US20230263385A1 - Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye - Google Patents
Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20230263385A1 US20230263385A1 US18/133,811 US202318133811A US2023263385A1 US 20230263385 A1 US20230263385 A1 US 20230263385A1 US 202318133811 A US202318133811 A US 202318133811A US 2023263385 A1 US2023263385 A1 US 2023263385A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- eye
- optical quality
- determination
- subject
- intensity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 210000001747 pupil Anatomy 0.000 claims description 108
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 62
- 201000009310 astigmatism Diseases 0.000 claims description 35
- 208000014733 refractive error Diseases 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 208000001491 myopia Diseases 0.000 claims description 17
- 206010020675 Hypermetropia Diseases 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000004379 myopia Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 201000006318 hyperopia Diseases 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000004305 hyperopia Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 210000004087 cornea Anatomy 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000001525 retina Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 12
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004438 eyesight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003128 head Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004020 luminiscence type Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/0016—Operational features thereof
- A61B3/0025—Operational features thereof characterised by electronic signal processing, e.g. eye models
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/12—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for looking at the eye fundus, e.g. ophthalmoscopes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/14—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography
- A61B3/15—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography with means for aligning, spacing or blocking spurious reflection ; with means for relaxing
- A61B3/156—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography with means for aligning, spacing or blocking spurious reflection ; with means for relaxing for blocking
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/14—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography
- A61B3/15—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography with means for aligning, spacing or blocking spurious reflection ; with means for relaxing
- A61B3/156—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography with means for aligning, spacing or blocking spurious reflection ; with means for relaxing for blocking
- A61B3/158—Arrangements specially adapted for eye photography with means for aligning, spacing or blocking spurious reflection ; with means for relaxing for blocking of corneal reflection
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/103—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for determining refraction, e.g. refractometers, skiascopes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/103—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for determining refraction, e.g. refractometers, skiascopes
- A61B3/1035—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for determining refraction, e.g. refractometers, skiascopes for measuring astigmatism
Definitions
- autorefractors/ophthalmic refractometers There are many existing devices that are used to detect the optical quality of the eye or other optical systems, including: autorefractors/ophthalmic refractometers, aberrometers, etc. All of the existing devices work by using a light source to illuminate the eye. Many devices, including the vast majority of autorefractors, use an infrared light source, but visible light sources are also used.
- An infrared light source but visible light sources are also used.
- autorefractors or aberrometers are based on this principle, i.e., shining a light into the eye and then detecting the pattern of the reflected light after it has been distorted by the eye.
- the devices vary in the configuration or type of light source or in how the reflected light is detected (single images, lenslet arrays, telescope combined with a lenslet array, etc.).
- a light is shined into the eye and then the magnitude of the refractive error is determined, and this is often based on the intensity slope of the light (brighter at either the top or the bottom of the pupil) that is reflected off of the retina and back out of the eye.
- Described herein are devices and methods to measure optical distortions in the eye by monitoring the intensity of a first color of light versus intensity of a second color of light within the pupil of a subject.
- the subject can be a human or an animal. While the pupil may appear to be black or very dark in a photograph that does not use a flash, the pixel values do vary in magnitude based on the power of the eye.
- the information needed to measure the optical distortions of the eye is contained within the pixel values of the first and second color.
- Non-relevant reflections from the lens and corneal surface are blocked; else these reflections would otherwise obscure measurement of the light within the pupil.
- the surface closest to the patient of the apparatus acquiring the images can be matte and black so that it does not create corneal reflections that would obscure the measurement, or a polarizing filter can be used.
- the pupil and its border are identified. Light within the pupil is then analyzed. The total intensity of the pupil is used in a formula that calculates the autorefraction result, and a minimum intensity is required, but differences in intensity across the pupil are not measured for autorefraction.
- the light in an eye with spherical refractive error does not have a slope; it is of uniform intensity within the pupil. Even the difference between the pixels of the first color and the second color is uniform across the pupil for spherical refractive error (i.e., no astigmatism).
- Light that is reflecting off of the retina is measured. A difference in the intensity of the first color versus the second color pixel values is determined and compared; this difference is related to the eye's refractive error/glasses prescription.
- the difference between the first color and second color pixels is a larger number in hyperopia (farsighted) and a lower number in myopia (nearsighted).
- the light within the pupil of eyes with hyperopia is somewhat brighter than eyes with myopia.
- the intensity of individual pixels across the pupil will have a higher standard deviation than with hyperopia or myopia alone.
- the axis of the astigmatism is known to be regular, meaning that the two principal power meridians are 90 degrees apart.
- the presence of astigmatism within an optical system causes differences in intensity within the pupil. The more myopic meridian will be dimmer and the more hyperopic meridian will be brighter.
- the method comprises detecting, using a computing device, light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject; and making a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
- the determination about the eye is made based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected light. For example, overall brightness and the intensity of one or more colors of the reflected light can be used to make the determination about the eye.
- the determination made about the eye comprises the refractive error for the eye of the subject based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected light.
- detecting, using the computing device, light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject can further comprise capturing, using an image capture device, an image of the eye of a subject, wherein non-relevant reflections from the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; determining, using the computing device, an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a first intensity of a first color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a second intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; and comparing, by the computing device, a relative intensity of the first color and a relative intensity of the second color, wherein the comparison and the overall intensity are used to
- the above described method can be used to make determinations about the eye that include an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
- capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject can comprise capturing a first image with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capturing a second image with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the first image is compared to the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a positive value or hyperopia.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a negative value or myopia.
- the above-described method can also be used to make a determination about the eye such as astigmatism.
- the method can further comprise making a first determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light from a first plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; making a second determination from a second plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels; making a third determination from a third plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
- Comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can be a presence or an absence of astigmatism. Further, when the presence of astigmatism is detected, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil.
- the method comprises managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image.
- this comprises managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image.
- managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise placing a polarizing filter over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject.
- managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye.
- managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise providing a surface that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image.
- the surface can have a black matte finish.
- the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device.
- the surface can comprise at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device.
- the image capture device can comprise a smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera.
- the image capture device can capture a still image or a video of the eye of the subject.
- the above-described method can be used to make a determination about the eye of a person having a smaller than average pupil.
- the subject's pupil has a diameter of approximately 2 mm or less.
- the subject's pupil can be a natural pupil or an artificial pupil.
- the eye of the subject can be the subject's left eye or right eye, or the subject's left eye and right eye.
- the method can further comprise detecting an intensity for the light conditions and providing an indication if the light conditions are too low for the image capture device to capture the image of the eye of the subject.
- the method comprises capturing, using an image capture device, an image of an eye of a subject, wherein the image is captured and wherein non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; determining, using a computing device, an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image, wherein the plurality of pixels comprise red, green and blue pixels; determining, using the computing device, an average red intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, an average blue intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; and determining, by the computing device, using the average red intensity, the average blue intensity and the determined overall intensity an optical quality of the eye.
- the determined optical quality of the eye can comprise an autorefraction or photorefraction measurement such that the method can be used to provide an estimated prescription for spectacle lens or contact lens. Further, the method can be used to determine an optical quality of the eye such as a positive value or hyperopia, a negative value or myopia, the presence or absence of astigmatism, and an amount of astigmatism if is found to be present.
- the apparatus comprises an image capture device; a memory; and a processor in communication with the memory and the image capture device, wherein the processor executes computer-readable instructions stored in the memory that cause the processor to: capture, using the image capture device, an image of an eye of a subject, wherein the image is captured and wherein non-relevant reflections from the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; detect, from the image of the eye of the subject, light reflected out of the eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject; and make a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the detected reflected light.
- the determination made about the eye by the apparatus comprises the refractive error for the eye of the subject based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected light.
- the apparatus can be used for detecting light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject by determining an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; determining a first intensity of a first color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; determining a second intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; and comparing a relative intensity of the first color and a relative intensity of the second color, wherein the comparison and the overall intensity are used to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
- the first or the second color can be any one or any combination of red, green and blue.
- the above described apparatus can make determinations about the eye that include an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
- the processor can execute computer-readable instructions store in the memory to capture a first image with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capture a second image with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the first image is compared to the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens.
- the processor of the apparatus can execute computer-readable instructions such that when the first intensity of the first color is brighter relative to the second intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively brighter, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a positive value or hyperopia. Similarly, when the first intensity of the first color is dimmer relative to the second intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively dimmer, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a negative value or myopia.
- the above-described apparatus can also be used to make a determination about the eye such as astigmatism.
- the processor of the apparatus can execute computer-readable instructions for making a first determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light from a first plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; making a second determination from a second plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels; making a third determination from a third plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
- Comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can be a presence or an absence of astigmatism. Further, when the presence of astigmatism is detected, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil.
- the apparatus can manage non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image.
- this comprises managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image.
- managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise placing a polarizing filter over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject.
- managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye.
- managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise providing a surface that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image.
- the surface can have a black matte finish.
- the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device.
- the surface can comprise at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device.
- the image capture device can comprise a smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera.
- the image capture device can capture a still image or a video of the eye of the subject.
- the above-described apparatus can be used to make a determination about the eye of a person having a smaller than average pupil.
- the subject's pupil has a diameter of approximately 2 mm or less.
- the subject's pupil can be a natural pupil or an artificial pupil.
- the eye of the subject can be the subject's left eye or right eye, or the subject's left eye and right eye.
- the apparatus can further comprise a light meter to detect an intensity for the light conditions and provide an indication if the light conditions are too low for the image capture device to capture the image of the eye of the subject.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary overview apparatus for making a determination about the eye of a subject in ambient lighting conditions
- FIG. 2 A illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions
- FIG. 2 B illustrates an image of the eye captured by an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions
- FIG. 2 C illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions
- FIG. 2 D illustrates an image of an eye that can be used to make a determination about the eye such as astigmatism
- FIG. 2 E illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye using polarizing filters and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions
- FIG. 2 F illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye using a surface and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example computing device upon which embodiments of the invention may be implemented
- FIG. 4 illustrates an example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye
- FIG. 5 illustrates an alternate example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye.
- the word “comprise” and variations of the word, such as “comprising” and “comprises,” means “including but not limited to,” and is not intended to exclude, for example, other additives, components, integers or steps.
- “Exemplary” means “an example of” and is not intended to convey an indication of a preferred or ideal embodiment. “Such as” is not used in a restrictive sense, but for explanatory purposes.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary overview apparatus for making a determination about the eye of a subject in ambient lighting conditions.
- the apparatus 100 comprises an image capture mechanism 102 .
- the image capture mechanism 102 can be camera.
- the image capture mechanism 102 can take still and/or video images.
- the image capture mechanism 102 will be a digital camera, but can be an analog device equipped with or in communication with an appropriate analog/digital converter.
- the image capture mechanism 102 may also be a webcam, scanner, recorder, or any other device capable of capturing a still image or a video.
- the image capture mechanism 102 is in direct communication with a computing device 110 through, for example, a network (wired (including fiber optic), wireless or a combination of wired and wireless) or a direct-connect cable (e.g., using a universal serial bus (USB) connection, IEEE 1394 “Firewire” connections, and the like).
- the image capture mechanism 102 can be located remotely from the computing device 110 , but capable of capturing an image and storing it on a memory device such that the image can be downloaded or transferred to the computing device 110 using, for example, a portable memory device and the like.
- the computing device 110 and the image capture mechanism 102 can comprise or be a part of a device such as a smart phone, table, laptop computer or any other mobile computing device.
- the computing device 110 can be comprised of a processor 104 and a memory 108 .
- the processor 104 can execute computer-readable instructions that are stored in the memory 108 .
- images captured by the image capture device 102 can be stored in the memory 108 and processed by the processor 104 using computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 .
- the processor 104 is in communication with the image capture device 102 and the memory 108 .
- the processor 104 can execute computer-readable instructions stored on the memory 108 to capture, using the image capture device 102 , an image of an eye 106 of a subject.
- No light source, other than ambient lighting, is required to capture the image.
- the image is captured using only ambient lighting conditions and does not require an additional light source to be directed into the eye 106 . While capturing the image of the eye 106 , non-relevant reflections from the eye 106 of the subject are managed.
- the processor 104 can further execute computer-readable instructions stored on the memory 108 to detect, from the image of the eye 106 of the subject, ambient light reflected out of the eye 106 of the subject from the retina of the eye 106 of the subject and to make a determination about the eye 106 of the subject based upon the detected reflected ambient light.
- the processor 104 of the apparatus 100 executing computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 that cause the processor 104 to make a determination about the eye 106 of the subject based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected ambient light.
- Such aspects can include, for example, an overall brightness or intensity of the reflected ambient light as determined in a plurality of pixels of the image acquired by the image capture device 102 .
- the aspects can also include one or more colors of the reflected ambient light also as determined from the plurality of pixels of the image acquired by the image capture device 102 .
- the processor 104 executing computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 can cause the processor 104 to make a determination about the eye 106 based at least in part on the overall brightness or intensity of the red, green and blue pixels that comprise the reflected ambient light as determined from the image acquired by the image capture device.
- Overall brightness can be determined, as a non-limiting example, using methods and software developed by Allan Hanbury (see, for example, “A 3D-Polar Coordinate Colour Representation Well Adapted to Image Analysis,” Hanbury, Allan; Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2003), which is fully incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
- the processor 104 also uses the relative intensity of red, green or blue found in the plurality of pixels of the image acquired by the image capture device 102 to make the determination about the eye 106 .
- the processor 104 executing computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 can make determinations about the eye 106 comprising a refractive error for the eye 106 of the subject.
- the processor 104 executing computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 can make determinations about the eye 106 including a refractive error for the eye 106 of the subject.
- the image capture device 102 of the apparatus 100 captures an image ( FIG. 2 B ) 208 of the eye 106 .
- the processor 104 of the apparatus 100 can execute computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 that cause the processor 104 to detect, from the image 208 of the eye, ambient light 202 reflected 204 out of an eye 106 of the subject from the retina 206 of the eye 106 of the subject and determine the overall intensity of the plurality of pixels (example pixels are shown in FIG.
- the regression analysis includes at least one of the following elements (1) the overall intensity or brightness of the pixels within pupil 210 or a portion of the pupil 210 ; and (2) the relative intensity of a first color from a first one or more pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil 210 of the eye of the subject captured in image 208 as compared to a second color from a second one or more pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil 210 of the eye of the subject captured in image 208 .
- the regression analysis can also include (3) the color of the iris of the subject captures in image 208 ; and (4) the overall intensity of the ambient lighting at the time the image is captured with the image capturing device 100 .
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise a positive value or hyperopia.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise a negative value or myopia.
- the first color can comprise any one or any combination of red, green, and blue and the second color can comprise any one or combination of red, green, and blue that is not used as the first color.
- the processor 104 of the apparatus 100 can execute computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 that cause the processor 104 to make an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
- the apparatus 100 can capture, using the image capture device 102 , an image 208 of the eye 106 of the subject using only ambient lighting 202 conditions through a spectacle lens or a contact lens (both shown as 212 in FIG. 2 C ) while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens 212 over the eye 106 .
- the image capturing device 102 of the apparatus 100 then captures a second image using only ambient lighting 202 conditions while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens 212 over the eye (see, for example, FIG.
- the processor 104 executes computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 that cause the processor 104 to compare the first image to the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected 204 ambient light is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens 212 .
- the processor 104 can execute computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 108 that cause the processor 104 to make a first determination about the eye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light from a first plurality of pixels 220 located within the at least a portion of the pupil 210 of the eye 106 of the subject captured in the image 208 ; make a second determination from a second plurality of pixels 222 located within the at least a portion of the pupil 210 of the eye 106 of the subject captured in the image 208 , wherein the second plurality of pixels 222 are a subset of the first plurality of pixels 210 ; make a third determination from a third plurality of pixels 224 located within the at least a portion of the pupil 210 of the eye 106 of the subject captured in the image 208 , wherein the third plurality of pixels 224 are a subset of the first plurality of pixels 210 and are separate from the second plurality of pixels 222 ; and compare the first determination
- comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light.
- the determination made about the eye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can be the presence or absence of astigmatism.
- the amount of astigmatism, once detected, can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil. For example, measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil using the apparatus 100 , as described herein, can be used to determine the amount of astigmatism present in the eye 106 .
- a refractive error of ⁇ 2.00 may be obtained if the whole pupil central region of the pupil (entire white dashed circle) 210 is analyzed using the methods and apparatus described herein, but if the sub-region at 90 degrees (solid square) 222 is analyzed and determined to have a refractive error of ⁇ 1.00 and the sub-region at 0 degrees (dashed square) 224 is analyzed and determined to have a refractive error of ⁇ 3.00, the standard deviation would be higher in the case of astigmatism where the sub-regions 222 , 224 would be ⁇ 1.00 and ⁇ 3.00, respectively.
- a prescription for corrective lenses also needs to be ⁇ 1.00 and ⁇ 3.00 in those two sub-regions 222 , 224 , rather than an overall ⁇ 2.00 for the central pupil region 220 .
- These numbers are also just examples. They could be positive, negative, or both (one of each).
- many sub-regions can be evaluated to make a determination about the eye. In this example the two sub-regions are at 90 degrees and 0 degrees, but they could be at any location throughout the pupil 210 .
- the apparatus 100 or the image capture device 102 can manage non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye 106 of the subject while capturing the image 208 .
- Such non-relevant reflections can affect the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light.
- Managing the non-relevant reflections can include, for example and as shown in FIG. 2 E , the use of a polarizing filter 214 , wherein non-relevant reflections 216 from the eye 106 are managed while capturing the image 208 by placing the polarizing filter 214 over a lens of the image capture device 102 or between the image capture device 102 and the eye 106 of the subject when capturing the image 208 .
- the apparatus 100 can further comprise a surface 218 , wherein non-relevant reflections 216 from the eye 106 are managed while capturing the image 208 comprise the surface 218 absorbing light or preventing the non-relevant reflections 216 from the eye 106 while capturing the image 208 .
- the apparatus 100 including the image capture device 102 can be placed close to the eye 106 such that non-relevant reflections 216 are minimized and those that do occur are absorbed or prevented by the surface 218 .
- the apparatus 100 including the image capture device 102 can be placed from approximately 4 to 10 cm away from the eye 106 while capturing the image 208 , or the apparatus 100 including the image capture device 102 can be placed from approximately 8 to 9 cm away from the eye 106 while capturing the image 208 .
- the surface 218 can comprise, for example, a surface having a black matte finish to facilitate the absorption of ambient light and prevent of non-relevant reflections.
- the surface 218 can comprise a portion of the image capture device 102 or the apparatus 100 , including a case that may house at least a portion of the image capture device 102 or the apparatus 100 .
- the image capture device 102 may comprise at least a portion of a smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera and the surface 218 can be at least a portion of a case that houses the smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera.
- This disclosure contemplates apparatus that can be used make determinations about the eye 106 in eyes that have smaller than average pupil diameters such as, for example, approximately 2 mm or less. This is currently a challenge for many photorefractors that require assessing the slope of the reflected light over a wide pupil diameter, making it is less useful in more brightly lit rooms or in older patients who have smaller pupils. Further, embodiments of the apparatus described herein can monitor the reflected light in just the center region of the pupil in this measurement allowing accurate measurement of the smaller pupil.
- embodiments of the apparatus described herein can monitor the reflected light in a natural pupil or an artificial pupil.
- An artificial, or second pupil can be optically created for an eye by combining lenses and apertures, without placing anything inside the eye. Vision scientists regularly create what is called a Maxwellian View during experiments where they want to give all subjects the same pupil size by creating an artificial pupil.
- An artificial pupil could be optically created or physically created by placing an aperture in front of the eye.
- the apparatus 100 as described herein can be used to make a determination of the subject's left eye or right eye. Similarly, it can be used to make a determination of the subject's left eye and right eye.
- the apparatus 100 can optionally include a light meter or any other mechanism for measure ambient lighting levels.
- the light meter can detect an intensity for the ambient light conditions and provide an indication if the ambient light conditions are too low for the apparatus 100 to capture an image of the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light.
- the light meter can measure ambient lighting conditions and such measurement can be used to adjust the image or the calculation of refractive error using regression analysis accordingly.
- Such a computing device 300 as shown in FIG. 3 can be the same as computing device 110 , described above, or used alternatively for computing device 110 .
- FIG. 3 an example computing device 300 upon which embodiments of the invention may be implemented is illustrated.
- the computing device 300 can optionally be a mobile computing device such as a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone and the like.
- the computing device 300 may include a bus or other communication mechanism for communicating information among various components of the computing device 300 .
- computing device 300 typically includes at least one processing unit 306 and system memory 304 .
- system memory 304 may be volatile (such as random access memory (RAM)), non-volatile (such as read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, etc.), or some combination of the two.
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read-only memory
- flash memory etc.
- the processing unit 306 may be a standard programmable processor that performs arithmetic and logic operations necessary for operation of the computing device 300 .
- Computing device 300 may have additional features/functionality.
- computing device 300 may include additional storage such as removable storage 308 and non-removable storage 310 including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tapes.
- Computing device 300 may also contain network connection(s) 316 that allow the device to communicate with other devices.
- Computing device 300 may also have input device(s) 314 such as a keyboard, mouse, touch screen, etc.
- Output device(s) 312 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included.
- the additional devices may be connected to the bus in order to facilitate communication of data among the components of the computing device 300 . All these devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here.
- the processing unit 306 may be configured to execute program code encoded in tangible, computer-readable media.
- Computer-readable media refers to any media that is capable of providing data that causes the computing device 300 (i.e., a machine) to operate in a particular fashion.
- Various computer-readable media may be utilized to provide instructions to the processing unit 306 for execution.
- Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, magnetic media, optical media, physical media, memory chips or cartridges, or any other non-transitory medium from which a computer can read.
- Example computer-readable media may include, but is not limited to, volatile media, non-volatile media and transmission media.
- Volatile and non-volatile media may be implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data and common forms are discussed in detail below.
- Transmission media may include coaxial cables, copper wires and/or fiber optic cables, as well as acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communication.
- Example tangible, computer-readable recording media include, but are not limited to, an integrated circuit (e.g., field-programmable gate array or application-specific IC), a hard disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, a holographic storage medium, a solid-state device, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices.
- an integrated circuit e.g., field-programmable gate array or application-specific IC
- a hard disk e.g., an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, a holographic storage medium, a solid-state device, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (
- the processing unit 306 may execute program code stored in the system memory 304 .
- the bus may carry data to the system memory 304 , from which the processing unit 306 receives and executes instructions.
- the data received by the system memory 304 may optionally be stored on the removable storage 308 or the non-removable storage 310 before or after execution by the processing unit 306 .
- Computing device 300 typically includes a variety of computer-readable media.
- Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by device 300 and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.
- Computer storage media include volatile and non-volatile, and removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
- System memory 304 , removable storage 308 , and non-removable storage 310 are all examples of computer storage media.
- Computer storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computing device 300 . Any such computer storage media may be part of computing device 300 .
- the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination thereof.
- the methods and apparatuses of the presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions thereof may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computing device, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter.
- the computing device In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device.
- One or more programs may implement or utilize the processes described in connection with the presently disclosed subject matter, e.g., through the use of an application programming interface (API), reusable controls, or the like.
- API application programming interface
- Such programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system.
- the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language and it may be combined with hardware implementations.
- the techniques for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions described herein can optionally be implemented with a mobile computing device, such as a laptop computer, tablet computer or mobile phone. Accordingly, the mobile computing device is extremely small compared to conventional devices and is very portable, which allows the mobile computing device to be used wherever needed. Many conventional devices have a chin rest that requires the subjects to only look straight ahead during this testing. Unlike conventional devices, the mobile computing device can be placed in any position relative to the subject's head where the eyes can still be viewed and measurements can be made.
- the logical operations described herein with respect to the various figures may be implemented (1) as a sequence of computer implemented acts or program modules (i.e., software) running on a computing device, (2) as interconnected machine logic circuits or circuit modules (i.e., hardware) within the computing device and/or (3) a combination of software and hardware of the computing device.
- the logical operations discussed herein are not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software. The implementation is a matter of choice dependent on the performance and other requirements of the computing device. Accordingly, the logical operations described herein are referred to variously as operations, structural devices, acts, or modules. These operations, structural devices, acts and modules may be implemented in software, in firmware, in special purpose digital logic, and any combination thereof. It should also be appreciated that more or fewer operations may be performed than shown in the figures and described herein. These operations may also be performed in a different order than those described herein.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye.
- the method comprises step 402 , detecting, using a computing device, ambient light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject; and step 404 , making a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light.
- Making the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light comprises making a determination based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected ambient light.
- the aspects can include making a determination based at least in part on an overall brightness (luminescence) of an image of the eye and the intensity of one or more colors of the reflected ambient light.
- the determination about the eye of the subject comprises refractive error and the refractive error is determined by a formula developed through regression analysis.
- the example formula considers overall brightness (“LuminancePupil”) of the pupil from the image capture using only ambient light and the intensity of blue from one or more pixels from the pupil in the image (“BluePixel”), the intensity of red in one or more pixels from the pupil in the image (“RedPixel”), and the intensity of green in one or more pixels from the pupil in the image (“GreenPixel”) while controlling for ambient light levels (“LuminanceAmbient”).
- detecting ambient light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject can further comprise capturing, using an image capture device, an image of the eye of a subject, wherein the image is captured using only ambient lighting conditions and wherein non-relevant reflections from the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; determining, using the computing device, an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a first intensity of a first color from the plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a second intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; and comparing, by the computing device, a relative intensity of the first color and a relative intensity of the second color, wherein the comparison and the overall intensity are used
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light comprises a positive value or hyperopia.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light comprises a negative value or myopia.
- the first color can comprise any one or any combination of red, green and blue and the second color can comprise any one or any combination of red, green and blue.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can alternatively or optionally comprise an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
- Capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject can comprise capturing a first image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capturing a second image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the first image can be compared to the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens.
- the method shown in FIG. 4 can further comprise making a first determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light from a first plurality of pixels located within the portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; making a second determination from a second plurality of pixels located within the portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels; making a third determination from a third plurality of pixels located within the portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light.
- Comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can be the presence or the absence of astigmatism.
- an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil.
- Such measurements of various regions of the pupil can comprise measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil.
- the method of FIG. 4 can include managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image, which can comprise managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image.
- a polarizing filter can be placed over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject.
- Managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can also comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye.
- a surface can be provided that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image.
- the surface can have a black matte finish.
- the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device or at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an alternate example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye.
- the method comprises step 502 , capturing, using an image capture device, an image of an eye of a subject, wherein said image is captured using only ambient lighting conditions and wherein non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image.
- an average red intensity can be determined from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image.
- an average blue intensity is determined from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image.
- an overall intensity is determined of the plurality pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; and, at step 510 , compare the average red intensity and the average blue intensity, wherein the comparison and the determined overall intensity are used to determine an optical quality of the eye.
- the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can alternatively or optionally comprise an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
- Capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject can comprise capturing a first image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capturing a second image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the first image can be compared to the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens.
- the method shown in FIG. 5 can further comprise determining a presence or an absence of astigmatism. If the presence of astigmatism is indicated, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing optical quality measurements of various regions of the pupil. Such optical quality measurements of various regions of the pupil can comprise measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil.
- the method of FIG. 5 can include managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image, which can comprise managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image.
- a polarizing filter can be placed over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject.
- Managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can also comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye.
- a surface can be provided that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image.
- the surface can have a black matte finish.
- the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device or at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device.
- At least one of the subject's eyes can be the subject's left eye or right eye.
- at least one of the subject's eyes can be the subject's left eye and right eye.
- This disclosure contemplates that the optical qualities based on the subject's left eye and right eye can be the same or different.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)
- Eyeglasses (AREA)
Abstract
Disclosed herein are methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye comprising detecting light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject and making a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
Description
- This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/240,212 filed Apr. 26, 2021, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/250,592 filed Jan. 17, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,986,991 issued on Apr. 27, 2021, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/934,742 filed Nov. 6, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,219,687 issued Mar. 5, 2019, which claims priority to and benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/076,804 filed Nov. 7, 2014, each of which are fully incorporated by reference and made parts hereof.
- There are many existing devices that are used to detect the optical quality of the eye or other optical systems, including: autorefractors/ophthalmic refractometers, aberrometers, etc. All of the existing devices work by using a light source to illuminate the eye. Many devices, including the vast majority of autorefractors, use an infrared light source, but visible light sources are also used. Anyone who has used a standard camera with a flash will know that light from the flash will reflect off of the retina during photography. This reflected light will make the pupil appear red in a photograph of a human eye or appear greenish in a photograph of many animals' eyes. The reflected light will also have a particular pattern that is dependent upon the eye's optical distortions. Many existing/previous autorefractors or aberrometers are based on this principle, i.e., shining a light into the eye and then detecting the pattern of the reflected light after it has been distorted by the eye. The devices vary in the configuration or type of light source or in how the reflected light is detected (single images, lenslet arrays, telescope combined with a lenslet array, etc.). However, in each of those cases, a light is shined into the eye and then the magnitude of the refractive error is determined, and this is often based on the intensity slope of the light (brighter at either the top or the bottom of the pupil) that is reflected off of the retina and back out of the eye.
- Therefore, methods, apparatus and systems are desired that improve the detection of an optical quality of the eye or other optical system and that overcome challenges in the art, some of which are described above.
- Described herein are devices and methods to measure optical distortions in the eye by monitoring the intensity of a first color of light versus intensity of a second color of light within the pupil of a subject. The subject can be a human or an animal. While the pupil may appear to be black or very dark in a photograph that does not use a flash, the pixel values do vary in magnitude based on the power of the eye. In the images that are obtained for embodiments of this invention, the information needed to measure the optical distortions of the eye is contained within the pixel values of the first and second color.
- Non-relevant reflections from the lens and corneal surface are blocked; else these reflections would otherwise obscure measurement of the light within the pupil. For example, the surface closest to the patient of the apparatus acquiring the images can be matte and black so that it does not create corneal reflections that would obscure the measurement, or a polarizing filter can be used.
- Once this image is obtained, the pupil and its border are identified. Light within the pupil is then analyzed. The total intensity of the pupil is used in a formula that calculates the autorefraction result, and a minimum intensity is required, but differences in intensity across the pupil are not measured for autorefraction. The light in an eye with spherical refractive error does not have a slope; it is of uniform intensity within the pupil. Even the difference between the pixels of the first color and the second color is uniform across the pupil for spherical refractive error (i.e., no astigmatism). Light that is reflecting off of the retina is measured. A difference in the intensity of the first color versus the second color pixel values is determined and compared; this difference is related to the eye's refractive error/glasses prescription. For example, the difference between the first color and second color pixels is a larger number in hyperopia (farsighted) and a lower number in myopia (nearsighted). Also, the light within the pupil of eyes with hyperopia is somewhat brighter than eyes with myopia. In the case of astigmatism, the intensity of individual pixels across the pupil will have a higher standard deviation than with hyperopia or myopia alone. In most eyes, the axis of the astigmatism is known to be regular, meaning that the two principal power meridians are 90 degrees apart. In the present disclosure, the presence of astigmatism within an optical system causes differences in intensity within the pupil. The more myopic meridian will be dimmer and the more hyperopic meridian will be brighter.
- Disclosed herein is a method of making a determination about an eye. The method comprises detecting, using a computing device, light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject; and making a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. The determination about the eye is made based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected light. For example, overall brightness and the intensity of one or more colors of the reflected light can be used to make the determination about the eye.
- In one aspect, the determination made about the eye comprises the refractive error for the eye of the subject based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected light.
- Alternatively, or optionally, in reference to the above-described method, detecting, using the computing device, light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject can further comprise capturing, using an image capture device, an image of the eye of a subject, wherein non-relevant reflections from the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; determining, using the computing device, an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a first intensity of a first color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a second intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; and comparing, by the computing device, a relative intensity of the first color and a relative intensity of the second color, wherein the comparison and the overall intensity are used to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. Either the first or the second color can be any one or any combination of red, green and blue.
- In one aspect, the above described method can be used to make determinations about the eye that include an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement. For example, capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject can comprise capturing a first image with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capturing a second image with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the first image is compared to the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens.
- Alternatively, or optionally, in reference to the above-described method, when the first intensity of the first color is brighter relative to the second intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively brighter, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a positive value or hyperopia. Similarly, when the first intensity of the first color is dimmer relative to the second intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively dimmer, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a negative value or myopia.
- The above-described method can also be used to make a determination about the eye such as astigmatism. For example, the method can further comprise making a first determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light from a first plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; making a second determination from a second plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels; making a third determination from a third plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. Comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. As noted above, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can be a presence or an absence of astigmatism. Further, when the presence of astigmatism is detected, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil.
- As noted above, the method comprises managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image. Generally, this comprises managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image. For example, managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise placing a polarizing filter over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject. Alternative or optionally, managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye. For example, managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise providing a surface that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image. The surface can have a black matte finish. In one aspect, the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device. For example, the surface can comprise at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device.
- In reference to the above-described method, the image capture device can comprise a smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera. Generally, the image capture device can capture a still image or a video of the eye of the subject.
- The above-described method can be used to make a determination about the eye of a person having a smaller than average pupil. For example, where the subject's pupil has a diameter of approximately 2 mm or less. Further, the subject's pupil can be a natural pupil or an artificial pupil. The eye of the subject can be the subject's left eye or right eye, or the subject's left eye and right eye. In one aspect, the method can further comprise detecting an intensity for the light conditions and providing an indication if the light conditions are too low for the image capture device to capture the image of the eye of the subject.
- Also disclosed herein is an alternate method of making a determination about an eye. The method comprises capturing, using an image capture device, an image of an eye of a subject, wherein the image is captured and wherein non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; determining, using a computing device, an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image, wherein the plurality of pixels comprise red, green and blue pixels; determining, using the computing device, an average red intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, an average blue intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; and determining, by the computing device, using the average red intensity, the average blue intensity and the determined overall intensity an optical quality of the eye.
- Similarly as described above, the determined optical quality of the eye can comprise an autorefraction or photorefraction measurement such that the method can be used to provide an estimated prescription for spectacle lens or contact lens. Further, the method can be used to determine an optical quality of the eye such as a positive value or hyperopia, a negative value or myopia, the presence or absence of astigmatism, and an amount of astigmatism if is found to be present.
- Another aspect of the disclosure is an apparatus for performing the above-described methods. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises an image capture device; a memory; and a processor in communication with the memory and the image capture device, wherein the processor executes computer-readable instructions stored in the memory that cause the processor to: capture, using the image capture device, an image of an eye of a subject, wherein the image is captured and wherein non-relevant reflections from the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; detect, from the image of the eye of the subject, light reflected out of the eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject; and make a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the detected reflected light.
- In one aspect, the determination made about the eye by the apparatus comprises the refractive error for the eye of the subject based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected light.
- Alternatively, or optionally, the apparatus can be used for detecting light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject by determining an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; determining a first intensity of a first color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; determining a second intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; and comparing a relative intensity of the first color and a relative intensity of the second color, wherein the comparison and the overall intensity are used to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. Either the first or the second color can be any one or any combination of red, green and blue.
- In one aspect, the above described apparatus can make determinations about the eye that include an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement. For example, when capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject the processor can execute computer-readable instructions store in the memory to capture a first image with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capture a second image with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the first image is compared to the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens.
- Alternatively, or optionally, the processor of the apparatus can execute computer-readable instructions such that when the first intensity of the first color is brighter relative to the second intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively brighter, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a positive value or hyperopia. Similarly, when the first intensity of the first color is dimmer relative to the second intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively dimmer, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises a negative value or myopia.
- The above-described apparatus can also be used to make a determination about the eye such as astigmatism. For example, the processor of the apparatus can execute computer-readable instructions for making a first determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light from a first plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; making a second determination from a second plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels; making a third determination from a third plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. Comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light. As noted above, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light can be a presence or an absence of astigmatism. Further, when the presence of astigmatism is detected, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil.
- As noted above, the apparatus can manage non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image. Generally, this comprises managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image. For example, managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise placing a polarizing filter over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject. Alternative or optionally, managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye. For example, managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can comprise providing a surface that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image. The surface can have a black matte finish. In one aspect, the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device. For example, the surface can comprise at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device.
- In reference to the above apparatus, the image capture device can comprise a smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera. Generally, the image capture device can capture a still image or a video of the eye of the subject.
- The above-described apparatus can be used to make a determination about the eye of a person having a smaller than average pupil. For example, where the subject's pupil has a diameter of approximately 2 mm or less. Further, the subject's pupil can be a natural pupil or an artificial pupil. The eye of the subject can be the subject's left eye or right eye, or the subject's left eye and right eye. In one aspect, the apparatus can further comprise a light meter to detect an intensity for the light conditions and provide an indication if the light conditions are too low for the image capture device to capture the image of the eye of the subject.
- It should be understood that the above-described subject matter may also be implemented as a computer-controlled apparatus, a computer process, a computing system, or an article of manufacture, such as a computer-readable storage medium.
- Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
- The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary overview apparatus for making a determination about the eye of a subject in ambient lighting conditions; -
FIG. 2A illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions; -
FIG. 2B illustrates an image of the eye captured by an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions; -
FIG. 2C illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions; -
FIG. 2D illustrates an image of an eye that can be used to make a determination about the eye such as astigmatism; -
FIG. 2E illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye using polarizing filters and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions; -
FIG. 2F illustrates an example of an apparatus for capturing an image of the eye using a surface and making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions; -
FIG. 3 illustrates an example computing device upon which embodiments of the invention may be implemented; -
FIG. 4 illustrates an example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye; and -
FIG. 5 illustrates an alternate example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye. - Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure.
- As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
- “Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.
- Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the word “comprise” and variations of the word, such as “comprising” and “comprises,” means “including but not limited to,” and is not intended to exclude, for example, other additives, components, integers or steps. “Exemplary” means “an example of” and is not intended to convey an indication of a preferred or ideal embodiment. “Such as” is not used in a restrictive sense, but for explanatory purposes.
- Disclosed are components that can be used to perform the disclosed methods and systems. These and other components are disclosed herein, and it is understood that when combinations, subsets, interactions, groups, etc. of these components are disclosed that while specific reference of each various individual and collective combinations and permutation of these may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein, for all methods and systems. This applies to all aspects of this application including, but not limited to, steps in disclosed methods. Thus, if there are a variety of additional steps that can be performed it is understood that each of these additional steps can be performed with any specific embodiment or combination of embodiments of the disclosed methods.
- The present methods and systems may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments and the Examples included therein and to the Figures and their previous and following description.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary overview apparatus for making a determination about the eye of a subject in ambient lighting conditions. As shown inFIG. 1 , one embodiment of theapparatus 100 comprises animage capture mechanism 102. In one aspect, theimage capture mechanism 102 can be camera. Theimage capture mechanism 102 can take still and/or video images. Generally, theimage capture mechanism 102 will be a digital camera, but can be an analog device equipped with or in communication with an appropriate analog/digital converter. Theimage capture mechanism 102 may also be a webcam, scanner, recorder, or any other device capable of capturing a still image or a video. - In one aspect, the
image capture mechanism 102 is in direct communication with acomputing device 110 through, for example, a network (wired (including fiber optic), wireless or a combination of wired and wireless) or a direct-connect cable (e.g., using a universal serial bus (USB) connection, IEEE 1394 “Firewire” connections, and the like). In other aspects, theimage capture mechanism 102 can be located remotely from thecomputing device 110, but capable of capturing an image and storing it on a memory device such that the image can be downloaded or transferred to thecomputing device 110 using, for example, a portable memory device and the like. In one aspect, thecomputing device 110 and theimage capture mechanism 102 can comprise or be a part of a device such as a smart phone, table, laptop computer or any other mobile computing device. - In a basic configuration, the
computing device 110 can be comprised of aprocessor 104 and amemory 108. Theprocessor 104 can execute computer-readable instructions that are stored in thememory 108. Moreover, images captured by theimage capture device 102, whether still images or video, can be stored in thememory 108 and processed by theprocessor 104 using computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108. - The
processor 104 is in communication with theimage capture device 102 and thememory 108. Theprocessor 104 can execute computer-readable instructions stored on thememory 108 to capture, using theimage capture device 102, an image of aneye 106 of a subject. No light source, other than ambient lighting, is required to capture the image. The image is captured using only ambient lighting conditions and does not require an additional light source to be directed into theeye 106. While capturing the image of theeye 106, non-relevant reflections from theeye 106 of the subject are managed. - The
processor 104 can further execute computer-readable instructions stored on thememory 108 to detect, from the image of theeye 106 of the subject, ambient light reflected out of theeye 106 of the subject from the retina of theeye 106 of the subject and to make a determination about theeye 106 of the subject based upon the detected reflected ambient light. Generally, theprocessor 104 of theapparatus 100 executing computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 that cause theprocessor 104 to make a determination about theeye 106 of the subject based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected ambient light. Such aspects can include, for example, an overall brightness or intensity of the reflected ambient light as determined in a plurality of pixels of the image acquired by theimage capture device 102. The aspects can also include one or more colors of the reflected ambient light also as determined from the plurality of pixels of the image acquired by theimage capture device 102. For example, theprocessor 104 executing computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 can cause theprocessor 104 to make a determination about theeye 106 based at least in part on the overall brightness or intensity of the red, green and blue pixels that comprise the reflected ambient light as determined from the image acquired by the image capture device. Overall brightness can be determined, as a non-limiting example, using methods and software developed by Allan Hanbury (see, for example, “A 3D-Polar Coordinate Colour Representation Well Adapted to Image Analysis,” Hanbury, Allan; Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2003), which is fully incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Theprocessor 104 also uses the relative intensity of red, green or blue found in the plurality of pixels of the image acquired by theimage capture device 102 to make the determination about theeye 106. For example, using at least in part on an aspect of the reflected ambient light as determined from an image of theeye 106 as captured by theimage capture device 102, theprocessor 104 executing computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 can make determinations about theeye 106 comprising a refractive error for theeye 106 of the subject. In other words, using at least in part an overall brightness or intensity of the reflected ambient light as determined in a plurality of the pixels of the image acquired by theimage capture device 102 and the relative intensity of one or more colors of the reflected ambient light also as determined from the plurality of pixels of the image acquired by theimage capture device 102, theprocessor 104 executing computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 can make determinations about theeye 106 including a refractive error for theeye 106 of the subject. - As shown in
FIG. 2A , theimage capture device 102 of theapparatus 100 captures an image (FIG. 2B ) 208 of theeye 106. Theprocessor 104 of theapparatus 100 can execute computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 that cause theprocessor 104 to detect, from theimage 208 of the eye,ambient light 202 reflected 204 out of aneye 106 of the subject from theretina 206 of theeye 106 of the subject and determine the overall intensity of the plurality of pixels (example pixels are shown inFIG. 2B as white “x” in thepupil 210 of theimage 208 of the eye) within thepupil 210 or a portion of thepupil 210; determine an intensity of a first color from a the plurality of pixels located within thepupil 210 or at least a portion of apupil 210 of the eye of the subject captured in theimage 208; determine an intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the pupil 201 or at least a portion of thepupil 210 of the eye of the subject captured in theimage 208; and calculate refractive error or glasses prescription based on regression analysis. The regression analysis includes at least one of the following elements (1) the overall intensity or brightness of the pixels withinpupil 210 or a portion of thepupil 210; and (2) the relative intensity of a first color from a first one or more pixels located within at least a portion of apupil 210 of the eye of the subject captured inimage 208 as compared to a second color from a second one or more pixels located within the at least a portion of thepupil 210 of the eye of the subject captured inimage 208. Optionally, the regression analysis can also include (3) the color of the iris of the subject captures inimage 208; and (4) the overall intensity of the ambient lighting at the time the image is captured with theimage capturing device 100. For example, when the intensity of the first color is brighter relative to the intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively brighter, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise a positive value or hyperopia. Alternatively, when the intensity of the first color is dimmer relative to the intensity of the second color and the overall intensity is relatively dimmer, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise a negative value or myopia. - For example, the first color can comprise any one or any combination of red, green, and blue and the second color can comprise any one or combination of red, green, and blue that is not used as the first color.
- By performing the steps described above, the
processor 104 of theapparatus 100 can execute computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 that cause theprocessor 104 to make an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement. For example, as shown inFIG. 2C , theapparatus 100 can capture, using theimage capture device 102, animage 208 of theeye 106 of the subject using onlyambient lighting 202 conditions through a spectacle lens or a contact lens (both shown as 212 inFIG. 2C ) while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or thecontact lens 212 over theeye 106. Theimage capturing device 102 of theapparatus 100 then captures a second image using onlyambient lighting 202 conditions while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or thecontact lens 212 over the eye (see, for example,FIG. 2A ) and theprocessor 104 executes computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 that cause theprocessor 104 to compare the first image to the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected 204 ambient light is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or thecontact lens 212. - Referring now to
FIG. 2D , in yet another aspect, theprocessor 104 can execute computer-readable instructions stored in thememory 108 that cause theprocessor 104 to make a first determination about theeye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light from a first plurality ofpixels 220 located within the at least a portion of thepupil 210 of theeye 106 of the subject captured in theimage 208; make a second determination from a second plurality ofpixels 222 located within the at least a portion of thepupil 210 of theeye 106 of the subject captured in theimage 208, wherein the second plurality ofpixels 222 are a subset of the first plurality ofpixels 210; make a third determination from a third plurality ofpixels 224 located within the at least a portion of thepupil 210 of theeye 106 of the subject captured in theimage 208, wherein the third plurality ofpixels 224 are a subset of the first plurality ofpixels 210 and are separate from the second plurality ofpixels 222; and compare the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about theeye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. For example, comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about theeye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about theeye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. The determination made about theeye 106 of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can be the presence or absence of astigmatism. The amount of astigmatism, once detected, can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil. For example, measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil using theapparatus 100, as described herein, can be used to determine the amount of astigmatism present in theeye 106. - Consider the following example, again referring to
FIG. 2D . If a determination of the eyes using the methods and apparatus described herein on the central region of the pupil (entire white dashed circle) 220 for someone with myopia (Ex: −2.00) and no astigmatism, a value of −2.00 would also be obtained in the sub-regions at 90 degrees (solid square) 222 and 0 degrees (dashed square) 224. If someone has astigmatism, a refractive error of −2.00 may be obtained if the whole pupil central region of the pupil (entire white dashed circle) 210 is analyzed using the methods and apparatus described herein, but if the sub-region at 90 degrees (solid square) 222 is analyzed and determined to have a refractive error of −1.00 and the sub-region at 0 degrees (dashed square) 224 is analyzed and determined to have a refractive error of −3.00, the standard deviation would be higher in the case of astigmatism where thesub-regions sub-regions central pupil region 220. These numbers are also just examples. They could be positive, negative, or both (one of each). Also, many sub-regions can be evaluated to make a determination about the eye. In this example the two sub-regions are at 90 degrees and 0 degrees, but they could be at any location throughout thepupil 210. - As described herein, the
apparatus 100 or theimage capture device 102 can manage non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of theeye 106 of the subject while capturing theimage 208. Such non-relevant reflections can affect the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. Managing the non-relevant reflections can include, for example and as shown inFIG. 2E , the use of apolarizing filter 214, whereinnon-relevant reflections 216 from theeye 106 are managed while capturing theimage 208 by placing thepolarizing filter 214 over a lens of theimage capture device 102 or between theimage capture device 102 and theeye 106 of the subject when capturing theimage 208. - In yet another aspect, as shown in
FIG. 2F , theapparatus 100 can further comprise asurface 218, whereinnon-relevant reflections 216 from theeye 106 are managed while capturing theimage 208 comprise thesurface 218 absorbing light or preventing thenon-relevant reflections 216 from theeye 106 while capturing theimage 208. For example, when acquiring theimage 208 theapparatus 100 including theimage capture device 102 can be placed close to theeye 106 such thatnon-relevant reflections 216 are minimized and those that do occur are absorbed or prevented by thesurface 218. For example, theapparatus 100 including theimage capture device 102 can be placed from approximately 4 to 10 cm away from theeye 106 while capturing theimage 208, or theapparatus 100 including theimage capture device 102 can be placed from approximately 8 to 9 cm away from theeye 106 while capturing theimage 208. Thesurface 218 can comprise, for example, a surface having a black matte finish to facilitate the absorption of ambient light and prevent of non-relevant reflections. Thesurface 218 can comprise a portion of theimage capture device 102 or theapparatus 100, including a case that may house at least a portion of theimage capture device 102 or theapparatus 100. For example, theimage capture device 102 may comprise at least a portion of a smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera and thesurface 218 can be at least a portion of a case that houses the smart phone or other mobile computing device having a camera. - This disclosure contemplates apparatus that can be used make determinations about the
eye 106 in eyes that have smaller than average pupil diameters such as, for example, approximately 2 mm or less. This is currently a challenge for many photorefractors that require assessing the slope of the reflected light over a wide pupil diameter, making it is less useful in more brightly lit rooms or in older patients who have smaller pupils. Further, embodiments of the apparatus described herein can monitor the reflected light in just the center region of the pupil in this measurement allowing accurate measurement of the smaller pupil. - Further, embodiments of the apparatus described herein can monitor the reflected light in a natural pupil or an artificial pupil. An artificial, or second pupil can be optically created for an eye by combining lenses and apertures, without placing anything inside the eye. Vision scientists regularly create what is called a Maxwellian View during experiments where they want to give all subjects the same pupil size by creating an artificial pupil. An artificial pupil could be optically created or physically created by placing an aperture in front of the eye.
- Alternatively or optionally, the
apparatus 100 as described herein can be used to make a determination of the subject's left eye or right eye. Similarly, it can be used to make a determination of the subject's left eye and right eye. - Though not shown in
FIG. 1 , theapparatus 100 can optionally include a light meter or any other mechanism for measure ambient lighting levels. The light meter can detect an intensity for the ambient light conditions and provide an indication if the ambient light conditions are too low for theapparatus 100 to capture an image of the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. In another aspect, the light meter can measure ambient lighting conditions and such measurement can be used to adjust the image or the calculation of refractive error using regression analysis accordingly. - When the logical operations described herein are implemented in software, the process may execute on any type of computing architecture or platform. Such a
computing device 300 as shown inFIG. 3 can be the same ascomputing device 110, described above, or used alternatively forcomputing device 110. For example, referring toFIG. 3 , anexample computing device 300 upon which embodiments of the invention may be implemented is illustrated. Thecomputing device 300 can optionally be a mobile computing device such as a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone and the like. Thecomputing device 300 may include a bus or other communication mechanism for communicating information among various components of thecomputing device 300. In its most basic configuration,computing device 300 typically includes at least oneprocessing unit 306 andsystem memory 304. Depending on the exact configuration and type of computing device,system memory 304 may be volatile (such as random access memory (RAM)), non-volatile (such as read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, etc.), or some combination of the two. This most basic configuration is illustrated inFIG. 3 by dashedline 302. Theprocessing unit 306 may be a standard programmable processor that performs arithmetic and logic operations necessary for operation of thecomputing device 300. -
Computing device 300 may have additional features/functionality. For example,computing device 300 may include additional storage such asremovable storage 308 andnon-removable storage 310 including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tapes.Computing device 300 may also contain network connection(s) 316 that allow the device to communicate with other devices.Computing device 300 may also have input device(s) 314 such as a keyboard, mouse, touch screen, etc. Output device(s) 312 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included. The additional devices may be connected to the bus in order to facilitate communication of data among the components of thecomputing device 300. All these devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here. - The
processing unit 306 may be configured to execute program code encoded in tangible, computer-readable media. Computer-readable media refers to any media that is capable of providing data that causes the computing device 300 (i.e., a machine) to operate in a particular fashion. Various computer-readable media may be utilized to provide instructions to theprocessing unit 306 for execution. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, magnetic media, optical media, physical media, memory chips or cartridges, or any other non-transitory medium from which a computer can read. Example computer-readable media may include, but is not limited to, volatile media, non-volatile media and transmission media. Volatile and non-volatile media may be implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data and common forms are discussed in detail below. Transmission media may include coaxial cables, copper wires and/or fiber optic cables, as well as acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communication. Example tangible, computer-readable recording media include, but are not limited to, an integrated circuit (e.g., field-programmable gate array or application-specific IC), a hard disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, a holographic storage medium, a solid-state device, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices. - In an example implementation, the
processing unit 306 may execute program code stored in thesystem memory 304. For example, the bus may carry data to thesystem memory 304, from which theprocessing unit 306 receives and executes instructions. The data received by thesystem memory 304 may optionally be stored on theremovable storage 308 or thenon-removable storage 310 before or after execution by theprocessing unit 306. -
Computing device 300 typically includes a variety of computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed bydevice 300 and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media. Computer storage media include volatile and non-volatile, and removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.System memory 304,removable storage 308, andnon-removable storage 310 are all examples of computer storage media. Computer storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computingdevice 300. Any such computer storage media may be part ofcomputing device 300. - It should be understood that the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination thereof. Thus, the methods and apparatuses of the presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computing device, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. One or more programs may implement or utilize the processes described in connection with the presently disclosed subject matter, e.g., through the use of an application programming interface (API), reusable controls, or the like. Such programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language and it may be combined with hardware implementations.
- The techniques for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions described herein can optionally be implemented with a mobile computing device, such as a laptop computer, tablet computer or mobile phone. Accordingly, the mobile computing device is extremely small compared to conventional devices and is very portable, which allows the mobile computing device to be used wherever needed. Many conventional devices have a chin rest that requires the subjects to only look straight ahead during this testing. Unlike conventional devices, the mobile computing device can be placed in any position relative to the subject's head where the eyes can still be viewed and measurements can be made.
- It should be appreciated that the logical operations described herein with respect to the various figures may be implemented (1) as a sequence of computer implemented acts or program modules (i.e., software) running on a computing device, (2) as interconnected machine logic circuits or circuit modules (i.e., hardware) within the computing device and/or (3) a combination of software and hardware of the computing device. Thus, the logical operations discussed herein are not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software. The implementation is a matter of choice dependent on the performance and other requirements of the computing device. Accordingly, the logical operations described herein are referred to variously as operations, structural devices, acts, or modules. These operations, structural devices, acts and modules may be implemented in software, in firmware, in special purpose digital logic, and any combination thereof. It should also be appreciated that more or fewer operations may be performed than shown in the figures and described herein. These operations may also be performed in a different order than those described herein.
-
FIG. 4 illustrates an example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye. The method comprisesstep 402, detecting, using a computing device, ambient light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject; and step 404, making a determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. - Making the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light comprises making a determination based at least in part on an aspect of the reflected ambient light. The aspects can include making a determination based at least in part on an overall brightness (luminescence) of an image of the eye and the intensity of one or more colors of the reflected ambient light. Consider one non-limiting example where the determination about the eye of the subject comprises refractive error and the refractive error is determined by a formula developed through regression analysis. The example formula considers overall brightness (“LuminancePupil”) of the pupil from the image capture using only ambient light and the intensity of blue from one or more pixels from the pupil in the image (“BluePixel”), the intensity of red in one or more pixels from the pupil in the image (“RedPixel”), and the intensity of green in one or more pixels from the pupil in the image (“GreenPixel”) while controlling for ambient light levels (“LuminanceAmbient”). The example formula comprises: Refractive Error=−36.47+(−638.37*RedPixel)+(−1807.2*GreenPixel)+(−333.64*BluePixel)+(2156.5*LuminancePupil)+(183.0*LuminanceAmbient)m+(890.2*GreenPixel*LuminanceAmbient)+(−4895.0*RedPixel*RedPixel)+(−8457.1*GreenPixel*GreenPixel)+(−1711.4*BluePixel*BluePixel)+(1592.8*LuminancePupil*LuminancePupil)+(−178.7*LuminanceAmbient*LuminanceAmbient), and has an R2 of approximately 0.78 for fitting the measurement to the intended refractive error of the eye. It is to be appreciated that this is only one example of a formula for making a determination about the eye and other formulas are contemplated within the scope of this disclosure.
- Referring back to the method described in
FIG. 4 , detecting ambient light reflected out of an eye of a subject from a retina of the eye of the subject can further comprise capturing, using an image capture device, an image of the eye of a subject, wherein the image is captured using only ambient lighting conditions and wherein non-relevant reflections from the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image; determining, using the computing device, an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a first intensity of a first color from the plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; determining, using the computing device, a second intensity of a second color from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; and comparing, by the computing device, a relative intensity of the first color and a relative intensity of the second color, wherein the comparison and the overall intensity are used to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. For example, when the intensity of the first color is brighter relative to the intensity of the second color and an overall intensity is relatively brighter, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light comprises a positive value or hyperopia. Conversely, when the intensity of the first color is dimmer relative to the intensity of the second color and an overall pixel intensity is relatively dimmer, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light comprises a negative value or myopia. The first color can comprise any one or any combination of red, green and blue and the second color can comprise any one or any combination of red, green and blue. - In the method of
FIG. 4 , the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can alternatively or optionally comprise an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement. Capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject can comprise capturing a first image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capturing a second image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the first image can be compared to the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens. - The method shown in
FIG. 4 can further comprise making a first determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light from a first plurality of pixels located within the portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image; making a second determination from a second plurality of pixels located within the portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels; making a third determination from a third plurality of pixels located within the portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the image, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. Comparing the first determination, the second determination and the third determination to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can comprise one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, or a standard deviation of the second determination to the third determination, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light. For example, the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can be the presence or the absence of astigmatism. When the presence of astigmatism is detected, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing the overall intensity and the relative intensity of the first color or the relative intensity of the second color of various regions of the pupil. Such measurements of various regions of the pupil can comprise measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil. - As noted above, the method of
FIG. 4 can include managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image, which can comprise managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image. For example, a polarizing filter can be placed over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject. Managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can also comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye. For example, a surface can be provided that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image. In one aspect, the surface can have a black matte finish. In various aspects the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device or at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device. -
FIG. 5 illustrates an alternate example method for making a determination about an eye of a subject based upon ambient light reflected out of the eye. The method comprises step 502, capturing, using an image capture device, an image of an eye of a subject, wherein said image is captured using only ambient lighting conditions and wherein non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the image. Atstep 504, an average red intensity can be determined from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image. Atstep 506, an average blue intensity is determined from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image. Atstep 508, an overall intensity is determined of the plurality pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the image; and, atstep 510, compare the average red intensity and the average blue intensity, wherein the comparison and the determined overall intensity are used to determine an optical quality of the eye. - In the method of
FIG. 5 , the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient light can alternatively or optionally comprise an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement. Capturing, using the image capture device, an image of the eye of the subject can comprise capturing a first image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device through a spectacle lens or a contact lens while the subject is wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and capturing a second image using only ambient lighting conditions with the image capture device while the subject is not wearing the spectacle lens or the contact lens over the eye and the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the first image can be compared to the aspects of the reflected ambient light in the second image and the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected ambient is based on the comparison and comprises an estimated prescription for the spectacle lens or the contact lens. - The method shown in
FIG. 5 can further comprise determining a presence or an absence of astigmatism. If the presence of astigmatism is indicated, an amount of astigmatism can be determined by comparing optical quality measurements of various regions of the pupil. Such optical quality measurements of various regions of the pupil can comprise measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil. - As noted above, the method of
FIG. 5 can include managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image, which can comprise managing reflections from a cornea or a lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the image. For example, a polarizing filter can be placed over a lens of the image capture device or between the image capture device and the eye of the subject. Managing non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image can also comprise blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface of the eye or a lens of the eye. For example, a surface can be provided that absorbs light or prevents the non-relevant reflections from the eye while capturing the image. In one aspect, the surface can have a black matte finish. In various aspects the surface can comprise a portion of the image capture device or at least a portion of a case that houses the image capture device. - As used herein, at least one of the subject's eyes can be the subject's left eye or right eye. Alternatively, at least one of the subject's eyes can be the subject's left eye and right eye. This disclosure contemplates that the optical qualities based on the subject's left eye and right eye can be the same or different.
- Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Claims (23)
1. A method comprising:
receiving, by a computing device, one or more images of an eye of a subject, wherein non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the one or more images;
determining, using the computing device:
an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the at least one of the one or more images, wherein the plurality of pixels comprise red, green, and blue pixels;
determining an average red intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil captured in the at least one of the one or more images;
determining an average blue intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the at least one of the one or more images; and
determining using the average red intensity, the average blue intensity and the determined overall intensity an optical quality of the eye.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein making a determination about the optical quality of the eye comprises making a determination of a refractive error for the eye.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein making a determination about the optical quality of the eye comprises an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the average red intensity is brighter relative to the average blue intensity and the overall intensity is relatively brighter, and the determined optical quality of the eye is a positive value or hyperopia.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the average red intensity is dimmer relative to the average blue intensity and the overall intensity is relatively dimmer, and the determined optical quality of the eye is a negative value or myopia.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises the computing device:
making a first determined optical quality about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light from a first plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the at least one of the one or more images;
making a second determined optical quality about the eye from a second plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the at least one of the one or more images, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels;
making a third determined optical quality about the eye from a third plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the at least one of the one or more images, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and
comparing the first determined optical quality, the second determined optical quality and the third determined optical quality to make the determined optical quality about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the computing device comparing the determined optical quality, the second determined optical quality and the third determined optical quality to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises the computing device performing one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determined optical quality, or a standard deviation of the second determined optical quality to the third determined optical quality, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determined optical quality about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the determined optical quality of the eye is a presence or an absence of astigmatism.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the presence of astigmatism is detected and an amount of astigmatism is determined by comparing the overall intensity and the average red intensity or the average blue intensity of various regions of the pupil.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the amount of astigmatism is determined by measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein managing non-relevant reflections from the cornea and the lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the one or more images comprises blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface or the lens of the eye.
12. An apparatus comprised of:
a computing device comprising at least a processor, wherein the computing device receives one or more images of an eye of a subject, wherein non-relevant reflections from a cornea and a lens of the eye of the subject are managed while capturing the one or more images,
wherein the computing device determines:
an overall intensity of light from a plurality of pixels located within at least a portion of a pupil captured in the at least one of the one or more images, wherein the plurality of pixels comprise red, green, and blue pixels;
an average red intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil captured in the at least one of the one or more images;
an average blue intensity from the plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of a pupil captured in the at least one of the one or more images; and
determines, using the average red intensity, the average blue intensity and the determined overall intensity an optical quality of the eye.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the processor executing computer-readable instructions stored in the memory that cause the processor to make a determination about the optical quality of the eye comprises the processor executing computer-readable instructions stored in the memory that cause the processor to make a determination of a refractive error for the eye.
14. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the determination about the optical quality of the eye comprises an autorefraction or a photorefraction measurement.
15. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the computing device further comprises a display, wherein the determined optical quality of the eye or information about the optical quality of the eye is displayed to on the display of the computing device.
16. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the average red intensity is brighter relative to the average blue intensity and the overall intensity is relatively brighter, and the determined optical quality of the eye is a positive value or hyperopia.
17. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the average red intensity is dimmer relative to the average blue intensity and the overall intensity is relatively dimmer, and the determined optical quality of the eye is a negative value or myopia.
18. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the method further comprises the computing device:
making a first determined optical quality about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light from a first plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the at least one of the one or more images;
making a second determined optical quality about the eye from a second plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the at least one of the one or more images, wherein the second plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels;
making a third determined optical quality about the eye from a third plurality of pixels located within the at least a portion of the pupil of the eye of the subject captured in the at least one of the one or more images, wherein the third plurality of pixels are a subset of the first plurality of pixels and are separate from the second plurality of pixels; and
comparing the first determined optical quality, the second determined optical quality and the third determined optical quality to make the determined optical quality about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the computing device comparing the determined optical quality, the second determined optical quality and the third determined optical quality to make the determination about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light comprises the computing device performing one or more of determining a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determination, a standard deviation of the first determination to the second determined optical quality, or a standard deviation of the second determined optical quality to the third determined optical quality, wherein the determined standard deviation indicates the determined optical quality about the eye of the subject based upon the reflected light.
20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the determined optical quality of the eye is a presence or an absence of astigmatism.
21. The apparatus of claim 20 , wherein the presence of astigmatism is detected and an amount of astigmatism is determined by comparing the overall intensity and the average red intensity or the average blue intensity of various regions of the pupil.
22. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein the amount of astigmatism is determined by measuring one or more of hyperopia or myopia at the various regions of the pupil.
23. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein managing non-relevant reflections from the cornea and the lens of the eye of the subject while capturing the one or more images comprises blocking light that would lead to reflections from a corneal surface or the lens of the eye.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US18/133,811 US20230263385A1 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2023-04-12 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201462076804P | 2014-11-07 | 2014-11-07 | |
US14/934,742 US10219687B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2015-11-06 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US16/250,592 US10986991B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2019-01-17 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US17/240,212 US11642017B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2021-04-26 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US18/133,811 US20230263385A1 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2023-04-12 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/240,212 Continuation US11642017B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2021-04-26 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20230263385A1 true US20230263385A1 (en) | 2023-08-24 |
Family
ID=55909878
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/934,742 Active 2036-12-02 US10219687B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2015-11-06 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US16/250,592 Active 2036-09-25 US10986991B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2019-01-17 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US17/240,212 Active US11642017B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2021-04-26 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US18/133,811 Pending US20230263385A1 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2023-04-12 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/934,742 Active 2036-12-02 US10219687B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2015-11-06 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US16/250,592 Active 2036-09-25 US10986991B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2019-01-17 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
US17/240,212 Active US11642017B2 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2021-04-26 | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US10219687B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3214993B1 (en) |
JP (3) | JP6794353B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3004408C (en) |
ES (1) | ES2911698T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016073887A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2911698T3 (en) | 2014-11-07 | 2022-05-20 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Procedures and apparatus for making a determination on an eye under ambient lighting conditions |
EP3721788A4 (en) * | 2017-12-04 | 2021-08-18 | Nidek Co., Ltd. | Ocular refractive power measurement device |
EP3501375A1 (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-06-26 | Nokia Technologies Oy | An eye monitoring apparatus |
EP4081098A4 (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2023-09-06 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye using color temperature adjusted ambient lighting |
WO2021133402A1 (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2021-07-01 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods and apparatus for detecting a presence and severity of a cataract in ambient lighting |
US11622682B2 (en) | 2019-12-27 | 2023-04-11 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye using color temperature adjusted ambient lighting |
US20210196119A1 (en) | 2019-12-27 | 2021-07-01 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Methods and apparatus for detecting a presence and severity of a cataract in ambient lighting |
Family Cites Families (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4293198A (en) | 1977-09-21 | 1981-10-06 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Eye refractometer |
IL87813A (en) * | 1987-09-21 | 1993-08-18 | Udden | Measuring light intensity variations |
US5329322A (en) * | 1992-05-26 | 1994-07-12 | Yancey Don R | Palm size autorefractor and fundus topographical mapping instrument |
US5632282A (en) * | 1993-07-20 | 1997-05-27 | Hay; S. Hutson | Ocular disease detection apparatus |
US6419638B1 (en) | 1993-07-20 | 2002-07-16 | Sam H. Hay | Optical recognition methods for locating eyes |
US6095989A (en) | 1993-07-20 | 2000-08-01 | Hay; Sam H. | Optical recognition methods for locating eyes |
JP3461965B2 (en) * | 1995-03-31 | 2003-10-27 | 株式会社ニデック | Ophthalmic measurement device |
NZ509367A (en) | 1998-07-09 | 2003-08-29 | Univ Colorado State Res Found | Retinal vasculature image acquistion apparatus and method |
JP4426032B2 (en) * | 1999-10-28 | 2010-03-03 | 株式会社トプコン | Glaucoma diagnosis device and recording medium for glaucoma diagnosis |
ATE357680T1 (en) * | 2000-10-07 | 2007-04-15 | David Dickerson | INFORMATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION USING A HOLOGRAPHIC ELEMENT |
ES2401132T3 (en) * | 2000-10-07 | 2013-04-17 | Metaio Gmbh | Device and procedure for determining the orientation of an eye |
US7311400B2 (en) | 2001-04-16 | 2007-12-25 | Tracey Technologies, Llc | Determining clinical refraction of eye |
JP2003168222A (en) | 2001-09-20 | 2003-06-13 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | Information recording carrier, and reproducing method and device for the same |
JP4318463B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2009-08-26 | 株式会社トプコン | Correction data measurement device, correction data measurement program, recording medium recording correction data measurement program, and eye characteristic measurement device |
US7614747B2 (en) | 2004-07-28 | 2009-11-10 | Solohealth, Inc. | Automated vision screening apparatus and method |
WO2006026666A2 (en) * | 2004-08-31 | 2006-03-09 | Synergeyes, Inc. | Multipurpose optical imaging devices |
US7167736B2 (en) | 2004-11-04 | 2007-01-23 | Q Step Technologies, Inc. | Non-invasive measurement system and method for measuring the concentration of an optically-active substance |
JP4444194B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-03-31 | 株式会社トプコン | Ophthalmic microscope |
JP4898704B2 (en) * | 2005-12-12 | 2012-03-21 | 淳大 上田 | Data sampling device for diagnostic imaging and imaging adapter used for the device |
US7445335B2 (en) | 2006-01-20 | 2008-11-04 | Clarity Medical Systems, Inc. | Sequential wavefront sensor |
CA2687100C (en) | 2007-05-11 | 2016-04-12 | Charles E. Campbell | Combined wavefront and topography systems and methods |
ES2310128B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2009-10-01 | Universidad Complutense De Madrid | DEVICE FOR THE STUDY OF RADIOS AND CHERATOMETRIC POWERS. |
US7594729B2 (en) | 2007-10-31 | 2009-09-29 | Wf Systems, Llc | Wavefront sensor |
US8210680B2 (en) * | 2008-04-26 | 2012-07-03 | University Of Southern California | Ocular imaging system |
JP2011521682A (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2011-07-28 | エージェンシー フォー サイエンス,テクノロジー アンド リサーチ | Automatic opacity detection system for cortical cataract diagnosis |
GB0821873D0 (en) | 2008-12-01 | 2009-01-07 | Univ St Andrews | Apparatus and method for obtaining an image of a fluorescent pattern under ambient light |
JP5394902B2 (en) * | 2009-11-27 | 2014-01-22 | 株式会社トプコン | Ophthalmic equipment |
WO2011100544A1 (en) | 2010-02-12 | 2011-08-18 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Apparatus and method to obtain clinical ophthalmic high order optical aberrations |
US8416396B2 (en) | 2010-07-18 | 2013-04-09 | David H. Parker | Methods and apparatus for optical amplitude modulated wavefront shaping |
US8632184B2 (en) | 2010-11-17 | 2014-01-21 | Shui T. Lai | Self guided subjective refraction instruments and methods |
DE102010055185B4 (en) * | 2010-12-20 | 2019-09-05 | Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh | Device with a spectacle lens with variable action and method for adjusting the effect of a spectacle lens |
JP5737072B2 (en) * | 2011-08-29 | 2015-06-17 | 株式会社Jvcケンウッド | Motion compensation frame generation apparatus and method |
WO2013059656A2 (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2013-04-25 | Elenza, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for detecting accommodative triggers |
WO2013096473A1 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2013-06-27 | Icheck Health Connection, Inc. | Video game to monitor visual field loss in glaucoma |
US20140111630A1 (en) * | 2012-08-14 | 2014-04-24 | Bernardo R. Pires | Systems and methods for iris detection and gaze estimation |
US9039179B2 (en) * | 2012-12-11 | 2015-05-26 | Elwha Llc | Unobtrusive active eye interrogation |
JP6221249B2 (en) * | 2013-02-08 | 2017-11-01 | 株式会社ニデック | Eye refractive power measuring device |
JP6062793B2 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2017-01-18 | ソフトケア有限会社 | Blood flow diagnostic equipment |
CN104954661B (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2018-10-12 | 诺基亚技术有限公司 | Method and apparatus for controlling image capture |
CN104068827A (en) * | 2014-06-25 | 2014-10-01 | 深圳市斯尔顿科技有限公司 | Self-service eye comprehensive detection method and detection equipment |
US20160019420A1 (en) | 2014-07-15 | 2016-01-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multispectral eye analysis for identity authentication |
ES2911698T3 (en) * | 2014-11-07 | 2022-05-20 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Procedures and apparatus for making a determination on an eye under ambient lighting conditions |
CN110448267B (en) | 2019-09-06 | 2021-05-25 | 重庆贝奥新视野医疗设备有限公司 | Multimode fundus dynamic imaging analysis system and method |
-
2015
- 2015-11-06 ES ES15856408T patent/ES2911698T3/en active Active
- 2015-11-06 WO PCT/US2015/059529 patent/WO2016073887A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-11-06 EP EP15856408.8A patent/EP3214993B1/en active Active
- 2015-11-06 CA CA3004408A patent/CA3004408C/en active Active
- 2015-11-06 US US14/934,742 patent/US10219687B2/en active Active
- 2015-11-06 JP JP2017524377A patent/JP6794353B2/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-01-17 US US16/250,592 patent/US10986991B2/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-11-10 JP JP2020187167A patent/JP7179814B2/en active Active
-
2021
- 2021-04-26 US US17/240,212 patent/US11642017B2/en active Active
-
2022
- 2022-11-15 JP JP2022182734A patent/JP2023022099A/en active Pending
-
2023
- 2023-04-12 US US18/133,811 patent/US20230263385A1/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2911698T3 (en) | 2022-05-20 |
US20210353138A1 (en) | 2021-11-18 |
US10219687B2 (en) | 2019-03-05 |
US20190167090A1 (en) | 2019-06-06 |
US10986991B2 (en) | 2021-04-27 |
CA3004408A1 (en) | 2016-05-12 |
JP7179814B2 (en) | 2022-11-29 |
EP3214993A1 (en) | 2017-09-13 |
EP3214993A4 (en) | 2018-08-29 |
US11642017B2 (en) | 2023-05-09 |
JP2021035545A (en) | 2021-03-04 |
US20160128559A1 (en) | 2016-05-12 |
EP3214993B1 (en) | 2022-03-30 |
JP2023022099A (en) | 2023-02-14 |
CA3004408C (en) | 2023-09-19 |
WO2016073887A1 (en) | 2016-05-12 |
JP6794353B2 (en) | 2020-12-02 |
JP2018500062A (en) | 2018-01-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11642017B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye in ambient lighting conditions | |
US11969210B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye using color temperature adjusted lighting | |
US10575727B2 (en) | Automated detection of eye alignment | |
US9877649B2 (en) | Photorefraction method and product | |
US11969212B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for detecting a presence and severity of a cataract in ambient lighting | |
TW202139918A (en) | Methods and apparatus for detecting a presence and severity of a cataract in ambient lighting | |
EP4081098A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye using color temperature adjusted ambient lighting | |
EP4081095A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for detecting a presence and severity of a cataract in ambient lighting | |
TW202142162A (en) | Methods and apparatus for making a determination about an eye using color temperature adjusted ambient lighting | |
KR102667772B1 (en) | Pupillary light reflex measurement method using cell phone | |
WO2021078880A1 (en) | Method and system for determining a prescription for an eye of a person | |
US20170196446A1 (en) | Contact Lens Assessment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OHIO STATE INNOVATION FOUNDATION, OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BAILEY, MELISSA D.;REEL/FRAME:064484/0130 Effective date: 20151116 |