US2196420A - Shingle - Google Patents
Shingle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US2196420A US2196420A US220295A US22029538A US2196420A US 2196420 A US2196420 A US 2196420A US 220295 A US220295 A US 220295A US 22029538 A US22029538 A US 22029538A US 2196420 A US2196420 A US 2196420A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- shingle
- shingles
- flap
- sheet
- edge
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04D—ROOF COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; ROOF-WORKING TOOLS
- E04D1/00—Roof covering by making use of tiles, slates, shingles, or other small roofing elements
- E04D1/12—Roofing elements shaped as plain tiles or shingles, i.e. with flat outer surface
- E04D1/22—Roofing elements shaped as plain tiles or shingles, i.e. with flat outer surface of specified materials not covered by any one of groups E04D1/14 - E04D1/205, or of combinations of materials, where at least one is not covered by any one of groups E04D1/14 - E04D1/205
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04D—ROOF COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; ROOF-WORKING TOOLS
- E04D1/00—Roof covering by making use of tiles, slates, shingles, or other small roofing elements
- E04D1/29—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements
- E04D1/2907—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements by interfitted sections
- E04D1/2914—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements by interfitted sections having fastening means or anchors at juncture of adjacent roofing elements
- E04D1/2916—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements by interfitted sections having fastening means or anchors at juncture of adjacent roofing elements the fastening means taking hold directly on adjacent elements of the same row
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04D—ROOF COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; ROOF-WORKING TOOLS
- E04D1/00—Roof covering by making use of tiles, slates, shingles, or other small roofing elements
- E04D1/29—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements
- E04D1/2907—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements by interfitted sections
- E04D1/2935—Means for connecting or fastening adjacent roofing elements by interfitted sections folded, rolled, or indented in situ
Definitions
- Another object is to provide a shingle having an underlying fastening flap which also provides a protective base sheet.
- Another object is to provide a shingle having a heavy butt to improve the shadow effect on the roof.
- a further object of my invention is to provide an improved method of laying shingles. r
- Figure 1 is a. plan view of a blank from which my shingle is folded.
- Figure 2 is a similar view showing the folded shingle.
- Figure 3 is a sectional View of the shingle, taken in a plane indicated by line 3-3 of Figure 2.
- Figure 4 is a plan view of a modified shingle
- Figure 5 is a sectional view of the same, taken in a plane indicated by line 5-5 of Figure 4.
- Figure 6 is a perspective view of a roof laid with my improved shingles, and illustrating the method of laying the same.
- Composition shingles are flexible and their lower or tab portions are likely to be lifted by ,the wind, thereby allowing rain to be driven up under the shingles.
- Numerous methods of interlocking these shingles at the base have been developed for holding them down; but interlocking shingles are complicated and difilcult to lay and the fastenings provided thereby are not positive or secure. With my improved shingles the lower edges are positively nailed down by a very simple method.
- composition shingles Another problem with composition shingles is the difliculty of obtaining a watertight roof with the shingles alone, and the usual procedure is to lay down a base-layer of roofing paper before .the shingles are applied.
- the fastening flap also shingle a protective base sheet is provided on the shingle itself, thereby making it unnecessary to apply roofing paper.
- a further objection to the ordinary composi tion shingle is that the" inherent thinness of the 5- shingle makes the roof look fiatand uninteresting.
- My shingle has a heavy butt and the shadow effects ofthe shingle are accentuated to give weight and character to the roof.
- the shingle of my 10 invention comprises an upper sheet having a flap underlying an exposed edge to provide fastening means for the shingle. The lower edge of the shingle is thus positively anchored down by nails driven through the fastening flap.
- My 5 method of laying the shingle comprises placing it on the roof with the upper sheet folded back to expose the fastening flap; driving a nail through the flap to fasten down the exposed 'edge; and then foldingthe upper sheet over 2 ⁇ the nailed flap.
- the fold between the upper" sheet and flap is preferably blunt, as by folding along a relatively wide score line, to give thick-' ness to the butt for increasing the shadow efiect.
- my shingle is formed from a. one-piece blank of composition roofing material, 30 such as a felt base materialsaturated and/or coatedwitha bituminous compound.
- the blank is preferably rhombieshaped and is divided transversely along a fold line 2 into an upper or surface sheet 3 and a" 35 fastening flap 4.
- fastening flap 4 is folded back under upper sheet 3 and underlies the lower edge of the shingle to provide a flap through which nails 4,5
- the blank is flexible it may readily be 50' that the upper sheet may be folded out flat to as;
- fold line 2- so' expose the underlying flap when the shingles are nailed down.
- the folding is preferably rounded to form a blunt edge and provide a heavy butt shingle
- the provision of a relatively wide score along this line of fold as shown in Figure 3 increases the bluntness of the edge and therefore serves the double function of making the blank easier to fold and increasing the heaviness of the butt.
- a roof laid with my shingles has marked shadow effects and has the appearance of weight and stability that ordinary composition shingled roofs do not have.
- Flap 4 preferably underlies the major portion of the upper sheet, so that the flap also forms a protective basesheet for the shingle.
- the underlying flap performs the double function of fastening down the exposed edge and providing a protective layer under the shingle.
- This base sheet on my shingle makes it unnecessary to lay down a sub-layer of roofing paper which is usually done in laying composition shingles.
- the rhombic shape of the blank provides a surface sheet having a sloping end edge to shed water when the shingles are laid. End edges of fiap 4 slope oppositely to those of the upper sheet when the flap is folded back, and one end of the flap projects out from under the upper sheet, as shown in Figure 2. This offsets the joints of the base sheet from those of the surface sheet, and also provides a water shedding edge for the base sheet.
- Figures 4 and 5 show a modified shingle in which the flap 4 is formed separately from upp r sheet 3 and is fastened to it by a strip 1 foldably connected along the lower edge of the fiap. Any suitable means, such as an adhesive 8, may be employed for uniting strip 1 to the upper sheet. With'bituminous treated roofing felts the bitumen of the sheet material may simply be softened and the parts pressed together to effect the seal. I
- fastening fiap 4 may be made of lighter weight material than the upper sheet.
- the top sheet should be fairly heavy, say about a 30 pound felt, and in the one-piece construction of Figure 1 this means that fiap d is also that heavy;
- the fastening flap may be made lighter, say about a 15 pound felt.
- Another advantage of the twopiece construction is that the lap joint along the lower edge of the shingle tends to further increase the 'thickness of the shingle butt, thus further improving the shadow effect of the shingles on a roof.
- FIG. 4 Another variation shown in Figures 4 and 5 is the widening of flap 4 to provide an extension 9 above the upper edge of the surface sheet. This provides a greater lap and affords additional protection.
- Figure 6 shows the preferred method of laying the shingles on a roof.
- the shingles are laid in overlapping courses, with the fastening flaps of the shingles in one course overlapping the shingles in the next lower course. Also, an end of each shingle in a course is interposed between the fastening flap and surface sheet of an adjacent shingle in the same course.
- Theshingles are secured bynails H penetrating the fastening flaps and the underlying portions of 'the shingles in the lower course. End nail l2 also penetrates the fastening flap of the adjacent shingle in-the same course.
- the method of laying the shingles comprises first folding back the upper sheets to expose the fastening flaps, and then laying the opened shinlapping the shingles of the underlying course,
- the exposed left hand edge of the shingle slopes outwardly from the bottom, due to the rhombic shape; and this sloping edge sheds water.
- the exposed edges of shingles in adjacent courses are preferably staggered, as shown in Figure 6.
- this nail may be driven through the corner of the surface sheet after the latter is folded up. This may be done because the nail is covered up by the overlapping part of the adjacent surface sheet. By driving the end nail through the surface sheet the latter receives the benefit of additional fastening means, and the nail also serves to hold the upfolded surface sheet until the next course is applied.
- This modified nailing is shown at l3 in Figure 6.
- the principal feature of my improved shingle is that the underlying fastening flap provides means for securely nailing down the exposed edges of the shingles, thereby insuring weather tightness along the lower edges of the courses.
- Composition shingles not so fastened are subjected to being lifted by wind, and rain is driven up under the shingles.
- Numerous methods of interlocking shingles at the base have been developed for holding them down, but these shingles are more complicated, less securely fastened, and less easily applied than my shingle.
- the labor cost of laying my shingles is one-third to onehalf less than that of laying ordinary composition shingles.
- fastening flap 4 underlies the surface sheet to provide a shingle of double thickness.
- the lapping joints at the ends of the flaps are offset from the joints at the ends of the surface sheets due to the reversely sloping edges.
- the joints of the flaps are also lapped inwater shedding relationship.
- shingles of my invention having 18x36 inch surface sheets may be laid with 2% inch lap at top and ends, leaving a net coverage of about 531 /2 square inches for each shingle.
- twenty-eight of my shingles will cover 14,383 square inches of roof area, which is more than one square (14,440 square inches).
- a shingle comprising an upper sheet, a flap hingeably connected along the lower edge of the sheet and underlying the latter, said sheet and flap being rhombic-shaped and arranged with an end edge oi the sheet angularly disposed to an adjacent end edge 01' the flap.
- a root comprising a plurality of shingles each having an upper sheet with a sloping side edge and a fastening flap underlying its lower edge, a course of said shingles laid with the sloping side edge of an upp sheet of each shingle overlapping an upper sheet 'of an adjacent shingle, the underlapping portions of the upper sheet of each shingle in said 'course being interposed between the upper sheet and fastening flap of an adjacent shingle.
- a roof comprising shingles having an upper sheet and an underlying flap, the upperv sheet having a side edge sloping in'one direction and the flap having an opposite edge sloping in the other direction, a course of said shingles laid with the sloping edge of an upper sheet of each shingle overlapping an upper sheet of an adjacent shingle to form a water shedding joint, and with the sloping edge of a. flap of each shingle overlapping a flap of an adjacent shingle to form a water shedding joint.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Roof Covering Using Slabs Or Stiff Sheets (AREA)
Description
April 9, 1940. E. MATQI'HEWS SHINGLE Filed Ju ly 20, 1938 INVENTORI EZNEST c MATH-{5W5 BY gaze/6M HA5 ATTORNEY Patented Apr. 9,: 1940 UNITED STATES .PATENT. OFFICE smote. Ernest 0. Matthews, Eureka, Calif. Application July 20, loss, Serial No. 220,295 4 Claims. (or. roe-:1)
edge to provide fastening means for securing anexposed edge of the shingle'to the roof.
Another object is to provide a shingle having an underlying fastening flap which also provides a protective base sheet.
Another object is to provide a shingle having a heavy butt to improve the shadow effect on the roof.
A further object of my invention is to provide an improved method of laying shingles. r
The invention possesses other objects and features of advantage, some of wmch, with the foregoing, will be set forth in the following description of my invention. It is to be understood that I do not'limit myself to this disclosure of species of my invention, as I may adopt variant embodiments thereof'within the scope of the claims.
Referring to the drawing:
Figure 1 is a. plan view of a blank from which my shingle is folded; and
Figure 2 is a similar view showing the folded shingle.
Figure 3 is a sectional View of the shingle, taken in a plane indicated by line 3-3 of Figure 2.
Figure 4 is a plan view of a modified shingle; and
Figure 5 is a sectional view of the same, taken in a plane indicated by line 5-5 of Figure 4.
Figure 6 is a perspective view of a roof laid with my improved shingles, and illustrating the method of laying the same.
Composition shingles are flexible and their lower or tab portions are likely to be lifted by ,the wind, thereby allowing rain to be driven up under the shingles. Numerous methods of interlocking these shingles at the base have been developed for holding them down; but interlocking shingles are complicated and difilcult to lay and the fastenings provided thereby are not positive or secure. With my improved shingles the lower edges are positively nailed down by a very simple method.
. Another problem with composition shingles is the difliculty of obtaining a watertight roof with the shingles alone, and the usual procedure is to lay down a base-layer of roofing paper before .the shingles are applied. In my improved The fastening flap also shingle a protective base sheet is provided on the shingle itself, thereby making it unnecessary to apply roofing paper.
A further objection to the ordinary composi tion shingle is that the" inherent thinness of the 5- shingle makes the roof look fiatand uninteresting. My shingle has a heavy butt and the shadow effects ofthe shingle are accentuated to give weight and character to the roof. In terms of broad inclusiomthe shingle of my 10 invention comprises an upper sheet having a flap underlying an exposed edge to provide fastening means for the shingle. The lower edge of the shingle is thus positively anchored down by nails driven through the fastening flap. My 5 method of laying the shingle comprises placing it on the roof with the upper sheet folded back to expose the fastening flap; driving a nail through the flap to fasten down the exposed 'edge; and then foldingthe upper sheet over 2} the nailed flap. The fold between the upper" sheet and flap is preferably blunt, as by folding along a relatively wide score line, to give thick-' ness to the butt for increasing the shadow efiect.
preferably underlies the .23 major portion of the shingle to provide "a base sheet for double proteetio In greater detail, and referring to Figures 1 to3 of the drawing, my shingle is formed from a. one-piece blank of composition roofing material, 30 such as a felt base materialsaturated and/or coatedwitha bituminous compound. As shown in Figure 1, the blank is preferably rhombieshaped and is divided transversely along a fold line 2 into an upper or surface sheet 3 and a" 35 fastening flap 4. A protective coating 8 of s'uit able material, such as'mineral granules, is preferably provided on the portion 3 of the blank which forms the upper sheet of the shingle. This mineral surfacing terminates at that fastening flap 4 is left clear.
-In the final shingle, as shown'in Figures 2 and 3, fastening flap 4 is folded back under upper sheet 3 and underlies the lower edge of the shingle to provide a flap through which nails 4,5
may be driven to fasten the exposed edge. Whenmy shingles are laid on a roof theexposed edges are thus positively nailed down, to'insure watertightness along the lower edges of the courses.
Since the blank is flexible it may readily be 50' that the upper sheet may be folded out flat to as;
fold line 2- so' expose the underlying flap when the shingles are nailed down.
Instead of folding sharply about fold line 2, the folding is preferably rounded to form a blunt edge and provide a heavy butt shingle, The provision of a relatively wide score along this line of fold as shown in Figure 3 increases the bluntness of the edge and therefore serves the double function of making the blank easier to fold and increasing the heaviness of the butt. A roof laid with my shingles has marked shadow effects and has the appearance of weight and stability that ordinary composition shingled roofs do not have.
- Flap 4 preferably underlies the major portion of the upper sheet, so that the flap also forms a protective basesheet for the shingle. In other words,. the underlying flap performs the double function of fastening down the exposed edge and providing a protective layer under the shingle. This base sheet on my shingle makes it unnecessary to lay down a sub-layer of roofing paper which is usually done in laying composition shingles.
The rhombic shape of the blank provides a surface sheet having a sloping end edge to shed water when the shingles are laid. End edges of fiap 4 slope oppositely to those of the upper sheet when the flap is folded back, and one end of the flap projects out from under the upper sheet, as shown in Figure 2. This offsets the joints of the base sheet from those of the surface sheet, and also provides a water shedding edge for the base sheet.
Figures 4 and 5 show a modified shingle in which the flap 4 is formed separately from upp r sheet 3 and is fastened to it by a strip 1 foldably connected along the lower edge of the fiap. Any suitable means, such as an adhesive 8, may be employed for uniting strip 1 to the upper sheet. With'bituminous treated roofing felts the bitumen of the sheet material may simply be softened and the parts pressed together to effect the seal. I
The principal advantage of this two-part construction is that fastening fiap 4 may be made of lighter weight material than the upper sheet. The top sheet should be fairly heavy, say about a 30 pound felt, and in the one-piece construction of Figure 1 this means that fiap d is also that heavy; With the two-piece construction the fastening flap may be made lighter, say about a 15 pound felt. Another advantage of the twopiece construction is that the lap joint along the lower edge of the shingle tends to further increase the 'thickness of the shingle butt, thus further improving the shadow effect of the shingles on a roof.
Another variation shown in Figures 4 and 5 is the widening of flap 4 to provide an extension 9 above the upper edge of the surface sheet. This provides a greater lap and affords additional protection.
Figure 6 shows the preferred method of laying the shingles on a roof. The shingles are laid in overlapping courses, with the fastening flaps of the shingles in one course overlapping the shingles in the next lower course. Also, an end of each shingle in a course is interposed between the fastening flap and surface sheet of an adjacent shingle in the same course. Theshingles are secured bynails H penetrating the fastening flaps and the underlying portions of 'the shingles in the lower course. End nail l2 also penetrates the fastening flap of the adjacent shingle in-the same course.
The method of laying the shingles comprises first folding back the upper sheets to expose the fastening flaps, and then laying the opened shinlapping the shingles of the underlying course,
so that when the nails are driven they also penetrate the surface sheets and flapsof the shingles in the underlying course. The surface sheets of the second course are then folded up and the third course laid.
It will be noted that after the surface sheets are folded up they have one end exposed and overlapping the surface sheet of an adjacent shingle in the same course. The exposed left hand edge of the shingle slopes outwardly from the bottom, due to the rhombic shape; and this sloping edge sheds water. The exposed edges of shingles in adjacent courses are preferably staggered, as shown in Figure 6.
Instead of driving nail I2 through the fastening flap alone, this nail may be driven through the corner of the surface sheet after the latter is folded up. This may be done because the nail is covered up by the overlapping part of the adjacent surface sheet. By driving the end nail through the surface sheet the latter receives the benefit of additional fastening means, and the nail also serves to hold the upfolded surface sheet until the next course is applied. This modified nailing is shown at l3 in Figure 6.
The principal feature of my improved shingle is that the underlying fastening flap provides means for securely nailing down the exposed edges of the shingles, thereby insuring weather tightness along the lower edges of the courses. Composition shingles not so fastened are subjected to being lifted by wind, and rain is driven up under the shingles. Numerous methods of interlocking shingles at the base have been developed for holding them down, but these shingles are more complicated, less securely fastened, and less easily applied than my shingle. The labor cost of laying my shingles is one-third to onehalf less than that of laying ordinary composition shingles.
Another important feature of my shingle is that fastening flap 4 underlies the surface sheet to provide a shingle of double thickness. And it is to be noted that the lapping joints at the ends of the flaps are offset from the joints at the ends of the surface sheets due to the reversely sloping edges. Furthermore, the joints of the flaps are also lapped inwater shedding relationship.
Another advantage of fastening along the lower edges of the shingles is that, a large amount of shingle area may be safely exposed to the weather. This means greater roof coverage with fewer shingles, and represents a material saving in cost. For example, shingles of my invention having 18x36 inch surface sheets may be laid with 2% inch lap at top and ends, leaving a net coverage of about 531 /2 square inches for each shingle. Thus, twenty-eight of my shingles will cover 14,383 square inches of roof area, which is more than one square (14,440 square inches).
While I have shown the shingles laid in straight courses, it is understood that the shingles may be laid in other ways to give different appearances edges angularlydisposed to the end .edges of the upper sheet. I
2. A shingle comprising an upper sheet, a flap hingeably connected along the lower edge of the sheet and underlying the latter, said sheet and flap being rhombic-shaped and arranged with an end edge oi the sheet angularly disposed to an adjacent end edge 01' the flap.
3. In a. root comprising a plurality of shingles each having an upper sheet with a sloping side edge and a fastening flap underlying its lower edge, a course of said shingles laid with the sloping side edge of an upp sheet of each shingle overlapping an upper sheet 'of an adjacent shingle, the underlapping portions of the upper sheet of each shingle in said 'course being interposed between the upper sheet and fastening flap of an adjacent shingle. I
4. In a roof comprising shingles having an upper sheet and an underlying flap, the upperv sheet having a side edge sloping in'one direction and the flap having an opposite edge sloping in the other direction, a course of said shingles laid with the sloping edge of an upper sheet of each shingle overlapping an upper sheet of an adjacent shingle to form a water shedding joint, and with the sloping edge of a. flap of each shingle overlapping a flap of an adjacent shingle to form a water shedding joint.
- ERNEST C. MATTHEWS. m
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US220295A US2196420A (en) | 1938-07-20 | 1938-07-20 | Shingle |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US220295A US2196420A (en) | 1938-07-20 | 1938-07-20 | Shingle |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US2196420A true US2196420A (en) | 1940-04-09 |
Family
ID=22822967
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US220295A Expired - Lifetime US2196420A (en) | 1938-07-20 | 1938-07-20 | Shingle |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US2196420A (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2538206A (en) * | 1948-06-18 | 1951-01-16 | Frelox Shingle Corp | Shingle |
US4120132A (en) * | 1976-03-03 | 1978-10-17 | Kendrick John W | Metal roofing shingle and holding strip therefor |
USD369421S (en) | 1995-03-17 | 1996-04-30 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Random cut laminated shingle |
US5611186A (en) | 1994-02-01 | 1997-03-18 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Laminated roofing shingle |
US5666776A (en) | 1991-09-18 | 1997-09-16 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Laminated roofing shingle |
US9212487B2 (en) | 2005-09-28 | 2015-12-15 | Elk Premium Building Products, Inc. | Enhanced single layer roofing material |
-
1938
- 1938-07-20 US US220295A patent/US2196420A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2538206A (en) * | 1948-06-18 | 1951-01-16 | Frelox Shingle Corp | Shingle |
US4120132A (en) * | 1976-03-03 | 1978-10-17 | Kendrick John W | Metal roofing shingle and holding strip therefor |
US5666776A (en) | 1991-09-18 | 1997-09-16 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Laminated roofing shingle |
US5611186A (en) | 1994-02-01 | 1997-03-18 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Laminated roofing shingle |
USD369421S (en) | 1995-03-17 | 1996-04-30 | Elk Corporation Of Dallas | Random cut laminated shingle |
US9212487B2 (en) | 2005-09-28 | 2015-12-15 | Elk Premium Building Products, Inc. | Enhanced single layer roofing material |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US2161440A (en) | Shingle | |
US2099131A (en) | Thick butt shingle | |
US2151794A (en) | Roof construction and roofing element therefor | |
US1828222A (en) | Composition roofing shingle | |
US1802868A (en) | Building covering | |
US2538206A (en) | Shingle | |
US2196420A (en) | Shingle | |
US1593096A (en) | Multiple-shingle-roofing unit | |
US2003503A (en) | Roofing or surfacing material | |
US1678333A (en) | Roof and shingle securing means | |
US2153887A (en) | Flexible cement roofing | |
US1547498A (en) | Roofing | |
US2182526A (en) | Asphalt roofing | |
US2097845A (en) | Roofing | |
US1848965A (en) | Rooe covering | |
US2444623A (en) | Shingle | |
US1665774A (en) | Shingle and shingle construction | |
US1418377A (en) | Roofing | |
US1549263A (en) | Shingle | |
US1585987A (en) | Roof-edging device | |
US1358863A (en) | Roof-covering | |
US2201442A (en) | Shingle | |
US1574345A (en) | Roof | |
US1438302A (en) | Method of laying paper or roofing materials on flat or sloping roofs | |
US2089490A (en) | Building covering |