US2026589A - Alloy - Google Patents

Alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2026589A
US2026589A US692132A US69213233A US2026589A US 2026589 A US2026589 A US 2026589A US 692132 A US692132 A US 692132A US 69213233 A US69213233 A US 69213233A US 2026589 A US2026589 A US 2026589A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
per cent
lead
magnesium
alloy
alloys
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US692132A
Inventor
Roy E Paine
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MAGNESIUM DEV CORP
MAGNESIUM DEVELOPMENT Corp
Original Assignee
MAGNESIUM DEV CORP
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MAGNESIUM DEV CORP filed Critical MAGNESIUM DEV CORP
Priority to US692132A priority Critical patent/US2026589A/en
Priority to US49960A priority patent/US2045236A/en
Priority to US49963A priority patent/US2045239A/en
Priority to US49962A priority patent/US2045238A/en
Priority to US49964A priority patent/US2045240A/en
Priority to US49961A priority patent/US2045237A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2026589A publication Critical patent/US2026589A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium

Definitions

  • the invention relates to magnesium-base alloys and is directed to the development of alloys of this class which have good corrosion resistance, particularly in the cast and in the cast andheat treated condition.
  • a further object is the provision of magnesium alloys characterized by their susceptibility to be improved in mechanical properties by suitable thermal treatments.
  • a further object is'thepro tive characteristics of alloys which are resistantto corrosion,'alloys which may be readily cast, alloys which are susceptible to alteration of properties by thermal treatments, alloys having favorable mechanical which, within a restricted range, may be worked by extrusion, forging, or other means of mechanical deformation.
  • lead may be present in amounts as low as 0.5 per cent.
  • the alloy may be worked by extrusion over a range of from 5 about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent of lead.
  • the alloy may be worked by extrusion over a range of from 5 about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent of lead.
  • As an all around casting alloy I have found a magnesium alloy containing 5 to 10 per cent of lead to be particularly adapted to general foundry purposes. Alloys falling within this preferred 10 range of composition as well as other alloys comprised within the broader limits previously defined, have been subjected to severe tests designed to produce accelerated corrosion. Sand cast test bars poured in accordance with the best casting practice in the art were subjected to corrosion tests in the as cast and in the heat treated condition.
  • heat treatment was carried out at about 459 centigrade for about 20 hours followed by 20 quenching in water, and both heat treated and unheattreated test bars were subjected to that corrosion test which comprises alternately immersing the metal in, and removing it from, a.
  • the binary magnesium-lead alloys there are certain elements which may be added to the binary magnesium-lead alloys to particular advantage. Such, for instance, are the 30 metals calcium, cadmium and zinc. These may be added singly or in combination with each other, thezinc in amounts between about 1.0 per cent and 10.0 per cent, the calcium between corrosion resistance.
  • a magnesium alloy containing 21.4 per cent of lead and 0.25 per cent of calcium shows, in the as cast condition a strength loss of only 17 per cent after 45 alternate immersion in a 3 per cent sodium chloride solution for about 80 hours, while a heat treated magnesium alloy containing about 5 percent of lead to which about 0.25 per cent of calcium had been added did not undergo any an appreciable loss in strength under the foregoing corrosion conditions; the heat treatment in this case was a treatment at about 450 centigrade for, about 20 hours.
  • An alloy of magnesium with about 5.1 per cent of lead and 10.0 per centof 55 cadmium had in the sand cast condition a tensile strength of about 24,650 pounds per square inch and an elongation of about 9.8 per cent in 2 inches.
  • magnesium-lead-silicon composition I use a magnesium-base alloy containing 7.0 per cent of lead and 0.5 per cent of silicon.
  • a preferred magnesium-lead-aluminum alloy I use a magnesium-base alloy containing 7.0 per cent of lead and 5.0 per cent-of aluminum.
  • aluminum and silicon are used in conjunction I prefer to use a total of about 5.0 per cent of aluminum andsilicon combined, for. instance about 4.0 per cent aluminum and 1.0 per cent silicon.
  • Manganese alone may be added to magnesiumlead alloys in amounts between 0.1 per cent and 1.0 per cent and has a stabilizing effect upon the alloy properties in that it raises the hardness slightly, does not materially decrease the corrosion resistance, and adds to the matrix of the alloy a hardening element which expresses itself not only in an increase in tensile strength but also in surface hardness.
  • Analloy of this nature containing about 8.0 per cent of lead and 0.85 per cent of manganese lost only 6 per cent of its original strength after 80 hours alternate immersion in a 3 per cent aqueous solution of sodium chloride and in the solution heat treated condition lost only 7 per cent of its strength in the alternate immersion treatment.
  • Amagnesium alloy con taining about 10.37 per cent of lead had lost only about 10 per cent of its strength at the eirpira tion' of this period as compared with certain other commercial alloys, such as, for instance, the well known magnesium alloy containing about 7 per cent of aluminum and 0.4 per cent of manganese which, at the end of 40 hours of alternate immersion, had lost about 60 per cent of its strength.
  • Very favorable alloys can be compounded by using as a base an alloy of magnesium, lead and aluminum and making additions thereto of at least one of the class of metals tin, manganese or zinc.
  • the lead can be used in amounts from about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per, cent, the aluminum from about 1.0 per cent to about 15.0 per cent, the tin from about 1.0 per cent to about 15.0 per cent, the manganese from about 0.1 per cent to about 1.0 per cent, and the zinc from about 1.0 per cent to about 10.0 per cent.
  • a sand cast alloy within this range had, in the as cast condition, a tensile strength of 27,500 pounds per square inch and an elongation of 5.7 per cent in 2 inches.
  • the alloy After a thermal treatment of 16 hours at 315 centigrade, the alloy had a tensile strength of 29,640pounds per square inch and an elongation of 6.0 per cent in 2 inches. Some of the heat treated specimens were then given an alternate immersion treatment for 40 hours and after the treatment the specimens had a tensile strength of 28,413 pounds per square inch and an elongation of 5.8 per cent in 2 inches, this alloy containing 5.0 per cent of aluminum, 5.0 per cent of lead, 0.4 per cent of manganese and 2.0 per cent of zinc.
  • the loss in strength on the corrosion treatment is observed to be less than 5 per cent as compared to about per cent with the commercial magnesium-aluminummanganese alloy disclosed hereinbefore which contains about 7 per cent of aluminum and 0.4 per cent of manganese.
  • the commercial magnesium-aluminummanganese alloy disclosed hereinbefore which contains about 7 per cent of aluminum and 0.4 per cent of manganese.
  • the loss of strength after the alternate immersion test was only about 30 cent of susceptible to variation of properties by thermal treatments and their hardness can be markedly increased by artificial aging after thermal solution treatments.
  • the lead content should range from about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent, the aluminum from about. 1.0 per cent to about I5.0 per cent, and the manganese from about 0.1 per cent to about 1.0 per cent.
  • the elements calcium, or cadmium, singly or in com-- bination the calcium in amounts from about 0.1 per cent to about 2.0 per cent, the cadmium from about 1.0 per cent to about 10.0 per cent.
  • a sand cast specimen of amagnesium-base alloy containing about 10.0 per cent of lead, about 7.0 per cent of aluminum, about 0.4 per cent of manganese, and about.5.0 per cent of cadmium had .in the cast condition a tensile strength of about 23,200
  • magnesium-base alloy containing about 5.0 per cent of lead, 10.0 per cent of cadmium, 7.0 per cent oialuminum, 1.0 per cent of manganese, and 0.25 per cent ofcalcium had.
  • Brinell harclness was about 61. After an additional aging treatment of about 20 hours at about 175 centigrade its tensile strength was about 37,010 pounds per square inch and itsBrinell hardness about 84. As a desirable alloy of this nature I advise 7.0 per cent lead, 7.0 per cent aluminum and 0.4 per cent manganese. If more than one .of the elements calcium or cadmium -are present simultaneously, the total. should not exceed about 10.0 per cent for preferred purposes.
  • alloys of .this type the lead should range. from 0.5 per cent to 22.0 per cent, the aluminum from 1.0 per cent to 15.0 per cent, and the silicon from 0.1 per cent to 2.0 per cent, but the total amount of aluminum and silicon should' preferably not exceed 15.0 per cent.
  • a useful alloy of this nature is a magnesiumbase alloy containing about 10.0 per cent lead,
  • An alloy similarly improved in casting properties is one containing from about 0.5 per cent to 22.0
  • the'alloys may be compounded by any of the methods known in the art. In casting the alloys recourse may be had to the protective measures disclosed in existing patents, and the published literature relating to I easily oxidizable metals. 'I'he alloys, especially the magnesium-lead binary alloys, may be extruded' over the entire disclosed composition range, but other types of mechanical deformation such as rolling or forging should be carried on with due regard for the fact that as the percentage of total added alloying elementsin creases, the necessity for precaution in working the alloy,also increases. 1
  • magnesium-base alloy refers to an: alloy containing more than approximately per cent of magnesium.
  • a ,magnesium-base alloy containing from about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent of lead and from about 1.0 per cent to about 1010 per cent of cadmium, the balance being magnesium.

Description

Patented Jan. 7, 1936 PATENT OFFICE.
ALLOY Roy E. Paine, Cleveland, Ohio, assignor to Magnesium Development Corporation, a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application October 4, 1933,
Serial N0. 692,132
2 Claims.
The invention relates to magnesium-base alloys and is directed to the development of alloys of this class which have good corrosion resistance, particularly in the cast and in the cast andheat treated condition.
The art of casting magnesium presents many practical difliculties which must be surmounted before the true commercial possibilities of magnesium castings can be fully realized. An alloy which is suitable for one application may be entirely unsuited to another and, as a consequence,
' it frequently necessary to sacrifice desirable characteristics of the alloy in order to more fully realize the advantages of some one or more Thus, a compromise. must quite frequently be made in order to apimportant characteristics.
proach in one alloythe optimum properties for a given application. For example, it may be found that corrosion resistance can be sacrificed to a' certain extent to obtain higher tensile strength, yield point, hardness, or similar mechanical properties. Again, tensile strength may be sacrificed in order to obtain proper casting or working characteristics. It is an object of the present in-: vention to develop magnesiumalloys which will combine to a maximum degree the characteristics of corrosion resistance, favorable mechanical properties, workability, susceptibility to improvement by heat treatment and adaptability to sand casting.
A further object is the provision of magnesium alloys characterized by their susceptibility to be improved in mechanical properties by suitable thermal treatments. A further object is'thepro tive characteristics of alloys which are resistantto corrosion,'alloys which may be readily cast, alloys which are susceptible to alteration of properties by thermal treatments, alloys having favorable mechanical which, within a restricted range, may be worked by extrusion, forging, or other means of mechanical deformation.
In accordance with my invention lead may be present in amounts as low as 0.5 per cent. The
properties, and alloys alloys that the most pronounced combination of these different properties is obtained. The alloy may be worked by extrusion over a range of from 5 about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent of lead. As an all around casting alloy I have found a magnesium alloy containing 5 to 10 per cent of lead to be particularly adapted to general foundry purposes. Alloys falling within this preferred 10 range of composition as well as other alloys comprised within the broader limits previously defined, have been subjected to severe tests designed to produce accelerated corrosion. Sand cast test bars poured in accordance with the best casting practice in the art were subjected to corrosion tests in the as cast and in the heat treated condition. In the example referred to the heat treatment was carried out at about 459 centigrade for about 20 hours followed by 20 quenching in water, and both heat treated and unheattreated test bars were subjected to that corrosion test which comprises alternately immersing the metal in, and removing it from, a.
3 per cent sodium chloride solution for about 25 hours, a treatment referred to hereinafter as the alternate immersion treatment.
. There are certain elements which may be added to the binary magnesium-lead alloys to particular advantage. Such, for instance, are the 30 metals calcium, cadmium and zinc. These may be added singly or in combination with each other, thezinc in amounts between about 1.0 per cent and 10.0 per cent, the calcium between corrosion resistance. For instance, a magnesium alloy containing 21.4 per cent of lead and 0.25 per cent of calcium shows, in the as cast condition a strength loss of only 17 per cent after 45 alternate immersion in a 3 per cent sodium chloride solution for about 80 hours, while a heat treated magnesium alloy containing about 5 percent of lead to which about 0.25 per cent of calcium had been added did not undergo any an appreciable loss in strength under the foregoing corrosion conditions; the heat treatment in this case was a treatment at about 450 centigrade for, about 20 hours. An alloy of magnesium with about 5.1 per cent of lead and 10.0 per centof 55 cadmium had in the sand cast condition a tensile strength of about 24,650 pounds per square inch and an elongation of about 9.8 per cent in 2 inches. After a heat treatment of about 20 hours at about 450 centigrade its tensile strength had increased to about 25,140 pounds per square inch and its elongation to 10.3 per cent in 2 inches. After an alternate immersion corrosion test for 80 hours the loss in strength was only 30 per cent. A similar result was obtained with a magnesium-base alloy containing about 5.3 per cent of lead and about 5.0 per cent of cadmium. An alloy of magnesium with about 5.0 per cent of lead and 5.0 per cent of zinc had in the sand cast condition a tensile strength of about 23,370 pounds per square inch. After a thermal treatment of about 20 hours at 450 centigrade followed by an aging treatment of about 20 hours at 150 centigrade its strength had increased to about 25,710 pounds per square inch. After an alternate immersion corrosion test of 80 hours the loss in strength was only 12 per cent. Another alloy of magnesium with about 5.2 per cent of lead and 3.2 per cent of zinc' under similar conditions lost only about 10 per cent after 80 hours alternate immersion in the corrosive solution. As a preferred composition for alloys ofthis nature I advise (1) 5.0 per cent lead, 1.0 per cent calcium, balance magnesium; (2) 5.0 per cent lead, 5.0 per cent cadmium, balance magnesium; (3) 5.0 per cent lead, 5.0 per cent zinc, balance magnesium. If more than one of the elements calcium, cadmium, or zinc be present simultaneously, I prefer not to exceed a total of 10.0 per cent for these elements.
One of the disadvantages of the alloys described herein which may afi'ect their use in certain applications, particularly where high strength is a leading or very material consideration, is the fact that the grain structure of these alloys (with or without calcium) tends to be coarse. I have found that the metals aluminum and silicon form a class of alloying elements which may be added to magnesium-lead alloys and are substantially equivalent'in vthis respect that they materially refine the grain structure of the alloy. Aluminum, for instance, can be added over a wide range, such as between-1.0 and 15.0 'per cent; silicon may-be effectively present for this purpose in amountsof about 0.1 to 2.0 per cent. When used in combination it is advisable that the total content of aluminum and silicon does not exceed 15.0 per cent. In the preferred practice of my invention I have found that the best results are usually obtained when the aluminum is present in amounts between 5 and per cent.
As a preferred magnesium-lead-silicon composition I use a magnesium-base alloy containing 7.0 per cent of lead and 0.5 per cent of silicon. As a preferred magnesium-lead-aluminum alloy I use a magnesium-base alloy containing 7.0 per cent of lead and 5.0 per cent-of aluminum. When the aluminum and silicon are used in conjunction I prefer to use a total of about 5.0 per cent of aluminum andsilicon combined, for. instance about 4.0 per cent aluminum and 1.0 per cent silicon.
Manganese alone may be added to magnesiumlead alloys in amounts between 0.1 per cent and 1.0 per cent and has a stabilizing effect upon the alloy properties in that it raises the hardness slightly, does not materially decrease the corrosion resistance, and adds to the matrix of the alloy a hardening element which expresses itself not only in an increase in tensile strength but also in surface hardness. Analloy of this nature containing about 8.0 per cent of lead and 0.85 per cent of manganese lost only 6 per cent of its original strength after 80 hours alternate immersion in a 3 per cent aqueous solution of sodium chloride and in the solution heat treated condition lost only 7 per cent of its strength in the alternate immersion treatment. Amagnesium alloy con taining about 10.37 per cent of lead had lost only about 10 per cent of its strength at the eirpira tion' of this period as compared with certain other commercial alloys, such as, for instance, the well known magnesium alloy containing about 7 per cent of aluminum and 0.4 per cent of manganese which, at the end of 40 hours of alternate immersion, had lost about 60 per cent of its strength.
Very favorable alloys can be compounded by using as a base an alloy of magnesium, lead and aluminum and making additions thereto of at least one of the class of metals tin, manganese or zinc. The lead can be used in amounts from about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per, cent, the aluminum from about 1.0 per cent to about 15.0 per cent, the tin from about 1.0 per cent to about 15.0 per cent, the manganese from about 0.1 per cent to about 1.0 per cent, and the zinc from about 1.0 per cent to about 10.0 per cent. A sand cast alloy within this range had, in the as cast condition, a tensile strength of 27,500 pounds per square inch and an elongation of 5.7 per cent in 2 inches. After a thermal treatment of 16 hours at 315 centigrade, the alloy had a tensile strength of 29,640pounds per square inch and an elongation of 6.0 per cent in 2 inches. Some of the heat treated specimens were then given an alternate immersion treatment for 40 hours and after the treatment the specimens had a tensile strength of 28,413 pounds per square inch and an elongation of 5.8 per cent in 2 inches, this alloy containing 5.0 per cent of aluminum, 5.0 per cent of lead, 0.4 per cent of manganese and 2.0 per cent of zinc. The loss in strength on the corrosion treatment is observed to be less than 5 per cent as compared to about per cent with the commercial magnesium-aluminummanganese alloy disclosed hereinbefore which contains about 7 per cent of aluminum and 0.4 per cent of manganese. As preferred compositions for alloys of this nature I advise (1) 7.0 per cent of lead, 7.0 per cent of aluminum, 2.0 per cent tin, balance magnesium; (2) 7.0 per cent lead, 7.0 per cent aluminum, 2.0 per cent tin, 0.5 per cent manganese, balance magnesium;
The addition of lead to the magnesium-alumimum-manganese alloys increases very considerably the corrosion resistance of these alloys, since with the addition of about 7 per cent of lead to,
an alloy containing 7 per cent of aluminum and 1 per cent of manganese, the loss of strength after the alternate immersion test was only about 30 cent of susceptible to variation of properties by thermal treatments and their hardness can be markedly increased by artificial aging after thermal solution treatments. In these alloys the lead content should range from about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent, the aluminum from about. 1.0 per cent to about I5.0 per cent, and the manganese from about 0.1 per cent to about 1.0 per cent.
To these elements as a' common base I add the elements calcium, or cadmium, singly or in com-- bination, the calcium in amounts from about 0.1 per cent to about 2.0 per cent, the cadmium from about 1.0 per cent to about 10.0 per cent. As an example of an alloy of this nature, a sand cast specimen of amagnesium-base alloy containing about 10.0 per cent of lead, about 7.0 per cent of aluminum, about 0.4 per cent of manganese, and about.5.0 per cent of cadmium, had .in the cast condition a tensile strength of about 23,200
pounds per square inch. After a thermal solu- I .tion treatment of 21 hours at about 430 centigrade the tensile strength of the alloy hadincreased to about 36,000 pounds per square inch, a gain in. strength of about 55 .per cent. The same alloy after the solution treatment had a Brinell hardness of about 61 and this hardness was raised to about 84' by an additional aging treatment of 20 hours at about 175? centigrade,-
the tensile strength increasing slightly to about 37,000 pounds per square inch. v Similarly a magnesium-base alloy containing about 5.0 per centof lead, 7.0 per cent of alumi-. num, 10.0 per cent of cadmium, and 0.4 per centof manganese had in the sand cast condition a tensile strength of about 24,000 pounds per square inch. After a thermal treatment of 21 hours at about 430 centigrade the alloy had a tensile strength of about 35,000 pounds per square inch. An additional aging treatment raised theBrinell hardness of the alloy from about 61 to'about 79.
Similarly, a magnesium-base alloy containing about 5.0 per cent of lead, 10.0 per cent of cadmium, 7.0 per cent oialuminum, 1.0 per cent of manganese, and 0.25 per cent ofcalcium had.
in the sand cast conditiona tensile strength of about 24,290 pounds per square inch. After a thermal treatment of 20 hours at about 430 centigrade this alloy had a tensile strength of about 33,200 pounds per square inch. "After an additional thermal treatment of about 20 hoiirs at about 150.centigrade the strength increased to about 35,600 pounds per square inch and the Brinell hardness from about,47 to about 66.
Another magnesium-base alloy containing about 10.0 per cent of lead, 7.0 per centof aluminum, 5.0 per cent, of cadmium, 0.4 per cent of manganese, and 0.1 per cent of calcium, had in the sand cast condition a tensile strength of about'23,210 pounds per square inch. After a thermal solution treatment of 21 hours at about 430 centigrade the alloy had a tensile strength of about 36,030 pounds per square inch; the
, Brinell harclness was about 61. After an additional aging treatment of about 20 hours at about 175 centigrade its tensile strength was about 37,010 pounds per square inch and itsBrinell hardness about 84. As a desirable alloy of this nature I advise 7.0 per cent lead, 7.0 per cent aluminum and 0.4 per cent manganese. If more than one .of the elements calcium or cadmium -are present simultaneously, the total. should not exceed about 10.0 per cent for preferred purposes.
The. addition of 'zinc in amounts from about 1.0 per cent to about 10.0 per cent to magnesiumlead alloys containing'aluminum and siliconiin combination decreases the linear shrinkage, thus favorably affecting the casting properties, and
also increases the corrosion resistance and raises the yield point of these alloys. In alloys of .this type the lead should range. from 0.5 per cent to 22.0 per cent, the aluminum from 1.0 per cent to 15.0 per cent, and the silicon from 0.1 per cent to 2.0 per cent, but the total amount of aluminum and silicon should' preferably not exceed 15.0 per cent.
A useful alloy of this nature is a magnesiumbase alloy containing about 10.0 per cent lead,
8.0 per cent aluminum and 3.25 percent zinc. Another useful composition is attained by sub- I stituting about 1.0 per cent silicon for part orall of the'aluminum.
An alloy similarly improved in casting properties, although not to such a decided extent, is one containing from about 0.5 per cent to 22.0
per cent of lead, from about 1.0 per cent to about- 10.0 per cent of zinc and from about 0.1 per-centv to about 2.0 per cent of silicon. A favorableall'oywithin this range is a 'magnesium-base alloy consisting of about 10.0 per cent of lead, about 3.25='per cent of zinc, and about 1.0 per cent of silicon, the balance being substantially mag-- nesiurn.
In making up alloys of the compositions disclosed hereinabove the'alloys may be compounded by any of the methods known in the art. In casting the alloys recourse may be had to the protective measures disclosed in existing patents, and the published literature relating to I easily oxidizable metals. 'I'he alloys, especially the magnesium-lead binary alloys, may be extruded' over the entire disclosed composition range, but other types of mechanical deformation such as rolling or forging should be carried on with due regard for the fact that as the percentage of total added alloying elementsin creases, the necessity for precaution in working the alloy,also increases. 1
It is my object to retain, as far as possible, the advantages of the use of magnesium base, such as low specific gravity,v while securing in addition the hereinaboye disclosed benefits accruing from the additions of the other alloying elements herein outlined. Accordingly, where in the appended claims the term magnesium-base alloy is used, it refers to an: alloy containing more than approximately per cent of magnesium.
This application is a continuation in part of my copending application Serial No. 643,052, filed November 17, 1932.
What I claim is:
1. A ,magnesium-base alloy containing from about 0.5 per cent to about 22.0 per cent of lead and from about 1.0 per cent to about 1010 per cent of cadmium, the balance being magnesium.
2. A magnesium-base alloy containing about 70 5.0 per cent of lead and 5.0 per cent of cadmium,
the balance being magnesium. 4
ROY E. PAINE.
US692132A 1933-10-04 1933-10-04 Alloy Expired - Lifetime US2026589A (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US692132A US2026589A (en) 1933-10-04 1933-10-04 Alloy
US49960A US2045236A (en) 1933-10-04 1935-11-15 Alloy
US49963A US2045239A (en) 1933-10-04 1935-11-15 Alloy
US49962A US2045238A (en) 1933-10-04 1935-11-15 Alloy
US49964A US2045240A (en) 1933-10-04 1935-11-15 Alloy
US49961A US2045237A (en) 1933-10-04 1935-11-15 Alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US692132A US2026589A (en) 1933-10-04 1933-10-04 Alloy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2026589A true US2026589A (en) 1936-01-07

Family

ID=24779379

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US692132A Expired - Lifetime US2026589A (en) 1933-10-04 1933-10-04 Alloy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2026589A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE741507C (en) * 1937-04-16 1943-11-12 Georg Von Giesche S Erben Magnesium alloy

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE741507C (en) * 1937-04-16 1943-11-12 Georg Von Giesche S Erben Magnesium alloy

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0124286B1 (en) Aluminium alloys
US1947121A (en) Aluminum base alloys
US4063936A (en) Aluminum alloy having high mechanical strength and elongation and resistant to stress corrosion crack
JP2020164893A (en) Automobile door beam made of extruded aluminum alloy material
US2204567A (en) Magnesium alloy of high strength
US1815479A (en) Zinc base alloy
US2026589A (en) Alloy
US2045244A (en) Alloy
US1998169A (en) Alloy
US2026590A (en) Alloy
US1998171A (en) Alloy
US1998168A (en) Alloy
US2045242A (en) Alloy
US1998170A (en) Alloy
US2823995A (en) Aluminum base alloy die casting
US2045247A (en) Alloy
US2073515A (en) Alloy
US2045237A (en) Alloy
US2026592A (en) Alloy
US2045238A (en) Alloy
US2045241A (en) Alloy
US2045245A (en) Alloy
US2045239A (en) Alloy
US2045236A (en) Alloy
US2045246A (en) Alloy