US20210155960A1 - Method for producing bioethanol from dates - Google Patents
Method for producing bioethanol from dates Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20210155960A1 US20210155960A1 US17/106,052 US202017106052A US2021155960A1 US 20210155960 A1 US20210155960 A1 US 20210155960A1 US 202017106052 A US202017106052 A US 202017106052A US 2021155960 A1 US2021155960 A1 US 2021155960A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- date
- ethanol
- yeast
- fermentation
- substrate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title abstract description 61
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 87
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 86
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 86
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 claims description 82
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 abstract description 75
- 244000253911 Saccharomyces fragilis Species 0.000 abstract description 51
- 238000001291 vacuum drying Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 352
- 235000019441 ethanol Nutrition 0.000 description 118
- 235000014680 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nutrition 0.000 description 99
- 244000286779 Hansenula anomala Species 0.000 description 95
- 235000013379 molasses Nutrition 0.000 description 49
- 238000010923 batch production Methods 0.000 description 15
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 12
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 235000014663 Kluyveromyces fragilis Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 235000018368 Saccharomyces fragilis Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 229940031154 kluyveromyces marxianus Drugs 0.000 description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 description 8
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 241001508813 Clavispora lusitaniae Species 0.000 description 7
- 108091023242 Internal transcribed spacer Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 108700022487 rRNA Genes Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 7
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 7
- YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N (+)-Biotin Chemical compound N1C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CCCCC(=O)O)SC[C@@H]21 YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N 0.000 description 6
- GHOKWGTUZJEAQD-ZETCQYMHSA-N (D)-(+)-Pantothenic acid Chemical compound OCC(C)(C)[C@@H](O)C(=O)NCCC(O)=O GHOKWGTUZJEAQD-ZETCQYMHSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 5
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- GHOKWGTUZJEAQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chick antidermatitis factor Natural products OCC(C)(C)C(O)C(=O)NCCC(O)=O GHOKWGTUZJEAQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229930091371 Fructose Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 239000005715 Fructose Substances 0.000 description 3
- RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-ARQDHWQXSA-N Fructose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@](O)(CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-ARQDHWQXSA-N 0.000 description 3
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 229960002685 biotin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000020958 biotin Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000011616 biotin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229960000367 inositol Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229940055726 pantothenic acid Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000019161 pantothenic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000011713 pantothenic acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000019750 Crude protein Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 235000014683 Hansenula anomala Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 description 2
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 2
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004821 distillation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000012054 meals Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- FWMNVWWHGCHHJJ-SKKKGAJSSA-N 4-amino-1-[(2r)-6-amino-2-[[(2r)-2-[[(2r)-2-[[(2r)-2-amino-3-phenylpropanoyl]amino]-3-phenylpropanoyl]amino]-4-methylpentanoyl]amino]hexanoyl]piperidine-4-carboxylic acid Chemical compound C([C@H](C(=O)N[C@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N1CCC(N)(CC1)C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1 FWMNVWWHGCHHJJ-SKKKGAJSSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetonitrile Chemical compound CC#N WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000012766 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012765 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. spontanea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000007399 DNA isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001712 DNA sequencing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000003183 Manihot esculenta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000016735 Manihot esculenta subsp esculenta Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 240000000111 Saccharum officinarum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007201 Saccharum officinarum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000061456 Solanum tuberosum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002595 Solanum tuberosum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001476 alcoholic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000004139 alpha-Amylases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000637 alpha-Amylases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229940024171 alpha-amylase Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002551 biofuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000009120 camo Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000005607 chanvre indien Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000018044 dehydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002816 fuel additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011487 hemp Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydridophosphorus(.) (triplet) Chemical compound [PH] BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013095 identification testing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001471 micro-filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007003 mineral medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011206 morphological examination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000039328 opportunistic pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000003044 randomized block design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006188 syrup Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020357 syrup Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000003722 vitamin derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
- C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
- C12P7/02—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
- C12P7/04—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
- C12P7/06—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
- C12P7/08—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage produced as by-product or from waste or cellulosic material substrate
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12M—APPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
- C12M21/00—Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses
- C12M21/12—Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses for producing fuels or solvents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12M—APPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
- C12M45/00—Means for pre-treatment of biological substances
- C12M45/02—Means for pre-treatment of biological substances by mechanical forces; Stirring; Trituration; Comminuting
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/14—Fungi; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/145—Fungal isolates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/14—Fungi; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/16—Yeasts; Culture media therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12M—APPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
- C12M23/00—Constructional details, e.g. recesses, hinges
- C12M23/02—Form or structure of the vessel
- C12M23/08—Flask, bottle or test tube
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12M—APPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
- C12M41/00—Means for regulation, monitoring, measurement or control, e.g. flow regulation
- C12M41/30—Means for regulation, monitoring, measurement or control, e.g. flow regulation of concentration
- C12M41/36—Means for regulation, monitoring, measurement or control, e.g. flow regulation of concentration of biomass, e.g. colony counters or by turbidity measurements
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12R—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C - C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
- C12R2001/00—Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
- C12R2001/645—Fungi ; Processes using fungi
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels, e.g. bio-diesel
Definitions
- the Applicant hereby incorporates by reference the sequence listing contained in the ASCII text file titled 32087_09_sequence_listing_ST25.txt, created Mar. 14, 2019, and having 17 KB of data.
- the disclosure of the present patent application relates to biofuels, and particularly to a method for producing bioethanol from dates.
- Bioethanol is ethyl alcohol produced from biological sources. Bioethanol can be used as fuel, or as a fuel additive for gasoline. Bioethanol is commonly made from biomass such as corn or sugarcane. Other common sources for bioethanol include potato, cassava, barley, wheat, and hemp.
- Bioethanol is manufactured from grains by milling the grains into meal, mixing the meal with water and alpha-amylase and liquefying the resulting mash. This step is followed by saccharification with a secondary enzyme to convert the liquefied starch to fermentable sugars, fermentation with yeast, distillation of the fermented mash to concentrate the alcohol, and dehydration to remove any remaining water, resulting in anhydrous ethanol.
- the method for producing bioethanol from dates includes manufacturing a suitable substrate for bioethanol from dates and fermenting the date substrate to produce bioethanol.
- the date substrate can be produced by de-pitting date fruits, heating the flesh with water to produce a mixture, filter pressing the mixture to produce a juice, and concentrating the juice by vacuum drying to produce a date substrate.
- the date substrate may then be fermented in either a batch or a fed-batch culture. In the batch process, the entire volume of substrate may be added to a bioreactor along with a yeast inoculum and fermentation may be conducted at either 30 or 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum.
- the substrate may be fed gradually into the bioreactor containing the yeast inoculum at a constant feeding rate and fermentation may be conducted at either 30° C. or 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum.
- the date substrate may be date extract.
- FIG. 1 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae.
- FIG. 2 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae.
- FIG. 3 depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae.
- FIG. 4 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae.
- FIG. 5 depicts a. graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae.
- FIG. 6 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae.
- FIG. 7 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in batch using K. marxianus NCYC 179.
- FIG. 8 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in batch using the yeast K. marxianus NCYC 179.
- FIG. 9 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 10 depicts a graph of the specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 11 depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 12 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 13 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 14 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 15 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 16 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 17 depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 18 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 19 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 20 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431.
- FIG. 21 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5.
- FIG. 22 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5.
- FIG. 23 depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5.
- FIG. 24 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5.
- FIG. 25 depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast S K. marxianus HH 5.
- FIG. 26 depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5.
- the term “about,” when used to modify a quantity, means within 10% of the modified quantity.
- a method for producing bioethanol from dates includes manufacturing a suitable substrate from dates and fermenting the date substrate to produce bioethanol.
- the date substrate may be “Dips,” a date substrate produced by de-pitting date fruits, heating the flesh with water to produce a mixture, filter pressing the mixture to produce a juice, and concentrating the juice by vacuum drying to produce a date substrate.
- the date substrate may then be fermented in either a batch or a fed-batch culture. In the batch process, the entire volume of substrate may be added to a bioreactor along with a yeast inoculum and fermentation can be conducted at about 30° C. or about 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum.
- the substrate may be gradually fed into the bioreactor containing the yeast inoculum at a constant feeding rate and fermentation can be conducted at about 30° C. or about 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum.
- the de-pitted date fruits may be heated with an equal volume of water at about 80° C. for about 30 minutes to produce the mixture.
- the filter pressing step is particularly useful to remove large impurities and insoluble matter.
- the juice may be further purified to provide a clear liquid by micro filtration using a sheet filter system prior to the concentration step. This embodiment is particularly suited to applications where it is desirable to remove smaller impurities from the juice.
- the vacuum drying step may involve concentrating the juice or the clear extract to about 75° Brix at a low temperature, such as about 80° C.
- the date substrate may be date extract.
- the date extract may be produced by mixing date fruits 1:4 (w/w) with water, boiling the water for about 60-90 minutes, and filtering the mixture to produce a date extract.
- the date extract may then be sterilized in an autoclave at about 121° C. for about 30 minutes.
- the date fruits may be waste date fruits, e.g., date fruits not fit for consumption.
- the waste date fruits include one or more of the Ruzeiz, Shunaizi, and Shahal varieties of dates.
- the waste date fruits may be waste date fruits harvested in Saudi Arabia.
- one ton of waste date fruits with an average of 70% sugar content can provide an extract having about 600 kg sugars, which can provide about 300 kg to about 600 kg, e.g., 400 kg, of ethanol.
- the fermentation may be conducted using a yeast such as S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus , or the like.
- the fermentation may be conducted at about 30° C. using a yeast strain such as S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus, S. cerevisiae NCYC 432, K. marxianus NCYC 179, or the like.
- the fermentation may be conducted at about 40° C. using a thermophilic yeast strain.
- the thermophilic yeast strain may be a thermophilic strain of K. marxianus , e.g., a strain isolated from local habitats in Alahsa, Saudi Arabia.
- the thermophilic K may be conducted using a yeast such as S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus , or the like.
- the fermentation may be conducted at about 30° C. using a yeast strain such as S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus, S. cerevisiae NCYC 432, K. marx
- the marxianus strain may include at least one of the DNA sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 5-16.
- the thermophilic yeast strain may be K. marxianus HH 5.
- the K. marxianus HH 5 strain may include the DNA sequences of SEQ ID NO: 5 and/or SEQ ID NO: 6.
- the fermentation may be conducted using date substrate with a starting sugar concentration ranging from about 20% to about 25%.
- Dips were manufactured by de-pitting date fruits and heating the flesh with an equal amount of water at 80° C. for 30 minutes to produce a mixture; filter pressing the mixture to produce a juice; micro filtering the juice to a clear liquid using a sheet filter system; and concentrating the clear extract to 75 Brix at low temperature (80° C.) by vacuum drying.
- Dips manufactured according to this process included the following nutrients: about 80% sugars, mainly in form of fructose (41%) and glucose (38%), and a small amount of sucrose (1%); about 2% crude protein; 1.1 g/kg phosphorus; 14.9 g/kg potassium; 0.8 g/kg magnesium; 240 ppm pantothenic acid; and 2.7 ppm biotin. (See Table 1) Therefore, Dips used as carbon and energy source in alcoholic fermentation would be expected to yield about 400 kg ethanol (about 500 liters).
- Waste date fruits were obtained from a date processing factory in Al Hofuf City, Saudi Arabia. They were mainly a collection from the varieties Ruzeiz, Shunaizi, and Shahal. Extraction of syrup from the fruits was performed as follows: I :4 (w/w) fruit: water, boiling for about 60-90 minutes and filtration. The resulting substrate was sterilized in 5-liter bottles by autoclaving at 121° C. for 30 minutes. The sterilized substrate contained about 30% sugar.
- the chemical composition of the date sterilized substrate was assessed, including determining protein concentration using the Kjeldhal method, M-Inositol concentration using and biotin and pantothenic acid concentration according to the vitaFast vitamin testing method, using an ELISA Reader (Multiskan EX Model No. 355, Thermolabsystem-Finlan). M-Inositol was determined with High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) using a Shimadzu Japan Model 2003, equipped with a RID 10A refractive index detector, CLC NH2 6 ⁇ 150 column, LC 10ATP pump, and CTO 10AC VP oven.
- HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography
- the mobile phase was 83% CH3CN:17% water (v/v), flow rate 1 ml/min., column pressure 200 KgF/cm 2 .
- Ethanol and sugar (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) concentrations were determined using the enzymatic UV method (Boehringer Mannheim).
- Mineral concentrations (Mg, P, K, and S) were determined using the atomic absorption method.
- the average chemical composition of the date sterilized substrate is shown in Table 1.
- the date substrate contained all nutrients needed for a small amount of yeast growth (See Table 1) and no addition of mineral medium was needed.
- the fruits contained 68-72% (w/w) sugars on wet basis and the thin extract contained 25-30% (w/w) sugars on wet basis, with 10.2-10.8% (w/w) sugar content remaining in the extracted fruit.
- the efficiency of our extraction system was about 85%.
- a ton of waste date fruits with an average of 70% sugar content can be expected to produce a date substrate containing about 600 kg sugars, which in turn would be expected to produce about 300 kg bioethanol. If the efficiency of extraction is raised, such as by using high quality equipment, the yield of bioethanol would be predicted to increase to more than 315 kg from a ton of waste date fruits. If the sugar content of the fruits is increased, this would also be predicted to increase the resulting bioethanol yield.
- thermotolerant yeasts from the local habitat in Saudi Arabia that can be used for ethanol production.
- the strains were cultivated on Malt Extract Agar for 3 days in the dark at 25° C. DNA was isolated using the MoBio-UltraCleanTM Microbial DNA Isolation Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fragments including the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) were amplified using the primers LROR: ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC (SEQ ID NO: 1) and LR5: TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG (SEQ ID NO: 2).
- ITS Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) were amplified using the primers LS266: GCATTCCCAAACAACTCGACTC (SEQ ID NO: 3) and V9G TTACGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTA (SEQ ID NO: 4).
- the PCR fragments were sequenced with the ABI Prism® Big DyeTM Terminator v. 3.0 Ready Reaction Cycle sequencing Kit. Samples were analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3730 Genetic Analyzer and contigs were assembled using the forward and reverse sequences with the SeqMan program from the LaserGene package. The sequence was compared in a large yeast database of CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre with sequences of known strains.
- thermophilic isolates Twenty two isolates that showed good growth at 45° C. were obtained from the screening program. Twelve of these isolates grew at 50° C., and hence were regarded as thermophilic. Preliminary identification tests were carried out on the 12 thermophilic isolates, including morphological examination of the yeast colonies grown on PDA, microscopic examination of the cell form, and ability to ferment glucose. The outcome of these tests indicated that the 12 thermophilic isolates belonged to at least to 3 different genera. Molecular identification of these 12 thermophilic isolates by DNA sequencing was carried out and the results are shown in Table 2. The isolates belonged to three genera and species, namely Kluyveromyces marxianus (6 isolates), Clavispora lusitaniae (5 isolates and Wickerhamomyces anomalus (1 isolate). C.
- lusitaniae is an opportunistic pathogen, hence it was not considered for ethanol production.
- Preliminary tests showed that W. anomalus was not a good ethanol producer.
- promising preliminary results for ethanol production were obtained for the strains of K. marxianus , and the best of these isolates was K. marxianus 05-1 or “HH5.”
- the isolates belonging to the same species had different genetic sequences at the tested loci, indicating that they are different strains of the species.
- the sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 05-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 6.
- the sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 12-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 8.
- the sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 14G-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 10.
- the sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 14W-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 12.
- the sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 23-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 14.
- the sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 25-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 16.
- the sequence of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) of the K. marxianus 05-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 5.
- the sequence of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) of the K. marxianus 12-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 7.
- the sequence of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) of the K. marxianus 14G-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 9.
- the sequence of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) of the K. marxianus 14W-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 11.
- the sequence of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) of the K. marxianus 23-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 13.
- the sequence of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 and 2 and the 5.8S gene (ITS) of the K. marxianus 25-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 15.
- the yeast strains were first propagated in shake flasks and then in a bioreactor containing suitable medium, harvested by filtration to a cake and kept in the refrigerator to be used as inocula.
- Fermentation experiments were done in batch and fed-batch cultures using shake flasks, a BioFlo 110 bioreactor (New Brunswick Scientific) with 10 liter working volume and an Applikon autoclavable Bioreactor system (Applikon Biotechnology, the Netherlands) with one liter working volume.
- the whole substrate was added to the bioreactor at the beginning of fermentation and the process continued to its end.
- the substrate was fed to the fermenter at constant feeding rates. Fermentations using the commercial baker's yeast, S. cerevisiae NCYC 432, and K. marxianus NCYC 179 were at 30° C., while fermentation using the thermophilic yeast K. marxianus HH 5 (isolated by the present inventors) was at 40° C. Samples were taken from the bioreactor every 2-4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugars and yeast dry matter were determined.
- a 3 X 4 X 2 (three variables) factorial experimental design was employed with three types of substrates (date extract, molasses, and a mixture of 1:1 date extract/molasses), 4 production organisms (local and imported) and two fermentation processes (batch and fed-batch) (See Table 3).
- a randomized block design was chosen to run the experiment.
- a collection of waste date fruits and 2 fermentation temperatures (30 and 40° C.) were chosen based on information from the literature. All of the above parameters were used as useful means for modeling and optimizing small-scale operations. Variables measured in this study included yield of ethanol on substrate (g ethanol/g sugar), and the concentrations (g/l) of ethanol, sugars, and yeast biomass.
- Ethanol and sugar were determined using the enzymatic UV method (Boehringer Mannheim).
- Yeast biomass concentration was determined by centrifugation of 5 ml broth at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes in dry centrifugal tube, and overnight drying at 105° C.
- the yeasts used were S. cerevisiae NCYC 431, Kluyveromyces marxianus NCYC 179, a commercial baker's yeast strain of the species S. cerevisiae purchased from the local market, and K. marxianus HH 5 (isolated by the present inventors). Batch and fed-batch fermentation processes were used at different final sugar concentrations. For comparison, substrates of pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses were also used for production. The fermentation experiments were done using shake flasks, a Biollo 110 bioreactor (New Brunswick Scientific) with 10 liter working volume and an Applikon autoclavable Bioreactor system (Applikon Biotechnology, the Netherlands) with one liter working volume.
- Date substrate was extracted as described in Example 1.
- the fruits used were waste fruits collected from a date processing factory in Hofuf City, mainly made of the varieties Ruzeiz, Shunaizi, and Shahal. Because yeast growth during ethanol production is normally minimal, sugars in the production substrate are mainly converted to ethanol and no significant amount of yeast biomass is formed.
- yeast strains were used for production including a commercial baker's yeast strain of the species S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus NCYC 179 , S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 and the strain K. marxianus HH 5 (isolated by the present inventors). Production was in batch and fed-batch cultures at fermentation temperatures of 30 and 40° C. Three substrates were used, namely pure date extract, pure molasses and a mixture of date extract and molasses at 1:1 ratio, with sugar concentrations of 20 to 25%. The results, all of which were averages of three runs, are presented in FIGS. 1 to 26 .
- the strain of the baker's yeast from the species S. cerevisiae was used for ethanol production in batch processes at fermentation temperatures of 30° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. Samples were taken every 4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were measured. The results are shown in FIGS. 1-6 .
- Ethanol production from date extract continued at a relatively high rate during the first 12 hours of fermentation, the concentration increased steadily during this period to reach 85.2 g/l ( FIG. 1 ). After that, the production rate decreased towards the end of the fermentation period of 32 hours and the final ethanol concentration reached was 112.1 g/l (11.2% w/v).
- the course of ethanol productivity is illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- the specific and volumetric productivities were relatively high during the first 12 hours of fermentation, after which they decreased steadily to reach very low values towards the end of the fermentation period.
- the specific productivity was 0.92 g ethanol per g yeast per hour (g/g. h) and the volumetric productivity was 9.7 g ethanol per liter reactor volume per hour (g/l.
- the specific productivity is mainly a measure of the efficiency of the yeast in ethanol production and the volumetric productivity is mainly a measure of the efficiency of the bioreactor system.
- the overall yield of ethanol on sugar was 91.5% of the theoretical. There was no significant yeast growth during fermentation, as yeast biomass concentration remained almost constant during the whole period of fermentation ( FIG. 1 ). The sugar was almost completely consumed, with only traces remaining at the end of the fermentation period ( FIG. 1 ).
- the values obtained for the yield of ethanol on sugar and for the specific and volumetric productivities are comparable to values reported for different organisms and substrates.
- the strain Kluyveromyces marxianus NCYC 179 was used for ethanol production in batch processes at fermentation temperatures of 30° C. on a substrate of pure date extract. Samples were taken every 4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were measured. The results are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8 .
- the performance of this yeast was generally weak.
- the concentration of ethanol after the first 4 hours of fermentation was only 25.6 g/l, which was much lower than the concentration reached from the commercial baker's yeast reported above ( FIG. 7 ).
- the maximum ethanol concentration was 71 g/l (7.1% w/v); it was reached after 28 hours of fermentation.
- the specific and volumetric productivities were also much lower than the values reported above for the commercial baker's yeast. They were 0.62 g/g. h for the specific productivity and 6.3 for the volumetric productivity after 4 hours of fermentation and 0.05 g/g. h and zero after 28 hours, respectively ( FIG. 8 ). No increase in ethanol concentration occurred when fermentation was continued to 36 hours.
- the yeast strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 was used for ethanol production in hatch processes at fermentation temperatures of 30° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. Samples were taken every 4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were determined. The results are shown in FIGS. 9-14 .
- Ethanol production from date extract substrate started at a relatively high rate compared to the other yeast strains discussed above.
- the concentration reached 45 g/l in the first 4 hours and continued to increase at a decreasing rate till it reached 117.6 g/l (11.8% w/v) at the end of fermentation of 32 hours ( FIG. 9 ).
- the specific productivity started at 1.05 g/g. h in the first 4 hours and ended at 0.03 g/g. h at the end of fermentation, while the volumetric productivity was 11.3 and 0.4 g/l. h after 4 and 32 hours of fermentation, respectively ( FIG. 10 ).
- the yield of ethanol on sugar was 94.6% of the theoretical, indicating that sugar was mainly converted into ethanol and no significant amounts of other metabolic products were formed. Sugar provided was consumed to traces remaining and no significant yeast growth occurred.
- Ethanol production from molasses substrate using the yeast strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 is presented in FIGS. 11 and 12 .
- Ethanol concentration after 4 hours was 50.5 g/l and reached 118.2 g/l (11.8% w/v) at the end of the fermentation period of 32 hours ( FIG. 11 ).
- the specific and volumetric productivities were high, starting at 1.15 g/g. h and 12.6 g/l. h in the first 4 hours, respectively and ending at 0.05 g/g. h and 0.6 WE h after 32 hours, respectively ( FIG. 12 ).
- the yield of ethanol on sugar was 95.4% of the theoretical, it was the second highest, but was not significantly different from the yields of pure date extract and pure molasses.
- the strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 was used for ethanol production in a fed-batch process of fermentation to attempt to further improve its productivity. Production was at a temperature of 30° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. The substrates were fed at constant rates of 200 ml/h and feeding time was 15 hours to deliver 3 liters of substrate containing about 50% sugars. Samples were taken every 2 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were measured. The results are shown in FIGS. 15-20 .
- FIGS. 15 and 16 The results of the experiments using date extract as substrate are shown in FIGS. 15 and 16 .
- Ethanol concentration reached 18.8 g/l in the first 2 hours of fermentation ( FIG. 15 ).
- the concentration increased steadily and reached its maximum of 121.5 g/l (12.2% w/v) in 24 hours.
- the total amount of ethanol produced was not much higher than that obtained in the batch culture discussed above.
- the main difference was in the fermentation time, which was 24 hours in the fed-batch process compared to 32 hours in the batch process.
- the specific productivity decreased much slower compared to that of the batch process (FIG. 16 ).
- Molasses substrate gave quite similar results to date extract substrate. As can be seen in FIGS. 17 and 18 , production proceeded in the same way as those of the date extract substrate. The concentration of ethanol reached 20.3 g/l in the first two hours of fermentation and continued to increase steadily to reach its Maximum of 119.9 g/l (12% w/v) after 24 hours of fermentation ( FIG. 17 ). The specific productivity remained fairly high over the whole period of fermentation ( FIG. 18 ). Sugar concentration increased slowly to reach 46.3 g/l towards the end of substrate feeding, and decreased quickly after that to reach very low levels ( FIG. 18 ). No significant amount of yeast growth was noticed. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 96.4% of the theoretical, which was a little lower than that obtained from the date extract but the difference was not significant as statistical analysis revealed.
- the substrate obtained from mixing date extract with molasses at a 1:1 ratio was utilized by the yeast in a similar efficiency as the former substrates discussed above ( FIGS. 19 and 20 ).
- Ethanol concentration was 17.6 g/l after 2 hours of fermentation and reached 116.3 g/l (11.6% w/v) at the end of fermentation after 24 hours ( FIG. 19 ).
- the specific productivity remained relatively high during the whole fermentation period at values of 0.45 and 0.2 g/g. h ( FIG. 20 ).
- Sugar concentration increased slowly during substrate feeding, and then decreased quickly to reach traces at the end of fermentation ( FIG. 19 ). No significant yeast growth occurred.
- the yield of ethanol on sugar was 95.1% of theoretical and was not significantly different from the yields of the other two substrates discussed above.
- Date extract gave ethanol yields comparable to those obtained from the reference substrate molasses.
- the strain Kluyveromyces marxianus HH5 isolated by the research team from local habitats in Saudi Arabia, was used for ethanol production in batch processes at fermentation temperatures of 40° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. The results are shown in FIGS. 21 to 26 .
- this yeast can produce and tolerate up to about 9% w/v or 11% v/v ethanol concentration.
- This high productivity is particularly of interest given that it can be achieved at a fermentation temperature of 40° C.
- the combination of high productivity and higher fermentation temperature suggests that this method could reduce the costs of cooling during fermentation and heating during distillation.
- ethanol concentration was 38.4 g/l after 4 hours of fermentation and reached 94.8 g/l in 24 hours then remained almost constant till 28 hours of fermentation.
- This result confirms that the yeast K. marxianus HH 5 can produce and tolerate ethanol concentrations in range of about 9-10% w/v (11-12% v/v).
- About 6 g/l sugar remained unconsumed and no significant yeast growth occurred.
- the yield of ethanol on sugar was 95.8% of the theoretical, which was higher than that obtained from date extract but the difference was not significant as statistical analysis showed.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The Applicant hereby incorporates by reference the sequence listing contained in the ASCII text file titled 32087_09_sequence_listing_ST25.txt, created Mar. 14, 2019, and having 17 KB of data.
- The disclosure of the present patent application relates to biofuels, and particularly to a method for producing bioethanol from dates.
- Bioethanol is ethyl alcohol produced from biological sources. Bioethanol can be used as fuel, or as a fuel additive for gasoline. Bioethanol is commonly made from biomass such as corn or sugarcane. Other common sources for bioethanol include potato, cassava, barley, wheat, and hemp.
- Bioethanol is manufactured from grains by milling the grains into meal, mixing the meal with water and alpha-amylase and liquefying the resulting mash. This step is followed by saccharification with a secondary enzyme to convert the liquefied starch to fermentable sugars, fermentation with yeast, distillation of the fermented mash to concentrate the alcohol, and dehydration to remove any remaining water, resulting in anhydrous ethanol.
- The traditional approach to manufacturing bioethanol suffers from a number of drawbacks. The use of grains to produce bioethanol could contribute to rising food prices. The process of producing ethanol from grain is highly inefficient, requiring many wasteful steps, including hydrolysis of starch by addition of enzymes and acids.
- Thus, a method for producing bioethanol from dates solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
- The method for producing bioethanol from dates includes manufacturing a suitable substrate for bioethanol from dates and fermenting the date substrate to produce bioethanol. In one embodiment, the date substrate can be produced by de-pitting date fruits, heating the flesh with water to produce a mixture, filter pressing the mixture to produce a juice, and concentrating the juice by vacuum drying to produce a date substrate. The date substrate may then be fermented in either a batch or a fed-batch culture. In the batch process, the entire volume of substrate may be added to a bioreactor along with a yeast inoculum and fermentation may be conducted at either 30 or 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum. In the fed-batch process, the substrate may be fed gradually into the bioreactor containing the yeast inoculum at a constant feeding rate and fermentation may be conducted at either 30° C. or 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum.
- In an alternative embodiment, the date substrate may be date extract.
- These and other features of the present disclosure will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
-
FIG. 1 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. -
FIG. 2 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. -
FIG. 3 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. -
FIG. 4 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. -
FIG. 5 : depicts a. graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. -
FIG. 6 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using a commercial strain of S. cerevisiae. -
FIG. 7 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in batch using K. marxianus NCYC 179. -
FIG. 8 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in batch using the yeast K. marxianus NCYC 179. -
FIG. 9 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 10 : depicts a graph of the specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 11 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 12 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 13 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 14 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 15 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 16 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 17 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 18 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 19 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 20 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast S. cerevisiae NCYC 431. -
FIG. 21 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5. -
FIG. 22 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5. -
FIG. 23 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5. -
FIG. 24 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from molasses in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5. -
FIG. 25 : depicts a graph of ethanol production from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast S K. marxianus HH 5. -
FIG. 26 : depicts a graph of specific and volumetric productivities of ethanol from date extract and molasses (1:1) in fed-batch using the yeast K. marxianus HH 5. - Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
- As used herein, the term “about,” when used to modify a quantity, means within 10% of the modified quantity.
- A method for producing bioethanol from dates includes manufacturing a suitable substrate from dates and fermenting the date substrate to produce bioethanol. The date substrate may be “Dips,” a date substrate produced by de-pitting date fruits, heating the flesh with water to produce a mixture, filter pressing the mixture to produce a juice, and concentrating the juice by vacuum drying to produce a date substrate. The date substrate may then be fermented in either a batch or a fed-batch culture. In the batch process, the entire volume of substrate may be added to a bioreactor along with a yeast inoculum and fermentation can be conducted at about 30° C. or about 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum. In the fed-batch process, the substrate may be gradually fed into the bioreactor containing the yeast inoculum at a constant feeding rate and fermentation can be conducted at about 30° C. or about 40° C., depending upon the strain of yeast used as the inoculum.
- In an embodiment, the de-pitted date fruits may be heated with an equal volume of water at about 80° C. for about 30 minutes to produce the mixture.
- The filter pressing step is particularly useful to remove large impurities and insoluble matter. In an embodiment, the juice may be further purified to provide a clear liquid by micro filtration using a sheet filter system prior to the concentration step. This embodiment is particularly suited to applications where it is desirable to remove smaller impurities from the juice.
- In an embodiment, the vacuum drying step may involve concentrating the juice or the clear extract to about 75° Brix at a low temperature, such as about 80° C.
- In an alternative embodiment, the date substrate may be date extract. The date extract may be produced by mixing date fruits 1:4 (w/w) with water, boiling the water for about 60-90 minutes, and filtering the mixture to produce a date extract. The date extract may then be sterilized in an autoclave at about 121° C. for about 30 minutes.
- In an embodiment, the date fruits may be waste date fruits, e.g., date fruits not fit for consumption. In a further embodiment the waste date fruits include one or more of the Ruzeiz, Shunaizi, and Shahal varieties of dates. In a further embodiment, the waste date fruits may be waste date fruits harvested in Saudi Arabia. In an embodiment of the present methods, one ton of waste date fruits with an average of 70% sugar content can provide an extract having about 600 kg sugars, which can provide about 300 kg to about 600 kg, e.g., 400 kg, of ethanol.
- In an embodiment, the fermentation may be conducted using a yeast such as S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus, or the like. In a further embodiment, the fermentation may be conducted at about 30° C. using a yeast strain such as S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus, S. cerevisiae NCYC 432, K. marxianus NCYC 179, or the like. In an alternative embodiment, the fermentation may be conducted at about 40° C. using a thermophilic yeast strain. The thermophilic yeast strain may be a thermophilic strain of K. marxianus, e.g., a strain isolated from local habitats in Alahsa, Saudi Arabia. The thermophilic K. marxianus strain may include at least one of the DNA sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 5-16. The thermophilic yeast strain may be K. marxianus HH 5. The K. marxianus HH 5 strain may include the DNA sequences of SEQ ID NO: 5 and/or SEQ ID NO: 6.
- In an embodiment, the fermentation may be conducted using date substrate with a starting sugar concentration ranging from about 20% to about 25%.
- The following examples illustrate the present teachings:
- As discussed above, Dips were manufactured by de-pitting date fruits and heating the flesh with an equal amount of water at 80° C. for 30 minutes to produce a mixture; filter pressing the mixture to produce a juice; micro filtering the juice to a clear liquid using a sheet filter system; and concentrating the clear extract to 75 Brix at low temperature (80° C.) by vacuum drying. Chemical analysis of Dips manufactured according to this process demonstrated that the Dips included the following nutrients: about 80% sugars, mainly in form of fructose (41%) and glucose (38%), and a small amount of sucrose (1%); about 2% crude protein; 1.1 g/kg phosphorus; 14.9 g/kg potassium; 0.8 g/kg magnesium; 240 ppm pantothenic acid; and 2.7 ppm biotin. (See Table 1) Therefore, Dips used as carbon and energy source in alcoholic fermentation would be expected to yield about 400 kg ethanol (about 500 liters).
- Waste date fruits were obtained from a date processing factory in Al Hofuf City, Saudi Arabia. They were mainly a collection from the varieties Ruzeiz, Shunaizi, and Shahal. Extraction of syrup from the fruits was performed as follows: I :4 (w/w) fruit: water, boiling for about 60-90 minutes and filtration. The resulting substrate was sterilized in 5-liter bottles by autoclaving at 121° C. for 30 minutes. The sterilized substrate contained about 30% sugar.
- The chemical composition of the date sterilized substrate was assessed, including determining protein concentration using the Kjeldhal method, M-Inositol concentration using and biotin and pantothenic acid concentration according to the vitaFast vitamin testing method, using an ELISA Reader (Multiskan EX Model No. 355, Thermolabsystem-Finlan). M-Inositol was determined with High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) using a Shimadzu Japan Model 2003, equipped with a RID 10A refractive index detector,
CLC NH2 6×150 column, LC 10ATP pump, and CTO 10AC VP oven. The mobile phase was 83% CH3CN:17% water (v/v),flow rate 1 ml/min.,column pressure 200 KgF/cm2. Ethanol and sugar (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) concentrations were determined using the enzymatic UV method (Boehringer Mannheim). Mineral concentrations (Mg, P, K, and S) were determined using the atomic absorption method. The average chemical composition of the date sterilized substrate is shown in Table 1. -
TABLE 1 Date Extract Nutrient Analysis Chemicals Total sugars (% w/w) Content Fruit 68-72 Thin Extract 25-30 Extracted Fruit 10.2-10.8 pH 4.3-4.5 Crude protein (% w/w) 2.0-2.5 Magnesium (g/kg) 0.5-0.9 Potassium (g/kg) 14.0-16.0 Phosphorous (g/kg) PO4 or P 1.0-1.4 Pantothenic acid (ppm) 200-240 Biotin (ppm) 2.0-3.0 m-Inositol (ppm) traces - The date substrate contained all nutrients needed for a small amount of yeast growth (See Table 1) and no addition of mineral medium was needed. The fruits contained 68-72% (w/w) sugars on wet basis and the thin extract contained 25-30% (w/w) sugars on wet basis, with 10.2-10.8% (w/w) sugar content remaining in the extracted fruit. Hence, the efficiency of our extraction system was about 85%. As a result, a ton of waste date fruits with an average of 70% sugar content can be expected to produce a date substrate containing about 600 kg sugars, which in turn would be expected to produce about 300 kg bioethanol. If the efficiency of extraction is raised, such as by using high quality equipment, the yield of bioethanol would be predicted to increase to more than 315 kg from a ton of waste date fruits. If the sugar content of the fruits is increased, this would also be predicted to increase the resulting bioethanol yield.
- A screening program was carried out to search for thermotolerant yeasts from the local habitat in Saudi Arabia that can be used for ethanol production. Samples of microbially spoiled fruits, especially date fruits, were collected from Hofuf markets and farms. Yeasts involved in spoilage were isolated by inoculation on PDA dishes and incubation at 35-50° C. for 2-3 days. Colonies of different forms were picked, purified by successive streaking on PDA dishes, and the pure cultures were kept in the refrigerator in PDA tubes for identification.
- The strains were cultivated on Malt Extract Agar for 3 days in the dark at 25° C. DNA was isolated using the MoBio-UltraClean™ Microbial DNA Isolation Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fragments including the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) were amplified using the primers LROR: ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC (SEQ ID NO: 1) and LR5: TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG (SEQ ID NO: 2). Fragments including the Internal Transcribed
Spacer - Twenty two isolates that showed good growth at 45° C. were obtained from the screening program. Twelve of these isolates grew at 50° C., and hence were regarded as thermophilic. Preliminary identification tests were carried out on the 12 thermophilic isolates, including morphological examination of the yeast colonies grown on PDA, microscopic examination of the cell form, and ability to ferment glucose. The outcome of these tests indicated that the 12 thermophilic isolates belonged to at least to 3 different genera. Molecular identification of these 12 thermophilic isolates by DNA sequencing was carried out and the results are shown in Table 2. The isolates belonged to three genera and species, namely Kluyveromyces marxianus (6 isolates), Clavispora lusitaniae (5 isolates and Wickerhamomyces anomalus (1 isolate). C. lusitaniae is an opportunistic pathogen, hence it was not considered for ethanol production. Preliminary tests showed that W. anomalus was not a good ethanol producer. However, promising preliminary results for ethanol production were obtained for the strains of K. marxianus, and the best of these isolates was K. marxianus 05-1 or “HH5.”
- The isolates belonging to the same species had different genetic sequences at the tested loci, indicating that they are different strains of the species. The sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 05-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 6. The sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 12-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 8. The sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 14G-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 10. The sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 14W-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 12. The sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 23-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 14. The sequence of the 26S ribosomal RNA gene, Large Subunit D1 and D2 region (LSU) of the K. marxianus 25-1 isolate includes SEQ ID. NO. 16. The sequence of the Internal Transcribed
Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer Spacer -
TABLE 2 Identification of Yeast Isolates Using Morphological and Molecular Characteristics Strain Name 05-1 Kluyveromyces marxianus (E. C. Hansen) Van der Walt (named K. marxianus HH5) 12-1 Kluyveromyces marxianus (E. C. Hansen) Van der Walt 14G-1 Kluyveromyces marxianus (E. C. Hansen) Van der Walt 14W-1 Kluyveromyces marxianus (E. C. Hansen) Van der Walt 23-1 Kluyveromyces marxianus (E. C. Hansen) Van der Walt 25-1 Kluyveromyces marxianus (E. C. Hansen) Van der Walt 15-2 Clavispora lusitaniae Rodr. Mir. 26-2 Clavispora lusitaniae Rodr. Mir. 28-2 Clavispora lusitaniae Rodr. Mir. 45-2 Clavispora lusitaniae Rodr. Mir. 50-2 Clavispora lusitaniae Rodr. Mir. 48-2 Wickerhamomyces anomalus (E. C. Hansen) Kurtzman, Robnett & Basehoar-Powers - The yeast strains were first propagated in shake flasks and then in a bioreactor containing suitable medium, harvested by filtration to a cake and kept in the refrigerator to be used as inocula.
- Fermentation experiments were done in batch and fed-batch cultures using shake flasks, a BioFlo 110 bioreactor (New Brunswick Scientific) with 10 liter working volume and an Applikon autoclavable Bioreactor system (Applikon Biotechnology, the Netherlands) with one liter working volume. In the batch process, the whole substrate was added to the bioreactor at the beginning of fermentation and the process continued to its end. In the fed-batch process the substrate was fed to the fermenter at constant feeding rates. Fermentations using the commercial baker's yeast, S. cerevisiae NCYC 432, and K. marxianus NCYC 179 were at 30° C., while fermentation using the thermophilic yeast K. marxianus HH 5 (isolated by the present inventors) was at 40° C. Samples were taken from the bioreactor every 2-4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugars and yeast dry matter were determined.
- A 3 X 4 X 2 (three variables) factorial experimental design was employed with three types of substrates (date extract, molasses, and a mixture of 1:1 date extract/molasses), 4 production organisms (local and imported) and two fermentation processes (batch and fed-batch) (See Table 3). A randomized block design was chosen to run the experiment. A collection of waste date fruits and 2 fermentation temperatures (30 and 40° C.) were chosen based on information from the literature. All of the above parameters were used as useful means for modeling and optimizing small-scale operations. Variables measured in this study included yield of ethanol on substrate (g ethanol/g sugar), and the concentrations (g/l) of ethanol, sugars, and yeast biomass.
-
TABLE 3 Experimental Design Independent Variable Factor Substrate 100 % Dips 100% 1:1 Dips/ Molasses Molasses Production Organism Local isolate Imported strains (one strain) (three strains) Production process Batch Fed-Batch - Ethanol and sugar (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) concentrations were determined using the enzymatic UV method (Boehringer Mannheim). Yeast biomass concentration was determined by centrifugation of 5 ml broth at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes in dry centrifugal tube, and overnight drying at 105° C.
- The yeasts used were S. cerevisiae NCYC 431, Kluyveromyces marxianus NCYC 179, a commercial baker's yeast strain of the species S. cerevisiae purchased from the local market, and K. marxianus HH 5 (isolated by the present inventors). Batch and fed-batch fermentation processes were used at different final sugar concentrations. For comparison, substrates of pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses were also used for production. The fermentation experiments were done using shake flasks, a Biollo 110 bioreactor (New Brunswick Scientific) with 10 liter working volume and an Applikon autoclavable Bioreactor system (Applikon Biotechnology, the Netherlands) with one liter working volume.
- Date substrate was extracted as described in Example 1. The fruits used were waste fruits collected from a date processing factory in Hofuf City, mainly made of the varieties Ruzeiz, Shunaizi, and Shahal. Because yeast growth during ethanol production is normally minimal, sugars in the production substrate are mainly converted to ethanol and no significant amount of yeast biomass is formed.
- Four yeast strains were used for production including a commercial baker's yeast strain of the species S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus NCYC 179, S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 and the strain K. marxianus HH 5 (isolated by the present inventors). Production was in batch and fed-batch cultures at fermentation temperatures of 30 and 40° C. Three substrates were used, namely pure date extract, pure molasses and a mixture of date extract and molasses at 1:1 ratio, with sugar concentrations of 20 to 25%. The results, all of which were averages of three runs, are presented in
FIGS. 1 to 26 . - The strain of the baker's yeast from the species S. cerevisiae was used for ethanol production in batch processes at fermentation temperatures of 30° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. Samples were taken every 4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were measured. The results are shown in
FIGS. 1-6 . - Ethanol production from date extract continued at a relatively high rate during the first 12 hours of fermentation, the concentration increased steadily during this period to reach 85.2 g/l (
FIG. 1 ). After that, the production rate decreased towards the end of the fermentation period of 32 hours and the final ethanol concentration reached was 112.1 g/l (11.2% w/v). The course of ethanol productivity is illustrated inFIG. 2 . The specific and volumetric productivities were relatively high during the first 12 hours of fermentation, after which they decreased steadily to reach very low values towards the end of the fermentation period. During the first 4 hours of fermentation the specific productivity was 0.92 g ethanol per g yeast per hour (g/g. h) and the volumetric productivity was 9.7 g ethanol per liter reactor volume per hour (g/l. h). At the end of fermentation after 32 hours, the specific productivity decreased to 0.05 g/g. h and the volumetric productivity decreased to 0.5 g/l. h. It is apparent that increased ethanol concentration in the fermentation medium was inhibitory to production, and the maximum amount produced and tolerated by the yeast was 11.2% (w/v). The specific productivity is mainly a measure of the efficiency of the yeast in ethanol production and the volumetric productivity is mainly a measure of the efficiency of the bioreactor system. The overall yield of ethanol on sugar was 91.5% of the theoretical. There was no significant yeast growth during fermentation, as yeast biomass concentration remained almost constant during the whole period of fermentation (FIG. 1 ). The sugar was almost completely consumed, with only traces remaining at the end of the fermentation period (FIG. 1 ). Generally, the values obtained for the yield of ethanol on sugar and for the specific and volumetric productivities are comparable to values reported for different organisms and substrates. - Substrates of pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses were used for ethanol production under conditions similar to those of the pure date extract. The results of molasses fermentation are presented in
FIGS. 3 and 4 . These results were quite similar to those of pure date extract (FIG. 3 ). Most production occurred in the first 12 hours of fermentation, after which production rate started to slow down and the final ethanol concentration reached was 108.4 g/l (10.8% w/v). The specific and volumetric productivities were also comparable to those of the pure date extract (FIG. 4 ). The specific productivity after 4 hours of fermentation was 1.05 g/g. h and the volumetric was 10.0 g/l. h, and both decreased to 0.06 g/g. h and 0.6 g/l. h at the end of fermentation, respectively. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 90.3% of the theoretical, which was a little lower than that of pure date extract, but statistical analysis showed that the difference was not significant. No significant yeast growth occurred and the sugar provided was almost completely utilized with only traces remaining at the end of the fermentation period (FIG. 3 ). A similar result was obtained using the 1:1 date extract and molasses mixture (FIGS. 5 and 6 ). The final ethanol concentration was 114.0 g/l (11.4% w/v), the specific and volumetric productivities 0.94 g/g. h and 9.2 g/l. h after 4 hours and 0.05 g/g. h and 0.5 g/l. h at the end of fermentation, respectively. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 90.1% of the theoretical and was not significantly different from the yields obtained for the other two substrates as statistical analysis showed. Again, no significant yeast growth occurred and the sugar was largely consumed with very small amount remaining at the end of fermentation (FIG. 5 ). It can therefore be said that this commercial yeast strain of the species S. cerevisiae can produce ethanol from date extract in efficiency comparable to that of the reference substrate molasses. That is to say that date extract substrate is quite suitable for ethanol production. - The strain Kluyveromyces marxianus NCYC 179 was used for ethanol production in batch processes at fermentation temperatures of 30° C. on a substrate of pure date extract. Samples were taken every 4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were measured. The results are shown in
FIGS. 7 and 8 . - The performance of this yeast was generally weak. The concentration of ethanol after the first 4 hours of fermentation was only 25.6 g/l, which was much lower than the concentration reached from the commercial baker's yeast reported above (
FIG. 7 ). The maximum ethanol concentration was 71 g/l (7.1% w/v); it was reached after 28 hours of fermentation. The specific and volumetric productivities were also much lower than the values reported above for the commercial baker's yeast. They were 0.62 g/g. h for the specific productivity and 6.3 for the volumetric productivity after 4 hours of fermentation and 0.05 g/g. h and zero after 28 hours, respectively (FIG. 8 ). No increase in ethanol concentration occurred when fermentation was continued to 36 hours. The yield was only 54.9% of the theoretical, which was much lower than that obtained from the commercial yeast. The sugar was not fully utilized, and 95.6 g/l remained unconsumed in the fermentation broth. This suggests that this yeast cannot produce and tolerate more than 7% w/v ethanol. For this reason, further experiments were not performed with this yeast strain. - The yeast strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 was used for ethanol production in hatch processes at fermentation temperatures of 30° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. Samples were taken every 4 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were determined. The results are shown in
FIGS. 9-14 . - Ethanol production from date extract substrate started at a relatively high rate compared to the other yeast strains discussed above. The concentration reached 45 g/l in the first 4 hours and continued to increase at a decreasing rate till it reached 117.6 g/l (11.8% w/v) at the end of fermentation of 32 hours (
FIG. 9 ). The specific productivity started at 1.05 g/g. h in the first 4 hours and ended at 0.03 g/g. h at the end of fermentation, while the volumetric productivity was 11.3 and 0.4 g/l. h after 4 and 32 hours of fermentation, respectively (FIG. 10 ). The yield of ethanol on sugar was 94.6% of the theoretical, indicating that sugar was mainly converted into ethanol and no significant amounts of other metabolic products were formed. Sugar provided was consumed to traces remaining and no significant yeast growth occurred. - Ethanol production from molasses substrate using the yeast strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 is presented in
FIGS. 11 and 12 . Ethanol concentration after 4 hours was 50.5 g/l and reached 118.2 g/l (11.8% w/v) at the end of the fermentation period of 32 hours (FIG. 11 ). The specific and volumetric productivities were high, starting at 1.15 g/g. h and 12.6 g/l. h in the first 4 hours, respectively and ending at 0.05 g/g. h and 0.6 WE h after 32 hours, respectively (FIG. 12 ). The yield of ethanol on sugar was also high, reaching a value of 96.6% of the theoretical, but statistical analysis showed that this result was not significantly different from the 94.6% obtained using the date extract substrate. As expected, sugar provided was almost completely consumed and no significant yeast growth occurred. - Ethanol production from the mixed substrate using strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 (1:1 date extract and molasses) followed a quite similar trend to the other substrates presented above (
FIGS. 13 and 14 ). Ethanol concentration in the first 4 hours was 47.9 g/l and reached 113.8 g/l (11.4% w/v) after 32 hours of fermentation (FIG. 13 ). The specific and volumetric productivities were 1.13 g/g. h and 12 g/l. h after 4 hours, respectively and ended at 0.01 g/g. h and 0.2 g/l. h after 32 hours, respectively (FIG. 14 ). The yield of ethanol on sugar was 95.4% of the theoretical, it was the second highest, but was not significantly different from the yields of pure date extract and pure molasses. - Statistical analysis comparing the yields of ethanol on sugar obtained from the baker's yeast strain S. cerevisiae and from the yeast strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 showed that the yields of the latter were significantly higher. It can therefore be concluded that the yeast strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 was the best producer of ethanol from date extract substrate. Production by this yeast stain was therefore further tested in fed-batch experiments.
- The strain S. cerevisiae NCYC 431 was used for ethanol production in a fed-batch process of fermentation to attempt to further improve its productivity. Production was at a temperature of 30° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. The substrates were fed at constant rates of 200 ml/h and feeding time was 15 hours to deliver 3 liters of substrate containing about 50% sugars. Samples were taken every 2 hours and the concentrations of ethanol, sugar and yeast dry matter were measured. The results are shown in
FIGS. 15-20 . - The results of the experiments using date extract as substrate are shown in
FIGS. 15 and 16 . Ethanol concentration reached 18.8 g/l in the first 2 hours of fermentation (FIG. 15 ). The concentration increased steadily and reached its maximum of 121.5 g/l (12.2% w/v) in 24 hours. The total amount of ethanol produced was not much higher than that obtained in the batch culture discussed above. The main difference was in the fermentation time, which was 24 hours in the fed-batch process compared to 32 hours in the batch process. The specific productivity decreased much slower compared to that of the batch process (FIG. 16). In the batch process the yeast was affected by the combined inhibitory effect of high concentrations of sugar and ethanol, whereas in the fed-batch process there was no inhibitory effect of sugar because its concentration remained relatively low throughout the fermentation time. Sugar concentration in the fermentation medium increased at a low rate till the end of substrate feeding after 15 hours, then decreased quickly to reach traces at the end of fermentation. No significant yeast growth occurred. The volumetric productivity in turn remained also relatively high during the whole time of fermentation indicating the absence of the combined inhibitory effect of sugar and ethanol (FIG. 16 ). Ethanol yield on sugar was 97.2% of the theoretical, indicating a high efficiency in converting sugar into ethanol without formation of significant amounts of other metabolic products. - Molasses substrate gave quite similar results to date extract substrate. As can be seen in
FIGS. 17 and 18 , production proceeded in the same way as those of the date extract substrate. The concentration of ethanol reached 20.3 g/l in the first two hours of fermentation and continued to increase steadily to reach its Maximum of 119.9 g/l (12% w/v) after 24 hours of fermentation (FIG. 17 ). The specific productivity remained fairly high over the whole period of fermentation (FIG. 18 ). Sugar concentration increased slowly to reach 46.3 g/l towards the end of substrate feeding, and decreased quickly after that to reach very low levels (FIG. 18 ). No significant amount of yeast growth was noticed. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 96.4% of the theoretical, which was a little lower than that obtained from the date extract but the difference was not significant as statistical analysis revealed. - The substrate obtained from mixing date extract with molasses at a 1:1 ratio was utilized by the yeast in a similar efficiency as the former substrates discussed above (
FIGS. 19 and 20 ). Ethanol concentration was 17.6 g/l after 2 hours of fermentation and reached 116.3 g/l (11.6% w/v) at the end of fermentation after 24 hours (FIG. 19 ). The specific productivity remained relatively high during the whole fermentation period at values of 0.45 and 0.2 g/g. h (FIG. 20 ). Sugar concentration increased slowly during substrate feeding, and then decreased quickly to reach traces at the end of fermentation (FIG. 19 ). No significant yeast growth occurred. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 95.1% of theoretical and was not significantly different from the yields of the other two substrates discussed above. - Date extract gave ethanol yields comparable to those obtained from the reference substrate molasses.
- The strain Kluyveromyces marxianus HH5, isolated by the research team from local habitats in Saudi Arabia, was used for ethanol production in batch processes at fermentation temperatures of 40° C. on substrates of pure date extract, pure molasses and a 1:1 mixture of date extract and molasses. The results are shown in
FIGS. 21 to 26 . - Production in a substrate of date extract containing about 20% sugar started at a relatively high rate. Ethanol concentration reached 40.5 g/l in the first 4 hours, which is comparable to values obtained from the other yeasts described above (
FIG. 21 ). Production continued at a reduced rate, and the maximum ethanol concentration was 92.7 g/l, reached in 24 hours of fermentation, which then remained almost constant till the end of fermentation after 28 hours. About 13 g/l sugar remained unconsumed in the fermentation broth and no significant increase in yeast concentration was observed. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 92.7% of the theoretical, which was quite good for a wild yeast strain. The yeast seemed to have converted most consumed sugars to ethanol without significant amounts of other metabolic products. - When a substrate of date extract containing about 25% sugar concentration was used, the rate of production decreased drastically. Only 24.5 g/l ethanol concentration was reached in the first 4 hours of fermentation compared to 40.5 g/l when 20% sugar concentration was used (
FIG. 22 ). Production continued after that at a low rate and the highest ethanol concentration was 81.2 g/l, reached after 28 hours of fermentation, and no further increase in ethanol concentration was observed when fermentation time was extended to 32 hours. This suggests that this yeast is sensitive to high sugar concentration. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 64.7% of the theoretical, which was very low compared to the yield of 92.7% obtained when a 20% sugar concentration was used. Therefore, it can be concluded that this yeast can produce and tolerate up to about 9% w/v or 11% v/v ethanol concentration. This high productivity is particularly of interest given that it can be achieved at a fermentation temperature of 40° C. The combination of high productivity and higher fermentation temperature suggests that this method could reduce the costs of cooling during fermentation and heating during distillation. - The yeast used molasses as substrate for ethanol production in a quite similar way as its use of date extract, confirming suitability of date extract as substrate for ethanol production. As can be seen in
FIG. 23 , ethanol concentration was 38.4 g/l after 4 hours of fermentation and reached 94.8 g/l in 24 hours then remained almost constant till 28 hours of fermentation. This result confirms that the yeast K. marxianus HH 5 can produce and tolerate ethanol concentrations in range of about 9-10% w/v (11-12% v/v). About 6 g/l sugar remained unconsumed and no significant yeast growth occurred. The yield of ethanol on sugar was 95.8% of the theoretical, which was higher than that obtained from date extract but the difference was not significant as statistical analysis showed. It is apparent that most of the sugar consumed was used for ethanol production and no significant amounts of other metabolic products were formed. When sugar concentration in the molasses substrate was raised to 25%, the performance of the yeast became very weak. The highest ethanol concentration reached was about 7.1% w/v (about 9% v/v) in 28 hours of fermentation, which was the lowest concentration obtained (FIG. 24 ). The yield of ethanol on sugar was only 56.9% of the theoretical, and about 98 g/l sugar remained unconsumed. This is a very low yield compared to the 95.8% obtained from molasses substrate containing 20% sugar, and confirms the result achieved when date extract substrate containing 25% sugar was used. This indicates again that the yeast K. marxianus HH 5 is sensitive to high sugar and ethanol concentrations. - Substrates of mixed date extract and molasses that contained 20% sugar gave a little lower substrate containing 20% sugar, and confirmed the result achieved when date extract substrate containing 25% sugar was used. This indicates again that the yeast K. marxianus HH 5 is sensitive to high sugar and ethanol concentrations.
- Substrates of mixed date extract and molasses that contained 20% sugar gave a little lower ethanol yields compared to substrates of pure date extract and pure molasses containing the same sugar concentrations. The maximum ethanol concentration reached was 8.7% w/v (11% v/v) in 28 hours of fermentation and the yield of ethanol on sugar was 85.7% of the theoretical (
FIG. 25 ). No considerable yeast growth occurred and about 17 g/l sugar remained in the fermentation broth unconsumed. In substrates containing sugar concentrations of about 25%, the yield of ethanol on sugar dropped to 63.3% of the theoretical compared to the 85.7% obtained from the substrates containing 20% sugar. The maximum ethanol concentration reached was 7.9 w/v (10% v/v) in 28 hours of fermentation (FIG. 26 ) with no significant yeast growth and about 85 g/l sugar remaining unconsumed. - It is to be understood that the method for producing bioethanol from dates is not limited to the specific embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the generic language of the following claims enabled by the embodiments described herein, or otherwise shown in the drawings or described above in terms sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the claimed subject matter.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/106,052 US20210155960A1 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2020-11-27 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/391,497 US10870868B2 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2019-04-23 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
US17/106,052 US20210155960A1 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2020-11-27 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/391,497 Division US10870868B2 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2019-04-23 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20210155960A1 true US20210155960A1 (en) | 2021-05-27 |
Family
ID=72916895
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/391,497 Active 2039-04-28 US10870868B2 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2019-04-23 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
US17/106,052 Pending US20210155960A1 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2020-11-27 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/391,497 Active 2039-04-28 US10870868B2 (en) | 2019-04-23 | 2019-04-23 | Method for producing bioethanol from dates |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US10870868B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2020217150A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
MY179534A (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2020-11-10 | Dow Brasil Sudeste Ind Ltda | Methods to control bacterial growth in fermentation processes |
BRPI0811809A8 (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2017-04-04 | Dow Brasil Sudeste Ind Ltda | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT BASED ON FERMENTATION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING ETHANOL |
JP2009125050A (en) | 2007-11-28 | 2009-06-11 | Jfe Engineering Corp | Pretreatment method for enzymatic hydrolysis of herbaceous biomass, ethanol production method using herbaceous biomass as raw material and ethanol production method using palm hollow bunch |
US8268600B2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2012-09-18 | Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research | Strain and a novel process for ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass at high temperature |
CN101475966B (en) | 2008-12-29 | 2011-02-02 | 刘明全 | Method for preparing ethanol from date |
US8530211B2 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2013-09-10 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Co-fermentation of glucose, xylose and/or cellobiose by yeast |
WO2017116840A1 (en) | 2015-12-28 | 2017-07-06 | Danisco Us Inc. | Methods for the production of fermentation products from feedstock |
CN106967757A (en) | 2017-03-12 | 2017-07-21 | 广西轻工业科学技术研究院 | A kind of preparation method of cellulosic ethanol |
-
2019
- 2019-04-23 US US16/391,497 patent/US10870868B2/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-04-17 WO PCT/IB2020/053665 patent/WO2020217150A1/en active Application Filing
- 2020-11-27 US US17/106,052 patent/US20210155960A1/en active Pending
Non-Patent Citations (9)
Title |
---|
Al Farsi, Clarification of date juice, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 38, 2003, 241-45. (Year: 2003) * |
Ali, A microbiological study of Sudanese date wines J. Food Sci. 49, 1984, 459-50. (Year: 1984) * |
Bassam, Industrial ethanol production using juice of dates in a fixed cell process, Second International Conference on Date Palms, Al Ain. U.A.E March 25-27, 2001, 850-860. (Year: 2001) * |
Breisha, Production of 16% ethanol from 35% sucrose, Biomass and Bioenergy 34, 2010, 1243-49. (Year: 2010) * |
Chniti et al., Residue of dates from the food industry as a new cheap feedstock for ethanol production, Biomass Bioenergy 69, 2014, 66-70. (Year: 2014) * |
Dudley et al., Human evolution and dietary ethanol, Nutrients 13, 2021, 2419. (Year: 2021) * |
Faranhnaky et al.m Some Physicochemical Properties of Date Syrup, Concentrate, and Liquid Sugar in Comparison with Sucrose Solutions, J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 18, 2016, 657-668. (Year: 2016) * |
Kimball, Chapter 2: Brix and Soluble Solids in CITRUS PROCESSING, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 1991. (Year: 1991) * |
Parn, Development of novel fruit bars by utilizing date paste, Food Biosci. 9, 2015, 20-27. (Year: 2015) * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2020217150A1 (en) | 2020-10-29 |
US20200340018A1 (en) | 2020-10-29 |
US10870868B2 (en) | 2020-12-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3214168B1 (en) | Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of being co-fermented by multiple carbon sources and application thereof | |
CN103119171B (en) | Manufacture the technique of butanols or acetone | |
US8980617B2 (en) | Yeast strains for improved ethanol production | |
Bvochora et al. | Application of very high gravity technology to the cofermentation of sweet stem sorghum juice and sorghum grain | |
Jones et al. | Ethanolic fermentation of blackstrap molasses and sugarcane juice using very high gravity technology | |
Asli | A study on some efficient parameters in batch fermentation of ethanol using Saccharomyces cerevesiae SC1 extracted from fermented siahe sardasht pomace | |
Araújo et al. | Cachaça yeast strains: alternative starters to produce beer and bioethanol | |
Hashem et al. | Optimization of the fermentation conditions for ethanol production by new thermotolerant yeast strains of Kluyveromyces sp | |
CA2775738A1 (en) | Yeast for fermentation | |
Ndubuisi et al. | Ethanol production from cassava pulp by a newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii LC375240 | |
Nieto-Sarabia et al. | Isolation, identification, and kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of a Pichia kudriavzevii yeast strain capable of fermentation | |
Yesmin et al. | Bioethanol production from corn, pumpkin and carrot of bangladesh as renewable source using yeast | |
Barros et al. | A yeast isolated from cashew apple juice and its ability to produce first-and second-generation ethanol | |
CN1165612C (en) | One brewer's yeast engineering saccharomycete strain and the production process of alcohol and ergosterin with the strain | |
Walker et al. | Selecting new distilling yeasts for improved fermentation and for sustainability | |
US10870868B2 (en) | Method for producing bioethanol from dates | |
Tsegu et al. | Bioethanol production from biodegradable wastes using native yeast isolates from Ethiopian traditional alcoholic beverages | |
JP5249106B2 (en) | Method for continuous fermentation production of ethanol | |
Saeid et al. | Isolation and Identification of the Hanseniaspora opuntiae MK 460485 as an efficient strain for ethanol production | |
KR101599997B1 (en) | A novel thermostable yeast Pichia guilliermondii Y-2 and use thereof | |
Buruiană et al. | Bioethanol production from sweet sorghum stalk juice by ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: An overview | |
CN113502234A (en) | Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y12 and application thereof in brewing of pure wheat whisky wine base | |
Balakumar et al. | Comparison of Industrial Scale Ethanol Production from a Palmyrah‐Based Carbon Source by Commercial Yeast and a Mixed Culture from Palmyrah Toddy | |
Nigam | An Overview of Microorganisms' Contribution and Performance in Alcohol Fermentation Processing a Variety of Substrates | |
Graves et al. | Development of a “Stress Model” fermentation system for fuel ethanol yeast strains |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KING FAISAL UNIVERSITY, SAUDI ARABIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALEID, SALAH MOHAMMED;HAMAD, SIDDIG HUSSEIN;REEL/FRAME:054479/0248 Effective date: 20190321 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |