US2320681A - Method of analyzing earth formations - Google Patents

Method of analyzing earth formations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2320681A
US2320681A US336411A US33641140A US2320681A US 2320681 A US2320681 A US 2320681A US 336411 A US336411 A US 336411A US 33641140 A US33641140 A US 33641140A US 2320681 A US2320681 A US 2320681A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
specific gravity
samples
solvent
density
hydrocarbons
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US336411A
Inventor
Hubert H Thompson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Stanolind Oil and Gas Co
Original Assignee
Stanolind Oil and Gas Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stanolind Oil and Gas Co filed Critical Stanolind Oil and Gas Co
Priority to US336411A priority Critical patent/US2320681A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2320681A publication Critical patent/US2320681A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/24Earth materials
    • G01N33/241Earth materials for hydrocarbon content
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N9/00Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity
    • G01N9/10Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity by observing bodies wholly or partially immersed in fluid materials
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N9/00Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity
    • G01N9/10Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity by observing bodies wholly or partially immersed in fluid materials
    • G01N9/12Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity by observing bodies wholly or partially immersed in fluid materials by observing the depth of immersion of the bodies, e.g. hydrometers
    • G01N9/18Special adaptations for indicating, recording, or control
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N9/00Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity
    • G01N9/26Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity by measuring pressure differences

Definitions

  • This invention relates to geochemical well .108- ging, geochemical prospecting and the analysis of earth formations. It relates more particularly to the determination of the hydrocarbon and water content of drill cuttings from subsurface formations. It also relates, as will hereinafter appear, to the determination of hydrocarbon constituents in soil samples.
  • the present invention relates-principallyto the determination of the liquid, gaseous; and/or solid constituents, notably the former. More particularly this invention is directed to a specific gravity method of determining the hydrocarbon and water content of cuttings or cores from subsurface formations. Such determinations can be used in preparing a log of a well, for example in order-to obtain an indication of the presence and location of oil and gas deposits.
  • samples-0f the cuttings are taken at frequent vertically spaced intervals along a well bore. Samples thus taken are analyzed in one way or another for various hydrocarbon or quasi-hydrocarbon constitu- 3 cuts or groups of such constituents and the re- 'sults for the various samples are compared and plotted in order to obtain a log of the well which indicates the presence and location of oil and gas deposits.
  • a still further object is to provide a method of this type by which one can readily determine the proportionate quantities of hydrocarbons in agiven formation having a relatively low density
  • Samples of the drill cuttings or cores taken at selected spaced vertical points as previously described are preferably first weighed and crushed toa grain size approaching that of course sand, and then extracted with a suitable solvent.
  • This extraction can be carried out invarious ways, for instance by leaching or by use of a Soxhlet apparatus.
  • the cuttings as taken from the well can'be heated and immersed in a cold solvent which will penetrate the pores and extract the hydrocarbon matter.
  • the solvent extract freed of solid material is placed in a suitable apparatus for determining the relative density of the pure solvent as a reference liquid and the liquid containing dissolved material.
  • Suitable solvents for the two stage extraction are normal pentane having a specific gravity of about .6300 and carbon tetrachloride with a specific ravity of about'l.5835.
  • Suitable apparatus for the density or specific gravity method of determining hydrocarbons is shown in the drawings, wherein Figures I and II represent partly by diagram, two devices which may be used in following my method of analysis. It will be understood, however, that any method and apparatus which is sufficiently accurate to give comparative data can be used to determine the density or 'specific gravity of the solvent and solutions.
  • a hydrometer, a pycnometer, a Westphal balance, or a Westphal balance type plummet used on sensitive analytical balances can be used with considerable accuracy.
  • Figure III represents a geochemical well log showing the saturation of the formation and the contained therein as a function of the depth at which the samples were taken.
  • the bob I 18 a relative- .ly incompressible float which has been. annealed and carefully ground down so that it 'will just float tioned so as to form a continuous tube and permit the flow of the two fluids to a new level.
  • the reference fluid may be a fluid having the same specific gravity as the pure solvent,
  • the glass chamber or reservoir ll encloses the bob l0. At its lower endis a U-shaped line l2 having a valve l3 and terminating in a funnel or thistle H at .a point above-the fluid level in .the chamber H.
  • a tube l5 communicates with the reservoir near its top and extends from the wall of the chamber ll.
  • Flexible conduit l3 communicates with line and its free end terminates in thistle IS.
  • the upper end of chamber I l; isprovided with line I6 having valve ll.
  • Athermometer may be provided and from its-reading a correction made from the known coeiflcient of thermal expansion, instead of attempting accurate temperature control of the device, although the latter-means can be used satisfactorily.
  • can be calibrated to measure the change in height of the -liquid in terms of change in pressure to restore equilibrium. On the other hand, it is also possible and usually preferable to indicate the density or specific gravity of the dissolved material directly.
  • valves l3 and I1 are closed.
  • the glass chamber or reservoir II are filled with the fluid under test and normally the float bob l0 sinks to the bottom of II.
  • Flexible conduit I8 and thistle l9 contain a heavy immiscible fluid such as mercury.
  • cock 34 at their lower end and terminating at their free ends with reservoirs 32 and 33'.
  • the entire assembly canbe immersed in a constant temperature bath; for example a water bath in cylinder 35 at about room temperature.
  • a cathetometer 36 can be provided for noting and comparing the relative heights of the liquid in the balanced columns.
  • the specific gravity of the solvents containing the hydrocarbons extracted from the bit cuttings is determined by placing in one arm of the balanced columns of the manometer, with the stop cock closed, a volume of the original pure solvent as a reference fluid and in the other arm, to the same level, the solvent bearing the hydrocarbons.
  • the stop cock is then posiand tube is or some multiple or fraction thereof, and preferably be immiscible therewith.
  • the proportionate quantities of hydrocarbons having a relatively low specific gravity to those having a relatively high specific gravity can be determined for example, as follows.
  • One portion of the same formation or soil sample may be extracted with a light solvent such as pentane and another with a heavy solvent such as carbon tetrachloride.
  • the mean specific gravity of the hydrocarbons extracted by the two solvents can I various samples in order to obtain an indication of the presence and location of hydrocarbon deposits.
  • FIG. 111 is a log made in the course of drilling a well in Liberty County, Texas. This log shows the saturation of the formations and the mean specific gravity of the soluble materials contained therein, as a function of the depth of the points where sampleswere taken.
  • the quantity of hydrocarbons in these various samples was determined by leaching weighed quantities of them. with standardized amounts of carbon tetrachloride and measuring the differencebetween the specific gravity of the original solvent and that of the solution. This difierence was measured using the apparatus of Figure 11,
  • results of a log of this sort can be improved by,taking samples during very short time intervals, in order to make them represent exact depth. Also rapid methods of drying the samples with a minimum loss of hydrocarbon content canbe used, in order to minimize the time elapsed between the taking of the sample and the availability of the data.
  • the observed difference in column height is a function of the density of the extract solution and also a function of the weight percentage of the
  • the hydrocarbon saturation is expressed as parts per 10,000 by hydrocarbons dissolved therein.
  • the right-hand curve indicates in general the amount of material present, while the left-hand curve indicates its nature.
  • Earth formations recovered by a core drill can be analyzed very advantageously by the methods above described.
  • Cores and drill cuttings have long been taken from oil-bearing formations or formations which may be oil-bearing and it is desirable to determine the amount of oil present and also something about its probable chemical and physical nature.
  • Previously available methods for determining'hydrocarbon and water con- have been taken from oil-bearing formations or formations which may be oil-bearing and it is desirable to determine the amount of oil present and also something about its probable chemical and physical nature.
  • a method of prospecting comprising taking samples of earth formations, extracting a portion of each of said samples with an organic solventof relatively high specific gravity, extracting a second portion of each of said samples with an organic solvent of relatively low specificgravity, measuring the density of each of the extracts thus formed, and determining the mean specific gravity of the hydrocarbons extracted from each sample, to secure comparative data indicative of the presence and location of Y petroleum deposits.
  • the improvement comprising ascertaining the density of an organic solvent under selected pressure conditions, treating each of a plurality of earth samples with a portion of the organic sol-, vent, determining the density of each of the extracts thus formed, and measuring the change in pressure necessary to render the apparent density of the extract equivalent to that of the organic solvent alone.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Description

June 1, 1943 H P Q 7 2,320,681 METHOD OF 'ANALYZING EARTH FORMATIONS Filed May 21, 1940 2 Sheets-Sheet l Huberfi Thbmpson,
1; 1 943. H; HGTII-IOMPVSON I 2,320,681"
METHOD-OF ANALYZING EARTH -FOR 1L'*.'1IONS I Fil ed Ma y 21, 1940 '2 Sheets-Sine 2 QEOCHEMICAL WELL LOCI MEAN SPECIFIC GRAVITY HYDROCARBUN SATURATION hm" Ian-1s 10,000 by weigh]:
i nzzeiaiarf' Patented June l, 1943 METHOD OF ANALYZING EARTH FORMATIONS Hubert R. Thompson, Tulsa, Okla., assignor t, Stanollnd Oil and Gas Company, Tulsa, Okla., a corporation of Delaware Application May 21, 1940, Serial No. 336,411
3 plaims.
This invention relates to geochemical well .108- ging, geochemical prospecting and the analysis of earth formations. It relates more particularly to the determination of the hydrocarbon and water content of drill cuttings from subsurface formations. It also relates, as will hereinafter appear, to the determination of hydrocarbon constituents in soil samples.
It has been found that the presence of various hydrocarbons in drill cuttings from subsurface formationsis related to.the presence of oil and gas deposits within the particular stratum and in somewhat deeper strata. These constituents which serve as indiciaof the petroleum deposits include gaseous, liquid and solid materials. The present invention relates-principallyto the determination of the liquid, gaseous; and/or solid constituents, notably the former. More particularly this invention is directed to a specific gravity method of determining the hydrocarbon and water content of cuttings or cores from subsurface formations. Such determinations can be used in preparing a log of a well, for example in order-to obtain an indication of the presence and location of oil and gas deposits.-
In making a. geochemical well log, samples-0f the cuttings are taken at frequent vertically spaced intervals along a well bore. Samples thus taken are analyzed in one way or another for various hydrocarbon or quasi-hydrocarbon constitu- 3 cuts or groups of such constituents and the re- 'sults for the various samples are compared and plotted in order to obtain a log of the well which indicates the presence and location of oil and gas deposits.
It is an object of my invention to provide a new and improved method of geochemical well logging and geochemical prospecting. Another object of the invention is'to provide a particularly rapid method of analysis of core cuttings'and surface soils for hydrocarbon constituents.- A further object is to measure directly the water saturation and the oil saturation of a core sample from a subsurface formation.
A still further object is to provide a method of this type by which one can readily determine the proportionate quantities of hydrocarbons in agiven formation having a relatively low density,
or specific gravity and those having a relatively high density or specific gravity. It is also an obiect of my invention to provide a method of well logging wherein the total quantity of hydrocarbons present in drill cuttings taken during a drilling operation can be determined, Other and more detailed objects, advantages and uses of my invention will become apparent as the description thereof proceeds.
Samples of the drill cuttings or cores taken at selected spaced vertical points as previously described are preferably first weighed and crushed toa grain size approaching that of course sand, and then extracted with a suitable solvent. This extraction can be carried out invarious ways, for instance by leaching or by use of a Soxhlet apparatus. 'It is also contemplated that the cuttings as taken from the well can'be heated and immersed in a cold solvent which will penetrate the pores and extract the hydrocarbon matter. After the extraction, the solvent extract freed of solid material is placed in a suitable apparatus for determining the relative density of the pure solvent as a reference liquid and the liquid containing dissolved material.
It will be understood, ofcourse, that any solvent or solvent mixture having certain solvent properties for hydrocarbon constituents of earth formations such as drill cuttings can be used, so
long as the solvent orsolvent mixture chosen has a specific gravity substantially different from that of the hydrocarbon constituents present. Just how different the specific gravities must be is determined by the sensitivity of the apparatus used and by the accuracy desired in the particular analysis. Examples of organic solvents which can be used for the extraction are benzene, cyclo hexane, normal pentane, light. naphtha, carbon disulfide, carbon tetrachloride, and the like. If desired, two extractions of separate portions of the sample may be made, one with a relatively.
low specific gravity solvent and the other with a solvent of relatively high specific gravity. Suitable solvents for the two stage extraction are normal pentane having a specific gravity of about .6300 and carbon tetrachloride with a specific ravity of about'l.5835.
Suitable apparatus for the density or specific gravity method of determining hydrocarbons is shown in the drawings, wherein Figures I and II represent partly by diagram, two devices which may be used in following my method of analysis. It will be understood, however, that any method and apparatus which is sufficiently accurate to give comparative data can be used to determine the density or 'specific gravity of the solvent and solutions. For example, a hydrometer, a pycnometer, a Westphal balance, or a Westphal balance type plummet used on sensitive analytical balances, can be used with considerable accuracy.
Figure III represents a geochemical well log showing the saturation of the formation and the contained therein as a function of the depth at which the samples were taken.
Referring to Figure I, the bob I 18 a relative- .ly incompressible float which has been. annealed and carefully ground down so that it 'will just float tioned so as to form a continuous tube and permit the flow of the two fluids to a new level. Likewise, the reference fluid may be a fluid having the same specific gravity as the pure solvent,
in the selected solvent liquid at a standard'temperature, for example 75 F. The sensitivity of the bob will depend on its size and can be checked at'intervals with the pure solvent, but a volume of about c. c. is satisfactory. The glass chamber or reservoir ll encloses the bob l0. At its lower endis a U-shaped line l2 having a valve l3 and terminating in a funnel or thistle H at .a point above-the fluid level in .the chamber H.
A tube l5 communicates with the reservoir near its top and extends from the wall of the chamber ll. Flexible conduit l3 communicates with line and its free end terminates in thistle IS. The upper end of chamber I l; isprovided with line I6 having valve ll. Athermometer may be provided and from its-reading a correction made from the known coeiflcient of thermal expansion, instead of attempting accurate temperature control of the device, although the latter-means can be used satisfactorily. Scale 2| can be calibrated to measure the change in height of the -liquid in terms of change in pressure to restore equilibrium. On the other hand, it is also possible and usually preferable to indicate the density or specific gravity of the dissolved material directly. Because of the low coefficient of compression, the reading of applied pressure gives a sensitive indication of the amount of compression and hence of the density of the extract before compression to restore equilibrium. The expansion of the reservoir or leaks through the valves are immaterial since the compression depends only onthe pressure. Of course, in applying the pressure, valves l3 and I1 are closed. The glass chamber or reservoir II are filled with the fluid under test and normally the float bob l0 sinks to the bottom of II. Flexible conduit I8 and thistle l9 contain a heavy immiscible fluid such as mercury. With valves l3 and I! closed, pressure on the fluid in II is changed by raising or lowering the column" of mercury in l8-l9 until the bob It! remains suspended in the compressed fluid. The heights of mercury and hence the degrees of compression of the fluids necessary to increase the specific gravity enough to float the bob ll is an indication of .the comparative densities of the solvents and extracts. v Another apparatus suitable for use in my gravimetric method of determining hydrocarbons in an extract liquid is shown in Figure II of the drawings. This device comprises-a pair of balanced columns and 3| having common stop,
cock 34 at their lower end and terminating at their free ends with reservoirs 32 and 33'. The entire assembly canbe immersed in a constant temperature bath; for example a water bath in cylinder 35 at about room temperature. A cathetometer 36 can be provided for noting and comparing the relative heights of the liquid in the balanced columns.
In this device the specific gravity of the solvents containing the hydrocarbons extracted from the bit cuttings is determined by placing in one arm of the balanced columns of the manometer, with the stop cock closed, a volume of the original pure solvent as a reference fluid and in the other arm, to the same level, the solvent bearing the hydrocarbons. The stop cock is then posiand tube is or some multiple or fraction thereof, and preferably be immiscible therewith.
The proportionate quantities of hydrocarbons having a relatively low specific gravity to those having a relatively high specific gravity can be determined for example, as follows. One portion of the same formation or soil sample may be extracted with a light solvent such as pentane and another with a heavy solvent such as carbon tetrachloride. The mean specific gravity of the hydrocarbons extracted by the two solvents can I various samples in order to obtain an indication of the presence and location of hydrocarbon deposits. 1
The values of the mean specific gravity and the saturation in terms of per cent hydrocarbons extracted from the drill .cuttings can be plotted against depth to give a complete log of the well.
The specific gravity or relative density rangeswhich indicate the classification of hydrocarbons the formations are expected to produce have been determined by actual production data obtained in the practice of my invention.
One specific application of my invention to geochemical well logging is shown in the accompanying Figure 111 which is a log made in the course of drilling a well in Liberty County, Texas. This log shows the saturation of the formations and the mean specific gravity of the soluble materials contained therein, as a function of the depth of the points where sampleswere taken.
In preparing this log, samples of bit cuttings were taken from the shale shaker screen at intervals of one sample each 50 feet of hole drilled-to a depth of 3000 feet. Thereafter samples were taken at intervals of 60 feet. The log was plotted sis by air drying in the open air for a period of about 48 hours.
The quantity of hydrocarbons in these various samples was determined by leaching weighed quantities of them. with standardized amounts of carbon tetrachloride and measuring the differencebetween the specific gravity of the original solvent and that of the solution. This difierence was measured using the apparatus of Figure 11,
measuring the difi'erence in the height of the columns in the two arms of the manometer to To determine the mean specific gravity of the hydrocarbons, the change in specific gravity of normal pentane as a leaching agent was determined for those samples showing large amounts of light substances extracted by carbon tetrachloride. This change in specific gravity of the normal pentane solvent was determined in the manner above described in the case of carbon tetrachloride. The ratio of the difference in column heights when using carbon tetrachloride as tween the experimental data and the production data in any given area.
The results of a log of this sort can be improved by,taking samples during very short time intervals, in order to make them represent exact depth. Also rapid methods of drying the samples with a minimum loss of hydrocarbon content canbe used, in order to minimize the time elapsed between the taking of the sample and the availability of the data.
In Figure III the right-hand curve shows the saturation which is the experimentally determined diflerencebetween the heights of the columns of the two arms of the manometer of Figure II when using carbon tetrachloride as the solvent.
The observed difference in column height is a function of the density of the extract solution and also a function of the weight percentage of the The hydrocarbon saturation is expressed as parts per 10,000 by hydrocarbons dissolved therein.
weight.
As previously indicated, the left-hand curve of Figure III is the mean specific gravity of the dissolved hydrocarbons determined as above described. I
The log shown in Figure III indicates a small show of light crude or distillate at 2800 feet to 2900 feet and somewhat more important shows of gas at 7830 feet continuing to 8220 feet with a slight show of distillate at about 8100 feet. Thus,
' the right-hand curve indicates in general the amount of material present, while the left-hand curve indicates its nature.
Earth formations recovered by a core drill can be analyzed very advantageously by the methods above described. Cores and drill cuttings have long been taken from oil-bearing formations or formations which may be oil-bearing and it is desirable to determine the amount of oil present and also something about its probable chemical and physical nature. Previously available methods for determining'hydrocarbon and water con-.
tent have been time-consuming and uncertain, while the method above described can be applied very rapidly'and satisfactorily to all earth formations, including cores, drill cuttings, and soil samples. I
In the, preceding discussion of my invention, it has been described with more or less particular reference to the use of my method in geochemical well logging by the analysis of samples of drill cuttings. It is also applicable, however,.to prosand to the analysis of earth formations other than drill cuttings. Thus for example, in making a geochemical survey, samples of the surface soil are taken at points along a survey line or at points spaced over a survey area. The samples thus taken can be analyzed in accordance with my method and the results compared, in order to obtain some indication of the presence and location' of deep seated oil and gas deposits which in general correspond to anomalies in the hydrocarbon composition of the surface soils.
My invention has been described with particular reference to the measurement of specific gravities but obviously density defined in any'type of unit is satisfactory and, for the purposes of the appended claims specific gravity determination is Also merely one form of density determination. since all that is required in geochemical well log- 'ging or geochemical surveying is comparative data, the density units need not always be known, so long as relative densities for various earth formation samples taken from vertically or horizontally spaced points are determined.
While I have described my invention in connection with certain preferred embodiments" thereof, it is to be understood that these are by way of example rather than by wayof limitation and I do notmean to be restricted thereto but only to the scope of the appended claims in which I have defined my invention.
I claim;
1. In a method of prospecting, the steps comprising taking samples of earth formations, extracting a portion of each of said samples with an organic solventof relatively high specific gravity, extracting a second portion of each of said samples with an organic solvent of relatively low specificgravity, measuring the density of each of the extracts thus formed, and determining the mean specific gravity of the hydrocarbons extracted from each sample, to secure comparative data indicative of the presence and location of Y petroleum deposits.
2. In a. method of well logging wherein a plu-' rality of samples of earth formations are taken at a plurality of vertically spaced points, the improvement comprising treating at least a portion of each of said samples with a liquid of known density, recovering at least a portion of each of said liquids, separately determining the pressure change necessary to render the apparent density I of the recovered liquids equivalent to the initial known density of the treating liquid.
3. In the method-of analyzing earth formations for hydrocarbon constituents wherein samples are taken from said formations at spaced points and treated with a solvent for said hydrocarbons,
the improvement comprising ascertaining the density of an organic solvent under selected pressure conditions, treating each of a plurality of earth samples with a portion of the organic sol-, vent, determining the density of each of the extracts thus formed, and measuring the change in pressure necessary to render the apparent density of the extract equivalent to that of the organic solvent alone.
HUBERT H. THOMPSON.
pecting techniques other than that described
US336411A 1940-05-21 1940-05-21 Method of analyzing earth formations Expired - Lifetime US2320681A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US336411A US2320681A (en) 1940-05-21 1940-05-21 Method of analyzing earth formations

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US336411A US2320681A (en) 1940-05-21 1940-05-21 Method of analyzing earth formations

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2320681A true US2320681A (en) 1943-06-01

Family

ID=23315971

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US336411A Expired - Lifetime US2320681A (en) 1940-05-21 1940-05-21 Method of analyzing earth formations

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2320681A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3841419A (en) * 1971-12-23 1974-10-15 Cities Service Oil Co Control of colligative properties of drilling mud
US4485071A (en) * 1983-05-16 1984-11-27 Union Oil Company Of California Field source rock evaluation apparatus
US4578356A (en) * 1983-05-16 1986-03-25 Union Oil Company Of California Field source rock evaluation method
US4785661A (en) * 1987-04-06 1988-11-22 Shell Oil Company Method for analyzing solvent extracted sponge core
FR2622296A1 (en) * 1987-10-21 1989-04-28 Draegerwerk Ag PROCESS FOR DETECTING HARMFUL SUBSTANCES IN SOLID SAMPLES
US5299453A (en) * 1993-01-28 1994-04-05 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for determining oil and water saturation of core samples at overburden pressure
US9926775B2 (en) 2014-07-02 2018-03-27 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for mercury removal

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3841419A (en) * 1971-12-23 1974-10-15 Cities Service Oil Co Control of colligative properties of drilling mud
US4485071A (en) * 1983-05-16 1984-11-27 Union Oil Company Of California Field source rock evaluation apparatus
US4578356A (en) * 1983-05-16 1986-03-25 Union Oil Company Of California Field source rock evaluation method
US4785661A (en) * 1987-04-06 1988-11-22 Shell Oil Company Method for analyzing solvent extracted sponge core
FR2622296A1 (en) * 1987-10-21 1989-04-28 Draegerwerk Ag PROCESS FOR DETECTING HARMFUL SUBSTANCES IN SOLID SAMPLES
US5299453A (en) * 1993-01-28 1994-04-05 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for determining oil and water saturation of core samples at overburden pressure
US9926775B2 (en) 2014-07-02 2018-03-27 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for mercury removal

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jennings Capillary pressure techniques: application to exploration and development geology
Torsæter et al. Experimental reservoir engineering laboratory workbook
US2214674A (en) Method of logging wells
Dake Fundamentals of reservoir engineering
US7532983B2 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring the wettability of geological formations
Ganat Fundamentals of reservoir rock properties
Glover Petrophysics
McCulloh Mass properties of sedimentary rocks and gravimetric effects of petroleum and natural-gas reservoirs
US10358919B2 (en) Reservoir fluid geodynamics system and method
US2320681A (en) Method of analyzing earth formations
Murphy et al. The use of special coring and logging procedures for defining reservoir residual oil saturations
Woodhouse Accurate reservoir water saturations from oil-mud cores: Questions and answers from Prudhoe Bay and beyond
Melcher Determination of pore space of oil and gas sands
US3874451A (en) Determination of oil saturation in a reservoir
US2446588A (en) Method of determining the permeability of substrata
US3993902A (en) Radioactive logging for determining oil saturation in a reservoir
US3722271A (en) Geochemical prospecting in submerged areas
McCulloh The promise of precise borehole gravimetry in petroleum exploration and exploitation
Pollard et al. Core-Analysis Practices--Basic Methods and New Developments
Boudjema et al. COMPARISON BETWEEN LOGGING RESULTS AND WELL EVALUATION RESULTS BY THE RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION INSTRUMENTS (RCI) TOOL
Keighin Physical properties of clastic reservoir rocks in the Uinta, Wind River, and Anadarko Basins, as determined by mercury-injection porosimetry
Li et al. Identification methods and the main factors controlling water washing in secondary oil reservoirs: A case study of Qingshuihe formation of lower Cretaceous in Mosuowan area of Junggar Basin
Donaldson et al. Review of petroleum oil saturation and its determination
US2225248A (en) Earth exploration
US2585412A (en) Well productivity logging