US20200123878A1 - Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance - Google Patents
Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20200123878A1 US20200123878A1 US16/624,480 US201816624480A US2020123878A1 US 20200123878 A1 US20200123878 A1 US 20200123878A1 US 201816624480 A US201816624480 A US 201816624480A US 2020123878 A1 US2020123878 A1 US 2020123878A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- rig
- equipment
- schedule
- work
- operating portion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 41
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B44/00—Automatic control systems specially adapted for drilling operations, i.e. self-operating systems which function to carry out or modify a drilling operation without intervention of a human operator, e.g. computer-controlled drilling systems; Systems specially adapted for monitoring a plurality of drilling variables or conditions
Definitions
- Drilling rigs are large, complex endeavors that employ many types of equipment to operate. Everything from major components such as top drives, mud pumps, draw works power, and hydraulic, to smaller pumps and electrical systems are used together to perform the tasks necessary in a drilling rig environment. Much of this equipment is subject to statutory/regulatory/certificate requirements for regular maintenance; however, the task of scheduling and executing maintenance and repairs can be difficult due to the complex interaction of the components in addition to the impact on drilling tasks. Many current rigs use an outdated system of verbal, reactionary communication to perform maintenance and updates that frequently are postponed due to the difficulty of scheduling. There is a need in the art for an improved way to schedule and perform maintenance on a drilling rig.
- Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to methods for coordinating schedules for executing work orders on an oilfield drilling rig.
- the methods include receiving a rig dynamic schedule that describes activities of the drilling rig as a whole, wherein the drilling rig comprises rig equipment, and receiving a plurality of work orders that describe maintenance work to be performed on the drilling equipment.
- the methods also include receiving an equipment-specific dynamic schedule for the rig equipment, wherein the equipment-specific schedule is coordinated with the rig schedule, and providing a composite dynamic schedule including the rig schedule and the equipment-specific schedule.
- the methods include assigning an availability value for the rig equipment, assigning an invasiveness value to the work order, and assigning an interruption tolerance value to the rig schedule.
- the interruption tolerance value pertains to the harm associated with rendering the rig equipment unavailable due to the work order, and if a combination of the availability value and invasiveness value is sufficiently low and the interruption tolerance is sufficiently high according to predetermined values, authorizing the work order.
- the present disclosure is directed to methods for receiving a rig planned schedule of events for a drilling rig, the rig having rig equipment configured to execute various tasks according to the rig schedule.
- a particular rig equipment or component is designated as idle or busy during certain times.
- the methods also include identifying a schedule of the various tasks for specific rig equipment according to the rig schedule, receiving a plurality of work orders describing work that is to be performed on the rig equipment, and monitoring the status of the rig equipment with a sensor deployed on the rig equipment. The sensor measures an observable parameter that dictates whether or not the rig equipment is in active use or is idle. If the status of the rig equipment is idle according to the monitoring status, authorizing a work order on rig equipment that is designated as busy according to the rig schedule.
- the present disclosure is directed to an apparatus for use on a drilling rig including an operating portion configured to perform work related to a drilling operation, a sensor operably coupled to the operating portion, the sensor being configured to measure at least one observable parameter that is related to the operation of the operating portion.
- the apparatus also includes a communication component operably coupled to the sensor and configured to communicate the measured observable parameter of the operating portion to a remote computing device to indicate the status of the operating portion.
- the remote computing device of the apparatus includes a scheduler configured to receive a schedule of rig operations and to coordinate operations of the operating portion with the schedule of rig operations.
- the scheduler is configured to authorize execution of a work order pertaining to the operating portion based at least in part upon the measurements taken by the sensor.
- FIG. 1 is a calendar diagram showing a schedule of employment of various pieces of equipment on a drilling rig according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing methods according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a system for determining status of equipment on a drilling rig according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 4 shows a swimlane diagram showing interaction between various components of a rig system according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 5 is another swimlane diagram according to embodiments of the present disclosure including the interactions between a scheduler and the subject equipment.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram for a method of scheduling a WO according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- the calendar and associated features shown and described in FIG. 1 will allow rig operators to coordinate scheduling for equipment on the rig in a more communicative, cooperative way.
- the rig operator(s) can input the schedule for the next upcoming time period (i.e. a week) into a central computerized system which stores the information and distributes the information to all necessary parties as needed and as permitted.
- Various maintenance operations such as repair, replacement, upkeep, upgrades, and any other type of maintenance work can be described in a work order (WO) which can include any necessary or convenient information relating to the WO, such as the subject equipment, the actions to be performed, the parts needed, the time it will take, the personnel required, etc.
- the WO can include any pertinent information that enables others to know what will be done.
- top drive 12 there are a number of equipment components such as top drive 12 , mud pumps 14 , drawworks 16 , power 18 , and hydraulics 20 . It is to be appreciated that this list is not exhaustive and that there can be any number and type of equipment listed in a given application, including duplicates of any one or more of the items.
- the equipment shown and described with respect to FIG. 1 are chosen for purposes of illustration and to avoid obscuring aspects of the present disclosure and without limitation.
- the calendar 10 can also include a master schedule 22 showing the activities of the rig at a macro level. Such activities can be listed as Drilling 24 , Reaming 26 , Trip Out 28 , etc.
- the horizontal axis can represent time in days or hours or another convenient measurement.
- the schedule for the equipment can be listed as busy, standby, idle, etc. for each equipment at any given time.
- time 29 is marked as “Available”
- time 27 is marked as “Standby” while the black line denotes “Busy.”
- Busy can mean that the equipment is actively being used and is therefore unavailable for another task.
- Standby can mean that the equipment needs to be ready for use, but may or may not be idle at a given time.
- Idle or available means the equipment is not in use and is generally available for maintenance. There may be other levels of availability for the equipment. For example, some equipment may have multiple components and the status of the equipment may be “busy” for some aspects of the equipment but “idle” for others.
- the schedule 10 includes blocked-off times 30 identified as busy, standby, or any other unavailable (or partially unavailable) status.
- Idle time (available time) 32 for each piece of equipment shows times during which certain equipment is available for performing a WO.
- a WO can schedule a time for a piece of equipment; however, in most cases priority is given to critical operations and maintenance is given a secondary priority. Accordingly maintenance can be scheduled during available times, ensuring that maintenance is more timely performed and fewer components are allowed to skip their WO time frame due to lack of communication or other inefficiencies.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram 40 showing methods according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- the methods 40 can be executed by a computing component such as a central server, a desktop computer at a rig site, a mobile device, or any other suitable computing component according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- the method includes compiling a list of equipment at the rig site. Frequently top drives, mud pumps, drawworks, power, and hydraulics can be featured. Other equipment can be included in this list.
- a list of work orders (WO) is compiled.
- the list of WO can be aggregated from various sources including parties responsible for performing or scheduling the work on the equipment.
- the computing component can also be in communication with a remote source of information such as a regulatory or certification body which sets forth maintenance schedules for various equipment.
- the WOs can contain as much information as needed, including such things as work to be performed, time required, parts required, personnel to perform work, location of work, etc.
- schedules for the WO can be received.
- the WO can include a time by which the work should (or in some cases must) be performed.
- the time for performing the WO is initially tentative and subject to availability.
- a WO can specify a high priority such as if the equipment may breakdown catastrophically without proper maintenance.
- an outside source of information such as the manufacturer of the equipment may issue a recall or a stop work order for their products because of new information coming to light in which case the WO can be given a high priority.
- the method includes identifying time windows for the WO(s) to be executed. This can be achieved by looking at the schedules and finding an available time.
- the proposed time window can compute two numbers: first, a probability that the time window will actually occur based on past statistics which can be maintained in a database for analysis; and second a probability that the actual maintenance time will fit into the time window.
- the time availability of two or more components is coupled together to perform maintenance on both components at the same time if the WO dictates that there is an opportunity for efficiently avoiding duplicate efforts. For example, suppose there are two pumps that need a certain cleaning operation. If both pumps can be cleaned simultaneously the method can include looking for a time during which both pumps are available and, if possible, schedule the maintenance accordingly.
- a check is performed to determine whether or not there is sufficient idle/semi-idle time to perform all WOs. This could be manual process (human decision) or an automated process based on probability rules. If yes, at 52 the WOs are scheduled and executed and the method terminates. If, however, there is insufficient time, at 54 a separate inquiry can be made to determine alternative available times for availability of equipment.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a system 60 for determining status of equipment on a drilling rig according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- the availability of a particular piece of equipment may be determined from various sources including input from a rig operator who can schedule time for the equipment during which it is available or idle. In other embodiments the system shown in FIG. 3 can provide additional information to properly determine availability of the equipment.
- the equipment is configured to communicate with a central computation component 68 which can be a controller, a switch, a server, or any other suitable computing component with sufficient computational capabilities to perform the tasks described herein.
- the communication between the equipment and the computation component 68 can be wired, wireless, direct, indirect, etc.
- the various pieces of equipment can have one or more sensors 70 , 72 , and 74 which can be configured to monitor the status of the equipment from time to time.
- the sensors can be accelerometers, vibration sensors, pressure sensors, temperatures sensors, electrical sensors, motion sensors (optical etc.) or any other suitable sensor configured to determine when the equipment is in actual use.
- Many of the types of equipment in use at a rig site involve power consumption and as such they are generally noisy, hot, or give some other measurable signal of their use.
- the type and quantity of sensor can vary for a given piece of equipment but will be sufficiently equipped to provide a signal back to the computation component 68 whether or not the equipment is idle or in use. There may be more than one sensor per equipment and the sensor(s) can provide a type or degree of availability/use.
- the drawworks may have a first sensor on the first reel and a second sensor on the second reel.
- the sensors can report the times during which each reel was in use.
- the number of sensors and the degree of detail desired can be virtually limitless.
- the computation component 68 can use this information to achieve a more detailed picture of whether or not a given piece of equipment is accessible for a given WO or not. For example, suppose a hydraulic component is scheduled as “busy” during a given day. Perhaps the rig operator is accustomed to having the hydraulic component ready for use in case of an emergency or another eventuality. Perhaps regulation or policy requires the hydraulic component to be available but in a standby mode.
- the sensors can be used to measure the actual use of the hydraulic component during the subject time period and can use this information to authorize a WO to be executed on the hydraulic component even though it is ostensibly “busy” during that time.
- the computing component 68 can store the information for use over time and compile a probabilistic model of availability for the equipment. Suppose there is a component that is scheduled “busy” for a certain type of rig activity. The computing component 68 can access past, similar operations and may find that the data shows that 80% of the time during this process this component is actually idle and therefore there is a good chance that a WO may be executed during this time period. In some embodiments the computing component 68 can issue a tentative authorization to perform a WO with an instruction that the equipment may actually be unavailable and that before performing the WO the status should be verified.
- the WO can include a description of the level of invasiveness of the work to be performed as per the WO. Some maintenance requires dismantling of equipment or other significant operation that cannot easily be reversed if an urgent, unexpected need to access the equipment arises. Other maintenance work can be terminated mid-stream quickly and the subject equipment can be returned to duty relatively quickly.
- the WO can provide a numerical value describing the invasiveness of the WO, or a description of the time, equipment, location, personnel or other aspects that will be required to return the subject equipment to service. If the combination of the probability the subject equipment will be needed and the invasiveness of the action is favorable, the WO can be executed with higher confidence that it will not disrupt normal operations of the rig as a whole.
- FIG. 4 shows a swimlane diagram 80 showing interaction between various components of a rig system according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- a rig planner 82 there can be a piece of equipment 84 (subject to the WO—can be any equipment or component), a WO executing party 86 , and a computation component with or without a database 88 .
- the WO executing party 86 can be personnel responsible for carrying out the WO and may include equipment used to execute the WO.
- the WO executing party includes a computing component configured to execute software or other instructions to carry out operations according to the present disclosure.
- the WO executing party can analyze schedules to make improved use of time by identifying additional available time as will be described herein. It is to be understood that there may be more parties involved and that the diagram does not necessarily show all communications and actions between these parties but rather is to illustrate certain features of the present disclosure. It is also to be appreciated that the order of operations described in FIG. 4 are not necessarily the order in which the operations take place. In many embodiments the order can change and it will become apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art how the operations interact.
- the WO executing party can initiate the WO.
- the WO can come from another party.
- the WO can be stored in a database and can include information necessary to allow proper scheduling of equipment and personnel to execute the WO.
- the rig activities are scheduled.
- the rig activities can include macro scheduling operations such as “drilling” “trip out” and other common rig-wide activities.
- the schedule can be delivered to the database for access by other relevant components and parties.
- the schedule is accessed by the WO executing party 86 .
- the WO executing party 86 can read the schedule to determine if there is available time to execute the WO in a manner similar to what was described above with respect to FIGS. 1 and 2 .
- the WO executing party 86 requests time for executing the WO. This can include identifying an available time window and requesting control of the subject equipment 84 during that time, or additionally it can include requesting access to the equipment 84 even if according to the schedule the equipment 84 is occupied.
- the WO executing party 86 can attempt to adjust the schedule if there are no available times.
- the Rig Planner 82 can grant or deny the request. If the request is granted the WO can be executed and the process can be terminated with respect to that WO. If there are no available times for the equipment 84 , at 100 the equipment 84 can be monitored by sensors such as accelerometers, vibration sensors, temperature sensors, etc. to determine whether or not the equipment is actually available. At 102 an available time is determined, and at 104 the WO is executed.
- monitoring equipment can include accessing a database for information describing past usage information for similar tasks to infer availability when even when the schedule may report “busy.” Accordingly, the WO is more likely to be executed in a timely, rapid manner using the systems and methods of the present disclosure. Monitoring the equipment allows use and access based on actual measurements of equipment.
- FIG. 5 is another swimlane diagram according to embodiments of the present disclosure including the interactions between a scheduler 110 and the subject equipment 112 .
- the equipment 112 can be equipped to communicate directly with the scheduler 110 via a wired or wireless connection.
- the scheduler 110 inquires after the macro schedule to determine availability of the equipment 112 as per the macro rig plan, including a probability that this time window will actually occur.
- the equipment 112 responds with the desired information.
- this query is not directed toward the equipment 112 but rather toward another database or another source of information wherever the rig plan is stored.
- the scheduler 110 can also have access to WOs and as such will know what is needed in terms of time, materials, expertise, etc. for performing the WO. If the report back from the equipment 112 does not provide a readily-available time for the WO, at 118 the scheduler can query after the micro status of the equipment 112 .
- the sensors can report on the actual usage of the equipment by monitoring some measurable parameter on the equipment which indicates idleness or activity. The parameter to be measured can depend on the equipment in question.
- the equipment 112 returns the desired information and the scheduler can proceed to make a more informed decision based on the measured information in combination with the rig plan and the probability that the WO will occur in the expected time. Accordingly, the WO is more likely to be executed on time and without significant interruption to rig operations.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram for a method 120 of scheduling a WO according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- a determination is made that there are no readily available time windows in which to perform a given WO. This determination can be made using methods and systems described elsewhere herein including creating a rig schedule, compiling WOs, scheduling equipment according to the rig schedule, and monitoring equipment for availability. Of course, if the above operations result in an acceptable time window the WO can be scheduled and carried out accordingly.
- the method includes accessing monitors/sensors that measure actual status of various equipment indicated in the WO. In other embodiments this can include accessing a database of past, similar activities.
- a value is assigned to the availability of the equipment.
- an availability score For example, an availability score of 0 means the equipment is in use and cannot be accessed, a score of 1 means the equipment is sitting idle and is not in use, and somewhere in between 0 and 1 means the equipment may be accessible. Closer to 1 means more available than closer to 0. There is accordingly a spectrum of availability score.
- an invasiveness score for the work to be performed as per the WO is obtained/acquired/assigned. The invasiveness score is 0, the work is very easily stopped and the equipment can be returned to service quickly, while a score of 1 means the work to be performed will take the equipment offline for a significant amount of time, or that there is a significant expense (in terms of time and/or expenditure) to return the equipment to service.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application having Ser. No. 62/524,166 which was filed on Jun. 23, 2017. The content of this priority provisional application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Drilling rigs are large, complex endeavors that employ many types of equipment to operate. Everything from major components such as top drives, mud pumps, draw works power, and hydraulic, to smaller pumps and electrical systems are used together to perform the tasks necessary in a drilling rig environment. Much of this equipment is subject to statutory/regulatory/certificate requirements for regular maintenance; however, the task of scheduling and executing maintenance and repairs can be difficult due to the complex interaction of the components in addition to the impact on drilling tasks. Many current rigs use an outdated system of verbal, reactionary communication to perform maintenance and updates that frequently are postponed due to the difficulty of scheduling. There is a need in the art for an improved way to schedule and perform maintenance on a drilling rig.
- Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to methods for coordinating schedules for executing work orders on an oilfield drilling rig. The methods include receiving a rig dynamic schedule that describes activities of the drilling rig as a whole, wherein the drilling rig comprises rig equipment, and receiving a plurality of work orders that describe maintenance work to be performed on the drilling equipment. The methods also include receiving an equipment-specific dynamic schedule for the rig equipment, wherein the equipment-specific schedule is coordinated with the rig schedule, and providing a composite dynamic schedule including the rig schedule and the equipment-specific schedule.
- In still further embodiments, the methods include assigning an availability value for the rig equipment, assigning an invasiveness value to the work order, and assigning an interruption tolerance value to the rig schedule. The interruption tolerance value pertains to the harm associated with rendering the rig equipment unavailable due to the work order, and if a combination of the availability value and invasiveness value is sufficiently low and the interruption tolerance is sufficiently high according to predetermined values, authorizing the work order.
- In other embodiments the present disclosure is directed to methods for receiving a rig planned schedule of events for a drilling rig, the rig having rig equipment configured to execute various tasks according to the rig schedule. A particular rig equipment or component is designated as idle or busy during certain times. The methods also include identifying a schedule of the various tasks for specific rig equipment according to the rig schedule, receiving a plurality of work orders describing work that is to be performed on the rig equipment, and monitoring the status of the rig equipment with a sensor deployed on the rig equipment. The sensor measures an observable parameter that dictates whether or not the rig equipment is in active use or is idle. If the status of the rig equipment is idle according to the monitoring status, authorizing a work order on rig equipment that is designated as busy according to the rig schedule.
- In yet other embodiments the present disclosure is directed to an apparatus for use on a drilling rig including an operating portion configured to perform work related to a drilling operation, a sensor operably coupled to the operating portion, the sensor being configured to measure at least one observable parameter that is related to the operation of the operating portion. The apparatus also includes a communication component operably coupled to the sensor and configured to communicate the measured observable parameter of the operating portion to a remote computing device to indicate the status of the operating portion.
- In still further embodiments the remote computing device of the apparatus includes a scheduler configured to receive a schedule of rig operations and to coordinate operations of the operating portion with the schedule of rig operations. The scheduler is configured to authorize execution of a work order pertaining to the operating portion based at least in part upon the measurements taken by the sensor.
-
FIG. 1 is a calendar diagram showing a schedule of employment of various pieces of equipment on a drilling rig according to embodiments of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing methods according to embodiments of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a system for determining status of equipment on a drilling rig according to embodiments of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 4 shows a swimlane diagram showing interaction between various components of a rig system according to embodiments of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 5 is another swimlane diagram according to embodiments of the present disclosure including the interactions between a scheduler and the subject equipment. -
FIG. 6 is a block diagram for a method of scheduling a WO according to embodiments of the present disclosure. - Below is a detailed description according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. The calendar and associated features shown and described in
FIG. 1 will allow rig operators to coordinate scheduling for equipment on the rig in a more communicative, cooperative way. The rig operator(s) can input the schedule for the next upcoming time period (i.e. a week) into a central computerized system which stores the information and distributes the information to all necessary parties as needed and as permitted. Various maintenance operations such as repair, replacement, upkeep, upgrades, and any other type of maintenance work can be described in a work order (WO) which can include any necessary or convenient information relating to the WO, such as the subject equipment, the actions to be performed, the parts needed, the time it will take, the personnel required, etc. The WO can include any pertinent information that enables others to know what will be done. - In some embodiments there are a number of equipment components such as
top drive 12,mud pumps 14,drawworks 16,power 18, and hydraulics 20. It is to be appreciated that this list is not exhaustive and that there can be any number and type of equipment listed in a given application, including duplicates of any one or more of the items. The equipment shown and described with respect toFIG. 1 are chosen for purposes of illustration and to avoid obscuring aspects of the present disclosure and without limitation. Thecalendar 10 can also include amaster schedule 22 showing the activities of the rig at a macro level. Such activities can be listed as Drilling 24, Reaming 26, Trip Out 28, etc. The horizontal axis can represent time in days or hours or another convenient measurement. The schedule for the equipment can be listed as busy, standby, idle, etc. for each equipment at any given time. For example,time 29 is marked as “Available” andtime 27 is marked as “Standby” while the black line denotes “Busy.” Busy can mean that the equipment is actively being used and is therefore unavailable for another task. Standby can mean that the equipment needs to be ready for use, but may or may not be idle at a given time. Idle or available means the equipment is not in use and is generally available for maintenance. There may be other levels of availability for the equipment. For example, some equipment may have multiple components and the status of the equipment may be “busy” for some aspects of the equipment but “idle” for others. - The
schedule 10 includes blocked-off times 30 identified as busy, standby, or any other unavailable (or partially unavailable) status. Idle time (available time) 32 for each piece of equipment shows times during which certain equipment is available for performing a WO. In some embodiments a WO can schedule a time for a piece of equipment; however, in most cases priority is given to critical operations and maintenance is given a secondary priority. Accordingly maintenance can be scheduled during available times, ensuring that maintenance is more timely performed and fewer components are allowed to skip their WO time frame due to lack of communication or other inefficiencies. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram 40 showing methods according to embodiments of the present disclosure. Themethods 40 can be executed by a computing component such as a central server, a desktop computer at a rig site, a mobile device, or any other suitable computing component according to embodiments of the present disclosure. At 42 the method includes compiling a list of equipment at the rig site. Frequently top drives, mud pumps, drawworks, power, and hydraulics can be featured. Other equipment can be included in this list. At 44 a list of work orders (WO) is compiled. The list of WO can be aggregated from various sources including parties responsible for performing or scheduling the work on the equipment. The computing component can also be in communication with a remote source of information such as a regulatory or certification body which sets forth maintenance schedules for various equipment. The WOs can contain as much information as needed, including such things as work to be performed, time required, parts required, personnel to perform work, location of work, etc. - At 46 schedules for the WO can be received. The WO can include a time by which the work should (or in some cases must) be performed. In some embodiments the time for performing the WO is initially tentative and subject to availability. In some cases a WO can specify a high priority such as if the equipment may breakdown catastrophically without proper maintenance. In some embodiments an outside source of information such as the manufacturer of the equipment may issue a recall or a stop work order for their products because of new information coming to light in which case the WO can be given a high priority.
- At 48 the method includes identifying time windows for the WO(s) to be executed. This can be achieved by looking at the schedules and finding an available time. The proposed time window can compute two numbers: first, a probability that the time window will actually occur based on past statistics which can be maintained in a database for analysis; and second a probability that the actual maintenance time will fit into the time window. In some embodiments the time availability of two or more components is coupled together to perform maintenance on both components at the same time if the WO dictates that there is an opportunity for efficiently avoiding duplicate efforts. For example, suppose there are two pumps that need a certain cleaning operation. If both pumps can be cleaned simultaneously the method can include looking for a time during which both pumps are available and, if possible, schedule the maintenance accordingly.
- At 50 a check is performed to determine whether or not there is sufficient idle/semi-idle time to perform all WOs. This could be manual process (human decision) or an automated process based on probability rules. If yes, at 52 the WOs are scheduled and executed and the method terminates. If, however, there is insufficient time, at 54 a separate inquiry can be made to determine alternative available times for availability of equipment.
-
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a system 60 for determining status of equipment on a drilling rig according to embodiments of the present disclosure. The availability of a particular piece of equipment may be determined from various sources including input from a rig operator who can schedule time for the equipment during which it is available or idle. In other embodiments the system shown inFIG. 3 can provide additional information to properly determine availability of the equipment. There are three pieces ofequipment central computation component 68 which can be a controller, a switch, a server, or any other suitable computing component with sufficient computational capabilities to perform the tasks described herein. The communication between the equipment and thecomputation component 68 can be wired, wireless, direct, indirect, etc. The various pieces of equipment can have one ormore sensors computation component 68 whether or not the equipment is idle or in use. There may be more than one sensor per equipment and the sensor(s) can provide a type or degree of availability/use. For example, consider a drawworks with multiple reels that can be used together or individually. The drawworks may have a first sensor on the first reel and a second sensor on the second reel. The sensors can report the times during which each reel was in use. The number of sensors and the degree of detail desired can be virtually limitless. - The
computation component 68 can use this information to achieve a more detailed picture of whether or not a given piece of equipment is accessible for a given WO or not. For example, suppose a hydraulic component is scheduled as “busy” during a given day. Perhaps the rig operator is accustomed to having the hydraulic component ready for use in case of an emergency or another eventuality. Perhaps regulation or policy requires the hydraulic component to be available but in a standby mode. The sensors can be used to measure the actual use of the hydraulic component during the subject time period and can use this information to authorize a WO to be executed on the hydraulic component even though it is ostensibly “busy” during that time. - The
computing component 68 can store the information for use over time and compile a probabilistic model of availability for the equipment. Suppose there is a component that is scheduled “busy” for a certain type of rig activity. Thecomputing component 68 can access past, similar operations and may find that the data shows that 80% of the time during this process this component is actually idle and therefore there is a good chance that a WO may be executed during this time period. In some embodiments thecomputing component 68 can issue a tentative authorization to perform a WO with an instruction that the equipment may actually be unavailable and that before performing the WO the status should be verified. - In some embodiments the WO can include a description of the level of invasiveness of the work to be performed as per the WO. Some maintenance requires dismantling of equipment or other significant operation that cannot easily be reversed if an urgent, unexpected need to access the equipment arises. Other maintenance work can be terminated mid-stream quickly and the subject equipment can be returned to duty relatively quickly. The WO can provide a numerical value describing the invasiveness of the WO, or a description of the time, equipment, location, personnel or other aspects that will be required to return the subject equipment to service. If the combination of the probability the subject equipment will be needed and the invasiveness of the action is favorable, the WO can be executed with higher confidence that it will not disrupt normal operations of the rig as a whole.
-
FIG. 4 shows a swimlane diagram 80 showing interaction between various components of a rig system according to embodiments of the present disclosure. In some embodiments of the present disclosure there can be arig planner 82, a piece of equipment 84 (subject to the WO—can be any equipment or component), a WO executingparty 86, and a computation component with or without adatabase 88. The WO executingparty 86 can be personnel responsible for carrying out the WO and may include equipment used to execute the WO. In some embodiments the WO executing party includes a computing component configured to execute software or other instructions to carry out operations according to the present disclosure. Among other things, the WO executing party can analyze schedules to make improved use of time by identifying additional available time as will be described herein. It is to be understood that there may be more parties involved and that the diagram does not necessarily show all communications and actions between these parties but rather is to illustrate certain features of the present disclosure. It is also to be appreciated that the order of operations described inFIG. 4 are not necessarily the order in which the operations take place. In many embodiments the order can change and it will become apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art how the operations interact. - At 90 the WO executing party can initiate the WO. In other embodiments the WO can come from another party. The WO can be stored in a database and can include information necessary to allow proper scheduling of equipment and personnel to execute the WO. At 92 the rig activities are scheduled. The rig activities can include macro scheduling operations such as “drilling” “trip out” and other common rig-wide activities. The schedule can be delivered to the database for access by other relevant components and parties. At 94 the schedule is accessed by the WO executing
party 86. The WO executingparty 86 can read the schedule to determine if there is available time to execute the WO in a manner similar to what was described above with respect toFIGS. 1 and 2 . At 96 the WO executingparty 86 requests time for executing the WO. This can include identifying an available time window and requesting control of thesubject equipment 84 during that time, or additionally it can include requesting access to theequipment 84 even if according to the schedule theequipment 84 is occupied. At 98 the WO executingparty 86 can attempt to adjust the schedule if there are no available times. TheRig Planner 82 can grant or deny the request. If the request is granted the WO can be executed and the process can be terminated with respect to that WO. If there are no available times for theequipment 84, at 100 theequipment 84 can be monitored by sensors such as accelerometers, vibration sensors, temperature sensors, etc. to determine whether or not the equipment is actually available. At 102 an available time is determined, and at 104 the WO is executed. - In some embodiments at 100 “monitoring equipment” can include accessing a database for information describing past usage information for similar tasks to infer availability when even when the schedule may report “busy.” Accordingly, the WO is more likely to be executed in a timely, rapid manner using the systems and methods of the present disclosure. Monitoring the equipment allows use and access based on actual measurements of equipment.
-
FIG. 5 is another swimlane diagram according to embodiments of the present disclosure including the interactions between ascheduler 110 and thesubject equipment 112. Theequipment 112 can be equipped to communicate directly with thescheduler 110 via a wired or wireless connection. In other embodiments there is a computing component intermediary facilitating the communication between equipment and scheduler. In other embodiments there is a sensor on theequipment 112 that carries out the communication. In yet further embodiments there is a sensor and a communication component operably coupled to the equipment to facilitate communications. At 114 thescheduler 110 inquires after the macro schedule to determine availability of theequipment 112 as per the macro rig plan, including a probability that this time window will actually occur. At 116 theequipment 112 responds with the desired information. In other embodiments this query is not directed toward theequipment 112 but rather toward another database or another source of information wherever the rig plan is stored. Thescheduler 110 can also have access to WOs and as such will know what is needed in terms of time, materials, expertise, etc. for performing the WO. If the report back from theequipment 112 does not provide a readily-available time for the WO, at 118 the scheduler can query after the micro status of theequipment 112. The sensors can report on the actual usage of the equipment by monitoring some measurable parameter on the equipment which indicates idleness or activity. The parameter to be measured can depend on the equipment in question. At 120 theequipment 112 returns the desired information and the scheduler can proceed to make a more informed decision based on the measured information in combination with the rig plan and the probability that the WO will occur in the expected time. Accordingly, the WO is more likely to be executed on time and without significant interruption to rig operations. -
FIG. 6 is a block diagram for amethod 120 of scheduling a WO according to embodiments of the present disclosure. At 122 a determination is made that there are no readily available time windows in which to perform a given WO. This determination can be made using methods and systems described elsewhere herein including creating a rig schedule, compiling WOs, scheduling equipment according to the rig schedule, and monitoring equipment for availability. Of course, if the above operations result in an acceptable time window the WO can be scheduled and carried out accordingly. At 124 the method includes accessing monitors/sensors that measure actual status of various equipment indicated in the WO. In other embodiments this can include accessing a database of past, similar activities. At 126 a value is assigned to the availability of the equipment. This numerical value can be referred to as an availability score. For example, an availability score of 0 means the equipment is in use and cannot be accessed, a score of 1 means the equipment is sitting idle and is not in use, and somewhere in between 0 and 1 means the equipment may be accessible. Closer to 1 means more available than closer to 0. There is accordingly a spectrum of availability score. At 128 an invasiveness score for the work to be performed as per the WO is obtained/acquired/assigned. The invasiveness score is 0, the work is very easily stopped and the equipment can be returned to service quickly, while a score of 1 means the work to be performed will take the equipment offline for a significant amount of time, or that there is a significant expense (in terms of time and/or expenditure) to return the equipment to service. Closer to 0 is less invasive and closer to 1 is more invasive. There is a spectrum of invasiveness for the WO. At 130 an interruption tolerance value is acquired/assigned that pertains to how significant the damage would be if the WO is executed and there is an unexpected need to access the equipment that is delayed or prevented because the WO is underway. There can be a spectrum for this value as well between 0 and 1 where closer to 0 means there is zero tolerance for delay and closer to 1 means the damage is insignificant or negligible. At 132 the availability score, the invasiveness score, and the interruption tolerance are mathematically combined. There are many ways to combine these numbers, but the result is that if the availability score is high enough, the invasiveness score is low enough, and the interruption tolerance is low enough, at 134 the WO is executed; else the WO is postponed and another time is sought. If it so happens that equipment is needed during a WO, the values can be adjusted for the next time a similar situation arises. One result of the systems and methods of the present disclosure is that the decision to proceed with a given WO at a given time is based on actual measurements of the use of the equipment in question, and decisions are made ahead of time with respect to the interruption tolerance so that WOs are more likely to be executed earlier and more efficiently than without the present disclosure. - The foregoing disclosure hereby enables a person of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the disclosed systems without undue experimentation. Certain examples are given to for purposes of explanation and are not given in a limiting manner.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/624,480 US20200123878A1 (en) | 2017-06-23 | 2018-06-25 | Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201762524166P | 2017-06-23 | 2017-06-23 | |
US16/624,480 US20200123878A1 (en) | 2017-06-23 | 2018-06-25 | Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance |
PCT/US2018/039245 WO2018237378A1 (en) | 2017-06-23 | 2018-06-25 | Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20200123878A1 true US20200123878A1 (en) | 2020-04-23 |
Family
ID=64737354
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/624,480 Abandoned US20200123878A1 (en) | 2017-06-23 | 2018-06-25 | Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20200123878A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2020102448A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018237378A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11274548B2 (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2022-03-15 | Sap Se | Workover rig scheduling to maximize oil production |
WO2023129784A1 (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2023-07-06 | Nabors Drilling Technologies Usa, Inc. | Rig task management |
US11808260B2 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2023-11-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Mud pump valve leak detection and forecasting |
US12000260B2 (en) | 2020-07-27 | 2024-06-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Monitoring and diagnosis of equipment health |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11041371B2 (en) | 2019-08-27 | 2021-06-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Adaptive probabilistic health management for rig equipment |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7440906B1 (en) * | 2001-09-04 | 2008-10-21 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Identification, categorization, and integration of unplanned maintenance, repair and overhaul work on mechanical equipment |
US20070142928A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2007-06-21 | Moughler Eric A | Process management system for work machine environments |
US8914267B2 (en) * | 2007-07-18 | 2014-12-16 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Systems and methods for diagnosing production problems in oil field operations |
US9324049B2 (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2016-04-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for tracking wellsite equipment maintenance data |
US10339478B2 (en) * | 2014-03-26 | 2019-07-02 | Ion Geophysical Corporation | Simultaneous operations coordination and planning system |
-
2018
- 2018-06-25 RU RU2020102448A patent/RU2020102448A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2018-06-25 US US16/624,480 patent/US20200123878A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2018-06-25 WO PCT/US2018/039245 patent/WO2018237378A1/en active Application Filing
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11274548B2 (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2022-03-15 | Sap Se | Workover rig scheduling to maximize oil production |
US11808260B2 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2023-11-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Mud pump valve leak detection and forecasting |
US12000260B2 (en) | 2020-07-27 | 2024-06-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Monitoring and diagnosis of equipment health |
WO2023129784A1 (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2023-07-06 | Nabors Drilling Technologies Usa, Inc. | Rig task management |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
RU2020102448A (en) | 2021-07-23 |
WO2018237378A1 (en) | 2018-12-27 |
RU2020102448A3 (en) | 2021-10-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20200123878A1 (en) | Systems and methods for scheduling and executing maintenance | |
US11093872B2 (en) | Systems and methods of ensuring and maintaining equipment viability for a task | |
EP3276549A1 (en) | Biometric-based resource allocation | |
March et al. | Predictive maintenance: strategic use of IT in manufacturing organizations | |
CA2831142C (en) | Maintenance system for aircraft fleet and method for planning maintenance | |
JP2019185292A (en) | Diagnosis service system utilizing network and diagnosis method | |
JP2006146928A (en) | Maintenance planning method and computer support system | |
US20110066898A1 (en) | Predictive analysis method for improving and expediting realization of system safety, availability and cost performance increases | |
KR101278428B1 (en) | Real-time collaborated enterprise asset management system based on condition-based maintenance and method thereof | |
Tao et al. | Short-term maintenance planning of autonomous trucks for minimizing economic risk | |
Meier et al. | Dynamic IPS2 networks and operations based on software agents | |
JP2016130928A (en) | Community management system, and method | |
JP6914701B2 (en) | Manufacturing material supply chain disruption management system | |
Kovacs et al. | A modified Weibull model for service life prediction and spare parts forecast in heat treatment industry | |
JP2005182558A (en) | Cost prediction/evaluation method | |
Frazzon et al. | Simulation-based performance evaluation of a concept for integrating intelligent maintenance systems and spare parts supply chains | |
US20150212809A1 (en) | Method for the Usage-Controlled Updating of a Software Product | |
Mohapatra | Improvised process for quality through quantitative project management: an experience from software development projects | |
Wakiru et al. | Maintenance objective selection framework applicable to designing and improving maintenance programs | |
KR20130000119A (en) | Apparatus and method for engine maintenance scheduling | |
JP6131528B2 (en) | Maintenance support device and maintenance support system | |
Neef et al. | Cyber-physical approach for integrated energy and maintenance management | |
CN110914842A (en) | Method and system for automatic maintenance of machines | |
Bowman et al. | How the Internet of Things will improve reliability tracking | |
Dér et al. | Concept for modeling and quantitative evaluation of life cycle dynamics in factory systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YEPEZ, JUAN-CARLOS;REEL/FRAME:051352/0029 Effective date: 20180815 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |