US20220343067A1

US20220343067A1 - Text Analysis System, and Characteristic Evaluation System for Message Exchange Using the Same

Info

Publication number: US20220343067A1
Application number: US17/639,866
Authority: US
Inventors: Hibiki Oka; Mitsuo Kojima; Akira Nakahashi
Original assignee: Imatrix Holdings Corp
Current assignee: Imatrix Holdings Corp
Priority date: 2019-09-02
Filing date: 2019-09-02
Publication date: 2022-10-27
Also published as: US20230237258A1; WO2021044475A1; EP4027247A1; JPWO2021044475A1; JP7007693B2; CN114341822B; EP4027247A4; CN114341822A

Abstract

[Problem(s)] To provide a text analysis system that is low cost and able to detect text with a normal expressive or structural features.

[Solution] A text analysis system 100 according to the present invention includes a text acquisition portion 110 for acquiring text data; a feature extraction portion 120 for converting the text data acquired by the text acquisition portion 110 into a time series signal to extract a feature from the converted time series signal; a feature storage portion 130 for storing the feature extracted by feature extraction portion 120; and an anomalous text detection portion 140 for detecting anomalous text based on the feature in the feature storage portion 130.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/JP2019/0344-02, filed on Sep. 2, 2019, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application is related to co-pending Japanese patent application JPWO2021044475A1.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a text analysis system and a feature evaluation system in message exchange using the same.

BACKGROUND

An approach to make a computer understand the natural language used by humans for information transmission is called natural language understanding. Information processing systems that use natural language understanding are widely used in fields such as automatic text translation, voice response systems, robotics, and security. The development of Internet technology facilitates multilateral cultural and business exchanges, thus a wide variety of languages or mixed multilingual languages has to be handled in real time. As an example of dealing with multiple languages, in an e-mail system that is a type of message exchange on the Internet, servers and terminal devices, providing an efficient matching system with predetermined definition files in a wide variety of languages in the filtering function to detect malicious messages such as spam and viruses, have been put into practical use. For example, Japanese Patent No. JP6267830B2 discloses a technique that sample data in which a character strings or the like are described is signalized as n-valued sample data (n is a natural number of 2 or more), similarity between the n-valued sample data and n-valued input data is calculated, and the input data is identified whether or not spam mail based on the calculated similarity.

SUMMARY

With the development of Internet technology, multilateral cultural and business exchanges have become active, and information processing systems are required to support the processing of a wide variety of languages. In addition, the e-mail system, which is a type of message exchange system on the Internet, requires the performance of handling a large amount of traffic in real time in addition to handling a wide variety of languages. However, natural language understanding requires a huge amount of data, not only a simple matching table, and requires complicated analysis based on syntax and semantics.
The purpose of processing a message written in natural language is not only to understand the content but also to acquire the characteristics or features of the message creator. The characteristics or features of message creators are also utilized in the field of information security. Information leakage due to obstruction of operation of computer devices and electronic devices using messages, information fraud, fraudulent acts against users, etc. is a big problem, and there is a high demand for information leakage prevention by message analysis. In addition to this, high speed processing is also required. There are two main types of information leakage in messages. One is a deliberate outflow by a malicious user. For example, a collaborator for fraud sends information to an external using a message tool or the like, or infects a computer with a malicious program such as malware to leak the information to an external computer. The other is erroneous transmission by the user. For example, the user sends a message to an unknown destination, uses a topic or term that he does not normally use, or attaches a file that he does not normally attach. A common feature of these is that these behaviors by the user are not usual. Therefore, it is possible to prevent information leakage due to message exchange by detecting the peculiarity existing in the message at high speed and by paying attention before transmission.
Considering the above described things, the present invention intends to provide a text analysis system that is low cost and fast compared to the conventional technique and is able to detect text with a specific expressive feature and structural feature. Further, the present invention intends to provide a feature evaluation system for detecting an anomaly in a text body in a message exchange.
The present invention achieves a system capable of processing a wide variety of languages with a single algorithm. The present invention for text analysis system can be applied to the detection of features and exceptions of spoken language and sentences. The present invention can discover differences in meaning, misunderstandings, injustices and their signs caused by wording errors and irregularities and can detect extraordinary ideas buried in mediocre ideas and a small number of intentions among great numbers. By extracting the expressive and structural features of spoken language and text, and comparing the extracted features with the spoken words and text to detect the different characteristics or features, or by using the opposite method, the text analysis system of the present invention can be used in a wide variety of ways.
Consider information leakage in an e-mail system as a specific example of what can be detected by comparing the expressive and structural features of spoken language and texts. Most of the methods for identifying malicious messages such as spam emails and virus emails detect the results of morphological analysis of the message body and the characteristics of header information including URLs and sending addresses, and compare the predefined criteria (malicious term, Address, URL, passage route, transmission amount, etc.) for determining malicious messages (illegal terms) and the characteristics of emails normally exchanged between the parties with the differences, for identifying. Since URLs and headers have formal information, it is easier to define the judgment criteria than that of the message body, however these characteristics are changed continuously thus high-precision filtering may be difficult. Therefore, detection based on the analysis of the message body is required in addition to the URLs and header information, but the languages included in the malicious message are multilingual, and in order to support morphological analysis and word-separation processing in multiple languages, a dictionary corresponding to each language is required. Due to the diversity of languages, there is a concern that extensibility will decrease and the processing speed of systems requiring real-time processing will decrease significantly. For avoiding them, the system equipment becomes enormous and the cost increases. Therefore, the sentence analysis method of the present invention, which is inexpensive and has expandability to a wide variety of languages, can be expected to provide a solution.
A text analysis system for analyzing text according to the present invention includes a conversion means for converting characters of the acquired text data into a numerical form to convert the text data into a time series signal(s); a feature extraction means for extracting feature information from the converted time series signal to store the extracted feature information; and a determination means for determining an identity of text data newly acquired by using the feature information.
In an embodiment, the text analysis system further includes a detection means for detecting anomalous text different from the feature information, based on a determination result by the determination means. In an embodiment, the conversion means converts characters into numerical data based on a predetermined conversion table. In an embodiment, the conversion means normalizes the time series signal to converge them into the range from a minimal value “0” to a maximum value “1.” In an embodiment, the conversion means attenuates a value(s) of the time series signal that is more than a set threshold to normalize the attenuated time series signal. In an embodiment, the feature extraction means extracts a feature(s) from the normalized time series signal of text data composed with a normal expressive feature and/or structural feature, and learns the feature to acquire output waveform that reproduces input waveform of the time series signal by using the extracted feature. In an embodiment, the feature extraction means encodes the feature information by an auto-encoder. In an embodiment, the feature extraction means learns the feature information by a neural network.
A feature evaluation system for message exchange according to the present invention includes the above-described text analysis system, and the detection means detects an anomaly in an outgoing e-mail based on the determination result by the determination means. In an embodiment, the feature evaluation system for message exchange further includes a transmission control means for halting the transmission of an outgoing mail when an anomaly is detected in the outgoing mail In an embodiment, the feature evaluation system for message exchange further includes a notification means for notifying the halt of the transmission of the outgoing email when the transmission of the outgoing emails is halted by the transmission control means.
A text analysis program executed by a computer terminal according to the present invention includes the steps of: acquiring text data; converting characters of the acquired text data into a numerical form to convert the text data into a time series signal; extracting feature information from the converted time series signal to store the extracted feature information; and; determining an identity of text data newly acquired by using the feature information. In an embodiment, the step of determining an identity includes identifying an outgoing e-mail composed with an expressive feature or structural feature different from the feature information.
A text analysis method in a computer terminal according to the present invention includes the steps of: acquiring text data; converting characters of the acquired text data into a numerical form to convert the text data into a time series signal; extracting feature information from the converted time series signal to store the extracted feature information; and determining an identity of text data newly acquired by using the feature information. In an embodiment, the step of determining an identity includes identifying an outgoing e-mail composed with an expressive feature and/or structural feature different from the feature information.
According to the present invention, since the text data is converted into a time-series signal, it is possible to reduce the cost without requiring morphological analysis of the texts or sentences and dictionary data for that purpose. Furthermore, by determining the identity of the text or sentence data based on the feature information extracted from the time-series signal, it is possible to easily determine whether or not the sentence is sentence of the person himself/herself. Furthermore, according to the present invention, by detecting the peculiarity of the sent mail, it is possible to prevent the information leakage by stopping the transmission of the abnormal sent mail.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a text analysis system according to a first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an internal structure of a feature extraction portion shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is an example of a part of Unicode.

FIG. 4 is an example illustrating that an electronic mail is acquired as text data and a time series signals of the electronic mail are normalized.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating an example of an operation of a signal normalization according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a feature extraction from an input by a signal classification portion according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an auto-encoder according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a classification by a threshold of the signal classification portion.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an outgoing e-mail monitoring system according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating an operation of the outgoing email monitoring system according to a second embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a graph showing one experimental result according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a graph showing another experimental result according to an embodiment of the present invention

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The following reference numerals can be used in conjunction with the drawings:

- 100: text analysis system
- 110: text acquisition portion
- 120: feature extraction portion
- 130: feature storage portion
- 140: anomalous text detection portion
- 200: outgoing email monitoring system
- 210: outgoing email acquisition portion
- 220: feature extraction portion
- 230: feature storage portion
- 240: anomalous email detection portion
- 250: output control portion

A text analysis system according to the present invention may be applied to any electronic devices having functions to electronically process text (such as computer device, mail server, client terminal, and smart phone).
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a structure of a text analysis system according to an embodiment herein. According to the embodiment, a text analysis system 100 includes a text acquisition portion no for acquiring text data, a feature extraction portion 120 for extracting feature(s) of the text data acquired in the text acquisition portion no, a feature storage portion 130 for storing the feature extracted by the feature extraction portion 120, and an anomalous text detection portion 140 for detecting anomalous text based on the feature in the feature extraction portion 120 or the feature storage portion 130.
The text analysis system 100 is implemented by software such as mail server and client terminal etc., hardware, or the combination of software and hardware. The text acquisition portion no acquires text data (for example, electronic mail etc.) composed by a user. In the case where text data is an electronic mail, an electronic mail in HTML form composed by a mail soft loaded in a client terminal, an electronic mail sent from a client terminal to a mail server through internet, or an electronic mail in a message exchange system is acquired.
The text acquisition portion no may acquire text data composed by multiple users. To provide a learning function to the text analysis system 100 in advance, text data acquired by the text acquisition portion no is normal text data that is composed in user's normal behaviors, i.e., composed with a normal expressive feature or structural feature. The feature extraction portion 120 extracts a feature included in normal text data composed with the normal expressive feature or structural feature of users and learns the feature of user's text. After learning by the text analysis system 100, the text acquisition portion no acquires optional text data and the text analysis system 100 identifies whether a feature of the optional text data corresponds to the feature of text composed with the normal expressive feature or structural feature. For example, for a text composed by one user, it is identified that whether the text is composed with the normal expressive feature or structural feature or whether the text is composed by another user.
FIG. 2 shows an internal structure of the feature extraction portion 120. The feature extraction portion 120 includes a character signalizing portion 122 for receiving text data acquired in the text acquisition portion no to convert characters described in a text to time series signals, a normalization portion 124 for normalizing the time series signals that are converted into signals by the character signalizing portion 122, and a signal classification portion 126 for classifying the normalized signals.
The character signalizing portion 122 converts a series of characters described in a text into one-dimensional time series signals. In one preferred example, the character signalizing portion 122 converts each of characters in the text into a numerical data based on Unicode. Unicode is one of the international standards for character code, where codes are assigned to characters, numbers, or symbols of various languages in the world. FIG. 3 shows an example of a part of Unicode. In Unicode, ASCII, Chinese character, Arabic, and Greek symbols etc. are coded to binary data in 16 bit or more. The character signalizing portion 122 may have the amount of data in which the number of bits per one numerical value converted from one character multiplied by the number of characters. Also, the character signalizing portion 122 may convert fixed-length data to one continuous sequence data or to varying-length data.
In another example, a conversion table may be previously prepared in which the relationship between character, idiom, and phrase etc. and numerical data is uniquely defined. The character signalizing portion 122 may convert each character or idiom etc. in a text to numerical data by using such conversion table.
The character signalizing portion 122 converts characters from the first to the last in a text to numerical data. For example, if the text has the size of P row(s)×Q column(s) (P and Q are any integer number), time series signals including binary value data corresponding to the number of characters in P×Q may be generated. In this case, character is a concept including characters in natural language, numbers, symbols, figures, and blank (space) without any characters. For example, for a text in horizontal writing, characters may be sequentially scanned from the first line to the last line, from left to right or from right to left. Alternatively, for a text in vertical writing, characters may be sequentially scanned from the first line to the last line, from the top to the bottom or from the bottom to the top. Thus, characters from the first to the last may be converted to numerical data. The scanning direction may be optionally determined. If page information configuring text data (the number of lines, the number of characters in one line) is required, the page information may be acquired at the same time. Thus, characters from the first to the last may be identified in reference to the page information.
The time series signals generated by the character signalizing portion 122 may be regarded as a non periodic waveform composed by characters in the text. Words or idioms included in the text are expressed as a waveform pattern. For example, when a user uses a word or idiom “XX” frequently, a waveform pattern corresponding to “XX” may be included in the time series signals. Alternatively, when the user composes a text in polite language and/or uses a lot of punctuations and/or a lot of certain conjunction with a normal expressive feature or structural feature, a waveform pattern expressing them may be included. Such waveform patter is one feature for identifying user.
The character signalizing portion 122 according an embodiment herein converts characters into signals based on Unicode or the conversion table. Thus, it may be applied to multiple languages without depending on a certain language. Language differences may be expressed as the difference of waveforms of time series signals. Further, the character signalizing portion 122 does not perform morphological analysis and/or syntax analysis, so that dictionaries such as corpus etc. are not required, which reduces cost.
The signal normalization portion 124 normalizes a time series signal generated by the character signalizing portion 122. When characters are converted into numerical form by Unicode, each numerical value for generating a time series signal is expressed in a discrete value whose range may be extremely large. Thus, the signal normalization portion 124 performs a process for suppressing outliers of the time series signals and a process for normalizing the range.
By the process for suppressing outliers, a numerical value that is more than a preset threshold value is attenuated. For example, the process is performed by the following equation, where “avg” is an average, “std” is a standard deviation, “x” is a target value (in this case, a numerical value of a time series signal), “rate” is an attenuation rate, and “d” is a coefficient that is multiplied by a numerical value to be added for raising the overall value.
threshold=|std−avg |×(1−d)
avg+((x−avg)×rate+(|x−avg|×d)):(|x−avg|>threshold)
x:(|x−avg|≤threshold) Equation 1
The threshold value (threshold) is set inside by an infinitesimal d from a point away from the average by G, as described above (|standard deviation−average value|×(1−d)). That is, since the degree away from the average value is referenced, the target value is also divided to cases by reference to the degree away from the average value |x−avg|.
Then, for a signal for which the process for suppressing outliers is performed, the process of normalization of the range is performed. In the process of normalization of the range, the standard deviation (std) is normalized to 1 and the average (avg) is normalized to 0, after that, minimum value is normalized to 0 and maximum value is normalized to 1 again, so that the time series signals are converged into the range of 0-1. FIG. 4 shows an example of a normalization, where characters of the body of an electronic mail are converted to time series signals when the electronic mail is received as text data, and the time series signals are normalized to be converged to the range of 0-1.
FIG. 5 shows a flow chart for an example of an operation of the signal normalization portion 124 according to an embodiment herein. First, each character in an acquired text is converted into a numerical form by the character signalizing portion 122 based on UNICODE at step S100. Then, the numerical value of the time series signals are multiplied by an integer by the signal normalization portion 124 to extend a waveform at step S102. The numeral value may be adjacent due to languages, this process is performed to correct it. Then, the process for suppressing outliers is performed by the signal normalization portion 124 as shown above at step S104. In the process for suppressing outliers, numerical values more than the threshold value are attenuated. The attenuation may be performed multiple times, at step 106. The number of times of attenuation may be adjusted according to data. Then, the variance and the average are normalized by the signal normalization portion 124, after that, the minimum values is normalized to “0” and the maximum value is normalized to “1.” Unless the value of the variance is below a certain threshold value, the processes of steps S104-S108 are repeated. An upper limit may be set to the number of times of the repeated process.
Now, the signal classification portion 126 is explained. The signal classification portion 126 receives a normalized time series signal from the signal normalization portion 124 to extract a feature included in the time series signal. The extracted feature is the one from which the input can be reproduced. The signal classification portion 126 learns the feature. The signal classification portion 126 learns text data only that is composed with a normal expressive feature or structural feature. For example, a feature is extracted from the normalized input form as shown in FIG. 6. To acquire output waveforms that can reproduce almost input waveforms by using the extracted feature, the feature is learned.
In one preferred aspect, the signal classification portion 216 reduces dimensionality(s) of the feature by an auto-encoder using neural network and suppresses the amount of information. FIG. 7 shows a concept of the auto-encoder using neural network. In a preferred aspect, the auto-encoder is configured with fully connected layers only and includes four encoder layers and four decoder layers. The width of each layer of neural network is variable according to the length of a signal converted from the character string. The encoder reduces unrequired dimensionality(s) of input to compress the feature. The decoder reproduces the input from the compressed feature. Neural network adjusts the respective weights of the encoder and the decoder by using the learning function. In this example, neural network reproduces the input with symmetrical configuration. The input has a fixed-length.
The signal classification portion 126 also includes a function to inspect the reproducibility of the output waveform. Specifically, the distances between each point in two time series of the input waveform and the output waveform as shown in FIG. 6 are compared in a round-robin manner to detect a path with the shortest distance of two time series. The path is regarded as DTW (Dynamic Time Warping) distance. While the reproduced waveform has some deviations, the inspection is tough to phase shift etc. The DTW distance is used to measure the reproducibility of new data after learning model is defined. In this case, new data is new text data that is determined whether or not it is unique by the text analysis system 100. New text data is processed by the auto-encoder. When the DTW distance of input/output waveforms is more than a threshold value (described later), the reproducibility is low and the text data is determined as unique data (that has no normal expressive feature and/or normal structural feature). The determination result is provided to the anomalous text detection portion 140.
The signal classification portion 126 calculates a threshold value for classifying waveforms. Specifically, evaluation data, i.e., a feature that is extracted from a text (sentence) written by a normal expressive feature and/or structural feature and is compressed by the auto-encoder (which is expressed as the weight of the auto-encoder, for example, as a coefficients of equation which each neuron has) is evaluated to calculate identity. Then, the median value and the standard deviation of the identity are obtained and a threshold value is calculated by the following equation. The threshold value means that almost 95% waveforms are included within the range from the median value to the standard deviation*2, if the waveforms show generally a normal distribution.
threshold value=median value−standard deviation×2 Equation 2
The threshold value is not limited to the above equation. If waveforms is closer to a normal distribution, threshold value=mean value−standard deviation*2(2σ) may be employed. When the similarity of waveforms is calculated by another equation, a threshold value may be based on this equation.
FIG. 8 shows an example of a classification according to a threshold value. In a graph of FIG. 8, dashed lines are one user's text that has already learned, and solid lines are another user's text. In this example, the threshold value of the feature is 50.8. A text that has a feature more than this value is detected as another user's text.
The feature storage portion 130 stores a feature extracted by the feature extraction portion 120 and its threshold value. Each time text data is learned, the feature and the threshold value are updated.
After pre-learning by the feature extraction portion 120 is completed, the anomalous text detection portion 140 detects anomalous text by using the result of the pre-learning. That is, an arbitrary text A is obtained by the text acquisition portion no, then the feature of the text A is extracted by the feature extraction portion 120. The signal classification portion 126 compares the feature extracted from the text A with a threshold value stored in the feature storage portion 130. When the feature is more than the threshold value, the text A is determined as anomalous text. The result of the determination is provided to the anomalous text detection portion 140. The anomalous text detection portion 140 detects that the text A determined as anomalous text is not composed with a normal expressive feature and/or structural feature. For example, the text A is estimated as a text that is composed by another user other than one user or a text that is composed by the one user himself with a specific expressive feature and/or structural feature.
FIG. 9 shows an application example of a text analysis system according to an embodiment herein to an outgoing email monitoring system. An outgoing email monitoring system 200 may be achieved for example in mail server, client terminal (computer device, mobile device, etc.) with mail sending/receiving function.
The outgoing email monitoring system 200 includes an outgoing email acquisition portion 210 for acquiring an outgoing mail composed by a user; a feature extraction portion 220 for extracting a feature of the outgoing mail that is acquired by the outgoing email acquisition portion 210; a feature storage portion 230 for storing the extracted feature; an anomalous email detection portion 240 for detecting whether or not the acquired outgoing mail has anomalous; and a transmission control portion 250 for controlling the transmission of the outgoing mail based on the detection result of the anomalous email detection portion 240. These functions may be performed by software in mail server or client terminal, hardware, or the combination of software and hardware.
The outgoing email acquisition portion 210 acquires an electronic mail in HTML form composed by mail soft that is mounted in a client terminal or a acquires an electronic mail for sending uploaded from a client terminal to mail server.
The feature extraction portion 220 operates similar to the feature extraction portion 120 of the above-described text analysis system. For simplicity sake, the feature extraction portion 220 shall be preliminary learned a feature of an electronic mail that is composed by user X with a normal expressive feature and/or structural feature. Accordingly, if an outgoing email acquired from the outgoing email acquisition portion 210 is composed by user X, the outgoing mail has the feature same as the learned feature. Thus, the outgoing mail is identified as a mail that is composed by user X with a normal expressive feature and/or structural feature. If an outgoing mail is composed by user X with specific expressive and/or structural features or composed by another user, the outgoing mail does not have the feature same as the learned feature. Thus, the outgoing mail is identified as a mail that is composed by user X with specific expressive and/or structural features or composed by another user. As shown in FIG. 8, whether or not the electronic mail has identity is determined based on the threshold value.
When it is determined that an outgoing mail has no identity, the anomalous email detection portion 240 detects the outgoing mail as anomalous mail and provides the detection result to the transmission control portion 250. When anomalous mail is detected, the transmission control portion 250 instructs, for example, a client terminal or mail server to halt or hold the transmission of the outgoing mail and alerts user to non-delivery. For example, non-delivery is displayed on the display of the client terminal or voice guidance may be used. When anomalous mail is not detected, the outgoing mail is sent to the client terminal or mail server.
FIG. 10 is a flow chart for explaining an example of an operation of the outgoing email monitoring system. First, an outgoing mail is acquired by the outgoing email acquisition portion 210 (S200). Then, each character of the body of the outgoing mail is converted into signals by the feature extraction portion 220 to generate a one-dimensional time series signal (S202). The time series signal is normalized (S206). Then, a feature is extracted from the time series signals. Then, whether or not there is any identity between the extracted feature and learned feature is determined (S208). When there is the identity, the outgoing mail is determined as the one that is composed with user's usual expressive and/or structural features (S210). Then, the outgoing mail is sent to a sending address (S212). When it is determined that there is no identity, the outgoing mail is determined as the one that is composed by user with specific expressive and/or structural features or composed by another user (S220). Sending the outgoing mail is halted (S222).
Thus, according to embodiments herein, an outgoing mail is determined if the mail is composed with usual expressive and/or structural features. When the mail is composed by user with specific expressive and/or structural features or composed by another user, sending of the outgoing mail is halted. Thus, information leak by unsolicited outgoing mail may be prevented.
Now, an example of a verification of the text analysis system according to an embodiment herein is described. In an experiment, four type of email magazines were used for evaluation. Only one email magazine A of the four email magazines was learned. It was evaluated whether or not the other three email magazines that were not targeted to learn are identified as the one other than email magazine A (That is, as shown in FIG. 8, it is evaluated whether or not email magazines more than a threshold value can be detected as the one that is composed with a specific expressive and/or structural features). Also, these four email magazines were translated into eight languages to verify the accuracy when the language is different.
In the experiment, 1000 email magazines A were learned and each 100 email magazines of each of the other three were evaluated whether or not they are identified as the one other than email magazine A. FIG. 11 shows the probability that the email magazines in each languages are identified as the one other than email magazine A. As seen in FIG. 8, the mail magazines B, C were identified with well probability, while the mail magazine D has some scatterings between languages. This is caused by the difference of feature(s) of each language. For example, the number of characters in Japanese language is 50+50+lowercase characters+Chinese characters, English language has 26 characters+their lowercase characters, Chinese and Taiwanese languages have 87,000 characters (Unicode11), French language have 26 characters+lowercase characters+7 characters, Hindi language haves 156 characters+lowercase characters, Korean language have 11,172 characters, and Finnish language has 29 characters+lowercase characters. According to language, the length of one sentence is different and/or the amplitude when converting into signals is different. Thus, the accuracy may be finally improved by optimal normalization.
In another experiment, emails by three employees were evaluated. Users A, B were with a sales department and User C was with a quality management engineering department. In the experiment, emails by user A was learned. FIG. 12 is a graph showing a rate whether or not users B, C are identified as the one other than user A. The rate in which user A were identified as others (mail composed with a specific expressive and/or structural features) is 5.95%. The rate in which users B, C were identified as the one other than user A (mail composed with a specific expressive and/or structural features) is 62.00% and 51.00%, respectively.
For emails, if the text is short, the difference is not sufficiently expressed, which causes low accuracy. Also, if the type of occupation is partially overlapped, the expressions is similar. Thus, it is expected that the difference is not sufficiently expressed.
While the preferred embodiments are described above in detail, the present invention is not limited thereto. Modifications and/or variations are possible within the scope of the claims.

Claims

1-15. (canceled)

16. A text analysis system for analyzing text, the system comprising:

acquisition means for acquiring text data;

a converter configured to convert characters of the acquired text data into a numerical form to convert the text data into a time series signal;

a feature extractor configured to extract feature information from the time series signal to store the extracted feature information, the feature extractor being further configured to extract a feature from a normalized time series signal of text data described by a normal expressive feature, structural feature, or both, and learn the feature to acquire an output waveform that reproduces an input waveform of the time series signal by using the feature; and

determination means for determining an identity of text data newly acquired by using the feature information.

17. The text analysis system of claim 16, the system further comprising:

a detector configured to detect anomalous text different from the feature information, based on a determination result by the determination means.

18. The text analysis system of claim 16, wherein the converter is configured to convert characters into numerical data based on a predetermined conversion table.

19. The text analysis system of claim 16, wherein the converter is configured to normalize the time series signal to converge them into a range from a minimal value 0 to a maximum value 1.

20. The text analysis system of claim 16, wherein the converter is configured to attenuate a value of the time series signal that is more than a set threshold to normalize the time series signal.

21. The text analysis system of claim 16, wherein the feature extractor is configured to encode the feature information by an auto-encoder.

22. The text analysis system of claim 21, wherein the feature extractor learns the feature information by a neural network.

23. A feature evaluation system for message exchange, the feature evaluation system comprising the text analysis system of claim 17, wherein the detector is configured to detect an anomaly in a transmitting email based on the determination result by the determination means.

24. The feature evaluation system of claim 23, the feature evaluation system further comprising a transmission controller configured to halt transmission of the transmitting email when the anomaly is detected in the transmitting email.

25. The feature evaluation system of claim 24, the feature evaluation system further comprising a notification means for notifying the halt of transmission of the transmitting email when the transmission of the transmitting email is halted by the transmission controller.

26-27. (canceled)

28. A text analysis method, the method comprising the steps of:

acquiring text data;

converting characters of the acquired text data into a numerical form to convert the text data into a time series signal;

extracting feature information from the converted time series signal to store the extracted feature information, wherein extracting the feature information comprises extracting a feature from a normalized time series signal of text data described by a normal expressive feature, a structural feature, or both, and learning the feature to acquire an output waveform that reproduces an input waveform of the time series signal by using the feature; and

determining an identity of newly-acquired text data by using the extracted feature information.

29. The text analysis method of claim 28, wherein the step of determining an identity includes identifying a transmitting email described with an anomalous expressive feature and/or structural feature different from the feature information.

30-35. (canceled)