US20210082001A1 - Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression - Google Patents

Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20210082001A1
US20210082001A1 US16/886,072 US202016886072A US2021082001A1 US 20210082001 A1 US20210082001 A1 US 20210082001A1 US 202016886072 A US202016886072 A US 202016886072A US 2021082001 A1 US2021082001 A1 US 2021082001A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bid
network
bids
networks
fill
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/886,072
Inventor
Benjamin Henry Yolken
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Twitter Inc
Original Assignee
Twitter Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Twitter Inc filed Critical Twitter Inc
Priority to US16/886,072 priority Critical patent/US20210082001A1/en
Assigned to TWITTER, INC. reassignment TWITTER, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: YOLKEN, BENJAMIN HENRY
Priority to US17/128,998 priority patent/US20210110438A1/en
Publication of US20210082001A1 publication Critical patent/US20210082001A1/en
Assigned to MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. reassignment MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TWITTER, INC.
Assigned to MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. reassignment MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TWITTER, INC.
Assigned to MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. reassignment MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TWITTER, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0277Online advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0242Determining effectiveness of advertisements
    • G06Q30/0246Traffic
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0273Determination of fees for advertising
    • G06Q30/0275Auctions

Definitions

  • An increasing number of companies, agencies, individuals, and other parties use online advertising to promote their products and services.
  • An advertiser purchases advertising space from an individual publisher, an advertising network, or an advertising exchange that distributes advertisements to one or more publishers.
  • a publisher may display advertisements in several formats depending on the platform the publisher uses to interface with the consuming public.
  • publishers enter into arrangements with advertising networks without knowing the amount of revenue they can expect to receive in consideration. Consequently, many publishers earn less income from their applications than they would otherwise.
  • the invention relates to a system for fill request processing, comprising: a data repository comprising a plurality of ad network credentials and a plurality of metrics, a network reporter is coupled to the data repository and programmed to: obtain the plurality of network credentials from a plurality of publishers, store the plurality of network credentials, connect, over a network, to a plurality of ad networks, authenticate, after connecting, to the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of network credentials, obtain, after authenticating, the plurality of metrics from the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of credentials, store the plurality of metrics in the data repository; and an optimizer coupled to the data repository and the plurality of publishers and programmed to generate a first ordering of ad networks for a first application associated with one of the plurality of publishers using at least a portion of the plurality of metrics, wherein the first ordering specifies an order in which the first application should send fill requests to the plurality of ad networks, and provide, over the network,
  • the invention relates to a system for fill request processing, comprising a data repository comprising a plurality of ad network credentials and a plurality of metrics, a network reporter is coupled to the data repository and programmed to: obtain the plurality of network credentials from a plurality of publishers, store the plurality of network credentials, connect, over a network, to a plurality of ad networks, authenticate, after connecting, to the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of network credentials, obtain, after authenticating, the plurality of metrics from the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of credentials, store the plurality of metrics in the data repository, and an optimizer coupled to the data repository and the plurality of publishers and programmed to: receive, from an application, a fill request for an ad unit in the application of a publisher, determine an estimated publisher revenue for a first ad network of a plurality of ad networks for filling the ad unit using the plurality of metrics, generate a proxy bid based on the estimated
  • FIG. 1 shows a system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flowchart in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flowchart in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a computing system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • ordinal numbers e.g., first, second, third, etc.
  • ordinal numbers may be used as an adjective for an element (i.e., any noun in the application).
  • the use of ordinal numbers is not to imply or create any particular ordering of the elements nor to limit any element to being only a single element unless expressly disclosed, such as by the use of the terms “before”, “after”, “single”, and other such terminology. Rather, the use of ordinal numbers is to distinguish between the elements.
  • a first element is distinct from a second element, and the first element may encompass more than one element and succeed (or precede) the second element in an ordering of elements.
  • an advertising server (“ad server”) system may optimize the order in which advertising networks (“ad networks” or “networks”) or other providers of advertising content are requested to serve impressions to fill an ad unit in a publisher's application.
  • optimization of an ad network request order may result in an increase in a publisher's revenue by estimating, e.g., cost-per-impression (i.e., cost to fill the publisher's ad unit) for each ad network.
  • a model for computing effective cost-per-impression is generated based on a variety of metrics, corresponding to the individual publisher and/or aggregate publishers.
  • the metrics may be obtained directly from the ad networks and/or from other sources.
  • the order for sending ad unit fill requests to the networks (also referred to as a “waterfall”), is optimized and requests may be sent iteratively to the networks down the waterfall until a network serves an impression either to the ad server system or directly to the application. Results of a particular optimization may be reported to the publisher and used as input for future optimization models and/or advertisement exchange (“ad exchange”) processes.
  • ad exchange advertisement exchange
  • FIG. 1 shows a system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • the system ( 100 ) may have multiple components including one or more applications ( 101 ), one or more ad networks ( 103 ), one or more demand-side platforms ( 105 ), and an ad server system ( 111 ) including a data repository ( 113 ) storing network credentials ( 115 ) and network metrics ( 117 ), an optimizer ( 119 ), a network reporter ( 121 ), and an ad exchange module ( 123 ).
  • a data repository 113
  • network metrics e.g., a network metrics
  • an optimizer 119
  • a network reporter 121
  • an ad exchange module 123
  • an application(s) ( 101 ) is a software application of any type configured to execute on any device (e.g., desktop computers, mobile devices).
  • the application is developed and/or owned by a publisher and is implemented to include one or more ad unit(s).
  • An ad unit is a predefined space in an application used to display one or more advertisements, or “impressions.”
  • the advertisement may be a native advertisement or a traditional advertisement.
  • An ad unit may be configured to display impressions in, for example, text, image, and/or video format.
  • An ad unit may be implemented with properties that constrain the number and type of advertisements that may be displayed within the application ( 101 ).
  • an ad unit may be configured to display impressions having a specific format (e.g., banner ads, pop-up ads, pop-under ads, floating ads, expanding ads, interstitial ads, or text ads).
  • an ad unit in a mobile application may have width and length requirements to ensure that any impression served to the application will fit appropriately within the confines of the mobile device screen. The invention is not limited to the aforementioned examples.
  • an application may be configured to communicate with external entities including, without limitation, ad networks ( 103 ), ad servers, ad exchanges, and/or the ad server system ( 111 ). These entities are described in further detail below.
  • An application may communicate with an external entity using an application programming interface (API) and/or any other method of communication known in the art.
  • API application programming interface
  • an ad network's API provides a set of specifications for receiving requests from and serving impressions to ad servers.
  • an application may be implemented to make requests to fill ad units (“fill requests”) formatted according to one or more entities' respective APIs.
  • an ad network(s) ( 103 ) is service that connects advertisers to publishers of applications.
  • One function of an ad network is matching publishers' ad unit supply with advertiser demand.
  • an ad network may charge the advertiser using one of several metrics, including online marketing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as, but not limited to, cost-per-click (CPC) and cost-per-impression (CPM).
  • KPIs online marketing Key Performance Indicators
  • CPC cost-per-click
  • CPM cost-per-impression
  • an advertiser is charged based on the number of times that users click on an advertisement; in other words, an advertiser is not charged when a publisher displays an advertisement to a user unless the user clicks on the advertisement.
  • CPM cost-per-impression
  • an ad network may be configured to communicate with external entities including, without limitation, applications ( 101 ), servers, ad exchanges, and/or the ad server system ( 111 ).
  • an ad network may use a publisher or third-party server (typically a combination of web server and database server) to store advertisers' impressions and deliver them to applications upon request.
  • the servers may be configured to perform a variety of other functions including metric tracking (e.g., number of clicks and number of impressions served) and report generation, both for publishers and for advertisers.
  • Publisher servers may be run by a single publisher and serve ads to that publisher's applications, allowing fine-grained creative, formatting, and content control by that publisher.
  • Third-party servers may serve ads across domains owned by multiple publishers and deliver the ads from a central source to facilitate advertiser and publisher tracking.
  • An ad exchange is a platform that allows real-time bidding (RTB) on publishers' ad units by ad networks ( 103 ), demand-side platforms ( 105 ), and/or individual advertisers.
  • RTB real-time bidding
  • publishers may auction their inventory to the highest bidder through a single interface.
  • many ad networks ( 103 ) are not configured to utilize ad exchange APIs for real-time bidding and may therefore be excluded from the RTB process.
  • DSP demand-side platform(s)
  • 105 demand-side platform(s)
  • DSPs demand-side platform(s)
  • 105 allow advertisers to manage multiple ad exchange accounts through one interface.
  • advertisers can manage and optimize their bids based on KPIs.
  • DSPs typically combine similar functionality to ad networks ( 103 ) with the ability to make real-time bids using ad exchange APIs.
  • the data repository ( 113 ) is any type of storage unit and/or device (e.g., a file system, database, collection of tables, or any other storage mechanism) for storing data. Further, the data repository may include multiple different storage units and/or devices. The multiple different storage units and/or devices may or may not be of the same type or located at the same physical site.
  • the data repository ( 113 ) is configured to store network credentials ( 115 ), network metrics ( 117 ), and/or any other data relevant to internet marketing, advertisement networks, and/or advertisement exchanges.
  • Network credentials ( 115 ) include user credentials (e.g., usernames and passwords) used by publishers or third parties to interface with an ad network's services.
  • a publisher's network credentials may be obtained from the publisher directly, or from a publisher's application.
  • Network metrics may include typical online marketing KPIs and other metrics obtained from publishers, ad networks, and/or other entities, including CPC, CPM, and click-through-rate (CTR) (i.e., number of clicks divided by number of impressions served for a given advertisement).
  • CTR click-through-rate
  • the metrics may include, without limitation, geographic data (e.g., CTR by country), time data (e.g., CTR by hour), platform data (e.g., CTR by operating system), and ad unit data (e.g., CTR by ad type).
  • the ad server system ( 111 ) is configured to communicate with applications ( 101 ), ad networks ( 103 ), DSPs ( 105 ), and/or other entities in order to facilitate serving impressions to applications in response to fill requests.
  • the ad server system may also include functionality typically provided by servers in general and as already described.
  • the ad server system may include functionality to receive, store, and deliver impressions to applications and publisher servers.
  • the ad server system may include functionality to track KPIs or other metrics for publishers and generate related reports.
  • the ad server system may also include functionality to request data from and store data to the data repository ( 113 ).
  • the optimizer may include functionality to receive fill requests from applications and publisher servers.
  • the optimizer may include functionality to send received fill requests to ad networks and/or other entities.
  • the optimizer may include functionality for generating a model for calculating estimated publisher revenue (e.g., eCPM) from an ad network, in the event the ad network successfully fills the publisher's ad unit with an impression.
  • the model may be generated based on one or more metrics measuring past performance of ad networks with respect to the either the individual publisher or publishers in aggregate.
  • the model may be generated based on: (i) CPM for ad networks that report CPM, (ii) based on a combination of CPC and CTR for ad networks that report CPC, or (iii) based on a combination of (i) and (ii) for hybrid ad networks.
  • the metrics may be obtained from the data repository ( 113 ) or directly from the ad networks using the network reporter ( 121 ) described below. See also FIG. 2 , Step 203 .
  • the optimizer may obtain the model from another entity within or external to the ad server system ( 111 ).
  • the optimizer ( 119 ) includes functionality to determine an optimal ordering for the waterfall of ad networks based on, for example, the estimated publisher revenue calculated using the above-mentioned model and fill rates (i.e., the probability that a given ad network will respond to a fill request).
  • the ordering may be determined so that ad networks expected to generate more revenue for a particular fill request are prioritized to receive the request.
  • the ordering may also be determined based on additional factors including ad networks' respective fill rates (the rate at which an ad network successfully serves an impression to fill an ad unit), geographic data, time data, platform data, and/or ad unit data.
  • the optimizer ( 119 ) may be configured to send a particular fill request to the first network in the ordering first. If the first network does not successfully serve an impression in response to the request, the fill request may then be sent to the second network in the ordering, and so on until an ad network responds by serving an impression (to the optimizer ( 119 ) or to the publisher directly).
  • the network reporter ( 121 ) may include functionality to access ad network reporting information through the networks' respective APIs, websites, and/or other methods of communication.
  • a given ad network's reporting information may include one or more KPIs or any other metric for measuring the ad network's performance history.
  • the network reporter may be configured to scrape an ad network's website to obtain the desired metrics.
  • the network reporter may include functionality to obtain credentials from publishers and/or other entities used to access the ad networks.
  • the network reporter may additionally store credentials in and obtain credentials from the data repository ( 113 ).
  • the network reporter obtains the aforementioned information from each of the ad networks by: connecting to the ad network, authenticating with the ad network using the aforementioned credentials (also referred to as ad network credentials), and, after successful authentication (i.e., the network reporting is able to access information in the ad network), obtaining the information (described above) from the ad network.
  • the authentication may be performed using any known or later discovered mechanism.
  • the network reporter ( 121 ) may include functionality to generate a report for a publisher based on metrics obtained from the ad networks and/or based on the performance of the optimizer for previously served fill requests.
  • the network reporter may obtain the aforementioned metrics in a synchronous manner (e.g., the metrics are obtained as they are generated such that the metrics used in FIGS. 2 and 3 are the most update metrics that are available) or asynchronous manner (e.g., the metrics that are obtain correspond to activity that occurred during some prior time period, e.g., activity that occurred in the prior 24 hours).
  • a synchronous manner e.g., the metrics are obtained as they are generated such that the metrics used in FIGS. 2 and 3 are the most update metrics that are available
  • asynchronous manner e.g., the metrics that are obtain correspond to activity that occurred during some prior time period, e.g., activity that occurred in the prior 24 hours.
  • the ad exchange module may include functionality to operate an ad exchange or interface with a third-party ad exchange.
  • the ad exchange module may include functionality to assign proxy bids to one or more ad networks for use in a RTB process (in the case where an ad network is unable to participate in an ad exchange directly).
  • a proxy bid assigned by the ad exchange module to an ad network may be based on the ad network's estimated publisher revenue, calculated by the optimizer using the model.
  • a proxy bid may also be assigned to an ad network using values input directly from the publisher.
  • the ad exchange module may include functionality to obtain one or more actual bids corresponding to one or more DSPs.
  • the ad exchange module may then perform a RTB auction using, or provide to a third-party ad exchange, proxy bids for ad networks and/or actual bids for DSPs in order to determine the highest bidder for a publisher's fill request.
  • the ad exchange module may implement generalized second-price auction in order to determine which of the bids or proxy bids is the highest bidder for the publisher's fill request.
  • the ad exchange module may implement Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) auction in order to determine which of the bids or proxy bids is the highest bidder for the publisher's fill request.
  • VCG Vickrey-Clarke-Groves
  • Other types of auctions may be implemented by the ad exchange module without departing from the invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows a configuration of components
  • various components may be combined to create a single component.
  • the functionality performed by a single component may be performed by two or more components.
  • Each of the components shown in FIG. 1 may be implemented using one or more computing systems as described in FIG. 4 .
  • Each of the components shown in FIG. 1 may communicate using any combination of wireless or wired connections.
  • the ad networks, DSPs, and applications may communicate with the ad server system via any combination of wired or wireless networks (also referred to as network communication).
  • the aforementioned networks may include the Internet, other wide area networks, and local area networks.
  • the invention is not limited to the system shown in FIG. 1 .
  • FIGS. 2-3 show flowcharts in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. While the various steps in these flowcharts are presented and described sequentially, one of ordinary skill will appreciate that some or all of the steps may be executed in different orders, may be combined or omitted, and some or all of the steps may be executed in parallel.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for optimizing publisher revenue from one or more ad networks and/or demand-side platforms in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • the process shown in FIG. 2 may be used, for example, with the system of FIG. 1 to optimize publishers' ad revenue.
  • a request to fill an ad unit is received from a publisher's application.
  • the request may include constraints for impressions that are compatible with properties of the ad unit.
  • the request may include, but is not limited to, information about the ad unit (e.g., the dimensions, the type of ad (e.g., banner ad, etc.), type of content that may be shown in the ad unit, etc.), application in which the ad unit resides (i.e., the application that issued the fill request), application type (i.e., the type of application), information about the user of the application, the platform upon which the application is executing (e.g., mobile or desktop, operating system (including version), type of mobile device (i.e., the manufacturer of the phone, etc.)), and the geographic location (e.g., city, state, country, continent, etc.) in which the application has issued the fill request is located.
  • information about the ad unit e.g., the dimensions, the type of a
  • Step 203 estimated publisher revenues (e.g., eCPM) from ad networks for filling the ad unit are calculated using a model.
  • the model may be previously generated and obtained from storage or may be generated contemporaneously with the execution of this step.
  • the estimated publisher revenue is determined on a per ad network basis.
  • the information use to determine estimated publisher revenue for a given ad network may be based on: (i) historical information (e.g., CPC, CTR, CPM, etc.) for the application using the ad network; (ii) historical information (e.g., CPC, CTR, CPM, etc.) for other applications using the ad network; and/or fill rate (described below).
  • the historical information for other applications using the ad network may be used to estimate various KPIs that are subsequently used as input to determine the estimated publisher revenues.
  • KPI is CPC.
  • CPC for an application may be estimated by: (i) obtaining the aggregate CPC for a given ad network; (ii) segmenting the aggregate CPC into per-geographic location per-application type segments (e.g., what is the CPC for a given application type in a given country); and (iii) estimating the CPC for an application based on (ii) and geographic information in the fill request.
  • the aforementioned process of taking the aggregate CPC for an ad network (or for a portion of the ad network) and then adjusting the CPC based on the geographic distribution of the application (i.e., the application that made the request) may be referred to as geographic scaling.
  • the historical information is used to determine the estimated publisher revenues on a per ad network basis. More specifically, in one embodiment of the invention, for CPM ad networks (i.e., ad networks that pay publishers based on CPM), the estimated publisher revenue (i.e., eCPM) may be determined using historical CPM information. In one embodiment of the invention, historical CPM may be determined using one or more of the following (listed from most specific to most general): (i) prior CPM determined using ad server system; (ii) network reporting (see FIG. 3 ) (i.e., average CPM for ⁇ application, ad network> as reported by the ad network); (ii) global network reporting (see FIG.
  • ad unit bid data i.e., user-entered bid expressed in terms of CPM.
  • the most specific historical CPM that is available is used to determine eCPM.
  • the estimated publisher revenue may be determined by: (i) obtaining the total impressions and historical CTR for a given network; (ii) determining total clicks using impressions and CTR; (iii) determining CPC for given ⁇ ad unit, geographic location> (or obtaining average CPC); (iv) determining total revenue using CPC (from (iii)) and total clicks (from (ii)); (v) determining eCPM by dividing total revenue by total impressions.
  • historical CPC may be determined using one or more of the following (listed from most specific to most general): (i) network reporting (see FIG. 3 ) (i.e., average CPC for ⁇ application, ad network> as reported by the ad network); (ii) global network reporting (see FIG. 3 ) (i.e., average CPC for ⁇ application type, ad network> for all application as reported by the ad network); (iii) ad unit bid data (i.e., user-entered bid expressed in terms of CPC).
  • the most specific historical CPC that is available is used to determine eCPM.
  • historical CTR may be determined using one or more of the following (listed from most specific to most general): (i) segment data (i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ ad unit, country, ad network>), (ii) continent data (i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ ad unit, continent, ad network>), (iii) global segment data (i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ application type, type of ad unit, country, ad network>), and (iv) application data (i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ application, country, ad network>).
  • segment data i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ ad unit, country, ad network>
  • continent data i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ ad unit, continent, ad network>
  • global segment data i.e., average historical CTR for ⁇ application type, type of ad unit, country, ad network>
  • application data i.e.,
  • all estimated publisher revenues are expressed in terms of eCPM in order to facilitate comparison between different bids (see e.g., Step 211 ) and/or for ordering purposes (see e.g., Step 217 ).
  • the estimated publisher revenues may be expressed using another KPI, e.g., eCPC, without departing from the invention.
  • the historical information used to determine estimated publisher revenues may be adjusted to take into account specific context of the fill request.
  • historical CTR information may be used to determine eCPM (as described above).
  • the historical CTR information may be adjusted to take into account how many ads have already been shown to a user of an application in a given session. This information, in combination with historical trends that model CTR variance as function of ⁇ ad network, number of ads shown in a single session>, may be used to determine an adjusted CTR.
  • the adjusted CTR may then be used to determine an eCPM (as discussed above).
  • the CTR for the sixth ad shown to the user in the aforementioned session may be reduced (or increased) by a certain percentage to take into account the fact that the user has already seen five ads in the aforementioned session.
  • the above adjustment to the CTR may be referred to as a session depth scaling factor.
  • the historical CTR information may also be adjusted to account for variances in reporting by the ad networks or DSPs (see FIG. 3 ) and information that the ad server system is able to ascertain about the historical CTR.
  • the ad server system includes at least CTR information segmented on a per-application type per-network basis.
  • the variance between the historical CTR information obtained from an ad network for an application see e.g., FIG. 3
  • the CTR information for the application type for the ad network exceeds a threshold
  • the historical CTR information may be adjusted to address the variance.
  • the adjustment may be performed using a CTR adjustment factor, which adjusts the CTR to take into account the aforementioned variance.
  • the adjusted CTR may then be used to determine an eCPM (as discussed above).
  • Step 205 a determination is made about whether to perform a RTB auction for the ad unit using an ad exchange. If the ad unit is to be auctioned, the process proceeds to Step 207 . If the ad unit is not to be auctioned, the process proceeds to Step 217 . This determination may be made based on publisher input (i.e., the publisher may “opt in” to RTB auctions). Other factors may be used to make the determination in step 205 without departing from the invention.
  • a proxy bid is assigned to participating ad networks based on the estimated revenue from each ad network for filling the ad unit, calculated according to Step 203 .
  • proxy bids are only assigned to ad networks that lack capability to participate directly in the ad exchange.
  • proxy bids are assigned to every ad network having an account for the publisher.
  • the proxy bids are expressed in terms of eCPM.
  • Step 209 actual bids on the ad unit are obtained from one or more DSPs.
  • Step 209 includes sending fill requests to one or more DSPs (using, e.g., APIs exposed by the DSPs) and receiving, in response to the fill requests, one or more actual bids.
  • the bids obtained from the one or more DSPs are expressed in the same terms as (e.g., eCPM) as the proxy bids.
  • an RTB auction is performed using the proxy bids assigned to the ad networks and the actual bids obtained from the DSPs, and a winning bid is obtained.
  • the winning bid may or may not represent the actual revenue received by the publisher, regardless of whether the winner successfully serves an impression to the application in response to the fill request.
  • the bids (actual and proxy) are ordered from highest to lowest, e.g., based on the eCPM.
  • the winning bid may correspond to the highest ordered bid.
  • the eCPM associated with the winning bid is the eCPM of the second highest order bid.
  • a variety of auction mechanisms can be used to determine a winning bid (e.g., second-price auction), in accordance with various embodiments.
  • Step 213 it is determined whether the winning bid belongs to a DSP. If a DSP wins the auction, the process proceeds to Step 215 . If a DSP does not win the auction (e.g., the winning bid is a proxy bid for an ad network), the process proceeds to Step 217 .
  • Step 215 the winning DSP's impression is sent to the application or publisher server in response to the fill request received in Step 201 , and the process proceeds to end.
  • the impression may be obtained from the DSP or may be obtained from storage if it has already been acquired by the ad server system.
  • Step 217 the ordering of ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP is optionally adjusted. More specifically, the ordering of the bids from the auction in step 211 are used to determine an ordering of ad networks and the highest non-winning bid from the DSP. In one embodiment of the invention, if the values of the proxy bids take into account the fill rates then the ordering may not be adjusted in step 217 .
  • the ordering of ad networks may be determined using one or more of the following metrics: (i) ordering based on which ad networks provided the highest eCPM based on the geographic location specified in the fill request; (ii) ordering based on which ad networks provided the highest eCPM based on the platform specified in the fill request; and (iii) ordering based on which ad networks provided the highest eCPM based on the type of ad unit (e.g., native, banner ads, etc.) specified in the fill request.
  • the ordering may be determined based, at least in part, on eCPM and fill rates for the ad networks.
  • the ordering of ad networks may be based on the eCPM without taking into account fill rates.
  • the ad network with which the proxy bid is associated may or may not be the actual ad network that ultimately provides an ad (or impression) in response to the fill request.
  • step 217 The following is an example of step 217 .
  • the example is not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
  • the ordering that result from may be Ad Network 1 (associated with Proxy Bid 1), Ad network 2 (associated with Proxy Bid 2), and DSP 1 (associated with DSP 1).
  • Ad Network 1 associated with Proxy Bid 1
  • Ad Network 2 associated with Proxy Bid 2
  • DSP 1 associated with DSP 1
  • Proxy Bid 2 associated with Proxy Bid 2
  • Proxy Bid 2 associated with Proxy Bid 2
  • DSP 1 bid associated with DSP 1
  • Proxy Bid 1 associated with Proxy Bid 1).
  • the ordering of the ad networks relative to the highest non-winning DSP may be determined as follows: (i) calculating an updated estimated publisher revenue for each of the ad networks taking into account fill rates for the ad networks; (ii) calculating a publisher revenue for highest non-winning DSP based on the auction results from step 211 ; and (iii) ordering the ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP based on the results from (i) and (ii).
  • the ordering resulting from Step 217 may only include the highest non-winning DSP and any ad networks that have a higher estimated publisher revenue then the publisher revenue associated with the highest non-winning DSP.
  • step 217 in one embodiment if the result of the optional adjustment of the ordering of the ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP results in the DSP being in the highest ordered position (e.g., in the first position), then the method proceeds to step 215 .
  • step 219 If the ordering of the ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP results in an ad network being in the highest ordered position (e.g., in the first position), then the method proceeds to step 219 .
  • an ad network (which may or may not be the ad network associated with the winning proxy bid) or highest non-winning DSP is selected to receive a fill request based on the ordering resulting from Step 217 .
  • a fill request is sent to the selected ad network or highest non-winning DSP.
  • the request may include the aforementioned constraints for impressions that are compatible with properties of the ad unit, as well as the aforementioned data regarding the publisher or the application. These constraints may serve to disallow the selected ad network from serving the fill request if the network has no qualifying impressions available.
  • Step 223 it is determined whether the fill request is accepted by the ad network or the highest non-winning DSP; in other words, whether the ad network will send an impression in response to the fill request.
  • the ad network may choose not to respond based on the fill request; for example, if the request indicates that the application is published only in the USA, an ad network representing only European advertisers may not respond to the request.
  • the process returns to Step 219 to send a fill request to another ad network or the highest non-winning DSP based on the ordering. If the fill request is accepted, the process may proceed to Step 225 . Alternatively, Steps 225 and 227 may be skipped in the event the selected ad network sends the impression to the publisher directly, in which case the process proceeds to end.
  • Step 225 if the fill request has been accepted by the selected ad network or the highest non-winning DSP, an impression is received from the selected ad network or the highest non-winning DSP in response to the request.
  • Step 227 the impression is sent to the publisher, and the process proceeds to end.
  • the highest non-winning DSP may still ultimately service the fill request if (i) the highest non-winning DSP is in the highest ordered position after the ordering is adjusted in step 217 or (ii) higher order ad networks fail to respond to the fill request and the highest non-ordered DSP is ultimately selected to service the fill request.
  • the ordering resulting from step 217 is Ad Network 1 (associated with Proxy Bid 1), Ad network 2 (associated with Proxy Bid 2), and DSP 1 bid (associated with DSP 1).
  • Ad network 1 and ad network 2 fail to respond to the fill request, then the fill request may be serviced by DSP 1.
  • ad server system sends an ad fill request to the application (or, more specifically, to an ad server system software development kit (SDK) in the application that is associated with the ad server system); (ii) the ad server system SDK in the application then issues a fill request to a native ads SDK in the application; (iii) the native ads SDK in the application attempts to service the fill request; and (iv) if the native ads SDK is unable to service the fill request, then the native ads SDK sends a response to the ad server system SDK indicating that it did not service the fill request; and (v) the ad server system SDK sends a response to the ad server system indicating that the native ads network did not service the fill
  • FIG. 3 shows a flowchart for determining estimated publisher revenue from one or more ad networks.
  • the process shown in FIG. 3 may be used, for example, with the system of FIG. 1 and the method of FIG. 2 (step 203 ) to build a model for ad revenue estimation.
  • publisher credentials are obtained for accessing one or more ad networks.
  • the publisher credentials may have been previously obtained by multiple publishers and stored for later retrieval.
  • the participating publisher may “opt in” to provide the publisher's credentials for accessing the ad networks.
  • Step 303 metrics are obtained from the one or more ad networks using the publisher credentials. If the participating publisher provides its credentials, metrics for the participating publisher are obtained in addition to metrics for the multiple ad networks. These metrics may include various KPIs and other metrics for previous transactions between the publishers and the ad networks.
  • Step 305 estimated publisher revenues may then be determined using a model (see FIG. 2 , step 203 ) and the metrics obtained, and the process proceeds to end.
  • the steps 300 and 303 may occur periodically in order to obtain the metrics information (also referred to as historical information) from the various ad networks and DSPs.
  • step 305 may be performed as part of step 203 in response to a fill request.
  • step 305 may be performed after steps 300 and 303 and the result of step 305 is provided to a user (e.g., a publisher), where the publisher may then modify how it interacts with the various ad networks and/or DSPs. More specifically, the publisher may set an order in which to contact ad networks and/or DSPs in order to service a fill request.
  • a user e.g., a publisher
  • the publisher may then modify how it interacts with the various ad networks and/or DSPs. More specifically, the publisher may set an order in which to contact ad networks and/or DSPs in order to service a fill request.
  • the ad server system may provide a service to publishers based on the method shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the service may be referred to as fill request processing service which determines an optimal ordering of fill requests for a given application. More specifically, a publisher may subscribe to the aforementioned service and, in response, the service may periodically provide the publisher (or an application of the publisher) with an optimal ordering for issuing fill requests. This information may be used to manually configure the application or, alternatively, the information may be used to automatically update the order in which the application sends fill requests to the various ad networks.
  • the ordering provided by the service may take into account the aforementioned factors listed above with respect to steps 203 and steps 217 in FIG. 2 .
  • the ordering provided by the service may be application specific. Additionally, or alternatively, the ordering may be specific to the application and the geographic distribution of application. For example, there may be an ordering for applications that issue fill requests from the United States of America and a second ordering for the same applications that issue fill requests from Europe.
  • the application when an application subscribes to the fill request processing service, the application may provide a list of ad networks with which the application is requesting ads. Alternatively, the application may not provide any list of ad networks and, instead, the fill request processing service selects a set of ad networks based on a metric associated with the application and/or the publisher associated with the application. Once the set of ad networks is selected, the fill request processing service may determine an optimal ordering of the set of ad networks as discussed above with respect to FIG. 3 .
  • Angry Anteaters that includes a single ad unit configured to display banner ads only. Paul enters into arrangements with ad networks A, B, and C to provide impressions to fill the ad unit, and as a result Paul obtains a username and password for each ad network. For a period of time, Paul allows the ad networks to serve impressions to his application directly. During this time, each ad network tracks metrics measuring the number of impressions served to Paul's application, the cost to the network for each impression served (CPM), and/or the cost to the network for each impression clicked by a user (CPC), among other values. Later, Paul creates an account with the ad server system and provides his ad network credentials to the ad server system.
  • CPM cost to the network for each impression served
  • CPC cost to the network for each impression clicked by a user
  • Ursula plays Angry Anteaters regularly. Ursula runs the application on her mobile device, and a request is received by the ad server system for an impression to be displayed on Ursula's mobile device.
  • a model is generated for ad networks A, B, and C.
  • Ad networks A and B are CPM-based ad networks
  • ad network C is a CPC-based ad network.
  • the model is used to estimate ad network A's eCPM and ad network B's eCPM based on the networks' respective reported CPMs for previously served impressions, obtained using Paul's credentials.
  • Ad network C's eCPM is estimated based on network C's reported CPC and CTR for previously served impressions.
  • a RTB auction is performed using the ad server system's ad exchange. Proxy bids based on the eCPM for each network are assigned to that network, and actual bids for a number of DSPs are obtained. It is determined that ad network A wins the auction. Ad network B comes in second place.
  • an optimal ordering for the ad networks is determined based on eCPMs and fill rates.
  • ad network A's eCPM is higher than ad network B's eCPM
  • ad network B has a much higher fill rate according to data obtained from the networks using multiple publishers' credentials. Accordingly, the ad network ordering is set at B, A, and C.
  • Network B is selected because it is first in the ordering and the fill request is sent to ad network B.
  • the fill request indicates that Angry Anteaters requires a banner ad, and at the time of the request, network B possesses no banner ad impressions to serve. Consequently, network B does not respond to the request. Accordingly, network A is selected as network A is second in the ordering.
  • the fill request is sent to ad network A, and in response, a banner ad impression is received from ad network A. Finally, the impression is served to the publisher, and Ursula sees the impression within Angry Anteaters.
  • Embodiments of the invention may be implemented on virtually any type of computing system regardless of the platform being used.
  • the computing system may be one or more mobile devices (e.g., laptop computer, smart phone, personal digital assistant, tablet computer, or other mobile device), desktop computers, servers, blades in a server chassis, or any other type of computing device or devices that includes at least the minimum processing power, memory, and input and output device(s) to perform one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • mobile devices e.g., laptop computer, smart phone, personal digital assistant, tablet computer, or other mobile device
  • desktop computers e.g., servers, blades in a server chassis, or any other type of computing device or devices that includes at least the minimum processing power, memory, and input and output device(s) to perform one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • the computing system ( 400 ) may include one or more computer processor(s) ( 402 ), associated memory ( 404 ) (e.g., random access memory (RAM), cache memory, flash memory, etc.), one or more storage device(s) ( 406 ) (e.g., a hard disk, an optical drive such as a compact disk (CD) drive or digital versatile disk (DVD) drive, a flash memory stick, etc.), and numerous other elements and functionalities.
  • the computer processor(s) ( 402 ) may be an integrated circuit for processing instructions.
  • the computer processor(s) may be one or more cores, or micro-cores of a processor.
  • the computing system ( 400 ) may also include one or more input device(s) ( 410 ), such as a touchscreen, keyboard, mouse, microphone, touchpad, electronic pen, or any other type of input device. Further, the computing system ( 400 ) may include one or more output device(s) ( 408 ), such as a screen (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a plasma display, touchscreen, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor, projector, or other display device), a printer, external storage, or any other output device. One or more of the output device(s) may be the same or different from the input device(s).
  • input device(s) such as a touchscreen, keyboard, mouse, microphone, touchpad, electronic pen, or any other type of input device.
  • the computing system ( 400 ) may include one or more output device(s) ( 408 ), such as a screen (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a plasma display, touchscreen, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor,
  • the computing system ( 400 ) may be connected to a network ( 412 ) (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, mobile network, or any other type of network) via a network interface connection (not shown).
  • the input and output device(s) may be locally or remotely (e.g., via the network ( 412 )) connected to the computer processor(s) ( 402 ), memory ( 404 ), and storage device(s) ( 406 ).
  • Software instructions in the form of computer readable program code to perform embodiments of the invention may be stored, in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently, on a non-transitory computer readable medium such as a CD, DVD, storage device, a diskette, a tape, flash memory, physical memory, or any other computer readable storage medium.
  • the software instructions may correspond to computer readable program code that when executed by a processor(s), is configured to perform embodiments of the invention.
  • one or more elements of the aforementioned computing system ( 400 ) may be located at a remote location and connected to the other elements over a network ( 412 ). Further, embodiments of the invention may be implemented on a distributed system having a plurality of nodes, where each portion of the invention may be located on a different node within the distributed system.
  • the node corresponds to a distinct computing device.
  • the node may correspond to a computer processor with associated physical memory.
  • the node may alternatively correspond to a computer processor or micro-core of a computer processor with shared memory and/or resources.

Abstract

In general, embodiments of the invention relate to servicing fill request using ad networks and demand-side partners.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), this application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/727,806, filed on Jun. 1, 2015, entitled “ORDERING OF FILL REQUESTS TO SEND TO ONLINE AD NETWORKS TO FILL AN AD UNIT IN AN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHER APPLICATION WITH AN ONLINE ADVERTISING IMPRESSION,” which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/005,797 filed on May 30, 2014, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADVERTISEMENT OPTIMIZATION.” The disclosure of the U.S. Provisional Application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • BACKGROUND
  • An increasing number of companies, agencies, individuals, and other parties (collectively “advertisers”) use online advertising to promote their products and services. An advertiser purchases advertising space from an individual publisher, an advertising network, or an advertising exchange that distributes advertisements to one or more publishers. A publisher may display advertisements in several formats depending on the platform the publisher uses to interface with the consuming public. In many existing approaches, publishers enter into arrangements with advertising networks without knowing the amount of revenue they can expect to receive in consideration. Consequently, many publishers earn less income from their applications than they would otherwise.
  • SUMMARY
  • In general, in one aspect, the invention relates to a system for fill request processing, comprising: a data repository comprising a plurality of ad network credentials and a plurality of metrics, a network reporter is coupled to the data repository and programmed to: obtain the plurality of network credentials from a plurality of publishers, store the plurality of network credentials, connect, over a network, to a plurality of ad networks, authenticate, after connecting, to the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of network credentials, obtain, after authenticating, the plurality of metrics from the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of credentials, store the plurality of metrics in the data repository; and an optimizer coupled to the data repository and the plurality of publishers and programmed to generate a first ordering of ad networks for a first application associated with one of the plurality of publishers using at least a portion of the plurality of metrics, wherein the first ordering specifies an order in which the first application should send fill requests to the plurality of ad networks, and provide, over the network, the first ordering to the first application.
  • In general, in one aspect, the invention relates to a system for fill request processing, comprising a data repository comprising a plurality of ad network credentials and a plurality of metrics, a network reporter is coupled to the data repository and programmed to: obtain the plurality of network credentials from a plurality of publishers, store the plurality of network credentials, connect, over a network, to a plurality of ad networks, authenticate, after connecting, to the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of network credentials, obtain, after authenticating, the plurality of metrics from the plurality of ad networks using the plurality of credentials, store the plurality of metrics in the data repository, and an optimizer coupled to the data repository and the plurality of publishers and programmed to: receive, from an application, a fill request for an ad unit in the application of a publisher, determine an estimated publisher revenue for a first ad network of a plurality of ad networks for filling the ad unit using the plurality of metrics, generate a proxy bid based on the estimated publisher revenue, obtain a winning bid from an ad exchange module, and service the fill request based on the winning bid, an ad exchange module coupled to the optimizer and programmed to: obtain the proxy bid from the optimizer, obtain, using network communication, a bid from a demand-side platform (DSP) for filing the ad unit, and perform a real-time auction for the request using at least the first proxy bid and the bid from the DSP in order to determine the winning bid.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flowchart in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flowchart in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a computing system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying figures. Like elements in the various figures are denoted by like reference numerals for consistency.
  • In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the description.
  • Throughout the application, ordinal numbers (e.g., first, second, third, etc.)
  • may be used as an adjective for an element (i.e., any noun in the application). The use of ordinal numbers is not to imply or create any particular ordering of the elements nor to limit any element to being only a single element unless expressly disclosed, such as by the use of the terms “before”, “after”, “single”, and other such terminology. Rather, the use of ordinal numbers is to distinguish between the elements. By way of an example, a first element is distinct from a second element, and the first element may encompass more than one element and succeed (or precede) the second element in an ordering of elements.
  • In general, according to one or more embodiments of the invention, an advertising server (“ad server”) system may optimize the order in which advertising networks (“ad networks” or “networks”) or other providers of advertising content are requested to serve impressions to fill an ad unit in a publisher's application. In one embodiment of the invention, optimization of an ad network request order may result in an increase in a publisher's revenue by estimating, e.g., cost-per-impression (i.e., cost to fill the publisher's ad unit) for each ad network. In one or more embodiments of the invention, a model for computing effective cost-per-impression is generated based on a variety of metrics, corresponding to the individual publisher and/or aggregate publishers. The metrics may be obtained directly from the ad networks and/or from other sources. The order for sending ad unit fill requests to the networks (also referred to as a “waterfall”), is optimized and requests may be sent iteratively to the networks down the waterfall until a network serves an impression either to the ad server system or directly to the application. Results of a particular optimization may be reported to the publisher and used as input for future optimization models and/or advertisement exchange (“ad exchange”) processes. Although the below description focuses primarily on optimizing revenue from ad networks, the following system, methods, and computer-readable media are relevant to general-purpose internet marketing applications involving multiple types of services and entities.
  • FIG. 1 shows a system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the system (100) may have multiple components including one or more applications (101), one or more ad networks (103), one or more demand-side platforms (105), and an ad server system (111) including a data repository (113) storing network credentials (115) and network metrics (117), an optimizer (119), a network reporter (121), and an ad exchange module (123). Each of these components is described below.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, an application(s) (101) is a software application of any type configured to execute on any device (e.g., desktop computers, mobile devices). The application is developed and/or owned by a publisher and is implemented to include one or more ad unit(s). An ad unit is a predefined space in an application used to display one or more advertisements, or “impressions.” The advertisement may be a native advertisement or a traditional advertisement.
  • An ad unit may be configured to display impressions in, for example, text, image, and/or video format. An ad unit may be implemented with properties that constrain the number and type of advertisements that may be displayed within the application (101). For example, an ad unit may be configured to display impressions having a specific format (e.g., banner ads, pop-up ads, pop-under ads, floating ads, expanding ads, interstitial ads, or text ads). As another example, an ad unit in a mobile application may have width and length requirements to ensure that any impression served to the application will fit appropriately within the confines of the mobile device screen. The invention is not limited to the aforementioned examples.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, an application (101) may be configured to communicate with external entities including, without limitation, ad networks (103), ad servers, ad exchanges, and/or the ad server system (111). These entities are described in further detail below. An application may communicate with an external entity using an application programming interface (API) and/or any other method of communication known in the art. As an example, an ad network's API provides a set of specifications for receiving requests from and serving impressions to ad servers. Accordingly, an application may be implemented to make requests to fill ad units (“fill requests”) formatted according to one or more entities' respective APIs.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, an ad network(s) (103) is service that connects advertisers to publishers of applications. One function of an ad network is matching publishers' ad unit supply with advertiser demand.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, an ad network (103) may charge the advertiser using one of several metrics, including online marketing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as, but not limited to, cost-per-click (CPC) and cost-per-impression (CPM). In a CPC system, an advertiser is charged based on the number of times that users click on an advertisement; in other words, an advertiser is not charged when a publisher displays an advertisement to a user unless the user clicks on the advertisement. In a CPM system, an advertiser is charged based on the number of times a publisher displays its advertisement to a user.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, an ad network (103) may be configured to communicate with external entities including, without limitation, applications (101), servers, ad exchanges, and/or the ad server system (111).
  • In the case of servers, an ad network may use a publisher or third-party server (typically a combination of web server and database server) to store advertisers' impressions and deliver them to applications upon request. The servers may be configured to perform a variety of other functions including metric tracking (e.g., number of clicks and number of impressions served) and report generation, both for publishers and for advertisers.
  • Publisher servers may be run by a single publisher and serve ads to that publisher's applications, allowing fine-grained creative, formatting, and content control by that publisher. Third-party servers may serve ads across domains owned by multiple publishers and deliver the ads from a central source to facilitate advertiser and publisher tracking.
  • An ad exchange is a platform that allows real-time bidding (RTB) on publishers' ad units by ad networks (103), demand-side platforms (105), and/or individual advertisers. Using an ad exchange, publishers may auction their inventory to the highest bidder through a single interface. However, many ad networks (103) are not configured to utilize ad exchange APIs for real-time bidding and may therefore be excluded from the RTB process.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, demand-side platform(s) (“DSP”s) (105) allow advertisers to manage multiple ad exchange accounts through one interface. By utilizing a DSP, advertisers can manage and optimize their bids based on KPIs. DSPs typically combine similar functionality to ad networks (103) with the ability to make real-time bids using ad exchange APIs.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the data repository (113) is any type of storage unit and/or device (e.g., a file system, database, collection of tables, or any other storage mechanism) for storing data. Further, the data repository may include multiple different storage units and/or devices. The multiple different storage units and/or devices may or may not be of the same type or located at the same physical site.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the data repository (113) is configured to store network credentials (115), network metrics (117), and/or any other data relevant to internet marketing, advertisement networks, and/or advertisement exchanges. Network credentials (115) include user credentials (e.g., usernames and passwords) used by publishers or third parties to interface with an ad network's services. A publisher's network credentials may be obtained from the publisher directly, or from a publisher's application.
  • Network metrics (117) may include typical online marketing KPIs and other metrics obtained from publishers, ad networks, and/or other entities, including CPC, CPM, and click-through-rate (CTR) (i.e., number of clicks divided by number of impressions served for a given advertisement). The metrics may include, without limitation, geographic data (e.g., CTR by country), time data (e.g., CTR by hour), platform data (e.g., CTR by operating system), and ad unit data (e.g., CTR by ad type).
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the ad server system (111) is configured to communicate with applications (101), ad networks (103), DSPs (105), and/or other entities in order to facilitate serving impressions to applications in response to fill requests. The ad server system may also include functionality typically provided by servers in general and as already described. The ad server system may include functionality to receive, store, and deliver impressions to applications and publisher servers. The ad server system may include functionality to track KPIs or other metrics for publishers and generate related reports. The ad server system may also include functionality to request data from and store data to the data repository (113).
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the optimizer (119) may include functionality to receive fill requests from applications and publisher servers. The optimizer may include functionality to send received fill requests to ad networks and/or other entities.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the optimizer may include functionality for generating a model for calculating estimated publisher revenue (e.g., eCPM) from an ad network, in the event the ad network successfully fills the publisher's ad unit with an impression. The model may be generated based on one or more metrics measuring past performance of ad networks with respect to the either the individual publisher or publishers in aggregate. The model may be generated based on: (i) CPM for ad networks that report CPM, (ii) based on a combination of CPC and CTR for ad networks that report CPC, or (iii) based on a combination of (i) and (ii) for hybrid ad networks. The metrics may be obtained from the data repository (113) or directly from the ad networks using the network reporter (121) described below. See also FIG. 2, Step 203. In another embodiment of the invention, the optimizer may obtain the model from another entity within or external to the ad server system (111).
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the optimizer (119) includes functionality to determine an optimal ordering for the waterfall of ad networks based on, for example, the estimated publisher revenue calculated using the above-mentioned model and fill rates (i.e., the probability that a given ad network will respond to a fill request). The ordering may be determined so that ad networks expected to generate more revenue for a particular fill request are prioritized to receive the request. The ordering may also be determined based on additional factors including ad networks' respective fill rates (the rate at which an ad network successfully serves an impression to fill an ad unit), geographic data, time data, platform data, and/or ad unit data.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the optimizer (119) may be configured to send a particular fill request to the first network in the ordering first. If the first network does not successfully serve an impression in response to the request, the fill request may then be sent to the second network in the ordering, and so on until an ad network responds by serving an impression (to the optimizer (119) or to the publisher directly).
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the network reporter (121) may include functionality to access ad network reporting information through the networks' respective APIs, websites, and/or other methods of communication. A given ad network's reporting information may include one or more KPIs or any other metric for measuring the ad network's performance history. In the case of web access, the network reporter may be configured to scrape an ad network's website to obtain the desired metrics. The network reporter may include functionality to obtain credentials from publishers and/or other entities used to access the ad networks. The network reporter may additionally store credentials in and obtain credentials from the data repository (113). In one embodiment of the invention, the network reporter obtains the aforementioned information from each of the ad networks by: connecting to the ad network, authenticating with the ad network using the aforementioned credentials (also referred to as ad network credentials), and, after successful authentication (i.e., the network reporting is able to access information in the ad network), obtaining the information (described above) from the ad network. The authentication may be performed using any known or later discovered mechanism.
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the network reporter (121) may include functionality to generate a report for a publisher based on metrics obtained from the ad networks and/or based on the performance of the optimizer for previously served fill requests.
  • The network reporter may obtain the aforementioned metrics in a synchronous manner (e.g., the metrics are obtained as they are generated such that the metrics used in FIGS. 2 and 3 are the most update metrics that are available) or asynchronous manner (e.g., the metrics that are obtain correspond to activity that occurred during some prior time period, e.g., activity that occurred in the prior 24 hours).
  • In one or more embodiments of the invention, the ad exchange module (123) may include functionality to operate an ad exchange or interface with a third-party ad exchange. The ad exchange module may include functionality to assign proxy bids to one or more ad networks for use in a RTB process (in the case where an ad network is unable to participate in an ad exchange directly). A proxy bid assigned by the ad exchange module to an ad network may be based on the ad network's estimated publisher revenue, calculated by the optimizer using the model. A proxy bid may also be assigned to an ad network using values input directly from the publisher.
  • The ad exchange module (123) may include functionality to obtain one or more actual bids corresponding to one or more DSPs. The ad exchange module may then perform a RTB auction using, or provide to a third-party ad exchange, proxy bids for ad networks and/or actual bids for DSPs in order to determine the highest bidder for a publisher's fill request.
  • The ad exchange module may implement generalized second-price auction in order to determine which of the bids or proxy bids is the highest bidder for the publisher's fill request. In another embodiment of the invention, the ad exchange module may implement Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) auction in order to determine which of the bids or proxy bids is the highest bidder for the publisher's fill request. Other types of auctions may be implemented by the ad exchange module without departing from the invention.
  • While FIG. 1 shows a configuration of components, other configurations may be used without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, various components may be combined to create a single component. As another example, the functionality performed by a single component may be performed by two or more components. Each of the components shown in FIG. 1 may be implemented using one or more computing systems as described in FIG. 4. Each of the components shown in FIG. 1 may communicate using any combination of wireless or wired connections. Further, the ad networks, DSPs, and applications may communicate with the ad server system via any combination of wired or wireless networks (also referred to as network communication). The aforementioned networks may include the Internet, other wide area networks, and local area networks.
  • The invention is not limited to the system shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIGS. 2-3 show flowcharts in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. While the various steps in these flowcharts are presented and described sequentially, one of ordinary skill will appreciate that some or all of the steps may be executed in different orders, may be combined or omitted, and some or all of the steps may be executed in parallel.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for optimizing publisher revenue from one or more ad networks and/or demand-side platforms in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The process shown in FIG. 2 may be used, for example, with the system of FIG. 1 to optimize publishers' ad revenue.
  • In Step 201, a request to fill an ad unit is received from a publisher's application. The request may include constraints for impressions that are compatible with properties of the ad unit. The request may include, but is not limited to, information about the ad unit (e.g., the dimensions, the type of ad (e.g., banner ad, etc.), type of content that may be shown in the ad unit, etc.), application in which the ad unit resides (i.e., the application that issued the fill request), application type (i.e., the type of application), information about the user of the application, the platform upon which the application is executing (e.g., mobile or desktop, operating system (including version), type of mobile device (i.e., the manufacturer of the phone, etc.)), and the geographic location (e.g., city, state, country, continent, etc.) in which the application has issued the fill request is located.
  • In Step 203, estimated publisher revenues (e.g., eCPM) from ad networks for filling the ad unit are calculated using a model. The model may be previously generated and obtained from storage or may be generated contemporaneously with the execution of this step.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the estimated publisher revenue is determined on a per ad network basis. The information use to determine estimated publisher revenue for a given ad network may be based on: (i) historical information (e.g., CPC, CTR, CPM, etc.) for the application using the ad network; (ii) historical information (e.g., CPC, CTR, CPM, etc.) for other applications using the ad network; and/or fill rate (described below).
  • In the event that there is no historical information (e.g., CPC, CTR, CPM, etc.) for the application using the ad network (or that there is not sufficient historical information), then the historical information for other applications using the ad network may be used to estimate various KPIs that are subsequently used as input to determine the estimated publisher revenues. For example, one such KPI is CPC. CPC for an application may be estimated by: (i) obtaining the aggregate CPC for a given ad network; (ii) segmenting the aggregate CPC into per-geographic location per-application type segments (e.g., what is the CPC for a given application type in a given country); and (iii) estimating the CPC for an application based on (ii) and geographic information in the fill request. The aforementioned process of taking the aggregate CPC for an ad network (or for a portion of the ad network) and then adjusting the CPC based on the geographic distribution of the application (i.e., the application that made the request) may be referred to as geographic scaling.
  • Regardless of how the aforementioned historical information is obtained, the historical information is used to determine the estimated publisher revenues on a per ad network basis. More specifically, in one embodiment of the invention, for CPM ad networks (i.e., ad networks that pay publishers based on CPM), the estimated publisher revenue (i.e., eCPM) may be determined using historical CPM information. In one embodiment of the invention, historical CPM may be determined using one or more of the following (listed from most specific to most general): (i) prior CPM determined using ad server system; (ii) network reporting (see FIG. 3) (i.e., average CPM for <application, ad network> as reported by the ad network); (ii) global network reporting (see FIG. 3) (i.e., average CPM for <application type, ad network> for all application as reported by the ad network); (iii) ad unit bid data (i.e., user-entered bid expressed in terms of CPM). In one embodiment of the invention, the most specific historical CPM that is available is used to determine eCPM.
  • Further, for CPC networks (i.e., ad networks that pay publishers based on the CPC), the estimated publisher revenue may be determined by: (i) obtaining the total impressions and historical CTR for a given network; (ii) determining total clicks using impressions and CTR; (iii) determining CPC for given <ad unit, geographic location> (or obtaining average CPC); (iv) determining total revenue using CPC (from (iii)) and total clicks (from (ii)); (v) determining eCPM by dividing total revenue by total impressions.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, historical CPC may be determined using one or more of the following (listed from most specific to most general): (i) network reporting (see FIG. 3) (i.e., average CPC for <application, ad network> as reported by the ad network); (ii) global network reporting (see FIG. 3) (i.e., average CPC for <application type, ad network> for all application as reported by the ad network); (iii) ad unit bid data (i.e., user-entered bid expressed in terms of CPC). In one embodiment of the invention, the most specific historical CPC that is available is used to determine eCPM.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, historical CTR may be determined using one or more of the following (listed from most specific to most general): (i) segment data (i.e., average historical CTR for <ad unit, country, ad network>), (ii) continent data (i.e., average historical CTR for <ad unit, continent, ad network>), (iii) global segment data (i.e., average historical CTR for <application type, type of ad unit, country, ad network>), and (iv) application data (i.e., average historical CTR for <application, country, ad network>). In one embodiment of the invention, the most specific historical CTR that is available is used to determine eCPM.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, if the network is a hybrid network (i.e., the ad network pays a certain percentage publishers based on CPC and CPM), then the eCPM for hybrid network is determined as follows: (i) determine eCPM for CPM portion of hybrid network, (ii) determine eCPM for CPC portion of hybrid network, (iii) determine final eCPM using following equation: final eCPM =eCPMCPM_Portion*CPM Portion+eCPMCPC_Portion (1-CPM Portion), where CPM Portion is expressed as a number between 0 and 1.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, all estimated publisher revenues are expressed in terms of eCPM in order to facilitate comparison between different bids (see e.g., Step 211) and/or for ordering purposes (see e.g., Step 217).
  • While the invention has been described with respect to eCPM, the estimated publisher revenues may be expressed using another KPI, e.g., eCPC, without departing from the invention.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the historical information used to determine estimated publisher revenues may be adjusted to take into account specific context of the fill request. For example, for CPC ad networks, historical CTR information may be used to determine eCPM (as described above). However, the historical CTR information may be adjusted to take into account how many ads have already been shown to a user of an application in a given session. This information, in combination with historical trends that model CTR variance as function of <ad network, number of ads shown in a single session>, may be used to determine an adjusted CTR. The adjusted CTR may then be used to determine an eCPM (as discussed above). For example, if five ads have already been shown to in an application to a specific user in a single session, then the CTR for the sixth ad shown to the user in the aforementioned session may be reduced (or increased) by a certain percentage to take into account the fact that the user has already seen five ads in the aforementioned session. The above adjustment to the CTR may be referred to as a session depth scaling factor.
  • The historical CTR information may also be adjusted to account for variances in reporting by the ad networks or DSPs (see FIG. 3) and information that the ad server system is able to ascertain about the historical CTR. In one embodiment of the invention, the ad server system includes at least CTR information segmented on a per-application type per-network basis. In such cases, if the variance between the historical CTR information obtained from an ad network for an application (see e.g., FIG. 3) and the CTR information for the application type for the ad network exceeds a threshold, then the historical CTR information may be adjusted to address the variance. The adjustment may be performed using a CTR adjustment factor, which adjusts the CTR to take into account the aforementioned variance. The adjusted CTR may then be used to determine an eCPM (as discussed above).
  • In Step 205, a determination is made about whether to perform a RTB auction for the ad unit using an ad exchange. If the ad unit is to be auctioned, the process proceeds to Step 207. If the ad unit is not to be auctioned, the process proceeds to Step 217. This determination may be made based on publisher input (i.e., the publisher may “opt in” to RTB auctions). Other factors may be used to make the determination in step 205 without departing from the invention.
  • In Step 207, if it has been determined that the ad unit is to be auctioned, a proxy bid is assigned to participating ad networks based on the estimated revenue from each ad network for filling the ad unit, calculated according to Step 203. In one or more embodiments of the invention, proxy bids are only assigned to ad networks that lack capability to participate directly in the ad exchange. In one or more embodiments of the invention, proxy bids are assigned to every ad network having an account for the publisher. In one embodiment of the invention, the proxy bids are expressed in terms of eCPM.
  • In Step 209, actual bids on the ad unit are obtained from one or more DSPs.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, Step 209 includes sending fill requests to one or more DSPs (using, e.g., APIs exposed by the DSPs) and receiving, in response to the fill requests, one or more actual bids. The bids obtained from the one or more DSPs are expressed in the same terms as (e.g., eCPM) as the proxy bids.
  • In Step 211, an RTB auction is performed using the proxy bids assigned to the ad networks and the actual bids obtained from the DSPs, and a winning bid is obtained. The winning bid may or may not represent the actual revenue received by the publisher, regardless of whether the winner successfully serves an impression to the application in response to the fill request. In one embodiment of the invention, the bids (actual and proxy) are ordered from highest to lowest, e.g., based on the eCPM. The winning bid may correspond to the highest ordered bid. If the RTB is implementing a second-price auction, then the eCPM associated with the winning bid is the eCPM of the second highest order bid. A variety of auction mechanisms can be used to determine a winning bid (e.g., second-price auction), in accordance with various embodiments.
  • Continuing with the discussion of FIG. 2, in Step 213, it is determined whether the winning bid belongs to a DSP. If a DSP wins the auction, the process proceeds to Step 215. If a DSP does not win the auction (e.g., the winning bid is a proxy bid for an ad network), the process proceeds to Step 217.
  • In Step 215, the winning DSP's impression is sent to the application or publisher server in response to the fill request received in Step 201, and the process proceeds to end. The impression may be obtained from the DSP or may be obtained from storage if it has already been acquired by the ad server system.
  • In Step 217, then the ordering of ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP is optionally adjusted. More specifically, the ordering of the bids from the auction in step 211 are used to determine an ordering of ad networks and the highest non-winning bid from the DSP. In one embodiment of the invention, if the values of the proxy bids take into account the fill rates then the ordering may not be adjusted in step 217. However, if the values of the proxy bids did not take into account fill rate, then the ordering of ad networks may be determined using one or more of the following metrics: (i) ordering based on which ad networks provided the highest eCPM based on the geographic location specified in the fill request; (ii) ordering based on which ad networks provided the highest eCPM based on the platform specified in the fill request; and (iii) ordering based on which ad networks provided the highest eCPM based on the type of ad unit (e.g., native, banner ads, etc.) specified in the fill request. In another embodiment of the invention, the ordering may be determined based, at least in part, on eCPM and fill rates for the ad networks.
  • If a RTB auction has been performed, the ordering of ad networks may be based on the eCPM without taking into account fill rates.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, if a proxy bid wins the auction (as determined in Step 213), the ad network with which the proxy bid is associated may or may not be the actual ad network that ultimately provides an ad (or impression) in response to the fill request.
  • The following is an example of step 217. The example is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Consider a scenario in which the result of the auction in step 211 is: Proxy Bid 1, Proxy Bid 2, DSP 1, Proxy Bid 3, and DSP 2. Then the ordering that result from may be Ad Network 1 (associated with Proxy Bid 1), Ad network 2 (associated with Proxy Bid 2), and DSP 1 (associated with DSP 1). However, if Ad Network 1 has a very low fill rate, then the order may be Proxy Bid 2 (associated with Proxy Bid 2), DSP 1 bid (associated with DSP 1), and Proxy Bid 1 (associated with Proxy Bid 1). In such scenarios, the ordering of the ad networks relative to the highest non-winning DSP (as determined by the auction in step 211) may be determined as follows: (i) calculating an updated estimated publisher revenue for each of the ad networks taking into account fill rates for the ad networks; (ii) calculating a publisher revenue for highest non-winning DSP based on the auction results from step 211; and (iii) ordering the ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP based on the results from (i) and (ii).
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the ordering resulting from Step 217 may only include the highest non-winning DSP and any ad networks that have a higher estimated publisher revenue then the publisher revenue associated with the highest non-winning DSP.
  • Continuing with the discussion of step 217, in one embodiment if the result of the optional adjustment of the ordering of the ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP results in the DSP being in the highest ordered position (e.g., in the first position), then the method proceeds to step 215.
  • If the ordering of the ad networks and the highest non-winning DSP results in an ad network being in the highest ordered position (e.g., in the first position), then the method proceeds to step 219.
  • Continuing with the discussion of FIG. 2, in Step 219, an ad network (which may or may not be the ad network associated with the winning proxy bid) or highest non-winning DSP is selected to receive a fill request based on the ordering resulting from Step 217.
  • In Step 221, a fill request is sent to the selected ad network or highest non-winning DSP. The request may include the aforementioned constraints for impressions that are compatible with properties of the ad unit, as well as the aforementioned data regarding the publisher or the application. These constraints may serve to disallow the selected ad network from serving the fill request if the network has no qualifying impressions available.
  • In Step 223, it is determined whether the fill request is accepted by the ad network or the highest non-winning DSP; in other words, whether the ad network will send an impression in response to the fill request. The ad network may choose not to respond based on the fill request; for example, if the request indicates that the application is published only in the USA, an ad network representing only European advertisers may not respond to the request. If the fill request is not accepted, the process returns to Step 219 to send a fill request to another ad network or the highest non-winning DSP based on the ordering. If the fill request is accepted, the process may proceed to Step 225. Alternatively, Steps 225 and 227 may be skipped in the event the selected ad network sends the impression to the publisher directly, in which case the process proceeds to end.
  • In Step 225, if the fill request has been accepted by the selected ad network or the highest non-winning DSP, an impression is received from the selected ad network or the highest non-winning DSP in response to the request. In Step 227, the impression is sent to the publisher, and the process proceeds to end.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, if a DSP does not win the auction in step 211, the highest non-winning DSP may still ultimately service the fill request if (i) the highest non-winning DSP is in the highest ordered position after the ordering is adjusted in step 217 or (ii) higher order ad networks fail to respond to the fill request and the highest non-ordered DSP is ultimately selected to service the fill request. For example, consider a scenario in which the ordering resulting from step 217 is Ad Network 1 (associated with Proxy Bid 1), Ad network 2 (associated with Proxy Bid 2), and DSP 1 bid (associated with DSP 1). In such cases, if Ad network 1 and ad network 2 fail to respond to the fill request, then the fill request may be serviced by DSP 1.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, if the ad network is a native ad network (i.e., an ad network that serves native ads), then in order to determine whether this ad network will fill the ad request the following steps may occur: (i) ad server system sends an ad fill request to the application (or, more specifically, to an ad server system software development kit (SDK) in the application that is associated with the ad server system); (ii) the ad server system SDK in the application then issues a fill request to a native ads SDK in the application; (iii) the native ads SDK in the application attempts to service the fill request; and (iv) if the native ads SDK is unable to service the fill request, then the native ads SDK sends a response to the ad server system SDK indicating that it did not service the fill request; and (v) the ad server system SDK sends a response to the ad server system indicating that the native ads network did not service the fill request. The ad server system may then proceed to select another ad network or the non-highest DSP to service the fill request.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flowchart for determining estimated publisher revenue from one or more ad networks. The process shown in FIG. 3 may be used, for example, with the system of FIG. 1 and the method of FIG. 2 (step 203) to build a model for ad revenue estimation.
  • In Step 301, publisher credentials are obtained for accessing one or more ad networks. The publisher credentials may have been previously obtained by multiple publishers and stored for later retrieval. In one or more embodiments of the invention, when an individual publisher agrees to participate in the ad server system, the participating publisher may “opt in” to provide the publisher's credentials for accessing the ad networks.
  • In Step 303, metrics are obtained from the one or more ad networks using the publisher credentials. If the participating publisher provides its credentials, metrics for the participating publisher are obtained in addition to metrics for the multiple ad networks. These metrics may include various KPIs and other metrics for previous transactions between the publishers and the ad networks.
  • In Step 305, estimated publisher revenues may then be determined using a model (see FIG. 2, step 203) and the metrics obtained, and the process proceeds to end.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the steps 300 and 303 may occur periodically in order to obtain the metrics information (also referred to as historical information) from the various ad networks and DSPs.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, step 305 may be performed as part of step 203 in response to a fill request. Alternatively, step 305 may be performed after steps 300 and 303 and the result of step 305 is provided to a user (e.g., a publisher), where the publisher may then modify how it interacts with the various ad networks and/or DSPs. More specifically, the publisher may set an order in which to contact ad networks and/or DSPs in order to service a fill request.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the ad server system (or a component therein) may provide a service to publishers based on the method shown in FIG. 3. The service may be referred to as fill request processing service which determines an optimal ordering of fill requests for a given application. More specifically, a publisher may subscribe to the aforementioned service and, in response, the service may periodically provide the publisher (or an application of the publisher) with an optimal ordering for issuing fill requests. This information may be used to manually configure the application or, alternatively, the information may be used to automatically update the order in which the application sends fill requests to the various ad networks. The ordering provided by the service may take into account the aforementioned factors listed above with respect to steps 203 and steps 217 in FIG. 2. Further, the ordering provided by the service may be application specific. Additionally, or alternatively, the ordering may be specific to the application and the geographic distribution of application. For example, there may be an ordering for applications that issue fill requests from the United States of America and a second ordering for the same applications that issue fill requests from Europe.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, when an application subscribes to the fill request processing service, the application may provide a list of ad networks with which the application is requesting ads. Alternatively, the application may not provide any list of ad networks and, instead, the fill request processing service selects a set of ad networks based on a metric associated with the application and/or the publisher associated with the application. Once the set of ad networks is selected, the fill request processing service may determine an optimal ordering of the set of ad networks as discussed above with respect to FIG. 3.
  • The following example is for explanatory purposes only and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. In other words, the following example is an example of one embodiment of the invention. Other embodiments may exist without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • Suppose that Paul is a publisher of mobile application, Angry Anteaters that includes a single ad unit configured to display banner ads only. Paul enters into arrangements with ad networks A, B, and C to provide impressions to fill the ad unit, and as a result Paul obtains a username and password for each ad network. For a period of time, Paul allows the ad networks to serve impressions to his application directly. During this time, each ad network tracks metrics measuring the number of impressions served to Paul's application, the cost to the network for each impression served (CPM), and/or the cost to the network for each impression clicked by a user (CPC), among other values. Later, Paul creates an account with the ad server system and provides his ad network credentials to the ad server system.
  • Ursula plays Angry Anteaters regularly. Ursula runs the application on her mobile device, and a request is received by the ad server system for an impression to be displayed on Ursula's mobile device. A model is generated for ad networks A, B, and C. Ad networks A and B are CPM-based ad networks, and ad network C is a CPC-based ad network. The model is used to estimate ad network A's eCPM and ad network B's eCPM based on the networks' respective reported CPMs for previously served impressions, obtained using Paul's credentials. Ad network C's eCPM is estimated based on network C's reported CPC and CTR for previously served impressions.
  • Because Paul has opted into real-time bidding, a RTB auction is performed using the ad server system's ad exchange. Proxy bids based on the eCPM for each network are assigned to that network, and actual bids for a number of DSPs are obtained. It is determined that ad network A wins the auction. Ad network B comes in second place.
  • Thereafter, an optimal ordering for the ad networks is determined based on eCPMs and fill rates. Although ad network A's eCPM is higher than ad network B's eCPM, ad network B has a much higher fill rate according to data obtained from the networks using multiple publishers' credentials. Accordingly, the ad network ordering is set at B, A, and C.
  • Network B is selected because it is first in the ordering and the fill request is sent to ad network B. The fill request indicates that Angry Anteaters requires a banner ad, and at the time of the request, network B possesses no banner ad impressions to serve. Consequently, network B does not respond to the request. Accordingly, network A is selected as network A is second in the ordering. The fill request is sent to ad network A, and in response, a banner ad impression is received from ad network A. Finally, the impression is served to the publisher, and Ursula sees the impression within Angry Anteaters.
  • Embodiments of the invention may be implemented on virtually any type of computing system regardless of the platform being used. For example, the computing system may be one or more mobile devices (e.g., laptop computer, smart phone, personal digital assistant, tablet computer, or other mobile device), desktop computers, servers, blades in a server chassis, or any other type of computing device or devices that includes at least the minimum processing power, memory, and input and output device(s) to perform one or more embodiments of the invention. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the computing system (400) may include one or more computer processor(s) (402), associated memory (404) (e.g., random access memory (RAM), cache memory, flash memory, etc.), one or more storage device(s) (406) (e.g., a hard disk, an optical drive such as a compact disk (CD) drive or digital versatile disk (DVD) drive, a flash memory stick, etc.), and numerous other elements and functionalities. The computer processor(s) (402) may be an integrated circuit for processing instructions. For example, the computer processor(s) may be one or more cores, or micro-cores of a processor. The computing system (400) may also include one or more input device(s) (410), such as a touchscreen, keyboard, mouse, microphone, touchpad, electronic pen, or any other type of input device. Further, the computing system (400) may include one or more output device(s) (408), such as a screen (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a plasma display, touchscreen, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor, projector, or other display device), a printer, external storage, or any other output device. One or more of the output device(s) may be the same or different from the input device(s). The computing system (400) may be connected to a network (412) (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, mobile network, or any other type of network) via a network interface connection (not shown). The input and output device(s) may be locally or remotely (e.g., via the network (412)) connected to the computer processor(s) (402), memory (404), and storage device(s) (406). Many different types of computing systems exist, and the aforementioned input and output device(s) may take other forms.
  • Software instructions in the form of computer readable program code to perform embodiments of the invention may be stored, in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently, on a non-transitory computer readable medium such as a CD, DVD, storage device, a diskette, a tape, flash memory, physical memory, or any other computer readable storage medium. Specifically, the software instructions may correspond to computer readable program code that when executed by a processor(s), is configured to perform embodiments of the invention.
  • Further, one or more elements of the aforementioned computing system (400) may be located at a remote location and connected to the other elements over a network (412). Further, embodiments of the invention may be implemented on a distributed system having a plurality of nodes, where each portion of the invention may be located on a different node within the distributed system. In one embodiment of the invention, the node corresponds to a distinct computing device. Alternatively, the node may correspond to a computer processor with associated physical memory. The node may alternatively correspond to a computer processor or micro-core of a computer processor with shared memory and/or resources.
  • While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.

Claims (21)

1. (canceled)
2. A method for processing an advertising fill request received from a mobile application during use of the mobile application by a user on a mobile device of the user, the method comprising:
receiving, from the mobile application executing on the mobile device, a fill request to fill an advertising unit for the mobile application;
conducting a real-time bidding (RTB) auction for filling the advertising unit based on:
a set of first bids, each first bid associated with a corresponding advertising networks of a set of advertising networks; and
a set of second bids, each second bid associated with a corresponding demand-side platform (DSP) of a set of DSPs,
to identify a winning bid from the set of first bids and the set of second bids; and
when the winning bid is associated with a winning DSP of the set of DSPs, transmitting an advertising impression associated with the winning DSP to the mobile device in response to the fill request.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
transmitting, in response to receiving the fill request, a bid request to each DSP of the set of DSPs; and
receiving, in response to the transmitting the bid request to each DSP of the set of DSPs, the set of second bids from the set of DSPs.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the set of first bids and the set of second bids each include a measure of estimated publisher revenue for filling the fill request.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the estimated publisher revenue includes estimated count per mile (eCPM), the conducting the RTB auction including:
ordering the set of first bids and the set of second bids from a bid with a highest eCPM to a bid with the lowest eCPM; and
identifying the bid with the highest eCPM as the winning bid.
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising setting the eCPM of the winning bid based on an eCPM of a bid with the second-highest eCPM.
7. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one first bid of the set of first bids is not generated by its corresponding ad network.
8. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one first bid of the set of first bids is an estimated first bid based on historical performance of its corresponding ad network for the mobile application.
9. The method of claim 2, wherein the mobile application is a first mobile application, and wherein at least one first bid of the set of first bids is an estimated first bid based on historical performance of its corresponding ad network for a second mobile application different from the first mobile application.
10. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one ad network of the set of ad networks is unable to participate in the RTB auction directly, further comprising:
receiving, from the at least one ad network, a set of performance metrics associated with that ad network; and
estimating, for that at least one ad network, a corresponding first bid, such that, by virtue of estimation of the first bid for the at least one ad network, that ad network participates in the conducting the RTB auction.
11. The method of claim 2, further comprising estimating, for at least one ad network of the set of ad networks, its corresponding first bid.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the estimating is based on one or more of historical cost-per-impression (CPM) information, historical cost-per-click information, historical click-through-rate (CTR) information, or combinations thereof, associated with the at least one ad network.
13. A system for processing an advertising fill request received from a mobile application during use of the mobile application by a user on a mobile device of the user, the system comprising:
a processor;
a network interface to communicatively couple the system to the mobile device, a set of ad networks and a set of demand-side platforms (DSP); and
a memory to store instructions that are executable by the processor to cause the ad server system to:
receive, from the mobile application executing on the mobile device, a fill request to fill an advertising unit for the mobile application;
conduct a real-time bidding (RTB) auction for filling the advertising unit based on:
a set of first bids, each first bid associated with a corresponding advertising networks of a set of advertising networks; and
a set of second bids, each second bid associated with a corresponding demand-side platform (DSP) of a set of DSPs,
to identify a winning bid from the set of first bids and the set of second bids; and
when the winning bid is associated with a winning DSP of the set of DSPs, transmit, via the network interface, an advertising impression associated with the winning DSP to the mobile device in response to the fill request.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the system to:
transmit, via the network interface and in response to receiving the fill request, a bid request to each DSP of the set of DSPs; and
receive, via the network interface and in response to the transmitting the bid request to each DSP of the set of DSPs, the set of second bids from the set of DSPs.
15. The system of claim 13, wherein the set of first bids and the set of second bids each include a measure of estimated publisher revenue for filling the fill request.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the estimated publisher revenue includes estimated count per mile (eCPM), wherein the instructions to conduct the RTB auctions further include instructions executable by the processor to cause the system to:
order the set of first bids and the set of second bids from a bid with a highest eCPM to a bid with the lowest eCPM; and
identify the bid with the highest eCPM as the winning bid.
17. The system of claim 5, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the system to set the eCPM of the winning bid based on an eCPM of a bid with the second-highest eCPM.
18. A non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed, cause one or more processors to process an advertising fill request received from a mobile application during use of the mobile application by a user on a mobile device of the user, wherein the one or more processors:
receive, from the mobile application executing on the mobile device, a fill request to fill an advertising unit for the mobile application;
conduct a real-time bidding (RTB) auction for filling the advertising unit based on:
a set of first bids, each first bid associated with a corresponding advertising networks of a set of advertising networks; and
a set of second bids, each second bid associated with a corresponding demand-side platform (DSP) of a set of DSPs,
to identify a winning bid from the set of first bids and the set of second bids; and
when the winning bid is associated with a winning DSP of the set of DSPs, transmit, via the network interface, an advertising impression associated with the winning DSP to the mobile device in response to the fill request.
19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13, further comprising instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to:
transmit, via the network interface and in response to receiving the fill request, a bid request to each DSP of the set of DSPs; and
receive, via the network interface and in response to the transmitting the bid request to each DSP of the set of DSPs, the set of second bids from the set of DSPs.
20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13, wherein the set of first bids and the set of second bids each include a measure of estimated publisher revenue for filling the fill request.
21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13, wherein at least one first bid of the set of first bids is not generated by its corresponding ad network.
US16/886,072 2014-05-30 2020-05-28 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression Abandoned US20210082001A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/886,072 US20210082001A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-05-28 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US17/128,998 US20210110438A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-12-21 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462005797P 2014-05-30 2014-05-30
US14/727,806 US10672040B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2015-06-01 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US16/886,072 US20210082001A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-05-28 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/727,806 Continuation US10672040B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2015-06-01 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/128,998 Continuation US20210110438A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-12-21 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20210082001A1 true US20210082001A1 (en) 2021-03-18

Family

ID=70856056

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/727,806 Active 2037-02-11 US10672040B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2015-06-01 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US16/886,072 Abandoned US20210082001A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-05-28 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US17/128,998 Abandoned US20210110438A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-12-21 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/727,806 Active 2037-02-11 US10672040B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2015-06-01 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/128,998 Abandoned US20210110438A1 (en) 2014-05-30 2020-12-21 Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US10672040B1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210110438A1 (en) * 2014-05-30 2021-04-15 Twitter, Inc. Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
WO2023042986A1 (en) * 2021-09-17 2023-03-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System and methods for bid optimization in real-time bidding
US11710088B1 (en) * 2021-02-16 2023-07-25 Target Brands, Inc. Scalable order management monitoring

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10915598B2 (en) * 2019-03-29 2021-02-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Generating HTML content to cache based on a member identifier and a template when there is no cached HTML content associated with a campaign and serving the cached HTML content

Citations (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090119167A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2009-05-07 Kendall Timothy A Social Advertisements and Other Informational Messages on a Social Networking Website, and Advertising Model for Same
US20100131352A1 (en) * 2008-11-24 2010-05-27 Admarvel, Inc. Mobile ad optimization architecture
US20100228636A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2010-09-09 Google Inc. Risk premiums for conversion-based online advertisement bidding
US20110106622A1 (en) * 2009-10-26 2011-05-05 Wireless Service Corp. Real-Time Mobile Advertising Marketplace
US20110173126A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2011-07-14 Knapp Jason J A Content security for real-time bidding
US20110231253A1 (en) * 2010-03-16 2011-09-22 Appnexus, Inc. Cross platform impression inventory classification
US20120041816A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2012-02-16 Yehuda Ari Buchalter Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US8249925B2 (en) * 2010-06-23 2012-08-21 Managed Audience Share Solutions LLC Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing organized binary advertising asset markets
CN202838429U (en) * 2012-08-30 2013-03-27 天津亚智网络科技研发有限公司 Advertisement real-time bidding system device
US8442859B1 (en) * 2011-12-23 2013-05-14 Managed Audience Share Solutions LLC Methods, systems, and computer program products for optimizing liquidity and price discovery in advertising markets
US20140058849A1 (en) * 2012-08-20 2014-02-27 OpenX Technologies, Inc. System and Methods for Generating Dynamic Market Pricing for Use in Real-Time Auctions
JP2014102663A (en) * 2012-11-19 2014-06-05 Dennoo:Kk On-line advertisement distribution system
US20140229273A1 (en) * 2013-02-11 2014-08-14 Facebook, Inc. Initiating real-time bidding based on expected revenue from bids
JP2014146274A (en) * 2013-01-30 2014-08-14 Microad Inc Advertisement distribution method, advertisement server, advertisement distribution system and program
US20140258000A1 (en) * 2013-03-06 2014-09-11 Contech Holdings, Llc Dynamic floor pricing system and associated methods
US20140316902A1 (en) * 2013-04-17 2014-10-23 Privowny, Inc. Systems and Methods for Online Advertising Using User Preferences
US9135655B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2015-09-15 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for using server side cookies by a demand side platform
US20150332331A1 (en) * 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Pubmatic, Inc. Intelligent ad auction and sla compliance techniques
US20150339728A1 (en) * 2014-05-20 2015-11-26 Pubmatic, Inc. Ad serving and intelligent impression throttling techniques implemented in electronic data networks
US20160125471A1 (en) * 2014-10-30 2016-05-05 Oracle International Corporation Real-time cross-device user category synchronization in an advertising campaign
US20170364945A1 (en) * 2016-06-21 2017-12-21 Sulvo, LLC Systems and methods for online ad pricing
US20190034978A1 (en) * 2017-07-26 2019-01-31 Inmobi Pte Ltd Computer-implemented method and system for bidding
US10554616B1 (en) * 2017-12-08 2020-02-04 Criteo S.A. Generating mobile device-specific identifiers across native mobile applications and mobile browsers
US10672040B1 (en) * 2014-05-30 2020-06-02 Twitter, Inc. Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US20200234342A1 (en) * 2019-01-18 2020-07-23 Timehop, Inc. Programmatic advertising server
US20200265467A1 (en) * 2019-02-20 2020-08-20 [24]7.ai, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing web advertisements to users

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8099328B2 (en) * 2007-05-01 2012-01-17 Traffiq, Inc. System and method for brokering the sale of internet advertisement inventory as discrete traffic blocks of segmented internet traffic
JP2010211248A (en) * 2007-06-07 2010-09-24 Nec Corp Advertisement display system, advertisement display method, and program for displaying advertisement
US8606873B2 (en) * 2008-06-27 2013-12-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for securely advertising identification and/or discovery information
US20100106556A1 (en) * 2008-10-23 2010-04-29 Yahoo! Inc. Time-weighted and scaling optimization of allocation of online advertisement inventory
CN101582768A (en) * 2009-06-12 2009-11-18 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Login authentication method in electronic advertisement system and system
US20120166292A1 (en) * 2010-12-28 2012-06-28 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and Methods for Pricing Portfolio Allocations of Ad Deliveries to Online Ads Using a Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Mechanism

Patent Citations (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110173126A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2011-07-14 Knapp Jason J A Content security for real-time bidding
US8554683B2 (en) * 2006-12-19 2013-10-08 Fox Audience Network, Inc. Content security for real-time bidding
US20090119167A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2009-05-07 Kendall Timothy A Social Advertisements and Other Informational Messages on a Social Networking Website, and Advertising Model for Same
US20100131352A1 (en) * 2008-11-24 2010-05-27 Admarvel, Inc. Mobile ad optimization architecture
US20100228636A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2010-09-09 Google Inc. Risk premiums for conversion-based online advertisement bidding
WO2010102054A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2010-09-10 Google Inc. Risk premiums for conversion-based online advertisement bidding
US10127581B2 (en) * 2009-03-04 2018-11-13 Google Llc Risk premiums for conversion-based online advertisement bidding
AU2010221343A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2011-09-22 Google Inc. Risk premiums for conversion-based online advertisement bidding
US20150348139A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2015-12-03 Google Inc. Risk premiums for conversion-based online advertisement bidding
US20110106622A1 (en) * 2009-10-26 2011-05-05 Wireless Service Corp. Real-Time Mobile Advertising Marketplace
US20110231253A1 (en) * 2010-03-16 2011-09-22 Appnexus, Inc. Cross platform impression inventory classification
US10636060B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2020-04-28 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for using server side cookies by a demand side platform
US11308526B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2022-04-19 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for using server side cookies by a demand side platform
US10332156B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2019-06-25 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for using server side cookies by a demand side platform
US9135655B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2015-09-15 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for using server side cookies by a demand side platform
US11080763B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2021-08-03 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for using server side cookies by a demand side platform
US8249925B2 (en) * 2010-06-23 2012-08-21 Managed Audience Share Solutions LLC Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing organized binary advertising asset markets
US11195187B1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2021-12-07 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US20200279277A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2020-09-03 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US11049118B2 (en) * 2010-07-19 2021-06-29 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US20210365958A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2021-11-25 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US10592910B2 (en) * 2010-07-19 2020-03-17 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US20190205900A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2019-07-04 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US20120041816A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2012-02-16 Yehuda Ari Buchalter Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US20220122094A1 (en) * 2010-07-19 2022-04-21 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US10223703B2 (en) * 2010-07-19 2019-03-05 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for determining competitive market values of an ad impression
US8442859B1 (en) * 2011-12-23 2013-05-14 Managed Audience Share Solutions LLC Methods, systems, and computer program products for optimizing liquidity and price discovery in advertising markets
US20140058849A1 (en) * 2012-08-20 2014-02-27 OpenX Technologies, Inc. System and Methods for Generating Dynamic Market Pricing for Use in Real-Time Auctions
CN202838429U (en) * 2012-08-30 2013-03-27 天津亚智网络科技研发有限公司 Advertisement real-time bidding system device
JP2014102663A (en) * 2012-11-19 2014-06-05 Dennoo:Kk On-line advertisement distribution system
JP2014146274A (en) * 2013-01-30 2014-08-14 Microad Inc Advertisement distribution method, advertisement server, advertisement distribution system and program
US20140229273A1 (en) * 2013-02-11 2014-08-14 Facebook, Inc. Initiating real-time bidding based on expected revenue from bids
WO2014123677A1 (en) * 2013-02-11 2014-08-14 Facebook, Inc. Initiating real-time bidding based on expected revenue from bids
US20140258000A1 (en) * 2013-03-06 2014-09-11 Contech Holdings, Llc Dynamic floor pricing system and associated methods
US20140316902A1 (en) * 2013-04-17 2014-10-23 Privowny, Inc. Systems and Methods for Online Advertising Using User Preferences
US20150332331A1 (en) * 2014-05-13 2015-11-19 Pubmatic, Inc. Intelligent ad auction and sla compliance techniques
US20150339728A1 (en) * 2014-05-20 2015-11-26 Pubmatic, Inc. Ad serving and intelligent impression throttling techniques implemented in electronic data networks
US10672040B1 (en) * 2014-05-30 2020-06-02 Twitter, Inc. Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US20160125471A1 (en) * 2014-10-30 2016-05-05 Oracle International Corporation Real-time cross-device user category synchronization in an advertising campaign
US20170364945A1 (en) * 2016-06-21 2017-12-21 Sulvo, LLC Systems and methods for online ad pricing
US20190034978A1 (en) * 2017-07-26 2019-01-31 Inmobi Pte Ltd Computer-implemented method and system for bidding
US10554616B1 (en) * 2017-12-08 2020-02-04 Criteo S.A. Generating mobile device-specific identifiers across native mobile applications and mobile browsers
US20200234342A1 (en) * 2019-01-18 2020-07-23 Timehop, Inc. Programmatic advertising server
US20200265467A1 (en) * 2019-02-20 2020-08-20 [24]7.ai, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing web advertisements to users

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
• Ad Traders. "The Real Costs of Real-Time Bidding (RTB)." (December 10th, 2009). Retrieved online 05/31/2022. https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/real-costs-real-time-bidding-rtb/ (Year: 2009) *
• Device Atlas. "What is a demand-side platform (DSP) and real-time bidding (RTB)?". ( January 03, 2014). Retrieved online 12/06/2022. https://deviceatlas.com/blog/what-is-a-demand-side-platform-dsp-and-real-time-bidding-rtb (Year: 2014) *
• DeviceAtlas. What is a demand-side platform (DSP) and real-time bidding (RTB)? (3 January 2014). Retrieved online 01/31/2022. https://deviceatlas.com/blog/what-is-a-demand-side-platform-dsp-and-real-time-bidding-rtb (Year: 2014) *
• Ratko Vidakovic. "5 Ways Real-Time Bidding Differs From Direct Buys." (April 1, 2013). Retrieved online 12/06/2022. https://martech.org/5-ways-real-time-bidding-differs-from-direct-buys/ (Year: 2013) *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210110438A1 (en) * 2014-05-30 2021-04-15 Twitter, Inc. Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US11710088B1 (en) * 2021-02-16 2023-07-25 Target Brands, Inc. Scalable order management monitoring
WO2023042986A1 (en) * 2021-09-17 2023-03-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System and methods for bid optimization in real-time bidding

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20210110438A1 (en) 2021-04-15
US10672040B1 (en) 2020-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210082001A1 (en) Ordering of fill requests to send to online ad networks to fill an ad unit in an electronic publisher application with an online advertising impression
US20230325887A1 (en) Systems and methods for determining bids for placing advertisements
US10827037B2 (en) Server to server interaction in content item selection events
US20150154650A1 (en) Systems And Methods For Implementing An Advertisement Platform With Novel Cost Models
US20140180829A1 (en) Advertising Platform
US20210090125A1 (en) Native Advertisements
JP6199884B2 (en) Precision control applications that deliver online advertising
KR20110112448A (en) Systems and methods for auctioning wireless device assets and providing wireless devices with an asset allocation option
US20120284128A1 (en) Order-independent approximation for order-dependent logic in display advertising
Geyik et al. Multi-touch attribution based budget allocation in online advertising
US20140200995A1 (en) Temporal budget optimization in online advertising
US20170161774A1 (en) Methods and systems for managing and routing targeted content over networks
US20150081425A1 (en) Multiple-entity temporal budget optimization in online advertising
US20200134663A1 (en) Automatic resource adjustment based on resource availability
JP6105001B2 (en) Advertisement server and advertisement exposure determination method using the same
US9336538B2 (en) Systems and methods for providing advertising services to devices with an advertising exchange
US10616135B2 (en) Resource usage control system
CN102498498A (en) Expressive bidding in online advertising auctions
US11055751B2 (en) Resource usage control system
US9336539B2 (en) Systems and methods for providing advertising services in a predictive manner to devices with an advertising exchange
US11093861B2 (en) Controlling item frequency using a machine-learned model
US20140114788A1 (en) Determining a price for content
US10733632B2 (en) Method and apparatus for validation of targeted advertising data
TW201423648A (en) Method of second price auction with monopoly reserve price and apparatus conducting the same
JP2019220052A (en) Information processing device, information processing method and information processing program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TWITTER, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YOLKEN, BENJAMIN HENRY;REEL/FRAME:053224/0174

Effective date: 20150812

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

AS Assignment

Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., MARYLAND

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TWITTER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:062079/0677

Effective date: 20221027

Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., MARYLAND

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TWITTER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:061804/0086

Effective date: 20221027

Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., MARYLAND

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TWITTER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:061804/0001

Effective date: 20221027

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: EX PARTE QUAYLE ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION