US20230374482A1 - Base editing enzymes - Google Patents

Base editing enzymes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20230374482A1
US20230374482A1 US18/326,440 US202318326440A US2023374482A1 US 20230374482 A1 US20230374482 A1 US 20230374482A1 US 202318326440 A US202318326440 A US 202318326440A US 2023374482 A1 US2023374482 A1 US 2023374482A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
endonuclease
seq
sequence
nucleic acid
engineered
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US18/326,440
Inventor
Brian C. THOMAS
Alan Brooks
Cristina Butterfield
Christopher Brown
Cindy CASTELLE
Jyun-Liang LIN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Metagenomi Inc
Original Assignee
Metagenomi Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metagenomi Inc filed Critical Metagenomi Inc
Priority to US18/326,440 priority Critical patent/US20230374482A1/en
Assigned to METAGENOMI, INC. reassignment METAGENOMI, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: THOMAS, BRIAN C., BROWN, CHRISTOPHER, LIN, Jyun-Liang, BROOKS, ALAN, BUTTERFIELD, CRISTINA, CASTELLE, Cindy
Publication of US20230374482A1 publication Critical patent/US20230374482A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/16Hydrolases (3) acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12N9/22Ribonucleases RNAses, DNAses
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/10Processes for the isolation, preparation or purification of DNA or RNA
    • C12N15/102Mutagenizing nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/111General methods applicable to biologically active non-coding nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C12N15/1137Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing against enzymes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/70Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for E. coli
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/85Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/85Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells
    • C12N15/86Viral vectors
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/87Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
    • C12N15/90Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/87Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
    • C12N15/90Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome
    • C12N15/902Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome using homologous recombination
    • C12N15/907Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome using homologous recombination in mammalian cells
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2497Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing N- glycosyl compounds (3.2.2)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/78Hydrolases (3) acting on carbon to nitrogen bonds other than peptide bonds (3.5)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • C12Y302/02Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2) hydrolysing N-glycosyl compounds (3.2.2)
    • C12Y302/02027Uracil-DNA glycosylase (3.2.2.27)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y305/00Hydrolases acting on carbon-nitrogen bonds, other than peptide bonds (3.5)
    • C12Y305/04Hydrolases acting on carbon-nitrogen bonds, other than peptide bonds (3.5) in cyclic amidines (3.5.4)
    • C12Y305/04004Adenosine deaminase (3.5.4.4)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2319/00Fusion polypeptide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2319/00Fusion polypeptide
    • C07K2319/01Fusion polypeptide containing a localisation/targetting motif
    • C07K2319/09Fusion polypeptide containing a localisation/targetting motif containing a nuclear localisation signal
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/20Type of nucleic acid involving clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats [CRISPRs]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2750/00MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA ssDNA viruses
    • C12N2750/00011Details
    • C12N2750/14011Parvoviridae
    • C12N2750/14111Dependovirus, e.g. adenoassociated viruses
    • C12N2750/14141Use of virus, viral particle or viral elements as a vector
    • C12N2750/14143Use of virus, viral particle or viral elements as a vector viral genome or elements thereof as genetic vector
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2800/00Nucleic acids vectors
    • C12N2800/10Plasmid DNA
    • C12N2800/106Plasmid DNA for vertebrates
    • C12N2800/107Plasmid DNA for vertebrates for mammalian
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2800/00Nucleic acids vectors
    • C12N2800/80Vectors containing sites for inducing double-stranded breaks, e.g. meganuclease restriction sites

Definitions

  • Cas enzymes along with their associated Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) guide ribonucleic acids (RNAs) appear to be a pervasive ( ⁇ 45% of bacteria, ⁇ 84% of archaea) component of prokaryotic immune systems, serving to protect such microorganisms against non-self nucleic acids, such as infectious viruses and plasmids by CRISPR-RNA guided nucleic acid cleavage. While the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) elements encoding CRISPR RNA elements may be relatively conserved in structure and length, their CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins are highly diverse, containing a wide variety of nucleic acid-interacting domains.
  • CRISPR Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • CRISPR DNA elements have been observed as early as 1987, the programmable endonuclease cleavage ability of CRISPR/Cas complexes has only been recognized relatively recently, leading to the use of recombinant CRISPR/Cas systems in diverse DNA manipulation and gene editing applications.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease.
  • said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
  • said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
  • said class 2, type II cas endonuclease comprises the aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned.
  • said endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NO: 72, or residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75 when optimally aligned.
  • said endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: an endonuclease having at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598 or a variant thereof, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • said endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II cas endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned.
  • said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51 or 385-390. In some embodiments, said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, said endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease.
  • said endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain.
  • said engineered guide ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising, an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to an endonuclease, wherein said engineered ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease configured to bind to said engineered guide ribonucleic acid; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease.
  • said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51 or 385-390.
  • said endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor is an adenine deaminase.
  • said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor is a cytosine deaminase.
  • said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • the system further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor coupled to said endonuclease or said base editor.
  • said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67.
  • said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises at least two ribonucleic acid polynucleotides.
  • said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises one ribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising said guide ribonucleic acid sequence and said tracr ribonucleic acid sequence.
  • said guide ribonucleic acid sequence is complementary to a prokaryotic, bacterial, archaeal, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, or human genomic sequence. In some embodiments, said guide ribonucleic acid sequence is 15-24 nucleotides in length.
  • said endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said NLS comprises a sequence with at least 90% identity to a selected from SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 or a variant thereof.
  • said endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to said base editor or covalently coupled to said base editor through a linker.
  • said endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73 or 78, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, residue 8 relative to SEQ ID NO: 77, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned.
  • said endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NO: 72, or residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75 when optimally aligned.
  • a polypeptide comprises said endonuclease and said base editor.
  • said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • said system further comprises a source of Mg 2+ .
  • said endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70, 71, 73, 74, 76, 78, 77, or 78 or a variant thereof;
  • said guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88, 89, 91, 92, 94, 96, 95, or 488;
  • said endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360, 361, 363, 365, 367, or 368; or
  • said base editor comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 58 or 595 or a variant thereof.
  • said endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70, 71, or 78 or a variant thereof;
  • said guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to non-degenerate nucleotides of at least one of SEQ ID NOs: 88, 89, or 96;
  • said endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360, 362, or 368; or
  • said base editor comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 594 or a variant thereof.
  • said sequence identity is determined by a BLASTP, CLUSTALW, MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm. In some embodiments, said sequence identity is determined by said BLASTP homology search algorithm using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment.
  • said endonuclease is configured to be catalytically dead. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • the present disclosure provides for a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid encodes a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, and wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the present disclosure provides for a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid encodes an endonuclease having at least 70% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78 coupled to a base editor.
  • said endonuclease comprises a sequence encoding one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease.
  • said NLS comprises a sequence with at least 90% identity to a selected from SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 or a variant thereof.
  • said organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • the present disclosure provides for a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the present disclosure provides for a vector comprising the nucleic acid of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • the vector further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to binding to said endonuclease.
  • the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus.
  • AAV adeno-associated virus
  • the present disclosure provides for a cell comprising the vector of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides for a method of manufacturing an endonuclease, comprising cultivating the cell of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides for a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising contacting said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to said endonuclease and said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a
  • said endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain is covalently coupled directly to said base editor or covalently coupled to said base editor through a linker.
  • said endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • the present disclosure provides for a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide, comprising contacting said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to said endonuclease and said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM); and wherein said PAM comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597.
  • a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, and an engineered
  • said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is covalently coupled to said base editor or coupled to said base editor through a linker.
  • said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95% identity to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor comprises an adenine deaminase; said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises an adenine; and modifying said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting said adenine to guanine.
  • said adenine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase; said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a cytosine; and modifying said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting said cytosine to uracil.
  • said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • said complex further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor coupled to said endonuclease or said base editor.
  • said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a first strand comprising a sequence complementary to a sequence of said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure and a second strand comprising said PAM.
  • said PAM is directly adjacent to the 3′ end of said sequence complementary to said sequence of said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure.
  • said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is not a Cas9 endonuclease, a Cas14 endonuclease, a Cas12a endonuclease, a Cas12b endonuclease, a Cas 12c endonuclease, a Cas12d endonuclease, a Cas12e endonuclease, a Cas13a endonuclease, a Cas13b endonuclease, a Cas13c endonuclease, or a Cas 13d endonuclease.
  • said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide is a eukaryotic, plant, fungal, mammalian, rodent, or human double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide.
  • the present disclosure provides for a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus said engineered nucleic acid editing system of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein, wherein said endonuclease is configured to form a complex with said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure, and wherein said complex is configured such that upon binding of said complex to said target nucleic acid locus, said complex modifies a nucleotide of said target nucleic locus.
  • said engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises an adenine deaminase, said nucleotide is an adenine, and modifying said target nucleic acid locus comprises converting said adenine to a guanine.
  • said engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises a cytidine deaminase and a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor, said nucleotide is a cytosine and modifying said target nucleic acid locus comprises converting said adenine to a uracil.
  • said target nucleic acid locus comprises genomic DNA, viral DNA, or bacterial DNA. In some embodiments, said target nucleic acid locus is in vitro.
  • said target nucleic acid locus is within a cell.
  • said cell is a prokaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, a eukaryotic cell, a fungal cell, a plant cell, an animal cell, a mammalian cell, a rodent cell, a primate cell, or a human cell.
  • said cell is within an animal.
  • said cell is within a cochlea.
  • said cell is within an embryo.
  • said embryo is a two-cell embryo. In some embodiments, said embryo is a mouse embryo.
  • delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering the nucleic acid of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein or the vector of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a nucleic acid comprising an open reading frame encoding said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said nucleic acid comprises a promoter to which said open reading frame encoding said endonuclease is operably linked.
  • delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a capped mRNA containing said open reading frame encoding said endonuclease. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a translated polypeptide. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure operably linked to a ribonucleic acid (RNA) pol III promoter.
  • DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
  • RNA ribonucleic acid
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease.
  • said endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: an endonuclease having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof, wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease.
  • said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • said endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease.
  • said endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain.
  • said tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489.
  • said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor is an adenine deaminase.
  • said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor is a cytosine deaminase.
  • said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: an endonuclease, wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in endonuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, wherein said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 385-386, 387-443, 444-447,488-475, or 595, or a variant thereof.
  • said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • said endonuclease is configured to be catalytically dead.
  • said endonuclease is a Cas endonuclease.
  • said Cas endonuclease is a Class II, type II Cas endonuclease or a Class II, type V Cas endonuclease.
  • said endonuclease comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • said Cas endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
  • said Cas endonuclease comprises the aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned.
  • said endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598.
  • said base editor is an adenine deaminase.
  • said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 385-443, or 448-475 or a variant thereof.
  • said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 385-390, or 595, or a variant thereof.
  • said base editor is a cytosine deaminase.
  • said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447 or a variant thereof.
  • the polypeptide further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor coupled to said endonuclease or said base editor.
  • said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • said endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N-or C-terminus of said endonuclease.
  • said NLS comprises a sequence with at least 90% identity to a selected from SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 or a variant thereof.
  • said endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to said base editor or covalently coupled to said base editor through a linker.
  • the present disclosure provides for a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid encodes a sequence having at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 385-386, 387-443, 444-447, or 488-475 or a variant thereof.
  • said organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • the present disclosure provides for a vector comprising the nucleic acid of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus.
  • AAV adeno-associated virus
  • the present disclosure provides for a cell comprising the vector of any one of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides for a method of manufacturing a base editor, comprising cultivating said cell of any one of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides for a system comprising: (a) the nucleic acid editing polypeptide of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein; and (b) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease.
  • said engineered guide ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489.
  • the present disclosure provides for a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus said engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein or said system of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein, wherein said complex is configured such that upon binding of said complex to said target nucleic acid locus, said complex modifies a nucleotide of said target nucleic locus.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease having at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78, wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising SEQ ID NOs: 360-368, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity; and (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising, (a) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to an endonuclease, wherein the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489; and a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease configured to bind to the engineered guide ribonucleic acid.
  • the endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51 and 385-475.
  • the base editor is an adenine deaminase.
  • the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57.
  • the base editor is a cytosine deaminase.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66.
  • the engineered nucleic acid editing system further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor.
  • the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67.
  • the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises at least two ribonucleic acid polynucleotides. In some embodiments, the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises one ribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising the guide ribonucleic acid sequence and the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is complementary to a prokaryotic, bacterial, archaeal, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, or human genomic sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is 15-24 nucleotides in length.
  • the endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N-or C-terminus of said endonuclease.
  • the endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker.
  • a polypeptide comprises the endonuclease and the base editor.
  • the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • the endonuclease comprises SEQ ID NO: 370.
  • the system further comprises a source of Mg 2+.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 70; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 88; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 360.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 71; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 89; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 361.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 73;
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 91; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 363.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 75; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 93; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 365.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 76; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 94; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 366.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 77; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 95; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 367.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 78;
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 96; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 368.
  • the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 57. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor comprises SEQ ID NO: 67.
  • sequence identity is determined by a BLASTP, CLUSTALW, MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm. In some embodiments, the sequence identity is determined by said BLASTP homology search algorithm using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment.
  • the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, and wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes an endonuclease having at least 70% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78 coupled to a base editor.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence encoding one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease.
  • the organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • the present disclosure provides a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the vector comprises the nucleic acid described herein.
  • the vector further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to binding to the endonuclease.
  • the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus.
  • the present disclosure provides a cell comprising the vector described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing an endonuclease, comprising cultivating the cell described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM).
  • the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker.
  • the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide, comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to the endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM); and wherein the PAM comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368.
  • a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to the endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribon
  • the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is covalently coupled to the base editor or coupled to the base editor through a linker.
  • the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95% identity to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1-51 and 385-475.
  • the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises an adenine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the adenine to guanine.
  • the adenine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57.
  • the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a cytosine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the cytosine to uracil.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66.
  • the complex further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor.
  • the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67.
  • the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a first strand comprising a sequence complementary to a sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure and a second strand comprising said PAM.
  • the PAM is directly adjacent to the 3′ end of the sequence complementary to the sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure.
  • the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is not a Cas9 endonuclease, a Cas14 endonuclease, a Cas12a endonuclease, a Cas12b endonuclease, a Cas 12c endonuclease, a Cas12d endonuclease, a Cas12e endonuclease, a Cas13a endonuclease, a Cas13b endonuclease, a Cas13c endonuclease, or a Cas 13d endonuclease.
  • the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide is a eukaryotic, plant, fungal, mammalian, rodent, or human double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein, wherein the endonuclease is configured to form a complex with the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure, and wherein the complex is configured such that upon binding of the complex to the target nucleic acid locus, the complex modifies a nucleotide of the target nucleic locus.
  • the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises an adenine deaminase, the nucleotide is an adenine, and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a guanine.
  • the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises a cytidine deaminase and a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor, the nucleotide is a cytosine and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a uracil.
  • the target nucleic acid locus comprises genomic DNA, viral DNA, or bacterial DNA. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus is in vitro.
  • the target nucleic acid locus is within a cell.
  • the cell is a prokaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, a eukaryotic cell, a fungal cell, a plant cell, an animal cell, a mammalian cell, a rodent cell, a primate cell, or a human cell. In some embodiments, the cell is within an animal.
  • the cell is within a cochlea. In some embodiments, the cell is within an embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a two-cell embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a mouse embryo. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering the nucleic acid described herein or the vector described herein. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a nucleic acid comprising an open reading frame encoding the endonuclease.
  • the nucleic acid comprises a promoter to which the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease is operably linked.
  • delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a capped mRNA containing the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease.
  • delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a translated polypeptide.
  • delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure operably linked to a ribonucleic acid (RNA) pol III promoter.
  • DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
  • RNA ribonucleic acid
  • the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78.
  • the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease having at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78, wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising SEQ ID NOs: 360-368, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51 and 385-475.
  • the base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57. In some embodiments, the base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the adenosine cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66.
  • FIG. 1 depicts typical organizations of CRISPR/Cas loci of different classes and types.
  • FIG. 2 shows the structure of a base editor plasmid containing a T7 promoter driving expression of the systems described herein.
  • FIG. 3 shows plasmid maps for systems described herein.
  • MGA contains TadA* (from ABE8.17m)-SV40 NLS and MGC contains APOBEC1 (from BE3) linked to a uracil glycosylase inhibitor and an SV40 NLS.
  • FIG. 4 shows predicted catalytic residues in the RuvCI domains of selected endonucleases described herein which are mutated to disrupt nuclease activity to generate nickase enzymes.
  • FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary method for cloning a single guide RNA expression cassette into the systems described herein.
  • One fragment comprises a T7 promoter plus spacer.
  • the other fragment comprises spacer plus single guide scaffold sequence plus bidirectional terminator.
  • the fragments are assembled into expression plasmids, resulting in functional constructs that can simultaneously express sgRNAs and base editors.
  • FIGS. 6 A and 6 B show sgRNA designs for lacZ targeting in E. coli.
  • the spacer length used for the systems described herein was 22 nucleotides.
  • three sgRNAs targeting lacZ in E. coli were designed to determine editing windows.
  • FIG. 7 shows the nickase activity of selected mutated effectors.
  • 600 bp double-stranded DNA fragments labeled with a fluorophore (6-FAM) on both 5′ ends were incubated with purified enzymes supplemented with their cognate sgRNAs. The reaction products were resolved on a 10% TBE-Urea denaturing gel. Double-stranded cleavage yields bands of 400 and 200 bases.
  • Nickase activity yields bands of 600 and 200 bases.
  • FIGS. 8 A, 8 B, and 8 C show Sanger sequencing results demonstrating base edits by selected systems described herein.
  • FIG. 9 shows how the systems described herein expand base-editing capabilities with the endonucleases and base editors described herein.
  • FIGS. 10 A and 10 B show base editing efficiencies of adenine base editors (ABEs) comprising TadA (ABE8.17m) and MG nickases.
  • TadA is a tRNA adenine deaminase
  • TadA is an engineered variant of E. coli TadA.
  • 12 MG nickases fused with TadA (ABE8.17m) were constructed and tested in E. coli.
  • Three guides were designed to target lacZ. Numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of A to G conversion quantified by Edit R. ABE8.17m was used as the positive control for the experiment.
  • FIGS. 11 A and 11 B show base editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors (CBEs) comprising rat APOBEC1, MG nickases, and the uracil glycosylase inhibitor of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage (UGI (PBS1)).
  • CBEs cytosine base editors
  • APOBEC1 is a cytosine deaminase.
  • 12 MG nickases fused to rAPOBEC1 on their N-terminus and UGI on their C-terminus were constructed and tested in E. coli.
  • Three guides were designed to target lacZ. The numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of C to T conversion quantified by Edit R. BE3 was used as the positive control in the experiment.
  • FIG. 12 shows effects of MG uracil glycosylase inhibitors (UGIs) on the base-editing activities of CBEs.
  • Panel (a) depicts a graph showing base-editing activity of MGC15-1 and variants, which comprise an N-terminal APOBEC1, the MG15-1 nickase, and a C-terminal UGI. Three MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in E. coli.
  • Panel (b) is a graph showing base editing activity of BE3, which comprises an N-terminal rAPOBEC1, the SpCas9 nickase, and a C-terminal UGI. Two MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in HEK293T cells. Editing efficiencies were quantified by Edit R.
  • FIGS. 13 A and 13 B depict maps of edited sites showing editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors comprising A0A2K5RDN7, an MG nickases, and an MG UGI.
  • the constructs comprise an N-terminal A0A2K5RDN7, an MG nickases, and a C-terminal MG69-1. For simplicity, only the identities of MG nickases are shown in the figure.
  • BE3 was used as the positive control for base editing.
  • An empty vector was used for the negative control.
  • FIG. 14 shows a positive selection method for TadA characterization in E. coli.
  • Panel (a) shows a map of one plasmid system used for TadA selection.
  • the vector comprises CAT (H193Y), a sgRNA expression cassette targeting CAT, and an ABE expression cassette.
  • N-terminal TadA from E. coli and a C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) from Streptococcus pyogenes are shown.
  • Panel (b) shows sequencing traces demonstrating that when introduced/transformed into E. coli cells, the A2 position of CAT (H193Y)'s template strand is edited, reverting the H193Y mutant to wild type and restoring its activity.
  • FIG. 15 shows mutations caused by TadA enable high tolerance of chloramphenicol (Cm).
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where different concentrations of chloramphenicol were used to select for antibiotics resistance of E. coli. In this example, wild type and two variants of TadA from E. coli (EcTadA) were tested.
  • Panel (b) shows a results summary table demonstrating that ABEs carrying mutated TadA show higher editing efficiencies than the wild type. In these experiments, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 ⁇ g/mL Cm. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown in the table.
  • FIG. 16 A shows photographs of growth plates to investigate MG TadA activity in positive selection.
  • 8 MG68 TadA candidates were tested against 0 to 2 ⁇ g/mL of chloramphenicol (ABEs comprised N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase). For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 ⁇ g/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 16 B summarizes the editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates and demonstrates that MG68-3, and MG68-4 drove base edits of adenine.
  • FIG. 17 shows an improvement of base editing efficiency of MG68-4 nSpCas9 via D109N mutation on MG68-4.
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where wild type MG68-4 and its variant were tested against 0 to 4 ⁇ g/mL of chloramphenicol. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown. Adenine base editors in this experiment are comprise N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase.
  • Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates. Panel (b) demonstrates thatMG68-4 and MG68-4 (D109N) showed base edits of adenine, with the D109N mutant showing increased activity. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 ⁇ g/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 18 shows base editing of MG68-4 (D109N)_nMG34-1.
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates of an experiment where an ABE comprising N-terminal MG68-4 (D109N) and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase was tested against 0 to 2 ⁇ g/mL of chloramphenicol.
  • Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies with and without sgRNA. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 1 ⁇ g/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 19 shows 28 MG68-4 variants designed for improvements of MG68-4-nMG34-1 base editing activity (SEQ ID NOs: 448-475). 12 residues were selected for targeted mutagenesis to improve editing of the enzymes.
  • a “cell” generally refers to a biological cell.
  • a cell may be the basic structural, functional and/or biological unit of a living organism.
  • a cell may originate from any organism having one or more cells.
  • Some non-limiting examples include: a prokaryotic cell, eukaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, an archaeal cell, a cell of a single-cell eukaryotic organism, a protozoa cell, a cell from a plant (e.g., cells from plant crops, fruits, vegetables, grains, soy bean, corn, maize, wheat, seeds, tomatoes, rice, cassava, sugarcane, pumpkin, hay, potatoes, cotton, cannabis, tobacco, flowering plants, conifers, gymnosperms, ferns, clubmosses, hornworts, liverworts, mosses), an algal cell, (e.g., Botryococcus braunii, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Nannochloropsis gaditana
  • seaweeds e.g., kelp
  • a fungal cell e.g., a yeast cell, a cell from a mushroom
  • an animal cell e.g., a cell from an invertebrate animal (e.g., fruit fly, cnidarian, echinoderm, nematode, etc.)
  • a cell from a vertebrate animal e.g., fish, amphibian, reptile, bird, mammal
  • a cell from a mammal e.g., a pig, a cow, a goat, a sheep, a rodent, a rat, a mouse, a non-human primate, a human, etc.
  • a cell is not originating from a natural organism (e.g., a cell can be a synthetically made, sometimes termed an artificial cell).
  • nucleotide generally refers to a base-sugar-phosphate combination.
  • a nucleotide may comprise a synthetic nucleotide.
  • a nucleotide may comprise a synthetic nucleotide analog.
  • Nucleotides may be monomeric units of a nucleic acid sequence (e.g., deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA)).
  • nucleotide may include ribonucleoside triphosphates adenosine triphosphate (ATP), uridine triphosphate (UTP), cytosine triphosphate (CTP), guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates such as dATP, dCTP, dITP, dUTP, dGTP, dTTP, or derivatives thereof.
  • Such derivatives may include, for example, [ ⁇ S]dATP, 7-deaza-dGTP and 7-deaza-dATP, and nucleotide derivatives that confer nuclease resistance on the nucleic acid molecule containing them.
  • nucleotide as used herein may refer to dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (ddNTPs) and their derivatives.
  • ddNTPs dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates
  • Illustrative examples of dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates may include, but are not limited to, ddATP, ddCTP, ddGTP, ddITP, and ddTTP.
  • a nucleotide may be unlabeled or detectably labeled, such as using moieties comprising optically detectable moieties (e.g., fluorophores). Labeling may also be carried out with quantum dots.
  • Detectable labels may include, for example, radioactive isotopes, fluorescent labels, chemiluminescent labels, bioluminescent labels and enzyme labels.
  • Fluorescent labels of nucleotides may include but are not limited fluorescein, 5-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 2′7′-dimethoxy-4′5-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (JOE), rhodamine, 6-carboxyrhodamine (R6G), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA), 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), 4-(4′dimethylaminophenylazo) benzoic acid (DABCYL), Cascade Blue, Oregon Green, Texas Red, Cyanine and 5-(2′-aminoethyl)aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (EDANS).
  • FAM 5-carboxyfluorescein
  • JE 2′7′-dimethoxy-4′5-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein
  • rhodamine 6-carboxy
  • fluorescently labeled nucleotides can include [R6G]dUTP, [TAMRA]dUTP, [R110]dCTP, [R6G]dCTP, [TAMRA]dCTP, [JOE]ddATP, [R6G]ddATP, [FAM]ddCTP, [R110]ddCTP, [TAMRA]ddGTP, [ROX]ddTTP, [dR6G]ddATP, [dR110]ddCTP, [dTAMRA]ddGTP, and [dROX]ddTTP available from Perkin Elmer, Foster City, Calif; FluoroLink DeoxyNucleotides, FluoroLink Cy3-dCTP, FluoroLink Cy5-dCTP, FluoroLink Fluor X-dCTP, FluoroLink Cy3-dUTP, and FluoroLink Cy5-dUTP available from Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.; Fluorescein-15-d
  • Nucleotides can also be labeled or marked by chemical modification.
  • a chemically-modified single nucleotide can be biotin-dNTP.
  • biotinylated dNTPs can include, biotin-dATP (e.g., bio-N6-ddATP, biotin-14-dATP), biotin-dCTP (e.g., biotin-11-dCTP, biotin-14-dCTP), and biotin-dUTP (e.g., biotin-11-dUTP, biotin-16-dUTP, biotin-20-dUTP).
  • polynucleotide oligonucleotide
  • nucleic acid a polymeric form of nucleotides of any length, either deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides, or analogs thereof, either in single-, double-, or multi-stranded form.
  • a polynucleotide may be exogenous or endogenous to a cell.
  • a polynucleotide may exist in a cell-free environment.
  • a polynucleotide may be a gene or fragment thereof.
  • a polynucleotide may be DNA.
  • a polynucleotide may be RNA.
  • a polynucleotide may have any three-dimensional structure and may perform any function.
  • a polynucleotide may comprise one or more analogs (e.g., altered backbone, sugar, or nucleobase). If present, modifications to the nucleotide structure may be imparted before or after assembly of the polymer.
  • analogs include: 5-bromouracil, peptide nucleic acid, xeno nucleic acid, morpholinos, locked nucleic acids, glycol nucleic acids, threose nucleic acids, dideoxynucleotides, cordycepin, 7-deaza-GTP, fluorophores (e.g., rhodamine or fluorescein linked to the sugar), thiol containing nucleotides, biotin linked nucleotides, fluorescent base analogs, CpG islands, methyl-7-guanosine, methylated nucleotides, inosine, thiouridine, pseudouridine, dihydrouridine, queuosine, and wyosine.
  • fluorophores e.g., rhodamine or fluorescein linked to the sugar
  • thiol containing nucleotides biotin linked nucleotides, fluorescent base analogs, CpG islands, methyl-7-
  • Non-limiting examples of polynucleotides include coding or non-coding regions of a gene or gene fragment, loci (locus) defined from linkage analysis, exons, introns, messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), short interfering RNA (siRNA), short-hairpin RNA (shRNA), micro-RNA (miRNA), ribozymes, cDNA, recombinant polynucleotides, branched polynucleotides, plasmids, vectors, isolated DNA of any sequence, isolated RNA of any sequence, cell-free polynucleotides including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and cell-free RNA (cfRNA), nucleic acid probes, and primers.
  • the sequence of nucleotides may be interrupted by non-nucleotide components.
  • transfection or “transfected” generally refer to introduction of a nucleic acid into a cell by non-viral or viral-based methods.
  • the nucleic acid molecules may be gene sequences encoding complete proteins or functional portions thereof. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 18.1-18.88.
  • peptide “polypeptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein to generally refer to a polymer of at least two amino acid residues joined by peptide bond(s). This term does not connote a specific length of polymer, nor is it intended to imply or distinguish whether the peptide is produced using recombinant techniques, chemical or enzymatic synthesis, or is naturally occurring. The terms apply to naturally occurring amino acid polymers as well as amino acid polymers comprising at least one modified amino acid. In some cases, the polymer may be interrupted by non-amino acids. The terms include amino acid chains of any length, including full length proteins, and proteins with or without secondary and/or tertiary structure (e.g., domains).
  • amino acid polymer that has been modified, for example, by disulfide bond formation, glycosylation, lipidation, acetylation, phosphorylation, oxidation, and any other manipulation such as conjugation with a labeling component.
  • amino acid and amino acids generally refer to natural and non-natural amino acids, including, but not limited to, modified amino acids and amino acid analogues.
  • Modified amino acids may include natural amino acids and non-natural amino acids, which have been chemically modified to include a group or a chemical moiety not naturally present on the amino acid.
  • Amino acid analogues may refer to amino acid derivatives.
  • amino acid includes both D-amino acids and L-amino acids.
  • non-native can generally refer to a nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence that is not found in a native nucleic acid or protein.
  • Non-native may refer to affinity tags.
  • Non-native may refer to fusions.
  • Non-native may refer to a naturally occurring nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence that comprises mutations, insertions and/or deletions.
  • a non-native sequence may exhibit and/or encode for an activity (e.g., enzymatic activity, methyltransferase activity, acetyltransferase activity, kinase activity, ubiquitinating activity, etc.) that may also be exhibited by the nucleic acid and/or polypeptide sequence to which the non-native sequence is fused.
  • a non-native nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence may be linked to a naturally-occurring nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence (or a variant thereof) by genetic engineering to generate a chimeric nucleic acid and/or polypeptide sequence encoding a chimeric nucleic acid and/or polypeptide.
  • promoter generally refers to the regulatory DNA region which controls transcription or expression of a gene and which may be located adjacent to or overlapping a nucleotide or region of nucleotides at which RNA transcription is initiated.
  • a promoter may contain specific DNA sequences which bind protein factors, often referred to as transcription factors, which facilitate binding of RNA polymerase to the DNA leading to gene transcription.
  • a ‘basal promoter’ also referred to as a ‘core promoter’, may generally refer to a promoter that contains all the basic necessary elements to promote transcriptional expression of an operably linked polynucleotide.
  • Eukaryotic basal promoters typically, though not necessarily, contain a TATA-box and/or a CAAT box.
  • expression generally refers to the process by which a nucleic acid sequence or a polynucleotide is transcribed from a DNA template (such as into mRNA or other RNA transcript) and/or the process by which a transcribed mRNA is subsequently translated into peptides, polypeptides, or proteins.
  • Transcripts and encoded polypeptides may be collectively referred to as “gene product.” If the polynucleotide is derived from genomic DNA, expression may include splicing of the mRNA in a eukaryotic cell.
  • operably linked As used herein, “operably linked”, “operable linkage”, “operatively linked”, or grammatical equivalents thereof generally refer to juxtaposition of genetic elements, e.g., a promoter, an enhancer, a polyadenylation sequence, etc., wherein the elements are in a relationship permitting them to operate in the expected manner.
  • a regulatory element which may comprise promoter and/or enhancer sequences, is operatively linked to a coding region if the regulatory element helps initiate transcription of the coding sequence. There may be intervening residues between the regulatory element and coding region so long as this functional relationship is maintained.
  • a “vector” as used herein, generally refers to a macromolecule or association of macromolecules that comprises or associates with a polynucleotide and which may be used to mediate delivery of the polynucleotide to a cell.
  • vectors include plasmids, viral vectors, liposomes, and other gene delivery vehicles.
  • the vector generally comprises genetic elements, e.g., regulatory elements, operatively linked to a gene to facilitate expression of the gene in a target.
  • an expression cassette and “a nucleic acid cassette” are used interchangeably generally to refer to a combination of nucleic acid sequences or elements that are expressed together or are operably linked for expression.
  • an expression cassette refers to the combination of regulatory elements and a gene or genes to which they are operably linked for expression.
  • a “functional fragment” of a DNA or protein sequence generally refers to a fragment that retains a biological activity (either functional or structural) that is substantially similar to a biological activity of the full-length DNA or protein sequence.
  • a biological activity of a DNA sequence may be its ability to influence expression in a manner known to be attributed to the full-length sequence.
  • an “engineered” object generally indicates that the object has been modified by human intervention.
  • a nucleic acid may be modified by changing its sequence to a sequence that does not occur in nature; a nucleic acid may be modified by ligating it to a nucleic acid that it does not associate with in nature such that the ligated product possesses a function not present in the original nucleic acid; an engineered nucleic acid may synthesized in vitro with a sequence that does not exist in nature; a protein may be modified by changing its amino acid sequence to a sequence that does not exist in nature; an engineered protein may acquire a new function or property.
  • An “engineered” system comprises at least one engineered component.
  • synthetic and “artificial” are used interchangeably to refer to a protein or a domain thereof that has low sequence identity (e.g., less than 50% sequence identity, less than 25% sequence identity, less than 10% sequence identity, less than 5% sequence identity, less than 1% sequence identity) to a naturally occurring human protein.
  • VPR and VP64 domains are synthetic transactivation domains.
  • tracrRNA or “tracr sequence”, as used herein, can generally refer to a nucleic acid with at least about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 100% sequence identity and/or sequence similarity to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA sequence (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus , etc.).
  • tracrRNA can refer to a nucleic acid with at most about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% sequence identity and/or sequence similarity to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA sequence (e.g., a tracrRNA from S.
  • tracrRNA may refer to a modified form of a tracrRNA that can comprise a nucleotide change such as a deletion, insertion, or substitution, variant, mutation, or chimera.
  • a tracrRNA may refer to a nucleic acid that can be at least about 60% identical to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus, etc.) sequence over a stretch of at least 6 contiguous nucleotides.
  • a tracrRNA sequence can be at least about 60% identical, at least about 65% identical, at least about 70% identical, at least about 75% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 85% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, or 100% identical to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus , etc.) sequence over a stretch of at least 6 contiguous nucleotides.
  • Type II tracrRNA sequences can be predicted on a genome sequence by identifying regions with complementarity to part of the repeat sequence in an adjacent CRISPR array.
  • a “guide nucleic acid” can generally refer to a nucleic acid that may hybridize to another nucleic acid.
  • a guide nucleic acid may be RNA.
  • a guide nucleic acid may be DNA.
  • the guide nucleic acid may be programmed to bind to a sequence of nucleic acid site-specifically.
  • the nucleic acid to be targeted, or the target nucleic acid may comprise nucleotides.
  • the guide nucleic acid may comprise nucleotides.
  • a portion of the target nucleic acid may be complementary to a portion of the guide nucleic acid.
  • the strand of a double-stranded target polynucleotide that is complementary to and hybridizes with the guide nucleic acid may be called the complementary strand.
  • a guide nucleic acid may comprise a polynucleotide chain and can be called a “single guide nucleic acid.”
  • a guide nucleic acid may comprise two polynucleotide chains and may be called a “double guide nucleic acid.” If not otherwise specified, the term “guide nucleic acid” may be inclusive, referring to both single guide nucleic acids and double guide nucleic acids.
  • a guide nucleic acid may comprise a segment that can be referred to as a “nucleic acid-targeting segment” or a “nucleic acid-targeting sequence.”
  • a nucleic acid-targeting segment may comprise a sub-segment that may be referred to as a “protein binding segment” or “protein binding sequence” or “Cas protein binding segment”.
  • sequence identity in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, generally refers to two (e.g., in a pairwise alignment) or more (e.g., in a multiple sequence alignment) sequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a local or global comparison window, as measured using a sequence comparison algorithm.
  • Suitable sequence comparison algorithms for polypeptide sequences include, e.g., BLASTP using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment for polypeptide sequences longer than 30 residues; BLASTP using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 2, an expectation (E) of 1000000, and the PAM30 scoring matrix setting gap costs at 9 to open gaps and 1 to extend gaps for sequences of less than 30 residues (these are the default parameters for BLASTP in the BLAST suite available at blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov); CLUSTALW with parameters of; the Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm with parameters of a match of 2, a mismatch of ⁇ 1, and a gap of ⁇ 1; MUSCLE with default parameters; MAFFT with parameters retree of 2 and maxiterations of 1000; Novafold with default parameters; HMMER hmmalign with default
  • RuvC_III domain generally refers to a third discontinuous segment of a RuvC endonuclease domain (the RuvC nuclease domain being comprised of three discontiguous segments, RuvC_I, RuvC_II, and RuvC_III).
  • a RuvC domain or segments thereof can generally be identified by alignment to known domain sequences, structural alignment to proteins with annotated domains, or by comparison to Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) built based on known domain sequences (e.g., Pfam HMM PF18541 for RuvC_III).
  • HNH domain generally refers to an endonuclease domain having characteristic histidine and asparagine residues.
  • An HNH domain can generally be identified by alignment to known domain sequences, structural alignment to proteins with annotated domains, or by comparison to Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) built based on known domain sequences (e.g., Pfam HMM PF01844 for domain HNH).
  • HMMs Hidden Markov Models
  • base editor generally refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of one target base or base pair into another (e.g. A:T to G:C, C:G to T:A) without requiring the creation and repair of a double-strand break.
  • the base editor is a deaminase.
  • the term “deaminase” generally refers to a protein or enzyme that catalyzes a deamination reaction.
  • the deaminase is an adenosine deaminase, which catalyzes the hydrolytic deamination of adenine or adenosine (e.g., an engineered adenosine deaminase that deaminates adenosine in DNA).
  • the deaminase or deaminase domain is a cytidine (or cytosine) deaminase, catalyzing the hydrolytic deamination of cytidine (or cytosine) or deoxycytidine to uridine (or uracil) or deoxyuridine, respectively.
  • the deaminase or deaminase domain is a cytidine (or cytosine) deaminase domain, catalyzing the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine (or cytosine) to uracil (or uridine).
  • the deaminase or deaminase domain is a naturally-occurring deaminase from an organism, such as a human, chimpanzee, gorilla, monkey, cow, dog, rat, mouse, or bacterium (e.g. E. coli ). In some embodiments, the deaminase or deaminase domain is a variant of a naturally-occurring deaminase from an organism that does not occur in nature.
  • optically aligned in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, generally refers to two (e.g., in a pairwise alignment) or more (e.g., in a multiple sequence alignment) sequences that have been aligned to maximal correspondence of amino acids residues or nucleotides, for example, as determined by the alignment producing a highest or “optimized” percent identity score.
  • variants of any of the enzymes described herein with one or more conservative amino acid substitutions can be made in the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide without disrupting the three-dimensional structure or function of the polypeptide.
  • Conservative substitutions can be accomplished by substituting amino acids with similar hydrophobicity, polarity, and R chain length for one another. Additionally, or alternatively, by comparing aligned sequences of homologous proteins from different species, conservative substitutions can be identified by locating amino acid residues that have been mutated between species (e.g., non-conserved residues) without altering the basic functions of the encoded proteins.
  • Such conservatively substituted variants may include variants with at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99% identity to any one of the endonuclease protein sequences described herein.
  • such conservatively substituted variants are functional variants.
  • Such functional variants can encompass sequences with substitutions such that the activity of one or more critical active site residues or guide RNA binding residues of the endonuclease are not disrupted.
  • a decreased activity variant as a protein described herein comprises a disrupting substitution of at least one, at least two, or all three catalytic residues.
  • any of the endonucleases described herein can comprise a nickase mutation.
  • any of the endonucleases described herein can comprise a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity.
  • any of the endonucleases described herein can be configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, any of the endonucleases described herein can comprise can be configured to lack endonuclease activity or be catalytically dead.
  • CRISPR/Cas systems are RNA-directed nuclease complexes that have been described to function as an adaptive immune system in microbes.
  • CRISPR/Cas systems occur in CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) operons or loci, which generally comprise two parts: (i) an array of short repetitive sequences (30-40 bp) separated by equally short spacer sequences, which encode the RNA-based targeting element; and (ii) ORFs encoding the Cas encoding the nuclease polypeptide directed by the RNA-based targeting element alongside accessory proteins/enzymes.
  • Efficient nuclease targeting of a particular target nucleic acid sequence generally requires both (i) complementary hybridization between the first 6-8 nucleic acids of the target (the target seed) and the crRNA guide; and (ii) the presence of a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence within a defined vicinity of the target seed (the PAM usually being a sequence not commonly represented within the host genome).
  • PAM protospacer-adjacent motif
  • CRISPR-Cas systems are commonly organized into 2 classes, 5 types and 16 subtypes based on shared functional characteristics and evolutionary similarity (see FIG. 1 ).
  • Class I CRISPR-Cas systems have large, multisubunit effector complexes, and comprise Types I, III, and IV.
  • Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are considered of moderate complexity in terms of components.
  • the array of RNA-targeting elements is transcribed as a long precursor crRNA (pre-crRNA) that is processed at repeat elements to liberate short, mature crRNAs that direct the nuclease complex to nucleic acid targets when they are followed by a suitable short consensus sequence called a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM).
  • PAM protospacer-adjacent motif
  • This processing occurs via an endoribonuclease subunit (Cas6) of a large endonuclease complex called Cascade, which also comprises a nuclease (Cas3) protein component of the crRNA-directed nuclease complex.
  • Cas I nucleases function primarily as DNA nucleases.
  • Type III CRISPR systems may be characterized by the presence of a central nuclease, known as Cas10, alongside a repeat-associated mysterious protein (RAMP) that comprises Csm or Cmr protein subunits.
  • Cas10 central nuclease
  • RAMP repeat-associated mysterious protein
  • the mature crRNA is processed from a pre-crRNA using a Cas6-like enzyme.
  • type III systems appear to target and cleave DNA-RNA duplexes (such as DNA strands being used as templates for an RNA polymerase).
  • Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems possess an effector complex that consists of a highly reduced large subunit nuclease (csf1), two genes for RAMP proteins of the Cas5 (csf3) and Cas? (csf2) groups, and, in some cases, a gene for a predicted small subunit; such systems are commonly found on endogenous plasmids.
  • csf1 highly reduced large subunit nuclease
  • csf3 two genes for RAMP proteins of the Cas5
  • Casf2 Cas?
  • Class II CRISPR-Cas systems generally have single-polypeptide multidomain nuclease effectors, and comprise Types II, V and VI.
  • Type II CRISPR-Cas systems are considered the simplest in terms of components.
  • the processing of the CRISPR array into mature crRNAs does not require the presence of a special endonuclease subunit, but rather a small trans-encoded crRNA (tracrRNA) with a region complementary to the array repeat sequence; the tracrRNA interacts with both its corresponding effector nuclease (e.g. Cas9) and the repeat sequence to form a precursor dsRNA structure, which is cleaved by endogenous RNAse III to generate a mature effector enzyme loaded with both tracrRNA and crRNA.
  • Cas II nucleases are known as DNA nucleases.
  • Type 2 effectors generally exhibit a structure consisting of a RuvC-like endonuclease domain that adopts the RNase H fold with an unrelated HNH nuclease domain inserted within the folds of the RuvC-like nuclease domain.
  • the RuvC-like domain is responsible for the cleavage of the target (e.g., crRNA complementary) DNA strand, while the HNH domain is responsible for cleavage of the displaced DNA strand.
  • Type V CRISPR-Cas systems are characterized by a nuclease effector (e.g. Cas12) structure similar to that of Type II effectors, comprising a RuvC-like domain. Similar to Type II, most (but not all) Type V CRISPR systems use a tracrRNA to process pre-crRNAs into mature crRNAs; however, unlike Type II systems which requires RNAse III to cleave the pre-crRNA into multiple crRNAs, type V systems are capable of using the effector nuclease itself to cleave pre-crRNAs. Like Type-II CRISPR-Cas systems, Type V CRISPR-Cas systems are again known as DNA nucleases.
  • Cas12 nuclease effector
  • Type V enzymes e.g., Cas12a
  • Cas12a some Type V enzymes appear to have a robust single-stranded nonspecific deoxyribonuclease activity that is activated by the first crRNA directed cleavage of a double-stranded target sequence.
  • Type VI CRIPSR-Cas systems have RNA-guided RNA endonucleases. Instead of RuvC-like domains, the single polypeptide effector of Type VI systems (e.g. Cas13) comprises two HEPN ribonuclease domains. Differing from both Type II and V systems, Type VI systems also appear to not need a tracrRNA for processing of pre-crRNA into crRNA. Similar to type V systems, however, some Type VI systems (e.g., C2C2) appear to possess robust single-stranded nonspecific nuclease (ribonuclease) activity activated by the first crRNA directed cleavage of a target RNA.
  • C2C2C2C2 some Type VI systems (e.g., C2C2) appear to possess robust single-stranded nonspecific nuclease (ribonuclease) activity activated by the first crRNA directed cleavage of a target RNA.
  • Class II CRISPR-Cas have been most widely adopted for engineering and development as designer nuclease/genome editing applications.
  • Jinek et al. Science. 2012 Aug. 17; 337(6096):816-21, which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
  • the Jinek study first described a system that involved (i) recombinantly-expressed, purified full-length Cas9 (e.g., a Class II, Type II Cas enzyme) isolated from S.
  • pyogenes SF370 (ii) purified mature ⁇ 42 nt crRNA bearing a ⁇ 20 nt 5′ sequence complementary to the target DNA sequence to be cleaved followed by a 3′ tracr-binding sequence (the whole crRNA being in vitro transcribed from a synthetic DNA template carrying a T7 promoter sequence); (iii) purified tracrRNA in vitro transcribed from a synthetic DNA template carrying a T7 promoter sequence, and (iv) Mg 2+ .
  • a linker e.g., GAAA
  • sgRNA single fused synthetic guide RNA
  • Base editing is the conversion of one target base or base pair into another (e.g. A:T to G:C, C:G to T:A) without requiring the creation and repair of a double-strand break.
  • the base editing may be achieved with the help of DNA and RNA base editors that allow the introduction of point mutations at specific sites, in either DNA or RNA.
  • DNA base editors may comprise a fusion of a catalytically inactive nuclease and a catalytically active base-modification enzyme that acts only on single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs).
  • RNA base editors may comprise of similar, RNA-specific enzymes. Base editing may increase the efficiency of gene modification, while reducing the off-target and random mutations in the DNA.
  • DNA base editors are engineered ribonucleoprotein complexes that act as tools for single base substitution in cells and organism. They may be created by fusing an engineered base-modification enzyme and a catalytically deficient Cas variant that cannot cut dsDNA, but it is able to unfold the dsDNA in a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence-dependent manner, such that a guide RNA can find its complementary target to indicate a ssDNA scission site. The guide RNA anneals to the complementary DNA, displacing a fragment of ssDNA and directing the Cas ‘scissors’ to the base modification site. The cellular repair machinery will repair the nicked non-edited strand using information from the complementary edited template.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • CBEs cytosine base
  • ABEs adenine base editors
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
  • the endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
  • the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease comprises a tracr sequence.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof, wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonu
  • the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease comprises a tracr sequence.
  • the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
  • the endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
  • the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease comprises a tracr sequence.
  • the endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
  • the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
  • the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain.
  • the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof.
  • the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising, (a) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to an endonuclease, wherein the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or
  • the endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360, 362, or 368.
  • the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor is an adenine deaminase.
  • the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor is a cytosine deaminase.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • the engineered nucleic acid editing system further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor.
  • the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises at least two ribonucleic acid polynucleotides. In some embodiments, the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises one ribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising the guide ribonucleic acid sequence and the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is complementary to a prokaryotic, bacterial, archaeal, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, or human genomic sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is 15-24 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N-or C-terminus of the endonuclease.
  • NLSs nuclear localization sequences
  • the NLS can comprise any of the sequences in Table 1 below, or a combination thereof:
  • the endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker.
  • linkers joining any of the enzymes or domains described herein can comprise one or multiple copies of a sequence having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGS, SGSETPGTSESATPESA, GSGGS, SGSETPGTSESATPES, SGGSS, or GAAA, or any other linker sequence described herein.
  • a polypeptide comprises the endonuclease and the base editor.
  • the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • the system further comprises a source of Mg 2+.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 70 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 88; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 360.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 71 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 89; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 361.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 73 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 91; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 363.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 75 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 93; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 365.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 76 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 94; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 366.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 77 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 95; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 367.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 78 or a variant thereof
  • the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 96; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 368.
  • the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 57 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 58 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor comprises SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • sequence identity is determined by a BLASTP, CLUSTALW, MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm. In some embodiments, the sequence identity is determined by said BLASTP homology search algorithm using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment.
  • the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, and wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes an endonuclease having at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof coupled to a base editor.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence encoding one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease.
  • the organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • the present disclosure provides a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the vector comprises the nucleic acid described herein.
  • the vector further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to binding to the endonuclease.
  • the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus.
  • the present disclosure provides a cell comprising the vector described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing an endonuclease, comprising cultivating the cell described herein.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM).
  • the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker.
  • the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide, comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to the endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM); and wherein the PAM comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598 or a variant thereof.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is covalently coupled to the base editor or coupled to the base editor through a linker.
  • the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises an adenine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the adenine to guanine.
  • the adenine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a cytosine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the cytosine to uracil.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58 or a variant thereof.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66 or a variant thereof.
  • the complex further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor.
  • the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a first strand comprising a sequence complementary to a sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure and a second strand comprising said PAM.
  • the PAM is directly adjacent to the 3′ end of the sequence complementary to the sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure.
  • the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is not a Cas9 endonuclease, a Cas14 endonuclease, a Cas12a endonuclease, a Cas12b endonuclease, a Cas 12c endonuclease, a Cas12d endonuclease, a Cas12e endonuclease, a Cas13a endonuclease, a Cas13b endonuclease, a Cas13c endonuclease, or a Cas 13d endonuclease.
  • the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide is a eukaryotic, plant, fungal, mammalian, rodent, or human double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide.
  • the present disclosure provides a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein, wherein the endonuclease is configured to form a complex with the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure, and wherein the complex is configured such that upon binding of the complex to the target nucleic acid locus, the complex modifies a nucleotide of the target nucleic locus.
  • the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises an adenine deaminase, the nucleotide is an adenine, and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a guanine.
  • the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises a cytidine deaminase and a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor, the nucleotide is a cytosine and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a uracil.
  • the target nucleic acid locus comprises genomic DNA, viral DNA, or bacterial DNA. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus is in vitro.
  • the target nucleic acid locus is within a cell.
  • the cell is a prokaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, a eukaryotic cell, a fungal cell, a plant cell, an animal cell, a mammalian cell, a rodent cell, a primate cell, or a human cell. In some embodiments, the cell is within an animal.
  • the cell is within a cochlea. In some embodiments, the cell is within an embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a two-cell embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a mouse embryo. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering the nucleic acid described herein or the vector described herein. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a nucleic acid comprising an open reading frame encoding the endonuclease.
  • the nucleic acid comprises a promoter to which the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease is operably linked.
  • delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a capped mRNA containing the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease.
  • delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a translated polypeptide.
  • delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure operably linked to a ribonucleic acid (RNA) pol III promoter.
  • DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
  • RNA ribonucleic acid
  • the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity.
  • the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof, wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • PAM protospacer adjacent motif
  • the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain.
  • the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof.
  • the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor is an adenine deaminase.
  • the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof.
  • the base editor is a cytosine deaminase.
  • the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • Systems of the present disclosure may be used for various applications, such as, for example, nucleic acid editing (e.g., gene editing), binding to a nucleic acid molecule (e.g., sequence-specific binding).
  • nucleic acid editing e.g., gene editing
  • binding to a nucleic acid molecule e.g., sequence-specific binding
  • Such systems may be used, for example, for addressing (e.g., removing or replacing) a genetically inherited mutation that may cause a disease in a subject, inactivating a gene in order to ascertain its function in a cell, as a diagnostic tool to detect disease-causing genetic elements (e.g. via cleavage of reverse-transcribed viral RNA or an amplified DNA sequence encoding a disease-causing mutation), as deactivated enzymes in combination with a probe to target and detect a specific nucleotide sequence (e.g.
  • Cas effector enzymes were fused in various configurations to the exemplary deaminases described herein. This process involved a first stage of constructing vectors suitable for generating the fusion enzymes. Two entry plasmid vectors, MGA, and MGC, were first constructed.
  • MGA Metal adenine base editor
  • MGC Metal cytosine base editor
  • T7 promoter-His tag-APOBEC1 BE3
  • UGI-SV40 NLS UGI-SV40 NLS
  • source plasmids containing MG1-4, MG1-6, MG3-6, MG3-7, MG3-8, MG4-5, MG14-1, MG15-1, or MG18-1 effector gene sequences were amplified by Q5 DNA polymerase with forward primers incorporating appropriate mutations and reverse primers. The linear DNA fragments were then phosphorylated and ligated. The DNA templates were digested with DpnI using KLD Enzyme Mix (New England Biolabs) per the manufacturer's instructions.
  • genes were amplified from plasmids carrying mutated effectors and cloned into MGA and MGC entry plasmids via XhoI and SacII sites, respectively.
  • one set of primers (P366 as the forward primer) was used to amplify a T7 promoter-spacer sequence while another set of primers (P367 as the reverse primer) was used to amplify spacer sequence-sgRNA scaffold-bidirectional terminator, in which pTCM plasmids were used as templates (see FIG. 2 ).
  • the two fragments were assembled into pMGA and pMGC via XbaI sites, resulting pMGA-sgRNA and pMGC-sgRNA, respectively.
  • nMG1-4 1025 SEQ ID NO: 70 nMG1-6 (D13A) 1059 SEQ ID NO: 71 nMG3-6 (D13A) 1134 SEQ ID NO: 72 nMG3-7 (D12A) 1131 SEQ ID NO: 73 nMG3-8 (D13A) 1132 SEQ ID NO: 74 nMG4-5 (D17A) 1055 SEQ ID NO: 75 nMG14-1 (D23A) 1003 SEQ ID NO: 76 nMG15-1 (D8A) 1082 SEQ ID NO: 77 nMG18-1 (D12A) 1348 SEQ ID NO: 78
  • the T7 promoter driven mutated effector genes in the pMGA and pMGC plasmids were expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells in Magic Media per manufacturer's instructions (Thermo) by transformation with each of the respective plasmids described in Example 1 above. After a 40 hour incubation at 16° C.
  • the transformed cells were harvested, suspended in lysis buffer (HisTrap equilibration buffer: 20 mM Tris (Sigma T2319-100 ML), 300 mM sodium chloride (VWR VWRVE529-500 ML), 5% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl 2 , with 10 mM imidazole (Sigma 68268-100 ML-F); pH 7.5) and EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Pierce), and frozen in the ⁇ 80° C. freezer. The cells were then thawed on ice, sonicated, clarified, and filtered before affinity purification.
  • HisTrap equilibration buffer 20 mM Tris (Sigma T2319-100 ML), 300 mM sodium chloride (VWR VWRVE529-500 ML), 5% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl 2 , with 10 mM imidazole (Sigma 68268-100 ML-F); pH
  • the protein was applied to Cytiva 5 ml HisTrap FF column on the Akta Avant FPLC per the manufacturer's specifications and the protein was eluted in an isocratic elution of 20 mM Tris (Sigma T2319-100 ML), 300 mM sodium chloride (VWR VWRVE529-500 ML), 5% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl 2 , with 250 mM imidazole (Sigma 68268-100 ML-F); pH 7.5.
  • Eluted fractions containing the His-tagged effector proteins were concentrated and buffer exchanged into 50 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, 5% glycerol; pH 7.5.
  • the protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo) and adjusted after determining the relative purity by SDS PAGE densitometry in Image Lab (Bio-Rad) (see FIG. 7 ).
  • 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM) labeled primers P141 and P146 (SEQ ID NOs: 179 and 180) synthesized by IDT were used to amplify linear fragments of LacZ containing targeting sequences of effectors using Q5 DNA polymerase.
  • DNA fragments containing the T7 promoter followed by sgRNAs containing 20-bp or 22-bp spacer sequences were transcribed in vitro using HiScribe T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs) per manufacturer's instructions.
  • Synthetic sgRNAs with the sequences corresponding to the named sgRNAs in the sequence listing were purified by Monarch RNA Cleanup Kit (New England Biolabs) according to the users manual and concentrations were measured by Nanodrop.
  • each of the purified mutated effectors was first supplemented with its cognate sgRNA. Reactions were initiated by adding the linear DNA substrate in a 15 ⁇ L reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl 2 , and 100 mM NaCl, 150 nM enzyme, 150 nM RNA, and 15 nM DNA. The reaction was incubated at 37° C. for 2 h. Digested DNA was purified using AMPure XP SPRI paramagnetic beads (Beckman Coulter) and eluted with 6 ⁇ L TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA; pH 8.0).
  • the nicked DNA was resolved on a 10% TBE-Urea denaturing gel (Biorad) and imaged by ChemiDoc (Bio-Rad) (see FIG. 7 , which shows that the depicted enzymes display nickase activity by production of bands 600 and 200 bases versus 400 and 200 bases in the case of the wild-type enzyme).
  • Plasmids were transformed into Lucergen's electrocompetent BL21 (DE3) cells according to the manufacturer's instructions. After electroporation, cells were recovered with expression recovery media at 37° C. for 1 h and spread on LB plates containing 100 L/mg ampicillin and 0.1 mM IPTG. After overnight growth at 37° C., colonies were picked and lacZ gene was amplified by Q5 DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) with primers P137 and P360. The resulting PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing at ELIM BIOPHARM. Base edits were determined by examining whether there exists C to T conversion or A to G conversion in the targeted protospacer regions for cytosine base editors or adenine base editors, respectively.
  • plasmids were transformed into electrocompetent BL21 (DE3) (Lucergen) and the electroporated cells were recovered with expression recovery media at 37° C. for 1 h. 10 ⁇ L of recovered cells were then inoculated into 990 ⁇ L SOB containing 100 ⁇ L/mg ampicillin and 0.1 mM IPTG in a 96-well deep well plate, and grown at 37° C. for 20 h. 1 ⁇ L cells induced for base editor expression were used for amplification of the lacZ gene in a 20 ⁇ L PCR reaction (Q5 DNA polymerase) with primers P137 and P360. The resulting PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing at ELIM BIOPHARM. Quantification of editing efficiency was processed by Edit R as described in Example 12.
  • Nucleofection is conducted in mammalian cells (e.g. K-562, Neuro-2A or RAW264.7) according to the manufacturer's recommendations using a Lonza 4D nucleofector and the Lonza SF Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit S (cat. no. V4XC-2032).
  • 200,000 cells are resuspended in 5 ⁇ l of buffer per nucleofection.
  • 20 pmol of chemically modified sgRNA from Synthego is combined with 18 pmol of base editor enzymes (e.g. ABE8e) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature to complex.
  • Cells are added to the 20 ⁇ l nucleofection cuvettes, followed by protein solution, and the mixture is triturated to mix.
  • Cells are nucleofected with program CM-130, immediately after which 80 ⁇ l of warmed media is added to each well for recovery. After 5 min, 25 ⁇ l from each sample is added to 250 ⁇ l of fresh media in a 48-well poly-d-lysine plate (Corning). Cells are then treated in the same way as lipofected cells above for genomic DNA extraction after three more days of culture.
  • PCR products are pooled and purified by electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel using a Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs), eluting with 30 ⁇ l H2O.
  • DNA concentration is quantified with a Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (paired-end read, R1: 250-280 cycles, R2: 0 cycles) according to the manufacturer's protocols.
  • plasmids are assembled by the uracil-specific excision reagent (USER) cloning method.
  • Guide RNA plasmids for SpCas9, SaCas9 and all engineered variants are assembled. Plasmids for mammalian cell transfections are prepared using the ZymoPURE Plasmid Midiprep kit (Zymo Research Corporation).
  • HEK293T cells ATCC CRL-3216 are cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Corning) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (ThermoFisher Scientific) and maintained at 37° C. with 5% CO2.
  • HEK293T cells are seeded on 48-well poly-d-lysine plates (Corning) in the same culture medium. Cells are transfected 12-16 h after plating with 1.5 ⁇ l Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific) using 750 ng base editor plasmid, 250 ng guide RNA plasmid and 10 ng green fluorescent protein as a transfection control.
  • Lipofectamine 2000 ThermoFisher Scientific
  • Cells are cultured for 3 d with media exchanged following the first day, then washed with ⁇ ⁇ 1 PBS (ThermoFisher Scientific), followed by genomic DNA extraction by addition of 100 ⁇ l freshly prepared lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.05% SDS, 25 ⁇ g ml-1 proteinase K (ThermoFisher Scientific)) directly into each transfected well. The mixture is incubated at 37° C. for 1 h then heat inactivated at 80° C. for 30 min. Genomic DNA lysate is subsequently used immediately for high-throughput sequencing (HTS).
  • HTS high-throughput sequencing
  • HTS of genomic DNA from HEK293T cells is performed. Following Illumina barcoding, PCR products are pooled and purified by electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel using a Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (NEB), eluting with 30 ⁇ l H2O. DNA concentration is quantified with Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (paired end read, R1: 250-280 cycles, R2: 0 cycles) according to the manufacturer's protocols.
  • the cytosine showing the highest C-T conversion frequency in a specified sgRNA is normalized to 1, and other cytosines at positions spanning from 30 nt upstream to 10 nt downstream of the PAM sequence (total 43 bp) of the same sgRNA are normalized subsequently. Then normalized C-T conversion frequencies are classified and compared according to their positions for all tested sgRNAs of a specified base editor.
  • a comprehensive editing window (CEW) is defined to span positions with an average C-T conversion efficiency exceeding 0.6 after normalization.
  • C sites are initially classified according to their positions in sgRNA targeting regions and those positions containing at least one C site with ⁇ 0.8 normalized C-T conversion frequency are included in subsequent analysis. Selected C sites are then compared depending on base types upstream or downstream of the edited cytosine (NC or CN).
  • NC or CN edited cytosine
  • the substrate preference is evaluated by integrating respective NT- and CT-CBEs together. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA is used and p ⁇ 0.05 is considered as significant
  • Example 8a Testing Off-Target Analysis with Whole Genome Sequencing and Transcriptomics in Mammalian Cells (Prophetic)
  • HEK293T cells are plated on 48-well poly-d-lysine-coated plates 16 to 20 h before lipofection at a density of 3.104 cells per well in DMEM+GlutaMAX medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) without antibiotics.
  • 750 ng nickase or base editor expression plasmid DNA is combined with 250 ng of sgRNA expression plasmid DNA in 15 ⁇ l Opti-MEM+GlutaMAX. This is combined with 10 ⁇ l of lipid mixture, comprising 1.5 ⁇ l Lipofectamine 2000 and 8.5 ⁇ l Opti-MEM +GlutaMAX per well.
  • Cells are harvested 3 d after transfection and either DNA or RNA was harvested.
  • RNA analysis cells are washed once in PBS, and then lysed in 100 ⁇ l QuickExtract Buffer (Lucigen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • QuickExtract Buffer Lucigen
  • MagMAX mirVana Total RNA Isolation Kit Thermo Fisher Scientific is used with the KingFisher Flex.
  • Genomic DNA from mammalian cells is fragmented and adapter-ligated using the Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit (Illumina) using 96-well plate Nextera indexing primers (Illumina), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Library size and concentration is confirmed by Fragment Analyzer (Agilent) and DNA is sent to Novogene for WGS using an Illumina HiSeq system.
  • Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit Illumina
  • Nextera indexing primers Illumina
  • All targeted NGS data is analyzed by performing four general steps: (1) alignment; (2) duplicate marking; (3) variant calling; and (4) background filtration of variants to remove artifacts and germline mutations.
  • the mutation reference and alternate alleles are reported relative to the plus strand of the reference genome.
  • RNA selection is performed using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England BioLabs).
  • RNA library preparation is performed using NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs). Based on the RNA input amount, a cycle number of 12 is used for the PCR enrichment of adapter-ligated DNA.
  • NEBNext Sample Purification Beads (New England BioLabs) is used throughout for all of the size selection performed by this method.
  • NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina is used for the multiplex indexes in accordance with the PCR recipe outlined in the protocol.
  • RNA sequencing Prior to sequencing, samples are quality checked using the High Sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape on the 4200 TapeStation System (Agilent). The libraries are pooled and sequenced using a NovaSeq (Novogene). Targeted RNA sequencing is then performed. Complementary DNA is generated by PCR with reverse transcription (RT-PCR) from the isolated RNA using the SuperScript IV One-Step RT-PCR System with EZDnase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • RT-PCR reverse transcription
  • amplicons are barcoded and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq sequencer as described above.
  • Off-target DNA sequencing is performed using primers, using a two-step PCR and barcoding method to prepare samples for sequencing using Illumina MiSeq sequencers as above.
  • Transfected cells prepared as in Example 8a are harvested after 3 days and the genomic DNA isolated using the Agencourt DNAdvance Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • On-target and off-target genomic regions of interest are amplified by PCR with flanking HTS primer pairs.
  • PCR amplification is carried out with Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer's instructions using 5 ng of genomic DNA as a template.
  • Cycle numbers are determined separately for each primer pair as to ensure the reaction was stopped in the linear range of amplification (30, 28, 28, 28, 32, and 32 cycles for EMX1, FANCF, HEK293 site 2, HEK293 site 3, HEK293 site 4, and RNF2 primers, respectively).
  • PCR products are purified using RapidTips (Diffinity Genomics).
  • Purified DNA is amplified by PCR with primers containing sequencing adaptors.
  • the products are gel-purified and quantified using the Quant-iTTM PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher) and KAPA Library Quantification Kit-Illumina (KAPA Biosystems). Samples are sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq as previously described.
  • Sequencing reads are automatically demultiplexed using MiSeq Reporter (Illumina), and individual FASTQ files are analyzed with a custom Matlab script. Each read is pairwise aligned to the appropriate reference sequence using the Smith-Waterman algorithm. Base calls with a Q-score below 31 are replaced with N′s and are thus excluded in calculating nucleotide frequencies. This treatment yields an expected MiSeq base-calling error rate of approximately 1 in 1,000. Aligned sequences in which the read and reference sequence contained no gaps are stored in an alignment table from which base frequencies were tabulated for each locus. Indel frequencies were quantified with a custom Matlab script.
  • Sequencing reads are scanned for exact matches to two 10-bp sequences that flank both sides of a window in which indels might occur. If no exact matches were located, the read is excluded from analysis. If the length of this indel window exactly matched the reference sequence the read is classified as not containing an indel. If the indel window is two or more bases longer or shorter than the reference sequence, then the sequencing read is classified as an insertion or deletion, respectively.
  • a base editor consisting of a novel DNA targeting nuclease domain fused to a novel deaminase domain can be validated as a therapeutic candidate by testing in appropriate mouse models of disease.
  • PCSK9 is a validated drug target for the reduction of lipid levels in people at increased risk of cardiovascular disease due abnormally high plasma lipid levels (doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0107-8). Reducing the levels of PCSK9 via genome editing is expected to permanently lower lipid levels for the life-time of the individual thus providing a life-long reduction in cardiovascular disease risk.
  • One genome editing approach can involve targeting the coding sequence of the PCSK9 gene with the goal of editing a sequence to create a premature stop codon and thus prevent the translation of the PCSK9 mRNA into a functional protein.
  • Targeting a region close to the 5′ end of the coding sequence is useful in order to block translation of the majority of the protein.
  • To create a stop codon (TGA, TAA, TAG) with high efficiency and specificity will require targeting a region of the PCSK9 coding sequence wherein the editing window will be placed over an appropriate sequence such that the highest frequency editing event results in a stop codon.
  • the availability of multiple base editing systems with a wide range of PAMs or a base editing system with a degenerate PAM is useful to access a larger number of potential target sites in the PCSK9 gene.
  • additional editing systems wherein the frequency of off-target editing is low are also useful to perform gene editing in this context.
  • the efficiency of base editing required for a therapeutic effect is in the range of 50% or higher in order to achieve a significant reduction in plasma lipid levels.
  • An example of the use of a base editor to create a stop codon in the PCSK9 gene is that of Carreras et al (doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0624-2) in which between 10% and 34% of the PCSK9 alleles were edited to create a stop codon. While this level of editing was sufficient to result in a measurable reduction in plasma lipid levels in the mice, a higher editing efficiency will be required for therapeutic use in humans.
  • a screen may be performed in a mouse liver cell line such as Hepa1-6 cells.
  • In silico screening may first be used to identify guides that target the PCSK9 gene with the various BE systems available. To select among the large number of possible guides an in-silico analysis may be performed to determine which guides have an editing window that encompasses a sequence that when edited may create a stop codon. Preference may then be given to those guides that are closer to the 5′ end of the coding sequence. The resulting set of guides and BE proteins may be combined to form a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) and may be nucleofected into Hepal-6 cells. After 72 h the efficiency of editing at the target site may be determined by NGS analysis. Based on these in vitro results the one or more BE/guide combinations that resulted in the highest frequency of stop codon formation may be selected for in vivo testing.
  • RNP ribonucleoprotein complex
  • AAV Adeno Associated Virus
  • BE base editors
  • approaches that package BE into two AAV using split intein technology have been demonstrated to be successful in mice (doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0501-5), the need for 2 viruses complicates development and manufacture.
  • AAV genomes persist as episomes inside the nucleus of transduced cells and can be maintained for years which may result in the long-term expression of BE in these cells and thus an increased risk of off-target effects because the risk of an off-target event occurring is a function of the time over which the editing enzyme is active.
  • Ad Adenovirus
  • Ad5 can efficiently deliver DNA payloads to the liver of mammals and can package up to 45 kb of DNA.
  • adenoviruses are known to induce a strong immune response in mammals (dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.5.733), including in patients which can result in serious adverse events including death (doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.02.010).
  • Non-viral delivery vectors (reviewed in doi:10.1038/mt.2012.79) which include lipid nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles have several advantages compared to viral delivery vectors including lower immunogenicity and transient expression of the nucleic acid cargo.
  • the transient expression elicited by non-viral delivery vectors is particularly suited to genome editing applications because it is expected to minimize off target events.
  • non-viral delivery unlike viral vectors has the potential for repeat administration to achieve the therapeutic effect.
  • a BE may be delivered in vivo using a non-viral vector such as a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) by encapsulating a synthetic mRNA encoding the BE together with the guide RNA into the LNP.
  • LNP lipid nanoparticle
  • This can be performed using methodologies well known in the art, for example as described by Finn et al (DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.014) or Yin et al (doi:10.1038/nbt.3471).
  • LNP deliver their cargo primarily to the hepatocytes of the liver, which is also a target organ/cell type when attempting to interfere with the expression of the PCSK9 gene.
  • a BE comprised of a novel genome editing protein fused to a deaminase domain may be encoded in a synthetic mRNA and packaged in a LNP together with an appropriate guide RNA that targets the selected site in the PCSK9 gene of the mouse.
  • the guide may be designed to target only the human PCSK9 gene or both the human and mouse PCSK9 genes.
  • the editing efficiency at the on-target site in the genome of the liver cells may be analyzed by amplicon sequencing or other methods such as tracking of indels by decomposition (doi: 10.1093/nar/gku936).
  • the physiologic impact may be determined by measuring lipid levels in the blood of the mice, including total cholesterol and triglyceride levels using standard methods.
  • Primary Hyperoxaluria type I is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by defects in the AGXT gene that encodes the enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase. This results in a defect in glyoxylate metabolism and the accumulation of the toxic metabolite oxalate.
  • One approach to treating this disease is to reduce the expression of the enzyme glycolate oxidase (GO) that produces glyoxylate from glycolate and thereby reducing the amount of substrate (glyoxylate) available for the formation of oxalate.
  • GO glycolate oxidase
  • PH1 can be modeled in mice in which both copies of the AGXT gene have been knocked out (agxt ⁇ / ⁇ mice) resulting in a significant 3-fold increase in oxalate levels in the urine compared to wild type controls.
  • the agxt ⁇ / ⁇ mice can therefore be used to assess the efficacy of a novel base editor designed to create a stop codon in the coding sequence of the endogenous mouse GO gene.
  • a screen may be performed in a mouse liver cell line such as Hepal-6 cells. In silico screening may first be used to identify guides that target the GO gene with the various BE systems available.
  • an in-silico analysis may be performed to determine which guides have an editing window that encompasses a sequence that when edited may create a stop codon. Preference may then be given to those guides that are closer to the 5′ end of the coding sequence.
  • the resulting set of guides and BE proteins may be combined to form a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) and may be nucleofected in to Hepal-6 cells. After 72 h, the efficiency of editing at the target site may be determined by NGS analysis. Based on these in vitro results the one or more BE/guide combinations that resulted in the highest frequency of stop codon formation may be selected for in vivo testing in mice.
  • the BE and guide may be delivered to the mice using an AAV virus with a split intein system to express the BE and a 3rd AAV to deliver the guide.
  • an Adenovirus type 5 may be used to deliver the BE and guide in a single virus because of the >40 Kb packaging capacity of Adenovirus.
  • the BE may be delivered as a mRNA together with the guide RNA packaged in an appropriate LNP. After intravenous injection of the LNP into the agxt ⁇ / ⁇ mice the oxalate levels in the urine may be monitored over time to determine if oxalate levels were reduced which may indicate that the BE was active and had the expected therapeutic effect.
  • the appropriate region of the GO gene can be PCR amplified from the genomic DNA extracted from livers of treated and control mice.
  • the resultant PCR product can be sequenced using Next Generation Sequencing to determine the frequency of the sequence changes.
  • Tbp (tera base pairs) of proprietary and public assembled metagenomic sequencing data from diverse environments (soil, sediments, groundwater, thermophilic, human, and non-human microbiomes) were mined to discover novel deaminases.
  • HMM profiles of known deaminases were built and searched against all predicted proteins using HMMER3 (hmmer.org) to identify deaminases from our databases.
  • Predicted and reference (e.g., eukaryotic APOBEC1, bacterial TadA) deaminases were aligned with MAFFT and a phylogenetic tree was inferred using FastTree2.
  • Novel families and subfamilies were defined by identifying clades composed of sequences disclosed herein. Candidates were selected based on the presence of critical catalytic residues indicative of enzymatic function (see e.g. SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 385-386, 387-443, 444-447, or 488-475).
  • Plasmid DNA was amplified in Endura electrocompetent cells (Lucigen) and isolated by QlAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen).
  • Vector backbones were prepared by restriction enzyme digestion of plasmids. Inserts were amplified by Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) using primers ordered either from Elim BIOPHARM or IDT. Both vector backbones and inserts were purified by gel extraction using the Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research). One or multiple DNA fragments were assembled into the vectors through NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly (New England Biolabs) (SEQ ID NOs.483-487).
  • FIG. 8 shows example base edits by enzymes interrogated by this experiment, as assessed by Sanger sequencing.
  • FIG. 10 shows base editing efficiencies of adenine base editors (ABEs) using TadA (ABE8.17m) (SEQ ID NO: 596) and MG nickases according to Table 3.
  • TadA is a tRNA adenine deaminase
  • TadA is an engineered variant of E. coli TadA. Twelve MG nickases fused with TadA (ABE8.17m) were constructed and tested in E. coli. Three guides were designed to target lacZ. Numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of A to G conversion quantified by Edit R at each position. ABE8.17m was used as the positive control for the experiment.
  • FIG. 11 shows base editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors (CBEs) comprising rat APOBEC1, MG nickases, and uracil glycosylase inhibitor of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage (UGI (PBS1)).
  • CBEs cytosine base editors
  • APOBEC1 is a cytosine deaminase.
  • 12 MG nickases fused with rAPOBEC1 on N-terminus and UGI on C-terminus were constructed and tested in E. coli.
  • Three guides were designed to target lacZ. Numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of C to T conversion quantified by Edit R. BE3 was used as the positive control in the experiment.
  • FIG. 12 shows effects of MG uracil glycosylase inhibitors (UGIs) on base editing activity when added to CBEs.
  • MGC15-1 comprises of N-terminal APOBEC1, MG15-1 nickase, and C-terminal UGI. Three MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in E. coli.
  • BE3 comprises N-terminal rAPOBEC1, SpCas9 nickase, and C-terminal UGI. Two MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in HEK293T cells. Editing efficiencies were quantified by Edit R.
  • HEK293T cells were grown and passaged in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium plus GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco) at 37° C. with 5% CO 2 .
  • 5 ⁇ 10 4 cells were seeded on 96-well cell culture plates treated for cell attachment (Costar), grown for 20 to 24 h, and the spent media were refreshed with new media right before transfection. 200 ng expression plasmid and 1 ⁇ L lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific) were used for transfection per well per manufacturer's instructions.
  • Transfected cells were grown for 3 days, harvested, and gDNA was extracted with QuickExtract (Lucigen) per manufacturer's instructions.
  • Targeted regions for base edits were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) with primers listed in Tables 8 and 9 (SEQ ID NOs. 538-585) and extracted
  • PCR products were purified using the HighPrep PCR Clean-up System (MAGBIO) per manufacturer's instructions.
  • the effect of uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) on base editing of candidate enzymes was analyzed by submitting PCR products to Elim BIOPHARM for Sanger sequencing, and the efficiency was quantified by Edit R.
  • UMI uracil glycosylase inhibitor
  • DNA concentrations of the resulting products were quantified by TapeStation (Agilent), and samples were pooled together to prepare the library for NGS analysis.
  • the resulting library was quantified by qPCR with Aria Real-time PCR System (Agilent) and high through sequencing was performed with an Illumina Miseq instrument per manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing data was analyzed for base edits by Cripresso2.
  • FIG. 13 shows maps of sites targeted by base editors showing base editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors comprising CMP/dCMP-type deaminase domain-containing protein (uniprot accession A0A2K5RDN7), MG nickases, and MG UGI.
  • the constructs comprise N-terminal A0A2K5RDN7, MG nickases, and C-terminal MG69-1. For simplicity, only the identities of MG nickases are shown in the figure.
  • BE3 (APOBEC1) was used as a positive control for base editing. An empty vector was used for the negative control. Three independent experiments were performed on different days. Abbreviations: R, repeat; NEG, negative control.
  • FIG. 14 shows a positive selection method for TadA characterization in E. coli.
  • Panel (a) shows a map of one plasmid system used for TadA selection.
  • the vector comprises CAT (H193Y), a sgRNA expression cassette targeting CAT, and an ABE expression cassette.
  • N-terminal TadA from E. coli and a C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) from Streptococcus pyogenes are shown.
  • Panel (b) shows sequencing traces demonstrating that when introduced/transformed into E. coli cells, the A2 position of CAT (H193Y)'s template strand is edited, reverting the H193Y mutant to wild type and restoring its activity.
  • FIG. 15 shows mutations caused by TadA enable high tolerance of chloramphenicol (Cm).
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where different concentrations of chloramphenicol were used to select for antibiotics resistance of E. coli. In this example, wild type and two variants of TadA from E. coli (EcTadA) were tested.
  • Panel (b) shows a results summary table demonstrating that ABEs carrying mutated TadA show higher editing efficiencies than the wild type. In these experiments, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 ⁇ g/mL Cm. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown in the table, but effectors (SpCas9) and construct organization are shown in the figures above.
  • FIG. 16 shows investigation of MG TadA activity in positive selection.
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates from an experiment where 8 MG68 TadA candidates were tested against 0 to 2 ⁇ g/mL of chloramphenicol (ABEs comprised N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase). For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown.
  • Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates. Panel (b) demonstrates that MG68-3 and MG68-4 drove base edits of adenine. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 ⁇ g/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 17 shows an improvement of base editing efficiency of MG68-4_nSpCas9 via D109N mutation on MG68-4.
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where wild type MG68-4 and its variant were tested against 0 to 4 ⁇ g/mL of chloramphenicol. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown.
  • Adenine base editors in this experiment comprise N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase.
  • Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates.
  • Panel (b) demonstrates that MG68-4 and MG68-4 (D109N) showed base edits of adenine, with the D109N mutant showing increased activity. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 ⁇ g/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 18 shows base editing of MG68-4 (D109N) nMG34-1.
  • Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates of an experiment where an ABE comprising N-terminal MG68-4 (D109N) and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase was tested against 0 to 2 ⁇ g/mL of chloramphenicol.
  • Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies with and without sgRNA. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 1 ⁇ g/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 19 shows 28 MG68-4 variants designed for improvements of MG68-4-nMG34-1 base editing activity. 12 residues were selected for targeted mutagenesis to improve editing of the enzymes.

Abstract

The present disclosure provides for endonuclease enzymes having distinguishing domain features, as well as methods of using such enzymes or variants thereof.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE
  • This application is a continuation application of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 18/180,009, filed on Mar. 7, 2023, entitled “BASE EDITING ENZYMES”, which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/US2021/049962 filed Sep. 10, 2021, entitled “BASE EDITING ENZYMES”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/077,057, filed on Sep. 11, 2020, entitled “BASE EDITING ENZYMES”; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/222,351, filed on Jul. 15, 2021, entitled “BASE EDITING ENZYMES”, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Cas enzymes along with their associated Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) guide ribonucleic acids (RNAs) appear to be a pervasive (˜45% of bacteria, ˜84% of archaea) component of prokaryotic immune systems, serving to protect such microorganisms against non-self nucleic acids, such as infectious viruses and plasmids by CRISPR-RNA guided nucleic acid cleavage. While the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) elements encoding CRISPR RNA elements may be relatively conserved in structure and length, their CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins are highly diverse, containing a wide variety of nucleic acid-interacting domains. While CRISPR DNA elements have been observed as early as 1987, the programmable endonuclease cleavage ability of CRISPR/Cas complexes has only been recognized relatively recently, leading to the use of recombinant CRISPR/Cas systems in diverse DNA manipulation and gene editing applications.
  • SEQUENCE LISTING
  • The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in XML format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said XML copy, created on May 26, 2023, is named 55921-715_304_sl.xml and is 1,479,021 bytes in size.
  • SUMMARY
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system, comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II cas endonuclease comprises the aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NO: 72, or residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75 when optimally aligned. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: an endonuclease having at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598 or a variant thereof, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II cas endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51 or 385-390. In some embodiments, said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, said endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, said endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, said engineered guide ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising, an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to an endonuclease, wherein said engineered ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease configured to bind to said engineered guide ribonucleic acid; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51 or 385-390. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the system further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor coupled to said endonuclease or said base editor. In some embodiments, said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67. In some embodiments, said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises at least two ribonucleic acid polynucleotides. In some embodiments, said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises one ribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising said guide ribonucleic acid sequence and said tracr ribonucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, said guide ribonucleic acid sequence is complementary to a prokaryotic, bacterial, archaeal, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, or human genomic sequence. In some embodiments, said guide ribonucleic acid sequence is 15-24 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said NLS comprises a sequence with at least 90% identity to a selected from SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to said base editor or covalently coupled to said base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73 or 78, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, residue 8 relative to SEQ ID NO: 77, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NO: 72, or residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75 when optimally aligned. In some embodiments, a polypeptide comprises said endonuclease and said base editor. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, said system further comprises a source of Mg2+. In some embodiments: (a) said endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70, 71, 73, 74, 76, 78, 77, or 78 or a variant thereof; (b) said guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88, 89, 91, 92, 94, 96, 95, or 488; (c) said endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360, 361, 363, 365, 367, or 368; or (d) said base editor comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 58 or 595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments: (a) said endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70, 71, or 78 or a variant thereof; (b) said guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to non-degenerate nucleotides of at least one of SEQ ID NOs: 88, 89, or 96; (c) said endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360, 362, or 368; or (d) said base editor comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 594 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said sequence identity is determined by a BLASTP, CLUSTALW, MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm. In some embodiments, said sequence identity is determined by said BLASTP homology search algorithm using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to be catalytically dead. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid encodes a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, and wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid encodes an endonuclease having at least 70% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78 coupled to a base editor. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises a sequence encoding one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said NLS comprises a sequence with at least 90% identity to a selected from SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a vector comprising the nucleic acid of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein. In some embodiments, the vector further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to binding to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a cell comprising the vector of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a method of manufacturing an endonuclease, comprising cultivating the cell of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising contacting said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to said endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to said endonuclease and said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain is covalently coupled directly to said base editor or covalently coupled to said base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide, comprising contacting said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to said endonuclease and said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM); and wherein said PAM comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is covalently coupled to said base editor or coupled to said base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95% identity to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises an adenine deaminase; said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises an adenine; and modifying said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting said adenine to guanine. In some embodiments, said adenine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase; said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a cytosine; and modifying said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting said cytosine to uracil. In some embodiments, said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said complex further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor coupled to said endonuclease or said base editor. In some embodiments, said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a first strand comprising a sequence complementary to a sequence of said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure and a second strand comprising said PAM. In some embodiments, said PAM is directly adjacent to the 3′ end of said sequence complementary to said sequence of said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is not a Cas9 endonuclease, a Cas14 endonuclease, a Cas12a endonuclease, a Cas12b endonuclease, a Cas 12c endonuclease, a Cas12d endonuclease, a Cas12e endonuclease, a Cas13a endonuclease, a Cas13b endonuclease, a Cas13c endonuclease, or a Cas 13d endonuclease. In some embodiments, said class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, said double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide is a eukaryotic, plant, fungal, mammalian, rodent, or human double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus said engineered nucleic acid editing system of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein, wherein said endonuclease is configured to form a complex with said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure, and wherein said complex is configured such that upon binding of said complex to said target nucleic acid locus, said complex modifies a nucleotide of said target nucleic locus. In some embodiments, said engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises an adenine deaminase, said nucleotide is an adenine, and modifying said target nucleic acid locus comprises converting said adenine to a guanine. In some embodiments, said engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises a cytidine deaminase and a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor, said nucleotide is a cytosine and modifying said target nucleic acid locus comprises converting said adenine to a uracil. In some embodiments, said target nucleic acid locus comprises genomic DNA, viral DNA, or bacterial DNA. In some embodiments, said target nucleic acid locus is in vitro. In some embodiments, said target nucleic acid locus is within a cell. In some embodiments, said cell is a prokaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, a eukaryotic cell, a fungal cell, a plant cell, an animal cell, a mammalian cell, a rodent cell, a primate cell, or a human cell. In some embodiments, said cell is within an animal. In some embodiments, said cell is within a cochlea. In some embodiments, said cell is within an embryo. In some embodiments, said embryo is a two-cell embryo. In some embodiments, said embryo is a mouse embryo. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering the nucleic acid of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein or the vector of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a nucleic acid comprising an open reading frame encoding said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said nucleic acid comprises a promoter to which said open reading frame encoding said endonuclease is operably linked. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a capped mRNA containing said open reading frame encoding said endonuclease. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a translated polypeptide. In some embodiments, delivering said engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure operably linked to a ribonucleic acid (RNA) pol III promoter.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof, wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598, wherein said endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, said endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, said endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, said tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489. In some embodiments, said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease, wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in endonuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, wherein said base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 385-386, 387-443, 444-447,488-475, or 595, or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to be catalytically dead. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is a Cas endonuclease. In some embodiments, said Cas endonuclease is a Class II, type II Cas endonuclease or a Class II, type V Cas endonuclease. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises a sequence having at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said Cas endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some embodiments, said Cas endonuclease comprises the aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598. In some embodiments, said base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 385-443, or 448-475 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 385-390, or 595, or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, said cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the polypeptide further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor coupled to said endonuclease or said base editor. In some embodiments, said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N-or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said NLS comprises a sequence with at least 90% identity to a selected from SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to said base editor or covalently coupled to said base editor through a linker.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein said nucleic acid encodes a sequence having at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 385-386, 387-443, 444-447, or 488-475 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, said organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a vector comprising the nucleic acid of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein. In some embodiments, the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a cell comprising the vector of any one of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a method of manufacturing a base editor, comprising cultivating said cell of any one of the aspects or embodiments described herein.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a system comprising: (a) the nucleic acid editing polypeptide of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein; and (b) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said nucleic acid editing polypeptide comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to said endonuclease. In some embodiments, said engineered guide ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus said engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein or said system of any of the aspects or embodiments described herein, wherein said complex is configured such that upon binding of said complex to said target nucleic acid locus, said complex modifies a nucleotide of said target nucleic locus.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system, comprising: (a) an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease having at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78, wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising SEQ ID NOs: 360-368, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity; and (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising, (a) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to an endonuclease, wherein the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489; and a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease configured to bind to the engineered guide ribonucleic acid.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51 and 385-475. In some embodiments, the base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57. In some embodiments, the base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66.
  • In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67.
  • In some embodiments, the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises at least two ribonucleic acid polynucleotides. In some embodiments, the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises one ribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising the guide ribonucleic acid sequence and the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is complementary to a prokaryotic, bacterial, archaeal, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, or human genomic sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is 15-24 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N-or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, a polypeptide comprises the endonuclease and the base editor. In some embodiments, the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises SEQ ID NO: 370. In some embodiments, the system further comprises a source of Mg2+.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 70; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 88; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 360.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 71; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 89; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 361.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 73; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 91; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 363.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 75; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 93; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 365.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 76; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 94; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 366.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 77; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 95; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 367.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 78; the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 96; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 368.
  • In some embodiments, the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 57. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor comprises SEQ ID NO: 67.
  • In some embodiments, the sequence identity is determined by a BLASTP, CLUSTALW, MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm. In some embodiments, the sequence identity is determined by said BLASTP homology search algorithm using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, and wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes an endonuclease having at least 70% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78 coupled to a base editor. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence encoding one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, the organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the vector comprises the nucleic acid described herein. In some embodiments, the vector further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to binding to the endonuclease. In some embodiments, the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a cell comprising the vector described herein. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing an endonuclease, comprising cultivating the cell described herein.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM).
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide, comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to the endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM); and wherein the PAM comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368.
  • In some embodiments, the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is covalently coupled to the base editor or coupled to the base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95% identity to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1-51 and 385-475. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises an adenine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the adenine to guanine. In some embodiments, the adenine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57.
  • In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a cytosine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the cytosine to uracil. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66.
  • In some embodiments, the complex further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67. In some embodiments, the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a first strand comprising a sequence complementary to a sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure and a second strand comprising said PAM. In some embodiments, the PAM is directly adjacent to the 3′ end of the sequence complementary to the sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure.
  • In some embodiments, the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is not a Cas9 endonuclease, a Cas14 endonuclease, a Cas12a endonuclease, a Cas12b endonuclease, a Cas 12c endonuclease, a Cas12d endonuclease, a Cas12e endonuclease, a Cas13a endonuclease, a Cas13b endonuclease, a Cas13c endonuclease, or a Cas 13d endonuclease. In some embodiments, the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide is a eukaryotic, plant, fungal, mammalian, rodent, or human double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein, wherein the endonuclease is configured to form a complex with the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure, and wherein the complex is configured such that upon binding of the complex to the target nucleic acid locus, the complex modifies a nucleotide of the target nucleic locus.
  • In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises an adenine deaminase, the nucleotide is an adenine, and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a guanine. In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises a cytidine deaminase and a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor, the nucleotide is a cytosine and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a uracil. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus comprises genomic DNA, viral DNA, or bacterial DNA. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus is in vitro. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus is within a cell. In some embodiments, the cell is a prokaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, a eukaryotic cell, a fungal cell, a plant cell, an animal cell, a mammalian cell, a rodent cell, a primate cell, or a human cell. In some embodiments, the cell is within an animal.
  • In some embodiments, the cell is within a cochlea. In some embodiments, the cell is within an embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a two-cell embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a mouse embryo. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering the nucleic acid described herein or the vector described herein. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a nucleic acid comprising an open reading frame encoding the endonuclease.
  • In some embodiments, the nucleic acid comprises a promoter to which the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease is operably linked. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a capped mRNA containing the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a translated polypeptide. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure operably linked to a ribonucleic acid (RNA) pol III promoter.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease having at least 95% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 70-78, wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising SEQ ID NOs: 360-368, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease comprises a RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96, 488, and 489. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51 and 385-475. In some embodiments, the base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57. In some embodiments, the base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58. In some embodiments, the adenosine cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66.
  • Additional aspects and advantages of the present disclosure will become readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description, wherein only illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are shown and described. As will be realized, the present disclosure is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the disclosure. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
  • INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
  • All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings (also “Figure” and “FIG.” herein), of which:
  • FIG. 1 depicts typical organizations of CRISPR/Cas loci of different classes and types.
  • FIG. 2 shows the structure of a base editor plasmid containing a T7 promoter driving expression of the systems described herein.
  • FIG. 3 shows plasmid maps for systems described herein. MGA contains TadA* (from ABE8.17m)-SV40 NLS and MGC contains APOBEC1 (from BE3) linked to a uracil glycosylase inhibitor and an SV40 NLS.
  • FIG. 4 shows predicted catalytic residues in the RuvCI domains of selected endonucleases described herein which are mutated to disrupt nuclease activity to generate nickase enzymes.
  • FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary method for cloning a single guide RNA expression cassette into the systems described herein. One fragment comprises a T7 promoter plus spacer. The other fragment comprises spacer plus single guide scaffold sequence plus bidirectional terminator. The fragments are assembled into expression plasmids, resulting in functional constructs that can simultaneously express sgRNAs and base editors.
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B show sgRNA designs for lacZ targeting in E. coli. The spacer length used for the systems described herein was 22 nucleotides. For selected systems described herein, three sgRNAs targeting lacZ in E. coli were designed to determine editing windows.
  • FIG. 7 shows the nickase activity of selected mutated effectors. 600 bp double-stranded DNA fragments labeled with a fluorophore (6-FAM) on both 5′ ends were incubated with purified enzymes supplemented with their cognate sgRNAs. The reaction products were resolved on a 10% TBE-Urea denaturing gel. Double-stranded cleavage yields bands of 400 and 200 bases. Nickase activity yields bands of 600 and 200 bases.
  • FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C show Sanger sequencing results demonstrating base edits by selected systems described herein.
  • FIG. 9 shows how the systems described herein expand base-editing capabilities with the endonucleases and base editors described herein.
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B show base editing efficiencies of adenine base editors (ABEs) comprising TadA (ABE8.17m) and MG nickases. TadA is a tRNA adenine deaminase, and TadA (ABE8.17m) is an engineered variant of E. coli TadA. 12 MG nickases fused with TadA (ABE8.17m) were constructed and tested in E. coli. Three guides were designed to target lacZ. Numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of A to G conversion quantified by Edit R. ABE8.17m was used as the positive control for the experiment.
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B show base editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors (CBEs) comprising rat APOBEC1, MG nickases, and the uracil glycosylase inhibitor of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage (UGI (PBS1)). APOBEC1 is a cytosine deaminase. 12 MG nickases fused to rAPOBEC1 on their N-terminus and UGI on their C-terminus were constructed and tested in E. coli. Three guides were designed to target lacZ. The numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of C to T conversion quantified by Edit R. BE3 was used as the positive control in the experiment.
  • FIG. 12 shows effects of MG uracil glycosylase inhibitors (UGIs) on the base-editing activities of CBEs. Panel (a) depicts a graph showing base-editing activity of MGC15-1 and variants, which comprise an N-terminal APOBEC1, the MG15-1 nickase, and a C-terminal UGI. Three MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in E. coli. Panel (b) is a graph showing base editing activity of BE3, which comprises an N-terminal rAPOBEC1, the SpCas9 nickase, and a C-terminal UGI. Two MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in HEK293T cells. Editing efficiencies were quantified by Edit R.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B depict maps of edited sites showing editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors comprising A0A2K5RDN7, an MG nickases, and an MG UGI. The constructs comprise an N-terminal A0A2K5RDN7, an MG nickases, and a C-terminal MG69-1. For simplicity, only the identities of MG nickases are shown in the figure. BE3 was used as the positive control for base editing. An empty vector was used for the negative control. Three independent experiments were performed on different days. Abbreviations: R, repeat; NEG, negative control.
  • FIG. 14 shows a positive selection method for TadA characterization in E. coli. Panel (a) shows a map of one plasmid system used for TadA selection. The vector comprises CAT (H193Y), a sgRNA expression cassette targeting CAT, and an ABE expression cassette. In this figure, N-terminal TadA from E. coli and a C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) from Streptococcus pyogenes are shown. Panel (b) shows sequencing traces demonstrating that when introduced/transformed into E. coli cells, the A2 position of CAT (H193Y)'s template strand is edited, reverting the H193Y mutant to wild type and restoring its activity. Abbreviations: CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
  • FIG. 15 shows mutations caused by TadA enable high tolerance of chloramphenicol (Cm). Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where different concentrations of chloramphenicol were used to select for antibiotics resistance of E. coli. In this example, wild type and two variants of TadA from E. coli (EcTadA) were tested. Panel (b) shows a results summary table demonstrating that ABEs carrying mutated TadA show higher editing efficiencies than the wild type. In these experiments, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL Cm. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown in the table.
  • FIG. 16A shows photographs of growth plates to investigate MG TadA activity in positive selection. 8 MG68 TadA candidates were tested against 0 to 2 μg/mL of chloramphenicol (ABEs comprised N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase). For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 16B summarizes the editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates and demonstrates that MG68-3, and MG68-4 drove base edits of adenine.
  • FIG. 17 shows an improvement of base editing efficiency of MG68-4 nSpCas9 via D109N mutation on MG68-4. Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where wild type MG68-4 and its variant were tested against 0 to 4 μg/mL of chloramphenicol. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown. Adenine base editors in this experiment are comprise N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase. Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates. Panel (b) demonstrates thatMG68-4 and MG68-4 (D109N) showed base edits of adenine, with the D109N mutant showing increased activity. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 18 shows base editing of MG68-4 (D109N)_nMG34-1. Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates of an experiment where an ABE comprising N-terminal MG68-4 (D109N) and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase was tested against 0 to 2 μg/mL of chloramphenicol. Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies with and without sgRNA. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 1 μg/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 19 shows 28 MG68-4 variants designed for improvements of MG68-4-nMG34-1 base editing activity (SEQ ID NOs: 448-475). 12 residues were selected for targeted mutagenesis to improve editing of the enzymes.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCE LISTING
  • The Sequence Listing filed herewith provides exemplary polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences for use in methods, compositions and systems according to the disclosure. Below are exemplary descriptions of sequences therein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 1-47 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG66 deaminases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 48-49 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG67 deaminases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 50-51 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG68 deaminases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 show the sequences of uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitors suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 57-66 show the sequences of reference deaminases.
      • SEQ ID NO: 67 shows the sequence of a reference uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor.
      • SEQ ID NO: 68 shows the sequence of an adenine base editor.
      • SEQ ID NO: 69 shows the sequence of a cytosine base editor.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 70-78 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG nickases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 79-87 shows the protospacer and PAM used in in vitro nickase assays described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 show the peptide sequences of single guide RNA used in in vitro nickase assays described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 97-156 show the sequences of spacers when targeting E. coli lacZ.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 157-176 show the sequences of primers when conducting site directed mutagenesis.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 177-178 show the sequences of primers for lacZ sequencing.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 179-342 show the sequences of primers used during amplification.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 343-345 show the sequences of primers for lacZ sequencing.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 346-359 show the sequences of primers used during amplification.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 show protospacer adjacent motifs suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 369-384 show nuclear localization sequences (NLS's) suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 385-443 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG68 deaminases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 444-447 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG121 deaminases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 448-475 show the full-length peptide sequences of MG68 deaminases suitable for the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 476 and 477 show sequences of adenine base editors.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 478-482 show sequences of cytosine base editors.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 483-487 show the sequences of plasmids suitable for encoding the engineered nucleic acid editing systems described herein.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 488 and 489 show the sgRNA scaffold sequences for MG15-1 and MG34-1.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 490-522 show the sequences of spacers used to target genomic loci in E. coli and HEK293T cells.
      • SEQ ID NOs: 523-585 show the sequences of primers used during amplification and Sanger sequencing.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • While various embodiments of the invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed.
  • The practice of some methods disclosed herein employ, unless otherwise indicated, techniques of immunology, biochemistry, chemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, cell biology, genomics and recombinant DNA. See for example Sambrook and Green, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th Edition (2012); the series Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (F. M. Ausubel, et al. eds.); the series Methods In Enzymology (Academic Press, Inc.), PCR 2: A Practical Approach (M. J. MacPherson, B. D. Hames and G. R. Taylor eds. (1995)), Harlow and Lane, eds. (1988) Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual, and Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique and Specialized Applications, 6th Edition (R I. Freshney, ed. (2010)) (which is entirely incorporated by reference herein).
  • As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and/or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.”
  • The term “about” or “approximately” means within an acceptable error range for the particular value as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, which will depend in part on how the value is measured or determined, i.e., the limitations of the measurement system. For example, “about” can mean within one or more than one standard deviation, per the practice in the art. Alternatively, “about” can mean a range of up to 20%, up to 15%, up to 10%, up to 5%, or up to 1% of a given value.
  • As used herein, a “cell” generally refers to a biological cell. A cell may be the basic structural, functional and/or biological unit of a living organism. A cell may originate from any organism having one or more cells. Some non-limiting examples include: a prokaryotic cell, eukaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, an archaeal cell, a cell of a single-cell eukaryotic organism, a protozoa cell, a cell from a plant (e.g., cells from plant crops, fruits, vegetables, grains, soy bean, corn, maize, wheat, seeds, tomatoes, rice, cassava, sugarcane, pumpkin, hay, potatoes, cotton, cannabis, tobacco, flowering plants, conifers, gymnosperms, ferns, clubmosses, hornworts, liverworts, mosses), an algal cell, (e.g., Botryococcus braunii, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Nannochloropsis gaditana, Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Sargassum patens C. Agardh, and the like), seaweeds (e.g., kelp), a fungal cell (e.g., a yeast cell, a cell from a mushroom), an animal cell, a cell from an invertebrate animal (e.g., fruit fly, cnidarian, echinoderm, nematode, etc.), a cell from a vertebrate animal (e.g., fish, amphibian, reptile, bird, mammal), a cell from a mammal (e.g., a pig, a cow, a goat, a sheep, a rodent, a rat, a mouse, a non-human primate, a human, etc.), and etcetera. Sometimes a cell is not originating from a natural organism (e.g., a cell can be a synthetically made, sometimes termed an artificial cell).
  • The term “nucleotide,” as used herein, generally refers to a base-sugar-phosphate combination. A nucleotide may comprise a synthetic nucleotide. A nucleotide may comprise a synthetic nucleotide analog. Nucleotides may be monomeric units of a nucleic acid sequence (e.g., deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA)). The term nucleotide may include ribonucleoside triphosphates adenosine triphosphate (ATP), uridine triphosphate (UTP), cytosine triphosphate (CTP), guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates such as dATP, dCTP, dITP, dUTP, dGTP, dTTP, or derivatives thereof. Such derivatives may include, for example, [αS]dATP, 7-deaza-dGTP and 7-deaza-dATP, and nucleotide derivatives that confer nuclease resistance on the nucleic acid molecule containing them. The term nucleotide as used herein may refer to dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (ddNTPs) and their derivatives. Illustrative examples of dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates may include, but are not limited to, ddATP, ddCTP, ddGTP, ddITP, and ddTTP. A nucleotide may be unlabeled or detectably labeled, such as using moieties comprising optically detectable moieties (e.g., fluorophores). Labeling may also be carried out with quantum dots. Detectable labels may include, for example, radioactive isotopes, fluorescent labels, chemiluminescent labels, bioluminescent labels and enzyme labels. Fluorescent labels of nucleotides may include but are not limited fluorescein, 5-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 2′7′-dimethoxy-4′5-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (JOE), rhodamine, 6-carboxyrhodamine (R6G), N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA), 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), 4-(4′dimethylaminophenylazo) benzoic acid (DABCYL), Cascade Blue, Oregon Green, Texas Red, Cyanine and 5-(2′-aminoethyl)aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (EDANS). Specific examples of fluorescently labeled nucleotides can include [R6G]dUTP, [TAMRA]dUTP, [R110]dCTP, [R6G]dCTP, [TAMRA]dCTP, [JOE]ddATP, [R6G]ddATP, [FAM]ddCTP, [R110]ddCTP, [TAMRA]ddGTP, [ROX]ddTTP, [dR6G]ddATP, [dR110]ddCTP, [dTAMRA]ddGTP, and [dROX]ddTTP available from Perkin Elmer, Foster City, Calif; FluoroLink DeoxyNucleotides, FluoroLink Cy3-dCTP, FluoroLink Cy5-dCTP, FluoroLink Fluor X-dCTP, FluoroLink Cy3-dUTP, and FluoroLink Cy5-dUTP available from Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.; Fluorescein-15-dATP, Fluorescein-12-dUTP, Tetramethyl-rodamine-6-dUTP, IR770-9-dATP, Fluorescein-12-ddUTP, Fluorescein-12-UTP, and Fluorescein-15-2′-dATP available from Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.; and Chromosome Labeled Nucleotides, BODIPY-FL-14-UTP, BODIPY-FL-4-UTP, BODIPY-TMR-14-UTP, BODIPY-TMR-14-dUTP, BODIPY-TR-14-UTP, BODIPY-TR-14-dUTP, Cascade Blue-7-UTP, Cascade Blue-7-dUTP, fluorescein-12-UTP, fluorescein-12-dUTP, Oregon Green 488-5-dUTP, Rhodamine Green-5-UTP, Rhodamine Green-5-dUTP, tetramethylrhodamine-6-UTP, tetramethylrhodamine-6-dUTP, Texas Red-5-UTP, Texas Red-5-dUTP, and Texas Red-12-dUTP available from Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg. Nucleotides can also be labeled or marked by chemical modification. A chemically-modified single nucleotide can be biotin-dNTP. Some non-limiting examples of biotinylated dNTPs can include, biotin-dATP (e.g., bio-N6-ddATP, biotin-14-dATP), biotin-dCTP (e.g., biotin-11-dCTP, biotin-14-dCTP), and biotin-dUTP (e.g., biotin-11-dUTP, biotin-16-dUTP, biotin-20-dUTP).
  • The terms “polynucleotide,” “oligonucleotide,” and “nucleic acid” are used interchangeably to generally refer to a polymeric form of nucleotides of any length, either deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides, or analogs thereof, either in single-, double-, or multi-stranded form. A polynucleotide may be exogenous or endogenous to a cell. A polynucleotide may exist in a cell-free environment. A polynucleotide may be a gene or fragment thereof. A polynucleotide may be DNA. A polynucleotide may be RNA. A polynucleotide may have any three-dimensional structure and may perform any function. A polynucleotide may comprise one or more analogs (e.g., altered backbone, sugar, or nucleobase). If present, modifications to the nucleotide structure may be imparted before or after assembly of the polymer. Some non-limiting examples of analogs include: 5-bromouracil, peptide nucleic acid, xeno nucleic acid, morpholinos, locked nucleic acids, glycol nucleic acids, threose nucleic acids, dideoxynucleotides, cordycepin, 7-deaza-GTP, fluorophores (e.g., rhodamine or fluorescein linked to the sugar), thiol containing nucleotides, biotin linked nucleotides, fluorescent base analogs, CpG islands, methyl-7-guanosine, methylated nucleotides, inosine, thiouridine, pseudouridine, dihydrouridine, queuosine, and wyosine. Non-limiting examples of polynucleotides include coding or non-coding regions of a gene or gene fragment, loci (locus) defined from linkage analysis, exons, introns, messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), short interfering RNA (siRNA), short-hairpin RNA (shRNA), micro-RNA (miRNA), ribozymes, cDNA, recombinant polynucleotides, branched polynucleotides, plasmids, vectors, isolated DNA of any sequence, isolated RNA of any sequence, cell-free polynucleotides including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and cell-free RNA (cfRNA), nucleic acid probes, and primers. The sequence of nucleotides may be interrupted by non-nucleotide components.
  • The terms “transfection” or “transfected” generally refer to introduction of a nucleic acid into a cell by non-viral or viral-based methods. The nucleic acid molecules may be gene sequences encoding complete proteins or functional portions thereof. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 18.1-18.88.
  • The terms “peptide,” “polypeptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein to generally refer to a polymer of at least two amino acid residues joined by peptide bond(s). This term does not connote a specific length of polymer, nor is it intended to imply or distinguish whether the peptide is produced using recombinant techniques, chemical or enzymatic synthesis, or is naturally occurring. The terms apply to naturally occurring amino acid polymers as well as amino acid polymers comprising at least one modified amino acid. In some cases, the polymer may be interrupted by non-amino acids. The terms include amino acid chains of any length, including full length proteins, and proteins with or without secondary and/or tertiary structure (e.g., domains). The terms also encompass an amino acid polymer that has been modified, for example, by disulfide bond formation, glycosylation, lipidation, acetylation, phosphorylation, oxidation, and any other manipulation such as conjugation with a labeling component. The terms “amino acid” and “amino acids,” as used herein, generally refer to natural and non-natural amino acids, including, but not limited to, modified amino acids and amino acid analogues. Modified amino acids may include natural amino acids and non-natural amino acids, which have been chemically modified to include a group or a chemical moiety not naturally present on the amino acid. Amino acid analogues may refer to amino acid derivatives. The term “amino acid” includes both D-amino acids and L-amino acids.
  • As used herein, the “non-native” can generally refer to a nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence that is not found in a native nucleic acid or protein. Non-native may refer to affinity tags. Non-native may refer to fusions. Non-native may refer to a naturally occurring nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence that comprises mutations, insertions and/or deletions. A non-native sequence may exhibit and/or encode for an activity (e.g., enzymatic activity, methyltransferase activity, acetyltransferase activity, kinase activity, ubiquitinating activity, etc.) that may also be exhibited by the nucleic acid and/or polypeptide sequence to which the non-native sequence is fused. A non-native nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence may be linked to a naturally-occurring nucleic acid or polypeptide sequence (or a variant thereof) by genetic engineering to generate a chimeric nucleic acid and/or polypeptide sequence encoding a chimeric nucleic acid and/or polypeptide.
  • The term “promoter”, as used herein, generally refers to the regulatory DNA region which controls transcription or expression of a gene and which may be located adjacent to or overlapping a nucleotide or region of nucleotides at which RNA transcription is initiated. A promoter may contain specific DNA sequences which bind protein factors, often referred to as transcription factors, which facilitate binding of RNA polymerase to the DNA leading to gene transcription. A ‘basal promoter’, also referred to as a ‘core promoter’, may generally refer to a promoter that contains all the basic necessary elements to promote transcriptional expression of an operably linked polynucleotide. Eukaryotic basal promoters typically, though not necessarily, contain a TATA-box and/or a CAAT box.
  • The term “expression”, as used herein, generally refers to the process by which a nucleic acid sequence or a polynucleotide is transcribed from a DNA template (such as into mRNA or other RNA transcript) and/or the process by which a transcribed mRNA is subsequently translated into peptides, polypeptides, or proteins. Transcripts and encoded polypeptides may be collectively referred to as “gene product.” If the polynucleotide is derived from genomic DNA, expression may include splicing of the mRNA in a eukaryotic cell.
  • As used herein, “operably linked”, “operable linkage”, “operatively linked”, or grammatical equivalents thereof generally refer to juxtaposition of genetic elements, e.g., a promoter, an enhancer, a polyadenylation sequence, etc., wherein the elements are in a relationship permitting them to operate in the expected manner. For instance, a regulatory element, which may comprise promoter and/or enhancer sequences, is operatively linked to a coding region if the regulatory element helps initiate transcription of the coding sequence. There may be intervening residues between the regulatory element and coding region so long as this functional relationship is maintained.
  • A “vector” as used herein, generally refers to a macromolecule or association of macromolecules that comprises or associates with a polynucleotide and which may be used to mediate delivery of the polynucleotide to a cell. Examples of vectors include plasmids, viral vectors, liposomes, and other gene delivery vehicles. The vector generally comprises genetic elements, e.g., regulatory elements, operatively linked to a gene to facilitate expression of the gene in a target.
  • As used herein, “an expression cassette” and “a nucleic acid cassette” are used interchangeably generally to refer to a combination of nucleic acid sequences or elements that are expressed together or are operably linked for expression. In some cases, an expression cassette refers to the combination of regulatory elements and a gene or genes to which they are operably linked for expression.
  • A “functional fragment” of a DNA or protein sequence generally refers to a fragment that retains a biological activity (either functional or structural) that is substantially similar to a biological activity of the full-length DNA or protein sequence. A biological activity of a DNA sequence may be its ability to influence expression in a manner known to be attributed to the full-length sequence.
  • As used herein, an “engineered” object generally indicates that the object has been modified by human intervention. According to non-limiting examples: a nucleic acid may be modified by changing its sequence to a sequence that does not occur in nature; a nucleic acid may be modified by ligating it to a nucleic acid that it does not associate with in nature such that the ligated product possesses a function not present in the original nucleic acid; an engineered nucleic acid may synthesized in vitro with a sequence that does not exist in nature; a protein may be modified by changing its amino acid sequence to a sequence that does not exist in nature; an engineered protein may acquire a new function or property. An “engineered” system comprises at least one engineered component.
  • As used herein, “synthetic” and “artificial” are used interchangeably to refer to a protein or a domain thereof that has low sequence identity (e.g., less than 50% sequence identity, less than 25% sequence identity, less than 10% sequence identity, less than 5% sequence identity, less than 1% sequence identity) to a naturally occurring human protein. For example, VPR and VP64 domains are synthetic transactivation domains.
  • The term “tracrRNA” or “tracr sequence”, as used herein, can generally refer to a nucleic acid with at least about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 100% sequence identity and/or sequence similarity to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA sequence (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus, etc.). tracrRNA can refer to a nucleic acid with at most about 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% sequence identity and/or sequence similarity to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA sequence (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus, etc.). tracrRNA may refer to a modified form of a tracrRNA that can comprise a nucleotide change such as a deletion, insertion, or substitution, variant, mutation, or chimera. A tracrRNA may refer to a nucleic acid that can be at least about 60% identical to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus, etc.) sequence over a stretch of at least 6 contiguous nucleotides. For example, a tracrRNA sequence can be at least about 60% identical, at least about 65% identical, at least about 70% identical, at least about 75% identical, at least about 80% identical, at least about 85% identical, at least about 90% identical, at least about 95% identical, at least about 98% identical, at least about 99% identical, or 100% identical to a wild type exemplary tracrRNA (e.g., a tracrRNA from S. pyogenes S. aureus, etc.) sequence over a stretch of at least 6 contiguous nucleotides. Type II tracrRNA sequences can be predicted on a genome sequence by identifying regions with complementarity to part of the repeat sequence in an adjacent CRISPR array.
  • As used herein, a “guide nucleic acid” can generally refer to a nucleic acid that may hybridize to another nucleic acid. A guide nucleic acid may be RNA. A guide nucleic acid may be DNA. The guide nucleic acid may be programmed to bind to a sequence of nucleic acid site-specifically. The nucleic acid to be targeted, or the target nucleic acid, may comprise nucleotides. The guide nucleic acid may comprise nucleotides. A portion of the target nucleic acid may be complementary to a portion of the guide nucleic acid. The strand of a double-stranded target polynucleotide that is complementary to and hybridizes with the guide nucleic acid may be called the complementary strand. The strand of the double-stranded target polynucleotide that is complementary to the complementary strand, and therefore may not be complementary to the guide nucleic acid may be called noncomplementary strand. A guide nucleic acid may comprise a polynucleotide chain and can be called a “single guide nucleic acid.” A guide nucleic acid may comprise two polynucleotide chains and may be called a “double guide nucleic acid.” If not otherwise specified, the term “guide nucleic acid” may be inclusive, referring to both single guide nucleic acids and double guide nucleic acids. A guide nucleic acid may comprise a segment that can be referred to as a “nucleic acid-targeting segment” or a “nucleic acid-targeting sequence.” A nucleic acid-targeting segment may comprise a sub-segment that may be referred to as a “protein binding segment” or “protein binding sequence” or “Cas protein binding segment”.
  • The term “sequence identity” or “percent identity” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, generally refers to two (e.g., in a pairwise alignment) or more (e.g., in a multiple sequence alignment) sequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a local or global comparison window, as measured using a sequence comparison algorithm. Suitable sequence comparison algorithms for polypeptide sequences include, e.g., BLASTP using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment for polypeptide sequences longer than 30 residues; BLASTP using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 2, an expectation (E) of 1000000, and the PAM30 scoring matrix setting gap costs at 9 to open gaps and 1 to extend gaps for sequences of less than 30 residues (these are the default parameters for BLASTP in the BLAST suite available at blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov); CLUSTALW with parameters of; the Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm with parameters of a match of 2, a mismatch of −1, and a gap of −1; MUSCLE with default parameters; MAFFT with parameters retree of 2 and maxiterations of 1000; Novafold with default parameters; HMMER hmmalign with default parameters.
  • As used herein, the term “RuvC_III domain” generally refers to a third discontinuous segment of a RuvC endonuclease domain (the RuvC nuclease domain being comprised of three discontiguous segments, RuvC_I, RuvC_II, and RuvC_III). A RuvC domain or segments thereof can generally be identified by alignment to known domain sequences, structural alignment to proteins with annotated domains, or by comparison to Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) built based on known domain sequences (e.g., Pfam HMM PF18541 for RuvC_III).
  • As used herein, the term “HNH domain” generally refers to an endonuclease domain having characteristic histidine and asparagine residues. An HNH domain can generally be identified by alignment to known domain sequences, structural alignment to proteins with annotated domains, or by comparison to Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) built based on known domain sequences (e.g., Pfam HMM PF01844 for domain HNH).
  • As used herein, the term “base editor” generally refers to an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of one target base or base pair into another (e.g. A:T to G:C, C:G to T:A) without requiring the creation and repair of a double-strand break. In some embodiments, the base editor is a deaminase.
  • As used herein, the term “deaminase” generally refers to a protein or enzyme that catalyzes a deamination reaction. In some embodiments, the deaminase is an adenosine deaminase, which catalyzes the hydrolytic deamination of adenine or adenosine (e.g., an engineered adenosine deaminase that deaminates adenosine in DNA). In some embodiments, the deaminase or deaminase domain is a cytidine (or cytosine) deaminase, catalyzing the hydrolytic deamination of cytidine (or cytosine) or deoxycytidine to uridine (or uracil) or deoxyuridine, respectively. In some embodiments, the deaminase or deaminase domain is a cytidine (or cytosine) deaminase domain, catalyzing the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine (or cytosine) to uracil (or uridine). In some embodiments, the deaminase or deaminase domain is a naturally-occurring deaminase from an organism, such as a human, chimpanzee, gorilla, monkey, cow, dog, rat, mouse, or bacterium (e.g. E. coli). In some embodiments, the deaminase or deaminase domain is a variant of a naturally-occurring deaminase from an organism that does not occur in nature.
  • The term “optimally aligned” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, generally refers to two (e.g., in a pairwise alignment) or more (e.g., in a multiple sequence alignment) sequences that have been aligned to maximal correspondence of amino acids residues or nucleotides, for example, as determined by the alignment producing a highest or “optimized” percent identity score.
  • Included in the current disclosure are variants of any of the enzymes described herein with one or more conservative amino acid substitutions. Such conservative substitutions can be made in the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide without disrupting the three-dimensional structure or function of the polypeptide. Conservative substitutions can be accomplished by substituting amino acids with similar hydrophobicity, polarity, and R chain length for one another. Additionally, or alternatively, by comparing aligned sequences of homologous proteins from different species, conservative substitutions can be identified by locating amino acid residues that have been mutated between species (e.g., non-conserved residues) without altering the basic functions of the encoded proteins. Such conservatively substituted variants may include variants with at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99% identity to any one of the endonuclease protein sequences described herein. In some embodiments, such conservatively substituted variants are functional variants. Such functional variants can encompass sequences with substitutions such that the activity of one or more critical active site residues or guide RNA binding residues of the endonuclease are not disrupted.
  • Also included in the current disclosure are variants of any of the enzymes described herein with substitution of one or more catalytic residues to decrease or eliminate activity of the enzyme (e.g. decreased-activity variants). In some embodiments, a decreased activity variant as a protein described herein comprises a disrupting substitution of at least one, at least two, or all three catalytic residues. In some embodiments, any of the endonucleases described herein can comprise a nickase mutation. In some embodiments, any of the endonucleases described herein can comprise a RuvC domain lacking nuclease activity. In some embodiments, any of the endonucleases described herein can be configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, any of the endonucleases described herein can comprise can be configured to lack endonuclease activity or be catalytically dead.
  • Conservative substitution tables providing functionally similar amino acids are available from a variety of references (see, for e.g., Creighton, Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties (W H Freeman & Co.; 2nd edition (December 1993)). The following eight groups each contain amino acids that are conservative substitutions for one another:
      • 1) Alanine (A), Glycine (G);
      • 2) Aspartic acid (D), Glutamic acid (E);
      • 3) Asparagine (N), Glutamine (Q);
      • 4) Arginine (R), Lysine (K);
      • 5) Isoleucine (I), Leucine (L), Methionine (M), Valine (V);
      • 6) Phenylalanine (F), Tyrosine (Y), Tryptophan (W);
      • 7) Serine (S), Threonine (T); and
      • 8) Cysteine (C), Methionine (M)
    Overview
  • The discovery of new Cas enzymes with unique functionality and structure may offer the potential to further disrupt deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) editing technologies, improving speed, specificity, functionality, and ease of use. Relative to the predicted prevalence of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) systems in microbes and the sheer diversity of microbial species, comparatively few functionally characterized CRISPR/Cas enzymes exist in the literature. This is partly because a huge number of microbial species may not be readily cultivated in laboratory conditions. Metagenomic sequencing from natural environmental niches that represent large numbers of microbial species may offer the potential to drastically increase the number of new CRISPR/Cas systems known and speed the discovery of new oligonucleotide editing functionalities. A recent example of the fruitfulness of such an approach is demonstrated by the 2016 discovery of CasX/CasY CRISPR systems from metagenomic analysis of natural microbial communities.
  • CRISPR/Cas systems are RNA-directed nuclease complexes that have been described to function as an adaptive immune system in microbes. In their natural context, CRISPR/Cas systems occur in CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) operons or loci, which generally comprise two parts: (i) an array of short repetitive sequences (30-40 bp) separated by equally short spacer sequences, which encode the RNA-based targeting element; and (ii) ORFs encoding the Cas encoding the nuclease polypeptide directed by the RNA-based targeting element alongside accessory proteins/enzymes. Efficient nuclease targeting of a particular target nucleic acid sequence generally requires both (i) complementary hybridization between the first 6-8 nucleic acids of the target (the target seed) and the crRNA guide; and (ii) the presence of a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence within a defined vicinity of the target seed (the PAM usually being a sequence not commonly represented within the host genome). Depending on the exact function and organization of the system, CRISPR-Cas systems are commonly organized into 2 classes, 5 types and 16 subtypes based on shared functional characteristics and evolutionary similarity (see FIG. 1 ).
  • Class I CRISPR-Cas systems have large, multisubunit effector complexes, and comprise Types I, III, and IV.
  • Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are considered of moderate complexity in terms of components. In Type I CRISPR-Cas systems, the array of RNA-targeting elements is transcribed as a long precursor crRNA (pre-crRNA) that is processed at repeat elements to liberate short, mature crRNAs that direct the nuclease complex to nucleic acid targets when they are followed by a suitable short consensus sequence called a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). This processing occurs via an endoribonuclease subunit (Cas6) of a large endonuclease complex called Cascade, which also comprises a nuclease (Cas3) protein component of the crRNA-directed nuclease complex. Cas I nucleases function primarily as DNA nucleases.
  • Type III CRISPR systems may be characterized by the presence of a central nuclease, known as Cas10, alongside a repeat-associated mysterious protein (RAMP) that comprises Csm or Cmr protein subunits. Like in Type I systems, the mature crRNA is processed from a pre-crRNA using a Cas6-like enzyme. Unlike type I and II systems, type III systems appear to target and cleave DNA-RNA duplexes (such as DNA strands being used as templates for an RNA polymerase).
  • Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems possess an effector complex that consists of a highly reduced large subunit nuclease (csf1), two genes for RAMP proteins of the Cas5 (csf3) and Cas? (csf2) groups, and, in some cases, a gene for a predicted small subunit; such systems are commonly found on endogenous plasmids.
  • Class II CRISPR-Cas systems generally have single-polypeptide multidomain nuclease effectors, and comprise Types II, V and VI.
  • Type II CRISPR-Cas systems are considered the simplest in terms of components. In Type II CRISPR-Cas systems, the processing of the CRISPR array into mature crRNAs does not require the presence of a special endonuclease subunit, but rather a small trans-encoded crRNA (tracrRNA) with a region complementary to the array repeat sequence; the tracrRNA interacts with both its corresponding effector nuclease (e.g. Cas9) and the repeat sequence to form a precursor dsRNA structure, which is cleaved by endogenous RNAse III to generate a mature effector enzyme loaded with both tracrRNA and crRNA. Cas II nucleases are known as DNA nucleases. Type 2 effectors generally exhibit a structure consisting of a RuvC-like endonuclease domain that adopts the RNase H fold with an unrelated HNH nuclease domain inserted within the folds of the RuvC-like nuclease domain. The RuvC-like domain is responsible for the cleavage of the target (e.g., crRNA complementary) DNA strand, while the HNH domain is responsible for cleavage of the displaced DNA strand.
  • Type V CRISPR-Cas systems are characterized by a nuclease effector (e.g. Cas12) structure similar to that of Type II effectors, comprising a RuvC-like domain. Similar to Type II, most (but not all) Type V CRISPR systems use a tracrRNA to process pre-crRNAs into mature crRNAs; however, unlike Type II systems which requires RNAse III to cleave the pre-crRNA into multiple crRNAs, type V systems are capable of using the effector nuclease itself to cleave pre-crRNAs. Like Type-II CRISPR-Cas systems, Type V CRISPR-Cas systems are again known as DNA nucleases. Unlike Type II CRISPR-Cas systems, some Type V enzymes (e.g., Cas12a) appear to have a robust single-stranded nonspecific deoxyribonuclease activity that is activated by the first crRNA directed cleavage of a double-stranded target sequence.
  • Type VI CRIPSR-Cas systems have RNA-guided RNA endonucleases. Instead of RuvC-like domains, the single polypeptide effector of Type VI systems (e.g. Cas13) comprises two HEPN ribonuclease domains. Differing from both Type II and V systems, Type VI systems also appear to not need a tracrRNA for processing of pre-crRNA into crRNA. Similar to type V systems, however, some Type VI systems (e.g., C2C2) appear to possess robust single-stranded nonspecific nuclease (ribonuclease) activity activated by the first crRNA directed cleavage of a target RNA.
  • Because of their simpler architecture, Class II CRISPR-Cas have been most widely adopted for engineering and development as designer nuclease/genome editing applications.
  • One of the early adaptations of such a system for in vitro use can be found in Jinek et al. (Science. 2012 Aug. 17; 337(6096):816-21, which is entirely incorporated herein by reference). The Jinek study first described a system that involved (i) recombinantly-expressed, purified full-length Cas9 (e.g., a Class II, Type II Cas enzyme) isolated from S. pyogenes SF370, (ii) purified mature ˜42 nt crRNA bearing a ˜20 nt 5′ sequence complementary to the target DNA sequence to be cleaved followed by a 3′ tracr-binding sequence (the whole crRNA being in vitro transcribed from a synthetic DNA template carrying a T7 promoter sequence); (iii) purified tracrRNA in vitro transcribed from a synthetic DNA template carrying a T7 promoter sequence, and (iv) Mg2+. Jinek later described an improved, engineered system wherein the crRNA of (ii) is joined to the 5′ end of (iii) by a linker (e.g., GAAA) to form a single fused synthetic guide RNA (sgRNA) capable of directing Cas9 to a target by itself.
  • Mali et al. (Science. 2013 Feb. 15; 339(6121): 823-826.), which is entirely incorporated herein by reference, later adapted this system for use in mammalian cells by providing DNA vectors encoding (i) an ORF encoding codon-optimized Cas9 (e.g., a Class II, Type II Cas enzyme) under a suitable mammalian promoter with a C-terminal nuclear localization sequence (e.g., SV40 NLS) and a suitable polyadenylation signal (e.g., TK pA signal); and (ii) an ORF encoding an sgRNA (having a 5′ sequence beginning with G followed by 20 nt of a complementary targeting nucleic acid sequence joined to a 3′ tracr-binding sequence, a linker, and the tracrRNA sequence) under a suitable Polymerase III promoter (e.g., the U6 promoter).
  • Base Editing
  • Base editing is the conversion of one target base or base pair into another (e.g. A:T to G:C, C:G to T:A) without requiring the creation and repair of a double-strand break. The base editing may be achieved with the help of DNA and RNA base editors that allow the introduction of point mutations at specific sites, in either DNA or RNA. Generally, DNA base editors may comprise a fusion of a catalytically inactive nuclease and a catalytically active base-modification enzyme that acts only on single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs). RNA base editors may comprise of similar, RNA-specific enzymes. Base editing may increase the efficiency of gene modification, while reducing the off-target and random mutations in the DNA.
  • DNA base editors are engineered ribonucleoprotein complexes that act as tools for single base substitution in cells and organism. They may be created by fusing an engineered base-modification enzyme and a catalytically deficient Cas variant that cannot cut dsDNA, but it is able to unfold the dsDNA in a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence-dependent manner, such that a guide RNA can find its complementary target to indicate a ssDNA scission site. The guide RNA anneals to the complementary DNA, displacing a fragment of ssDNA and directing the Cas ‘scissors’ to the base modification site. The cellular repair machinery will repair the nicked non-edited strand using information from the complementary edited template.
  • So far, two types of DNA editors, cytosine base (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs) have been developed. They were shown to efficiently and precisely edit point mutations in DNA with minimal off-target DNA editing (see Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 35:435-437, Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 35:438-440 and Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 35:475-480, each of which is entirely incorporated herein by reference). However, recent findings indicate that off-target modifications are present in DNA, and that many off-target modifications are also introduced into RNA by DNA base editors.
  • MG Base Editors
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system, comprising: (a) an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof. In some cases, the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity. In some cases, the endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some cases, the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some cases the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease comprises a tracr sequence.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof, wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease. In some cases the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease comprises a tracr sequence. In some cases, the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity. In some cases, the endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some cases, the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides for an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising: (a) an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and (b) a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and (c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease. In some cases, the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to the endonuclease comprises a tracr sequence. In some cases, the endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation. In some cases, the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity. In some cases, the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing system comprising, (a) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprising: (i) a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and (ii) a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind to an endonuclease, wherein the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof; and a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease configured to bind to the engineered guide ribonucleic acid.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360, 362, or 368. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises at least two ribonucleic acid polynucleotides. In some embodiments, the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises one ribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising the guide ribonucleic acid sequence and the tracr ribonucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is complementary to a prokaryotic, bacterial, archaeal, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, or human genomic sequence. In some embodiments, the guide ribonucleic acid sequence is 15-24 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N-or C-terminus of the endonuclease.
  • The NLS can comprise any of the sequences in Table 1 below, or a combination thereof:
  • TABLE 1
    Example NLS Sequences that can be used with Cas Effectors According to the
    Disclosure
    Source NLS amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO:
    SV40 PKKKRKV 369
    nucleoplasmin bipartite NLS KRPAATKKAGQAKKKK 370
    c-myc NLS PAAKRVKLD 371
    c-myc NLS RQRRNELKRSP 372
    hRNPA1 M9 NLS NQSSNFGPMKGGNFGGRSSGPYGGGGQYFAKPRNQG 373
    GY
    Importin-alpha IBB domain RMRIZFKNKGKDTAELRRRRVEVSVELRKAKKDEQIL 374
    KRRNV
    Myoma T protein VSRKRPRP 375
    Myoma T protein PPKKARED 376
    p53 PQPKKKPL 377
    mouse c-abl IV SALIKKKKKMAP 378
    influenza virus NS1 DRLRR 379
    influenza virus NS1 PKQKKRK 380
    Hepatitis virus delta antigen RKLKKKIKKL 381
    mouse Mx1 protein REKKKFLKRR 382
    human poly(ADP-ribose) KRKGDEVDGVDEVAKKKSKK 383
    polymerase
    steroid hormone receptor (human) RKCLQAGMNLEARKTKK 384
    glucocorticoid
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, linkers joining any of the enzymes or domains described herein can comprise one or multiple copies of a sequence having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to SGGSSGGSSGSETPGTSESATPESSGGSSGGS, SGSETPGTSESATPESA, GSGGS, SGSETPGTSESATPES, SGGSS, or GAAA, or any other linker sequence described herein. In some embodiments, a polypeptide comprises the endonuclease and the base editor. In some embodiments, the endonuclease is configured to cleave one strand of a double-stranded target deoxyribonucleic acid. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the system further comprises a source of Mg2+.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 70 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 88; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 360.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 71 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 89; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 361.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 73 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 91; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 363.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 75 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 93; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 365.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 76 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 94; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 366.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 77 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 95; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 367.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 78 or a variant thereof the guide RNA structure comprises a sequence at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% identical to at least one of SEQ ID NO: 96; and the endonuclease is configured to bind to a PAM comprising SEQ ID NO: 368.
  • In some embodiments, the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 57 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises SEQ ID NO: 58 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylation inhibitor comprises SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the sequence identity is determined by a BLASTP, CLUSTALW, MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm. In some embodiments, the sequence identity is determined by said BLASTP homology search algorithm using parameters of a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and a BLOSUM62 scoring matrix setting gap costs at existence of 11, extension of 1, and using a conditional compositional score matrix adjustment.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, and wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising an engineered nucleic acid sequence optimized for expression in an organism, wherein the nucleic acid encodes an endonuclease having at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof coupled to a base editor. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence encoding one or more nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) proximal to an N- or C-terminus of said endonuclease. In some embodiments, the organism is prokaryotic, bacterial, eukaryotic, fungal, plant, mammalian, rodent, or human.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a vector comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease coupled to a base editor, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the vector comprises the nucleic acid described herein. In some embodiments, the vector further comprises a nucleic acid encoding an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with the endonuclease comprising: a guide ribonucleic acid sequence configured to hybridize to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and a tracr ribonucleic acid sequence configured to binding to the endonuclease. In some embodiments, the vector is a plasmid, a minicircle, a CELiD, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived virion, or a lentivirus. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a cell comprising the vector described herein. In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing an endonuclease, comprising cultivating the cell described herein.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity; a base editor coupled to the endonuclease; and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM).
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain is covalently coupled directly to the base editor or covalently coupled to the base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method for modifying a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide, comprising contacting the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide with a complex comprising: a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, a base editor coupled to the endonuclease, and an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to bind to the endonuclease and the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide; wherein the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM); and wherein the PAM comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598 or a variant thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is covalently coupled to the base editor or coupled to the base editor through a linker. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 57-66, 385-443, 444-475, or 594-595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises an adenine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises an adenine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the adenine to guanine. In some embodiments, the adenine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 57 or a variant thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a cytosine deaminase; the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a cytosine; and modifying the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polypeptide comprises converting the cytosine to uracil. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 58 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 59-66 or a variant thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the complex further comprises a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. In some embodiments, the uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide comprises a first strand comprising a sequence complementary to a sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure and a second strand comprising said PAM. In some embodiments, the PAM is directly adjacent to the 3′ end of the sequence complementary to the sequence of the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure.
  • In some embodiments, the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is not a Cas9 endonuclease, a Cas14 endonuclease, a Cas12a endonuclease, a Cas12b endonuclease, a Cas 12c endonuclease, a Cas12d endonuclease, a Cas12e endonuclease, a Cas13a endonuclease, a Cas13b endonuclease, a Cas13c endonuclease, or a Cas 13d endonuclease. In some embodiments, the class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide is a eukaryotic, plant, fungal, mammalian, rodent, or human double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid polynucleotide.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides a method of modifying a target nucleic acid locus, said method comprising delivering to said target nucleic acid locus the engineered nucleic acid editing system described herein, wherein the endonuclease is configured to form a complex with the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure, and wherein the complex is configured such that upon binding of the complex to the target nucleic acid locus, the complex modifies a nucleotide of the target nucleic locus.
  • In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises an adenine deaminase, the nucleotide is an adenine, and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a guanine. In some embodiments, the engineered nucleic acid editing system comprises a cytidine deaminase and a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor, the nucleotide is a cytosine and modifying the target nucleic acid locus comprises converting the adenine to a uracil. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus comprises genomic DNA, viral DNA, or bacterial DNA. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus is in vitro. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid locus is within a cell. In some embodiments, the cell is a prokaryotic cell, a bacterial cell, a eukaryotic cell, a fungal cell, a plant cell, an animal cell, a mammalian cell, a rodent cell, a primate cell, or a human cell. In some embodiments, the cell is within an animal.
  • In some embodiments, the cell is within a cochlea. In some embodiments, the cell is within an embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a two-cell embryo. In some embodiments, the embryo is a mouse embryo. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering the nucleic acid described herein or the vector described herein. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a nucleic acid comprising an open reading frame encoding the endonuclease.
  • In some embodiments, the nucleic acid comprises a promoter to which the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease is operably linked. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to said target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a capped mRNA containing the open reading frame encoding the endonuclease. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a translated polypeptide. In some embodiments, delivering the engineered nucleic acid editing system to the target nucleic acid locus comprises delivering a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) encoding the engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure operably linked to a ribonucleic acid (RNA) pol III promoter.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity. In some embodiments, the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease having at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof, wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • In some aspects, the present disclosure provides an engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising: an endonuclease configured to bind to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence comprising any one of SEQ ID NOs: 360-368 or 598, wherein the endonuclease is a class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein the endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity; and a base editor coupled to the endonuclease.
  • In some embodiments, the endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism. In some embodiments, the endonuclease has less than 80% identity to a Cas9 endonuclease. In some embodiments, the endonuclease further comprises an HNH domain. In some embodiments, the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to about 60 to 90 consecutive nucleotides selected from any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the ribonucleic acid sequence configured to bind the endonuclease comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to non-degenerate nucleotides of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 88-96 or 488-489 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs:70-78 or 597 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor is an adenine deaminase. In some embodiments, the adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 50-51, 57, 385-443, 448-475, or 595 or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, the base editor is a cytosine deaminase. In some embodiments, the cytosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100% sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-49, 444-447, 594, or 58-66 or a variant thereof.
  • Systems of the present disclosure may be used for various applications, such as, for example, nucleic acid editing (e.g., gene editing), binding to a nucleic acid molecule (e.g., sequence-specific binding). Such systems may be used, for example, for addressing (e.g., removing or replacing) a genetically inherited mutation that may cause a disease in a subject, inactivating a gene in order to ascertain its function in a cell, as a diagnostic tool to detect disease-causing genetic elements (e.g. via cleavage of reverse-transcribed viral RNA or an amplified DNA sequence encoding a disease-causing mutation), as deactivated enzymes in combination with a probe to target and detect a specific nucleotide sequence (e.g. sequence encoding antibiotic resistance int bacteria), to render viruses inactive or incapable of infecting host cells by targeting viral genomes, to add genes or amend metabolic pathways to engineer organisms to produce valuable small molecules, macromolecules, or secondary metabolites, to establish a gene drive element for evolutionary selection, to detect cell perturbations by foreign small molecules and nucleotides as a biosensor.
  • TABLE 2
    Sequence Listing of Protein and Nucleic Acid Sequences Referred to Herein
    SEQ
    ID Other
    Category NO: Description Type Organism Information Sequence
    Cytosine 594 CMP/dCMP- protein Cebus unknown MEASPASRPRPLMGPR
    Deaminase type imitator TFTENFTNNPEVFGRH
    deaminase QTYLCYEVKCQGPDG
    domain- TRDLMTEQRDFLCNQ
    containing ARNLLSGFDGRHAER
    protein CFLDRVPSWRLDPAQ
    (uniprot TYRVTCFISWSPCFSC
    accession AREVAEFLQENPHVN
    A0A2K5RDN7) LRIFAARIYDCRPRYEE
    GLQMLQNAGAQVSIM
    TSEEFRHCWDTFVDH
    QGHPFQPWEGLDEHS
    QALSRRLQAILQGNR
    WMILSL
    Adenosine 595 TadA* protein unknown unknown MSEVEFSHEYWMRHA
    Deaminase (ABE8.17m) LTLAKRARDEREVPV
    GAVLVLNNRVIGEGW
    NRAIGLHDPTAHAEIM
    ALROGGLVMQNYRLI
    DATLYSTFEPCVMCA
    GAMIHSRIGRVVFGVR
    NAKTGAAGSLMDVLH
    YPGMNHRVEITEGILA
    DECAALLCYFFRMPR
    RVFNAQKKAQSSTD
    MG34 596 MG34-1 protein unknown uncultivatde MERELVLGIDYGGKY
    active effector organism TGLAVVDRRHNQVLY
    effectors ANRLKMRDDVAGILK
    DRRKQRGIRRTAQTK
    KKRLRELKNYLKSIGY
    NESTATFETVYSLAHK
    RGYDYADMPEEKTSE
    EIEAMDVEERKQWEK
    EKQEWEETKRNSRHR
    KEVVKDVHKAMIEGR
    ATEEQIKRVERIFNKQ
    YRPKRFNNRILTKCKV
    EDCGVNTPLRKNVRD
    LLIENIVRFFPIEQSEKD
    NLKDAVLDKNRREEV
    KSFFRKHKTDEHIRKQ
    VYDIADNKLSGRTVFC
    KEHILEHTEHSKEERK
    VFRLAPSLKTKIENVL
    AVIKDEILPKFTVNKV
    VMESNNFDIAAKTQG
    KKRLAKEEYGKGPRE
    GKETRKEALLRETDG
    RCIYCGKSIDISNAHD
    DHIFPRKAGGLNIFAN
    LVACCAVCNENKKGR
    TPLESGISPKPEIIAFMK
    NDLKKKILEDARNINT
    VDFNKYMSHASIGWR
    YMRDRLRESAGNKKL
    PIERQSGIYTAYFRRW
    WGFKKERGNTLHHAL
    DAVILASRKGYSDDGL
    VDMTLKPKYNKGGEF
    DPEKHLPEPIEFKMDK
    GSRGSALHDRNPLSYK
    KGIITRRFMVTEIECGK
    EDDVISETYREKLKEA
    FKRFDTKKGKCLTDK
    EAKEAGFCIKKNELV
    MSLKCSIKGTGPGQMI
    RINNNVFKTNVHNVG
    VDVYLDEKGKKKAYE
    RKNPRLSKHFIEPPPQP
    NGRVSFTLKRRDMVT
    VEGEDAIYRIKKLGTS
    PTIEAVVGSDGKTRTV
    SATKLTKANSAE
    nickase 597 MG34-1 protein unknown uncultivated  MERELVLGIAYGGKY
    (D10A) organism TGLAVVDRRHNQVLY
    ANRLKMRDDVAGILK
    DRRKQRGIRRTAQTK
    KKRLRELKNYLKSIGY
    NESTATFETVYSLAHK
    RGYDYADMPEEKTSE
    EIEAMDVEERKQWEK
    EKQEWEETKRNSRHR
    KEVVKDVHKAMIEGR
    ATEEQIKRVERIFNKQ
    YRPKRFNNRILTKCKV
    EDCGVNTPLRKNVRD
    LLIENIVRFFPIEQSEKD
    NLKDAVLDKNRREEV
    KSFFRKHKTDEHIRKQ
    VYDIADNKLSGRTVFC
    KEHILEHTEHSKEERK
    VFRLAPSLKTKIENVL
    AVIKDEILPKFTVNKV
    VMESNNFDIAAKTQG
    KKRLAKEEYGKGPRE
    GKETRKEALLRETDG
    RCIYCGKSIDISNAHD
    DHIFPRKAGGLNIFAN
    LVACCAVCNENKKGR
    TPLESGISPKPEIIAFMK
    NDLKKKILEDARNINT
    VDFNKYMSHASIGWR
    YMRDRLRESAGNKKL
    PIERQSGIYTAYFRRW
    WGFKKERGNTLHHAL
    DAVILASRKGYSDDGL
    VDMTLKPKYNKGGEF
    DPEKHLPEPIEFKMDK
    GSRGSALHDRNPLSYK
    KGIITRRFMVTEIECGK
    EDDVISETYREKLKEA
    FKRFDTKKGKCLTDK
    EAKEAGFCIKKNELV
    MSLKCSIKGTGPGQMI
    RINNNVFKTNVHNVG
    VDVYLDEKGKKKAYE
    RKNPRLSKHFIEPPPQP
    NGRVSFTLKRRDMVT
    VEGEDAIYRIKKLGTS
    PTIEAVVGSDGKTRTV
    SATKLTKANSAE
    PAM 598 MG34-1 nucleotide unknown unknown NGG
    PAM
  • EXAMPLES Example 1.—Plasmid Construction for Base Editors
  • To create base editing enzymes that utilize CRISPR functionality to target their base editing, Cas effector enzymes were fused in various configurations to the exemplary deaminases described herein. This process involved a first stage of constructing vectors suitable for generating the fusion enzymes. Two entry plasmid vectors, MGA, and MGC, were first constructed.
  • To construct the MGA (Metagenomi adenine base editor) entry plasmid containing T7 promoter-His tag-TadA* (ABE8.17m)-SV40 NLS, three DNA fragments were amplified from pAL6. To construct the MGC (Metagenomi cytosine base editor) entry plasmid containing T7 promoter-His tag-APOBEC1 (BE3)-UGI-SV40 NLS, APOBEC1 and UGI-SV40 NLS were amplified from pAL9 and two pieces of vector backbones were amplified from pAL6 (see FIG. 3 ).
  • To introduce mutations into the effectors, source plasmids containing MG1-4, MG1-6, MG3-6, MG3-7, MG3-8, MG4-5, MG14-1, MG15-1, or MG18-1 effector gene sequences were amplified by Q5 DNA polymerase with forward primers incorporating appropriate mutations and reverse primers. The linear DNA fragments were then phosphorylated and ligated. The DNA templates were digested with DpnI using KLD Enzyme Mix (New England Biolabs) per the manufacturer's instructions.
  • To generate the pMGA and pMGC expression plasmids, genes were amplified from plasmids carrying mutated effectors and cloned into MGA and MGC entry plasmids via XhoI and SacII sites, respectively. To clone sgRNA expression cassettes comprising T7 promoter-sgRNA-bidirectional terminator into BE expression plasmids, one set of primers (P366 as the forward primer) was used to amplify a T7 promoter-spacer sequence while another set of primers (P367 as the reverse primer) was used to amplify spacer sequence-sgRNA scaffold-bidirectional terminator, in which pTCM plasmids were used as templates (see FIG. 2 ). The two fragments were assembled into pMGA and pMGC via XbaI sites, resulting pMGA-sgRNA and pMGC-sgRNA, respectively.
  • TABLE 3
    Summary of constructs made for ABE
    screening systems described herein
    # Application Candidate
    1 ABE MGA1-4-sgRNA1
    2 MGA1-4-sgRNA2
    3 MGA1-4-sgRNA3
    4 MGA1-6-sgRNA1
    5 MGA1-6-sgRNA2
    6 MGA1-6-sgRNA3
    7 MGA3-6-sgRNA1
    8 MGA3-6-sgRNA2
    9 MGA3-6-sgRNA3
    10 MGA3-7-sgRNA1
    11 MGA3-7-sgRNA2
    12 MGA3-7-sgRNA3
    13 MGA3-8-sgRNA1
    14 MGA3-8-sgRNA2
    15 MGA3-8-sgRNA3
    16 MGA14-1-sgRNA1
    17 MGA14-1-sgRNA2
    18 MGA14-1-sgRNA3
    19 MGA15-1-sgRNA1
    20 MGA15-1-sgRNA2
    21 MGA15-1-sgRNA3
    22 MGA18-1-sgRNA1
    23 MGA18-1-sgRNA2
    24 MGA18-1-sgRNA3
    25 ABE8.17m-sgRNA1
    26 ABE8.17m-sgRNA2
    27 ABE8.17m-sgRNA3
    28 CBE MGC1-4-sgRNA1
    29 MGC1-4-sgRNA2
    30 MGC1-4-sgRNA3
    31 MGC1-6-sgRNA1
    32 MGC1-6-sgRNA2
    33 MGC1-6-sgRNA3
    34 MGC3-6-sgRNA1
    35 MGC3-6-sgRNA2
    36 MGC3-6-sgRNA3
    37 MGC3-7-sgRNA1
    38 MGC3-7-sgRNA2
    39 MGC3-7-sgRNA3
    40 MGC3-8-sgRNA1
    41 MGC3-8-sgRNA2
    42 MGC3-8-sgRNA3
    43 MGC4-5-sgRNA1
    44 MGC4-5-sgRNA2
    45 MGC4-5-sgRNA3
    46 MGC14-1-sgRNA1
    47 MGC14-1-sgRNA2
    48 MGC14-1-sgRNA3
    49 MGC15-1-sgRNA1
    50 MGC15-1-sgRNA2
    51 MGC15-1-sgRNA3
    52 MGC18-1-sgRNA1
    53 MGC18-1-sgRNA2
    54 MGC18-1-sgRNA3
    55 BE3-sgRNA1
    56 BE3-sgRNA2
    57 BE3-sgRNA3
  • All amplified DNA fragments were purified by QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), assembled via NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly (New England Biolabs), and the resulting assemblies were propagated via Endura Electrocompetent cells (Lucergen) per the manufacturer's instructions (see FIGS. 4 & 5 ). The DNA sequences of all cloned genes were confirmed at ELIM BIOPHARM.
  • TABLE 4
    Conserved catalytic residues parsed out
    for selected systems described herein
    Associated Full-length
    Nickase Candidate Length Protein Sequence
    nMG1-4 (D9A) 1025 SEQ ID NO: 70
    nMG1-6 (D13A) 1059 SEQ ID NO: 71
    nMG3-6 (D13A) 1134 SEQ ID NO: 72
    nMG3-7 (D12A) 1131 SEQ ID NO: 73
    nMG3-8 (D13A) 1132 SEQ ID NO: 74
    nMG4-5 (D17A) 1055 SEQ ID NO: 75
    nMG14-1 (D23A) 1003 SEQ ID NO: 76
    nMG15-1 (D8A) 1082 SEQ ID NO: 77
    nMG18-1 (D12A) 1348 SEQ ID NO: 78
  • Example 2.—Protein Expression and Purification
  • The T7 promoter driven mutated effector genes in the pMGA and pMGC plasmids were expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells in Magic Media per manufacturer's instructions (Thermo) by transformation with each of the respective plasmids described in Example 1 above. After a 40 hour incubation at 16° C. the transformed cells were harvested, suspended in lysis buffer (HisTrap equilibration buffer: 20 mM Tris (Sigma T2319-100 ML), 300 mM sodium chloride (VWR VWRVE529-500 ML), 5% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl2, with 10 mM imidazole (Sigma 68268-100 ML-F); pH 7.5) and EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Pierce), and frozen in the −80° C. freezer. The cells were then thawed on ice, sonicated, clarified, and filtered before affinity purification. The protein was applied to Cytiva 5 ml HisTrap FF column on the Akta Avant FPLC per the manufacturer's specifications and the protein was eluted in an isocratic elution of 20 mM Tris (Sigma T2319-100 ML), 300 mM sodium chloride (VWR VWRVE529-500 ML), 5% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl2, with 250 mM imidazole (Sigma 68268-100 ML-F); pH 7.5. Eluted fractions containing the His-tagged effector proteins were concentrated and buffer exchanged into 50 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, 5% glycerol; pH 7.5. The protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo) and adjusted after determining the relative purity by SDS PAGE densitometry in Image Lab (Bio-Rad) (see FIG. 7 ).
  • Example 3.—In Vitro Nickase Assay
  • 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM) labeled primers P141 and P146 (SEQ ID NOs: 179 and 180) synthesized by IDT were used to amplify linear fragments of LacZ containing targeting sequences of effectors using Q5 DNA polymerase. DNA fragments containing the T7 promoter followed by sgRNAs containing 20-bp or 22-bp spacer sequences were transcribed in vitro using HiScribe T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs) per manufacturer's instructions. Synthetic sgRNAs with the sequences corresponding to the named sgRNAs in the sequence listing were purified by Monarch RNA Cleanup Kit (New England Biolabs) according to the users manual and concentrations were measured by Nanodrop.
  • To determine DNA nickase activity, each of the purified mutated effectors was first supplemented with its cognate sgRNA. Reactions were initiated by adding the linear DNA substrate in a 15 μL reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl, 150 nM enzyme, 150 nM RNA, and 15 nM DNA. The reaction was incubated at 37° C. for 2 h. Digested DNA was purified using AMPure XP SPRI paramagnetic beads (Beckman Coulter) and eluted with 6 μL TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA; pH 8.0). The nicked DNA was resolved on a 10% TBE-Urea denaturing gel (Biorad) and imaged by ChemiDoc (Bio-Rad) (see FIG. 7 , which shows that the depicted enzymes display nickase activity by production of bands 600 and 200 bases versus 400 and 200 bases in the case of the wild-type enzyme). The results indicated that all the tested nickase mutants in FIG. 7 displayed their expected nickase activity instead of wild type cleavage activity with the exception of MG4-5 (D17A), which was inconclusive.
  • Example 4.—Base Editor Introduction into E. coli
  • Plasmids were transformed into Lucergen's electrocompetent BL21 (DE3) cells according to the manufacturer's instructions. After electroporation, cells were recovered with expression recovery media at 37° C. for 1 h and spread on LB plates containing 100 L/mg ampicillin and 0.1 mM IPTG. After overnight growth at 37° C., colonies were picked and lacZ gene was amplified by Q5 DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) with primers P137 and P360. The resulting PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing at ELIM BIOPHARM. Base edits were determined by examining whether there exists C to T conversion or A to G conversion in the targeted protospacer regions for cytosine base editors or adenine base editors, respectively.
  • To evaluate editing efficiency in E. coli, plasmids were transformed into electrocompetent BL21 (DE3) (Lucergen) and the electroporated cells were recovered with expression recovery media at 37° C. for 1 h. 10 μL of recovered cells were then inoculated into 990 μL SOB containing 100 μL/mg ampicillin and 0.1 mM IPTG in a 96-well deep well plate, and grown at 37° C. for 20 h. 1 μL cells induced for base editor expression were used for amplification of the lacZ gene in a 20 μL PCR reaction (Q5 DNA polymerase) with primers P137 and P360. The resulting PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing at ELIM BIOPHARM. Quantification of editing efficiency was processed by Edit R as described in Example 12.
  • TABLE 5
    The MG base editors described herein with associated PAM and deaminases
    Linker Linker
    (Deaminase- (Nickase-
    Candidate Type PAM Deaminase Nickase) Nickase UGI UGI
    MGA1-4 II nRRR SEQ ID NO: 595 SGGSSGGSSGSE nMG1-4 (D9A)
    SEQ ID NO: 360 TadA* TPGTSESATPESS SEQ ID NO: 70
    (ABE8.17m) GGSSGGS
    MGA3-7 II nnRnYAY SEQ ID NO: 595 SGGSSGGSSGSE nMG3-7 (D12A)
    SEQ ID NO: 363 TadA* TPGTSESATPESS SEQ ID NO: 73
    (ABE8.17m) GGSSGGS
    MGA18-1 II nRWART SEQ ID NO: 595 SGGSSGGSSGSE InMG18-1
    SEQ ID NO: 368 TadA* TPGTSESATPESS (D12A)
    (ABE8.17m) GGSSGGS SEQ ID NO: 78
    MGC1-6 II nnRRAY SEQ ID NO: 58 SGSETPGTSESAT nMG1-6 (D13A) UGI (BE3) GSGGS
    SEQ ID NO: 361 APOBEC1 (BE3) PESA SEQ ID NO: 71 SEQ ID
    NO: 67
    MGC3-7 II nnRnYAY SEQ ID NO: 58 SGSETPGTSESAT nMG3-7 (D12A) UGI (BE3) GSGGS
    SEQ ID NO: 363 APOBEC1 (BE3) PESA SEQ ID NO: 73 SEQ ID
    NO: 67
    MGC4-5 II nRCCV SEQ ID NO: 58 SGSETPGTSESAT nMG4-5 (D17A) UGI (BE3) GSGGS
    SEQ ID NO: 365 APOBEC1 (BE3) PESA SEQ ID NO: 74 SEQ ID
    NO: 67
    MGC14-1 II nRnnGRKA SEQ ID NO: 58 SGSETPGTSESAT nMG14-1 UGI (BE3) GSGGS
    SEQ ID NO: 366 APOBEC1 (BE3) PESA (D23A) SEQ ID
    SEQ ID NO: 76 NO: 67
    MGC15-1 II nnnnC SEQ ID NO: 58 SGSETPGTSESAT nMG15-1 (D8A) UGI (BE3) GSGGS
    SEQ ID NO: 367 APOBEC1 (BE3) PESA SEQ ID NO: 77 SEQ ID
    NO: 67
    MGC18-1 II nRWART APOBEC1 (BE3) SGSETPGTSESAT nMG18-1 UGI (BE3) GSGGS
    SEQ ID NO 368 SEQ ID NO: 58 PESA (D12A)
    SEQ ID NO: 78
  • Example 5.—Protein Nucleofection and Amplicon Seq in Mammalian Cells (Prophetic)
  • Nucleofection is conducted in mammalian cells (e.g. K-562, Neuro-2A or RAW264.7) according to the manufacturer's recommendations using a Lonza 4D nucleofector and the Lonza SF Cell Line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit S (cat. no. V4XC-2032). After formulating the SF nucleofection buffer, 200,000 cells are resuspended in 5 μl of buffer per nucleofection. In the remaining 15 μl of buffer per nucleofection, 20 pmol of chemically modified sgRNA from Synthego is combined with 18 pmol of base editor enzymes (e.g. ABE8e) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature to complex. Cells are added to the 20 μl nucleofection cuvettes, followed by protein solution, and the mixture is triturated to mix. Cells are nucleofected with program CM-130, immediately after which 80 μl of warmed media is added to each well for recovery. After 5 min, 25 μl from each sample is added to 250 μl of fresh media in a 48-well poly-d-lysine plate (Corning). Cells are then treated in the same way as lipofected cells above for genomic DNA extraction after three more days of culture.
  • Following Illumina barcoding, PCR products are pooled and purified by electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel using a Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs), eluting with 30 μl H2O. DNA concentration is quantified with a Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (paired-end read, R1: 250-280 cycles, R2: 0 cycles) according to the manufacturer's protocols.
  • Sequencing reads are demultiplexed using the MiSeq Reporter (Illumina) and FASTQ files are analyzed using CRISPResso2. Dual editing in individual alleles is analyzed by a Python script. Base editing values are representative of n=3 independent biological replicates collected by different researchers, with the mean±s.d. shown. Base editing values are reported as a percentage of the number of reads with adenine mutagenesis over the total aligned reads.
  • Example 6.—Plasmid Nucleofection and Whole Genome Seq in Mammalian Cells (Prophetic)
  • All plasmids are assembled by the uracil-specific excision reagent (USER) cloning method. Guide RNA plasmids for SpCas9, SaCas9 and all engineered variants are assembled. Plasmids for mammalian cell transfections are prepared using the ZymoPURE Plasmid Midiprep kit (Zymo Research Corporation). HEK293T cells (ATCC CRL-3216) are cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Corning) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (ThermoFisher Scientific) and maintained at 37° C. with 5% CO2.
  • HEK293T cells are seeded on 48-well poly-d-lysine plates (Corning) in the same culture medium. Cells are transfected 12-16 h after plating with 1.5 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific) using 750 ng base editor plasmid, 250 ng guide RNA plasmid and 10 ng green fluorescent protein as a transfection control. Cells are cultured for 3 d with media exchanged following the first day, then washed with Ř1 PBS (ThermoFisher Scientific), followed by genomic DNA extraction by addition of 100 μl freshly prepared lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.05% SDS, 25 μg ml-1 proteinase K (ThermoFisher Scientific)) directly into each transfected well. The mixture is incubated at 37° C. for 1 h then heat inactivated at 80° C. for 30 min. Genomic DNA lysate is subsequently used immediately for high-throughput sequencing (HTS).
  • HTS of genomic DNA from HEK293T cells is performed. Following Illumina barcoding, PCR products are pooled and purified by electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel using a Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (NEB), eluting with 30 μl H2O. DNA concentration is quantified with Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (paired end read, R1: 250-280 cycles, R2: 0 cycles) according to the manufacturer's protocols.
  • Example 7.—Determining Editing Window (Prophetic)
  • To examine the editing window regions, the cytosine showing the highest C-T conversion frequency in a specified sgRNA is normalized to 1, and other cytosines at positions spanning from 30 nt upstream to 10 nt downstream of the PAM sequence (total 43 bp) of the same sgRNA are normalized subsequently. Then normalized C-T conversion frequencies are classified and compared according to their positions for all tested sgRNAs of a specified base editor. A comprehensive editing window (CEW) is defined to span positions with an average C-T conversion efficiency exceeding 0.6 after normalization.
  • To examine the substrate preference for each cytidine deaminase, C sites are initially classified according to their positions in sgRNA targeting regions and those positions containing at least one C site with ≥0.8 normalized C-T conversion frequency are included in subsequent analysis. Selected C sites are then compared depending on base types upstream or downstream of the edited cytosine (NC or CN). For cytidine deaminases showing efficient C-T conversion at both N-terminus and C-terminus of the endonuclease, the substrate preference is evaluated by integrating respective NT- and CT-CBEs together. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA is used and p<0.05 is considered as significant
  • Example 8a.—Testing Off-Target Analysis with Whole Genome Sequencing and Transcriptomics in Mammalian Cells (Prophetic)
  • HEK293T cells are plated on 48-well poly-d-lysine-coated plates 16 to 20 h before lipofection at a density of 3.104 cells per well in DMEM+GlutaMAX medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) without antibiotics. 750 ng nickase or base editor expression plasmid DNA is combined with 250 ng of sgRNA expression plasmid DNA in 15 μl Opti-MEM+GlutaMAX. This is combined with 10 μl of lipid mixture, comprising 1.5 μl Lipofectamine 2000 and 8.5 μl Opti-MEM +GlutaMAX per well. Cells are harvested 3 d after transfection and either DNA or RNA was harvested. For DNA analysis, cells are washed once in PBS, and then lysed in 100 μl QuickExtract Buffer (Lucigen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For RNA harvest, the MagMAX mirVana Total RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) is used with the KingFisher Flex.
  • Genomic DNA from mammalian cells is fragmented and adapter-ligated using the Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit (Illumina) using 96-well plate Nextera indexing primers (Illumina), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Library size and concentration is confirmed by Fragment Analyzer (Agilent) and DNA is sent to Novogene for WGS using an Illumina HiSeq system.
  • All targeted NGS data is analyzed by performing four general steps: (1) alignment; (2) duplicate marking; (3) variant calling; and (4) background filtration of variants to remove artifacts and germline mutations. The mutation reference and alternate alleles are reported relative to the plus strand of the reference genome.
  • For whole Transcriptome sequencing, mRNA selection is performed using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England BioLabs). RNA library preparation is performed using NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs). Based on the RNA input amount, a cycle number of 12 is used for the PCR enrichment of adapter-ligated DNA. NEBNext Sample Purification Beads (New England BioLabs) is used throughout for all of the size selection performed by this method. NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (New England BioLabs) is used for the multiplex indexes in accordance with the PCR recipe outlined in the protocol. Prior to sequencing, samples are quality checked using the High Sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape on the 4200 TapeStation System (Agilent). The libraries are pooled and sequenced using a NovaSeq (Novogene). Targeted RNA sequencing is then performed. Complementary DNA is generated by PCR with reverse transcription (RT-PCR) from the isolated RNA using the SuperScript IV One-Step RT-PCR System with EZDnase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • The following program is used: 58° C. for 12 min; 98° C. for 2 min; followed by PCR cycles that varied by amplicon: for CTNNB1 and IP90; 32 cycles of (98° C. for 10 s; 60° C. for 10 sec; 72° C. for 30 sec). Following the combined RT-PCR, amplicons are barcoded and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq sequencer as described above. The first 125 nucleotides in each amplicon, beginning at the first base after the end of the forward primer in each amplicon, are aligned to a reference sequence and used for analysis of maximum A-to-I frequencies in each amplicon. Off-target DNA sequencing is performed using primers, using a two-step PCR and barcoding method to prepare samples for sequencing using Illumina MiSeq sequencers as above.
  • Example 8b.—Analysis of Off-Target Edits by Whole Genome Sequencing and Transcriptomics (Prophetic)
  • Transfected cells prepared as in Example 8a are harvested after 3 days and the genomic DNA isolated using the Agencourt DNAdvance Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer's instructions. On-target and off-target genomic regions of interest are amplified by PCR with flanking HTS primer pairs. PCR amplification is carried out with Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer's instructions using 5 ng of genomic DNA as a template. Cycle numbers are determined separately for each primer pair as to ensure the reaction was stopped in the linear range of amplification (30, 28, 28, 28, 32, and 32 cycles for EMX1, FANCF, HEK293 site 2, HEK293 site 3, HEK293 site 4, and RNF2 primers, respectively). PCR products are purified using RapidTips (Diffinity Genomics). Purified DNA is amplified by PCR with primers containing sequencing adaptors. The products are gel-purified and quantified using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher) and KAPA Library Quantification Kit-Illumina (KAPA Biosystems). Samples are sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq as previously described.
  • Sequencing reads are automatically demultiplexed using MiSeq Reporter (Illumina), and individual FASTQ files are analyzed with a custom Matlab script. Each read is pairwise aligned to the appropriate reference sequence using the Smith-Waterman algorithm. Base calls with a Q-score below 31 are replaced with N′s and are thus excluded in calculating nucleotide frequencies. This treatment yields an expected MiSeq base-calling error rate of approximately 1 in 1,000. Aligned sequences in which the read and reference sequence contained no gaps are stored in an alignment table from which base frequencies were tabulated for each locus. Indel frequencies were quantified with a custom Matlab script.
  • Sequencing reads are scanned for exact matches to two 10-bp sequences that flank both sides of a window in which indels might occur. If no exact matches were located, the read is excluded from analysis. If the length of this indel window exactly matched the reference sequence the read is classified as not containing an indel. If the indel window is two or more bases longer or shorter than the reference sequence, then the sequencing read is classified as an insertion or deletion, respectively.
  • Example 9.—Mouse Editing Experiments (Prophetic)
  • It is envisaged that a base editor consisting of a novel DNA targeting nuclease domain fused to a novel deaminase domain can be validated as a therapeutic candidate by testing in appropriate mouse models of disease.
  • One example of an appropriate model comprises mice that have been engineered to express the human PCSK9 protein, for example, as described by Herbert et al (10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.204040). The PCSK9 protein regulates LDL receptor (LDLR) levels and influences serum cholesterol levels. Mice expressing the human PCSK9 protein exhibit elevated levels of cholesterol and more rapid development of atherosclerosis. PCSK9 is a validated drug target for the reduction of lipid levels in people at increased risk of cardiovascular disease due abnormally high plasma lipid levels (doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0107-8). Reducing the levels of PCSK9 via genome editing is expected to permanently lower lipid levels for the life-time of the individual thus providing a life-long reduction in cardiovascular disease risk. One genome editing approach can involve targeting the coding sequence of the PCSK9 gene with the goal of editing a sequence to create a premature stop codon and thus prevent the translation of the PCSK9 mRNA into a functional protein. Targeting a region close to the 5′ end of the coding sequence is useful in order to block translation of the majority of the protein. To create a stop codon (TGA, TAA, TAG) with high efficiency and specificity will require targeting a region of the PCSK9 coding sequence wherein the editing window will be placed over an appropriate sequence such that the highest frequency editing event results in a stop codon. Therefore, the availability of multiple base editing systems with a wide range of PAMs or a base editing system with a degenerate PAM is useful to access a larger number of potential target sites in the PCSK9 gene. In addition, additional editing systems wherein the frequency of off-target editing is low (e.g. in the range of 1% or less of the on-target editing events) are also useful to perform gene editing in this context.
  • The efficiency of base editing required for a therapeutic effect is in the range of 50% or higher in order to achieve a significant reduction in plasma lipid levels. An example of the use of a base editor to create a stop codon in the PCSK9 gene is that of Carreras et al (doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0624-2) in which between 10% and 34% of the PCSK9 alleles were edited to create a stop codon. While this level of editing was sufficient to result in a measurable reduction in plasma lipid levels in the mice, a higher editing efficiency will be required for therapeutic use in humans.
  • To identify a base-editing (BE) system and a guide that are optimal for introducing the stop codons in the PCSK9 gene, a screen may be performed in a mouse liver cell line such as Hepa1-6 cells. In silico screening may first be used to identify guides that target the PCSK9 gene with the various BE systems available. To select among the large number of possible guides an in-silico analysis may be performed to determine which guides have an editing window that encompasses a sequence that when edited may create a stop codon. Preference may then be given to those guides that are closer to the 5′ end of the coding sequence. The resulting set of guides and BE proteins may be combined to form a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) and may be nucleofected into Hepal-6 cells. After 72 h the efficiency of editing at the target site may be determined by NGS analysis. Based on these in vitro results the one or more BE/guide combinations that resulted in the highest frequency of stop codon formation may be selected for in vivo testing.
  • For application in a human therapeutic setting a safe and effective method of delivering the base editing components comprising the base editor and the guide RNA is required. In vivo delivery methods can be divided in to viral or non-viral methods. Among viral vectors the Adeno Associated Virus (AAV) is the virus of choice for clinical use due to its safety record, efficient delivery to multiple tissues and cell types and established manufacturing processes. The large size of base editors (BE) exceeds the packaging capacity of AAV which interferes with packaging in a single Adeno Associated Virus. While approaches that package BE into two AAV using split intein technology have been demonstrated to be successful in mice (doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0501-5), the need for 2 viruses complicates development and manufacture. An additional disadvantage of AAV is that while the virus does not have a mechanism for promoting integration into the genome of host cells, and most of the AAV genomes remain episomal, a fraction of the AAV genomes do become integrated at random double strand breaks that occur naturally in cells (Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2009 August; 11(4): 442-447). This may lead to the persistence of gene sequences expressing the BE for the life-time of the organism. Moreover, AAV genomes persist as episomes inside the nucleus of transduced cells and can be maintained for years which may result in the long-term expression of BE in these cells and thus an increased risk of off-target effects because the risk of an off-target event occurring is a function of the time over which the editing enzyme is active. Adenovirus (Ad) such as Ad5 can efficiently deliver DNA payloads to the liver of mammals and can package up to 45 kb of DNA. However, adenoviruses are known to induce a strong immune response in mammals (dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.5.733), including in patients which can result in serious adverse events including death (doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.02.010).
  • Non-viral delivery vectors (reviewed in doi:10.1038/mt.2012.79) which include lipid nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles have several advantages compared to viral delivery vectors including lower immunogenicity and transient expression of the nucleic acid cargo. The transient expression elicited by non-viral delivery vectors is particularly suited to genome editing applications because it is expected to minimize off target events. In addition, non-viral delivery unlike viral vectors has the potential for repeat administration to achieve the therapeutic effect. There is also no theoretical limit to the size of the nucleic acid molecules that can be packaged in non-viral vectors, although in practice the packaging becomes less efficient as the size of the nucleic acid increases and the particles size may increase.
  • A BE may be delivered in vivo using a non-viral vector such as a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) by encapsulating a synthetic mRNA encoding the BE together with the guide RNA into the LNP. This can be performed using methodologies well known in the art, for example as described by Finn et al (DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.014) or Yin et al (doi:10.1038/nbt.3471). Typically, LNP deliver their cargo primarily to the hepatocytes of the liver, which is also a target organ/cell type when attempting to interfere with the expression of the PCSK9 gene. In order to demonstrate proof of concept for this approach we envisage that a BE comprised of a novel genome editing protein fused to a deaminase domain may be encoded in a synthetic mRNA and packaged in a LNP together with an appropriate guide RNA that targets the selected site in the PCSK9 gene of the mouse. In the case of mice that were engineered to express the human PCSK9 gene the guide may be designed to target only the human PCSK9 gene or both the human and mouse PCSK9 genes. Following injection of these LNP the editing efficiency at the on-target site in the genome of the liver cells may be analyzed by amplicon sequencing or other methods such as tracking of indels by decomposition (doi: 10.1093/nar/gku936). The physiologic impact may be determined by measuring lipid levels in the blood of the mice, including total cholesterol and triglyceride levels using standard methods.
  • Another example of a disease that may be modeled in mice to evaluate a novel BE is Primary Hyperoxaluria type I. Primary Hyperoxaluria type I (PH1) is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by defects in the AGXT gene that encodes the enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase. This results in a defect in glyoxylate metabolism and the accumulation of the toxic metabolite oxalate. One approach to treating this disease is to reduce the expression of the enzyme glycolate oxidase (GO) that produces glyoxylate from glycolate and thereby reducing the amount of substrate (glyoxylate) available for the formation of oxalate. PH1 can be modeled in mice in which both copies of the AGXT gene have been knocked out (agxt−/− mice) resulting in a significant 3-fold increase in oxalate levels in the urine compared to wild type controls. The agxt−/− mice can therefore be used to assess the efficacy of a novel base editor designed to create a stop codon in the coding sequence of the endogenous mouse GO gene. To identify a BE system and a guide that is optimal for introducing stop codons in the GO gene, a screen may be performed in a mouse liver cell line such as Hepal-6 cells. In silico screening may first be used to identify guides that target the GO gene with the various BE systems available. To select among the large number of possible guides an in-silico analysis may be performed to determine which guides have an editing window that encompasses a sequence that when edited may create a stop codon. Preference may then be given to those guides that are closer to the 5′ end of the coding sequence. The resulting set of guides and BE proteins may be combined to form a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) and may be nucleofected in to Hepal-6 cells. After 72 h, the efficiency of editing at the target site may be determined by NGS analysis. Based on these in vitro results the one or more BE/guide combinations that resulted in the highest frequency of stop codon formation may be selected for in vivo testing in mice.
  • The BE and guide may be delivered to the mice using an AAV virus with a split intein system to express the BE and a 3rd AAV to deliver the guide. Alternatively, an Adenovirus type 5 may be used to deliver the BE and guide in a single virus because of the >40 Kb packaging capacity of Adenovirus. Further, the BE may be delivered as a mRNA together with the guide RNA packaged in an appropriate LNP. After intravenous injection of the LNP into the agxt−/− mice the oxalate levels in the urine may be monitored over time to determine if oxalate levels were reduced which may indicate that the BE was active and had the expected therapeutic effect. To determine if the BE had introduced the stop codons, the appropriate region of the GO gene can be PCR amplified from the genomic DNA extracted from livers of treated and control mice. The resultant PCR product can be sequenced using Next Generation Sequencing to determine the frequency of the sequence changes.
  • Example 10.—Gene Discovery of New Deaminases
  • 4 Tbp (tera base pairs) of proprietary and public assembled metagenomic sequencing data from diverse environments (soil, sediments, groundwater, thermophilic, human, and non-human microbiomes) were mined to discover novel deaminases. HMM profiles of known deaminases were built and searched against all predicted proteins using HMMER3 (hmmer.org) to identify deaminases from our databases. Predicted and reference (e.g., eukaryotic APOBEC1, bacterial TadA) deaminases were aligned with MAFFT and a phylogenetic tree was inferred using FastTree2. Novel families and subfamilies were defined by identifying clades composed of sequences disclosed herein. Candidates were selected based on the presence of critical catalytic residues indicative of enzymatic function (see e.g. SEQ ID NOs: 1-51, 385-386, 387-443, 444-447, or 488-475).
  • Example 11.—Plasmid Construction
  • DNA fragments of genes were synthesized at either Twist Bioscience or Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT). Plasmid DNA was amplified in Endura electrocompetent cells (Lucigen) and isolated by QlAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen). Vector backbones were prepared by restriction enzyme digestion of plasmids. Inserts were amplified by Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) using primers ordered either from Elim BIOPHARM or IDT. Both vector backbones and inserts were purified by gel extraction using the Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research). One or multiple DNA fragments were assembled into the vectors through NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly (New England Biolabs) (SEQ ID NOs.483-487).
  • Example 12.—Assessment of Base Edit Efficiency in E. coli by Sequencing
  • 5 ng extracted DNA prepared as in Example 4 was used as the template and primers (P137 and P360) were used for PCR amplification, and the resulting products were submitted for Sanger sequencing at ELIM BIOPHARM. Primers used for sequencing are shown in Tables 6 and 7 (Seq ID NOs. 523-531).
  • TABLE 6
    Primers used for base editing analysis of lacZ gene in E. coli
    SEQ
    Name ID NO. Description Sequence (5′->3′)
    P137 523 Forward primer used to amplify CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    lacZ
    P360 524 Reverse primer used to amplify CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    lacZ
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA1-4_site 1
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA1-4_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA1-4_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA1-6_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA1-6_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA1-6_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA3-6_site 1
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGA3-6_site 2
    P360 524 Sanger sequencing primer of CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    MGA3-6_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA3-7_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA3-7_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA3-7_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA3-8_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA3-8_site 2
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGA3-8_site 3
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGA4-2_site 1
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGA4-2_site 2
    P360 524 Sanger sequencing primer of CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    MGA4-2_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA4-5_Site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA4-5_Site 2
    P461 530 Sanger sequencing primer of GGATTGAAAATGGTCTGCTG
    MGA4-5_Site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA7-1_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA7-1_site 2
    P461 530 Sanger sequencing primer of GGATTGAAAATGGTCTGCTG
    MGA7-1_site 3
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGA14-1_site 1
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGA14-1_site 2
    P360 524 Sanger sequencing primer of CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    MGA14-1_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA15-1_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA15-1_site 2
    P140 527 Sanger sequencing primer of TTGTGGAGCGACATCCAG
    MGA15-1_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGA16-1_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA16-1_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA16-1_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGA18-1_site 1
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGA18-1_site 2
    P462 531 Sanger sequencing primer of ACTGCTGACGCCGCTGCG
    MGA18-1_site 3
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    ABE8.17_site 1
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    ABE8.17_site 2
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    ABE8.17_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC1-4_site 1
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC1-4_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC1-4_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC1-6_site 1
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC1-6_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC1-6_site 3
    P138 525 Sanger sequencing primer of CCGAAAGGCGCGGTGCCG
    MGC3-6_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC3-6_site 2
    P360 524 Sanger sequencing primer of CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    MGC3-6_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC3-7_site 1
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC3-7_site 2
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC3-7_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC3-8_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC3-8_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC3-8_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC4-2_site 1
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC4-2_site 2
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGC4-2_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC4-5_site 1
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC4-5_site 2
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC4-5_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC7-1_site 1
    P461 530 Sanger sequencing primer of GGATTGAAAATGGTCTGCTG
    MGC7-1_site 2
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC7-1_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC14-1_site 1
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC14-1_site 2
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC14-1_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC15-1_site 1
    P461 530 Sanger sequencing primer of GGATTGAAAATGGTCTGCTG
    MGC15-1_site 2
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC15-1_site 3
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC16-1_site 1
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    MGC16-1_site 2
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC16-1_site 3
    P361 528 Sanger sequencing primer of TGAGCGCATTTTTACGCGC
    MGC18-1_site 1
    P139 526 Sanger sequencing primer of GTATGTGGTGGATGAAGCC
    MGC18-1_site 2
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    MGC18-1_site 3
    P363 529 Sanger sequencing primer of GAAAACGGCAACCCGTGG
    BE3_site 1
    P360 524 Sanger sequencing primer of CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    BE3_site 2
    P137 523 Sanger sequencing primer of CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    BE3_site 3
  • TABLE 7
    Primers used for base editing analysis of the effect of uracil
    glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) in E. coli
    SEQ
    Name ID NO. Description Sequence (5′->3′)
    P137 523 Forward primer used to amplify CCAGGCTTTACACTTTATGCT
    lacZ
    P360 524 Reverse primer used to amplify CGAACATCCAAAAGTTTGTGTTTTT
    lacZ
    P461 530 Sanger sequencing primer of lacZ GGATTGAAAATGGTCTGCTG
    site
  • FIG. 8 shows example base edits by enzymes interrogated by this experiment, as assessed by Sanger sequencing.
  • FIG. 10 shows base editing efficiencies of adenine base editors (ABEs) using TadA (ABE8.17m) (SEQ ID NO: 596) and MG nickases according to Table 3. TadA is a tRNA adenine deaminase; TadA (ABE8.17m) is an engineered variant of E. coli TadA. Twelve MG nickases fused with TadA (ABE8.17m) were constructed and tested in E. coli. Three guides were designed to target lacZ. Numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of A to G conversion quantified by Edit R at each position. ABE8.17m was used as the positive control for the experiment.
  • FIG. 11 shows base editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors (CBEs) comprising rat APOBEC1, MG nickases, and uracil glycosylase inhibitor of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage (UGI (PBS1)). APOBEC1 is a cytosine deaminase. 12 MG nickases fused with rAPOBEC1 on N-terminus and UGI on C-terminus were constructed and tested in E. coli. Three guides were designed to target lacZ. Numbers shown in boxes indicate percentages of C to T conversion quantified by Edit R. BE3 was used as the positive control in the experiment.
  • FIG. 12 shows effects of MG uracil glycosylase inhibitors (UGIs) on base editing activity when added to CBEs. (a) MGC15-1 comprises of N-terminal APOBEC1, MG15-1 nickase, and C-terminal UGI. Three MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in E. coli. (b) BE3 comprises N-terminal rAPOBEC1, SpCas9 nickase, and C-terminal UGI. Two MG UGIs were tested for improvements of cytosine base editing activities in HEK293T cells. Editing efficiencies were quantified by Edit R.
  • Example 13.—Cell Culture, Transfections, Next Generation Sequencing, and Base Edit Analysis
  • HEK293T cells were grown and passaged in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium plus GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco) at 37° C. with 5% CO2. 5×104 cells were seeded on 96-well cell culture plates treated for cell attachment (Costar), grown for 20 to 24 h, and the spent media were refreshed with new media right before transfection. 200 ng expression plasmid and 1 μL lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific) were used for transfection per well per manufacturer's instructions. Transfected cells were grown for 3 days, harvested, and gDNA was extracted with QuickExtract (Lucigen) per manufacturer's instructions. Targeted regions for base edits were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) with primers listed in Tables 8 and 9 (SEQ ID NOs. 538-585) and extracted DNA as the templates.
  • TABLE 8
    Primers used for base edit analysis of the effect of UGI
    in HEK293T
    SEQ
    Name ID NO. Description Sequence (5′->3′)
    P577 536 Forward primer used to amplify the GAGGCTGGAGAGGCCCGT
    targeted region
    P578 537 Reverse primer used to amplify the GATTTTCATGCAGGTGCTGAAA
    targeted region
    P577 536 Sanger sequencing primer GAGGCTGGAGAGGCCCGT
  • TABLE 9a
    Primers used to amplify targeted regions in HEK293T cells
    transfected with A0A2K5RND7-MG nickase-MG69-1
    SEQ
    Name ID NO. Description Sequence (5′->3′)
    P969 538 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNAGGAG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- GAAGGGCCTGAGT
    MG69-1_site 1
    P970 539 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTCTGC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- CCTCGTGGGTTTG
    MG69-1_site 1
    P971 540 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCTCTG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- GCCACTCCCTGGC
    MG69-1_site 2
    P972 541 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGGCAG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- GCTCTCCGAGGAG
    MG69-1_site 2
    P973 542 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGGGAA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- TAATAAAAGTCTCTCTCTTAA
    MG69-1_site 3
    P974 543 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCCCC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- TCCACCAGTACCC
    MG69-1_site 3
    P975 544 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCTGT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- CCTTGGAGAACCG
    MG69-1_site 4
    P976 545 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGCAGG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- TGAACACAAGAGCT
    MG69-1_site 4
    P977 546 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGAAGG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- TGTGGTTCCAGAAC
    MG69-1_site 5
    P978 547 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTCGAT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nSpCas9 (D10A)- GTCCTCCCCATTG
    MG69-1_site 5
    P979 548 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNAAACA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- GGCTAGACATAGGGA
    MG69-1_site 1
    P980 549 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGAAGC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- CACCAGAGTCTCTA
    MG69-1_site 1
    P981 550 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGCCGC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- CATTGACAGAGGG
    MG69-1_site 2
    P982 551 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGCATC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- AAAACAAAAGGGAGATTG
    MG69-1_site 2
    P983 552 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCTCT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- GCCCACCTCACTT
    MG69-1_site 3
    P984 553 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGCCAT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- GTGGGTTAATCTGG
    MG69-1_site 3
    P985 554 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCGGA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- CGCACCTACCCAT
    MG69-1_site 4
    P986 555 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCTAGA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG1-4 (D9A)- TGGGAATGGATGGG
    MG69-1_site 4
    P987 556 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNAACCA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- CAAACCCACGAGG
    MG69-1_site 1
    P988 557 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTCAAT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- GGCGGCCCCGGGC
    MG69-1_site 1
    P989 558 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNAGTGA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- TCCCCAGTGTCCC
    MG69-1_site 2
    P990 559 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGCCCT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- GAACGCGTTTGCT
    MG69-1_site 2
    P991 560 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTGGGA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- ATAATAAAAGTCTCTCTCT
    MG69-1_site 3
    P992 561 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCCCT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- CCACCAGTACCCC
    MG69-1_site 3
    P993 562 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCAGGG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- CCTCCTCAGCCCA
    MG69-1_site 4
    P994 563 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGTCTG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- GATGTCGTAAGGGAA
    MG69-1_site 4
    P995 564 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGGGGT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- GTAACTCAGAATGTTTT
    MG69-1_site 5
    P996 565 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGGGAG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- TGAGACTCAGAGA
    MG69-1_site 5
    P997 566 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGCAAA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- GAGGGAAATGAGATCA
    MG69-1_site 6
    P998 567 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGTGAC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- ACATTTGTTTGAGAATCA
    MG69-1_site 6
    P999 568 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCTTTA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- TCCCCGCACAGAG
    MG69-1_site 7
    P1000 569 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCTTGG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG3-6 (D13A)- CCCATGGGAAATC
    MG69-1_site 7
    P1001 570 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGTCCC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- ATCCCAACACCCC
    MG69-1_site 1
    P1002 571 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTGGGC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- ATGTGTGCTCCCA
    MG69-1_site 1
    P1003 572 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCTATG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- GGAATAATAAAAGTCTCTC
    MG69-1_site 2
    P1004 573 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCTCCA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- CCAGTACCCCACC
    MG69-1_site 2
    P1005 574 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNGGACC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- CTGGTCTCTACCT
    MG69-1_site 3
    P1006 575 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCTCT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- CCCATTGAACTACC
    MG69-1_site 3
    P1007 576 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCCCA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- GTGACTCAGGGCC
    MG69-1_site 4
    P1008 577 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTCGTA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG4-2 (D28A)- AGGGAAAGACTTAGGAA
    MG69-1_site 4
    P1009 578 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNTCTCC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- CTTTTGTTTTGATGCATTT
    MG69-1_site 1
    P1010 579 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCACC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- CCAGGCTCTGGGG
    MG69-1_site 1
    P1011 580 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCTTT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- TGTTTTGATGCATTTCTGTTT
    MG69-1_site 2
    P1012 581 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNAATCT
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- ACCACCCCAGGCT
    MG69-1_site 2
    P1013 582 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNATCCC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- CAGTGTCCCCCTT
    MG69-1_site 3
    P1014 583 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCAGG
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- CCCTGAACGCGTT
    MG69-1_site 3
    P1015 584 Forward primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNAGGCC
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- AGGCCTGCGGGGG
    MG69-1_site 4
    P1016 585 Reverse primer used to amplify GCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNCCAAA
    A0A2K5RDN7-nMG18-1 (D12A)- AACTCCCAAATTAGCAAA
    MG69-1_site 4
  • PCR products were purified using the HighPrep PCR Clean-up System (MAGBIO) per manufacturer's instructions. The effect of uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) on base editing of candidate enzymes was analyzed by submitting PCR products to Elim BIOPHARM for Sanger sequencing, and the efficiency was quantified by Edit R. To analyze base editing of A0A2K5RND7-MG nickase-MG69-1, adapters used for next generation sequencing (NGS) were appended to PCR products by subsequent PCR reactions using KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR Kit (Roche) and primers compatible with TruSeq DNA Library Prep Kits (illumina). DNA concentrations of the resulting products were quantified by TapeStation (Agilent), and samples were pooled together to prepare the library for NGS analysis. The resulting library was quantified by qPCR with Aria Real-time PCR System (Agilent) and high through sequencing was performed with an Illumina Miseq instrument per manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing data was analyzed for base edits by Cripresso2.
  • FIG. 13 shows maps of sites targeted by base editors showing base editing efficiencies of cytosine base editors comprising CMP/dCMP-type deaminase domain-containing protein (uniprot accession A0A2K5RDN7), MG nickases, and MG UGI. The constructs comprise N-terminal A0A2K5RDN7, MG nickases, and C-terminal MG69-1. For simplicity, only the identities of MG nickases are shown in the figure. BE3 (APOBEC1) was used as a positive control for base editing. An empty vector was used for the negative control. Three independent experiments were performed on different days. Abbreviations: R, repeat; NEG, negative control.
  • TABLE 9b
    Protein Domains used in constructs in Example 13
    Linker
    (Deaminase Linker
    Candidate Type PAM Deaminase Nickase) Nickase UGI (Nickase-UGI)
    A0A2K5RDN7- II nnRGGnT A0A2K5RDN7 SGSETPGT nMG3-6 (D13A) MG69-1 SGGSS
    nMG3-6-MG69-1 SEQ ID SEQ ID NO: 594 SESATPES SEQ ID NO: 71 SEQ ID 
    NO: 362 NO: 52
    A0A2K5RDN7- II nRRR A0A2K5RDN7 SGSETPGT nMG1-4 MG69-1 SGGSS
    nMG1-4-MG69-1 SEQ ID SEQ ID NO: 594 SESATPES SEQ ID NO:70 SEQ ID
    NO: 360 NO: 52
    A0A2K5RDN7- |II nRWART A0A2K5RDN7 SGSETPGT nMG18-1 MG69-1 SGGSS
    nMG18-1-MG69-1 SEQ ID SEQ ID NO: 594 SESATPES SEQ ID NO: 78 SEQ ID
    NO: 368 NO: 52
  • Example 14.—Positive Selection of Base Editor Mutants in E. coli
  • FIG. 14 shows a positive selection method for TadA characterization in E. coli. Panel (a) shows a map of one plasmid system used for TadA selection. The vector comprises CAT (H193Y), a sgRNA expression cassette targeting CAT, and an ABE expression cassette. In this figure, N-terminal TadA from E. coli and a C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) from Streptococcus pyogenes are shown. Panel (b) shows sequencing traces demonstrating that when introduced/transformed into E. coli cells, the A2 position of CAT (H193Y)'s template strand is edited, reverting the H193Y mutant to wild type and restoring its activity. Abbreviations: CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
  • 1 μL of plasmid solution with a concentration of 10 ng/μL was transformed into 25 μL BL21 (DE3) electrocompetent cells (Lucigen), recovered with 975 μL expression recovery medium at 37° C. for 1 h. 50 μL of the resulting cells were spread on a LB agar plate containing 100 μg/mL carbenicillin, 0.1 mM IPTG, and appropriate amount of chloramphenicol. The plate was incubated at 37° C. until colonies were pickable. Colony PCR were used to amplify the genomic region containing base edits, and the resulting products were submitted for Sanger sequencing at ELIM BIOPHARM. Primers used for PCR and sequencing are listed in Table 10 (SEQ ID NOs. 532-537).
  • TABLE 10
    Primers used for base edit analysis of CAT (H193Y)
    SEQ
    Name ID NO. Description Sequence (5′->3′)
    P570 532 Forward primer used to amplify CAT CCGCCGCCGCAAGGAATGGTTT
    (H193Y) of CAT (H193Y)-sgRNA- AATTAATTTGATCGGCACGTAAG
    MG68-4 variant-nSpCas9 (D10A) AGG
    P1050 534 Forward primer used to amplify CAT AAGGAATGGTTTAATTAATTCTA
    (H193Y) of CAT (H193Y)-sgRNA- GATTAATTAATTTGATCGGCACG
    MG68-4 variant-nMG34-1 (D10A) TAAG
    P571 533 Reverse primer used to amplify CAT GGACTGTTGGGCGCCATCTCCTT
    (H193Y) of CAT (H193Y)-sgRNA- GCATGCTTCACTTATTCAGGCGT
    MG68-4 variant-nSpCas9 AGCA
    P571 535 Sanger sequencing primer of CAT GGACTGTTGGGCGCCATCTCCT
    (H193Y) TGCATGCTTCACTTATTCAGGCG
    TAGCA
  • FIG. 15 shows mutations caused by TadA enable high tolerance of chloramphenicol (Cm). Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where different concentrations of chloramphenicol were used to select for antibiotics resistance of E. coli. In this example, wild type and two variants of TadA from E. coli (EcTadA) were tested. Panel (b) shows a results summary table demonstrating that ABEs carrying mutated TadA show higher editing efficiencies than the wild type. In these experiments, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL Cm. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown in the table, but effectors (SpCas9) and construct organization are shown in the figures above.
  • FIG. 16 shows investigation of MG TadA activity in positive selection. Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates from an experiment where 8 MG68 TadA candidates were tested against 0 to 2 μg/mL of chloramphenicol (ABEs comprised N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase). For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown. Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates. Panel (b) demonstrates that MG68-3 and MG68-4 drove base edits of adenine. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 17 shows an improvement of base editing efficiency of MG68-4_nSpCas9 via D109N mutation on MG68-4. Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates where wild type MG68-4 and its variant were tested against 0 to 4 μg/mL of chloramphenicol. For simplicity, only identities of deaminases are shown. Adenine base editors in this experiment comprise N-terminal TadA variants and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase. Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies of MG TadA candidates. Panel (b) demonstrates that MG68-4 and MG68-4 (D109N) showed base edits of adenine, with the D109N mutant showing increased activity. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 18 shows base editing of MG68-4 (D109N) nMG34-1. Panel (a) shows photographs of growth plates of an experiment where an ABE comprising N-terminal MG68-4 (D109N) and C-terminal SpCas9 (D10A) nickase was tested against 0 to 2 μg/mL of chloramphenicol. Panel (b) shows a summary table depicting editing efficiencies with and without sgRNA. In this experiment, colonies were picked from the plates with greater than or equal to 1 μg/mL Cm.
  • FIG. 19 shows 28 MG68-4 variants designed for improvements of MG68-4-nMG34-1 base editing activity. 12 residues were selected for targeted mutagenesis to improve editing of the enzymes.
  • While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. It is not intended that the invention be limited by the specific examples provided within the specification. While the invention has been described with reference to the aforementioned specification, the descriptions and illustrations of the embodiments herein are not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. Furthermore, it shall be understood that all aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific depictions, configurations or relative proportions set forth herein which depend upon a variety of conditions and variables. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is therefore contemplated that the invention shall also cover any such alternatives, modifications, variations or equivalents. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

Claims (21)

1-133. (canceled)
134. An engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide, comprising an adenosine deaminase, wherein said adenosine deaminase comprises a sequence with at least 60% sequence identity to at least 20 consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 50.
135. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 134, further comprising an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a Class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, and wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity.
136. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 135, wherein said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
137. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 135, wherein said Class 2, type II endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
138. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 135, wherein said Class 2, type II endonuclease is configured to be catalytically dead.
139. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 135, wherein said Class 2, type II Cas endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO:
73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned.
140. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 135, further comprising a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) coupled to said Class 2, type II endonuclease or said adenosine deaminase.
141. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 140, wherein said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
142. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 134, further comprising an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a Class 2, type V Cas endonuclease, and wherein said endonuclease is configured to be deficient in nuclease activity.
143. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 142, wherein said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
144. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 142, wherein said Class 2, type V endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
145. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 142, further comprising a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) coupled to said Class 2, type V endonuclease or said adenosine deaminase.
146. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 145, wherein said uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor comprises a sequence with at least 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 52-56 or SEQ ID NO: 67 or a variant thereof.
147. An engineered nucleic acid editing system, comprising:
(a) an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain and an HNH domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a Class 2, type II Cas endonuclease, wherein said endonuclease is configured to comprise a mutation of a RuvC domain residue such that said RuvC domain of said endonuclease is deficient in nuclease activity; and
(b) a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, wherein said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 60% identity to at least 20 consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 50; and
(c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease, wherein said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises:
(i) a guide portion comprising a ribonucleic acid sequence, wherein said ribonucleic acid sequence is configured such that said guide portion hybridizes to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and
(ii) a non-guide portion with a sequence configured such that said non-guide portion binds said endonuclease.
148. The engineered nucleic acid editing system of claim 147, wherein said Class 2, type II Cas endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
149. The engineered nucleic acid editing polypeptide of claim 147, wherein said Class 2, type II Cas endonuclease is configured to be catalytically dead.
150. The engineered nucleic acid editing system of claim 147, wherein said Class 2, type II Cas endonuclease comprises an aspartate to alanine mutation at residue 9 relative to SEQ ID NO: 70, residue 13 relative to SEQ ID NOs: 71, 72, or 74, residue 12 relative to SEQ ID NO: 73, residue 17 relative to SEQ ID NO: 75, residue 23 relative to SEQ ID NO: 76, or residue 10 relative to SEQ ID NO: 597 when optimally aligned.
151. An engineered nucleic acid editing system, comprising:
(a) an endonuclease comprising a RuvC domain, wherein said endonuclease is derived from an uncultivated microorganism, wherein said endonuclease is a Class 2, type V Cas endonuclease, wherein said endonuclease is configured to comprises a mutation of a RuvC domain residue such that said RuvC domain of said endonuclease is deficient in nuclease activity; and
(b) a base editor coupled to said endonuclease, wherein said base editor comprises a sequence having at least 60% identity to at least 20 consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 50; and
(c) an engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure configured to form a complex with said endonuclease, wherein said engineered guide ribonucleic acid structure comprises:
(i) a guide portion comprising a ribonucleic acid sequence, wherein said ribonucleic acid sequence is configured such that said guide portion hybridizes to a target deoxyribonucleic acid sequence; and
(ii) a non-guide portion with a sequence configured such that said non-guide portion binds said endonuclease.
152. The engineered nucleic acid editing system of claim 151, wherein said RuvC domain lacks nuclease activity.
153. The engineered nucleic acid editing system of claim 151, wherein said Class 2, type V Cas endonuclease comprises a nickase mutation.
US18/326,440 2020-09-11 2023-05-31 Base editing enzymes Pending US20230374482A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18/326,440 US20230374482A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-05-31 Base editing enzymes

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202063077057P 2020-09-11 2020-09-11
US202163222351P 2021-07-15 2021-07-15
PCT/US2021/049962 WO2022056324A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2021-09-10 Base editing enzymes
US18/180,009 US20230348876A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-03-07 Base editing enzymes
US18/326,440 US20230374482A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-05-31 Base editing enzymes

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US18/180,009 Continuation US20230348876A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-03-07 Base editing enzymes

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20230374482A1 true US20230374482A1 (en) 2023-11-23

Family

ID=80629930

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/841,082 Pending US20220364067A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2022-06-15 Base editing enzymes
US18/180,009 Pending US20230348876A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-03-07 Base editing enzymes
US18/326,440 Pending US20230374482A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-05-31 Base editing enzymes

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/841,082 Pending US20220364067A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2022-06-15 Base editing enzymes
US18/180,009 Pending US20230348876A1 (en) 2020-09-11 2023-03-07 Base editing enzymes

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (3) US20220364067A1 (en)
EP (1) EP4211234A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2023540797A (en)
KR (1) KR20230062873A (en)
AU (1) AU2021339819A1 (en)
CA (1) CA3192224A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2605340A (en)
MX (1) MX2023002913A (en)
WO (1) WO2022056324A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2617658B (en) 2020-03-06 2024-04-17 Metagenomi Inc Class II, type V CRISPR systems
MX2022012110A (en) * 2020-03-31 2022-10-18 Metagenomi Inc Class ii, type ii crispr systems.
AU2022210762A1 (en) * 2021-01-22 2023-08-24 Metagenomi, Inc. Novel engineered and chimeric nucleases
CA3234217A1 (en) * 2021-11-05 2023-05-11 Brian C. Thomas Base editing enzymes

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110892069B (en) * 2017-03-30 2024-02-09 国立大学法人京都大学 Exon skipping induction method based on genome editing
US9982279B1 (en) * 2017-06-23 2018-05-29 Inscripta, Inc. Nucleic acid-guided nucleases

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP4211234A1 (en) 2023-07-19
AU2021339819A1 (en) 2023-05-25
GB2605340A (en) 2022-09-28
GB202209534D0 (en) 2022-08-10
GB2605340A8 (en) 2024-02-21
US20230348876A1 (en) 2023-11-02
US20220364067A1 (en) 2022-11-17
JP2023540797A (en) 2023-09-26
CA3192224A1 (en) 2022-03-17
WO2022056324A1 (en) 2022-03-17
KR20230062873A (en) 2023-05-09
MX2023002913A (en) 2023-06-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20240117330A1 (en) Enzymes with ruvc domains
US10982200B2 (en) Enzymes with RuvC domains
US20230374482A1 (en) Base editing enzymes
US11713471B2 (en) Class II, type V CRISPR systems
JP2019526248A (en) Programmable CAS9-recombinase fusion protein and use thereof
EP4146800A1 (en) Enzymes with ruvc domains
US11946039B2 (en) Class II, type II CRISPR systems
WO2023097282A1 (en) Endonuclease systems
EP4127155A1 (en) Class ii, type ii crispr systems
US20220298494A1 (en) Enzymes with ruvc domains
WO2023081855A1 (en) Base editing enzymes
US20220220460A1 (en) Enzymes with ruvc domains
WO2022159742A1 (en) Novel engineered and chimeric nucleases
US20230348877A1 (en) Base editing enzymes
AU2021333586A1 (en) Systems and methods for transposing cargo nucleotide sequences
CN116867897A (en) Base editing enzyme
US20240110167A1 (en) Enzymes with ruvc domains
WO2023076952A1 (en) Enzymes with hepn domains
GB2617659A (en) Enzymes with RUVC domains

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

AS Assignment

Owner name: METAGENOMI, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LIN, JYUN-LIANG;BROOKS, ALAN;BUTTERFIELD, CRISTINA;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20230317 TO 20230524;REEL/FRAME:065404/0051