US2178573A - Magnesium alloy - Google Patents

Magnesium alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2178573A
US2178573A US112288A US11228836A US2178573A US 2178573 A US2178573 A US 2178573A US 112288 A US112288 A US 112288A US 11228836 A US11228836 A US 11228836A US 2178573 A US2178573 A US 2178573A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
per cent
silver
magnesium
alloys
manganese
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US112288A
Inventor
John A Gann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dow Chemical Co
Original Assignee
Dow Chemical Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dow Chemical Co filed Critical Dow Chemical Co
Priority to US112288A priority Critical patent/US2178573A/en
Priority to US288768A priority patent/US2178578A/en
Priority to US288771A priority patent/US2178581A/en
Priority to US288770A priority patent/US2178580A/en
Priority to US288769A priority patent/US2178579A/en
Priority to US288772A priority patent/US2178582A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2178573A publication Critical patent/US2178573A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

Patented Nov. 7, 1939 2,178,573 MAGNESIUM ALLOY John a Gann, Midland, Mich, assignor to The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich, a corporation Michigan No Drawing. Application November 23, 1936,
Serial No. 112,288
3 Claim.
This invention relates to magnesium alloys and, particularly to those containing magnesium in excess of approximately 80 per cent.
' It is well known that the addition of certain metals to magnesium results in the production of alloys possessing good strength characteristics, while the addition of other metals results in the production of alloys possessing good corrosion resistance. One of the major problems of the magnesium industry is the preparation of an alloy in which both objectives are obtained at the same time.
Accordingly, the object of the present invention is to prepare magnesium alloys which have improved physical properties and corrosion resistance. Other objects and advantages will appear as the description proceeds.
My invention is based on the disc6very that highly desirable and useful alloys can be prepared by the addition of silver to magnesium and magnesium alloys, and that these alloys possess good strength characteristics, combined with good corrosion resistance.
I have discovered that the strength characteristics of magnesium may be improved to a very marked degree by the addition of suitable amounts of silver. The tensile strength ofcast pure magnesium, for example, was found to be 14,000 pounds per square inch, while that of a magnesium alloy containing 2 per cent-of silver was 21,100 pounds per square inch and that of a magnesium alloy containing 4 per cent of silver was 22,300 pounds per square inch. The yield strength of cast magnesium was 2,500 pounds per square inch, while the yield strengths of the magnesium alloys containing 2 per cent of silver and 4 per cent of silver were 4,100 pounds'per squaretion and toughness. The magnesium alloy-con taining 8 per cent of silver, for example, had a Brinell hardness value of 45 and the magnesium inch and 5,100 pounds per square inch respectively. The addition of 2 per cent and 4 per cent of silver to pure magnesium raised the percentage elongation of the cast metal from 8.0 per cent up to 10.5 per cent and 10.0 per cent respectively. The toughness of the magnesium was likewise improved by the additiol of silver. The single blow impact value for pure magnesium was 9.0 foot pounds, while the-corresponding values for the magnesium alloys containing 2 per centof silver and 4 per cent of silver were 12.6 and 11.5 foot pounds respectively. The Brinell hardness values of these same two alloys were 34 and 37 resp c -vely as compared with 33 for pure magne- 'si: As the percentage of silver in the alloy is increased; still greater improvements are obtained in the yield strength and hardness, with a proportional decrease the percentage elongaalloy containing 12 per cent of silver had a Brinell hardness valuev of 51.
Magnesium-silver alloys, particularly those containing approximately 4 per cent or more of silver, are amenable to heat treatment. A solution heat treatment of 18 hours at 770 F. increased the tensile strength of the magnesium alloy containing 4 per cent of silver from 22,300 pounds per square inch to 24,900 pounds per square inch, and increased the percentage elongation from 10.0 per cent to 11.5 per cent without appreciably affecting other properties. A subsel5 quent precipitation heat treatment of 48 hours. at 350 F. produced a small increase in the tensile strength. Precipitation heat treatment, however, produced marked property improvements, particularly in tensile strength, yield strength, and 0 hardness in alloys containing higher percentages of silver. A solution heat treatment of 18 hours at 770 F. followed by a precipitation heat treatment of 48 hours at 350 F., for example, increased the Brinell hardness of the magnesium alloy containing 8 per ,cent' of silver from 45.0 to 55.5 and the Brinell hardness value of the magnesium alloy containing 12 per cent of silver from 51.0 to 65.5. Although beneficial property improvements are obtained in alloys containing ap-' proximately 0.3 to 15 per cent of silver, I normally prefer to use from 0.5 to 8 per cent of silver, except in those cases where maximum properties in the heat treated condition are required, and then I prefer to use alloys containing approximately 4 per cent to 8 per cent of silver. Alloys with low percentages of silver are better adapted for plastic deformation operations, while alloys with higher percentages of silver are better suited for the production of castings.
Furthermore, I have discoveredthat the addition of silver to commercial magnesium is beneficial from the standpoint of corrosion resistance. This may be illustrated by alternate immersion corrosion tests conducted in a 3 per cent salt solution. At the end of 24 hours, pure magnesium had lost weight at the rate of 65.8 mg./cm. /day,
While the magnesium alloys containing 2 per cent of silver and 4 per cent of silver lost only 51.2 and metals aluminum, manganese, zinc is added to magnesium-silver alloys, or, in other words, when silver is added to an alloy consisting of magnesium with at least one of the metals aluminum, manganese, zinc. In such alloys, the percentage of silver may vary from about 0.3 per cent to 12 per cent, the percentage of aluminum may vary from about 0.5 per cent to 12 per cent, the percentage of zinc may vary from about 0.5 per cent to 8 per cent, and the percentage of manganese may vary from about 0.1 per cent to 1 per cent (0.1 per cent to 0.5 per cent in alloys likewise containing aluminum) but the total percentage of added metals should not exceed approximately 20 per cent. The absolute percentage of each metal is dependent upon the use for which the alloy is intended and upon the percentages of the other alloying ingredients. For plastic deformation processes, I normally prefer from 0.5 per cent to 4 per cent of silver, from 0.5 per cent to 6 percent of aluminum, from 0.2 per cent to 0.8 per cent of manganese, and from 0.5 per cent to 2.0 per cent of zinc, with a maximum of approximately 8 per cent of added-metals. For castings, I normally prefer from 0.5 per cent to 8 per cent of silver, from 5 per cent to 10 per cent of aluminum, from 0.1 per cent to 0.5 per cent of manganese, and from 1 per cent to 4 per cent of zinc, the percentage of total added ingredients varying from approximately 8 per cent to 12 per cent.
The following examples serve to illustrate the beneficial effect of silver in this class of magnesium alloys as expressed by improvements in physical-mechanical properties. For example, the ternary magnesium alloy containing 2 per cent of silver and 0.2 per cent of manganese had a tensile strength of 23,000 pounds per square inch as compared with 18,000 pounds per square inch for the binary magnesium alloy containing 0.2 per cent of manganese and 21,100 pounds per square inch for the binary magnesium alloy containing 2 per cent of silver. The yield strength of this ternary magnesium-silver-manganese alloy was 4,400 pounds per square inch as compared with 3,000 pounds per square inch for the binary magnesium alloy containing 0.2 per cent of manganese and 4,100 pounds per square inch for the binary magnesium alloy containing 2 per cent of silver.
The addition of silver to magnesium-aluminum and to magnesium-aluminum-manganese alloys has been found to be particularly beneficial when the alloys are used for the production of heat treated castings. Under such conditions, comparable physical property improvements are obtained in alloys with and without manganese, but otherwise of similar composition, although the presence of manganese is desirable when the alloy is used for extrusion purposes. The addition of 2 per cent of silver, for example, increased the tensile strength of a solution heat treated magnesium alloy containing 8 per cent of aluminum and 0.2 per cent of manganese from 34,000 pounds per square inch to 36,000 pounds per square inch and the yield strength of this same alloy from 11,000 pounds per square inch to 12,000 pounds per square inch. Maximum improvement due to the presence of silver in alloys containing aluminum and manganese occurs in the aged or precipitation heat treated alloys, and here the effect is particularly pronounced in the yield strength and hardness values. For example, the addition of 2 per cent of silver to this same magnesium alloy containing 8 per cent of aluminum and 0.2 per cent of manganese increased the yield strength from 13,000 pounds per square inch to 18,000 pounds per square inch and the Brinell hardness from The magnesium-silver-zinc and magnesiumsilver-manganese-zinc alloys are satisfactory for the production of wrought shapes. While both alloys can be extruded readily, the former is better for rolling and forging operations, since the annealing temperature generally employed in such operations closely corresponds to the temperature at which precipitation of manganese occurs, and this precipitated manganese lowers the ductility and workability of the alloy. Magnesium-silver-zinc alloys, suitable for rolling, contain approximately 0.5 per cent to 3 per cent of silver and 0.5 per cent to 1 per cent of zinc, the balance being magnesium. Magnesiumsilver-zinc alloys, suitable for extrusion, contain approximately 0.5 per cent to 6 per cent of silver and 0.5 per cent to 5 per cent of zinc, the balance being magnesium. Where ease of subsequent deformation is not required, as, for example, in extruded sections, I normally prefer to use magnesium-silvermanganese-zinc alloys containing 0.5 per cent to 5 per cent of silver, 0.1 per cent to 0.6 per cent of manganese, and 0.5 per cent to 6 per cent of zinc. The properties of such alloys, particularly those containing more than approximately 3 per .cent of silver and .2 per cent of zinc, may be further improved by heat treatment.
Although the magnesium-silver-zinc alloys may be used for the production of castings, I generally prefer to use, for such purposes, alloys containing silver, aluminum, and zinc, or silver, aluminum, zinc, and manganese. Manganese is soluble in this type of alloy to the extent of a few tenths of a per cent, and in such amounts has no appreciable effect on physical property improvement, although it does improve the corrosion resistance of the alloy. The choice between the alloy with or without manganese, but otherwise of similar compositions, depends largely on the use for which the product is intended. A good composition, selected from the more corrosion resistant type of alloy, contains 2 per cent of silver, 8 per cent of aluminum, 0.2 per cent of manganese, and 3 per cent of zinc. This alloy, in the solution heat treated condition, has a tensile strength 01 27,200 pounds per square inch, a yield strength of 13,000 pounds per square inch, 4 per cent elongation, a Brinell hardness value of 53, and a single-blow impact value of 9.? foot pounds. In the solution-me cipitation heat treated condition, this same alloy composition has the following properties-tensile strength 31,000 pounds per square inch, yield strength 21,000 pounds per square inch, 0.5 per cent elongation, 72 Brinell hardness, and a singleblow impact value of 2.5 foot pounds.
I have likewise discovered that the corrosion resistance of the magnesium-silver 'alloys may be improved very materially by the addition oi! at least one of the metals aluminum, manganese, zinc. For example, the loss in weight in a magnesium alloy containing 2 per cent of silver when tested in 3 per cent salt solution was 51.2 mg/cm /day, whereas the addition of 0.2 per cent of manganese reduced this corrosion rate to 4.9 mg/cm /day. In another instance, the addition 01' 0.9 per cent of manganese to a binary magnesium alloy containing 1 'per cent of silver reduced the corrosion rate'from approximately 60 mg-f'cm /day to 1.7 mg/cm /day. In a similar fashion, the addition of 8 per cent of aluminum plus 0.2 per cent of manganese to a binary magnesium alloy containing 2 per cent of silver reduced the corrosion rate from 51.2 mglcm /day to 1.2 mg/cm /day, while the addition of 8 per cent of aluminum plus 0.2 per cent of manganese plus 3 per cent of zinc to the binary alloy containing 2 per cent of silver reduced the corrosion rate to 0.6 mg/cm lday.
The above described alloys may be prepared by the well known methods of alloying metals with magnesium, such as adding the respective alloying ingredients to a bath of molten metal protected from oxidation by a cover of a fluid flux. The various alloying ingredients may be added singly or simultaneously, and are usually added as pure metals, except in those compositions containing both aluminum and manganese, in which case these two metals are preferably added in the form of a 90-10 aluminum-manganese hardener.
Other modes of applying the principle of my invention may be employed instead of those explained, change being made as regards the ingredients and the steps herein disclosed, provided those stated by any of the following claims or their equivalent be employed.
I particularly point out and distinctly claim as my invention:
1. A magnesium-base alloy containing about 0.3 per cent to 12 per cent of silver, and from about 0.5 per cent to 12 per cent of aluminum, and from about 0.1 per cent to 0.5 per cent of manganese, the balance being magnesium.
2. A magnesium base alloy containing 2 per cent of silver, and 8 per cent of aluminum, and 0.2 per cent of manganese, the balance being magnesium.
3. A magnesium base alloy containing about 2 to 6 per cent of silver, 0.5 to 8 per cent of aluminum, 0.1 to 0.5 per cent of manganese, the balance being magnesium.
JOHN A. GAN'N.
US112288A 1936-11-23 1936-11-23 Magnesium alloy Expired - Lifetime US2178573A (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US112288A US2178573A (en) 1936-11-23 1936-11-23 Magnesium alloy
US288768A US2178578A (en) 1936-11-23 1939-08-07 Magnesium alloy
US288771A US2178581A (en) 1936-11-23 1939-08-07 Magnesium alloy
US288770A US2178580A (en) 1936-11-23 1939-08-07 Magnesium alloy
US288769A US2178579A (en) 1936-11-23 1939-08-07 Magnesium alloy
US288772A US2178582A (en) 1936-11-23 1939-08-07 Magnesium alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US112288A US2178573A (en) 1936-11-23 1936-11-23 Magnesium alloy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2178573A true US2178573A (en) 1939-11-07

Family

ID=22343095

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US112288A Expired - Lifetime US2178573A (en) 1936-11-23 1936-11-23 Magnesium alloy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2178573A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4096064A (en) * 1976-04-05 1978-06-20 Ameron, Inc. System for removal of toxic heavy metals from drinking water

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4096064A (en) * 1976-04-05 1978-06-20 Ameron, Inc. System for removal of toxic heavy metals from drinking water

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2188203A (en) Aluminum base alloy
US2178573A (en) Magnesium alloy
US2178579A (en) Magnesium alloy
US2178580A (en) Magnesium alloy
US2178582A (en) Magnesium alloy
US2290020A (en) Aluminum alloy
US2249740A (en) Aluminum alloys
US2317980A (en) Magnesium-base alloy
US2178581A (en) Magnesium alloy
US2290026A (en) Aluminum alloy
US2178578A (en) Magnesium alloy
US2270193A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2290023A (en) Aluminum alloy
US3370945A (en) Magnesium-base alloy
US2178576A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2124560A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2178575A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2124559A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2290024A (en) Aluminum alloy
US2124561A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2221245A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2178577A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2124553A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2270190A (en) Magnesium base alloy
US2085544A (en) Acid resistant copper alloys