the present invention is concerned, it makes little difference whether the sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbon is used per se or as a salt; whether or not the sulfur is present in a sulfate or a sulfonate group, there usually being some of both present; or whether the compounds are used in acidic form, that is without neutralization or in partially neutralized form or as the ammonium salts or the salts of sodium, potassium, calcium, barium, aluminum, and the like, Nor need the materials be purified, since mixtures of these compounds produce wholly satisfactory results. As used in the present case, the term sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons" is, therefore, intended to include such mixtures as are found in the commercial products.
However, the commercially-available sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons may be divided on a functional basis into two distinct groups. One of these is the group variously known as maho any acids, mahogany soaps and the like. This group is characterized in that its constituents are generally oil-soluble but may be waterdispersible. Usually, but not necessarily, these compounds have a deepmahogany color which gives rise to the generic designation as "mahogany" compounds.
The other group is generally. but not necessarily, characterized by a green coloration. Hence, compounds of this group are usually referred to as "green" acids or "green soaps. More important than the color distinction, however, is the fact that the so-called "green compounds are characterized by being water-soluble. Despite their other similarities the two groups of compounds are by no means necessarily equivalents each to the other. Particularly is this true as in the present invention, when they are applied to ore dressing problems. The instant application is primarily concerned with the use of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates. i. e., the green sulfuric acids and salts or soaps thereof, which require considerably different treatment than those of the mahogany or oilsoluble type.
In general, the process of the present'invention comprises the steps of reducing the ore, if necessary, to a size suitable for feed to a froth flotation operation; desliming the ore, if necessary; making a pulp of the ore with water; adding the reagents thereto; subjecting the pulped ore to froth flotation and finally collecting the fro h concentrate in the usual manner, In many cases the flotation concentrate will contain the valuable constituents. In others, the flotation may be conducted to remove certain minerals from a valuable product which is retained as the flotation tailing.
Where it is desirable to use a desliming operation, it has been found well in some cases to carry out this operation in the presence of soda ash, sodium silicate, or some equivalent alkaline material or other dispersing agent to assist in freeing the slimes. If a modifier for the gangue is to be used in the subsequent operations, it may be well in some cases to add a small amount of the modifier during desliming. Where a modifier for the gangue minerals is to be used in carrying out the process of the present invention, quebracho was found to give excellent results. Other modifiers such as dextrin, particularly yellow corn dextrin, sodium and calcium lignin sulfonates and the alkali phosphates and polyphosphates may be used with highly satisfactory results.
It was also found desirable in certain cases to condition the ore-pulp with the flotation reagents prior to the actual flotation step. Pulp densities of about 60-65% solids were found to give excellent results and to be ordinarily preferable.
However, if so desired, lower pulp densities even down to densities such as those commonly used in flotation operations per se may be used. The invention is not necessarily limited to any particular mode of admixture, and the reagents may be added directly to the flotation cell if so desired, and still obtain acceptable results.
The green type of petroleum sulfonates and/or their derivatives which are used in the present process are characterized. as noted above, by their solubility in water. While this solubility is not always complete, it is sufllciently high so that when used alone the reagent may not always produce the optimum concentration of certain minerals. These green compounds appear to lack certain water-repellant properties which are helpful in making successful concentration. In the process of the present invention, this difiiculty is readily overcome by the addition of an amount of a more hydrophobic material. This may be done by adding an oil in suitable quantity or by mixing a portion of oil-soluble petroleum sulfonates with the water-soluble type, Any of the commercially available oils of animal, vegetable or mineral origin may be used for this purpose. Unsulfonated petroleum derivatives such as crude oil, kerosene or fuel oil are very suitable. Saponiflable oils, such as coconut oil, cotton seed oil and other glyceride oils may be used. Anionic materials such as the fatty acids and the like may be used in certain cases. Talloel, in view of its low cost, is especially useful in such operations.
The use of fatty acids with a water-soluble petroleum sulfonate provides a very flexible reagent combination. It is suitable for the treatment of a wide variety of ores and minerals since it enables a wide control of the froth characteristics. For example, in certain flotation operations it is often desirable to use a strong promoter such as a fatty acid. Such a promoter is needed on many diflicultly-floatable ores, yet it cannot be used because under the operating conditions a heavy, sticky froth is produced. The froth characteristics tend to entrap gangue particles, and, therefore, the concentrate obtained is too low in grade.
Such a difficulty is generally readily overcome by using the reagent compounds of the present invention. Even relatively small amounts of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonate may serve to modify the texture and volume of the froth. Such modification often so increases the selectivity of the operation that the same or increased amounts of the'mlneral value is collected as when the fatty acid is used alone. Yet, the rejection of the gangue particles is such as to produce a marked improvement in grade.
Similarly, the flotation reagent compounds of the present invention may be used to marked advantage under other conditions, For example, the concentration of scheelite by froth flotation ordinarily requires the use of highly alkaline dispersing agents. Their use often has a marked effect on the characteristics of the froth obtainable when using an anionic promoter of the fatty acid type such as oleic acid or talloel. On the other hand, the use of such reagents in conjunction with a water-soluble petroleum sulfonate enables the operator to control the froth characteristics so as to obtain the optimum benefit.
Amounts of the hydrophobic materials used will obviously vary with the particular circumstances. The most pronounced variations in demand are caused by the nature of the ore and the particular water-soluble petroleum sulfonates being used. No general rule can, therefore, be empirically established for all cases. In general, however, the amounts required have been found to fall within the range of about 0.1-2.5 pounds/ton of ore treated. Ordinarily, however, the amounts used will be between about 0.5 and 1.5 pounds/ton. Variations in the temperature at which the flotation is carried out i have also been found to have an effect on the amount of these hydrophobic-materials required.
Similarly, the nature of the ore, the pulp density, the type of water used, the amount of slimes present, the source of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates have all been found to have a direct bearing on the amount of petroleum sulfonate required to bring about an effective concentration. Therefore, as in the case of the hydrophobic materials, no fixed rule applicable to all instances can be laid down as to the amount of collecting agent required, In general, how ever, it has been found that amounts of watersoluble petroleum hydrocarbons ranging from about 0.1 to 5.0 pounds/ton will take care of all but the most extraordinary cases. With the ores most commonly encountered, this range can be substantially halved, since most of the ores can be readily beneficlated using an amount of reagent in the range from about 0.2 to 3.0 pounds/ton.
The water-soluble petroleum sulfonates are frequently available as water solutions as well as in paste or dry forms. Frequently these products contain oil, sodium sulfate, caustic and other impurities. While it is unnecessary to remove these impurities before using the sulfonates in flotation, the amount of reagent used in any particular operation will depend frequently on the dilution and the amount of impurities present.
As has been shown, the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates have generally proved to be satisfactory when used as the principal promoter. However, as also has been shown, certain external circumstances may require that the actual froth flotation operation be carried out in the presence of other substances such as oleic acid, talloel and the like, which are themselves well known anionic-type reagents. This condition may be brought about by the nature of the flow scheme employed, the presence of these additional agents being due to other operations which are being carried out in the same plant. For example, these reagents are frequently carried along in reusing process water. It has been found that the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates are perfectly effective in the presence of these extraneous reagents. In fact, as has been noted above, under some circumstances these agents may be added deliberately as corrective measures in certain parts of the flotation operation Similarly, the presence of small amounts of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonates has been frequently found to increase the effectiveness of these additional reagents in their intended applications.
The invention will be more fully illustrated in combination with the following examples which are meant by way of illustration and not by way of limitation. All parts are by weight unless otherwise noted. Where tons are referred to, short tons are intended. In the following examples, the terms reagents A, B, C, and D" have been used to designate water-soluble sul fonated petroleum hydrocarbons of the "green acid" type obtained in the refining of petroleum lubricating oil fractions. -The principal distinction between these reagents is in the source of their origin.
subjected to a froth flotation to remove a sulfide concentrate, using soda ash, sodium silicate, secondary butyl xanthate, and pine oil as reagents. The tailings from this flotation operation contained approximately 44% barium sulfate. These were conditioned without desliming with 1.0 pound/ton of reagent A and 1.0 pound/ton of fuel oil and then floated in a Fagergren flotation machine. The resulting concentrate was cleaned once without additional reagents. The concentrate assayed 95.6% barium sulfateand contained 86.6% of the barite in the feed, The water-soluble petroleum sulfonate used in this test was obtained from the manufacturer in the form of a dry solid.
EXAMPLE 2 A sample of Pennsylvania cement rock containing chiefly calcite, quartz, and mica was ground and conditioned for 30 seconds at about 22% solids with 0.5 pound/ton of reagent A and 1.0 pound/ton of fuel oil, followed by two additional conditioning flotation stageseach of which used 0.5 pound/ton of water-soluble petroleum sulfonate and 1.0 pound/ton fuel oil. The resultant concentrates were combined and cleaned. From a feed to flotation assaying about 72.9% CaCOs, a cleaned concentrate was obtained assaying 93.4% CaCOa, representing a recovery of 88.7% of the carbonate in the feed.
EXAMPLE 3 A sample of Pennsylvania cement rock containing calcite, quartz, mica, and carbonaceous material and assaying about 75.5% CaCOa was ground to minus 325 mesh, Samples of this ground mixture were conditioned with 1.5 pound/ton of crude calcium lignin sulfonate in a Fagergren flotation machine, The reagents were varied. The metallurgical results and reagents are shown in the following table.
B. P. L. were only a normal eum sulfonates.
Middling Telling gren machine and ingle cleaning. In the Insol. Assay deslimed, scrubbed and raulic classification was applied.
Concentrate P m m tenths wmuuanmuw Exams: 6
B. P. L.
m u o A number of samples of Florida pebble-phos- Table 1r lb./ton
It will be noted in the above tests that the Samples of the Florida phosphate rock. de-
ll, No. 2....-.-...
. -..do....- Talloel.-..
Fuel 0 alloel ordinary procedure followed in treating Florida pebble phosphate in which caustic soda is used in the conditioning operation was not followed.
scribed in Example 5 were deslimed and condi- Per Cent CaCO:
Assay poor selectivity Concentrate Weight Per Cent Snlionate Type lb.lton
Table 1 Reagents Used pounds/ton of l coconut oil and ta1loel.. 1.3 pounds/ton talloeL.
0.8 pound/ton saponifled talloel..-
A....-... C--...--. B....-.-.
From the foregoing results it will be apparent that the reagents used in the present invention gave superior results to those obtainable in similar tests using ordinary reagents such as talloel and saponifled talloel.
Exanru: 4
A Texas ore containing celestite, dolomite and feldspars and having a SrSOs-content of about 78% was crushed to minus 200 mesh, conditioned tioned at high solids with reagent A and various auxiliary agents. The conditioned pulp was then at 22% solids with 5 pounds/ton sodium silicate, 6o floated and the resulting concentrate cleaned by 1 pound/ton of reagent A and 2 pounds/ton of refloating. The results of these tests are preiuel oil. On treatment by froth flotation in a sented in the following table. 2.0 pounds/ton of Fagergren machine, a rougher concentrate was obtained which, after a single cleaning, gave a concentrate containing about 71% of the celestite in a 95.24% SrSO4 grade.
Rgh. Tail.
mmwmwmuu maaaaaem P B. P. L. Dist.
Cl. Tall.
maths.
Insol.
w .as 5
Per cent Per Dist.
w ase mummammm Cleaner Concentrate B. P. L.
Assay Table III 0000000000 .mQWLZZLLLLL Bunker O 0i1.........,.
Fish 03.-.. Talloel....-..-
Naphthenlc Acids..
cld--....
Naphthenic Acids Fuel Oil No. Oleic A 9 Exurru'l In order to show low sensitivity to slimes of the process of the present invention, samples of a Florida phosphate rock (about 30% B. P. 1...), which in ordinary operation requires a high degree of desliming, were subjected to froth flotation using the ordinary reagent combination of talloel and fuel oil and also using a reduced amount of talloel which was replaced with reagent B. Only a very mild desliming was carried out. No caustic soda was used, the rougher concentrate was given a final cleaning. Illustrative results and the reagents used are shown in the following table.
found that slightly more reagent was required, that the recovery was slightly less but that the concentrate in general was of higher grade and contained less objectionable non-metallic gangue. Illustrative results are shown in Table IV.
Table IV Per Cent B P. L T Per Cent B. P. L- Pounds per on Per cent Dismh Inso 3 Assa Dlstriby Mlddling Telling No. 2 col 7 2.0 1.0 1.0 77.87 78.98 3.73 9. 11.97 None 1. 0 i. 0 No flotatlon0.24% weight recovery None 1. 0 3. 0 No useful flotation Exams: 8 Exams: 10
In certain cases caustic soda may be used to advantage in phosphate treatment as indicated in the following tests. A sample of Florida phosphate rock was deslimed hydraulically, conditioned with reagents at high solids,-and floated in a Fagergren flotation machine. The flotation concentrate was cleaned twice. The feed to flotation assayed about 36.5% B. P. L. The results of several flotation tests follow. In all tests 2.4 pounds/ton of a neutralized water-soluble petroleum sulfonate from Sun Oil Company, 0.99 pound/ton talloel. and 5.0 pounds/ton 22 B. fuel oil were used and the caustic soda varied in It will be noted that good results were obtained without the use of caustic. However, improve-- ment was obtained when caustic was employed.
EXAMPLE 9 An Illinois fluorite ore, containing chiefly fluorite (about 72% CaFz) and limestone (about 18.5% 02.603) were round to minus 65 mesh, and deslimed using a 2 pounds/ton of soda. ash and 0.1 pound/ton of quebracho. The deslimed pulp was then made up to 22% solids and conditioned for 1 minute with about 0.1 pound/ton of quebracho and varying amounts of green acids. In different tests the pulp was treated at diflerent temperatures. The conditioned pulp was subjected to froth flotation in a Fagergren flotation machine. The concentrate was cleaned once using 0.25 pound/ton of quebracho. It was found that acceptable results could be obtained using green acids in amounts varying from 0.5-2.0 pounds/ton over a temperature range of from 32-100 F. At the lower temperatures it was A table concentrate containing mainly scheelite, pyrite, and garnet were ground in the presence of 2.0 pounds/ton of soda ash, treated with 1.0 pound/ton sodium silicate, and deslimed. A sulfide concentrate was removed using 0.10 pound/ton sodium secondary butyl xanthate and 0.11 pound/ton of pine oil. The resulting tailings were conditioned with 1.0 pound/ton sodium silicate, 4.0 pounds/ton of a petroleum green acids and 1.0 pound/ton of fuel oil and a tungsten concentrate removed. This concentrate was cleaned once; 1.0 pound/ton of sodium silicate was added to the cleaning operation. 92.48% of the tungsten was thus recovered in the cleaner concentrate. The grade of this concentrate was 75.65% W03.
EXAMPLE 11 A New York talc ore was ground, diluted to flotation density without desliming, conditioned with 6.0 pounds/ton of a water-soluble petroleum sulionate, containing about 30% sulfonates. The sulfonate was added as an emulsion with 3.0 pounds/ton of fuel oil, a small amount of sulfuric acid being used as anemulsion stabilizer. The pulp was conditioned with the sulfonatefuel oil combination for 1 minute and floated for 2 minutes in a Fagergren flotation machine. The resulting concentrate was cleaned twice, each cleaning operation being preceded by a 1-minute conditioning with 1.0 pound/ton sodium silicate. From a feed to flotation containing about 71% tale, a concentrate containing 96% talc and representing a recovery of 62% was obtained.
EXAMPLE 12 cassava 1'1 process is by no means so'limited." This will be more fully illustrated in the followingexample.
Exams: 13
Samples of minus 8 mesh Florida phosphate with 4.6 pounds/ton or a water-soluble petroleum 1o sulfonate and 13.9 pounds/ton of fuel oil. In the second test the procedure was the same except that 0.6 pound/ton of caustic soda was used with the sulfonate-oil combination. In the first test 90.3% of the B. P. L. was recovered in a 15 concentrate assaying 70.0% B. P. L, In the second test 91.2% or the B P. L. was recovered in a concentrate assaying 71.2% B. P. L.
We claim:
1. In separating ores containing a plurality of 2 constituents by modifying surface conditions on at least one of the constituents with an agent having a selective afllnity therefor, the improvement in beneflciating ores of a mineral selected from the group consisting of barite, calcite, celesg5 tite, dolomite, phosphate rock, gypsum, magnesite, scheelite and talc which comprises the steps of forming apulp of the ore with water, treating the ore with an eflective amount of a material selected from the group consisting of the watersoluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons oi the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubrieating oils, and soaps and water-soluble salts of such acids and subjecting the treated pulp to conditions under which the selectively-.eflected constituents are separated from the non-effected cone stituents.
2. A process according to claim 1 in which the action of the water-soluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbon is enhanced by the conjointuse of a. hydrophobic agent used in amounts sunlcient to increase the lipophilic properties of the orepromoter complex. I
3. A process accordingto claim 1 in which the water-soluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbon is used in amounts ranging from about'0.1 to about 5.0 pounds per ton of ore.
4. A process according to claim 1 in which the water-soluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbon is used in amounts ranging from about 0.1 to 5.0
pounds per ton of ore and its efliciency is enhanced by the conjoint use of from about 0.1 to 3.0 pounds per ton of a hydrophobic agent.
5. In beneflciating ores of a mineral selected from the group consisting of barite, calcite, celes-' tite, dolomite, phosphate "rock, gypsum, magnesite, scheelite and talc by froth flotation, the steps which comprise forming a pulp of the ore with water, treating the ore with an eflective amount of a material selected from the group consisting of the water-soluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons of the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubricating oils, and soaps and watersoluble salts oi. such acids, and subjecting the treated pulp to conditions under which the selectively-efiected constituents are floated away from the non-efl'ected constituents.
6. In beneficiating ores of a mineral selected from the group consisting of barite, calcite, celestite, dolomite, phosphate rock, gypsum, magnesite, scheelite and talc by froth fiotation, the steps which comprise forming a pulp of the ore with water, treating the ore with 0.1-5.0 pounds per ton of ore of a material selected from the group consisting of the water-soluble, sulfonated petroleum hydrocarbons of the green acid type obtained in the refining of lubricating oils, and soaps and water-soluble salts of such acids, and subjecting the treated pulp to conditions under which the selectively-eflected constituents are floated away from the non-effected constituents.
7. A process according to claim 6 in which the efficacy of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonate is enhanced by the conjoint use of from about 0.1-3.0 pounds per ton of a hydrophobic material.
8. A process according to claim 6 in which the eflicacy of the water-soluble petroleum sulfonate is enhanced by the conjoint use of from about 0.1-3.0 pounds per ton of a hydrophobic material selected from the group consisting of the animal, vegetable and mineral oils, fatty acids, talloel, water-insoluble sulfonated derivatives thereoi, and the sodium, potassium and ammonium soaps of such oils, fatty acids and sulfonated derivatives thereof.
ROBERT BEN BOOTH. JOSEPH EMME'I'I' CARPENTER.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 1,170,665 Nutter Feb. 8, 1916 1,996,035 Singleton Mar. 26, 1935 2,105,827 Tartaron Jan. 18, 1938 2,116,727 Lenher May 10, 1938 2,163,701 Ried June 27, 1939 2,216,992 Vogel-Jorgensen Oct. 8, 1940 2,299,893 Greene Oct. 27, 1942 2,303,931 Greene Dec. 1, 1942 2,305,032 Reaol Dec. 15, 1942 2,310,240 Keck Feb. 9, 1943
US550852A 1944-08-23 1944-08-23 Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals Expired - Lifetime US2442455A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US550852A US2442455A (en) 1944-08-23 1944-08-23 Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US550852A US2442455A (en) 1944-08-23 1944-08-23 Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2442455A true US2442455A (en) 1948-06-01

Family

ID=24198826

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US550852A Expired - Lifetime US2442455A (en) 1944-08-23 1944-08-23 Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2442455A (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2607479A (en) * 1948-02-04 1952-08-19 California Research Corp Agglomerate tabling of tungsten bearing ores
US2769542A (en) * 1953-04-03 1956-11-06 American Cyanamid Co Beneficiation of bauxite
US2970692A (en) * 1956-12-31 1961-02-07 Nat Lead Co Flotation of barite
US3102856A (en) * 1960-06-24 1963-09-03 Johnson & Johnson Platy talc beneficiation
US3164549A (en) * 1961-07-31 1965-01-05 Armour & Co Flotation separation of phosphate ores
US3405802A (en) * 1964-07-20 1968-10-15 Phosphate Dev Corp Ltd Flotation of apatite
US3456791A (en) * 1967-04-17 1969-07-22 Jose L Ramirez Separation of schoenite by flotation
US3459299A (en) * 1967-09-01 1969-08-05 Engelhard Min & Chem Talc beneficiation
US3462017A (en) * 1966-12-29 1969-08-19 Cominco Ltd Phosphate flotation process
US3462016A (en) * 1966-12-29 1969-08-19 Cominco Ltd Phosphate flotation process
US3482688A (en) * 1966-07-08 1969-12-09 Cominco Ltd Phosphate flotation process
US3685652A (en) * 1969-08-06 1972-08-22 Occidental Petroleum Corp Flotation recovery of mirabilite from salt complexes
US3915391A (en) * 1972-07-17 1975-10-28 Engelhard Min & Chem Recovery of scheelite from ores by flotation
US4040519A (en) * 1974-03-28 1977-08-09 Nittetsu Mining Company, Ltd. Froth flotation process for recovering sheelite
US4122950A (en) * 1975-11-24 1978-10-31 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials using hydrocarbon sulfonates
US4133750A (en) * 1975-10-30 1979-01-09 Mobil Oil Corporation Phosphate flotation process
US4172029A (en) * 1978-05-11 1979-10-23 The Dow Chemical Company Phosphate flotation process
US4186083A (en) * 1977-12-21 1980-01-29 American Cyanamid Company Process for froth flotation of non-sulfide minerals
US4269700A (en) * 1978-03-21 1981-05-26 Occidental Research Corporation Flotation of inorganic materials from glass using hydrocarbon sulfonates
US4514292A (en) * 1983-11-09 1985-04-30 Hercules Incorporated Froth flotation process
US5171427A (en) * 1990-02-23 1992-12-15 The Dow Chemical Company Sulfonated and carboxylate collector compositions useful in the flotation of minerals
US5962828A (en) * 1997-10-15 1999-10-05 Custom Chemicals Corporation Enhanced flotation reagents for beneficiation of phosphate ores
US10434520B2 (en) * 2016-08-12 2019-10-08 Arr-Maz Products, L.P. Collector for beneficiating carbonaceous phosphate ores

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1170665A (en) * 1915-08-31 1916-02-08 Minerals Separation American Syndicate 1913 Ltd Concentration of ore.
US1996035A (en) * 1931-09-21 1935-03-26 American Agricultural Chem Co Mineral concentration
US2105827A (en) * 1935-12-11 1938-01-18 Phosphate Recovery Corp Concentration of nonmetallic minerals
US2116727A (en) * 1933-06-10 1938-05-10 Du Pont Flotation process
US2163701A (en) * 1937-09-10 1939-06-27 Separation Process Company Flotation process
US2216992A (en) * 1937-09-18 1940-10-08 Separation Process Company Froth flotation reagent
US2299893A (en) * 1941-03-18 1942-10-27 Phosphate Recovery Corp Process for concentrating minerals
US2303931A (en) * 1940-04-25 1942-12-01 Phosphate Recovery Corp Process for concentrating phosphate ores
US2305032A (en) * 1940-05-15 1942-12-15 Standard Oil Dev Co Concentration of ores by flotation
US2310240A (en) * 1939-10-02 1943-02-09 Walter E Keck Flotation of ores

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1170665A (en) * 1915-08-31 1916-02-08 Minerals Separation American Syndicate 1913 Ltd Concentration of ore.
US1996035A (en) * 1931-09-21 1935-03-26 American Agricultural Chem Co Mineral concentration
US2116727A (en) * 1933-06-10 1938-05-10 Du Pont Flotation process
US2105827A (en) * 1935-12-11 1938-01-18 Phosphate Recovery Corp Concentration of nonmetallic minerals
US2163701A (en) * 1937-09-10 1939-06-27 Separation Process Company Flotation process
US2216992A (en) * 1937-09-18 1940-10-08 Separation Process Company Froth flotation reagent
US2310240A (en) * 1939-10-02 1943-02-09 Walter E Keck Flotation of ores
US2303931A (en) * 1940-04-25 1942-12-01 Phosphate Recovery Corp Process for concentrating phosphate ores
US2305032A (en) * 1940-05-15 1942-12-15 Standard Oil Dev Co Concentration of ores by flotation
US2299893A (en) * 1941-03-18 1942-10-27 Phosphate Recovery Corp Process for concentrating minerals

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2607479A (en) * 1948-02-04 1952-08-19 California Research Corp Agglomerate tabling of tungsten bearing ores
US2769542A (en) * 1953-04-03 1956-11-06 American Cyanamid Co Beneficiation of bauxite
US2970692A (en) * 1956-12-31 1961-02-07 Nat Lead Co Flotation of barite
US3102856A (en) * 1960-06-24 1963-09-03 Johnson & Johnson Platy talc beneficiation
US3164549A (en) * 1961-07-31 1965-01-05 Armour & Co Flotation separation of phosphate ores
US3405802A (en) * 1964-07-20 1968-10-15 Phosphate Dev Corp Ltd Flotation of apatite
US3482688A (en) * 1966-07-08 1969-12-09 Cominco Ltd Phosphate flotation process
US3462017A (en) * 1966-12-29 1969-08-19 Cominco Ltd Phosphate flotation process
US3462016A (en) * 1966-12-29 1969-08-19 Cominco Ltd Phosphate flotation process
US3456791A (en) * 1967-04-17 1969-07-22 Jose L Ramirez Separation of schoenite by flotation
US3459299A (en) * 1967-09-01 1969-08-05 Engelhard Min & Chem Talc beneficiation
US3685652A (en) * 1969-08-06 1972-08-22 Occidental Petroleum Corp Flotation recovery of mirabilite from salt complexes
US3915391A (en) * 1972-07-17 1975-10-28 Engelhard Min & Chem Recovery of scheelite from ores by flotation
US4040519A (en) * 1974-03-28 1977-08-09 Nittetsu Mining Company, Ltd. Froth flotation process for recovering sheelite
US4133750A (en) * 1975-10-30 1979-01-09 Mobil Oil Corporation Phosphate flotation process
US4122950A (en) * 1975-11-24 1978-10-31 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials using hydrocarbon sulfonates
US4186083A (en) * 1977-12-21 1980-01-29 American Cyanamid Company Process for froth flotation of non-sulfide minerals
US4269700A (en) * 1978-03-21 1981-05-26 Occidental Research Corporation Flotation of inorganic materials from glass using hydrocarbon sulfonates
US4172029A (en) * 1978-05-11 1979-10-23 The Dow Chemical Company Phosphate flotation process
US4514292A (en) * 1983-11-09 1985-04-30 Hercules Incorporated Froth flotation process
US5171427A (en) * 1990-02-23 1992-12-15 The Dow Chemical Company Sulfonated and carboxylate collector compositions useful in the flotation of minerals
US5962828A (en) * 1997-10-15 1999-10-05 Custom Chemicals Corporation Enhanced flotation reagents for beneficiation of phosphate ores
US6149013A (en) * 1997-10-15 2000-11-21 Custom Chemicals Corporation Enhanced flotation reagents for beneficiation of phosphate ores
US10434520B2 (en) * 2016-08-12 2019-10-08 Arr-Maz Products, L.P. Collector for beneficiating carbonaceous phosphate ores

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2442455A (en) Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals
US2990958A (en) Froth flotation method
US2293640A (en) Process of concentrating phosphate minerals
US2373305A (en) Tungsten ore flotation
US2433258A (en) Froth flotation of nonsulfide ores with a mixture of oil-soluble and water-soluble petroleum sulfonates
US2407651A (en) Concentrating fluorspar by froth flotation
US2373688A (en) Flotation of ores
US3314537A (en) Treatment of phosphate rock slimes
US2120485A (en) Ore flotation
US2310240A (en) Flotation of ores
US2483192A (en) Froth flotation of iron impurities from feldspar
US2959281A (en) Flotation of niobium-bearing minerals
US2410377A (en) Beneficiation of iron ores
US3910836A (en) Pyrochlore flotation
US2322789A (en) Concentration of sylvinite ores
US2105807A (en) Differential concentration of non
US2383467A (en) Flotation of iron ores
US2410770A (en) Beneficiation of fluorite
US3469692A (en) Use of organic dithiols as flotation reagents
US2470150A (en) Froth flotation of oxide iron ore
US3037627A (en) Method of beneficiating sulfide and oxide ores of copper, manganese, lead and zinc
US2126292A (en) Process of mineral concentration
US2423022A (en) Froth flotation of silica from iron ore by anionic collectors
US2525146A (en) Selective separation by flotation of phosphatic titanium-oxide mixtures
US3278028A (en) Flotation of mica