US2114313A - Process for refining hydrocarbons - Google Patents

Process for refining hydrocarbons Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2114313A
US2114313A US661160A US66116033A US2114313A US 2114313 A US2114313 A US 2114313A US 661160 A US661160 A US 661160A US 66116033 A US66116033 A US 66116033A US 2114313 A US2114313 A US 2114313A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sulphur
oil
chloride
reaction
treatment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US661160A
Inventor
Jr Walter A Patrick
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US661160A priority Critical patent/US2114313A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2114313A publication Critical patent/US2114313A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G50/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from lower carbon number hydrocarbons, e.g. by oligomerisation

Definitions

  • the present invention is an improved chemical treatment of mineral oils and distillates and the product thereof.
  • the invention relates to the chemical treatment and purification of petroleum hydrocarbons, such as crudes, distillates, products 'from' cracking, as well as oils derived from the processing of shales and coke oven products such as light oils and distillates thereof.
  • the present invention has as an object to provide an improved refining process and a superior product without recourse to the conventional sulphuric acid treatment.
  • An object of the invention is to obtain in:
  • troleum products for example, gasoline, lubricating oils and kerosene, by a method afiording a product substantially free from deleterious.
  • the invention is to manu- 40 iacture gasoline, of high quality without recourse to blending.
  • the naphthas treated in accordance with the present invention do not have their valuable saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons substantially afi'ected, and the final product has an octane number considerably higher than that obtained by conventional operations.
  • the invention comprises treating the mineral oils and distillates, oils derived fromvthe processing of shale and coke oven products such as.
  • Lorand (Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, June 1927, page 733) discusses the laboratory use of sulphur chloride in large amounts as a testing material for petroleum hydrocarbons without relation to the re ning of the same. Jaeger in his Patent No. 1:74 05, December 31, 1929 discusses the chlorination of aliphatics and thiopene compounds contained in coal tar and its. derivatives using sulphur chloride as a carrier.
  • halides of metals and metaloids have been sugg sted as refining reagents of petroleum products notably AlCla, ZnClz, and FeCla, and others such as AsCla, SbCla, SnCh have also 20 been mentioned; Their use was directed either to cracking or to cause the complete removal of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons.
  • the halides of sulphur are milder polymerizing agents than the metallic chlorides, making it possible to select conditions that will result in only the elimination of objectionable. constituents of the oil. 1
  • a sulphur halide preferably sulphur mono-chloride (S2C12) properly regulated under suitable reaction conditions, constitutes a highly eflective refining agent and may be employed as a substitute for the conventional sulphuric acid treatment.
  • S2C12 sulphur mono-chloride
  • the sulphur halide which I have most successfully employed is the mono-chloride (SzClz).
  • the principle of'my method consists in treating the impure hydrocarbons with sulphur chloride so as topi'oduce a reaction between the actualand/or potential gu'm Iorming constitucuts and the sulphur chloride and thus form a gum or tarry fiioduct which is not appreciably volatile'at distillation temperatures.
  • the exact quantity of the reagent can be determined, for example, by adding small percentages of the same to the oil to be refined, refluxing for a short time,v and then subjecting the mixture to distillation. The purity and other characteristics of the distillate will enable one to.
  • hydrocarbon oils do not show the same velocity of reaction with the reagent. It is, therefore, necessary to determine the length of the treatment with each variety of oil. This reaction velocity is dependent upon temperature, the nature of the oil to be refined, the concentration and composition of the sulphur chloride, and where a catalyst is employed, the nature of I have found that ordinarily the sulphur chloride should be used in relatively small percentages, usually less than 1%.
  • the reaction between the sulphur halide and the oil may, in some cases, be accelerated by a catalyst, such as finely divided clay or fullers earth, copper, lead, zinc and finely divided anhydrous sulfides of copper, lead, tin, arsenic and antimony. The-reaction can take place in the cold, but ordinarily heat will reduce the time period.
  • the reaction is characterized by (1) chlorination of the valuable aliphatic and aromatic compounds does not take place so that addition or substitution chlorinated products of the valuable hydrocarbons are not formed; (2) the potential gum forming constituents of the: oil are reduced or condensed or polymerized to form separable bodies which are insoluble or are but slightly soluble, i. e., of reduced solubility in the oil, and
  • the sulphur chloride' is relatively inexpensive and the simplicity of the process reduces the refining expense, having in mind particularly that only small percentages of sulphur chloride are-employed.
  • the amount of the gum or tarry residue obtained is considerably less than the sludge produced by the acid treatment.
  • the gasoline obtained has characteristics which clearly distinguish it from the product of the sulphuric acid treatment and has a number of definite advantages.
  • the product is not only satisfactory under the copper-dish test, from the standpoint of actual and potential gums, but is also comparatively rich in the valuable anti-knock constituents which are lost in the sulphuric acid method of refining.
  • An examination of the sulphur content of the gasoline prepared in accordance with this invention discloses that it is less than one-tenth of 1%.
  • the gasoline is highly stable. Whenallowed to stand for a considerable period after distillation, even in the sunlight, it exhibits no appreciable deterioration, whereas gasoline obtained by the. sulphuric acid treatment shows very appreciable deterioration when subjected to the same tests. More particularly, the product of this process when subjected to this stability test shows little or no dropping of octane number or discoloration, and at the end of the period of test responds to the copper-dish test equally as well as before exposure.
  • the oil is treated ina suitable chamber by boiling point, but is speeded or accelerated at elevated temperatures.
  • the factors of heat and time required to satisfactorily complete the reaction will vary in accordance with the oil under treatment.
  • the reaction proceeds with formation of hydrochloric acid gas which is liberated and recovered as a dry gas.
  • the oil under treatment turns a dark color and a heavy precipitate forms comprising the gums, resins, and reaction compounds, together with free sulphur. It is noted that the heavy precipitate is much less in quantity than the "sludge or tar formed when a sulphuric acid wash is employed.
  • temperatures employed will be determined by the oil under treatment, and, if desired, the distillation may be accomplished under reduced pressure and/or condensing means'disposed in termediate the tower or at the outlet thereof for returningcertain fractions back to the chamber.
  • fractions may be condensed and collected from the tower, i. e., separate fractions may be taken off.
  • the gasoline or distillate upon examination contains a minimum of deleterious substances and is much more eflicient from the standpoint of anti-knock characteristics and more stable than gasolines obtained by chemical treatment with sulphuric acid.
  • the gasoline recovered by the present method is remarkably free of gums and resins, as wellas sulphur compounds,
  • any suitable appa ratus may be employed and various methods of procedure may be adopted as best suited to plant installation.
  • Figure 1 is a diagrammatic view of a typical apparatus.
  • Figure 2 is a fragmentary diagrammatic view of a modified form of apparatus.
  • I indicates aconventional fractionating column intowhich the crude naphtha may be-introduced through a pipe ll leading from any suitable source.
  • the lower end of the column forms a residue receiving chamber l2 having a draw-oil? outlet, and heat may be applied to the oil within the column as by means of a suitable internal heating coil 13.
  • the treating agent such as sulphur mono-chloride, may be initially introduced through pipe [9 in a percentage predetermined as hereinbefore described, and the reaction permitted to take place preferably in the presence of heat supplied by means of the heating coil. Such pressures may be employed as will prevent any substantial distillation of the product during the reaction period.
  • reaction conditions will be such that hydrochloric acid gas as liberated may be taken ofi through the pipe Id at the upper end of the column and carried either to an absorber and/or to a chamber I 6, wherein chlorine may be separated from the hydrochloric acid gas for the purpose of supplying additional reagent to the still in further operations.
  • the chlorine liberated in the chamber l6 may be conducted by pipe I! to a chamber l8, wherein it will be comblned'with sulphur in a conventional'manner to produce sulphur chloride.
  • the sulphur chloride may be conducted as by the pipe IE! to the column, as required.
  • the sulphur obtained from the reaction in the column may be removed from time to time, and treated for use in the chamber l8 to produce the sulphur chloride.
  • or a battery of such columns through a pipe or pipes 22.
  • the crude naphtha introduced into the chamber maybe partially distilled before introducing the sulphur chloride.
  • Another method of operation consists in adding theinitial or low boiling distillate in either treated or untreated condition, as mentioned above, to the remaining undistilled treated bo y of oil, and then distilling the mixture.
  • the low boiling constituents and high boiling constituents are each separately chemically treated and then mixed and distilled.
  • @Such mixture of untreated low boiling distillate and treated oil will be distilled, as described;
  • I further proceed by reacting upon the oil to be treated with a very small percentage of the sulphur halide, and distilling ofl fractions of the oil as long as their recovery indicates they are the valuable ones or the ones desired, and are free of deleterious substances. When this ceases, the fractionation is discontinued, and another compounds of reduced solubility, and separating small percentage of sulphur halide is added and allowed to react with the remaining body of oil. When the reaction has been completed, distillation and fractionation are resumed. This semicontinuous and partial treatment with relatively small percentages of sulphur halide, followed by distillation, may be carried on until .no more desirable fractions are recovered and assures that a relatively high yield, 1. e., substantially all of the valuable constituents, will be obtained.
  • oils derived from the treatment of shales, and liquid coke-oven products 1. e., light oils and distillates thereof
  • the sulphur chloride will be added in amounts and con- 'light oils and distillates thereof, in liquid phase to obtain products free of potential gum-forming substances and undesirable sulphur compounds, which comprises reacting upon the oil containing the said substances with up.to one percent of sulphur chloride, thereby polymerizing the said substances into relatively high boiling and stable out such high boiling coinpounds.

Description

' April 19, 1938. w. p ficK JR 2,114,313
PROCESS FOR REFINING HYDROCARB'ONS' "ori inal Filed March 16, 1935 Patented Apr. 19', 1938 UNITED STATES PATENT PROCESS FOR. REFINING mzm ocsanoss Walter A. Patrick, Jr.,
Application March 16,
Renewed February 8, 1938 4 Claims. The present invention is an improved chemical treatment of mineral oils and distillates and the product thereof. In its primary application, the invention relates to the chemical treatment and purification of petroleum hydrocarbons, such as crudes, distillates, products 'from' cracking, as well as oils derived from the processing of shales and coke oven products such as light oils and distillates thereof. I
The invention will be described inconnection with the treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons but it is to be understood that the process is equally applicable upon shales and coke oven products. In spite of much effort and study, the method sired refining of nearly all petroleum products, is that suggested .in 1855 by Silliman-treatment with concentrated sulphuric acid followed by washing with sodium hydroxide solution. The objections to the sulphuric acid wash are generally recognized, but no suitable refining substitute has yet been made available (Petroleum and its Products Gruse-1928, page 121).
The present invention has as an object to provide an improved refining process and a superior product without recourse to the conventional sulphuric acid treatment.
An object of the invention is to obtain in:
troleum products, for example, gasoline, lubricating oils and kerosene, by a method afiording a product substantially free from deleterious.
substances, s'uch' as those which are easily .oxidizable or otherwise unstable as well as resinous and asphaltic materials and sulphur impuritiesv or compounds. The presenceof such substances in theoils or distillates is generally recognized as impairing the quality of the ,product.
- Another object 01' the invention is to manu- 40 iacture gasoline, of high quality without recourse to blending. 'I'hat is to say, the naphthas treated in accordance with the present invention do not have their valuable saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons substantially afi'ected, and the final product has an octane number considerably higher than that obtained by conventional operations.
The invention comprises treating the mineral oils and distillates, oils derived fromvthe processing of shale and coke oven products such as.
light oils and distillates thereof with a sulphur halide or reagents which react to form a sulphur halide. y
Kendall in his Patent No. 413,187, October 22, .1889, suggests the use of sulphur chloride to 56 deodorize certain oils preliminary to the use 0! almost universally used to bring about the de-- the sulphuric acid treatment and the deodorizing effector sulphur chlorides has, therefore, been recognized. Meigs (Industrial 8: Engineering- Chemistry, July 1917, page 655) discusses the .use of sulphur chloride and carbon disulphide 5 solution in large amounts for testing asphaltic materials and gas engine oils for bituminous content. Lorand (Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, June 1927, page 733) discusses the laboratory use of sulphur chloride in large amounts as a testing material for petroleum hydrocarbons without relation to the re ning of the same. Jaeger in his Patent No. 1:74 05, December 31, 1929 discusses the chlorination of aliphatics and thiopene compounds contained in coal tar and its. derivatives using sulphur chloride as a carrier.
' Many halides of metals and metaloids have been sugg sted as refining reagents of petroleum products notably AlCla, ZnClz, and FeCla, and others such as AsCla, SbCla, SnCh have also 20 been mentioned; Their use was directed either to cracking or to cause the complete removal of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons. The halides of sulphur are milder polymerizing agents than the metallic chlorides, making it possible to select conditions that will result in only the elimination of objectionable. constituents of the oil. 1
I have discovered that a sulphur halide, preferably sulphur mono-chloride (S2C12) properly regulated under suitable reaction conditions, constitutes a highly eflective refining agent and may be employed as a substitute for the conventional sulphuric acid treatment.
The sulphur halide which I have most successfully employed is the mono-chloride (SzClz).
But the di-chloride and tetrachloride of sulphur are ,also useful. Obviously, the same result may be obtained by using other reagents which react to form a sulphur halide;
.The principle of'my method consists in treating the impure hydrocarbons with sulphur chloride so as topi'oduce a reaction between the actualand/or potential gu'm Iorming constitucuts and the sulphur chloride and thus form a gum or tarry fiioduct which is not appreciably volatile'at distillation temperatures.
The amount of sulphur chloride nrust be carefully determined beI0re.distillation-,'since all ,or I
I the catalyst.
no further amount oi! the reagent should be used must be determined. Y
The exact quantity of the reagent can be determined, for example, by adding small percentages of the same to the oil to be refined, refluxing for a short time,v and then subjecting the mixture to distillation. The purity and other characteristics of the distillate will enable one to.
quickly ascertain the requisite amount of the reagent for the oil. 1
Moreover, all hydrocarbon oils do not show the same velocity of reaction with the reagent. It is, therefore, necessary to determine the length of the treatment with each variety of oil. This reaction velocity is dependent upon temperature, the nature of the oil to be refined, the concentration and composition of the sulphur chloride, and where a catalyst is employed, the nature of I have found that ordinarily the sulphur chloride should be used in relatively small percentages, usually less than 1%. The reaction between the sulphur halide and the oil may, in some cases, be accelerated by a catalyst, such as finely divided clay or fullers earth, copper, lead, zinc and finely divided anhydrous sulfides of copper, lead, tin, arsenic and antimony. The-reaction can take place in the cold, but ordinarily heat will reduce the time period.
The reaction is characterized by (1) chlorination of the valuable aliphatic and aromatic compounds does not take place so that addition or substitution chlorinated products of the valuable hydrocarbons are not formed; (2) the potential gum forming constituents of the: oil are reduced or condensed or polymerized to form separable bodies which are insoluble or are but slightly soluble, i. e., of reduced solubility in the oil, and
which have a boiling point above that employed for distillation so that the valuable constituents of the oil are removable by distillation; (3) formation of substantially ,dry hydrochloric acid gas which, in some cases, may be recovered in the gaseous phase, and (4) the sulphur chloride'reacts upon the potential gum forming constituents and sulphur compounds of the oil and is in such small percentage that no opportunity is afiorded for the formation either of an increase of sulphur impurities, or objectionable chlorinated products, both of which would impair the final covery of the valuable and useful hydrocarbons is materially increased, as comparedto the sulphuric acid treatment. The increased yield is equal to the. amount of the valuable unsaturated hydrocarbons which are usually destroyed bysulphuric acid treatment, and in'the case of cracked gasolines has amounted to substantially 10%. The sulphur chloride'is relatively inexpensive and the simplicity of the process reduces the refining expense, having in mind particularly that only small percentages of sulphur chloride are-employed. The amount of the gum or tarry residue obtained is considerably less than the sludge produced by the acid treatment.
Further, the handling of large quantities of sulphuric acid with its attendant problems is avoided.
In addition, there is a substantial reduction in the time period of operation.
The gasoline obtained has characteristics which clearly distinguish it from the product of the sulphuric acid treatment and has a number of definite advantages.
It is well known, -of course, that aromatic hydrocarbons are desirable in the gasoline; my improved process does not attack the aromatic hydrocarbons but preserves the same. The gaso' line produced is substantially water-white and sweet. Repeated tests have shown that it has a high octane number as compared to gasoline obtained from the same crude naphtha by the sulphuric acid treatment. Under comparative test the product has exhibited an octane number substantially greater than the octane number for gasoline produced from the same oil refined by the sulphuric acid treatment. Under the copper-dish test, both the factors of .corro sion and gum residue are satisfactory. In other words, the product is not only satisfactory under the copper-dish test, from the standpoint of actual and potential gums, but is also comparatively rich in the valuable anti-knock constituents which are lost in the sulphuric acid method of refining. An examination of the sulphur content of the gasoline prepared in accordance with this invention discloses that it is less than one-tenth of 1%.
The gasoline is highly stable. Whenallowed to stand for a considerable period after distillation, even in the sunlight, it exhibits no appreciable deterioration, whereas gasoline obtained by the. sulphuric acid treatment shows very appreciable deterioration when subjected to the same tests. More particularly, the product of this process when subjected to this stability test shows little or no dropping of octane number or discoloration, and at the end of the period of test responds to the copper-dish test equally as well as before exposure.
The process is-applicable to all oils and distillates which normally require chemical refining treatment. I will describe the invention in connection with the manufacture of gasoline.
Ordinary crude naphthas are treated, such as straight run or cracked distillates. The oil is tested by refluxing or in any suitable manner to determine the quantity of potential gum forming constituents and the boiling point. These factors I find determine (1) the quantity or sulphur halide to be added, and (2) the control of the operation.
Where the amount of potential gums is high, a greater percentage of the chemical is employed. In cases where the oil is relatively low boiling or contains appreciable low boiling unsaturated hydrocarbons, the quantity of the chemical is regulated so as 'to avoid chlorination of the valuable. low boiling constituents. I have found that the low boiling hydrocarbons require lesser amounts of the sulphur chloride and that, in fact, the use of an excessive percentage is objectionable.
- I have found that for most crude naphthas, the percentage of sulphurhalide need not be in excess .of 1%, the exact percentage being determined as explained by the boiling point and actual and potential gum content. The amount will vary in the case of raw crudes, or kerosene and lubricating oils.
The oil is treated ina suitable chamber by boiling point, but is speeded or accelerated at elevated temperatures. The factors of heat and time required to satisfactorily complete the reaction will vary in accordance with the oil under treatment.
In some cases I find the use of a catalyst oraccelerator, such as one of the accelerators above mentioned, will materially decrease the time factor.
The reaction which takes place, I believe to be 1) a combining of the sulphur chloride with the gum forming and sulphur compound constituents of the oil with liberation of substantially dry hydrochloric acid gas; (2) the changing or polymerizaticn of these and other deleterious compounds into definite relatively stable bodies which are high boiling, separable, i. e., stable abovedistillation, are separable as a residue.
The reaction proceeds with formation of hydrochloric acid gas which is liberated and recovered as a dry gas. The oil under treatment turns a dark color and a heavy precipitate forms comprising the gums, resins, and reaction compounds, together with free sulphur. It is noted that the heavy precipitate is much less in quantity than the "sludge or tar formed when a sulphuric acid wash is employed.
, The naphtha so treated is now distilled and this is satisfactorily accomplished in any suitable 'fractionating tower s: the usual manner. The
temperatures employed will be determined by the oil under treatment, and, if desired, the distillation may be accomplished under reduced pressure and/or condensing means'disposed in termediate the tower or at the outlet thereof for returningcertain fractions back to the chamber.
Ilikewise, various of the fractions may be condensed and collected from the tower, i. e., separate fractions may be taken off.
The gasoline or distillate upon examination contains a minimum of deleterious substances and is much more eflicient from the standpoint of anti-knock characteristics and more stable than gasolines obtained by chemical treatment with sulphuric acid. In fact, the gasoline recovered by the present method is remarkably free of gums and resins, as wellas sulphur compounds,
. such as mercaptans, polysulphides and other su1-.
phur impurities. The characteristics of the product have been described above.
' In practicing the process, any suitable appa ratus may be employed and various methods of procedure may be adopted as best suited to plant installation. I
In the accompanying drawing,
-reaction processes which have heretofore Figure 1 is a diagrammatic view of a typical apparatus.
Figure 2 is a fragmentary diagrammatic view of a modified form of apparatus.
Referring to the drawing, I indicates aconventional fractionating column intowhich the crude naphtha may be-introduced through a pipe ll leading from any suitable source. The lower end of the column forms a residue receiving chamber l2 having a draw-oil? outlet, and heat may be applied to the oil within the column as by means of a suitable internal heating coil 13. The treating agent, such as sulphur mono-chloride, may be initially introduced through pipe [9 in a percentage predetermined as hereinbefore described, and the reaction permitted to take place preferably in the presence of heat supplied by means of the heating coil. Such pressures may be employed as will prevent any substantial distillation of the product during the reaction period. The reaction conditions, however, will be such that hydrochloric acid gas as liberated may be taken ofi through the pipe Id at the upper end of the column and carried either to an absorber and/or to a chamber I 6, wherein chlorine may be separated from the hydrochloric acid gas for the purpose of supplying additional reagent to the still in further operations. the chlorine liberated in the chamber l6 may be conducted by pipe I! to a chamber l8, wherein it will be comblned'with sulphur in a conventional'manner to produce sulphur chloride. The sulphur chloride. may be conducted as by the pipe IE! to the column, as required. The sulphur obtained from the reaction in the column may be removed from time to time, and treated for use in the chamber l8 to produce the sulphur chloride.
Instead of the apparatus illustrated in Figure 1, it may be desirable, in some instances, to treat the crude naphtha in a chamber independent of the fractionating column and store the same for supply to. the fractionating column as required.
That is to say;
For example, as illustrated in Figure 2, a storage I distillation column 2| or a battery of such columns through a pipe or pipes 22.
In order that the practical application of the process may be I more clearly understood and merely by way of example, I will describe typical been conducted.
Commercial crude naphtha resulting from a cracking process is supplied to a column, such as illustrated in Figure 1. Into' the naphtha is introduced 0.6 of 1% of sulphur mono-chloride; the mixture is refluxed for twenty (20) minutes and heated to the boiling point of thenaphtha. The
oil becomes dark and atarry precipitate and reaction products settle into the bottom of the chamber. Thereafterthe oil is distilled to approximately 150 0., or aslong'as the distillate is clear or colorless. It has been observed that at about 1509, it may be desirable .to reduce the pressure in the column, as by evacuation, thereby permitting the distillation to continue without increasing the temperature to apoint which will cause the reaction products to vaporize. The dis-- tillation process is continued as long as the distillate is clear, It has been observed, in some cases,
that it is desirable to keep the distillation temperature below 170 0., in order to avoid vaporizing or cracking the-reaction products, However,
it will be understood thatthis temperature will vary with different oils. The distillate produced by this process has been found to. have all the characteristics hereinbefore described.
As an alternative procedure, the crude naphtha introduced into the chamber maybe partially distilled before introducing the sulphur chloride.
For example, it is distilled sufliciently to take oil the lighter hydrocarbons of low boiling point. In some instances, I have distilled to about 120 C., and the cut taken off up to this temperaturehas been treated in two ways. For example, (1) it has been given a treatment, of 0.1 of 1% of sulphur mono-chloride and because of the character of the distillate, this can be done at atmospheric temperature and pressure. Ordinarily, it is tilled as long as the distillate has the desired characteristics.
In some instances, it has been found helpful to combine the distillate obtained in the first step with the distillate from the second step, and then redistill" the mixture to approximately 200 C.
Another method of operation consists in adding theinitial or low boiling distillate in either treated or untreated condition, as mentioned above, to the remaining undistilled treated bo y of oil, and then distilling the mixture. In other words, the low boiling constituents and high boiling constituents are each separately chemically treated and then mixed and distilled. Frequently, it is unnecessary to chemically treat the low' boiling distillate, and when this is addedtothe body of undi'stilled treated oil, a small percentage of residual sulphur halide which may remain in the treated oil, will be suiilcient to react upon any deleterious substances in the untreated initial distillate. @Such mixture of untreated low boiling distillate and treated oil will be distilled, as described;
I further proceed by reacting upon the oil to be treated with a very small percentage of the sulphur halide, and distilling ofl fractions of the oil as long as their recovery indicates they are the valuable ones or the ones desired, and are free of deleterious substances. Whenthis ceases, the fractionation is discontinued, and another compounds of reduced solubility, and separating small percentage of sulphur halide is added and allowed to react with the remaining body of oil. When the reaction has been completed, distillation and fractionation are resumed. This semicontinuous and partial treatment with relatively small percentages of sulphur halide, followed by distillation, may be carried on until .no more desirable fractions are recovered and assures that a relatively high yield, 1. e., substantially all of the valuable constituents, will be obtained.
. As explained, it maybe desirable ,to employ a catalyst, such as one of those described above preferably in finely divided condition, and these have been used with satisfactory results in each of the processes described. Y
With reference to the treatment of raw crudes, oils derived from the treatment of shales, and liquid coke-oven products, 1. e., light oils and distillates thereof, it will be understoodthat the sulphur chloride will be added in amounts and con- 'light oils and distillates thereof, in liquid phase to obtain products free of potential gum-forming substances and undesirable sulphur compounds, which comprises reacting upon the oil containing the said substances with up.to one percent of sulphur chloride, thereby polymerizing the said substances into relatively high boiling and stable out such high boiling coinpounds.-
2. The process of chemically treating petroleum hydrocarbon oils and distillates thereof and light-oils and distillates thereof, in liquid phase,
substances and undesirable sulphur compounds,
which comprises reactingupon the oil containing the said substances with up to one percent of sulphur mono-chloride, thereby polymerizing the said substances into relatively high boiling and stable compounds of reduced solubility, and separating out said'high boiling compounds.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the reaction of the oil with sulphur chloride takes place in the presence. of a catalyst.
WALTER A. PATRICK, JR.
US661160A 1933-03-16 1933-03-16 Process for refining hydrocarbons Expired - Lifetime US2114313A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US661160A US2114313A (en) 1933-03-16 1933-03-16 Process for refining hydrocarbons

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US661160A US2114313A (en) 1933-03-16 1933-03-16 Process for refining hydrocarbons

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2114313A true US2114313A (en) 1938-04-19

Family

ID=24652454

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US661160A Expired - Lifetime US2114313A (en) 1933-03-16 1933-03-16 Process for refining hydrocarbons

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2114313A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3291724A (en) * 1964-04-29 1966-12-13 Universal Oil Prod Co Process for treating petroleum crude oil
US3407136A (en) * 1966-01-24 1968-10-22 Cities Service Oil Co Nitrogen removal from distillate fuel with sulfur halides

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3291724A (en) * 1964-04-29 1966-12-13 Universal Oil Prod Co Process for treating petroleum crude oil
US3407136A (en) * 1966-01-24 1968-10-22 Cities Service Oil Co Nitrogen removal from distillate fuel with sulfur halides

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2001715A (en) Method of preparing organic disulphides
US2926129A (en) Deashing of residual fractions
US1865235A (en) Treating process for hydrocarbon oils
US2114313A (en) Process for refining hydrocarbons
US1826140A (en) Process of refining hydrocarbon oils with cadmium salts
US2114314A (en) Process of treating oils and distillates thereof
US3004912A (en) Desulfurization process utilizing metallic sodium and recycling of sludge
US2114315A (en) Process of chemically refining hydrocarbons
US1920248A (en) Process for refining gasoline-containing distillates
US1801213A (en) Process of refining mineral oils
US2503486A (en) Method of desulfurization by treatment with elemental halogens
US2417280A (en) Production of butadiene
US2205410A (en) Process for treating hydrocarbon oils
US1948528A (en) Purification of hydrocarbon oils
US1946131A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2063491A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US1766338A (en) Method of refining liquid hydrocarbons
US2305742A (en) Treating hydrocarbon distillates
US2064558A (en) Removal of sulphur compounds from hydrocarbons
US2131879A (en) Method of treating hydrocarbon distillates
US1941267A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oil
US2063082A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oil
US1962182A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2055027A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US1939129A (en) Method of refining liquid low boiling distillates