US20230381157A1

US20230381157A1 - Rifabutin for the treatment of acinetobacter baumannii

Info

Publication number: US20230381157A1
Application number: US18/137,151
Authority: US
Inventors: Brad Spellberg; Brian LUNA
Original assignee: University of Southern California USC
Current assignee: University of Southern California USC
Priority date: 2018-11-28
Filing date: 2023-04-20
Publication date: 2023-11-30
Also published as: US20200222373A1; US11701346B2

Abstract

To identify novel agents to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. the Inventors used a nutrient-depleted medium with serum to mimic the in vivo environment. In RPMI with serum, the screen identified rifabutin (RBT) as being 133-fold more potent than rifampin (RIF) against A. baumannii, with MICs of 0.031 μg/ml and 4 μg/ml respectively. No difference in RBT vs. RIF activity was observed when MHII was used as the culture media. RBT possesses markedly superior in efficacy to RIF in murine models of lethal iv and pneumonia models of infection with a hyper-virulent, clinical lung and blood isolate of extreme-drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii. In both models, RBT significantly improved survival and lowered bacterial burden compared to RIF. RBT is a promising, novel therapeutic option for A. baumannii infections.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 16/821,861, filed Mar. 17, 2020, which is incorporated by reference. U.S. Nonprovisional Application Ser. No. 16/821,861 is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 16/697,853, filed Nov. 27, 2019, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/772,367, filed Nov. 28, 2018. The U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/772,367 is also incorporated by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under Grant No. AI117211 awarded by National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Described herein are methods and compositions related to antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. The described method and compositions related to identifying, delivering and designing effective therapeutics for combating antibiotic resistance.

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is a tremendous global concern. Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria have spread widely through global health care systems. Increasingly they have become resistant to all antibiotics available for treatment, i.e. pan-drug resistant (PDR). Examples of these PDR Gram-negative bacteria include Acinetobacter baumannii (Spellberg et al., Combating antimicrobial resistance: policy recommendations to save lives, Clin Infect Dis. 2011, 52 Suppl 5:S397-428; Wong et al, Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview of Acinetobacter infections: A century of challenges, Clin Microbiol Rev 2017, 30:409-47).
Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), a ubiquitous pathogen capable of causing both community and health care-associated infections (HAIs), has emerged recently as a major cause of HAI due to the extent of its antimicrobial resistance and its propensity to cause large, often multi-facility, nosocomial outbreaks (Fournier et al., The epidemiology and control of A. baumannii in health care facilities, Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 42(5):692-9, Epub). Acinetobacter species accounted for 1.5% of all nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSIs) reported and is increasingly frequently associated with nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care units (ICUs), the incidence of which has increased from 4% in 1986 to 7% in 2003. In addition, A. baumannii is associated with bacteremia, urinary tract infections and surgical-site infections (Gaynes et al., Overview of nosocomial infections caused by gram-negative bacilli, Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 41(6):848-54, Epub; Wong et al., Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview of Acinetobacter infections: A century of challenges, Clin Microbiol Rev 2017, 30:409-47).
Acinetobacter is one of several Gram-negative species that routinely demonstrates an XDR phenotype, the hallmark of which is carbapenem resistance. XDR is defined as resistance to all available systemic antibiotics except for those that are known to be less effective or more toxic compared to first-line agents that are used to treat susceptible pathogens (Infectious Diseases Society of America. White Paper: Recommendations on the Conduct of Superiority and Organism-Specific Clinical Trials of Antibacterial Agents for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Drug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens. 2012. Clin Infect Dis. 55:1031-46). Thus, infections caused by XDR A. baumannii are generally only treatable with often toxic, not always very effective second-line agents, such as tigecycline or polymyxins. Such infections cause longer hospitalization, increased costs, and greater mortality than infections caused by carbapenem-susceptible strains. Indeed, due to their resistance to first-line agents, XDR A. baumannii bloodstream infections result in 50 to 60% mortality (Wong et al., 2017, op.cit.).
But pulmonary patients infected by multiresistant A. baumannii treated with the non-traditional agent polymyxin B or colistin have not responded well to such monotherapy, and resistance has occurred among strains that have persisted during treatment. For this reason therapy with multiple antibacterial agents is often used by practitioners (Maragakis LL and Perl TM, Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment options. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46(8): 1254-63). This high unmet medical need has brought recent research to focus on the search of synergistic double and triple combination of multiple agents with or without antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (Yoon et al., In vitro double and triple synergistic activities of Polymyxin B, imipenem, and rifampin against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004, 48(3):753-7) (Sun W, et al., Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test for identification of new therapeutics and drug combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Emerg Microbes Infect 2016, 5(11):e116).
Thus, there is a high need for new therapeutic agents to treat infections caused by drug resistant bacteria such as Acinetobacter bacteria, since such infections are a leading threat to public health.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Described herein are methods and compositions related to the treatment of Acinetobacter infections in humans with rifabutin. In one embodiment, the method of treatment includes administering rifabutin to a subject in need thereof. In various embodiments, the subject in need thereof is infected with Acinetobacter. In various embodiments, the rifabutin is administered as sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection. In various embodiments, the is not co-administered with any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection. In various embodiments, the Acinetobacter infection is Acinetobacter baumannii. In various embodiments, the rifabutin is administered to a human patient. In various embodiments, the method includes a time lag of at least about 48 h, preferably at least about 24 h, more preferably at least about 12 h, again more preferably about at least 8 h, again more preferably at least about 4 h is between administration of rifabutin and administration of another antibiotic that is administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection. In various embodiments, the Acinetobacter infection is caused by multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria. In various embodiments, the Acinetobacter infection is selected from the group consisting of: respiratory tract, blood, circulation system, urinary tract, skin, surgical-site, and meningitis; preferably said infection is an infection of respiratory tract or blood. In various embodiments, the Acinetobacter infection is a nosocomial Acinetobacter infection. In various embodiments, the rifabutin is administered in a dose of 60 mg to 600 mg per day.
Further described herein are methods and compositions related to the addition of rifabutin therapy to other antibiotics as a combination regimen to treat Acinetobacter infections.
Also described herein are methods and compositions related to the method of using RPMI-based media as a screen for in vitro antimicrobial activity of compounds that is more predictive of in vivo efficacy than traditional rich media used to grow microbes.
Further described herein is a pharmaceutical composition including a quantity of rifabutin and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 . Summary of the compound screening assay used for the identification of rifabutin. The ReFRAME compound library, a curated chemical library that is comprised of structurally and functionally diverse chemicals, including FDA approved drugs. 11,862 chemicals werE screened in total and rifabutin was identified as the most active hit.

FIG. 2 . MIC assays were done in either MHII alone, RPMI alone, or RPMI that was spiked MHII. MHII culture media was fractionated using molecular weight cutoff columns. The less than 10 kDa fraction inhibits the activity when spiked into RPMI media. MIC results from the above assays: RBT/RPMI <0.0625 μg/ml; RBT/RPMI+MHII Fraction=8 μg/ml; RBT/MHII=4 μg/ml; MHII+RPMI=8 μg/ml; RIF/RPMI=2 μg/ml; RIF+MHII=2 μg/ml.

FIG. 3 . RBT vs RIF therapy in an A. baumannii lung infection mouse model. C3H mice (n=5) were infected with A. baumannii HUMC1 (antibiotic-resistant strain) and mice were treated with 10 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with RIF or RBT by oral gavage. A) At 24 hrs, blood was collected and there was a significant reduction in CFUs in the RBT treated group and B) a modest survival benefit. C) The experiment was repeated with a larget group of mice (n=8) and the dose was decreased to 5 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with RIF or RBT by oral gavage. At 24 hrs, mice were sacrificed and lungs were harvested and homegates were plated to determine the bacterial density in the lung. Mice that received the rifabutin treatment had significantly lower CFUs in the lung at 24 hrs post infection and D) survival was also significantly improved.

FIG. 4 . RBT vs RIF therapy in an A. baumannii IV infection mouse model. C3H mice (n=8) were A) infected with via tail vein injection with A. baumannii HUMC1 (antibiotic-resistant strain) and mice were treated with 10 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with B) RIF or RBT by oral gavage. Blood was collected at 24 hrs from mice (n=8) and serial dilutions were plated to determine the bacterial density. Mice that received the rifabutin treatment had significantly lower CFUs in the lung at 24 hrs post infection and also improved survival.

FIG. 5 . RBT vs RIF therapy in an A. baumannii IV infection mouse model. C3H mice were A) infected with A. baumannii HUMC1 and mice were B) treated with 10 or 30 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with RIF; or mice were treated with 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with RBT by oral gavage. RBT was fully protective at doses that were 100X lower that RIF.

FIG. 6 . Time kill assay. An overnight culture of A. baumannii HUMC1 was subcultured in fresh RPMI, with or without supplemented amino acids, and the number of viable cells was determined by plating serial dilutions at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

FIG. 7 . Summary of the compound screening assay used for the identification of rifabutin. A) The ReFRAME compound library, a curated chemical library that is comprised of structurally and functionally diverse chemicals, including FDA approved drugs. 11,862 chemicals were screened in total and rifabutin was identified as the most active hit. A. baumannii ATCC 17978 and HUMC1 were selected as representative antibiotic-sensitive and extensively drug-resistant strains. B) Specificity (mammalian cell cytotoxicity/inhibition of bacteria growth; CC₅₀/IC₅₀) of the top 4 compound screen hits against A. baumannii HUMC1 and HEK293T and HepG2 mammalian cells. C) To determine if A. baumannii are hypersusceptible to rifamycins in general, the IC₅₀was determined against ATCC 17978 and HUMC1 for 8 rifamycins. D) Specificity (mammalian cell cytotoxicity/inhibition of bacteria growth; CC₅₀/IC₅₀) of 8 rifamycins were tested against A. baumannii ATCC17978, HUMC1, and HEK293T mamillian cells, in RPMI with and without 50% serum. E) MICs were determined for RBT and RIF against a panel of ESKAPE clinical isolates.

FIG. 8 . Intracellular accumulation of RBT. An overnight culture of A. baumannii HUMC1 was subcultured in fresh RPMI, with or without supplemented amino acids (AA). A) The number of viable cells was determined by plating serial dilutions on agar plates at 0, 1, 8, and 24 hours and enumerating CFUs. B) Additionally, bacteria were harvested, washed, and lyzed to quantify the intracellular concentration of RBT by LC-MS/MS. C) A GFP expressing reporter strain of A. baumannii HUMC1 was cultured in RPMI, with or without supplemented amino acids, and challenged with RBT. The fluorescence intensity was measured every 30 minutes for 6 hours using a fluorescent microplate reader. The addition of amino acids (open triangles and open circles) resulted in less inhibition of GFP fluorescence which is consistent with the higher MICs observed in these same conditions.

FIG. 9 . Efficacy of RBT in vivo. A) C3H mice (n=5) were infected (oral aspiration pneumoniae model) with A. baumannii HUMC1 (carbapenem-resistant strain) and mice were treated with 10 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with RIF or RBT by oral gavage. At 24 hrs, blood was collected and there was a significant reduction in CFUs in the RBT treated group and B) a modest survival benefit. C) The experiment was repeated with a larger group of mice (n=8) and the dose was decreased to 5 mg/kg/daily for 3 days with RIF or RBT by oral gavage. At 24 hrs, mice were sacrificed and lungs were harvested, homogenized, and serial dilutions were plated on agar plates and CFUs were quantified. Mice that received the RBT treatment had significantly lower CFUs in the lung at 24 hrs post infection and D) survival was also significantly improved. E) C3H mice (n=8) were infected via tail vein injection with A. baumannii HUMC1. Mice were treated with 10 mg/kg/daily RIF or RBT for 3 days by oral gavage. Mice that received the RBT treatment had improved survival and F) significantly lower CFUs in the blood at 1 hrs. G) C3H mice were infected IV and treated with RIF or RBT.

FIG. 10 . RPMI MIC predicts in vivo response to treatment. C3H mice were infected with A. baumannii LAC-4, a strain that has the same MIC for RIF and RBT in RPMI, and mice were treated with 10 mg/kg/daily or 1 mg/kg for 3 days with RIF or RBT. Consistent with the RPMI MIC data, no difference was observed in vivo.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising”, are to be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integer or step.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents, unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The term “about” when used in connection with a numerical value is meant to encompass numerical values within a range having a lower limit that is 0-10% smaller than the indicated numerical value and having an upper limit that is 0-10% larger than the indicated numerical value.
The term “therapeutically active agent” as used herein refers to any substance which is intended to furnish therapeutic activity, i.e. which is intended to furnish a direct effect in the cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of a disease, disorder or condition.
The term “to administer”, “administration” or “administered”, as used interchangeably herein, means to introduce a therapeutically or pharmaceutically active agent into the body of a subject in need thereof to treat or prevent a disease, disorder or condition.
The term “treatment”, “treating”, or “therapy”, as used interchangeably herein, refers to the management and care of a patient having a pathology, preferably an infection, for which administration of one or more therapeutic compounds is indicated for the purpose of combating or alleviating symptoms and complications of said pathology conditions. Treating includes administering rifabutin in order to prevent the onset of the symptoms or complications, alleviating the symptoms or complications, or eliminating the disease, condition, or disorder. As used herein, “treatment” refers to therapeutic treatment, and prophylactic or preventative measures.
The term “patient” is used herein to mean preferably a subject suffering from, being at risk of suffering from, or being potentially capable of suffering from a disease, disorder or condition. Said disease is preferably an infection, more preferably an Acinetobacter infection, again more preferably an Acinetobacter baumannii infection. The term “patient” is used herein to mean preferably an animal, more preferably a mammal (including a human). Most preferred, the patient is a human.
The term “therapeutically effective amount” as used herein refers to an amount of an agent, preferably rifabutin, which is effective to treat at least one symptom of an infection. Amounts of an agent for administration may vary based upon the desired activity, the diseased state of the patient being treated, the dosage form, method of administration, patient factors such as the patient's sex, weight and age, the underlying cause of the condition or disease to be treated, the route of administration and bioavailability, the persistence of the administered agent in the body, the formulation, and the potency of the agent.
Rifabutin is administered as the sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection in the absence of co-administration of any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection, to which it is referred herein as “single active agent therapy” or administration as “single active agent”.
Said other therapeutically active agent is preferably an antimicrobial, more preferably an antibiotic. The term “antimicrobial” as used herein refers to an agent that kills any type of microorganisms (i.e. incl. microbicidal) or stops or inhibits growth of microorganisms (i.e. incl. biostatic) and includes and are preferably antibacterials (antibiotics), antifungals, antivirals, antiprotozoics and antiparasitics. In a more preferred embodiment, said antimicrobial is an antibiotic. The term “antibiotic” as used herein refers to an agent that kills bacteria or stops or inhibits growth of bacteria. In an again more preferred embodiment, said antibiotic is selected from the group consisting of colistin, imipenem, polymyxins (including polymyxin B and E), trimethoprim, aztreonam, ceftazidime, trimethoprim, and aztreonam.
The term “infection” or “infectious disease”, as used interchangeably herein, refers to the invasion of body tissues by infectious pathogens, their multiplication, and the reaction of body tissues to the infectious pathogens and the toxins they produce. The term “infection” includes and refers preferably to chronic infections (long-term), acute infections (short-term), symptomatic infections (apparent, clinical), subclinical infections (inapparent, silent or occult), latent infection (inactive or dormant), systemic infection, local infection, primary infections, secondary infections and opportunistic infections.
The terms “Acinetobacter infection” and “infection caused by Acinetobacter”, as used interchangeably herein, refers preferably to an infection, wherein bacteria of the genus Acinetobacter cause, at least in part, or participate in induction, development or course of said Acinetobacter infection. An Acinetobacter infection is most preferably an infection wherein bacteria of the genus Acinetobacter can be detected in samples of the affected tissue or cells.
The invention presents herein a new approach for the treatment of highly lethal, antibiotic-resistant infections caused by bacteria of the genus Acinetobacter, preferably A. baumannii.
Rifabutin is a well-known and safe antibiotic currently used in the clinical practice for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and tuberculosis infections in AIDS patients (cf. Mycobutin (Rifabutin), USP description at www.accessdata.fda.gov). Clinical use of rifabutin for the treatment of infections caused by A. baumannii has never been considered due to the poor in vitro activity of rifabutin tested under CLSI (Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute) and EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) conditions which recommends testing of A. baumannii in Mueller-Hinton-based media. When tested under this condition, MICs of rifabutin and of other members of this antibiotic class, e.g., rifampin, against Acinetobacter baumannii are too high and these drug levels are considered unachievable in humans for an effective treatment of the infection and/or eradication of the pathogen. Based on these evidences, two recent papers sought synergistic activities among drugs so that MIC of rifampin (Yoon J, et al., In vitro double and triple synergistic activities of polymyxin B, imipenem, and rifampin against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004, 48(3):753-7) or of rifabutin (Sun W, et al., Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test for identification of new therapeutics and drug combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Emerg Microbes Infect 2016, 5(11):e116) could be lowered to levels potentially achievable in humans. Caveat of both publication is that the observed in vitro synergy was not verified in any animal infection model; indeed, it is well known that for synergy among drugs to occur in vivo, all drugs must be present at the same time and at the correct concentrations at the infection site and this is dependent from the pharmacokinetics, which include the distribution into tissues, of each single drug. This is a well-known limit to the approach.
Contrary to the above approach, the inventors had the novel ideal to test a series of antibiotics in RPMI, a medium that, although commonly used in cell and tissue culture for growing a variety of eukaryotic cell, is not routinely used for bacterial cultures. The rationale for testing RPMI is that standard methodologies for determining antibiotic susceptibilities use rich culture media, which may not reflect the hostile in vivo environment with respect to supporting microbial growth. Since RPMI is used as a culture media for human and mammalian cells, the idea was to determine if cryptic, hidden, or previously undetectable antimicrobial activity could be unmasked when many drugs were screened for such activity in RPMI media, rather than traditional rich culture media.
In a drug screen of more than 8,000 compounds, surprisingly, the inventors discovered that MICs of rifabutin against Acinetobacter baumannii were up to 200-fold lower in RPMI than in a Mueller-Hinton-based medium such as CAMHB (cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth). Even more surprisingly, only the MIC of rifabutin dropped from 3.125 μg/ml down to 0.0156 μg/ml against A. baumannii HUMC1 (a hyper-virulent, clinical bloodstream isolate), but not that of the closely related rifampin which showed an MIC of 3.125 μg/ml in both RPMI and CAMHB. Similarly the MICs of other rifamycins were not shifted in RPMI vs. CAMHB media; only rifabutin's MICs shifted.
This discovery revealed for the first time that the MIC of rifabutin are significantly lower than previously reported when tested in mammalian culture media rather than rich media and, consequently, rifabutin drug levels are fully achievable in humans for an effective treatment of the infection and eradication of Acinetobacter baumannii.
To prove that the MIC shift seen for rifabutin in RPMI medium was indeed predictive of a good in vivo efficacy against Acinetobacter baumannii infections, rifabutin was tested for the first time ever in several animal infection models using rifampin as comparator.
Rifabutin was first tested in a well-validated Acinetobacter baumannii infection model generated in Galleria mellonella in a dose-response manner against rifampin. The data confirmed that MIC of rifabutin generated in RPMI medium were more predictive than those generated in CAMHB in predicting in vivo efficacy: whereas rifampin showed only a partial protection at doses as high as 5 mg/kg, rifabutin was efficacious at doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg.
Rifabutin's superior in vivo efficacy was confirmed in two different A. baumannii animal infection models, which are highly predictive of efficacy in humans: the murine bacteremia and the murine pneumonia. Similarly to the A. baumannii infection in the Galleria mellonella model, in the murine bacteremia infection model rifabutin was fully protective at 0.1 mg/kg whereas rifampin at 10 mg/kg gave only 50% protection. In the murine pneumonia infection model caused by A. baumannii, rifabutin and rifampin were compared at the same dose of 5 mg/kg and the treatment-related daily survival rates and reduction of bacterial burden at day 7 post-infection were recorded: Rifampin did not protect from mortality similarly to the vehicle control, but rifabutin improved survival rates by over 70%. Parallelly, bacterial counts of rifampin at day 7 were similar to those of the vehicle control (Log₁₀(CFU/mg lung) of 6.5) whereas rifabutin reduced bacterial burden down to about 2 Log₁₀(CFU/mg lung). Hence, rifabutin is much more potent than rifampin at killing A. baumannii not only in vitro but also in vitro, i.e. in treating A. baumannii infections. These results confirm the previously unknown in vivo activity of rifabutin against A. baumannii, and validate that the in vitro susceptibility testing of novel antimicrobial compounds in RPMI-based media can be more predictive of in vivo antimicrobial activity in mammals than traditional rich media testing.
Thus rifabutin, used as the sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection in the absence of co-administration of any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered for the only purpose of exercising synergy with rifabutin to treat the same Acinetobacter infection, provides an efficacious treatment of diseases caused by this pathogen as demonstrated in several animal models of infection.
Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the most drug resistant bacterial pathogens. Blood or lung infections caused by extreme drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii cause 50% mortality rates, and the antimicrobial pipeline for such infections is inadequate. Discovery of new antibiotics has traditionally occurred via high throughput screening assays. These assays use rich media, such as Mueller-Hinton II (MHII) broth and rarely identify any new candidates now. However, modifying the screen by changing the media to be more reflective of the in vivo environment has enabled discovery of novel compounds.
There is a critical need to develop new therapeutics to treat carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infections. In this study the Inventors conducted a high throughput, modified chemical screening approach which led to the “unmasking” of rifabutin activity in vitro when the bacteria were cultured in RPMI, but not in MHII media.
To increase the probability of identifying novel agents that would be effective in vivo, we screened for activity in a nutrient-depleted medium with serum to mimic the host environment. We screened a library of 11,862 compounds against A. baumannii cultured in RPMI with serum, or in traditional, nutrient-rich Mueller-Hinton (MHII) media. In RPMI with serum, the screen identified rifabutin (RBT) as being 133-fold more potent than rifampin (RIF) against A. baumannii, with MICs of 0.031 μg/ml and 4 μg/ml respectively. However, no difference in RBT vs. RIF activity was observed when MHII was used as the culture media (MIC=4 μg/ml for both). The activity in the depleted media better predicted in vivo efficacy since RBT was markedly superior in efficacy to RIF in lethal models of extreme drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii bacteremia and pneumonia in mice, and in a lethal Galleria model of infection. In all models, RBT markedly improved survival and lowered bacterial burden compared to RIF. The mechanism of enhanced efficacy of RBT vs. RIF was a Trojan horse-like, selective, import of RBT but not RIF intracellularly in A. baumannii. Free aromatic amino acids, specifically histidine and tryptophan, were the constituents of rich media that antagonized the potency of RBT such that it became similar to RIF, and acted by antagonizing the Trojan horse-like uptake of RBT by the bacteria. Furthermore, administering free amino acids to the bloodstream of mice during infection also antagonized RBTs enhanced activity. Thus we identify RBT as a promising, novel therapeutic option for A. baumannii infections. RBT, but not RIF, is selectively imported into A. baumannii in a manner antagonized by free aromatic amino acids. As such, screening in traditional media was not capable of detecting the phenomenon, while screening in nutrient depleted media plus serum much better predicted in vivo efficacy in multiple animal models. Given that RBT is already commercially available, these results can be immediately translated to clinical trials.
These results that free amino acids in the MHII inhibit the activity of rifabutin. Lastly, the Inventors further demonstrate the superiority of rifabutin over rifampin in mouse models of bacteremia and oral aspiration pneumonia disease models.
Described herein is the use of Rifabutin in the treatment of an Acinetobacter infection. In a first aspect, the invention relates to rifabutin for use in the treatment of an Acinetobacter infection, wherein Rifabutin is administered as the sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection in the absence of co-administration of any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection.
In a preferred embodiment, the invention refers to a method for treating an Acinetobacter infection, wherein a therapeutically effective amount of Rifabutin is administered as the sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection in the absence of co-administration of any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection to a patient.
In various embodiments, administration is to a subject that is a mammalian, more preferably a human patient. In a preferred embodiment, in the method for treating said Acinetobacter infection, a therapeutically effective amount of Rifabutin is administered to a mammalian, more preferably a human patient. In various embodiments, Rifabutin is administered as the sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection in the absence of co-administration of any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection, to which it is referred herein as “single active agent therapy” or administration as “single active agent”.
In a preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection caused by bacteria selected from the group consisting of Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter nosocomialis, Acinetobacter pittii, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, Acinetobacter johnsonii, Acinetobacter junii, Acinetobacter schindleri, Acinetobacter ursingii, and Acinetobacter seifertii. In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection caused by bacteria selected from the group consisting of Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter nosocomialis, and Acinetobacter pittii. Most preferably, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, Rifabutin is used in the treatment of an Acinetobacter baumannii infection in a human patient.
In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter bacteria. The term “multi-drug resistant bacteria” preferably refers to bacteria with an in vitro resistance to more than one antimicrobial. More preferably, MDR bacteria are defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one antimicrobial in three or more antimicrobial categories (cf. Magiorakos et al., Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance, Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 268-281). Antimicrobial categories and agents used to define MDR, XDR and PDR can be also found in Magiorakos et al., 2012 (op.cit.)
In another preferred embodiment, said multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria are extremely drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria (i.e. extensively drug resistant, XDR bacteria) or pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter bacteria (PDR bacteria). In another preferred embodiment, said multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria are XDR bacteria. In another preferred embodiment, said multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria are PDR bacteria. XDR is preferably defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories (i.e. bacterial isolates remain susceptible to only one or two categories), and PDR is preferably defined as non-susceptibility to all agents in all antimicrobial categories (Magiorakos et al., 2012, op.cit.)
In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is selected from the group consisting of an Acinetobacter infection of the respiratory tract, blood (i.e. bacteremia), circulation system, urinary tract, skin, surgical-site, catheter-site and meningitis. In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is selected from the group consisting of an Acinetobacter infection of the respiratory tract, blood, urinary tract, skin, and meningitis. In another more preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection of respiratory tract or blood. In another more preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection of the lung (pneumonia) or blood.
In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is a nosocomial infection. The term “nosocomial infection” as used herein refers to an infection that is acquired in a hospital or other health care facility (e.g., nursing home, rehabilitation facility, outpatient clinic, or other clinical settings) and includes healthcare associated infections and hospital acquired infections.
In another preferred embodiment, rifabutin is administered in a daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg as sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection in the absence of co-administration of any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection. In another preferred embodiment, rifabutin is administered as single active agent in a daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg in 1-3 doses per day.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising rifabutin as sole active agent for use in the treatment and/or prevention according to the invention.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to rifabutin for use in the treatment of an Acinetobacter infection, wherein rifabutin is administered in a daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg. Rifabutin can be administered in a daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg either as single active therapy or in combination with another therapeutically active agent that is co-administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection. In a preferred embodiment, the invention refers to a method for treating an Acinetobacter infection, wherein rifabutin is administered in a daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg to a patient.
In a preferred embodiment, said daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg of rifabutin is used in the treatment of an Acinetobacter infection in a mammalian, more preferably a human patient.
In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection caused by bacteria selected from the group consisting of Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter nosocomialis, and Acinetobacter pittii. In the most preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an A. baumannii infection.
In a preferred embodiment, said daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg of rifabutin is used in the treatment of an Acinetobacter baumannii infection in a human patient.
In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is caused by multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria, preferably XDR bacteria or PDR bacteria.
In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is selected from the group consisting of an Acinetobacter infection of the respiratory tract, blood (i.e. bacteremia), circulation system, urinary tract, skin, surgical-site, catheter-site and meningitis. In another preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is selected from the group consisting of an Acinetobacter infection of the respiratory tract, blood, urinary tract, skin, and meningitis. In another more preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is an infection of respiratory tract or blood. In another more preferred embodiment, said Acinetobacter infection is a nosocomial Acinetobacter infection.
The invention will now be illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples.

Example 1

Materials and Methods
Bacteria Culture
Frozen stock: Working solutions of bacteria were prepared using frozen stocks of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Staphylococcus aureus strains used for MIC testing, which were prepared as previously published.¹⁴The bacterial frozen stocks were diluted to ˜1×10⁶CFU/mL for plating using Mueller Hinton II (MHII) broth or RPMI 1640 (Gibco #11875-085).
Fresh culture: Overnight cultures of A. baumannii and Escherichia coli were grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) at 37° C. The overnight culture was diluted 1:100 and then subcultured in MHII at 37° C./200 rpm until the culture reached an ₀D600 of 0.5. The bacterial density was adjusted to 1×10⁶CFU/mL by dilution in the same medium used for the MIC, either MHII or RPMI.
Antibiotic Preparation: A fresh stock of RBT and RIF was prepared each week for the MIC assay. For in vitro testing, the stock solution was prepared by dissolving RBT or RIF in 100% DMSO. The working solution of antibiotic was prepared 2X of the desired starting well final drug concentration. The antibiotic working solution dilutions were prepared in the respective media used for the MIC, MHII or RPMI.
MIC Protocol: The medium used for the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays performed in this study was either MHII or RPMI 1640. All of the MICs were performed in sterile 96-well round bottom microwell plates.
Briefly, 100 11.1 of media, RPMI or MHII, was added to the wells in columns 2-10. Column 11 served as a positive control for each of the conditions. One hundred 11.1 of the respective media was added to the wells in this column while 200 11.1 of the media was added to column 12, which served as the negative control. Next, 200 11.1 of a 2X rifabutin or rifampin working solution was added to the wells in column 1. Two-fold serial dilutions of the antibiotic were performed through column 10. Next, 100 11.1 of a 1×10⁶CFU/mL working solution of bacteria was added to each of the wells in columns 1-11. The inoculum concentration was confirmed by plating serial dilutions on TSA plates.
To test the effect of the individual components of MHII, MHII fractions (size separation, acetonitrile extracted, proteinase K digested, or sodium periodate oxidized), 10 μL of the purified fraction was added to the appropriate wells. Amino acids (essential, non-essential, or individual amino acids) were added to the MIC at final concentrations summarized in Table 6. The individual components were also added to the positive and negative controls to confirm that there are no adverse effects as a result of the addition of these solutions. The MIC plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37° C.
Fractionation of MHII: 10X MHII was used for the fractionation to maximize the concentration of the MHII components. The media was filtered through a 0.22 μM filter and then the media was run through 10 and 30 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) centrifugal filtration columns at 12,000 g for 20 minutes. The >30 kDa fraction was collected and reserved for experimentation. The flow through was collected and transferred to a 10 kDa MWCO column. The centrifugation step was repeated as previously stated. The <10 kDa flow through was collected from this column. The 10<X<30 kDa fraction was collected as well.
Acetonitrile Extraction: The organic and inorganic layers were separated with a liquid-liquid extraction by mixing the purified MHII fraction 1:1 with 100% acetonitrile. The sample was vortexed thoroughly and centrifuged at maximum speed for 10 minutes. The aqueous and organic layers were transferred to clean microcentrifuge tubes. To ensure the removal of any residual acetonitrile, the extracted MHII sample was dried using a SpeedVac and then resuspended in the original volume using sterile molecular grade H2O.
Proteinase K Digestion: 30 11.1 of proteinase K (Invitrogen, #46-7603) was added to 1 mL of the MHII <10 kDa fraction (organic extract or non-extracted as a control). The media was incubated at 65° C. for 1 hour. To inactivate the proteinase K, the sample was then incubated at 80° C. for 15 minutes.
Sodium Periodate Oxidation (Source #/): Sodium periodate oxidation was done as previously described. Briefly, to oxidize the carbohydrates in the organic layer of the medium, sodium periodate (NaIO4) was added to the <10 fraction at a final concentration of 10 mM. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Following incubation, the sodium periodate was quenched using 0.1 mL of 50% glycerol for every 1 mL of reaction. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour before downstream application.
Amino Acid Additions: As indicated, amino acids were used to supplement the media for MIC testing. Mixed amino acids were tested by adding 10 μL of GIBCO® MEM Amino Acids Solution (Thermo Scientific, #11130051) and GIBCO® MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids (Thermo Scientific, #11140050) to each well in the MIC assay. Additionally, the effect of individual amino acids on the MIC was tested by the addition of purified amino acids at the same concentration contained in the Gibco mixed amino acid solutions listed above. Amino acids were prepared fresh and filter sterilized solutions prior to use.
Mouse Studies
Intravenous (IV) infection: A. baumannii HUMC1 frozen stock was prepared as described in previous work. Frozen stocks of HUMC1 were thawed and diluted in PBS to adjust the bacterial density as needed for infection. C3HeB/FeJ mice, 8 to 14 weeks old, were infected with 2×10⁷CFUs via tail vein injection and the inoculum bacterial density was confirmed by plating serial dilutions on TSA plates and incubating overnight at 37° C.
Oral aspiration (OA) infection: Single colonies of A. baumannii HUMC1 grown on TSA were used to inoculated TSB and bacteria were cultured overnight at 37° C./200 rpm. The following day, the bacteria was subcultured by diluting the overnight 1:100 in fresh TSB and cultured for 3 hrs at 37° C./200 rpm. The subculture was washed with PBS three times and adjust to optical density (0D600) equal to 0.5. The inoculum was concentrated to 2×10⁹CFUs/ml and 9 to 10 weeks old C3HeB/FeJ mouse is infected with 50 ul (1×10⁸CFUs) of inoculum via oral aspiration. The inoculum CFUs was confirmed by plating on TSA plates and incubating overnight at 37° C.
Antibiotic treatments: RIF (Sigma, R3501-1G) and RBT (Sigma, R3530-25MG) were dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The working solution of antibiotics are prepared fresh daily. The appropriate concentration of antibiotic working solution was prepared in PBS with 10% DMSO and administered by oral gavage. The control mice received the same volume of PBS with 10% DMSO without drug. RIF, RBT, and the control were administered once a day for three days starting the day of infection.
Blood CFUs: 50 to 100 ul blood was collected by tail nick at the indicated timepoints post OA or IV infection. Blood samples were serially diluted in PBS and plated on TSA plates. The plates are incubated overnight at 37° C. and CFUs were counted the next day.
Lung CFUs: At 18 hrs post OA infection, lungs were harvested, weighed, and homogenized in sterile PBS. Lung homogenates were serially diluted in PBS and plated on TSA plates. The plates are incubated overnight at 37° C. and CFUs were counted the next day.
Statistics. Bacterial burden was compared using the Mann Whitney test. Time to death was compared using the Log Rank test. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Example 2

High Throughput Compound Screening-ReFRAME Library
The ReFRAME library is a curated small molecule library that represents over 10,000 compounds that cover small molecules with previously characterized activity, including antimicrobial activity. The Inventors' primary goal was to identify novel compounds that were active against the Inventors' well characterized XDR, hyper-virulent clinical isolate of A. baumannii HUMC1 (FIG. 1 ). However, the Inventors didn't want to miss potential hits that would be active against a less antibiotic-resistant target and therefore included a counter screen against the antibiotic susceptible ATCC 17978 strain. The Inventors selected RPMI to be used as the culture medium as it is less nutrient rich as compared to MHII. It has been previously reported that serum exposure induces gene expression changes in the bacteria and therefore serum was included to help simulate the bloodstream environment. The Inventors were concerned that any chemicals with high protein binding affinity would be missed during the screen so the Inventors also included an RPMI group without the addition of serum to model less stringent conditions. Lastly, the library was screened against mammalian cells to evaluate toxicity.
In total the Inventors screened 11,862 chemicals at 20 μM as an initial screen. The screen resulted in a hit rate of 0.52%; 62 putative hits were identified for follow up confirmation in a serial dose response screen. About half of the compounds (32/62) were validated to inhibit 50% of bacterial growth (IC₅₀) at a concentration of less than 20 μM. These compounds were also assessed for cytotoxicity and 4 compounds had a favorable specific activity (IC₅₀<20 μM) and low toxicity (CC₅₀/IC₅₀>10); of these rifabutin was the most potent (i.e., had the lowest MICs, Table 1).

Example 3

Rifabutin vs Other Rifamycins
It was unexpected that RIF and RBT would have significantly different IC₅₀values and the Inventors therefore tested a panel of 8 rifamycins to confirm activity using a more sensitive 11-point dose response curve. The Inventors evaluated the IC₅₀against antibiotic-resistant and -susceptible A. baumannii strains in RPMI with and without serum (Table 2). Toxicity was also determined against 2 eukaryotic cell lines. RBT was confirmed to be the most potent and the most specific rifamycin tested (Table 2, 3).

Example 4

Confirmation of Rifabutin Activity By MIC
The MIC of each antibiotic was determined using the broth microdilution method against A. baumannii HUMC1 and the Inventors were able to confirm the previously observed differences in activity from the chemical screen. In RPMI, the MIC of RBT (0.03 μg/mL) was 133-fold lower as compared to RIF (41 μg/mL) (FIG. 2 ). However, there was no difference in MIC when the bacteria were cultured in MHII (MIC=4 μg/mL for both RBT and RIF) (FIG. 2 ).
The Inventors also tested a panel of antibiotic susceptible or resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and E. coli to determine if the decreased MIC observed in RPMI was generalizable to other bacteria. The Inventors did not find a universal improvement against other species tested (Table 4).

Example 5

MHII vs RPMI Effects On RBT MIC
MHII Antagonizes RBT Activity
The Inventors mixed RPMI and MHII media in equal parts together and used this media to test the MIC. If the MHII media contained a component that antagonized RBT potency, the Inventors would expect that the MIC of RBT in hybrid RPMI-MHII media to be similar to the MIC of bacteria cultured in 100% MHII. In contrast, if the RPMI contained a component that promoted the activity RBT, then the Inventors would expect a MIC in the hybrid media to be closer to the MIC when the bacteria are cultured in 100% RPMI. The MICs of RBT was 4 and 8 μg/mL in the 100% MHII and hybrid media respectively (FIG. 2 ). This result suggested that the MHII media antagonized the activity of RBT.
Growth Rate
The Inventors sought to understand the drivers responsible for the change in RBT potency in RPMI versus MHII media. One possibility was that the bacteria grow more slowly when cultured in RPMI vs MI-III, which could then slow down antimicrobial effect. Another way to slow bacterial grow is to alter the temperature of the cultures. However, the Inventors did not observe any difference in the RIF vs. RBT MICS when A. baumannii HUMC1 was cultured at lower temps of 25° C. or 30° C. compared to culture at the normal temp of 37° C. in MI-III or RPMI. Therefore, the growth rate alone was not responsible for the differences in the observed antibiotic activity.
Carbon Source and Essential Nutrients
The primary carbon source in RPMI is glucose and the primary carbon source in MHII is proteins/peptides from the beef extract and casein digest. The Inventors evaluated if differences in central carbon metabolism was responsible to the observed differences in antibiotic activity by the Inventors spiking glucose into MI-III at 1× and 1/10× the concentration present in RPMI. No difference in MIC was observed against A. baumannii HUMC1 in MI-III with the different amounts of glucose added.
RPMI has less iron, an essential nutrient that is required for growth, as compared to MI-III. MI-III media contains an estimated 20 μg/mL compared to trace amounts present in RPMI. To recreate similar levels of iron in RPMI compared to MI-III, FeCl₃was spiked into RPMI at 0.01, 0.10, and 0.30 μg/mL and the MIC was evaluated. The addition of additional iron did not have any effect on the MIC of RBT against A. baumannii HUMC1.
MHII Fractions and Digested Products
The Inventors collected MI-III media fractions based on size using molecular weight cutoff columns. The Inventors collected the <10 kDa fraction and spiked the fraction in RPMI media and again determined the MIC against RBT and RIF. The Inventors found that the addition of this fraction was sufficient to inhibit the activity of RBT (Table 5, FIG. 2 ).
The Inventors therefore focused on this low molecular weight fraction. The Inventors further separated the <10 kDa fraction by extracting the aqueous and organic phases by an acetonitrile liquid-liquid extraction. The addition of the purified aqueous layer to RPMI did not increase the MIC of RBT as observed in MHII. However, addition of the organic layer to RPMI did increase the MIC of RBT (Table 5). These results suggested that the material antagonizing RBT in MHII was protein-based.
If small molecular weight proteins or peptides present in MHII were the cause of the increase in MIC, the Inventors would expect that digestion of the proteins in the extracted organic layer would decrease the MIC to an equivalent value to that seen in RPMI. However, the Inventors did not observe a decrease in the MIC of RBT by treating the <10 kDa fraction with proteinase K (Table 5). If low molecular carbohydrate components present in MHII were the cause of the increase in MIC of RBT, the Inventors would expect that oxidation of carbohydrates by sodium periodate would reverse the effect. Just as with the proteinase K treatment, the Inventors did not observe a decrease in MIC or RBT upon the addition of sodium periodate treated <10 kDa MHII fraction (Table 5).
Lastly, the Inventors sought to determine the effect of free amino acids on the activity of RBT. The Inventors started by adding mixed amino acids (essential or nonessential) and found that addition of each mixture had an antagonistic effect on the activity of RBT (Table 5, 6). The Inventors then tested individual amino acids from the nonessential group to determine the contribution of each amino acid species and the Inventors found that RBT activity was inhibited by the addition of L-histidine and L-tryptophan (Table 6).

Example 6

In vivo RBT Activity
The Inventors next evaluated if the potent activity of RBT would translate to enhanced efficacy vs. RIF in in vivo mouse models of disease. The Inventors first tested the efficacy of the RBT vs. RIF in an A. baumannii pneumonia model. Mice were infected with A. baumannii HUMC1 and treated with treated with 10/mg/kg/day RIF or RBT for 3 days. At 24 hours, RBT-treated mice had a 7-log reduction in the median CFUs in the blood as compared to RIF-treated mice. There was a modest improvement in survival as well. (FIG. 3A-B).
The Inventors repeated the experiment with a reduced dose of each drug to determine if the efficacy difference would be enhanced (presuming greater potency of RFB vs. RIF). Mice were infected and treated with 5 mg/kg/daily of either drug or placebo for 3 days, and lungs were harvested and the bacterial density of the organs was quantified. RBT-treated mice had significantly reduced lung CFUs and significantly improved survival (FIG. 3C-D). Mice that were treated with 5 mg/kg of RIF did not do any better as compared to the PBS control group. This experiment validated the initial mouse experiment and the Inventors' hypothesis that RBT is more potent in vivo as compared to RIF.
Next the Inventors tested if RBT was more effective than RIF in an intravenous model of infection. Mice were infected IV with HUMC1 and treated with 10/mg/kg/day RIF or RBT for 3 days. At 24 hours, RBT-treated mice had significantly lower CFUs in the blood as compared to RIF-treated mice. Additionally, there was also a significant improvement in survival as well. (FIG. 4 ). Lastly, the Inventors tested with the minimum dose required for RBT or RIF would allow for protection in an IV infection model. The Inventors found that RBT was fully protective when dosed at 100× lower concentration as compared to RIF which was only partially protective
(FIG. 5 )

TABLE 1

Specificity results from the top hits of the chemical screen.

	Specificity HEK293T	Specificity HepG2
Compound	(CC50/IC50)	(CC50/IC50)

CBR-001-573-826-8	148.31	148.31
(rifabutin)
CBR-001-634-681-9	10.44	25.61
CBR-001-573-317-2	14.02	14.02
CBR-001-634-178-9	13.82	13.82

The IC₅₀value represents testing against A. baumannii HUMC1 in 50% serum. Rifabutin was the most active of the compounds identified.

TABLE 2

IC50 [μM] of 8 rifamycins against A. baumannii.

RPMI

RPMI + 50% Serum

	ATCC		ATCC
Compound
	17978	HUMC1	17978	HUMC1

rifabutin	0.024	0.001	<0.000847	<0.000847
rifaximin	1.777	1.526	2.449	1.586
rifapentine	7.589	10.043	28.060	10.889
FCE-22250	9.738	9.034	35.294	21.697
rifampicin	13.808	11.018	18.245	7.993
rifalazil	17.384	20.004	50.000	7.510
rifamycin	28.431	20.793	33.023	35.442
rifamycin SV	45.147	37.095	50.000	50.000

An 11-point dose response curve was used to determine activity. Rifabutin was significantly more active as compared to rifamycins tested.

TABLE 3

Specificity results of the rifamycins against A. baumanni

HEK293T (CC50/IC50)

RPMI alone

RPMI + 50% serum

	ATCC		ATCC
Compound
	17978	HUMC1	17978	HUMC1

rifabutin	1961.478	33559.242	506006.298	97331.320
rifaximin	28.143	32.776	20.421	31.517
rifapentine	4.517	3.413	1.222	3.148
rifampicin	3.621	4.538	2.741	6.256
FCE-22250	3.441	3.710	0.950	1.545
rifalazil	1.752	1.523	0.609	4.055
rifamycin SV	1.108	1.348	1.000	1.000
rifamycin	0.478	0.654	0.412	0.383

Rifabutin was the most active rifamycin and also displayed low toxicity against eukaryotic cells.

TABLE 4

MICs were performed for various strains of bacteria
Various Strains MIC (μg/mL)

Rifabutin	Rifampin

A. baumannii HUMC1	MHII	3.125	3.125
	RPMI	0.0156	3.125
A. baumannii	MHII	3.125	3.125
VA-AB21	RPMI	0.391	>6.125
S. aureus LAC	MHII	0.012	0.025
	RPMI	0.025	0.05
K. pneumonia	MHII	25	25
KPC-KP1	RPMI	12.5	50
K. pneumonia	MHII	1.56	3.125
KP-3	RPMI	0.391	1.56
E. coli JJ1886	MHII	6.25	6.25
	RPMI	6.25	25
E. coli DH5a	MHII	6.25	ND
	RPMI	ND*	ND

MICs were performed for various strains of bacteria to determine if effect seen with rifabutin between MHII and RPMI is a strain-specific phenomenon or a common effect between multiple strains.

TABLE 5

MICs were performed for against HUMC1 using with rifabutin in RPMI
A. baumannii HUMC1 MIC (μg/mL)

	Rifabutin	Rifampin

Media Controls
MHII	3.125	3.125
RPMI	0.0156	3.125
Modified RPMI
5 × RPMI	<0.0625	ND
RPMI Supplemented with MHII	8	ND
Fractionated MHII Spiked Into RPMI
10-30 kDa MHII Fraction	8	ND
<10 kDa MHII Fraction	8	ND
Acetonitrile Treated <10 kDa MHII Fraction
Aqueous Layer	<0.0312	ND
Organic Layer
	4	ND
Organic Layer, Proteinase K Digested	4	ND
Organic layer, Sodium Periodate Treated	4	ND
Essential Amino Acid Solution (50×)
MHII	ND	ND
RPMI	1.56	6.25
Non-Essential Amino Acid Solution (100×)
MHII	3.125	ND
RPMI	0.781	ND
Efflux Pump Inhibitor
CCCP (2 μg/mL)	<.05
CCCP (2 μg/mL) + Essential Amino Acids	1.56
Detergents
0.05% Tween 20, MHII		2
0.01% Triton X-100		2
Culture conditions
Tissue culture treated 96-well plates	1.56
Non tissue culture treated 96-well plates	1.56
25° C., RPMI	<.06	2
25° C., MHII	4	2
Culture Media
No Salt Luria Broth	1
Low Salt Luria Broth	2
Luria Broth	1
M9	<0.05
MHII	3.125	3.125
RPMI	0.0156	3.125

MICs were performed for against HUMC1 using with rifabutin in RPMI, unless otherwise indicated on the table, to determine which component of MHII inhibits the activity of rifabutin. The MIC for CCCP alone is 8 μg/mL

TABLE 6

MICs were performed to determine if an increase in MIC will result
by the addition of individual amino acids to the MIC.
Amino Acid MIC (μg/mL)

Final Concentration/
Well (mM)	Rifabutin	Rifampin

Controls	RPMI Only	ND	0.0156	3.125
	MHII Only	ND	3.125	3.125
Amino	L-Arginine	0.5	<0.048	ND
Acid	Glutamic Acid	0.5	<0.048	ND
	Glycine	0.5	<0.048	ND
	L-Histidine	0.5	1.56	12.5
	Leucine	1	<0.048	ND
	L-Tryptophan	0.125	1.56	12.5

MICs were performed to determine if an increase in MIC will result by the addition of individual amino acids to the MIC.

TABLE 7

Mutation Frequencies.
RIF and RBT Mutation Frequency

TSA

MHII

Strain	Rifabutin	Rifampin	Rifabutin	Rifampin

A. baumannii HUMC1	1.28E−08	1.44E−08	2.20E−09	9.19E−09
A. baumannii ABNIH1	5.95E−09	1.75E−08	8.85E−09	4.17E−08
A. baumannii ATCC17978	8.49E−10	7.95E−09	5.72E−09	5.14E−09
A. baumannii LAC-4	7.41E−09	1.76E−08	1.29E−08	2.62E−08
S. aureus LAC	1.10E−07	9.49E−08
E. coli JJ1886	3.89E−08	2.21E−08

The mutation frequency was found to be similar between RBT and RIF when the bacteria were cultured on TSA and MIMI agar plates. The frequency of resistance to either drug was found to be lower as compared to S. aureus and E. coli.

TABLE 8

Rifabutin MICs against A. baumannii AB5075 transposon
disruption mutants deficient in amino acid transport genes.

	Disrupted	MHII	RPMI
Strain	Gene	(μg/mL)	(μg/mL)

HUMC1		6.25	<0.05
AB5075-UW		6.25	<0.05
AB00188	aroP	3.13	<0.05
AB00190	aroP	6.25	<0.05
AB03015	aroP	6.25	<0.05
AB02204	aroP	6.25	<0.05
AB09979	aroP	0.78	<0.05
AB09980	tryP	3.13	<0.05
AB00215	tryP	6.25	<0.05
AB03612	hisM	3.13	<0.05
AB03616	hisM	6.25	<0.05
AB03618	hisM	6.25	<0.05
AB06383	hisJ	6.25	<0.05
AB07813	mtr	25	<0.05
AB02205	aroP	3.13	<0.05
AB07354	aroP	6.25	<0.05
AB07356	aroP	1.56	<0.05
AB09982	tryP	6.25	<0.05
AB00216	tryP	1.56	<0.05
AB06392	hisP	0.78	<0.05
AB06386	hisP	0.78	<0.05
AB06105	aroP	3.13	<0.05
AB03608	hisJ	3.13	<0.05

Rifabutin MICs against A. baumannii AB5075 transposon disruption mutants deficient in amino acid transport genes. MIC assay was done by culturing the bacteria in either MHII or RPMI media.

Example 7

DISCUSSION

A. baumannii is one of the few bacteria strains of which have developed resistance to all available antibiotics. National surveillance data confirm that an astonishing 50% of A. baumannii isolates from US intensive care units are XDR, far higher than for other pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20%) or Klebsiella spp. (10%). 1,2 Approximately 23,000 and 75,000 cases of XDR A. baumannii infections occur annually in the US and globally (in developed countries), respectively.
High throughput chemical screening assays have been a standard practice for the pharmaceutical industry for decades. However, these libraries have been screened many times, and rarely do new screens of the same library identify novel compounds that have not been previously identified. One fundamental limitation is that the culture conditions will influence the physiologic state of the bacteria. A change in cellular physiology could alter the availability of the drug target or affect drug metabolism. This may result in a culture-dependent susceptible phenotype that selects for false positives or a resistant phenotype that selects for false negatives. Changes in the carbon source during culture can result in significant overall changes in both gene expression and protein translation. These metabolic changes have been shown to have direct effects on antibiotic activity. A significant amount of time, labor, and financial resources may have been lost to the characterization of drug candidates that target a metabolic process that is active in vitro but not in vivo.
The modification of in vitro culture conditions to best reflect in vivo conditions are needed for the best chance of success. For example, some pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb), are likely to reside in host macrophages which constitute a significantly different environment as compared to nutrient rich broth culture of the bacteria alone. Modified screening protocols that involved screening chemicals against M. tb infected macrophages resulted in the identification of novel compounds. To identify rifabutin, the Inventors modified the culture conditions to better reflect the in vivo environment of a bloodstream infection by culturing the bacteria in a relatively nutrient depleted media with the addition of serum. The Inventors found that RFB was much more potent than RIF when tested in the depleted media plus serum but not in rich media. Validating the relevance of this approach is that RFB was also more effective in vivo when treating mice infected intravenously or with pneumonia caused by an XDR hyper-virulent clinical isolate of A. baumannii. This finding would not have been made had the initial screen been conducted with rich media.
The relative superiority of RFB over RIF is highly significant due to a recent, randomized, controlled clinical trial that found a non-significant trend to improved clinical cure, with a significant improvement in microbiological eradication when adding rifampin to colistin for treatment of XDR A. baumannii infections. Given that RIF had some effect clinically, and that RFB appears far more potent and effective in pre-clinical models, the Inventors believe that the addition of adjunct RFB, as compared to RIF, could serve as a critically needed new therapeutic option for patients with infections caused by XDR A. baumannii, potentially resulting in superior survival compared to the current standard of care. As RBT is already commercially available, these results can be immediately translated.

Example 8

Additional Materials and Methods
Bacteria Culture Working solutions of bacteria were prepared using frozen stocks of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Staphylococcus aureus strains as previously published,¹²or by inoculating a fresh overnight culture in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) and incubating at 37° C./200 rpm. The overnight culture was diluted 1:100 and then subcultured in MEHII at 37° C./200 rpm until the culture reached an ₀D600 of 0.5.
High Throughput Compound Screening
Compounds from the 10 mM ReFRAME library stock were pre-spotted at 20 μM final assay concentration into 384 or 1536 well plates. Log-phase growth A. baumannii HUMC1 was be diluted in assay media (MHII or RPMI with and without 50% mouse serum) and dispensed into assay plates. Bacterial viability was assessed 24 hours later using the BacTiter-Glo Microbial Cell Viability Assay. Positive controls included 10 μM colistin and doxycycline. Assay was normalized to neutral and inhibitor controls and putative hits were be selected based on 50% reduction in viability. Putative hits were re-tested in single point triplicate and upon reconfirmation were further tested in an 8 point 1:3 dose response and counter-screened against mammalian HepG2 and HEK293T cell lines. Dose response synergy testing was done to follow up on hits that appear to potentiate activity of meropenem (10 μM) with the goal of identifying compounds that increase meropenem EC₅₀at least 100-fold (MIC difference between the resistant HUMC1 and susceptible ATCC17978 strain is −128).
Antibiotic Preparation
RIF (Sigma, R3501-1G) and RBT (Sigma, R3530-25MG) were dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The working solution of antibiotic was prepared 2X of the desired starting well final drug concentration. The antibiotic working solution dilutions were prepared in the respective media used for the MIC, MHII or RPMI.
MIC Protocol
Unless otherwise indicated, the standard broth microdilution method was used to determine MICs. The medium used for the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays performed in this study was either MHII or RPMI 1640.
Briefly, 100 11.1 of media, RPMI or MHII, was added to the wells in columns 2-10. Column 11 served as a positive growth control and contained only bacteria and media. Column 12 served as the negative control and contained only culture media without bacteria. Next, 200 11.1 of a 2X rifabutin or rifampin working solution was added to the wells in column 1. Two-fold serial dilutions of the antibiotic were performed through column 10. Next, 100 11.1 of a 1×10⁶CFU/mL working solution of bacteria was added to each of the wells in columns 1-11. The inoculum concentration was confirmed by plating serial dilutions on TSA plates. MICs plates were incubated at 35±2° C. without shaking and results were recorded at 24 hours.
To test the effect of the individual components of MHII, MHII fractions (size separation, acetonitrile extracted, proteinase K digested, or sodium periodate oxidized), 10 μL of the purified fraction was added to the appropriate wells.
As indicated, amino acids were used to supplement the media for MIC testing. Mixed amino acids were tested by adding 10 μL of GIBCO® MEM Amino Acids Solution (Thermo Scientific, #11130051) and GIBCO® MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids (Thermo Scientific, #11140050) to each well in the MIC assay. Additionally, the effect of individual amino acids on the MIC was tested by the addition of purified amino acids at the same concentration contained in the Gibco mixed amino acid solutions listed above. Amino acids were prepared fresh and filter sterilized solutions prior to use.
For some MICs, efflux pump inhibitors were added to the media. Efflux pump inhibitor MICs were performed to identify subinhibitory concentrations of the efflux pump inhibitors. The final concentration of inhibitors used were as follows: verapamil (100 μg/mL), thioridize (16 μg/mL), arsenate (33.3 mM), and CCCP (2 μg/mL).
Fractionation of MHII:
Size Fractionation
10X MHII was used for the fractionation to maximize the concentration of the MHII components. The media was filtered through a 0.22 μM filter and then the media was run through 10 and 30 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) centrifugal filtration columns at 12,000 g for 20 minutes. The >30 kDa fraction was collected and reserved for experimentation. The flow through was collected and transferred to a 10 kDa MWCO column. The centrifugation step was repeated as previously stated. The <10 kDa flow through was collected from this column. The 10<X<30 kDa fraction was collected as well.
Acetonitrile Extraction
The organic and inorganic layers were separated with a liquid-liquid extraction by mixing the purified MHII fraction 1:1 with 100% acetonitrile. The sample was vortexed thoroughly and centrifuged at maximum speed for 10 minutes. The aqueous and organic layers were transferred to clean microcentrifuge tubes. To ensure the removal of any residual acetonitrile, the extracted MHII sample was dried using a SpeedVac and then resuspended in the original volume using sterile molecular grade H2O.
Proteinase K Digestion
30 μl of proteinase K (Invitrogen, #46-7603) was added to 1 mL of the MHII <10 kDa fraction (organic extract or non-extracted as a control). The media was incubated at 65° C. for 1 hour. To inactivate the proteinase K, the sample was then incubated at 80° C. for 15 minutes.
Sodium Periodate Oxidation
Sodium periodate oxidation was done as previously described.′ Briefly, to oxidize the carbohydrates in the organic layer of the medium, sodium periodate (NaIO4) was added to the <10 fraction at a final concentration of 10 mM. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Following incubation, the sodium periodate was quenched using 0.1 mL of 50% glycerol for every 1 mL of reaction. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour before downstream application.
Time Kill Assay
Time kill assays were performed in a 96-well U-bottom plate using the same plate set up as the MIC assay. The Inventors measured viable cell counts at 1, 8, and 24 hours. At each time point, the contents of the individual well were collected and CFUs were determined by plating serial dilutions on TSA plates and incubating overnight at 37° C.
As a control, the remaining wells of the 96-well plate were returned to the incubator after each sample collection and an MIC was determined as described above.
Mass Spectrophotometry
Log-phase A. baumannii culture was incubated 0.79 or 0.38 μg/mL RBT in the presence or absence of amino acid mixture at 37° C. Bacteria were harvested 0, 1, 8, and 24 hours and CFUs were determined by plating serial dilutions on agar media. The cell free supernatant was collected by filtration through a 0.22 μm filter. RBT were extracted by adding LC-MS grade acetonitrile:methanol:water (40:40:20) solution that was precooled to −40° C. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) differentiation and detection of RBT was performed using a Cogent Diamond Hydride Type C column (Microsolve Technologies) with an Agilent Accurate Mass 6230 TOF coupled with an Agilent 1290 Liquid Chromatography system as previously published.^14,15An isocratic pump was used for continuous infusion of a reference mass solution to allow mass axis calibration. Detected RBT ion was validated based on unique accurate mass-retention time identifiers for masses. RBT level was analyzed using Agilent Qualitative Analysis B.08.00 (Agilent Technologies) with a mass tolerance of <0.005 Da. The intracellular RBT was calculated as the [RBT]_{drug only control}—[RBT]filtrate. 3 biological replicates were tested per group.
Selection of Spontaneous RBT-Resistant Mutants and WGS:
The RBT hypersensitive strain HUMC1 was cultured overnight in TSB. Bacteria were plated on RPMI agar plates supplemented with 3 μg/mL of RBT. Individual colonies were selected and then counter screened in RPMI agar plates supplemented with 25 μg/mL RBT.
Colonies that grew on the RPMI agar plates supplemented with 3 μg/mL, but not the 25 μg/mL RBT, were processed for whole genome sequencing. Selected mutants, and the parent strain, were Sequencing libraries for the selected mutants and parent strain were prepared at the USC Molecular Genomics Core. Libraries were simultaneously prepared from extracted genomic DNA using the Illumina Nextera XT library prep kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Cat #FC-131-1024, Illumina). Prepared libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Miseq V2 at 2×150 cycles. Assembled reads were aligned to the previously published A. baumannii HUMC1 sequence (NCBI Reference Sequence: NZ_LQRQ01000007.1).
Mouse Studies
Intravenous (IV) Infection
A. baumannii HUMC1 frozen stock was prepared as described in previous work. 12 Frozen stocks of HUMC1 were thawed and diluted in PBS to adjust the bacterial density as needed for infection. C3HeB/FeJ mice, 8 to 14 weeks old, were infected with 2×10⁷CFUs via tail vein injection and the inoculum bacterial density was confirmed by plating serial dilutions on TSA plates and incubating overnight at 37° C.
Oral Aspiration (OA) Infection
Single colonies of A. baumannii HUMC1 grown on TSA were used to inoculated TSB and bacteria were cultured overnight at 37° C./200 rpm. The following day, the bacteria was subcultured by diluting the overnight 1:100 in fresh TSB and cultured for 3 hrs at 37° C./200 rpm. The subculture was washed with PBS three times and adjust to optical density (0D600) equal to The inoculum was concentrated to 2×10⁹CFUs/ml and 9 to 10 weeks old C3HeB/FeJ mouse is infected with 50 ul (1×10⁸CFUs) of inoculum via oral aspiration. The inoculum CFUs was confirmed by plating on TSA plates and incubating overnight at 37° C.
Antibiotic Treatments
RIF (Sigma, R3501-1G) and RBT (Sigma, R3530-25MG) were dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The working solution of antibiotics are prepared fresh daily. The appropriate concentration of antibiotic working solution was prepared in PBS with 10% DMSO and administered by oral gavage. The control mice received the same volume of PBS with 10% DMSO without drug. RIF, RBT, and the control were administered once a day for three days starting the day of infection.
Blood CFUs
50-100 μL of blood was collected by tail nick at the indicated timepoints post OA or IV infection. Blood samples were serially diluted in PBS and plated on TSA plates. Agar plates were incubated overnight at 37° C. and CFUs were counted the next day.
Lung CFUs
At 18 hrs post infection, lungs were harvested, weighed, and homogenized in sterile PBS. Lung homogenates were serially diluted in PBS and plated on TSA plates. The plates are incubated overnight at 37° C. and CFUs were counted the next day.
Statistics
Bacterial burden was compared using the Mann Whitney test. Time to death was compared using the Log Rank test. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Example 9—High Throughput In-Vitro Chemical Screen

1.1 Initial Chemical Screen
A high throughput chemical screen was conducted in which compounds (in a concentration of 20 mM) were assessed for their ability to inhibit A. baumannii growth in a 1536 well format.
1.1.1 Bacteria Culture
Single colonies from agar plates were picked to inoculate 10 mL broth cultures in TSB media. Bacteria were cultured overnight at 37° C. with shaking at 200 rpm. A fresh subculture was by inoculating 100 μL of the overnight culture into 10 mL of fresh TSB media, and incubated at 37° C. with shaking at 200 rpm for 3 hours. Bacteria were washed 3× with PBS and the OD₆₀₀density was adjusted. Bacteria were diluted in either RPMI or MHII medium, with or without the addition of 50% serum. MHII is the standard reference culture medium that is used by clinical laboratories for determining antibacterial activity by the MIC assay. RPMI was included as model of in vivo environmental conditions. Viability of the bacteria was monitored and quantified using the BacTiterGlo.
1.1.2 Sample Analysis
Fluorescence was measured after 24 hours of incubation. Background wells containing only media were subtracted from other test wells. The % of inhibition by the compounds was normalized to growth control well that contained no inhibitor compound. The IC50 was determined as the concentration of compound that provided a 50% inhibition relative to the untreated growth control.
1.1.3 Results
11,862 compounds were screened and rifabutin was identified as the most potent inhibitor of A. baumannii growth.
1.2 Minimum Inhibitory Testing MIC Testing of rifampin and rifabutin against A. baumannii in RPMI or MHII
As a secondary confirmation of the primary high throughput screen results, MIC of rifampin (RIF) and rifabutin (RBT) against A. baumannii cultured in RPMI or MHII was determined.
1.2.2. MIC Plate Set Up
The bacteria were cultured the same as described above. A series of two-fold serial dilutions of RBT or RIF were done in 96-well plates. The drugs were diluted in RPMI or MHII respectively. Bacteria were added and the plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37° C. A. baumannii infections
1.2.3 Sample Analysis
The MIC is defined as the lowest concentration of drug in which there is no visible growth of bacteria.
1.2.4 Results
Against A. baumannii ATCC17978 and HUMC1, the MIC of RIF and RBT in MHII were both 2 μg/mL. In RPMI, the MIC of RBT was <0.0625 μg/mL and RIF was 8 μg/mL.
1.2.5 IC₅₀Testing of Rifamycin Compounds
The IC₅₀was determined for eight rifamycin compounds (members of the rifamycin family) using an 11-point dose response curve to determine activity. RBT was found to be the most potent against both HUMC1 and ATCC17978 (Table 9).

TABLE 9

IC₅₀[μM] of 8 members of the Rifamycin family against A. baumannii

	‘ ATCC		ATCC	17978 in	HUMC1 in
	17978	HUMC1	RPMI + 50%	RPMI +
Compound	in RPMI	in RPMI	Serum		50% serum

rifabutin	0.024	0.001	<0.000847	<0.000847
rifaximin	1.777	1.526	2.449	1.586
rifapenline	7.589	10.043	28.060	10.889
FDE-22250	9.738	9.034	35.294	21,697
rifampicin	13.808	11.018	18.245	7.993
rifalazil	17.384	20.004	50.000	7.510
rifamycin	28.431	20.793	33.023	35.442
rifamycin SV	45.147	37.095	50.000	50.000

In a test of 21 clinical isolates of A. baumannii, intrinsic resistance to rifabutin and rifampin was found in one strain (Table 2). Of the 20 non-resistant strains, 15 demonstrated markedly lower MICs to rifabutin in RPMI medium than in MEHII media (Table 10).

TABLE 10

Rifabutin MICs of clinical isolates of A. baumannii in RPMI or MHII

A. baumannii Strain	Media	Rifabutin

1	HUMC1	MHII	3.125
	HUMC1	RPMI	0.0156
2	ATCC 17978	MHII	3.125
	ATCC 17978	RPMI	<0.05
3	VA-AB21	MHII	3.125
	VA-AB21	RPMI	0.391
4	ARLG-1915	MHII	3.13
	ARLG-1915	RPMI	0.1
5	UH6507	MHII	3.13
	UH6507	RPMI	0.39
6	HUMC6	MHII	25
	HUMC6	RPMI	3.13
7	HUMC10	MHII	12.5
	HUMC10	RPMI	<0.05
8	ARLG-1314	MHII	6.25
	ARLG-1314	RPMI	<0.05
9	AB15827	MHII	3.13
	AB15827	RPMI	0.2
10	AB307-0294	MHII	6.25
	AB307-0294	RPMI	<0.05
11	LACUSC-01	MHII	6.25
	LACUSC-01	RPMI	<0.05
12	UH118	MHII	3.13
	UH118	RPMI	0.2
14	AB046	MHII	6.25
	AB046	MHII	0.19
15	AB044	MHII	3.12
	AB044	RPMI	0.78
16	UH516	MHII	>25
	UH516	RPMI	>25
17	VA-AB74	MHII	6.25
	VA-AB74	RPMI	3.13
18	ARLG-1777	MHII	6.25
	ARLG-1777	RPMI	3.13
19	NIH1	MHII	3.13
	NIH1	RPMI	3.13
20	UH2207	MHII	6.25
	UH2207	RPMI	3.13
21	LAC -- 4	MHII	0.78
	LAC -- 4	RPMI	1.56

Example 10

In vivo Animal Efficacy Studies
It was determined if the MIC assay results in RPMI or MHII were more predictive of in vivo efficacy, and efficacy of rifampin and rifabutin as therapy for A. baumannii infections in mice was compared.
Mouse and Bacterial Strains: C3H/FeJ mice were used for all animal studies. A. baumannii HUMC1, a highly virulent, XDR clinical blood and lung isolate, was used for all animal infections.
3.1 Oral Aspiration Pneumonia Infection Model
Frozen stocks of A. baumannii HUMC1 were thawed prior to infection and the CFU density was adjusted to deliver a targeted inoculum of 2×10⁸CFU per mouse for the aspiration pneumonia route. Mice were anesthetized with isofluorane, the mouse tongue grasped to prevent swallowing, and infectious inoculum was administered in 50 11.1 of PBS directly into the trachea. Following infection, mice were treated by oral gavage for 3 days with freshly prepared RIF or RBT resuspended in 10% DMSO. Treatment dosing was 5 or 10 mg/kg once per day depending on the experiment.
3.1.1 Sample Analysis
Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on survival time and the reduction in bacterial CFUs. Bacterial density was measured by collecting blood or lung tissue and plating serial dilutions on agar plates. The median and interquartile ranges were calculated and compared for analysis. For survival time analysis, mice were euthanized according to humane endpoints that were approved by IACUC (inability to ambulate after tactile stimulation). Differences in survival were compared by the Log Rank test.
3.1.2 Results
Mice (n=8/group) were infected with 1.3×10⁸CFU and treated for 3 days with RBT or RIF at 5 mg/kg. RBT significantly improved survival compared to both PBS control and RFP and RFP did not improve survival vs. control (FIG. 2 ; RBT: survival of about 80%, RFP and PBS/control: survival of <20% 2 days post infection).
For a separate cohort of mice (n=8 mice per group), lungs were collected at 24 hrs post infection and the bacterial burden was determined by quantitative culture. RBT reduced CFUs compared to both PBS and RFP, and RFP treatment did not reduce CFUs compared to control (FIG. 3 ).
3.2 In-Vivo Bacteremia Model
Mice (n=8 per group) were infected with 2×10⁷treated for 3 days with RBT or RIF at 10 mg/kg. RBT significantly improved survival compared to both RFP and PBS control (FIG. 4 ; RBT: survival of about 100%, RFP: survival of about 50%, both compared to PBS/control with 0% 2 days post infection).
In a separate cohort of mice (n=8 per group), blood was collected at 24 hrs post infection and the bacterial burden was quantified.
RBT significantly reduced CFUs compared to both PBS control and RFP (FIG. 5 ).

Example 11

A. baumannii strain panel with Rifabutin/Rifampin MICs

TABLE 11

Rifampin and Rifabutin MIC media comparison

		RPMI	CAMHB

Rifampin
MIC₉₀(μg/mL)	25	6.25
MIC₅₀(μg/mL)	12.5	3.13
Rifabutin
MIC₉₀(μg/mL)	3.13	6.25
MIC₅₀(μg/mL)	0.39	3.13

Example 12

High Throughput Compound Screening-ReFRAME Library
The ReFRAME library is a curated small molecule library that represents over 10,000 compounds that cover small molecules with previously characterized activity, including antimicrobial activity. The Inventors' primary goal was to identify novel compounds that were active against the Inventors' well characterized XDR, hyper-virulent clinical isolate of A. baumannii HUMC1 (FIG. 7A). However, the Inventors didn't want to miss potential hits that would be active against a less antibiotic-resistant target and therefore included a counter screen against the antibiotic susceptible ATCC 17978 strain. The Inventors selected RPMI to be used as the culture medium as it is less nutrient rich as compared to MHII. It has been previously reported that serum exposure induces gene expression changes in the bacteria and therefore serum was included to help simulate the bloodstream environment. The Inventors were concerned that any chemicals with high protein binding affinity would be missed during the screen so the Inventors also included an RPMI group without the addition of serum to model less stringent conditions. Lastly, the library was screened against mammalian cells to evaluate toxicity.
In total the Inventors screened 11,862 chemicals at 20 μM as an initial screen. The screen resulted in a hit rate of 0.52%; 62 putative hits were identified for follow up confirmation in a serial dose response screen. About half of the compounds (32/62) were validated to inhibit 50% of bacterial growth (IC₅₀) at a concentration of less than 20 μM. These compounds were also assessed for cytotoxicity and 4 compounds had a favorable specific activity (IC₅₀<20 μM) and low toxicity (CC₅₀/IC₅₀>10); of these rifabutin was the most potent (i.e., had the lowest MICs, FIG. 7B).

Example 13

Rifabutin vs Other Rifamycins
It was unexpected that RIF and RBT would have significantly different IC₅₀values and the Inventors therefore tested a panel of 8 rifamycins to confirm activity using a more sensitive 11-point dose response curve. The Inventors evaluated the IC₅₀against antibiotic-resistant and -susceptible A. baumannii strains in RPMI with and without serum (FIG. 7C). Toxicity was also determined against 2 eukaryotic cell lines. RBT was confirmed to be the most potent and the most specific rifamycin tested (FIG. 7D).

Example 14

Confirmation of Rifabutin Activity By MIC
The MIC of each antibiotic was determined using the broth microdilution method against A. baumannii HUMC1 and the Inventors were able to confirm the previously observed differences in activity from the chemical screen. In RPMI, the MIC of RBT (0.0156 μg/mL) was 200-fold lower as compared to RIF (3.125 μg/mL) (FIG. 7E). However, there was no difference in MIC when the bacteria were cultured in MHII (MIC=3.125 μg/mL for both RBT and RIF) (FIG. 7E).
The Inventors also tested a panel of antibiotic susceptible or resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and E. coli clinical isolates to determine if the decreased MIC observed in RPMI was generalizable to other bacteria. The Inventors did not find a universal improvement against other species tested (FIG. 7E).

Example 15

MHII vs RPMI Effects On RBT MIC
MHII Antagonizes RBT Activity
The Inventors mixed RPMI and MHII media in equal parts together and used this media to test the MIC. If the MHII media contained a component that antagonized RBT potency, the Inventors would expect that the MIC of RBT in hybrid RPMI-MHII media to be similar to the MIC of bacteria cultured in 100% MHII. In contrast, if the RPMI contained a component that promoted the activity RBT, then the Inventors would expect a MIC in the hybrid media to be closer to the MIC when the bacteria are cultured in 100% RPMI. The MICs of RBT was 4 and 8 μg/mL in the 100% MHII and hybrid media respectively (Table 12). This result suggested that the MHII media antagonized the activity of RBT.
Growth Rate
The Inventors sought to understand the drivers responsible for the change in RBT potency in RPMI versus MHII media. One possibility was that the bacteria grow more slowly when cultured in RPMI vs MI-III, which could then slow down antimicrobial effect. Another way to slow bacterial grow is to alter the temperature of the cultures. However, the Inventors did not observe any difference in the RIF vs. RBT MICS when A. baumannii HUMC1 was cultured at lower temps of 25° C. compared to culture at the normal temp of 37° C. in MHII or RPMI (Table 12). Therefore, the growth rate alone was not responsible for the differences in the observed antibiotic activity.
Carbon Source and Essential Nutrients
The primary carbon source in RPMI is glucose and the primary carbon source in MHII is proteins/peptides from the beef extract and casein digest. The Inventors evaluated if differences in central carbon metabolism was responsible for observed differences in antibiotic activity by the Inventors spiking glucose into MI-III at 1× and 1/10× the concentration present in RPMI. No difference in MIC was observed against A. baumannii HUMC1 in MI-III with the different amounts of glucose added (Table 12).
MHII Fractions and Digested Products
The Inventors collected MI-III media fractions based on size using molecular weight cutoff columns. The Inventors collected the <10 kDa fraction and spiked the fraction in RPMI media and again determined the MIC against RBT and RIF. The Inventors found that the addition of this fraction was sufficient to inhibit the activity of RBT (Table 12, FIG. 2 ).
The Inventors therefore focused on this low molecular weight fraction. The Inventors further separated the <10 kDa fraction by extracting the aqueous and organic phases by an acetonitrile liquid-liquid extraction. The addition of the purified aqueous layer to RPMI did not increase the MIC of RBT as observed in MHII. However, addition of the organic layer to RPMI did increase the MIC of RBT (Table 12). These results suggested that the material antagonizing RBT in MHII was protein-based.
If small molecular weight proteins or peptides present in MI-III were the cause of the increase in MIC, the Inventors would expect that digestion of the proteins in the extracted organic layer would decrease the MIC to an equivalent value to that seen in RPMI. However, the Inventors did not observe a decrease in the MIC of RBT by treating the <10 kDa fraction with proteinase K (Table 12). If low molecular carbohydrate components present in MI-III were the cause of the increase in MIC of RBT, the Inventors would expect that oxidation of carbohydrates by sodium periodate would reverse the effect. Just as with the proteinase K treatment, the Inventors did not observe a decrease in MIC or RBT upon the addition of sodium periodate treated <10 kDa MHII fraction (Table 12).
The Inventors sought to determine the effect of free amino acids on the activity of RBT. The Inventors started by adding mixed amino acids (essential or nonessential) and found that addition of each mixture had an antagonistic effect on the activity of RBT (Table 12). The Inventors then tested individual amino acids from the nonessential group to determine the contribution of each amino acid species and the Inventors found that RBT activity was inhibited by the addition of L-histidine and L-tryptophan (Table 12).
Due to amino acid mediated antagonism of RBT activity, the Inventors hypothesized that RBT, and not RIF, was entering the cell through amino acid transporters. Therefore, if the Inventors could knock-out the relevant transporter, the Inventors would inhibit RBT entry into the cell and the Inventors would observe an increase in the MIC. Amino acid transport system are redundantly encoded in the A. baumannii genome and the Inventors evaluated single gene transposon-disrupted mutants of apoP, tryP, hisM, mtr, hisP, and hisJ to determine if the Inventors could observe a higher shift in MIC. No single disruptant mutant displayed and difference in MIC which would indicate that a RBT may enter the cell through more than 1 transporter (Table 13).

TABLE 12

MICs were performed against HUMC1 in RPMI
A. baumannii HUMC1 MIC

		RBT [μg/mL]

	Controls
	MHII	4.00
	RPMI	0.02
	Temperature
	25° C., MHII	4.00
	25° C., RPMI	0.05
	Glucose Supplementation
	MHII + 200 mg/L glucose	2.00
	MHII + 2,000 mg/L glucose	2.00
	Modified RPMI
	5 × RPMI	0.06
	RPMI Supplemented with MHII	8.00
	Efflux Pump Inhibitor
	CCCP (2 μg/mL)	0.05
	thioridazine (16 μg/mL)	12.50
	Fractionated MHII Spiked Into RPMI
	10-30 kDa MHII Fraction	8.00
	<10 kDa MHII Fraction	8.00
	Acetonitrile Treated <10 kDa MHII Fraction
	Aqueous Layer	0.03
	Organic Layer	4.00
	Organic Layer, Proteinase K Digested	4.00
	Organic layer, Sodium Periodate Treated	4.00
	Supplemented RPMI
	Non-Essential Amino Acid Solution	0.78
	Essential Amino Acid Solution	1.56
	L-Arginine (0.5 mM)	0.05
	Glutamic Acid (0.5 mM)	0.05
	Glycine (0.5 mM)	0.05
	Leucine (1 mM)	0.05
	L-Histidine (0.5 mM)	1.56
	L-Tryptophan (0.125 mM)	1.56

MICs were performed against HUMC1 in RPMI, unless otherwise specified, to determine which component of MEM inhibits the activity of RBT. The MIC for CCCP and thioridazine alone are 8 and 64 μg/mL respectively.

TABLE 13

Rifabutin MICs against A. baumannii AB5075
transposon disruption mutants

Disrupted

RBT (μg/mL)

	Strain	Gene	MHII	RPMI

HUMC1		6.25	0.05
AB5075-UW		6.25	0.05
AB00188	aroP	3.13	0.05
AB00190	aroP	6.25	0.05
AB03015	aroP	6.25	0.05
AB02204	aroP	6.25	0.05
AB09979	aroP	0.78	0.05
AB09980	tryP	3.13	0.05
AB00215	tryP	6.25	0.05
AB03612	hisM	3.13	0.05
AB03616	hisM	6.25	0.05
AB03618	hisM	6.25	0.05
AB06383	hisJ	6.25	0.05
AB07813	mtr	25	0.05
AB02205	aroP	3.13	0.05
AB07354	aroP	6.25	0.05
AB07356	aroP	1.56	0.05
AB09982	tryP	6.25	0.05
AB00216	tryP	1.56	0.05
AB06392	hisP	0.78	0.05
AB06386	hisP	0.78	0.05
AB06105	aroP	3.13	0.05
AB03608	hisJ	3.13	0.05

Mutants were deficient in amino acid transport genes. MIC assay was done in both MHII and RPMI media. AB5075-UW is the parent strain for the transposon mutants.
Rifabutin MICs against A. baumannii AB5075 transposon disruption mutants. Mutants were deficient in amino acid transport genes. MIC assay was done in both MHII and RPMI media. AB5075-UW is the parent strain for the transposon mutants.

TABLE 14

Rifabutin MICs against A. baumannii AB5075 transposon
disruption mutants

Strain	AB locus	Disrupted gene	MHII	RPMI

AB05672	ABUW_2165		6.25	3.13
AB05673	ABUW_2165		3.13	3.13
AB05674	ABUW_2165		3.13	1.56
AB10057	ABUW_3811	DID	3.13	0.05
AB10058	ABUW_3811		3.13	0.05
AB06731	ABUW_2557	hypothetical	3.13	0.05
		protein(epoxyqueuosine
		reductase QueH)
AB06732	ABUW_2557		6.25	0.05
AB06076	ABUW_2318	cytosine permease	3.13	0.05
AB06077	ABUW_2318		1.56	0.05
AB05837	ABUW_2228	TonB-dependent receptor	3.13	0.05
AB05838	ABUW_2228		3.13	0.05
AB05361	ABUW_2062	phospholipase D family	1.56	0.05
		protein
AB05362	ABUW_2062		1.56	0.05
AB07566	ABUW_2893	hypothetical protein	0.78	0.05
AB07567	ABUW_2893		0.78	0.05
AB02034	ABUW_0745	hypothetical protein	0.78	0.05
AB02035	ABUW_0745		1.56	0.05
AB09112	ABUW_3470	Zn-dependent hydrolase	0.78	0.05
AB09114	ABUW_3470		0.78	0.05
AB01188	ABUW_0449	hypothetical protein	1.56	0.05
AB01192	ABUW_0449		1.56	0.05
AB04576	ABUW_1741	outer membrane protein	1.56	0.05
		assembly factor BamA
AB05479	ABUW_2100	LysR family	3.13	0.05
		transcriptional regulator
AB05480	ABUW_2100		1.56	0.05
AB05756	ABUW_2194	acyl-CoA	1.56	0.05
		dehydrogenase
AB05757	ABUW_2194		6.25	0.05
AB06047	ABUW_2307	biotin synthase	0.05	0.05
AB06049	ABUW_2307		0.05	0.05
AB06089	ABUW_2322	integrase	3.13	0.05
AB06091	ABUW_2322		6.25	0.05
AB05348	ABUW_2057	alcohol dehydrogenase	1.56	0.05
AB05089	ABUW_1933	NADP-dependent fatty	1.56	0.05
		aldehyde dehydrogenase
AB04593	ABUW_1750	HAD-superfamiy	3.13	0.05
		hydrolase
AB04594	ABUW_1750		3.13	0.05
AB02891	ABUW_1069	NADH dehydrogenase	3.13	0.05
AB02892	ABUW_1069		6.25	0.05
AB06694	ABUW_2539	IS4 family transposase	3.13	0.05
AB06695	ABUW_2539		3.13	0.05
AB01494	ABUW_0559	putative phage-related	3.13	0.05
		membrane protein
AB01495	ABUW_0559		6.25	0.05
AB06821	ABUW_2586	allophanate hydrolase	3.13	0.05
AB06822	ABUW_2586		3.13	0.05
AB04749	ABUW_1817	putative	3.13	0.05
		peroxidase(alpha/beta
		hydrolase)
AB04750	ABUW_1817		3.13	0.05

MIC assay was done by culturing the bacteria in either MHII or RPMI media.
Lastly, the Inventors sought to measure the accumulation of RBT in the cell by LC/MS/MS (FIG. 8A). Bacteria were incubated in RPMI with or without amino acid supplementation and treated with RBT. The Inventors observed a greater reduction in CFUs when bacteria were cultured in RPMI alone at the 8 and 24 hrs timepoints (FIG. 8B). CFU number was inversely correlated with intracellular drug accumulation which indicates that inhibition of RBT entry into the cell resulted in a greater number of surviving bacteria (FIG. 8A-B). To test if RBT was functioning by inhibiting transcriptions, as compared to an uncharacterized mechanism of action, the Inventors challenged a GFP expressing reporter strain with RBT in RPMI with and without amino acid supplementation. The Inventors observed that the greater inhibition of transcription was consistent with the intracellular accumulation of RBT in RPMI vs RPMI supplemented with amino acids (FIG. 8C).

Example 16

In vivo RBT Activity
The Inventors next evaluated if the potent activity of RBT would translate to enhanced efficacy vs. RIF in in vivo mouse models of disease. The Inventors first tested the efficacy of the RBT vs. RIF in an A. baumannii pneumonia model. Mice were infected with A. baumannii HUMC1 and treated with treated with 10/mg/kg/day RIF or RBT for 3 days. At 24 hours, RBT-treated mice had a 7-log reduction in the median CFUs in the blood as compared to RIF-treated mice. There was a modest improvement in survival as well. (FIG. 9A-B).
The Inventors repeated the experiment with a reduced dose of each drug to determine if the efficacy difference would be enhanced (presuming greater potency of RFB vs. RIF). Mice were infected and treated with 5 mg/kg/daily of either drug or placebo for 3 days, and lungs were harvested and the bacterial density of the organs was quantified. RBT-treated mice had significantly reduced lung CFUs and significantly improved survival (FIG. 9C-D). Mice that were treated with 5 mg/kg of RIF did not do any better as compared to the PBS control group. This experiment validated the initial mouse experiment and the Inventors' hypothesis that RBT is more potent in vivo as compared to RIF.
Next, the Inventors tested if RBT was more effective than RIF in an intravenous model of infection. Mice were infected IV with HUMC1 and treated with 10/mg/kg/day RIF or RBT for 3 days. At 1 hour, RBT-treated mice had significantly lower CFUs in the blood as compared to RIF-treated mice. Additionally there was also a significant improvement in survival as well. (FIG. 9E-F). The Inventors tested the minimum dose required for RBT or RIF would allow for protection in an IV infection model. The Inventors found that RBT was fully protective when dosed at 100× lower concentration as compared to RIF which was only partially protective (FIG. 9G).
Additionally, the Inventors observed that RBT was more effective as compared to RIF in a murine neuropenic lung infection model. Lastly, multiple doses of RBT and RIF were tested in a G. mellonella infection model. Consistent with dose titration studies that were one in mice, the Inventors also observed that RBT was protective at significantly lower doses as compared to RIF.
The Inventors identified that the LAC-4 strain was not hypersensitive to RBT and was equally sensitive to RBT and RIF in the RPMI MIC assay. The Inventors then tested if this equal susceptibility phenotype would be reproduced in vivo. Consistent with the in vitro RPMI MIC data, there was no difference in efficacy of RBT or RIF against LAC-4. There was also no difference in efficacy of RBT vs RIF against LAC-4 in a G. mellonella infection model.

Example 17

DISCUSSION

A. baumannii is one of the few bacteria strains of which have developed resistance to all available antibiotics. National surveillance data confirm that an astonishing 50% of A. baumannii isolates from US intensive care units are XDR, far higher than for other pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20%) or Klebsiella spp. (10%). Approximately 23,000 and cases of XDR A. baumannii infections occur annually in the US and globally (in developed countries), respectively.
High throughput chemical screening assays have been a standard practice for the pharmaceutical industry for decades. However, these libraries have been screened many times, and rarely do new screens of the same library identify novel compounds that have not been previously identified. One fundamental limitation is that the culture conditions will influence the physiologic state of the bacteria. A change in cellular physiology could alter the availability of the drug target or affect drug metabolism. This may result in a culture-dependent susceptible phenotype that selects for false positives or a resistant phenotype that selects for false negatives. Changes in the carbon source during culture can result in significant overall changes in both gene expression and protein translation. These metabolic changes have been shown to have direct effects on antibiotic activity. A significant amount of time, labor, and financial resources may have been lost to the characterization of drug candidates that target a metabolic process that is active in vitro but not in vivo.
The modification of in vitro culture conditions to best reflect in vivo conditions are needed for the best chance of success. For example, some pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb), are likely to reside in host macrophages which constitute a significantly different environment as compared to nutrient rich broth culture of the bacteria alone. Modified screening protocols that involved screening chemicals against M. tb infected macrophages resulted in the identification of novel compounds. To identify rifabutin, the Inventors modified the culture conditions to better reflect the in vivo environment of a bloodstream infection by culturing the bacteria in a relatively nutrient depleted media with the addition of serum. The Inventors found that RFB was much more potent than RIF when tested in the depleted media plus serum but not in rich media. Validating the relevance of this approach is that RBT was also more effective in vivo when treating mice infected intravenously or with pneumonia caused by an XDR hyper-virulent clinical isolate of A. baumannii. This finding would not have been made had the initial screen been conducted with rich media.
The relative superiority of RFB over RIF is highly significant due to a recent, randomized, controlled clinical trial that found a non-significant trend to improved clinical cure, with a significant improvement in microbiological eradication when adding rifampin to colistin for treatment of XDR A. baumannii infections. paperpile.com/c/XyTdki/xEeXU, Given that RIF had some effect clinically, and that RFB appears far more potent and effective in pre-clinical models, the Inventors believe that the addition of adjunct RFB, as compared to RIF, could serve as a critically needed new therapeutic option for patients with infections caused by XDR A. baumannii, potentially resulting in superior survival compared to the current standard of care. As RBT is already commercially available, these results can be immediately translated.

Claims

1. A method of treatment treating a mammalian subject infected with Acinetobacter, comprising:

administering rifabutin to the mammalian subject, wherein the rifabutin is administered as a sole therapeutically active agent to treat the Acinetobacter, or the rifabutin is not co-administered with any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection.

2. (canceled)

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the rifabutin is administered as sole therapeutically active agent to treat said Acinetobacter infection.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the rifabutin is not co-administered with any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein Acinetobacter infection is Acinetobacter baumannii.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein rifabutin is administered to a human patient.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein the method comprises a time lag of at least about 48 h, preferably at least about 24 h, more preferably at least about 12 h, again more preferably about at least 8 h, again more preferably at least about 4 h is between administration of the rifabutin and administration of another antibiotic that is administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection in a human patient.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the Acinetobacter infection is caused by multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the Acinetobacter infection is an infection in respiratory tract, blood, circulation system, urinary tract, skin, surgical-site, or a combination thereof, of the human patient, or wherein meningitis is identified in the human patient.

10. (canceled)

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the rifabutin is administered in a dose of 60 mg to 600 mg per day.

12. A method of treating an Acinetobacter infection, comprising:

administering rifabutin to a human subject in need thereof, wherein rifabutin is administered in a daily dose of 60 mg to 600 mg and wherein the rifabutin is administered as a sole therapeutically active agent or the rifabutin is not co-administered with any other therapeutically active agent that is being administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the Acinetobacter infection is an infection caused by bacteria selected from the group consisting of Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter nosocomialis, and Acinetobacter pittii.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein the Acinetobacter infection is caused by multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter bacteria.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein the Acinetobacter infection is an Acinetobacter infection of the respiratory tract, blood (i.e. bacteremia), circulation system, urinary tract, skin, surgical-site, catheter-site, or a combination thereof, of the human subject, or wherein meningitis is identified in the human subject.

16. (canceled)

17. The method of claim 12, wherein the rifabutin is administered as the sole therapeutically active agent.

18. The method of claim 12, wherein the rifabutin is administered sequentially to another therapeutically active agent that is not co-administered to treat the same Acinetobacter infection.

19. (canceled)

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the mammalian subject after receiving an administered dosage of the rifabutin has a greater reduction in Acinetobacter amount compared to that in a control mammalian subject infected with the Acinetobacter but treated with rifampicin at the same dosage instead of the rifabutin.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the Acinetobacter amount in a log 10 scale in the mammalian subject after receiving the rifabutin is about 7-fold lower than that in the control mammalian subject treated with the rifampicin.

22. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring Acinetobacter amount in blood of the mammalian subject after the administration of the rifabutin.

23. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring Acinetobacter density in a sample of infected organ of the mammalian subject after the administration of the rifabutin.

24. The method of claim 1, further comprising detecting that the Acinetobacter amount in the mammalian subject after the administration of the rifabutin (i) is reduced compared to before the administration, (ii) the reduction in the mammalian subject is greater than that in a control mammalian subject infected with the Acinetobacter but treated with rifampicin at a same dosage as the rifabutin, or both (i) and (ii).