US20230273602A1 - SIS Identification Method of Reversible Recovery Fault-Oriented Workshop Key Manufacturing Resources - Google Patents
SIS Identification Method of Reversible Recovery Fault-Oriented Workshop Key Manufacturing Resources Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20230273602A1 US20230273602A1 US17/810,371 US202217810371A US2023273602A1 US 20230273602 A1 US20230273602 A1 US 20230273602A1 US 202217810371 A US202217810371 A US 202217810371A US 2023273602 A1 US2023273602 A1 US 2023273602A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- manufacturing
- fault
- occurred
- resources
- resource
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 196
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 208000035473 Communicable disease Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/4184—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by fault tolerance, reliability of production system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06312—Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/41865—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by job scheduling, process planning, material flow
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/4188—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by CIM planning or realisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/28—Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
- G06F16/284—Relational databases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K17/00—Methods or arrangements for effecting co-operative working between equipments covered by two or more of main groups G06K1/00 - G06K15/00, e.g. automatic card files incorporating conveying and reading operations
- G06K17/0022—Methods or arrangements for effecting co-operative working between equipments covered by two or more of main groups G06K1/00 - G06K15/00, e.g. automatic card files incorporating conveying and reading operations arrangements or provisions for transferring data to distant stations, e.g. from a sensing device
- G06K17/0029—Methods or arrangements for effecting co-operative working between equipments covered by two or more of main groups G06K1/00 - G06K15/00, e.g. automatic card files incorporating conveying and reading operations arrangements or provisions for transferring data to distant stations, e.g. from a sensing device the arrangement being specially adapted for wireless interrogation of grouped or bundled articles tagged with wireless record carriers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0633—Workflow analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/08—Probabilistic or stochastic CAD
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a technical field of production processing control, and more particularly to a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources.
- the provision of production system analysis is to fully understand and accurately model the production links of discrete manufacturing workshops. By establishing key indicators, risk points and key nodes of the production plan within a production cycle of the workshop can be identified, while accurate data can be provided and supported for subsequent targeted improvements.
- an objective of the present invention is to provide a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources.
- a change of a number of bottleneck of other manufacturing resources over a time is determined through the SIS model.
- an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource is marked by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value.
- groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources are changed while the importance is re-determined. Repeat the steps until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained.
- key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system are obtained according to an order of all the importance.
- a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources for establishing a production model comprises the steps, executed by a computerized device, such as a computer or a server, of:
- Step 1 Based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish an automatic link of workpieces produced in a production cycle with their production plan, production process, and manufacturing resources, and according to SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, assume a total number of the manufacturing resources as a constant as N throughout a production cycle of a manufacturing workshop, and configure an initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and a “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in discrete workshop manufacturing resources as X(t 0 ) and Y(t 0 ) respectively.
- Step 2 Based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish a second automatic link among the workpieces, the production plan, the production process, and the corresponding manufacturing resources within the production cycle in the manufacturing workshop. Convert the second automatic link into a plurality of connecting network edges in a workshop manufacturing system network. Finally map weighted edges of a processing time and all the manufacturing resources, including machine tools, cutting tools, fixtures, measuring tools and personnel in the production process, to a plurality of network nodes in the workshop manufacturing system network.
- Step 3 According to a grouping result in the Step 1, configure a probability of eventual failure of the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource caused by the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as ⁇ , configure an effective number in unit of time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource to the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as ⁇ , and configure a ratio of a number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource that has failed again to a total number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as ⁇ .
- Step 4 As shown in FIG. 3 , configure a fault propagation rate between the manufacturing resources with a connection relationship thereof as a ratio of the weight of the edge connecting two of the manufacturing resources and the maximum weight in the entire network.
- ⁇ ij is determined as:
- ⁇ is the contact probability of two of the manufacturing resources.
- the contact probability is set as 1 when there is a connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources.
- the contact probability is set as 0 when there is no connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources.
- Step 5 Through the SIS model, determine a change of a number of bottleneck occurring over a time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource due to the initial the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource.
- I ( t ) N ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) ⁇ ⁇ ( N ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) I 0 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ 1 ) e ⁇ ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) t + 1
- I(t) is the number of bottleneck occurring in the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resources over the time.
- Step 6 Mark an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value.
- Step 7 As shown in FIG. 4 , change groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources and re-determine the importance according to steps 1 to 6, and repeat it until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained.
- Step 8 Obtain key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system according to an order of all the importance, so as to establish the production model based on the key manufacturing resource nodes.
- the present invention has the following advantages.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a classification of workshop key manufacturing resources according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a network building framework of workshop key manufacturing resources according to the present invention.
- FIG. 3 illustrates values of contact probabilities for different manufacturing resources according to the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating key manufacturing resource node identification according to the present invention.
- a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources is configured for establishing a production model, wherein the method comprises the following steps which are executed by a computerized device.
- Step 1 As shown in FIG. 1 , based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish an automatic link of workpieces produced in a production cycle with their production plan, production process, and manufacturing resources, and according to SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, assume a total number of the manufacturing resources as a constant as N throughout a production cycle of a manufacturing workshop, and configure an initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and a “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in discrete workshop manufacturing resources as X(t 0 ) and Y(t 0 ) respectively.
- Step 2 As shown in FIG. 2 , based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish a second automatic link among the workpieces, the production plan, the production process, and the corresponding manufacturing resources within the production cycle in the manufacturing workshop. Convert the second automatic link into a plurality of connecting network edges in a workshop manufacturing system network. Finally map weighted edges of a processing time and all the manufacturing resources, including machine tools, cutting tools, fixtures, measuring tools and personnel in the production process, to a plurality of network nodes in the workshop manufacturing system network.
- Step 3 According to a grouping result in the Step 1, configure a probability of eventual failure of the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource caused by the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as ⁇ , configure an effective number in unit of time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource to the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as ⁇ , and configure a ratio of a number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource that has failed again to a total number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as ⁇ .
- Step 4 As shown in FIG. 3 , configure a fault propagation rate between the manufacturing resources with a connection relationship thereof as a ratio of the weight of the edge connecting two of the manufacturing resources and the maximum weight in the entire network.
- ⁇ ij is determined as:
- ⁇ is the contact probability of two of the manufacturing resources.
- the contact probability is set as 1 when there is a connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources.
- the contact probability is set as 0 when there is no connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources.
- Step 5 Through the SIS model, determine a change of a number of bottleneck occurring over a time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource due to the initial the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource.
- I ( t ) N ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ N ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ I 0 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ 1 e ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ t + 1
- I(t) is the number of bottleneck occurring in the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resources over the time.
- Step 6 Mark an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value.
- Step 7 As shown in FIG. 4 , change groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources and re-determine the importance according to steps 1 to 6, and repeat it until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained.
- Step 8 Obtain key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system according to an order of all the importance, so as to establish the production model based on the key manufacturing resource nodes.
- the production model can be accurately established by programming using the key manufacturing resource nodes so as to optimize the production system.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
Abstract
A SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources is that based on SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, the workpieces and manufacturing resources required in a production order are linked together through database technology to establish a discrete production workshop manufacturing network. The SIS model is configured to solve a change of the number of bottlenecks of other manufacturing resources caused by the initial fault manufacturing resources over time. The weighted result of a peak number of bottleneck resources and its time to reach the peak is marked to determine the importance of the initial fault manufacturing resources. Through the sorting of importance, the key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop are finally selected. The invention sorts out other key manufacturing resources that need to pay attention in production management in the manufacturing workshop to plan in advance and to improve the efficiency.
Description
- This is a non-provisional application that claims priority to a Chinese application, Chinese application number CN202110795439.8, filed Jul. 14, 2021, the entire contents of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates to a technical field of production processing control, and more particularly to a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources.
- Due to the dramatical market competitive, enterprises focus on the improvement and optimization of the production system and production process to meet the needs of different customers. The requirements for the efficient and controllable production system and manufacturing resources, such as personnel, machines, materials, and workpieces related to production activities, can be achieved by organic combination and mutual cooperation. Scientific and systematic analysis and quantitative evaluation of the production system is able to enhance the stability of discrete manufacturing workshops and improve the on-time completion rate of workpieces, so as to improve the economic efficiency of enterprises.
- The provision of production system analysis is to fully understand and accurately model the production links of discrete manufacturing workshops. By establishing key indicators, risk points and key nodes of the production plan within a production cycle of the workshop can be identified, while accurate data can be provided and supported for subsequent targeted improvements.
- In order to solve the above problems, an objective of the present invention is to provide a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources. First, through information technology and database technology, an automatic link of workpieces produced in a production cycle is established to link with their production plan, production process, and manufacturing resources. Second, according to SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, it is configured to have an initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and a “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in discrete workshop manufacturing resources. Third, a change of a number of bottleneck of other manufacturing resources over a time is determined through the SIS model. Then, an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource is marked by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value. Next, groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources are changed while the importance is re-determined. Repeat the steps until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained. Finally, key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system are obtained according to an order of all the importance.
- According to the present invention, the foregoing and other objects and advantages are attained by:
- a SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources for establishing a production model comprises the steps, executed by a computerized device, such as a computer or a server, of:
- Step 1: Based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish an automatic link of workpieces produced in a production cycle with their production plan, production process, and manufacturing resources, and according to SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, assume a total number of the manufacturing resources as a constant as N throughout a production cycle of a manufacturing workshop, and configure an initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and a “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in discrete workshop manufacturing resources as X(t0) and Y(t0) respectively.
- Configure a relationship between X(t0) and Y(t0) as:
-
-
- wherein:
- Xj(t0) is the jth initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource at the start time;
- Yk(t0) is the kth initial “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource at the start time.
- Step 2: Based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish a second automatic link among the workpieces, the production plan, the production process, and the corresponding manufacturing resources within the production cycle in the manufacturing workshop. Convert the second automatic link into a plurality of connecting network edges in a workshop manufacturing system network. Finally map weighted edges of a processing time and all the manufacturing resources, including machine tools, cutting tools, fixtures, measuring tools and personnel in the production process, to a plurality of network nodes in the workshop manufacturing system network.
- Step 3: According to a grouping result in the
Step 1, configure a probability of eventual failure of the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource caused by the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as β, configure an effective number in unit of time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource to the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as γ, and configure a ratio of a number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource that has failed again to a total number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as λ. - Step 4: As shown in
FIG. 3 , configure a fault propagation rate between the manufacturing resources with a connection relationship thereof as a ratio of the weight of the edge connecting two of the manufacturing resources and the maximum weight in the entire network. βij is determined as: -
- wherein δ is the contact probability of two of the manufacturing resources. The contact probability is set as 1 when there is a connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources. The contact probability is set as 0 when there is no connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources.
- Step 5: Through the SIS model, determine a change of a number of bottleneck occurring over a time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource due to the initial the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource.
-
- wherein I(t) is the number of bottleneck occurring in the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resources over the time.
- Step 6: Mark an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value.
-
-
- wherein ZYD(i) is the importance of the ith group of initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource;
- T(i) is the peak time when the number of bottlenecks in the ith group reaches the peak value;
- P̅(i) is the peak value of the number of bottleneck in the ith group;
- k1, k2 are the weights of peak time and peak value.
- Step 7: As shown in
FIG. 4 , change groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources and re-determine the importance according tosteps 1 to 6, and repeat it until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained. - Step 8: Obtain key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system according to an order of all the importance, so as to establish the production model based on the key manufacturing resource nodes.
- The present invention has the following advantages.
- 1) The key manufacturing resources can be determined in the discrete manufacturing workshop under the reversible recovery manufacturing resource fault environment.
- 2) The importance of key manufacturing resources can be quantitatively determined by weighting the peak time and peak value of the number of bottleneck resources.
- 3) The effect of the connection relationship between manufacturing resources in response to the reversible recovery fault propagation can be determined.
- 4) Through the sorting of fault propagation speed, other key manufacturing resources that need to pay attention in production management in the manufacturing workshop can be sorted out, such that plans can be prepared in advance to improve the flexibility of production organization.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a classification of workshop key manufacturing resources according to the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a network building framework of workshop key manufacturing resources according to the present invention. -
FIG. 3 illustrates values of contact probabilities for different manufacturing resources according to the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating key manufacturing resource node identification according to the present invention. - A SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources is configured for establishing a production model, wherein the method comprises the following steps which are executed by a computerized device.
- Step 1: As shown in
FIG. 1 , based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish an automatic link of workpieces produced in a production cycle with their production plan, production process, and manufacturing resources, and according to SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, assume a total number of the manufacturing resources as a constant as N throughout a production cycle of a manufacturing workshop, and configure an initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and a “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in discrete workshop manufacturing resources as X(t0) and Y(t0) respectively. - Configure a relationship between X(t0) and Y(t0) as:
-
-
- wherein:
- Xj(t0) is the jth initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource at the start time;
- Yk(t0) is the kth initial “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource at the start time.
- Step 2: As shown in
FIG. 2 , based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establish a second automatic link among the workpieces, the production plan, the production process, and the corresponding manufacturing resources within the production cycle in the manufacturing workshop. Convert the second automatic link into a plurality of connecting network edges in a workshop manufacturing system network. Finally map weighted edges of a processing time and all the manufacturing resources, including machine tools, cutting tools, fixtures, measuring tools and personnel in the production process, to a plurality of network nodes in the workshop manufacturing system network. - Step 3: According to a grouping result in the
Step 1, configure a probability of eventual failure of the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource caused by the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as β, configure an effective number in unit of time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource to the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as γ, and configure a ratio of a number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource that has failed again to a total number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as λ. - Step 4: As shown in
FIG. 3 , configure a fault propagation rate between the manufacturing resources with a connection relationship thereof as a ratio of the weight of the edge connecting two of the manufacturing resources and the maximum weight in the entire network. βij is determined as: -
- wherein δ is the contact probability of two of the manufacturing resources. The contact probability is set as 1 when there is a connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources. The contact probability is set as 0 when there is no connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources.
- Step 5: Through the SIS model, determine a change of a number of bottleneck occurring over a time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource due to the initial the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource.
-
- wherein I(t) is the number of bottleneck occurring in the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resources over the time.
- Step 6: Mark an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value.
-
-
- wherein ZYD(i) is the importance of the ith group of initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource;
- T(i) is the peak time when the number of bottlenecks in the ith group reaches the peak value;
- P(i) is the peak value of the number of bottleneck in the ith group;
- k1, k2 are the weights of peak time and peak value.
- Step 7: As shown in
FIG. 4 , change groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources and re-determine the importance according tosteps 1 to 6, and repeat it until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained. - Step 8: Obtain key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system according to an order of all the importance, so as to establish the production model based on the key manufacturing resource nodes. In other words, the production model can be accurately established by programming using the key manufacturing resource nodes so as to optimize the production system.
Claims (1)
1. A SIS identification method of reversible recovery fault-oriented workshop key manufacturing resources for establishing a production model, comprising the steps, executed by a computerized device, of:
step 1: based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establishing an automatic link of workpieces produced in a production cycle with their production plan, production process, and manufacturing resources; according to SIS model in the infectious disease research theory, assuming a total number of the manufacturing resources as a constant as U throughout a production cycle of a manufacturing workshop, and configuring an initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and a “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in discrete workshop manufacturing resources as X(t0) and Y(t0) respectively;
wherein a relationship between X(t0) and Y(t0) is configured as:
wherein:
Xj(t0) is the jth initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource at the start time;
Yk(t0) is the kth initial “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource at the start time;
step 2: based on Internet RFID technology and relational SQL database, establishing a second automatic link among the workpieces, the production plan, the production process, and the corresponding manufacturing resources within the production cycle in the manufacturing workshop; converting the second automatic link into a plurality of connecting network edges in a workshop manufacturing system network, and finally mapping weighted edges of a processing time and all the manufacturing resources, including machine tools, cutting tools, fixtures, measuring tools and personnel in the production process, to a plurality of network nodes in the workshop manufacturing system network;
step 3: according to a grouping result in the step 1, configuring a probability of eventual failure of the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource caused by the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as β, configuring an effective number in unit of time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource to the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as γ, and configuring a ratio of a number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource that has failed again to a total number of the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource as λ;
step 4: configuring a fault propagation rate between the manufacturing resources with a connection relationship thereof as a ratio of the weight of the edge connecting two of the manufacturing resources and the maximum weight in the entire network, wherein βij is determined as:
wherein δ is the contact probability of two of the manufacturing resources, wherein the contact probability is set as 1 when there is a connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources, wherein the contact probability is set as 0 when there is no connecting edge between the two manufacturing resources;
step 5: through the SIS model, determining a change of a number of bottleneck occurring over a time for the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource due to the initial the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource;
wherein I(t) is the number of bottleneck occurring in the “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resources over the time;
Step 6: marking an importance of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource by weighting a peak value of the number of bottleneck and a time length to reach the peak value;
wherein ZYD(i) is the importance of the ith group of initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource;
T(i) is the peak time when the number of bottlenecks in the ith group reaches the peak value;
P(i) is the peak value of the number of bottleneck in the ith group;
k1, k2 are the weights of peak time and peak value;
step 7: changing groupings of the initial “fault has been occurred” manufacturing resource and the “fault has not been occurred” manufacturing resource in the workshop manufacturing resources and re-determine the importance according to steps 1 to 6, and repeat it until the importance of all possible groupings is obtained; and
step 8: obtaining key manufacturing resource nodes in the discrete workshop manufacturing system according to an order of all the importance, so as to establish the production model based on the key manufacturing resource nodes.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110795439.8A CN113408145B (en) | 2021-07-14 | 2021-07-14 | Workshop key manufacturing resource SIS identification method for reversible recovery fault |
CN202110795439.8 | 2021-07-14 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20230273602A1 true US20230273602A1 (en) | 2023-08-31 |
Family
ID=77686368
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/810,371 Pending US20230273602A1 (en) | 2021-07-14 | 2022-07-01 | SIS Identification Method of Reversible Recovery Fault-Oriented Workshop Key Manufacturing Resources |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20230273602A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN113408145B (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7110841B1 (en) * | 2003-12-17 | 2006-09-19 | Glovia International, Inc. | Multi-level shipping instructions in manufacturing systems |
US8102779B2 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2012-01-24 | Howard University | System and method of detecting and locating intermittent electrical faults in electrical systems |
CN102682188A (en) * | 2011-03-15 | 2012-09-19 | 中国科学院遥感应用研究所 | City-wide infectious disease simulation method and device |
CN107480731A (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2017-12-15 | 西安西热电站信息技术有限公司 | A kind of EARLY RECOGNITION method of thermal power plant's automobile assembly welding Iine fault signature |
CN107742168B (en) * | 2017-10-20 | 2021-04-02 | 西北工业大学 | Production workshop dynamic bottleneck prediction method based on Internet of things technology |
CN110261159B (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2021-06-29 | 上海应用技术大学 | Fault diagnosis method for flexible manufacturing cutter subsystem |
CN110427712B (en) * | 2019-08-07 | 2020-05-15 | 广东工业大学 | Preventive maintenance method based on fault influence analysis and workshop manufacturing system |
KR102274856B1 (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2021-07-08 | 주식회사 서연이화 | System and method for analyzing failure of linkage type of MES of automated system |
-
2021
- 2021-07-14 CN CN202110795439.8A patent/CN113408145B/en active Active
-
2022
- 2022-07-01 US US17/810,371 patent/US20230273602A1/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN113408145B (en) | 2023-05-23 |
CN113408145A (en) | 2021-09-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10120912B2 (en) | System and method for combination-based data analysis | |
CN104573106A (en) | Intelligent urban construction examining and approving method based on case-based reasoning technology | |
CN104407589A (en) | Workshop manufacturing process-oriented active sensing and anomaly analysis method of real-time generating performance | |
CN110287987B (en) | Method for discovering hierarchical organization structure of business system with hierarchical network structure | |
CN107665172A (en) | A kind of Software Defects Predict Methods based on complicated weighting software network | |
CN108470022A (en) | A kind of intelligent work order quality detecting method based on operation management | |
Musarat et al. | Digital transformation of the construction industry: a review | |
CN111080132A (en) | Industry chain analysis system and method based on big data | |
Zhang et al. | A generic data analytics system for manufacturing production | |
CN102789598B (en) | Operation workshop bottleneck identification method taking machine attribute as interval number | |
Aguilar-Chávez et al. | Business Intelligence, Based on the Ralph Kimball Methodology, for Decision-Making in General Management | |
CN115269958A (en) | Internet reliability data information acquisition and analysis system | |
US20230273602A1 (en) | SIS Identification Method of Reversible Recovery Fault-Oriented Workshop Key Manufacturing Resources | |
Sangwa et al. | Prioritization and ranking of lean practices: a case study | |
Marović et al. | Performance management in civil engineering: A systematic literature review | |
CN111581298B (en) | Heterogeneous data integration system and method for large data warehouse | |
CN111581302A (en) | Decision-making assisting system based on data warehouse | |
CN116152011A (en) | Manufacturing service data value evaluation method and device based on fuzzy neural network | |
Sahebjamnia et al. | Designing a new model of distributed quality control for sub-assemble products based on the intelligent web information system | |
Liu et al. | Application of master data classification model in enterprises | |
CN112948469A (en) | Data mining method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
CN117171591B (en) | Method for analyzing dynamic change of fault correlation of numerical control machine tool | |
Succi et al. | Quantitative assessment of extreme programming practices | |
Virmani et al. | Quantifying key factors affecting leagile manufacturing system | |
CN111177571B (en) | Value-driven dynamic recommendation system with multi-factor dimension space and multi-mesoscale fusion |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: XI'AN UNIVERSITY OF POSTS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CHINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WANG, CHUANG;FENG, YAQIAN;ZHOU, GUANGHUI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:060418/0807 Effective date: 20220614 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |