US20220212314A1 - Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces - Google Patents
Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20220212314A1 US20220212314A1 US17/599,403 US202017599403A US2022212314A1 US 20220212314 A1 US20220212314 A1 US 20220212314A1 US 202017599403 A US202017599403 A US 202017599403A US 2022212314 A1 US2022212314 A1 US 2022212314A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- viscoelastic polymer
- layer
- polishing
- tool
- segments
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 title description 37
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 102
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 claims description 6
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- RSWGJHLUYNHPMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Abietic-Saeure Natural products C12CCC(C(C)C)=CC2=CCC2C1(C)CCCC2(C)C(O)=O RSWGJHLUYNHPMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000009496 Juglans regia Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004820 Pressure-sensitive adhesive Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-HUOMCSJISA-N Rosin Natural products O(C/C=C/c1ccccc1)[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-HUOMCSJISA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001800 Shellac Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000013871 bee wax Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012166 beeswax Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000021388 linseed oil Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000944 linseed oil Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000019198 oils Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000013874 shellac Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- ZLGIYFNHBLSMPS-ATJNOEHPSA-N shellac Chemical compound OCCCCCC(O)C(O)CCCCCCCC(O)=O.C1C23[C@H](C(O)=O)CCC2[C@](C)(CO)[C@@H]1C(C(O)=O)=C[C@@H]3O ZLGIYFNHBLSMPS-ATJNOEHPSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229940113147 shellac Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004208 shellac Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011269 tar Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N trans-cinnamyl beta-D-glucopyranoside Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OCC=CC1=CC=CC=C1 KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000020234 walnut Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009827 uniform distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000007049 Juglans regia Species 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 14
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 13
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 13
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000013013 elastic material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003190 viscoelastic substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000758789 Juglans Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012886 linear function Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013515 script Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005489 elastic deformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007517 polishing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000916 rhodite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001993 wax Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B37/00—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
- B24B37/11—Lapping tools
- B24B37/20—Lapping pads for working plane surfaces
- B24B37/24—Lapping pads for working plane surfaces characterised by the composition or properties of the pad materials
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
- B24B13/01—Specific tools, e.g. bowl-like; Production, dressing or fastening of these tools
- B24B13/012—Specific tools, e.g. bowl-like; Production, dressing or fastening of these tools conformable in shape to the optical surface, e.g. by fluid pressure acting on an elastic membrane
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B37/00—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
- B24B37/11—Lapping tools
- B24B37/20—Lapping pads for working plane surfaces
- B24B37/26—Lapping pads for working plane surfaces characterised by the shape of the lapping pad surface, e.g. grooved
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D11/00—Constructional features of flexible abrasive materials; Special features in the manufacture of such materials
- B24D11/001—Manufacture of flexible abrasive materials
- B24D11/003—Manufacture of flexible abrasive materials without embedded abrasive particles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D11/00—Constructional features of flexible abrasive materials; Special features in the manufacture of such materials
- B24D11/02—Backings, e.g. foils, webs, mesh fabrics
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D3/00—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents
- B24D3/02—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent
- B24D3/20—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent and being essentially organic
- B24D3/28—Resins or natural or synthetic macromolecular compounds
Definitions
- This patent document relates to high-precision optical surfaces.
- CCOS computer controlled optical surfacing
- CCOS processes can provide good solutions for fabrication of precise optics because of their high convergence rate using deterministic removal processes.
- a polishing tool is a component that provides physical contact with the optics and removes material from it. Polishing tool development for aspheric or freeform optics production has been a complex problem.
- an apparatus for polishing an optical component having an aspheric or freeform surface includes a solid back plate, a container coupled to the solid plate, and a layer of viscoelastic polymer attached or otherwise coupled to the container.
- the container encloses a non-Newtonian material that exhibits a solid-like and a fluid-like behavior based on a stress frequency applicable to the non-Newtonian material.
- the layer of viscoelastic polymer positioned to provide physical contact with the optical component for polishing the optical component.
- the layer of viscoelastic polymer comprises one or more segments.
- Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for producing a layer of viscoelastic polymer that includes melting a viscoelastic polymer into a liquid form, pouring the viscoelastic polymer between multiple substrates, and solidifying the viscoelastic polymer to obtain one or more viscoelastic polymer layers.
- the multiple substrates are separated by a plurality of spacers.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a side view of a part of an example rigid polishing tool.
- FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a side view of a part of an example compliant polishing tool.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a side view of a part of an example rigid-conformal polishing tool.
- FIG. 4 illustrates smoothing of a local bump on a component using a non-Newtonian smoothing tool.
- FIG. 5 a set of operations for producing a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- FIG. 6 illustrate an example segmented pattern of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- FIG. 7 illustrate another example segmented pattern of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- FIG. 8 illustrate yet another example segmented pattern of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- FIG. 9 illustrates smoothing of a local bump on a workpiece using a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a configuration for a polishing tool in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- FIG. 11 illustrates a polishing tool and multiple segments of a polishing pad attached thereto in accordance with one or more example embodiments.
- CCOS Computer-controlled optical surfacing
- Many CCOS processes are based on three main components: (1) a numerically controlled polishing machine, (2) process control intelligence to control the surfacing process, and (3) a polishing tool to polish the optics.
- a tool influence function is the shape of the wear function created by the polishing tool motion (e.g. spin or orbital motion) on the workpiece.
- TIF tool influence function
- Optimization intelligence e.g., software programs
- the TIF is a function of tool properties, such as pressure distribution under the tool, polishing material at the contacting interface, contact area shape, tool motion, and so forth.
- tool properties such as pressure distribution under the tool, polishing material at the contacting interface, contact area shape, tool motion, and so forth.
- developing a tool with a deterministic TIF for aspheric (or freeform) optics fabrication becomes a complex problem because local surface shape (e.g. curvature) of an aspheric surface varies as a function of position on a workpiece.
- Some flexibility in the tool is required to maintain intimate contact with the workpiece surface.
- rigidity of the tool is also desired to get natural smoothing effects, which removes mid-to-high spatial frequency errors on the workpiece.
- a well-behaved tool development is a balancing problem between flexibility and rigidity.
- the smoothing effect becomes more important for large workpiece fabrications to correct mid-to-high spatial frequency errors smaller than the tool size.
- large errors e.g., low spatial frequency surface errors compared to the tool size
- smaller tools require higher tool positioning accuracy to avoid residual tool marks, which is another source of mid-spatial frequency errors.
- the use of small tools increases the total fabrication time.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example side view of a part of a rigid polishing tool 100 .
- the rigid polishing tool 100 has a solid back plate 101 and a polishing interface 103 .
- the back plate can, for example, be an aluminum back plate of a specific thickness.
- the polishing interface 103 includes a polishing material, such as pitch (a viscoelastic polymer) or polyurethane.
- pitch a viscoelastic polymer
- the smoothing effects by a rigid tool can be understood in a simple way. If the tool does not fit to the surface irregularity under the tool (that is, infinite rigidity), and maintains its shape, the tool only rubs the high points on the surface. As the tool runs on the workpiece, it wears down the highs, and eventually the surface can be smoothed out. The spatial frequency of the final surface will be directly related to the tool size of the rigid tool.
- a rigid polishing tool is suitable for spherical surface polishing, which has the same curvature everywhere on the optics (also referred to as the workpiece).
- rigid polishing tools have an intrinsic limitation in fabricating aspheric or freeform workpieces because they cannot follow the local curvature or shape changes as the tool moves on the workpiece.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example side view of a part of a compliant polishing tool 200 .
- the compliant tool 200 includes a solid back plate 201 such as an aluminum back plate.
- the compliant tool 200 utilizes compliant materials 205 , such as a liquid or air, that are often sealed in a container 207 .
- the compliant polishing tool 200 also often includes a polishing pad (e.g., a polyurethane pad) as the polishing interface 203 .
- a compliant polishing tool can conform to virtually any type of workpiece including aspheric and freeform surfaces.
- the compliant polishing tool has poor smoothing efficiency; its smoothing performance is limited by the polishing interface because the compliant material cannot exert much local pressure to the workpiece to remove surface bumps.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example side view of a part of a rigid-conformal polishing tool 300 .
- the rigid-conformal tool 300 includes a solid back plate 301 such as an aluminum back plate.
- the rigid-conformal polishing tool 300 includes a non-Newtonian material 305 enclosed in a container 307 and a polishing pad (e.g., polyurethane) as the polishing interface 303 .
- a polishing pad e.g., polyurethane
- Non-Newtonian materials can resist deformation in a solid-like and/or a fluid-like manner depending on the applied frequencies of stress.
- a visco-elastic non-Newtonian fluid can act like a solid for a short time period under stress. If stress is applied over a long time period, it flows like a liquid.
- the applied stress frequency can be both fast and slow at the same time, because there is the frequency associated with the spinning of the pad (high frequency) and a frequency of the pad as it is moving along the surface (low frequency).
- the non-Newtonian fluid behaves differently at the local point (where the non-Newtonian fluid is acting as a solid) than it does as the pad is moving slowly across the surface (where the non-Newtonian fluid is acting as a fluid).
- Both behaviors can happen at the same time, which allows the polishing head to grind down a bump while conforming to the overall surface figure of the surface.
- the use of the non-Newtonian materials allows the rigid-conformal polishing tool to conform to the aspheric or freeform surface shapes while maintaining a rigid behavior to preserve the natural smoothing abilities.
- the flow characteristic of the RC lap depends on the frequency of applied stress. Because the tool motion (e.g. orbital motion) is usually fast (e.g. 60 RPM) relative to the local features (e.g. bumps or ripples) under the motion, the RC lap acts like a rigid tool with respect to that time scale. If the tool is orbiting at 60 RPM on a bumpy area, the tool quickly smoothes out the bumps with high local pressures on the bump peaks. However, the tool fits the overall local curvature changes on the workpiece since the RC lap moves slowly on the workpiece (e.g. ⁇ 1 rpm workpiece rotation) along the tool path.
- the tool motion e.g. orbital motion
- the local features e.g. bumps or ripples
- the Bridging model can be used. As the tool moves on the workpiece, it continuously bends by different amounts to fit the local curvature, resulting in continuous changes in the pressure distribution under the tool. If a semi-flexible tool meets mid-spatial frequency ripples, the tool contacts the ridges of highs in the surface with higher pressure, and begins to smooth them out. The lap can be considered as to form a bridge across the ridges known as the bridging effect.
- the strains induced from the thin plate bending influence the polishing pressure distribution. Kirchhoffs thin plate equations can be modified to include the effect of transverse shear strain.
- the polishing pressure distribution p(x) due to the sinusoidal error error(x) on the surface can be derived based on the theory of elasticity as:
- ⁇ error ⁇ ( x ) PV ⁇ ( 1 - sin ⁇ ( 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ x ) ) Eq . ⁇ ( 1 )
- P ⁇ ( x ) P nominal + error ⁇ ( x ) 1 D plate ⁇ ( 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) 4 + 1 D s_plate ⁇ ( 2 ⁇ ⁇ ) 2 + 1 K total Eq . ⁇ ( 2 )
- PV is the peak-to-valley magnitude of the sinusoidal error
- ⁇ is the spatial frequency of the surface error
- P nominal is the nominal pressure under the tool
- D plate is the flexural rigidity of the plate
- D s_plate is the transverse shear stiffness of the plate
- K total is the compressive stiffness of the whole tool including elastic material (e.g. pitch) and polishing interface material (e.g. polyurethane pad).
- the flexural rigidity and transverse shear stiffness of the flexible thin plate are defined as:
- E plate is the Youngs modulus of the plate material
- t plate is the plate thickness
- v plate is the Poisson's ratio of the plate.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an example of smoothing a local bump on a workpiece using a non-Newtonian smoothing tool.
- the non-Newtonian smoothing tool 400 includes a back plate 401 , a non-Newtonian material 405 enclosed in a container (not shown), and a polyurethane pad as the polishing interface 403 .
- the non-Newtonian material is locally deformed by the bump 413 . Because the non-Newtonian material begins to act like a solid when the applied stress is oscillating at a higher frequency (e.g., >1 Hz tool motion), there is additional local polishing pressure near the bump to wear down the bump.
- a higher frequency e.g., >1 Hz tool motion
- a parametric smoothing model can be used. Quantifying the smoothing effect allows improvements in efficiency for finishing large precision optics.
- Dynamic modulus values can be used in the parametric smoothing model for the viscoelastic tools such as pitch or RC laps.
- Pitch can be regarded as an extreme of visco-elastic materials. It almost acts like a solid during the tool motion time period (e.g. ⁇ seconds). However, for very long time periods (e.g. ⁇ hours), it flows to fit the surface.
- the dynamic modulus quantitatively describes these time-dependent characteristics. It is defined as the ratio of the stress to strain under an oscillating stress condition.
- Eq. (5) and (6) Two dynamic modulus values, tensile storage modulus and loss modulus, are defined as Eq. (5) and (6).
- the storage modulus is related to the elastic deformation
- the loss modulus is related to the time-dependent viscous behavior of a non-Newtonian fluid.
- the ⁇ is the time dependent strain
- ⁇ 0 is magnitude of the strain
- t is time
- ⁇ is angular frequency of the oscillation
- a is the time dependent stress
- ⁇ 0 is magnitude of the stress
- ⁇ is phase lag between the stress and strain.
- the phase lag ⁇ is a function of the angular frequency ⁇ for the non-Newtonian fluid.
- a loss tangent which is the ratio between the storage and loss modulus, is a convenient measure of the relative contribution of the solid-like and fluid-like mechanical responses.
- the loss factor tan ⁇ is defined as:
- the ⁇ total can be approximated by two springs connected in series as:
- K elastic is the stiffness of the elastic material and K others is the combined stiffness of all other structures including polishing pad, polishing compound fluid, wrapping material, and so forth.
- the stiffness of the elastic material K elastic can be expressed in terms of the storage modulus, which defines the local pressure caused by the deformation from a bump on the workpiece. If an elastic material with storage modulus E′ has a thickness L and is compressed by a ⁇ L tall bump, the compressive stiffness K elastic is:
- the applied stress angular frequency ⁇ is determined by the spatial frequency of the surface error ⁇ and the speed of the tool motion V tool_motion as:
- T is the time interval between a position under the tool sees two adjacent peaks in the sinusoidal ripple and V tool_motion is the speed of the tool motion.
- the speed of the smoothing action using the pressure distribution on a given ripple can be modeled by using the pressure distribution:
- ⁇ z is the integrated material removal from the workpiece surface
- R Preston is the Preston coefficient (e.g., removal rate)
- P is the polishing pressure
- V tool_workpiece is the relative speed between the tool and workpiece
- ⁇ t is the dwell time.
- the nominal removal depth (e.g., removal depth from the nominal pressure) is used as:
- the smoothing factor SF is defined as:
- the definition of the smoothing factor can be expressed as a linear function in SF vs. PVini space.
- the smoothing efficiency e.g., the ripple magnitude decrease per unit nominal removal depth
- the theoretical smoothing model can be parameterized using two parameters, C 1 and C 2 , to fit the measured data.
- the first parameter C 1 represents K others and other unknown effects which may change the slope of the linear SF function.
- the PVini becomes smaller and smaller the fluid dynamics of the polishing compound may begin to limit the smoothing action. This can give a limiting minimum ripple magnitude PVmin of the ripple, which means no more smoothing occurs below PVmin.
- This can be represented as an x-intercept C 2 in SF vs. PVini space.
- the resulting parametric smoothing model is:
- C 1 is the slope correction parameter and C 2 is the x-intercept parameter. Because this is a linear function, these two parameters can be easily determined in practice by performing a few smoothing runs using a given polishing tool.
- a thin layer of pitch provides some flexibility.
- a layer of pitch having a thickness of 1 mm can deform slightly in a range of 10 to 20 microns.
- a polishing interface formed using a thin layer of pitch (also referred to as a pitch layer pad) can be applied to the non-Newtonian material (or the container thereof) to provide both reasonable conformity to the workpiece and sufficient rigidity for efficient smoothing.
- a pitch layer pad as the polishing interface allows a polishing tool to polish a surface that has an arbitrary surface profile.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart representation of a method 500 for producing a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology.
- the method 500 includes, at operation 501 , melting a pitch material into the liquid form.
- the pitch material can include various amounts of the following elements: residues distilled from tar, oil, or wood; rosin; beeswax or linseed oil; asphalt; flake shellac; paraffin wax; wood flour; or walnut shell flour.
- Commercially available pitch materials such as Gugolz or Acculap can also be used.
- the method 500 includes, at operation 503 , pouring the melted pitch material onto a substrate.
- the substrate can be a solid plate or a piece of wax paper.
- the melted pitch material can be poured between multiple substrates separated by spacers.
- the plurality of spacers has a size in a range of 0.1 mm to 5 mm.
- the method comprises placing a matrix material between the multiple substrate to form a viscoelastic polymer compound after the viscoelastic polymer solidifies.
- the matrix material includes a cloth or a polyurethane matrix.
- spacers of various sizes can be placed between adjacent substrates to produce pitch layer pads having a thickness between 0.1 mm to 5 mm.
- a matrix can be placed between adjacent substrates to produce a pitch compound matrix.
- a piece of cloth, a polyurethane matrix, or other reinforcement structures can be used to compound pitch layer pad.
- the method 500 also includes, at operation 505 , solidifying the pitch material.
- a single PLP can be applied to the tool when the tool is relatively small (e.g., having a diameter of ⁇ 3 cm).
- the polishing tool has a larger size (e.g., 30 cm in diameter)
- the solidified pitch material can be cut into different segments.
- a polishing compound e.g., Hastilite or Rhodite
- the channels formed between the segments can facilitate uniform polishing compound distribution under the polishing tool.
- the method includes dividing each of the one or more viscoelastic polymer layers into multiple segments.
- the multiple segments have random or pseudo-random boundaries.
- the multiple segments include one or more slices or wedges to form a circular shape.
- the multiple segments have a rectangular or square shape.
- FIG. 11 illustrates an example polishing tool 1100 with multiple segments of a polishing pad attached to it.
- the polishing pad includes multiple segments 1101 a , 1101 b with channels 1103 in between.
- FIGS. 6-8 illustrate three example multi-segment patterns of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology.
- a pizza-shaped segment pattern can be created for a circular polishing tool, where the pattern includes slices (or wedges) 601 .
- the example pattern in FIG. 7 includes square (or generally rectangular) segments that can be used with square or rectangular-shaped polishing tools.
- channels 703 are formed between the segments 701 .
- the segment pattern can be randomized or arbitrary, such as that pattern that is shown in FIG. 8 , to accommodate various tool shapes.
- the boundaries of the segments can have random or pseudo-random boundaries.
- the channels 803 can also have random or pseudo-random shapes.
- the solidified PLP (either a single pad or a pad having multiple segments) can be applied to the polishing tool using a pressure-sensitive adhesive or similar types of adhesive.
- the adhesive can allow easy replacement of the polishing pad for tool maintenance purposes.
- FIG. 9 illustrates an example of smoothing a local bump on a workpiece using a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology.
- a non-Newtonian smoothing tool 900 includes a back plate 901 , a non-Newtonian material 905 enclosed in a container (not shown), and a pitch layer pad (PLP) as the polishing interface 903 .
- the non-Newtonian smoothing tool 900 is pressed against a workpiece 911 to smooth out a bump 913 . While the non-Newtonian material and the polishing pad is still locally deformed by the bump 913 , the rigidity of the pitch layer pad provides a much higher local polishing pressure. As shown in FIG.
- ⁇ L′ e.g., 0.1 micron as compared to ⁇ 1 ⁇ m in FIG. 4
- the high local pressure allows the bump to be smoothed out in a much more efficient manner. For example, when the local pressure doubles, the smoothing rate also doubles accordingly.
- FIG. 10 illustrates another example configuration of a polishing tool in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology.
- the polishing tool 1000 includes a back plate 1001 , a non-Newtonian material 1005 enclosed in a container 1007 , and a pitch layer pad (PLP) as the polishing interface 1003 .
- the polishing tool 1000 also includes a driver pin 1009 configured to apply a drive force to drive the movement of the tool 1000 .
- the drive force allows the polishing tool 1000 to move against the workpiece 1011 .
- the polishing tool 1000 itself exerts a force against the workpiece 1011 due to its weight.
- An additional local polishing pressure (by the bumps) is also applied against the workpiece 1011 so that the polishing tool 1000 can smooth out any local bumps on the workpiece 1011 .
- the polishing tool 1000 can be used for regular polishing and smoothing process machines without major modifications to the existing machines.
- an apparatus for polishing an optical component having an aspheric or freeform surface includes a solid back plate, a container coupled to the solid plate, and a layer of viscoelastic polymer attached or otherwise coupled to the container.
- the container encloses a non-Newtonian material that exhibits a solid-like and a fluid-like behavior based on a stress frequency applicable to the non-Newtonian material the layer of viscoelastic polymer positioned to provide physical contact with the optical component for polishing the optical component.
- the layer of viscoelastic polymer comprises one or more segments.
- the viscoelastic polymer includes at least one of: a residue distilled from tar, oil, or wood; a rosin; a beeswax or linseed oil; an asphalt; a flake shellac; a paraffin wax; a wood flour; or a walnut shell flour.
- the layer of viscoelastic polymer has a thickness in a range 0.1 mm to 5 mm.
- the layer of viscoelastic polymer further comprises a matrix material to form a compound matrix of viscoelastic polymer.
- the matrix material includes a cloth or a polyurethane matrix.
- the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer form multiple channels for facilitating uniform distribution of a polishing compound.
- the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer have random or pseudo-random boundaries.
- the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer include one or more slices or wedges to form a circular shape.
- the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer have a rectangular or square shape.
- the layer of viscoelastic polymer is adhered to the container using a pressure-sensitive adhesive. In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer is adapted to polish a surface having an arbitrary surface profile. In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer causes a smaller displacement of the non-Newtonian material and the polishing pad in polishing a surface protrusion as compared to a polishing arrangement that includes a polyurethane layer for contacting the surface protrusion.
- At least parts of the disclosed embodiments can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware.
- electronic circuits can be used to control the operation of the detector arrays and/or to process electronic signals that are produced by the detectors.
- At least some of those embodiments or operations can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer-readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus.
- the computer-readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them.
- data processing apparatus encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers.
- the apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
- a propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus.
- a computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment.
- a computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system.
- a program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code).
- a computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
- the processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output.
- the processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
- processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer.
- a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both.
- the essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data.
- a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks.
- mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks.
- a computer need not have such devices.
- Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices.
- semiconductor memory devices e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices.
- the processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Methods, apparatus and systems for polishing an optical component having an aspheric or freeform surface are described. In one example aspect, a polishing device includes a solid plate and a container coupled to the solid plate. The container encloses a non-Newtonian material that exhibits a solid-like and a fluid-like behavior based on a frequency of a stress applicable to the non-Newtonian material. The device also includes a layer of viscoelastic polymer adhered to the container to polish the optical component. The layer of viscoelastic polymer comprises one or more segments positioned according to a shape of the solid plate.
Description
- This application claim priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/834,147, titled “PITCH LAYER PAD FOR SMOOTHING OPTICAL SURFACES,” filed on Apr. 15, 2019. The entire disclosure of the aforementioned application is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this application.
- This patent document relates to high-precision optical surfaces.
- Various computer controlled optical surfacing (CCOS) processes have been developed since the 1960s. CCOS processes can provide good solutions for fabrication of precise optics because of their high convergence rate using deterministic removal processes. Among various key components of the CCOS process, a polishing tool is a component that provides physical contact with the optics and removes material from it. Polishing tool development for aspheric or freeform optics production has been a complex problem.
- Devices, systems and methods related to producing high-precision optical components and surfaces are disclosed.
- In one example aspect, an apparatus for polishing an optical component having an aspheric or freeform surface is disclosed that includes a solid back plate, a container coupled to the solid plate, and a layer of viscoelastic polymer attached or otherwise coupled to the container. The container encloses a non-Newtonian material that exhibits a solid-like and a fluid-like behavior based on a stress frequency applicable to the non-Newtonian material. The layer of viscoelastic polymer positioned to provide physical contact with the optical component for polishing the optical component. The layer of viscoelastic polymer comprises one or more segments.
- Another aspect of the disclosed embodiments relates to a method for producing a layer of viscoelastic polymer that includes melting a viscoelastic polymer into a liquid form, pouring the viscoelastic polymer between multiple substrates, and solidifying the viscoelastic polymer to obtain one or more viscoelastic polymer layers. The multiple substrates are separated by a plurality of spacers.
- The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the detailed description and the claims.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a side view of a part of an example rigid polishing tool. -
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a side view of a part of an example compliant polishing tool. -
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a side view of a part of an example rigid-conformal polishing tool. -
FIG. 4 illustrates smoothing of a local bump on a component using a non-Newtonian smoothing tool. -
FIG. 5 a set of operations for producing a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments. -
FIG. 6 illustrate an example segmented pattern of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments. -
FIG. 7 illustrate another example segmented pattern of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments. -
FIG. 8 illustrate yet another example segmented pattern of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments. -
FIG. 9 illustrates smoothing of a local bump on a workpiece using a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments. -
FIG. 10 illustrates a configuration for a polishing tool in accordance with one or more example embodiments. -
FIG. 11 illustrates a polishing tool and multiple segments of a polishing pad attached thereto in accordance with one or more example embodiments. - Computer-controlled optical surfacing (CCOS) processes are widely used for fabrication of precise optics. Many CCOS processes are based on three main components: (1) a numerically controlled polishing machine, (2) process control intelligence to control the surfacing process, and (3) a polishing tool to polish the optics.
- One of the key components for a CCOS process is the polishing tools, which provide physical contact with the workpiece and remove material from it. A tool influence function (TIF) is the shape of the wear function created by the polishing tool motion (e.g. spin or orbital motion) on the workpiece. In general, a dwell time map optimization approach can be used to achieve a given target removal map. Optimization intelligence (e.g., software programs) uses TIFs as building blocks to achieve the target removal map by spatially distributing and accumulating them. Having stable and deterministic TIFs is important in achieving successful CCOS processes.
- The TIF is a function of tool properties, such as pressure distribution under the tool, polishing material at the contacting interface, contact area shape, tool motion, and so forth. For instance, developing a tool with a deterministic TIF for aspheric (or freeform) optics fabrication becomes a complex problem because local surface shape (e.g. curvature) of an aspheric surface varies as a function of position on a workpiece. Some flexibility in the tool is required to maintain intimate contact with the workpiece surface. However, rigidity of the tool is also desired to get natural smoothing effects, which removes mid-to-high spatial frequency errors on the workpiece. Thus, a well-behaved tool development is a balancing problem between flexibility and rigidity.
- The smoothing effect becomes more important for large workpiece fabrications to correct mid-to-high spatial frequency errors smaller than the tool size. Based on the deterministic TIFs of CCOS processes, large errors (e.g., low spatial frequency surface errors compared to the tool size) can be corrected by increasing the dwell time on the high error areas. On the other hand, smaller tools require higher tool positioning accuracy to avoid residual tool marks, which is another source of mid-spatial frequency errors. Also, the use of small tools increases the total fabrication time.
- Correcting these mid-to-high spatial frequency errors on optical surfaces is very important in some applications, including for the next generation of extremely large telescopes such as the Giant Magellan Telescope and for nuclear fusion energy plants using high power lasers (e.g. Laser Inertial Fusion Engine). Because the mid-to-high-spatial frequency errors are directly related to the sharpness of the point spread function (e.g. Airy disk radius) or the scattering characteristic of high-power laser application optics, the overall performance of those systems may be degraded due to those errors.
- The most common polishing tools are rigid tools.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example side view of a part of arigid polishing tool 100. As shown inFIG. 1 , therigid polishing tool 100 has asolid back plate 101 and apolishing interface 103. The back plate can, for example, be an aluminum back plate of a specific thickness. Thepolishing interface 103 includes a polishing material, such as pitch (a viscoelastic polymer) or polyurethane. The smoothing effects by a rigid tool can be understood in a simple way. If the tool does not fit to the surface irregularity under the tool (that is, infinite rigidity), and maintains its shape, the tool only rubs the high points on the surface. As the tool runs on the workpiece, it wears down the highs, and eventually the surface can be smoothed out. The spatial frequency of the final surface will be directly related to the tool size of the rigid tool. - A rigid polishing tool is suitable for spherical surface polishing, which has the same curvature everywhere on the optics (also referred to as the workpiece). However, rigid polishing tools have an intrinsic limitation in fabricating aspheric or freeform workpieces because they cannot follow the local curvature or shape changes as the tool moves on the workpiece.
- Recent developments have introduced various tool structures to fit to the aspheric or freeform workpiece surfaces under fabrication.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example side view of a part of acompliant polishing tool 200. Thecompliant tool 200 includes asolid back plate 201 such as an aluminum back plate. Thecompliant tool 200 utilizescompliant materials 205, such as a liquid or air, that are often sealed in acontainer 207. Thecompliant polishing tool 200 also often includes a polishing pad (e.g., a polyurethane pad) as the polishinginterface 203. A compliant polishing tool can conform to virtually any type of workpiece including aspheric and freeform surfaces. However, the compliant polishing tool has poor smoothing efficiency; its smoothing performance is limited by the polishing interface because the compliant material cannot exert much local pressure to the workpiece to remove surface bumps. - A rigid conformal (RC) polishing tool (also referred to as an RC lap) using a visco-elastic non-Newtonian fluid has been developed to take advantage from both rigid and compliant tools in two different time scales using a visco-elastic non-Newtonian fluid.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example side view of a part of a rigid-conformal polishing tool 300. The rigid-conformal tool 300 includes asolid back plate 301 such as an aluminum back plate. The rigid-conformal polishing tool 300 includes anon-Newtonian material 305 enclosed in acontainer 307 and a polishing pad (e.g., polyurethane) as the polishinginterface 303. Non-Newtonian materials can resist deformation in a solid-like and/or a fluid-like manner depending on the applied frequencies of stress. For example, a visco-elastic non-Newtonian fluid can act like a solid for a short time period under stress. If stress is applied over a long time period, it flows like a liquid. The applied stress frequency can be both fast and slow at the same time, because there is the frequency associated with the spinning of the pad (high frequency) and a frequency of the pad as it is moving along the surface (low frequency). The non-Newtonian fluid behaves differently at the local point (where the non-Newtonian fluid is acting as a solid) than it does as the pad is moving slowly across the surface (where the non-Newtonian fluid is acting as a fluid). Both behaviors can happen at the same time, which allows the polishing head to grind down a bump while conforming to the overall surface figure of the surface. The use of the non-Newtonian materials allows the rigid-conformal polishing tool to conform to the aspheric or freeform surface shapes while maintaining a rigid behavior to preserve the natural smoothing abilities. - The flow characteristic of the RC lap depends on the frequency of applied stress. Because the tool motion (e.g. orbital motion) is usually fast (e.g. 60 RPM) relative to the local features (e.g. bumps or ripples) under the motion, the RC lap acts like a rigid tool with respect to that time scale. If the tool is orbiting at 60 RPM on a bumpy area, the tool quickly smoothes out the bumps with high local pressures on the bump peaks. However, the tool fits the overall local curvature changes on the workpiece since the RC lap moves slowly on the workpiece (e.g. ˜1 rpm workpiece rotation) along the tool path.
- By the way of example, and not by limitation, in order to describe the smoothing effects by semi-flexible tools, the Bridging model can be used. As the tool moves on the workpiece, it continuously bends by different amounts to fit the local curvature, resulting in continuous changes in the pressure distribution under the tool. If a semi-flexible tool meets mid-spatial frequency ripples, the tool contacts the ridges of highs in the surface with higher pressure, and begins to smooth them out. The lap can be considered as to form a bridge across the ridges known as the bridging effect. For a semi-flexible tool, the strains induced from the thin plate bending influence the polishing pressure distribution. Kirchhoffs thin plate equations can be modified to include the effect of transverse shear strain. For the one-dimensional case, the polishing pressure distribution p(x) due to the sinusoidal error error(x) on the surface can be derived based on the theory of elasticity as:
-
- PV is the peak-to-valley magnitude of the sinusoidal error, ξ is the spatial frequency of the surface error, Pnominal is the nominal pressure under the tool, Dplate is the flexural rigidity of the plate, Ds_plate is the transverse shear stiffness of the plate, and Ktotal is the compressive stiffness of the whole tool including elastic material (e.g. pitch) and polishing interface material (e.g. polyurethane pad). The flexural rigidity and transverse shear stiffness of the flexible thin plate are defined as:
-
D plate =D plate ·t plate 3/12(1−v plate 2) Eq. (3) -
D s_plate =E plate ·t plate/2(1−v plate) Eq. (4) - Eplate is the Youngs modulus of the plate material, tplate is the plate thickness, and vplate is the Poisson's ratio of the plate.
- Although non-Newtonian materials are able to maintain a rigid behavior, the smoothing abilities are nonetheless affected when the stress is applied over a relatively long period of time, causing the non-Newtonian materials to behave more viscously.
FIG. 4 illustrates an example of smoothing a local bump on a workpiece using a non-Newtonian smoothing tool. In this example, thenon-Newtonian smoothing tool 400 includes aback plate 401, anon-Newtonian material 405 enclosed in a container (not shown), and a polyurethane pad as the polishinginterface 403. Thenon-Newtonian smoothing tool 400 is pressed against aworkpiece 411 to smooth out a bump 413 (ΔL=˜1 μm). The non-Newtonian material is locally deformed by thebump 413. Because the non-Newtonian material begins to act like a solid when the applied stress is oscillating at a higher frequency (e.g., >1 Hz tool motion), there is additional local polishing pressure near the bump to wear down the bump. - By the way of example, and not by limitation, to quantitatively describe the smoothing action of polishing tools that use visco-elastic materials, a parametric smoothing model can be used. Quantifying the smoothing effect allows improvements in efficiency for finishing large precision optics. Dynamic modulus values can be used in the parametric smoothing model for the viscoelastic tools such as pitch or RC laps. Pitch can be regarded as an extreme of visco-elastic materials. It almost acts like a solid during the tool motion time period (e.g. ˜seconds). However, for very long time periods (e.g. ˜hours), it flows to fit the surface. The dynamic modulus quantitatively describes these time-dependent characteristics. It is defined as the ratio of the stress to strain under an oscillating stress condition.
- Two dynamic modulus values, tensile storage modulus and loss modulus, are defined as Eq. (5) and (6). The storage modulus is related to the elastic deformation, and the loss modulus is related to the time-dependent viscous behavior of a non-Newtonian fluid.
-
- Where the oscillating stress and strain as expressed as
-
ε=ε0 sin(tω) Eq. (7) -
σ=σ0 sin(tω+δ) Eq. (8) - The ε is the time dependent strain, ε0 is magnitude of the strain, t is time, ω is angular frequency of the oscillation, a is the time dependent stress, σ0 is magnitude of the stress, and δ is phase lag between the stress and strain.
- The phase lag δ is a function of the angular frequency ω for the non-Newtonian fluid. For an ideal solid, the strain and stress are oscillating in phase (e.g., δ=0°). If the material is an ideal viscous fluid, the stress is 90° out of phase (e.g., δ=90°) with the strain. A loss tangent, which is the ratio between the storage and loss modulus, is a convenient measure of the relative contribution of the solid-like and fluid-like mechanical responses. The loss factor tan δ is defined as:
-
- The polishing pressure distribution under the visco-elastic tools were derived based on the Bridging model. Because there is no flexible thin plate in the tool, the Bridging model in Eq. (2) can be simplified as:
-
P(x)=P nominal +K total·error(x) Eq. (10) - Because the elastic material (e.g., visco-elastic material under the tan δ<<1 condition) is a part of the total compressive stiffness of the tool, the κtotal can be approximated by two springs connected in series as:
-
- Kelastic is the stiffness of the elastic material and Kothers is the combined stiffness of all other structures including polishing pad, polishing compound fluid, wrapping material, and so forth. By combining Eq. (10) and (11) the pressure distribution under the RC lap is expressed as:
-
- The stiffness of the elastic material Kelastic can be expressed in terms of the storage modulus, which defines the local pressure caused by the deformation from a bump on the workpiece. If an elastic material with storage modulus E′ has a thickness L and is compressed by a ΔL tall bump, the compressive stiffness Kelastic is:
-
- The applied stress angular frequency ω is determined by the spatial frequency of the surface error ξ and the speed of the tool motion Vtool_motion as:
-
- T is the time interval between a position under the tool sees two adjacent peaks in the sinusoidal ripple and Vtool_motion is the speed of the tool motion.
- The speed of the smoothing action using the pressure distribution on a given ripple can be modeled by using the pressure distribution:
-
Δz(x)=R Preston ·P(x)·V toolworkpice (x)·Δt(x) Eq. (15) - Δz is the integrated material removal from the workpiece surface, RPreston is the Preston coefficient (e.g., removal rate), P is the polishing pressure, Vtool_workpiece is the relative speed between the tool and workpiece and Δt is the dwell time. For a given initial sinusoidal ripple magnitude PVini, the additional polishing pressure Padd on the peak is:
-
- Then, for a dwell time Δt, the decrease in the ripple magnitude ΔPV is calculated as:
-
ΔPV=PV ini −PV after =R Preston ·P add ·V tool_workpiece ·Δt Eq. (17) - In order to normalize ΔPV, the nominal removal depth (e.g., removal depth from the nominal pressure) is used as:
-
nominal removal depth=R Preston ·P nominal ·V tool_workpiece ·Δt Eq. (18) - The smoothing factor SF is defined as:
-
- The definition of the smoothing factor can be expressed as a linear function in SF vs. PVini space. For instance, the smoothing efficiency (e.g., the ripple magnitude decrease per unit nominal removal depth) can be easily calculated for a given initial ripple magnitude. Because the real smoothing effect may be affected by other complex factors such as polishing pads, wrapping materials and the fluid dynamics of polishing compounds, the theoretical smoothing model can be parameterized using two parameters, C1 and C2, to fit the measured data. The first parameter C1 represents Kothers and other unknown effects which may change the slope of the linear SF function. As the PVini becomes smaller and smaller the fluid dynamics of the polishing compound may begin to limit the smoothing action. This can give a limiting minimum ripple magnitude PVmin of the ripple, which means no more smoothing occurs below PVmin. This can be represented as an x-intercept C2 in SF vs. PVini space. The resulting parametric smoothing model is:
-
- C1 is the slope correction parameter and C2 is the x-intercept parameter. Because this is a linear function, these two parameters can be easily determined in practice by performing a few smoothing runs using a given polishing tool.
- Experimental results have shown that, in some cases, the polishing ability of rigid polishing tools can be ˜7 times more efficient than the polishing ability of rigid-conformal polishing tools. The superb polishing efficiency in rigid polishing tools is at least partially attributed to the use of pitch. Since the days of Sir Isaac Newton, opticians have relied on the viscoelastic properties of pitch to create effective polishing tools. Under load, pitch exhibits an instantaneous elastic strain, a delayed elastic strain, and creep or permanent deformation. The ability of pitch to deform, albeit slowly, keeps it in constant uniform contact with the optical surface.
- While the rigidity of a thick block of pitch prevents it from conforming to the aspheric or freeform surface of the workpiece (such as shown in
FIG. 1 ), a thin layer of pitch provides some flexibility. For example, a layer of pitch having a thickness of 1 mm can deform slightly in a range of 10 to 20 microns. A polishing interface formed using a thin layer of pitch (also referred to as a pitch layer pad) can be applied to the non-Newtonian material (or the container thereof) to provide both reasonable conformity to the workpiece and sufficient rigidity for efficient smoothing. Using a pitch layer pad as the polishing interface allows a polishing tool to polish a surface that has an arbitrary surface profile. - A pitch layer pad (PLP) can be manufactured in various ways.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart representation of amethod 500 for producing a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology. Themethod 500 includes, atoperation 501, melting a pitch material into the liquid form. In some example embodiments, the pitch material can include various amounts of the following elements: residues distilled from tar, oil, or wood; rosin; beeswax or linseed oil; asphalt; flake shellac; paraffin wax; wood flour; or walnut shell flour. Commercially available pitch materials such as Gugolz or Acculap can also be used. - The
method 500 includes, atoperation 503, pouring the melted pitch material onto a substrate. The substrate can be a solid plate or a piece of wax paper. In some embodiments, the melted pitch material can be poured between multiple substrates separated by spacers. In some embodiments, the plurality of spacers has a size in a range of 0.1 mm to 5 mm. In some embodiments, the method comprises placing a matrix material between the multiple substrate to form a viscoelastic polymer compound after the viscoelastic polymer solidifies. In some embodiments, the matrix material includes a cloth or a polyurethane matrix. For example, spacers of various sizes (e.g., from 0.1 mm to 5 mm) can be placed between adjacent substrates to produce pitch layer pads having a thickness between 0.1 mm to 5 mm. In some embodiments, a matrix can be placed between adjacent substrates to produce a pitch compound matrix. For example, a piece of cloth, a polyurethane matrix, or other reinforcement structures can be used to compound pitch layer pad. - The
method 500 also includes, atoperation 505, solidifying the pitch material. In some embodiments, a single PLP can be applied to the tool when the tool is relatively small (e.g., having a diameter of ˜3 cm). When the polishing tool has a larger size (e.g., 30 cm in diameter), it can be beneficial to have a PLP that is constructed to include multiple segments. For example, the solidified pitch material can be cut into different segments. A polishing compound (e.g., Hastilite or Rhodite) can be used in the polishing process. The channels formed between the segments can facilitate uniform polishing compound distribution under the polishing tool. In some embodiments, the method includes dividing each of the one or more viscoelastic polymer layers into multiple segments. In some embodiments, the multiple segments have random or pseudo-random boundaries. In some embodiments, the multiple segments include one or more slices or wedges to form a circular shape. In some embodiments, the multiple segments have a rectangular or square shape. -
FIG. 11 illustrates anexample polishing tool 1100 with multiple segments of a polishing pad attached to it. The polishing pad includesmultiple segments channels 1103 in between.FIGS. 6-8 illustrate three example multi-segment patterns of a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology. For example, as shown inFIG. 6 , a pizza-shaped segment pattern can be created for a circular polishing tool, where the pattern includes slices (or wedges) 601. The spacings between the slides or wedges frommultiple channels 603. The example pattern inFIG. 7 includes square (or generally rectangular) segments that can be used with square or rectangular-shaped polishing tools. Similarly,channels 703 are formed between thesegments 701. In another example, the segment pattern can be randomized or arbitrary, such as that pattern that is shown inFIG. 8 , to accommodate various tool shapes. The boundaries of the segments can have random or pseudo-random boundaries. Thechannels 803 can also have random or pseudo-random shapes. - The solidified PLP (either a single pad or a pad having multiple segments) can be applied to the polishing tool using a pressure-sensitive adhesive or similar types of adhesive. The adhesive can allow easy replacement of the polishing pad for tool maintenance purposes.
-
FIG. 9 illustrates an example of smoothing a local bump on a workpiece using a pitch layer pad in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology. In this example, anon-Newtonian smoothing tool 900 includes aback plate 901, anon-Newtonian material 905 enclosed in a container (not shown), and a pitch layer pad (PLP) as the polishinginterface 903. Thenon-Newtonian smoothing tool 900 is pressed against aworkpiece 911 to smooth out abump 913. While the non-Newtonian material and the polishing pad is still locally deformed by thebump 913, the rigidity of the pitch layer pad provides a much higher local polishing pressure. As shown inFIG. 9 , a much smaller deformity ΔL′ (e.g., 0.1 micron as compared to ˜1 μm inFIG. 4 ) can be observed, indicating that the polishing tool is exerting more local pressure against the bump. The high local pressure allows the bump to be smoothed out in a much more efficient manner. For example, when the local pressure doubles, the smoothing rate also doubles accordingly. -
FIG. 10 illustrates another example configuration of a polishing tool in accordance with one or more example embodiments of the present technology. In this example, thepolishing tool 1000 includes aback plate 1001, anon-Newtonian material 1005 enclosed in acontainer 1007, and a pitch layer pad (PLP) as the polishinginterface 1003. Thepolishing tool 1000 also includes adriver pin 1009 configured to apply a drive force to drive the movement of thetool 1000. The drive force allows thepolishing tool 1000 to move against theworkpiece 1011. Thepolishing tool 1000 itself exerts a force against theworkpiece 1011 due to its weight. An additional local polishing pressure (by the bumps) is also applied against theworkpiece 1011 so that thepolishing tool 1000 can smooth out any local bumps on theworkpiece 1011. Thepolishing tool 1000 can be used for regular polishing and smoothing process machines without major modifications to the existing machines. - In one example aspect, an apparatus for polishing an optical component having an aspheric or freeform surface includes a solid back plate, a container coupled to the solid plate, and a layer of viscoelastic polymer attached or otherwise coupled to the container. The container encloses a non-Newtonian material that exhibits a solid-like and a fluid-like behavior based on a stress frequency applicable to the non-Newtonian material the layer of viscoelastic polymer positioned to provide physical contact with the optical component for polishing the optical component. The layer of viscoelastic polymer comprises one or more segments.
- In some embodiments, the viscoelastic polymer includes at least one of: a residue distilled from tar, oil, or wood; a rosin; a beeswax or linseed oil; an asphalt; a flake shellac; a paraffin wax; a wood flour; or a walnut shell flour. In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer has a thickness in a range 0.1 mm to 5 mm. In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer further comprises a matrix material to form a compound matrix of viscoelastic polymer. In some embodiments, the matrix material includes a cloth or a polyurethane matrix.
- In some embodiments, the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer form multiple channels for facilitating uniform distribution of a polishing compound. In some embodiments, the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer have random or pseudo-random boundaries. In some embodiments, the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer include one or more slices or wedges to form a circular shape. In some embodiments, the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer have a rectangular or square shape.
- In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer is adhered to the container using a pressure-sensitive adhesive. In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer is adapted to polish a surface having an arbitrary surface profile. In some embodiments, the layer of viscoelastic polymer causes a smaller displacement of the non-Newtonian material and the polishing pad in polishing a surface protrusion as compared to a polishing arrangement that includes a polyurethane layer for contacting the surface protrusion.
- At least parts of the disclosed embodiments, such as the motor and control system that drive the movement of the driver pin as shown in
FIG. 10 , can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware. For example, electronic circuits can be used to control the operation of the detector arrays and/or to process electronic signals that are produced by the detectors. At least some of those embodiments or operations can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer-readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer-readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them. A propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus. - A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
- The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
- Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
- While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
- Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.
- Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.
Claims (20)
1. An apparatus for polishing an optical component having an aspheric or freeform surface, comprising:
a solid back plate,
a container coupled to the solid plate, wherein the container encloses a non-Newtonian material that exhibits a solid-like and a fluid-like behavior based on a stress frequency applicable to the non-Newtonian material; and
a layer of viscoelastic polymer attached or otherwise coupled to the container, the layer of viscoelastic polymer positioned to provide physical contact with the optical component for polishing the optical component, wherein the layer of viscoelastic polymer comprises one or more segments.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the viscoelastic polymer includes at least one of:
a residue distilled from tar, oil, or wood;
a rosin;
a beeswax or linseed oil;
an asphalt;
a flake shellac;
a paraffin wax;
a wood flour; or
a walnut shell flour.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the layer of viscoelastic polymer has a thickness in a range 0.1 mm to 5 mm.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the layer of viscoelastic polymer further comprises a matrix material to form a compound matrix of viscoelastic polymer.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the matrix material includes a cloth or a polyurethane matrix.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer form multiple channels for facilitating uniform distribution of a polishing compound.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer have random or pseudo-random boundaries.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer include one or more slices or wedges to form a circular shape.
9. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the one or more segments of the layer of viscoelastic polymer have a rectangular or square shape.
10. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the layer of viscoelastic polymer is adhered to the container using a pressure-sensitive adhesive.
11. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the layer of viscoelastic polymer is adapted to polish a surface having an arbitrary surface profile.
12. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the layer of viscoelastic polymer causes a smaller displacement of the non-Newtonian material and the polishing pad in polishing a surface protrusion as compared to a polishing arrangement that includes a polyurethane layer for contacting the surface protrusion.
13. A method for producing a layer of viscoelastic polymer, comprising:
melting a viscoelastic polymer into a liquid form;
pouring the viscoelastic polymer between multiple substrates, wherein the multiple substrates are separated by a plurality of spacers; and
solidifying the viscoelastic polymer to obtain one or more viscoelastic polymer layers.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of spacers has a size in a range of 0.1 mm to 5 mm.
15. The method of claim 13 , comprising placing a matrix material between the multiple substrate to form a viscoelastic polymer compound after the viscoelastic polymer solidifies.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the matrix material includes a cloth or a polyurethane matrix.
17. The method of claim 13 , comprising:
dividing each of the one or more viscoelastic polymer layers into multiple segments.
18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the multiple segments have random or pseudo-random boundaries.
19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the multiple segments include one or more slices or wedges to form a circular shape.
20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the multiple segments have a rectangular or square shape.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/599,403 US20220212314A1 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2020-04-14 | Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201962834147P | 2019-04-15 | 2019-04-15 | |
US17/599,403 US20220212314A1 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2020-04-14 | Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces |
PCT/US2020/028142 WO2020214605A1 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2020-04-14 | Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20220212314A1 true US20220212314A1 (en) | 2022-07-07 |
Family
ID=72837581
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/599,403 Pending US20220212314A1 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2020-04-14 | Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20220212314A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2020214605A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112720248B (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2022-05-03 | 浙江工业大学 | Efficient polishing disc with shear expansion characteristic and preparation method thereof |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011006650A1 (en) * | 2009-07-15 | 2011-01-20 | Jan-Peter Urbach | Microstructuring, polishing method and polishing device for correcting geometric deviation defects on precision surfaces |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6838149B2 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2005-01-04 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article for the deposition and polishing of a conductive material |
US9302367B2 (en) * | 2010-08-16 | 2016-04-05 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona | Non-newtonian lap |
US9956669B2 (en) * | 2013-03-12 | 2018-05-01 | Kyushu University, National University Corporation | Polishing pad and polishing method |
JP6452295B2 (en) * | 2014-03-19 | 2019-01-16 | スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー | Polishing pad and glass substrate polishing method |
-
2020
- 2020-04-14 WO PCT/US2020/028142 patent/WO2020214605A1/en active Application Filing
- 2020-04-14 US US17/599,403 patent/US20220212314A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011006650A1 (en) * | 2009-07-15 | 2011-01-20 | Jan-Peter Urbach | Microstructuring, polishing method and polishing device for correcting geometric deviation defects on precision surfaces |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
WO2011006650 - Machine Translation (Year: 2011) * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2020214605A1 (en) | 2020-10-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20220212314A1 (en) | Pitch layer pad for smoothing optical surfaces | |
Wan et al. | Modeling and analysis of sub-aperture tool influence functions for polishing curved surfaces | |
Lin et al. | Development and theoretical analysis of novel center-inlet computer-controlled polishing process for high-efficiency polishing of optical surfaces | |
Gray et al. | Fast manufacturing of E-ELT mirror segments using CNC polishing | |
Liao et al. | Surface shape development of the pitch lap under the loading of the conditioner in continuous polishing process | |
Geng et al. | Prediction of surface profile evolution of workpiece and lapping plate in lapping process | |
Wang et al. | Experimental investigation and analytical modelling of the tool influence function of the ultra-precision numerical control polishing method based on the water dissolution principle for KDP crystals | |
Dumas et al. | Complete sub-aperture pre-polishing and finishing solution to improve speed and determinism in asphere manufacture | |
Ban et al. | Improvement and application of pad conditioning accuracy in chemical mechanical polishing | |
Wan et al. | Effect of pad wear on tool influence function in robotic polishing of large optics | |
Nam et al. | Modeling of edge tool influence functions for computer controlled optical surfacing process | |
Ban et al. | Effect of geometry error on accuracy of large-diameter pads used for CMP dressing | |
Song et al. | Improving smoothing efficiency of rigid conformal polishing tool using time-dependent smoothing evaluation model | |
Li et al. | Development of a force controlled nanocutting system using a flexible mechanism for adaptive cutting of microstructures on non-planar surfaces | |
Hou et al. | A predictable smoothing evolution model for computer-controlled polishing | |
Ding et al. | Theoretical and experimental investigation on the surface stripes formation in ultra-precision fly cutting machining | |
Wang et al. | Removal characteristics and performance of brick-shape permanent magnet–assisted magnetorheological lapping | |
US20180154495A1 (en) | Fiber based finishing tools | |
Yang et al. | Theoretical and experimental analysis of surface topography and surface roughness evolution in fixed abrasive double-sided planetary lapping of YAG wafers | |
Zhu et al. | Finishing of micro-aspheric tungsten carbide mold using small viscoelastic tool | |
Achour et al. | Deterministic polishing of micro geometries | |
Li et al. | A time domain dynamic simulation model for stability prediction of infeed centerless grinding processes | |
Ye et al. | A material removal model for nonconstant-contact flexible grinding | |
Wang et al. | Prediction and verification of wafer surface morphology in ultrasonic vibration assisted wire saw (UAWS) slicing single crystal silicon based on mixed material removal mode | |
Hung et al. | Small-wavelength form error compensation during hydrodynamic polishing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KIM, DAE WOOK;REEL/FRAME:058851/0233 Effective date: 20220131 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |