US2409665A - Purification of industrial sands - Google Patents

Purification of industrial sands Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2409665A
US2409665A US506876A US50687643A US2409665A US 2409665 A US2409665 A US 2409665A US 506876 A US506876 A US 506876A US 50687643 A US50687643 A US 50687643A US 2409665 A US2409665 A US 2409665A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
froth
sands
treatment
residue
pulp
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US506876A
Inventor
Allen T Cole
James B Duke
Lynn L Mcmurray
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Minerals Separation North American Corp
Original Assignee
Minerals Separation North American Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Minerals Separation North American Corp filed Critical Minerals Separation North American Corp
Priority to US506876A priority Critical patent/US2409665A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2409665A publication Critical patent/US2409665A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an improved process of purifying industrial sands, and particularly glass sands, by froth-flotation.
  • Suchsands generally contain ferruginous impurities in the form of iron-bearing and ironstained minerals which are detrimental in glassmaking.
  • ferruginous impurities exist in the sands in a very small quantity, it is essential that they be reduced to very low limits. That, however, presents difficulties owing to the varying nature of the ferruginous impurities found in industrial sands.
  • the present invention may be considered an improvement upon the process covered by the patent to Tartaron and Duke, No. 2,283,295, owned by the assignee of the present application in which process a thick aqueous pulp of glass sands is conditioned with cooperating agents consisting of a substantially insoluble and unsaponifiable oil, a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, and an alkali; after which said conditioned pulp is dilutedand subjected to froth-flotation to float off the ferruginous impurities from the silica, leaving the residue as the purified glass sands.
  • cooperating agents consisting of a substantially insoluble and unsaponifiable oil, a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, and an alkali
  • the invention herein described is theresult of the discovery that the removal of ferruginous impurities from sands may be even more advantageously accomplished, if the treatment of sands, according to the process above mentioned, is followed by froth-fiotation treatment of the residue of that process in the presence of cooperating agents consisting of a mineral acid and a cationicactive nitrogenous compound proportioned to collect ferruginous impurities in preference to quartz, usually with a suitable frother; thereby roducing a froth containing ferruginous impurities which is discarded, leaving the residue as the purified glass sands.
  • the second froth-flotation treatment of the residue of the first froth-flotation treatment after conditioning said residue with the cooperating agents mentioned, results 'in removing a large proportion of the 'ferruginous impurities which were left in the residue of the first froth-flotation treatment, and without unduly decreasing the weight of thefinal product which is the residue of the second frothfiotation treatment. While it is unnecessary to theorize about the reasons for the results attained by. the successive treatments in the manner described, it is believed that the success of the second treatment after conditioning with the agents mentioned is due partly to'the eifect of the agents used in the first treatment on the residueofithattreatment. At :any rate,-the two conditionings with the agents mentioned, and the successive froth-flotation treatments after those conditionings, cooperate to produce surprisingly good results.
  • the insoluble and unsaponifiable oil may be (for example) fuel oil, lubricating oil, Diesel oil, etc.
  • the fatty acid compound may be (for example) a crude fatty acid compound derived from fish oil, or the product commercially known as varlacoid which is a mixture of fatty and resin acids;
  • the alkali maybe (for example) sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sodiumcarbonate, sodium silicate, etc.
  • the mineral acid may be (for example) sulfuric acid.
  • the cationicactive nitrogenous compound may be (for example) the higher aliphatic amines and their salts with water-soluble acids, the condensation prod-- nets of amino-alcohols with high-molecularweight fatty acids and their salts with watersoluble acids, the higher alkyl-O-substituted isoureas and their salts with water-soluble acids, the higher aliphatic quaternary ammonium bases and their salts with water-soluble acids, the higher alkyl pyridinium salts of water-soluble acids, the higher alkyl quinolinium salts of water-soluble acids, etc.
  • cationic-active nitrogenous compounds which we have found satisfactory are aliphatic amines containing from 7 to 19 carbon atoms in the alkyl group; for example; the commercial product sold by I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. as D. P. 243, which is understood to be a 50% aqueous paste of technical laurylamine hydrochloride understood to contain approximately 18%foctylamine hydrochloride, 10% decylamine hydrochloride, 55% laurylamine hydrochloride, 17% myristyl amine hydrochloride, and traces of secondary and tertiary amines.
  • Another example of said cationicactive nitrogenous compounds is the commercial product sold by Armour and Company as Am. Ac.
  • 1180-C which is understood to consist of approximately 73% mono-octadecylamine acetate, about 24% mono-heptadecylamine acetate, together with small quantities of secondary and tertiary amine acetates.
  • a suitable frother such as .pine oil, is preferably used inone or both treatments, along with the other agents; and conditioning for the first treatment is best conducted in a thick pulp.
  • EXAMPLE III In this example, the industrial sands were obtained from P. J. Weisel, Inc., of Corona, California, and were treated as received, without screening or desliming. The percentage of ferruginous impurities in these sands is much higher than in the sands of Examples I and II; and, in addition to the reagents used in Example I, aluminum chloride (A1C13) was used in the second treatment of this Example III.
  • the feed was first conditioned for about two minutes in an aqueous pulp at about 71% solids with the reagents listed below in column (1); after which the conditioned pulp was subjected to froth-flotation treatment, and the froth was removed and discarded.
  • the residue of this treatment was conditioned for about a quarter of a minute with the reagents listed below in column (2) and was then subjected to the second frothfiotation treatment, and the resulting froth was removed and discarded.
  • the residue was the final product of purified sands,
  • the reagents used, in pounds per ton of feed, were as follows:
  • the cationicactive nitrogenous compound is an aliphatic amine whose alkyl group contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms.
  • frothflotation treatment to a second froth-flotation treatment in the presence of cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of a mineral acid and less than about one pound of a cationic-active nitrogenous compound containing an alkyl group which contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, both per ton of solids in the feed, and aluminum chloride, and removing and discarding th froth, leaving the residue as the purified sands.
  • the process ofremoving ferruginous impurities from industrial sands which consists in conditioning a thick aqueous pulp of such sands with a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, an alkali, and a mineral oil; diluting such conditioned pulp, subjecting it to a first froth-flotation treatment, and removing and discarding the froth; and treating the pulp residu of the aforesaid froth-flotation treatment with cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of a mineral acid and less than about one pound of a cationic-active nitrogenous compound containing an alkyl group which contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, both per ton of solids in the feed, and aluminum chloride; and subjecting that treated pulp residue to a froth-flotation treatment, and removing and discarding the froth, leaving the residue as the purified sands.
  • cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of

Description

Patented Oct. 22, 1946 PURIFICATION INDUSTRIAL SANDS Allen T. Cole and James B. Duke, Lakeland, Fla.,
and Lynn L. McMurray, Lovingston, Va., assignors .toMinerals Separation North American Corporation, New York, N. Y., a corporation of Maryland No Drawing. Application October 19, 1943,
Serial No. 506,876
7 Claims. 1
The present invention relates to an improved process of purifying industrial sands, and particularly glass sands, by froth-flotation. Suchsands generally contain ferruginous impurities in the form of iron-bearing and ironstained minerals which are detrimental in glassmaking. Although such ferruginous impurities exist in the sands in a very small quantity, it is essential that they be reduced to very low limits. That, however, presents difficulties owing to the varying nature of the ferruginous impurities found in industrial sands.
The present invention may be considered an improvement upon the process covered by the patent to Tartaron and Duke, No. 2,283,295, owned by the assignee of the present application in which process a thick aqueous pulp of glass sands is conditioned with cooperating agents consisting of a substantially insoluble and unsaponifiable oil, a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, and an alkali; after which said conditioned pulp is dilutedand subjected to froth-flotation to float off the ferruginous impurities from the silica, leaving the residue as the purified glass sands.
' The invention herein described is theresult of the discovery that the removal of ferruginous impurities from sands may be even more advantageously accomplished, if the treatment of sands, according to the process above mentioned, is followed by froth-fiotation treatment of the residue of that process in the presence of cooperating agents consisting of a mineral acid and a cationicactive nitrogenous compound proportioned to collect ferruginous impurities in preference to quartz, usually with a suitable frother; thereby roducing a froth containing ferruginous impurities which is discarded, leaving the residue as the purified glass sands. The second froth-flotation treatment of the residue of the first froth-flotation treatment, after conditioning said residue with the cooperating agents mentioned, results 'in removing a large proportion of the 'ferruginous impurities which were left in the residue of the first froth-flotation treatment, and without unduly decreasing the weight of thefinal product which is the residue of the second frothfiotation treatment. While it is unnecessary to theorize about the reasons for the results attained by. the successive treatments in the manner described, it is believed that the success of the second treatment after conditioning with the agents mentioned is due partly to'the eifect of the agents used in the first treatment on the residueofithattreatment. At :any rate,-the two conditionings with the agents mentioned, and the successive froth-flotation treatments after those conditionings, cooperate to produce surprisingly good results. a
In the first treatment, as described in the aforesaid patent, the insoluble and unsaponifiable oil may be (for example) fuel oil, lubricating oil, Diesel oil, etc. the fatty acid compound may be (for example) a crude fatty acid compound derived from fish oil, or the product commercially known as varlacoid which is a mixture of fatty and resin acids;. and the alkali maybe (for example) sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sodiumcarbonate, sodium silicate, etc.
In the second treatment, the mineral acid may be (for example) sulfuric acid. The cationicactive nitrogenous compound may be (for example) the higher aliphatic amines and their salts with water-soluble acids, the condensation prod-- nets of amino-alcohols with high-molecularweight fatty acids and their salts with watersoluble acids, the higher alkyl-O-substituted isoureas and their salts with water-soluble acids, the higher aliphatic quaternary ammonium bases and their salts with water-soluble acids, the higher alkyl pyridinium salts of water-soluble acids, the higher alkyl quinolinium salts of water-soluble acids, etc. Among the cationic-active nitrogenous compounds which we have found satisfactory are aliphatic amines containing from 7 to 19 carbon atoms in the alkyl group; for example; the commercial product sold by I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. as D. P. 243, which is understood to be a 50% aqueous paste of technical laurylamine hydrochloride understood to contain approximately 18%foctylamine hydrochloride, 10% decylamine hydrochloride, 55% laurylamine hydrochloride, 17% myristyl amine hydrochloride, and traces of secondary and tertiary amines. Another example of said cationicactive nitrogenous compounds is the commercial product sold by Armour and Company as Am. Ac. 1180-C which is understood to consist of approximately 73% mono-octadecylamine acetate, about 24% mono-heptadecylamine acetate, together with small quantities of secondary and tertiary amine acetates. A suitable frother, such as .pine oil, is preferably used inone or both treatments, along with the other agents; and conditioning for the first treatment is best conducted in a thick pulp. We have also discovered that in some cases considerably improved results may be obtained by employing in the second treatment of the process, along with thejmineral acid andLthe-cationic-active nitrogenous compound, a
salt of a trivalent metal such as aluminum chloride.
The invention will be understood from the following examples of the practice thereof on glass sands containing substantial amounts of ferruginous impurities.
' EXAMPLE I The crude industrial sands treated were of a fineness to pass through a 20 mesh screen. These sands were agitated in waterat about 50% solids for about three minutes for the purpose of disintegrating the clay, and the mixture was then deslimed. The substantially deslimed feed thus obtained was conditioned for about two minutes in an aqueous pulp at about 70% solids with the reagents listed below under column 1). The thus conditioned pulp was then diluted and subjected to froth-flotation treatment in a flotation cell, and the first froth product was removed and discarded. Then the reagents listed below in column (2) were added to the residue of the first flotation treatment and were distributed in the pulp by agitation for about one minute; after which the pulp was again subjected to froth-flotation treatment and the second froth product was removed and discarded. The residue was the final product of purified sands. The reagents used, in pounds per ton of feed, were as follows:
(1)First treatment (2) Second treatment Caustic soda 0.4 Sulfuric acid 5.5 Fuel oil 1.7 D. P. '243 0.3 "Varlacoid 0.3 Pine oil 0.2 Pine oil 0.2
The metallurgical results of the two treatments It will be noted that the ferruginous impurities in the sands have been reduced from 087% to 044%, that is to about 35% of the original amount; and that the weight of the final product was 67.7% of the weight of the feed.
EXAMPLE II In this example, the procedures were exactly the same as those in Example I; and the reagents used were the same in kind and quantity, except that Ac. 1180-C in the amount of 0.07 lb. per ton of feed was used instead of .D. P. 243. In this case the metallurgical results of the two treatments were as follows:
Percent Percent Percent Product weight Fezoa gf Feed 100. O. 088 100. 0 First froth product 17.6 21 42.1 Second froth product 10. 9 .18 22. 7 Final product 71. 043 35. 2
It will be seen that the ferruginous impurities in the sands were again reduced .to about 35% of the original amount; and that the weight of the final product was somewhat higher, namely, 71.5% of the weight of the feed.
EXAMPLE III In this example, the industrial sands were obtained from P. J. Weisel, Inc., of Corona, California, and were treated as received, without screening or desliming. The percentage of ferruginous impurities in these sands is much higher than in the sands of Examples I and II; and, in addition to the reagents used in Example I, aluminum chloride (A1C13) was used in the second treatment of this Example III.
The feed was first conditioned for about two minutes in an aqueous pulp at about 71% solids with the reagents listed below in column (1); after which the conditioned pulp was subjected to froth-flotation treatment, and the froth was removed and discarded. The residue of this treatment was conditioned for about a quarter of a minute with the reagents listed below in column (2) and was then subjected to the second frothfiotation treatment, and the resulting froth was removed and discarded. The residue was the final product of purified sands, The reagents used, in pounds per ton of feed, were as follows:
(1) First treatment (2) Second treatment Caustic sodn 0.5 Sulfuric acid (H SO 2.5 Fuel oil 2.3 P. 243" 0.6 Varlacoid 0.8 Aluminum chloride (AlCl 0.8
Pine oil 0.2
The metallurgical results of the two treatments were as follows:
The excellent nature of the results in this Example III will be evident from the facts that the ferruginous impurities in the sands have been reduced from 0.232% to 0.037%, that is, to about 16% of the original amount; and that the weight of the final product is 88.7% of the weight of the feed.
What isolaimed is:
1. The process of removing ferruginous impurities from industrial sands which consists in subjecting such sands to a first froth-flotation treatment in the presence of a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, an alkali and a mineral oil, and. removing and discarding the froth; and subjecting the pulp residue of th aforesaid first frothflotation treatment to a second froth-flotation treatment in the presence of cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of a mineral acid and less than about one pound of a cationic-active nitrogenous compound containing an alkyl group which contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, both per ton of solids in the feed, and removing and discarding the froth, leaving the residue as the purified sands.
'2. The process of claim 1 in which the cationicactive nitrogenous compound .is an aliphatic amine whose alkyl group contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms.
3. Th process of claim 1 in which a frother is used in addition to the other reagents.
4. The process of removing ferruginous impurities from industrial sands which consists in subjecting such sands to a first froth-flotation treatment in the presence of a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, an alkali and a mineral oil, and removing and discarding the froth; and subjecting the pulp residue of. the aforesaid frothflotation treatment to a second froth-flotation treatment in the presence of cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of a mineral acid and less than about one pound of a cationic-active nitrogenous compound containing an alkyl group which contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, both per ton of solids in the feed, and aluminum chloride, and removing and discarding th froth, leaving the residue as the purified sands.
5. The process of claim 4, in which the cationic-active compound is an aliphatic amine Whose alkyl group contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms.
6. The process of removing-ferruginous impurities from industrial sands which consists in conditioning a thick aqueous pulp of such sands with a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, an alkali, and a mineral oil; diluting such conditioned pulp, subjecting it to a first froth-fiotation treatment, and removing and discarding the froth; and subjecting the pulp residue of the aforesaid first froth-flotation treatment to a second froth flotation treatment in the presence of cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of a mineral acid and less than about one pound of a cationic-active nitrogenous compound containing an alkyl group Which contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, both per ton of solids in the feed, and removing and discarding the froth, leaving the residue as the purified sands.
7. The process ofremoving ferruginous impurities from industrial sands which consists in conditioning a thick aqueous pulp of such sands with a fatty acid compound having a hydrocarbon radical of at least 12 carbon atoms, an alkali, and a mineral oil; diluting such conditioned pulp, subjecting it to a first froth-flotation treatment, and removing and discarding the froth; and treating the pulp residu of the aforesaid froth-flotation treatment with cooperating agents consisting of less than about six pounds of a mineral acid and less than about one pound of a cationic-active nitrogenous compound containing an alkyl group which contains from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, both per ton of solids in the feed, and aluminum chloride; and subjecting that treated pulp residue to a froth-flotation treatment, and removing and discarding the froth, leaving the residue as the purified sands.
ALLEN T. COLE. JAMES B. DUKE. LYNN L. McMURRAY.
US506876A 1943-10-19 1943-10-19 Purification of industrial sands Expired - Lifetime US2409665A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US506876A US2409665A (en) 1943-10-19 1943-10-19 Purification of industrial sands

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US506876A US2409665A (en) 1943-10-19 1943-10-19 Purification of industrial sands

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2409665A true US2409665A (en) 1946-10-22

Family

ID=24016322

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US506876A Expired - Lifetime US2409665A (en) 1943-10-19 1943-10-19 Purification of industrial sands

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2409665A (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2578790A (en) * 1951-05-07 1951-12-18 Minerals Separation North Us Froth flotation of ferruginous impurities from finely divided granite rock
US2769540A (en) * 1952-11-08 1956-11-06 American Cyanamid Co Method of beneficiating sand
US2811254A (en) * 1955-01-06 1957-10-29 Int Minerals & Chem Corp Method for the beneficiation of phosphate ores
US2885078A (en) * 1956-04-12 1959-05-05 Int Minerals & Chem Corp Flotation of mica from silt deposits
US3282416A (en) * 1962-10-22 1966-11-01 Internat Pipe And Ceramics Cor Method of treating quartz sands
US3914385A (en) * 1973-06-11 1975-10-21 Owens Illinois Inc Benefication of siderite contaminated sand
US4067502A (en) * 1974-05-08 1978-01-10 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials
US4401638A (en) * 1981-12-21 1983-08-30 Materias Primas, Monterrey, S.A. Process for purifying silica sand
US4725351A (en) * 1986-09-29 1988-02-16 International Minerals & Chemical Corp. Collecting agents for use in the froth flotation of silica-containing ores
US20160051993A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2016-02-25 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Froth flotation separation and analysis

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2578790A (en) * 1951-05-07 1951-12-18 Minerals Separation North Us Froth flotation of ferruginous impurities from finely divided granite rock
US2769540A (en) * 1952-11-08 1956-11-06 American Cyanamid Co Method of beneficiating sand
US2811254A (en) * 1955-01-06 1957-10-29 Int Minerals & Chem Corp Method for the beneficiation of phosphate ores
US2885078A (en) * 1956-04-12 1959-05-05 Int Minerals & Chem Corp Flotation of mica from silt deposits
US3282416A (en) * 1962-10-22 1966-11-01 Internat Pipe And Ceramics Cor Method of treating quartz sands
US3914385A (en) * 1973-06-11 1975-10-21 Owens Illinois Inc Benefication of siderite contaminated sand
US4067502A (en) * 1974-05-08 1978-01-10 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials
US4401638A (en) * 1981-12-21 1983-08-30 Materias Primas, Monterrey, S.A. Process for purifying silica sand
US4725351A (en) * 1986-09-29 1988-02-16 International Minerals & Chemical Corp. Collecting agents for use in the froth flotation of silica-containing ores
US20160051993A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2016-02-25 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Froth flotation separation and analysis
US9776194B2 (en) * 2013-05-13 2017-10-03 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Froth flotation separation and analysis

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2409665A (en) Purification of industrial sands
US2341046A (en) Flotation
US2373688A (en) Flotation of ores
US4324653A (en) Process for the treatment of phosphate ores with silico-carbonate gangue
US2578790A (en) Froth flotation of ferruginous impurities from finely divided granite rock
US3164549A (en) Flotation separation of phosphate ores
US4493817A (en) Process for recovering pyrochlore mineral containing niobium and tantalum
US2303962A (en) Concentration of mica
US2298281A (en) Process of flotation separation of ore
US3710934A (en) Concentration of spodumene using flotation
US2222330A (en) Process of salt purification
US2748939A (en) Phosphate recovery in reverse flotation using a fluosilicate to deactivate the reagents
US2238439A (en) Froth flotation process
US3361257A (en) Phosphate flotation
US3032189A (en) Beneficiation of phosphatic ores
US2750036A (en) Process for concentrating phosphate ores
US2633241A (en) Froth flotation of iron-bearing minerals from feldspathic ores
US2433633A (en) Two-stage amine flotation of glass sands
US2293470A (en) Froth flotation of siliceous material
US4098688A (en) Brightening of clay by froth flotation
US2382178A (en) Process of concentrating ores
US2381662A (en) Concentration of ores
US2340580A (en) Process of purifying industrial sands
US2363104A (en) Magnesite ore treatment
US3310170A (en) Sylvinite flotation with amine composition