US2312517A - Method of nickel plating - Google Patents

Method of nickel plating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2312517A
US2312517A US246678A US24667838A US2312517A US 2312517 A US2312517 A US 2312517A US 246678 A US246678 A US 246678A US 24667838 A US24667838 A US 24667838A US 2312517 A US2312517 A US 2312517A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
nickel
bath
lead
plate
bright
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US246678A
Inventor
Edwin M Baker
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Houdaille Hershey Corp
Original Assignee
Houdaille Hershey Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Houdaille Hershey Corp filed Critical Houdaille Hershey Corp
Priority to US246678A priority Critical patent/US2312517A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2312517A publication Critical patent/US2312517A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/12Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of nickel or cobalt

Definitions

  • the formate has a twofold efiect, in that it acts as a buffer for the control of the hydrogen ion concentration near the optimum point and also has a brightening effect in combination with certain of the other ingredients of the solution.
  • the other ingredients of the solution that are essential are ammonium sulfate and formaldehyde. Neither of these latter two ingredients is essential to the operation of my bath. In fact any compound furnishing ammonium radicals is'to be avoided, if best results are to be obtained.
  • nickel plate resulting from the use of my method can be much more readily buffed and polished, with consequent saving in labor and material cost. Also, while the relatively small cost of bumng my nickel plate represents an item that is not present in the case of bright nickel plating, the superior ductility and adherence of my nickel plate over a bright nickel" plate far outweighs the slight added cost of bufling.
  • nickel deposited from my bath is equally as ductile and adherent as ordinary gray nickel deposited from a Watt bath and much more so than bright nickel.
  • My nickel plate furthermore, exhibits excellent adherence when deposited directly to a thickness up to 0.001 inch and over upon plain carbon steels, either low carbon or heat treated high carbon steel, or upon low alloy steels. For instance, if a sheet of plain carbon steel plated directly with nickel from my bath be held edgewise against an emery wheel, there is no separation of the plate whatsoever, whereas, if similarly tested, a bright nickel plate would show some separation from the steel. Furthermore, the bright nickel plate could easily be stripped entirely from the steel by manually completing the separation started by the emery wheel.
  • My nickel plate adheres to steel more firmly than does a composite plate of copper and "bright nickel, with the copper deposited from a copper cyanide plating solution. I also find that my nickel plate is at least as firmly adherent to steel as is a composite plate of gray nickel plate followed by bright nickel" plate, such as is described in the Hogaboom Patent No. 1,991,747.
  • nickel plate deposited by my method is of the same order of hardness as ordinary gray nickel and considerably softer than bright nickel.
  • a nickel plating bath containing sodium formate is maintained under oxidizing conditions by means of the use of a supplemental inert anode, such as lead or platinum.
  • the action of the supplemental inert anode is to generate chlorine by electrolytic action upon the chloride present in the bath, and the chlorine so generated maintains the bath in an oxidized condition.
  • the generated chlorine gas serves to prevent pitting, so that no additional pitting agent need be added to the bath.
  • the addition of .wetting agents is not only unnecessary, but would render the bath inoperative for the production of a lustrous nickel electrodeposit.
  • the nickel plating bath of my present invention may be operated at a lower cost than baths requiring the addition of anti-pit or wetting agents, or the so-called "bright nickel” plating baths that require the addition of brightening agents, promoter metals or the like.
  • the concentration of sodium formate may be varied from as little as 1 gram per liter up to its saturation point of around 50 to 60 grams per liter.
  • the sodium formate may, instead, be formed in the bath by the addition thereto of its constituent radicals in reacting proportions, as by the addition of formic acid and caustic soda, or by any suitable method.
  • Other metal formates, such as nickel formate, or ammonium formate, are not the full equivalent of sodium formate.
  • the hydrogen ion concentration of the nickel plating bath may be'varied between the pH values of 5.5 and 2.5 and the temperatures within the range of 90 to 190 F., the higher temperatures being used with the numerically lower pH values and vice versa.
  • the bath With proper control of the pH of the bath, the bath may be operated at a temperature as low as room temperature.
  • Nickel carbonate, sulfuric acid, or formic acid may be conveniently used for the adjustment of the pH value of the bath.
  • the cathode rod should be agitated.
  • An agitation equivalent to 30 cycles of strokes per minute with a minimum travel of 2 inches has been found to give very satisfactory results.
  • More rapid agitation gives generation of the proper amount of chlorine to a supplementary anode, such as a lead anode, a certain amount of chlorine is generated as a result of the electrolysis of the nickel chloride in the bath, with the consequence that the bath is maintained in an oxidized condition.
  • the amount of current that is passed through the lead anode should be controlled so as to effect the maintain the bath in an oxidized condition, but
  • a supplementary anode such as a lead anode
  • an anti-pit agent such as hydrogen peroxide
  • a wetting agent such as lauryl sulfate or the like.
  • an organic wetting agent to the oxidized type of bath of this invention tends to render the bath inoperative for the production of a bright, lustrous nickel electrodeposit, so that wetting agents should be avoided. It is also unnecessary to include in the bath composition addition agents such as are generally employed in "bright nickel plating baths. The expense attendant upon the use of organic wetting agents, brightening agents, promoter metals and the like is therefore entirely eliminated from the cost of operation of the nickel plating bath of my invention.
  • the proportion of current passing through the lead anode or lead lining of the tank should be so controlled as to generate sufficient chlorine to maintain the bath in an oxidized condition without causing the nickel to plate out as a gray nickel.
  • the amount of lead so dissolved will be between 0.05 and 0.5 g./l. with about 0.1 to 0.2 g./l. on the average. From such a bath, the nickel electrodeposit will be found to contain an average of around 0.2% of lead.
  • the sodium formate in the bath acts as a carrier for the lead.
  • the lead may be introduced into the bath in the form of additions thereto of a lead salt, such is: lead carbonate, acetate, citrate, formate or the I am aware that numerous details of the process may be varied through a wide range without departing from the principles of this invention, and I, therefore, do not propose limiting the patent granted hereon otherwise than necessitated by the prior art.
  • a lead salt such as: lead carbonate, acetate, citrate, formate or the I am aware that numerous details of the process may be varied through a wide range without departing from the principles of this invention, and I, therefore, do not propose limiting the patent granted hereon otherwise than necessitated by the prior art.
  • the method of obtaining directly a soft, ductile nickel plate of image reflective ability that may be readily buffed to produce a mirrorlike surface comprises electrolyzing a soluplating salts consisting o! a mixture otnickel chloride and nickel sulphate. between 0.05'and 0.5 g./l. 0! lead, and sodium fox-mate as a carrier iofmalntainlng said lead in solution.
  • the method of electrodepositing a ductile, adherent. lustrous nickel which comprises passing an electric current from nickel and lead anodes to the work to be plated as a cathode through a solution having a pH between 2.5 and 5.5 and having active ingredients consisting essentially of nickel plating salts consisting of a mixture of nickel chloride and nickel sulphate, between 0.05 and 0.5 g./l. of lead, and sodium formate as a carrier for keepingsald lead in solution, and maintaining the lead content of the solution within the range specified above.

Description

Patented Mar. 2, 1943 m-mron or mean. m'rma Edwin M. Baker, Ann Arbor, Mich, assignor to Hondaille-Hershey Corporation, Detroit, Micln, a corporation of Michigan No Drawing. Application December 19, 1938, Serial No. 246,678
2 Claims.
- Haas Patent No. 230,872, to employ a nickel formate bath for the electrodeposition of nickel. In the Haas bath, however, the concentration of nickel salts is so low that it is not practicable to use a relatively high current density. The
' Haas bath is therefore not suitable for use in accordance with present day nickel plating practices.
The Welsberg and Stoddard Patent No. 2,026,718, dated January 7, 1936, also discloses the use of a formate in a nickel, or nickel and cobalt, plating bath. According to that patent, the formate has a twofold efiect, in that it acts as a buffer for the control of the hydrogen ion concentration near the optimum point and also has a brightening effect in combination with certain of the other ingredients of the solution. In the Weisberg and Stoddard bath the other ingredients of the solution that are essential are ammonium sulfate and formaldehyde. Neither of these latter two ingredients is essential to the operation of my bath. In fact any compound furnishing ammonium radicals is'to be avoided, if best results are to be obtained.
I have now found that very good results can be obtained by the use of sodium formate, without employing an ammonium salt or formaldehyde. By the use of my bath, a nickel deposit is obtained which, before being subjected to any buffing operation, is more lustrous than ordinary gray nickel, varying from a milky lustre having limited image reflectability to a bright lustre. While not a bright nickel plate within the present acceptance of the term as signifying a nickel crystal size of less than ,5 of a millimeter, the nickel plate so produced from my bath can nevertheless be bufled very easily and at but little greater cost than bright nickel to give a brilliantly lustrous, mirror-like surface.
As compared with the ordinary gray nickel,
obtainable by the use of the Watt bath, the
nickel plate resulting from the use of my method can be much more readily buffed and polished, with consequent saving in labor and material cost. Also, while the relatively small cost of bumng my nickel plate represents an item that is not present in the case of bright nickel plating, the superior ductility and adherence of my nickel plate over a bright nickel" plate far outweighs the slight added cost of bufling.
With respect to its properties, nickel deposited from my bath is equally as ductile and adherent as ordinary gray nickel deposited from a Watt bath and much more so than bright nickel. My nickel plate, furthermore, exhibits excellent adherence when deposited directly to a thickness up to 0.001 inch and over upon plain carbon steels, either low carbon or heat treated high carbon steel, or upon low alloy steels. For instance, if a sheet of plain carbon steel plated directly with nickel from my bath be held edgewise against an emery wheel, there is no separation of the plate whatsoever, whereas, if similarly tested, a bright nickel plate would show some separation from the steel. Furthermore, the bright nickel plate could easily be stripped entirely from the steel by manually completing the separation started by the emery wheel.
My nickel plate adheres to steel more firmly than does a composite plate of copper and "bright nickel, with the copper deposited from a copper cyanide plating solution. I also find that my nickel plate is at least as firmly adherent to steel as is a composite plate of gray nickel plate followed by bright nickel" plate, such as is described in the Hogaboom Patent No. 1,991,747.
With respect to hardness, nickel plate deposited by my method is of the same order of hardness as ordinary gray nickel and considerably softer than bright nickel.
In accordance with the method of my present invention, a nickel plating bath containing sodium formate is maintained under oxidizing conditions by means of the use of a supplemental inert anode, such as lead or platinum. The action of the supplemental inert anode is to generate chlorine by electrolytic action upon the chloride present in the bath, and the chlorine so generated maintains the bath in an oxidized condition. When in such condition, the generated chlorine gas serves to prevent pitting, so that no additional pitting agent need be added to the bath. Furthermore, the addition of .wetting agents is not only unnecessary, but would render the bath inoperative for the production of a lustrous nickel electrodeposit. Consequently, the nickel plating bath of my present invention may be operated at a lower cost than baths requiring the addition of anti-pit or wetting agents, or the so-called "bright nickel" plating baths that require the addition of brightening agents, promoter metals or the like.
It is therefore an important object of this invention to provide a method for the electrodeposition of nickel from a nickel plating bath that is maintained under oxidized conditions and that contains sodium formate as one of its essential ingredients.
It is a further important object of this invention to provide a sodium formate nickel plating bath for use with a leadanode to maintain oxidized conditions within the bath, whereby relatively lustrous, image reflecting electrodeposits of nickel may be obtained directly without the addition to the bath of anti-pit or wetting agents, brightening agents or so-called promoter metals.
It is a further important object of this invention to provide a relatively inexpensive and efficient method for the plating of relatively lustrous, image reflecting deposits of nickel that require very little bufllng and that have such excellent adherence to a ferrous foundation metal that the nickel may be plated directly over a ferrous foundation metal to form an adherent undercoating for a subsequent deposit of chromium.
Other and further important objects of this invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims.
The following illustrates the preferred range of bath compositions and conditions for use with the method of my invention:
Nickel sulfate, hydrated grams per liter 240-300 Nickel chloride (MCI-2.61120) do 35-50 Sodium formate do 25-40 Boric acid do 25-40 pI-I pH 3.6-4.0
Temperature degrees Fahrenheit 135-145 Current density amperes per sq. ft- 40-60 an aid in the obtaining of smooth plates of more;
or less uniform quality, as measured by surface lustre, on objects of irregular shape. Likewise, the concentration of sodium formate may be varied from as little as 1 gram per liter up to its saturation point of around 50 to 60 grams per liter. I prefer to add sodium formate, as such, to the bath, but the sodium formate may, instead, be formed in the bath by the addition thereto of its constituent radicals in reacting proportions, as by the addition of formic acid and caustic soda, or by any suitable method. Other metal formates, such as nickel formate, or ammonium formate, are not the full equivalent of sodium formate.
In general, the hydrogen ion concentration of the nickel plating bath may be'varied between the pH values of 5.5 and 2.5 and the temperatures within the range of 90 to 190 F., the higher temperatures being used with the numerically lower pH values and vice versa. With proper control of the pH of the bath, the bath may be operated at a temperature as low as room temperature. Nickel carbonate, sulfuric acid, or formic acid may be conveniently used for the adjustment of the pH value of the bath.
In order to obtain best results, the cathode rod should be agitated. An agitation equivalent to 30 cycles of strokes per minute with a minimum travel of 2 inches has been found to give very satisfactory results. More rapid agitation gives generation of the proper amount of chlorine to a supplementary anode, such as a lead anode, a certain amount of chlorine is generated as a result of the electrolysis of the nickel chloride in the bath, with the consequence that the bath is maintained in an oxidized condition. The amount of current that is passed through the lead anode should be controlled so as to effect the maintain the bath in an oxidized condition, but
without the generation of too little or too much chlorine, since either causes the nickel deposit to become gray. It has been found satisfactory to pass 0.1% of the total current through the supplementary lead anodes.
The use of a supplementary anode, such as a lead anode, renders it unnecessary to add to the bath an anti-pit agent, such as hydrogen peroxide, or a wetting agent, such as lauryl sulfate or the like. In fact, the. addition of an organic wetting agent to the oxidized type of bath of this invention tends to render the bath inoperative for the production of a bright, lustrous nickel electrodeposit, so that wetting agents should be avoided. It is also unnecessary to include in the bath composition addition agents such as are generally employed in "bright nickel plating baths. The expense attendant upon the use of organic wetting agents, brightening agents, promoter metals and the like is therefore entirely eliminated from the cost of operation of the nickel plating bath of my invention.
In place of auxiliary lead anodes as such, the
same results may be obtained through the use of a lead lined tank. In any event, the proportion of current passing through the lead anode or lead lining of the tank should be so controlled as to generate sufficient chlorine to maintain the bath in an oxidized condition without causing the nickel to plate out as a gray nickel.
Where a lead anode or lead lining is employed, some lead will be dissolved into the plating bath and will plate out with the nickel. In general, the amount of lead so dissolved will be between 0.05 and 0.5 g./l. with about 0.1 to 0.2 g./l. on the average. From such a bath, the nickel electrodeposit will be found to contain an average of around 0.2% of lead. The sodium formate in the bath acts as a carrier for the lead. Instead of relying upon the electrolytic action of the lead anodes to build up a dissolved lead content in the bath, the lead may be introduced into the bath in the form of additions thereto of a lead salt, such is: lead carbonate, acetate, citrate, formate or the I am aware that numerous details of the process may be varied through a wide range without departing from the principles of this invention, and I, therefore, do not propose limiting the patent granted hereon otherwise than necessitated by the prior art.
I claim as my invention:
1. The method of obtaining directly a soft, ductile nickel plate of image reflective ability that may be readily buffed to produce a mirrorlike surface, which comprises electrolyzing a soluplating salts consisting o! a mixture otnickel chloride and nickel sulphate. between 0.05'and 0.5 g./l. 0! lead, and sodium fox-mate as a carrier iofmalntainlng said lead in solution.
2. The method of electrodepositing a ductile, adherent. lustrous nickel which comprises passing an electric current from nickel and lead anodes to the work to be plated as a cathode through a solution having a pH between 2.5 and 5.5 and having active ingredients consisting essentially of nickel plating salts consisting of a mixture of nickel chloride and nickel sulphate, between 0.05 and 0.5 g./l. of lead, and sodium formate as a carrier for keepingsald lead in solution, and maintaining the lead content of the solution within the range specified above.
EDWIN M. BAKER.
US246678A 1938-12-19 1938-12-19 Method of nickel plating Expired - Lifetime US2312517A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US246678A US2312517A (en) 1938-12-19 1938-12-19 Method of nickel plating

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US246678A US2312517A (en) 1938-12-19 1938-12-19 Method of nickel plating

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2312517A true US2312517A (en) 1943-03-02

Family

ID=22931726

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US246678A Expired - Lifetime US2312517A (en) 1938-12-19 1938-12-19 Method of nickel plating

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2312517A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2879211A (en) * 1956-11-16 1959-03-24 Hanson Van Winkle Munning Co Electroplating duplex nickel coatings
US3488264A (en) * 1965-03-26 1970-01-06 Kewanee Oil Co High speed electrodeposition of nickel

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2879211A (en) * 1956-11-16 1959-03-24 Hanson Van Winkle Munning Co Electroplating duplex nickel coatings
US3488264A (en) * 1965-03-26 1970-01-06 Kewanee Oil Co High speed electrodeposition of nickel

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2927066A (en) Chromium alloy plating
US3925170A (en) Method and composition for producing bright palladium electrodepositions
US2822326A (en) Bright chromium alloy plating
US3951759A (en) Chromium electroplating baths and method of electrodepositing chromium
US2693444A (en) Electrodeposition of chromium and alloys thereof
US20060257683A1 (en) Stainless steel electrolytic coating
US2686756A (en) Chromium plating
US2990343A (en) Chromium alloy plating
US3326782A (en) Bath and method for electroforming and electrodepositing nickel
US3021267A (en) Plating bath and process
CA1058553A (en) Electrodeposition of alloys of nickel, cobalt, or nickel and cobalt with iron
US2900707A (en) Metallic protective coating
US2832729A (en) Electrodeposition of iron-zinc alloys
US2063760A (en) Bath for and process of electrodeposition of metal
US4543167A (en) Control of anode gas evolution in trivalent chromium plating bath
US2112818A (en) Electrodeposition of metals
US1970549A (en) Process of electroplating bronze
US2312517A (en) Method of nickel plating
US4673471A (en) Method of electrodepositing a chromium alloy deposit
US3111464A (en) Electrodeposition of chromium and chromium alloys
US3488264A (en) High speed electrodeposition of nickel
US2809156A (en) Electrodeposition of iron and iron alloys
US2751341A (en) Electrodeposition of lead and lead alloys
EP0088192B1 (en) Control of anode gas evolution in trivalent chromium plating bath
US2284629A (en) Method of nickel plating