US20210037536A1 - Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device - Google Patents
Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20210037536A1 US20210037536A1 US16/525,864 US201916525864A US2021037536A1 US 20210037536 A1 US20210037536 A1 US 20210037536A1 US 201916525864 A US201916525864 A US 201916525864A US 2021037536 A1 US2021037536 A1 US 2021037536A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- modem
- interference
- cem
- communication device
- mitigation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 66
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 36
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H04W72/082—
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/38—Transceivers, i.e. devices in which transmitter and receiver form a structural unit and in which at least one part is used for functions of transmitting and receiving
- H04B1/40—Circuits
- H04B1/403—Circuits using the same oscillator for generating both the transmitter frequency and the receiver local oscillator frequency
- H04B1/406—Circuits using the same oscillator for generating both the transmitter frequency and the receiver local oscillator frequency with more than one transmission mode, e.g. analog and digital modes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/50—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
- H04W72/54—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
- H04W72/541—Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria using the level of interference
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W74/00—Wireless channel access
- H04W74/08—Non-scheduled access, e.g. ALOHA
- H04W74/0808—Non-scheduled access, e.g. ALOHA using carrier sensing, e.g. carrier sense multiple access [CSMA]
- H04W74/0816—Non-scheduled access, e.g. ALOHA using carrier sensing, e.g. carrier sense multiple access [CSMA] with collision avoidance
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W84/00—Network topologies
- H04W84/02—Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
- H04W84/04—Large scale networks; Deep hierarchical networks
- H04W84/042—Public Land Mobile systems, e.g. cellular systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
- H04W88/02—Terminal devices
- H04W88/06—Terminal devices adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals
Definitions
- This application pertains to portable communication devices and more particularly to managing modem operations of a converged portable communication device.
- Portable battery powered communication devices are often utilized in public safety environments, such as law enforcement, fire rescue, and the like.
- public safety communication devices may be referred to as converged devices.
- converged devices It is highly desirable that a converged device be able to operate two modems simultaneously.
- operating two modems simultaneously can result in plethora of complex self-interference scenarios not encountered in conventional single modem devices. For example, out-of-band emissions, blocking and/or intermediation occurring in one sub-system of a converged device may severely interfere with the performance of another sub-system of the converged device. Compliance with regulatory emission limits may also lead to inter-modulation artifacts from one modem interference with nearby spectrum of another modem.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portable communication device formed and operating in accordance with some embodiments.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for managing simultaneous modem operations in a converged portable communication device in accordance with some embodiments.
- an apparatus and method for dynamically managing simultaneous modem operation in a portable communication device are directed to mitigating interference resulting from the simultaneous operation of the two or more modems.
- Improved converged communications is provided through the use of a programmable logic array operating as a coexistence module (CEM) interoperating with a plurality of different processors, a plurality of different modems, and a plurality of attenuation switches.
- CEM coexistence module
- Interference during converged operation is detected, analyzed, and applicable mitigation is applied to the interference, thereby enabling converged communications to be established in a mitigated mode.
- the mitigated mode of operation continues until the interference has been removed.
- Mission critical communications is maintained without relying on the use of infrastructure collaboration.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portable communication device 100 formed and operating in accordance with some embodiments.
- the portable communication device 100 is powered by a battery (not shown).
- the portable communication device 100 comprises a programmable logic array operating as a coexistence module (CEM) 102 , an applications processor (AP) 104 operatively coupled to the CEM 102 , and a baseband processor (BP) 106 operatively coupled to the CEM and the AP.
- the portable communication device 100 further comprise a first modem 108 , such as a land mobile radio (LMR) modem, operatively coupled to the BP 106 , the first modem operating using a first frequency band of operation.
- LMR land mobile radio
- the first modem is responsible for mission critical operations, such as scan, push-to-talk (PTT), and high power audio.
- the portable communication device 100 further comprises a second modem 110 , such as a long term evolution (LTE) modem, operatively coupled to the AP 104 , the second modem operating using a second frequency band of operation.
- the AP 104 is responsible for non-mission critical operations, such as software applications associated with touchscreen interface, low power audio, and global positioning system (GPS).
- Other radio elements such as radio frequency (RF) transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers are not shown (to maintain simplicity) but are understood to be embodied within the device 100 .
- RF radio frequency
- the AP 104 , the BP 106 , and the first and second modems 108 , 110 are operable in a converged mode in which both the first and second modems operate simultaneously receiving and transmitting signals via respective first and second antennas 130 , 132 , such as an LMR antenna and an LTE antenna.
- Data 140 is transferred between the baseband processor 106 and the first modem 108 and then via the LMR TX/RX 114 onto the first antenna 130 .
- narrowband data is transferred between the BP and the LMR modem and then to the LMR antenna.
- Data 142 is also transferred between the applications processor 104 and the second modem 110 and then via the LTE TX/RX 116 onto the second antenna 132 .
- broadband data is transferred between the AP and the LTE modem and then to the LTE antenna.
- the portable communication device 100 further comprises an attenuation switch 112 operatively coupled to the CEM 102 and to the second modem 110 .
- the attenuation switch 112 operates as a hardware clamp to second modem communications.
- the attenuation switch 112 is disengaged during normal, non-interfered converged operation.
- incoming RF signals to the second (LTE) antenna 132 are disconnected, thereby preventing external RF energy from damaging the second modem 110 . Protection is also provided from internal RF energy generated from the first modem (LMR internal).
- the BP 106 further generates indicator signals 118 , 120 to the CEM 102 and to the AP 104 while the first modem 108 is transmitting and receiving on a first frequency band.
- the second modem 110 is generating indicator signals 122 to the CEM 102 and the AP 104 while transmitting and receiving on the second frequency band.
- the BP 106 may generate the indicator signal 118 indicative of ‘LMR transmit enabled’ to the CEM 102 and to the AP 104 .
- the BP 106 may also generate the indicator signal 120 indicative of frequency band, such as ‘LMR frequency’, to the CEM 102 and to the AP 104 .
- the ‘LMR Frequency’ may specify the exact LMR Frequency in use or a range of LMR frequencies that are currently in use.
- the second modem 110 generates the indicator signal 122 to the CEM 102 and the AP 104 indicative of the frequency band of operation, such as ‘LTE band’.
- ‘The LTE’ band’ may specify the exact LTE frequency in use, or a range of LTE Frequencies in use, for example Band 14 or Band 5.
- the AP 104 determines and performs an appropriate interference mitigation. This mitigation will be performed after an optional holdoff timer stage.
- the holdoff timer may be a configurable holdoff timer.
- the AP validates that the interference is still present before applying the interference mitigation. An example scenario would be during LMR scan, in which the time spent in the interference scenario would be shorter than the time required to engage the software mitigation.
- the AP 104 then drives the software mitigation line 128 to the CEM 102 .
- the CEM 102 further detects changes in interference conditions, such as via the indicator signals 118 , 120 , 122 and instructs the AP 104 to disengage the interference mitigation, via a release mitigation signal 138 , when the interference is no longer present.
- a change in the indicator signals 118 , 120 , 122 will trigger the AP to reevaluate if the interference is no longer present.
- the AP may apply a second holdoff timer to prevent mitigation thrashing scenarios that may occur with LMR scan or trunking mobility. At the completion of the second holdoff timer, the AP will remove the mitigation, thereby returning the first and second modems 108 , 110 to normal converged operation.
- interference mitigation can be removed in response to a frequency change by one of the modems which negates the need for the interference mitigation.
- the portable communication device 100 when operating using first and second frequency bands controlled by first and second modems is able to detect and mitigate interference generated by second modem transmit frequency bands conflicting with first modem receive bands, external RF transmissions interfering with the second modem, internal first modem transmissions interfering with the second modem, and second modem transmit frequency bands interfering with internally generated first modem transmissions.
- the portable communication device 100 when operating using LMR and LTE frequency bands controlled by LMR and LTE modems is able to detect and mitigate interference generated by: LTE transmit frequency bands conflicting with LMR receive bands, external LMR transmissions interfering with the LTE modem, internal LMR transmissions interfering with LTE modem, and LTE transmit frequency bands interfering with internally generated LMR transmissions.
- Examples of potential interference may include but are not limited to, the upper edge of LMR 700 MHz band (769 MHz-775 MHz) which may be very close to the lower edge of LTE BAND 13 (Uplink 777 MHz-787 MHz) resulting in out of band emissions interference when two transceivers are operating simultaneously.
- Another example, in which frequencies overlap are LMR 800 MHz band (862 MHz-869 MHz) and LTE BAND 5 (Downlink 869 MHz-894 MHz).
- the hardware mitigation provided by the CEM 102 to engage the attenuation switch 112 provides instantaneous interference protection while the software mitigation is executed. These software mitigations can take hundreds of milliseconds to enact, and relying on them without the hardware mitigation would result in degraded LMR scan and mobility operations.
- the coexistence module (CEM) 102 takes into account the currently active first and second modems and automatically applies respective mitigation only as needed under the predetermined scenarios of concern.
- Portable communication device 100 advantageously allows for fine adjustment of predetermined modem transceiver parameters such as power level and band operation.
- Implementation of the CEM 102 and attenuation switch 112 in hardware advantageously avoids substantial delays that would be experienced through a software only mitigation approach. In many cases, the dynamically changing nature of the communications protocol makes a software implementation impractical or unrealizable.
- the cause of interference is analyzed, by the applications processor 104 and a determination is made as to whether a mitigation action is possible.
- the cause of interference may be analyzed by the AP and CEM of FIG. 1 as previously described.
- the method 200 proceeds to a mitigation mode at 216 .
- the mitigation may be a software controlled mitigation comprising for example, reduced power to the second modem and/or reduced data speed to the second modem (the LTE modem) as determined at 218 .
- the software mitigation 218 may incorporate an optional holdoff timer as previously described to cater for LMR scan and mobility operations.
- the method 200 proceeds by disengaging the attenuation switch at 220 and establishing communications using the applicable software mitigation thereby re-establishing coexistence operations at 222 .
- the LTE modem may operate at restricted power and/or speed while the LMR operations remain normal. Communications continue in the mitigated coexistence mode returning to 204 to await a frequency change or change in TX/RX state.
- the embodiments can be applied to communication devices having more than two processors supported more than two modems operating with nearby frequency bands that are susceptible to RF interference. As such the embodiments can be said to apply to a plurality of different modems supporting communication protocols operating over different but nearby frequency bands which are susceptible to interference with each other.
- an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein.
- Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Transceivers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application pertains to portable communication devices and more particularly to managing modem operations of a converged portable communication device.
- Portable battery powered communication devices are often utilized in public safety environments, such as law enforcement, fire rescue, and the like. There is an increased desire to expand the functionality of public safety communication devices to incorporate additional features that run on different operating platforms, other than the main mission critical public safety platform. Such devices may be referred to as converged devices. It is highly desirable that a converged device be able to operate two modems simultaneously. However, operating two modems simultaneously can result in plethora of complex self-interference scenarios not encountered in conventional single modem devices. For example, out-of-band emissions, blocking and/or intermediation occurring in one sub-system of a converged device may severely interfere with the performance of another sub-system of the converged device. Compliance with regulatory emission limits may also lead to inter-modulation artifacts from one modem interference with nearby spectrum of another modem.
- Existing strategies to interference mitigation, such as those used on single modem devices, do not lend themselves well to converged devices, as these strategies tend to negatively impact performance and timing of one or more sub-systems.
- Hence, there is a need for an improved interference mitigation approach in a converged portable communication device.
- The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portable communication device formed and operating in accordance with some embodiments. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for managing simultaneous modem operations in a converged portable communication device in accordance with some embodiments. - Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
- The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
- Briefly, there is provided herein an apparatus and method for dynamically managing simultaneous modem operation in a portable communication device. The embodiments are directed to mitigating interference resulting from the simultaneous operation of the two or more modems. Improved converged communications is provided through the use of a programmable logic array operating as a coexistence module (CEM) interoperating with a plurality of different processors, a plurality of different modems, and a plurality of attenuation switches. Interference during converged operation is detected, analyzed, and applicable mitigation is applied to the interference, thereby enabling converged communications to be established in a mitigated mode. The mitigated mode of operation continues until the interference has been removed. Mission critical communications is maintained without relying on the use of infrastructure collaboration.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of aportable communication device 100 formed and operating in accordance with some embodiments. Theportable communication device 100 is powered by a battery (not shown). Theportable communication device 100 comprises a programmable logic array operating as a coexistence module (CEM) 102, an applications processor (AP) 104 operatively coupled to theCEM 102, and a baseband processor (BP) 106 operatively coupled to the CEM and the AP. Theportable communication device 100 further comprise afirst modem 108, such as a land mobile radio (LMR) modem, operatively coupled to theBP 106, the first modem operating using a first frequency band of operation. The first modem is responsible for mission critical operations, such as scan, push-to-talk (PTT), and high power audio. Theportable communication device 100 further comprises asecond modem 110, such as a long term evolution (LTE) modem, operatively coupled to theAP 104, the second modem operating using a second frequency band of operation. The AP 104 is responsible for non-mission critical operations, such as software applications associated with touchscreen interface, low power audio, and global positioning system (GPS). Other radio elements such as radio frequency (RF) transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers are not shown (to maintain simplicity) but are understood to be embodied within thedevice 100. - In accordance with some embodiments, the AP 104, the
BP 106, and the first andsecond modems second antennas Data 140 is transferred between thebaseband processor 106 and thefirst modem 108 and then via the LMR TX/RX 114 onto thefirst antenna 130. For example, narrowband data is transferred between the BP and the LMR modem and then to the LMR antenna.Data 142 is also transferred between theapplications processor 104 and thesecond modem 110 and then via the LTE TX/RX 116 onto thesecond antenna 132. For example broadband data is transferred between the AP and the LTE modem and then to the LTE antenna. - In accordance with the embodiments, the
portable communication device 100 further comprises anattenuation switch 112 operatively coupled to theCEM 102 and to thesecond modem 110. Theattenuation switch 112 operates as a hardware clamp to second modem communications. Theattenuation switch 112 is disengaged during normal, non-interfered converged operation. During engagement of theattenuation switch 112, incoming RF signals to the second (LTE)antenna 132 are disconnected, thereby preventing external RF energy from damaging thesecond modem 110. Protection is also provided from internal RF energy generated from the first modem (LMR internal). Additionally, outgoing RF signals from the second modern 110 via the LTE TX/RX signal 116 are also disconnected, thereby preventing RF Energy from thesecond modem 110 from interfering with thefirst modem 108. The methods employed by theattenuation switch 112 may be one of shunting the antenna path to ground, or providing an open circuit between the antenna path and the second modem. Theattenuation switch 112 may also be realized as a plurality of switches each acting on a plurality of paths to thesecond modem 110 and a plurality ofsecond antennas 132. - During converged operation, the
BP 106 further generatesindicator signals CEM 102 and to the AP 104 while thefirst modem 108 is transmitting and receiving on a first frequency band. Simultaneously, thesecond modem 110 is generating indicator signals 122 to theCEM 102 and the AP 104 while transmitting and receiving on the second frequency band. For example, theBP 106 may generate theindicator signal 118 indicative of ‘LMR transmit enabled’ to theCEM 102 and to the AP 104. The BP 106 may also generate theindicator signal 120 indicative of frequency band, such as ‘LMR frequency’, to theCEM 102 and to the AP 104. The ‘LMR Frequency’ may specify the exact LMR Frequency in use or a range of LMR frequencies that are currently in use. In simultaneous operations, thesecond modem 110 generates theindicator signal 122 to theCEM 102 and the AP 104 indicative of the frequency band of operation, such as ‘LTE band’. ‘The LTE’ band’ may specify the exact LTE frequency in use, or a range of LTE Frequencies in use, for example Band 14 or Band 5. - In accordance with some embodiments, the
indicator signals CEM 102 and the AP 104 for interference. In response to detecting interference by theCEM 102, the CEM drives a hardware attenuation enableline 126 to both theAP 104 and theattenuation switch 112, thereby engaging theattenuation switch 112 which serves to disconnect thesecond modem 110 from thesecond antenna 132. In response to the hardware attenuation enableline 126 being enabled, the AP 104 performs additional analysis to confirm the interference detected by theCEM 102. In some embodiments, a change in theindicator signals software mitigation line 128 to theCEM 102. In other embodiments, where AP 104 determines that power mitigation is the appropriate interference mitigation, the AP 104 then instructs thesecond modem 110 to perform a specific power level interference mitigation, and the second modern 110 then drives a TXPower Level line 124 to theCEM 102. In response to either the TXpower level signal 124 orsoftware mitigation signal 128, theCEM 102 then releases the hardware attenuation enabledline 126 thereby releasing theattenuation switch 112 in response to the interference software mitigation being engaged. - The
CEM 102 further detects changes in interference conditions, such as via the indicator signals 118, 120, 122 and instructs theAP 104 to disengage the interference mitigation, via arelease mitigation signal 138, when the interference is no longer present. In some embodiments, a change in the indicator signals 118,120, 122 will trigger the AP to reevaluate if the interference is no longer present. Prior to removing the mitigation, the AP may apply a second holdoff timer to prevent mitigation thrashing scenarios that may occur with LMR scan or trunking mobility. At the completion of the second holdoff timer, the AP will remove the mitigation, thereby returning the first andsecond modems - In accordance with the embodiments, the interference mitigation may comprise one or more of: power reduction to the second modem; data throttling to the second modem; and/or band steering of the second modem. For example, for the LMR/LTE application, the interference mitigation may comprise one or more of: power reduction to the LTE modem, reducing data speed to the LTE modem, and/or band steering of the LTE modem. The band steering may be performed for example, through dynamically disabling certain LTE bands to steer the LTE modern to a non-interfering location.
- While examples are provided which refer to LMR and LTE modems, it is to be appreciated that the embodiments can be applied beyond LMR and LTE operations. The use of the
baseband processor 106 and theLMR modem 108 is particularly advantageous to public safety communication devices which support mission critical communications. Such devices rely on mission critical push-to-talk (PTT) and scan, hence the mitigation of interference from theLTE modem 110 is extremely important. Theapplications processor 104 and theLTE modem 110 provide a plurality of non-mission critical features such as text-to-speech, touch screen display features, BLUETOOTH, WiFi, and/or global positioning system (GPS) to name a few. - The
portable communication device 100, when operating using first and second frequency bands controlled by first and second modems is able to detect and mitigate interference generated by second modem transmit frequency bands conflicting with first modem receive bands, external RF transmissions interfering with the second modem, internal first modem transmissions interfering with the second modem, and second modem transmit frequency bands interfering with internally generated first modem transmissions. For example, theportable communication device 100, when operating using LMR and LTE frequency bands controlled by LMR and LTE modems is able to detect and mitigate interference generated by: LTE transmit frequency bands conflicting with LMR receive bands, external LMR transmissions interfering with the LTE modem, internal LMR transmissions interfering with LTE modem, and LTE transmit frequency bands interfering with internally generated LMR transmissions. - To address the LTE transmit frequency bands conflicting with LMR receive bands and to address the LTE transmit frequency bands interfering with internally generated LMR transmissions, the mitigation approach comprises reducing power, and/or band steering, and/or reducing data speed to the second modem in the manner described previously.
- Examples of potential interference may include but are not limited to, the upper edge of LMR 700 MHz band (769 MHz-775 MHz) which may be very close to the lower edge of LTE BAND 13 (Uplink 777 MHz-787 MHz) resulting in out of band emissions interference when two transceivers are operating simultaneously. Another example, in which frequencies overlap are LMR 800 MHz band (862 MHz-869 MHz) and LTE BAND 5 (Downlink 869 MHz-894 MHz). The hardware mitigation provided by the
CEM 102 to engage theattenuation switch 112 provides instantaneous interference protection while the software mitigation is executed. These software mitigations can take hundreds of milliseconds to enact, and relying on them without the hardware mitigation would result in degraded LMR scan and mobility operations. - To address internal or external LMR transmissions interfering with the LTE modem, the
portable communication device 100 further comprises a radio frequency (RF)detector 134 operatively coupled to a receive input of thesecond antenna 132 for detecting unwanted RF signals associated with a specific LMR frequency range that can interfere with or cause damage to the LTE modern 1110. Although not shown, theRF detector 134 may interoperate with RF filtering and voltage reference circuits known in the field of RF detection. In the past, the presence of a strong unwanted RF signal to thesecond antenna 132 could have damaged thesecond modem 110 and/or cause interference to thesecond modem 110. For example, the presence of a strong unwanted external RF signal or internal inter-modulation artifacts being picked up by thesecond antenna 132 could have damaged thesecond modem 110 and/or cause interference to thesecond modem 110. TheRF detector 134, in response to a strong unwanted signal, generates an external power detectsignal 136 to theCEM 102 and to theAP 104. TheCEM 102, in response to the external power detectsignal 136, drives thehardware attenuation signal 126 thereby enabling theattenuation switch 112 and disconnecting the LTE antenna from the LTE modern thereby protecting thesecond modem 110 from damage or interference. Theswitch 112 remains engaged until the external power detectsignal 136 changes to an acceptable level as determined by theCEM 102, thereby ensuring that thesecond modem 110 remains undamaged. For example, the presence of, a strong LMR signal at an LTE antenna is prevented from causing damage to the LTE modem by having the CEM maintain the attenuation switch engaged. - The coexistence module (CEM) 102 provided by the embodiments takes into account the currently active first and second modems and automatically applies respective mitigation only as needed under the predetermined scenarios of concern.
Portable communication device 100 advantageously allows for fine adjustment of predetermined modem transceiver parameters such as power level and band operation. Implementation of theCEM 102 andattenuation switch 112 in hardware advantageously avoids substantial delays that would be experienced through a software only mitigation approach. In many cases, the dynamically changing nature of the communications protocol makes a software implementation impractical or unrealizable. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of amethod 200 for managing simultaneous modem operations in a portable communication device, such as the convergedportable communication device 100 ofFIG. 1 , in accordance with some embodiments. Themethod 200 has been illustrated in terms of LMR and LTE frequency bands, controlled by separate modems for ease of description, however it is to be appreciated that themethod 200 is applicable to other modems operating simultaneously in frequency bands susceptible to interference. - The method begins at 202, with simultaneous operation of first and second modems, such as first and
second modems LTE modems portable communication device 100. When a change in frequency band operation takes place at 204, for example a change in either LTE band operation and/or LMR TX/RX and/or LMR band operation, the method ensures operation of the first frequency band communications (LMR band) remains normal. At 208, a check is made for detecting interference during the coexistence mode. For example, the method detects whether the LTE band operations have interfered with the LMR band operations. - When interference is detected at 208, the
method 200 proceeds by engaging anattenuation switch 112 to the antenna path of the second modem at 210 to temporarily negate second frequency band communications at 212. For example, theattenuation switch 112 can be used to temporarily negate LTE communications, while the LMR modem which may be handling mission critical communications operates normally. - At 214, the cause of interference is analyzed, by the
applications processor 104 and a determination is made as to whether a mitigation action is possible. For example, the cause of interference may be analyzed by the AP and CEM ofFIG. 1 as previously described. When a mitigation action is possible at 214, themethod 200 proceeds to a mitigation mode at 216. The mitigation may be a software controlled mitigation comprising for example, reduced power to the second modem and/or reduced data speed to the second modem (the LTE modem) as determined at 218. Thesoftware mitigation 218 may incorporate an optional holdoff timer as previously described to cater for LMR scan and mobility operations. When the applicable software mitigation has been completed at 218, themethod 200 proceeds by disengaging the attenuation switch at 220 and establishing communications using the applicable software mitigation thereby re-establishing coexistence operations at 222. For example the LTE modem may operate at restricted power and/or speed while the LMR operations remain normal. Communications continue in the mitigated coexistence mode returning to 204 to await a frequency change or change in TX/RX state. - Returning back to 214, when the cause of interference is analyzed and a determination is made that a software mitigation action is not possible, the
method 200 returns back to 204 to await a frequency change or change in LMR TX/RX state. Here, the first frequency band communication, such as the LMR communication, operates normally while the second frequency band communication, such as LTE communications, has been negated at 212. - Returning back to 208, when interference is no longer detected in the mitigated coexistence mode, the attenuation switch is disengaged at 230. The removal of
software mitigation 232 may incorporate an optional holdoff timer as previously described to cater for LMR scan and mobility operations. Any previously applied software mitigation is removed at 232, thereby allowing the second frequency band operations, such as the LTE band communications, to return to normal, non-mitigated operation at 234, while returning to 204 to await changes in frequency change or change in LMR TX/RX state. - The method and apparatus provided herein have beneficially enabled coexistence by mitigating interference without infrastructure interaction. The method and apparatus advantageously allow for fine adjustment for specific transceiver parameters such as power level, data throttling, and band steering.
- The mitigation approach advantageously focus on band edges and avoids the use of large filters that could result in increased insertion loss across the band, as well as the cost and size associated with such filters. Additionally, the mitigation approach avoids the use of a software-only approach that can take hundreds of milliseconds which would degrade LMR scan/mobility operations that can be on the order of 50 ms.
- While the AP and BP have been described in terms of advantageously supporting converged operation of two different modems, for example the LMR modem and the LTE modem, it is also to be appreciated that the embodiments can be applied to communication devices having more than two processors supported more than two modems operating with nearby frequency bands that are susceptible to RF interference. As such the embodiments can be said to apply to a plurality of different modems supporting communication protocols operating over different but nearby frequency bands which are susceptible to interference with each other.
- In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present teachings.
- The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
- Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes,” “including,” “contains,” “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a,” “has . . . a,” “includes . . . a,” or “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially,” “essentially,” “approximately,” “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
- It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
- Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
- The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Claims (21)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/525,864 US10917899B1 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2019-07-30 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
CA3148053A CA3148053C (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2020-07-16 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
PCT/US2020/042242 WO2021021450A1 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2020-07-16 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
AU2020319606A AU2020319606B2 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2020-07-16 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
EP20750136.2A EP4005098A1 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2020-07-16 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/525,864 US10917899B1 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2019-07-30 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20210037536A1 true US20210037536A1 (en) | 2021-02-04 |
US10917899B1 US10917899B1 (en) | 2021-02-09 |
Family
ID=71895305
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/525,864 Active 2039-09-19 US10917899B1 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2019-07-30 | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10917899B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP4005098A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2020319606B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3148053C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2021021450A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11304215B2 (en) * | 2019-07-30 | 2022-04-12 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for a portable communication device |
CN115361035A (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2022-11-18 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Radio frequency system, communication device, communication control method, and communication control apparatus |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11690023B2 (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2023-06-27 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Interference mitigation for portable communication device |
Family Cites Families (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6643522B1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2003-11-04 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Method and apparatus providing simultaneous dual mode operations for radios in the shared spectrum |
US7197291B2 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2007-03-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Multimode receiver and method for controlling signal interference |
US20090245221A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Nokia Corporation | Multiradio operation using interference reporting |
US8085834B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2011-12-27 | Infineon Technologies Ag | System partitioning for multi-mobile devices |
US20110105037A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and systems for interference cancellation in multi-mode coexistence modems |
US9277564B2 (en) * | 2010-08-05 | 2016-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus to facilitate support for multi-radio coexistence |
GB2489702A (en) | 2011-04-04 | 2012-10-10 | Nec Corp | Determining interference between first and second radio technologies in a mobile communications device |
US8923816B2 (en) * | 2011-07-28 | 2014-12-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for providing seamless service between a cellular network and wireless local area network for a mobile user |
FR2979045B1 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2013-09-20 | Cassidian | METHOD OF RADIOELECTRIC COEXISTENCE BETWEEN TWO PMR DEVICES, ONE OF WHICH IS IN NARROW BAND AND THE OTHER WITH BROADBAND |
US8995918B2 (en) | 2011-11-14 | 2015-03-31 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Mitigating transmission interference between digital radio and broadband communication devices |
US9066363B2 (en) | 2011-12-29 | 2015-06-23 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for mitigating interference between co-located collaborating radios |
US10264587B2 (en) | 2012-01-17 | 2019-04-16 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Collaborative interference mitigation between physically-proximate narrowband and broadband communication devices |
US8712331B2 (en) * | 2012-04-13 | 2014-04-29 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for mitigating interference between co-located collaborating radios |
US9008020B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2015-04-14 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing resources in a wireless communication system implementing multiple air interface technologies |
GB2507800B (en) * | 2012-11-12 | 2015-05-06 | Broadcom Corp | Apparatus and method |
US9980171B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2018-05-22 | Liveu Ltd. | Apparatus for cooperating with a mobile device |
US9252863B2 (en) * | 2013-04-04 | 2016-02-02 | Mbit Wireless, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adaptive antenna sharing |
CN104185183A (en) | 2013-05-20 | 2014-12-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method for realizing D2D communication and system thereof |
WO2014189436A2 (en) * | 2013-05-23 | 2014-11-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Methods and apparatus for handling connections to multiple radio access technologies |
WO2014193303A1 (en) * | 2013-05-30 | 2014-12-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Ran-controlled selective handover between first and second ran:s |
CN104469818B (en) * | 2013-09-18 | 2018-11-13 | 华为终端有限公司 | Avoid circuit, method and the relevant apparatus of channel disturbance |
US9231711B2 (en) | 2013-11-22 | 2016-01-05 | Harris Corporation | Interference management service for portable communication devices |
US20150163752A1 (en) * | 2013-12-10 | 2015-06-11 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for mitigating interference in user equipment |
US10135139B2 (en) | 2014-07-10 | 2018-11-20 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Multiband antenna system |
US9247413B1 (en) | 2014-10-17 | 2016-01-26 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for flexible fast network switching |
US9749263B2 (en) | 2014-11-05 | 2017-08-29 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods and systems for identifying and reducing LTE-system coverage holes due to external interference |
US9504058B2 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2016-11-22 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods and systems for scheduling transmission of uplink communication |
US9363845B1 (en) | 2014-12-31 | 2016-06-07 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Apparatus and method for carrier aggregation and fast network switching with a single-baseband-modem, carrier-aggregation-capable wireless-communication device |
US9642154B2 (en) | 2015-01-29 | 2017-05-02 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Uplink broadband scheduling in the presence of narrowband interference |
US10034202B2 (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2018-07-24 | Mediatek Inc. | Finer control of WLAN association for network-controlled LTE-WLAN internetworking |
US10122406B2 (en) * | 2015-06-29 | 2018-11-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coexistence over a shared band with dual antenna sharing |
US9668300B2 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2017-05-30 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Filtering apparatus and method for multiband radio |
US9615299B1 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2017-04-04 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mitigating interference between mobile devices in a wireless communication system |
US9461696B1 (en) | 2015-10-05 | 2016-10-04 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and converged communication device for enhancing broadband and narrowband communication |
US10178688B2 (en) * | 2015-10-06 | 2019-01-08 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method of scheduling short uplink transmissions |
US10334473B2 (en) | 2015-12-15 | 2019-06-25 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing radiofrequency interference in a mobile communications device |
US9979069B2 (en) | 2016-05-02 | 2018-05-22 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Wireless broadband/land mobile radio antenna system |
US10420023B2 (en) | 2018-01-10 | 2019-09-17 | Dell Products, Lp | Method and apparatus for multiple radio access technology antenna front end controller integration |
CN108183725B (en) | 2018-01-17 | 2021-02-26 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Antenna coexistence mutual interference processing method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
-
2019
- 2019-07-30 US US16/525,864 patent/US10917899B1/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-07-16 CA CA3148053A patent/CA3148053C/en active Active
- 2020-07-16 EP EP20750136.2A patent/EP4005098A1/en active Pending
- 2020-07-16 AU AU2020319606A patent/AU2020319606B2/en active Active
- 2020-07-16 WO PCT/US2020/042242 patent/WO2021021450A1/en unknown
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11304215B2 (en) * | 2019-07-30 | 2022-04-12 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for a portable communication device |
CN115361035A (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2022-11-18 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Radio frequency system, communication device, communication control method, and communication control apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA3148053A1 (en) | 2021-02-04 |
AU2020319606B2 (en) | 2023-02-23 |
US10917899B1 (en) | 2021-02-09 |
EP4005098A1 (en) | 2022-06-01 |
CA3148053C (en) | 2023-12-05 |
AU2020319606A1 (en) | 2022-02-17 |
WO2021021450A1 (en) | 2021-02-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2020319606B2 (en) | Method and apparatus to maximize simultaneous modem operations in a converged communication device | |
US9467236B2 (en) | Method of In-device interference mitigation for cellular, bluetooth, WiFi, and satellite systems coexistence | |
EP3255938B1 (en) | Transmission power modulation to facilitate in-device coexistence between wireless communication technologies | |
US9781687B2 (en) | Controlling radio transmission power in a multi-radio wireless communication device | |
US7848711B2 (en) | Radio communication apparatus and radio communication method | |
EP2375571B1 (en) | User equipment apparatus for simultaneously transmitting signals via a plurality of wireless communication chips to which different wireless communication schemes are applied and method for controlling transmission power thereof | |
JP2007318690A (en) | Radio communication equipment, and radio communication method | |
EP3542466B1 (en) | Desktop signal booster | |
EP3654623B1 (en) | Method for reducing radiation and mobile terminal | |
EP3092720A2 (en) | Opportunistic active interference cancellation using rx diversity antenna | |
KR20130129383A (en) | Method and apparatus for handling in-device co-existence interference in a multi-radio environment | |
EP3629637A1 (en) | Lte nr power control for en-dc | |
US9197166B2 (en) | Increasing power amplifier linearity to facilitate in-device coexistence between wireless communication technologies | |
CA3147873A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing broadband data in a converged portable communication device | |
KR20120064834A (en) | Apparatus and method for improving performance of rse in a multi-standby terminal | |
CN104243376A (en) | Communications apparatus and related method thereof | |
WO2014100180A1 (en) | Agile active interference cancellation (aaic) for multi-radio mobile devices | |
EP3577797B1 (en) | Reducing oscillation in a signal booster | |
WO2015067220A1 (en) | Methods for packet transmission protection and communications apparatus utilizing the same | |
US8107510B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for non-cooperative coexistence between wireless communication protocols |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALFARO, JAVIER;BYK, DENNIS A;BOERGER, MARK A;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049899/0459 Effective date: 20190730 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |